CA1168176A - Carbo-metallic oil conversion - Google Patents

Abstract

ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE

A process for economically converting carbo-metallic oils to lighter products includes providing a converter feed containing 650°F+ material, the 650°F+ material being characterized by a carbon residue on pyrolysis of at least about 1 and by containing at least about 4 parts per million of Nickel Equivalents of heavy metal(s).
The converter feed is brought together with a cracking catalyst to form a stream comprising a suspension of the catalyst in the feed, and the resultant stream is caused to flow through a progressive flow type reactor having an elongated reaction chamber which is at least in part vertical or inclined for a pre-determined vapor riser residence time in the range of about 0.5 to about 10 seconds at a temperature of about 900 to about 1400°F
and under a pressure of about 10 to about 50 pounds per square inch absolute sufficient for causing a conversion per pass in the range of about 50% to about 90% while producing coke in amounts in the range of about 6 to about 14% by weight based on fresh feed, and laying down coke on the catalyst in amounts in the range of about 0.3 to about 3% by weight.
The catalyst is ballistically separated from the stream of hydrocarbons formed by vaporized feed and resultant cracking products in the reaction chamber by projecting catalyst particles in a direction established by the elongated reaction chamber or an extension thereof, the products being caused to make an abrupt change of direction relative to the direction in which the catalyst particles are projected.
Adsorbed hydrocarbons are stripped from the separated catalyst, which is then regenerated with oxygen-containing combustion-supporting gas under conditions of time, temperature and atmosphere sufficient to reduce the carbon on the catalyst to about 0.25% by weight or less, while forming gaseous combustion product gases comprising CO and/or CO2.
The regenerated catalyst is recycled to the reactor for contact with fresh feed.

Description

B~CICGr~OUND OF THE INV~l`lTION

In general, gasoline and other liquid hydrocarbon fuels boil in the range-of about 100 to about 650F, However, the crude oil from which these fuels are made contains a diverse mi~ture of hydrocarbons and other compounds which vary widely in molecular weight and therefore boil over a wide range.
For example, crude oils are known in which 30 to 60~ or more of the total volume of oil is composed of compounds boiling at temperatures above 650F. Among these are crudes in which about 10~ to about 30~ or more oE the total volume consists of compounds so heavy in molecular weignt that they boil above 1025F or at least will not boil below 1025F at atmospheric pressure.
L5 Because these relatively abundant hiyh boiling components of crude oil are unsuitable for inclusion in gasoline and other liquid hydrocarbon Euels, the petroleum refining industry has developed processes for cracking or breaking the molecules of the high molcular weight, high boiling compounds into smaller molecules which do boil over an appropriate boiling range. The cracking process which is most widely used for this purpose is -known as fluid catalytic cracking (FCC). Although the FCC process has reached a highly advanced state, and many modified forms and ~riations have been developed, thei.r unifying factor is that a vaporized hydrocarbon feedstock is caused to crack at an elevated temperature in contact with a cracking catalyst that is suspended in the feedstock vapors. Upon attainment of the desired degree of molecular weight and boiling point reduction the catal~st is separated from the desired products, ~.
.~ ,, Cru~e oil in the natural state contains a variety of materials which tend to have quite troublesome effects on FCC processes, and only a portion of these troublesome materia s can be economically removed from the crude oil.
Among these troublesome materials are coke precursors (such as asphaltenes, polynucleax aromatics, etc.), heavy metals (such as nickel, vanadium, iron, eopper, etc.), lighter metals (such as sodium, potassium, etc.), sulfur, nitrogen and others. Cextain of these, such as the lighter metals, can L0 be economically removed by desalting operations, which are part of the normal procedure for pretreating crude oil for fluid eatalytic eraeking. Other materials, such as coke precursors, asphaltenes and the like, tend to break down into eoke during -~ the cracking operation, which eoke deposits on the catalyst, L5 impairing eontact between the hydrocarbon feedstoek and the eatalyst, and generally reducing its potency or activity level.
The heavy metals transfer almost quantitatively from the feedstock to the catalyst surface~
If the catalyst is reused again and again for process-ing additional feedstock, which is usually the case, the heavy metals can accumulate on the eatalyst to the point that they unfavorably alter the composition of the catalyst and/or the nature o its effect upon the feedstock. For example, vanadium tends to form fluxes with certain eomponents of commonly used FCC catalysts, lowering the melting point of portions of the catalyst particles sufficiently so that they begin to sinter and become ineffective cracking catalysts. Accumulations of vanadium and other heavy metals, especially nickel, also "poison" the ca~alyst. They tend in varying degrees to promote excessive dehydroyenation and aromatic condensation, resulting in excessive production of carbon and gases with consequent impairment of liquid fuel yield. An oil 5 such as a crude or crude fraction or other oil that is particularly abundant in nickel and/or other metals exhibiting similar behavior, while containing relatively large quantities of coke precursor s, is referred to herein as a carbo-metallic oil, and represen ts a particular challenge to the petroleum refiner.
In general, the coke-forming tendency cr coke precursor content of an oil can be ascertained by determining the weight percent of carbon remaining af ter a sample of that oil has been pyrolyzed. The industry accepts this value as a measure of the esctent to which a given oil tends to form non-catalytic coke when 15 employed as feedstock in a catalytic cracker. Two established tests are recognized, the Conradson Carbon and Ramsbottom Carbon tests, the latter being described in ASTM Test No. D524-76. In conventional FCC practice, Ramsbottom carbon values on the order of about 0 .1 to about 1. 0 are regarded as indicative of acceptable 20 feed. The present invention is concerned with the use of hydrocarbon feedstocks which have higher Ramsbottom carbon values and thus exhibit substantially grea ter potential for coke formation than the usual feeds.
Since the various heavy metals are not of equal catalyst 25 poisoning activi~y, it i5 convenient ~o express the poisoning activity of an oil containing a given poisoning metal or metals in terms of the amount of a single metal which is estimated to have equivalent poisoning activity. Thus, the heavy metals content of an oil can be expressed by the following formwla (patterned after that of W . L .
30 Nelson in Oil and Gas Journal, page 143, October 23, 1961) in which the content of each metal present is expressed in parts per million of such metal, as metal, on a weight basis, based on the weight of feed:

( 'k~ ¦
~ , . .

Nickel Equivalents - Ni + 4 ~ -~ 7 1 ~ 1 23 According to conventional FCC practice, the heavy metal content of feedstock for FCC processing is controlled at a.relatively low level, e.g. about 0.25 ppm Nickel Equivalents or less.
The present invention is concerned with the processing of feed-stocks containing metals substantially in excess of this ~alue, and which therefore have a significantly greater potentital for accumulating on and poisoning catalyst.
The above formula can also be employed as a measure of the accumulation of heavy metals on cracking catalyst, except that the quantity.of.metal employed in the formula is based - on the w~ight of catalyst (moisture free basis) instead of the weight of feed. In conventional FCC practice, in which a :~ circulating inventory o catalyst is used again and again in the . 15 processing of fresh feed, with periodic or continuing minor addition and withdrawal of fresh and spent catalyst, the metal : content of the catalyst is maintained at a level which may for example be in the range of about 200 to about 600 ppm Nickel Equivalents. The process of the present invention is concerned with the use oE catalyst having a substantially larger metals content, and which therefore hàs a much greater than normal tendency to promote dehydrogenation, aromatic condensation, ~~
gas production or coke formation. Therefore, such hiyher metals accumulation is normally regarded as quite undesira~le in FCC processing.
There has been a long standing interest in the conversion of carbo-metallic oil5 into gasoline and other liquid fuels. For example, in the 1950s it was suggested that a variety of carbo-mctallic oils could be successfully converted to gasoline and othcr products in the Houdresid process. Turning from the FCC mode of operation, the Houdresid process em21Oyed catalyst v ~7~

particles of "granular size" (much larger than conventional FCC
catalyst particle size) in a compact gravitating bed, rather tlran suspending catalyst particles in feed and product vapors in a fluidized hed.
Although the Houdresid process obviously represented a step forward in dealing with the effect of metal contamination and coke formation on catalys t performance, its productivity was limited .
Because its operation was uneconomical, the first Houdresid unit is no longer operating. Thus, for the 25 7~
years wI~ich have passed since the lIoudresid process was first introduced commercially, the art has continued its arduous search for suitable modifications or alternatives to the FCC
process which would permit cornmercially successful operation on reduced crude and the like. During thls period a number of proposals have been made; some have been used commercially to a certain extent.
Several proposals involve treating the heavy oil feed to remove the metal therefrom prior to cracking, such as by hydrotreating, solvent extraction and eomplexing with Frièdel-Crafts catalysts, but these techniques have been critici~ed as unjustified economically. Another proposal employs a eombination cracking process having "dirty oil" and "clean oil" units. Still another proposal blends residual oil with gas oil and controls the quantity of residual oil in the mixture in relation to the equilibrium flash vaporization temperature at the bottom of the riser type craeker unit employed in the process~ Still another proposal subjects the feed to a mild preliminary hydrocracking or hydrotreating operation before it is introduced into the crack-ing unit. It has also been suggested to contact a earbo-metallie oil sueh as reduced crude with hot taconite pellets to produce gasoline. This is a small sampling of the many proposals which have appeared in the patent literature and technical reports.~
Notwithstanding the great effort which has been expended and the faet that each of these proposals overcomes some of the diffieulties involved, conventional FCC practice tod~y bears mute testimony to the dearth of carbo-metallic oil-crack-ing techniques that are both economical and highly practical in terms of technical feasibility. Some crude oils are relatively free of coke precursors or heavy metals or both, and the troublesome components of crude oil are for the most part concentrated in the highest boiling fractions. Accordingly.

i t has been possible to largely avoid the prohlems of coke precursors and heavy metals by sacrificing the liquid f uel yield which would be potentially available from the highest boiling fractions. More particularly, conventional FCC practice has employed as feedstock that fraction of crude oil which boils at about 650F to about 1000F, such fractions being relatively of coke precursors and heavy metal contamination. Such feedstock, known as "vacuum gas oil" (VGO) is generally prepared from crude oil by distilling off the fractions boiling below a~out 650F at atmospheric 10 pressure and then separating by further vacuum distillation from the heavier fractions a cut boiling between about 650F and about 900 to 1025F.
The vacuum gas oil is used as feedstock for conventional FCC
processing. The heavier fractions are normally employed for a 15 variety of other purposes, such as for instance production of asphalt, residual fuel oil, #6 fuel oil, or rnarine Bunker C fuel oil, which represents a great waste of the potential value of this portion of the crude oil, especially in light of the great effort and expense which the art has been willing to expend in the attempt to produce generally similar materials from coal and shale oils. The present invention is aimed at the simultaneous cracking of these heavier fractions containing substantial quantities of both coke precursors and heavy metals, and possibly other troublesome components, in conjunction with the lighter oils, thereby increasing the overall yield of gasoline and other hydrocarbon liquid fuels from a given quantity of crude. As indicated above, the present invention by no means constitutes the first a ttempt to develop such a process, but the long standing recognition of the desirability of cracking carbo-metallic feedstocks, along with the slow progress of the 30 industry toward doing so, show the continuing need for such a process. It is believed that the present process is uniquely advantageous for dealing with the problem of treating such carbo-metallic oils in an economically and technically sound manner.

~,r~
/ ';

S~MM~I~Y o~ l'JI~ IN~ TIO~
The prescnt invention is notable in ~rovidin~ a slmple, relatively straicJIltforward and highly productive a~proacll to the conversion of carbo-metallic f~ed such as . .
reduced crude or the like to various lighter products such as gaso1ine. The carbo-metallic feed comprises or is composed of oil which boils above about 6~0F. Such oil, or at least the 650F+ portion thereof, is characterized by a heavy metal con-- tent of at least about 4,-preferably more than about 5, and ~10 most preferably at least about 5.5 ppm of Nickel Equivalents by weight and by a carbon residue on pyrolysis of at least about 1o and more preferably at least about 2~ by weight. In accord-ance with the invention, the carbo-metallic feed, in the form of a purnpable liquid, is brought into contact with hot conver-sion cataly,t in a weight ratio of catalyst to feed in the range of about 3 to about 18 and preferably more than about 6.
The feed in said mixture undergoes a conversion step which includes cracking while the mixture of feed and catalyst is flowing t-hrough a progressive flow type reactor. The feed, catalyst, and other materials may be introduced at one or ; more points. The reactor includes an elongated reaction chamber which is at least partly vertical or inclined and in whi-ch the feed material, resultant products and catalyst are maintained in contact with one another while flowing as a dilute phase or stream for a predetermined riser residence time in the range of - about 0.5 to about 10 seconds~
The reaction is conducted at a temperature of about 900 to about 1400F, measured at the reaction ch amber exit, under a total pressure of about 10 to about 50 psia (pounds per square inch absolute) under conditions sufficiently severe to provide 7~

a conversion per pass in the range of about 50~ or more and to lay down coke on the catalyst in an amount in the ranye of about 0.3 to ahout 3~ by weight and preferably at least about 0.5~. The overall rate of coke production, based on weight of fresh feed, is in the range of about 4 to about 14~ by weight.
At the end of the predetermined residence time, the catalyst is projected in a direction established by the elongated reaction chamber or an extension thereo~, while the products, having lesser momentum, are caused to make an abrupt change of direction, resulking in an abrupt, substantially instantaneous ballistic separation of products from catalyst. The thus separated catalyst is stripped to remove high boiling components and other entrained or adsorbed hydrocarbons and is then re-generated with oxygen-containing combustion-supporting gas under conditions of time, temperature and atmosphere sufficient to reduce the carbon on the regenerated catalyst to about 0.25% or less and preferably about 0.05% or less by weight. The regenera-ted catalyst is recycled to the reactor for contact with fresh feed.
Depending on how the process of the invention is prac-ticed, one or more of the following advantages may be realized, If desired, and preferably, the process may be operated without added hydrogen in the reaction chamber. If desired, and prefer-ably, the process may he operated without prior hydrotreating of the feed and/or without other process of removal of asphaltenes or metals from the feed, and this is true even where the carbo-metallic oil as a whole contains more than about 4, or more than about 5 or even more than about 5.5 ppm Nickel Equivalents by weight of heavy metal and has a carbon residue on pyrolysis greater than about 1~, greater than about 1.4~ or greater than _ g _ iabout 2% by weight. Moreover, all of the converter feed, as above described, may be cracked in one and the same conversion chamber The cracking reaction may be carried out with a catalyst which has previously been used (recycled, except for such replacement as required to compensate for normal losses and deactivation) to crack a carbo-metallic feed under the above described conditions. Heavy hydrocarbons not cracked to gasoline in a first pass may be recycled with or without h~drotreating for further cracking in contact with the same kind of feed in which they were first subjected to cracking conditions, and under the same kind of conditions; but operation in a substantially once-through or single pass mode (e.g. less than about 15% by volume of recycle based on volume of fresh feed) is preferred.
The process as above described may be practiced in conjunctlon with other preferred alternatives, refinements or more commonly encountered conditions, a few of which will be ireferred to under the heading (Description of Various and Preferred Embodiments" below.

, ",~- 10 ~
..

,,:
., .

. . -11 -BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 is a schematic diagrarn of a first apparatus for carrying out the invention Figure 2 is a schematic diagram of a second apparatus for 5 carrying the invention.
Figures 3 through 5 are graphs of data obtained from operating the process of the invention.
DESCRIPTION OF VARIOUS AND PREFERRED EMBCDIMENTS
The present invenl:ion provides a process for the continuous 10 catalytic conversion of a wide variety of carbo-metallic oils to lower molecular weight products, while maximizing production of highly valuable liquid produc-ts, and making it possible, if desired, to avoid vacuum distillation and other expensive treatments such as hydrotreating. The term "oils", includes not only those 15 predominantly hydrocarbon compositions which are liquid at room temperature (i.e., 68F), but also those predominantly hydrocarbon - compositions which are asphalts or tars at ambient temperature but liquify when heatecl to temperatures in the range of up to about 800F . The invention is applicable to carbo- metallic oils, whether 20 or petroleum origin or not. For example, provided they have the requisite boiling range, carbon residue on pyrolysis and heavy metals content, the invention may be applied ~o the processing of such widely diverse ma~erials as heavy bottoms from crude oil, heavy bitumen crude oil, those crude oils known as "heavy crude"
25 which approximate the properties of reduced crude, shale oil, tar sand extract, products from coal liquification and solvated coal, ., ,~, , '' .

L7!~i . . , ~ . .

atmos~eric and vacuum rcduccd crudc, extracts and/or ~ottoms ~raffin~te) from solvent de-asphalting, aromatic eY.tract fxom lube oil refining, ~ar hottoms, heavy cycle oil, slop oil, othcr refinery waste streams and mixtures of the foregoing.
Such mi.~tures can for instance be prepared by mixing available hydrocarbon fractions, including oils, tars, pitches and the like. Also, powdered coal may be suspended in the carbo-metallic oil. Persons skilled in the art are aware o~ techniques for demetalation of carbo-metallic oils, and demetalated oils may be converted using the invention; but it is an advantage of the invention that it can employ as feedstock carbo-metallic oils that have had no prior demetalation treatment. Likewise, the invention can be applied to hydrotreated feedstocks; but it is an advantage of the invention that it can successfully convert carbo-metallic oils which have had substantially no prior hydrotreatment. However, the pre,erred application of the process is to reduced crude, i.e.~ that fraction of crude oil boiling at and above 650F, alone or in admi:~ture with virgin gas oils. While the use of material that has been subjected to prior vacuum distillation is not excluded, it is an advantage of , the invention that it can satisfactorily process material which has had no prior vacuum distillation, thus saving on capital investment and operating costs as compared to conventional FCC
processes that require a vacuum distillation unit.
Table ~ below provides a comparison between a typical vacuum gas oil (VGO) which has been used heretofore in fluid catal~tic cracking, with various reduced crudcs, constituting a cw e~amples of the many reduced crudes useable in the ~rcscnt invcntion:

.....

7~
oo ~ U~ 3 ,~ O
~ ~ ' _~ ~ U O O ~ o r~
~ O ~ ~ U~ ~ O C:
O--' U t~ ~ `3 t-- N In ~J
IL~
~ ~ O ~1 t`~ o o N O rl 3 ~ u~ ~ ~ O r~
:i!; ~ ~ I~
E9 ~i ~q ~ o ~I co ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ o O
.9 ¢ ~ O ~ ~ e~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O aJ
.J .1-1 i ~ O O ~ ~D ~ ~ O t`
O ~0 0 O~ O _~ ~ O
Ll ~a u~ ` ~ ~ O
~_ ~ G~O O~ ~ O~ ~ ~ ~ U~ O r-,~
. ~ X I ,~ o~ O In 1` o o o o o ~
O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ o I o u ,~ O ~ C
o ~ ~ I
o O
O Y
~- _l ~ ~D O O~ ~D O
E3 ~: ~ ~ c~ o ~ C~ E~ o ~

Ea g 00 O~ O ~ D #
+ U~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~3 O O O O ~ O O U ~
Ll a O ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ U~ O ~ C:
i` I~ CO W ~D ~:0 ~ 1~ ~ "
. o o o ~ o ~O O O ~ u O O ~I~ ~D U') I~ ~ ~O 00 ~ U 1.
' ~ O O
O ~ +
j ~ rrJ ~ ~ O ~ D 6) O CO ~ ~ I` ~ O~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
: ~ D ~ r--l O

~, ~ æ ~
O ~ C~ C d !~ ~ qJ V
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 o Q ~s x ~ ~ ~ o la ~ o ~
. ~ X ~e ~ ~ ~C p?J ~ ~ ~:J 5 `-- ~--. ~
' `:
As can be seen from ~he Table, the heavier or higher boiling feeds are characterized by relatively lower API Gravity values than the illustrative vacuum gas oil (VGO). In general those catalytic cracking process feedstocks having lower boiling temperatures 5 and/or hi~her API Gravity have been considered highly superior to feeds~ocks with higher boiling temperatures and/or lower API
Gravity. Comparisons of the gasoline yield of high boiling feeds compared to medium boiling feeds at constant coke yield have shown that the medium boiling feeds provide superior gasoline yield for a 10 given coke yield.
In accordance with the invention one provides a carbo-metallic oil feedstock, at least about 70%, more preferably at least about 85%
and still more preferably about 100% (by volume) of which boils at and above about 550F. All boiling temperatures herein are based 15 on standard a-tmospheric pressure conditions. In carbo-metallic oil partly or wholly composed of material which boils at and above about 650F, such material which is part of or has been separated from an oil containing components boiling above and below 650F
~;` may be referred to as a 650F-~ fraction. But the terms "boils 20 above" and "650~F+" are not intended to imply that all of the material characterized by said terms will have the capability of boiling. The carbo-metallic oils contemplated by the invention may contain material which may not boil under any conditions; for example, certain asphalts and asphaltenes may crack thermally 25 during distillation, apparently without boiling. Thus, for example, when it is said that the feed comprises at least about 70% by volume of material which boils above about 650F, it should be understood that the 70% in question may include some material which will not boil or volatilize at any temperature. These non-boilable materials 30 when present, may frequently or for the most part be concentrated ':.
,~

~;
...

3171~
.. . .
in portions of the feed which do not boil below about 1000F, - -.
1025F or highcr. Thus, whcn it is said that at least about 10%, more preferably about 15o and still more preferably at least about 20Q (by volume) of the-650F~ fraction will not boil below about 1000F or 1025~F, it should be understood that all or any part of the material not boiling below about 1000 or 1025F, may or may not be volatile at and above the indicated temperatures.
- Preferably, the contemplated feeds, or at least the 650F+ material therein, have a carbon residue on pyrolysis of at least about 2 or greater. For example, the Ramsbottom carbon conten~ may be in the range of about 2 to about 12 and most frequently at least about 4. A~particularly common range is about 4 to about 8. Not~ that the illustrative YGO in Table 1 has a Ramsbottom carbon residue value of 0.38, and that the 650 to lS 1025F fractions of the various reduced crudes have Ramsbottom carbon values between about 0.3 and about 0.5, whereas the various reduced crudes as a whole (650+ Total) vary upwards in Ramsbottom carbon value from about 4 to about 16.8, and still higner values are contemplated.
Pref~rably, the feed has an average composition characterized by an atomic hydrogen to carbon ratio in the range of about 1.2 to about 1.9, and preferably about 1.3 to about 1.8.
The carbo-metallic feeds employed in accordance with the invention, or at least the 650F+ material therein, ma~ contain at least about 4 parts per million of Nickel Equivalents, as defined above, of which at least about 2 parts per million is nickel (as metal, by weight). Carbo-metallic oils within the a~ove range can be prepared from mi~tures of two or more oils, some of whlch do and do not contain the quantities of Nickel Equivalents and nickel set forth above. It shouid also be noted that the above values i7~6 - ~for Nickel Equivalents and nicke~ represent time-wcighted - _-~ , . . .
averages for a substantial period of opcration of the conversion - Ullit, such as one month, for example. It should also be noted that the heavy metals have in certain circumstances exhibited some lessening of poisoning tendency after repeated oxidations and reduc~ioi-s on ~e catalys~,~and the literature describes criteria for establishing "effective ~etal" values. For exarnple, see the article by Cimbalo, et al, entitled "Deposited Metals Poison FCC Catalyst", Oil and Gas Journal, May 15, 1972, pp 112-122 r If considered necessary or desirable, the contents of I~ickel Equivalents and nickel in the carbo-rnetallic oils processed according to the invention may be expressed in terms of "effective metal" values. Notwithstanding the gradual reduction in poisoning activity noted by Cimbalo, et al, the regeneration of catalyst under normal FCC regeneration conditions may not, and usually does not, severely impair the dehydrogenation, - demethanation and aromatic condensation activity of heavy metals accumulated on cracking catalyst.
It is known that about 0.2 to about 5 weight per cent of "sulfur" in the form of elementa] sulfur and/or its ~; compounds (~ut reported as elemental sulfur based on the weight of feed) appears in FCC feeds and that the sulfur and modified forms of sulfur can find their way into the resultant gasoline product and, where lead is added, tend to reduce its susceptibility to octane enhancement. Sulfur in the produc~ gasoline often requires sweetening when processing high sulfur containing crudes. To the extent that sulfur is present in the coke, it also represents a potcntial air pollutant since tlle regenerator burlls it to SO2 and SO3. However, we have - found that in our process the sulfur in the feed is on the other ~ 16 -.

... ~ j .

IL ~

hand able to inhibit heavy metal activity by maintaining metals such as Ni, V, Cu and Fe in the sulfide form in the reactor. These sulfides are much less active than the metals themselves in promoting dehydrogenation and coking reactions. Accordingly, it is acceptable to carry out the inven tion with a carbo-metallic oil having at least abou t 0 . 3%, acceptably more than about 0 . 8% and more acceptably at least about 1. 5% by weight of sulfur in the 650F~ fraction.
The carbo-metallic oils useful in the invention may and usually do contain significant quanti ties of compounds containing nitrogen, a substantial portion of which may be l~asic nitrogen. For example, the total nitrogen content of the carbo-metallic oils may be at least about 0.05% by weight. Since cracking catalysts owe their cracking activity to acid sites on the catalyst surface or in its pores, basic nitrogen-containing compounds may temporarily neutralize t.hese sites, poisoning the catalyst. However, the catalyst is not permanently damaged since the nitrogen can be burned off the catalyst during regeneration, as a result of which the acidity of the active sites is restored.
.:, The carbo-metallic oils may also include significant quantities of pentane insolubles, for example at leas~ about 0. 5% by weight, ; and more typically about 2% or more or even abou~ 4% or more.
These may include for instance asphaltenes and other materials.
Alkali and alkaline earth metals ~enerally do not tend to vaporize in large quantities under the distillation conditions ernployed in distilling crude oil to prepare the vacuum gas oils normally used as FCC feedstocks. Rather, these metals remain for the most part in the "bottoms" fraction (the non-vaporized high boiling portion) which may for instance be used in the production of asphalt or other by-products. However, reduced crude and other carbo-metallic oils are in many cases " '~

L7'~i bottoms products, and therefore may contain significant quantities of alkali and alkaline earth metals such as sodium. These metals - deposit upon the catalyst during cracking. Depending on the composition of the catalyst and magni-tude of the regeneration S temperatures to which it is exposed, these metals may undergo interactions and reactions with the ca-talyst (including the catalyst support) which are not normally experienced in processing VGO
wlder conventional FCC processing conditions. If the catalyst characteristics and regeneration conditions so require, one will of lO course take the necessary precautions to limit the amounts of alkali and alkaline earth metal in the feed, which metals may enter the feed not only as brine associated with the crude oil in its natural state, but also as components of water or steam which are supplied to the cracking unit. Thus, careful desalting of the crude used to 15 prepare the carbo-metallic feed may be important when the catalyst is particularly susceptible to alkali and alkaline earth metals. In such circumstances, the content of such metals (hereinafter ; collectively referred to as "sodium") in the feed can be maintained at about 1 ppm or less, based on the weight of the feedstock.
20 Alternatively, the sodium level of the feed may be keyed to that of the catalyst, so as to maintain the soclium level of the catalyst ` which is in use substantially the same as or less than tha-t of the replacement cata]yst which is charged to the unit.
According to a particularly preferred embodiment of the 25 invention, the carbo-metallic oil feedstock constitutes at least about : 70% by volume of material which boils above about 650F, and at least about 10% of the material which boils above about 650F will not boil below about 1025F. The average composition of this 650F+ material may be further characterized by: (a) an atomic 30 hydrogen to carbon ratio in the range of about RI-60'19A

~r~; / I
r~ .

-1.3 to about 1.8: (b) a Ramsbottom carbon value of at least about

2; (c) at least about four parts per million of Nickel Equivalents, as defined above, of which at least about two parts per million is nickel (as metal, by weight); and (d) at least one of the following:
(i) at least about 0.3% by weight of sulfur, (ii) at least about 0.5%
by weight of nitrogen, and (iii) at least about 0.5% by weight of pentane insolubles. Very commonly, the preferred feed will include .; all of (i), (ii), and (iii), and other components found in oils of petroleum and non-petroleum origin may also be present in varying quantities providing they do not prevent operation of the process.
~l~hough there is not intention of excluding the possibility of using a feedstock which has previously been subjected to some cracking, the present invention has the definite advantage that it .;, ~ can successfully produce large conversions and very substantial : 15 yields of liquid hydrocarbon fuels from carbo-metallic oils which have not been subjected to any substantial amount of cracking.
; Thus, for example, and preferably, at least about 85%, more preferably at least about 90% and most preferably substantially all of the carbo-metallic feed introduced into the present process is oil -` 20 which has not previously been contacted with cracking catalyst under cracking conditions. Moreover, the process of the invention is suitable for operation in a substantially once-through or single pass mode. Thus, the volume of recycle, if any, based Oll the volume of fresh feed is preferably about 15% or less and more preferably about 10% or less.

RI-~049A

~ `
In gencral, the wcight ratio of catal~st to fresh feed (ecd which has not previously been eY.posed to cracking - catalyst under cracking~conditions) used in the process is in the range of about 3 to about 18. Preferred and more preferred ratios are about 4 -to about 12, more preferably about 5 to about 10 and still more preferably about 6 to about 10, a ratio of about 6 to about 8 presently being considered most nearly optimum. Within the limitations of product quality ~ requirements, controlling the catalyst to oil ratio at relatively low levels within the aforesaid ranges tends to reduce the coke yield of the process, based on fresh feed.
In conventional FCC.processing of VGOI the ratio between . the number of barrels per day of plant through-put and the total number of tons of catalyst undergoing circulation throughout all phases of the process can vary wiclely. For purposes of this disclosure, daily plant through-put is defined as the number . of barrels of fresh feed boiling above about 650F which that plant processes per average day of operation to liquid products boiling below about 430F. For example, in one.commercially successful type of FCC-VGO operation, about 8 to about 12 tons of catalyst are under circulation in the process per 1000 barrels per-day of plant through-put. In another commercially success-ful process, this ratio is in the range of about 2 to 3. .While the present invention may be practiced in the range of about..~
2C` to about 30 and more typically about 2 to about 12 tons of cata-lyst inventory per 1000 barrels of daily plant through-put, it is prcferred to carry out the process of the present invention with a very small ratio of catalyst weight to daily plant through-put. More specifically, it is preferred to carry out thc process of the pr~scnt invention with an inventory of catalyst that is sufficient to contact the feed for the desired residence time L 7~

in the abovë~indicatcd catalyst to oil ratio while minimizing the amount of catalyst invcntory, relative to plant through-put, which - is undcrgoing circulation or being held for treatment in other phases of the process such as, for example, stripping~ reyenera-tion and the like. Thus, more particularly, it is preferred to carry out the process of the present invention with about 2 to about 5 and more preferably about 2 tons of catalyst inventory or less per thousand barrels of daily plant through-put.

In the practice of the invention, catalyst rnay be added continuously or periodically, such as, for example, to make up or normal losses of catalyst from the system. Moreover, catalyst-addition may be conducted in conjunction with withdrawal of catalyst, such as, for example, to maintain or increase the average activity level of the catalyst in the unit. For example, the rate at which ~irgin catalyst is added to the unit may be i~
the range of about 0.1 to about 3, more preferably about 0.15 to about 2, and most preferably to about 0.2 to about l.5 pounds per barrel of feed. If on the other hand equilibrium catalyst from ~CC operation is to be utilized, replacement rates as high -~ 20 as about 5 pounds per barrel can be practiced. Where circum-stances are such that the catalyst employed in the unit is below averaqe in resistance to deactivation andjor conditions prevailing ln the unit tend to promote more rapid deactivation, one may employ rates of addition greater than those stated above;
~5 but in the opposite circumstances, lower rates of addition may be employed.
Without wishing to be bound by any theory, it appears that a number of features of the process to be described in greater detail below, such as, for instance, the residence time and optional mixing of steam with the feedstock, tend to rcstrict the extent to ~hich cracking conditions produce metals in thc reduced state on the catalyst from hea~ metal sulfide(s), . , .
. - 21 ~

- ` ~

sulfate(s) or oxide(s) deposited on thc catal~st particles by prior e~posures to carbo metallic feedstock and regeneration conditions. Thus, the process appears to afford significant control over the poisoning effect of heavy metals on the catalyst, even when the accumulations o~ such metals are quite substantial.

Accordingly, the process rnay be practiced with catalyst bearing accumulations of heavy metals which heretofore would have been considered quite intolerable in conventional FCC-VGO
operations. For these reasons, operation of the process with catalyst bearing heavy metals accumulations in the range of about 3,000 to about 70,000 ppm Nickel Equivalents, on the average is contemplated. More specifically, the accumulation may be in the range of about 4,000 to about 50,000 ppm and particularly more than about 5,000 to about 30,000 ppm. The foregoing ranges are lS based on parts per million of Nickel Equivalents, in which the metals are expressed as metal, by weight, measured on and based on regenerated equilibrium catalyst. However, in the event that cata-lyst of adequate activity is available at very low cost, making feasible very high rates of catalyst replacement, the carbo-metallic oil could be converted to lower boiling liquid products with catalyst bearing less than 3,000 ppm Nickel Equivalents of heavy metals. For example, one-might employ equilibrium catalyst from another unit, for example, an FCC unit which has been used in the cracking of a feed, e.g. vacuum gas oil, having a carhon residue on pyrolysis of less than 1 and containing less than about 4 ppm Nickel Equivalents of heavy metals.
In any event, the equilibrium concentration of heavy metals in the circulating inven-tory of catalyst can be controlled (including maintained or varied as desired or needed) by manipu-lation of the rate of catalyst addition discussed above. Thus,for e:cample, addition of catalyst may be maintained at a rate which will control the heavy metals accumulation on the catalyst in one of the ran~es set forth above.

..

In general, it is preferred to employ a catalyst having~ ~
a relatively high level of cracking activity, providing high levcls of conversion and productivity at low residence times.
The conversion capabiliti-es of the catalyst may be expressed in terms o the conversion produced during actual operation of the process and/or in terms of conversion produced in standard catalyst activity tests. For example, it is preferred to employ catalyst which, in the course of extended operation in the process, is sufficiently active for sustainl~g a level of conversion of at least about 50% and more preferably at least about 60~. In this connection, conversion is expressed in liquid volume percent, ; based on fresh ~eed. Also, for example, the preferred catalyst may ;
be defined as one which, in its virgin or equilibr1um state, exhibits a specified activity expressed as a volume percentage derived by the MAT (micro-activity test). For purposes of the present invention the foregoing percentage is the volume percen-tage of standard feedstock that is co~verted to 430F end point gasoline and lighter products at 900F, 16 whsv (weight hourly space velocity), calculated on the basis of catalyst ~ried at 1100F) and 3C/O (catalyst to oil xatio) by tentative ASTM
MAT test D-32, using an appropriate standard feedstock, e.g.
Davison WHPS-12 primary gas oil, having the following analysis and properties:
API Gravity at 60F, degrees 31.0 Specific Gravity at 60F, g/cc 0.8708 Ramsbottom Carbon, wt. %0.09 - Conradson Carbon, wt. % (est.) 0.04 Carbon, wt. % 84.92 Hydrogen, wt. % 12.94 Sulfur, wt. ~ 0.68 Nitrogen, ppm 305 Viscosity at 100F, centisto~es 10.36 atson IC Factor ~1.93 Aniline Point~ 182 Bromine No. 2.2 5 Paraffins, Vol. ~ 31.7 ~: Olefins, Vol. % 1.8 Naphthenes, Vol. % 44.0 . Aromatics, Vol.% 22.7 ; Average Molecular Weight 284 Nickel . Trace Vanadium ~ Trace .
; Iron Trace Sodium Trace .
: Chlorides Trace B S & W Trace Distillation, F ASTM D-1160 IBP
. 10% . 601 20 30% ~ 664 50~ . 701 70% 734 --; 90% 787 :., .'~ , .
. '' The end point of the yasolinc produced in the ~T tc~t is oftcn . . . ~
de~incd as 430F tbp (true boiling point) which is a standardlaboratory distillation, but other end points could serve equ~lly well for our present purposes. Conversion is calculated by subtracting from 100 the volume percent (based on fresh feed) of those products heavier than gasoline which remain in the recovered product.
The catalyst may be introduced into the process in its virgin form or, as-previously indicated, in other than ~irgin form; e.g. one may use equilibrium catalyst withdrawn from another unit, such as catalyst that has been employed in the - cracking of a different feed. When characterized on the basis of r~AT activity, the preferred catalysts may be described on the basis of their MAT activity "as introduced" into the process of the pxesent invention, or on the basis of their "as withdrawn"
or equilibrium MAT activity in the process of the present inven-tion, or on both of these bases. A preferred MAT activity for virgin and non-virgin catalyst 'las introduced" into the process of the present invention is at least about 60%, but it will be appreciated that, particularly in the case of non-virgin catalysts supplied at high addition rates, lower MAT activity levels may be acceptable. An acceptable "as withdrawn" or equilibrium M~T activity level of catalyst which has been used in the process of the present invention is about 20~ or more, but about 40~ of more and preferably about 60~ or more are preferred values.

- One may empioy any hydrocarbon cracking catalyst having the above indicated conversion capabilities. A parti-cularly preferred class of catalysts includes those which have pore structures into which molecules of feed material may enter for adsorption and/or for contact with active catalytic sites within or adjacent the pores. Various types of catalysts are available within this classification, including for exam21e the layered silicates, e.g. smectites. Although the most widely available catalysts within this classification are the well-known zeolite-containing catalysts, non-zeolite catalysts are also contemplated.

The preferred zeolite~containing catalysts may include any zeolite, whether natural r semi-synthetic or synthetic, alone or in admixture with other materials which do not significantly impair the suitability of the catalyst, provided the resultant catalyst has t:he activity and pore struc-ture referred to above. For example, if the catalyst is a mixture, it may include the zeolite component associated with or dispersed in a porous refractory inorganic oxide carrier; in such case the catalyst may for example contain about 1% to about 60~, more preferably abou~ 1 to about 40% and most typically about .. . .
5 to about 25% by weight, based on the total weight of catalyst ~water free basis) of the zeolite~ the balance of the catalyst being the porous refractory inorganic oxide alone or in com~ination with any of the known adjuvants for promoting or suppressing various desired and undesired reactions. For a general explanation of the genus of zeolite, molecular sieve catalysts useful in the invention~ attention is drawn to the disclosures of the articles entitled "Refinery Catalys`ts Are a Fluid Business"

and ".~laking Cat Crackers Work on Varied Diet", - 2~ -.. ' ( .

appearing respectively in the July 26, 1978 and September 13, 197B
issues of Chemical Week magazine.
.
For -the mos t par t, the zeolite components of the zeolite-containing ca~alysts will be those which are known to be useful in ~CC cracking processes. In general, these are crystalline aluminosilicates, typically made up of tetra coordinated aluminum atoms associated through oxygen atoms with adjacent silicon atoms in the crystal structure. However, the term "zeolite" as used in this disclosure contemplates not only aluminosilicates, but also substances in which the aluminum has been party or wholly replaced, such as for instance by gallium and/or other metal atoms, and further includes substances in which all or part of the silicon has been replaced, such as ~ for instance by germanium . Titanium and zirconium substitution may also be practiced.
Mos t zeolites are prepared or occur naturally in the sodium form, so that sodium cations are associated with the electro negative sites in the crys tal structure . The sodium cations tend to make zeolites inactive and much less stable when exposed to hydrocarbon conversion conditions, particularly high temperatures. Accordingly, - the zeolite may be -ion exchanged, ancl where the zeolite is a component of a catalyst composition, such ion exchanging may occur r before or after incorporation of the zeolite as a component of the - composition. Suitable cations for replacement of sodium in the zeolite crystal structure include ammonium (decomposable tD
hydrogen)l hydrogen, -rare earth metals, alkaline earth metals, etc.
Various suitable ion exchange procedures and cations which may be exchanged into the zeolite crystal structure are well known to those skilled in the art.

~;. ' ' '' ' am~lcs of thc natural-ly occuring crystallinc ~
~luminosiIicatc zeolitcs which may be used as or includcd in thc catalyst for thc present invention are fau~asite, mordenite, clinoptilote, chabazite, analcite, erionite, as well as levynite, dachiardite, paulingite, noselite, ferriorite, heulandite; scolccite, stibite, harmotome, phillipsite, brewsterite, flarite, datolite, gmelinite, caumnite, leucite, lazurite, scapIite, mesolite, ptholite, nephe-line, matroli~e, offretite and sodallte.

Examples of the synthetic crystalline aluminosilicate zeolites which are useful as or in the catalyst for carrying ou~ :
the present invention are Zeolite X, U. S. Patent No. 2,882,244, Zeolite Y, U. S. Patent No. 3,130,0~7; and Zeolite A, U. S.
Patent No. 2,882,243; as well as Zeolite B, U. S. Patent No.
lS 3,008,803; Zeolite D, Canada Patent No. 661,981, Zeolite E, Canada Patent No. 614,495; Zeolite F, U. S. Patent No. 2,996,358;
- Zeolite H, U. S. Patent No. 3,010,789; Zeolite J. U. S. Patent No. 3,011,869; Zeolite L, Belgian Patent No. 575,177;
` Zeolite M. U. S. Patent No. 2,995,423, Zeolite O, U. S. Patent No. 3,140,252; Zeolite Q, U. S. Patent No. 2,991,151; Zeolite :. . .
S, U. S. Patent No. 3,054,657, Zeolite T/ U. S. Patent ~o.
2,950,952; Zeollte W, U. S. Patent No. 3,012,853; Zeolite Z, - Canada Patent No. 614,495; and Zeolite Omega, Canada Patent No.
817,91S. Also, ZK-4HJ,alpha be-ta and ZS~I-type zeolites are useful. Moreover, the zeolites described in U. S. Patents ~os. 3,140,249, 3,]40,253, 3,944,482 and 4,137,151 are also useful~

The crystalline alumillosilicate zeolites having a faujasite-type crystal structure are particularly preferred for use in the presen~ invention. Tl-is includes particularly nat~ral faujasite and Zeolite X and Zeolite Y.

.. .

- ' , ~ The crystallinc aluminosilicate zcolites, such ~s , synthctic faùjasite, will undcr normal conditions cr~stallize as regularly shaped, discrete particles of about one ko about ten microns in size, and, accordingly, this is the size range frequently found in commercial catalysts which can be used in the invention. Preferably, the particle size of the zeolites is from about 0.5 to about 10 microns and more preferably is from about 0.1 to about 2 microns or less. For example, zeolites prepared in situ from calcined kaolin may be characterized by even smaller crystallites. Crystalline zeolites exhibit both an interior and an exterior surface area, which we have defined as "portal" surface area, with the largest portion of the total . . .
surface area being internal. By portal surface area, we refer to the outer surface of the zeolite crystal through which 15 reactants are cons~dered to pass in order to convert to lower boiling products. Blockage of the internal channels by, for example, coke formation, blockage of entrance to the internal channels by deposltion of coke in the portal surface area, and contamination by metals poisoning, will greatly reduce the total zeolite surface area. Therefore, to minimize the effect of con-tamination and pore blockage, crystals larger than the normal size cited above are preferably not used in the catalysts of this invention.
Commercial zeolite-containing catalysts are avail-able with carriers containing a variety of metal oxides and combination thereof, including for example silica, alumina, magnesia, and mixtures thereof and mixtures of such oxides with clays as e.g~ described in U. S. Patent No.

.

.
_ .

3,031,9~ One may for e~ample selcct any of thc zeolite-cont~ining molecular sieve fluid cracking catalysts which are suitable for production of qasoline from vacuum gas oils. How-ever, certain advantages may be attained by judicious selection of catalysts having maxked resistance to metals. A metal resistant zeolite catalyst is, for instance, described in U. S. Patent No. 3,944,482, in which the catalyst contains l-40 weight percent of a rare earth-exchanged zeolite, the balance being a refractory metal oxide having specified pore volume and size distribution. Other catalysts described ,as "metals-tolerant" are described in the above mentioned Cimbalo et al article.
In general, it is preferred to employ catalysts having an over-all particle size in the range of about 5 to 15 about 160, more preferably about 40 to about 120, and most preferably about 40 to about 80 microns.
The catalyst composition may also include one or more combustion promoters which are useful in the subsequent step of regenerating the catalyst. Cracking of carbo-metallic oils results in substantial deposition of coke on the catalyst, which coke reduces the activity of the catalyst., Thus, in order to restore the activity of the catalyst the coke is burned off in a regeneration step, in which the coke is converted to com-bustion gases including carbon monoxide and/ox carbon dioxide.
Various substances are known which, when incorporated in crac~ing catal~st in small quantities, tend to promote conversion of the cokc to carbon monoxide and/or carbon dioxide. Promoters of combustion to carbon monoxide tend to lower the temperature at ~1hich a given degree of coke removal can be attained, thus ciminishing the potential for thermal deactivation of the cat~lyst. Such promoters, normally used in effective amounts ranginq from a trace u~ to about l0 or 20O ~y weiqht of the .

catalyst, may be of any type which generally promotes combus tion of carbon under regenerating conditions, or may be somewhat selective in respect to completing the combustion of CO, or, more preferably, for reasons explained in greater detail l:)elow, may have 5 some tendency to combust carbon to carbon monoxide in preference to carbon dioxide.
Although a wide variety of other catalysts, including both zeolite-containing and non-zeolite-containing may be employed in the practice of the invention the following are examples of commercially 10 available catalysts which have been employed in practicing the invention:

`~ Specific Weight Percent Surface Zeolite m2/gContent Al203 SiO2 Na20 Fe20 TiO2 AGZ-90 30011. 0 29 . 5 59.0 0.40 0.11 0.59 GRZ-1 16214.0 23.4 69.0 0.10 0.4 0.9 CCZ 220 12911.0 34.6 60.0 0.60 0.57 1.9 Super DX 155 13.0 31.0 65.0 0.80 0.57 1.6 - 20 F-87 24010 . O 44 . 0 50.0 0.80 0.70 1.6 FOC-90 240 8.0 44.0 52.1) O .65 0.65 1.1 HFZ-20 31020.0 59.0 40.0 0.47 0.54 2.75 HEZ-55 21019 . 0 59.0 35.2 0.60 0.60 2.5 The A~Z-290, GRZ-1, CCZ-220 and Super DX catalysts referred to 25 above are produc-ts of W.R. Grace and Co. F-87 and and FOC-90 are products of Filtrol, while HFZ-20 and HXZ-55 are products of Engelhard/Houdry. The above are properties of virgin catalyst and, except in the case of zeolite content, are adjusted to a water free basis, i. e . based on material ignited at 1750DF . The zeolite 30 content is derived by comparison of the X-ray intensities of a catalyst sample and of a standard material composed of high purity sodium Y zeolite in accordance with draft #6, dated January 9, 1978, of proposed ASTM Standard Method entitled "Determination of the Faujasite Content of a Catalyst".
' .,~,~.r .

Xt is considcrcd an advantage that thc process of the prcscnt invention can be conducted in the substantial absence of tin and/or antimony or at least in the presence of a catalyst which is substantially free of either or both of these metals.
The process of the present invention may be operated , with the above described carbo-metallic oil and catalysk as sub-- stantially the sole materials charged to the reaction zone. But the charging of additional materials is not excluded. The charging of recycled oii to the reaction zone has already been 1~ mentioned. As described in yreater detail below~ still ot'ner materials fulfilling a variety of ~unctions may also ~e charged. In such case, the carbo-metallic oil and catalyst ; usually represent the major proportion by weight of the total of all materials charged to the reaction zone.
Certain of the additional materials which may be used perform functions which offer significant advantages over the process as performed with only the carbo-metallic oil and catalyst. Among these ~unctions are: controlling the effects of heavy metals and other catalyst conta~inants; enhanc-ing catalyst activity; absorbing excess heat in the catalyst as receivea from the regenerator; disposal of pollutants or con-version thereof to a form or forms in which they may be more readily separated from products and/or disposea o~; controlling catalyst temperature; diluting the carbo-metallic oil vapors to reduce their partial pressure and increase the yield of dcsired products; adjusting feed/catalyst contact time; donation of hydrogen to a hydrogen deficient carbo-metallic oil feedstock;
- assisting in the dispersion of the feed; and possibly also distillation of products. Cert~in of the metals in the heavy metals accumulation on ~he catalyst are more active in promoting ~6~6 unuesircd reactions when thcy are in-thc form of elemental meta~
than they are when in the o~idized form ~roduced by contact with o~ygen in the catalyst regenerator. Elowever, the time of contact ~et~een catalyst and vapors of feed and product in past conven-tional catalytic cracking was sufficient so that hydrogen releasedin the cracking reaction was able to reconvert a significant portion of the less harmful oxides back to the more harmful lemental heavy metals. One can take advantage of this situation through the introduction of additional materials which are in gaseous (including vaporous) form in the reaction zone in admixture with the catalyst and vapors of feed and products. The increased volume of material in the reaction zone resulting from the presence of such additional materials-tends to increase the velocity of flow through the reactlon zone with a corresponding decrease in the residence time of the catalyst and oxidized heavy metals borne thereby. Because of this reduced residence time, there is less opportunity for reduction of the oxidized heavy metals to elemental form and therefore less of the harmful elemental J' metals axe available for contacting the feed and products.
Added materials may be introduced into the process in any suitab~e fashion, some examples of which ~ollo~. For ! instance, they may be admixed with the carbo-metallic oil feed-stock prior to contact of the latter with the catalyst.
Alternatively, the added materials may, if desired, be admi~ed with the catalyst prior to contact of the latter with the feed-stock. Separate portions of the added materials may be separately admi~ed with both catalyst and carbo-metallic oil. Moreover, the feedstock, catalyst and additional materials may, if desired, be ~rought together substantially simultaneously. A portion of ,: . .

' tllc ~ddcd m~tcrials may be mi~cd with catalyst and/or carbo-mctallic oil in any of the above dcscribcd ways~ while additional .. . .
portions are subsequently brought into admixture. For example, a portion of the added materials may be added to the carbo-metallic - 5 oil and/or to the catalyst before they reach the reaction zone, while another portion of the added materials is introduced directly into the reaction zone. The added materials may be introduced at a plurali-ty of spaced locations in the r~action zone or along the length thereof, if elongated.
The amount of additional materials which may be present in the feed, catalyst or reaction zone for carrying out the above functions, and others, may be varied as des1red; but said amount will preferably be sufficient to substantially heat balance the pro-cess. These materials may for example be introduced into the reaction zone in a wçight ratio relative to feed of up to about 0.4, preferable in the range of about 0.02 to about 0.4, more preferably about 0.03 to about 0.3 and most preferably about 0.05 to about 0.25.
For example, many or: all of the above desireable functions may be attained by introducing HzO to the reaction zone ~ in the form of steam or of liquid water or a combination thereof in a weight ratio relative to feed in the range of about 0.04 or more, or more preferably about 0.05 to about 0.1 or more. Without wish-ing to be bound by any theory, it appears that t~e use of H2O tends to inhibit reduction of catalyst-borne oxides, sulfites and sulfides to the free metallic form which is believed to promote condensation-dehydrogcnation with consequent promotion of coke and hydrogen yield and accompanying loss of product. Moreover, H2O may also, to some extcnt, reduce deposition of ~.etals onto the ca-talyst surfacc. There may also be some tendency to desorb nitrogen-con-taining and other heavy contaminant-containin~ molecules from the surface of the catalyst particles, or at least some tendency to inhibit their absorption by the catalyst. It is also believed that . - 3~ _ ' .

`" ~ 7~

added H2O tends to increase the acidity of the catalyst by Bronsted acid formation which in turn enhances -the activity of the catalyst.
Assuming the E~2O as supplied is cooler than the regenerated cata-lyst and/or the temperature of -the reaction zone, the sensible heat involved in raising the temperature of the H2O upon contac-ting the catalyst in the reaction zone or elsewhere can absorb ~` excess heat from the catalyst. Preferably, the liquid or vapor H2O contains less than about 100 ppm of sodium, and less than about 500 ppm each of calcium and magnesium. All or a portion of the H2O may be and preferably is condensed from the products of a prior catalytic conversion of a carbo~metallic oil. Where the H2O is or - includes recycled water that contains for example about 500 to about 5000 ppm of H2S dissolved therein, a number of additional ad-vantages may accrue~ The ecologically unattractive H2S need not ;~ be vented to the atmosphere, the recycled water does not require further treatment to remove H2S and the H2S may be of assistance in reducing coking of the catalyst by passivation of the heavy ; metals, i.e. by conversion thereof to the sulfide form which has a lesser tendency than the free metals to enhance coke and hydro-gen production. In the reaction zone, the presence of H2O can dilute the carbo-metallic oil vapors, thus reducing their partial pressure and tending to increase the yield of the desired products.
It`has been reported that H2O is useful in combination with other materials in generating hydrogen during cracking; thus it may be able to act as a hydrogen donor for hydrogen deficient carbo-metallic oil feedstocks. The H2O may also serve certain purely mechanical functions such as: assisting in the atomizing or dis-persion of the feed; competing with high molecular weight mole-cules for adsorption on the surface of the catalyst, thus inter-rupting coke formation; steam distillation of vaporizable productfrom unvaporized feed material; and disengagement of product from -catalyst upon conclusion of the cracking reaction. It is .., 7'~

particularly pre`ferrcd to bring together ll2O, catalyst and carbo-mctallic oil substantially simultaneously. For e~ample, one may admix H2O and feedstock in an atomizing noz21e and irnme-;~ diately direct the resultant spray into contact with the catalyst at the downstream end of the reaction zone.
The addition of steam to the reaction zone is frequentlymentioned in the literature of fluid cataly-tic cracking. Addition of liquid water to the feed is discussed relatively infrequently, compared to the introduction of steam directly into the reaction zone. However, in accordance with the present invention it is particularly preferred that liquid water be brought into intimate admixture with the carbo-metallic oil in a weight ratio of about to about 0.15 at or prior to the time of in-troduction of the oil into the reaction zone, whereby the water`te.g., in the form of liquid water or in the form of steam produced by vaporiza-tion of liquid water in contact with the oil) enters the reaction zone as part of the flow of feedstock which enters such æone.
Although not wishing to be bound by any theory, it is believed that the foregoing is advantageous in ~romoting dispersion of the feed-stoclc. Also, the heat of vaporization of the water, which heat is absorbed from the catalyst, from the feedstock, or from both, causes the water to be a more efficient heat sink than steam alone.
Preferably the weight ratio of liquid water to feed is about 0.04 to about 0.1, more preferably about 0.05 to about ~.1 Of course, the liquid water may be introduced into the process in the above described manner or in other ways, and in either event the introduction of liquid water may be accom-panied by the introduction of additional amounts of water as stcam into the same or different portions of the reaction zone or into the catalyst and/or feedstock. For example, the amount of additional steam may be in a weight ratio relative to feed in ~he range of about 0.01 to about 0.25, with the weight ratio ,,, _, , .

of total 1120 (~s steam and liquid water) to feedstock being about 0.3 or less. The charying weight ratio of li~uid water relative to steam in such combined use of liquid water and steam may thus range from ab~ut 5 to about 0.2. Such ratio may be main-tained at a predetermined level within such range or varied asnecessary or desired to adjust or maintain the heat balance of the reaction.
Other rnaterials may be added to the reaction zone to perform one or more of the above described functions. For e~ample, the dehydrogenation-condensation activity of heavy ^ metals may be inhibited by introducing hydrogen sulfide gas into the reaction zone. Hydrogen may be made available for hydrogen deficient carbo-metallic oil feedstocks by intro-ducing into the reaction zone either a conventional hydrogen donor diluent such as a heavy naphtha or relativeiy low molecular weight carbon-hydrogen fragment contributors, including for example: light paraffins; low molecular weight alcohols and other compounds which permit or favor intermolecular hydrogen . .
transfer; and compounds that chemically combine to generate hydrogen in the reaction zone such as by reaction of carbon ~ , . .
monoxide with water, or with alcohols, or with olefins, or with other materials or mixtures of the foregoing.
A11 of the above mentioned additional materials tincluding water), alone or in conjunction with each other or .
2S in conjunction with other materials, such as nitrogen or other inert gases, light hydrocarbons, and others, may perform any of the above-described functions for which they are suitable, including without limitation, acting as diluents to reduce feed partial pressure and/or as heat sinks to absorb excess heat prcsent in the catalyst as received from the regeneration step.
. . , ~ 37 --.

f .. ..

The foregoing is a discussion of some of -the-functions which can be performed by materials other than catalyst and carbo-metallic oil feedstock introduced into the reaction zone, and it should ~e understood that other materials may be added S or other functions performed without departing from the spirit of the invention.
The invention may be practiced in a wide variety of apparatus. However, the preferred apparatus includes means for rapidly vaporizing as much feed as possible and efficiently ]0 admixing feed and catalyst (although not necessarily in that order), for ~ausing the resultant mix-ture to flow as a dilute suspension in a progressive flow mode, and for separating the catalyst rom cracked products and any uncracked or only partialIy cracked feed at the end of a predetermined residence time or times, it being preferred that all or at l~ast a substantial i portion of the product should be abruptly separated from at least a portion of the catalyst.
For example, the apparatus may include, along its elongated reaction chamber, one or more points for introduction of carbo-metallic feed, one or more points for introduction of ~ ¦
catalyst, one or more points for introduction of additional material, one or more points for withdrawal of products and one or more points for withdrawal of catalyst. The means for introducing feed, catalyst and other material may range from open pipes to sophisticated jets or spray nozzles, it being preferred to use means capable of breakin~ up the liquid feed into fine droplets.

It is preferred that the reaction chamber, or at least the major portion thereof, be more nearly vertical than horizontal a~d have a length to diameter ratio oE at least about lO, more preferably about 20 or 25 or more. Use of a vertical riser type reactor is preEerred. If tubular, the reactor can be of uniform diameter throughout or may be provided with a continuous or step-wise increase in di~meter along the reaction path to maintain or vary the velocity along the flow path.
In general, the charging means (for catalyst and feed) and the reactor configuration are such as to provide a relatively high velocity of flow and dilute suspension of catalyst.
For example, the vapor or catalyst velocity in the riser will be usually at least about 25 and more typically at least about 35 feet per second. This velocity may range up to about 55 or about 75 feet per second or higher. The velocity capabilities of the reactor will in general be sufficient to prevent substantial build-up of a catalyst bed in the bottom or other portions of the riser, whereby the catalyst loading in the riser ca~ be maintained below about 4 or 5 pounds and below about 2 pounds per cubic foot, respectively, at the upstream ~e.g. bottom) and downstream (e.g. top) ends oE the riser.
The progressive flow mode involves, for e~ample, ~flowing of catalyst, feed and products as a stream in a positive-ly controlled and maintained dlrection established by the elon-gated nature of the reaction zone. This is not to suggest however that there must be strictly linear flow. As is well known, turbulent Elow and "slipp~ge" oE catalyst may occur to some extent especially in certain ranges of vapor velocity and sor,l~ catalyst loadings, although it has been reported _ 3~

, _. .

adviseable to employ sufficiently low catalyst loadings to restrict slippage and back-mixing.
Most preferably the reactor is one which abruptly separates a substantial portion or all of the vap~rized cracked products from the catalyst at one or more points along the riser, and preferably separates substantially all of the vaporized cracked products from the catalyst at the downstream end of the riser. The process of the present invention uses ballistic separation of catalyst and products; that is, catalyst is projected in a direction established by the riser tube, and is caused to continue ts motion in the general direction so established, while the products, having lesser momentum, are caused to make an abrupt change of direction, resulting in an abrupt, substantially instantaneous separation of product from catalyst. In a `;15 preferred embodiment referred to as a vented riser, the riser tube is provided with a substantially unobstructed discharge opening at its downstream end for discharge of catalyst. An exit port in the side of the tube adjacent the downstream end receives the .
products. The discharge opening communicates with a catalyst flow path which extends to the usual stripper and regenerator, ~hile the exit port communicates with a product flow path which is substantially or entirely separated from the catalyst flow : path and leads to separat1on means for separating the products from the relatively small portion of catalyst, if any, which manages to gain entry to the product exit port, Examples of a ballistic separation apparatus and technique as above dcscribed, are found in U. S. Patents 4,066,533 and 4,070,159 to Myers et al, Preferred conditions for operation of the proccss are described below. ~mong thcse are feed, catalyst and reaction tempcraturcs~ rcaction and feed pressures, residence time and levels of conversion, coke production and coke laydown on S catalyst.
~- In conventional FCC operations with VGO, the feed-stock is customarily preheated, often to temperatures signifi-cantly higher than are required to make the feed sufficiently fluid for pumping and for introduction into the reactor. For ~10 e~ample, preheat temperatures as high as about 700or 800F

have been reported. But in our process as presently practiced it is preferred to restrict preheating of-the feed! 50 that the feed is capable of absorbing a larger amount of heat fro~ the - catalyst while the catalyst raises the feed to conversion ;15 temperature, at.the same time minimizing utilization of external fuels to heat the feedstock. Thus, where the nature of the feed-.. ; , stock permits, it may be fed at ambient te~perature. Heavier ; stocks may be ~ed at preheat temperatures of up to about 600F, typically about 200F to about 500F, but higher preheat 20 temperatures are not necessarily excluded.
The catalyst fed to the reactor may vary widely in temperature, for example from-about 1100to about 1600F, more v preferably about 1200to about 1500F and most preferably about 1300to about 1400F, with about 1325 to about 1375 25 being considered optimum at present.
As indicated previously, the conversion of the carbo-mctallic oil to lower molecular weight yroducts may be conducted at a temperature of about 900to about 1~00F, measured at the reaction chamber outlet. The reaction tempera-30 turc as measured at said outlet is more preferably maintained in the range oE about 975 to about 1300F, still more preEerably ~bout ga5O to about 1200F, and most preferably about 1000 7~ :
~ , to about 1150F. Depending upon thc temperature selected and the ~ropcrties of thc feed, all of the feed may or may not vaporize in the riser.
Although the pressure in the reactor may, as indicated a~ove, xan~e from about 10 to about 50 psia, preferred and more preferred pressure ranges are about 15 to about 35 and about 20 : to about 35. In general, the part.ial (or total) pressure of the feed may be in the range of about 3 to about 30, more preferably about 7 to about 25 and most preferably about lO to about 17 psia. The feed partial pressure may be controlled ` or su~ressed by the introduction of gaseous (including vaporous) materials into the reactor, such as for instance the steam,water, and other additional materials described above. The process has for example been operated with the ratio of feed partial pressure ~ 15 relative to total pressure in the riser in the range of about 0.2 `~ to about 0.8, more typically about 0.3 to about 0.7 and still more typically about 0.4 to about 0.6, with the ratio of added gaseous material (which may include recycled gases and/or steam resulting from introduction of H2O to the riser in the form of steam and/or ¦ 20 liquid water) relative to total pressure in the riser correspond-ingly ranging from about 0.8 to about 0.2, more typically about . . .
0.7 to about 0.3 and still more typically about 0.6 to about 0.4.
n the illustrative operations just described, the ratio of the partial pressure of the added gaseous material relative to the partial pressure of the feed has been in the range of about 0.25 to about 2.5, more typically about 0O4 to about 2 and still more tynically about 0.7 to about 1.7.
Although the residence time of feed and product vapors in the riser may be in the range of about 0.5 to about 10 seconds, as described above, preferred and more preferred valucs are about 0.5 to about o.and about 1 to about 4 seconds, with - ~2 -a~
, . . . .

. . .
about l.S to about 3.0 seconds currently being considered ~ a~out optimum. For cxample, thc proccss has been o~eratcd with .,, .
a ri~er vapor residence time of abou-t 2.5 seconds or less by introduction of copious amounts of qaseous materials into the S riser, such amoun~s being sufficien-t to provide for example a . . i ~ partial pressure ratio of adde~ gaseous materials relative to r" hydrocarbon feed of about 0.8 or more. By way of further illus-tration, the process has been operated with said residence time being about two seconds or less, with the aforesaid ratio being in the range of ~bout l to about 2. The combination of low feed partial pressure, very low residence time and ballistic separation of products from catalyst are considered especially :
beneficial for the conversion of carbo-metallic oils. Additional benefits may be obtained in the foregoing combination when there is lS a substantial partial pressure of added gaseous material, especially H2O, as described above.
Depending upon whether there is slippage between the catalyst and hydrocarbon vapors in the riser, the catalyst riser residence time may or may not be the same as that of the vapors. Thus, the ratio of average catalyst reactor residence -~ time versus vapor reactor ~esidence time, i.e. slippage, may be in the range of about 1 to about 5, more preferably about 1 to about

4 and most preferably about l.Z to about 3, with about 1.2 to about 2 currently being considered optimum.
In certain types of known FCC units, there is a riser which discharges catalyst and product vapors togeth~r into an enlarged chamber, usually considered to be part of the reactor, in which the catalyst is disengaged from product and collected.
Continucd contact of catalyst, uncracked feed (if any) and cracked products in such enlarged cham~er results in an overall catalyst feed contact time appreciably exceeding the riser tube - ~3 -residence times oE the vapors and catalysts. When practicing~the~
process of the prcsent invention with ballistic separation of ; catalyst and vapors at the downstream (e.g. upper) extremity of the riser, such as is taught in the above mentioned ~yers et al patents, the riser residence time and the catalyst contact time are substantially the same for a major portion of the feed and product vapor~. It is considered advantageous if the vapor riser residence time and vapor catalyst contact time are substan-tially the same for at least about 80%, more preferably at least 10 about 90%6 and most preferably at least about 95% by volume of the total feed and product vapors passing through the risex.
By denying such vapors continued contact with catalyst in a catalyst disengagement and collection chamber one may avoid a tendency toward re-cracking and diminished selectivity.
In general, the combination of catalyst to oil ratio, temperatures, pressures and residence times should be such as to effect a substantial conversion of the carbo-metallic oil feedstock. It is an advantage of the process that very high levels of conversion can be attained in a single pass; for example the conversion may be in excess of 50 6 and may range to about 90~ or higher. Preferably, the aforementioned condltions are maintained at levels sufficient to maintain conversion levels in the range of about 60 to about 90% and more preferabl~
about 70 to about 85%. The foregoing conversion levels are cal-culated by subtracting from 100% the percentage ob-tained by dividiny the liquid volume of fresh feed into lO0 times the vo1ume of liquid product boiling at and above 430F (tbp, standard at-mosplleric pressure).
These substantial levels of conversion may and usually do result in relatively largc yields of coke, such as for example about 4 to about 146 by weight based on fresh feed, more co~only about 6 to about 12~ and most frequently about 6 to _ ~,~, _ ~7~

a~out 10~. The co~e yield can morc or lcss quantitativcly ~ -deposit upon the catalyst. ~t contemp1ated catalyst to oil ratios, the result~nt coke laydown may be in excess of about 0.3, Y~ more commonly in excess of about 0.5 and very frequently in e~cess of about 1~ of coke by weight, based on the weight of moisture free regenerated catalyst. Such coke laydown may range as high as about 2%, or about 3g6, or even higher.
In common with conventional FCC operations on VGO, the present process includes stripping of spent catalyst after disengagement of the catalyst from product vapors. Persons skilled in the art are acquainted with appropriate stripping agents and conditions for stripping spent catalyst, but in some cases the present process may require somewhat more severe conditions than are commonly employed. This may result, for example, from the use of a carbo-metallic oil having constitu-ents which do not volatilize under the conditions prevailing-in the reactor, which constituents deposit themselves at least in part on the catalyst. Such adsorbed, unvaporized material can be troublesome from at least two standpoints. First, if the gases (including vapors~ used to strip the catalyst can gain admission to a catalyst disengagement or collection chamber connected to the downs-tream end of the riser, and if there is an accumulation of catalyst in such chamber, vapo~i~ation of these unvaporized hydrocarbons in the stripper can be followed by adsorption on the bed of catalyst in the chamber. More particu-larly, as the catalyst in the stripper is stripped of adsorbed feed material, the resultant feed material vapors pass through the bed of catalyst accumulated in the catalyst collection and/or - discngagement chamber and may deposit co~e and/or condensed material on the catalyst in said bed. ~s the catalyst bearing sucn dcposits mo~es from the bed and into the stripper and from ~;, _ thcnce to thc regcncrator, the condcnsed products c~n crcate a - -demand for more stripping capacity, while the coke can tcn~ to increase regeneration temperatures and/or demand greater regenera-tion capacity. For the foregoing reasons, it is preferred to prevent or restrict contact between stripping vapors and catalyst accumulations in the catalyst disengagement or collection chamber.
This may be done for example by preventing such accumulations from forming, e.g. with the exception of a quantity of catalyst which essentially drops out of circulation and may remain at the bottom of the disengagement and/or collection chamber, the catalyst that is in circu1ation may be removed from said chamber -promptly upon settling to the bottom of the chamber. Also, to minimize regeneration temperatures and demand for regeneration capacity, it may be desirable to employ conditions of time, temperature and atmosphere in the st:ripper which are sufficient to reduce potentially volatile hydrocarbon material borne by the stripped catalyst to about lO~ or less by weight of the total carbon loading on the catalyst. Such stripping may for example include reheating of the catalyst, extensive stripping with steam, the use of gases having a temperature considered higher than normal ~or FCC/VGO operations, such as for instance flue gas from the regenerator, as well as other refinery stream gases such as hydrotreater off-gas (H2S containing), hydrogen and others.
For example, the stripper may be operated at a temperature of about 1025F or higher.
Substantial conversion of carbo-metallic oils to lighter products in accordance with the invention tends to produce sufficiently large coke yields and co~e laydo~n on catalyst to require some care in catalyst regeneration. In order to maintain adequate activity in zeolite and non-zeolite catalysts, it is dcsirable to regenerate the catalyst under conditions of time, temper~ture and atmosphcre sufficient to reduce the percent - 4~ -.
17~
. _ , by wei~ht of carbon remaining on the catalyst to abo~lt 0.25 or less, whether the catalyst bears a large heavy metals aecumu-lation or not. Preferably this weight percentage is about 0.1 ; or less and more preferably about 0.05% or less, especially with zeolite eatalysts. The amounts of coke which must there-fore be burned off of the catalysts when processing earbo-metallie oils are usually substantially greater than would be the ease when eraeking VG0. The term coke when used to describe the present invention, should be understood to include any residual unvaporized feed or eraeking produet, if any such materlal is present on the eatalyst after stripping.
Regeneration of eatalyst, burning away of coke deposited on the catalyst during the conversion of the feed, may be performed at any suitable temperature in the range of lS about 1100 to about 1600F, measured at the regenerator eatalyst outlet. This temperature is preferably in the range of about 1200 to about 1500F, more preferably about 1275 to about 1425F and optimally about 1325 to about 1375F. The process has been operated, for example, with a fluidized regene-rator with the temperature of the eatalyst dense phase in the range of about 1300 to about 1400~.
When regenerating eatalyst to very low levels of carbon on regenerated catalyst, e.g. about 0.1% or less or al?out 0.05~ or less, based on the weight of regenerated catalyst, it is acceptable to burn off at least about the last 10% or at least about the last 5% by weight of coke (based on the total weight of co~e on the eatalyst immediately prior to regeneration) in contact with combustion producing gases containing excess o~y~en.
In this connection it is contemplated that some selected portion of the coke, ranging from all of the coke down to a~o~t the last

5 or 10~ b~ eight, can be burned with excess oxygen. By excess o:~!gen is meant an amount in excess of the stoichiometric require-.

- 47 ~

- 4g -ment for burning all of the hydrogen, all of the carbon and all of the other combustible components, if any, which are present in the above-mentioned selected portion of the coke immediately prior to regeneration. The gaseous products of combustion conducted in the presence of excess oxygen will normally in-:lude an appreciable amount of free oxygen. Such free oxygen, unless removed from the by-product gases or converted to some other form by a means or process other than regeneration, will normally manifest itself as free oxygen in the flue gas from the regenerator unit. In order to provide sufficient driving force to complete the combus tion of coke with excess oxygen, the amount of free oxygen will normally be not merely appreciable but suhstantial, i . e . there will be a concentration of at least about 2 mole percent of free oxygen in the total regeneration flue gas recovered from the entire, completed regeneration operation. While such technique is effective in attaining the desired low levels of carbon on regenerated catalyst, it has its limitations and difficulties as will become apparent from the discussions below.
As conventionally practiced, the burning of coke during regeneration produces some H20 because of the small amount of hydrogen normally ~ound in coke; but carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide are generally regarded as the principal products. The , conversion of the carbon content of coke to carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide are highly exothermic reactions. For instance the : ~ 25 reaction of oxygen with coke to produce carbon dioxide produces 14,10~ BTUs per pound of coke~ while the reaction of oxygen with coke or carbon to form carbon monoxide produces approximately 3967 ; ~3TUs per pound of coke. The larger the amount of coke which must .~ be burned ~rom a given weight of catalyst, the greater the amount of heat released during combustion in the regenerator.

6l~7~

.
. .
eat released by combustion of coke in the regenera-tor is absorbed by the catalyst and can be readily retained thereby until the regenerated catalyst is brought into contact with fresh feed. ~Yhen processing caxbo~metallic oils to the relatively high levels of conversion involved in the present invention, the amount of regeneratox heat which is transmitted to fresh feed by way of recycling regenerated catalyst can substantially exceed ; the level of heat input which is appropriate in the riser for heating and vaporizing the feed and other materials, for su~plying 10 the endothermic heat of reaction for cracking, for making up the heat losses of the unit and so forth. Thus, in accordance with the invention, the amount of regenerator heat transmitted to resh feed may be controlled, or restricted where necessary, ~ - .
within certain approximate ranges. The amount of heat so trans-mitted may for example be in the range of about 500 to about 1200, more particularly about 600 to about 900, and more particularly ; about 650 to about 850 BTUs per pound of fresh feed. The a~ore-said ranges refer to the co~bined heat, in BTUs per pound of fresh feed, which is transmitted by the catalyst to the feed and reac-tion products (between the contacting of feed with catalyst and the separation of product from catalyst) for supplylng the heat of reaction (e.g. for cracking) and the difference in enthalpy between the products and the fresh feed. Not included in the ~; foregoing are the heat made available in the reactor by the adsorption of coke on the catalyst, nor the heat consumed by heatiny, vaporizing or reacting recycle streams and such added materials as water, steam, naphtha and other hydrogen donors, flue gases and inert gases, or by radiation and other losses.

One or a combination of techniques may be utilized 3~ in this invention for controlling or restricting the amount of regeneration heat transmitted via catalyst to fresh feed.

_ ~9 _ -~ --For example, one may add a comhustion promotor to the cracking c~alyst in order to reducc the temperature of combustion of co~e to carbon dio~ide and/or carbon monoxide in the reyenerator.
~loreover, one may remove heat from the catalyst through ; 5 heat exchange means, including for example heat exchangers (e.g. steam coils) built into the regenerator itself, whereby one may extract heat from the catalyst during regeneration. Heat exchangers can be built into catalyst transfer lines, such as for instance the catalyst return line from the regenerator to the reactor, whereby heat may be removed from the catalyst after t is regenerated. The amount of heat imparted to the catalyst in the regenerator may be restricted by reducing the amount of insulation on the regenerator to permit some heat loss to the surrounding atmosphere, especially if feeds of exceedingly high ~15 coking potential are pIanned ~or processing; in general, such loss of heat to the atmosphere is considered economically less desirable than certain of the other alternatives set forth herein. One may also inject cooling fluids into the regenerator, for example water and/or steam, whereby the amount of inert gas a~-ailable in the regenerator for heat absorption and removal is . ~ increased.
Another suitable and preferred technique for controlling or restricting the heat transmitted to fresh feed via recycled regenerated catalyst involves maintaining a s~ecified ratio between the carbon dioxide and carhon monoxide formed in the regenerator while such gases are in heat exchange contact or rclationship with catalyst undergoing regeneration. In general, all or a major portion by weight of the coke present Oll the c~talyst immediately prior to regeneration is removed in at least onc . ' .

combustion zone in which the aEorcsaid rati.o is controlled as ~..
described below. More particularly, at least the major portion .~ more preferably at least about 65~ and more preferably at least about 80 n by weight of the coke on the catalyst is removed in a combustion zone in which the molar ratio of CO2 to CO is main-..tained at a level substantially below 5, e.g. about 4 or less.
Looking at the CO2/CO relationship from the inverse standpoint, it is preferred that the CO/CO2 molar ratio should be at least about 0.25 and preferably at least about 0.3 and still more prefer-. 10 ably about 1 or more or even 1.5 or more. While persons skilled ~ in the art are aware of techniques for inhibiting the burning : of CO to CO2, it has been suggested tha-t the mole ratio of CO:CO2 : should be kept less than 0.2 ~hen reyenerating catalyst with large heavy metal accumulations resulting from the processing of carbo-metallic oils; in this connection see for example U. S. Patent 4,162,213 to Zrinscak, Sr. et al. In this invention however, maximizing CO productionwhile regenerating catalyst to about 0.1% carbon or less, and preferably about 0.05% carbon or less, is a particularly preferred embodiment of this invention.
Moreover, according to a preferred method of carrying out the invention the sub-process of regeneratlon, as a w~ole, may be carried out to the above-mentioned low levels of carbon on reqenerated catalyst with a deficiency of oxygen; more specifi-.cally, the total o~ygen supplied to the one or more stages of regeneration can be and preferably is less than the stoichiometric amount which would be required to burn all hydrogen in the coke to ~12O and to burn all carbon in the coke to CO2. If the coke includcs other combustibles, the aforementioned stoichiometric amount can be adjusted to include the amount of oxygen required to burn them~

. - 51 -:

Still anothcr 2articularly prcferred techniquc ~- for controlling or restricting thc regcneration heat i~partcd to fresh feed via recycled catalyst involves the diversion of a portion of ~he heat borne by recycled catalyst to added materials introduced into the reactor, such as the water, steam, naphtha, other llydrogen donors, flue yases, inert gases, and other gaseous or vaporizable materials which may be introduced into the reactor.
The larger the amount of coke which must be burned from a given weight of catalyst, the greater the potential ~or exposing the catalyst to excessive tempera-tures. Many otherwise desirable and useful cracking-catalysts are particularly susceptible to deactivation at high ~emperatures, and among these are quite a few of the costly molecular sieve or zeolite types of catalyst.
The crystal structures of zeolites and the pore structures of the catalyst carriers generally are somewhat susceptible to thermal and/or hydrothermal degradation. The use of such catalysts in catalytic conversion processes for carbo-metallic feeds creates a need for regeneration techniques which will not destroy the catalyst by exposure to highly severe temperatures and steaming. Such need can be met by a multi~
stage regeneration process which includes conveying spent catalyst into a first regeneration zone and introducing oxidizing gas ; thereto The amount of oxidizing gas that enters said first zone and the concentration of oxyqen or oxygen bearing gas therein are sufficient for only partially effecting the desired conversion of co~e on the catalyst to carbon oxide gases. The partially regenerated catalyst is then removed from the first regeneration zone and iJ conveyed to a second regeneration zone. Oxidizing gas is introduced into the second regeneration zone to provide a highcr concentration of oxygen or oxygcn-containing ~as han in thc first zone, to com21ete the removal of carbon ~o th2 dcsired level. The regener~ted catalvst may then be 7~ii . .
removed from the second zone and recycled to the reactor for contact with fresh feed. An exar~le of such multl-stage re-generation process is described in U.S. Patent 2,938,739.

Multi-stage regeneration offers the possibility of combining oxygen deficient regeneration with the control of the C~:CO~ molar ratio. Thus, about 50~ or more, more preferably about 65% to about 95~, and more preferably about 80% to about 95~ by weight of the coke on the catalyst immediately prior to regeneration may be removed in one or more stages of regenera-tion in which the molar ratio of CO:CO2 is controlled in the manner described above. In combination with the foregoing, the last 5~ or more, or 10% or more by weight of the co]ce originally present, up to the entire amount of coke remaining after the preceding stage or stages, can be removed in a subsequent stage of regeneration in which more oxygen is present. Such process is susceptible o~ operation in such à manner that the total flue gas recovered from the entire, completed regeneration operation contains little or no excess oxygen, i.e. on the order of about 0.2 mole percent or less, or as low as about 0.1-mole percent or . .
less, which is substantially less than the 2 mole percent which has been suggested elsewhere. Thus, multi-stage regeneration is particularly beneficial in that it provides another convenient technique for restricting regeneration heat transmitted to fresh feed via regenerated catalyst and/or reducing the potential for thermal deactivation, while simultaneously affording an oppor-tunity to reduce the carbon level on regenerated catalyst to those vcry lo~ percentages (e.g. abou~ 0.1% or less) which particularly ~ 53 -enhance catalyst activity. Morcover, where the rcgencration conditions, c.g. temperature or atmosphere, are substantially less severe in the second zone than in the first zone (e.g. by at least about 10 and preferably at least about 20F), that part of the regeneration sequence which involves the most severe condi~ions is performed while there is s~ill an appreciable amount of coke on the catalyst. Such operation may provide some protection of the catalyst from the more severe conditions. A
particularly preferred embodiment of the invention is two-stage fluidized regeneration at a maximum temperature of about 1500F
with a reduced temperature of at least about 10 or 20F in the dense phase o the second stage as compared to the dense phase of the first stage, and with reduction of carbon on catalyst to about 0.05% or less or even about 0 025% or less by weight in the second zone. In fact, catalyst can readily be regenerated to carbon levels as low as 0.01% by this technique, even though the carbon on catalyst prior to regeneration is as much as about 1%.
In most circumstances, it will be important ~C to insure that no adsorbed oxygen containing gases are carried - into the riser by recycled cataIyst. Thus, whenever such action is cons_dered necessary, the catalyst discharged from the regenerator may be stripped with appropriate stripping gases to remove oxygen containing gases. Such stripping may for instance be conducted at relatively high temperatures, for e~ample about 1350 to about 13~0F, using steam, nitrogen or other inert gas as the stripoing gas(es). The use of nitrogen and other inert gases is beneficial from the standpoint of avoiding a tendency toward h~dro-thermal catalyst deactivation which may result from the use of steam.

5~ -The following comments and discussion,relating to metals managcment, carbon management and heat management may be of assist~lc~ in obtaining best results when operating the inven-tion. Since these remarks are for the most part directed to what is considered the best mode of operation, it should be apparent that the i~vention is nok limited to the particular modes of 'operation discussed below. Moreover, since certain of these comments are necessarily based on theoretical considerations, there is no intention-to be bound by any such theory) whether e~pressed herein or implicit in the operating suggestions set forth hereinafter.
~; 10 Although discussed separately below, it is readily apparent that metals management, carbon management and heat mange-. ment are inter-related and interdependentsubjects both in theory and practice. While coke yield and coke laydown on catalyst are primarily the result of the re`la~tively large quantities of coke precursors found in carbo-metallic oils, the production of coke is '; exacerbated by high metals accumulations, which can also signifi-'~ cantly affect catalyst performance. Moreover, the degree of ~'- success experienced irr metals management and carbon management will have a-direct--influence on the extent to whlch heat manage-, 20 ment is necessary. Moreover, some of the steps taken in support of metals management have proved very helpful in respect to carbon and heat management.
- As noted previously the presence of a large heavy metals accumulation on the catalyst tends to aggravate the problem ' of dehydrogenation and aromatic condensation, resultin~ in increased production of gases and coke for a feedstock of a given Ramsbottom carbon value. The introduction of substantial quantities of H2O
into the reactor, either in the form of steam or liquid water, appears higllly beneficial`from thc standpoint of keeping the . _ . ~
hcavy mctals in a less harmful form, i.e. the oxid~ xathcr than metallic form. This is of assistance in maintaining the desired selectivity.
Also, a unit design in which system components and residence times are selectea to reduce khe ratio of catalyst reactor residence time relative to catalyst regenerator residence time will tend to reduce the ratio of the times during which the catalyst is respectively under reduction conditions and oxidation conditions. This too can assist in maintaining desired levels of selectivity.
Whether the metals content of the catalyst is being managed successfully may be observed by monitoring the total hydrogen plus methane produced in the reactor and~or the ~; 15 ratio of hydrogen to methane thus produced. In general, it is considered that the hydrogen to methane mole ratio should be less than about 1 and preferably about 0.6 or less, with about 0.4 i~ or less being considered about optimum.
Careful carbon management can improve both selectivity, (the ability to maximize production of valuable products) and heat produckivity. In general, the techniques of metals control described above are also of assistance in carbon management.
The usefulness of water addition in respect to car~on management has already been spelled out in considerable detail in that part of the specification which relates to added materials for intro~
duction into the reaction:zone. In ~eneral, those techniques which improve dispersion of the feed in the reaction zone should also prove helpful; these include for instance the use of fogging or misting devices to assist in dispersing the feed.

_. .

Catalys t to oil ratio is also a factor in heat management . In common with prior FCC practice on VGO, the reactor temperature may be controlled in the practice of the present invention by respectively increasing or decreasing the flow of hot regenerated catalyst to the reactor in response to decreases and increases in reactor temperature, typically the outlet temperature in the case of a riser type reactor. Where the automatic controller for catalyst introduction is set to maintain an excessive catalyst to oil ratio, one can expect unnecessarily lar~e rates of carbon proAuction and heat 10 release, relative to the weight of fresh feed charged to the reaction zone .
Relatively high reactor temperatures are also beneficial from the standpoint of carbon management. Such higher temperatures foster more complete vaporization of feed and disengagement of 15 product from catalyst.
Carbon management can also be facilitated by suitable restriction of the total pressure in the reactor and the partial pressure of the feed. In general, at a given level of conversion, relatively small decreases in the aforementioned pressures can 20 substantially reduce coke production. This may be due to the fact that restricting total pressure tends to enhance vaporization of high boiling components of the feed, encourage cracking and facilitate ' disengagement of both unconverted feed and higher boiling reduced products from the catalyst. It may be of assistance in this regard - 25 to restrict the pressure drop of equipment downstream of and in communication with the reactor. But if it is desired or necessary to operate the system at higher total pressure, such as for instance because of operating limitations (e.g. pressure drop in downstream equipment) the above described benefits may be obtained by 30 restricting the feed partial pressure. Suitable ranges for total reactor pressure and feed partial pressure have been set forth above, and in general it is desirable to attempt to minimize the pressures within these ranges.

,. , RI-60~9A

The abrupt separation of catalyst from product vapo~s- -and unconvcrted feed (if any) is also of great assistance. It is or this reason that the so-called vented riser apparatus and techni~ue disclosed in U. S. Patents 4,070,159 and 4,066,533 to George D. Myers et al is the preferred type of apparatus for conducting this process. For similar reasons, it is beneficial to reduce insofar as possible the elapsed time between separa-tion of catalyst from product vapors and the commencement of stripping. The vented riser and prompt stripping tend to reduce the opportunity for coking of unconverted feed and higher boiling cracked products adsorbed on the catalyst.
` A particularly desirable mode of operation from the standpoint of carbon management is to operate the process in the vented riser using a hydrogen donor if necessary, while maintain-ing the feed partial pressure and total reactor pressure as low as possible, and incorporating relatively large amounts of water, steam and if desired, other diluents, which provide the numerous benefits discussed in greater detail above.
Moreover, when liquid water, steam, hydrogen donors, hydrogen and other gaseous or vaporizable materials are fed to the reaction zone, the feeding of these materials provides an opportunity for exercising additional control over catalyst to oil ratio. Thus, for example, the practice of increasing or decreasing the catalyst to oil ratio for a given amount of decrease or increase in reactor temperature may be reduced or eliminated by substituting either appropriate reduction or increase in the charging ratios o~ the water, steam and other gaseous or vaporizable material, or an appropriate reduction or increase in the ratio of water to steam and/or other gaseous materials introduced into the reaction zone.

lleat management lncludes measures taken to con~rol _-the amount of heat rele~sed in various parts of the process and/or for dealing successfully with such heat as-may be released.
Unlike conventional FCC practice using VGO, wherein it is usuall~
a problem to generate sufficient heat during regeneration to heat balance the reactor, the processing of carbo-metallic oils generally produces so much heat as to require careful management thereof.
Heat management can be facilitated by various techniques associated with the materials introduced into the reactor. Thus, heat absorption by feed can be maximized by minimum preheating of feed, it being necessary only that the feed temperature be high .. .
~ enough so that it is sufficiently fluid for successful pumping -` and dispersion in the reactor. When the catalyst is maintained in a highly active state with the suppression of coking (metals contxolj, so as to achieve higher conversion, the resultant higher conversion and greater selectivity can increase the heat absorption of the reactlon. In general, higher reactor tempera-tures promote catalyst conversion activity in the face of more refractory and higher boiling constituents with high coking potentials. While the rate of catalyst deactivation may thus be increased, the higher temperature of operation tends to offset this loss in activity. Higher temperatures in the reactor also contribute to enhancement of octane number, thus off-setting the octane depressant effect of high carbon lay down. Other techniques for absorbing heat have also been discussed above in connection with the introduction of water, steam, and other gaseous or vapori~able materials into the reactor.

~. .....
Tllc sevcrc stripping and various rcgener~tion techniyucs discussed above are useful in controlling heat rclc~se in the regenerator. While removaI of heat from catalyst in or downstream of the regenerator by means of heat exchangers (includ-ing steam coils) has been suggested as a means for controlling - heat releas2,the above described techniques of multi-stage regeneration and control over the CO/C02 ratio (in either single or multi-stage regeneration) are considered more advan-tageous. The use of steam coils is considered to be partly sel~-defeating, in that a steam coil or heat exchanger in the regenerator or catalyst return line will generally cause an increase in the catalyst to oil ratio with a resultant increase in the rates of carbon production in the reactor and heat release in the regenerator.
lS As noted above, the invention can be practiced in the above described modes and ~tany others. Two illustrative, non-limiting examples are described by the accompanying schematic diagrams in Figures 1 and 2 and by the descriptions of those figures which follow.
Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of an apparatus for carrying out the process of the present invention. The carbo-metallic oil feed (which may have been heated in a feed preheater ~not shown) and water (when used) supplied through delivery pipe 9, are fed by feed supply pipe 10 having a control valve 11 to a wye 12 in which they mix with a flow of catalyst delivered through suppl~ pipc 13 and controlled by valve 14. Of course a variety of mixing arrangcments may be employed, and provisions may be made for introducing the other added materials discussed a~ove. The mixture of catalyst and feed, with or without such additional materials, is thcn introduced into riser 18.

Although riser 18 appears vertical in the drawing, persons s~illed in the art ~ill recognize that the riser need not be vertical~ as riser type reactors are known in which an appreci-able portion of the riser pipe is non-vertical. Thus, riser pipes having an upward component of direction are contemplated, and usually the upward component of their up~ardly flowing inclined portions is substanti~1, i.e. at least about 30. It is also known to provide risers which have downwardly flowing inclined or vertical portions, as well as horizontal portions. Folded risers are also known, in which there are both upwardly extending and downwardly extending segments. Moreover, it is entirely feasible to practice the process of the invention in an inclined and/or vertical pipe in which the feed and catalyst are introduced at an upper elevation and in which the feed and catalyst moves under the influence of gravity and the down flow of the feed-to a lower elevation. Thus, in general, the invention contem?lates the use of reactionchambers having a long L/D ratio and having a significant deviation from horizontal.

; . .
At the upper end of the riser 18 is a chamber 19 which receives the catalyst from the riser. Means are provided for causing product vapors to undergo a sufficient change of direction relative to the direction traveled by the catalyst particles, whereby the vapors are suddenly and effectively separated from the catalyst. Thus, there is "ballistic"
separation of catalyst particles and product vapors as described above.
In the present schematic diagram, the disengagement chamber 19 includes an upward extension 20 of riser pipe 18 having an open top 21 through which the catalyst particles are discharged. This embodiment makes use of the so-called vented riser described in the above-mentioned Myers et al patents.

: secause of the re~ractory nature of carbo-metallic fractions, relatively high severity is required, but the rapid disengage-ment of catalyst from lighter cracked products in the vented riser.prevents overcracking of desirable liquid products such as . 5 gasoline to gaseous products. The product vapors are caused to .undergo a sudden change of direction into lateral port 22 in the side of riser extension 20, the catalyst particles being, for the most part, unable to foll.ow the product vapors into port 22.
lu The vapors and those few particles which do manage to follow them into port 22 are transferred by cross pipe.23 to a cyclone separator 24. It is an advantage of the vented riser system shown that it can functi.on satisfactorily with . a single stage cyclone separator. However, in the present embodiment the cyclone separator 24 is employed as a first .

stage cyclone separator which is connected via tran~fer pipe 17 with optional secondary cyclone separator 25. The cyclone separator means, whether of the single- or multi-stage type, separates from the product vapors those small amounts of catalyst which do enter the lateral port 22. Product vapors are discharged from disengagement chamber 19 through product.
discharge pipe 26.
The catalyst particles which discharge from open top 21 of riser pipe extension 20, and those catalyst particles which are discharged from the discharge legs 27 and 28 of primary and secondary cyclones 24 and 25 dro2 to the bottom of disen~agement chamber 19. The inventory and residence time of catalyst in chamber 19 are preferably minimi~ed. During startup those catalyst particles which are present may be kept in suspension by fluffing jets 30 supplied with steam through steam supply pipe 29. Spent catalyst spilling over from the bottom of disengagement chamber 19 passes via drop let 31 to a stripper chamber 32 equipped with baffles 33 and steam jet 34. Any of the other stripping gases referred to above may be employed with or in place of the steam.
, .
. ~ Carbon is burned from the surface of the catalyst in the combustor 38 which receives stripped catalyst via downcomer pipe 39 and control valve 40. Blowers 41 and 42, in association with a valve and piping arrangement generally indicated by 44, supply air to combustion air jets 48 at the bottom of the combustor and to fluffing jets 49 at an elevated position. Air preheater 43, although usually unused when processing heavy hydrocarbons in accordance ,~ with the invention, may be employed when starting up the unit on VGO; then, when the unit is switched over to the carbo-metallic feed, preheater operation may be discontinued (or at least reduced). Supplemental fuel means may be provided to supply fuel through the combustion air jets 48; but such is usually unnecessary since the carbon lay down on the catalyst supplies more than enough fuel to maintain the requisite temperatures in the regeneration section. Regenerated catalyst, with most of the carbon burned off, departs the combustor through an upper outlet 50 and cross pipe 51 to a secondary chamber 52, where it is deflected into the lower portion of the chamber by a baffle 53.
Although the use of two stage regeneration is contemplated, and preferred, in this particular embodiment the secondary chamber 52 was operated primarily as a separator chamber, although it can be used to remove additional carbon down to about 0.01% or less in the final stages of regeneration.

Catalyst moves in up to thrce difEcrcnt directions .
from the secondary chamber'52. ~ portion of the catalyst mly be circulated back to combustor 38 via catalyst recirculation loop 55 and control valve 56 for heat control in ~he combustor.
Some of the catalyst is entrained in the product gases, such as CO and/or CO2 pr,oduced by burning the carbon on the catalyst in the combustor, and the entrained catalyst fines pass `~ upwardly in chamber 52 to two sets of primary and secondary ~ cyolones generally indicated by 57 and 58 which separate these ,, 10 catalyst fines from the combustion-gases. Catalyst collected ;- in the cyclones 57,58 and discharged through their drop legs is directed to the bottom of chamber 5~ where catalyst is kept in ' suspension by inert gas ~nd/or steam jets 59 and by a baffle arrangement 54, the latter facilitating discharge of regenerated catalyst through outlet 69 to catalyst supply pipe 13 through , ~ which it is recirculated for contac~ with fresh feed at wyte 12, -- as previously described.
Combustion product gases produced by regeneration of the catalyst and separated from entrained catalyst fines by the sets 57,58 of primary and secondary cyclones in chamber 52, discharge through effluent pipes 61,62 and heat exchangers 60,63. If such gases contain significa~t amounts of CO, they may ~- be sent via,gas supply pipe 64 to an optional furnace 6S in which the CO is burned to heat heating coil 66 connected with steam boiler 67. Additional heat may be supplied to the contents of the boilers through conduit loop 68, which circulates fl,uid from the boiler 67 to heat exchangers 60,63 and back to the boiler, This is of course only one example of many possible rcgcneration arrangements which may be employed. The amount o hcat passed from the regcnerator back to the riser via regeneratcd catalyst may be controlled in any of the other ways described a~ove; ho~levcr it is preferred to control the relative proportions ' ' of carbon monoxidc and c~rbon dloxide produced while the catal~st is in heat exchange relationship with the cornbustion gases rcsult-ing from regeneration. An- example of thls technique is disclcsed in the particularly preferred embodiment described in Figure 2.
In Figure 2 reference numeral 80 identifies a feed control valve in feedstock supply pipe 82. Supply pipe 83 (when uscd) introduces liquid water into the feed. Heat exchanger 81 in supply pipe 82 acts as a feed prehe~ter, whereby preheated feed material may be delivered to the bottom of riser type reactor 91. Catalyst is delivered to the reactor through catalyst stand--~ pipe 86, the flow of catalyst being regulated by a control valve 87 and suitable automatic control equipment (not shown) with which persons skilled in the art of designing and operating risex .. ~
` type crackers are familiar.

The riser 91 may optionally include provision for ;~ injection of water, steam and, if desired, other gaseous and/or vaporizable material for the purpose described above.
The reactor is equipped with a disengagement chamber 92 similar to the disengagement chamber 19 of the reactor shown in Figure 1, 2D and the Figure 2 embodiment thus includes means for causing product vapors to undergo a change of direction for sudden and effective separation from the catalyst as in the previous embodiment.
Catalyst departs disengagement-chamber 92 through stripper 94 which operates in a manner similar to stripper 32 of Figure l. Spent catalyst passes ~rom stripper 94 to regcncrator lOl via spent catalyst transfer pipe 97 having a slide valve 98 for controlling the flow.
Rcgcnerator lOl is divided into upper chamber 102 and lower chamber 103 by a divider panel 104 intermediate thc upper and lower ends of the regenerator. The spent catalyst fro~ transfer pipe 97 enters upper chamber 102 in which the - 65 ~

31 7~i catalyst is partially regencratcd. ~ funnel-like collector ~~
lOG havill~ a bias-cut upper edye r~ceives partially regenerated c~talyst from the upper surface of the dense phase of catalyst - in upper chamber 102 and delivers it via drop leg 107 haviny an outlet 110 beneath the upper surface of the dense phase of catalyst in lower regeneration ahamber 103. Instead of the ` internal catalyst drop leg 107, one may use an external drop legO Valve means in such external drop leg can control the catalyst residence time and flow rate in and between the upper and lower chambers.
Air is supplied to the regenerator through an air supply pipe 113. A portion of the air travels through a branch supply pipe 114 to bayonet 115 extending upwardly in the interior of plenum 111 along its central axis. Catalyst in chamber 103 ~15 has access to the space within plenum 111 between its walls and the bayonet 115~ A small bayonet (not shown) in the aforemen-tioned space fluffs the catalyst and urges it upwardly toward a horizontally arranged ring distributor (not shown) where the open top of plenum 111 opens into chamber 103. The remainder of the air passing through air supply pipe 113 may be heated in air heater 117 (at least during start-up with VGO) and is then introduced into the inlet 118 of the aforementionea ring distribu-tor, which may be provided with holes, nozzles or other apertures which produce an upwara flow of gas to fluidize the paxtially regenerated catalyst in chamber 103.
The air introduced in the manner described above completes in chamber 103 the regeneration of the partially regenerated catalyst received via drop leg 107. The amount of air that is supplied is sufficient so that the air and/or the resultant combustion gases are still able to support combustion .

u~on reaching the top of chamber 103. The aforementioned drop . le~ 107 e~tends through an en.larged aperture in panel 104, to whicll is secured a gas distributor 120 which is concentric with . and surrounds -the drop leg. Via gas distributor 120, combustion .
supporting gases, which have now been partially depleted of combustion supporting gas, are introduced into the up~er regenerator chamber 102 where they contact for purposes of .partial oxidation the incoming spent catalyst from spent - catalyst transfer pipe 97. Apertured probes 121 or other suitable means in gas distributor 120 assist in achieving a uniform distribution of the partially depleted-combustion . supporting gas in upper chamber 102. Supplemen~al air or other fluids may be introduced into ~pper chamber 102, if desired through supply pipe 122, which discharges into or through ~as distributox 120.
Fully regenerated catalyst with less than about 0.25~
carbon, preferably less than about 0.1% and more preferably less than about 0.05~, is discharged from lower regenerator chamber 103 through a regenerated catalyst stripper 128, whose outlet feeds into the catalyst standpipe 86 mentioned above. Thus, regenerated catalyst is returned to riser 91 for contact with additional fresh feed from feed supply pipe 82. Whatever heat is introduced into the recycled catalyst in the regenerator 101 is available for heat transfer with the fresh feed in the riser~ .

The division of the regenerator into upper and lower regeneration chambers 102 and 103 not only smooths out variations in catalyst regenerator residence time but is also uniquely of assistance in restricting the quantity of regeneration heat which is imparted to the fresh feed while yielding a regenerated catalyst with low levels of residual carbon for return to the reac~or.

. - 67 -7~
. . , . , :
~ ecause o~ t~e arrangement of the regenerator, the spent catal~st-,~ from transfer line 97, with its high loadiny of carbon, contacts ' ~ in chamber 102 combustion supporting g~ses which have alread~
been at least partially dépleted of oxygen by the burning of ,, 5 carbon from partially regenerated catalyst in lower reyenerator .
chamber 102. Because of this, it is possible to control both , the combustion and the quantity of carbon dioxide produced in upper regenerator chamber 132. Although the air or other regenerating gas introduced through air supply pipe 113 and branch conduit 114 may contain a relatively large quantity of o~ygen, the partially regenerated'catalyst which they contact in lower regenerator chamber 103 has already had part of its carbon removed. The high concentration of oxygen and the temperature ' of the partially regenerated catal'yst combine to rapidly remove the remaining carbon in the ,catalyst, thereby achieving a clean regenerated catalyst with a minimum of heat release.
Thus, here again, the combustion temperature and the CO:CO2 ratio in the lower regeneration chamber are therefore readily ; controlled. The regeneration off gases are discharged from up2er regenerator chamber 102 via off gas pipe 123, regulator valve 124, catalyst fines trap 125 and outlet,126.
The vapor products from disengagement chamber 92 may ~ be processed in any, convenient manner such as for example, by ,, discharge through vapor discharge line 131 to the inlet of fractionator 132. Said fractionator includes a bottoms outlet 1-33, side outlet 134, flush oil stripper 135, and stripper bottom outlet and discharge line 136 connected to pump 137 for discharging flush oil. The overhead product from stripper 135 is routed via stripper overhead return line 138 to the fractionator 132.

- 6~ -.

~: ~ ~`76 , Tlle maln overhcad discharge linc 13~ of the fractio~n-~tor is connected to ovcrhcad receiver 142 having a bottoms discharge line 143 feed.ing into pump 144 for di-scharging gasoline ~ product. If desired, a portion of this product may be sent via -~ 5 recirculation line 145, the flow being contro].led by recircula-tion valve 1~, back to the fractionator 132. The overhead .. receiver also incl~des a water receiver 147 and a water .. discharge line 148. The gas outlet 150 of the overhead receiver - discharges a stream which is mainly below C5, but containing some C5, C6 and C7 material. If desired, the C5 and above material in this gas stream may be separated by compression, cooling and fractionation and recycled to the overhead receiver wlth a compre~sor, coole= and f~act onator ~not shown).

;:

.,,' ' .
.~ .

_ ~9 _ EXAMPLES
.

The following examples are given only by way of illustration and not for lirniting the invention. Data on the catalysts employed herein is provided in Table 2 above.
~ Heretofore commercial practice in some refineries - has included the blending of relatively small quantities of carbo-metallic oils with the vacuum gas oils commonly used as ' feeds-tock for fluid catalytic cracking.~' It should be emphas'lzed r~ ~
however that the usua] practice was to restrict the quantities of carbo-metallic oll in such blends in order to provide a feedstock which was characterized by relatively low levels of , nickel equivalents of heavy metals and by relatively low levels of carbon residue on'pyrolosis~ Quite unexpectedly however, it appears that the level of conversion of the carbo-metallic oils is great~r when such oils are employed in sufficient amounts so that the nickel equivalents of heavy metals and the carbon residue' are at the relatively higher levels taught herein, sùch as for example when the quantity of carbo-metallic oil ranges from a major weight proportion up to substantially all of the hydro-carbon cracking reactant in the feedstock. ' ''' ~ "-EXAMPLES lA - lD
:, These examples employ'the unit substantially as depicted . .
in Figure 1 and as described in the accompanying text. Examples ', lA - lC illustrate operation with blends containing different '' relative amounts of vacuum gas oils (VGO) and reduced crudes.
Examples lC and lD compare operation with a blend versus operation with 100% reduced crude. For analyses of the vacuum gas oils and reduced crudes, refer to Table 3 which follows. For the unit operating conditions and tabulation of results refer to Table 4 below.

7~
, Comparison of-ReSults of Examples lA and lB ~~
At a temperature in the range of a~out 975-980F, the unit employed herein is known to produce a conversion level of about 78~ when operating with equivalent catalyst on VGO similar to the vacuum gas oils-illustrated in Table 3. A comparison of the data from Examples lA and lB will show that if the vacuum gas oil in each blend is assumed to have converted at the previously esta~lished rate of 78%, the reduced crude which was present in a lower proportion (about 40~) in the run of Example lA was converted to the extent of only about 44~, whereas in the processlng of the blend containing a higher proportion of reduced crude (about 66%) shown in Example lD, a 63~ conversion of the reduced crude was achieved. Note also the increase in volume yield. Thus~
the invention can be operated to produce higher conversion of the reduced crude and/or higher v~lume yield at very adequate octane levels when the reduced crude is charged in blends, as compared to blends having substantially larger amounts of VGO and substantially smaller amounts of reduced crude.
Comparison of Results of Examples lC and lD
A comparison of the data from Example, lC and lD will sho~ that if the VGO in the blend of Examples lC is assumed to have converted at the previously established rate of 78%, then the reduced crude was converted to the extent of only about 58% when it constituted about 42~ of the feedstock, whereas it was convexted to a level of about 64~ when it represented 100~ of the feedstock, Note again the increase in volume percent yield. Thus~ the invention can be operated in such a manner as to provide higher conversion of reduced crude and/or increased volume percent yield of liquid products at very adequate octane levels when the reduced crude is charged alone as compared to a blend of reduced crude with VGO.

. , ~ 7~

._ . EXAMPLES 2 ~ 3 - ~_ . Using as feedstock the reduced crude of Example lD, shown in Table 3, a unit constructed in accordance with Figure i was operated in accordance with the portion of the text relating to Figure 1 and ~n accordance with the conditions set forth in Table 4, giving the results indicated in Table ~.

- EX~MPLES 4 - 6 :
These examples were conducted with a unit constructed --. in accordance with the teachings of Figure 2 and the related text~
Upon operating the unit.in accordance with said text and the condi-tions set forth in Table 4, employing regeneration in two stages, results were obtained as reported in Table 4.

., . ~XAM2LES 7 - 10 ,, ' ' ' ' ' These examples were conducted in a pilot scale unit using feedstock, catalyst and operating conditions as shown in Tables 1, 2 and 4. Figures 3-5 of the d:rawings show the yield in volume percent of (3) C3 olefins, (4) C4 saturates and olefins, and (5) gasoline, respectively versus volume percent conversion~
obtained th~ough use of the feeds and catalysts o~ Examples 7-10 repeated at var.ious levels ..

.
.

.

6~:~7~; ; .
.
~ .

. .. - ` -.
h a~
O a~
a . ~ . . . . . . . , 0~
o r~ cn ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
a) ~ r~ ~ ~1 o - a) ~ ~r co ~ ,~

, : , ' ' , .

.~ .
U '-I ~9 N' I
. I ~. . .
-- . -~ ~ ~ ~ co o o ~ ~ ~ O
~ O 1~ ~ o . -1 . ,~ .
~ ~
a~ In ~ I O LO' ~ ~ U~
. X O . ` o .
1:'1 C~ ~ 3 0 ~1 0~1~1 .
,~^
',~ . . ..
. :h : -m . . . . . . . . .
~a ~ ~ u, o o ~ ~ ~ er o In C5`~ co ~ ~ r~
.~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ o In u~ n u, X o V ~ o :n ~ o o o o :~ , u~ V \l , ' . . ~
~ ~ o c~ ~ In ~ o~ w 01 . . . . . . . ~ .
~a ~7 . O ~r n o ~P . ~ r- ~r ' ~; , ~ ~ a~ , :~
oo ~ ~ a~
~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ u~
x o . . . . ~ . . .
a~ ,1 o o ~D
~ ~ I V

,~: a) ~ (v o o ~
Q
~ ~1 C) O
:~ o o ~ U~
~ .,1 . op o~ dP tll ~3 ~ Cl~ ~:
~J ~ 1~ 0 0 P~ O H ~) ~, au r~ ~ O
~ ~ U~ CO W ~ ~ ~ ~ Z ~ Z ~
,~ , .
s~ ~1 a) ~ o ~
~1 C~ 5~ ~ O
~ h t~ ~ Q~
H u~ O ~ E~ ~ O
r~ ~ O
~; ~ ~ P~

L ~ 7~i ~ ~ X ~ ~ ~1 00 ~ ~ 01~ 0 ~ ~ ~D
i o ~" ~ ~ o~
~ ^

,~ p;, O~ O o ~ ~ o ~ o c~
o ~oo I r~
, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~cY~
o o .^ ^ P:
~D
I
; , , P: ~, o 00 0 0 ~1 1~ i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1~ ~ 00 o r~ ~ c~ I r c~
o ~ oo ,; ~ ^ `` D~
a~
r~

., P~, O O O~ t-- O ~ ~D C~OO CY~ ~0 L~
~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ , oo ~ ~ ~
. ~ o o o ~1 O
~ ~~ 00 ~
~ ~ I~
o r~ ~o r~
¢ ~ ~ ~ ~ I 1~C`~ ~ o ~_,t~ IY ~ N ~ 1~ Cl~
N 1~ ~ 11 O
`-- ~1 oo 00 ,_ . O ~ ~0~ ~ U~OO ~ ~ ~D
o o o ~o ~r~ ~a~ln~o c~ ~ ~ ~ r~ o ~ ~ O

~ ~ ^ ^ I
~D ~ ~ ~ _I
. ~ r~
t~l O _I O ~ ~D ~11~ `J ~D
, ~ t~ C: O O 00 ~00 ~ D O
¢ ~ 1 ~ o ~ o ,_ ~ ~ 0~ 0 o ~
O U~ O U~ O

~ ~ C ~ O ~
t~ ~ O O ~ ~ P, I Y ~1 ~
O ~p~ ~ ~ ~ `J ~ O tO ~rl 9) ~ V ~ 2 rO a) ~`~.

U~ O OQ Ct~ I~ ~ C~ ~ O 0 oo ~ CO~ o~ s oU~ ~ o C
~ ~ ~ ~ Z s~

,:

~ ~ ~ ~ u~ 3 ~ ' ; ~ ~ O U~
. ~` `oJ ~

,, r~u~ o ~ U~ ~ U) ~ ~oo ,~ ~ ~,: ¢
.,~
, , " ~
.. .

~: - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o o` ~ lo . .: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cr~ ~ ~ ~ o\~ Ln oo ~ r~ o ~ 0 00 ~_ r~ a~ ~ Oo u~ O ~ ~ ~ , ,_ ~; ~ ~J ~ -l ~ o ~ ~ oo o . ~ ~ ~I h^) ~ ~ oo ~
~ o oo o o ~: . . . ..
I ~1 ~ ~ C`~

.. . .. l l .. l . ~
~a~ ~ ~oo ~ ~ ~ao I I o ~ o ¢~D ~ ln ~ cr~
l ~ ~~
~:~
t~ ~ ~
~ ~
o o o ~ ~ ~ ~
3 ~ ~ ~

g~ ~ O Ln S ~ I ~ D

U~ O O ~ ~t2:; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 e ~ ~c ~ ~ X ~ ~ h ~ ~ g OO ~ ~~ O :4 0rl N O
V~ ~ ~ o ~

3L7~i W C~
O p; . I I ~ . .......
~ ~ ~ O
Q~
.:~¢
o~ r~
~;~ U ~ ~ u~
o ~ . a N 1 1 U~ N 11'~
'~ ~ ~ O
..
;
t~
I~ r~
. . I I ~ . . .
I
cr o . ~
~:1 aJ
~~ ~0 ~1~ ~D ~ O ~ ~ `J
-1 XtY) ~0 ~ N CO
~::r~ . . , , ~ . ....... .
O ~ ~J I IV~ O `D C~ C~ ~00 r-i C~) 1~ 00 h ~i L~ r~l ~\ LO 0 ~,~ ~ O
~1 N

~ . . ~ . . . ....... . .
~ O~ 1~ N u~ N ~ U~ O N 00 0 D D ~ ~ tJ~ N ~) r~ O
I~ CY O
~: N ~1 ~
~:t ~ CO ~ ~ O'l N 1~ ~) 00 U) O'~ N ~0 ~c~l oo o~ u~ ~ ~ O r~ o u~
1~ O 00 V~ O
o ~! 3 e ^ ^ J O tn O u~ O ~, O ~ U~ . ~ . ~ O
0 3 ~:~
f~ o u~ o ~ a~ , ~ ~ o ~~ ~ a) a) ~ u~ ~~ Y
o o ~ p~ o ~ ~

~ ~ .

7~

~ ~ o ~ o ., `:

cr o~ N N
r~
:. W ~ :2; Z
. ~

00 ~ C~ 00 0 ~--i `J 00 I~ ~0~ r~ ~ ¢ ¢
:. ~ C~
. ^ Z Z
,: .

,~ ~ u70 r~
JJ 00 ~t~i O ~ ¢ ¢ N ~
' ~ r~ ~ o~ t~ oo ~ \
t~
~*

~: ~
..
r-- 00 ~ ~0~ ~1 O ~ 00 ~D Ir`) ~ co oo c~ O CJ~ O ~n ~oo ¢ ~ In _~
Z ~` ~

I N
. . .~ . ~ C:
11~ ~1 ~0 0 Lr) N 00 ~ 1 ¢
~ - C`J ~ æ o N
~t ~
.. ~
_1 ~ ~, ~, C,) ~ ~ O
o o o U~ U) ~! ~ ~ O E~ E~E3 3 ~ ~ O U~

U~ 1 0 0 ~ ~ a ~ x ~ h ~ O
o ~ qJ cJ ~ o O Q ~ ~ O ~ ~ N O
O U
-, ...

Claims (83)

The embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive property of privilege is claimed, are defined as follows:

1. A process for economically converting carbometallic oils to lighter products, comprising:

I providing a converter feed containing 650°F.+
material, said 650°F.+ material being characterized by a carbon residue on pyrolysis of at least about 1 and by containing at least about 4 parts per million of Nickel Equivalents of heavy metal(s);

II bringing said converter feed together with cracking catalyst to form a stream comprising in suspension of said catalyst in said converter feed and causing the resultant stream to flow through a progressive flow type reactor having an elongated reaction chamber which is at least in part vertical or inclined for a vapor residence time in the range of about 0.5 to about 10 seconds at a reaction chamber outlet temperature of about 900° to about 1400°F. and under a pressure of about 10 to about 50 pounds per square inch absolute sufficient for causing a conversion per pass in the range of about 50% to about 90% while producing coke in amounts in the range of about 6 to about 14% by weight based on fresh feed, and laying down coke on the catalyst in amounts in the range of about 0.3 to about 3% by weight;

III ballistically separating said catalyst from the stream of hydrocarbons formed by vaporized feed and resultant cracking products in the elongated reaction chamber by projecting catalyst particles in a direction established by said elongated reaction chamber or an extension thereof, and causing said products to make an abrupt change of direction relative to the direction in which said catalyst particles are projects, IV stripping hydrocarbons from said separated catalyst;

V regenerating said catalyst; and VI recycling the regenerated catalyst to the reactor for contact with fresh feed.

2. A process for economically converting carbometallic oils to lighter products, comprising:

I providing a converter feed containing at least about 70% by volume of 650°F.+ material, said converter feed being further characterized by a carbon residue on pyrolysis of more than about 1.4 and by containing more than about 5 parts per million of Nickel Equivalents of heavy metal(s);

II bringing said converter feed together with cracking catalyst having an equilibrium microactivity test conversion activity level of at least about 50 volume percent to form a stream comprising a suspension of said catalyst in said converter feed and causing the resultant stream to flow at a lineal velocity of at least about 25 feet per second through a progressive flow type reactor having an elongated reaction chamber which is a least in part vertical or inclined for a vapor residence time in the range of about 0.5 to about 6 seconds at a reaction chamber outlet temperature of about 975° to about 1300°F. and under a pressure of about 10 to about 50 pounds per square inch absolute sufficient for causing a conversion per pass in the range of about 60% to about 90% while producing coke in amounts in the range of about 6 to about 14% by weight based on fresh feed, and laying down coke on the catalyst in amounts in the range of about 0.3 to about 3% by weight;

III ballistically separating said catalyst from the stream of hydrocarbons formed by vaporized feed and resultant cracking products in the elongated reaction chamber by projecting catalyst particles in a direction established by said elongated reaction chamber or an extension thereof, and causing said products to make an abrupt change of direction relative to the direction in which said catalyst particles are projected;

IV stripping hydrocarbons from said separated catalyst;

V regenerating said catalyst; and VI recycling the regenerated catalyst to the reactor for contact with fresh feed.

3. A process for ecominically converting carbometallic oils to lighter products, comprising:

I providing a converter feed containing at least about 70% by volume of 650°F.+ material, said converter feed being further characterized by a carbon residue on pyrolysis of more than about 1.4 and by containing more than about 5 parts per million of Nickel Equivalents of heavy metal(s);

II bringing said converter feed together with cracking catalyst having an equilibrium microactivity test conversion level of at least about 60 volume percent with H2O in a weight ratio of at least about 0.04 relative to said converter feed to form a stream comprising a suspension of said catalyst in a mixture of said converter feed and steam and causing the resultant stream to flow at a lineal velocity of at least about 25 feet per second through a progressive flow type reactor having an elongated reaction chamber which is a least in part vertical or inclined for a vapor residence time in the range of about 0.5 to about 6 seconds at a reaction chamber outlet temperature of about 975° to about 1300°F. and under a pressure of about 10 to about 50 pounds per square inch absolute sufficient for causing a conversion per pass in the range of about 60% to about 90% while producing coke in amounts in the range of about 6 to about 14% by weight based on fresh feed, and laying down coke on the catalyst in amounts in the range of about 0.3 to about 3% by weight;

III ballistically separating said catalyst from the stream of hydrocarbons formed by vaporized feed and resultant cracking products in the elongated reaction chamber by projecting catalyst particles in a direction established by said elongated reaction chamber or an extension thereof, and causing said products to make an abrupt change of direction relative to the direction in which said catalyst particles are projected;

IV stripping hydrocarbons from said separated catalyst;

V regenerating said catalyst; and VI recycling the regenerated catalyst to the reactor for contact with fresh feed.

4. A process for ecominically converting carbometallic oils to lighter products, comprising:

I providing a converter feed containing 650°F.+
material, said converter feed having had substantially no prior hydrotreatment and being composed of at least about 70% by volume of 650°F.+ material and of at least about 10% by volume of material which will not boil below about 1025°F., at least about 85% by volume of said converter feed not having been previously exposed to cracking catalyst under cracking conditions, said converter feed being further characterized by a carbon residue on pyrolysis of at least about 4 and by containing more than about 5.5 parts per million of Nickel Equivalents of heavy metal(s), II bringing said converter feed together with cracking catalyst bearing a heavy metal(s) accumulation of about 5000 to about 30,000 Nickel Equivalents by weight, expressed as metal(s) on regenerated equilibrium catalyst and having an equilibrium microactivity test conversion level of at least about 60 volume percent, in a catalyst to converter feed weight ratio of at least about 6, and with H2O in a weight ratio relative to the converter feed of about 0.04 to about 0.3 to form a stream comprising a suspension of said catalyst in a mixture of said converter feed and steam and causing the resultant stream to flow at a lineal velocity of at least about 35 feet per second through a progressive flow type reactor having an elongated riser reaction chamber which is a least in part vertical or inclined for a vapor residence time in the range of about 0.5 to about 3 seconds at a reaction chamber outlet temperature of about 985° to about 1200°F. and under a pressure of about 15 to about 35 pounds per square inch absolute sufficient for causing a conversion per pass in the range of about 60% to about 90%, said conditions being insufficient fully vaporizing and converter feed, while producing coke in amounts in the range of about 6 to about 14% by weight based on fresh feed, and laying down coke on the catalyst in amounts in the range of about 0.3 to about 3% by weight;

III at least one location along the elongated reaction chamber, including an outlet means at the downstream end of the elongated reaction chamber or an extension thereof, ballistically separating said catalyst from at least a substantial portion of the stream comprising said catalyst, steam and resultant cracking products formed in the elongated reaction chamber by projecting catalyst particles in a direction established by said elongated reaction chamber or an extension thereof, diverting vapors in said stream, including said steam and said products, by abrupt change of direction relative to the direction in which said catalyst particles are projected and interposing wall means between the thus projected catalyst and the diverted steam and products;

IV stripping hydrocarbons from said separated catalyst;

V regenerating said catalyst with oxygen-containing combustion-supporting gas under conditions of time, temperature and atmosphere sufficient to reduce the carbon on the catalyst to about 0.25 by weight or less, while forming gaseous combustion product gases comprising CO and/or CO2; and VI recycling the regenerated catalyst to the reactor for contact with fresh feed.

5. A process according to claim 1 in which said 650°F.+
material represents at least about 70% by volume of said feed.

6. A process according to claim 1 in which said 650°F.+
material represents at least about 70% by volume of said feed.

7. A process according to either of claims 3 or 4 in which said 650°F.+ material represents about 100% by volume of said feed.

8. A process according to any of claims 1, 2 or 3 in which the 650°F.+ material includes at least about 10% by volume of material which will not boil below about 1000°F.

9. A process according to claim 3 in which the 650°F+
material includes at least about 15% by volume of material which will not boil below about 1000°F.

10. A process according to claim 3 in which the 650°F.+
material includes at least about 20% by volume of material which will not boil below about 1000°F.

11. A process according to claim 3 in which the 650°F.+
material includes at least about 10% by volume of material which will not boil below about 1025°F.

12. A process according to either of claims 3 or 85 in which the 650°F.+ material includes at: least about 15% by volume of material which will not boil below about 1025°F.

13. A process according to either of claims 3 or 4 in which the 650°F.+ material includes at least about 20% by volume of material which will not boil below about 1025°F.

14. A process according to either of claims 2 or 3 wherein said carbon residue corresponds with a Ramsbottom carbon value in the range of about 2 to about 12.

15. A process according to any of claims 2, 3 or 4 wherein said carbon residue corresponds with a Ramsbottom carbon value in the range of about 4 to about 8.

16. A process according to claim 1 wherein the carbon residue of the feed as a whole corresponds with a Ramsbottom carbon value of at least about 1.

17. A process according to any of claims 1, 2 or 3 wherein said carbon residue of the converter feed as a whole corresponds with a Ramsbottom carbon value not exceeding about 12.

18. A process according to either of claims 3 or 4 wherein the carbon residue of the converter feed as a whole corresponds with a Ramsbottom carbon value in the range of about 4 to about 8.

19. A process according to any of claims 1, 2 or 3 wherein the feed as a whole contains at least about 4 parts per million of Nickel Equivalents of heavy metal(s), of which at least about 2 parts per million is nickel (expressed as metal, by weight).

20. A process according to either of claims 3 or 4 wherein said converter feed comprises at least about 70% by volume of material which boils above about 650°F. and at least about 10% by volume of material which will not boil below about 1000°F., and has an average composition characterized by:

(a) an atomic hydrogen to carbon ratio in the range of about 1.2 to about 1.9; and (b) by containing one or more of the following:
(i) at least about 0.3% by weight of sulfur;
(ii) at least about 0.5% by weight of nitrogen; and (iii) at least about 0.5% of pentane insolubles.

21. A process according to either of claims 3 or 4 wherein said converter feed comprises at least about 0.8% by weight of sulfer.

22. A process according to either of claims 2 or 3 wherein at least about 85% by volume of the converter feed is oil which has not previously been contacted with cracking catalyst under cracking conditions.

23. A process according to any of claims 1, 2 or 3 wherein at least about 90% by volume of the converter feed is oil which has not previously been contacted with cracking catalyst under cracking conditions.

24. A process according to either of claims 3 or 4 wherein substantially all of the converter feed is oil which has not previously been contacted with cracking catalyst under cracking conditions.

25. A process according to any of claims 1, 2 or 3 wherein said converter feed comprises about 15% or less by volume of recycled oil.

26. A process according to any of claims 1, 2 or 3 wherein said converter feed comprises about 10% or less by volume of recycled oil.

27. A process according to either of claims 3 or 4 wherein said converter feed is processed in a substantially once-through or single pass mode with no substantial amount of recycled oil in the converter feed.

28. A process according to any of claims 1, 2 or 3 wherein said catalyst is maintained in contact with said converted feed in said elongated reaction zone in a weight ratio of catalyst to converter feed in the range of about 3 to about 18.

29. A process according to any of claims 1, 2 or 3 wherein said catalyst is maintained in contact with said converted feed in said elongated reaction zone in a weight ratio of catalyst to converter feed in the range of about 4 to about 12.

30. A process according to claim 3 wherein said catalyst is maintained in contact with said converter feed in said elongated reaction zone in a weight ratio of catalyst to converter feed in the range of about 5 to about 10.

31. A process according to either claim 3 or 4 wherein said catalyst is maintained in contact with said converter feed in said elongated reaction zone in a weight ratio of catalyst to converter feed in the range of about 6 to about 10.

32. A process according to either claim 3 or 4 wherein said catalyst is maintained in contact with said converter feed in said elongated reaction zone in a weight ratio of catalyst to converter feed in the range of about 6 to about 8.

33. A process according to either of claims 3 or 4 wherein catalyst is added to the process at a rate in the range of about 0.1 to about 3 pounds per barrel of converter feed.

34. A process according to either of claims 3 or 4 wherein catalyst is added to the process at a rate in the range of about 0.15 to about 2 pounds per barrel of converter feed.

35. A process according to either of claims 3 or 4 wherein catalyst is added to the process at a rate in the range of about 0.2 to about 1.5 pounds per barrel of converter feed.

36. A process according to claim 1 wherein said catalyst has an equilibrium microactivity of at least about 20 volume percent.

37. A process according to claim 1 wherein said catalyst has an equilibrium microactivity of at least about 40 volume percent.

38. A process according to claim 1 wherein said catalyst has an equilibrium microactivity of at least about 60 volume percent.

39. A process according to any of claims 1, 2 or 3 wherein said catalyst is equilibrium cracking catalyst which has previously been used in a fluid catalytic cracking unit in which said catalyst was used for the cracking of feed characterized by a carbon residue on pyrolysis of less than 1 and by containing less than about 4 parts per million of Nickel Equivalents of heavy metal (5) .

40. A process according to claim 3 wherein there is an accumulation of heavy metal(s) on said catalyst substantially greater than 600 ppm of Nickel Equivalents, by weight, expressed as metal(s) on regenerated equilibrium catalyst.

41. A process according to any of claims 1, 2 or 3 wherein there is an accumulation of heavy metal(s) on said catalyst in the range of about 3000 ppm to about 70,000 ppm of Nickel Equivalents, by weight, expressed as metal(s) on regenerated equilibrium catalyst.

42. A process according to any of claims 1, 2 or 3 wherein there is an accumulation of heavy metal(s) on said catalyst in the range of about 4000 ppm to about 50,000 ppm of Nickel Equivalents, by weight, expressed as metal(s) on regenerated equilibrium catalyst.

43. A process according to any of claims 1, 2 or 3 wherein there is an accumulation of heavy metal(s) on said catalyst in the range of about 5000 ppm to about 30,000 ppm of Nickel Equivalents, by weight, expressed as metal(s) on regenerated equilibrium catalyst.

44. A process according to any of claims 1, 2 or 3 wherein said catalyst has a particle size in the range of 5 to about 160 microns.

45. A process according to any of claims 1, 2 or 3 wherein said catalyst is characterized by a pore structure for absorbing hydrocarbon molecules and by reactive sites within or adjacent the pores.

46. A process according to any of claims 1, 2 or 3 wherein said catalyst is a zeolite-containing catalyst.

47. A process according to any of claims 1, 2 or 3 wherein said zeolite-containing catalyst is a molecular sieve catalyst which includes at least about 5% by weight of sieve.

48. A process according to either of claims 1 or 2 conducted in the presence, in the reaction zone, of additional gaseous and/or vaporizable material in a weight ratio, relative to converter feed, in the range of up to about 0.4.

49. A process according to either of claims 1 or 2 conducted in the presence, in the reaction zone, of additional gaseous and/or vaporizable material in a weight ratio, relative to converter feed, in the range of about 0.02 to about 0.4

50. A process according to either of claims 1 or 2 conducted in the presence, in the reaction zone, of additional gaseous and/or vaporizable material in a weight ratio, relative to converter feed, in the range of about 0.03 to about 0.3.

51. A process according to either of claims 1 or 2 conducted in the presence, in the reaction zone, of additional gaseous and/or vaporizable material in a weight ratio, relative to converter feed, in the range of about 0.05 to about 0.25.

52. A process according to either of claims 3 or 4 wherein the total amount of gaseous and/or vaporizable material other than converter feed and resultant products which is present in said reaction zone is in a weight ratio, relative to converter feed, of up to about 0.4.

53. A process according to either of claims 3 or 4 wherein the total amount of gaseous and/or vaporizable material other than converter feed and resultant products which is present in said reaction zone is in a weight ratio, relative to converter feed, in the range of about 0.02 to about 0.4.

54. A process according to either of claims 3 or 4 wherein the total amount of gaseous and/or vaporizable material other than converter feed and resultant products which is present in said reaction zone is in a weight ratio, relative to converter feed, in the range of about 0.03 to about 0.4.

55. A process according to either of claims 3 or 4 wherein the total amount of gaseous and/or vaporizable material other than converter feed and resultant products which is present in said reaction zone is in a weight ratio, relative to converter feed, in the range of about 0.05 to about 0.25.

56. A process according to any of claims 1, 2 or 3 conducted in the presence, in the reaction zone, of additional gaseous and/or vaporizable material in a weight ratio, relative to converter feed, in the range of up to about 0.4, including at least one of the following: nitrogen, other inert gases recycled gas, and hydrogen donors.

57. A process according to any of claims 1, 2 or 3 wherein said reactor is a riser type reactor.

58. A process according to any of claims 1, 2 or 3 wherein said reactor is a vented riser type reactor.

59. A process according to any of claims 1, 2 or 3 wherein said catalyst is a zeolite-containing molecular sieve fluid cracking catalyst suitable for production of gasoline from vacuum gas oils.

60. A process according to claim 3 wherein said residence time of the converter feed and product vapors is in the range of about 1 to about 4 seconds.

61. A process according to claim 3 wherein said residence time of the converter feed and product vapors is in the range of about 1.5 to about 3 seconds.

62. A process according to any of claims 1, 2 or 3 wherein the ratio of the average catalyst residence time to vapor residence time is in the range of about 1 to about 5.

63. A process according to any of claims 1, 2 or 3 wherein the ratio of the average catalyst residence time to vapor residence time is in the range of about 1 to about 4.

64. A process according to claim 1 wherein the temperature in said reactor is maintained in the range of about 975°F. to about 1300°F.

65. A process according to any of claims 1, 2 or 3 wherein the temperature in said reactor is maintained in the range of about 985°F. to about 1200°F.

66. A process according to either of claims 3 or 4 wherein the temperature in said reactor is maintained in the range of about 1000 F. to about 1150 F.

67. A process according to any of claims 1, 2 or 3 wherein the reactor pressure is in the range of about 15 to about 35 psia.

68. A process according to any of claims 1, 2 or 3 wherein the feed partial or total pressure is in the range of about 3 to about 30 psia.

69. A process according to either of claims 3 or 4 wherein the feed partial or total pressure is in the range of about 7 to about 25 psia.

70. A process according to either of claims 3 or 4 wherein the feed partial or total pressure is in the range of about 10 to about 17 psia.

71. A process according to claim 1 wherein said conversion is in the range of about 60 to about 90%.

72. A process according to either of claims 3 or 4 wherein said conversion is in the range of about 70% to about 85%.

73. A process according to any of claims 1, 2 or 3 wherein the coke laydown is in the range of about 0.5 to about 3%.

74. A process according to either of claims 3 or 4 wherein the coke laydown is in the range of about 1 to about 2%.

75. A process according to either of claims 3 or 4 wherein said stripping is conducted at a temperature of about 1025°F.
or higher.

76. A process according to claim 4 wherein said regeneration is conducted at a temperature in the range of about 1100°F. to about 1600°F.

77. A process according to claim 4 wherein said regeneration is conducted at a temperature in the range of about 1200°F. to about 1500°F.

78. A process according to claim 4 wherein said regeneration is conducted at a temperature in the range of about 1275°F. to about 1425°F.

79. A process according to claim 4 wherein the catalyst is regenerated to a carbon content of about 0.1% by weight or less.

80. A process according to claim 4 wherein the catalyst is regenerated to a carbon content of about 0.05% by weight or less.

81. A process according to claim 4 wherein said H2O is brought into contact with said converter feed in said stream and/or prior to formation of said stream in the form of said liquid water in a weight ratio relative to converter feed in the range of about 0.04 to about 0.15 and in the form of steam in a weight ratio relative to converter feed in the range of about 0.01 to about 0.25, the total M O thus supplied not exceeding a weight ratio of about 0.3 relative to converter feed.

82. A process according to claim 4 wherein the percentage of feed and product vapors prevented from having further contact with projected catalyst is at least about 80% by volume.

83. A process according to claim 4 wherein the percentage of feed and product vapors prevented from having further contact with projected catalyst is at least about 90% by volume.