Střípky
Last edited July 18, 2008
More by jilm »
Utilitarianism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism
Marx's accusation is twofold. In the first place, he says that the theory of utility is true by definition and thus does not really add anything meaningful.
In defense of dangerous ideas :: CHICAGO SUN-TIMES :: Other Views
www.suntimes.com/news/otherviews/469317,CST-CONT-d...
And if currently popular ideas about how to improve the environment are shown to be ineffective, it only highlights the need to know what would be effective.
 

The Ticket Inspector

Scene A compartment on a train
Characters A passenger on a train
A ticket inspector
A steward and a waiter

The passenger is sitting in a compartment on a train. He is reading a
newspaper. The steward opens the door.

Steward Coffee!

Passenger No, thanks.

The passenger closes the door, and continues reading. The waiter opens the door.

Waiter Seats for dinner!

Passenger No, thanks.

The passengers closes the door again, and continues reading. The ticket inspector opens the door.

Inspector Tickets!

Passenger No, thanks.

Inspector Pardon?

Passenger I don't want a ticket, thank you.

Inspector I'm not selling a ticket, thank you, sir.

Passenger No?

Inspector No, I want to see your ticket.

Passenger Oh, I haven't got a ticket.

Inspector You haven't got a ticket?

Passenger No. I never buy a ticket.

Inspector Why not?

Passenger Well, they are very expensive, you know.

Inspector Sir, you're travelling on a train. When people travel on a train, they always buy a ticket.

Passenger Er -

Inspector And this is a first-class compartment.

Passenger Yes, it is very nice, isn't it?

Inspector No, sir. I mean: This is a first-class compartment. When people travel in a first-class compartment, they always buy a first-class ticket.

They look at each other for a moment.

Passenger No, they don't.

Inspector What?

Passenger A lot of people buy tickets. The Queen doesn't buy a ticket, does she? Eh? Eh?

Inspector No, sir, but she's a famous person.

Passenger And what about you? Where's yours?

Inspector Mine?

Passenger Yes, yours. Your ticket. Have you got a ticket?

Inspector Me, sir?

Passenger Yes, you.

Inspector No, I haven't got a ticket.

Passenger Ooh - are you a famous person?

Inspector (Flattered) Famous? Well, not very - (Back to normal) Sir, I am a ticket inspector. I inspect ticket.

Passenger I see.

The ticket inspector puts his hand into his pocket.

Passenger What are you going to do?

Inspector I'm going to write your name in my book.

Passenger Oh.

Inspector What is your name, sir?

Passenger Mickey Mouse.

The inspector begin to write.

Inspector Mickey -

Passenger Mouse. M-O-U-S-E.

The inspector stops writing.

Inspector Your name, sir?

Passenger Eason Chan, Nicolas Tse, Tung Chee Hwa..

Inspector I see, sir. Well, if you're not going to tell me your name, please leave the train.

Passenger Pardon?

Inspector Leave the train.

Passenger I can't.

Inspector You can't what?

Passenger I can't leave the train.

Inspector Why not?

Passenger It's moving.

Inspector Not now, sir. At the next station.

Passenger Oh.

Inspector It's in the book, sir. When you travel by train, you buy a ticket, and if you don't buy a ticket, you -

Passenger leave the train.

Inspector leave the train.

Inspector Here we are, sir. We're coming to a station. Please leave the train now.

Passenger Now?

Inspector Yes, sir. I'm sorry, but -

Passenger Oh, that's O.K.

Inspector - it's in the book, and - What did you say?

Passenger I said: 'That's O.K.'

Inspector O.K.?

Passenger Yes, this is my station. Goodbye.

The passenger leaves the train.

The end

Billova alergie odpověd | Vše co tě napadne!
weryk.blog.cz/0605/billova-alergie-odpoved

Billova alergie odpověd

neděle 16:44 | Weryk | Tokio Hotel

Jak tak koukám, tak zatím skoro nikdo nevěděl na co má Bill alergii- je to opravdu na JABLKA+ ŠTÍPNUTÍ HMYZEM!!!!!! Ten kdo odpověděl na jablka, nebo na št. hmyzem ho zná jen zpoloviny.

Niam - čokoláda. 
Trompe l'oeil | Free exchange | Economist.com
www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2007/06/tromp...
  • A little bit off the main topic, there is another possible way of interpreting these figures: a necessary (but not sufficient) condition for making it into the club of really rich countries is to be either (a) small or (b) a robust federation:

    Norway (4.6 million)
    US (average 6 million per State)
    Eire (4.1 million)
    Denmark (5.5 million)
    Canada (average 3.3 million per Province)
    Austria (8.3 million); and
    Switzerland (7.5 million, or 0.3 million per canton. Switzerland's result would be 10% higher if GNI were used instead of GDP.)


    This is not statistical analysis. I mention it only because it's consistent with what one might expect from economic theory: large centralised governments, like all large monopolies, promote rent-seeking and reduce output. The larger the government, the larger (or more prolonged) the misallocation of resources that can occur before it becomes intolerable.


    Of course, there are also economies of scale in running countries. But with supranational organisation like the EU, EFTA and NAFTA providing many of the free-trade and coordination benefits previously available only in the internal markets of single polities, should we not expect to see a reduction in the optimal size of polities?

    Posted by Stephen Morris at July 3, 2007 11:43 AM
  • The content on this page is provided by a Google Notebook user, and Google assumes no responsibility for this content.