CA2144766C - Determination of the extent of cross-linking prior to the intentional curing of polymers - Google Patents
Determination of the extent of cross-linking prior to the intentional curing of polymers Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2144766C CA2144766C CA002144766A CA2144766A CA2144766C CA 2144766 C CA2144766 C CA 2144766C CA 002144766 A CA002144766 A CA 002144766A CA 2144766 A CA2144766 A CA 2144766A CA 2144766 C CA2144766 C CA 2144766C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- impedance
- linking
- polymer material
- voltage
- cross
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N27/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
- G01N33/26—Oils; viscous liquids; paints; inks
- G01N33/32—Paints; inks
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N27/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means
- G01N27/02—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means by investigating impedance
- G01N27/04—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means by investigating impedance by investigating resistance
- G01N27/041—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means by investigating impedance by investigating resistance of a solid body
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
- G01N33/44—Resins; rubber; leather
- G01N33/442—Resins, plastics
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2203/00—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
- G01N2203/0058—Kind of property studied
- G01N2203/0092—Visco-elasticity, solidification, curing, cross-linking degree, vulcanisation or strength properties of semi-solid materials
Abstract
Detection of the extent of cross-linking of a high impedance polymer material during a pre-cure stage is disclosed. The sen-sor inputs a test signal (20) to the polymer material (21) and a fixed resistance reference material (22) to generate an output vol-tage (27) which is indicative of the impedance of the sample. The initial output adopted as a reference and subsequent voltage dif-ferences are taken as a relative indicator of the extent of cross-linking which has occurred within the polymer material.
Description
~~.~~-~7~~ ~'CT/US9 3 / 0 8 g 1 3 03 Reed PCT~PTO 2 0 OCT 154 M~sTHOD .AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING
EB;TENT OF CURE IN POLYMERS
The present inveantion relates to a METHOD AND APPARATUS
1. Field of Invmntion This invention relates to a process for determining the extent of cross-linking which has occurred in a polymeric material such as paint, dental resin, B-staged resin, etc.. More particularly, the present invention pertains to the detection of extent of curing of such materials i.n their pre-cure stage.
EB;TENT OF CURE IN POLYMERS
The present inveantion relates to a METHOD AND APPARATUS
1. Field of Invmntion This invention relates to a process for determining the extent of cross-linking which has occurred in a polymeric material such as paint, dental resin, B-staged resin, etc.. More particularly, the present invention pertains to the detection of extent of curing of such materials i.n their pre-cure stage.
2. Prior A.rt Thermosetting resins form a class of very useful plastics which have been applied throughout the aerospace industry, construction industry, automotive manufacturing, medical applications, adhesives, and in virtually every area where permanent characteristics of weatherability, structural stiffness, strength and ease of manufacture 'through molding process provides an advantage over competing metals, ceramics and other compositions. Dental applications include filling and facia materials which are applied to the tooth in liquid form and thEan pol~~rmerized by W radiation or other known techniques. Marry paint compositions are a form of thermosetting resin whose application depends on having a uniform liquid state which can be readily applied by brush or air gun. Matched die, filament winding, transfer molding, lay up molding and pultrusion techniques for fabricating structural and component parts, hou:~ings, etc., depend on maintenance of a flowable condition which can wet fibers or quickly fill mold cavitiEas in .a liquid state.
These resin materials are typically manufactured in a low viscous liquid state wherein the polymer material has incurred minimal cross-linking prior to the curing stage. It is, of course, this cross-linking that solidifies the thermosetting composition into a permanent, rigid structure characterizing this group of plastics. The shelf life of such products is AMENDED SHEET
WO 94/07128 ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ PCT/US93/08813 significani~, because premature curing results in permanent, irreversible condition which makes the material useless for further processing. Indeed, the extent: of 'caste arising because of premature curing of thermosett~.ng materials is substantial. In industries where partially cured materials must be discarded for safety rea:aons,, the losses are even more significant.
For examp7.e, the manufacture of high performance aircraft components from resins that have already partly cured could: result in weakened structures that put life in jeopardy. Therefore, it is very likely that a substantial amount of good resin is discarded because of suspicion of excessive pre-cure.
Because most resins will inherently begin cross linking upon manufacture and will continue such cross linking uwtil finally cured, measures are taken to reduce and control this process. The primary control measure is 'to maintain the resins at low temperatures to reduce reaction rates to a minimum. This low temperature environment needs to be maintained until the material is ready for final curing. Unfortunately, the resin :material appearance does not always reflect the degree of curing which has occurred during this pre-cure stage. If° variations in temperature occur during storage, their impact may be substantially unknown.
Therefore, the extent of cure is often a risk factor that must be considered with the choice of any particular ~..~esin.
With paints and adhesives, viscosity provides a useful measure of acceptability of pre-cure. In general., their shelf life is determined by the time required far the material to set up or become too viscous to flow well. There are, however, no current tests to det:ermi.ne the actual state of cross-linking in paints and adhesives. Current practice is to examine the viscosity oj: the materials qualitatively as noted, WO 94/07128 ~ ~ ~ PCT/US93/08813 or perform sample. tests to determine the performance of these resins in <3 particular application.
With respect: to polymers used in a matrix material for fiber reinforced composites, there are two distinct time periods during which cross linking takes place.
The first period can be called the shelf life of the material and the second is the curing cycle. Typically, thermosetting resins for composites are stored at very low temperatures such as -0 degrees F. The curing cycle occurs when the resins are subjected to heat/radiation and/or pressure dluring molding processes. For example, elevated te~mperat.ures in the range of 200 to 400 degrees F, and occasionally as high as 700 degrees F, are common for curing these polymers and can enable the completion of cross linking in a short time interval.
Users of fiber reinforced thermosetting composites have created several mechanical tests to evaluate the state of ciunulat.ive cross linking in the storage and pre-cure stages. For example, tack and drape properties give an indication of the extent of cure. These tests are acknowledged i~o be highly subjective and unreliable, and are at best general qualitative indicators having little quanititative value.
A more specil:ic application of thermosetting resins for composite materials is to impregnate a layer of fiber reinforcement with resin, and then store this "pre-preg" or "B-staged" material for later use.
Obviously, 'this Es-staged material will have a limited shelf life, depending upon the rate of continued cross linking, which is affected mainly by temperature. It is presently difficult, subjective, and consumptive of material to test t:he B-staged material for the extent of cross linking. If the B-staged material has reached a particular stage of cross linkage, it is no longer usable material and must be discarded on the basis of storage time:, rather than on the actual amount of cross linking.
These resin materials are typically manufactured in a low viscous liquid state wherein the polymer material has incurred minimal cross-linking prior to the curing stage. It is, of course, this cross-linking that solidifies the thermosetting composition into a permanent, rigid structure characterizing this group of plastics. The shelf life of such products is AMENDED SHEET
WO 94/07128 ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ PCT/US93/08813 significani~, because premature curing results in permanent, irreversible condition which makes the material useless for further processing. Indeed, the extent: of 'caste arising because of premature curing of thermosett~.ng materials is substantial. In industries where partially cured materials must be discarded for safety rea:aons,, the losses are even more significant.
For examp7.e, the manufacture of high performance aircraft components from resins that have already partly cured could: result in weakened structures that put life in jeopardy. Therefore, it is very likely that a substantial amount of good resin is discarded because of suspicion of excessive pre-cure.
Because most resins will inherently begin cross linking upon manufacture and will continue such cross linking uwtil finally cured, measures are taken to reduce and control this process. The primary control measure is 'to maintain the resins at low temperatures to reduce reaction rates to a minimum. This low temperature environment needs to be maintained until the material is ready for final curing. Unfortunately, the resin :material appearance does not always reflect the degree of curing which has occurred during this pre-cure stage. If° variations in temperature occur during storage, their impact may be substantially unknown.
Therefore, the extent of cure is often a risk factor that must be considered with the choice of any particular ~..~esin.
With paints and adhesives, viscosity provides a useful measure of acceptability of pre-cure. In general., their shelf life is determined by the time required far the material to set up or become too viscous to flow well. There are, however, no current tests to det:ermi.ne the actual state of cross-linking in paints and adhesives. Current practice is to examine the viscosity oj: the materials qualitatively as noted, WO 94/07128 ~ ~ ~ PCT/US93/08813 or perform sample. tests to determine the performance of these resins in <3 particular application.
With respect: to polymers used in a matrix material for fiber reinforced composites, there are two distinct time periods during which cross linking takes place.
The first period can be called the shelf life of the material and the second is the curing cycle. Typically, thermosetting resins for composites are stored at very low temperatures such as -0 degrees F. The curing cycle occurs when the resins are subjected to heat/radiation and/or pressure dluring molding processes. For example, elevated te~mperat.ures in the range of 200 to 400 degrees F, and occasionally as high as 700 degrees F, are common for curing these polymers and can enable the completion of cross linking in a short time interval.
Users of fiber reinforced thermosetting composites have created several mechanical tests to evaluate the state of ciunulat.ive cross linking in the storage and pre-cure stages. For example, tack and drape properties give an indication of the extent of cure. These tests are acknowledged i~o be highly subjective and unreliable, and are at best general qualitative indicators having little quanititative value.
A more specil:ic application of thermosetting resins for composite materials is to impregnate a layer of fiber reinforcement with resin, and then store this "pre-preg" or "B-staged" material for later use.
Obviously, 'this Es-staged material will have a limited shelf life, depending upon the rate of continued cross linking, which is affected mainly by temperature. It is presently difficult, subjective, and consumptive of material to test t:he B-staged material for the extent of cross linking. If the B-staged material has reached a particular stage of cross linkage, it is no longer usable material and must be discarded on the basis of storage time:, rather than on the actual amount of cross linking.
There is increasing interest in the composites industry to monitor, adjust and optimize the cure cycle of thermoset polymers. Accordingly, it is known to evaluate cross linking during actual cure using viscometers, infrared meters, and microdielectrometers.
This period of evaluation is characterized by the resins being subjected to high temperatures used to fully complete the curing of the materials. The primary interest is to identify the gelation point and then to confirm final stage at which the curing process is complete, so that the final product can be removed without extending cure time and conditions beyond that which is necessary. This enables efficient use of expensive equipment and also insures that the manufactured part is not removed from the mold prior to complete cross linking.
The present inventors are unaware of any activity designed to determine the extent of cross linking in polymers prior to the actual curing process within a high temperature environment. Specifically, adhesives and paints represent a broad class of polymers which do not require devoted temperatures to cure to f final stage .
Because curing in such polymers is an ongoing process at a somewhat continuous rate, neither intermediate nor final cure status is generally measured. Where polymers are cured in two stages representing pre-cure and elevated final process, the only point of measurement of cross linking in polymers has occurred only during the elevated conditions, with little regard for cross linking during the pre-cure stage or shelf-life period.
This practice may have arisen in part from an assumption that the electrical response of any polymer at low temperatures applied during storage would not provide enough signal to show a measurable change as the pre-cure cross linking continues.
What is needed is an effective method for detecting the extent of cure in polymer materials during the shelf-life period, to enable more effective determination of whether specific batches or lot:. of polymer have exceeded safe limits in the pre-cure stage. Such procedures could provide quanti.tat_ive determination of which resins must be 5 discarded and which can be safely used, and yield substantial savings in. cost and natural resources.
OBJECT AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an object of_ the present invention to provide a device and method for enabling the determination of the extent of cross linking in any z:~esistive polymer.
The method of this invention includes:
a) applying a test signal through a sensor to the polymer material in th~~ pre-cure sage to determine a level of impedance and corresponding sample i~oltage representative of a degree o' cross-l.:~nking witluin the material;
b) applying the same test signal through the sensor to a reference material having a fixed resistance to determine a referf=nce ,~ro.ltage;
This period of evaluation is characterized by the resins being subjected to high temperatures used to fully complete the curing of the materials. The primary interest is to identify the gelation point and then to confirm final stage at which the curing process is complete, so that the final product can be removed without extending cure time and conditions beyond that which is necessary. This enables efficient use of expensive equipment and also insures that the manufactured part is not removed from the mold prior to complete cross linking.
The present inventors are unaware of any activity designed to determine the extent of cross linking in polymers prior to the actual curing process within a high temperature environment. Specifically, adhesives and paints represent a broad class of polymers which do not require devoted temperatures to cure to f final stage .
Because curing in such polymers is an ongoing process at a somewhat continuous rate, neither intermediate nor final cure status is generally measured. Where polymers are cured in two stages representing pre-cure and elevated final process, the only point of measurement of cross linking in polymers has occurred only during the elevated conditions, with little regard for cross linking during the pre-cure stage or shelf-life period.
This practice may have arisen in part from an assumption that the electrical response of any polymer at low temperatures applied during storage would not provide enough signal to show a measurable change as the pre-cure cross linking continues.
What is needed is an effective method for detecting the extent of cure in polymer materials during the shelf-life period, to enable more effective determination of whether specific batches or lot:. of polymer have exceeded safe limits in the pre-cure stage. Such procedures could provide quanti.tat_ive determination of which resins must be 5 discarded and which can be safely used, and yield substantial savings in. cost and natural resources.
OBJECT AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an object of_ the present invention to provide a device and method for enabling the determination of the extent of cross linking in any z:~esistive polymer.
The method of this invention includes:
a) applying a test signal through a sensor to the polymer material in th~~ pre-cure sage to determine a level of impedance and corresponding sample i~oltage representative of a degree o' cross-l.:~nking witluin the material;
b) applying the same test signal through the sensor to a reference material having a fixed resistance to determine a referf=nce ,~ro.ltage;
c) determining a voltage difference between the test signal applied to the polymer at pre-cure stage and the test signal applied to the reference material as the reference voltage; and d) correlating the voltage difference as a relative indicator of the extent of cross-linking which has occurred within the polymer material, based on comparison of magnitude of the voltage difference with respect to a comparable potential range of impedance for the polymer material from its lower impedance stage at minimal cross-linking to its high impedance stage at maximum impedance for total cross-linking.
Another aspect of this invention is represented by a device for testing extent of cross-linking of a polymer material in a pre-cure stage, wherein the device comprises a signal generator capable of generating a low frequency, low amplitude signal with an attached sensor adapted for receiving a coating of the polymer material to be tested, wherein the sensor has a known impedance.
A reference material is provided which has a resistance approximately equal to the geometric mean of (i) the impedance of the sensor with polymer material in its lower-resistivity state, and (ii) the expected impedance of the polymer material when the polymer material has reached its high resistivity state upon full curing.
The device includes voltage means for determining voltage difference between a signal detected through the sensor with polymer material and a signal detected through the sensor at the reference material. Means are provided and coupled to the voltage means for converting the voltage difference to a factor representing the extent of cross-linking which has occurred within the polymer material.
Other objects and features of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art, based upon the following detailed description of a preferred WO 94/07128 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ PCT/US93/08813 embodiment, taken in combination with the accompanying drawings.
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 shows a graphic, block diagram of the various functional features of the present invention.
Figure 2 slhows a schematic diagram of circuitry providing a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
Figure 3 shows an exploded view of a sensor device useful with then disclosed circuitry for monitoring extended pi-eliminarization.
Figure: 4 slhows an additional embodiment of the combined sensor and circuitry for implementing the subject invention.
Figure: 5 di:~closes an additional embodiment of the subject invention, in combination with pre-preg material.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The present inventors have discovered that it is possible to determine the extent of cross-linking in any resistive polymer, even during the pre-cure stage.
Specifically, the invention comprises a method for detecting extent of cross-linking of a high impedance polymer material during a pre-cure stage. The first step of this mei:hod involves applying a test signal through a sE:nsor to the polymer material in the pre-cure stage to dete=-mine a level of impedance and corresponding sample voltage representative of a degree of cross-linking within the material. Typically, this signal will be an electric current whose amplitude is inversely proportional with the resistance of the polymer in accordance with Ohms law I=E/R. Other techniques of measuring the resistance of the material may likewisea be employed.
The test signal is conducted directly into the polymer by means of an interdigitated electrode sensor which is inserted in contact with the polymer. Other than the interdigitated relationship of the electrodes, the geometry of the probe is not significant. Any conductive material coupled at one end to a voltage source may be used as a probe. Where the sensor is used with high resistivity resins, the probe should be shielded by a shielding means coupled around the sensor to shield from static electricity.
The next step of this methodology is applying the same test signal as applied in the previous step through the sensor to a reference material, such as a fixed value resistor. This provides the quantitative character of the procedure. The reference material should have a fixed resistance to determine a reference voltage. A voltage difference between the test signal applied to the polymer at pre-cure stage and the test signal applied to the reference material as the reference voltage is then determined. This voltage difference serves as a relative indicator of the extent of cross-linking which has occurred within the polymer material, based on comparison of magnitude of the voltage difference with respect to a comparable potential range of impedance for the polymer material from its lower impedance stage at minimal cross-linking to its high impedance stage at maximum impedance for total cross-linking.
The mechanics of processing the voltage difference to get an indication of the actual extent of cross-linking may vary. The preferred technique represented in the disclosed figures involves converting the alternating voltage to direct current and inputting this direct current to a display device which gives direct readout of a value which can be correlated with the extent of cross-linking of the polymer. This direct readout comprises a DC voltage ranging from approximately .5 volts at low impedance to 0.0 at high impedance, representing a range of magnitude of at least approximately 1 x 10°. This may extend as high as 10g.
Another aspect of this invention is represented by a device for testing extent of cross-linking of a polymer material in a pre-cure stage, wherein the device comprises a signal generator capable of generating a low frequency, low amplitude signal with an attached sensor adapted for receiving a coating of the polymer material to be tested, wherein the sensor has a known impedance.
A reference material is provided which has a resistance approximately equal to the geometric mean of (i) the impedance of the sensor with polymer material in its lower-resistivity state, and (ii) the expected impedance of the polymer material when the polymer material has reached its high resistivity state upon full curing.
The device includes voltage means for determining voltage difference between a signal detected through the sensor with polymer material and a signal detected through the sensor at the reference material. Means are provided and coupled to the voltage means for converting the voltage difference to a factor representing the extent of cross-linking which has occurred within the polymer material.
Other objects and features of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art, based upon the following detailed description of a preferred WO 94/07128 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ PCT/US93/08813 embodiment, taken in combination with the accompanying drawings.
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 shows a graphic, block diagram of the various functional features of the present invention.
Figure 2 slhows a schematic diagram of circuitry providing a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
Figure 3 shows an exploded view of a sensor device useful with then disclosed circuitry for monitoring extended pi-eliminarization.
Figure: 4 slhows an additional embodiment of the combined sensor and circuitry for implementing the subject invention.
Figure: 5 di:~closes an additional embodiment of the subject invention, in combination with pre-preg material.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The present inventors have discovered that it is possible to determine the extent of cross-linking in any resistive polymer, even during the pre-cure stage.
Specifically, the invention comprises a method for detecting extent of cross-linking of a high impedance polymer material during a pre-cure stage. The first step of this mei:hod involves applying a test signal through a sE:nsor to the polymer material in the pre-cure stage to dete=-mine a level of impedance and corresponding sample voltage representative of a degree of cross-linking within the material. Typically, this signal will be an electric current whose amplitude is inversely proportional with the resistance of the polymer in accordance with Ohms law I=E/R. Other techniques of measuring the resistance of the material may likewisea be employed.
The test signal is conducted directly into the polymer by means of an interdigitated electrode sensor which is inserted in contact with the polymer. Other than the interdigitated relationship of the electrodes, the geometry of the probe is not significant. Any conductive material coupled at one end to a voltage source may be used as a probe. Where the sensor is used with high resistivity resins, the probe should be shielded by a shielding means coupled around the sensor to shield from static electricity.
The next step of this methodology is applying the same test signal as applied in the previous step through the sensor to a reference material, such as a fixed value resistor. This provides the quantitative character of the procedure. The reference material should have a fixed resistance to determine a reference voltage. A voltage difference between the test signal applied to the polymer at pre-cure stage and the test signal applied to the reference material as the reference voltage is then determined. This voltage difference serves as a relative indicator of the extent of cross-linking which has occurred within the polymer material, based on comparison of magnitude of the voltage difference with respect to a comparable potential range of impedance for the polymer material from its lower impedance stage at minimal cross-linking to its high impedance stage at maximum impedance for total cross-linking.
The mechanics of processing the voltage difference to get an indication of the actual extent of cross-linking may vary. The preferred technique represented in the disclosed figures involves converting the alternating voltage to direct current and inputting this direct current to a display device which gives direct readout of a value which can be correlated with the extent of cross-linking of the polymer. This direct readout comprises a DC voltage ranging from approximately .5 volts at low impedance to 0.0 at high impedance, representing a range of magnitude of at least approximately 1 x 10°. This may extend as high as 10g.
The test signal is applied by generating a low frequency signal of less than 10 Hz, having a low amplitude of less than 20 volts peak to peak, and by applying this signal to the polymer in uncured stage and to the reference resistance. In a more preferred embodiment,, the 7Low frequency signal is approximately .1 Hz to 5 Hz, and consists of a low amplitude of less than volts pEaak to peak.
Figursa 1 and 2 illustrate implementation of this 10 invention by structuring the polymer material and the reference material within the circuit as a voltage divider wherein the voltage output is proportional to the ratio of the impedance of the reference material to total impedance of the polymer material plus the reference material. This circuit can sense a resistance change in the order of 104 Ohms from the fresh stage of the material to the cured stage. Such a range is typical for resins, plastics, paints, adhesives and caulks. I:n addition the circuit can be adjusted to begin sensing in the fresh stage at anywhere from 103 Ohms to 108 Ohms ,, finishing up in the cured stage at anywhere from 107 Ohms to 10'3 Ohms.
Figure 1 shows a block diagram in which the signal generator 20 is a sinusoidal generator which provides a 1 Hz, 1 Voll~ p-p signal (Vappl) which is applied to the sensor 21 and coated polymer to be tested. This signal is then applied to the reference resistor 22. The voltage between these function blocks (Vd) is then buffered 24 and filtered 25, after which the resulting signal (Vf) is converted to DC with a peak detector 26.
V(out) 27 is then a DC voltage ranging from approximate7.y .5 'volts (for lower resistivity) up to 0 volts (for high-resistivity). The illustrated circuit can sense a range of about 1 x 104 Ohms.
An important part of this sensor is the resin-covered sensor combined with the reference. One embodiment of the sensor is shown in Figure 3. This WO 94/07128 ~~ ~~~ PCT/US93/08813 device comprises an upper 30 and lower 31 casement, with the interdigitated electrode sensor component 32 enclosed therein. Contact pins 34 are electrically coupled to contacts 35, 36, and 37 of the sensor 5 component. Contacts 35 are at ground potential, while contacts 36 and 37 provide the voltage differential V(subscript D) for indicating the extent of polymerization. These contacts 36 and 37 are coupled to the respective interdigitated terminal electrode 38 and l0 39. The actual measurement of resistivity is made by placing the polymer 40 to be tested on two or more of the adjacent terminal electrodes 38 and 39 to provide a conductance path for measuring resistance through the material. This grid of interdigitated electrodes may be etched or plated on a substrate in accordance with standard technology. The pins 34 are coupled by wires to appropriate contacts of the circuitry described in Figure 2.
The reference sensor 22 is simply a fixed-value resistor chosen to be approximately equal to the geometric mean of the impedance of the sensor with material in its lower resistivity state, and the same impedance as expected when the material has reached its high resistivity state. In this manner, the sensor and the reference form a simple voltage divider. The output voltage from this divider is proportional to the ratio of the reference resistor to the total impedance of the sensor plus the reference resistor, as shown in Equation 1:
Rr Vd a -------Rr + Zs Vd = Voltage divider output voltage Rr = Reference resistor Zs = Impedance Specific considerations are relevant to Figure 2.
For example, the purpose of the voltage reference stage is simply to allow the remaining op amp stages to operate in a pseudo-dual-supply mode. This is necessary because the circuit is to be battery powered, yet generate an AC signal with no DC offset as applied to, the sensor« Resistor R5 is a multi-turn trim potentiometer. :.Ct is necessary to adjust the gain of the oscillator to the point where a steady amplitude signal is produced.
The op amp chosen must have an input impedance in the area of 10'2 Ohms and must operate from +3 volts.
The op amp chosen for the test implementation of this *
invention was the Texas Instruments TSC27M4AIN. The buffer stage is necessary to prevent loading the voltage divider output voltage, Vd. The buffer stage raises the load impedance to about 10'~ Ohms. The filter stage is an attempt to limit the bandwidth of the entire circuit and thereby reduce noise sensitivity to most stray voltages and all static electricity. For this reason, the enclosure should be carefully shielded.
When energised, the oscillator stage may not automatically start oscillating and may require a jump-start. This is accomplished by simply disconnecting R8 from the reference ground voltage, and reconnecting it.
It should also be noted that V(out) will not change quickly. Therefore, when testing a new or different sensor, C4 should be momentarily shorted out, then returned to normal. This will allow V(out) to settle more quickly to its final value.
*Trade-mark The above described structure is representative of a device for testing the extent of cross-linking of a polymer material in a pre-cure stage which is generally described to include (i) a signal generator capable of generating a low frequency, low amplitude signal; (ii) a sensor coupled to the signal generator and adapted for receiving a coating of the polymer material to be tested, the sensor having a known impedance; (iii) a reference material which has a resistivity approximately equal to the geometric mean of the impedance of the sensor with polymer material in its lower-resistivity state, and the expected impedance of the polymer material when the polymer material has reached its high resistivity state upon full curing; and voltage means for determining the voltage difference between a signal detected through the sensor with polymer material and a signal detected through the sensor at the reference material. Converting means is coupled to the voltage means for converting the voltage difference to a factor representing the extent of cross-linking which has occurred within the polymer material. A display means may be coupled to the converting means to provide a visual readout of the extent of cross-linking in real time mode.
The subject device can be correlated to the monitored polymer sample by numerous techniques. For example, a sample 40 of the polymer may be placed directly on the electrodes of the sensor as described in 2 .~ ~4'~ 6 ~
Figursa 1 and 2 illustrate implementation of this 10 invention by structuring the polymer material and the reference material within the circuit as a voltage divider wherein the voltage output is proportional to the ratio of the impedance of the reference material to total impedance of the polymer material plus the reference material. This circuit can sense a resistance change in the order of 104 Ohms from the fresh stage of the material to the cured stage. Such a range is typical for resins, plastics, paints, adhesives and caulks. I:n addition the circuit can be adjusted to begin sensing in the fresh stage at anywhere from 103 Ohms to 108 Ohms ,, finishing up in the cured stage at anywhere from 107 Ohms to 10'3 Ohms.
Figure 1 shows a block diagram in which the signal generator 20 is a sinusoidal generator which provides a 1 Hz, 1 Voll~ p-p signal (Vappl) which is applied to the sensor 21 and coated polymer to be tested. This signal is then applied to the reference resistor 22. The voltage between these function blocks (Vd) is then buffered 24 and filtered 25, after which the resulting signal (Vf) is converted to DC with a peak detector 26.
V(out) 27 is then a DC voltage ranging from approximate7.y .5 'volts (for lower resistivity) up to 0 volts (for high-resistivity). The illustrated circuit can sense a range of about 1 x 104 Ohms.
An important part of this sensor is the resin-covered sensor combined with the reference. One embodiment of the sensor is shown in Figure 3. This WO 94/07128 ~~ ~~~ PCT/US93/08813 device comprises an upper 30 and lower 31 casement, with the interdigitated electrode sensor component 32 enclosed therein. Contact pins 34 are electrically coupled to contacts 35, 36, and 37 of the sensor 5 component. Contacts 35 are at ground potential, while contacts 36 and 37 provide the voltage differential V(subscript D) for indicating the extent of polymerization. These contacts 36 and 37 are coupled to the respective interdigitated terminal electrode 38 and l0 39. The actual measurement of resistivity is made by placing the polymer 40 to be tested on two or more of the adjacent terminal electrodes 38 and 39 to provide a conductance path for measuring resistance through the material. This grid of interdigitated electrodes may be etched or plated on a substrate in accordance with standard technology. The pins 34 are coupled by wires to appropriate contacts of the circuitry described in Figure 2.
The reference sensor 22 is simply a fixed-value resistor chosen to be approximately equal to the geometric mean of the impedance of the sensor with material in its lower resistivity state, and the same impedance as expected when the material has reached its high resistivity state. In this manner, the sensor and the reference form a simple voltage divider. The output voltage from this divider is proportional to the ratio of the reference resistor to the total impedance of the sensor plus the reference resistor, as shown in Equation 1:
Rr Vd a -------Rr + Zs Vd = Voltage divider output voltage Rr = Reference resistor Zs = Impedance Specific considerations are relevant to Figure 2.
For example, the purpose of the voltage reference stage is simply to allow the remaining op amp stages to operate in a pseudo-dual-supply mode. This is necessary because the circuit is to be battery powered, yet generate an AC signal with no DC offset as applied to, the sensor« Resistor R5 is a multi-turn trim potentiometer. :.Ct is necessary to adjust the gain of the oscillator to the point where a steady amplitude signal is produced.
The op amp chosen must have an input impedance in the area of 10'2 Ohms and must operate from +3 volts.
The op amp chosen for the test implementation of this *
invention was the Texas Instruments TSC27M4AIN. The buffer stage is necessary to prevent loading the voltage divider output voltage, Vd. The buffer stage raises the load impedance to about 10'~ Ohms. The filter stage is an attempt to limit the bandwidth of the entire circuit and thereby reduce noise sensitivity to most stray voltages and all static electricity. For this reason, the enclosure should be carefully shielded.
When energised, the oscillator stage may not automatically start oscillating and may require a jump-start. This is accomplished by simply disconnecting R8 from the reference ground voltage, and reconnecting it.
It should also be noted that V(out) will not change quickly. Therefore, when testing a new or different sensor, C4 should be momentarily shorted out, then returned to normal. This will allow V(out) to settle more quickly to its final value.
*Trade-mark The above described structure is representative of a device for testing the extent of cross-linking of a polymer material in a pre-cure stage which is generally described to include (i) a signal generator capable of generating a low frequency, low amplitude signal; (ii) a sensor coupled to the signal generator and adapted for receiving a coating of the polymer material to be tested, the sensor having a known impedance; (iii) a reference material which has a resistivity approximately equal to the geometric mean of the impedance of the sensor with polymer material in its lower-resistivity state, and the expected impedance of the polymer material when the polymer material has reached its high resistivity state upon full curing; and voltage means for determining the voltage difference between a signal detected through the sensor with polymer material and a signal detected through the sensor at the reference material. Converting means is coupled to the voltage means for converting the voltage difference to a factor representing the extent of cross-linking which has occurred within the polymer material. A display means may be coupled to the converting means to provide a visual readout of the extent of cross-linking in real time mode.
The subject device can be correlated to the monitored polymer sample by numerous techniques. For example, a sample 40 of the polymer may be placed directly on the electrodes of the sensor as described in 2 .~ ~4'~ 6 ~
Figure 3. This sensor can be permanently attached to the monitored polymer material so that the extent of polymerization c:an be checked at any time by merely inserting 'the pins 34 into a monitoring device 41 such as the hand held reader shown in Figure 4. This reader 41 would contain the circuitry shown in Figure 2, including ~~ powe:r supply for the signal generator. The reading is then displayed on the LCD 42, giving an accurate statement of condition for the batch of polymer to which t:he sample relates. This system could be readily applied with respect to batch shipments of adhesives, paints, caulks, and similar products which are stored and shipped in quantity. Once the reading is taken, the sensor 21 is returned to the material, to which it remains attached for future monitoring.
Alternately, the circuitry and sensor could be housed in a small, disposable unit such as that illustrated in Figure 5. In this embodiment, the device 45 is a disposable unit which is coupled directly to the monitored polymer 46. Where the polymer 46 is prepreg material, t:he monitoring device 45 is loaded with a sample of representative polymer associated with the prepreg matcsrial ~46. This device 45 is then permanently attached to the cardboard core 47 in visual position.
When a reading :is to be taken, the circuit may be activated b:y pre~;sing a switch 48 which energizes the circuit and giver a reading on the LCD 49. In this manner, wherever the roll of prepreg material is WO 94/07128 ~ ~ ~ PCT/US93/08813 shipped, its extent of polymerization can be immediately read from the attached device 45. It will be apparent that numerous methods of permanent or temporary attachment may be envisioned. These may include sensors which have a sample of material embedded at the time of manufacture, as in Figure 3, or may be sensors which are inserted directly into the monitored polymer.
These features also suggest the use of the present invention as part of a more general method for monitoring extent of cross linking of polymer material which comprises the steps of (i) identifying polymer material in pre-cure stage; (ii) attaching a sensor in contact with the identified polymer as part of the material, which sensor enables intermittent or continuous reading of cure state of the polymer; and (iii) maintaining the sensor in contact with the polymer throughout the pre-cure stage of the polymer as a means for determining extent of cure of the material to which the sensor is attached. The same steps can be applied toward a batch of polymer material in pre-cure stage, wherein a sample of the polymer material is separated from the batch and the sensor is attached in contact with the sample of the identified polymer material. In this latter case, the material may be visually inaccessible, such as being in a closed container, but the sample which is attached to the outside of the container will be indicative of the contents. For this reason it is important that the WO 94/07128 .
sample being measured is fixed to the container so that the sample polymer experiences the same temperature and environmental conditions of the primary batch of polymer. The circuit described above could be in the 5 form of a hand-held meter, which when attached to a sensor, would give a voltage proportional to the parameter of the material being measured.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the foregoing disclosure is merely representative 10 of preferred embodiments of the invention and is not to be considered limiting, except as set forth in the following claims"
Alternately, the circuitry and sensor could be housed in a small, disposable unit such as that illustrated in Figure 5. In this embodiment, the device 45 is a disposable unit which is coupled directly to the monitored polymer 46. Where the polymer 46 is prepreg material, t:he monitoring device 45 is loaded with a sample of representative polymer associated with the prepreg matcsrial ~46. This device 45 is then permanently attached to the cardboard core 47 in visual position.
When a reading :is to be taken, the circuit may be activated b:y pre~;sing a switch 48 which energizes the circuit and giver a reading on the LCD 49. In this manner, wherever the roll of prepreg material is WO 94/07128 ~ ~ ~ PCT/US93/08813 shipped, its extent of polymerization can be immediately read from the attached device 45. It will be apparent that numerous methods of permanent or temporary attachment may be envisioned. These may include sensors which have a sample of material embedded at the time of manufacture, as in Figure 3, or may be sensors which are inserted directly into the monitored polymer.
These features also suggest the use of the present invention as part of a more general method for monitoring extent of cross linking of polymer material which comprises the steps of (i) identifying polymer material in pre-cure stage; (ii) attaching a sensor in contact with the identified polymer as part of the material, which sensor enables intermittent or continuous reading of cure state of the polymer; and (iii) maintaining the sensor in contact with the polymer throughout the pre-cure stage of the polymer as a means for determining extent of cure of the material to which the sensor is attached. The same steps can be applied toward a batch of polymer material in pre-cure stage, wherein a sample of the polymer material is separated from the batch and the sensor is attached in contact with the sample of the identified polymer material. In this latter case, the material may be visually inaccessible, such as being in a closed container, but the sample which is attached to the outside of the container will be indicative of the contents. For this reason it is important that the WO 94/07128 .
sample being measured is fixed to the container so that the sample polymer experiences the same temperature and environmental conditions of the primary batch of polymer. The circuit described above could be in the 5 form of a hand-held meter, which when attached to a sensor, would give a voltage proportional to the parameter of the material being measured.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the foregoing disclosure is merely representative 10 of preferred embodiments of the invention and is not to be considered limiting, except as set forth in the following claims"
Claims (30)
1. A method for detecting extent of cross-linking of a high impedance polymer material during a pre-cure stage, said method comprising the steps of:
a) applying a test signal through a sensor to the polymer material in the pre-cure stage to determine a level of impedance and corresponding sample voltage representative of a degree of cross-linking within the material;
b) applying the same test signal through the sensor to a reference resistance having a fixed resistance to determine a reference voltage;
c) determining a voltage difference between the test signal applied to the polymer at pre-cure stage and the test signal applied to the reference resistance as the reference voltage; and d) correlating the voltage difference as a relative indicator of the extent of cross-linking which has occurred within the polymer material, based on comparison of magnitude of the voltage difference with respect to a comparable potential range of impedance for the polymer material from its lower impedance stage at minimal cross-linking to its high impedance stage at maximum impedance for total cross-linking.
a) applying a test signal through a sensor to the polymer material in the pre-cure stage to determine a level of impedance and corresponding sample voltage representative of a degree of cross-linking within the material;
b) applying the same test signal through the sensor to a reference resistance having a fixed resistance to determine a reference voltage;
c) determining a voltage difference between the test signal applied to the polymer at pre-cure stage and the test signal applied to the reference resistance as the reference voltage; and d) correlating the voltage difference as a relative indicator of the extent of cross-linking which has occurred within the polymer material, based on comparison of magnitude of the voltage difference with respect to a comparable potential range of impedance for the polymer material from its lower impedance stage at minimal cross-linking to its high impedance stage at maximum impedance for total cross-linking.
2. A method as defined in claim 1, wherein the voltage difference is processed by converting the voltage to direct current and inputting this direct current to a display device which gives direct readout of a value which can be correlated with the extent of cross-linking of the polymer.
3. A method as defined in claim 2, wherein the direct readout comprises a DC voltage ranging from approximately 0.5 volts at low impedance to 0 volts at high impedance, representing a range of magnitude of at least approximately 1 x 10 4 ohms of impedance in the polymer material.
4. A method as defined in claim 1, wherein the test signal is applied by generating a low frequency signal of less than 10 Hz, having a low amplitude of less than 20 volts peak to peak, and by applying this signal to the polymer in a pre-cure stage and to the reference resistance.
5. A method as defined in claim 4, wherein the test signal is applied by generating a low frequency signal of approximately .1 Hz to 5 Hz, having a low amplitude of less than 10 volts peak to peak, and by applying this signal respectively to the polymer and the reference resistance.
6. A method as defined in claim 1, comprising the more specific step of applying the test signal to reference resistance comprising a fixed value resistor.
7. A method as defined in claim 1, wherein the steps of applying test signal to the polymer material and to the reference resistance comprise the specific steps of forming a voltages divider wherein the voltage output is proportional to the ratio of the impedance of the reference material to total impedance of the polymer material plus the reference resistance.
8. A method as defined in claim 1, wherein the steps comprise a process for measuring the extent of cross-linking in paint material, the method comprising the more specific step of applying paint to be tested to the sensor and processing the voltage difference.
9. A method as defined in claim 1, wherein the steps comprise a process for measuring the extent of cross-linking in a dental polymer material, the method comprising the more specific step of applying dental polymer to be tested to the sensor and processing the voltage difference.
10. A method of monitoring extent of cross-linking of polymer in a B-staged material, comprising the steps of:
a) selecting the B-staged material which has an uncertain extent of cross-linking or an unknown state of curing; and b) applying a test signal through a sensor to the B-staged material in the pre-cure stage to determine a level of impedance and corresponding sample voltage representative of a degree of cross-linking within the material;
c) applying the same test signal through the sensor to a reference resistance having a fixed resistance to determine a reference voltage;
d) determining a voltage difference between the test signal applied to the B-staged material at pre-cure stage and the test signal applied to the reference resistance as the reference voltage; and e) correlating the voltage difference as a relative indicator of the extent of cross-linking which has occurred within the B-staged material, based on comparison of magnitude of the voltage difference with respect to a comparable potential range of impedance far the B-staged material from its lower impedance stage at minimal cross-linking to its high impedance stage at maximum impedance for total cross-linking.
a) selecting the B-staged material which has an uncertain extent of cross-linking or an unknown state of curing; and b) applying a test signal through a sensor to the B-staged material in the pre-cure stage to determine a level of impedance and corresponding sample voltage representative of a degree of cross-linking within the material;
c) applying the same test signal through the sensor to a reference resistance having a fixed resistance to determine a reference voltage;
d) determining a voltage difference between the test signal applied to the B-staged material at pre-cure stage and the test signal applied to the reference resistance as the reference voltage; and e) correlating the voltage difference as a relative indicator of the extent of cross-linking which has occurred within the B-staged material, based on comparison of magnitude of the voltage difference with respect to a comparable potential range of impedance far the B-staged material from its lower impedance stage at minimal cross-linking to its high impedance stage at maximum impedance for total cross-linking.
11. A method as defined in claim 10, wherein the voltage difference is processed by converting the voltage to direct current and inputting this direct current to a display device which gives direct readout of a value which can be correlated with the extent of cross-linking of the polymer.
12. A method as defined in claim 11, wherein the direct readout comprises a DC voltage ranging from approximately 0.5 volts at lower impedance to 0 volts at high impedance, representing a range of magnitude of at least approximately 1 x 10 4 ohms of impedance in the polymer material.
13. A method as defined in claim 10, wherein the steps of applying test signal to the polymer material and to the reference resistance comprises the specific steps of forming a voltage divider wherein the voltage output is proportioned to the ratio of the impedance of the reference material to total impedance of the polymer material plus the reference resistance.
14. A device for testing extent of cross-linking of a polymer material. in a pre-cure stage, said device comprising:
a signal generator capable of generating a low frequency, law amplitude signal;
a sensor coupled to the signal generator and adapted for receiving a coating of the polymer material to be tested, said sensor having a known impedance;
a reference resistance which has a resistivity approximately equal to the geometric mean of (i) the impedance of the sensor with polymer material in its lower-resistivity state, and (ii) the expected impedance of the polymer material when the polymer material has reached its high resistivity state upon full curing;
voltage means for determining voltage difference between a signal detected through the sensor with polymer material and a signal detected through the sensor at the reference resistance and converting means coupled to the voltage means for converting the voltage difference to a factor representing the extent of cross-linking which has occurred within the polymer material.
a signal generator capable of generating a low frequency, law amplitude signal;
a sensor coupled to the signal generator and adapted for receiving a coating of the polymer material to be tested, said sensor having a known impedance;
a reference resistance which has a resistivity approximately equal to the geometric mean of (i) the impedance of the sensor with polymer material in its lower-resistivity state, and (ii) the expected impedance of the polymer material when the polymer material has reached its high resistivity state upon full curing;
voltage means for determining voltage difference between a signal detected through the sensor with polymer material and a signal detected through the sensor at the reference resistance and converting means coupled to the voltage means for converting the voltage difference to a factor representing the extent of cross-linking which has occurred within the polymer material.
15. A device as defined in claim 14, wherein the signal generator produces a signal within the range of .1 Hz to 5 Hz with an amplitude of less than 20 volts peak to peak.
16. A device as defined in claim 15, wherein the signal generator comprises a sinusoidal signal generator having a peak to peak voltage of no greater than 10 volts.
17. A device as defined in claim 14, wherein the reference resistance comprises a fixed value resistor.
18. A device as defined in claim 14, wherein the sensor with polymer material and the reference resistance collectively comprise a voltage divider wherein a voltage output is proportional to the ratio of the impedance of the reference resistance to total impedance of the polymer material plus the reference resistance.
19. A device as defined in claim 18, further comprising a buffer circuit coupled to the voltage means, said buffer circuit providing means for increasing a load impedance too greater than 10 15 ohms to prevent loading down the voltage divider output voltage.
20. A device as defined in claim 19, further comprising a filter stage coupled to the buffer circuit and including means to limit bandwidth reception of the device to reduce noise sensitivity.
21. A device as defined in claim 14, further comprising display means coupled co the converting means to provide a visual readout of the extent of cross-linking in real time mode.
22. A device as defined in claim 21, wherein the device is contained within a housing, wherein the housing has an opening sufficiently large to enable insertion of a drop of polymer material to be tested, and is attached to a container of the polymer material as an indicator of extent of cross-linking in real time mode.
23. A device as defined in claim 22, wherein the housing and device are prepared as a disposable item to be discarded upon completion of use.
24. A device as defined in claim 21, wherein the sensor is prepared as a disposable item, the sensor including means for replaceable detachment from the device, and wherein the device is otherwise reusable except for the disposable sensor.
25. A method for monitoring an extent of cross linking of a polymer material, comprising the steps of:
a) identifying a batch of the polymer material in a pre-cure stage;
b) separating a sample of the polymer material from the batch;
c) attaching a sensor in contact with the sample of the identified polymer material, which sensor enables intermittent or continuous reading of a cure state of the polymer;
d) maintaining the sensor and attached sample in contact with the batch of polymer material throughout the pre-cure stage of the polymer as a means for determining extent of cure of the material to which the sensor and sample are attached, e) applying a test signal through the sensor to the polymer material of they sample in the pre-cure stage to determine a level of impedance and corresponding sample voltage representative of a degree of cross-linking within the material;
f) applying the same test signal through the sensor to a reference material having a fixed resistance to determine a reference voltage;
g) determining a voltage difference between the test signal applied to the polymer at pre-cure stage and the test signal applied to the reference material as the reference voltage; and h) correlating the voltage difference as a relative indicator of the extent of cross-linking which has occurred within the polymer material, based on comparison of magnitude of the voltage difference with respect to a comparable potential range of impedance for the polymer material from its lower impedance stage at minimal cross-linking to its high impedance stage at maximum impedance for total cross-linking.
a) identifying a batch of the polymer material in a pre-cure stage;
b) separating a sample of the polymer material from the batch;
c) attaching a sensor in contact with the sample of the identified polymer material, which sensor enables intermittent or continuous reading of a cure state of the polymer;
d) maintaining the sensor and attached sample in contact with the batch of polymer material throughout the pre-cure stage of the polymer as a means for determining extent of cure of the material to which the sensor and sample are attached, e) applying a test signal through the sensor to the polymer material of they sample in the pre-cure stage to determine a level of impedance and corresponding sample voltage representative of a degree of cross-linking within the material;
f) applying the same test signal through the sensor to a reference material having a fixed resistance to determine a reference voltage;
g) determining a voltage difference between the test signal applied to the polymer at pre-cure stage and the test signal applied to the reference material as the reference voltage; and h) correlating the voltage difference as a relative indicator of the extent of cross-linking which has occurred within the polymer material, based on comparison of magnitude of the voltage difference with respect to a comparable potential range of impedance for the polymer material from its lower impedance stage at minimal cross-linking to its high impedance stage at maximum impedance for total cross-linking.
26. A method as defined in claim 1, further comprising the step of shielding the sensor in applications to high resistivity resins with respect to static electricity.
27. A method as defined in claim 25, further comprising the step of shielding the sensor in applications to high resistivity resins with respect to static electricity.
28. A device as defined in claim 14, further comprising shielding means coupled around the sensor and operable to shield the sensor in applications to high resistivity resins against static electricity.
29. A method as defined in claim 1, which comprises the more specific steps of:
a) coupling the output of the test signal sent through the polymer material of step a) to the input of the reference resistance of step b);
b) measuring voltage at the point of coupling to create a voltage divider for determining the voltage difference between the test signal dropped across the polymer at pre-cure stage and the test signal dropped across the reference resistance as the reference voltage; and c) correlating the voltage difference as a relative indicator of the extent of cross-linking which has occurred within the polymer material, based on comparison of magnitude of the voltage difference with respect to a comparable potential range of impedance for the polymer material from its lower impedance stage at minimal cross-linking to its high impedance stage at maximum impedance for total cross-linking.
a) coupling the output of the test signal sent through the polymer material of step a) to the input of the reference resistance of step b);
b) measuring voltage at the point of coupling to create a voltage divider for determining the voltage difference between the test signal dropped across the polymer at pre-cure stage and the test signal dropped across the reference resistance as the reference voltage; and c) correlating the voltage difference as a relative indicator of the extent of cross-linking which has occurred within the polymer material, based on comparison of magnitude of the voltage difference with respect to a comparable potential range of impedance for the polymer material from its lower impedance stage at minimal cross-linking to its high impedance stage at maximum impedance for total cross-linking.
30. A method as defined in claim 1, which comprises the more specific steps of:
a) coupling the output of the test signal sent through the polymer material of step a) to an input of a differential amplifier;
b) coupling the output of the test signal sent through the reference resistance of step b) to a second input of the differential amplifier;
c) determining the voltage difference between the test signal applied to the polymer at pre-cure stage and the test signal applied to the reference resistance as the reference voltage; and d) correlating the voltage difference as a relative indicator of the extent of cross-linking which has occurred within the polymer material, based on comparison of magnitude of the voltage difference with respect to a comparable potential range of impedance for the polymer material from its lower impedance stage at minimal cross-linking to its high impedance stage at maximum impedance for total cross-linking.
a) coupling the output of the test signal sent through the polymer material of step a) to an input of a differential amplifier;
b) coupling the output of the test signal sent through the reference resistance of step b) to a second input of the differential amplifier;
c) determining the voltage difference between the test signal applied to the polymer at pre-cure stage and the test signal applied to the reference resistance as the reference voltage; and d) correlating the voltage difference as a relative indicator of the extent of cross-linking which has occurred within the polymer material, based on comparison of magnitude of the voltage difference with respect to a comparable potential range of impedance for the polymer material from its lower impedance stage at minimal cross-linking to its high impedance stage at maximum impedance for total cross-linking.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US07/948,008 US5432435A (en) | 1992-09-22 | 1992-09-22 | Detection of cross-linking in pre-cure stage polymeric materials by measuring their impedance |
| US07/948,008 | 1992-09-22 | ||
| PCT/US1993/008813 WO1994007128A1 (en) | 1992-09-22 | 1993-09-20 | Determination of the extent of cross-linking prior to the intentional curing of polymers |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2144766A1 CA2144766A1 (en) | 1994-03-31 |
| CA2144766C true CA2144766C (en) | 2003-12-16 |
Family
ID=25487115
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002144766A Expired - Fee Related CA2144766C (en) | 1992-09-22 | 1993-09-20 | Determination of the extent of cross-linking prior to the intentional curing of polymers |
Country Status (9)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (2) | US5432435A (en) |
| EP (1) | EP0729573B1 (en) |
| JP (1) | JP3477204B2 (en) |
| KR (1) | KR950703734A (en) |
| AT (1) | ATE229179T1 (en) |
| AU (1) | AU4927993A (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2144766C (en) |
| DE (1) | DE69332545T2 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO1994007128A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (21)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5572115A (en) * | 1992-09-22 | 1996-11-05 | Brigham Young University | Device and method for measuring charge carrying activity in generally non-conductive materials |
| US5432435A (en) * | 1992-09-22 | 1995-07-11 | Brigham Young University | Detection of cross-linking in pre-cure stage polymeric materials by measuring their impedance |
| US5635845A (en) * | 1992-09-22 | 1997-06-03 | Brigham Young University | Detection of cross-linking in pre-cure stage polymeric materials by measuring their resistance |
| US5528133A (en) * | 1994-07-21 | 1996-06-18 | Powerpoint Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for determining the quality of a colloidal suspension |
| US6002259A (en) * | 1998-01-20 | 1999-12-14 | Rice University | Electrostatic adhesion tester for thin film conductors |
| US5907280A (en) * | 1997-04-28 | 1999-05-25 | Dkl International, Inc. | Static electrification assisted dielectrokinesis detection of plastics and other materials |
| US5872447A (en) * | 1997-09-10 | 1999-02-16 | Hager, Iii; Nathaniel E. | Method and apparatus for in-situ measurement of polymer cure status |
| US6208152B1 (en) * | 1999-10-14 | 2001-03-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Redundant resistor matching detector with constant percentage threshold |
| US7167773B2 (en) * | 2001-03-21 | 2007-01-23 | Signature Control Systems | Process and apparatus for improving and controlling the curing of natural and synthetic moldable compounds |
| US7245985B2 (en) * | 2001-03-21 | 2007-07-17 | Signature Control Systems | Process and apparatus for improving and controlling the vulcanization of natural and synthetic rubber compounds |
| FR2831668B1 (en) * | 2001-10-26 | 2004-10-15 | Inst Francais Du Petrole | METHOD FOR EVALUATING THE REMAINING TIME BEFORE GELIFICATION OF A THERMOSETTING COMPOSITION |
| ATE538373T1 (en) * | 2002-03-06 | 2012-01-15 | Polymer Aging Concepts Inc | ELECTRICAL MONITORING METHOD FOR POLYMERS |
| AU2003258165A1 (en) * | 2002-08-08 | 2004-02-25 | David Biro | Apparatus and method for quantatively measuring liquid film drying rates on substrates |
| US20040058453A1 (en) * | 2002-09-20 | 2004-03-25 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Reaction pouch comprising an analytical sensor |
| US7676953B2 (en) | 2006-12-29 | 2010-03-16 | Signature Control Systems, Inc. | Calibration and metering methods for wood kiln moisture measurement |
| US8089283B2 (en) * | 2007-08-10 | 2012-01-03 | Consolidate Research, Inc. | Apparatus and method for high-speed determination of bioelectric electrode impedances |
| US8349104B2 (en) * | 2008-07-21 | 2013-01-08 | United Technologies Corporation | Method and assembly for validating bond line |
| US9128048B2 (en) | 2010-12-09 | 2015-09-08 | Owens Corning Intellectual Capital, Llc | Method for online determination of cure status of glass fiber products |
| CN103402724A (en) * | 2010-12-09 | 2013-11-20 | 欧文斯科宁知识产权资产有限公司 | Control method determining cure status of glass fiber products |
| US10302455B2 (en) * | 2015-10-09 | 2019-05-28 | Bellutech Llc | Modules, systems, and methods for monitoring environmental conditions |
| WO2022100649A1 (en) * | 2020-11-11 | 2022-05-19 | 固瑞特模具（太仓）有限公司 | Intelligent controlling and monitoring system for wind power blade mold and application thereof |
Family Cites Families (14)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US3935053A (en) * | 1969-04-24 | 1976-01-27 | Photocircuits Corporation | Process for preparing thermosetting laminates |
| US3791792A (en) * | 1972-03-29 | 1974-02-12 | Northrop Corp | Polymer cure determination method |
| JPS52153651A (en) * | 1976-06-17 | 1977-12-20 | Sony Corp | Gain changing circuit |
| US4129824A (en) * | 1976-11-22 | 1978-12-12 | Howes E | Electronic hydrometer |
| US4723908A (en) * | 1985-05-01 | 1988-02-09 | Kranbuehl David E | Dielectric probe; method and apparatus including its use |
| US4777431A (en) * | 1986-06-27 | 1988-10-11 | Micromet Instruments, Inc. | Apparatus for monitoring dielectric changes in polymeric materials |
| US4891591A (en) * | 1988-02-16 | 1990-01-02 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration | Nonintrusive method and apparatus for monitoring the cure of polymeric materials |
| US5095278A (en) * | 1988-11-21 | 1992-03-10 | Ta Instruments, Inc. | Planar interdigitated dielectric sensor |
| US5089780A (en) * | 1989-10-04 | 1992-02-18 | Hughes Aircraft Company | Oil quality monitor sensor and system |
| US5184077A (en) * | 1990-04-05 | 1993-02-02 | G-C Acquisition, Inc. | Abrasion-resistant, high pressure dielectric sensors |
| JPH04150224A (en) * | 1990-10-15 | 1992-05-22 | Internatl Business Mach Corp <Ibm> | Integrated circuit |
| US5210499A (en) * | 1990-11-16 | 1993-05-11 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army | In-situ sensor method and device |
| US5200027A (en) * | 1991-11-12 | 1993-04-06 | General Motors Corporation | Oil microsensor having interdigitated electrodes with rough surfaces and methods of making and using the same |
| US5432435A (en) * | 1992-09-22 | 1995-07-11 | Brigham Young University | Detection of cross-linking in pre-cure stage polymeric materials by measuring their impedance |
-
1992
- 1992-09-22 US US07/948,008 patent/US5432435A/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
1993
- 1993-09-20 CA CA002144766A patent/CA2144766C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1993-09-20 KR KR1019950701068A patent/KR950703734A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1993-09-20 WO PCT/US1993/008813 patent/WO1994007128A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1993-09-20 EP EP93921656A patent/EP0729573B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1993-09-20 JP JP50834594A patent/JP3477204B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1993-09-20 AU AU49279/93A patent/AU4927993A/en not_active Abandoned
- 1993-09-20 AT AT93921656T patent/ATE229179T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1993-09-20 DE DE69332545T patent/DE69332545T2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
1995
- 1995-06-22 US US08/493,796 patent/US5596268A/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP3477204B2 (en) | 2003-12-10 |
| US5432435A (en) | 1995-07-11 |
| EP0729573A1 (en) | 1996-09-04 |
| KR950703734A (en) | 1995-09-20 |
| US5596268A (en) | 1997-01-21 |
| AU4927993A (en) | 1994-04-12 |
| ATE229179T1 (en) | 2002-12-15 |
| JPH08501634A (en) | 1996-02-20 |
| EP0729573A4 (en) | 1996-05-14 |
| EP0729573B1 (en) | 2002-12-04 |
| DE69332545D1 (en) | 2003-01-16 |
| WO1994007128A1 (en) | 1994-03-31 |
| CA2144766A1 (en) | 1994-03-31 |
| DE69332545T2 (en) | 2003-04-10 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA2144766C (en) | Determination of the extent of cross-linking prior to the intentional curing of polymers | |
| US5635845A (en) | Detection of cross-linking in pre-cure stage polymeric materials by measuring their resistance | |
| US7924031B2 (en) | Health monitoring method for composite materials | |
| WO1981003709A1 (en) | Determination of moisture level in materials | |
| AU687265B2 (en) | Device and method for measuring charge carrying activity in generally non-conductive materials | |
| EP1725859A2 (en) | Heath monitoring method and apparatus for composite materials | |
| US6420877B1 (en) | Continuity totalizer/analyzer | |
| García-Baños et al. | Noninvasive monitoring of polymer curing reactions by dielectrometry | |
| US3593119A (en) | Electronic titrimeter | |
| US3965722A (en) | Apparatus for the measurement of viscosity | |
| Ruland et al. | Quantitative characterisation of conductive fibers by capacitive coupling | |
| US20160084789A1 (en) | Method for inspecting composite material components | |
| CN107490714A (en) | Detection method, device and the vehicle of the battery bag charging and discharging currents of vehicle | |
| Wright et al. | Rheological characterization of feedstocks for metal injection molding | |
| Mandavgade et al. | Measurement uncertainty evaluation of automatic Tan Delta and resistivity test set for transformer oil | |
| JPS5763461A (en) | Device for testing watermeter | |
| Merrell | Development and application of a system for the measurement of reactive polymers | |
| RU2027178C1 (en) | Method of inspection of physical-mechanical parameters of articles made of ferromagnetic material | |
| Weitz | Testing the electrostatic (ESD) parameters of thermoformed conductive and low static dissipative materials for applications including automotive fuel systems (Proposed revisions to SAE J1645) | |
| Gordon et al. | Designing an embedded probe for hazardous material shelf-life monitoring | |
| Kern et al. | Dielectric Analysis for Polymer Processing | |
| Kranbuehl et al. | MONITORING THE DURABILITY OF PPS, NYLON, AND PVDF USING IN SITU FDEMS SENSING FOR EXTENDED USE IN THE FIELD | |
| Elsner | Application of Dielectric Spectroscopy for Nondestructive Investigation of Expoxy Curing | |
| SK8802000A3 (en) | Insulating resistance metering method and/or electric properties of dielectric materials and apparatus for carrying out said method |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEER | Examination request | ||
| MKLA | Lapsed |