CA2059927A1 - Method and apparatus for variable complexity user interface in a data processing system - Google Patents
Method and apparatus for variable complexity user interface in a data processing systemInfo
- Publication number
- CA2059927A1 CA2059927A1 CA002059927A CA2059927A CA2059927A1 CA 2059927 A1 CA2059927 A1 CA 2059927A1 CA 002059927 A CA002059927 A CA 002059927A CA 2059927 A CA2059927 A CA 2059927A CA 2059927 A1 CA2059927 A1 CA 2059927A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- user
- data processing
- processing system
- user interface
- function application
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F9/00—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
- G06F9/06—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
- G06F9/44—Arrangements for executing specific programs
- G06F9/451—Execution arrangements for user interfaces
- G06F9/453—Help systems
Abstract
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR VARIABLE COMPLEXITY USER
INTERFACE IN A DATA PROCESSING SYSTEM
ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
A method and apparatus for enhanced user interface in a data processing system for use with a multiple function application. Multiple user interfaces are established for selected functions within a multiple function application and stored within a data processing system. Each of the multiple user interfaces preferably has a different level of complexity. User profiles for selected users within the data processing system are then utilized to specify desired levels of complexity for particular functions for each selected user. Thereafter, these user profiles are utilized to automatically select a particular one of the multiple user interfaces within a multiple function application in response to a selection of a particular function by a user.
In one depicted embodiment of the present invention a user may selectively alter a user profile or alternatively, the user profile may be automatically altered by the occurrence of a selected event, such as the lapse of a selected period of time or the completion of an education course by a user.
In either event a default user interface is also provided for utilization in situations wherein a user profile does not specify a desired level of complexity for a selected function.
INTERFACE IN A DATA PROCESSING SYSTEM
ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
A method and apparatus for enhanced user interface in a data processing system for use with a multiple function application. Multiple user interfaces are established for selected functions within a multiple function application and stored within a data processing system. Each of the multiple user interfaces preferably has a different level of complexity. User profiles for selected users within the data processing system are then utilized to specify desired levels of complexity for particular functions for each selected user. Thereafter, these user profiles are utilized to automatically select a particular one of the multiple user interfaces within a multiple function application in response to a selection of a particular function by a user.
In one depicted embodiment of the present invention a user may selectively alter a user profile or alternatively, the user profile may be automatically altered by the occurrence of a selected event, such as the lapse of a selected period of time or the completion of an education course by a user.
In either event a default user interface is also provided for utilization in situations wherein a user profile does not specify a desired level of complexity for a selected function.
Description
RO9-91-005 1 20~9927 MET~OD ~ND APPAR~TUS FOR VARIABLE COMPLEXITY USER
INTERFACE IN A DATA PROCESSING SYST~M
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Technicai Field:
The present invention relates in general to an improved data processing system and in particular to an enhanced user interface for utilization with a data processing system. Still more particularly, the present invention relates to an enhanced user interface which permits the automatic selection of variable complexity user interfaces for selected functions within a multiple function application.
INTERFACE IN A DATA PROCESSING SYST~M
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Technicai Field:
The present invention relates in general to an improved data processing system and in particular to an enhanced user interface for utilization with a data processing system. Still more particularly, the present invention relates to an enhanced user interface which permits the automatic selection of variable complexity user interfaces for selected functions within a multiple function application.
2. Description of the Related Art:
The design of modern state-of-the-art computer systems devotes much effort to enhancing the efficiency of the interface between man and machine. So-called "user interfaces" must be sufficiently .simple or intuitive to permit relatively unskilled users to utilize complex so~tware applications, yet these user interfaces must be complete enough to allow skilled users to access the multitude of features which modern applications typically provide. Often a designer must simply compromise and provide an interface which represents a less than optimal solution to both of these problems.
One example of a known solution to this problem is exhibited in many game or entertainment applications in which a user may select a "beginner," "intermediate," or "expert" level of play wherein the speed, complexity and skill level of a selected game may be permanently altered for the duration of an entire game or sequence. While this approach permits users of varying skill levels to enjoy a s.ingle game it does not recognize that a user may have differing skill levels for different aspects of a game or entertainment appl.ication. No provision e~ists in such R09-91-005 2 2~ ~ 99 27 systems for accommodating a user having expert level skill in one aspect and beginner level skill in another aspect of the game or entertainment application.
A similar approach which may be utilized in conjunction with productivity software, such as word processing, is disclosed in U.S. Ratent No. 4,821,211, issued to Robert J. Torres and assigned to the assignee herein. This patent allows a user designated as an "expert"
to omit unnecessary intermediate steps for all functions within the application. For example, menu solutions may not be displayed for users who are expected to recall all available functions at selected locations within the application. As above, the method disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 4,821,211 contains I10 provision for accommodating a user having varying levels of skills for different functions within a multiple function application.
It should therefore be apparent that a need exists for a method and apparatus which allows variable complexity user interfaces to be established for different functions within a multiple function application. SUMMARY OF THE
INVENTION
It is therefore one object of the present invention to provide an improved data processing system.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an enhanced user interface for utilization with a data processing system.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide an enhanced user interace which permits the automatic selection of variable complexity user interfaces for selected functions within a multiple function application.
The foregoing objects are achieved as is now described. The method and apparatus of the present invention utilizes multiple user interfaces which are established for selected func-tions within a multiple RO9-91-005 3 2~927 function application and stored within a data processing system. ~ach of the multiple user interfaces preferably has a different level of complexity. User pro~iles for selected users within the data processing system are then utillzed to specify desired levels of complexity for particular functions for each selected user. Thereafter, these user profiles are utilized to select a particular one of the multiple user interfaces within a multiple function application in response to a selection of a particular function by a user. In one depicted embodiment of the present invention a user may selectively alter a user profile or alternatively, the user profile may be automatically altered by the occurrence of a selected event, such as the lapse of a selected period of time or the completion of an educational course by a user. In either event a default user interface is also provided for utilization in situations wherein a user profile does not specify a desired level of complexity for a selected function. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
The novel features believed characteristic of the invention are set forth in the appended claims. The invention itself however, as well as a preferred mode of use, further objects and advantages thereof, will best be understood by reference to the following detailed description of an illustrative embodiment when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Figure 1 is a pictorial representation of a data processing system which may be utilized to implement the method and apparatus of the present invention;
Figure 2 is a pictorial representation of a comptuer display depicting a user profile which may be utilized to implement the method and apparatus of the present invention;
Figure 3 is a pictorial representation of a computer display depicting the modification of a portion of a user profile which may be utilized to implement the method and apparatus of the present invention;
Figure 4 is a logic flow chart illus-trating the creation/modification of a user profile which may be utilized to implement the method and apparatus of the present invention;
Figure 5 is a logic flow chart illustrating the automatic modification of a user profile which may be utilized to implement the method and apparatus of the present invention; and Figure 6 is a logic flow chart illustrating the establishment of a variable complexity user interface in accordance with the method and apparatus of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
With reference now to the figures and in particular with reference to Figure 1, there is depicted a pictorial representation of a data processing system 10 which may be utilized to implement the method and apparatus of the present invention. As illustrated, data processing system 10 includes a display device 12 which is utilized to create a video output on display screen 14. Display device 12 is preferably coupled to processor 16 which, as those skilled in the art of computer devices will appreciate, preferably includes a microprocessor 18 and memory storage 20. Coupled to processor 16 is keyboard 22 which is utilized, in accordance with the illustrated embodiment of the present invention, to permit a user to selectively alter a user profile in a manner which will be explained in greater detail herein.
Upon reference to the specification contained herein, those skilled in the art will appreciate that data processing system 10 may be implemented utilizing a so-called "personal" computer such as the PS/2~ personal computer manufactured by International Business Machines Corporation of Armonk, New ~ork. Alternatively, data processing system 10 may be implemented utilizing a larger computer such as the mid-range AS/400~ computer manufactured by International Business Machines Corporation or any of a number of suitable large mainframe computers. The method R09-91-005 5 20~9927 and apparatus of the present invention may be utilized to implement an enhanced user interface in conjunction with any data processing system having a multiple function application resident therein.
Referring now to Figure :~, there is depicted a pictorial representation of a computer display screen 14 depicting a user profile which may be utilized to implement the method and apparatus of the present invention. As is illustrated, the user profile includes a list of functions under function column 32 and an assistance level for each function under assistance leveL column 34. In this manner, a user may identify a particular function within a multiple function application and specify a level of complexity or assistance level which that user desires with respect to that particular function.
Further, as illustrated in Figure 2, the user may specify a user profile assistance level default at entry point 36 and a system default at entry point 38. In this manner, in the event that a user profile does not specify a desired level of complexity or assistance level for a particular function, the method of the present invention first attempts to determine whether or not the user profile specifies a default level for that user.
For example, a user may specify a default level of intermediate complexity for all functions not explicitly set forth within the user profile. In this manner the user is not required to physically enter a desired level of complexity for a large number of the functions specified.
Further, the entire system may have a default level such as "BASIC" which will be utilized in the event no user profile or user profile assistance level default exists for a particular user or for a particular function. Further, as illustrated in the user profile depicted within computer display screen 14, a user may specify that the system level default is to be utilized in the event the user profile does not specify a desired level of complexity for a particular function.
R09-91-005 205~27 Referring now to Figure 3, there is depicted a pictorial representation of a computer display screen 14 depicting the modification of a user profile which may be utilized to implement the method and apparatus of the present invention. As illustrated, computer display screen 14 may be utilized to depict a user profile associated with a particular function of a multiple function computer application. Function identifier 24 is preferably utilized in conj~mction with the user profile depicted within disp lay screen 14 to identify the particular function for which a desired level of complexity is specified.
Also depicted within computer display screen 14 is assistance level window 26. Assistance level window 26 is utilized, in accordance with the method and apparatus of the present invention, to permit a user to identify the current level of assistance, or complexity specified for the function identified within function identifier 24. As illustrated within current level identifier 28, the "basic"
level interface has been selected for the function identified by function identifier 24. Also depicted within assistance level window 26 is selected level identifier 30, which permits a user to type in, via keyboard 22 (see Figure 1), a desired level of complexity for the function identified within function identifier 24.
As illustrated, a user may select a basic level of complexity, an intermediate level of complexity or an advanced level of complexity for the function identified in function identifier 24. Thus, upon reference to the foregoing those skilled in the art will appreciate that the user profile depicted within Figure 2 may be utilized by a user to specify a desired level of complexity for each of a plurality of functions within a complex computer application having multiple functions associated therewith. In this manner, a user having a great deal of expertise with regard to one function may select the most complex level of interface for that function while specifying a less complex level of interface for those functions for which the user has less expertise.
20~927 With reference now to Figure 4, there is depicted a logic flow chart which illustrates the creation/modification of a user profile such as the user profile depicted within Figure 3. As illustrated, the process begins at block 40 and thereafter passes to block 42 which depicts the identification of a selec-ted function from a multiple function software application. Next, ~he process passes to block ~4 which illustrates the selection of the user profile for the user in question with respect to the identified function.
After selecting a user profile for the user in question and identifying the selected function from those functions contained within the multiple function application, block 46 next illustrates the creation/modification of the user profile. As illustrated in Figure 3, this step permits the user to specify or modify the level of assistance requested for a particular function.
That is, the level of complexity to be utilized in the interface between the user and the selected function. Next, the process passes to block 48 which illustrates the storing o the user profile within data processing system 10 (see F~ure ~) and the process -thereafter terminates, as illustrated in block 50.
Referring now to Figure 5, there is depicted a lo~ic flow chart which illustrates the automatic modification of a user profile in a manner which may be utilized to implement the method and apparatus of the present invention. As above, the process begins at block 60 and thereafter passes to block 62 which illustrates a determination of whether or not a selected event has occurred. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that by "selected event" what is meant is any event which may be characterized by the user and utilized to automatically modify a user profile such that the level of complexity of a user interface selected for a particular function may be modified.
For example, a system may be implemented which permits the user interface selected by a particular user for ROg-gl-005 20~9927 a selected function within a multiple function application to increase in complexity following the lapse of a selected period of time. ~hat is, after the user has utilized the application for a selected period of time the complexity of the interface between the user and a selected function within the application may be automatically increased in complexity in recognition of the increased amount of experience which the user has accumulated with regard to that function. Additionally, the entry of an indication of educational accomplishment with regard to a particular function in the personnel file of a particular user may also, in accordance with the spirit and intent of the present application, be utilized to automatically modify the level of complexity of an interface selected by a user for a particular function.
In either case, block 62 illustrates a determination of whether or not an event has occurred which may be utilized to initiate the modification of a user profile in accordance with the method and apparatus of the present invention. Until such time as an event does occur, the process merely iterates, as illustrated at block 62.
However, after an event has occurred which has been designated by a user or the system operator as an event which precipitates the automatic modification of a user profile, the process then passes to block 64 which illustrates the selecting of -the user profile for the function and user in question. Thereafter, block 66 illustrates the modification of the user profile in the manner specified in association with the event which has occurred. Finally, the modified profile is then stored within data processing system 10 (see Figure 1) as depicted in block 68 and the process again terminates, as illustrated in block 70.
Finally, with reference to Figure 6, there is depicted a logic flow chart which illustrates the establishment of a variable complexity user interface in accordance with the method and apparatus of the present invention. As above, the process begins at block 80 and thereafter passes to block 82 which depicts a determination R09-91-005 9 2~9927 of whether or not a function within the multiple function application has been selected by a user. If not, the process merely iterates until such time as a particular function has been selected b~ the user. After a function has been selected, the process passes to block 84.
Block 84 illustrates a determination of whether of not an override has been selected by the user. By "override" what is meant is whether or not the user has explicitly selected a particular level of complexity for a desired user interface. By providing an override capability the method and apparatus of the present invention permit a user to temporarily specify a different level of complexity for a user interface than the level which is specified within his or her user profile. By utilizing the override approach a user may be permitted to temporarily view a different user interface having a differing level of complexity without explicitly changing the desired level of complexity for that function within his or her user profile.
If the override function has been selected, as determined in block 84, the process passes to block 90 which illustrates the accessing of the desired user interface at the selected level. Thereafter, the selected interface is utilized to couple that user to that function within the multiple function application, as illustrated in block 94.
The process then terminates, as depicted in block 96. Of course, those skilled in the art will appreciate that an override function may be selected at any point during the process without departing from the spirit and intent of the present invention. Referring again to block 84, in the event the override function has not been selected, the process then passes to block 86. Block 86 illustrates the retrieval of the user profile for the user in question and for the selected function.
After retrieving the user profile for the selected function, as illustrated in block 86, the process passes to block 88 which depict.s the determination of whether or not the assistance level for the function in question is listed within the user profile. That is, the level of complexity R09-91-005 ]o 20~9927 which the user in ~uestlon desires for an interface with that function. In the even-t the assistance level is listed, as determined within block 88, the process passes to block 90 which illustrates the retrieval of the desired user interface at the selected level of assistance.
In accordance with an important feature of the present invention, in the event an assistance level is not listed within the retrieved user profile, as determined in block 88, then the process passes to block 92 which illustrates the selection of a default interface level.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that in situations wherein multiple user interfaces are available for utilization b~ a user with regard to a selected function a default interface should be available for those instances in which the user profile does not specify a particular level of assistance for that function. Generally, the default interface level will be the most basic level of interface available for that function. That is, in the depicted embodiment of the present invention, the level of interface having the least number of options presented to the user when utilizing the function in ~uestion. Of course, the intermediate and expert levels of interface will, in accordance with the method of the present invention, present increased numbers of options to the user for dealing with the selected function. Thus, an expert level of interface selected by a user for a particular function will present to that user a maximum number of options for activities with regard to the selected function. Further, an expert level of interface may only present options without additional textual information in order to allow space for additional list entries in a highly complex interface.
After selecting a default level of interface in accordance With a predetermined default setting, the process then passes from block 9~ to block 94, which illustrates the interfacing of the user and function at the selected level of assistance. That is, either the default interface level or the interface level which is determined in accordance with the user profile. Thereafter, the process again terminates, as depicted in block 96.
20~92~
Upon reference to the foregoing, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the Applicants herein have created a variable complexity user interface system wherein the level of complexity of a user interface between the user and an application may be varied in response to the function selected and to a level either determined by the user or automatically modified by the system. In this manner, a user utilizing a complex software application, such as an integrated accounting package, may specify an expert level of skill with regard to data entry or data manipulation while requiring a basic level of assistance for the interface with regard to file origination or manipulation, functions which are rarely utilized by selected individuals.
While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to a preferred embodiment, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
The design of modern state-of-the-art computer systems devotes much effort to enhancing the efficiency of the interface between man and machine. So-called "user interfaces" must be sufficiently .simple or intuitive to permit relatively unskilled users to utilize complex so~tware applications, yet these user interfaces must be complete enough to allow skilled users to access the multitude of features which modern applications typically provide. Often a designer must simply compromise and provide an interface which represents a less than optimal solution to both of these problems.
One example of a known solution to this problem is exhibited in many game or entertainment applications in which a user may select a "beginner," "intermediate," or "expert" level of play wherein the speed, complexity and skill level of a selected game may be permanently altered for the duration of an entire game or sequence. While this approach permits users of varying skill levels to enjoy a s.ingle game it does not recognize that a user may have differing skill levels for different aspects of a game or entertainment appl.ication. No provision e~ists in such R09-91-005 2 2~ ~ 99 27 systems for accommodating a user having expert level skill in one aspect and beginner level skill in another aspect of the game or entertainment application.
A similar approach which may be utilized in conjunction with productivity software, such as word processing, is disclosed in U.S. Ratent No. 4,821,211, issued to Robert J. Torres and assigned to the assignee herein. This patent allows a user designated as an "expert"
to omit unnecessary intermediate steps for all functions within the application. For example, menu solutions may not be displayed for users who are expected to recall all available functions at selected locations within the application. As above, the method disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 4,821,211 contains I10 provision for accommodating a user having varying levels of skills for different functions within a multiple function application.
It should therefore be apparent that a need exists for a method and apparatus which allows variable complexity user interfaces to be established for different functions within a multiple function application. SUMMARY OF THE
INVENTION
It is therefore one object of the present invention to provide an improved data processing system.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an enhanced user interface for utilization with a data processing system.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide an enhanced user interace which permits the automatic selection of variable complexity user interfaces for selected functions within a multiple function application.
The foregoing objects are achieved as is now described. The method and apparatus of the present invention utilizes multiple user interfaces which are established for selected func-tions within a multiple RO9-91-005 3 2~927 function application and stored within a data processing system. ~ach of the multiple user interfaces preferably has a different level of complexity. User pro~iles for selected users within the data processing system are then utillzed to specify desired levels of complexity for particular functions for each selected user. Thereafter, these user profiles are utilized to select a particular one of the multiple user interfaces within a multiple function application in response to a selection of a particular function by a user. In one depicted embodiment of the present invention a user may selectively alter a user profile or alternatively, the user profile may be automatically altered by the occurrence of a selected event, such as the lapse of a selected period of time or the completion of an educational course by a user. In either event a default user interface is also provided for utilization in situations wherein a user profile does not specify a desired level of complexity for a selected function. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
The novel features believed characteristic of the invention are set forth in the appended claims. The invention itself however, as well as a preferred mode of use, further objects and advantages thereof, will best be understood by reference to the following detailed description of an illustrative embodiment when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Figure 1 is a pictorial representation of a data processing system which may be utilized to implement the method and apparatus of the present invention;
Figure 2 is a pictorial representation of a comptuer display depicting a user profile which may be utilized to implement the method and apparatus of the present invention;
Figure 3 is a pictorial representation of a computer display depicting the modification of a portion of a user profile which may be utilized to implement the method and apparatus of the present invention;
Figure 4 is a logic flow chart illus-trating the creation/modification of a user profile which may be utilized to implement the method and apparatus of the present invention;
Figure 5 is a logic flow chart illustrating the automatic modification of a user profile which may be utilized to implement the method and apparatus of the present invention; and Figure 6 is a logic flow chart illustrating the establishment of a variable complexity user interface in accordance with the method and apparatus of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
With reference now to the figures and in particular with reference to Figure 1, there is depicted a pictorial representation of a data processing system 10 which may be utilized to implement the method and apparatus of the present invention. As illustrated, data processing system 10 includes a display device 12 which is utilized to create a video output on display screen 14. Display device 12 is preferably coupled to processor 16 which, as those skilled in the art of computer devices will appreciate, preferably includes a microprocessor 18 and memory storage 20. Coupled to processor 16 is keyboard 22 which is utilized, in accordance with the illustrated embodiment of the present invention, to permit a user to selectively alter a user profile in a manner which will be explained in greater detail herein.
Upon reference to the specification contained herein, those skilled in the art will appreciate that data processing system 10 may be implemented utilizing a so-called "personal" computer such as the PS/2~ personal computer manufactured by International Business Machines Corporation of Armonk, New ~ork. Alternatively, data processing system 10 may be implemented utilizing a larger computer such as the mid-range AS/400~ computer manufactured by International Business Machines Corporation or any of a number of suitable large mainframe computers. The method R09-91-005 5 20~9927 and apparatus of the present invention may be utilized to implement an enhanced user interface in conjunction with any data processing system having a multiple function application resident therein.
Referring now to Figure :~, there is depicted a pictorial representation of a computer display screen 14 depicting a user profile which may be utilized to implement the method and apparatus of the present invention. As is illustrated, the user profile includes a list of functions under function column 32 and an assistance level for each function under assistance leveL column 34. In this manner, a user may identify a particular function within a multiple function application and specify a level of complexity or assistance level which that user desires with respect to that particular function.
Further, as illustrated in Figure 2, the user may specify a user profile assistance level default at entry point 36 and a system default at entry point 38. In this manner, in the event that a user profile does not specify a desired level of complexity or assistance level for a particular function, the method of the present invention first attempts to determine whether or not the user profile specifies a default level for that user.
For example, a user may specify a default level of intermediate complexity for all functions not explicitly set forth within the user profile. In this manner the user is not required to physically enter a desired level of complexity for a large number of the functions specified.
Further, the entire system may have a default level such as "BASIC" which will be utilized in the event no user profile or user profile assistance level default exists for a particular user or for a particular function. Further, as illustrated in the user profile depicted within computer display screen 14, a user may specify that the system level default is to be utilized in the event the user profile does not specify a desired level of complexity for a particular function.
R09-91-005 205~27 Referring now to Figure 3, there is depicted a pictorial representation of a computer display screen 14 depicting the modification of a user profile which may be utilized to implement the method and apparatus of the present invention. As illustrated, computer display screen 14 may be utilized to depict a user profile associated with a particular function of a multiple function computer application. Function identifier 24 is preferably utilized in conj~mction with the user profile depicted within disp lay screen 14 to identify the particular function for which a desired level of complexity is specified.
Also depicted within computer display screen 14 is assistance level window 26. Assistance level window 26 is utilized, in accordance with the method and apparatus of the present invention, to permit a user to identify the current level of assistance, or complexity specified for the function identified within function identifier 24. As illustrated within current level identifier 28, the "basic"
level interface has been selected for the function identified by function identifier 24. Also depicted within assistance level window 26 is selected level identifier 30, which permits a user to type in, via keyboard 22 (see Figure 1), a desired level of complexity for the function identified within function identifier 24.
As illustrated, a user may select a basic level of complexity, an intermediate level of complexity or an advanced level of complexity for the function identified in function identifier 24. Thus, upon reference to the foregoing those skilled in the art will appreciate that the user profile depicted within Figure 2 may be utilized by a user to specify a desired level of complexity for each of a plurality of functions within a complex computer application having multiple functions associated therewith. In this manner, a user having a great deal of expertise with regard to one function may select the most complex level of interface for that function while specifying a less complex level of interface for those functions for which the user has less expertise.
20~927 With reference now to Figure 4, there is depicted a logic flow chart which illustrates the creation/modification of a user profile such as the user profile depicted within Figure 3. As illustrated, the process begins at block 40 and thereafter passes to block 42 which depicts the identification of a selec-ted function from a multiple function software application. Next, ~he process passes to block ~4 which illustrates the selection of the user profile for the user in question with respect to the identified function.
After selecting a user profile for the user in question and identifying the selected function from those functions contained within the multiple function application, block 46 next illustrates the creation/modification of the user profile. As illustrated in Figure 3, this step permits the user to specify or modify the level of assistance requested for a particular function.
That is, the level of complexity to be utilized in the interface between the user and the selected function. Next, the process passes to block 48 which illustrates the storing o the user profile within data processing system 10 (see F~ure ~) and the process -thereafter terminates, as illustrated in block 50.
Referring now to Figure 5, there is depicted a lo~ic flow chart which illustrates the automatic modification of a user profile in a manner which may be utilized to implement the method and apparatus of the present invention. As above, the process begins at block 60 and thereafter passes to block 62 which illustrates a determination of whether or not a selected event has occurred. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that by "selected event" what is meant is any event which may be characterized by the user and utilized to automatically modify a user profile such that the level of complexity of a user interface selected for a particular function may be modified.
For example, a system may be implemented which permits the user interface selected by a particular user for ROg-gl-005 20~9927 a selected function within a multiple function application to increase in complexity following the lapse of a selected period of time. ~hat is, after the user has utilized the application for a selected period of time the complexity of the interface between the user and a selected function within the application may be automatically increased in complexity in recognition of the increased amount of experience which the user has accumulated with regard to that function. Additionally, the entry of an indication of educational accomplishment with regard to a particular function in the personnel file of a particular user may also, in accordance with the spirit and intent of the present application, be utilized to automatically modify the level of complexity of an interface selected by a user for a particular function.
In either case, block 62 illustrates a determination of whether or not an event has occurred which may be utilized to initiate the modification of a user profile in accordance with the method and apparatus of the present invention. Until such time as an event does occur, the process merely iterates, as illustrated at block 62.
However, after an event has occurred which has been designated by a user or the system operator as an event which precipitates the automatic modification of a user profile, the process then passes to block 64 which illustrates the selecting of -the user profile for the function and user in question. Thereafter, block 66 illustrates the modification of the user profile in the manner specified in association with the event which has occurred. Finally, the modified profile is then stored within data processing system 10 (see Figure 1) as depicted in block 68 and the process again terminates, as illustrated in block 70.
Finally, with reference to Figure 6, there is depicted a logic flow chart which illustrates the establishment of a variable complexity user interface in accordance with the method and apparatus of the present invention. As above, the process begins at block 80 and thereafter passes to block 82 which depicts a determination R09-91-005 9 2~9927 of whether or not a function within the multiple function application has been selected by a user. If not, the process merely iterates until such time as a particular function has been selected b~ the user. After a function has been selected, the process passes to block 84.
Block 84 illustrates a determination of whether of not an override has been selected by the user. By "override" what is meant is whether or not the user has explicitly selected a particular level of complexity for a desired user interface. By providing an override capability the method and apparatus of the present invention permit a user to temporarily specify a different level of complexity for a user interface than the level which is specified within his or her user profile. By utilizing the override approach a user may be permitted to temporarily view a different user interface having a differing level of complexity without explicitly changing the desired level of complexity for that function within his or her user profile.
If the override function has been selected, as determined in block 84, the process passes to block 90 which illustrates the accessing of the desired user interface at the selected level. Thereafter, the selected interface is utilized to couple that user to that function within the multiple function application, as illustrated in block 94.
The process then terminates, as depicted in block 96. Of course, those skilled in the art will appreciate that an override function may be selected at any point during the process without departing from the spirit and intent of the present invention. Referring again to block 84, in the event the override function has not been selected, the process then passes to block 86. Block 86 illustrates the retrieval of the user profile for the user in question and for the selected function.
After retrieving the user profile for the selected function, as illustrated in block 86, the process passes to block 88 which depict.s the determination of whether or not the assistance level for the function in question is listed within the user profile. That is, the level of complexity R09-91-005 ]o 20~9927 which the user in ~uestlon desires for an interface with that function. In the even-t the assistance level is listed, as determined within block 88, the process passes to block 90 which illustrates the retrieval of the desired user interface at the selected level of assistance.
In accordance with an important feature of the present invention, in the event an assistance level is not listed within the retrieved user profile, as determined in block 88, then the process passes to block 92 which illustrates the selection of a default interface level.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that in situations wherein multiple user interfaces are available for utilization b~ a user with regard to a selected function a default interface should be available for those instances in which the user profile does not specify a particular level of assistance for that function. Generally, the default interface level will be the most basic level of interface available for that function. That is, in the depicted embodiment of the present invention, the level of interface having the least number of options presented to the user when utilizing the function in ~uestion. Of course, the intermediate and expert levels of interface will, in accordance with the method of the present invention, present increased numbers of options to the user for dealing with the selected function. Thus, an expert level of interface selected by a user for a particular function will present to that user a maximum number of options for activities with regard to the selected function. Further, an expert level of interface may only present options without additional textual information in order to allow space for additional list entries in a highly complex interface.
After selecting a default level of interface in accordance With a predetermined default setting, the process then passes from block 9~ to block 94, which illustrates the interfacing of the user and function at the selected level of assistance. That is, either the default interface level or the interface level which is determined in accordance with the user profile. Thereafter, the process again terminates, as depicted in block 96.
20~92~
Upon reference to the foregoing, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the Applicants herein have created a variable complexity user interface system wherein the level of complexity of a user interface between the user and an application may be varied in response to the function selected and to a level either determined by the user or automatically modified by the system. In this manner, a user utilizing a complex software application, such as an integrated accounting package, may specify an expert level of skill with regard to data entry or data manipulation while requiring a basic level of assistance for the interface with regard to file origination or manipulation, functions which are rarely utilized by selected individuals.
While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to a preferred embodiment, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Claims (14)
1. A method in a data processing system for an enhanced user interface for use with a multiple function application.
said method comprising the steps of:
establishing multiple user interfaces for each of a plurality of functions within said multiple function application, each of said multiple user interfaces having a differing level of complexity;
creating a user profile for at least one user within said data processing system, said user profile specifying a desired level of complexity for said at least one user with respect to each of said plurality of functions within said multiple function application; and utilizing said user profile to automatically select a particular one of said multiple user interfaces for a particular function within said multiple function application in response to a selection of said particular function by said at least one user.
said method comprising the steps of:
establishing multiple user interfaces for each of a plurality of functions within said multiple function application, each of said multiple user interfaces having a differing level of complexity;
creating a user profile for at least one user within said data processing system, said user profile specifying a desired level of complexity for said at least one user with respect to each of said plurality of functions within said multiple function application; and utilizing said user profile to automatically select a particular one of said multiple user interfaces for a particular function within said multiple function application in response to a selection of said particular function by said at least one user.
2. The method in a data processing system for an enhanced user interface for use with a multiple function application according to Claim 1, further including the step of permitting a user to selectively alter said user profile.
3. The method in a data processing system for an enhanced user interface for use with a multiple function application according to Claim 1, further including the step of automatically altering said user profile in response to an occurrence of a selected event.
4. The method in a data processing system for an enhanced user interface for use with a multiple function application according to Claim 1, further including the step of automatically selecting a default user interface from said multiple user interfaces in response to a failure of said user profile to specify a level of complexity for a particular function in response to a selection of said particular function by said at least one user.
5. The method in a data processing system for an enhanced user interface for use with a multiple function application according to Claim 1, further including the step of storing said user profile within said data processing system.
6. The method in a data processing system for an enhanced user interface for use with a multiple function application according to Claim 1, wherein said multiple user interfaces include at least one basic user interface having a minimum number of options associated therewith.
7. The method in a data processing system for an enhanced user interface for use with a multiple function application according to Claim 1, wherein said multiple user interfaces include at least one advanced user interface having a maximum number of options associated therewith.
8. The method in a data processing system for an enhanced user interface for use with a multiple function application according to Claim 1, further including the step of temporarily selecting a particular one of said multiple user interfaces in response to a request from said at least one user.
9. A data processing system having an enhanced user interface for use with a multiple function application, said data processing system comprising:
memory means;
multiple user interfaces stored within said memory means for each of a plurality of functions within said multiple function application, each of said multiple user interfaces having a differing level of complexity;
a user profile stored within said memory means for at least one user within said data processing system, said user profiles specifying a desired level of complexity for said at least one user with respect to each of said plurality of functions within said multiple function application; and control means for accessing and utilizing said user profile to automatically select a particular one of said multiple user interfaces for a particular function within said multiple function application in response to a selection of said particular function by said at least one user.
memory means;
multiple user interfaces stored within said memory means for each of a plurality of functions within said multiple function application, each of said multiple user interfaces having a differing level of complexity;
a user profile stored within said memory means for at least one user within said data processing system, said user profiles specifying a desired level of complexity for said at least one user with respect to each of said plurality of functions within said multiple function application; and control means for accessing and utilizing said user profile to automatically select a particular one of said multiple user interfaces for a particular function within said multiple function application in response to a selection of said particular function by said at least one user.
10. The data processing system having an enhanced user interface for use with a multiple function application according to Claim 9, further including operator input means for permitting a user to selectively alter said user profile.
11. The data processing system having an enhanced user interface for use with a multiple function application according to Claim 9, wherein said control means includes means for automatically altering said user profile in response to an occurrence of a selected event.
12. The data processing system having an enhanced user interface for use with a multiple function application according to Claim 9, wherein said control means includes means for selecting a default user interface from said multiple user interface in response to a failure of said user profile to specify a level of complexity for a particular function in response to a selection of said particular function by said at least one user.
13. The data processing system having an enhanced user interface for use with a multiple function application according to Claim 9, wherein said multiple user interfaces include at least one basic user interface having a minimum number of options associated therewith.
14. The data processing system having an enhanced user interface for use with a multiple function application according to Claim 13, wherein said multiple user interfaces include at least one advance user interface having a maximum number of options associated therewith.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US655,870 | 1991-02-14 | ||
| US07/655,870 US5535321A (en) | 1991-02-14 | 1991-02-14 | Method and apparatus for variable complexity user interface in a data processing system |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2059927A1 true CA2059927A1 (en) | 1992-08-15 |
Family
ID=24630723
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002059927A Abandoned CA2059927A1 (en) | 1991-02-14 | 1992-01-23 | Method and apparatus for variable complexity user interface in a data processing system |
Country Status (4)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US5535321A (en) |
| EP (1) | EP0499567A3 (en) |
| JP (1) | JP3014842B2 (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2059927A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (103)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US6418424B1 (en) | 1991-12-23 | 2002-07-09 | Steven M. Hoffberg | Ergonomic man-machine interface incorporating adaptive pattern recognition based control system |
| US10361802B1 (en) | 1999-02-01 | 2019-07-23 | Blanding Hovenweep, Llc | Adaptive pattern recognition based control system and method |
| US6400996B1 (en) | 1999-02-01 | 2002-06-04 | Steven M. Hoffberg | Adaptive pattern recognition based control system and method |
| US6850252B1 (en) | 1999-10-05 | 2005-02-01 | Steven M. Hoffberg | Intelligent electronic appliance system and method |
| US8352400B2 (en) | 1991-12-23 | 2013-01-08 | Hoffberg Steven M | Adaptive pattern recognition based controller apparatus and method and human-factored interface therefore |
| US5903454A (en) | 1991-12-23 | 1999-05-11 | Hoffberg; Linda Irene | Human-factored interface corporating adaptive pattern recognition based controller apparatus |
| GB2271004A (en) * | 1992-09-28 | 1994-03-30 | Ford Motor Co | Expert system for diagnosing machines. |
| JP2543324B2 (en) * | 1993-03-23 | 1996-10-16 | インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレイション | Method and computer system for presenting the function of computer application software to a user |
| US5767848A (en) * | 1994-12-13 | 1998-06-16 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Development support system |
| US5799292A (en) * | 1994-04-29 | 1998-08-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | Adaptive hypermedia presentation method and system |
| DE69519205T2 (en) * | 1994-07-22 | 2001-05-23 | Koninkl Kpn Nv | Method for creating connections in a communication network |
| US6578019B1 (en) | 1994-11-08 | 2003-06-10 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Information processing system which understands information and acts accordingly and method therefor |
| JP3488525B2 (en) * | 1994-12-13 | 2004-01-19 | 富士通株式会社 | Help screen display method and help screen display device |
| US5539451A (en) * | 1994-12-27 | 1996-07-23 | At&T Corp. | Method and apparatus for channel spinning off a channel |
| US5710884A (en) * | 1995-03-29 | 1998-01-20 | Intel Corporation | System for automatically updating personal profile server with updates to additional user information gathered from monitoring user's electronic consuming habits generated on computer during use |
| US5799298A (en) * | 1995-08-07 | 1998-08-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method of indirect specification of user preferences |
| US5805118A (en) * | 1995-12-22 | 1998-09-08 | Research Foundation Of The State Of New York | Display protocol specification with session configuration and multiple monitors |
| US6021403A (en) * | 1996-07-19 | 2000-02-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Intelligent user assistance facility |
| JP3755204B2 (en) * | 1996-09-20 | 2006-03-15 | カシオ計算機株式会社 | COMMUNICATION DEVICE, COMMUNICATION CONTROL METHOD, AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM |
| US8745493B2 (en) * | 1996-10-25 | 2014-06-03 | Karen A. McKirchy | Method and apparatus for providing instructional help, at multiple levels of sophistication, in a learning application |
| US5950168A (en) * | 1996-12-18 | 1999-09-07 | Knowmed Systems | Collapsible flowsheet for displaying patient information in an electronic medical record |
| US6583797B1 (en) | 1997-01-21 | 2003-06-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Menu management mechanism that displays menu items based on multiple heuristic factors |
| US6003020A (en) * | 1997-10-30 | 1999-12-14 | Sapient Health Network | Intelligent profiling system |
| US6047261A (en) * | 1997-10-31 | 2000-04-04 | Ncr Corporation | Method and system for monitoring and enhancing computer-assisted performance |
| US7234118B1 (en) * | 1997-12-15 | 2007-06-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for setting parameters in a system |
| US8752010B1 (en) | 1997-12-31 | 2014-06-10 | Honeywell International Inc. | Dynamic interface synthesizer |
| US6405159B2 (en) | 1998-06-03 | 2002-06-11 | Sbc Technology Resources, Inc. | Method for categorizing, describing and modeling types of system users |
| US6345278B1 (en) * | 1998-06-04 | 2002-02-05 | Collegenet, Inc. | Universal forms engine |
| US20040199863A1 (en) * | 1998-06-04 | 2004-10-07 | Hitchcock Michael D. | Universal forms engine |
| US6882824B2 (en) | 1998-06-10 | 2005-04-19 | Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc. | Interactive teaching toy |
| US6801751B1 (en) | 1999-11-30 | 2004-10-05 | Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc. | Interactive learning appliance |
| US6389400B1 (en) | 1998-08-20 | 2002-05-14 | Sbc Technology Resources, Inc. | System and methods for intelligent routing of customer requests using customer and agent models |
| US6256664B1 (en) * | 1998-09-01 | 2001-07-03 | Bigfix, Inc. | Method and apparatus for computed relevance messaging |
| US7197534B2 (en) * | 1998-09-01 | 2007-03-27 | Big Fix, Inc. | Method and apparatus for inspecting the properties of a computer |
| US6263362B1 (en) | 1998-09-01 | 2001-07-17 | Bigfix, Inc. | Inspector for computed relevance messaging |
| US8914507B2 (en) | 1998-09-01 | 2014-12-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Advice provided for offering highly targeted advice without compromising individual privacy |
| US7246150B1 (en) | 1998-09-01 | 2007-07-17 | Bigfix, Inc. | Advice provided for offering highly targeted advice without compromising individual privacy |
| US6353885B1 (en) | 1999-01-26 | 2002-03-05 | Dell Usa, L.P. | System and method for providing bios-level user configuration of a computer system |
| US7966078B2 (en) | 1999-02-01 | 2011-06-21 | Steven Hoffberg | Network media appliance system and method |
| US7277919B1 (en) | 1999-03-19 | 2007-10-02 | Bigfix, Inc. | Relevance clause for computed relevance messaging |
| US7003729B1 (en) * | 1999-04-20 | 2006-02-21 | I2 Technologies Us, Inc. | Method and apparatus for supporting multiple alternative graphical user interfaces in computer-moderated electronic commerce |
| US7086007B1 (en) * | 1999-05-27 | 2006-08-01 | Sbc Technology Resources, Inc. | Method for integrating user models to interface design |
| AR029163A1 (en) * | 1999-06-11 | 2003-06-18 | Ods Properties Inc | SYSTEM FOR PERFORMING BETS INTERACTIVELY |
| ZA200110153B (en) * | 1999-06-11 | 2003-03-10 | Ods Properties Inc | Methods and systems for interactive wagering using multiple types of user interfaces. |
| US9640083B1 (en) | 2002-02-26 | 2017-05-02 | Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc. | Method and system for providing content for learning appliances over an electronic communication medium |
| US9520069B2 (en) * | 1999-11-30 | 2016-12-13 | Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc. | Method and system for providing content for learning appliances over an electronic communication medium |
| US6778643B1 (en) * | 2000-03-21 | 2004-08-17 | Sbc Technology Resources, Inc. | Interface and method of designing an interface |
| US20040006473A1 (en) | 2002-07-02 | 2004-01-08 | Sbc Technology Resources, Inc. | Method and system for automated categorization of statements |
| AU5005901A (en) | 2000-04-05 | 2001-10-23 | Ods Properties Inc | Systems and methods for placing parimutuel wagers on future events |
| US6837791B1 (en) * | 2000-04-05 | 2005-01-04 | Ods Properties, Inc. | Interactive wagering system with totalisator selection |
| AR033549A1 (en) * | 2000-08-07 | 2003-12-26 | Diebold Inc | AUTOMATIC MACHINE FOR BANK OPERATIONS, METHODS TO OPERATE IT AND LEGIBLE ENVIRONMENT BY COMPUTER |
| US6658562B1 (en) * | 2000-08-25 | 2003-12-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system, and program for customizing a basic input/output system (“BIOS”) configuration according to the type of user |
| US6788313B1 (en) * | 2000-09-28 | 2004-09-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for providing on line help for custom application interfaces |
| US6912493B1 (en) * | 2000-09-29 | 2005-06-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Technique for configuring processors in system with logical partitions |
| EP1215570A1 (en) * | 2000-12-13 | 2002-06-19 | Pentap Technologies AG | Providing a windows-based user interface |
| US7275220B2 (en) * | 2000-12-22 | 2007-09-25 | Epic Systems Corporation | System and method for a seamless user interface for an integrated electronic health care information system |
| DE10117410B4 (en) * | 2001-04-06 | 2004-11-18 | Daimlerchrysler Ag | Method and device for outputting data about information of a motor vehicle |
| US6957435B2 (en) * | 2001-04-19 | 2005-10-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for allocating processor resources in a logically partitioned computer system |
| US6973626B1 (en) | 2001-06-22 | 2005-12-06 | I2 Technologies Us, Inc. | Automatically generating graphical user interface elements at a client system according to a current configuration model |
| US6983421B1 (en) | 2001-06-22 | 2006-01-03 | I2 Technologies Us, Inc. | Using connectors to automatically update graphical user interface elements at a client system according to an updated state of a configuration |
| US7065201B2 (en) | 2001-07-31 | 2006-06-20 | Sbc Technology Resources, Inc. | Telephone call processing in an interactive voice response call management system |
| US7251814B2 (en) * | 2001-08-24 | 2007-07-31 | International Business Machines Corporation | Yield on multithreaded processors |
| US7428485B2 (en) * | 2001-08-24 | 2008-09-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | System for yielding to a processor |
| DE10163947A1 (en) * | 2001-12-22 | 2003-07-03 | Deere & Co | On-board computer system for a work vehicle |
| US7305070B2 (en) | 2002-01-30 | 2007-12-04 | At&T Labs, Inc. | Sequential presentation of long instructions in an interactive voice response system |
| US6914975B2 (en) | 2002-02-21 | 2005-07-05 | Sbc Properties, L.P. | Interactive dialog-based training method |
| US7665024B1 (en) * | 2002-07-22 | 2010-02-16 | Verizon Services Corp. | Methods and apparatus for controlling a user interface based on the emotional state of a user |
| JP4065516B2 (en) * | 2002-10-21 | 2008-03-26 | キヤノン株式会社 | Information processing apparatus and information processing method |
| US7000051B2 (en) * | 2003-03-31 | 2006-02-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Apparatus and method for virtualizing interrupts in a logically partitioned computer system |
| US7281075B2 (en) | 2003-04-24 | 2007-10-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Virtualization of a global interrupt queue |
| US20050015728A1 (en) * | 2003-07-17 | 2005-01-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system, and program product for customizing a user interface |
| US20050054381A1 (en) * | 2003-09-05 | 2005-03-10 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Proactive user interface |
| US7430722B2 (en) * | 2003-10-02 | 2008-09-30 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Method and system for selecting skinnable interfaces for an application |
| US7027586B2 (en) * | 2003-12-18 | 2006-04-11 | Sbc Knowledge Ventures, L.P. | Intelligently routing customer communications |
| US7707499B2 (en) * | 2004-05-03 | 2010-04-27 | At&T Intellectual Property, I.L.P. | Methods, systems, and storage mediums for optimizing a device |
| US8365083B2 (en) * | 2004-06-25 | 2013-01-29 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Customizable, categorically organized graphical user interface for utilizing online and local content |
| DE102005034160A1 (en) * | 2005-07-21 | 2007-02-01 | Siemens Ag | Method for optimizing the performance of measurements |
| US20070136367A1 (en) * | 2005-11-02 | 2007-06-14 | Sourcecode Technology Holding, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for dynamically modifying a business object definition |
| US20070130138A1 (en) * | 2005-11-02 | 2007-06-07 | Sourcecode Technology Holding, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for storing a collaboratively designed workflow process |
| US20070143711A1 (en) * | 2005-11-02 | 2007-06-21 | Sourcecode Technology Holding, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for displaying a setup sequence |
| US8010940B2 (en) * | 2005-11-02 | 2011-08-30 | Sourcecode Technologies Holdings, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for designing a workflow process using inheritance |
| US20070143305A1 (en) * | 2005-11-02 | 2007-06-21 | Sourcecode Technology Holding, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for storing functions associated with an electronic form |
| US8239226B2 (en) * | 2005-11-02 | 2012-08-07 | Sourcecode Technologies Holdings, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for combining properties and methods from a plurality of different data sources |
| US8224853B2 (en) | 2005-11-02 | 2012-07-17 | Sourcecode Technologies Holdings, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for updating a plurality of data fields in an electronic form |
| EP1955201A4 (en) * | 2005-11-02 | 2011-04-20 | Sourcecode Technology Holding Inc | Methods and apparatus for processing business objects, electronic forms, and workflows |
| US7996758B2 (en) * | 2005-11-02 | 2011-08-09 | Sourcecode Technologies Holding, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for storing data associated with an electronic form |
| US20070118804A1 (en) * | 2005-11-16 | 2007-05-24 | Microsoft Corporation | Interaction model assessment, storage and distribution |
| WO2007063714A1 (en) * | 2005-11-29 | 2007-06-07 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | I/o device, i/o method, and program thereof |
| US20080092052A1 (en) * | 2006-10-12 | 2008-04-17 | Motorola, Inc. | Method and system for customizing multiple user interfaces mapped to functions |
| US20080198154A1 (en) * | 2007-02-19 | 2008-08-21 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Image processing apparatus and method for supporting operation of image processing apparatus |
| US20080227440A1 (en) | 2007-03-16 | 2008-09-18 | Vinay Kumar Chowdary Settepalli | Methods and apparatus for discovering and updating a mobile device via user behavior |
| AU2008248373A1 (en) * | 2007-05-08 | 2008-11-13 | Sourcecode Technology Holding, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for exposing workflow process definitions as business objects |
| US8314789B2 (en) * | 2007-09-26 | 2012-11-20 | Autodesk, Inc. | Navigation system for a 3D virtual scene |
| US8151192B2 (en) * | 2008-02-01 | 2012-04-03 | Microsoft Corporation | Context sensitive help |
| JP6028429B2 (en) * | 2012-07-10 | 2016-11-16 | 富士ゼロックス株式会社 | Display control apparatus, service providing apparatus, and program |
| US20140181103A1 (en) * | 2012-12-21 | 2014-06-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | Modifying a user profile |
| US10331765B2 (en) | 2013-05-24 | 2019-06-25 | Sourcecode Technology Holdings, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for translating forms to native mobile applications |
| DE102013220892A1 (en) * | 2013-10-15 | 2015-04-16 | Continental Automotive Gmbh | Device and method for a voice control system |
| US11116426B2 (en) * | 2015-12-09 | 2021-09-14 | Zoll Medical Corporation | Device administered tests and adaptive interactions |
| CN111936958A (en) * | 2018-03-27 | 2020-11-13 | 日本电信电话株式会社 | Adaptive interface providing device, adaptive interface providing method, and program |
| US11061638B2 (en) | 2019-09-17 | 2021-07-13 | The Toronto-Dominion Bank | Dynamically determining an interface for presenting information to a user |
| CN112579074A (en) * | 2019-09-29 | 2021-03-30 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | Hardware management method, terminal and storage medium |
| US11562615B2 (en) * | 2020-04-10 | 2023-01-24 | Igt | Symbol substitution system |
Family Cites Families (10)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPS61123947A (en) * | 1984-11-20 | 1986-06-11 | Fujitsu Ltd | Intelligence editing method |
| US4805134A (en) * | 1986-01-09 | 1989-02-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Electronic system for accessing graphical and textual information |
| JP2581678B2 (en) * | 1986-09-03 | 1997-02-12 | 富士通株式会社 | Data processing device |
| JPS6397130U (en) * | 1986-12-12 | 1988-06-23 | ||
| US4817018A (en) * | 1987-01-29 | 1989-03-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Electronic calendaring method which provides for automatic assignment of alternates in requested events |
| US4964077A (en) * | 1987-10-06 | 1990-10-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for automatically adjusting help information displayed in an online interactive system |
| US4821211A (en) * | 1987-11-19 | 1989-04-11 | International Business Machines Corp. | Method of navigating among program menus using a graphical menu tree |
| US5008853A (en) * | 1987-12-02 | 1991-04-16 | Xerox Corporation | Representation of collaborative multi-user activities relative to shared structured data objects in a networked workstation environment |
| JPH01307818A (en) * | 1988-06-07 | 1989-12-12 | Toshiba Corp | Conversational data display system |
| US5115501A (en) * | 1988-11-04 | 1992-05-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Procedure for automatically customizing the user interface of application programs |
-
1991
- 1991-02-14 US US07/655,870 patent/US5535321A/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
1992
- 1992-01-14 JP JP4004747A patent/JP3014842B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1992-01-23 CA CA002059927A patent/CA2059927A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 1992-01-28 EP EP19920480014 patent/EP0499567A3/en not_active Withdrawn
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| EP0499567A2 (en) | 1992-08-19 |
| US5535321A (en) | 1996-07-09 |
| EP0499567A3 (en) | 1993-06-02 |
| JPH0540560A (en) | 1993-02-19 |
| JP3014842B2 (en) | 2000-02-28 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US5535321A (en) | Method and apparatus for variable complexity user interface in a data processing system | |
| EP3792797B1 (en) | Apparatus amd method for configuring access to applications | |
| US11687212B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for managing digital media content | |
| CN1329798C (en) | System and method for managing software application programme in figure user interface | |
| US6208339B1 (en) | User-interactive data entry display system with entry fields having distinctive and changeable autocomplete | |
| JP3365706B2 (en) | Computer system with graphical interface | |
| CA2060983C (en) | Hypertext marker and method for dynamically displaying help information in an interactive data processing system | |
| US5726688A (en) | Predictive, adaptive computer interface | |
| US5592609A (en) | Video game/videographics program fabricating system and method with unit based program processing | |
| US5241624A (en) | Method for determining a user selected group of data objects for the propagation of attribute values | |
| US6115036A (en) | Video game/videographics program editing apparatus with program halt and data transfer features | |
| EP0590759B1 (en) | System and method for locating video segment boundaries | |
| EP0709771B1 (en) | Videographics program/video game editing system and method | |
| US6681343B1 (en) | Debugging device and method as well as storage medium | |
| US20060248474A1 (en) | Method for displaying menu items on menu screen with improved convenience | |
| US20120206497A1 (en) | Method and Apparatus for Displaying Content | |
| CA2054479A1 (en) | Three dimensional graphic interface | |
| CN106156240A (en) | Information processing method, information processor and subscriber equipment | |
| CN106354412A (en) | Input method and device based on virtual reality equipment | |
| US20020105542A1 (en) | User identification and password field determination | |
| JPH025624A (en) | Menu processor | |
| CN112752132A (en) | Cartoon picture bullet screen display method and device, medium and electronic equipment | |
| CN110035171A (en) | Electronic equipment and auxiliary operation method | |
| Cisco | Thresholding Regimes | |
| EP4293491A1 (en) | Modifying scrolling behavior with competing constraint priorities in landscape and portrait modes |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEER | Examination request | ||
| FZDE | Discontinued |