CA1238398A - Terrain advisory system - Google Patents
Terrain advisory systemInfo
- Publication number
- CA1238398A CA1238398A CA000469416A CA469416A CA1238398A CA 1238398 A CA1238398 A CA 1238398A CA 000469416 A CA000469416 A CA 000469416A CA 469416 A CA469416 A CA 469416A CA 1238398 A CA1238398 A CA 1238398A
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- recited
- vehicle
- warning system
- warning
- cone
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
- G08G5/00—Traffic control systems for aircraft, e.g. air-traffic control [ATC]
- G08G5/04—Anti-collision systems
- G08G5/045—Navigation or guidance aids, e.g. determination of anti-collision manoeuvers
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01C—MEASURING DISTANCES, LEVELS OR BEARINGS; SURVEYING; NAVIGATION; GYROSCOPIC INSTRUMENTS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY OR VIDEOGRAMMETRY
- G01C5/00—Measuring height; Measuring distances transverse to line of sight; Levelling between separated points; Surveyors' levels
- G01C5/005—Measuring height; Measuring distances transverse to line of sight; Levelling between separated points; Surveyors' levels altimeters for aircraft
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
- G08G5/00—Traffic control systems for aircraft, e.g. air-traffic control [ATC]
- G08G5/0073—Surveillance aids
- G08G5/0086—Surveillance aids for monitoring terrain
Abstract
TERRAIN ADVISORY SYSTEM
Abstract of the Disclosure A terrain advisory system utilizes stored data representative of terrain and other obstacles in predetermined geographical areas of interest to provide advisory warnings of the proximity of terrain, obstacles and restricted areas as they are approached. When used in a vehicle such as an aircraft, the system monitors the position, altitude, ground speed, ground track and the vertical speed of the vehicle and provides advisory indications of the position and path of travel of the vehicle with respect to obstacles and terrain.
Such advisory indications may take the form of voice warnings describing the nature and position of any obstacles, or a visual display showing the position of the obstacles and terrain with respect to the vehicle.
Abstract of the Disclosure A terrain advisory system utilizes stored data representative of terrain and other obstacles in predetermined geographical areas of interest to provide advisory warnings of the proximity of terrain, obstacles and restricted areas as they are approached. When used in a vehicle such as an aircraft, the system monitors the position, altitude, ground speed, ground track and the vertical speed of the vehicle and provides advisory indications of the position and path of travel of the vehicle with respect to obstacles and terrain.
Such advisory indications may take the form of voice warnings describing the nature and position of any obstacles, or a visual display showing the position of the obstacles and terrain with respect to the vehicle.
Description
3~
Technical Field Th~s inventi~n relates gener~lly to systems for advising the pilot of ~ vehicle such as an aircraft or a submarine of the proximity of obstacles or terrain in the path of the vehicle, and more particularly to navigationally based terrain advisoey systems that advise of the presence of terrain or other obstacles in the vicinity of the v~hicle based on navigationally derived position as well as altitude, ground speed, ground track and vertical speed of the vehicle.
Various systems that provide warnings or advisory inaications of the presence of terrain or obstacles are known. Among those sy~tems include systems generally known as ground proximity warning systems for ai~craft. Such systems monitor the flight conditions of an airctaft and provide 2 warning if the flight conditions are such that an inadvertent cont~ct with the ground is imminent. Among the flight conditions monitored by such systems are radio al~itude and rate, barometric al~itude and rate, airspeed, and flap and gear positio~s. The aforement~oned parameters are monitored, and an advisory indication or a warning is generated when the relationship between the afore-~aid conditions or parameters is such that ground impact is likely to occur. Typical examples of such systems are disclosed in United St~tes Patent Nos.
3,715,71~, 3,g25,751, 3,934,221, 3,934,222, 3,936,796, 3,944,968, 3,947,808, 3,947,~10, 3,95~,218, 3,958,219, 4,016,5~5, 4,030,065, 4,058,710, 4,060 "93, 4,067,520, 4,071,894, 4,093,938, 4,107,681, 4,112,~13, ~,121,287, 4,122,529, 4,135,143, 4~189,777, 4,215,334, 4,293,840, 4,319,218, 4,336,976 and 4,369,425, and Canadian Patent N~. 1,033,828.
3~ .
3~3~13 1 While the above-described sys-tems provide advisory and warning signals in the event of proximi-ty to terrain, such systems generate warnings based solely on the flight conditions of the aircraft, and do not utilize navigation information. Consequently, the sensitivity of such systems must be adjusted to pro-vide adequate warnings when a hazardous flight condi-tion exists without generating false or nuisance warn-ings when there is no danger. Such an adjustment results in a compromise that rrlay still cause nuisance warnings when flying over terrain unique to par-ticular geographic areas and reduced warning times in other areas. One approach to improve the performance of such systems has been to modify the warning envelopes of the g-ound proximity warning system in accordance with the geographic ]ocation of the aircraft in order to optimize the warning criteria for the particular 'geographic area over which the aircraft is flying.
An example of such a system is described in the applicants' Canadian Patent application Serial No. ~42,015, filed November 25, 1983. In the system disclosed in the aforesaid application, the warning criteria are optimized to suit the terrain characteristics about various geographic areas, particularly the airports from which the aircraft is taking off or landing.
Another approach utilizing a geographical input is disclosed in United States Patent No. 4,224,669.
In the system disclosed in the aforesaid patent, a memory device is employed to store minimum safe altitudes by geographic coordinate areas. A navigational computer is used to determine the position of the aircraft, and a warning is given if the aircraft descends below the stored minimum safe alti-~23~q;~
tude for the coordinate area in which the aircraft isflying. The system has a ~worst case" and a "tactical"
mode of operation. In the "worst case~ mode, the minimum safe altitude is determined as a function of the highest terrain feature or obstacle within the geographic coordinate area of interest. In the "tac-tical~ mode of operation, curren~ flight conditions such as position, ground speed and ground track are used to define a minimum safe altitude based on the heights of terrain and obstacles immediately ahead of the projected flight path.
While these ~ystems do provide warnings of the proximity of terrain or obstacles, none of the above-described systems provides information relating to the exact location or nature of the terrain or obstacle, nor of the type of action required to avoid the obstacle. Thus, when a warning represe~tative of the proximity of terrain, or of a descent below a minimum safe altitude is provided by the above systems, the evasive action that is normally called for is for the pilot to pull up. While pulling up may be suffi-cient evasive action to avoid impact in many or most cases, there are cases where turning right or turning left in addition to or instead of pulling up would provide a greater margin of safety.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Thus, it is an object of the present inven-tion to provide a terrain or obstacle advisory system that improves the performance of ground proximity warnin~ systems.
It is another object of the present inven-tion to provide a terrain or obstacle advisory system that provides an indication of the nature and location of obstacles and terrain in the vicinity of the vehicle.
_4_ It is yet another object of the present inVentLon to provide a terrain advisory ystem that provides terrain avoidance quidance to the pilot.
It i5 another object of the invention to provide a system that advises the pilot of an aircraft of flight into a restricted area.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide aural terrain avoidance guidance to the pilot.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a visual display of terrain and obstacles.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a terrain advisory system that predicts the flight path of an aircraft with respect to obstacles or terrain and provides an alert if the flight path of the aircraft is such that it is likely to result in an impact with the terrain or an obstacle within a predetermined time interval.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a warning system that provides lonqer warning times than those provided by the prior art systems.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a terrain advisory system capable of providing several minutes of warning time of an impending impact with terrain or an obstacle.
It is yet another object of tne present invention to provide a terrain advisory system that minimizes the number of nuisance warnings generated.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a system that stores geographical features of terrain as well as the location of man-made obstacles, and retrieves the stored terrain and obstacle information to provide an alert in the event of close proximity to the terrain or an obstacle.
It is yet another object of the present invention ~o provide a system that minimizes the memory capacity required to store the terrain and obstacle information.
It is yet another object of the present invention to alter the warning criteria required for the system to generate a warning as a function of the ground track, ground speed and ver~ical speed of the aircraft.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a system that predictively ~looks ahead" of the vehicle withou~ using forward l~oking radar.
It is still another object of the present invention to provide a system that ~looks ahead~ of the vehicle by utilizing navigation information and stored terrain and obstacle data to predict a flight path and to display any obstacles or terrain within the predicted flight path.
Thus, in accordance with a preferred embodi-ment of the invention, geographical data representative of terrain and other obstacles, both natural and man-made are stored in memory as a function of geographic location. In addition, the boundaries of restricted areas, such as, for example, military installations may also be stored in the memory. In order to mini-mize the amount of storage required to store the ter-rain and obstacle information, the shapes and contours of the terrain and obstacles are approximated by simple geometric shapes such as cones, connected cones, in-verted cones and other simple shapes that can be de-fined by a few bits of information. This permits a mountain or a mountain range to be defined by a very few bits defining the height and slope of a cone or connected cones. Alternatively, the shapes may be defined algebraically, but geometric shapes are pre-ferable because they are easier to manipulate mathe-matically.
A navigation system which may include, for example, a flight management system that receives signals from, for example, an inertial navigation system and other signals such as signals from a satel-lite navigation receiver, VLF/OMEGA, Loran C, VOR/DME, and DME/DME, is employed to determine the present latitude and longitude of the aircraft. If no flight management system is used, the signal may be obtained from the various navigation systems directly. Search logic that is responsive to the lati~ude and longitude signals is used to retrieve data representative of the terrain in the vicinity of the present position of the aircraft.
A predictive terrain/obstacle warning envel-ope generator receives the terrain representative data as well as data representative of the ground speed, ground track, altitude and vertical speed of the aircraft to generate a warninq envelope which is a function of aircraft speed, ground track, altitude and vertical speed. In addition, the size of the envelope may be tailored to provide any desired warn-ing time. The point of reference may be selected sothat the envelope is defined either about the aircraft, or about the various obstacles. If the warning envel-ope is defined about the aircraft, a warning or an advisory is generated each time an obstacle pene-trates the warning envelope. If the envelope is ae-fined about the terrain or obstacle, the warning is generated whenever the position of the aircraft is such that it penetrates the envelope.
In order to determine whether the envelope is penetrated, the envelope signal from the predic-3~
tive terrain/obstacle warning envelope generator iscompared with the position of the aircraft or of the terrain/obstacle, and an advisory is issued when the envelope is penetrated. In addition, data from the envelope generator may be used to control a voice generator and a visual display. The voice generator may be programmea to instruct the pilot of the type and location of the terrain or obstacle and the type of action required to avoid it. The data may also be presented visually either in the form of a map display or an attitude display to permit the pilot visually ~o fly around the terrain/obstacle or restrictea area.
These and other objects and advantages of the present invention will become readily apparent upon consideration of the following detailed descrip-tion and attached drawing wherein:
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a preferred embodiment of the terrain/obstacle advisory system according to the invention;
FIGS. 2 and 3 illustrate how terrain features are approximated by simple geometric shapes by the system according to the invention;
FIG. 3A illustrates how a restricted area may be defined;
FIG. 3B illustrates how an inverted cone may be used to define rising terrain ab~ut a plateau or an airport;
FIGS. 4-6 illustrate various approaches to aeriving warning envelopes based on terrain/obstacle loca~ions and aircraft position and flight parameters;
FIGS. 7 and 8 show how the geometric shapes defining the terrain obstacles may ~e expanded as a function of aircraft flight parameters to define a safe approach distance;
~f~
FIG. 9 shows an expansion similar to the expansions illustrated in FIGS. 7 and 8 in three dimen-sions;
FIG. 10 is a block diagram of the predictive terrain/obstacle warning envelope generator illustrated in FIG. l;
FIG. 11 is a block diagram of the envelope functions generator illustrated in FIG. 10; and FIG~ 12 is a block diagram of an alternative embodiment of the terrain advisory system according to the invention.
Referring now to the drawing with particular attention to FIG. 1, there is illustrated a preferred embodiment of the system according to the invention generally designated by reference numeral 10. Although the system according to the invention is illus rated as a series of functional blocks for purposes of clarity, it is to be understood that the actual imple-~entation o the system may be other than that speci-fically shown in FIG. 1, with various analog and digi-tal implementations being possible. The system 10 according to the invention utilizes data from an air data computer 12 or from a barometric altimeter and rate circuit present on the aircraft and from a navi-gation system which may include a flight management system 14, also present in the aircraft, in order to determine the location of the aircraft and to advise the pilot of dangerous proximity to terrain or to other obstacles. Alternatively, the navigation data may be ob~ained directly from the navigation system, which may include an inertial navigation system, a satellite navigation receiver, VLF/OMEGA, Loran C, VOR/DME or DME/DME, particularly when no flight manage-ment system is used.
:1~31~
g 1 In the discussion of the present invention, the system will be discussed in an aircraft environ-ment; however, the system is also usable for other vehicles that must navigate around terrain, such as, for example, submarines. The signals from the air data compu-ter 12 and flight management system 14 are applied to a predictive terrain/obs-tacle warning envelope generator 16 along with terrain data which is retrieved from a terrain memory 18 by location search logic 20. A system particular:y suitable for the search logic 20 is disclosed in the applicants' Canadian patent application serial No. 469,728 filed on December 10, 1984 entitled "Ground Proximity Warning System Geographic Area Determination", but ol:her searcll logic may be.used. In addition, envelope control data is applied to the envelope generator 16. Data representative of the climb performance of the aircraft is also applied to the envelope generator 16 from an circraft performance input 22. The envelope generated by the envelope generator 16 is compared with the position (latitude and longitude) of the aircraft provided by the flight management system 14 by a comparator 24 that compares the envelope and position signals. The comparator 24 illustrated in Fig. 1 may be a comparator that compares, for example, voltages or currents, or simply a summing junction. In a digital system, a digital comparator may be used.
The comparator 24 controls a voice generator 26 which generates a voice advisory signal and applies it to a transducer 28, which may be part of the cockpit communication system in order to provide an advisory indication of the presence of terrain or obstacles whenever the envelope generated by the envelope generator 16 is penetrated. In addition, the envelope generator causes the voice generator 26 to advise the pilot 3~, of the nature and location of the terrain or obstacle by selecting the appropriate message to indicate to the pilot whether he should turn left or right, and whether the object is terrain or a man-made obstacle.
In addition, display data is generated by ~he warning envelope generator and applied to an attitude display generator 30 and a map display generator 32 which generate attitude and map displays that are applied to a pair of displays, such as cathode ray tubes 34 and 3b. The at~itude display displays an image show-ing the terrain and obstacles that lie in the flight path forward of the aircraft. The map display dis-plays the same terrain below the aircraft. A signal from the comparator 24 is also applied to the display generators 30 and 32 to permit them to indicate a hazardous condition visually, for example, by a change in color. A system suitable for providing such dis-plays is described in Aviation Week and Space Technology, September 12, 1983, pages 88-95. Other systems suitable for providing such displays are multi-function displays that provide, for example, a map display that shows the position of the aircraft rela-tive to a navigational waypoint and a weather radar display. Such displays are presently used on modern transport aircraft such as the Boeing 757 and 767 aircraft and the European A310 Airbus.
In operation, the air data computer 12 pro-vides signals representative of the barometric altitude, or height above sea level, of the aircraft and the vertical speed of the aircraft in the form of a baro-metric rate signal Hb to the predictive terrain/obstacle warning generator 16. Alternatively, the vertical speed signal may be a Z-velocity signal obtained from an inertial navigation system 37.
9.3~3 The flight management system provides signals representative of ground speed and the ground track of the aircraft to the envelope generator 16. In addition, the ground track signal, which is a vector repzesenting the direction of the aircraft along the ground is differentiated by a differentiator 3~ and applied to the envelope generator 16 to provide infor-mation to the envelope generator 16 representative of changes in direction of the aircraft. A position signal representing the latitude and longitude of the aircraft is also applied to the generator 16 as well as to the location search logic 20. The location search logic 20 is responsive to the position signal and causes data representative of terrain within a lS predetermine~ distance from the position of the air-craft to be retrieved from the terrain memory 18 and applied to the envelope generator 16. The envelope generator 16 responds to the various altitude, posi-tion, track and speed signals to generate the various display data, and to advise the pilot of the proxi-mity of terrain and obstacles. The operation of the envelope generator will be discussed in greater detail in a subsequent portion of the detailed description.
In order for the system to operate, data representative of the terrain and obstacle around predetermined critical geographic areas such as, for example, airports and restricted areas, must be stored.
In addition, it is desirable to store data representa-tive of potentially dangerous terrain, such as, for example, mountain ranges. However, in order to store data representative of such terrain and obstacles would require an inordinate amount of memory capacity in the terrain memory 18. Consequently, some form of data compaction must be provided.
Therefore, in accordance with an important aspect of the present invention, rather than storing all of the irregularities and insignificant features of terrain and obstacles, the terrain and obstacles can be approximated by a series of standard shapes that can readily be deined by a few bits. These standard shapes may include simple geometric shapes such as cones, truncated cones, connected cones and other simple shapes that can be defined by a few bits.
Algebraic shapes such as quadratic surfaces and other surfaces that may be readily defined by an algebraic equation may also be used. Preferably, geometric shapes are used as the standard shapes, and mountains, for example, may readily be approximated by cones as shown in FIG. 2. The size, shape and location of such cones may be defined by only four numbers, for example, the height above sea level of the peak of the cone, h, the radius of the base of the cone, r, and the latitude and longituae of the center of the cone, X0, Y0. Similarly, mountain ridges may be defined by two or more connected cones as is shown in FIG. 3. For flat-topped mountains and for plateaus the cones may also b~ truncated as in FIG. 3. Thus, the plateau illustrated in FIG. 3 can be defined by only 10 numbers, namely the truncated and untruncated heights of the cones, hl, hl', and h~, h2l, the radii of the bases of the two cones rl and r2, and locations of the centers of the cones Xl, Yl and X2, Y2. Re-stricted areas, such as, for example, military instal-lations may be storea as a geographical boundary 40(FIG. 3A) or an approximation thereof and an imaginary wall 42 defined around the boundary 42~ The wall 42 may extend to a minimum flight ceiling 44 above which flight is permitted, or may simply define a restricted lZ~
area boundary that must not be penetrated at any alti-tude.
Minimum safe altitudes about a plateau 46, for example, a plateau containing an airport, may be defined by an inverted cone 48 ~Fig. 3B) or by connect-ed inverted cones. In such instances, the slope of the sides of the cone 48 would be selected such that the sides of the cone clear surrounding obstacles and terrain, or so that they approximate the angle of the glide slope beam.
Once the terrain and obstacle data has been stored in the terrain memory 18, such data can be utilized to warn the pilot if he approaches the ter-rain Ot obstacles too closely. There are many cri-teria for determining what distance is too close toan obstacle or terrain. For example, if a pilot is flying alongside or away from a mountai~, he may safely approach much closer than if he were flying toward the mountain. Si~ilarly, if the pilot is approaching a mountain at a rela~ively high altitude, he may safely approach the mountain more closely than if he were flying at a lower altitude.
Therefore, it has been found advantageous to define the safe approach distances as a function of the various flight conditions of ~he aircraft.
For example, it is possible to define an envelope that defines a constant time to impact such as, for example, 90 seconds. Such an envelope would be de-fined as a function of altitude above sea level, ver-tical speed, ground speed and ground track and thedesired time to impact. The envelope could be defined around each obstacle or terrain feature; and whenever the aircraft penetrated the envelope a warning or advisory indication would be given~ Such a system has the advantage that any warning time could be f~
selected, and consequently longer warning times than had previously been possible can be achieved. More-over, knowing the warning time permits a pilot to adjust his course appropriately without having to take hasty and possi~ly ill-conceived evasive maneuvers. However, in some instances it has been found that a constant time to impact envelope is too sensitive and may cause nuisance warnings. Consequent-ly, it has been found advantageous to modify the con-stant time to impact envelope to make it more sensi-tive when the aircraft is heading directly at an object, and less sensitive when the aircraft is pas-sing by the object. Examples of such envelopes are discussed in a subsequent portion of the specification.
There are various ways to define envelopes that provide the desired warning criteria. Perhaps the easiest approach to understan~ conceptually is illustrated in FIG. 4. In FIG. 4, there is illus-trated a cone 50 defining a terrain feature or obstacle that is being approached by an aircraft 52.
In the example illustrated in FIG. 4, an envelope, for example, a constant time to impact envelope 54 may be defined about the cone 50. The envelope 54 is a dynamic envelope whose bounaaries are a function of not only the shape of the cone 50, but also of the altitude above sea level, vertical speed, ground speea and ground track of the aircraft 52, as well as the desired time to impact. Thus, for an aircraft travel-ing at high speed, the boundary 54 extends farther from the cone 50 than for an aircraft traveling at low speed. Moreover, the direction of extension of the envelope 54 from the cone 50 is determined by the position and ground track of the aircraft. Because the envelope 54 is dynamic and defines the time to impact boundary as a function of both the characteris-tics of the cone 50 and the operating conditions of the aircraft 52, it is not necessary to predict the course of the aircraft 52. All that is necessary is to compare the position of the aircraft 52 with the boundary of the envelope 54, and to issue an advisory warning if the aircraft 52 penetrates the boundary 54.
Rathe r than referencing the constant time to impact envelope to a terrain feature or to an obstacle, the constant time to impact envelope may be referenced to the aircraft as shown in FIG~ 5. In the syste~ illustrated in FIG. 5, a warning envelope 54' is defined such that under ~he present flying conditions of an aircraft 52', any object within the envelope 54' will be struck by the aircraft within a predetermined time to impact time. As in the case of the envelope 54 (FIG. 4), the envelope 54' (FIGo 5) is a dynamic envelope defined by the operating condi-tions of the aircraft. Thus, the envelope 54' will be smaller for a lower speed aircraft ~han for faster aircraft. To determine whether a warning is to be given, the locations of the various terrain features and obstacles are compared with the boundary of the envelope 54', and an advisory warning is issued if the boundary of the envelope 54' is penetrated. In the system illustrated in FIG. 5, a warning is gener-ated if the boundary 5~' crosses the surface of the cone 50'. The criteria for determining the shapes of the envelope boundaries 54 an~ 54' illustrated in FIGS. 4 and 5 are described in greater detail in a subsequent portion of the detailed description.
Yet another approach to defining a warning envelope is illustrated in FIG. 6~ In the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 6, a projected flight path 56 is predicted based on the current flying conditions of ~3~
an aircraft 52''. The length of the projected flight path 56 is determined by the desired time to impact, and its shape is determined by the flight conditions of the aircraft. An envelope 54'' is defined about the projected flight path 53. The envelope 54'' increases in width along the length of the projectea flight path 56 to account for inaccuracies that occur in predicting flight paths over longer distances.
The position of the envelope 54'' is compared with the terrain features in the proximity of the projected flight path, and an advisory warning is given if the envelope 54'' is penetrated. In the example illus-trated in FIGo 6, if the surface of a cone 50'' pene-trates the envelope 54'', an advisory warning will be issued.
One method of defining the envelope about terrain or an obstacle is illustrated in FIG. 7. In the illustration of FIG ~ 7 t i t is assumed that the aircraft 52 is flying level and at the radius of the cone 50, rO, is the raaius at the altitude at which the aircraft 52 is flying. The boundary of the warn-ing envelope 54 is a function of the magnitude of the component of the aircraft speed in the direction toward the center of the obstacle or terrain multiplied ~y the desired time to impact. This velocity component can be obtained by knowing the relative position of the aircraf~ with respect to the obstacle as well as the ground track of the aircraft. In the illustration of FIG. 7, the heading of the ground track of the aircraft is obtained from, for example, the flight management system 14 of FIG. 1, and defined by the angle ~. The position of the aircraft as defined by the latitude and longitude coordinates X and Y is obtained from the flight management system or from one of the navigation systems on the aircraft. The position of the peak of the cone 50, XO~ YO~ and its radius, rO, at the flight altitude of the aircraft 52 are obtained from the terrain memory 18. By taking the difference in the X-coordinates and tne Y-coordi-nates of the aircraft and the center of the cone 50, the angle ~ between the position of ~he aircraft and the position of the cone 50 can be calculated. Know-ing the angles 0 and ~, the angle e may be calculated.
Knowing the angle e, the component of the velocity in the direction in the center of the cone 50 may be obtained by multiplication with the cosine of the angle e.
A constant time to impact warning envelope can readily be defined by multiplying the component of the velocity of the aircraft in the direction of the center of the cone 50 and adding it to the radius of the cone 50 at the altitude at which the aircraft is flying. This can be accomplished as follows:
f(e) = rO + V T cos (e) which is equal to:
f(e) = rO + V T cos which is equal to:
f(e) = rO + V T cos l~-arc tan((X-XO)/(Y-YO))]
wherein:
V = the velocity of the aircraft T = the desired time to impact.
The equation defines the value of the envel-ope 54 only for the face of the cone 50 facing the direction of travel of the aircraft 52. Because there is no expansion or tne envelope when the aircraft is traveling away from the terra~in, f(e) i5 set to rO
for values of e greater than or equal to 90.
Although the above equations provide a con-stant time to impact function, the cosine function tends to slow down computation time, particularly when a relatively small microprocessor is used. In addition, as previously discussed, it is sometimes desirable to modify the constant time to impact envel-ope to reduce nuisance warnings or for other reasons.
Thus, in order to simplify computation and to optimize the shape of the warning envelope, the cosine func-tion is approximated by a linear function wherein the cosine term is replaced by the term (90-e)/90) to generate the following equation:
f(~) = rO ~ V T[(90-e)/(90)]
The above equation provides a close approximation to the envelope generated by the cosine func~ion; however, square and square root functions may also be used to provide a brodder or a narrower warning envelope, respectively.
In the square function, the envelope is defined by the following equa~ion:
f(e) = rO + v T[(90-e)/(90)]2 and in the square root function, the envelope is de-fined by the following equation:
f (~) = rO + V T[ (go-e)/(90)~1/2 Thus, the envelope may be tailored to provide either greater sensitivity to flybys in order to increase the warning time, or to provide a lesser sensitivity in order to reduce nuisance warnings.
Examples of the linear, square and square root functions are illustrated by the graphs 55, 56 and 57, respectively, sf FIG. 8. Presently, it appears that the square function provides the best results of the three equations.
The above descri~ed example assumed that the aircraft is flying in level flight~ In the event that the aircraft is not flying in level flight, the warning envelope must be modified accordingly. This may be readily accomplished by raising and lowering the effective envelope as is illustrated in ~IG. 9.
This is accomplished by simply raising the height of the envelope by an amount ~h required to maintain the constant time to impact durîng descent conditions.
The addition of ~h to the height of the envelope will result in an increase in the diameter, ~ rO, at the base of the cone. The values ~h and ~ rO
may be readily computed by the following equations:
~h = k hb ~r = ~h rO/hO
wherein:
k = a constant having units of time ana is determined by the desired time to impact ho = the initial height of the object prior to expan-sion.
hb = the barometric descent rate or the Z-velocity or vertical velocity of the aircraft.
The predictive terrain/obstacle warning envelop~ generator 16 is illustrated in greater detail in FIG. 10. The envelope generator 16 contains an envelope function generator 60 that contains data defining the basic shapes of the various terrain fea-tures and obstacles, as well as the logic required to alter those shapes as a function of aircraft flying conditions. The envelope functions generator 60 re-ceives signals representative of the position of the aircraft with respect to terrain from a comparator 62 ~3~3~
that compares signals representative of the position of the aircraft from the flight management system 14 (FIG. 1~. Terrain data received from the memory 18 via the location search logic ~0 is used by the com-parator 62 to determine the position of the aircraftwith respect to terrain. The terrain data is also applied to the envelope functions generator 60, as is data representative of the ground track of the air-craft. A comparator 64 compares the terrain data with the ground track data to generate a signal repre-sentative of the ground track with respect to terrain and applies it to the envelope functions generator 60. Signals representative of the ground speed of ~he aircraft as well as i~s altitude above sea level are also applied to the envelope functions generator 60. An envelope control signal provides various con-trol signals to the envelope functions generator such as, the shape of the terrain, i.e. whether the terrain is to be represented by a cone, a truncated cone, connected cones, etc. as well as the desired time to impact.
The envelope functions generator 60 operates on the received data to generate a static envelope which is modified by the descent rate of the aircraft and the rate of change of its ground track by a dynamic biasing circuit to provide a dynamic envelope. The static envelope generated by the envelope functions generator 60 is basically the envelope 54 described in conjunction with FIG. 7 and the vertical rate si~-nal serves to raise the envelope as the aircraftdescends and the ground track rate signal serves to adjust the orientation of the envelope to maintain a constant time to impact as a function of aircraft speed. Right left climb information is also generated by the envelope functions generator 60. Basically, the envelope functions generator 60 provides a ~turn right" signal when e ~IG. 7) is positive and a ~turn left~ signal when e is negative.
A visual alert logic circuit 61 receives S the position and ground track data from the comparators 62 and 64, as well as envelope data from the envelope functions generator 60 and operates on the received data to generate the display data that is applied to the attitude and map display generators 30 and 32 (FIG. l), respectively. Such data could, for example, cause the position of the aircraft to be displayed with respect to the terrain. In addition, the display data could be used in conjunction with the signal from the comparator 24 to indicate a hazardous flight condition. Such a condition could be indicated by displaying a projested flight path into terrain, or by a change in the color of the terrain to a color such as red to indicate a hazardously close approach.
The envelope functions generator 60 is illus-trated in greater detail in FIG. ll. In the illustra-tion of FIG. ll, equations for a cone function are illustrated, but the same principles apply to other shapes. The terrain data, XO~ YO' r and h defining a cone is applied to an arithmetic circuit 63 that solves the cone equation for the altitude at which the air-craft is flying, as determined by the altitude above sea level signal, in order to generate the radius rO
at the altitude of the aircraft, as illustrated in FIG. ll.
Another arithmetic circuit 65 defines the shape of the envelope expansion 54 (FIG. 7) based on a signal representative of the desired shape of the envelope as well as a signal representative of the direction of the ground track of the aircraft with ~L2~
respect to terrain, which corresponds to the angle e of FIG. 7. The direction wi~h respect to tçrrain is generated by comparing the angle of the aircraft with respect to terrain (~ in FIG. 7) with the angle of the ground trac~ (0 in FIG. 7) to generate e. Alter-natively, the ground track with respect to terrain (FIG. 10) signal may be applied to the arithmetic circuit 65. The unit 65 generates the shape of the expansion envelope and applies it to a scaling circuit 66 that alters the magnitude of the envelope as a function of the velocity ~f the aircraft and the de-sired time to impact. The output of the scaling cir-cuit 67 as well as the output of the circuit 63 are combined in an adder 68 to generate the static envelope.
lS Referring to FIG. 12, there is shown an alternative embodiment of the system according to the invention. The system illustrated in FIG. 12 predicts the flight path of the aircraft and generates a warning if the predicted flight path should encounter an ob-stacle, as is illustratea in FIG. 6. Many of the components of the system illustrated in FIG. 12 are similar to those illustrated in FIG. 1, and consequent-ly, will be assigned like reference numerals; however, such components will be designated by primed numbers in FIG. 12.
The system illustrated in FIG. 12 is similar to that illustrated in FIG. 1 with the exception of the addition of a flight path and projected path gener-ator 100 which, based on signals representa~ive of the altitude of the aircraft above sea level, its vertical speed, its position and ground track, as well as its rate of change of ground track determines the flight path and a projected flight patn for a predetermined time forward. The flight path and pro-jected flight path are displayed on the monitors 34' 1 and 36', and a signal representative o-f -the projected flight path is also applied -to the warning envelope generator 16'. This envelope can be modified by terrain and speed considerations and compared by the comparator 24' to genera-te a voice warning.
Obviously, many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light o-f the above teachings. Thus, it is to be understood tha~, within the scope of the appended claims, the inven ion may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described above.
Technical Field Th~s inventi~n relates gener~lly to systems for advising the pilot of ~ vehicle such as an aircraft or a submarine of the proximity of obstacles or terrain in the path of the vehicle, and more particularly to navigationally based terrain advisoey systems that advise of the presence of terrain or other obstacles in the vicinity of the v~hicle based on navigationally derived position as well as altitude, ground speed, ground track and vertical speed of the vehicle.
Various systems that provide warnings or advisory inaications of the presence of terrain or obstacles are known. Among those sy~tems include systems generally known as ground proximity warning systems for ai~craft. Such systems monitor the flight conditions of an airctaft and provide 2 warning if the flight conditions are such that an inadvertent cont~ct with the ground is imminent. Among the flight conditions monitored by such systems are radio al~itude and rate, barometric al~itude and rate, airspeed, and flap and gear positio~s. The aforement~oned parameters are monitored, and an advisory indication or a warning is generated when the relationship between the afore-~aid conditions or parameters is such that ground impact is likely to occur. Typical examples of such systems are disclosed in United St~tes Patent Nos.
3,715,71~, 3,g25,751, 3,934,221, 3,934,222, 3,936,796, 3,944,968, 3,947,808, 3,947,~10, 3,95~,218, 3,958,219, 4,016,5~5, 4,030,065, 4,058,710, 4,060 "93, 4,067,520, 4,071,894, 4,093,938, 4,107,681, 4,112,~13, ~,121,287, 4,122,529, 4,135,143, 4~189,777, 4,215,334, 4,293,840, 4,319,218, 4,336,976 and 4,369,425, and Canadian Patent N~. 1,033,828.
3~ .
3~3~13 1 While the above-described sys-tems provide advisory and warning signals in the event of proximi-ty to terrain, such systems generate warnings based solely on the flight conditions of the aircraft, and do not utilize navigation information. Consequently, the sensitivity of such systems must be adjusted to pro-vide adequate warnings when a hazardous flight condi-tion exists without generating false or nuisance warn-ings when there is no danger. Such an adjustment results in a compromise that rrlay still cause nuisance warnings when flying over terrain unique to par-ticular geographic areas and reduced warning times in other areas. One approach to improve the performance of such systems has been to modify the warning envelopes of the g-ound proximity warning system in accordance with the geographic ]ocation of the aircraft in order to optimize the warning criteria for the particular 'geographic area over which the aircraft is flying.
An example of such a system is described in the applicants' Canadian Patent application Serial No. ~42,015, filed November 25, 1983. In the system disclosed in the aforesaid application, the warning criteria are optimized to suit the terrain characteristics about various geographic areas, particularly the airports from which the aircraft is taking off or landing.
Another approach utilizing a geographical input is disclosed in United States Patent No. 4,224,669.
In the system disclosed in the aforesaid patent, a memory device is employed to store minimum safe altitudes by geographic coordinate areas. A navigational computer is used to determine the position of the aircraft, and a warning is given if the aircraft descends below the stored minimum safe alti-~23~q;~
tude for the coordinate area in which the aircraft isflying. The system has a ~worst case" and a "tactical"
mode of operation. In the "worst case~ mode, the minimum safe altitude is determined as a function of the highest terrain feature or obstacle within the geographic coordinate area of interest. In the "tac-tical~ mode of operation, curren~ flight conditions such as position, ground speed and ground track are used to define a minimum safe altitude based on the heights of terrain and obstacles immediately ahead of the projected flight path.
While these ~ystems do provide warnings of the proximity of terrain or obstacles, none of the above-described systems provides information relating to the exact location or nature of the terrain or obstacle, nor of the type of action required to avoid the obstacle. Thus, when a warning represe~tative of the proximity of terrain, or of a descent below a minimum safe altitude is provided by the above systems, the evasive action that is normally called for is for the pilot to pull up. While pulling up may be suffi-cient evasive action to avoid impact in many or most cases, there are cases where turning right or turning left in addition to or instead of pulling up would provide a greater margin of safety.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Thus, it is an object of the present inven-tion to provide a terrain or obstacle advisory system that improves the performance of ground proximity warnin~ systems.
It is another object of the present inven-tion to provide a terrain or obstacle advisory system that provides an indication of the nature and location of obstacles and terrain in the vicinity of the vehicle.
_4_ It is yet another object of the present inVentLon to provide a terrain advisory ystem that provides terrain avoidance quidance to the pilot.
It i5 another object of the invention to provide a system that advises the pilot of an aircraft of flight into a restricted area.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide aural terrain avoidance guidance to the pilot.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a visual display of terrain and obstacles.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a terrain advisory system that predicts the flight path of an aircraft with respect to obstacles or terrain and provides an alert if the flight path of the aircraft is such that it is likely to result in an impact with the terrain or an obstacle within a predetermined time interval.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a warning system that provides lonqer warning times than those provided by the prior art systems.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a terrain advisory system capable of providing several minutes of warning time of an impending impact with terrain or an obstacle.
It is yet another object of tne present invention to provide a terrain advisory system that minimizes the number of nuisance warnings generated.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a system that stores geographical features of terrain as well as the location of man-made obstacles, and retrieves the stored terrain and obstacle information to provide an alert in the event of close proximity to the terrain or an obstacle.
It is yet another object of the present invention ~o provide a system that minimizes the memory capacity required to store the terrain and obstacle information.
It is yet another object of the present invention to alter the warning criteria required for the system to generate a warning as a function of the ground track, ground speed and ver~ical speed of the aircraft.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a system that predictively ~looks ahead" of the vehicle withou~ using forward l~oking radar.
It is still another object of the present invention to provide a system that ~looks ahead~ of the vehicle by utilizing navigation information and stored terrain and obstacle data to predict a flight path and to display any obstacles or terrain within the predicted flight path.
Thus, in accordance with a preferred embodi-ment of the invention, geographical data representative of terrain and other obstacles, both natural and man-made are stored in memory as a function of geographic location. In addition, the boundaries of restricted areas, such as, for example, military installations may also be stored in the memory. In order to mini-mize the amount of storage required to store the ter-rain and obstacle information, the shapes and contours of the terrain and obstacles are approximated by simple geometric shapes such as cones, connected cones, in-verted cones and other simple shapes that can be de-fined by a few bits of information. This permits a mountain or a mountain range to be defined by a very few bits defining the height and slope of a cone or connected cones. Alternatively, the shapes may be defined algebraically, but geometric shapes are pre-ferable because they are easier to manipulate mathe-matically.
A navigation system which may include, for example, a flight management system that receives signals from, for example, an inertial navigation system and other signals such as signals from a satel-lite navigation receiver, VLF/OMEGA, Loran C, VOR/DME, and DME/DME, is employed to determine the present latitude and longitude of the aircraft. If no flight management system is used, the signal may be obtained from the various navigation systems directly. Search logic that is responsive to the lati~ude and longitude signals is used to retrieve data representative of the terrain in the vicinity of the present position of the aircraft.
A predictive terrain/obstacle warning envel-ope generator receives the terrain representative data as well as data representative of the ground speed, ground track, altitude and vertical speed of the aircraft to generate a warninq envelope which is a function of aircraft speed, ground track, altitude and vertical speed. In addition, the size of the envelope may be tailored to provide any desired warn-ing time. The point of reference may be selected sothat the envelope is defined either about the aircraft, or about the various obstacles. If the warning envel-ope is defined about the aircraft, a warning or an advisory is generated each time an obstacle pene-trates the warning envelope. If the envelope is ae-fined about the terrain or obstacle, the warning is generated whenever the position of the aircraft is such that it penetrates the envelope.
In order to determine whether the envelope is penetrated, the envelope signal from the predic-3~
tive terrain/obstacle warning envelope generator iscompared with the position of the aircraft or of the terrain/obstacle, and an advisory is issued when the envelope is penetrated. In addition, data from the envelope generator may be used to control a voice generator and a visual display. The voice generator may be programmea to instruct the pilot of the type and location of the terrain or obstacle and the type of action required to avoid it. The data may also be presented visually either in the form of a map display or an attitude display to permit the pilot visually ~o fly around the terrain/obstacle or restrictea area.
These and other objects and advantages of the present invention will become readily apparent upon consideration of the following detailed descrip-tion and attached drawing wherein:
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a preferred embodiment of the terrain/obstacle advisory system according to the invention;
FIGS. 2 and 3 illustrate how terrain features are approximated by simple geometric shapes by the system according to the invention;
FIG. 3A illustrates how a restricted area may be defined;
FIG. 3B illustrates how an inverted cone may be used to define rising terrain ab~ut a plateau or an airport;
FIGS. 4-6 illustrate various approaches to aeriving warning envelopes based on terrain/obstacle loca~ions and aircraft position and flight parameters;
FIGS. 7 and 8 show how the geometric shapes defining the terrain obstacles may ~e expanded as a function of aircraft flight parameters to define a safe approach distance;
~f~
FIG. 9 shows an expansion similar to the expansions illustrated in FIGS. 7 and 8 in three dimen-sions;
FIG. 10 is a block diagram of the predictive terrain/obstacle warning envelope generator illustrated in FIG. l;
FIG. 11 is a block diagram of the envelope functions generator illustrated in FIG. 10; and FIG~ 12 is a block diagram of an alternative embodiment of the terrain advisory system according to the invention.
Referring now to the drawing with particular attention to FIG. 1, there is illustrated a preferred embodiment of the system according to the invention generally designated by reference numeral 10. Although the system according to the invention is illus rated as a series of functional blocks for purposes of clarity, it is to be understood that the actual imple-~entation o the system may be other than that speci-fically shown in FIG. 1, with various analog and digi-tal implementations being possible. The system 10 according to the invention utilizes data from an air data computer 12 or from a barometric altimeter and rate circuit present on the aircraft and from a navi-gation system which may include a flight management system 14, also present in the aircraft, in order to determine the location of the aircraft and to advise the pilot of dangerous proximity to terrain or to other obstacles. Alternatively, the navigation data may be ob~ained directly from the navigation system, which may include an inertial navigation system, a satellite navigation receiver, VLF/OMEGA, Loran C, VOR/DME or DME/DME, particularly when no flight manage-ment system is used.
:1~31~
g 1 In the discussion of the present invention, the system will be discussed in an aircraft environ-ment; however, the system is also usable for other vehicles that must navigate around terrain, such as, for example, submarines. The signals from the air data compu-ter 12 and flight management system 14 are applied to a predictive terrain/obs-tacle warning envelope generator 16 along with terrain data which is retrieved from a terrain memory 18 by location search logic 20. A system particular:y suitable for the search logic 20 is disclosed in the applicants' Canadian patent application serial No. 469,728 filed on December 10, 1984 entitled "Ground Proximity Warning System Geographic Area Determination", but ol:her searcll logic may be.used. In addition, envelope control data is applied to the envelope generator 16. Data representative of the climb performance of the aircraft is also applied to the envelope generator 16 from an circraft performance input 22. The envelope generated by the envelope generator 16 is compared with the position (latitude and longitude) of the aircraft provided by the flight management system 14 by a comparator 24 that compares the envelope and position signals. The comparator 24 illustrated in Fig. 1 may be a comparator that compares, for example, voltages or currents, or simply a summing junction. In a digital system, a digital comparator may be used.
The comparator 24 controls a voice generator 26 which generates a voice advisory signal and applies it to a transducer 28, which may be part of the cockpit communication system in order to provide an advisory indication of the presence of terrain or obstacles whenever the envelope generated by the envelope generator 16 is penetrated. In addition, the envelope generator causes the voice generator 26 to advise the pilot 3~, of the nature and location of the terrain or obstacle by selecting the appropriate message to indicate to the pilot whether he should turn left or right, and whether the object is terrain or a man-made obstacle.
In addition, display data is generated by ~he warning envelope generator and applied to an attitude display generator 30 and a map display generator 32 which generate attitude and map displays that are applied to a pair of displays, such as cathode ray tubes 34 and 3b. The at~itude display displays an image show-ing the terrain and obstacles that lie in the flight path forward of the aircraft. The map display dis-plays the same terrain below the aircraft. A signal from the comparator 24 is also applied to the display generators 30 and 32 to permit them to indicate a hazardous condition visually, for example, by a change in color. A system suitable for providing such dis-plays is described in Aviation Week and Space Technology, September 12, 1983, pages 88-95. Other systems suitable for providing such displays are multi-function displays that provide, for example, a map display that shows the position of the aircraft rela-tive to a navigational waypoint and a weather radar display. Such displays are presently used on modern transport aircraft such as the Boeing 757 and 767 aircraft and the European A310 Airbus.
In operation, the air data computer 12 pro-vides signals representative of the barometric altitude, or height above sea level, of the aircraft and the vertical speed of the aircraft in the form of a baro-metric rate signal Hb to the predictive terrain/obstacle warning generator 16. Alternatively, the vertical speed signal may be a Z-velocity signal obtained from an inertial navigation system 37.
9.3~3 The flight management system provides signals representative of ground speed and the ground track of the aircraft to the envelope generator 16. In addition, the ground track signal, which is a vector repzesenting the direction of the aircraft along the ground is differentiated by a differentiator 3~ and applied to the envelope generator 16 to provide infor-mation to the envelope generator 16 representative of changes in direction of the aircraft. A position signal representing the latitude and longitude of the aircraft is also applied to the generator 16 as well as to the location search logic 20. The location search logic 20 is responsive to the position signal and causes data representative of terrain within a lS predetermine~ distance from the position of the air-craft to be retrieved from the terrain memory 18 and applied to the envelope generator 16. The envelope generator 16 responds to the various altitude, posi-tion, track and speed signals to generate the various display data, and to advise the pilot of the proxi-mity of terrain and obstacles. The operation of the envelope generator will be discussed in greater detail in a subsequent portion of the detailed description.
In order for the system to operate, data representative of the terrain and obstacle around predetermined critical geographic areas such as, for example, airports and restricted areas, must be stored.
In addition, it is desirable to store data representa-tive of potentially dangerous terrain, such as, for example, mountain ranges. However, in order to store data representative of such terrain and obstacles would require an inordinate amount of memory capacity in the terrain memory 18. Consequently, some form of data compaction must be provided.
Therefore, in accordance with an important aspect of the present invention, rather than storing all of the irregularities and insignificant features of terrain and obstacles, the terrain and obstacles can be approximated by a series of standard shapes that can readily be deined by a few bits. These standard shapes may include simple geometric shapes such as cones, truncated cones, connected cones and other simple shapes that can be defined by a few bits.
Algebraic shapes such as quadratic surfaces and other surfaces that may be readily defined by an algebraic equation may also be used. Preferably, geometric shapes are used as the standard shapes, and mountains, for example, may readily be approximated by cones as shown in FIG. 2. The size, shape and location of such cones may be defined by only four numbers, for example, the height above sea level of the peak of the cone, h, the radius of the base of the cone, r, and the latitude and longituae of the center of the cone, X0, Y0. Similarly, mountain ridges may be defined by two or more connected cones as is shown in FIG. 3. For flat-topped mountains and for plateaus the cones may also b~ truncated as in FIG. 3. Thus, the plateau illustrated in FIG. 3 can be defined by only 10 numbers, namely the truncated and untruncated heights of the cones, hl, hl', and h~, h2l, the radii of the bases of the two cones rl and r2, and locations of the centers of the cones Xl, Yl and X2, Y2. Re-stricted areas, such as, for example, military instal-lations may be storea as a geographical boundary 40(FIG. 3A) or an approximation thereof and an imaginary wall 42 defined around the boundary 42~ The wall 42 may extend to a minimum flight ceiling 44 above which flight is permitted, or may simply define a restricted lZ~
area boundary that must not be penetrated at any alti-tude.
Minimum safe altitudes about a plateau 46, for example, a plateau containing an airport, may be defined by an inverted cone 48 ~Fig. 3B) or by connect-ed inverted cones. In such instances, the slope of the sides of the cone 48 would be selected such that the sides of the cone clear surrounding obstacles and terrain, or so that they approximate the angle of the glide slope beam.
Once the terrain and obstacle data has been stored in the terrain memory 18, such data can be utilized to warn the pilot if he approaches the ter-rain Ot obstacles too closely. There are many cri-teria for determining what distance is too close toan obstacle or terrain. For example, if a pilot is flying alongside or away from a mountai~, he may safely approach much closer than if he were flying toward the mountain. Si~ilarly, if the pilot is approaching a mountain at a rela~ively high altitude, he may safely approach the mountain more closely than if he were flying at a lower altitude.
Therefore, it has been found advantageous to define the safe approach distances as a function of the various flight conditions of ~he aircraft.
For example, it is possible to define an envelope that defines a constant time to impact such as, for example, 90 seconds. Such an envelope would be de-fined as a function of altitude above sea level, ver-tical speed, ground speed and ground track and thedesired time to impact. The envelope could be defined around each obstacle or terrain feature; and whenever the aircraft penetrated the envelope a warning or advisory indication would be given~ Such a system has the advantage that any warning time could be f~
selected, and consequently longer warning times than had previously been possible can be achieved. More-over, knowing the warning time permits a pilot to adjust his course appropriately without having to take hasty and possi~ly ill-conceived evasive maneuvers. However, in some instances it has been found that a constant time to impact envelope is too sensitive and may cause nuisance warnings. Consequent-ly, it has been found advantageous to modify the con-stant time to impact envelope to make it more sensi-tive when the aircraft is heading directly at an object, and less sensitive when the aircraft is pas-sing by the object. Examples of such envelopes are discussed in a subsequent portion of the specification.
There are various ways to define envelopes that provide the desired warning criteria. Perhaps the easiest approach to understan~ conceptually is illustrated in FIG. 4. In FIG. 4, there is illus-trated a cone 50 defining a terrain feature or obstacle that is being approached by an aircraft 52.
In the example illustrated in FIG. 4, an envelope, for example, a constant time to impact envelope 54 may be defined about the cone 50. The envelope 54 is a dynamic envelope whose bounaaries are a function of not only the shape of the cone 50, but also of the altitude above sea level, vertical speed, ground speea and ground track of the aircraft 52, as well as the desired time to impact. Thus, for an aircraft travel-ing at high speed, the boundary 54 extends farther from the cone 50 than for an aircraft traveling at low speed. Moreover, the direction of extension of the envelope 54 from the cone 50 is determined by the position and ground track of the aircraft. Because the envelope 54 is dynamic and defines the time to impact boundary as a function of both the characteris-tics of the cone 50 and the operating conditions of the aircraft 52, it is not necessary to predict the course of the aircraft 52. All that is necessary is to compare the position of the aircraft 52 with the boundary of the envelope 54, and to issue an advisory warning if the aircraft 52 penetrates the boundary 54.
Rathe r than referencing the constant time to impact envelope to a terrain feature or to an obstacle, the constant time to impact envelope may be referenced to the aircraft as shown in FIG~ 5. In the syste~ illustrated in FIG. 5, a warning envelope 54' is defined such that under ~he present flying conditions of an aircraft 52', any object within the envelope 54' will be struck by the aircraft within a predetermined time to impact time. As in the case of the envelope 54 (FIG. 4), the envelope 54' (FIGo 5) is a dynamic envelope defined by the operating condi-tions of the aircraft. Thus, the envelope 54' will be smaller for a lower speed aircraft ~han for faster aircraft. To determine whether a warning is to be given, the locations of the various terrain features and obstacles are compared with the boundary of the envelope 54', and an advisory warning is issued if the boundary of the envelope 54' is penetrated. In the system illustrated in FIG. 5, a warning is gener-ated if the boundary 5~' crosses the surface of the cone 50'. The criteria for determining the shapes of the envelope boundaries 54 an~ 54' illustrated in FIGS. 4 and 5 are described in greater detail in a subsequent portion of the detailed description.
Yet another approach to defining a warning envelope is illustrated in FIG. 6~ In the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 6, a projected flight path 56 is predicted based on the current flying conditions of ~3~
an aircraft 52''. The length of the projected flight path 56 is determined by the desired time to impact, and its shape is determined by the flight conditions of the aircraft. An envelope 54'' is defined about the projected flight path 53. The envelope 54'' increases in width along the length of the projectea flight path 56 to account for inaccuracies that occur in predicting flight paths over longer distances.
The position of the envelope 54'' is compared with the terrain features in the proximity of the projected flight path, and an advisory warning is given if the envelope 54'' is penetrated. In the example illus-trated in FIGo 6, if the surface of a cone 50'' pene-trates the envelope 54'', an advisory warning will be issued.
One method of defining the envelope about terrain or an obstacle is illustrated in FIG. 7. In the illustration of FIG ~ 7 t i t is assumed that the aircraft 52 is flying level and at the radius of the cone 50, rO, is the raaius at the altitude at which the aircraft 52 is flying. The boundary of the warn-ing envelope 54 is a function of the magnitude of the component of the aircraft speed in the direction toward the center of the obstacle or terrain multiplied ~y the desired time to impact. This velocity component can be obtained by knowing the relative position of the aircraf~ with respect to the obstacle as well as the ground track of the aircraft. In the illustration of FIG. 7, the heading of the ground track of the aircraft is obtained from, for example, the flight management system 14 of FIG. 1, and defined by the angle ~. The position of the aircraft as defined by the latitude and longitude coordinates X and Y is obtained from the flight management system or from one of the navigation systems on the aircraft. The position of the peak of the cone 50, XO~ YO~ and its radius, rO, at the flight altitude of the aircraft 52 are obtained from the terrain memory 18. By taking the difference in the X-coordinates and tne Y-coordi-nates of the aircraft and the center of the cone 50, the angle ~ between the position of ~he aircraft and the position of the cone 50 can be calculated. Know-ing the angles 0 and ~, the angle e may be calculated.
Knowing the angle e, the component of the velocity in the direction in the center of the cone 50 may be obtained by multiplication with the cosine of the angle e.
A constant time to impact warning envelope can readily be defined by multiplying the component of the velocity of the aircraft in the direction of the center of the cone 50 and adding it to the radius of the cone 50 at the altitude at which the aircraft is flying. This can be accomplished as follows:
f(e) = rO + V T cos (e) which is equal to:
f(e) = rO + V T cos which is equal to:
f(e) = rO + V T cos l~-arc tan((X-XO)/(Y-YO))]
wherein:
V = the velocity of the aircraft T = the desired time to impact.
The equation defines the value of the envel-ope 54 only for the face of the cone 50 facing the direction of travel of the aircraft 52. Because there is no expansion or tne envelope when the aircraft is traveling away from the terra~in, f(e) i5 set to rO
for values of e greater than or equal to 90.
Although the above equations provide a con-stant time to impact function, the cosine function tends to slow down computation time, particularly when a relatively small microprocessor is used. In addition, as previously discussed, it is sometimes desirable to modify the constant time to impact envel-ope to reduce nuisance warnings or for other reasons.
Thus, in order to simplify computation and to optimize the shape of the warning envelope, the cosine func-tion is approximated by a linear function wherein the cosine term is replaced by the term (90-e)/90) to generate the following equation:
f(~) = rO ~ V T[(90-e)/(90)]
The above equation provides a close approximation to the envelope generated by the cosine func~ion; however, square and square root functions may also be used to provide a brodder or a narrower warning envelope, respectively.
In the square function, the envelope is defined by the following equa~ion:
f(e) = rO + v T[(90-e)/(90)]2 and in the square root function, the envelope is de-fined by the following equation:
f (~) = rO + V T[ (go-e)/(90)~1/2 Thus, the envelope may be tailored to provide either greater sensitivity to flybys in order to increase the warning time, or to provide a lesser sensitivity in order to reduce nuisance warnings.
Examples of the linear, square and square root functions are illustrated by the graphs 55, 56 and 57, respectively, sf FIG. 8. Presently, it appears that the square function provides the best results of the three equations.
The above descri~ed example assumed that the aircraft is flying in level flight~ In the event that the aircraft is not flying in level flight, the warning envelope must be modified accordingly. This may be readily accomplished by raising and lowering the effective envelope as is illustrated in ~IG. 9.
This is accomplished by simply raising the height of the envelope by an amount ~h required to maintain the constant time to impact durîng descent conditions.
The addition of ~h to the height of the envelope will result in an increase in the diameter, ~ rO, at the base of the cone. The values ~h and ~ rO
may be readily computed by the following equations:
~h = k hb ~r = ~h rO/hO
wherein:
k = a constant having units of time ana is determined by the desired time to impact ho = the initial height of the object prior to expan-sion.
hb = the barometric descent rate or the Z-velocity or vertical velocity of the aircraft.
The predictive terrain/obstacle warning envelop~ generator 16 is illustrated in greater detail in FIG. 10. The envelope generator 16 contains an envelope function generator 60 that contains data defining the basic shapes of the various terrain fea-tures and obstacles, as well as the logic required to alter those shapes as a function of aircraft flying conditions. The envelope functions generator 60 re-ceives signals representative of the position of the aircraft with respect to terrain from a comparator 62 ~3~3~
that compares signals representative of the position of the aircraft from the flight management system 14 (FIG. 1~. Terrain data received from the memory 18 via the location search logic ~0 is used by the com-parator 62 to determine the position of the aircraftwith respect to terrain. The terrain data is also applied to the envelope functions generator 60, as is data representative of the ground track of the air-craft. A comparator 64 compares the terrain data with the ground track data to generate a signal repre-sentative of the ground track with respect to terrain and applies it to the envelope functions generator 60. Signals representative of the ground speed of ~he aircraft as well as i~s altitude above sea level are also applied to the envelope functions generator 60. An envelope control signal provides various con-trol signals to the envelope functions generator such as, the shape of the terrain, i.e. whether the terrain is to be represented by a cone, a truncated cone, connected cones, etc. as well as the desired time to impact.
The envelope functions generator 60 operates on the received data to generate a static envelope which is modified by the descent rate of the aircraft and the rate of change of its ground track by a dynamic biasing circuit to provide a dynamic envelope. The static envelope generated by the envelope functions generator 60 is basically the envelope 54 described in conjunction with FIG. 7 and the vertical rate si~-nal serves to raise the envelope as the aircraftdescends and the ground track rate signal serves to adjust the orientation of the envelope to maintain a constant time to impact as a function of aircraft speed. Right left climb information is also generated by the envelope functions generator 60. Basically, the envelope functions generator 60 provides a ~turn right" signal when e ~IG. 7) is positive and a ~turn left~ signal when e is negative.
A visual alert logic circuit 61 receives S the position and ground track data from the comparators 62 and 64, as well as envelope data from the envelope functions generator 60 and operates on the received data to generate the display data that is applied to the attitude and map display generators 30 and 32 (FIG. l), respectively. Such data could, for example, cause the position of the aircraft to be displayed with respect to the terrain. In addition, the display data could be used in conjunction with the signal from the comparator 24 to indicate a hazardous flight condition. Such a condition could be indicated by displaying a projested flight path into terrain, or by a change in the color of the terrain to a color such as red to indicate a hazardously close approach.
The envelope functions generator 60 is illus-trated in greater detail in FIG. ll. In the illustra-tion of FIG. ll, equations for a cone function are illustrated, but the same principles apply to other shapes. The terrain data, XO~ YO' r and h defining a cone is applied to an arithmetic circuit 63 that solves the cone equation for the altitude at which the air-craft is flying, as determined by the altitude above sea level signal, in order to generate the radius rO
at the altitude of the aircraft, as illustrated in FIG. ll.
Another arithmetic circuit 65 defines the shape of the envelope expansion 54 (FIG. 7) based on a signal representative of the desired shape of the envelope as well as a signal representative of the direction of the ground track of the aircraft with ~L2~
respect to terrain, which corresponds to the angle e of FIG. 7. The direction wi~h respect to tçrrain is generated by comparing the angle of the aircraft with respect to terrain (~ in FIG. 7) with the angle of the ground trac~ (0 in FIG. 7) to generate e. Alter-natively, the ground track with respect to terrain (FIG. 10) signal may be applied to the arithmetic circuit 65. The unit 65 generates the shape of the expansion envelope and applies it to a scaling circuit 66 that alters the magnitude of the envelope as a function of the velocity ~f the aircraft and the de-sired time to impact. The output of the scaling cir-cuit 67 as well as the output of the circuit 63 are combined in an adder 68 to generate the static envelope.
lS Referring to FIG. 12, there is shown an alternative embodiment of the system according to the invention. The system illustrated in FIG. 12 predicts the flight path of the aircraft and generates a warning if the predicted flight path should encounter an ob-stacle, as is illustratea in FIG. 6. Many of the components of the system illustrated in FIG. 12 are similar to those illustrated in FIG. 1, and consequent-ly, will be assigned like reference numerals; however, such components will be designated by primed numbers in FIG. 12.
The system illustrated in FIG. 12 is similar to that illustrated in FIG. 1 with the exception of the addition of a flight path and projected path gener-ator 100 which, based on signals representa~ive of the altitude of the aircraft above sea level, its vertical speed, its position and ground track, as well as its rate of change of ground track determines the flight path and a projected flight patn for a predetermined time forward. The flight path and pro-jected flight path are displayed on the monitors 34' 1 and 36', and a signal representative o-f -the projected flight path is also applied -to the warning envelope generator 16'. This envelope can be modified by terrain and speed considerations and compared by the comparator 24' to genera-te a voice warning.
Obviously, many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light o-f the above teachings. Thus, it is to be understood tha~, within the scope of the appended claims, the inven ion may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described above.
Claims (77)
1. A warning system for warning the operator of a vehicle of the location of obstacles in the path of travel, comprising:
means for storing representations of the locations and physical characteristics of obstacles;
means for determining the speed, position and direction of travel of said vehicle;
means responsive to said storing means and to said determining means for defining safe approach boundaries between said vehicle and said obstacles as a function of the location and physical characteris-tics of said obstacles and the speed, position and direction of travel of the vehicle; and means responsive to said determining means and to said defining means when the distance between the vehicle and the obstacle is less than the distance defined by the safe approach boundary.
means for storing representations of the locations and physical characteristics of obstacles;
means for determining the speed, position and direction of travel of said vehicle;
means responsive to said storing means and to said determining means for defining safe approach boundaries between said vehicle and said obstacles as a function of the location and physical characteris-tics of said obstacles and the speed, position and direction of travel of the vehicle; and means responsive to said determining means and to said defining means when the distance between the vehicle and the obstacle is less than the distance defined by the safe approach boundary.
2. A warning system as recited in claim 1 wherein said storing means includes means for storing approximations of the shapes and sizes of the obstacles.
3. The warning system recited in claim 2 wherein said shape approximations include cones and the sizes include the heights and slopes of said cones.
4. The warning system recited in claim 3 wherein said approximations include truncated cones.
5. The system recited in claim 3 wherein said approximations include connected cones.
6. The system recited in claim 3 wherein said approximations include inverted cones.
7. A warning system as recited in claim 1 wherein said defining means includes means for defining safe approach boundaries around said obstacles.
8. A warning system as recited in claim 7 wherein said obstacle is approximated by a cone and wherein said boundaries are defined by the equation:
f(.THETA.) = ro + VT [(90-.THETA.)/90]
wherein:
ro = the radius of the cone at the altitude of the vehicle V = the velocity of the vehicle T = a function of the time to impact.
f(.THETA.) = ro + VT [(90-.THETA.)/90]
wherein:
ro = the radius of the cone at the altitude of the vehicle V = the velocity of the vehicle T = a function of the time to impact.
9. A warning system as recited in claim 7 wherein said obstacle is approximated by a cone and wherein said boundaries are defined by the equation:
f(.THETA.) = ro + VT [(90-.THETA.)/90]2 wherein:
ro = the radius of the cone at the altitude of the vehicle Y = the velocity of the vehicle T = a function of the time to impact.
f(.THETA.) = ro + VT [(90-.THETA.)/90]2 wherein:
ro = the radius of the cone at the altitude of the vehicle Y = the velocity of the vehicle T = a function of the time to impact.
10. A warning system as recited in claim 7 wherein said obstacle is approximated by a cone and wherein said boundaries are defined by the equation:
f(.THETA.) ro + VT [90-.THETA./90]1/2 wherein:
ro = the radius of the cone at the altitude of the vehicle V = the velocity of the vehicle T = a function of the time to impact.
f(.THETA.) ro + VT [90-.THETA./90]1/2 wherein:
ro = the radius of the cone at the altitude of the vehicle V = the velocity of the vehicle T = a function of the time to impact.
11. A warning system as recited in claim 7 wherein said obstacle is approximated by a cone and wherein said boundaries are defined by the equation:
f(.THETA.) = ro + VT COS .THETA.
wherein:
ro = the radius of the cone at the altitude of the vehicle V = the velocity of the vehicle T = a function of the time to impact.
f(.THETA.) = ro + VT COS .THETA.
wherein:
ro = the radius of the cone at the altitude of the vehicle V = the velocity of the vehicle T = a function of the time to impact.
12. A warning system as recited in claim 1 wherein said defining means includes means for defin-ing a safe approach boundary around said vehicle.
13. A warning system as recited in claim 1 wherein said defining means includes means for predict-ing the path of travel of said vehicle and for defin-ing a safe approach boundary around said path of travel.
14. A warning system as recited in claim 13 wherein said predicting means includes means res-ponsive to said speed, direction of travel and the rate of change of the direction of travel of said vehicle for predicting the path of travel of said vehicle.
15. A warning system as recited in claim 1 wherein said boundary defining means includes means for defining said boundary as a function of time to impact.
16. A warning system as recited in claim 15 wherein said boundary defining means includes means for defining said boundary as a constant time to impact boundary.
17. A warning system as recited in claim 1 further including means for advising the operator of the relative position of said vehicle and said obstacles.
18. A warning system as recited in claim 17 wherein said advising means includes a visual dis-play.
19. A warning system as recited in claim 18 wherein said visual display is a color display, and wherein the color of the display changes as a function of the proximity of the vehicle to an obstacle.
20. A warning system as recited in claim 18 wherein said display is a map display.
21. A warning system as recited in claim 18 wherein said display is an attitude display.
22. A warning system as recited in claim 17 wherein said advising means includes means for providing an aural announcement.
23. A warning system as recited in claim 22 wherein said aural announcement providing means includes means for announcing to the operator the locations of the obstacle.
24. A warning system as recited in claim 22 wherein said aural announcement providing means includes means for announcing to the operator the corrective action to be taken.
25. A warning system for warning the opera-tor of a vehicle of the location of obstacles near the path of travel, comprising:
means for storing representations of the locations and physical characteristics of obstacles, said representations being stored as predetermined standard shapes and the locations and sizes thereof;
means for determining the speed, position and direction of travel of the vehicle and altering the shapes and sizes of said predetermined standard shapes as a function of speed, position and direction of travel of the vehicle to generate altered shapes;
and means for providing an indication when the vehicle enters one of said altered shapes.
means for storing representations of the locations and physical characteristics of obstacles, said representations being stored as predetermined standard shapes and the locations and sizes thereof;
means for determining the speed, position and direction of travel of the vehicle and altering the shapes and sizes of said predetermined standard shapes as a function of speed, position and direction of travel of the vehicle to generate altered shapes;
and means for providing an indication when the vehicle enters one of said altered shapes.
26. The system recited in claim 25 wherein said predetermined standard shapes are three dimen-sional shapes having horizontal and vertical compo-nents and wherein said vehicle is capable of moving horizontally and vertically, and wherein the horizon-tal and vertical components of the shapes are altered as a function of the horizontal and vertical movement of the vehicle, respectively.
27. The system recited in claim 25 wherein said standard shapes include geometric shapes.
28. The system as recited in claim 27 wherein said geometric shapes include cones having predetermined heights and radii, where the heights and radii of the cones are altered as a function of the horizontal and vertical movement of the vehicle, respectively.
29. The system recited in claim 27 wherein said geometric shapes include cones and the sizes include the heights and radii of said cones.
30. The system recited in claim 27 wherein said geometric shapes include truncated cones.
31. The system recited in claim 27 wherein said geometric shapes include connected cones.
32. The system recited in claim 27 wherein said geometric shapes include inverted cones.
33. The system recited in claim 25 wherein said altered shape generating means includes means for defining safe approach boundaries around said obstacles.
34. The system recited in claim 25 wherein the physical characteristics of an obstacle is approximated by a cone and wherein said boundaries are defined by the equation:
f(.THETA.) = ro + VT [(90-.THETA./90]
wherein:
ro = the radius of the cone at the altitude of the vehicle V = the velocity of the vehicle T = a function of the time to impact.
f(.THETA.) = ro + VT [(90-.THETA./90]
wherein:
ro = the radius of the cone at the altitude of the vehicle V = the velocity of the vehicle T = a function of the time to impact.
35. The system recited in claim 25 wherein the physical characteristics of an obstacle are approximated by a cone and wherein said boundaries are defined by the equation:
f(.THETA.) = ro + VT [(90-.THETA./90]2 wherein:
ro = the radius of the cone at the altitude of the vehicle V = the velocity of the vehicle T = a function of the time to impact.
f(.THETA.) = ro + VT [(90-.THETA./90]2 wherein:
ro = the radius of the cone at the altitude of the vehicle V = the velocity of the vehicle T = a function of the time to impact.
36. The system recited in claim 25 wherein the physical characteristics of an obstacle is approximated by a cone and wherein said boundaries are defined by the equation:
f(.THETA.) = ro + VT [90-.THETA./90]1/2 wherein:
ro = the radius of the cone at the altitude of the vehicle V = the velocity of the vehicle T = a function of the time to impact.
f(.THETA.) = ro + VT [90-.THETA./90]1/2 wherein:
ro = the radius of the cone at the altitude of the vehicle V = the velocity of the vehicle T = a function of the time to impact.
37. The system recited in claim 25 wherein the physical characteristics of an obstacle is approximated by a cone and wherein said boundaries are defined by the equation:
f(.THETA.) = ro + VT COS .THETA.
wherein:
ro = the radius of the cone at the altitude of the vehicle V = the velocity of the vehicle T = a function of the time to impact.
f(.THETA.) = ro + VT COS .THETA.
wherein:
ro = the radius of the cone at the altitude of the vehicle V = the velocity of the vehicle T = a function of the time to impact.
38. The system recited in claim 25 wherein said altered shape generating means includes means for defining a safe approach boundary around the obstacle as a function of time to impact.
39. The system recited in claim 38 wherein said safe approach boundary defining means includes means for defining said boundary as a constant time to impact boundary.
40. The system recited in claim 25 further including means for advising the operator of the rela-tive position of said vehicle and said obstacles.
41. The system recited in claim 40 wherein said advising means includes a visual display.
42. The system recited in claim 41 wherein said visual display is a color display, and wherein the color of the display changes as a function of the proximity of the vehicle to an obstacle.
43. The system recited in claim 30 wherein said dispaly is a map display.
44. The system recited in claim 41 wherein said display is an attitude display.
45. The system recited in claim 40 wherein said advising means includes means for providing an aural announcement.
46. The system recited in claim 45 wherein said aural announcement providing means includes means for announcing to the operator the locations of the obstacle.
47. The system recited in claim 45 wherein said aural announcement providing means includes means for announcing to the operator the corrective action to be taken.
48. A warning system for providing a warning to the operator of a vehicle a predetermined time prior to a projected impact with an obstacle, compris-ing:
means for storing data representative of the location and boundaries of obstacles;
means for determining the velocity and posi-tion of the vehicle;
means responsive to said data storing means and said determining for defining warning boundaries between the vehicle and said obstacles, said warning boundaries being a function of the location and boundaries of said obstacles and the position and velocity of said vehicle; and means for generating a warning when one of said warning boundaries is penetrated.
means for storing data representative of the location and boundaries of obstacles;
means for determining the velocity and posi-tion of the vehicle;
means responsive to said data storing means and said determining for defining warning boundaries between the vehicle and said obstacles, said warning boundaries being a function of the location and boundaries of said obstacles and the position and velocity of said vehicle; and means for generating a warning when one of said warning boundaries is penetrated.
49. A warning system as recited in claim 48 wherein said warning boundaries define a predeter-mined time to impact.
50. A warning system as recited in claim 49 wherein said warning boundaries define a constant time to impact.
51. A warning system as recited in claim 48 wherein said storing means includes means for storing approximations of the shapes and sizes of the obstacles.
52. A warning system as recited in claim 51 wherein said approximations include algebraic approximations.
53. A warning system as recited in claim 51 wherein said approximations include geometric approximations.
54. The warning system recited in claim 53 wherein said geometric approximations include cones and the sizes include the heights and slopes of said cones.
55. The warning system recited in claim 53 wherein said geometric approximations include trun-cated cones.
56. The system recited in claim 53 wherein said geometric approximations include connected cones.
57. The system recited in claim 53 wherein said approximations include inverted cones.
58. A warning system as recited in claim 48 wherein said defining means includes means for defining safe approach boundaries around said obstacles.
59. A warning system as recited in claim 58 wherein said obstacle is approximated by a cone and wherein said boundaries are defined by the equa-tion:
f(.THETA.) = ro + VT + (90-.THETA.)/90]
wherein:
ro = the radius of the cone at the altitude of the vehicle V = the velocity of the vehicle T = a function of the time to impact.
f(.THETA.) = ro + VT + (90-.THETA.)/90]
wherein:
ro = the radius of the cone at the altitude of the vehicle V = the velocity of the vehicle T = a function of the time to impact.
60. A warning system as recited in claim 58 wherein said obstacle is approximated by a cone and wherein said boundaries are defined by the equa-tion:
f(.THETA.) = ro + VT [(90-.THETA.)/90]2 wherein:
ro = the radius of the cone at the altitude of the vehicle V = the velocity of the vehicle T = a function of the time to impact.
f(.THETA.) = ro + VT [(90-.THETA.)/90]2 wherein:
ro = the radius of the cone at the altitude of the vehicle V = the velocity of the vehicle T = a function of the time to impact.
61. A warning system as recited in claim 58 wherein said obstacle is approximated by a cone and wherein said boundaries are defined by the equa-tion:
f(.THETA.) = ro + VT [90-.THETA./90]1/2 wherein:
ro = the radius of the cone at the altitude of the vehicle V = the velocity o the vehicle T = a function of the time to impact.
f(.THETA.) = ro + VT [90-.THETA./90]1/2 wherein:
ro = the radius of the cone at the altitude of the vehicle V = the velocity o the vehicle T = a function of the time to impact.
62. A warning system as recited in claim 58 wherein said obstacle is approximated by a cone and wherein said boundaries are defined by the equa-tion:
f(.THETA.) = ro + VT COS .THETA.
wherein:
ro = the radius of the cone at the altitude of the vehicle V = the velocity of the vehicle T = a function of the time to impact.
f(.THETA.) = ro + VT COS .THETA.
wherein:
ro = the radius of the cone at the altitude of the vehicle V = the velocity of the vehicle T = a function of the time to impact.
63. A warning system as recited in claim 48 wherein said defining means includes means for defining a safe approach boundary around said vehicle.
64. A warning system as recited in claim 48 wherein said defining means includes means for predicting the path of travel of said vehicle and for defining a safe approach boundary around said path of travel.
65. A warning system as recited in claim 64 wherein said predicting means includes means res-ponsive to said speed, direction of travel and the rate of change of the direction of travel of said vehicle for predicting the path of travel of said vehicle.
66. A warning system as recited in claim 48 wherein said warning boundary defining means includes means for defining said boundary as a function of time to impact.
67. A warning system as recited in claim 66 wherein said warning boundary defining means in-cludes means for defining said warning boundary as a constant time to impact boundary.
68. A warning system as recited in claim 48 further including means for advising the operator of the relative position of said vehicle and said obstacles.
69. A warning system as recited in claim 68 wherein said advising means includes a visual dis-play.
70. A warning system as recited in claim 69 wherein said visual display is a color display, and wherein the color of the display changes as a function of the proximity of the vehicle to an obstacle.
71. A warning system as recited in claim 69 wherein said display is a map display.
72. A warning system as recited in claim 69 wherein said display is an attitude display.
73. A warning system as recited in claim 68 wherein said advising means includes means for providing an aural announcement.
74. A warning system as recited in claim 73 wherein said aural announcement providing means includes means for announcing to the operator the locations of the obstacle.
75. A warning system as recited in claim 73 wherein said aural announcement providing means includes means for announcing to the operator the corrective action to be taken.
76. A warning system for warning the operator of a vehicle of the location of restricted areas in the path of travel, comprising:
means for storing representations of the locations of restricted areas;
means for determining the speed, position and direction of travel of said vehicle;
means responsive to said storing means and to said determining means for defining safe approach boundaries between said vehicle and said restricted areas as a function of the location of said restricted areas and the speed, position and direction of travel of the vehicle; and means responsive to said determining means and to said defining means when the distance between the vehicle and the restricted area is less than the distance defined by the safe approach boundary.
means for storing representations of the locations of restricted areas;
means for determining the speed, position and direction of travel of said vehicle;
means responsive to said storing means and to said determining means for defining safe approach boundaries between said vehicle and said restricted areas as a function of the location of said restricted areas and the speed, position and direction of travel of the vehicle; and means responsive to said determining means and to said defining means when the distance between the vehicle and the restricted area is less than the distance defined by the safe approach boundary.
77. A warning system as recited in claim 76 wherein said storing means includes means for storing approximations of the shapes and sizes of the restricted areas.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US06/576,450 US4646244A (en) | 1984-02-02 | 1984-02-02 | Terrain advisory system |
| US576,450 | 1984-02-02 |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA1238398A true CA1238398A (en) | 1988-06-21 |
Family
ID=24304475
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA000469416A Expired CA1238398A (en) | 1984-02-02 | 1984-12-05 | Terrain advisory system |
Country Status (11)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US4646244A (en) |
| EP (1) | EP0172221B1 (en) |
| JP (1) | JPS61501283A (en) |
| AU (1) | AU563701B2 (en) |
| CA (1) | CA1238398A (en) |
| DE (1) | DE3584553D1 (en) |
| FI (1) | FI853790A0 (en) |
| IL (1) | IL74045A0 (en) |
| IT (1) | IT1182170B (en) |
| NZ (1) | NZ210815A (en) |
| WO (1) | WO1985003566A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US7634335B2 (en) * | 2004-04-20 | 2009-12-15 | Thales | Distance estimating method for aircraft taking air navigation restrictions into account |
Families Citing this family (186)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NO164137C (en) * | 1984-07-10 | 1990-08-29 | Norges Teknisk Naturvitenskape | SYSTEM FOR THE DETECTION OF OBJECTS FOR GRID, KNOWN CATARCH CHARACTERISTICS, ON A BACKGROUND. |
| CA1243117A (en) * | 1985-02-22 | 1988-10-11 | Michael M. Grove | Altitude loss after take-off warning system utilizing time and altitude |
| GB8512340D0 (en) * | 1985-05-15 | 1986-10-29 | Gec Avionics | Measuring dynamic system |
| GB8606978D0 (en) * | 1986-03-20 | 1986-10-29 | British Aerospace | Stabilizing air to ground radar |
| IL83184A0 (en) * | 1986-07-15 | 1987-12-31 | Sundstrand Data Control | Method and apparatus for memory mapping topographical data |
| US4835537A (en) * | 1986-07-16 | 1989-05-30 | Manion James H | Telemetry burst collision avoidance system |
| US4914436A (en) * | 1987-04-06 | 1990-04-03 | Sundstrand Data Control, Inc. | Ground proximity approach warning system without landing flap input |
| US4812990A (en) * | 1987-04-29 | 1989-03-14 | Merit Technology Incorporated | System and method for optimizing aircraft flight path |
| US6009373A (en) * | 1987-06-01 | 1999-12-28 | Furuno Electric Company, Limited | Ship track and underwater conditions indicating system |
| JPS6436400A (en) * | 1987-07-31 | 1989-02-07 | Japan Radio Co Ltd | Front warning device |
| DE3786803D1 (en) * | 1987-11-17 | 1993-09-02 | Litef Gmbh | METHOD FOR INCREASING ERROR DETECTION IN THE SPEED MEASUREMENT OF AIRCRAFT DEVICES USING DOPPLER RADAR. |
| US4903216A (en) * | 1988-04-11 | 1990-02-20 | Hughes Aircraft Company | Method for displaying intervisibility data |
| US4876651A (en) * | 1988-05-11 | 1989-10-24 | Honeywell Inc. | Digital map system |
| US5136512A (en) * | 1988-06-26 | 1992-08-04 | Cubic Defense Systems, Inc. | Ground collision avoidance system |
| US5058024A (en) * | 1989-01-23 | 1991-10-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Conflict detection and resolution between moving objects |
| US5086396A (en) * | 1989-02-02 | 1992-02-04 | Honeywell Inc. | Apparatus and method for an aircraft navigation system having improved mission management and survivability capabilities |
| US5157615A (en) * | 1990-01-09 | 1992-10-20 | Ryan International Corporation | Aircraft traffic alert and collision avoidance device |
| GB9026451D0 (en) * | 1990-12-05 | 1991-01-23 | Smiths Industries Plc | Aircraft display systems |
| US5173861A (en) * | 1990-12-18 | 1992-12-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Motion constraints using particles |
| JP2749727B2 (en) * | 1991-03-08 | 1998-05-13 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Route prediction device |
| GB9111086D0 (en) * | 1991-05-22 | 1991-10-16 | Marconi Gec Ltd | Aircraft terrain and obstacle avoidance system |
| GB2258362A (en) * | 1991-07-27 | 1993-02-03 | Gec Ferranti Defence Syst | A collision warning system |
| JPH05209954A (en) * | 1992-01-31 | 1993-08-20 | Nec Corp | Accurately measuring radar indicating device incorporating safe altitude limit indicating function |
| FR2903771B1 (en) * | 1992-03-24 | 2011-12-30 | Thomson Csf | METHOD FOR ACTIVATING AN ALTIMETRIC TRIGGER AND DEVICE FOR IMPLEMENTING SAID METHOD |
| FR2689668B1 (en) * | 1992-04-07 | 1994-05-20 | Dassault Electronique | FIELD ANTI-COLLISION PROCESS AND DEVICE FOR AIRCRAFT. |
| FR2690518B1 (en) * | 1992-04-24 | 1997-01-03 | Sagem | METHOD OF PILOTING AN AIRCRAFT TO AVOID COLLISION WITH THE GROUND. |
| FR2690754B1 (en) * | 1992-04-30 | 1994-06-10 | Thomson Csf | METHOD FOR DETECTION AND LOCATION OF OBJECTS ON A RELATIVELY PLANAR SOIL AND DEVICE FOR IMPLEMENTING SAME. |
| US5530650A (en) * | 1992-10-28 | 1996-06-25 | Mcdonnell Douglas Corp. | Computer imaging system and method for remote in-flight aircraft refueling |
| FR2697796B1 (en) * | 1992-11-10 | 1994-12-09 | Sextant Avionique | Collision avoidance device for aircraft, in particular with the ground. |
| IL104542A (en) * | 1993-01-28 | 1996-05-14 | Israel State | Airborne obstacle collision avoidance apparatus |
| US5410317A (en) * | 1993-04-06 | 1995-04-25 | Alliedsignal Inc. | Terrain clearance generator |
| US5465142A (en) * | 1993-04-30 | 1995-11-07 | Northrop Grumman Corporation | Obstacle avoidance system for helicopters and other aircraft |
| US20030193414A1 (en) * | 1993-05-18 | 2003-10-16 | Jones M. Kelly | User-definable communications methods and systems |
| JP3109701B2 (en) * | 1993-08-17 | 2000-11-20 | キヤノン株式会社 | Communication device, information processing device having communication function, communication management device, and control method thereof |
| FR2712251B1 (en) * | 1993-11-10 | 1996-01-26 | Eurocopter France | Method and device for assisting the piloting of an aircraft. |
| FR2717934B1 (en) * | 1994-03-22 | 1996-04-26 | Sextant Avionique | Collision avoidance device for aircraft in particular with the ground by approach slope control. |
| FR2717935B1 (en) * | 1994-03-24 | 1996-05-31 | Sextant Avionique | Method and device for preventing collisions of aerodynes with obstacles in relief. |
| US5654890A (en) | 1994-05-31 | 1997-08-05 | Lockheed Martin | High resolution autonomous precision approach and landing system |
| US6865477B2 (en) | 1994-05-31 | 2005-03-08 | Winged Systems Corporation | High resolution autonomous precision positioning system |
| FR2721130B1 (en) * | 1994-06-14 | 1996-07-12 | Sextant Avionique | Collision avoidance device for aircraft, in particular with ground with reduced energy balance. |
| FR2728374A1 (en) * | 1994-12-15 | 1996-06-21 | Aerospatiale | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROVIDING INFORMATION, ALERT, OR ALARM FOR AN AIRCRAFT NEAR THE GROUND |
| US5581250A (en) * | 1995-02-24 | 1996-12-03 | Khvilivitzky; Alexander | Visual collision avoidance system for unmanned aerial vehicles |
| FR2731824B1 (en) * | 1995-03-17 | 1997-05-16 | Sextant Avionique | COLLISION AVOIDANCE DEVICE FOR AIRCRAFT, PARTICULARLY WITH THE GROUND |
| EP0750238B1 (en) * | 1995-06-20 | 2000-03-01 | Honeywell Inc. | Integrated ground collision avoidance system |
| US6292721B1 (en) | 1995-07-31 | 2001-09-18 | Allied Signal Inc. | Premature descent into terrain visual awareness enhancement to EGPWS |
| US5839080B1 (en) * | 1995-07-31 | 2000-10-17 | Allied Signal Inc | Terrain awareness system |
| US6606034B1 (en) | 1995-07-31 | 2003-08-12 | Honeywell International Inc. | Terrain awareness system |
| US6691004B2 (en) | 1995-07-31 | 2004-02-10 | Honeywell International, Inc. | Method for determining a currently obtainable climb gradient of an aircraft |
| US6092009A (en) | 1995-07-31 | 2000-07-18 | Alliedsignal | Aircraft terrain information system |
| US6138060A (en) * | 1995-07-31 | 2000-10-24 | Alliedsignal Inc. | Terrain awareness system |
| US5745053A (en) * | 1995-12-08 | 1998-04-28 | Fleming, Iii; Hoyt A. | Landing gear warning apparatus and method for pilots approaching a runway with retracted landing gear |
| US5864307A (en) * | 1996-02-19 | 1999-01-26 | Gec Marconi Limited | Aircraft terrain advisory system |
| US5781146A (en) * | 1996-03-11 | 1998-07-14 | Imaging Accessories, Inc. | Automatic horizontal and vertical scanning radar with terrain display |
| US5828332A (en) * | 1996-03-11 | 1998-10-27 | Imaging Accessories, Inc. | Automatic horizontal and vertical scanning radar with terrain display |
| FR2747492B1 (en) * | 1996-04-15 | 1998-06-05 | Dassault Electronique | TERRAIN ANTI-COLLISION DEVICE FOR AIRCRAFT WITH TURN PREDICTION |
| WO1997040401A1 (en) * | 1996-04-23 | 1997-10-30 | Alliedsignal Inc. | Integrated hazard avoidance system |
| US5781126A (en) * | 1996-07-29 | 1998-07-14 | Alliedsignal Inc. | Ground proximity warning system and methods for rotary wing aircraft |
| US6043759A (en) * | 1996-07-29 | 2000-03-28 | Alliedsignal | Air-ground logic system and method for rotary wing aircraft |
| EP0916072B1 (en) * | 1996-07-30 | 2014-10-15 | Honeywell International Inc. | Aircraft terrain information system |
| US5838262A (en) * | 1996-12-19 | 1998-11-17 | Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation | Aircraft virtual image display system and method for providing a real-time perspective threat coverage display |
| GB2322611B (en) * | 1997-02-26 | 2001-03-21 | British Aerospace | Apparatus for indicating air traffic and terrain collision threat to an aircraft |
| JP3054685B2 (en) * | 1997-06-05 | 2000-06-19 | 運輸省船舶技術研究所長 | Onboard navigation device with terrain display function |
| US5936552A (en) * | 1997-06-12 | 1999-08-10 | Rockwell Science Center, Inc. | Integrated horizontal and profile terrain display format for situational awareness |
| US6021374A (en) * | 1997-10-09 | 2000-02-01 | Mcdonnell Douglas Corporation | Stand alone terrain conflict detector and operating methods therefor |
| US5987379A (en) * | 1997-10-30 | 1999-11-16 | Trimble Navigation Limited | Creation and monitoring of variable buffer zones |
| WO2000023967A1 (en) * | 1998-10-16 | 2000-04-27 | Universal Avionics Systems Corporation | Flight plan intent alert system and method |
| EP1157318B1 (en) | 1999-02-01 | 2003-05-21 | Honeywell International Inc. | Ground proximity warning system, method and computer program product for controllably altering the base width of an alert envelope |
| EP1151359B1 (en) | 1999-02-01 | 2006-08-30 | Honeywell International Inc. | Method, apparatus and computer program products for determining a corrected distance between an aircraft and a selected runway |
| US6445310B1 (en) | 1999-02-01 | 2002-09-03 | Honeywell International, Inc. | Apparatus, methods, computer program products for generating a runway field clearance floor envelope about a selected runway |
| WO2000047948A1 (en) | 1999-02-01 | 2000-08-17 | Honeywell International Inc. | Apparatus, method, and computer program product for generating terrain clearance floor envelopes about a selected runway |
| DE60041810D1 (en) * | 1999-02-01 | 2009-04-30 | Honeywell Int Inc | GROUND PROXIMITY WARNING SYSTEM |
| US7570214B2 (en) | 1999-03-05 | 2009-08-04 | Era Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for ADS-B validation, active and passive multilateration, and elliptical surviellance |
| US7495612B2 (en) | 1999-03-05 | 2009-02-24 | Era Systems Corporation | Method and apparatus to improve ADS-B security |
| US7429950B2 (en) * | 1999-03-05 | 2008-09-30 | Era Systems Corporation | Method and apparatus to extend ADS performance metrics |
| US6885340B2 (en) * | 2000-02-29 | 2005-04-26 | Rannoch Corporation | Correlation of flight track data with other data sources |
| US7375683B2 (en) * | 1999-03-05 | 2008-05-20 | Era Systems Corporation | Use of geo-stationary satellites to augment wide— area multilateration synchronization |
| US7667647B2 (en) * | 1999-03-05 | 2010-02-23 | Era Systems Corporation | Extension of aircraft tracking and positive identification from movement areas into non-movement areas |
| US7576695B2 (en) * | 1999-03-05 | 2009-08-18 | Era Systems Corporation | Multilateration enhancements for noise and operations management |
| US7126534B2 (en) * | 1999-03-05 | 2006-10-24 | Rannoch Corporation | Minimum safe altitude warning |
| US7889133B2 (en) | 1999-03-05 | 2011-02-15 | Itt Manufacturing Enterprises, Inc. | Multilateration enhancements for noise and operations management |
| US7477193B2 (en) * | 1999-03-05 | 2009-01-13 | Era Systems Corporation | Method and system for elliptical-based surveillance |
| US7777675B2 (en) * | 1999-03-05 | 2010-08-17 | Era Systems Corporation | Deployable passive broadband aircraft tracking |
| US8203486B1 (en) | 1999-03-05 | 2012-06-19 | Omnipol A.S. | Transmitter independent techniques to extend the performance of passive coherent location |
| US7423590B2 (en) | 1999-03-05 | 2008-09-09 | Era Systems Corporation | Method and apparatus for improving ADS-B security |
| US7782256B2 (en) * | 1999-03-05 | 2010-08-24 | Era Systems Corporation | Enhanced passive coherent location techniques to track and identify UAVs, UCAVs, MAVs, and other objects |
| US7908077B2 (en) * | 2003-06-10 | 2011-03-15 | Itt Manufacturing Enterprises, Inc. | Land use compatibility planning software |
| US8446321B2 (en) | 1999-03-05 | 2013-05-21 | Omnipol A.S. | Deployable intelligence and tracking system for homeland security and search and rescue |
| US7612716B2 (en) * | 1999-03-05 | 2009-11-03 | Era Systems Corporation | Correlation of flight track data with other data sources |
| US20100079342A1 (en) * | 1999-03-05 | 2010-04-01 | Smith Alexander E | Multilateration enhancements for noise and operations management |
| US7739167B2 (en) * | 1999-03-05 | 2010-06-15 | Era Systems Corporation | Automated management of airport revenues |
| US7437250B2 (en) * | 1999-03-05 | 2008-10-14 | Era Systems Corporation | Airport pavement management system |
| US6785594B1 (en) * | 1999-03-25 | 2004-08-31 | Honeywell International Inc. | Ground proximity warning system and method having a reduced set of input parameters |
| US6421603B1 (en) | 1999-08-11 | 2002-07-16 | Honeywell International Inc. | Hazard detection for a travel plan |
| US6469664B1 (en) | 1999-10-05 | 2002-10-22 | Honeywell International Inc. | Method, apparatus, and computer program products for alerting surface vessels to hazardous conditions |
| US6734808B1 (en) | 1999-10-05 | 2004-05-11 | Honeywell International Inc. | Method, apparatus and computer program products for alerting submersible vessels to hazardous conditions |
| SE515860C2 (en) * | 2000-02-14 | 2001-10-22 | Saab Dynamics Ab | Installation and procedure for navigating a vehicle |
| US6469660B1 (en) | 2000-04-13 | 2002-10-22 | United Parcel Service Inc | Method and system for displaying target icons correlated to target data integrity |
| US8131407B1 (en) | 2000-05-26 | 2012-03-06 | Aerotech Research (Usa), Inc. | Transmission, receipt, combination, sorting, reporting, and presentation of vehicle specific environmental conditions and hazards information utilizing a ground station |
| US7463955B1 (en) | 2000-05-26 | 2008-12-09 | Aerotech Research (Usa), Inc. | Transmission, receipt, combination, sorting, and presentation of vehicle specific environmental conditions and hazards information |
| US7471995B1 (en) | 2000-05-26 | 2008-12-30 | Aerotech Research (Usa), Inc. | Transmission, receipt, combination, sorting, and presentation of vehicle specific environmental conditions and hazards information |
| US6833797B2 (en) | 2000-05-26 | 2004-12-21 | Honeywell International Inc. | Method, apparatus and computer program product for displaying terrain in rotary wing aircraft |
| US8135500B1 (en) | 2000-05-26 | 2012-03-13 | Aerotech Research (Usa), Inc. | Wake vortex detection and reporting system |
| US6381538B1 (en) * | 2000-05-26 | 2002-04-30 | Aerotech Research (U.S.A.), Inc. | Vehicle specific hazard estimation, presentation, and route planning based on meteorological and other environmental data |
| US6583733B2 (en) | 2000-05-26 | 2003-06-24 | Honeywell International Inc. | Apparatus, method and computer program product for helicopter ground proximity warning system |
| US6650972B1 (en) | 2000-05-26 | 2003-11-18 | Aerotech Research (U.S.A.), Inc. | Estimation, transmission, receipt, and presentation of vehicle specific environmental conditions and hazards information |
| MXPA03000264A (en) | 2000-07-10 | 2004-01-26 | United Parcel Service Inc | Method for determining conflicting paths between mobile airborne vehicles and associated system and computer software program product. |
| WO2002023125A1 (en) | 2000-09-14 | 2002-03-21 | Honeywell International Inc. | Method, apparatus and computer program product for helicopter tail strike warning |
| US6700482B2 (en) | 2000-09-29 | 2004-03-02 | Honeywell International Inc. | Alerting and notification system |
| WO2003071371A1 (en) * | 2001-10-11 | 2003-08-28 | Sandel Avionics, Inc. | Method and apparatus for predictive altitude display |
| JP2004518213A (en) * | 2000-10-25 | 2004-06-17 | ユナイテッド パーセル サービス オブ アメリカ インコーポレイテッド | Altitude range filter for cockpit traffic display |
| ATE338297T1 (en) * | 2001-01-24 | 2006-09-15 | Honeywell Int Inc | CHANGEABLE PREDICTIVE OFFSET AND SUB-OFFSET FOR AN IMPROVED GROUND PROXIMITY WARNING SYSTEM |
| US6431730B1 (en) * | 2001-02-08 | 2002-08-13 | Emerald Innovations, L.L.C. | Decorative light curtain |
| US7117089B2 (en) * | 2001-03-06 | 2006-10-03 | Honeywell International Inc. | Ground runway awareness and advisory system |
| US6983206B2 (en) * | 2001-03-06 | 2006-01-03 | Honeywell International, Inc. | Ground operations and imminent landing runway selection |
| US7587278B2 (en) * | 2002-05-15 | 2009-09-08 | Honeywell International Inc. | Ground operations and advanced runway awareness and advisory system |
| US8145367B2 (en) | 2001-03-06 | 2012-03-27 | Honeywell International Inc. | Closed airport surface alerting system |
| US6492934B1 (en) * | 2001-08-06 | 2002-12-10 | Rockwell Collins | Method of deriving ground speed for descending aircraft |
| US6525674B1 (en) * | 2001-08-08 | 2003-02-25 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | Conditional hazard alerting display |
| US6452511B1 (en) * | 2001-08-08 | 2002-09-17 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | Method and system for providing ground proximity warnings |
| US7177763B2 (en) * | 2001-09-25 | 2007-02-13 | Werner Keber | Method and device for preventing unpermitted approach of airplanes to objects on the ground which are to be protected |
| US6484072B1 (en) | 2001-09-28 | 2002-11-19 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Embedded terrain awareness warning system for aircraft |
| US6584383B2 (en) * | 2001-09-28 | 2003-06-24 | Pippenger Phillip Mckinney | Anti-hijacking security system and apparatus for aircraft |
| CN101033957B (en) * | 2001-10-11 | 2012-01-04 | 山德尔埃维翁尼克斯有限公司 | Method and device for predicting high and displaying same |
| JP4174559B2 (en) * | 2001-10-26 | 2008-11-05 | 独立行政法人 宇宙航空研究開発機構 | Advanced visibility information providing system and method using satellite image and flight obstacle recognition system and method |
| US7079951B2 (en) * | 2002-05-15 | 2006-07-18 | Honeywell International Inc. | Ground operations and imminent landing runway selection |
| US20040054472A1 (en) * | 2002-09-17 | 2004-03-18 | Koncelik Lawrence J. | Controlling aircraft from collisions with off limits facilities |
| FR2847700B1 (en) * | 2002-11-22 | 2005-01-14 | Thales Sa | METHOD OF SYNTHESIZING A THREE DIMENSIONAL INTERVISIBILITY IMAGE |
| US7386373B1 (en) * | 2003-01-07 | 2008-06-10 | Garmin International, Inc. | System, method and apparatus for searching geographic area using prioritized spatial order |
| US6745115B1 (en) | 2003-01-07 | 2004-06-01 | Garmin Ltd. | System, method and apparatus for searching geographic area using prioritized spacial order |
| US6970104B2 (en) * | 2003-01-22 | 2005-11-29 | Knecht William R | Flight information computation and display |
| US7382287B1 (en) | 2003-06-03 | 2008-06-03 | Garmin International, Inc | Avionics system, method and apparatus for selecting a runway |
| NO333526B1 (en) | 2003-06-12 | 2013-07-01 | Vestas Wind Sys As | System to prevent collision between aircraft and an obstacle |
| US7376494B2 (en) | 2003-06-26 | 2008-05-20 | Michael Arnouse | Apparatus, system and method for aircraft security and anti-hijacking intervention |
| US7379795B2 (en) * | 2003-06-26 | 2008-05-27 | Michael Arnouse | Apparatus, system and method for aircraft security and anti-hijacking intervention |
| DE102004040249A1 (en) * | 2003-08-30 | 2005-05-25 | Eads Deutschland Gmbh | Low-level guidance system, low-level guidance warning system, low-level command warning generator and low-level guidance method |
| US7379796B2 (en) * | 2003-08-30 | 2008-05-27 | Eads Deutschland Gmbh | Low-altitude flight guidance system, warning system for low-altitude flight guidance, warning generator for low-altitude flight guidance and method for low-altitude flight guidance |
| US7268703B1 (en) | 2003-09-18 | 2007-09-11 | Garmin Ltd. | Methods, systems, and devices for cartographic alerts |
| US7386392B1 (en) | 2003-09-18 | 2008-06-10 | Garmin Ltd. | Methods, systems, and devices for condition specific alerts |
| FR2860292B1 (en) * | 2003-09-26 | 2005-12-02 | Thales Sa | DISTANCE ESTIMATING METHOD FOR A MOBILE SUBJECT TO DYNAMIC TRAVEL CONSTRAINTS |
| US7619513B2 (en) * | 2003-10-03 | 2009-11-17 | Satellite Tracking Of People Llc | System and method for tracking movement of individuals |
| FR2867559B1 (en) * | 2004-03-12 | 2006-05-26 | Thales Sa | TOPOGRAPHIC MAP DISPLAY DEVICE FOR AIRCRAFT |
| FR2870605B1 (en) * | 2004-05-18 | 2010-10-08 | Airbus France | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR AUTOMATICALLY GUIDING AN AIRCRAFT FOR LOW-ALTITUDE AT LEAST PART FLIGHT |
| CN101048469B (en) * | 2004-09-13 | 2010-12-08 | 株式会社理光 | Recording ink, ink cartridge, ink record, inkjet recording apparatus, and inkjet recording method |
| FR2875899B1 (en) * | 2004-09-24 | 2006-12-01 | Thales Sa | DEVICE AND METHOD FOR SIGNALING SIDE MARGINS OF MANEUVER |
| FR2884020B1 (en) * | 2005-04-04 | 2011-06-10 | Airbus France | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR AIDING NAVIGATION ON THE GROUND OF AN AIRCRAFT ON AN AIRPORT |
| US7551990B2 (en) * | 2005-04-21 | 2009-06-23 | Honeywell International Inc. | System and method for management of a ground obstacle display |
| US7831381B2 (en) * | 2005-08-04 | 2010-11-09 | Microsoft Corporation | Data engine for ranking popularity of landmarks in a geographical area |
| EP1764759A1 (en) * | 2005-09-14 | 2007-03-21 | Honeywell International Inc. | System and method for displaying protected or restricted airspace inside an aircraft |
| US7783612B2 (en) * | 2005-09-21 | 2010-08-24 | The Boeing Company | Creation of optimized terrain databases |
| US20070112511A1 (en) * | 2005-11-17 | 2007-05-17 | Digital Cyclone, Inc. | Mobile geo-temporal information manager |
| FR2897448B1 (en) * | 2006-02-14 | 2008-03-14 | Airbus France Sas | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR AIDING THE CONTROL OF AN AIRCRAFT. |
| US20110029162A1 (en) * | 2006-03-06 | 2011-02-03 | Honeywell International, Inc. | Systems and methods for selectively altering a ground proximity message |
| US8050863B2 (en) * | 2006-03-16 | 2011-11-01 | Gray & Company, Inc. | Navigation and control system for autonomous vehicles |
| FR2898972B1 (en) * | 2006-03-21 | 2008-06-27 | Thales Sa | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR MONITORING THE MINIMUM FLIGHT ALTITUDE OF AN AIRCRAFT |
| US7965227B2 (en) * | 2006-05-08 | 2011-06-21 | Era Systems, Inc. | Aircraft tracking using low cost tagging as a discriminator |
| FR2902537B1 (en) * | 2006-06-20 | 2016-04-29 | Eurocopter France | SYSTEM FOR DETECTING OBSTACLES IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD OF A POSITION POINT |
| US9354633B1 (en) | 2008-10-31 | 2016-05-31 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | System and method for ground navigation |
| US9733349B1 (en) | 2007-09-06 | 2017-08-15 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | System for and method of radar data processing for low visibility landing applications |
| US9939526B2 (en) | 2007-09-06 | 2018-04-10 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | Display system and method using weather radar sensing |
| US9024805B1 (en) | 2012-09-26 | 2015-05-05 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | Radar antenna elevation error estimation method and apparatus |
| US7965225B1 (en) | 2008-07-02 | 2011-06-21 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | Radar antenna stabilization enhancement using vertical beam switching |
| US8558731B1 (en) | 2008-07-02 | 2013-10-15 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | System for and method of sequential lobing using less than full aperture antenna techniques |
| DE102008032394A1 (en) * | 2008-07-09 | 2010-01-21 | Mtu Friedrichshafen Gmbh | Method for regulating ship speed, involves regulating engine speed by engine speed control circuit as internal regulator circuit, where ship speed is regulated by ship speed-regulator circuit as external regulator circuit |
| US8077078B1 (en) * | 2008-07-25 | 2011-12-13 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | System and method for aircraft altitude measurement using radar and known runway position |
| US8570211B1 (en) * | 2009-01-22 | 2013-10-29 | Gregory Hubert Piesinger | Aircraft bird strike avoidance method and apparatus |
| US8401774B2 (en) * | 2009-01-23 | 2013-03-19 | The Boeing Company | System and method for detecting and preventing runway incursion, excursion and confusion |
| US8773299B1 (en) * | 2009-09-29 | 2014-07-08 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | System and method for actively determining obstacles |
| US8531293B2 (en) * | 2009-12-23 | 2013-09-10 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Predictive geofence crossing |
| FR2957447B1 (en) * | 2010-03-15 | 2012-10-26 | Eurocopter France | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR FLYING WITH LOW ALTITUDE AIRCRAFT IN A SECURE MANNER |
| US8731810B2 (en) * | 2010-12-10 | 2014-05-20 | The Boeing Company | Aircraft path conformance monitoring |
| US8624757B2 (en) * | 2011-06-27 | 2014-01-07 | General Electric Company | Method for visually indicating an advisory from the traffic collision avoidance system on a flight display |
| US9019145B1 (en) | 2011-07-14 | 2015-04-28 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | Ground clutter rejection for weather radar |
| US8989925B2 (en) * | 2012-03-19 | 2015-03-24 | L-3 Communications Corporation | Method and apparatus for conversion of GPS heading data for use by electronic flight director |
| US20140285661A1 (en) * | 2013-03-22 | 2014-09-25 | Honeywell International Inc | Methods and systems for colorizing an enhanced image during alert |
| US9262932B1 (en) | 2013-04-05 | 2016-02-16 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | Extended runway centerline systems and methods |
| US8972082B2 (en) * | 2013-07-25 | 2015-03-03 | Honeywell International Inc. | Aircraft flight deck displays and systems and methods for displaying integrated minimum safe altitude and minimum vectoring altitude information on a display device in an aircraft |
| US9533769B1 (en) * | 2014-08-20 | 2017-01-03 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | Terrain warning systems and methods |
| US10928510B1 (en) | 2014-09-10 | 2021-02-23 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | System for and method of image processing for low visibility landing applications |
| US10713859B1 (en) * | 2014-09-12 | 2020-07-14 | World Wide Walkie Talkie (Mbt) | Wireless flight data recorder with satellite network method for real time remote access and black box backup |
| US10705201B1 (en) | 2015-08-31 | 2020-07-07 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | Radar beam sharpening system and method |
| US10228460B1 (en) | 2016-05-26 | 2019-03-12 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | Weather radar enabled low visibility operation system and method |
| US10353068B1 (en) | 2016-07-28 | 2019-07-16 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | Weather radar enabled offshore operation system and method |
| US10473781B2 (en) | 2016-09-14 | 2019-11-12 | Garmin Switzerland Gmbh | Determining a boundary enclosing a region of interest for a body of water |
| JP6929211B2 (en) * | 2017-12-12 | 2021-09-01 | 朝日航洋株式会社 | Methods, programs and equipment for determining the safety of an aircraft's flight path |
| FR3081596A1 (en) * | 2018-05-23 | 2019-11-29 | Marc Labrucherie | METHOD FOR AUTOMATICALLY BACKING THE FLIGHT OF AN AIRCRAFT WITH ELECTRIC FLIGHT CONTROLS |
| US11348468B1 (en) | 2019-03-15 | 2022-05-31 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | Systems and methods for inhibition of terrain awareness and warning system alerts |
Family Cites Families (11)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GB1355312A (en) * | 1972-10-05 | 1974-06-05 | Furuno Electric Co | Collision alarm system |
| US4063073A (en) * | 1974-11-29 | 1977-12-13 | Strayer Larry G | Computer system to prevent collision between moving objects such as aircraft moving from one sector to another |
| US3958219A (en) * | 1975-03-06 | 1976-05-18 | Sundstrand Data Control, Inc. | Terrain closure warning system with altitude rate signal conditioning |
| US4030065A (en) * | 1976-07-19 | 1977-06-14 | Sundstrand Corporation | Terrain clearance warning system for aircraft |
| JPS5353899A (en) * | 1976-10-22 | 1978-05-16 | Toyo Communication Equip | Aircraft collision prevent system |
| US4224669A (en) * | 1977-12-22 | 1980-09-23 | The Boeing Company | Minimum safe altitude monitoring, indication and warning system |
| US4253150A (en) * | 1978-09-29 | 1981-02-24 | Scovill Royal J | Pictorial navigation computer |
| US4283705A (en) * | 1979-05-30 | 1981-08-11 | Robert James | System for providing an integrated display of instantaneous information relative to aircraft attitude, heading, altitude, and horizontal situation |
| FR2461305B1 (en) * | 1979-07-06 | 1985-12-06 | Thomson Csf | MAP INDICATOR SYSTEM MORE PARTICULARLY FOR AIR NAVIGATION |
| US4495580A (en) * | 1981-03-30 | 1985-01-22 | E-Systems, Inc. | Navigation system |
| US4369425A (en) * | 1981-06-08 | 1983-01-18 | Sperry Corporation | Voiced alerting system |
-
1984
- 1984-02-02 US US06/576,450 patent/US4646244A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1984-12-05 CA CA000469416A patent/CA1238398A/en not_active Expired
-
1985
- 1985-01-11 NZ NZ210815A patent/NZ210815A/en unknown
- 1985-01-11 IL IL74045A patent/IL74045A0/en unknown
- 1985-01-22 JP JP60500806A patent/JPS61501283A/en active Pending
- 1985-01-22 EP EP85901148A patent/EP0172221B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1985-01-22 AU AU39396/85A patent/AU563701B2/en not_active Ceased
- 1985-01-22 DE DE8585901148T patent/DE3584553D1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1985-01-22 WO PCT/US1985/000089 patent/WO1985003566A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1985-02-01 IT IT47632/85A patent/IT1182170B/en active
- 1985-10-01 FI FI853790A patent/FI853790A0/en not_active Application Discontinuation
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US7634335B2 (en) * | 2004-04-20 | 2009-12-15 | Thales | Distance estimating method for aircraft taking air navigation restrictions into account |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| IT8547632A1 (en) | 1986-08-01 |
| IT1182170B (en) | 1987-09-30 |
| WO1985003566A1 (en) | 1985-08-15 |
| FI853790L (en) | 1985-10-01 |
| JPS61501283A (en) | 1986-06-26 |
| EP0172221A4 (en) | 1989-10-27 |
| EP0172221B1 (en) | 1991-10-30 |
| FI853790A0 (en) | 1985-10-01 |
| IT8547632A0 (en) | 1985-02-01 |
| NZ210815A (en) | 1988-10-28 |
| DE3584553D1 (en) | 1991-12-05 |
| IL74045A0 (en) | 1985-04-30 |
| EP0172221A1 (en) | 1986-02-26 |
| US4646244A (en) | 1987-02-24 |
| AU563701B2 (en) | 1987-07-16 |
| AU3939685A (en) | 1985-08-27 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA1238398A (en) | Terrain advisory system | |
| US6940427B2 (en) | Pitch alerting angle for enhanced ground proximity warning system (EGPWS) | |
| US4825374A (en) | Aircraft descent guide system and method for creating descent guidance information | |
| EP0309578B1 (en) | Ground proximity approach warning system without landing flap input | |
| US6021374A (en) | Stand alone terrain conflict detector and operating methods therefor | |
| US8280622B2 (en) | Terrain avoidance system for transport aircraft | |
| US6347263B1 (en) | Aircraft terrain information system | |
| US6691004B2 (en) | Method for determining a currently obtainable climb gradient of an aircraft | |
| US6085129A (en) | Integrated vertical profile display | |
| EP0965118B1 (en) | Apparatus for indicating air traffic and terrain collision threat to an aircraft | |
| US6879886B2 (en) | Flight guidance system providing perspective flight guidance symbology | |
| US5677842A (en) | Collision avoidance device with reduced energy balance for aircraft, notably for avoiding collisions with the ground | |
| EP0257702B1 (en) | Navigational apparatus and methods for displaying aircraft position with respect to a selected vertical flight path profile | |
| EP1203201B1 (en) | Hazard detection for flight plans and the like | |
| US8000848B2 (en) | Integrated system for aircraft vortex safety | |
| US20070050101A1 (en) | Automatic flight protection system for an aircraft | |
| EP0750238A1 (en) | Integrated ground collision avoidance system | |
| EP1360457B1 (en) | Egpws cutoff altitude for helicopters | |
| US6484072B1 (en) | Embedded terrain awareness warning system for aircraft | |
| US6480763B1 (en) | Method and system for providing an aircraft drift advisory | |
| EP0418934B1 (en) | Aircraft navigational system and method for guiding an aircraft along intersecting airways | |
| Hewitt et al. | A ground and obstacle collision avoidance technique (GOCAT) | |
| Breen | 17.1 Enhanced Ground Proximity Warning System | |
| Green et al. | Helicopter unique instrument approaches: Trajectories, flying qualities, controls and displays | |
| Coppenbarger | Helmet-mounted display symbology for automated nap-of-the-earth rotorcraft flight |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MKEX | Expiry |