CA1276283C - Unidirectional second order gradient microphone - Google Patents
Unidirectional second order gradient microphoneInfo
- Publication number
- CA1276283C CA1276283C CA000497835A CA497835A CA1276283C CA 1276283 C CA1276283 C CA 1276283C CA 000497835 A CA000497835 A CA 000497835A CA 497835 A CA497835 A CA 497835A CA 1276283 C CA1276283 C CA 1276283C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- microphones
- wall
- baffles
- microphone
- walls
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R1/00—Details of transducers, loudspeakers or microphones
- H04R1/02—Casings; Cabinets ; Supports therefor; Mountings therein
- H04R1/04—Structural association of microphone with electric circuitry therefor
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R3/00—Circuits for transducers, loudspeakers or microphones
- H04R3/005—Circuits for transducers, loudspeakers or microphones for combining the signals of two or more microphones
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R1/00—Details of transducers, loudspeakers or microphones
- H04R1/20—Arrangements for obtaining desired frequency or directional characteristics
- H04R1/32—Arrangements for obtaining desired frequency or directional characteristics for obtaining desired directional characteristic only
- H04R1/40—Arrangements for obtaining desired frequency or directional characteristics for obtaining desired directional characteristic only by combining a number of identical transducers
- H04R1/406—Arrangements for obtaining desired frequency or directional characteristics for obtaining desired directional characteristic only by combining a number of identical transducers microphones
Abstract
UNIDIRECTIONAL SECOND ORDER GRADIENT MICROPHONE
Abstract A second order gradient microphone with unidirectional sensitivity pattern is obtained by housing each of two commercially available first order gradient microphones centrally within a baffle. The baffles have flat surfaces, are preferably square or circular and have parallel surfaces the two baffles being parallel to each other. The rotational axes of the microphones are arranged to coincide. The output signal from one of the microphones is subtracted from the delayed signal output of the other.
Abstract A second order gradient microphone with unidirectional sensitivity pattern is obtained by housing each of two commercially available first order gradient microphones centrally within a baffle. The baffles have flat surfaces, are preferably square or circular and have parallel surfaces the two baffles being parallel to each other. The rotational axes of the microphones are arranged to coincide. The output signal from one of the microphones is subtracted from the delayed signal output of the other.
Description
- l -UNIDIRECTIONAL SECOND ORDER GRADIENT MICROPHON~
Technical Field ~ . _ This invention relates to electroacoustic transducers and, more particularlyl to a directional microphone with a unidirectional directivity pattern.
Backqround of the Invention Acoustic transducers with directional characteristics are useful in many applications.
In particular, unidirectional microphones with their relatively large directivity factors are widely used.
Most of these microphones are first order gradients which exhibit, depending on the construction details, directional characteristics described by (a + cos ~), where a is a constant and ~ is the angle relative to the rotational axis. Directivity factors ranging up to four can be obtained with such systems.
The directivity may be improved by utilizing second order gradient microphones. These microphones have a directional pattern given by (a + cos ~) (b + cos a) and yield maximum directivity factors of nine. Wide ultization of such microphones was impeded by the more complicated design and the reduction of signal to noise when compared with the first order designs.
Summary of_the Invention In accordance with an aspect of the invention there is provided a unidirectional microphone arrangement comprising first and second walls in spaced substantially parallel relationship each having an inner surface facing the other wall and an outer surface, a plurality of pressure gradient electroacoustic tranducers each having first and second sides determining a prescribed directional polarity, the dimensions of said transducers being in pre-determined relation to the dimensions of said walls, at least one electroacoustic transducer being mounted in said first wall having its first side on said first wall outer surface and its second side on said first wall inner ,~.'` ~
i~76;i~3 - la -surface, at least one electroacoustic transducer being mounted in said second wall having its first side on said second wall outer surface and its second side on said second wall inner surface, and means for combining the outputs of the transducers on said first wall with the outputs of the transducers on said second wall to produce a unidirectional response pattern.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention there is provided a method of producing a unidirectional microphone sensitivity pattern comprising the steps of centrally perforating a recess through the wall of each of first and second baffles each of which has substantially parallel surfaces, and the surfaces of both baffles being substantially parallel to each other, placing a bi-directional first order microphone in predeterminedrelationship within each of said recesses so that the axes of said microphones coincide, introducing at least one delay device into the signal path from the output of said microphones, and summing the output signals from said microphones to derive a direction sensitivity pattern for said arrangement.
A second order gradient microphone with unidirectional sensitivity pattern is obtained by housing each of two commercially available first order gradient microphones centrally within a baffle. The baffles have flat surfaces, are preferably square or circul~r and have parallel surfaces, the two baffles being parallel to each other. The rotational axes of the microphones are arranged to coincide. The output signal from one of the microphones is subtracted from the delayed signal output from the other.
The unidirectional microphone exhibits a directional characteristic which is relatively frequency independent, has a three decibel beam width of the main lobe of + 40 degrees, and exhibits side lobes about fifteen decibels below the mai n lobe. After equalization, the frequency response of the microphone in its direction of maximum sensitivity is within ~3 dB
between 0.3 kHz and 4 kHz. The equivalent noise level of the microphone amounts to 28 dB SPL.
The following advantages over the prior art are realized with the present invention. The preferred embodiment has a smaller size for the same sensitivity.
The effective spacing between the two surfaces of each microphone is increased, thus directly increasing the sensitivity of the system without introducing undesirable side effects. The preferred embodiment uses simple commercially available first order gradient electret microphones. Any type of first order, small transducer may be used. A signal to noise ratio of about thirty decibels for normal speech level is obtained. There is an extended band width over prior art systems. ~he embodiment is simple to make.
One immediate application for this invention is in mobile radio which requires high directional sensitivity and small size.
Brief Description of the Drawinqs FIG. 1 shows the preferred embodiment of the present invention;
FIG.'s 2, 3 and 4 are useful in disclosing the principles o* which the present invention is based;
FIG.'s 5, 8, 9 and 10 show response patterns;
FIG.'s 6 and ~ show the signal path, 35~ FIG. 11 shows an application of the present invention, and J, ~, W e ~ U - ~ ~
i276;2~33 FIG. 12 shows an alternate arrangement to FIG. 4.
Detailed Description The preferred embodiment of the present invention is shown in FIG. 1. The unidirectional microphone arrangement comprises two commercial first order gradient bidirectional microphones 14 and 24 such as Knowles model BW-1789 of size 8x4x2 mm3 or the ATT-~echnologies EL-3 electret microphones when the rear cavity is opened to the sounc ~ield to form a first order gradient. These microphones are placed in openings cut into two square or circular LUCITE, or other plastic, baffles 12 and 22 of size 3x3cm2 or 3 cm diameter, respectively. The gaps between microphones 14 and 24 and baffles 12 and 24 are sealed with epoxy. As shown in FIG. 1, baffled microphones 14 and 24 are arranged at a distance of 5 cm apart and are oriented such that the axes of microphones 14 and 24 coincide.
Microphones 14 and 24 are located in baffles 12 and`22 so that the distance hl from the top of the microphones to the top of the baffles equal the distance h2 from the bottom of the microphones to the bottom of the baffIes.
Likewise, the distance ll from one side of the microphones to the nearest edge of the baffles equals the distance from the opposite edge of the microphones to the nearest edges of the baffles. The baffles 12 and 22 are suitably supported by a device 18.
The principle of the present invention will become clear by referring to FIG. 2. Microphone 14 is shown comprising two sensors: positive sensor 15 and negative sensor 13 separated by a distance d2.
Likewise, microphone 24 is shown comprising two sensors:
positive sensor 25 and negative sensor 23 separated by a distance d2. Each sensor corresponds to a face of a microphone. The distance between the two microphones is dl. The microphones are arranged, in one embodiment, so that like polaritlos face each other.
~. M. Sessler-J. E. West 20-29 ` ~Z76283 Assume a plane sound wave traveling from source B impinges on the device of FIG. 2. The sound will first be picked up by microphone 14 and then the output from microphone 14 is passed throuqh delay circuit 20. After impinging on microphone 14, the so~nd from source B must travel a distance dl before impinging microphone 24. If the delay ~ is made to equal the distance dl, the sound signals from microphones 14 and 24 will cancel each other and there will be no output from the device. The overlapping of the two sound signals is shown conceptually in FIG. 3.
Assume now that a sound radiates from soucce F. The sound will first impinge microphone 24. The sound will next travel a distance dl to microphone 14 and be returned through delay circuit 20, and, as readily seen, be added with the sound from microphone 24 to derive an output.
Referring to FIG. 4, there is shown Fig. 2 which has been redrawn to show two separate delay circuits + t, 30, and - r, 35. The signal outputs from these delay circuits are then added by circuit 40. I~
the output signal from one of the microphones is delayed by 2t relative to the other, the sensitivity of the entire system is given by 2 d3 Mo k dl d2 I(dl) + cos e ]CS ~ . . . (1) where, Mo is the sensitivity of each of the sensors 13, 15, 23 and 25, the wave number k ~ c~' uu is the angular frequency, c is the velocity of sound, d3 equals 2cr and ~ is the direction of sound incidence relative to the line connecting the sensors. Depending on the ratio of d3 d-' various directional patterns with different directivity indexes are obtained. Two examples are shown ln F~G. S. Th- d-slgn wSth ~ ~ 1 yl-~d~ dS~ SvSty 12~6283 ( factor of 7.5 while that with ~ = ~ yields the highest achievable factor of 8. Directivity factors up to 9 can be achieved by inserting additional delays in the outputs of the individual sensors in FIG. 4.
S saffles, such as 12 and 22 of FIG. 1, are used in the present invention to increase the acoustic path difference between the two sound inlets of each gradient, that is, between the two surfaces (inner and outer) of microphones 14 and 24 by changing the distances hl, h2, 11, and 12. Thus, the spacing d2 in FIG. 9 is determined by the size of baffles 12 and 22 of FIG. 1.
The output from one of gradient microphones 14 or 24 can be delayed, for example, by a third order Butterworth filter with a delay time of 150 ~s, corresponding to the separation dl between microphones d, 14 and 24. By this means, a delay ratio of d- is obtained. Butterworth filter 60, amplifier 62 and low pass filter 64 for correcting the w2 frequency dependence are shown in FIG. 6. The corresponding theoretical polar pattern for this device is shown in FIG. 5. The pattern comprises a main lobe 53 and two small 5ide lobes 55 and 57 which are, if the three dimensional directivity pattern is considered, actually a single deformed toroidal side lobe.
Measurements on the unidirectional microphone were carried out in an anechoic chamber. The microphone was mounted on a B ~ K model 3922 turntable and exposed to plane and spherical sound fields. The results were plotted with a B & K model 2307 level recorder.
The output of the microphone was first amplified forty decibels and then passed through a two stage RC filter to correct the w2 frequency dependence of the second order system as shown in FIG.'s 6 and 7. A
band pass filter, for the range 0.25 through 3.5 kHz, was used to eliminate the out of band noise.
G. M. Sessler-J. E. West 20-2 9 - 6 _ i~6283 The directional characteristics of the unidirectionai microphone for a plain sound field, source located abo~t two meters from the microphone, are shown in FIG. 8. The figure also shows expected theoretical polar response [1 cos etl+cOs e)] for the second order unidirectional system chosen here. At 1 kHz and 2 kHz the experimental results are in reasonable agreement with theory. At 500 Hz the side lobes are only 12 dB down, but 8 dB larger than predicted. At all frequencies, the microphone has a nonvanishing sensitivity in the backward direction. Inspection of FIG. 5 suggests that this is due to a deviation of d-from the value of 1 or differences in the frequency andphase response of the first order gradient sensors.
The performance of such a directional microphone exposed to the sound fields of a sound source at a finite distance is of considerable interest for their use in small noisy spaces. FIG. 9 shows the polar response for a sound source located at a distance of 0.5 meter. Surprisingly, the directional characteristics are about the same as for the plane wave case. This could be due to poor anechoic conditions.
The corrected frequency responses of the microphone for ~ ~ 0, 90 and 180 degrees are shown in FIG 10 for ~ octave band noise excitation. The sensitivity of the microphone at 1 kHz is -60 dBV/Pa in the direction of maximum sensitivity at ~ ~ 0 degrees.
The microphone has a frequency response within ~3~dB
from 0.3 kHz to 4 kHz. In the direction of minimum sensitivity, ~ = 90 and 180 degrees, the response is -15 dB down between 0.45 kHz and 2 kHz. The equivalent noise level of the microphone measured for the frequency range 0.25 kHz to 3.5 kHz, is 28 dB.
This invention finds use in mobile radio.
Referring to PIG. 11, there is shown a directional miceophon- embodying th- pr--ent lnv-ntton ~oc-t-d und-r roof 82 of an automobile near windshield 80 and near the a ~ e~ r ~ J . ~; . w e s ~ ~ g 12762~33 driver who is not shown. The microphone arrangement comprises a base 90 having two parallel baffles 92 and 94 housing respectively microphones 91 and 93 in a manner described hereinabove. The normal response pattern is shown by lobe 96. The dimensions of roof 82 of the car is large in comparison with the wave length of sound in the speech range. This causes lobe 96 to sag and double in intensity, caused by the well known pressure doubling effect. As stated hereinabove, by adjusting the dimensions of the baffle the directivity and the size of the lobe is controlled.
There is shown in FIG. 12 an alternate arrangement to that shown in FIG. 4 for the microphones 14 and 24 of Fig. 1. Sensor 13 of microphone 14 and sensor 25 of microphone 24 are made to face each other.
The output signals from microphones 14 and 24 are subtracted in this case. Such an arrangement is needed when the sensors are not truly first order gradients.
Technical Field ~ . _ This invention relates to electroacoustic transducers and, more particularlyl to a directional microphone with a unidirectional directivity pattern.
Backqround of the Invention Acoustic transducers with directional characteristics are useful in many applications.
In particular, unidirectional microphones with their relatively large directivity factors are widely used.
Most of these microphones are first order gradients which exhibit, depending on the construction details, directional characteristics described by (a + cos ~), where a is a constant and ~ is the angle relative to the rotational axis. Directivity factors ranging up to four can be obtained with such systems.
The directivity may be improved by utilizing second order gradient microphones. These microphones have a directional pattern given by (a + cos ~) (b + cos a) and yield maximum directivity factors of nine. Wide ultization of such microphones was impeded by the more complicated design and the reduction of signal to noise when compared with the first order designs.
Summary of_the Invention In accordance with an aspect of the invention there is provided a unidirectional microphone arrangement comprising first and second walls in spaced substantially parallel relationship each having an inner surface facing the other wall and an outer surface, a plurality of pressure gradient electroacoustic tranducers each having first and second sides determining a prescribed directional polarity, the dimensions of said transducers being in pre-determined relation to the dimensions of said walls, at least one electroacoustic transducer being mounted in said first wall having its first side on said first wall outer surface and its second side on said first wall inner ,~.'` ~
i~76;i~3 - la -surface, at least one electroacoustic transducer being mounted in said second wall having its first side on said second wall outer surface and its second side on said second wall inner surface, and means for combining the outputs of the transducers on said first wall with the outputs of the transducers on said second wall to produce a unidirectional response pattern.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention there is provided a method of producing a unidirectional microphone sensitivity pattern comprising the steps of centrally perforating a recess through the wall of each of first and second baffles each of which has substantially parallel surfaces, and the surfaces of both baffles being substantially parallel to each other, placing a bi-directional first order microphone in predeterminedrelationship within each of said recesses so that the axes of said microphones coincide, introducing at least one delay device into the signal path from the output of said microphones, and summing the output signals from said microphones to derive a direction sensitivity pattern for said arrangement.
A second order gradient microphone with unidirectional sensitivity pattern is obtained by housing each of two commercially available first order gradient microphones centrally within a baffle. The baffles have flat surfaces, are preferably square or circul~r and have parallel surfaces, the two baffles being parallel to each other. The rotational axes of the microphones are arranged to coincide. The output signal from one of the microphones is subtracted from the delayed signal output from the other.
The unidirectional microphone exhibits a directional characteristic which is relatively frequency independent, has a three decibel beam width of the main lobe of + 40 degrees, and exhibits side lobes about fifteen decibels below the mai n lobe. After equalization, the frequency response of the microphone in its direction of maximum sensitivity is within ~3 dB
between 0.3 kHz and 4 kHz. The equivalent noise level of the microphone amounts to 28 dB SPL.
The following advantages over the prior art are realized with the present invention. The preferred embodiment has a smaller size for the same sensitivity.
The effective spacing between the two surfaces of each microphone is increased, thus directly increasing the sensitivity of the system without introducing undesirable side effects. The preferred embodiment uses simple commercially available first order gradient electret microphones. Any type of first order, small transducer may be used. A signal to noise ratio of about thirty decibels for normal speech level is obtained. There is an extended band width over prior art systems. ~he embodiment is simple to make.
One immediate application for this invention is in mobile radio which requires high directional sensitivity and small size.
Brief Description of the Drawinqs FIG. 1 shows the preferred embodiment of the present invention;
FIG.'s 2, 3 and 4 are useful in disclosing the principles o* which the present invention is based;
FIG.'s 5, 8, 9 and 10 show response patterns;
FIG.'s 6 and ~ show the signal path, 35~ FIG. 11 shows an application of the present invention, and J, ~, W e ~ U - ~ ~
i276;2~33 FIG. 12 shows an alternate arrangement to FIG. 4.
Detailed Description The preferred embodiment of the present invention is shown in FIG. 1. The unidirectional microphone arrangement comprises two commercial first order gradient bidirectional microphones 14 and 24 such as Knowles model BW-1789 of size 8x4x2 mm3 or the ATT-~echnologies EL-3 electret microphones when the rear cavity is opened to the sounc ~ield to form a first order gradient. These microphones are placed in openings cut into two square or circular LUCITE, or other plastic, baffles 12 and 22 of size 3x3cm2 or 3 cm diameter, respectively. The gaps between microphones 14 and 24 and baffles 12 and 24 are sealed with epoxy. As shown in FIG. 1, baffled microphones 14 and 24 are arranged at a distance of 5 cm apart and are oriented such that the axes of microphones 14 and 24 coincide.
Microphones 14 and 24 are located in baffles 12 and`22 so that the distance hl from the top of the microphones to the top of the baffles equal the distance h2 from the bottom of the microphones to the bottom of the baffIes.
Likewise, the distance ll from one side of the microphones to the nearest edge of the baffles equals the distance from the opposite edge of the microphones to the nearest edges of the baffles. The baffles 12 and 22 are suitably supported by a device 18.
The principle of the present invention will become clear by referring to FIG. 2. Microphone 14 is shown comprising two sensors: positive sensor 15 and negative sensor 13 separated by a distance d2.
Likewise, microphone 24 is shown comprising two sensors:
positive sensor 25 and negative sensor 23 separated by a distance d2. Each sensor corresponds to a face of a microphone. The distance between the two microphones is dl. The microphones are arranged, in one embodiment, so that like polaritlos face each other.
~. M. Sessler-J. E. West 20-29 ` ~Z76283 Assume a plane sound wave traveling from source B impinges on the device of FIG. 2. The sound will first be picked up by microphone 14 and then the output from microphone 14 is passed throuqh delay circuit 20. After impinging on microphone 14, the so~nd from source B must travel a distance dl before impinging microphone 24. If the delay ~ is made to equal the distance dl, the sound signals from microphones 14 and 24 will cancel each other and there will be no output from the device. The overlapping of the two sound signals is shown conceptually in FIG. 3.
Assume now that a sound radiates from soucce F. The sound will first impinge microphone 24. The sound will next travel a distance dl to microphone 14 and be returned through delay circuit 20, and, as readily seen, be added with the sound from microphone 24 to derive an output.
Referring to FIG. 4, there is shown Fig. 2 which has been redrawn to show two separate delay circuits + t, 30, and - r, 35. The signal outputs from these delay circuits are then added by circuit 40. I~
the output signal from one of the microphones is delayed by 2t relative to the other, the sensitivity of the entire system is given by 2 d3 Mo k dl d2 I(dl) + cos e ]CS ~ . . . (1) where, Mo is the sensitivity of each of the sensors 13, 15, 23 and 25, the wave number k ~ c~' uu is the angular frequency, c is the velocity of sound, d3 equals 2cr and ~ is the direction of sound incidence relative to the line connecting the sensors. Depending on the ratio of d3 d-' various directional patterns with different directivity indexes are obtained. Two examples are shown ln F~G. S. Th- d-slgn wSth ~ ~ 1 yl-~d~ dS~ SvSty 12~6283 ( factor of 7.5 while that with ~ = ~ yields the highest achievable factor of 8. Directivity factors up to 9 can be achieved by inserting additional delays in the outputs of the individual sensors in FIG. 4.
S saffles, such as 12 and 22 of FIG. 1, are used in the present invention to increase the acoustic path difference between the two sound inlets of each gradient, that is, between the two surfaces (inner and outer) of microphones 14 and 24 by changing the distances hl, h2, 11, and 12. Thus, the spacing d2 in FIG. 9 is determined by the size of baffles 12 and 22 of FIG. 1.
The output from one of gradient microphones 14 or 24 can be delayed, for example, by a third order Butterworth filter with a delay time of 150 ~s, corresponding to the separation dl between microphones d, 14 and 24. By this means, a delay ratio of d- is obtained. Butterworth filter 60, amplifier 62 and low pass filter 64 for correcting the w2 frequency dependence are shown in FIG. 6. The corresponding theoretical polar pattern for this device is shown in FIG. 5. The pattern comprises a main lobe 53 and two small 5ide lobes 55 and 57 which are, if the three dimensional directivity pattern is considered, actually a single deformed toroidal side lobe.
Measurements on the unidirectional microphone were carried out in an anechoic chamber. The microphone was mounted on a B ~ K model 3922 turntable and exposed to plane and spherical sound fields. The results were plotted with a B & K model 2307 level recorder.
The output of the microphone was first amplified forty decibels and then passed through a two stage RC filter to correct the w2 frequency dependence of the second order system as shown in FIG.'s 6 and 7. A
band pass filter, for the range 0.25 through 3.5 kHz, was used to eliminate the out of band noise.
G. M. Sessler-J. E. West 20-2 9 - 6 _ i~6283 The directional characteristics of the unidirectionai microphone for a plain sound field, source located abo~t two meters from the microphone, are shown in FIG. 8. The figure also shows expected theoretical polar response [1 cos etl+cOs e)] for the second order unidirectional system chosen here. At 1 kHz and 2 kHz the experimental results are in reasonable agreement with theory. At 500 Hz the side lobes are only 12 dB down, but 8 dB larger than predicted. At all frequencies, the microphone has a nonvanishing sensitivity in the backward direction. Inspection of FIG. 5 suggests that this is due to a deviation of d-from the value of 1 or differences in the frequency andphase response of the first order gradient sensors.
The performance of such a directional microphone exposed to the sound fields of a sound source at a finite distance is of considerable interest for their use in small noisy spaces. FIG. 9 shows the polar response for a sound source located at a distance of 0.5 meter. Surprisingly, the directional characteristics are about the same as for the plane wave case. This could be due to poor anechoic conditions.
The corrected frequency responses of the microphone for ~ ~ 0, 90 and 180 degrees are shown in FIG 10 for ~ octave band noise excitation. The sensitivity of the microphone at 1 kHz is -60 dBV/Pa in the direction of maximum sensitivity at ~ ~ 0 degrees.
The microphone has a frequency response within ~3~dB
from 0.3 kHz to 4 kHz. In the direction of minimum sensitivity, ~ = 90 and 180 degrees, the response is -15 dB down between 0.45 kHz and 2 kHz. The equivalent noise level of the microphone measured for the frequency range 0.25 kHz to 3.5 kHz, is 28 dB.
This invention finds use in mobile radio.
Referring to PIG. 11, there is shown a directional miceophon- embodying th- pr--ent lnv-ntton ~oc-t-d und-r roof 82 of an automobile near windshield 80 and near the a ~ e~ r ~ J . ~; . w e s ~ ~ g 12762~33 driver who is not shown. The microphone arrangement comprises a base 90 having two parallel baffles 92 and 94 housing respectively microphones 91 and 93 in a manner described hereinabove. The normal response pattern is shown by lobe 96. The dimensions of roof 82 of the car is large in comparison with the wave length of sound in the speech range. This causes lobe 96 to sag and double in intensity, caused by the well known pressure doubling effect. As stated hereinabove, by adjusting the dimensions of the baffle the directivity and the size of the lobe is controlled.
There is shown in FIG. 12 an alternate arrangement to that shown in FIG. 4 for the microphones 14 and 24 of Fig. 1. Sensor 13 of microphone 14 and sensor 25 of microphone 24 are made to face each other.
The output signals from microphones 14 and 24 are subtracted in this case. Such an arrangement is needed when the sensors are not truly first order gradients.
Claims (11)
1. A unidirectional microphone arrangement comprising first and second walls in spaced substantially parallel relationship each having an inner surface facing the other wall and an outer surface, a plurality of pressure gradient electroacoustic tranducers each having first and second sides determining a prescribed directional polarity, the dimensions of said transducers being in predetermined relation to the dimensions of said walls, at least one electroacoustic transducer being mounted in said first wall having its first side on said first wall outer surface and its second side on said first wall inner surface, at least one electroacoustic transducer being mounted in said second wall having its first side on said second wall outer surface and its second side on said second wall inner surface, and means for combining the outputs of the transducers on said first wall with the outputs of the transducers on said second wall to produce a unidirectional response pattern.
2. A directional microphone arrangement comprising a plurality of walls in spaced relationship surrounding a central point each having an inner surface facing the central point and an outer surface facing away from said central point, a plurality of pressure gradient electroacoustic transducers each having first and second sides determining a prescribed directional polarity, the dimensions of said transducers being in predetermined relation to the dimensions of said walls, at least one electroacoustic transducer being mounted in each of said walls having its first side on said wall outer surface and its second side on said wall inner surface, and means for combining the outputs of the transducers on said walls to produce a prescribed directional response pattern.
3. A second order unidirectional microphone arrangement comprising first and second baffles, each of said first and second baffles comprising first and second surfaces, said surfaces being parallel to one another, first and second first order bidirectional microphones, said first and second microphones located within recesses through the walls of said first and second baffles respectively, said recesses being located in predetermined relationship centrally within said baffles so that the axes of said first and second microphones coincide, and means for summing the signals from said first and second microphones to derive an output signal which has a directional response pattern.
4. The microphone arrangement of claim 3 wherein said microphones are so placed within said baffles that the sides of said microphones facing each other have the same polarity sensors.
5. The microphone arrangement of claim 4 further comprising at least one delay circuit from the output of said first or second microphones.
6. The microphone arrangement of claim 5 wherein delay devices are connected to each sensor of said first and second microphones to increase the directivity of said arrangement.
7. The microphone arrangement of claim 5 wherein the directivity of said arrangement is controlled by the dimensions of said baffle.
8. The microphone arrangement of claim 5 for use in an automobile to derive a directional sensitivity pattern.
9. The microphone arrangement of claim 3 wherein said microphones are so placed within said baffles that the sides of said microphones facing each other have the opposite polarity sensors.
10. A method of producing a unidirectional microphone sensitivity pattern comprising the steps of centrally perforating a recess through the wall of each of first and second baffles each of which has substantially parallel surfaces, and the surfaces of both baffles being substantially parallel to each other, placing a bidirectional first order microphone in predetermined relationship within each of said recesses so that the axes of said microphones coincide, introducing at least one delay device into the signal path from the output of said microphones, and summing the output signals from said microphones to derive a direction sensitivity pattern for said arrangement.
11. The method of claim 10 further comprising the steps of introducing delay devices into the signal output path from each surface of said microphones.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US06/684,575 US4742548A (en) | 1984-12-20 | 1984-12-20 | Unidirectional second order gradient microphone |
| US684,575 | 1984-12-20 |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA1276283C true CA1276283C (en) | 1990-11-13 |
Family
ID=24748619
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA000497835A Expired - Fee Related CA1276283C (en) | 1984-12-20 | 1985-12-17 | Unidirectional second order gradient microphone |
Country Status (6)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US4742548A (en) |
| EP (1) | EP0186996B1 (en) |
| JP (1) | JP2537785B2 (en) |
| KR (1) | KR940003447B1 (en) |
| CA (1) | CA1276283C (en) |
| DE (1) | DE3587217T2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (34)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPS6452393U (en) * | 1987-09-29 | 1989-03-31 | ||
| US4965775A (en) * | 1989-05-19 | 1990-10-23 | At&T Bell Laboratories | Image derived directional microphones |
| DE3926884A1 (en) * | 1989-08-16 | 1991-02-21 | Neumann Gmbh Georg | ELECTROACOUSTIC CONVERTER |
| US5121426A (en) * | 1989-12-22 | 1992-06-09 | At&T Bell Laboratories | Loudspeaking telephone station including directional microphone |
| US5029215A (en) * | 1989-12-29 | 1991-07-02 | At&T Bell Laboratories | Automatic calibrating apparatus and method for second-order gradient microphone |
| US5226076A (en) * | 1993-02-28 | 1993-07-06 | At&T Bell Laboratories | Directional microphone assembly |
| US5633935A (en) * | 1993-04-13 | 1997-05-27 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Stereo ultradirectional microphone apparatus |
| US5524056A (en) * | 1993-04-13 | 1996-06-04 | Etymotic Research, Inc. | Hearing aid having plural microphones and a microphone switching system |
| US5452363A (en) * | 1993-10-12 | 1995-09-19 | Mader; Lynn J. | Direction sensing microphone system using time differential |
| US5463694A (en) * | 1993-11-01 | 1995-10-31 | Motorola | Gradient directional microphone system and method therefor |
| US5920350A (en) * | 1995-08-04 | 1999-07-06 | Eastman Kodak Company | Camera including means for acquiring bi-directional sound |
| US6421444B1 (en) | 1995-09-28 | 2002-07-16 | Nortel Networks Limited | Embedded higher order microphone |
| US5748757A (en) * | 1995-12-27 | 1998-05-05 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Collapsible image derived differential microphone |
| US5742693A (en) * | 1995-12-29 | 1998-04-21 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Image-derived second-order directional microphones with finite baffle |
| US6987856B1 (en) | 1996-06-19 | 2006-01-17 | Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Illinois | Binaural signal processing techniques |
| US6978159B2 (en) * | 1996-06-19 | 2005-12-20 | Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Illinois | Binaural signal processing using multiple acoustic sensors and digital filtering |
| IES970640A2 (en) * | 1996-08-30 | 1998-01-14 | Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd | A handset and a connector therefor |
| DE69918793T2 (en) * | 1998-12-31 | 2005-07-21 | Arkamys | Method and device for sound recording and reproduction with natural feeling of sound field |
| DE50003206D1 (en) | 1999-06-02 | 2003-09-11 | Siemens Audiologische Technik | HEARING AID WITH DIRECTIONAL MICROPHONE SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OPERATING A HEARING AID |
| US8682005B2 (en) * | 1999-11-19 | 2014-03-25 | Gentex Corporation | Vehicle accessory microphone |
| US7120261B1 (en) * | 1999-11-19 | 2006-10-10 | Gentex Corporation | Vehicle accessory microphone |
| JP2003533152A (en) | 2000-05-10 | 2003-11-05 | ザ・ボード・オブ・トラスティーズ・オブ・ザ・ユニバーシティ・オブ・イリノイ | Interference suppression method and apparatus |
| US7116792B1 (en) * | 2000-07-05 | 2006-10-03 | Gn Resound North America Corporation | Directional microphone system |
| US7181026B2 (en) * | 2001-08-13 | 2007-02-20 | Ming Zhang | Post-processing scheme for adaptive directional microphone system with noise/interference suppression |
| US6917688B2 (en) * | 2002-09-11 | 2005-07-12 | Nanyang Technological University | Adaptive noise cancelling microphone system |
| US7092529B2 (en) * | 2002-11-01 | 2006-08-15 | Nanyang Technological University | Adaptive control system for noise cancellation |
| US7512448B2 (en) | 2003-01-10 | 2009-03-31 | Phonak Ag | Electrode placement for wireless intrabody communication between components of a hearing system |
| US7945064B2 (en) * | 2003-04-09 | 2011-05-17 | Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Illinois | Intrabody communication with ultrasound |
| US7076072B2 (en) * | 2003-04-09 | 2006-07-11 | Board Of Trustees For The University Of Illinois | Systems and methods for interference-suppression with directional sensing patterns |
| US7697827B2 (en) | 2005-10-17 | 2010-04-13 | Konicek Jeffrey C | User-friendlier interfaces for a camera |
| JP5104536B2 (en) | 2008-05-16 | 2012-12-19 | マックス株式会社 | Fuel filling container and gas combustion type driving tool |
| EP2375779A3 (en) * | 2010-03-31 | 2012-01-18 | Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Angewandten Forschung e.V. | Apparatus and method for measuring a plurality of loudspeakers and microphone array |
| US9131915B2 (en) | 2011-07-06 | 2015-09-15 | University Of New Brunswick | Method and apparatus for noise cancellation |
| US9031259B2 (en) * | 2011-09-15 | 2015-05-12 | JVC Kenwood Corporation | Noise reduction apparatus, audio input apparatus, wireless communication apparatus, and noise reduction method |
Family Cites Families (19)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US1735905A (en) * | 1926-12-30 | 1929-11-19 | American Telephone & Telegraph | Microphone mounting |
| US1816618A (en) * | 1928-06-26 | 1931-07-28 | Thomas S Hammond | Acoustic element |
| US2301744A (en) * | 1941-05-31 | 1942-11-10 | Rca Corp | Electroacoustical signal translating apparatus |
| US2457527A (en) * | 1942-10-02 | 1948-12-28 | Bell Telephone Labor Inc | Acoustic device |
| US2396222A (en) * | 1942-10-26 | 1946-03-05 | Brush Dev Co | Sound receiving system |
| AT212395B (en) * | 1958-11-03 | 1960-12-12 | Electrotrading Establishment | Microphone arrangement with adjustable directional characteristic |
| AT211395B (en) * | 1959-05-20 | 1960-10-10 | Akg Akustische Kino Geraete | Sound recording device with variable directional characteristics |
| NL282923A (en) * | 1962-09-05 | 1965-01-11 | Philips Nv | Microphone combination with acoustic obstacle |
| NL6405564A (en) * | 1964-05-20 | 1965-11-22 | Philips Nv | |
| GB1139770A (en) * | 1966-05-13 | 1969-01-15 | Standard Telephones Cables Ltd | Second order pressure gradient microphone |
| US3715500A (en) * | 1971-07-21 | 1973-02-06 | Bell Telephone Labor Inc | Unidirectional microphones |
| US3903989A (en) * | 1974-05-20 | 1975-09-09 | Cbs Inc | Directional loudspeaker |
| US4009355A (en) * | 1975-07-02 | 1977-02-22 | Roanwell Corporation | Reversible anti-noise microphone |
| GB1572093A (en) * | 1976-03-16 | 1980-07-23 | Wehner R | Omniphonic transducer system |
| JPS5333613A (en) * | 1976-09-09 | 1978-03-29 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Microphone and its manufacture |
| JPS5910119B2 (en) * | 1979-04-26 | 1984-03-07 | 日本ビクター株式会社 | variable directional microphone |
| JPS56116396A (en) * | 1980-02-19 | 1981-09-12 | Victor Co Of Japan Ltd | Unidirectional microphone system with secondary sound pressure gradient |
| DE3102208C2 (en) * | 1980-01-25 | 1983-01-05 | Victor Company Of Japan, Ltd., Yokohama, Kanagawa | Microphone system with adjustable directional characteristics |
| JPS58151799A (en) * | 1982-03-05 | 1983-09-09 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Electrostatic microphone |
-
1984
- 1984-12-20 US US06/684,575 patent/US4742548A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1985
- 1985-12-12 DE DE8585309031T patent/DE3587217T2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1985-12-12 EP EP85309031A patent/EP0186996B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1985-12-17 CA CA000497835A patent/CA1276283C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1985-12-19 KR KR1019850009581A patent/KR940003447B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1985-12-20 JP JP60285897A patent/JP2537785B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| KR860005550A (en) | 1986-07-23 |
| DE3587217T2 (en) | 1993-07-29 |
| JPS61150600A (en) | 1986-07-09 |
| EP0186996A3 (en) | 1987-12-02 |
| EP0186996A2 (en) | 1986-07-09 |
| KR940003447B1 (en) | 1994-04-22 |
| DE3587217D1 (en) | 1993-04-29 |
| EP0186996B1 (en) | 1993-03-24 |
| JP2537785B2 (en) | 1996-09-25 |
| US4742548A (en) | 1988-05-03 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA1276283C (en) | Unidirectional second order gradient microphone | |
| EP0186388B1 (en) | Second order toroidal microphone | |
| CA1088871A (en) | Noise cancellation apparatus | |
| US4653606A (en) | Electroacoustic device with broad frequency range directional response | |
| Guicking et al. | Active impedance control for one-dimensional sound | |
| US7492911B2 (en) | Noise reducing device | |
| EP0398595B1 (en) | Image derived directional microphones | |
| US4991687A (en) | Speaker system having directivity | |
| Poole et al. | An experimental study of Swinbanks' method of active attenuation of sound in ducts | |
| US4314098A (en) | Reversible electroacoustic transducer device having a constant directivity characteristic over a wide frequency band | |
| JP2008219933A (en) | Acoustic element and method for sound processing | |
| US4570742A (en) | Microphone apparatus | |
| EP0868107A2 (en) | Loudspeaker unit | |
| JPH0562515B2 (en) | ||
| Sessler et al. | Unidirectional, second‐order gradient microphone | |
| JPH0527320B2 (en) | ||
| RU2169439C1 (en) | Method of formation of directivity characteristic of hydroacoustic antenna | |
| EP0777404B1 (en) | System for attenuation of noise | |
| JP3326063B2 (en) | Omnidirectional microphone | |
| JP3186909B2 (en) | Stereo microphone for video camera | |
| JP2001513904A (en) | Sound processing method and apparatus | |
| JPS6090499A (en) | Sound collector | |
| Soderman et al. | A four-element end-fire microphone array for acoustic measurements in wind tunnels | |
| JPS5915183Y2 (en) | horn speaker | |
| JP2004021243A (en) | Speaker enclosure and speaker for active control of diffraction sound |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MKLA | Lapsed |