CA2113219C - Sulfur reduction in fcc gasoline - Google Patents
Sulfur reduction in fcc gasoline Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2113219C CA2113219C CA002113219A CA2113219A CA2113219C CA 2113219 C CA2113219 C CA 2113219C CA 002113219 A CA002113219 A CA 002113219A CA 2113219 A CA2113219 A CA 2113219A CA 2113219 C CA2113219 C CA 2113219C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- alumina
- composition
- weight percent
- lewis acid
- sulfur
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
- C10G11/00—Catalytic cracking, in the absence of hydrogen, of hydrocarbon oils
- C10G11/02—Catalytic cracking, in the absence of hydrogen, of hydrocarbon oils characterised by the catalyst used
- C10G11/04—Oxides
- C10G11/05—Crystalline alumino-silicates, e.g. molecular sieves
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J37/00—Processes, in general, for preparing catalysts; Processes, in general, for activation of catalysts
- B01J37/04—Mixing
Abstract
Catalytic cracking catalysts and catalyst additives which contain silica modified bayerite and/or eta alumina.
Description
The present invention relates to catalytic cracking, and more specifically to catalytic cracking compositions and processes that may be used to catalytically convert high molecular weight feedstocks into valuable lower molecular weight products having reduced sulfur content.
It is generally known that catalytic cracking catalysts which comprise zeolites such as synthetic faujasite, zeolite Beta, and ZSM-5 dispersed in an inorganic oxide matrix such as silica/alumina hydrogel, sols and clay may be used to economically convert heavy hydrocarbon feedstocks such as gas-oils and/or resid into gasoline and diesel fuel.
More recently it has been disclosed that the addition of SOx reduction "additives" such as alumina, magnesium aluminate (spinel) to cracking catalyst compositions will improve the overall performance of the catalyst, particularly when used to process feedstocks that contain significant quantities of sulfur.
Canadian patent 1,117,511 describes FCC catalysts which contain free alumina hydrate, particularly alpha-alumina hydrate (boehmite) which may be used to catalytically crack hydrocarbons that contain sulfur.
U.S. Patent 4,010,116 discloses FCC catalysts which contain pseudo-boehmite aluminas that may contain crystalline trihydrate components such as bayerite and gibbsite.
While it is recognized that additives including aluminas and spinels may be added to catalytic cracking catalysts to reduce SOx emissions during the oxidation and regeneration of FCC catalyst, the industry has not developed catalytic cracking catalyst ~~~~~:~9 compositions that reduce the sulfur level of cracked products such as gasoline and diesel fuel It is therefore an object to provide improved FCC
catalysts and additives which possess the ability to reduce the sulfur content of cracked products.
It is another object of the present invention to provide improved catalytic cracking compositions, additives and processes for converting sulfur-containing hydrocarbon feedstocks to low sulfur gasoline and diesel fuel.
It is yet a further object to provide a particulate FCC catalyst additive composition that may be blended with conventional zeolite-containing catalysts to reduce the sulfur content of cracked products.
These and additional objects of the invention will become readily apparent to one skilled-in-the-art from the following detailed description, specific examples, and drawings, wherein Figures 1-18 are graphic representations of Conversion vs. Gasoline sulfur content data, which illustrates the sulfur reduction capability of catalysts/additives of our invention.
Broadly, our invention contemplates zeolite catalytic cracking catalyst compositions and additives that contain a Lewis acid supported upon alumina and the use thereof to process hydrocarbon feedstocks.
More specifically, we have discovered that cracking catalyst compositions which contain from about 1 to 50 weight percent of a Lewis acid such as a compound of Ni, Cu, Zn, Ag, Cd, In, Sn, Hg, T1, Pb, Bi, B, A1 (other than Alzo3) & Ga supported on alumina may be used to obtain gasoline fractions that have low sulfur content.
~~~J~~~
It is generally known that catalytic cracking catalysts which comprise zeolites such as synthetic faujasite, zeolite Beta, and ZSM-5 dispersed in an inorganic oxide matrix such as silica/alumina hydrogel, sols and clay may be used to economically convert heavy hydrocarbon feedstocks such as gas-oils and/or resid into gasoline and diesel fuel.
More recently it has been disclosed that the addition of SOx reduction "additives" such as alumina, magnesium aluminate (spinel) to cracking catalyst compositions will improve the overall performance of the catalyst, particularly when used to process feedstocks that contain significant quantities of sulfur.
Canadian patent 1,117,511 describes FCC catalysts which contain free alumina hydrate, particularly alpha-alumina hydrate (boehmite) which may be used to catalytically crack hydrocarbons that contain sulfur.
U.S. Patent 4,010,116 discloses FCC catalysts which contain pseudo-boehmite aluminas that may contain crystalline trihydrate components such as bayerite and gibbsite.
While it is recognized that additives including aluminas and spinels may be added to catalytic cracking catalysts to reduce SOx emissions during the oxidation and regeneration of FCC catalyst, the industry has not developed catalytic cracking catalyst ~~~~~:~9 compositions that reduce the sulfur level of cracked products such as gasoline and diesel fuel It is therefore an object to provide improved FCC
catalysts and additives which possess the ability to reduce the sulfur content of cracked products.
It is another object of the present invention to provide improved catalytic cracking compositions, additives and processes for converting sulfur-containing hydrocarbon feedstocks to low sulfur gasoline and diesel fuel.
It is yet a further object to provide a particulate FCC catalyst additive composition that may be blended with conventional zeolite-containing catalysts to reduce the sulfur content of cracked products.
These and additional objects of the invention will become readily apparent to one skilled-in-the-art from the following detailed description, specific examples, and drawings, wherein Figures 1-18 are graphic representations of Conversion vs. Gasoline sulfur content data, which illustrates the sulfur reduction capability of catalysts/additives of our invention.
Broadly, our invention contemplates zeolite catalytic cracking catalyst compositions and additives that contain a Lewis acid supported upon alumina and the use thereof to process hydrocarbon feedstocks.
More specifically, we have discovered that cracking catalyst compositions which contain from about 1 to 50 weight percent of a Lewis acid such as a compound of Ni, Cu, Zn, Ag, Cd, In, Sn, Hg, T1, Pb, Bi, B, A1 (other than Alzo3) & Ga supported on alumina may be used to obtain gasoline fractions that have low sulfur content.
~~~J~~~
In particular, we have found that if a composition which comprises from about 1 to 50 weight percent of a Lewis acid supported on alumina is added to conventional particulate zeolite containing fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) catalysts as either an integral catalyst matrix component or as a separate particulate additive having the same particle size as the conventional FCC catalyst, the catalysts may be used in the catalytic cracking of high molecular weight sulfur containing hydrocarbons feedstocks such as gas-oil, residual oil fractions and mixtures thereof to produce products such as gasoline and diesel fuel that have significantly reduced sulfur content.
Furthermore, the surface area of the Lewis acid on alumina should be as high as possible to facilitate the interaction of the sulfur species in the hydrocarbon feedstock. In other words, the dispersion of the Lewis acid on the support should be as high as possible. Therefore, compounds which can stabilize the alumina support surface area can be incorporated in the support, such as lanthana, or baria. Silica, which is also known ~to stabilize the surface area of alumina is detrimental to this invention.
While the mechanism by which the Lewis acid-containing alumina removes the sulfur components normally present in cracked hydrocarbon products is not precisely understood, it is believed that the Lewis Base (basic) sulfur species produced in the cracking of sulfur-containing hydrocarbons, such as gas-oil, interact with the Lewis acid on alumina by absorbtion or chemical reaction.
In other words, during the catalytic cracking of a sulfur-containing gas-oil at 500 to 550°C sulfur species are produced in the gasoline boiling range from the cracking reaction. These species are thiophene, C1 to Ca alkylthiophenes, tetrahydrothiophene, and propyl to hexyl mercaptans, which all have boiling points in the gasoline range.
These species axe Lewis bases and can interact with the Lewis acid-containing alumina. One such interaction would be adsorption of the sulfur Lewis base species to the Lewis acid-containing alumina.in the riser/reactor side of the FCCU. The adsorbed species on the Lewis acid-containing alumina could then be oxidized free of the sulfur Lewis base species in the regenerator side of the FCCU, enabling more sulfur species to be adsorbed in the riser/reactor side. Another interaction would be the adsorption of the sulfur Lewis base on the Lewis acid-containing alumina, followed by cracking reactions in the riser/reactor side of the FCCU. The most likely products from these reactions would be hydrogen sulfide and hydrocarbons free of sulfur.
As shown in the examples, this invention selectively removes those sulfur species from the gasoline, such as thiophene, methylthiophenes, ethylthiophenes, propylthiophenes, and tetrahydrothiophene.
The Lewis acid-containing alumina component is prepared by reacting/impregnating an alumina substrate, which in itself has Lewis acid properties,' having a surface area of about 30 to 400 m2/g, with a "second" Lewis acid component selected from the group consisting of elements/compounds selected from the group consisting of Ni, Cu, Zn, Ag, Cd, In, Sn, Hg, T1, Pb, Bi, B, A1 (not A1203), Ga and mixtures thereof.
~~.~.3~~.
Furthermore, the surface area of the Lewis acid on alumina should be as high as possible to facilitate the interaction of the sulfur species in the hydrocarbon feedstock. In other words, the dispersion of the Lewis acid on the support should be as high as possible. Therefore, compounds which can stabilize the alumina support surface area can be incorporated in the support, such as lanthana, or baria. Silica, which is also known ~to stabilize the surface area of alumina is detrimental to this invention.
While the mechanism by which the Lewis acid-containing alumina removes the sulfur components normally present in cracked hydrocarbon products is not precisely understood, it is believed that the Lewis Base (basic) sulfur species produced in the cracking of sulfur-containing hydrocarbons, such as gas-oil, interact with the Lewis acid on alumina by absorbtion or chemical reaction.
In other words, during the catalytic cracking of a sulfur-containing gas-oil at 500 to 550°C sulfur species are produced in the gasoline boiling range from the cracking reaction. These species are thiophene, C1 to Ca alkylthiophenes, tetrahydrothiophene, and propyl to hexyl mercaptans, which all have boiling points in the gasoline range.
These species axe Lewis bases and can interact with the Lewis acid-containing alumina. One such interaction would be adsorption of the sulfur Lewis base species to the Lewis acid-containing alumina.in the riser/reactor side of the FCCU. The adsorbed species on the Lewis acid-containing alumina could then be oxidized free of the sulfur Lewis base species in the regenerator side of the FCCU, enabling more sulfur species to be adsorbed in the riser/reactor side. Another interaction would be the adsorption of the sulfur Lewis base on the Lewis acid-containing alumina, followed by cracking reactions in the riser/reactor side of the FCCU. The most likely products from these reactions would be hydrogen sulfide and hydrocarbons free of sulfur.
As shown in the examples, this invention selectively removes those sulfur species from the gasoline, such as thiophene, methylthiophenes, ethylthiophenes, propylthiophenes, and tetrahydrothiophene.
The Lewis acid-containing alumina component is prepared by reacting/impregnating an alumina substrate, which in itself has Lewis acid properties,' having a surface area of about 30 to 400 m2/g, with a "second" Lewis acid component selected from the group consisting of elements/compounds selected from the group consisting of Ni, Cu, Zn, Ag, Cd, In, Sn, Hg, T1, Pb, Bi, B, A1 (not A1203), Ga and mixtures thereof.
~~.~.3~~.
The preferred "desulfurizing" compositions of our invention contain from about 1 to 50 weight percent and preferably 10 to 40 weight percent of the second Lewis acid component, expressed as the oxide, and the balance alumina (A1203) .
Our Lewis acid desulfurization compositions are prepared by incorporating an alumina support having a particle size of 1 to 150 mgt with a salt solution of the second Lewis acid component. Typically, aqueous solutions which contain from about 10 to 20 weight percent of the Lewis acid metal salt compound, preferably the nitrates, chloride's and sulfates are used to impregnate the alumina to incipient wetness, i.e. fill the water pore volume.
The impregnated alumina is then dried at 100 to 150°C and heated (calcined) at 200 to 850°C to remove the anionic component, such as chloride, nitrate, or sulfate, thereby yielding a particulate desulfurization composition which may be added to commercial zeolite-containing "cracking" catalyst either as a component of the catalyst particulate, or as a separate particulate additive.
The hydrothermal stability of alumina substrate can be improved by stabilizing alumina with approximately 5 to 30 weight percent La203. This can be achieved either by incipient-wetness impregnation of alumina particles with an aqueous solution of lanthanum or lanthanum-rich rare earth salt solution, followed by drying and calcination, or by co-precipitating well-mixed hydrous oxides of both lanthanum and aluminum, followed by washing, drying, and calcination.
Dispersion of the key Lewis acid component can be improved by including a precursor of this ingredient -7- 211~~~~
in the co-precipitation of well-mixed hydrous oxides of aluminum and lanthanum. For example, a key Lewis acid such as Zn0 can be well-dispersed on lanthana-stabilized alumina by a co-precipitation reaction as follows: two feedstreams are simultaneously fed into a mix-pump, one acidic stream containing a mixed aqueous solution of Zn, La (or La/Nd or La-rich rare earth) salts along with an acid as needed, the other a basic solution containing a sodium aluminate solution and sodium hydroxide as needed, maintaining approximately 8 to 9.5 pH at the mix-pump outlet. After dewatering, milling, and homogenization, the resulting slurry is spray dried, washed, dried, and calcined at approximately 500° to 700°C to obtain attrition resistant particles compatible with FCC catalysts.
Catalysts which may be improved by the addition of our Lewis acid compositions typically comprise crystalline alumino-silicate zeolites such as synthetic faujasite i.e. type Y zeolite, type X
zeolite, Zeolite Beta, ZSM-5, as well as heat treated (calcined) and/or rare-earth exchanged derivatives thereof dispersed in an inorganic oxide matrix.
Zeolites which are particularly suited include calcined rare-earth exchanged type Y zeolite (CREY), the preparation of which is disclosed in US patent 3,402,996, ultrastable type Y zeolite (USY) as disclosed in US gatent 3,293,192, as well as various partially exchanged type Y zeolites as disclosed in US
patents 3,607,043 and 3,676,368. The catalysts may also contain molecular sieves such as SAPO and ALPO as disclosed in US patent 4,764,269. Typical catalyst compositions will include from about 5 to 50 weight percent molecular sieve, about 1 to 50 weight percent Lewis acid alumina dispersed in the catalyst ~~~J~~~
_g_ particles, and the balance will comprise an inorganic oxide matrix which comprises binders and additives such as silica, silica alumina and alumina gels and sols as well as clay such as kaolin. Procedures that may be used to prepare FCC catalysts of the invention are disClOSed in US 3,957,689, 4,126,579, 4,226,743, 4,458,023 and Canadian patent 967,136.
The desulfurizing Lewis acid additive/catalyst compositions of the present invention possess the LO following characteristics: A surface area of 30 to 400 m2/g as determined by BET; a bulk density of 0.4 to 0.9 g/cc; an attrition resistance of 1 to 20 DI
(Davison Index) as described as follows: A 7 g sample of catalyst is screened to remove particles in the 0 to 20 micron size range. The particles above 20 microns are then subjected to a 5 hour test in the standard Roller Particle Size Analyzer using a 0.07 inch jet and 1 inch I.D. U-Tube as supplied by American Instrument Company, Silver Spring, Md. An air flow of 21 liters per minute is used. The Davison Index is calculated as follows:
Davison Index = Wt. 0-20 micron material formed durina test x 100 Wt. original 20 + micron fraction;
The hydrocarbon feedstocks that are used typically contain from about 0.1 to 2.5 weight percent, and as much as 4 weight percent sulfur. These feedstocks include gas-oils which have a boiling range of from about 340 to 565°C as well as residual feedstocks and mixtures thereof.
The catalytic cracking process is conducted in conventional FCC units wherein reaction temperatures that range of from about 400 to 700°C and regeneration _g_ ~~~J~~~
temperatures from about 500 to 850°C are utilized.
The catalyst, i.e. inventory, is circulated through the unit in a continuous reaction/regeneration process during which the sulfur content of cracked gasoline and diesel fuel fraction is reduced by 5 to 100 percent.
Having.described the basic aspects of the invention, the following examples are given to illustrate specific embodiments in which Table I shows the conditions of the microactivity testing of the examples of the invention, and Table II shows the feedstock properties of the feedstock used in the testing; and Table III shows the conditions of the circulating riser/regenerator pilot unit. All of the cracked products were analyzed for sulfur using capillary gas chromatography with an atomic emission detector, as described in Albro et al (accepted for publication in Journal of High Resolution r Chromatography).
Example 1 An alumina substrate having a surface area of 350 m2/g, a water pore volume of 1 cc/g (SRA alumina as supplied by Grace-Davison) was impregnated with Ni to a level 10% by weight Ni as follows: 48.3 g of Ni (N03) 2~ 6 HZO was dissolved into 100 ml H20. 100 g of dry SRA powder was impregnated with the above Ni(N03)2~6 H20 solution. The impregnated powder was dried overnight at 110°C, then heat treated at 815°C
for 4 hours. The material was then screened to obtain a fraction having a particle size range of 20 to 100 microns. The sized material was then steamed for 4 hours at 815°C with 100% HZO vapor to obtain a sample having a surface area of 106 m2/g, and an X-ray 2~.~.~~~.~
diffraction pattern which identified the presence of Ni (A102) 2 Example 2 A sample which comprised.l0 weight percent Cu on alumina was prepared using the general procedure of Example 1, except that the Ni (N03) z~ 6 Hz0 in the impregnating solution was replaced with 38.6 g of Cu (N03)z~2.5 H20. The surface area of the material was 70 mz/g and the X-ray diffraction pattern identified the presence of Cu(AlOz)z~
Example 3 FCC catalyst samples were prepared by blending 3 weight percent of the samples of Examples 1 and 2 with XP-750, a commercial cracking catalyst obtained from Grace-Davison. The mixture was tested by MAT (ASTM
procedure D-3907), as well as 100% XP-750 and the gasoline analyzed fox sulfur. Figure 1 shows the sulfur content of the full range gasoline, T90 +
380°F, endpoint = 430°F, versus conversion. Figure 2 shows the sulfur content of cut gasoline, T90 = 300°F, endpoint = 340°F versus conversion. As shown in both figures, the sulfur content of the blends with the examples is significantly reduced.
Example 4 A sample which contained 10 weight percent Zn was prepared by the procedure of Example 1 except that the Ni (N03) z~ 6 HZO in the impregnating solution was replaced with 49.4 g of Zn(N03)z~6 H20. The surface area of the material was 142 mz/g and the X-ray pattern identified Zn (AlOz) z 2~.~~?~'~
A blend of 3% by weight with steamed XP-750 was MAT tested as in Example 3. Figure 3 shows the sulfur content of the full range gasoline, and Figure 4 shows the cut gasoline, versus conversion. As seen in these figures, the use of Example 3 significantly reduces the sulfur content of the gasolines.
Example 5 This example shows that the alumina support must be free of Si02. The incipient wetness of Grace-Davison SRS alumina, which contains 6% Si02 was determined to be 0.9 mls H20/g SRS. 45.49 g of Zn (N03) 2~ 6 H20 was dissolved into 237 mls H20. 263 . 04 g of SRS alumina (TV = 31.57%) was impregnated with the above solution. The sample was dried overnight at 110°C, then calcined for 2 hours at 800°C. The surface area of the material was 176 mz/g. A blend containing 5 weight percent of the calcined sample and 95 weight percent steamed (1500°F, 100% H20, 4 hours) XP-750 was prepared and tested by MAT, using 100% XP-750 as the base case. Figure 5 shows the sulfur content of the full range gasoline, and Figure 6 shows the sulfur content of the cut gasoline at T90 = 300°F, versus conversion. As shown when silica is present in the alumina support, the performance of the invention is degraded.
Example 6 A catalyst composition consisting of zinc oxide/lanthana-neodymia/alumina was prepared by coprecipitation as followss an acidic solution containing 68.88 g of Zn0 and 34.44 g of (La/Nd)203 was prepared from their nitrates along with 9.6 g of straight nitric acid, and was diluted with DI-water to -12- i~.r ~ r~
98.4 ml. A dilute sodium aluminate solution containing 68.88 g AlZOa was also readied by diluting 340.99 g of plant-made solution with DI-water to 984 ml. These two solutions were fed into a beaker with 400 g of DI-water at 38-43°C, at an, equal rate of 40 ml/min., with good agitation. Feeding another feedstream of 16% sodium hydroxide solution directly into the beaker, pH of the resulting slurry of mixed hydrous oxide was maintained at 8.5-8.7 while maintaining the slurry at 38 -43°C through the runoff.
After 15 min. aging under this condition, pH of the slurry was raised to 9.0 with dilute sodium hydroxide, and the slurry was dewatered immediately using a Buchner funnel. The filtercake was then washed three times with 1.? liters of 80°C DI-water. The resulting filtercake was dried overnight in 115°C oven, crushed, and sifted. Particles of 80 - 200 meshes were air calcined for 2 hours at 704°C. The resulting material was 74 m2/g BET (N2) surface area, and had the following composition (weight %): 40.72% ZnO, 0.05%
Na20, 16.24% La203, 1.89% Ndz03, 18.18% total RE203, 0.15% 504, and 40.81% A1203. Powder X-ray diffraction scan largely exhibited a pattern characteristic of Zn0 and the presence of La203. This example was then blended sith steamed XP-750 and MAT tested as in the previous examples. Figures 7 and 8 show the full range and cut gasoline sulfur levels for the blend with Example 6 and neat XP-750. As seen, a reduction in the sulfur content of the gasolines is achieved.
Examgle 7 This example shows the utility of this invention in circulating FCC riser/regenerator pilot unit testing. 15 kg of Davison SRA alumina was slurried in _13_ 2~13~~~
H20 to nominally 20% solids. The slurry was peptized with 35% HC1 using 0.15 mols HC1/mole of A1203 in the slurry. The slurry was then sand milled, and peptized again with 0.1 moles HC1/mole of A1203. The slurry was then spray dried. 2 kg of the spray dried alumina was calcined for 2 hours at 538°C to remove moisture and HC1. 100 g of the above material was impregnated with 45. 49 g of Zn (N03) Z~ 6 H20 dissolved in 100 g HZO. This impregnation was repeated 13 times, then combined, making Example 7. The combined materials were calcined for 3 hrs at 704°C to pre-treat the materials for testing.
A charge of 2300 g of XP-750 was loaded into the Davison Circulating Riser (DCR) and a yield curve at various conversions was run. 255.5 g of pretreated Example 7 was then added to the inventory of the DCR
to give a nominal blend of 10% of Example 7 with 90%
of XP-750. Another yield curve was run by varying the conversion. The gasolines from the riser testing were analyzed fur sulfur in a similar fashion to the previous MAT studies. Figures 9 and 10 show the full range and cut gasolines for neat XP-750 and the 10%
blend with Example 7. Again, a clear reduction in the sulfur content of the gasolines is observed with this invention in riser/regenerator pilot unit testing. To further illustrate the effectiveness of this invention Figures 11 - 18 show the concentrations of the individual classes of sulfur species in the gasoline fraction from the pilot unit testing. These classes are, respectively, the C3 to C6 mercaptans, thiophene, methylthiophenes, tetrahydrothiophene, CZ alkyl thiophenes, C3 alkyl thiophenes, C4 alkyl thiophenes, and benzothiophene. In all cases, a reduction of the concentrations of the compounds is observed.
2~.~ ~~~
Furthermore, an increase in gasoline yield, which would account for the reduction in concentration in a simple way was not observed.
TABLE I
Conditions far Microactivity Testing (MAT) Temperature, °F
nominal catalyst charge, gr. 5 cat to oil weight ratios 2 3 4 WHSV, hr-1 60 40 30 TABLE II
Feed Properties °API 27.8 Anline Point, °F 187 Sulfur, wt.% 0.474 Total Nitrogen, wt.% 0.07 Basic Nitrogen, wt.% 0.02 Conradson Carbon, wt.% 0.16 Ni, ppm 0.14 0.1 V, ppm 0.4 FE, ppm Cu, ppm <0.1 Simulated Distillation, vol.% F
IBp 338 90 ~ 910 FBp 1065 K factor 11.68 TABLE III
Testina Conditions of the Davison Circulatina Riser jDCR) FCC Pilot Plant Adiabatic Operating Mode Riser Outlet Temperature - 970°F
Feed Preheat Temperature - 250 - 750°F
Regenerator Temperature - 1300°F
Reactor Pressure - 25 psig Catalyst Deactivation of the XP-750:
LO 4 hrs./1500°F/100% 0 psig Steam Fluid Bed Steaming
Our Lewis acid desulfurization compositions are prepared by incorporating an alumina support having a particle size of 1 to 150 mgt with a salt solution of the second Lewis acid component. Typically, aqueous solutions which contain from about 10 to 20 weight percent of the Lewis acid metal salt compound, preferably the nitrates, chloride's and sulfates are used to impregnate the alumina to incipient wetness, i.e. fill the water pore volume.
The impregnated alumina is then dried at 100 to 150°C and heated (calcined) at 200 to 850°C to remove the anionic component, such as chloride, nitrate, or sulfate, thereby yielding a particulate desulfurization composition which may be added to commercial zeolite-containing "cracking" catalyst either as a component of the catalyst particulate, or as a separate particulate additive.
The hydrothermal stability of alumina substrate can be improved by stabilizing alumina with approximately 5 to 30 weight percent La203. This can be achieved either by incipient-wetness impregnation of alumina particles with an aqueous solution of lanthanum or lanthanum-rich rare earth salt solution, followed by drying and calcination, or by co-precipitating well-mixed hydrous oxides of both lanthanum and aluminum, followed by washing, drying, and calcination.
Dispersion of the key Lewis acid component can be improved by including a precursor of this ingredient -7- 211~~~~
in the co-precipitation of well-mixed hydrous oxides of aluminum and lanthanum. For example, a key Lewis acid such as Zn0 can be well-dispersed on lanthana-stabilized alumina by a co-precipitation reaction as follows: two feedstreams are simultaneously fed into a mix-pump, one acidic stream containing a mixed aqueous solution of Zn, La (or La/Nd or La-rich rare earth) salts along with an acid as needed, the other a basic solution containing a sodium aluminate solution and sodium hydroxide as needed, maintaining approximately 8 to 9.5 pH at the mix-pump outlet. After dewatering, milling, and homogenization, the resulting slurry is spray dried, washed, dried, and calcined at approximately 500° to 700°C to obtain attrition resistant particles compatible with FCC catalysts.
Catalysts which may be improved by the addition of our Lewis acid compositions typically comprise crystalline alumino-silicate zeolites such as synthetic faujasite i.e. type Y zeolite, type X
zeolite, Zeolite Beta, ZSM-5, as well as heat treated (calcined) and/or rare-earth exchanged derivatives thereof dispersed in an inorganic oxide matrix.
Zeolites which are particularly suited include calcined rare-earth exchanged type Y zeolite (CREY), the preparation of which is disclosed in US patent 3,402,996, ultrastable type Y zeolite (USY) as disclosed in US gatent 3,293,192, as well as various partially exchanged type Y zeolites as disclosed in US
patents 3,607,043 and 3,676,368. The catalysts may also contain molecular sieves such as SAPO and ALPO as disclosed in US patent 4,764,269. Typical catalyst compositions will include from about 5 to 50 weight percent molecular sieve, about 1 to 50 weight percent Lewis acid alumina dispersed in the catalyst ~~~J~~~
_g_ particles, and the balance will comprise an inorganic oxide matrix which comprises binders and additives such as silica, silica alumina and alumina gels and sols as well as clay such as kaolin. Procedures that may be used to prepare FCC catalysts of the invention are disClOSed in US 3,957,689, 4,126,579, 4,226,743, 4,458,023 and Canadian patent 967,136.
The desulfurizing Lewis acid additive/catalyst compositions of the present invention possess the LO following characteristics: A surface area of 30 to 400 m2/g as determined by BET; a bulk density of 0.4 to 0.9 g/cc; an attrition resistance of 1 to 20 DI
(Davison Index) as described as follows: A 7 g sample of catalyst is screened to remove particles in the 0 to 20 micron size range. The particles above 20 microns are then subjected to a 5 hour test in the standard Roller Particle Size Analyzer using a 0.07 inch jet and 1 inch I.D. U-Tube as supplied by American Instrument Company, Silver Spring, Md. An air flow of 21 liters per minute is used. The Davison Index is calculated as follows:
Davison Index = Wt. 0-20 micron material formed durina test x 100 Wt. original 20 + micron fraction;
The hydrocarbon feedstocks that are used typically contain from about 0.1 to 2.5 weight percent, and as much as 4 weight percent sulfur. These feedstocks include gas-oils which have a boiling range of from about 340 to 565°C as well as residual feedstocks and mixtures thereof.
The catalytic cracking process is conducted in conventional FCC units wherein reaction temperatures that range of from about 400 to 700°C and regeneration _g_ ~~~J~~~
temperatures from about 500 to 850°C are utilized.
The catalyst, i.e. inventory, is circulated through the unit in a continuous reaction/regeneration process during which the sulfur content of cracked gasoline and diesel fuel fraction is reduced by 5 to 100 percent.
Having.described the basic aspects of the invention, the following examples are given to illustrate specific embodiments in which Table I shows the conditions of the microactivity testing of the examples of the invention, and Table II shows the feedstock properties of the feedstock used in the testing; and Table III shows the conditions of the circulating riser/regenerator pilot unit. All of the cracked products were analyzed for sulfur using capillary gas chromatography with an atomic emission detector, as described in Albro et al (accepted for publication in Journal of High Resolution r Chromatography).
Example 1 An alumina substrate having a surface area of 350 m2/g, a water pore volume of 1 cc/g (SRA alumina as supplied by Grace-Davison) was impregnated with Ni to a level 10% by weight Ni as follows: 48.3 g of Ni (N03) 2~ 6 HZO was dissolved into 100 ml H20. 100 g of dry SRA powder was impregnated with the above Ni(N03)2~6 H20 solution. The impregnated powder was dried overnight at 110°C, then heat treated at 815°C
for 4 hours. The material was then screened to obtain a fraction having a particle size range of 20 to 100 microns. The sized material was then steamed for 4 hours at 815°C with 100% HZO vapor to obtain a sample having a surface area of 106 m2/g, and an X-ray 2~.~.~~~.~
diffraction pattern which identified the presence of Ni (A102) 2 Example 2 A sample which comprised.l0 weight percent Cu on alumina was prepared using the general procedure of Example 1, except that the Ni (N03) z~ 6 Hz0 in the impregnating solution was replaced with 38.6 g of Cu (N03)z~2.5 H20. The surface area of the material was 70 mz/g and the X-ray diffraction pattern identified the presence of Cu(AlOz)z~
Example 3 FCC catalyst samples were prepared by blending 3 weight percent of the samples of Examples 1 and 2 with XP-750, a commercial cracking catalyst obtained from Grace-Davison. The mixture was tested by MAT (ASTM
procedure D-3907), as well as 100% XP-750 and the gasoline analyzed fox sulfur. Figure 1 shows the sulfur content of the full range gasoline, T90 +
380°F, endpoint = 430°F, versus conversion. Figure 2 shows the sulfur content of cut gasoline, T90 = 300°F, endpoint = 340°F versus conversion. As shown in both figures, the sulfur content of the blends with the examples is significantly reduced.
Example 4 A sample which contained 10 weight percent Zn was prepared by the procedure of Example 1 except that the Ni (N03) z~ 6 HZO in the impregnating solution was replaced with 49.4 g of Zn(N03)z~6 H20. The surface area of the material was 142 mz/g and the X-ray pattern identified Zn (AlOz) z 2~.~~?~'~
A blend of 3% by weight with steamed XP-750 was MAT tested as in Example 3. Figure 3 shows the sulfur content of the full range gasoline, and Figure 4 shows the cut gasoline, versus conversion. As seen in these figures, the use of Example 3 significantly reduces the sulfur content of the gasolines.
Example 5 This example shows that the alumina support must be free of Si02. The incipient wetness of Grace-Davison SRS alumina, which contains 6% Si02 was determined to be 0.9 mls H20/g SRS. 45.49 g of Zn (N03) 2~ 6 H20 was dissolved into 237 mls H20. 263 . 04 g of SRS alumina (TV = 31.57%) was impregnated with the above solution. The sample was dried overnight at 110°C, then calcined for 2 hours at 800°C. The surface area of the material was 176 mz/g. A blend containing 5 weight percent of the calcined sample and 95 weight percent steamed (1500°F, 100% H20, 4 hours) XP-750 was prepared and tested by MAT, using 100% XP-750 as the base case. Figure 5 shows the sulfur content of the full range gasoline, and Figure 6 shows the sulfur content of the cut gasoline at T90 = 300°F, versus conversion. As shown when silica is present in the alumina support, the performance of the invention is degraded.
Example 6 A catalyst composition consisting of zinc oxide/lanthana-neodymia/alumina was prepared by coprecipitation as followss an acidic solution containing 68.88 g of Zn0 and 34.44 g of (La/Nd)203 was prepared from their nitrates along with 9.6 g of straight nitric acid, and was diluted with DI-water to -12- i~.r ~ r~
98.4 ml. A dilute sodium aluminate solution containing 68.88 g AlZOa was also readied by diluting 340.99 g of plant-made solution with DI-water to 984 ml. These two solutions were fed into a beaker with 400 g of DI-water at 38-43°C, at an, equal rate of 40 ml/min., with good agitation. Feeding another feedstream of 16% sodium hydroxide solution directly into the beaker, pH of the resulting slurry of mixed hydrous oxide was maintained at 8.5-8.7 while maintaining the slurry at 38 -43°C through the runoff.
After 15 min. aging under this condition, pH of the slurry was raised to 9.0 with dilute sodium hydroxide, and the slurry was dewatered immediately using a Buchner funnel. The filtercake was then washed three times with 1.? liters of 80°C DI-water. The resulting filtercake was dried overnight in 115°C oven, crushed, and sifted. Particles of 80 - 200 meshes were air calcined for 2 hours at 704°C. The resulting material was 74 m2/g BET (N2) surface area, and had the following composition (weight %): 40.72% ZnO, 0.05%
Na20, 16.24% La203, 1.89% Ndz03, 18.18% total RE203, 0.15% 504, and 40.81% A1203. Powder X-ray diffraction scan largely exhibited a pattern characteristic of Zn0 and the presence of La203. This example was then blended sith steamed XP-750 and MAT tested as in the previous examples. Figures 7 and 8 show the full range and cut gasoline sulfur levels for the blend with Example 6 and neat XP-750. As seen, a reduction in the sulfur content of the gasolines is achieved.
Examgle 7 This example shows the utility of this invention in circulating FCC riser/regenerator pilot unit testing. 15 kg of Davison SRA alumina was slurried in _13_ 2~13~~~
H20 to nominally 20% solids. The slurry was peptized with 35% HC1 using 0.15 mols HC1/mole of A1203 in the slurry. The slurry was then sand milled, and peptized again with 0.1 moles HC1/mole of A1203. The slurry was then spray dried. 2 kg of the spray dried alumina was calcined for 2 hours at 538°C to remove moisture and HC1. 100 g of the above material was impregnated with 45. 49 g of Zn (N03) Z~ 6 H20 dissolved in 100 g HZO. This impregnation was repeated 13 times, then combined, making Example 7. The combined materials were calcined for 3 hrs at 704°C to pre-treat the materials for testing.
A charge of 2300 g of XP-750 was loaded into the Davison Circulating Riser (DCR) and a yield curve at various conversions was run. 255.5 g of pretreated Example 7 was then added to the inventory of the DCR
to give a nominal blend of 10% of Example 7 with 90%
of XP-750. Another yield curve was run by varying the conversion. The gasolines from the riser testing were analyzed fur sulfur in a similar fashion to the previous MAT studies. Figures 9 and 10 show the full range and cut gasolines for neat XP-750 and the 10%
blend with Example 7. Again, a clear reduction in the sulfur content of the gasolines is observed with this invention in riser/regenerator pilot unit testing. To further illustrate the effectiveness of this invention Figures 11 - 18 show the concentrations of the individual classes of sulfur species in the gasoline fraction from the pilot unit testing. These classes are, respectively, the C3 to C6 mercaptans, thiophene, methylthiophenes, tetrahydrothiophene, CZ alkyl thiophenes, C3 alkyl thiophenes, C4 alkyl thiophenes, and benzothiophene. In all cases, a reduction of the concentrations of the compounds is observed.
2~.~ ~~~
Furthermore, an increase in gasoline yield, which would account for the reduction in concentration in a simple way was not observed.
TABLE I
Conditions far Microactivity Testing (MAT) Temperature, °F
nominal catalyst charge, gr. 5 cat to oil weight ratios 2 3 4 WHSV, hr-1 60 40 30 TABLE II
Feed Properties °API 27.8 Anline Point, °F 187 Sulfur, wt.% 0.474 Total Nitrogen, wt.% 0.07 Basic Nitrogen, wt.% 0.02 Conradson Carbon, wt.% 0.16 Ni, ppm 0.14 0.1 V, ppm 0.4 FE, ppm Cu, ppm <0.1 Simulated Distillation, vol.% F
IBp 338 90 ~ 910 FBp 1065 K factor 11.68 TABLE III
Testina Conditions of the Davison Circulatina Riser jDCR) FCC Pilot Plant Adiabatic Operating Mode Riser Outlet Temperature - 970°F
Feed Preheat Temperature - 250 - 750°F
Regenerator Temperature - 1300°F
Reactor Pressure - 25 psig Catalyst Deactivation of the XP-750:
LO 4 hrs./1500°F/100% 0 psig Steam Fluid Bed Steaming
Claims (12)
1. A catalytic cracking catalyst composition which comprises (1) a molecular sieve dispersed in an inorganic oxide matrix, and (2) a component comprising a Lewis acid supported on an alumina, the alumina having a surface area of 30 to 400m2/g and a particle size of 1 to 150 µu, the Lewis acid being selected from the group consisting of elements and compounds of Ni, Cu, Zn, Ag, Cd, In, Sn, Hg, Ti, Pb, Bi, B, Al (other than Al2O3), Ga and mixtures thereof and being present in an amount ranging from 1 to 50 weight percent based on the total weight of the Lewis acid and alumina.
2. The composition of claim 1 wherein said component is included as a separate particulate additive.
3. The composition of claim 1 wherein said component is included in said matrix.
4. The composition of claim 1 which contains from 1 to 50 weight percent of said component.
5. The composition of claim 1 which contains from 1 to 50 weight percent of said component, from 5 to 50 weight percent synthetic faujasite, from 10 to 60 weight percent clay, and from 10 to 30 weight percent of an inorganic oxide binder selected from the group consisting of silica, alumina and silica-alumina, hydrogels and sols.
6. The composition of claim 1 wherein the alumina is lanthana stabilized.
7. The composition of claim 1 wherein said Lewis acid is Zn.
8. A composition for reducing the sulfur level of catalytically cracked hydrocarbons, which comprises a component comprising a Lewis acid supported on alumina, the alumina having a surface area of 30 to 400 m2/g and a particle size of 1 to 150 µu, the Lewis acid being selected from the group and consisting of elements and compounds of Ni, Cu, Zn, Ag, Ca, In, Sn, Hg, Ti, Pb, Bi, B, Al(other than Al2O3) Ga, and mixtures thereof and being present in an amount ranging from 1 to 50 weight percent based on the total weight of the Lewis acid and alumina.
9. The composition of claim 8 wherein the alumina is lanthana stabilized.
10. The composition of claim 6 wherein the composition has a particle size of 20 to 140 µm, a DI of 1 to 20, and a bulk density of 0.4 to 0.9.
11. A method for the catalytic cracking of sulfur-containing hydrocarbons which comprises reacting a hydrocarbon feedstock with the catalyst of claim 1 and removing gasoline fractions having a reduced sulfur content.
12. The method of claim 11 wherein said feedstock contains in excess of up to 4 weight percent S.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US08/010,035 | 1993-01-27 | ||
US08/010,035 US5376608A (en) | 1993-01-27 | 1993-01-27 | Sulfur reduction in FCC gasoline |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2113219A1 CA2113219A1 (en) | 1994-07-28 |
CA2113219C true CA2113219C (en) | 2002-11-12 |
Family
ID=21743475
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA002113219A Expired - Lifetime CA2113219C (en) | 1993-01-27 | 1994-01-11 | Sulfur reduction in fcc gasoline |
Country Status (9)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US5376608A (en) |
EP (1) | EP0609971B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP3693362B2 (en) |
KR (1) | KR100301883B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN1049678C (en) |
CA (1) | CA2113219C (en) |
DE (1) | DE69414278T2 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2122154T3 (en) |
TW (1) | TW287120B (en) |
Families Citing this family (49)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5376608A (en) * | 1993-01-27 | 1994-12-27 | W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn. | Sulfur reduction in FCC gasoline |
US6482313B1 (en) | 1994-10-03 | 2002-11-19 | Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company | FCC process incorporating crystalline microporous oxide catalysts having increased Lewis acidity |
US6673734B1 (en) | 1994-10-03 | 2004-01-06 | Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company | Crystalline microporous oxide catalysts having increased Lewis acidity and methods for the preparation thereof |
US6036847A (en) * | 1996-03-26 | 2000-03-14 | W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn. | Compositions for use in catalytic cracking to make reduced sulfur content gasoline |
NO317500B1 (en) * | 1998-03-13 | 2004-11-08 | Statoil Asa | Process and composition for reducing the sulfur content of a hydrocarbon mixture, and use thereof |
US20020153283A1 (en) * | 1998-12-28 | 2002-10-24 | Arthur W Chester | Gasoline sulfur reduction in fluid catalytic cracking |
US6852214B1 (en) * | 1998-08-31 | 2005-02-08 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Gasoline sulfur reduction in fluid catalytic cracking |
US6974787B2 (en) | 1998-08-31 | 2005-12-13 | Exxonmobil Corporation | Gasoline sulfur reduction in fluid catalytic cracking |
US6846403B2 (en) * | 1998-12-28 | 2005-01-25 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Gasoline sulfur reduction in fluid catalytic cracking |
US7803267B2 (en) * | 1998-12-28 | 2010-09-28 | W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn. | Gasoline sulfur reduction in fluid catalytic cracking |
CN1122702C (en) * | 1998-12-29 | 2003-10-01 | 中国石油化工集团公司 | Sulfur transferring assistant for catalytic cracking of hydrocarbon and its usage |
US6635169B1 (en) | 1999-09-20 | 2003-10-21 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Method for reducing gasoline sulfur in fluid catalytic cracking |
JP4609961B2 (en) * | 2000-01-28 | 2011-01-12 | Jx日鉱日石エネルギー株式会社 | Method for removing sulfur compounds |
CN1102640C (en) * | 2000-07-11 | 2003-03-05 | 石油大学(华东) | Catalytic cracking and desulfurizing catalyst for refining light oil products |
US6635168B2 (en) * | 2001-04-13 | 2003-10-21 | W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn | Gasoline sulfur reduction catalyst for fluid catalytic cracking process |
US6558533B2 (en) | 2001-04-13 | 2003-05-06 | W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn | Process for sulfur removal from hydrocarbon liquids |
US7153413B2 (en) * | 2001-07-10 | 2006-12-26 | W.R. Grace &Co.-Conn. | Gasoline sulfur reduction in fluid catalytic cracking |
CN1665587B (en) | 2002-06-28 | 2010-05-12 | 阿尔伯麦尔荷兰有限公司 | FCC catalyst for reducing the sulfur content in gasoline and diesel |
US7449104B2 (en) * | 2002-07-05 | 2008-11-11 | Conocophilips Company | Integrated catalytic cracking and desulfurization system |
EP1403358A1 (en) * | 2002-09-27 | 2004-03-31 | ENI S.p.A. | Process and catalysts for deep desulphurization of fuels |
US7507686B2 (en) * | 2002-12-03 | 2009-03-24 | W. R. Grace & Co. - Conn. | Gasoline sulfur reduction in fluid catalytic cracking |
US7087156B2 (en) * | 2002-12-19 | 2006-08-08 | W.R. Grace & Co. - Conn. | Process for removal of nitrogen containing contaminants from gas oil feedstreams |
US7160438B2 (en) * | 2002-12-19 | 2007-01-09 | W.R. Grace & Co. - Conn. | Process for removal of nitrogen containing contaminants from gas oil feedstreams |
CN1261216C (en) * | 2003-05-30 | 2006-06-28 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Hydrocarbon cracking catalyst with molecular sieve and preparing method thereof |
CN1261528C (en) | 2003-06-30 | 2006-06-28 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Cracking catalyst having desulfidation |
US7347930B2 (en) * | 2003-10-16 | 2008-03-25 | China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation | Process for cracking hydrocarbon oils |
US8084383B2 (en) * | 2004-03-16 | 2011-12-27 | W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn. | Gasoline sulfur reduction catalyst for fluid catalytic cracking process |
US20050205466A1 (en) * | 2004-03-19 | 2005-09-22 | Beswick Colin L | Zn-containing FCC catalyst and use thereof for the reduction of sulfur in gasoline |
TWI523688B (en) | 2005-02-25 | 2016-03-01 | W R 康格雷氏公司 | A method of reducing the sulfur content of a catalytically cracked petro leum fraction and a fluid catalytic cracking process |
CN100404128C (en) * | 2005-05-12 | 2008-07-23 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Assitants for catalyzing cyacking of reducing gasoline sulphur content, preparation process and application thereof |
CA2645839C (en) * | 2006-03-15 | 2016-08-16 | Basf Catalysts Llc | Catalyst composition for reducilng gasoline sulfur content in catalytic cracking process |
US20090230023A1 (en) | 2006-06-28 | 2009-09-17 | Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd. | Fluid catalytic cracking catalyst having desulfurizing functions, process for production of the same, and process for production of low-sulfur catalytically cracked gasoline with the catalyst |
US8623199B2 (en) | 2006-06-28 | 2014-01-07 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Clay additive for reduction of sulfur in catalytically cracked gasoline |
US8409428B2 (en) | 2006-06-28 | 2013-04-02 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Catalyst additive for reduction of sulfur in catalytically cracked gasoline |
CA2678810C (en) * | 2007-02-21 | 2015-08-25 | W.R. Grace & Co. -Conn. | Gasoline sulfur reduction catalyst for fluid catalytic cracking process |
EP2310122B1 (en) | 2008-07-30 | 2017-05-24 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Metallic clay based fcc gasoline sulfur reduction additive compositions |
CN101921611B (en) * | 2009-06-12 | 2013-07-31 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Catalytic cracking method and system for reducing sulphur content of petrol |
US8905478B2 (en) * | 2010-03-17 | 2014-12-09 | Britax Child Safety, Inc. | Child safety seat with structural support |
US20140235429A1 (en) * | 2011-10-12 | 2014-08-21 | Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. | Process for enhancing nickel tolerance of heavy hydrocarbon cracking catalysts |
CN103055919B (en) * | 2011-10-18 | 2015-08-26 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | A kind of ordered structure catalyst of steam cracking propylene |
WO2013064955A2 (en) | 2011-11-03 | 2013-05-10 | Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. | Process for reduction of sulfur in fcc liquid products through the use of carbon monoxide as a reducing agent |
CN104549475B (en) * | 2013-10-29 | 2017-02-08 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Preparation method of FCC gasoline desulfurization agent composition |
CN105582941B (en) * | 2014-10-20 | 2018-03-20 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | A kind of method of desulphurization catalyst and preparation method thereof and desulfurization of hydrocarbon oil |
AU2017325716B2 (en) | 2016-09-16 | 2020-01-30 | Lummus Technology Llc | Fluid catalytic cracking process and apparatus for maximizing light olefin yield and other applications |
CN106955746A (en) * | 2017-03-17 | 2017-07-18 | 钦州学院 | A kind of complex carrier of the aluminum oxide containing zinc oxide and preparation method thereof |
WO2019087052A1 (en) * | 2017-10-31 | 2019-05-09 | Reliance Industries Limited | A process for reducing the content of sulfur containing compounds in a hydrocarbon feed |
WO2019229689A1 (en) * | 2018-06-01 | 2019-12-05 | Reliance Industries Limited | A process for adsorptive desulphurization of naphtha |
CN110252385A (en) * | 2019-06-17 | 2019-09-20 | 青岛惠城环保科技股份有限公司 | A kind of catalytic cracking catalyst |
CN114080272A (en) | 2019-07-02 | 2022-02-22 | 鲁姆斯科技有限责任公司 | Fluid catalytic cracking process and apparatus |
Family Cites Families (45)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE275405C (en) * | ||||
US3883442A (en) * | 1972-05-19 | 1975-05-13 | Union Oil Co | Non-shrinking alumina-based catalyst compositions |
US3808121A (en) * | 1972-11-01 | 1974-04-30 | Mobil Oil Corp | Method of regenerating a hydrocarbon conversion catalyst to minimize carbon monoxide in regenerator effluent |
US4010116A (en) * | 1974-10-15 | 1977-03-01 | Filtrol Corporation | Fluid cracking catalysts |
AU517621B2 (en) * | 1975-12-19 | 1981-08-13 | Amoco Corporation | Catalytic cracking with reduced emission of noxious gases |
US4071436A (en) * | 1976-03-11 | 1978-01-31 | Chevron Research Company | Process for removing sulphur from a gas |
CA1117511A (en) * | 1977-11-02 | 1982-02-02 | Edwin W. Albers | Cracking catalyst composition |
US4497902A (en) * | 1979-04-11 | 1985-02-05 | Standard Oil Company (Indiana) | Composition for removing sulfur oxides from a gas |
US4423019A (en) * | 1979-04-11 | 1983-12-27 | Standard Oil Company (Indiana) | Process for removing sulfur oxides from a gas |
US4369130A (en) * | 1979-04-11 | 1983-01-18 | Standard Oil Company | Composition for removing sulfur oxides from a gas |
US4259176A (en) * | 1979-09-13 | 1981-03-31 | Chevron Research Company | Restricting silica content of catalyst inventory to prevent alumina poisoning for SOx control |
US4263020A (en) * | 1980-01-02 | 1981-04-21 | Exxon Research & Engineering Co. | Removal of sulfur from process streams |
EP0039266B1 (en) * | 1980-04-23 | 1984-10-24 | Rhone-Poulenc Specialites Chimiques | Oxidation process of hydrogen sulfide and organic compounds of sulfur |
US4758418A (en) * | 1980-07-29 | 1988-07-19 | Union Carbide Corporation | Process for combusting solid sulfur-containing material |
JPS5761085A (en) * | 1980-07-29 | 1982-04-13 | Atlantic Richfield Co | Conversion of hydrocarbon |
US4495304A (en) * | 1980-07-29 | 1985-01-22 | Atlantic Richfield Company | Catalyst for conversion of hydrocarbons |
US4495305A (en) * | 1980-07-29 | 1985-01-22 | Atlantic Richfield Company | Catalyst for conversion of hydrocarbons |
US4472267A (en) * | 1980-07-29 | 1984-09-18 | Atlantic Richfield Company | Catalyst and process for conversion of hydrocarbons |
US4642178A (en) * | 1980-07-29 | 1987-02-10 | Katalistiks, Inc. | Process for conversion of hydrocarbons |
US4376103A (en) * | 1981-10-26 | 1983-03-08 | Standard Oil Company (Indiana) | Removing sulfur oxides from a gas |
US4405443A (en) * | 1982-03-29 | 1983-09-20 | Standard Oil Company (Indiana) | Process for removing sulfur oxides from a gas |
US4425312A (en) * | 1982-07-02 | 1984-01-10 | Exxon Research And Engineering Co. | Removal of sulfur from process streams |
US4471070A (en) * | 1982-11-29 | 1984-09-11 | Atlantic Richfield Company | Preparative process for alkaline earth metal, aluminum-containing spinels |
US4428827A (en) * | 1983-01-24 | 1984-01-31 | Uop Inc. | FCC Sulfur oxide acceptor |
US4836993A (en) * | 1983-09-27 | 1989-06-06 | Amoco Corporation | Process for removing sulfur oxides from a gas |
US4735705A (en) * | 1984-05-30 | 1988-04-05 | Katalistiks International Inc. | Composition of matter and process useful for conversion of hydrocarbons |
US4622210A (en) * | 1984-08-13 | 1986-11-11 | Standard Oil Company (Indiana) | Sulfur oxide and particulate removal system |
US4609539A (en) * | 1984-08-13 | 1986-09-02 | Standard Oil Company (Indiana) | Process for simultaneously removing sulfur oxides and particulates |
US4918036A (en) * | 1984-08-16 | 1990-04-17 | W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn. | Cracking catalyst/sulfur oxide gettering agent compositions |
EP0188841B2 (en) * | 1984-12-21 | 1992-01-15 | Catalysts & Chemicals Industries Co., Ltd. | Hydrocarbon catalytic cracking catalyst compositions and method therefor |
US4592829A (en) * | 1984-12-26 | 1986-06-03 | Exxon Research And Engineering Co. | Desulfurization of hydrocarbons |
US4620053A (en) * | 1985-06-17 | 1986-10-28 | Phillips Petroleum Company | Zinc aluminate double bond isomerization catalyst and double bond isomerization of olefins employing said catalyst |
US4642177A (en) * | 1985-09-30 | 1987-02-10 | Union Oil Company Of California | Process for reducing sulfur oxide emissions from catalytic cracking units |
US4728635A (en) * | 1986-04-07 | 1988-03-01 | Katalistiks International Inc. | Alkaline earth metal spinels and processes for making |
US4790982A (en) * | 1986-04-07 | 1988-12-13 | Katalistiks International, Inc. | Metal-containing spinel composition and process of using same |
US4755498A (en) * | 1986-04-30 | 1988-07-05 | International Fuel Cells Corporation | Steam reforming catalyst |
US4690806A (en) * | 1986-05-01 | 1987-09-01 | Exxon Research And Engineering Company | Removal of sulfur from process streams |
US4724226A (en) * | 1986-09-23 | 1988-02-09 | W. R. Grace & Co. | Boria-promoted HP catalyst |
DE3825169A1 (en) * | 1988-07-23 | 1990-02-01 | Huels Chemische Werke Ag | METHOD FOR FINE DESULFURATION OF HYDROCARBONS |
US5110780A (en) * | 1988-08-12 | 1992-05-05 | W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn. | Carbon monoxide oxidation catalyst |
CA2004511C (en) * | 1989-03-02 | 1999-11-02 | Wu-Cheng Cheng | Catalytic cracking |
US5002654A (en) * | 1989-12-28 | 1991-03-26 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Reducing NOx emissions with zinc catalyst |
US5077261A (en) * | 1990-06-25 | 1991-12-31 | Phillips Petroleum Company | Sulfur absorbants |
CA2060229A1 (en) * | 1991-02-05 | 1992-08-06 | Toshiaki Hayasaka | Exhaust gas purifying catalyst and an exhaust gas purifying method using the catalyst |
US5376608A (en) * | 1993-01-27 | 1994-12-27 | W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn. | Sulfur reduction in FCC gasoline |
-
1993
- 1993-01-27 US US08/010,035 patent/US5376608A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1993-11-24 TW TW082109900A patent/TW287120B/zh not_active IP Right Cessation
-
1994
- 1994-01-11 CA CA002113219A patent/CA2113219C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1994-01-12 KR KR1019940000546A patent/KR100301883B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1994-01-14 JP JP01498194A patent/JP3693362B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1994-01-18 ES ES94250006T patent/ES2122154T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1994-01-18 DE DE69414278T patent/DE69414278T2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1994-01-18 EP EP94250006A patent/EP0609971B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1994-01-27 CN CN94101167A patent/CN1049678C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1994-08-30 US US08/297,738 patent/US5525210A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
KR940018134A (en) | 1994-08-16 |
JP3693362B2 (en) | 2005-09-07 |
ES2122154T3 (en) | 1998-12-16 |
DE69414278D1 (en) | 1998-12-10 |
CA2113219A1 (en) | 1994-07-28 |
CN1093735A (en) | 1994-10-19 |
CN1049678C (en) | 2000-02-23 |
US5525210A (en) | 1996-06-11 |
EP0609971B1 (en) | 1998-11-04 |
KR100301883B1 (en) | 2001-11-30 |
EP0609971A1 (en) | 1994-08-10 |
JPH06277519A (en) | 1994-10-04 |
US5376608A (en) | 1994-12-27 |
DE69414278T2 (en) | 1999-06-10 |
TW287120B (en) | 1996-10-01 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA2113219C (en) | Sulfur reduction in fcc gasoline | |
US5194413A (en) | Catalytic cracking catalysts and additives | |
EP2604340B1 (en) | Gasoline sulfur reductions catalyst for fluid catalytic cracking process | |
EP1381461B1 (en) | Gasoline sulfur reduction catalyst for fluid catalytic cracking process | |
AU2005224255B2 (en) | Gasoline sulfur reduction catalyst for fluid catalytic cracking process | |
AU2002254479A1 (en) | Gasoline sulfur reduction catalyst for fluid catalytic cracking process | |
AU7588600A (en) | Gasoline sulfur reduction in fluid catalytic cracking | |
US6605207B2 (en) | Bayerite alumina clad zeolite and cracking catalysts containing same | |
US20050205466A1 (en) | Zn-containing FCC catalyst and use thereof for the reduction of sulfur in gasoline | |
ZA200306365B (en) | Gasoline sulfur reduction catalyst for fluid catalytic cracking process. | |
CA2061663A1 (en) | Catalytic cracking catalyst additive | |
MXPA06009287A (en) | Gasoline sulfur reduction catalyst for fluid catalytic cracking process |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
EEER | Examination request | ||
MKEX | Expiry |
Effective date: 20140113 |