^•

Vividness:

actors attend more to events, actions, or situations, etc., which are conspicuous or vivid (see: Availability bias);

^•

Representativeness:

people tend to classify objects, people, events, etc., by the degree of (ostensible) resemblance with a class, group, or category – thereby, on occasion, obscuring or overriding taking relevant information such as base rates into account, and leading to errors such as the Conjunction fallacy;

^•

Stereotypes:

an unfortunate concomitant to making ‘quick and dirty’ (simplistic) judgements about people such as “he’s old or Irish” or “she’s a neat writer or a good runner” auto-matically ‘credits’ a cache of other attributes, many of which may be quite mistaken about the category and will be inappropriate for the particular case at hand;

^•

Sample size:

giving too little attention to or not placing sufficient importance upon considering an adequate sample when making decisions about a group, class, or category (especially of people as they will typically exhibit substantial variability);

^•

Mistaking co-incidence:

actors can find it difficult to make a good ‘ballpark’ estimate about co-incidences and frequently fail to bring to bear applicable background information so as to enable the event to be seen in a proper context;

^•

Order:

a penchant for creating ‘order’ even when it does not exist, for example, as in the Gambler's fallacy – the feeling that after a fair coin has fallen ‘heads’ eight times in a row that the next toss is bound to redress the balance;

^•

Overconfidence:

people’s weakness of (usually) having a great deal more confidence in their judgements than the circumstances reveal is warranted, for instance, in our replies to a general knowledge quiz (“is absinthe a drink or a precious stone”) in which we correctly answer, say, 65% of questions while being confident our results will show us right in 90% of cases.

†

Retrieval

The act of recalling or remembering information previously acquired or learnt.