Google Green

The Big Picture FAQs

Has Google's carbon footprint been verified by a trusted third-party?

Yes, our carbon footprint has been verified by Cameron-Cole. You can view the verification statement here.

What was Google's carbon footprint in 2012?

In 2012 our net carbon footprint was zero. Before offsets, our gross 2012 carbon footprint was 1,519,787 metric tons of CO2e including green power purchase agreements (Scope 1: 37,187, Scope 2: 1,149,988, Scope 3: 332,612) and 2,024,444 metric tons of CO2e excluding green power purchase agreements (Scope 1: 37,187, Scope 2: 1,654,645, Scope 3: 332,612).

How do you account for green power purchases in your footprint?

Per new industry guidance, as of 2012, we’re now deducting our green power purchases from our footprint, which accounted for the drop in emissions from 2011 to 2012. We’ve also increased our renewable electricity purchases. We’re reporting our 2013 greenhouse gas emissions inventory both with and without green power purchase agreements.

What are Google’s carbon emissions per million dollars in revenue?

Our net carbon emissions per million dollars in revenue is zero. Our gross carbon footprint per million dollars in revenue was 31.8 metric tons in 2013. This continues the downward trend of our footprint growing more slowly than our business. This trend occurs even when we do not deduct our green power purchase agreements. In other words, Google is getting less carbon intensive. We've updated our gross carbon emissions per million dollars in revenue for 2012 to 33.0 to exclude Motorola Mobility revenue, as we report our carbon footprint separately, as discussed in the last question.

How do you calculate the percentage of renewables in Google’s total electricity mix?

This calculation includes three components: renewable electricity native to the grid, renewable electricity from green power purchase agreements and renewable electricity from on-site facilities. To calculate renewable power from the grid, we multiplied the electricity consumption of our various offices and data centers around the world by the percentage of renewables in that location. For US locations (excluding those associated with green power purchase agreements), our grid renewables data are from the EPA’s eGRID. For non-US locations, our grid renewables data are from the International Energy Agency. For our green power purchase agreements, we assume they are 100% renewable. Similarly, we assume our on-site renewable power generation is 100% renewable. We sum these three totals and divide them by our total power consumption, including on-site renewables.

What is the impact of Google’s purchases of renewable electricity?

In 2013, Google’s long-term agreements for renewable power produced 869,636 MWh. These contracts covered 23% of our total electricity consumption. We also obtain green power from the grid and on-site renewables, making the total share of renewables in our mix over 35%. Note that our green power purchase agreements are separate from our renewable energy project investments, as discussed in the next question.

What is the impact of Google’s renewable energy project investments?

Recently we passed $1.5 billion in agreements to fund renewable energy projects. The total nameplate capacity of all our renewable energy project investments is over 2.5 GW. These projects are expected to generate over 6 billion kWh annually—far more electricity than we consume (although we don’t purchase or consume this electricity ourselves). To provide context, this electricity is equivalent to that consumed by approximately 500,000 homes. This assumes that the average home uses 12,069 kWh per year, which comes from the EPA’s GPE calculator. Here are a few other ways to view this power in everyday terms:

  • Watch 90 billion one-hour episodes of your favorite TV show. This is based on the maximum energy use for a 42-inch Energy Star-rated TV.
  • Power the Sydney Opera House for 300 years. This is based on the Sydney Opera House using 18,525 MWh of electricity in the 2012-2013 season.
  • Travel around the planet almost 200,000 times in a car. This is based on a fuel economy of 28 miles per gallon for a Toyota Camry and using the GHG Protocol’s's estimate of 34.47 kWh per gallon of gasoline.
  • Power all the public elementary schools in New York, Oregon and Wyoming for one year. This is based on US Energy Information Administration and National Center for Education Statistics data that indicate an average consumption of 281,900 kWh per year per school building, an average of 3 buildings per school and that there are 6,367 public elementary schools in New York, Oregon and Wyoming.

We are actively searching out and signing new deals for renewable energy investment projects. Note that our renewable energy project investments are separate from our green power purchase agreements, as discussed in the previous question.

How does Google run its data centers with 50% less energy than a typical data center?

Data centers use energy to run the facility as well as to power the servers that do the work. Most data centers use almost as much non-computing or “overhead” energy (like cooling and power conversion) as they do to power their servers. At Google, we’ve reduced this overhead to only 12%. Additionally, we reduce the energy our servers use by designing our own servers, which we have optimized for the work they need to do. We’ve pulled out the components we don’t need, such as peripheral connectors and video cards. We've also efficiently redesigned the components we do need, like power supplies, voltage regulators modules and backup power systems. Combining our efficient servers and facilities, our data centers use 50% less energy than a typical data center.

How did you calculate the impact of Google’s transportation program?

We used an average commute distance for Googlers, the U.S. Department of Transportation's average fuel economy estimate of 23.5 miles per gallon and the Greenhouse Gas Protocol's estimated carbon content of 8.81 kg CO2 per US gallon of gasoline.

What assumptions are you using for the "1 month = 1 mile" calculation?

We estimate that Google uses the CO2 equivalent of driving one mile to serve an active user for one month. To calculate this, we used the following assumptions:

  • Our “active user”—which is not an average user—does 25 searches per day, watches 60 minutes of YouTube per day and has 1 active Gmail account. We’ve also accounted for their use of other Google products and services.
  • Our carbon intensity is 347 grams of CO2e per kWh of energy consumption. This is equal to our Scope 1 and Scope 2 carbon footprint of 1,286,626 metric tons CO2e divided by our total electricity consumption of 3,712,865 MWh.
  • We assumed a fuel economy of 33 miles per gallon, which is the fuel economy of a relatively fuel-efficient car, such as a Ford Focus. We converted this to a carbon emissions intensity using an assumption of 8.81 kg CO2 per US gallon of gasoline from the Greenhouse Gas Protocol.

How did you calculate the greenhouse gas emissions savings from Google Apps?

To estimate the savings from Google Apps for Enterprise, we took our active users of this product and estimated the emissions before and after switching to Google Apps. We used the public Cloud Energy and Emissions Research Model developed by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and Northwestern University. Except for the number of users, we used the same assumptions as those described in this paper.

Do you emit and track biogenic carbon emissions?

We produce and track a small amount (less than 1% of our footprint) of biogenic emissions—emissions from biologically based sources like plants, animals or waste. These emissions are released via the landfill gas cogeneration facility we operate on our Mountain View campus and the biodiesel we use in our shuttles. Biogenic emissions are often excluded from an entity's compliance footprint (e.g. these California regulations) because they are part of the natural carbon cycle. The natural carbon cycle takes carbon out of the atmosphere on the front end (as opposed to using fossil fuels) and results in emissions that would have happened anyway. For example, the landfill gas we use to generate power would have otherwise been flared, resulting in the same emissions. Or it would have vented directly as methane which would have an even higher greenhouse gas impact. While we track our biogenic emissions, we do not include them in our footprint.

What about Motorola Mobility?

We’re reporting our carbon footprint separately from Motorola Mobility LLC because we operate the companies independently. Motorola Mobility’s carbon footprint, including its verification statement, is available on their website.