CA1117796A

CA1117796A - Bonding of bone to materials presenting a high specific area, porous, silica-rich surface

Info

Publication number: CA1117796A
Application number: CA000323788A
Authority: CA
Inventors: Larry L. Hench; Michael M. Walker
Original assignee: University of Texas System
Current assignee: University of Texas System
Priority date: 1978-04-05
Filing date: 1979-03-20
Publication date: 1982-02-09
Also published as: DE2910335A1; AU522940B2; GB2020197A; JPS54135496A; FR2421595A1; AU4515579A; GB2020197B; JPS6247546B2; US4171544A; DE2954180C2; FR2421595B1; DE2910335C2; NL7902497A

Abstract

BONDING OF BONE TO MATERIALS PRESENTING A HIGH
SPECIFIC AREA, POROUS, SILICA-RICH SURFACE

Abstract of The Disclosure Compositions possessing a porous, high specific area, silica-rich surface, or capable of developing such a surface in vivo, form strong bonds with bone tissue. These compositions are thus excellent materials for dental and surgical implants, or the coatings thereof. Examples of such compositions include highly porous glasses and glass-ceramics comprising at least about 80 weight percent silicon dioxide, hardened inorganic cements such as Portland cement and known silicon dioxide-based biologically active glasses and glass-ceramics. Neither calcium, sodium nor phosphorus compounds are necessary ingredients. Cements which develop the above described surface characteristics in vivo form a strong bond with both bone and implant when used in the fixation of dental and surgical implants, especially those made or coated with a biologically active silicon dioxide-based glass or glass-ceramic.

Description

lli~6 , Bac~ground of the Invention Biologically active silicon dioxide (silica)-based glasses and glass-ceramics are known to the art. These materials are characterized by their ability to form a direct chemical bond of excellent strength with bone in vivo. The bond strength is not strongly dependent upon the degree of crystallinity of the bio-logically active material. ~owever, the use of a partially or fully crystal~ized glass-ceramic is often preferred because devi-trification increases the strength of the biologically active 1~ material itself. It has been proposed to construct a variety of dental and surgical implants for cement-free implantation from these biologically active glasses and glass-ceramics and of stronger materials such as aluminum oxide and surgical implant alloys coated therewith. The silica-basea biologically active glasses and glass-ceramics of the prior art generally contain about 40 to 60 weightpercent silica as the network former plus substantial levels of soluble modifiers such as sodium oxide, potassium oxide, calcium oxide, magnesium oxide, phosphorus pentoxide, lithium oxide and calcium fluoride. Boron oxide may be substituted for some of the silicon dioxide. A particularly preferred composition of the prior art, designated as composition 45S5, contains 45 weight percent silicon dioxide, 24.5 weight percent sodium oxide, 24.5 weight percent calcium oxide, and 6 weight percent phosphorus pentoxide.
The chemical bond between a biologically active glass or glass-ceramic material and bone is to be distinguished from the mechanicaltype of bond formed by the ingrowth and interlocking of bone tissue within a macroscopically porous implant surface. Until now, it has been generally believed that a biologically active glass or glass-ceramic material possesses its activity because of its sur~ace reactivity in physiological solutions. That is, soluble ions such as the sodium and calcium ions are selectively leached from the glass or glass-ceramic material, thereby causing the surrounding physiological fluid to become more alkaline. The alkaline solu-tion then attacks the glass or glass-ceramic material, forming a silica gel layer thereon. It is to this silica gel layer, according to this proposed mechanism, that the fresh growing bone bonds lHench, L.L., Splinter, R.J., Allen, W.C. and Greenlee, T. K., J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Symp., No. 2 (Part I), pp. 117-141 ~1971);
Hench, L.L. and Paschall, H.A., Biomed. Mater. Res. SYmp., No. 4, pp. 25-42 ~1973); Hench, L.L. and Paschall, H.A., J. Biomed. Mater.
~es. Symp., No. 5 (Part I~, pp. 49-64 ~1974); Piotrowski, G., ~ench, L.L., Allen W.C. and ~liller, G.J., J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Symp., ~o. ~, pp. 47-61 (1975); Clark, A.E., Hench, L.L. and Paschall, H.A., J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 10, pp. 161-174 (1976); U.S. Patent 3,919,723; U.S. Patent 3,922,155; U.S. Patent 3,981,736; U.S.
Patent 3,987,499; U.S. Patent 4,031,571].
It is of course known to achieve the fixation of dental or surgioal implants to the bone of the recipient by utilizing organlc resin cements such as polymethylmethacrylate. However, there are known disadvantages in the use of such cements related to reactivity in vivo, toxicity, and loosening of the fixation. It is also known to strengthen an implant resin cement by incorporating therein various types of reinforcing material including particles of glass tsee e.g. U.S. Patent 3,919,773). Glass reinforced hardened inorganic cements (e.g. Portland cement) are also known (see U.S. Patent 3,147,127).
Summary of the Invention A novel dental or surgical implant having a surface for bonding to the bone of a recipient has now been discovered in which said bonding surface comprises a biologically compatible glass, glass-ceramic or ceramic material comprising at least about 80 weight percent silicon dioxide and having a specific surface area of at least about 80 square meters per gram, a porosity of from about 10 to about 50 volume percent, and an average pore diameter of from about 20 to about 300 Angstroms.

, _ The present invention also includes a dental or surgical implant havino a surface for bonding to the bone of a recipient in which said bonding surface comprises a biologically c~mpatible inorganic material of adequate physical chara-'eristics for the intended use, other than a silicon dioxide - based glass or glass-ceramic containing less than about 80 weight percent silicon dioxide, that is capable of developing a porous silica-rich surface layer having a specific surface area of at least about 80 square meters per gram wi~hin about 10 daysl exposure to aqueous tris-(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane buffer at a pH of 7.2 and a tempera-ture of 37~C. Materials contem~lated within this second aspeçt of the invention include certain ceramics and hardened inorganic cements, e.g., Portland cement.
Additionally, the present invention includes an improvement to a process for fixing a dental or surgical implant to bone com-prising placing a wet cement between the surface of the bone and implant and allowing said cement to harden. Said improvement com-prises using a biologically compatible inorganic cement which, in the hardened state, is capable of developing a porous silica-rich surface layer having a specific surface area of at least about 80 square meters per gram within about 10 days' exposure to aqueous tris~hydroxymethyl~aminomethane buffer at a pH of 7.2 and a temperature of 37C. Portland cement is one inorganic cement whicn may be used. In a preferred embodiment of this improvemen~, the wet cement is mixed with particles of a biolog-ically active silicon dioxide - based glass or glass-ceramic. In another preferred embodiment, the bonding surface of said implant in contact with said inorganic cement comprises a biologically active silicon-dioxide - based g~ass or glass-ceramic.
Detailed Description o the Invention We have now surprisingly discovered that biologically active silica-based glass and glass-ceramic materials fabricated by standard casting and crystallization techniques bond strongly to bone by virtue of their ability to develop in vivo a porous silica-rich surface layer havinq at least a minimum specific_surface area. Silica-based glass and glass-ceramic materials which do not develop a surface layer in vivo with the above characteristics generàlly form poor chemical bonds, or none at all, with bone. The high area silica-rich surface layer (roughly about 25 to 10~ microns thic~) apparently provides a vast number of sites for deposition and interaction of various of the organic and inorganic components of healing bone. In vivo ~iological activity may be predicted by a convenient in vitro test. Thus, a silica-based glass or glass-. .
ceramic will bond strongly to bone in vivo if it is capable ofdeveloping a porous silica-rich surface layer having a specific surface area of at least about 80 square meters per gram of said ~ayer within about ten days' exposure to aqueous tris(hydroxymethyl)-aminomethane buffer at a pH of 7.2 and a temperature of 37C.
Table I presents data on a series of non-porous glasses of the silicon dioxide-calcium oxide- sodium oxide - phosphorus pentoxide system. Biological activity is strongly dependent upon silicon dioxide content, but less dependent upon the contents of the other three components. For a calcium oxide: sodium oxide weight ratio of about 0.4 to about 2.5 and a phosphorus pentoxide content of 6 weight percent, the boundary line of biological activity was observed to fall between about 54 and 58 weight percent silicon dioxide. This boundary range drops to about 4;
to 55 weight percent silicon dioxide when phosphorus pentoxide is eliminated. Replacement of sodium oxide by potassium oxide has little effect on biological activity. Silicon dioxide-sodium oxide glasses containing more than about 78 weight percent silicon diox~de did not bond to bone. Neither did essentially pure silicon R 11~7796 _ .
E~
m ~ O O UO C O O rr, -r, ^r, U
C O O O '1 0 ~ D o1~ o c r ~
C: ~U~ I V
~1 ~ O ~ O 1` O~
I`a~ ,~ ~ _I ~ In g lC

m c gl~ , ,. I ~1~ .

E~ ' _ OP .

o O o o o o o o o o o O O

~1 ~r o ~ o o o ~ o ~r ~ ~
~n ~ . . . . . . . . . . O O . O O O O

C~ o ~- ~ O ~ u~ o C~...... ... ... O ...
0 ~ ~ O C~ n o ~ o 0 Z _I~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _I

O ~ O ~ c~ ~ ~ ~<~Ic~ -IQ t~ . . . . . . O o o o _~ ~ I~ o ~ ~~ O ~ ~ _~
O ~ ~ ~I ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~I

O
~ ~ cc~ w o _I o a~ co o ~r ~ ~ ~ ~ o O O ~ ~ ~ ~ o COCO~--U~U~ ~ ~ ~ CO

R
-E~
. ~
_ t`
~ O
J
G~ C~ Q.
O ~C CG
~ ~ o o n H ~ ~ ~
~J CO
S~ _1 ~0 ~'S . C~ 3 O
o ~ æ
~ a ~
O O

t., C
.~ X C
~ O ~
C 1 ~ H

H P ~ ~ ~ ~ .
e) . ~
.H ~
I~ o 0 E~
~ Q. 4~
O . o o 0 hi ,~
. ~1 . E~

ol ~; ~ ~l u , ,05 ~ :
. o3~ o o D ~ o~O ~ ~1 ~ O

a Q !3 o C ~
~ ~ ~ X ~1 g rl~ ._ .
O C~
~` I O C~ ~ h ~? ~ ~ o d O ~ o U~ 1~ ~Y
tn Z ~ ~ ~ o u~ o ~
_l ~ ~ S ~ Ul O ,_, ~,? I C) o ~ ~ ~ ,~ ,4 c O ~ _I .t h ~ h o ~ o ~ ~ 8 a ~ r~
l ~ c~ .
æ o~ O O a~ _ _ ,~

11~779~

dioxide qlass. The glasses of Table I were prepared by melting a mix of reagent grade calcium, sodium and potassium carbonates, phosphorus pentoxide and 5 micron silicon dioxide powders at about 1200 - 1500C., casting disc shaped samples and then annealing said samples at about 450 - 700C. 4 X 4 X 1 mm. implants were then prepared for the rat tibial mini push out test for in vivo bonding to bone described below. Table I shows the strong dependence of biological activity on surface area developed n vitro. Thus, if a non-porous glass~f this system contains too much SiO2, it will not be able, as indicated by the in vitro test, to develop an adequate surface layer in vivo to bond to bone. The surface area numbers were obtained by the B.E.T. nitrogen adsorption method on critical point (CO2) dried glass samples and are expressed as times increase. Independent direct measurements of surface area indicate that a 1,000-fold surface area increase for the total sample is equivalent to generation of a specific surface area of about 80 square meters per gram of dry surface layer material.
The presence or absence of bonding with bone was determined using the known rat tibial mini push out test. This test utilizes the following procedure. Implants of dimensions 4 x 4 x 1 mm are fabricated for each composition tested. ~ach is wet polished using 180, 320 and 600 grit silicon carbide polishing discs. A final dry polishing with a 600 grit disc is followed by ultrasonic cleaning in reagent grade acetone for two minutes. The implants are then wrapped in surgical drapes and gas sterilized with ethylene dioxide. Male Sprague-Dawley rats in the 150 to 300 g mass range are used as the test animal. Sodium pentabarbital is administered intra-peritoneally to anesthetize the animal. A
quantity of 0.1 cc atropine is in~ected subcutaneously to prevent bronchial congestion. An incision is made on the anterior surface of the left hind leg from the knee to midway down the tibia. ~he peroneal muscles on the lateral aspect of the tibia are cut away from the bone at their origin. The anterior tibialis and common extensors are separated from the medial portion of the tibia. A
Hall I~ drill driven by compressed nitrogen gas with a carbide tip ~ental burr is used to form a slot in the lateral and medial cortices of the anterior ~order of the tibia. The implants are inserted into this defect and the incision closed. The relat~ve dimensions or the im~lant and the tibia are such that the i~plant protrudes slightly on either side of the tibia after implantation. ~esting for bonding with bone 30 days after implantation provides a relia~le test for bonding ability. After sacrifice, the test t~biae are excised from each anlmal and cleaned of adhering soft tissues. The area over the exposed ends o~ each implant is examined and cleaned of boney overgrowths. This is done to prevent undue mechanical interference. The mecha~ical 1~ integrity of the bond is then tested. ~lodified sponge forceps are used to apply a push ou~ load of approximately 30 Newtons onto the implant~ If the implant resists dislodgement under the applied load, then it is deemed to have passed the mini push out test for bonding. If any movement is observed between the implant and the surrounding bone, then it is considered to have failed the bond test.
E~en more surprising is the discovery that bone bonds strongly to any inorganic biologically com2atible material, including but not limited to silicon dioxi~e - based glasses and glass-ceramics, that either possesses before implan~a-ion a porous silica-rich surface layer having at least a minim~ sp2cific surface area or develops a surface layer in vivo of the a~ove nature The unifying char-acteristic of these biologically ac~ive ~i.e., capable of forming a strong chemical bond _ vivo wi~h bone) materi~ls is the avail-ability to the growing bone o- the required high surface area, porous, silica-rich surfac~ layer. Except to the extent that soluble modifiers mzy contribute to the development in vivo of the _g_ , ~117796 . .

requisite surface layer, neither calcium, sodium nor phosphorous compounds are necessary ingredients in a biologically active material. Biological activity may be predicted by B.E.T. nitrogen adsorption analysis of the material itself or, if the requisite surface layer is developed in vivo, of a sample treated according to the in v tro test described above. The surface area is expressed herein in units of square meters per gram of surface layer material on a dry basis. A surface area of 80 square meters per gram may be developed, depending on the material tested, within as little as six ~ours. When a biologically active material con-tains both soluble calcium ions and soluble ions containing phos-phorus and oxygen, calcium phospha~e or related compounds may deposit ~uickly upon the outermost portions of the silica-rich surface layer both in vivo and in the in vitro test described above.
This deposition is generally formed from ions generated by the bio-logically active material itself and appears to benefit in vivo activity. The presence of such a deposition does not substantially affect the results of B.E.T. analysis in terms of increase in surface area after reaction.
As defined in this application the term glass refers to a primarily vitreous inorganic material, while the term glass-ceramic refers to a glass which is from about 20 to lO0 volume percent devitrified. The term cement refers to a composition which may be used to fasten different articles together by virtue of its ability to harden. The term ceramic refers to a polycrystalline ceramic material other than a glass-ceramic.
It is important to distinguish the chemical bond between bone and a bi~logically active material from the mechanical bond caused by the interlocking of growing bone tissue within large (about 10 to 200 microns) surface pores of certain known implant matexials.
The direct chemical bond witn bone of the biologically active materials described herein is caused by chemical forces, and is defined broadly to include primary (e.g., ionic, covalent, epitaxial) 1~7796 and secondary (e.g., van der Waals, hydrogen bond, London dispersion force) chemical bonds. ~he porosity of the requisite silica-rich surface layer is of a different nature from that existing in implants relying on a mechanical interlock for bonding to bone. For S substantial ingrowth of hard tissue to occur a pore diameter of at least about 50 microns is required. In the present invention however the active silica-rich surface layer generally has pore diameters no larger than about 3,000 Angstroms, which is too small for substantial ingrowth of growing bone tissue to occur. The present invention is thus not subject to the known disadvantage of mechanical interlock into a porous substrate, i.e. the strength reduction resulting from the void fraction left unoccupied by the growing bone.
As used in this application the term dental implants refers to, or example, artificial teeth, crowns, inlays, etc. The term surgical implan~s refers to bone pins, bone plates, bone re-placement prostheses, prosthetic devices such as hip and other joint prostheses, or any other surgical implant or prosthesis which must be bound directly to the bone of the recipient. It will of course be required that the biologically active material employed in any particular instance be ~iologically compatible and have adequate physical characteristics, such as strength, abrasion resis-tance, fatigue resistance, elastic modulus, ductility, etc., for the intended use. As used in this application the term biologically - compatible means that the material is benign or non-toxic in the in vivo biological system in which it is to be employed, and does not adversely interfere with the bone growth process. The last entry in Table I shows that, at least in certain circumstances, replacement of calcium oxide with magnesium oxide can render a silica-bas~d material biologically inco~patible, possibly because the Ca:~g ratio in the surrounding body fluids is substantially altered.
The entire bonding surface of an implant, i.e.

1~17796 ' ' ' ~

the surface in contact with the bone of the recipient for bonding thereto, must ~e biologically compatible. In some cases, however, some of said bonding surface may be biologically compatible but inactive. Thus, for example, the scope of the present inventio~
includes an implant made of or coated with a phase-separated glass or glass-ceramic material, with both active (high surface area developed in vivo) and inactive ~low surface area developed in vivo) regions present, even though the overall average of the specific surface area develo'ped in vitro by such a material may be less than about 80 square meters per gram. The present invention also includes an implant wherein a portion of the surface thereof in contact with the bone of the recipient is, e.g., a biologically compatible but inactive metal or ceramic.
As one aspect of the invention described herein the bonding surface o a dental or surgical implant comprises a biologically compatible glass, glass-ceramic or ceramic materiaI comprising at least about 80 weight percent silicon dioxide and having a specific surface area of at least about 80 square meters per gram, a porosity of from about 10 to about 50 volume percent and an average pore diameter of from about 20 to about 300 Angstroms, with some pores being as large as about 3,000 Angstroms in diameter. It is to be noted that the indicated surface properties are present in the surface material itself before in vivo implantation. Thus, it is not necessary that the material be surface reactive or subject to preferential leaching in physiological solutions. This obser-vation is quite surprising and unexpected. The advantages of using a glass, glass-ceramic or ceramic of this aspect of the invention are low cost and the fact that only low amounts (or 11~7~
virtually none) of ionic materials are leached into the body from such a material. It is not necessary that the materials of this aspect of the invention contain compounds of either calcium or phosphorus. There-fore, one group of said materials consists of those containing, on an elemental basis, less than about 1 weight percent calcium and less than about 0.1 weight percent phosphorus. Another group of said materials consists of those comprising at least Ah~ut 95 weight percent silicon dioxide, less than about 1 weight percent calcium and less than about 0.1 weight percent phosphorus. In another e:txxlimcnt said m~terial, preferably a glass, comprises at least about 80 weight percent silicon dioxide and up to about 20 weight percent boron oxide. An example of a useful biologically active material is Thirsty Glass (Corning Glass Wbrks, Corning, New York) a highly porous glass consisting essentially of silicon dioxide and borDn oxide. m irsty Glass is the acid leached product of the original phase separated borosilicate glass from which it is made.
A surgical or dental implant of the aspect of the invention under discussion may be a unitary glass, glass-ceramic or ceramic implant, or comprised of a substrate material coated with the biologi-cally active material, or possess any other known type of configuration.
Xncwn methods of casting, crystallizing and sintering may be employed to make unitary implants such as artificial teeth. When greater strength is nePded than would be provided by the biologically active material ~ se, kncwn m thods of coating a metal (~ . Vitallium, trademark of Howmedica Inc., New York, N.Y.), non-biologically active ceramic or other substrate may be employed, such as firing techniques, flame spraying, etc. A particularly advantageous method of coating an alumina substrate with a biologically active glass or glass-ceramic is disclosed in commDnly assigned U.S. patent No. 4,103,002, A
particularly advantageous method of coating an alloy substrate with a biologically active glass or glass-c~x~mic ma~rial is disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 4,103,002, ~hen a glass- oe ramic coatLng is desired bhz X - 13 ~

11177~6 the devitrification may be effected either before or after the coating is applied to the substrate, according to known techniques. An implant comprising a e.g. borosilicate glass body or coating wherein the surface only of said body or coating has been leached to render said surface biologically active is within the scope of the present invention.
In another aspect of the present invention the bonding surface of a dental or surgical implant comprises any biologically compatible inorganic material, other than a silicon dioxide - based glass or glass-ceramic containing less than about 80 weight percent silicon dioxide (some of these being known), which is capable of developing a porous silica-rich surface layer having a specific surface area of at least about 80 square meters per gram within about 10 days' exposure according to the in vitro test described earlier.
Such a material may be, for example, a hardened inorganic cement, a ceramic, a glass, a glass-ceramic, or fall within any other classification of inorganic material. The fact that in the case of Portland cement, for example, the sur-face layer developed in vivo contains significant amounts ofother inorganic oxides (i.e., alumina and iron oxide) as well as silica, does not remove implants comprised thereof from within the scope of this invention. An example of a biolog-ically compatible hardened inorganic cement is Portland cement, which has the composition (dry basis):
SiO2 2~ 24 weight percent e2 3 2 - 4 weight percent A12O3 1 - 14 weight percent CaO 60 - 65 weight percent MgO 1 ~ 4 weight percent SO3 1 - 1.8 weight percent and a specific surface area (hardened) of over 200 sq. meters per gram. The implant may e.g. be unitary or comprise a jb/ ~ - 14 -substrate of another material such as a non-biologically active ceramic, organic polymer, plastic or metal (e.g. Vitallium, trademark of Howmedica Inc., New York, N.Y.) ooated with a biologically active material, e.g. a ceramic or cement. Processes known to the art for nE~cing unitary articles of cements, ceramics or other materials, or for coating substrate materials therewith, or for making any other oonfiguration useful as an implant may be used in the practice of this aspect of the invention. When the implant comprises hardened inorganic cement, the hardening of the cement may occur before or after implanta-tion. Thus, in one enixxl~ent of the invention a bone replacement prosthesis is made by inserting wet cement into a cavity in the bone of the recipient formed by rem~val of diseased or damaged bane, molding the cement to the desirea shape and then allowing the cement to harden in situ.
In still another aspect of the present invention a surgical or den~1 implant is bonded to bone by using a wet haraenable inorganic cenent. The bonding surface of the implant, i.e. the surface in oantact with said cement for b~nding to the bone of the recipient, preferably ocmprises a biologi~lly active silicon dioxide-based glass or glass-ceramic. The cement is one which, in the hardened state, is capable of developing a porous silica-rich surface layer having a specific surfa oe area of at least about 80 sguare meters per gram within about 10 days' exposure acoording to the In vitro test described earlier.
~ecause the cement develops the biologically active, high specific area, porous, sili Q -rich surface layer as it hardens in VlVD, it forms a very strong bond with bone. It also forms a v~ry strong bond with the biologically active glass or glass-ceramic surface of the implant, if such a surface is utilized. m e hardened cement material is, of oourse, stnang in its own right, m us, the problems associated with the use of polymethylmethacrylate resin cements may be reduced, i.e,~ the problems of toxicity jb/ cz X - 15 -~il7796 loosening and reactivity in vivo. In another preferred embodiment the cement is reinforced with particles of a ~iologically active silicon dioxide - based glass or glass-ceramic, not only to increase its strength ~ se, ~ut also to improve the respective strengths of the bone to cement and implant ~when biologically active as described above) to cement bonds.
The following examples illustrate the invention but are not to be construed as limiting ~he same.
E ~IPLE 1 Implants of Thirsty Glass (Corning Glass Works, Corning, New Yor~) of 4 x 4 x 1 mm. were made and wet polished with 320 and 600 grit silicon carbide polishing discs. They were then ultrasonically cleaned in distilled water and sterilized by boiling. The ~hirsty Glasa sample used consis~ed of abo~t 96 wei~ht percent silicon dio~ide and 4 weight percent boron oxide, and had a specific surface area of 200 s~uare meters per gram, a porosity of 28 volume percent and an average poré
diameter of 40 Angstroms. ~he implants were tested for bonding to bone in vivo by means of the rat tibial mlni pushout procedure Xnown to the art. ~o bonding was observed ~etween bone and implants at either 11 or 18 days after imp~an.ation.
After 40 days of implantation, however, two implants out of two passed the mini pushout test for bonding. One of Lhese implants was sectioned, and microscopic examination showed that a direct chemical bond had formed between the Thirsty Glass implant and the healing bone.
E~'`!P~E 2 The dry Portland ce~ent used in this experiment was ~merican Society for Testing ~aterials Type II Portland cement. Harde~ed samples 7ere made by adding water to cement at a water to ~11~7g6 cement ratio of 0.4 and allowing the mix to harden for about two weeks to thirty days. After hardening, 4 x 4 x 1 mm. implants were fabricated from the cement. These were wet polished using 320 and 600 grit silicon carbide polishing discs. The implants were then rinsed in distilled water and allowed to remain in the rinse solution until implanted. In vi~o testing for bonding to bone was performed using the rat tibial mini pushout procedure known to the art. No bonding was observed after 10 and 13 days implantation. After 28 days implantation, however, two sa~ples out of two passed the mini pushout test for bonding. After 69 days implantation one sample out of one passed the mini pushout test. After 92 days implantation one sam?le out of one passed the mini pushout tes~ Qualitative mechanical testing of the im?lant-bone junction after 92 days showed fracture within the bone or the implant but not at the interface between the materials. Microscopic examination showed a direct chemical bond between the prehardened Portland cement implants and the healing bone.

Claims

THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:

1. A dental or surgical implant having a surface for bonding to the bone of a recipient, said bonding surface comprising a biologically compatible inorganic material capable of developing a porous silica-rich surface layer having a specific surface area of at least about 80 square meters per gram within about ten days' exposure to aqueous tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane buffer at a pH of 7.2 and a temperature of 37°C, said material being other than a silicon dioxide - based glass or glass-ceramic containing less than about 80 weight percent silicon dioxide.

2. An implant of Claim 1 wherein said material is a hardened inorganic cement.

3. An implant of Claim 2 wherein said cement is hardened Portland cement.

4. An implant of Claim 1 wherein said material is a ceramic.