CA1309187C - Sharing word-processing functions among multiple processors - Google Patents

Sharing word-processing functions among multiple processors

Info

Publication number
CA1309187C
CA1309187C CA000580380A CA580380A CA1309187C CA 1309187 C CA1309187 C CA 1309187C CA 000580380 A CA000580380 A CA 000580380A CA 580380 A CA580380 A CA 580380A CA 1309187 C CA1309187 C CA 1309187C
Authority
CA
Canada
Prior art keywords
processor
data
document
function
auxiliary processor
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
CA000580380A
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Patrick James Christenson
Graig William Martens
David George Wenz
David Nicholas Youngers
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
International Business Machines Corp
Original Assignee
International Business Machines Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by International Business Machines Corp filed Critical International Business Machines Corp
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CA1309187C publication Critical patent/CA1309187C/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F40/00Handling natural language data
    • G06F40/10Text processing
    • G06F40/103Formatting, i.e. changing of presentation of documents
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F40/00Handling natural language data
    • G06F40/10Text processing
    • G06F40/166Editing, e.g. inserting or deleting
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F8/00Arrangements for software engineering
    • G06F8/40Transformation of program code
    • G06F8/41Compilation
    • G06F8/45Exploiting coarse grain parallelism in compilation, i.e. parallelism between groups of instructions

Abstract

Docket No. R0988-001 IMPROVEMENTS IN SHARING WORD-PROCESSING
FUNCTIONS AMONG MULTIPLE PROCESSORS

Abstract of the Disclosure A central processor holds a word-processing program and an entire document to be processed. A
personal computer or intelligent terminal has an interactive display and holds code for some functions of the word processor, and stores individual pages of the document. As an operator performs editing tasks at the display, the personal computer performs locally those functions involving only the document page it holds. When additional document text is required to complete a function, the central processor performs the function on the full document. The central computer also performs all of certain other functions, regardless of where the data is stored.

Description

Docket No. R0988-001 IMpRovEMENrrs IN SHARING WORD-PROCESSING
FUNCTIONS AMONG MULTIPLE PROCESSORS

Backqround of the Invention The present invention concerns electronic data ; processing, and more particularly concerns an improved method for sharing the execution of functions performed on large data entities among multiple processors.

Word processing took a giant leap with the advent of microprocessor-based dedicated word processors and personal computers. Previous mainframe-based text processing programs, lacking a wide bandwidth between memory and text display on a terminal, and requiring time-sharing the program among multiple users, could not attain enough speed " for a real-time "wysiwyg" (what you see is what you get) type word processor (WP). Presently available personal computers and dedicated word processors do successfully implement this type of WP for a single user, and their use is widespread.

However, in many cases it is desirable to house high-speed word processing~programs in multiple-user minicomputers, for example~ The cost of a minicomputer with terminals serving each person in a department is much less than the cost of providing individual personal computers and programs for each person, and has other advantages such as central storage of departmental records. The incremental cost of providing word processing tWP) on such a minicomputer would be low; but speeds are still not nearly high enough to provide the ~ind of WP

Docket No. R098~-001 ~91~37 functions people have come to expect from single-user machines It is ~nown to provide a method of imple~entiny word-processing and other programs requiring high-speed interaction with a display and involving large amounts of data. That method employs a processing system having multiple processors. A central processor (CP) is capable of operating directly upon a large data entity such-as an entire document, bu-t its code is shared among all operators. An input/output processor (IOP) interacts directly with each operator s display in real time, but it can store only a limited amount of data, perhaps only a small portion of that operator's document. Broadly speaking, the IOP executes functions of the program upon such data as is available to it in a local stora~e.. Whenever a function requires a larger block of data, the IOP requests the CP to perform a part of the function on the data not directly avai.lable -to the IOP. Typically, the IOP
processes as much -text as can be displayed to a user at one time on a terminal, while the CP
operates on an entire document. The functions include such things as locating the occurrence of desig~ated characters .in a document ("locate", "search", etc.) and processing specified blocks of characters as a unit ("delete"~ "move", etc.).

The foregoing method was originally conceived in the context of a minicomputer having a microprocessor-based workstation controller and a number of "dumb" termlnals attached thereto. More Docket No. Ros88-ool and more, system users attach "smart" terminals or personal computers using terminal-emulation software to such minicomputersO

Summary of the Invention Where such a personal computer or high-function terminal is connected to the central processor, significant advantages would accrue if the function division between them were shifted to take advantage of the best characteristics of bo~h types of processor. More specifically, a central minicomputer has generally more function and performance, but a personal computer has advantages in the area of user interface and certain other performance aspects.

The present invention, then, provides improvements to the method described above which enable word processing and other interactive tasks involving large data entities to perform faster and more efficiently when a central multi-user data processor is connected to high-function auxiliary processors each serving only a single user.

Broadly speaking, the invention divides the individual functions of an overall task into two categories. Functions in the first category generally relate to operations on a large portion of the data entity, which is stored in the central processor. Category-one functions are performed entirely in the central processor, by code stored there. Category-two functions concern operations which at least potentially involve smaller portions of the data entity. These functions are performed entirely ln the smaller auxiliary processor if the Docket Mo. R0988-001 4 ~3~ 7 data portion is already stored i.n, or can easily be transferred to, the memory of the auxiliary processor. If a category-two function involves more of the data entity than can be stored or transferred, then the shared-function method of the above-described method may be invoked to perform a part of the function in the auxiliary processor and a part of the same function in the central processor.

_rief Description of the Drawinqs ~ IG. 1 is a high-level diagram of a data-processing system upon which the invention can be carried out.

FIG. 2 shows the memory locations of data and shared-function code used in the invention.

FIG. 3 is a high-level 10wchart of a word-processor program in which shared functions can be implemented.

FIG. 4 is a 10w chart of the "block delete"
operation of Fig 3.

FIG. 5 details the '1character locate"
function of E'ig. 4.

FIG. 6 details the "delete charac;ters"
function of Fig. 4.

FIG. 7, consisting of FIGS. 7A and 7B, is a allow chart of the "continuous insert" operation using shared functions.

Docke-t Mo. R0988-001 ~3~ 37 FIG. 8 shows memory locations of data and code used in the presen-t invention.

FIG. 9 is a flowchart of a method according to the inven-tion, showing both control and data flow.

Description of Preferred Embodiment _ _ _ . _ FIG. 1 shows a publicly available IBM*
System/36 data processor 100 which may serve as an environment for the present invention. Briefly, central processor 110 includes main-store processor (MSP) 111 for executing application programs from read/write main store 112, which also holds data of various kinds. Control-store processor ~CSP) 113 executes low-level operating-system tasks from read/write control store 114. CSP 113 controls channel logic 115 for transferring data at high speed to and from channel bus 120. Diferent types of input/output (I/0) device controllers attach to channel bus 120. Workstation controllers (WSCs) 130 interface workstation terminals 140 such as interactive alphanumeric displays 141, printer 142, and personal computers 145. Controllers 130 may be attached locaLly to bus ].20 or remotely by a comtnunications controller 140). Central processor 110 and WSCs 130 communicate with each other via a conventional data stream having a series of frames carrying various commands and parameters for transferring control information and the contants of display screens.~ Normally, central processor 110 acts as a master processor, while WSC 130 acts as a slave. That is, processor 110 sends commands to WSC 130, which executes program modules to carry out the commands, then returns responses to processor lI0 via the data stream. The responses may include * Re~istered trade mark Docket No. R0988-001 6 ~ 3~ 37 attention identifiers (AIDS) indicating depression of some terminal keys by the operator.

Display terminals 141 may be publicly available products such as the IBM 5250 Model 11, IBM 5291, IBM 5292, or IBM 3180 Model 2 Workstation Terminals, which communicate with controllers 130 by a multi-drop cable 144. Each controller 130 includes an I/O processor (IOP) 131, an I/O memory holding data and program code for IOP 131, and a bus coupler 133 having ports for transferring data via I/o processor 131 between I/O memory 132 and bus 120, and be-tween memory 132 and cable 144. The conventional function of processor 131 is to execute programs residing in memory 132 for converting high-function data streams received from CP 110 into simpler, more basic commands that can be understood by dependent terminals 141, and vice versa. In other processor or~anizations, contr411er 130 might be a physical part of an intelligent terminal, rather than being located with the central processor or in its own enclosure as a freestanding unit.

Personal computers 145 may be publicly available products such as the IBM 5150, 5160, 5170, or PS/2lM units. Conven-tionally, such units attach to a multi-drop cable 144 via an adapter card and emulator software which makes the personal computer appear to WSC 130 as a terminal such as the workstation terminals described above.
Normally, such emulator software severely limits or entirely negates the performance of any other unction in the persona:L computer while the emula-tor is running actively. ButJ as described more Eully, below, the invention adds further code to the emulator software '~7' Docket No. R0988-001 to allow the personal computer to perform additional functions at the same time.

FIG. 2 is a memory map 200 illustrating how the shared-function capability divides the WP code for processing in the previous method described in the aforementioned application.

Main store 112, Fig. 1~ holds an entire document 210 to be processed. (Part of the document may physically reside on a disk file, but this is transparent.) This document is divided into pages 211. At any given time, one block 212 of the document resides in a buffer 220 defined in memory 130, of controller 130. Actually, this buffer holds only a single li.ne of data for each terminal connected to its cable 1~4; a refresh buffer (not shown) in each terminal 141 holds the full screen currentl~ being displayed, and is updated when necessary from buffer 220. This implementation detail, however~ is transparen-t for the present purpose; for descripkion purposes, data Z21 in buffer 220 wi].1. be treated as though it contained the entire screen currently being displayed. When WSC 130 requlres more data from document 210 to continue processiny, swap routine 231 o~ WSC microcode 230, stored in IOP 131, tran~mits the buffer contents back to block 212;
then it receives another block 213 as new data 221 in buffer 120. WSC 130 has no direct access to main ~tore 112; processor 110 likewise~has no access to I/O memory 132, nor to the refresh buffer in terminals 141. These and other trans~ers between buffer 220 and document 210 are actually carried out via the data stream between the -two processors. For example, WSC e~ecutes microcode to access buffer 221 in its Docket No. R0988-001 8 ~ 3~ 37 addressable memory 132, packages the buffer in data-stream frames, and transmits them to central processor 110. Processor 110 receives and decodes the rames, and writes the data to the appropriate addresses in main store 112.

Although the data stream is a conventional part of the publicly available IBM System/3~, a brief overview of the CP-to-WSC communication is helpful in understanding how the data relevant to the invention is actually transported in this embodiment of the invention. A communication begins when CP 110 sends an interrupt to WSC 130 over channel 120. This is controlled by a program running in CSP 113 dedicated to running -the wor~station subsystem, and occurs when an application program executing in MSP 112 issues a command to a display or when the CSP program i-tself has nothing else to do and issues an "Invite" command to determine whether new dàta is available or needed. WSC 130 responds to the interrupt by requasting a Workstation Control Field (WSCF) rom a known location in MS 112 by a cycle-steal (direct memory access, or DMA) transfer via channe]. ~20. (Cycle-steals are mediated by CSP 113, which can address data in main store 112 directly.) The WSCF may be a command such as "Read Screen", having an operation code, a display identifier, and a maximum byte count.

WSC 130 decodes the WSCF, and initiates the - transfer of a data-stream frame to carry out the request. They vary greatly in length, from 8 bytes to more than 12,000 bytes. Each frame contains an escape character and a command byte.
The command byte specifies the format of the rest of the frame. Frames relevant to the invention may ~7~
~.

Docket No. R0988-001 9 ~3~

have two bytes specifying the entire frame length, class and type bytes encoding the interpretation to be accorded the subsequent data, one or more flag b~tes, and the data from the screen. This data itself may be structured or formatted into records representing display lines, each line havin~ a flag byte and a length byte.

WSC 130 sends -the formatted data-stream ~rame over channel 120 by cycle-steal into main store 112. The WSC then returns the WSCF back to its location in main store with a completion code and issues an interrupt to CSR 113 of CP 110. The workstation-subsystem program then reads the WSCF
and decides what to do next. This procedure, and the data-stream contents, varies from one model of data processor to another, and may be carried out in many different ways wlthi.n the concept of the inven~i.on.

In the present inventi.on. I~P 130 also stores and e~ecutes a part of the code for a WP, an application program whlch would conventionally be executed by central processor 110 in MSP 111 as a single program residing in main store 112. WP code 240 located in main store 112 contains main routines 241 and individual functions such as a delete ~unction 242, a character-locate function 243, continuous-insert function 244, and other functions 245. WP code 250 stored in I/0 memory 132 contains auxiliary routines 251 and portions of some of the same functions -- the "shared functions" -- located in the main store. A Pending Data table 260 in I/0 memory contains items for coordinating the execution of these functions. An image of table 260 is lnaintained in an area 270 of main store 112. The ,., ,~
, :.,.

Docket No. R0988--001 lo ~ 7 image is updated by transmitting table 260 to main store 112 in the da-ta stream whenever CP 110 reads the display screen; correspondingly~ table 260 is updated from the data in area 270 whenever CP 110 writes a display screen to WSC 130. The relevant data in table 260 is shown in -the table below.

Docket No. R0988-001 11 ~.3~9~L~7 Field Length Bit Name (byt~l No. Descrie~_o Flags 2 0 Insert mode is on for this display 1 Locate mode is on for this display 2 An active Copy, Move, or Delete operation wa~
completed, and CP had requested notification 3 An active Copy, Move or Delete was cancelled, and CP had re~uested notification 4 A Delete is now active 5 A Copy is now active 6 A Move is now active (Remaining bits not relevant) D.isplaced 3 (Not relevant) Characters Start 4 - Position of first character itl a Copy, Move or Delete operation Locate 1 - Character code to be located during a CP-assisted Locate operation The specific shared functions to be described as examples herein are the~delete, character-locate, and insert functions, whose auxiliary code in I/O memory 132 is labelled 252-254 respectively.

~'~

Docket Mo. R0988-001 12 ~3~ 7 FIG. 3 is a high-level flow diagram of a program 300 for executing the main routines of the IBM DisplayWrite/36, a word processor 241 which uses the shared-functions concept of the aforementioned application. Program 300 runs in central processor 110; more specifically, it is stored in main store 112 and is executed by MSP
111, Fig. 1. After starting 310, the program re~uests 320 the operator to select a task, such as printing 330, deleting a document 340, editing 350 (creating or revising) a document, or ending 360 the WP program. When the selected task has finished, control returns 370 to block 320 for another selection.

Within each task, the operator may select individual functions to be performed, perhaps to multiple levels of detail. While editing document text, for example, hlock 351 displays a screen 221 of document 210. The operator may press keyboard keys to select any one o:E a number of functions for m~nipulating characters in the document. These futlctions include such things as moving 352, copying 353, and inserting 354 text characters, changing 355 the format of -the text, and ending 356 the editing function.

A number of functions in program 300 use the shared-function concept.

Fig. 4 is a flow chart o a program module 400 detailing the operation of the delete function 354, Fig. 3, as one example of how to implement a shared function according to the invention.
Program 400 runs in WSC 130; that is, it is stored in I/0 memory 132 and executed by I/0 processor 131. (It can be downloaded from a disk at initial program load Docket No. RO988-001 13 ~ 3~ 37 time.) Program 400 begins when the operator presses a "Delete" key at the terminal.

Blocks 410 set up the function. The code sets 411 a "Delete-Active" bit in table 260, bit 4 in the FF field in the above table, stores 412 the location of the first character in the block (i.e., the cursor location), in the "Start" field, changes 413 the attri~ute of the first character to reverse-video, and displays 414 a prompt such as "DELETE WHAT?" on the screen, requesting the operator to specify the location of the last character in the block. The operator may then press 421 a cursor key to move the cursor to another character. Block 430 then moves the current cursor location. Alternatively, the operator can press 422 a character key on the keyboard, causing block 440 to locate the next occurrence of that character in the document, starting rom the current cursor location. After either block 430 or 440 has finished, control returns to selection block 420. That is, any combination of the two methods 430-440 can be used in any order to define a single block to be deleted. The remaining alternative from selection 420 occurs when the operator presses 423 the Enter key, signifying that the present cursor position locates the end of the block. Code g50 then deletes all characters between the stored first-character location and the current cursor posi~ion, and updates the display.~

FIG. 5 is a flow chart 500 showing how the exec~tion of block 440, Fig. 4, is shared between IOP 131 of workstation controller 130 and MSP 111 of central processor ll0, Fig. 1. In Fig. 5, the steps executed in WSC 130 are prefixed with a "W", while Docket No. R0988-001 14 ~3~ 7 those executed in CP 110 carry a "C". When keypress 422 activates character-locate function 440, ~ig. 4, block W510 searches the current screen 221 (stored in I/0 memory 132) for the keycode o the pressed key between the current cursor location and the end of the screen. If block W520 find,s this code, block W530 carries out the locate function by moving the cursor to the end-character ]ocation. In this case, the entire locate function is executed i.n WSC 130, without any involvement of CP 110, which can thus execute other tasks at the same time, without interruption.

But, if W520 does not find the desired character code by the end of the current screen, block W540 requests CP 110 to carry out the locate unct}on. Specifically, block W540 sends the pending-data table 260 to CP 110 in a data-stream frame, and also sends a host-assisted-locate attention identiier (AID) indicating that the locat~ function is to be carried out. Code C510 saves the contents of table 260 in an area 270 of main store 112. CP 110 then searches C520 the remainder of document 210 or the specified character code. When block C530 finds the character code~ block C540 completes the locate unction by moving the cursor to the end-character code. Blocks C550 return updated data 270 to WSC
130. Block C551 generates a number buffer-full of characters 211 containing the end character, with the c~rsor located under the end character. As soon as the character has been found,~block C552 transmits, via the data stream, to WSC 130:

(a) data for the new screen of characters 213;

Docket No. R0988-001 13091~7 ~b) a command speclfying the position of the cursor on the located character within that screen, (c) turning on the "Locate" bit in table 270;

(d) a new position for the first character in table 270;

(e) turning on the "Notify Host" bit for delete, bit 4 of field Flagl in table 270.

I block C530 should not ind the specified end character in the remainder of document 210, block C560 merely writes a message such as "CHARACTER NOT FOUND" on the current screen to WSC
130 via the data stream.

Line 502 indicates the transmission of the new data back to WSC 130. Block W550 then receives and stores the new screen and cursor location for display in terminal 141.

The following table detatls the contents o.f area 270 in MS 112, Fig. l : : ;
: :

Docket No. RO988-001 16 ~L36~9~1 ~37 Field Length Bit Name L_Y_es) No. Descri~tion Flagl 2 0 Set insert mode off/on for this display 1 Set locate mode off/on for this display 2 Execute Delete operation in WSC/CP
3 (Not relevant) 4 Don t/do notify CP when current active Copy, Move, or Delete operation is completed or cancelled 5-7 (Not relevant) Flag2 l 0 Allow/prohibit Copy, Move, or Delete operation l-7 (Always OFF) Displaced 3 (Not relevant) Characters Start Loc 4 - Row--column location of start of a Move, Copy, or Delete operation Fig. 6 is a flow chart 600 of delete function 450, showing what happens when the operator pres~es the "Enter" key after having defined the block of characters to be deleted. Again, blocks executed by WSC 130 are prefixed by "W"; a "C"
denotes blocks executed by CP llO.

Block W610 deletes the characters in the current screen 221 from the displayed ~J

Docket No. ROg88-001 ~3~
first-character position -to the end-character position marked by the cursor. As previously described, the first-character position is the actual beginning of the delete block if the current screen is the same as the screen in which the delete operation was started. Otherwise, the first-character position is the first character in the current screen: i.e., the screen in which the delete operation ends. WSC 130 then resets the "Delete Active" bit (Flags bit 4 of buffer 260) in block W620. Blocks ~630 synchronize the function sharing if necessary. If the "No-tify CP of Delete Completion" bit (Flagsl bit 4 of buffer 270) is ON
in hlock W631, block W632 sets the "Delete Completed" bit (Flags bit 2 in buffer 260); this bit had been set in block C552, Fig. 5 if the operation was seen to span multiple screens. At a later time, block W640 transmits a data frame to CP 110. The rame includes data table 260; as mentioned above, tables 260 and 270 are updated from each other s data every time a screen is read from WSC 130 or written to CP 110.
7~SC 130 then exits to block 450, Fig. 4, which in turn exits block 354~ Fig. 3.

When CP 110 later reads C610 the data frame sent by W640, i-t checks C620 for the "Delete Completed" bit (Flags bit 2 in buffer 260~. If this bit is on, block C630 repositions the end-character location to a position in document 210 just before the first character of the current screen. This is done by changing the 'IStart Locatlon'7 field in buffer 270. Block C640 deletes all characters in document 210 from the stored ~in buffer 270) first-Docket No. R0988-001 ~3~9~37 character location in screen ~12 to the (new) end-character location.

MSP 111 of CP 110 -then continues with other tas~s, such as display rec~uests for other doc-uments. These tasks might or might not be connected with the present invention.

Thus, if the delete operation spanned more than one screen of text, it is shared between -the two processors: WSC 130 deletes the charac-ters on its current screen~ while CP 110 deletes the remaining characters clirectly in document 210.
But, if only the current screen is involved, CP
110 does not share the deletion operation, and WSC
130 performs the entire task. In either case, all characters chanyed in the current screen will be updated in document 210 at a ].ater time, whenever CP 110 requests a screen read.

Another function shared between WSC 130 and central processor 110 is t:hat of continuous .inserti.on of new di.sp].ay lines as needed for te~t-character entry. The normal mode ln which the word processor enters new characters into a document is to insert them at the cursor location, pushing all characters to the riyht of the cursor on the same line one position to the right as each new character is displayed. When the line becomes too long -- that is, when a non-null character enters the right-~argin column -- these characters of the rightmost word are moved into a new line, and other lines are scrolled up or down on the display to make room for the new line. This function appears as bloc~ 353 in Fig. 3, and is executed whenever the Docket No. R09~8-001 19 ~91~37 operator is entering text and has not invoked some other task such as moving or delet.ing characters.

FIG. 7 represents code 700 for sharing the insert function between the two processors. This code is a WSC 13~ module; tha-t is, the code resides in memory 132 and is executed by proGessor 1~1 .

When the operator presses a character key at 710 to insert new characters at the cursor position in an existing line, block 720 decides whether or not a new display line is required. I~
the existing line contains on.Ly null characters between its rightmost character and the right margin column, control passes immediately to blocks 730. These blocks merely make room in the existing line for the character to be inserted.
Block 731 moves the characters from the cursor location one space to the right; block 732 inserts the new character in the space thus opened up at the cursor location.

I the existing line is already full (no null at the right margin), a new line must be inserted below the cursor position. Blocks 740 determine which way the existing display lines will be scrolled 750 to make room for the new line. If block 741 finds that the last (lowermost) text line on the display has not been modified since the present screen was displayed, block 751 scrolls downward all the lines below the cursor position, pushing the last line off the screen.
No information is lost, because the same up-tG-date data is contained in portion 212 of document 210 in MS 112. Blocks 770 then prepare the new line. Block 771 overwrites all the characters in the line immediately below the cursor with null characters.

~,~

Docket No. R0988-001 13~ 7 Block 772 word-wraps the last word the cursor line; that is, the entire word having its rightmost character in -the right-margin column is moved to -the new line. Blocks 730 then insert the rlew character as prevlously described.

If the last disp]ay line has been changed but block 742 finds that the firs-t (uppermost) text line has not, block 752 scrolls upward all the lines above the present cursor position, pushing the first line off the screen. Blocks 760 anticipate future scroll-ing needs. Block 761 detects whether fewer than two scrollable text lines remain on the screen; these may be two unmodified lines at the bottom of the screen, two at the top, or one at the top and one at the bottom. If fewer than two scrollable lines remain, block 762 sends an AID to CP 110 for an update of document 210. This occurs when block 763 reads the screen back to the document 210. Block 764 then chang~s the status of all. screen lines to "umnodified," so they can be scrolled off the screen .if required, without losing any changes made by the operator. Control. then passes to block~ 770, and therea:Eter to blocks 730. The actual screen read will be done by CP 110 at some time after block 762 has been executed; this does not interrupt the operator~ who may continue to key in characters.

If blocks 740 detect that both the first and the last display ].ines have been changed since the screen was displayed, a scroll in either direction would destroy modified data. This can occur if the screen reads done by blocks 760 cannot occur fast enough to provide scrollable line before they are actually needed. This rare case is treated as an 25!~

Docket No. R0988-001 ~36~ 37 error conditi.on by blocks 780. Block 781 sends an AID to CP 110 requesting an immediate screen read.
Block 782 signals the opera-tor of an error, and locks the keyboard. (The operator must then press a "Reset" ~ey and reenter the character.) Control then returns to block 710 to continue character insertion. If -the operator presses a function key instead of a character key, exit 711 returns to Fig. 3.

The above description shows the sharing of several functions, block delete, character locate, and continuous insert. The DW/36 word processor shares other functions, such as moving and copying blocks of characters, in substantially the same way. The character-locate function is used with other functions besides deletion, and can also be used by itself as a standalone function.

The preerred embodiment for the improved method of the present inventlon uses CP 110 as the multi-~lser, high-performance central processor and a personal computer (PC) 145 as the single-user, lower-performance auxiliary processor. tPC 145 has, of course, a display for presenting data to an operator, and a keyboard for accepting data and commands from the operator.) In the following description, IOP 130 func-tions in a conventional "pass-through" mode, merely transferring data back and ~orth between CP 110 and PC 14~ without performing any word-processlng functions upon it.

Rather than sending document data back and forth in screen-buffer sized portions, this embodiment transmits document data as "pages" of Docke-t No. R0988-001 22 ~L3~g~

text, corresponding to large pages of the document along with enough formatting information about the page that PC 145 can store and format the page in its own memory. ~In effect, PC 145 sees the downloaded page as an entire document, complete with a format specification.) PC 145 executes program code located in the PC -to perform certain word-processing functions upon the page available in its memory. These include copying, moving, and deleting text. When one of these functions requires more text than is available in the local page, PC 145 transmits the function request to CP 110, and CP 110 then performs the function wi.th its own code for the same function, upon any data in the entire document located in the CP s memory.

Program code for certain other word-processing Eunctions, however, is always done in CP 110 upon the entire document, as will be explained.

FIG. 8 shows the location of the code and data relevant to the present invention. Details of this implementation are publi.cly available as parts of the IBM DisplayWrite/36 (Release 5.1) and the IBM PC Support/36 Workstation Feature. More specifically, the portions relevant to the invention are located mostly ln the Text Assist function of the PC Support/36 Organizer.~A
publicly available emulator is the IBM 5250 Enhanced Emulation Program.

The letters "CP" and "IOP" in Fig. 8 desi~nate items in the memory of CP 110 and IOP
130 (Fig. 1), respectively. The remaining code and data are stored in the memory of PC 145. The column labelled Docke-t No. R0988-001 23 ~3~ 7 "PC Emulator" contains conventional functions of -the aforementioned emulation program. The column labeled "DOS" contains conventional code ~or an operating s~stem and other user programs for the personal computer. The middle column, "PC Text Assist," incorporates code for the present i.nvention.

FIG. 8 is a memory map 800 illustrating how the invention is divided into components between the memory 810 associated with the central processor and the memory 850 of -the personal computer. For the present purpose, memory 810 includes components in the proper memory 810 of CP
110, Eig. 1, and also memory 830 of IOP 130 and any secondary storage 840, such as on-line disk drives, available to CP 110.

~ emory 820 contains word-processor code which includes control code 821 and three components 822-824 for perorming differellt categories of func tions .

Control code 821 performs a number of editor funct.ions not implemented on the RC; see the description of emulation displays under Fig. g.
Page-processing functions 822 are typical to a word processor and include the functi.ons mentioned in connection with Fig. 2 as being 'ishared functions," such as insert, delete, move, copy, find, and so forth; code 822 is executed only when the requested function requires more document data than is avaiIable in the PC 1~5.
Document-processiny functions 823 inherently require large portions of a document; these typically include spell-checking, paginating, printing, and so forth. Code 823 is always executed when one of its functions is invoked ~r ~.

Docke-t No. RO988-001 24 ~ 7 from PC 145. ~ode 824 involves serving functions for transferring document pages back and forth between CP memory 810 and PC memory 850. Page serving is accomplished by using the I/O Processor 830 Data Stream Passthru capability 8~1; the IOP
130 does not interpret the clatastream, but passes it through to -the PC memory 850 intact.

Storage 840 holds the entire document 841 being processed. The document is divided logically into a number of pages 842, each corresponding roughly to one page of typescript. Page length is, however, arbitrary and variable. Document 841 is preerably stored on a disk, with portions brought into random-access memory by any conventional caching or buffering means; storage 840 conceptually includes all the components re~uired to store and access document 841.

The PC memory 850 contains a conventional etnulator 860, whose overall task is to make PC 145 appear to WSC as a conventional. terminal such as 141. The emulator runs under a conventional operating system such as IBM PC-DOS, along with a number of other application programs 880.
Text-assist (TA) code 870 communicates with emulator 860 via a number of inl:inks and outlinks 8~0; these are conventional control blocks that control the communication among the different modules of code 860 and 870. The text-assist code 870 also allows the user to hotkey to operating-system code 880, so that other application programs may execute. The TA code 870 remains in memory during DO5 program 880 execution, unless DOS explicitly removes it.

~,.

Docket No. R0988-001 ~3~ 37 The emulator 860 provides several conventional. features 861 not relevant to the text-assist component 870.

The prlmary ones include emulation 862 itself, which allows PC 145 to act as a "dumb"
terminal 141 for executing functions on CP 110;
again, see the description of emulation displays in connection with Fig. 9.

Keyboard monitor 863 gets the user's keystrokes and passes them to a TA keystroke processor 87. Code module 864 translates conventional PC keyboard scan codes in order to build an ASCII di.splay 874. Emu].ator 860 also has a component 865 to send and receive datastreams in a.known format; component 865 lnterfaces to TA
component 875 for sending -the datastream to WP
code 820 on CP 110, and a component 876 that perorms a parse-datastream operation to get it into the proper form for component 873.
.

Two aclclitional components of TA 870 do not commu~ica-te directly with emulator 860. Component 872 contains code for performing a category of editing procedures. The procedures of component 872 d~ all of the editing functions within the current page of text. The functions in this category include inserting, deleting, copying, and moving text, line adjusting, and word wrapping.
Component 873 provides code for converting the text datastream, formatting it~ according to the page and line format data from CP 110, and buildlng a display page to be presented to the user on the PC display.

.~

Docket No. R0988-001 26 ~3~9~7 Block 891 is a buffer in the memory of PC 145 which holds the curren-t document page and its format. The current page is stored substan-tially as a one-page document with standard Displaywrite format.

FIG. 9 is a diagram 900 describing the flow of control of the preferred embodiment. The method is executed primarily by two programs:
word-processing (WP) code 930, which is the main routine of IBM DisplayWrite/36 running in CP 110, Fig. 1, and text-assist (TA) code 940, which is a program running in PC 145.

The dashed line down the middle of FIG. 9 represents the boundary between operations perfo~med in CP 110 and those performed in PC i45.

First, the user specifies, at block 910, a document to be edited. Block 911 provides termination cocle or exi.ti.ng the entire WP program a-t end point 912. Block 913 determines whether the TA program 940 is already loaded; the TA program remaill~ resident as long as PC 145 is powered on and communications is uninterrupted. If the TA
code i~ not loaded, it is downloaded at 970 to the PC and becomes a resident download program 950.

The first page of the document 340, Fig. 8, is then assembled at 914 and sent to the PC block 951 at line 971. TA code 940 then formats the page a-t 951, putting a displ.ay page up for user interaction.

Editor block 952 waits for the user to specify a desired action on the document, then performs various basic editing functions, such as inserting ,~

- Docket No. R0988-001 27 ~3~ 7 text, wordwrapping to the ne~t line, locating text, and Block 953 monitors for buffer-full condition; i the buffer holding page 891 is full, line 972 sends the modified data to the WP code 915 for storage in document 841. Line 973 confirms receipt of this data to the TA program 940.

I the user had selected a copy, move, or delete functi.on, then block 954 causes block 955 to determine whether the data necessary to perform the function is within the current page buffer. If it is not, line 974 sends the request back to WP
code block 916 to perform the requested copy, move or delete. Block 916 performs the entire operation on all the relevant document data. If the request involves data only within the current page, block 956 perorms the copy, move, or del.ete within PC
145 by means of TA code 940. Any line-adjusting re~uired because of editincl activity is entirely performed by TA code, at block 957.

If the ope.rator had re~uested (at block 952) spell-checkincJ or o-ther li.nguistic functions such as synonyms, block 958 obtai.ns the start and end locations the user had specii.ed in block 952 and these bounds are sent via line 975 to WP code block 917 to handle the spel.]. checking or other function upon the stored document 840 in CP 110.
Line 976 returns error flags (e.g., for misspelled words) to TA spelling function 958, which provides a display of the errors.

Block 959 sends printing and pagination requqsts on line 977 to the WP code block 918, which provides that function entirely within CP
110.

~s~

- Doc~e-t No. R0988-001 28 ~3~9~7 Some of the fullctions of the overall DlsplayWrite/36 word processor are still performed as though the PC 145 were a dumb terminal; these are funckions which execute jUSt as efficiently on ~P 110 as they would on PC 145, so there is no reason to move them to the PC wi-th its limited memory space and performance characteristics.
These functions include, for example, multi-column operations and page/line forma-t changes. When any of these functions had been requested at 952, then block 960 sends a request on line 978 to the WP
code 919. Block 919 causes the appropria-te function to be executed in CP 110 and transmits the necessary display screens to the PC via the emulator 860, Fig. 8. (These displays are not normally pages of the document, but rather menus, messages, etc.) This allocation of functions provides the user with all of the capability of the WP code without requiring the code to be actually present in both processors 110 and 145.

If, because o:E searches or scrolling by the user, a new page is required, block 962 sends a request 980 to WP code block 920. Block 920 determines which page of the document stored in CP
110 should be sent~ and transfers control to block 914. Th.is blocks, as described previously, assembles the requested pa~e and sends it to the TA code at 972.

If the user requests an exit from the document, block 963 sends a request 981 to termination code 921.~Block 921 then saves the document buffer 891 back to document 841~ and closes down the word processor.

Docket No. R0988-001 29 1~ g~7 Other applications, such as a database management system, coulcl also use the present invention to divide func-tions such as record searching or updating using -the same concepts.
Office-management systems also offer an environment conducive to the use of this invention. Other implementations may employ different processor organiza-tions from that shown.
Additional levels of processors could be used to operate on screens, pages, documents, and folders of documents, if desirecl.

~.'

Claims (8)

1. A method of performing an interactive task upon a data entity by means of a first central data processor and a second auxiliary data processor, said auxiliary processor being adapted for display to and input from an operator, said method comprising the steps of:

(a) storing said entire data entity in said central processor;

(b) transferring a portion of said data entity to said second processor;

(c) displaying at least some of said data-entity portion on said display under the control of code located in said auxiliary processor;

(d) receiving in said auxiliary processor a command input by said operator to perform a predetermined function upon said entity;

(e) if said function. belongs to a first predefined category, performing said predetermined function in said central processor, by means of code located entirely in said central processor, upon said data entity located in said central processor;

(f) if said function belongs to a second predefined category, determining in said auxiliary processor whether said function involves only data in said data-entity portion located in said auxiliary processor;

Docket No. R0988-001 Claim 1 Continued (1) if so, performing said predetermined function entirely in said auxiliary processor, by means of program code located in said auxiliary processor, upon data located in said auxiliary processor;

(2) if not, performing the same predetermined function in said central processor, by means of program code located in said central processor, upon data in the same data entity located in said central processor.
2. A method of performing an interactive task upon a data entity by means of a first central data processor and a second auxiliary data processor, said auxiliary processor being adapted for display to and input from an operator, said method comprising the steps of:

(a) storing said entire data entity in said central processor;

(b) transferring a portion of said data entity to said auxiliary processor;

(c) receiving in said auxiliary processor a specification of a function to be performed upon said data entity from an operator at said auxiliary processor;

Docket No. RO988-001 Claim 2 Continued (d) determining whether said function belongs to a first category and whether said function involves only said portion of said data entity presently in said auxiliary processor;

(e) if so, (1) performing said function in said auxiliary processor by means of code located in said auxiliary processor;

(2) displaying information from said function at said auxiliary processor by means of code located in said auxiliary processor;

(f) otherwise, (1) performing said function in said central processor by means of code located in said central processor;

(2) emulating a terminal in said auxiliary processor;

(3) displaying information from said function in said auxiliary processor by means of said emulated terminal.

Docket No. RO988-001
3. The method of Claim 2, further comprising:

(g) after the completion of said function, determining whether a new portion of said data entity is required for possible further processing in said auxiliary processor;

(h) if so, transferring a further portion of said data entity from said document from said central processor to said auxiliary processor.
4. The method of Claim 3, wherein said data entity is a text document, and wherein said portions are predefined pages in said document.
5. The method of Claim 3, wherein said document contains formatting data specifying a format for other data in said document, and wherein steps (b) and (g) include transferring said formatting data from said entire document in said central processor to said auxiliary processor, and formatting said other data in said portion according to said formatting data transferred from said central processor.

: ::

Docket No. R0988-001
6. A system for performing a plurality of different functions upon a document included in a data entry, said system comprising:

(a) a central processor;

(b) storage means, coupled to said central processor, for holding an entire document;

(c) a first program code, executable by said central processor, for performing a first category of document functions upon said entire document;

(d) means for transferring portions of said document to an auxiliary processor;

(e) an auxiliary processor;

(f) buffer means, coupled to said means for transferring, for storing any of said portions;

(g) display and input means, coupled to said buffer means, for communicating with an operator;

(h) a second program code, executable by said auxiliary processor, for performing a second category of document functions upon any of said document portions transferred to said auxiliary processor; and (i) an emulator, executable by said auxiliary processor, for causing said auxiliary processor to emulate a terminal when any of said document functions is being performed in said central processor.

Docket No. R0988-001
7. The system of Claim 6, wherein said central processor further includes program code for performing further page functions in said central processor, and for communicating with said auxiliary processor via said emulator.
8. The system of Claim 6, wherein said document includes formatting data and a number of pages containing text data, and wherein said transferring means transfers one of said pages along with at least some of said formatting data.
CA000580380A 1988-01-07 1988-10-17 Sharing word-processing functions among multiple processors Expired - Fee Related CA1309187C (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US07/142,587 US4949300A (en) 1988-01-07 1988-01-07 Sharing word-processing functions among multiple processors
US142,587 1988-01-07

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CA1309187C true CA1309187C (en) 1992-10-20

Family

ID=22500459

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CA000580380A Expired - Fee Related CA1309187C (en) 1988-01-07 1988-10-17 Sharing word-processing functions among multiple processors

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US4949300A (en)
EP (1) EP0323795B1 (en)
JP (1) JPH01259447A (en)
CA (1) CA1309187C (en)
DE (1) DE3853274T2 (en)

Families Citing this family (66)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5291489A (en) * 1987-11-13 1994-03-01 Dsc Communications Corporation Interprocessor switching network
JP2755951B2 (en) * 1988-01-30 1998-05-25 キヤノン株式会社 Information processing device
CA1341310C (en) 1988-07-15 2001-10-23 Robert Filepp Interactive computer network and method of operation
CA2007414C (en) * 1989-04-26 1994-10-25 Clayton James Bennett Iii Method for manipulating elements within a structured document using active intent interpretations
CA2059615A1 (en) * 1991-01-23 1992-07-24 Edward J. Neubauer Method of selecting and representing data
US5528490A (en) * 1992-04-10 1996-06-18 Charles E. Hill & Associates, Inc. Electronic catalog system and method
US5437036A (en) * 1992-09-03 1995-07-25 Microsoft Corporation Text checking application programming interface
JP3534359B2 (en) * 1994-05-13 2004-06-07 インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレーション Apparatus, method and computer system supporting multiple display sessions
US5781758A (en) * 1995-03-23 1998-07-14 Apple Computer, Inc. Software emulation system with reduced memory requirements
US5970471A (en) * 1996-03-22 1999-10-19 Charles E. Hill & Associates, Inc. Virtual catalog and product presentation method and apparatus
US5956047A (en) * 1997-04-30 1999-09-21 Hewlett-Packard Co. ROM-based control units in a geometry accelerator for a computer graphics system
US5930519A (en) * 1997-04-30 1999-07-27 Hewlett Packard Company Distributed branch logic system and method for a geometry accelerator
US6184902B1 (en) 1997-04-30 2001-02-06 Hewlett-Packard Company Centralized branch intelligence system and method for a geometry accelerator
JP3507681B2 (en) * 1998-01-08 2004-03-15 インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレーション Information processing method, information processing apparatus, information processing system, and storage medium storing program for controlling information processing apparatus
US6088702A (en) * 1998-02-25 2000-07-11 Plantz; Scott H. Group publishing system
DE19830472B4 (en) * 1998-07-08 2013-06-27 Robert Bosch Gmbh External component for a microprocessor system and operating procedures
US6757900B1 (en) 2000-05-18 2004-06-29 Microsoft Corporation State management of server-side control objects
US7013340B1 (en) 2000-05-18 2006-03-14 Microsoft Corporation Postback input handling by server-side control objects
US20020019845A1 (en) 2000-06-16 2002-02-14 Hariton Nicholas T. Method and system for distributed scripting of presentations
US7380250B2 (en) 2001-03-16 2008-05-27 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for interacting with devices having different capabilities
US7493397B1 (en) 2001-06-06 2009-02-17 Microsoft Corporation Providing remote processing services over a distributed communications network
US6944797B1 (en) 2001-06-07 2005-09-13 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for tracing
US6915454B1 (en) 2001-06-12 2005-07-05 Microsoft Corporation Web controls validation
US7162723B2 (en) * 2001-06-29 2007-01-09 Microsoft Corporation ASP.NET HTTP runtime
US7594001B1 (en) 2001-07-06 2009-09-22 Microsoft Corporation Partial page output caching
US7216294B2 (en) 2001-09-04 2007-05-08 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for predicting optimal HTML structure without look-ahead
US7428725B2 (en) * 2001-11-20 2008-09-23 Microsoft Corporation Inserting devices specific content
US20030112273A1 (en) * 2001-12-17 2003-06-19 Workshare Technology, Ltd. Document collaboration suite using a common database
US7496841B2 (en) * 2001-12-17 2009-02-24 Workshare Technology, Ltd. Method and system for document collaboration
US20030233477A1 (en) * 2002-06-17 2003-12-18 Microsoft Corporation Extensible infrastructure for manipulating messages communicated over a distributed network
US7574653B2 (en) 2002-10-11 2009-08-11 Microsoft Corporation Adaptive image formatting control
US7596782B2 (en) * 2003-10-24 2009-09-29 Microsoft Corporation Software build extensibility
US7890604B2 (en) 2004-05-07 2011-02-15 Microsoft Corproation Client-side callbacks to server events
US8065600B2 (en) 2004-05-14 2011-11-22 Microsoft Corporation Systems and methods for defining web content navigation
US7464386B2 (en) 2004-05-17 2008-12-09 Microsoft Corporation Data controls architecture
US8156448B2 (en) * 2004-05-28 2012-04-10 Microsoft Corporation Site navigation and site navigation data source
US7530058B2 (en) * 2004-05-28 2009-05-05 Microsoft Corporation Non-compile pages
US20060020883A1 (en) * 2004-05-28 2006-01-26 Microsoft Corporation Web page personalization
US20060064643A1 (en) * 2004-09-14 2006-03-23 Hariton Nicholas T Distributed scripting for presentations with touch screen displays
US9176943B2 (en) 2008-05-12 2015-11-03 Adobe Systems Incorporated Comment presentation in electronic documents
US7949633B1 (en) 2008-05-12 2011-05-24 Adobe Systems Incorporated Shared edit access of electronic content
US9418054B2 (en) 2008-05-12 2016-08-16 Adobe Systems Incorporated Document comment management
US7945595B1 (en) 2008-05-12 2011-05-17 Adobe Systems Incorporated System and method for generating an item list in electronic content
US8996621B2 (en) 2008-05-12 2015-03-31 Adobe Systems Incorporated Asynchronous comment updates
US10055392B2 (en) 2008-05-12 2018-08-21 Adobe Systems Incorporated History-based archive management
US9329744B2 (en) 2008-05-12 2016-05-03 Adobe Systems Incorporated Segmented scroll bar
US8893017B2 (en) 2008-05-29 2014-11-18 Adobe Systems Incorporated Tracking changes in a database tool
US8286171B2 (en) 2008-07-21 2012-10-09 Workshare Technology, Inc. Methods and systems to fingerprint textual information using word runs
US8555080B2 (en) * 2008-09-11 2013-10-08 Workshare Technology, Inc. Methods and systems for protect agents using distributed lightweight fingerprints
WO2010059747A2 (en) 2008-11-18 2010-05-27 Workshare Technology, Inc. Methods and systems for exact data match filtering
US8406456B2 (en) * 2008-11-20 2013-03-26 Workshare Technology, Inc. Methods and systems for image fingerprinting
WO2011017084A2 (en) * 2009-07-27 2011-02-10 Workshare Technology, Inc. Methods and systems for comparing presentation slide decks
US10783326B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2020-09-22 Workshare, Ltd. System for tracking changes in a collaborative document editing environment
US11030163B2 (en) 2011-11-29 2021-06-08 Workshare, Ltd. System for tracking and displaying changes in a set of related electronic documents
US10025759B2 (en) 2010-11-29 2018-07-17 Workshare Technology, Inc. Methods and systems for monitoring documents exchanged over email applications
US10574729B2 (en) 2011-06-08 2020-02-25 Workshare Ltd. System and method for cross platform document sharing
US10880359B2 (en) 2011-12-21 2020-12-29 Workshare, Ltd. System and method for cross platform document sharing
US9948676B2 (en) 2013-07-25 2018-04-17 Workshare, Ltd. System and method for securing documents prior to transmission
US10963584B2 (en) 2011-06-08 2021-03-30 Workshare Ltd. Method and system for collaborative editing of a remotely stored document
US9170990B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2015-10-27 Workshare Limited Method and system for document retrieval with selective document comparison
US9613340B2 (en) 2011-06-14 2017-04-04 Workshare Ltd. Method and system for shared document approval
US11567907B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2023-01-31 Workshare, Ltd. Method and system for comparing document versions encoded in a hierarchical representation
US10911492B2 (en) 2013-07-25 2021-02-02 Workshare Ltd. System and method for securing documents prior to transmission
US10133723B2 (en) 2014-12-29 2018-11-20 Workshare Ltd. System and method for determining document version geneology
US11182551B2 (en) 2014-12-29 2021-11-23 Workshare Ltd. System and method for determining document version geneology
US11763013B2 (en) 2015-08-07 2023-09-19 Workshare, Ltd. Transaction document management system and method

Family Cites Families (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4204206A (en) * 1977-08-30 1980-05-20 Harris Corporation Video display system
EP0042895B1 (en) * 1980-06-30 1984-11-28 International Business Machines Corporation Text processing terminal with editing of stored document at each keystroke
US4398264A (en) * 1980-08-12 1983-08-09 Pitney Bowes Inc. Circuit to enable foreground and background processing in a word processing system with circuits for performing a plurality of independently controlled functions
US4463442A (en) * 1981-10-09 1984-07-31 International Business Machines Corporation Emulation of data processing display terminals of variable screen size on the display of a text processor
US4604710A (en) * 1981-10-09 1986-08-05 International Business Machines Corporation System for converting data processing information to text processing format and vice versa
US4503499A (en) * 1982-09-14 1985-03-05 Eaton Corporation Controlled work flow system
JPS5971562A (en) * 1982-10-18 1984-04-23 Hitachi Ltd Control system of time division computer system
US4532588A (en) * 1982-11-09 1985-07-30 International Business Machines Corporation Electronic document distribution network with uniform data stream
US4633430A (en) * 1983-10-03 1986-12-30 Wang Laboratories, Inc. Control structure for a document processing system
JPS60245338A (en) * 1984-05-21 1985-12-05 Hitachi Ltd Data processing system
US4924434A (en) * 1985-10-15 1990-05-08 International Business Machines Corporation Sharing word-processing functions among multiple processors
JPS62212761A (en) * 1986-03-14 1987-09-18 Hitachi Ltd Processing system for function decentralized information

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0323795A2 (en) 1989-07-12
DE3853274T2 (en) 1995-09-14
US4949300A (en) 1990-08-14
DE3853274D1 (en) 1995-04-13
JPH01259447A (en) 1989-10-17
EP0323795A3 (en) 1991-04-03
EP0323795B1 (en) 1995-03-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA1309187C (en) Sharing word-processing functions among multiple processors
CA1172374A (en) Interactive display terminal with alternating data processing and text processing sessions with text processing status line operable during data processing session
US4513391A (en) Text processing apparatus with two-stage formatting of text
EP0173123B1 (en) Implicit creation of a superblock structure in a multiple data editor
EP0173124B1 (en) Multiple data editor using flow attributes for text objects
US4996662A (en) Method for generating document using tables storing pointers and indexes
EP0173122B1 (en) Integrated multiple data editor
EP0136711B1 (en) Control structure in a document processing system
US5173854A (en) Distributed text editing system with remote terminal transmits successive audit messages each identifying individual editing operation
US5335323A (en) Computer human interface with multiapplication display
EP0231472A2 (en) Editing system for virtual machines
Wood Z-the 95% program editor
JPS5872240A (en) Text processing system
Finseth The craft of text editing: Emacs for the modern world
US5133066A (en) Method for selecting multiple versions of data in a reduced record units text editing system
US4924434A (en) Sharing word-processing functions among multiple processors
EP0185904B1 (en) Tailored document building
JP2000099526A (en) Document information extracting device
EP0043392A1 (en) Text processing apparatus with direct formatting of text
CA1172371A (en) System for converting data processing information to text processing format and vice versa
Macleod Design and implementation of a display oriented text editor
EP0075731A2 (en) Column formatting by typed example
Cargill Full‐screen editing in a hostile environment
Hunter et al. A network screen editor implementation
GUIDE inter

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
MKLA Lapsed