CA2097222A1 - Particle blasting utilizing crystalline ice - Google Patents
Particle blasting utilizing crystalline iceInfo
- Publication number
- CA2097222A1 CA2097222A1 CA002097222A CA2097222A CA2097222A1 CA 2097222 A1 CA2097222 A1 CA 2097222A1 CA 002097222 A CA002097222 A CA 002097222A CA 2097222 A CA2097222 A CA 2097222A CA 2097222 A1 CA2097222 A1 CA 2097222A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- particles
- ice
- blast
- ice particles
- air
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
- B24C—ABRASIVE OR RELATED BLASTING WITH PARTICULATE MATERIAL
- B24C1/00—Methods for use of abrasive blasting for producing particular effects; Use of auxiliary equipment in connection with such methods
- B24C1/08—Methods for use of abrasive blasting for producing particular effects; Use of auxiliary equipment in connection with such methods for polishing surfaces, e.g. smoothing a surface by making use of liquid-borne abrasives
- B24C1/086—Descaling; Removing coating films
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
- B24C—ABRASIVE OR RELATED BLASTING WITH PARTICULATE MATERIAL
- B24C1/00—Methods for use of abrasive blasting for producing particular effects; Use of auxiliary equipment in connection with such methods
- B24C1/003—Methods for use of abrasive blasting for producing particular effects; Use of auxiliary equipment in connection with such methods using material which dissolves or changes phase after the treatment, e.g. ice, CO2
Abstract
ABSTRACT
The invention relates to an improved method and apparatus for particle blasting utilizing crystalline ice. A theory of impact erosion is presented, as opposed to conventional abrasive techniques, which allows for the development ofice blast conditions to achieve a maximum efficiency for surface cleaning and coating removal applications. By impacting a surface with ice particles which have been treated to bring their temperature near the melting point of ice. Erosion is effected by a rupture process caused by the well known reaction-force. It hasbeen found that warming of the ice particles can be realized by using the warm blast air taken from a high pressure compressor.
The invention relates to an improved method and apparatus for particle blasting utilizing crystalline ice. A theory of impact erosion is presented, as opposed to conventional abrasive techniques, which allows for the development ofice blast conditions to achieve a maximum efficiency for surface cleaning and coating removal applications. By impacting a surface with ice particles which have been treated to bring their temperature near the melting point of ice. Erosion is effected by a rupture process caused by the well known reaction-force. It hasbeen found that warming of the ice particles can be realized by using the warm blast air taken from a high pressure compressor.
Description
PARTICLE BLASTING UTILIZING CRYSTALLINE ICE
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to pa;ticle blast tecnnology and, more particularly, S to a method and apparatus for particle blasting utilizing crystalline ice particles.
Pa;ticle blast technology is well known and well used in industrial processes as a means for cleansing surfaces. Blast particle media include sand, grit, steel shots, nut shells, glass, plastic, corn starch, etc. These materialsgenerally effect cleaning and surface preparation through an abrasive process 10 wherein particles are projected by an air stream at a target surface resulting in surface erosion. However, abrasive processes are not practical or useful in certain applications as the degree of surface erosion effected is difficult to control and the occurrence of unintentional damage to the target surface may result. Also, a large amount of dust is typically generated producing a hazardous and unfriendly 15 working environment, both for the humans and for machinery.
In view of .~he above-mentioned deficiencies, alternative solid particle media have been proposed. In one variation of the technology, dry-ice (solid carbon dioxide) is pelletized into particles and used as the blast medium. On impact subli nation occurs and no dust is generated. Furtherrnore, such pellets are 20 relatively soft and, thus, do not tend to damage the surface to be cleaned under normal operating conditions. One drawback of this approach is that sublimation of dry ice results in the formation of a smoke-like vapor so that the object to be cleaned cannot 'oe seen and consequently the cleaning procedure is adversely affected. Another consideration would be the relatively high cost representative25 of this particular blast medium. Examples of dry ice blast equipment are provided in U.S. Patents 4,389,820 and 5,203,794.
A further variation provides the use of crystalline ice particles for effecting surface cleaning. Descriptions of various methods and apparatuses employing ice particles as the blast medium can be found in PCT patent application CA90/00174 30 entitled "Particle Blast Cleaning and Treating of Surfaces", publicati~n number WO90/14927 and publication date December 13, 1990; PCT patent application CA90/00291 entitled "Apparatus for Preparing, Classifying and Metering Particle Media", publication number WO91/04449 and publication date April 4,1991; and British patent application 2,171,624A published September 3, 1986. Crystalline ice particles are considered an inexpensive and fairly non-abrasive blast mediumS which lends itself to dust-free surface cleaning and coating removal, and facilitates cleanup and waste management. However, the cleaning efficiency of an ice blasting method is low relative to the abrasive techniques previously mentioned.It is generally believed that production of ice particles with sharp edges and utilizing low temperatures to enhance the hardness and strength of the particles are factors that contribute to improved abrasiveness and therefore effectiveness of this blast medium. Enhancement of ice particle hardness is achieved in conventional devices by incorporating an air cooling unit in order to cool the blast air projecting the particles. Overheads associated with this air cooling unit provide additional cost, weight and size to the blasting apparatus, along with increasing the overall power consumption of the device.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It i8 an object of the invention to provide an improved method and apparatus for particle blasting utilizing crystalline ice particles.
It is another object of the invention to increase the effectiveness of low temperature particles, in particular ice particles as a blast medium.
It is yet another object of the invention to provide an apparatus employing crystalline ice pardcles as the blast medium with reduced cost and more power efficiency than conventional devices.
Therefore, in accordance with one aspect of the invention, there is provided 2S a blasting process for cleaning or decoadng a surface comprising, propelling ice particles at the surface, the particles having a temperature near their melting point.
According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided a blasting proces8 for cleaning or decoating a surface comprising, propelling ice particles at the surface by warm blasting air.
According to a further aspect of the invention, there is provided a blasting apparatus for cleaning or decoating a surface comprising:
i) ice supply means for supplying ice particles;
ii) fluidizing means for providing a fluidized flow of the ice particles entrained in cold dry air;
iii) conveying means for transporting the fluidized flow to a blast S nozzle; and iv) warm blast air means connected to the blast nozzle for propelling the ice particles of the fluidized flow at the surface.
The inventors of the present invention have done extensive research in the area of blast technology in order to better understand the phenomenon of ice particle induced erosion. It has been discovered that under certain blast conditions, much more erosion of the target surface can be achieved than that expected from the hardness or abrasiveness of the ice particles. Under ~ese conditions, very tough coatings such as marine enamel or polyurethane can be readily removed by ice blasting. The inventors have realized a theory of impact erosion by relatively non-abrasive particles with the underlying principle of Sir Isaac Newton's third law of motion, namely to every action there is always opposed and equal reaction. This theory allows for the development of ice blast conditions to achieve a maximum efficiency for coating removal applications and for the practical implementation of ice blast processes.
A relatively non-abrasive impacting particle, regardless of being sharp or blunt, when approaching the target material at a sufficiently high speed such asthat in typical blast conditions, will cause maximum target material erosion when the approach is normal to the target surface. Target erosion does not proceed byabrasion of the impacting particles, but rather by a rupture process caused by the well-known action-reaction force. The impacting particles merely act as a means of transferring an impacting force to the target material. On impact, the particle melts or disintegrates. The impacted zone of the target material subsequently exerts an opposite reaction force away from the surface. In this way, impacting particles generate successive compression and tensile stresses on the target material to eventually cause rupture or ejection of surface material.
20~7222 Contrary to intuition and logical deduction, it has been found that improved performance in blasting is attained by utilizing high temperature air, preferably taken directly from an air compressor without further treatment as to drying andcooling, to propel ice particles at a surface. For operator comfort, a standard aftercooler may be employed. It has been further found that suitably selected ice particle size and blast air pressure, and the manner which ice particles approach the target surface, can combine to produce specific end results for surface cleaning purposes or for coating removal purposes.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
In order that the invention may be more clearly understood, an embodiment will be described with reference being made to the figures shown in the accompanying drawings, in which:
Figures lA-lD illustrate progressively the impact erosion theory in accordance with the ice blasting process of the invention.
Figure 2 illustrates diagrammatically an embodiment of an ice blasting appara~us in accordance with the invention.
Figure 3 illustrates diagrammatically an alternate embodiment of an ice blasting apparatus in accordance with the invention.
pETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The phenomenon of impact erosion will now be discussed with reference to Figures lA-lD. Conventional thinking is that abrasion is the dominant mechanism behind surface erosion, but with small ice particles at high speed abrasion is not in fact the cause of erosion at all. In actuality, erosion is effected by a rupture process whereby tensile stress acting on a surface overcomes the cohesive forces of the target material resulting in rupture. Coating removal results when tensile stress acting on a surface coating overcomes adhesive forces between the coating and the substrate. The tensile stress is a reaction force generated by the application of an impact force on the target surface.
Figure lA shows an ice particle 10 travelling towards a target surface 11 comprising a surface coating 12 and substrate 13. It is preferable that the ice particle 10 travel and thus impact the target surface 11 at a normal incidence as s a normal approach by particles causes the most efficient transfer of impact force to the surface coating 12 and substrate 13. However particles impacting the target surface 11 at any approach angle will generate an impact force, but to a lesser degree than a normal approach.
S Figure lB depicts the ice particle 10 impacting with the target surface 11.
Upon impact, the ice particle 10 deforrns while applying compressive stress to the surface coating 12. This impacting action results in the transfer of force from the ice particle 10 to the surface coating 12 and substrate 13. The target material is therefore under compressive stress.
As shown in Figure lC, the surface coating 12 reacts to the impacting force applied. The surface coating 12 is now under tensile stress from reaction forcesgenerated by the surface coating 12 along with the substrate 13 responsive to the compression force generated by an impacting particle. If the impacting particle is still present and in contact with the target surface 11 subsequent to initialimpact, it is apparent that the tensile stress generated would be applied to both the particle and surface coating 12, and may not be sufficient to overcome the adhesive bond between the surface coating 12 and the substrate 13. Thus, there is desirability to have the impacting force source removed immediately after applicadon so the reactive tensile stress will act solely on the surface coating 12 to effect disbonding. This desirability can be achieved when using crystalline ice as the source to apply the impacting force by providing a condition which facilitates rapid melting or disintegration of the particles immediately after impact with the target surface 11 This condition can be effected by using high temperature blast air to project the particles 2S Figure lD illustrates the reaction of the surface coating 12 to the tensile force applied to it, When a tensile force of su~ficient magnitude is generated, overcoming the adhesive bond between the surt`ace coating 12 and substrate 13, the result is the rupturing of the surface coating 12 in the general area where the particle first impacts the target surface 11 Once an initial surface rupture occurs, the overall integrity of the surface coating 12 in the vicinity of the rupture is adversely affected which enhances removal of the surrounding surface coating 12 from the substrate 13.
Further considerations for maximizing the reaction force generated would be the density and rate at which the ice particles impact the target surface along with the physical size of the ice particles used. It has been found that as the 5 impact density of particles increases, the performance of the ice blasting process deteriorates. Also, use of smaller particles helps to maximize impact stress on loading and also to maximize tensile stress through rapid disintegration after impact, thereby improving results.
Turning now to Figure 2, a general illustration is presented of a blasting 10 apparatus utilizing crystalline ice particles as the blast medium. The ice blasting apparatus includes a storage unit 20 containing ice particles 21 which may be continuously agitated to prevent cohesion thereof. The ice particles 21 are fed by gravity through a metering device or flow controller 22 into a transport hose 23.
The flow controller 22 permits adjustment of the rate at which ice particles enter 15 the transportation hose 23 and, therefore, act as a means for controlling thequantity of particles projected and impacting the target surface 29. A sizer device 37 may be inserted after the flow controller 22 to limit the size of the ice particles permitted to enter the transportation hose 24. Smaller particles, typically in the range of two millimeters in each direction, have been found to be most efficient20 at effecting impact erosion because they generally tend to melt once contacting the surface. Although particles which are larger or smaller are useful depending on the type of work to be performed.
The particle stream entering the transportation hose 23 is combined with low pressure compressed air 24 and this fluidized particle stream 25 flows along2S the transpo~t hose 23 to the blast nozzle 26. Since the low pressure compressed air 24 is the vehicle by which movement of the ice particles through the transportation hose 23 towards the blast nozzle 26 is effected, it is necessary for this compressed air 24 to be sufficiently cool and dry in order to minimize attrition of the fluidized particles 25 as the length of the transport hose 23 may be 30 considerable, for example, in excess of t vo hundred and fifty feet. Transport air temperature should be in the range of -5F to 15F, depending on the ambient .
temperature.
At the blast nozzle 26, the fluidized particle stream 25 is entrained by a stream of high pressure compressed air 27 producing a blast stream 28 to be directed at a target surface 29 for cleaning. Typically, the ratio of fluidizing to 5 blast air volumes is within the range of 0.005:1 to 0.25:1, with the ratio 0.15:1 normally used. The high pressure compressed air 27 should be of a suitably warm temperature such as at least ambient and preferably in the range of 70F to 130F, to facilitate rapid disintegration of the particles upon impact with the target surface 29. It has been found that superior performance of the blasting apparatus was 10 achieved by utilizing high temperature air taken directly from an air compressor, without any further treatment as to drying and special cooling, as required by conventional systems. For example, the blast air 27 produced by a high pressure air compressor may have a temperature in the order of lS0F. Once this blast air27 is mixed at the blast nozzle 26 with the fluidked ice particles 25, a blast stream 15 28 is expelled from the nozzle 26 having a temperature of approximately 60F.Such a design provides a blasdng apparatus construction which is cheaper and simpler than conventional devices. With certain constructions, a standard aftercooler may be used to slightly reduce the temperature of the air from the compressor for safety and operator comfort. Although for other instances, the 20 blast air may be cooled by the environment within which the apparatus operates and in fact, can reach ambient temperature by the time the air arrives at the blasting head.
Since the volume of warm blast air 27 is larger than that of cooled blast air, hot air taken directly from a compressor also represents a major cost benefit.
25 That is to say, this increased volume of air means there is more air available for propelling the ice particles from the nozzle 26 to achieve a greater speed than in cool air blasting devices. Observed results indicate that speed increases of up to 20% can been obtained. This is particularly relevant as faster moving particles apply a greater force on impacting the target surface generating a larger reaction 30 force, as well as facilitating particle melting or disintegration.
Other aspects of the ice blasting apparatus of the present invention that affect itS performance for cleaning and decoating surfaces are the amount of blast air pressure used, which is dependent upon the application, and the manner in which the blast stream applied. For applications such as cleaning, degreasing and S surface decontamination, compressed air of up to 130 psig is preferred.
Applications involving decoating of enamel materials, rubber seal removal or dechroming typically require blast air pressure in the range between 130 and 170psig, and decoating of polyurethane rnaterials requires air pressure from 170 tO250 psig. Furtherrnore, for decoating applications, the most effective and efficient results are obtained when the blast stream is directed essentially perpendicular, i.e.
at 90 degrees, to the target surface.
An alternate embodiment of an ice blasting apparatus is illustrated in Figure 3. In typical industrial applications, the supply of crystalline ice particles can be so arranged to effectively use gravity as a means of transporting the particles to the blast nozzle, therefore eliminating the need of cold dry low pressure compressed air for fluidizing the ice particles. Depicted is a blasting apparatus 30 positioned above a conveyor belt 31 on which the article 35 to be cleaned is transported and positioned directly beneath the nozzle 32 of the blasting apparatus 30. The storage unit 33 containing the ice particles is connected directly to the blast nozzle 32. This unit 33 is arranged in such a manner relative to the blastnozzle 32 that gravity acts to feed the ice particles to the blast nozzle 32. A
compressor providing high pressure warm air is connected to the blast nozzle 32 via an air hose 34. At the nozzle the ice particles are combined with the high pressure air producing a blast stream 36 which is directed at the article 35.
The foregoing description has been limited to specific embodiments of the invention. It will be apparent, however, that variations and modifications may be made to the invention, with the attainment of some or all of the advantages of the invention. Therefore, it is the object of the appended claims to cover all such variations and modifications as come within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to pa;ticle blast tecnnology and, more particularly, S to a method and apparatus for particle blasting utilizing crystalline ice particles.
Pa;ticle blast technology is well known and well used in industrial processes as a means for cleansing surfaces. Blast particle media include sand, grit, steel shots, nut shells, glass, plastic, corn starch, etc. These materialsgenerally effect cleaning and surface preparation through an abrasive process 10 wherein particles are projected by an air stream at a target surface resulting in surface erosion. However, abrasive processes are not practical or useful in certain applications as the degree of surface erosion effected is difficult to control and the occurrence of unintentional damage to the target surface may result. Also, a large amount of dust is typically generated producing a hazardous and unfriendly 15 working environment, both for the humans and for machinery.
In view of .~he above-mentioned deficiencies, alternative solid particle media have been proposed. In one variation of the technology, dry-ice (solid carbon dioxide) is pelletized into particles and used as the blast medium. On impact subli nation occurs and no dust is generated. Furtherrnore, such pellets are 20 relatively soft and, thus, do not tend to damage the surface to be cleaned under normal operating conditions. One drawback of this approach is that sublimation of dry ice results in the formation of a smoke-like vapor so that the object to be cleaned cannot 'oe seen and consequently the cleaning procedure is adversely affected. Another consideration would be the relatively high cost representative25 of this particular blast medium. Examples of dry ice blast equipment are provided in U.S. Patents 4,389,820 and 5,203,794.
A further variation provides the use of crystalline ice particles for effecting surface cleaning. Descriptions of various methods and apparatuses employing ice particles as the blast medium can be found in PCT patent application CA90/00174 30 entitled "Particle Blast Cleaning and Treating of Surfaces", publicati~n number WO90/14927 and publication date December 13, 1990; PCT patent application CA90/00291 entitled "Apparatus for Preparing, Classifying and Metering Particle Media", publication number WO91/04449 and publication date April 4,1991; and British patent application 2,171,624A published September 3, 1986. Crystalline ice particles are considered an inexpensive and fairly non-abrasive blast mediumS which lends itself to dust-free surface cleaning and coating removal, and facilitates cleanup and waste management. However, the cleaning efficiency of an ice blasting method is low relative to the abrasive techniques previously mentioned.It is generally believed that production of ice particles with sharp edges and utilizing low temperatures to enhance the hardness and strength of the particles are factors that contribute to improved abrasiveness and therefore effectiveness of this blast medium. Enhancement of ice particle hardness is achieved in conventional devices by incorporating an air cooling unit in order to cool the blast air projecting the particles. Overheads associated with this air cooling unit provide additional cost, weight and size to the blasting apparatus, along with increasing the overall power consumption of the device.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It i8 an object of the invention to provide an improved method and apparatus for particle blasting utilizing crystalline ice particles.
It is another object of the invention to increase the effectiveness of low temperature particles, in particular ice particles as a blast medium.
It is yet another object of the invention to provide an apparatus employing crystalline ice pardcles as the blast medium with reduced cost and more power efficiency than conventional devices.
Therefore, in accordance with one aspect of the invention, there is provided 2S a blasting process for cleaning or decoadng a surface comprising, propelling ice particles at the surface, the particles having a temperature near their melting point.
According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided a blasting proces8 for cleaning or decoating a surface comprising, propelling ice particles at the surface by warm blasting air.
According to a further aspect of the invention, there is provided a blasting apparatus for cleaning or decoating a surface comprising:
i) ice supply means for supplying ice particles;
ii) fluidizing means for providing a fluidized flow of the ice particles entrained in cold dry air;
iii) conveying means for transporting the fluidized flow to a blast S nozzle; and iv) warm blast air means connected to the blast nozzle for propelling the ice particles of the fluidized flow at the surface.
The inventors of the present invention have done extensive research in the area of blast technology in order to better understand the phenomenon of ice particle induced erosion. It has been discovered that under certain blast conditions, much more erosion of the target surface can be achieved than that expected from the hardness or abrasiveness of the ice particles. Under ~ese conditions, very tough coatings such as marine enamel or polyurethane can be readily removed by ice blasting. The inventors have realized a theory of impact erosion by relatively non-abrasive particles with the underlying principle of Sir Isaac Newton's third law of motion, namely to every action there is always opposed and equal reaction. This theory allows for the development of ice blast conditions to achieve a maximum efficiency for coating removal applications and for the practical implementation of ice blast processes.
A relatively non-abrasive impacting particle, regardless of being sharp or blunt, when approaching the target material at a sufficiently high speed such asthat in typical blast conditions, will cause maximum target material erosion when the approach is normal to the target surface. Target erosion does not proceed byabrasion of the impacting particles, but rather by a rupture process caused by the well-known action-reaction force. The impacting particles merely act as a means of transferring an impacting force to the target material. On impact, the particle melts or disintegrates. The impacted zone of the target material subsequently exerts an opposite reaction force away from the surface. In this way, impacting particles generate successive compression and tensile stresses on the target material to eventually cause rupture or ejection of surface material.
20~7222 Contrary to intuition and logical deduction, it has been found that improved performance in blasting is attained by utilizing high temperature air, preferably taken directly from an air compressor without further treatment as to drying andcooling, to propel ice particles at a surface. For operator comfort, a standard aftercooler may be employed. It has been further found that suitably selected ice particle size and blast air pressure, and the manner which ice particles approach the target surface, can combine to produce specific end results for surface cleaning purposes or for coating removal purposes.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
In order that the invention may be more clearly understood, an embodiment will be described with reference being made to the figures shown in the accompanying drawings, in which:
Figures lA-lD illustrate progressively the impact erosion theory in accordance with the ice blasting process of the invention.
Figure 2 illustrates diagrammatically an embodiment of an ice blasting appara~us in accordance with the invention.
Figure 3 illustrates diagrammatically an alternate embodiment of an ice blasting apparatus in accordance with the invention.
pETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The phenomenon of impact erosion will now be discussed with reference to Figures lA-lD. Conventional thinking is that abrasion is the dominant mechanism behind surface erosion, but with small ice particles at high speed abrasion is not in fact the cause of erosion at all. In actuality, erosion is effected by a rupture process whereby tensile stress acting on a surface overcomes the cohesive forces of the target material resulting in rupture. Coating removal results when tensile stress acting on a surface coating overcomes adhesive forces between the coating and the substrate. The tensile stress is a reaction force generated by the application of an impact force on the target surface.
Figure lA shows an ice particle 10 travelling towards a target surface 11 comprising a surface coating 12 and substrate 13. It is preferable that the ice particle 10 travel and thus impact the target surface 11 at a normal incidence as s a normal approach by particles causes the most efficient transfer of impact force to the surface coating 12 and substrate 13. However particles impacting the target surface 11 at any approach angle will generate an impact force, but to a lesser degree than a normal approach.
S Figure lB depicts the ice particle 10 impacting with the target surface 11.
Upon impact, the ice particle 10 deforrns while applying compressive stress to the surface coating 12. This impacting action results in the transfer of force from the ice particle 10 to the surface coating 12 and substrate 13. The target material is therefore under compressive stress.
As shown in Figure lC, the surface coating 12 reacts to the impacting force applied. The surface coating 12 is now under tensile stress from reaction forcesgenerated by the surface coating 12 along with the substrate 13 responsive to the compression force generated by an impacting particle. If the impacting particle is still present and in contact with the target surface 11 subsequent to initialimpact, it is apparent that the tensile stress generated would be applied to both the particle and surface coating 12, and may not be sufficient to overcome the adhesive bond between the surface coating 12 and the substrate 13. Thus, there is desirability to have the impacting force source removed immediately after applicadon so the reactive tensile stress will act solely on the surface coating 12 to effect disbonding. This desirability can be achieved when using crystalline ice as the source to apply the impacting force by providing a condition which facilitates rapid melting or disintegration of the particles immediately after impact with the target surface 11 This condition can be effected by using high temperature blast air to project the particles 2S Figure lD illustrates the reaction of the surface coating 12 to the tensile force applied to it, When a tensile force of su~ficient magnitude is generated, overcoming the adhesive bond between the surt`ace coating 12 and substrate 13, the result is the rupturing of the surface coating 12 in the general area where the particle first impacts the target surface 11 Once an initial surface rupture occurs, the overall integrity of the surface coating 12 in the vicinity of the rupture is adversely affected which enhances removal of the surrounding surface coating 12 from the substrate 13.
Further considerations for maximizing the reaction force generated would be the density and rate at which the ice particles impact the target surface along with the physical size of the ice particles used. It has been found that as the 5 impact density of particles increases, the performance of the ice blasting process deteriorates. Also, use of smaller particles helps to maximize impact stress on loading and also to maximize tensile stress through rapid disintegration after impact, thereby improving results.
Turning now to Figure 2, a general illustration is presented of a blasting 10 apparatus utilizing crystalline ice particles as the blast medium. The ice blasting apparatus includes a storage unit 20 containing ice particles 21 which may be continuously agitated to prevent cohesion thereof. The ice particles 21 are fed by gravity through a metering device or flow controller 22 into a transport hose 23.
The flow controller 22 permits adjustment of the rate at which ice particles enter 15 the transportation hose 23 and, therefore, act as a means for controlling thequantity of particles projected and impacting the target surface 29. A sizer device 37 may be inserted after the flow controller 22 to limit the size of the ice particles permitted to enter the transportation hose 24. Smaller particles, typically in the range of two millimeters in each direction, have been found to be most efficient20 at effecting impact erosion because they generally tend to melt once contacting the surface. Although particles which are larger or smaller are useful depending on the type of work to be performed.
The particle stream entering the transportation hose 23 is combined with low pressure compressed air 24 and this fluidized particle stream 25 flows along2S the transpo~t hose 23 to the blast nozzle 26. Since the low pressure compressed air 24 is the vehicle by which movement of the ice particles through the transportation hose 23 towards the blast nozzle 26 is effected, it is necessary for this compressed air 24 to be sufficiently cool and dry in order to minimize attrition of the fluidized particles 25 as the length of the transport hose 23 may be 30 considerable, for example, in excess of t vo hundred and fifty feet. Transport air temperature should be in the range of -5F to 15F, depending on the ambient .
temperature.
At the blast nozzle 26, the fluidized particle stream 25 is entrained by a stream of high pressure compressed air 27 producing a blast stream 28 to be directed at a target surface 29 for cleaning. Typically, the ratio of fluidizing to 5 blast air volumes is within the range of 0.005:1 to 0.25:1, with the ratio 0.15:1 normally used. The high pressure compressed air 27 should be of a suitably warm temperature such as at least ambient and preferably in the range of 70F to 130F, to facilitate rapid disintegration of the particles upon impact with the target surface 29. It has been found that superior performance of the blasting apparatus was 10 achieved by utilizing high temperature air taken directly from an air compressor, without any further treatment as to drying and special cooling, as required by conventional systems. For example, the blast air 27 produced by a high pressure air compressor may have a temperature in the order of lS0F. Once this blast air27 is mixed at the blast nozzle 26 with the fluidked ice particles 25, a blast stream 15 28 is expelled from the nozzle 26 having a temperature of approximately 60F.Such a design provides a blasdng apparatus construction which is cheaper and simpler than conventional devices. With certain constructions, a standard aftercooler may be used to slightly reduce the temperature of the air from the compressor for safety and operator comfort. Although for other instances, the 20 blast air may be cooled by the environment within which the apparatus operates and in fact, can reach ambient temperature by the time the air arrives at the blasting head.
Since the volume of warm blast air 27 is larger than that of cooled blast air, hot air taken directly from a compressor also represents a major cost benefit.
25 That is to say, this increased volume of air means there is more air available for propelling the ice particles from the nozzle 26 to achieve a greater speed than in cool air blasting devices. Observed results indicate that speed increases of up to 20% can been obtained. This is particularly relevant as faster moving particles apply a greater force on impacting the target surface generating a larger reaction 30 force, as well as facilitating particle melting or disintegration.
Other aspects of the ice blasting apparatus of the present invention that affect itS performance for cleaning and decoating surfaces are the amount of blast air pressure used, which is dependent upon the application, and the manner in which the blast stream applied. For applications such as cleaning, degreasing and S surface decontamination, compressed air of up to 130 psig is preferred.
Applications involving decoating of enamel materials, rubber seal removal or dechroming typically require blast air pressure in the range between 130 and 170psig, and decoating of polyurethane rnaterials requires air pressure from 170 tO250 psig. Furtherrnore, for decoating applications, the most effective and efficient results are obtained when the blast stream is directed essentially perpendicular, i.e.
at 90 degrees, to the target surface.
An alternate embodiment of an ice blasting apparatus is illustrated in Figure 3. In typical industrial applications, the supply of crystalline ice particles can be so arranged to effectively use gravity as a means of transporting the particles to the blast nozzle, therefore eliminating the need of cold dry low pressure compressed air for fluidizing the ice particles. Depicted is a blasting apparatus 30 positioned above a conveyor belt 31 on which the article 35 to be cleaned is transported and positioned directly beneath the nozzle 32 of the blasting apparatus 30. The storage unit 33 containing the ice particles is connected directly to the blast nozzle 32. This unit 33 is arranged in such a manner relative to the blastnozzle 32 that gravity acts to feed the ice particles to the blast nozzle 32. A
compressor providing high pressure warm air is connected to the blast nozzle 32 via an air hose 34. At the nozzle the ice particles are combined with the high pressure air producing a blast stream 36 which is directed at the article 35.
The foregoing description has been limited to specific embodiments of the invention. It will be apparent, however, that variations and modifications may be made to the invention, with the attainment of some or all of the advantages of the invention. Therefore, it is the object of the appended claims to cover all such variations and modifications as come within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
Claims (6)
1. A blasting process for cleaning or decoating a surface comprising:
i) propelling frozen ice particles at said surface, the particles having a temperature near the melting point of the particles, said particles being propelled by warm blasting air having a temperature at least equal to ambient temperature to warm said particles to the temperature near said melting point.
i) propelling frozen ice particles at said surface, the particles having a temperature near the melting point of the particles, said particles being propelled by warm blasting air having a temperature at least equal to ambient temperature to warm said particles to the temperature near said melting point.
2. A blasting process as claimed in claim 1, wherein said ice particles are propelled at an angle essentially normal to said surface.
3. A blasting process as claimed in claim 1 or 2, wherein said ice particleshave a particle size of approximately 2 mm.
4. A blasting process for cleaning or decoating a surface comprising:
i) providing ice particles to a sizer;
i) sizing said ice particles producing sized ice particles;
ii) metering said sized ice particles to a blast head;
iv) combining at said blast head said sized ice particles with compressed air taken from an air compressor producing a blast stream; and v) directing said blast stream at said surface.
i) providing ice particles to a sizer;
i) sizing said ice particles producing sized ice particles;
ii) metering said sized ice particles to a blast head;
iv) combining at said blast head said sized ice particles with compressed air taken from an air compressor producing a blast stream; and v) directing said blast stream at said surface.
5. A blasting process as claimed in claim 4 wherein:
i) said sized ice particles are fluidized with cold dry compressed air producing a fluidized flow;
ii) said fluidized flow is conveyed to a blast head;
iii) said fluidized flow is combined at said blast head with said compressed air.
i) said sized ice particles are fluidized with cold dry compressed air producing a fluidized flow;
ii) said fluidized flow is conveyed to a blast head;
iii) said fluidized flow is combined at said blast head with said compressed air.
6. A blasting apparatus for cleaning or decoating a surface comprising:
i) ice supply means for supplying ice particles;
ii) fluidizing means for providing a fluidized flow of said ice particles entrained in cold dry air;
iii) conveying means for transporting said fluidized flow to a blast nozzle; and iv) warm blast air means having a temperature at least equal to ambient temperature connected to said blast nozzle for propelling said ice particles of said fluidized flow at said surface.
i) ice supply means for supplying ice particles;
ii) fluidizing means for providing a fluidized flow of said ice particles entrained in cold dry air;
iii) conveying means for transporting said fluidized flow to a blast nozzle; and iv) warm blast air means having a temperature at least equal to ambient temperature connected to said blast nozzle for propelling said ice particles of said fluidized flow at said surface.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US89105192A | 1992-06-01 | 1992-06-01 | |
| US891,051 | 1992-06-01 |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2097222A1 true CA2097222A1 (en) | 1993-12-02 |
Family
ID=25397536
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002097222A Abandoned CA2097222A1 (en) | 1992-06-01 | 1993-05-28 | Particle blasting utilizing crystalline ice |
Country Status (5)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US5367838A (en) |
| AU (1) | AU4302893A (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2097222A1 (en) |
| MX (1) | MX9303282A (en) |
| WO (1) | WO1993024275A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5623831A (en) * | 1995-05-10 | 1997-04-29 | Mesher; Terry | Fluidized particle production system and process |
Families Citing this family (68)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AT405290B (en) * | 1994-02-28 | 1999-06-25 | Christine Maslo | Artificial snow as cleaning agent (dust removal) |
| US5651723A (en) * | 1994-04-13 | 1997-07-29 | Viratec Thin Films, Inc. | Method and apparatus for cleaning substrates in preparation for deposition of thin film coatings |
| US5785581A (en) * | 1995-10-19 | 1998-07-28 | The Penn State Research Foundation | Supersonic abrasive iceblasting apparatus |
| US5913711A (en) | 1996-06-07 | 1999-06-22 | Universal Ice Blast, Inc. | Method for ice blasting |
| US6197951B1 (en) * | 1996-06-26 | 2001-03-06 | Archer Daniels Midland Company | Starch graft copolymer blast media |
| US5780619A (en) * | 1996-06-26 | 1998-07-14 | U.S. Technology Corporation | Starch graft poly(meth)acrylate blast media |
| US5820447A (en) * | 1997-02-18 | 1998-10-13 | Inter+Ice, Inc. | Ice blasting cleaning system |
| US5910042A (en) * | 1997-02-18 | 1999-06-08 | Inter Ice, Inc. | Ice blasting cleaning system and method |
| US6099396A (en) * | 1997-03-14 | 2000-08-08 | Eco-Snow Systems, Inc. | Carbon dioxide jet spray pallet cleaning system |
| US6718002B2 (en) * | 1997-05-21 | 2004-04-06 | Westinghouse Atom Ab | Method and device for removing radioactive deposits |
| US6220935B1 (en) * | 1997-08-11 | 2001-04-24 | Sprout Co., Ltd. | Apparatus and method for cleaning substrate |
| GB2335154B (en) * | 1998-03-09 | 2002-10-30 | System Hygienics Ltd | A method of cleaning the inside surface of ducts |
| DE19844668A1 (en) * | 1998-09-29 | 2000-03-30 | Linde Ag | Processing of surfaces to be coated by means of thermal spraying |
| EP1034889A3 (en) * | 1999-03-05 | 2000-12-20 | Linde Gas Aktiengesellschaft | Method and device for blasting with a blasting medium at a reduced temperature |
| TW514996B (en) | 1999-12-10 | 2002-12-21 | Tokyo Electron Ltd | Processing apparatus with a chamber having therein a high-corrosion-resistant sprayed film |
| JP2002172368A (en) * | 2000-12-05 | 2002-06-18 | Canon Inc | Method and apparatus for dry ice cleaning |
| US20040081746A1 (en) * | 2000-12-12 | 2004-04-29 | Kosuke Imafuku | Method for regenerating container for plasma treatment, member inside container for plasma treatment, method for preparing member inside container for plasma treatment, and apparatus for plasma treatment |
| WO2002048421A1 (en) * | 2000-12-12 | 2002-06-20 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Method for regenerating container for plasma treatment, member inside container for plasma treatment, method for preparing member inside container for plasma treatment, and apparatus for plasma treatment |
| US6536220B2 (en) | 2001-05-11 | 2003-03-25 | Universal Ice Blast, Inc. | Method and apparatus for pressure-driven ice blasting |
| US6719612B2 (en) * | 2001-05-14 | 2004-04-13 | Universal Ice Blast, Inc. | Ice blast cleaning cabinet |
| US20030064665A1 (en) * | 2001-09-28 | 2003-04-03 | Opel Alan E. | Apparatus to provide dry ice in different particle sizes to an airstream for cleaning of surfaces |
| DE60105830T2 (en) * | 2001-12-21 | 2006-03-09 | Siemens Ag | Method for removing a metal layer of a layer system |
| US20050156065A1 (en) * | 2002-06-16 | 2005-07-21 | Bertil Eliasson | Cleaning device and method |
| US7147749B2 (en) | 2002-09-30 | 2006-12-12 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Method and apparatus for an improved upper electrode plate with deposition shield in a plasma processing system |
| US6837966B2 (en) | 2002-09-30 | 2005-01-04 | Tokyo Electron Limeted | Method and apparatus for an improved baffle plate in a plasma processing system |
| US7166166B2 (en) * | 2002-09-30 | 2007-01-23 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Method and apparatus for an improved baffle plate in a plasma processing system |
| US7137353B2 (en) | 2002-09-30 | 2006-11-21 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Method and apparatus for an improved deposition shield in a plasma processing system |
| US7204912B2 (en) | 2002-09-30 | 2007-04-17 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Method and apparatus for an improved bellows shield in a plasma processing system |
| US7166200B2 (en) | 2002-09-30 | 2007-01-23 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Method and apparatus for an improved upper electrode plate in a plasma processing system |
| US6798519B2 (en) | 2002-09-30 | 2004-09-28 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Method and apparatus for an improved optical window deposition shield in a plasma processing system |
| US20040091390A1 (en) * | 2002-11-12 | 2004-05-13 | Bentley Jeffrey B. | Method for removal of mold and other biological contaminants from a surface |
| KR100772740B1 (en) | 2002-11-28 | 2007-11-01 | 동경 엘렉트론 주식회사 | Internal member of a plasma processing vessel |
| JP4597972B2 (en) * | 2003-03-31 | 2010-12-15 | 東京エレクトロン株式会社 | A method of bonding adjacent coatings on a processing member. |
| JP4532479B2 (en) | 2003-03-31 | 2010-08-25 | 東京エレクトロン株式会社 | A barrier layer for a processing member and a method of forming the same. |
| EP1729898A1 (en) * | 2004-03-31 | 2006-12-13 | Ecolab, Inc. | System for semi-automatic line cleaning |
| US20060097003A1 (en) * | 2004-11-09 | 2006-05-11 | Joerg Emmendoerfer | Chemical dispense system for cleaning components of a fluid dispensing system |
| US20060169715A1 (en) * | 2004-11-09 | 2006-08-03 | Jorg Emmendorfer | Controller-based management of a fluid dispensing system |
| US20060175352A1 (en) * | 2004-11-09 | 2006-08-10 | Jorg Emmendorfer | Cleaning processes for a fluid dispensing system |
| US7311224B2 (en) * | 2004-11-09 | 2007-12-25 | Ecolab Inc. | Chemical dispense system for cleaning components of a fluid dispensing system |
| US20060113322A1 (en) * | 2004-11-09 | 2006-06-01 | Maser Bryan A | Monitoring operation of a fluid dispensing system |
| US7552521B2 (en) | 2004-12-08 | 2009-06-30 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Method and apparatus for improved baffle plate |
| US7601242B2 (en) | 2005-01-11 | 2009-10-13 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Plasma processing system and baffle assembly for use in plasma processing system |
| US20070095859A1 (en) * | 2005-10-31 | 2007-05-03 | Maser Bryan A | Controller-based management of a fluid dispensing system |
| US8551505B2 (en) | 2008-10-31 | 2013-10-08 | The Invention Science Fund I, Llc | Compositions and methods for therapeutic delivery with frozen particles |
| US9060934B2 (en) | 2008-10-31 | 2015-06-23 | The Invention Science Fund I, Llc | Compositions and methods for surface abrasion with frozen particles |
| US8762067B2 (en) | 2008-10-31 | 2014-06-24 | The Invention Science Fund I, Llc | Methods and systems for ablation or abrasion with frozen particles and comparing tissue surface ablation or abrasion data to clinical outcome data |
| US8721583B2 (en) | 2008-10-31 | 2014-05-13 | The Invention Science Fund I, Llc | Compositions and methods for surface abrasion with frozen particles |
| US20100111857A1 (en) | 2008-10-31 | 2010-05-06 | Boyden Edward S | Compositions and methods for surface abrasion with frozen particles |
| US8409376B2 (en) | 2008-10-31 | 2013-04-02 | The Invention Science Fund I, Llc | Compositions and methods for surface abrasion with frozen particles |
| US8731840B2 (en) | 2008-10-31 | 2014-05-20 | The Invention Science Fund I, Llc | Compositions and methods for therapeutic delivery with frozen particles |
| US9050070B2 (en) | 2008-10-31 | 2015-06-09 | The Invention Science Fund I, Llc | Compositions and methods for surface abrasion with frozen particles |
| US8731841B2 (en) | 2008-10-31 | 2014-05-20 | The Invention Science Fund I, Llc | Compositions and methods for therapeutic delivery with frozen particles |
| US9050317B2 (en) | 2008-10-31 | 2015-06-09 | The Invention Science Fund I, Llc | Compositions and methods for therapeutic delivery with frozen particles |
| US9072799B2 (en) | 2008-10-31 | 2015-07-07 | The Invention Science Fund I, Llc | Compositions and methods for surface abrasion with frozen particles |
| US9072688B2 (en) | 2008-10-31 | 2015-07-07 | The Invention Science Fund I, Llc | Compositions and methods for therapeutic delivery with frozen particles |
| US8725420B2 (en) | 2008-10-31 | 2014-05-13 | The Invention Science Fund I, Llc | Compositions and methods for surface abrasion with frozen particles |
| US8545855B2 (en) | 2008-10-31 | 2013-10-01 | The Invention Science Fund I, Llc | Compositions and methods for surface abrasion with frozen particles |
| US8793075B2 (en) | 2008-10-31 | 2014-07-29 | The Invention Science Fund I, Llc | Compositions and methods for therapeutic delivery with frozen particles |
| US8788211B2 (en) | 2008-10-31 | 2014-07-22 | The Invention Science Fund I, Llc | Method and system for comparing tissue ablation or abrasion data to data related to administration of a frozen particle composition |
| US9060926B2 (en) | 2008-10-31 | 2015-06-23 | The Invention Science Fund I, Llc | Compositions and methods for therapeutic delivery with frozen particles |
| JP5623722B2 (en) * | 2009-09-28 | 2014-11-12 | 東京エレクトロン株式会社 | Method for recycling silicon parts for plasma etching equipment |
| ES2525400B1 (en) * | 2013-06-21 | 2015-09-29 | Proyectos Y Montajes Ingemont, S.A. | Procedure and equipment for cleaning electrical installations in tension. |
| US9884404B2 (en) | 2013-10-22 | 2018-02-06 | Nike, Inc. | Buffing expanded foam items |
| US9789584B2 (en) * | 2013-10-22 | 2017-10-17 | Nike, Inc. | Buffing expanded foam items |
| KR101387024B1 (en) * | 2013-11-25 | 2014-04-21 | 한모기술주식회사 | The combined cleaning system for hear exchanger |
| CN104713412A (en) * | 2013-12-13 | 2015-06-17 | 琳德股份公司 | On-line cleaning method |
| AU2020417294B2 (en) | 2019-12-31 | 2024-04-04 | Cold Jet, Llc | Method and apparatus for enhanced blast stream |
| DE202023002302U1 (en) | 2023-04-18 | 2024-03-08 | Jürgen v.d. Ohe | Device for cleaning surfaces and systems with a mechanically acting cryogenic blasting agent made of extremely cold water ice |
Family Cites Families (24)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US2699403A (en) * | 1952-05-24 | 1955-01-11 | Emmett J Courts | Means and methods for cleaning and polishing automobiles |
| GB1171624A (en) * | 1966-05-24 | 1969-11-26 | Kirby S Engineers Ltd | Apparatus for Creasing and/or Cutting Cardboard and Analogous Flexible Sheet Material |
| US3676963A (en) * | 1971-03-08 | 1972-07-18 | Chemotronics International Inc | Method for the removal of unwanted portions of an article |
| GB1397102A (en) * | 1972-03-22 | 1975-06-11 | Carrier Drysys Ltd | Abrasive treatment of a surface of a metal substrate |
| US4038786A (en) * | 1974-09-27 | 1977-08-02 | Lockheed Aircraft Corporation | Sandblasting with pellets of material capable of sublimation |
| FR2475425A1 (en) * | 1980-02-08 | 1981-08-14 | Reel Sa | Cleaner for external aircraft surfaces - combines compressed air with water and coolant to produce stream of ice particles |
| FR2494160A1 (en) * | 1980-11-17 | 1982-05-21 | Chausson Usines Sa | Abrasive surface treatment for polishing vehicle - forms ice crystals projected onto work in cold air stream |
| US4389820A (en) * | 1980-12-29 | 1983-06-28 | Lockheed Corporation | Blasting machine utilizing sublimable particles |
| JPS6029277A (en) * | 1983-07-27 | 1985-02-14 | Kurita Water Ind Ltd | Cleaning method with ice drops |
| US4655847A (en) * | 1983-09-01 | 1987-04-07 | Tsuyoshi Ichinoseki | Cleaning method |
| US4617064A (en) * | 1984-07-31 | 1986-10-14 | Cryoblast, Inc. | Cleaning method and apparatus |
| DK550884A (en) * | 1984-11-20 | 1986-05-21 | Knud Erik Westergaard | PROCEDURE AND APPARATUS FOR PARTICULATE BLASTING WITH PARTICLES OF A MATERIAL CHANGING CONDITION FORM |
| GB8505429D0 (en) * | 1985-03-02 | 1985-04-03 | Kue Eng Ltd | Blast cleaning |
| JPH066265B2 (en) * | 1985-04-11 | 1994-01-26 | 石川島播磨重工業株式会社 | Ice grain blasting equipment |
| JPS62120978A (en) * | 1985-11-18 | 1987-06-02 | Fuji Seiki Seizosho:Kk | Cleaning device with spray of crushed ice |
| JPS62140767A (en) * | 1985-12-16 | 1987-06-24 | Aisin Warner Ltd | Shot blasting machining device by ice grains |
| US4744181A (en) * | 1986-11-17 | 1988-05-17 | Moore David E | Particle-blast cleaning apparatus and method |
| DE3844649C2 (en) * | 1987-06-23 | 1992-04-23 | Taiyo Sanso Co. Ltd., Osaka, Jp | |
| FR2627121B1 (en) * | 1988-02-12 | 1994-07-01 | Carboxyque Francaise | METHOD, INSTALLATION AND SPRAY NOZZLE FOR THE TREATMENT OF TRAPS BY BLASTING BLAST |
| US5063015A (en) * | 1989-03-13 | 1991-11-05 | Cold Jet, Inc. | Method for deflashing articles |
| CA1321478C (en) * | 1989-05-30 | 1993-08-24 | Somyong Visaisouk | Particle blast cleaning and treating of surfaces |
| US5009240A (en) * | 1989-07-07 | 1991-04-23 | United States Of America | Wafer cleaning method |
| CA1324591C (en) * | 1989-09-12 | 1993-11-23 | Somyong Visaisouk | Apparatus for preparing, classifying, and metering particle media |
| US5203794A (en) * | 1991-06-14 | 1993-04-20 | Alpheus Cleaning Technologies Corp. | Ice blasting apparatus |
-
1993
- 1993-05-28 WO PCT/CA1993/000230 patent/WO1993024275A1/en active Application Filing
- 1993-05-28 AU AU43028/93A patent/AU4302893A/en not_active Abandoned
- 1993-05-28 CA CA002097222A patent/CA2097222A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 1993-06-01 MX MX9303282A patent/MX9303282A/en unknown
-
1994
- 1994-03-21 US US08/210,724 patent/US5367838A/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5623831A (en) * | 1995-05-10 | 1997-04-29 | Mesher; Terry | Fluidized particle production system and process |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| AU4302893A (en) | 1993-12-30 |
| WO1993024275A1 (en) | 1993-12-09 |
| MX9303282A (en) | 1994-05-31 |
| US5367838A (en) | 1994-11-29 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US5367838A (en) | Particle blasting using crystalline ice | |
| US5230185A (en) | Blasting apparatus and method | |
| US5456629A (en) | Method and apparatus for cutting and abrading with sublimable particles | |
| US5308404A (en) | Less aggressive blast media formed from compacted particles | |
| CA2194194C (en) | Apparatus for producing and blasting sublimable granules on demand | |
| US5733174A (en) | Method and apparatus for cutting, abrading, and drilling with sublimable particles and vaporous liquids | |
| US5283990A (en) | Blast nozzle with inlet flow straightener | |
| US5637030A (en) | Abrasive formulation for waterjet cutting and method employing same | |
| US5509971A (en) | Process for removing coatings from hard surfaces | |
| US5265383A (en) | Fan nozzle | |
| US5820447A (en) | Ice blasting cleaning system | |
| JPH04253331A (en) | Cleaning method of substrate and apparatus used for said method | |
| US5044129A (en) | Cryogenic mechanical means of paint removal | |
| MXPA97000150A (en) | Apparatus to produce and apply in the form of sublimable granules chorrolos required | |
| GB1468495A (en) | Blasting with pellets of material capable of sublimation | |
| PL1977859T3 (en) | Device and method for processing surfaces or surface processing using dry ice granules | |
| US5112406A (en) | Process for removing coatings from sensitive substrates, and sodium sulfate-containing blasting media useful therein | |
| Liang et al. | A novel cryogenic grinding system for recycling scrap tire peels | |
| CN1029599C (en) | Blasting medium | |
| WO1990014927A1 (en) | Particle blast cleaning and treating of surfaces | |
| US6007639A (en) | Blasting process for removing contaminants from substrates and potassium magnesium sulfate-containing blast media | |
| CA2121269A1 (en) | Crystalline ice particle mixture for optimum ice blast surface treatment | |
| JPH0152150B2 (en) | ||
| JPS6070399A (en) | Method of decontaminating surface of material to be treated | |
| JPS61152368A (en) | Method of ground work cleaning by blasting |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| FZDE | Discontinued |