CA2165875C - Intersatellite communications systems - Google Patents
Intersatellite communications systems Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2165875C CA2165875C CA002165875A CA2165875A CA2165875C CA 2165875 C CA2165875 C CA 2165875C CA 002165875 A CA002165875 A CA 002165875A CA 2165875 A CA2165875 A CA 2165875A CA 2165875 C CA2165875 C CA 2165875C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- satellite
- subchannels
- incoming
- outgoing
- channel
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B7/00—Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
- H04B7/14—Relay systems
- H04B7/15—Active relay systems
- H04B7/185—Space-based or airborne stations; Stations for satellite systems
- H04B7/18521—Systems of inter linked satellites, i.e. inter satellite service
Abstract
A multibeam communications satellite has direct links with at least one other satellite.
The satellite's repeater operates in the bent-pipe mode and can provide service to users independent of signal content, format and protocol. Each incoming electromagnetic (radio) beam received by the satellite contains at least one channel of information, and each channel is divisible into subchannels. Naturally, each subchannel is of a bandwidth which is less than the bandwidth of the channel from which the subchannel was derived.
The other satellite has outgoing beams that complement the first satellites incoming beams. Generally, both satellites have processors on board designed to interbeam-switch at the subchannel level. (However, a description is given also of an instance where one or the other satellites may not have subchannelizing capability and limited use may be made of the invention). The satellites are linked by an intersatellite link carrying information on a channel consisting of subchannels constituted from several incoming channels. Therefore, an outgoing beam from the second satellite can contain a channel having information combined from several incoming channels to the first satellite and the channel information on any incoming electromagnetic (radio) beam can be delivered at the subchannel level to several output beams from the second satellite. The system can operate in a broadcast mode whereby information at the subchannel level can be distributed simultaneously (i.e. in parallel) to several outgoing electromagnetic (radio) beams. The intersatellite link is treated as any other beam (incoming or outgoing, as the case may be), although its operating wavelength may be different from the operating wavelengths of the beams having terrestrial origin or destination. For example, the intersatellite link could be at microwave, optical or some other suitable frequency. The basic concept may be extended to a system supporting multiple intersatellite links, e.g.
links in both directions between the two satellites or, in some circumstances, among a constellation of more than two satellites.
The satellite's repeater operates in the bent-pipe mode and can provide service to users independent of signal content, format and protocol. Each incoming electromagnetic (radio) beam received by the satellite contains at least one channel of information, and each channel is divisible into subchannels. Naturally, each subchannel is of a bandwidth which is less than the bandwidth of the channel from which the subchannel was derived.
The other satellite has outgoing beams that complement the first satellites incoming beams. Generally, both satellites have processors on board designed to interbeam-switch at the subchannel level. (However, a description is given also of an instance where one or the other satellites may not have subchannelizing capability and limited use may be made of the invention). The satellites are linked by an intersatellite link carrying information on a channel consisting of subchannels constituted from several incoming channels. Therefore, an outgoing beam from the second satellite can contain a channel having information combined from several incoming channels to the first satellite and the channel information on any incoming electromagnetic (radio) beam can be delivered at the subchannel level to several output beams from the second satellite. The system can operate in a broadcast mode whereby information at the subchannel level can be distributed simultaneously (i.e. in parallel) to several outgoing electromagnetic (radio) beams. The intersatellite link is treated as any other beam (incoming or outgoing, as the case may be), although its operating wavelength may be different from the operating wavelengths of the beams having terrestrial origin or destination. For example, the intersatellite link could be at microwave, optical or some other suitable frequency. The basic concept may be extended to a system supporting multiple intersatellite links, e.g.
links in both directions between the two satellites or, in some circumstances, among a constellation of more than two satellites.
Description
SPECIFICATION
Field of the Invent~on This invention relates to satellite communications systems and particularly to systems of multibeam co~ lications satellites with direct hllel~alellite links.
Background of the Invent~on The early communications satellites were used as "dumb" repeaters opt;l~ g in a bent-pipe mode.
("Bent-pipe" is a term in general use and well understood by those skilled in the art). Initially, no significant processin~ other than signal amplification was carried in the satellite payload and the information relayed back to Earth was a replica of the information from the source. The advantages of this type of satellite were simplicity and low front-end capital and launch costs. As satellite systems became more sophisticated, multibeam satellites, still op~ling in the bent-pipe mode were introduced whereby one or more sources could relay messages to several destinations. The architecture of these systems was still fairly rigid and allowed little or no flexibility in switching between sources or ~lestin~t-ons. Typical were the first broadcast satellites that relayed information to several geographic regions. An example would be the system described in USA Patent 3,541,553 (Gubin) issued on November 17, 1970 and assigned to RCA Coll,or~lion.
Later, satellites with on-board switching capability were introduced. In these systems, each incoming beam from Earth would, typically, carry several frequency-multiplexed channels. Existing fixed satellite service (FSS) systems now generally employ multibeam satellites having input demultiplexers near the front end of the satellite which separate incoming beams into a number of l~llspollder channels. Prior to high-power amplification, these channels are hllell,ealll switched by means of coaxial switches so that con.,nul~ications intelligence arriving via one of the incoming beams can be directed to one of several output beams. Path selection is at the discretion of ground control. Connections are made on a relatively broad channel basis, i.e. all of the illfollllation in one ll~l~pollder channel is switched in its entirety. In some instances, by using power-combining techniques, information from two or more sources could be sent to a common ~lestin~tion. This approach is, however, costly and wasteful of resources.
Other, quite separate, developments have concerned the enabling of satellites to co~ icate with each other by the use of direct electrom~gnetic (e.g. radio or optical) links between the satellites. These inlel~alellite links are used to pass intelli~nce (for control or comlllullications) between orbiting ~1 65875 satellites. In USA Patent 4,691,882 (Young) issued September 8, 1987 and assigned to British Aerospace PLC, for example, clusters of coo~l~ling con~nullications satellites act in unison as one large satellite and are radio-linked together. In other in~t~n~es, defence and other government satellite systems e.g. TDRSS (the Traffic and Data Relay Satellite System) use inlelsalellite links.
Also, a number of h~ ll developments have occurred in the mobile conl~ lications ma,l~l~. For the hand-held-terminal market, interest is focused on low-earthorbit (LEO) and medium-earth-orbit (MEO) satellite constellations. The geostationary (GEO) market is also undergoing major changes.
Traditional point-to-point communications between major population centres are being converted to optical fibre and o~l~lol~ are now looking to provide a greater number of narrow-band links, plincipally to areas that are not well served by existing tellesllial infrastructure. To this end, proposed satellites have more beams, higher effective isotropic radiated power (EIRP) and greater interbeam connectivity and users will require less e~llsive ground tçrmin~l~ These trends are being accelerated by data colllpl~ssion which is forcing opel~lol~ to lease colllpal~lively narrow bandwidths.
Developments have been described in which global systems of orbiting satellites will be commissioned to provide personal communications (similar to cellular telephone service) any~,vhere on the Earth. Each of these satellites will be linked by h~ al~llite beams to as many as eight other satellites. USA Patent 5,129,095 (Davis et al) issued July 7, 1992 and assigned to Motorola, Inc. is an example of such a system. Recently proposed LEO and MEO systems (e.g. Iridium and Teledesic)1 will support hlle-salellite links.
The present and proposed communications systems using hllel~alellite links are constrained by the type of signals they can handle, especially with regard to protocols used and particular modulation methods employed. They tend to rely on digital switching technology and make extensive use of "smart" on-board processors. Decisions are made, at least in part, on board the satellite. For these systems to work, subscribers are required to procure special transceivers which are not backward compatible and hence generally unusable with other existing systems. Globalsfar2 is one system of global telecommunications proposed that uses bent-pipe technology. However, it relies on the terrestrial communications inrl~l ucture for inter-regional communications: it does not propose illlel~alellite links.
With respect to the fixed satellite service systems, the mounting demand for greater connectivity and leases of fractions of llan~llders cannot be satisfied by simply increasing the number of beams since IIridium and Teledesic are Registered Trade Marks.
2Globalstar is a Registered Tr~dem~rk this aggravates the connectivity problem and leads to reduced transponder utilization efficiency. The problem was addressed in USA Patent 4,706,239 (Ito et al) issued November 12, 1987 and assigned to Kokusai Denshin Denwa Co. Ltd. In the Ito et al patent, every incoming radio-frequency beam is divided first into ll~nspollder channels by means of a demultiplexer as is well known in the art. Each channel is further divided into subchannels by use of surface-acoustic-wave (SAW) filters. Interbeam switching is then carried out using GaAs FET switches at the relatively narrow subchannel level, rather than at the channel level as in prior systems. The output of the switches are subsequently multiplexed back into llallspollder channels and amplified and multiplexed for the down-link beams. The result of Ito et al is that the infollllalion contained in a channel does not have to be switched as a whole.
The problem of full interconnectivity was also addressed in USA Patent 5,274,627 (De Santis) issued December 28, 1993 and assigned to the International Telecommunications Satellite Org~ni7~tion. In the De Santis system, the incoming continuous-wave frequency-division multiple-access signal is rolllled into periodic-burst time-division signals. They are routed via a switching matrix and ll~l~lllled back to the frequency domain prior to channeling to the desired down-link beam or beams as continuous-wave frequency-division-multiplex signals. In the De Santis arrangement, the system is ll~lspalelll to the form or protocol of the incoming signals. Although De Santis discloses a complex system for h~lell~ealll switching, it does not disclose any application of hllel~alellite links.
The Inmarsat 3 geostationary mobile communications system, employs on-board subchannelizing technology. The system makes use of multiple hops between Earth and satellite to collllll~ icate between two mobile users. For example, a ship communicating with a second ship would send h~llllation signals to the satellite. These signals would be switched in the satellite and sent back to Earth for control and billing purposes, resent to the satellite for further proce~ing and then relayed to the second ship.
In a further improvement in subchannelizing technology, the applicant has determined that, by combining the coaxial switch methods commonly used in the prior art with the subchannelization methods, advantages similar to those of the Ito et al system can be obtained with greatly reduced hardware complexity. For example, by subchannelizing all 8 channels, as proposed by Ito et al, one would produce a 25 percent improvement in llalls~llder utilization over previous systems. However, if the same 8-beam, 8-channel system were to subchannelize only four of the eight channels, the system would require some 50 percent less hardware than the Ito et al system requires. Tlallspollder utilization would be only slightly degraded, i.e. typically one would obtain a 20 percent capacity improvement over the art prior (instead of the 25 percent of the Ito et al system). Reference is made to the teaching of ,_ copending C~n~ n Patent Application No. 2,157,209 which is ~si ne~l to the assignee of this application.
Sta~ement of the Invention With the advent of s~t~llite communications systems that propose to respond to the increasing tlem~nfl for more flexibility and capacity while rem~ining colllpelilive with other co~ "~ ;cations systems, greater ingenuity is required to offer new services at economically colll~lilive cost. The requirement is for a bent-pipe system, i.e. one that does not restrict the nature or protocol of the information signals being transmitted. The system must also provide significant improvement in transponder eff1ciency in delivering small packets of information to different destin~tions.
New advances in enabling the commissioning of relatively ine~ellsive subchannelizing systems offer new commercial opportunities hitherto not reali_able. The invention described herein responds to the system requirements outlined above by providing a new form of hll~l~alellite link that m~int~ins the bent-pipe mode of operation. As noted above, the system described on our copending application 2,157,209 also helps accomplish the objectives by providing partial subchannelization and can be used in co~ ;tion with the invention described herein to provide more pronounced benefits.
D~ tion of the Drawings In the drawings:
Figure 1 shows the arrangement of a typical satellite incoming beam, Figure 2 shows a prior art system that utilizes a standard microwave payload with partial tl~l~s~llder ntili7~tion, Figure 3 shows the prior art improvement as described in the Ito et al patent, Figure 4 shows a prior art fixed satellite service system using an inlel~alellite link, Figure 5 shows a first embodiment of the invention incoll,olated in an FSS system and in which the inlel~at~llite link is used to serve, simultaneously, several incoming beams, Figure 6 shows a second embodiment of the invention incorporated in an FSS system in which a broadcast mode is used, Figure 7 shows an embodiment of the invention in which the intersatellite link serves two satellites, only one of which is ntili7in~ subchannelizing technology, Figure 8 shows the use of the invention in relation to a constellation of communications satellites.
Not shown in the drawings or discussed to any extent in the description are the standard circuit co~ found in a satellite repeater system. These include the low-noise amplifiers, the frequency down-converters (e.g. from 14 GHz to 12 GHz) and the redlln(l~ncy selection circuits.
Detailed D~s~ Jtion of Preferred Embodiments Figure 1 in the drawings shows a typical beam (in the drawing it is given the all,ill~dly number "X") used in frequency-division-multiplex (FDM) satellite tr~n~mi~sions. Although the example given is for an incoming beam (i.e. a beam received by a col..l..ullications satellite), outgoing beams (i.e. beams transmitted from a communications satellite) would have a similar make-up. The following is an example only and the quantities specified for bandwidths and frequencies used are purely notional. For inct~nce~ while the channels are described as being of equal bandwidth and the subchannels are also described as being of equal bandwidth, this is not necessarily the case and design considerations may require the channels to be of li~l~;nl bandwidths, and the ~ul~chalmels to be of dirrelelll bandwidths.
Furthermore, the number of channels per beam need not be eight since there could be a different number of channels (greater or fewer than eight) in each beam.
In this example shown in Figure 1, each beam is divided into eight non-overlapping frequency-separated channels. Each channel (including interchannel guardbands) is about 62 MHz in bandwidth and thus the bandwidth of the beam itself is no more than 500 MHz. The centre frequency of the beam could be at some regular collll--u--ication frequency (e.g. L-Band, S-Band, ~-Band, Ku-Band or Ka-Band). Every channel is divided into four equal subchannels, each subchannel having a bandwidth no greater than 15 MHz. (Some allowance may have to be made for guard bands).
For purpose of discussion in this disclosure, the first to fourth subchannels in each channel are identified respectively by the letters "a", "b", "c" and "d". In the example, each subchannel is destined for a particular output destin~tion (i.e. beam) and is accordingly labelled to facilitate underst~nrling of the description. For example, a subchannel destined for downlink beam "P" carries an appropriate identifier in the drawings. More specifically, a subchannel in channel 1 of beam 1 that has the identifier "a28" is a subchannel "a" (the first of the four ~ul)channels in channel 1) that is destined for the outgoing beam 28.
The output will be placed in beam 28, channel 1, subchannel "a".
Referring to the prior art in Figure 2, consideration is given to a 6-beam satellite in which each beam is divided into 8 channels. In the drawing only the first channel in each input and output beam is shown in detail, i.e. each of the first channels is shown as co~ inin~ four subchannels of communications il~llll~lion labeled "a" to "d" respectively. It will be understood that each of the other channels in each .._ beam will also generally contain several subchannels of communications information as described with rerelence to Figure 1. The input beams 1 to 6 are derived from telle~lfial sources as shown. Output beams 7 to 12 are directed to telle~l~ial destin~tions through the satellite payload 13 as is well known in the art. It should be understood that although all beams are shown as Col~L~ g eight channels, this may not be the case and more or fewer channels may be l~~ "ilted in any beam. Similarly, there may be more or fewer than four subchannels in each channel.
The architecture of the satellite system allows the channels from the various beams to be switched to dirrerelll outputs. For example, the first three subchannels of channel 1 of beam 1 are destined for the west coast of North America (beam 11) and are labelled "al 1" to "c11" respectively. Similarly, the ~ul~cham~el contents of channel 2 of beam 1 may be directed to a different output beam, such as beam 7:
(this is not shown). However, note that if the channel is only partially utili7efl~ for example channel 1 of beam 1 is shown as having subchannel "d" unused, i.e. the channel is only 75 percent utili7e~1 the rem~ining capacity (in this case 25 percent) of the channel is "wasted".
Figure 3 shows a configuration using the tç~çhing of Ito et al referred to before. The Ito et al disclosure teaches a two-level ~ul~chamlelizing system in which, for a 6-by-6 satellite, input beams 14 to 19 are connected to a satellite payload (shown generally at 26) which splits each beam into its respective channels in a first stage demultiplexer (26a). A second stage (26b) employing SAW filters and solid-state (GaAsFET) switches further divides each channel into subch~nnel~ hllelbealll connects these ~ul)channels and recombines the ~ul~channels into newly constructed channels. These channels are then recombined in the output multiplexer (third) stage (26c) for distribution to the output ~nt~nn~.
Referring to Figure 4 in the drawings, a standard communication system using an hllel ~alellite link is shown. Radio-frequency signals comprising each of four incoming beams shown as 27 to 30 l~clively, arrive at the input ~nt~nn~ 35 of a satellite 36 located at the equator over (for greatest convenience) the Pacific Ocean. The regions (27 to 30) tr~n~mitting to the satellite 36 are shown as being located in Australia, North-East Asia (e.g. Japan), India and Hawaii respectively. Although A 35 is shown as a single unit, it may consist of a group of ~nt~nn~c or a single multi-feed orthogonally polarized device.
A second satellite 42 serves the North and South American continent~ as well as parts of Europe. It would normally be placed at the equator over the Atlantic Ocean. The lon itu-linAl positions of the two satellites 36 and 42 would be such that each satellite is in line of sight of the other. According to this arrangement, an hllel~lellite link 40 is established between the satellites 36 and 42 and it uses A.l~el~nAC
~ 2 1 65875 38 and 41 respectively. The link would normally be of a bandwidth sufficient to handle at least two subchannels (four or more are plerel,ed) and could be of microwave frequency, e.g. 30 Hz or 60 GHz, or be an optical link using a laser beam or some other light source.
If, as shown in this example, Australia is llan~ illil g to Europe, it captules the intersatellite link to the exclusion of the other regions and sends the information "a34" (shown at 37) over the link 40 (shown at 39). The information is forwarded to the applopliate subchannel (shown at 44) in the chosen ~lestin~tion (beam 34). In this case, Europe is the ~lestin~tion chosen, but the hlroll.lation could have been directed to any of the regions being served by satellite 42 provided, of course, there was sufficient channel capacity.
It may be seen in this example of the prior art system that there are severe constraints on the use of the system and that, if the information being transmitted does not require the full capacity of the link llansl)onder in satellite 36, there is a potential for waste in the form of power and system utilization. In the example given, the hlrollll~lion being transmitted from Australia occupies only 25 percent of the available hllel~alellite link's channel, (~sllming that only one of four available subchannels of equal bandwidth is employed). Although the connectivity problems could be alleviated by providing additional channels in the intersatellite link, this would not address the problem of inefficiency in channel-carrying capacity and would add to the complexity, cost and weight of the satellite payload.
It should be noted that, firstly, the prece-~in~ and following discussion give examples only and the invention is not limited to conllllullications satellites over the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans. Secondly, to simplify the drawings, only one channel in each beam is shown. For example, beam 27 (Australia), in addition to the channel CO~ g information 37, would generally also contain additional other channels arriving at the 2nt~nn~ array 35 of satellite 36 . Similarly, each of the other regions (28 to 30 and 31 to 34) would support more than the one channel shown per beam.
Figure 5 shows the system of Figure 4 embodying the invention. In the invention, at least one channel in each of the incoming beams is divided into ~ul)chal~l~els. Use may be made of (SAW) technology as described in the Ito et al patent. In addition, the user may choose to employ partial subchannelization as described in our copending application supra. The actual method of subchannelizing is not critical and any suitable method taught in the prior art could be used. On board the satellite, the processor acts to hllell,ealll switch information at the subchannel level, as taught in the prior art. The output (hllel~alellite linking) beam 40, which includes channel 39' and its contents, is treated by the on-board cil~;uilly as any standard output beam. However, the int~s~tellite beam's frequency may differ, for ._ convenience or security or some other reason, from the frequency of the standard up- or down-link frequencies .
Using the system described, it is now possible for two or more regions to make use of a single channel in the hllel~ llite link. The first (or "a") subchannel (shown at 37) from Australia transmits to Europe (shown at 44), as described with respect to Figure 4. However, because of the ability to hllell,ealll switch at the ~ul)chdmlel level, it is possible to connect the second (or "b") subchannel (45) from another region (North-East Asia) being served by satellite 36 to another region (in this case North America) being served by satellite 42, the infommation apl)ealillg in the respective second subchannel as shown at 48. Similarly, the third (or "c") subchannel (36) from India may be ll~nslllilled to Northern South America (appearing at 49) and the fourth (or "d") subchannel (47) from Hawaii may be ll~n~ ed to Southem South America (a~ealillg at 50). The ideal situation is shown where the hllel~atellite link 40 (which is assumed to have four subchannels) is fully utilized and all four items of inrollllation from the respective regions 27 to 30 are shown in the inlelsal~llite link channel 39'.
In the case described, it should be noted that both satellites 36 and 42 must have subchannel-h~n-llin~
capability. In satellite 36 incoming channels are subchannelized, the subch~nnel~ are interbeam switched and finally combined for the hllel ~alellite link feed. In like manner, satellite 42 treats the hllel~lellite link as it does any other incoming beam and ~lrOlllls the action of subchannelizing, interbeam switching and combining with other ~ul)chal~llels to form new channels for the down links to Earth.
As taught in the prior art, by applvpliate switching arr~ngement~ on board the satellites, it is possible to place the satellite 42 in broadcast mode. As an example, Figure 6 shows an arrangement whereby hlrollllation (37) from the Australian up-link may be distributed to all the regions served by satellite 42 as shown at 44 in each region served by satellite 42. It may be noted that this does not impede the relay of single--l~stin~tion, i.e. non-bro~(lc~t infommation (46 to 47) by the other three regions being served by satellite 36 to selected regions in the footprints of satellite 42 (shown as 48 to 50). By extension, a limiting case is the possibility for each region served by satellite 36 to broadcast to all regions served by satellite 42, within the limits of satellite transponder, switching and power-h~n-lling capacity.
It is also possible to make some limited use of the invention where only one of the satellites is using a capability to subchannelize and hllelbealll switch. This may be a case when it is decided not to use on-board switching capability or if the satellite is not capable of ~I roll.ling subchannel operations. Figure 7 shows the case where one channel's colll~llls (two subchannels are placed on the beam from Australia) ., are transmitted over the intersatellite link 40 to satellite 42. In satellite 42 the incoming in~ alellite link is ~ul~channelized and hllell~ea~ll switched to deliver the contents to two down-link beams (in this case Europe at 44 and Northem South America 51 respectively are suggested). It should be apl,arelll to a skilled person that if satellite 36 has subchannel-h~n-lling capabilities and satellite 42 does not, then ~u~cha~ els from two separate sources, e.g. Australia and India, could be combined in satellite 36 for intersatellite ll~nsrel and onward tr~n~mi~sion to a single telle~llial destination, e.g. Europe.
It should be recognized that, for clarity, only part of the satellite communications system has been shown. Both satellites 36 and 42 would normally be part of a regional system. Figure 8 describes this:
however, not all beams are shown. For example, satellite 36 is shown to be receiving two beams (53 and 55) from the Earth (62). Also shown is the illlel~alellite beam 40 tr~n~mitted to satellite 42.
However, satellite 36 also ll~lls~,lil~ beams (52 and 54) to the Earth. In addition, satellite 36 receives col"~"unications signals from satellite 42 over the retum hlle,~alellite link (40'). To complete the system, satellite 42, in addition to transmitting several beams (shown as 56 and 59) to the Earth, would receive beams (57 and 58) from le"e~l~ial sources as well as the intersatellite beam 40 received from satellite 36. In keeping with the foregoing description of a typical FDM satellite system, the beams to and from satellites 36 and 42 would nommally include several channels (e.g. eight) and each channel would consist of several subchannels (e.g. four). As described above, the intersatellite link 40 would be supplemented by a complementary link 40' providing tr~n~mi~sions in the reverse direction i.e. from satellite 42 to satellite 36.
Finally, the system shown could easily be extended to fomm part of a matrix or constellation of satellites, where direct illl~l~alellite links could be ~ 1 by one satellite with more than one other s~tellite.
In Figure 8, satellite 42 is shown as being directly linked with another satellite shown at 45 via intersatellite links 47 (forward direction) and 47' (return direction). Similar to satellites 36 and 42, satellite 45 has down-links (60 and 62) and up-links (61 and 63). This application ofthe invention would be particularly useful where geostationary satellites are arranged to provide near-global conl,llu"ications coverage or in the situation where the satellites are not geostationary, but are part of, for example, a constellation of satellites in low-earth or medium-earth orbit.
What has been described is a bent-pipe communications satellite system. In general, at least part of the information contained in M incoming beams to a first satellite may be combined together and re"ed by i"le,~atellite link to a second satellite. The second satellite can separate the information out and place the separated information on N outgoing beams. M and N are natural numbers. One limiting case, M=l and N=2, is a broadcast configuration described with respect to Figure 6 in which ..
satellite 36 does not need subchannelizing capability but satellite 42 does subchannelize the signals. In this limiting case, only one up-link is participating and only two down-links are making use of the broadcast facility.
Another limiting case is where M=2 and N=l. In this case two incoming subchannels are combined in s~tellite 36 and are directed to a single destination by satellite 42. In this case, satellite 42 would not need subchannelizing capability to handle the signals.
Field of the Invent~on This invention relates to satellite communications systems and particularly to systems of multibeam co~ lications satellites with direct hllel~alellite links.
Background of the Invent~on The early communications satellites were used as "dumb" repeaters opt;l~ g in a bent-pipe mode.
("Bent-pipe" is a term in general use and well understood by those skilled in the art). Initially, no significant processin~ other than signal amplification was carried in the satellite payload and the information relayed back to Earth was a replica of the information from the source. The advantages of this type of satellite were simplicity and low front-end capital and launch costs. As satellite systems became more sophisticated, multibeam satellites, still op~ling in the bent-pipe mode were introduced whereby one or more sources could relay messages to several destinations. The architecture of these systems was still fairly rigid and allowed little or no flexibility in switching between sources or ~lestin~t-ons. Typical were the first broadcast satellites that relayed information to several geographic regions. An example would be the system described in USA Patent 3,541,553 (Gubin) issued on November 17, 1970 and assigned to RCA Coll,or~lion.
Later, satellites with on-board switching capability were introduced. In these systems, each incoming beam from Earth would, typically, carry several frequency-multiplexed channels. Existing fixed satellite service (FSS) systems now generally employ multibeam satellites having input demultiplexers near the front end of the satellite which separate incoming beams into a number of l~llspollder channels. Prior to high-power amplification, these channels are hllell,ealll switched by means of coaxial switches so that con.,nul~ications intelligence arriving via one of the incoming beams can be directed to one of several output beams. Path selection is at the discretion of ground control. Connections are made on a relatively broad channel basis, i.e. all of the illfollllation in one ll~l~pollder channel is switched in its entirety. In some instances, by using power-combining techniques, information from two or more sources could be sent to a common ~lestin~tion. This approach is, however, costly and wasteful of resources.
Other, quite separate, developments have concerned the enabling of satellites to co~ icate with each other by the use of direct electrom~gnetic (e.g. radio or optical) links between the satellites. These inlel~alellite links are used to pass intelli~nce (for control or comlllullications) between orbiting ~1 65875 satellites. In USA Patent 4,691,882 (Young) issued September 8, 1987 and assigned to British Aerospace PLC, for example, clusters of coo~l~ling con~nullications satellites act in unison as one large satellite and are radio-linked together. In other in~t~n~es, defence and other government satellite systems e.g. TDRSS (the Traffic and Data Relay Satellite System) use inlelsalellite links.
Also, a number of h~ ll developments have occurred in the mobile conl~ lications ma,l~l~. For the hand-held-terminal market, interest is focused on low-earthorbit (LEO) and medium-earth-orbit (MEO) satellite constellations. The geostationary (GEO) market is also undergoing major changes.
Traditional point-to-point communications between major population centres are being converted to optical fibre and o~l~lol~ are now looking to provide a greater number of narrow-band links, plincipally to areas that are not well served by existing tellesllial infrastructure. To this end, proposed satellites have more beams, higher effective isotropic radiated power (EIRP) and greater interbeam connectivity and users will require less e~llsive ground tçrmin~l~ These trends are being accelerated by data colllpl~ssion which is forcing opel~lol~ to lease colllpal~lively narrow bandwidths.
Developments have been described in which global systems of orbiting satellites will be commissioned to provide personal communications (similar to cellular telephone service) any~,vhere on the Earth. Each of these satellites will be linked by h~ al~llite beams to as many as eight other satellites. USA Patent 5,129,095 (Davis et al) issued July 7, 1992 and assigned to Motorola, Inc. is an example of such a system. Recently proposed LEO and MEO systems (e.g. Iridium and Teledesic)1 will support hlle-salellite links.
The present and proposed communications systems using hllel~alellite links are constrained by the type of signals they can handle, especially with regard to protocols used and particular modulation methods employed. They tend to rely on digital switching technology and make extensive use of "smart" on-board processors. Decisions are made, at least in part, on board the satellite. For these systems to work, subscribers are required to procure special transceivers which are not backward compatible and hence generally unusable with other existing systems. Globalsfar2 is one system of global telecommunications proposed that uses bent-pipe technology. However, it relies on the terrestrial communications inrl~l ucture for inter-regional communications: it does not propose illlel~alellite links.
With respect to the fixed satellite service systems, the mounting demand for greater connectivity and leases of fractions of llan~llders cannot be satisfied by simply increasing the number of beams since IIridium and Teledesic are Registered Trade Marks.
2Globalstar is a Registered Tr~dem~rk this aggravates the connectivity problem and leads to reduced transponder utilization efficiency. The problem was addressed in USA Patent 4,706,239 (Ito et al) issued November 12, 1987 and assigned to Kokusai Denshin Denwa Co. Ltd. In the Ito et al patent, every incoming radio-frequency beam is divided first into ll~nspollder channels by means of a demultiplexer as is well known in the art. Each channel is further divided into subchannels by use of surface-acoustic-wave (SAW) filters. Interbeam switching is then carried out using GaAs FET switches at the relatively narrow subchannel level, rather than at the channel level as in prior systems. The output of the switches are subsequently multiplexed back into llallspollder channels and amplified and multiplexed for the down-link beams. The result of Ito et al is that the infollllalion contained in a channel does not have to be switched as a whole.
The problem of full interconnectivity was also addressed in USA Patent 5,274,627 (De Santis) issued December 28, 1993 and assigned to the International Telecommunications Satellite Org~ni7~tion. In the De Santis system, the incoming continuous-wave frequency-division multiple-access signal is rolllled into periodic-burst time-division signals. They are routed via a switching matrix and ll~l~lllled back to the frequency domain prior to channeling to the desired down-link beam or beams as continuous-wave frequency-division-multiplex signals. In the De Santis arrangement, the system is ll~lspalelll to the form or protocol of the incoming signals. Although De Santis discloses a complex system for h~lell~ealll switching, it does not disclose any application of hllel~alellite links.
The Inmarsat 3 geostationary mobile communications system, employs on-board subchannelizing technology. The system makes use of multiple hops between Earth and satellite to collllll~ icate between two mobile users. For example, a ship communicating with a second ship would send h~llllation signals to the satellite. These signals would be switched in the satellite and sent back to Earth for control and billing purposes, resent to the satellite for further proce~ing and then relayed to the second ship.
In a further improvement in subchannelizing technology, the applicant has determined that, by combining the coaxial switch methods commonly used in the prior art with the subchannelization methods, advantages similar to those of the Ito et al system can be obtained with greatly reduced hardware complexity. For example, by subchannelizing all 8 channels, as proposed by Ito et al, one would produce a 25 percent improvement in llalls~llder utilization over previous systems. However, if the same 8-beam, 8-channel system were to subchannelize only four of the eight channels, the system would require some 50 percent less hardware than the Ito et al system requires. Tlallspollder utilization would be only slightly degraded, i.e. typically one would obtain a 20 percent capacity improvement over the art prior (instead of the 25 percent of the Ito et al system). Reference is made to the teaching of ,_ copending C~n~ n Patent Application No. 2,157,209 which is ~si ne~l to the assignee of this application.
Sta~ement of the Invention With the advent of s~t~llite communications systems that propose to respond to the increasing tlem~nfl for more flexibility and capacity while rem~ining colllpelilive with other co~ "~ ;cations systems, greater ingenuity is required to offer new services at economically colll~lilive cost. The requirement is for a bent-pipe system, i.e. one that does not restrict the nature or protocol of the information signals being transmitted. The system must also provide significant improvement in transponder eff1ciency in delivering small packets of information to different destin~tions.
New advances in enabling the commissioning of relatively ine~ellsive subchannelizing systems offer new commercial opportunities hitherto not reali_able. The invention described herein responds to the system requirements outlined above by providing a new form of hll~l~alellite link that m~int~ins the bent-pipe mode of operation. As noted above, the system described on our copending application 2,157,209 also helps accomplish the objectives by providing partial subchannelization and can be used in co~ ;tion with the invention described herein to provide more pronounced benefits.
D~ tion of the Drawings In the drawings:
Figure 1 shows the arrangement of a typical satellite incoming beam, Figure 2 shows a prior art system that utilizes a standard microwave payload with partial tl~l~s~llder ntili7~tion, Figure 3 shows the prior art improvement as described in the Ito et al patent, Figure 4 shows a prior art fixed satellite service system using an inlel~alellite link, Figure 5 shows a first embodiment of the invention incoll,olated in an FSS system and in which the inlel~at~llite link is used to serve, simultaneously, several incoming beams, Figure 6 shows a second embodiment of the invention incorporated in an FSS system in which a broadcast mode is used, Figure 7 shows an embodiment of the invention in which the intersatellite link serves two satellites, only one of which is ntili7in~ subchannelizing technology, Figure 8 shows the use of the invention in relation to a constellation of communications satellites.
Not shown in the drawings or discussed to any extent in the description are the standard circuit co~ found in a satellite repeater system. These include the low-noise amplifiers, the frequency down-converters (e.g. from 14 GHz to 12 GHz) and the redlln(l~ncy selection circuits.
Detailed D~s~ Jtion of Preferred Embodiments Figure 1 in the drawings shows a typical beam (in the drawing it is given the all,ill~dly number "X") used in frequency-division-multiplex (FDM) satellite tr~n~mi~sions. Although the example given is for an incoming beam (i.e. a beam received by a col..l..ullications satellite), outgoing beams (i.e. beams transmitted from a communications satellite) would have a similar make-up. The following is an example only and the quantities specified for bandwidths and frequencies used are purely notional. For inct~nce~ while the channels are described as being of equal bandwidth and the subchannels are also described as being of equal bandwidth, this is not necessarily the case and design considerations may require the channels to be of li~l~;nl bandwidths, and the ~ul~chalmels to be of dirrelelll bandwidths.
Furthermore, the number of channels per beam need not be eight since there could be a different number of channels (greater or fewer than eight) in each beam.
In this example shown in Figure 1, each beam is divided into eight non-overlapping frequency-separated channels. Each channel (including interchannel guardbands) is about 62 MHz in bandwidth and thus the bandwidth of the beam itself is no more than 500 MHz. The centre frequency of the beam could be at some regular collll--u--ication frequency (e.g. L-Band, S-Band, ~-Band, Ku-Band or Ka-Band). Every channel is divided into four equal subchannels, each subchannel having a bandwidth no greater than 15 MHz. (Some allowance may have to be made for guard bands).
For purpose of discussion in this disclosure, the first to fourth subchannels in each channel are identified respectively by the letters "a", "b", "c" and "d". In the example, each subchannel is destined for a particular output destin~tion (i.e. beam) and is accordingly labelled to facilitate underst~nrling of the description. For example, a subchannel destined for downlink beam "P" carries an appropriate identifier in the drawings. More specifically, a subchannel in channel 1 of beam 1 that has the identifier "a28" is a subchannel "a" (the first of the four ~ul)channels in channel 1) that is destined for the outgoing beam 28.
The output will be placed in beam 28, channel 1, subchannel "a".
Referring to the prior art in Figure 2, consideration is given to a 6-beam satellite in which each beam is divided into 8 channels. In the drawing only the first channel in each input and output beam is shown in detail, i.e. each of the first channels is shown as co~ inin~ four subchannels of communications il~llll~lion labeled "a" to "d" respectively. It will be understood that each of the other channels in each .._ beam will also generally contain several subchannels of communications information as described with rerelence to Figure 1. The input beams 1 to 6 are derived from telle~lfial sources as shown. Output beams 7 to 12 are directed to telle~l~ial destin~tions through the satellite payload 13 as is well known in the art. It should be understood that although all beams are shown as Col~L~ g eight channels, this may not be the case and more or fewer channels may be l~~ "ilted in any beam. Similarly, there may be more or fewer than four subchannels in each channel.
The architecture of the satellite system allows the channels from the various beams to be switched to dirrerelll outputs. For example, the first three subchannels of channel 1 of beam 1 are destined for the west coast of North America (beam 11) and are labelled "al 1" to "c11" respectively. Similarly, the ~ul~cham~el contents of channel 2 of beam 1 may be directed to a different output beam, such as beam 7:
(this is not shown). However, note that if the channel is only partially utili7efl~ for example channel 1 of beam 1 is shown as having subchannel "d" unused, i.e. the channel is only 75 percent utili7e~1 the rem~ining capacity (in this case 25 percent) of the channel is "wasted".
Figure 3 shows a configuration using the tç~çhing of Ito et al referred to before. The Ito et al disclosure teaches a two-level ~ul~chamlelizing system in which, for a 6-by-6 satellite, input beams 14 to 19 are connected to a satellite payload (shown generally at 26) which splits each beam into its respective channels in a first stage demultiplexer (26a). A second stage (26b) employing SAW filters and solid-state (GaAsFET) switches further divides each channel into subch~nnel~ hllelbealll connects these ~ul)channels and recombines the ~ul~channels into newly constructed channels. These channels are then recombined in the output multiplexer (third) stage (26c) for distribution to the output ~nt~nn~.
Referring to Figure 4 in the drawings, a standard communication system using an hllel ~alellite link is shown. Radio-frequency signals comprising each of four incoming beams shown as 27 to 30 l~clively, arrive at the input ~nt~nn~ 35 of a satellite 36 located at the equator over (for greatest convenience) the Pacific Ocean. The regions (27 to 30) tr~n~mitting to the satellite 36 are shown as being located in Australia, North-East Asia (e.g. Japan), India and Hawaii respectively. Although A 35 is shown as a single unit, it may consist of a group of ~nt~nn~c or a single multi-feed orthogonally polarized device.
A second satellite 42 serves the North and South American continent~ as well as parts of Europe. It would normally be placed at the equator over the Atlantic Ocean. The lon itu-linAl positions of the two satellites 36 and 42 would be such that each satellite is in line of sight of the other. According to this arrangement, an hllel~lellite link 40 is established between the satellites 36 and 42 and it uses A.l~el~nAC
~ 2 1 65875 38 and 41 respectively. The link would normally be of a bandwidth sufficient to handle at least two subchannels (four or more are plerel,ed) and could be of microwave frequency, e.g. 30 Hz or 60 GHz, or be an optical link using a laser beam or some other light source.
If, as shown in this example, Australia is llan~ illil g to Europe, it captules the intersatellite link to the exclusion of the other regions and sends the information "a34" (shown at 37) over the link 40 (shown at 39). The information is forwarded to the applopliate subchannel (shown at 44) in the chosen ~lestin~tion (beam 34). In this case, Europe is the ~lestin~tion chosen, but the hlroll.lation could have been directed to any of the regions being served by satellite 42 provided, of course, there was sufficient channel capacity.
It may be seen in this example of the prior art system that there are severe constraints on the use of the system and that, if the information being transmitted does not require the full capacity of the link llansl)onder in satellite 36, there is a potential for waste in the form of power and system utilization. In the example given, the hlrollll~lion being transmitted from Australia occupies only 25 percent of the available hllel~alellite link's channel, (~sllming that only one of four available subchannels of equal bandwidth is employed). Although the connectivity problems could be alleviated by providing additional channels in the intersatellite link, this would not address the problem of inefficiency in channel-carrying capacity and would add to the complexity, cost and weight of the satellite payload.
It should be noted that, firstly, the prece-~in~ and following discussion give examples only and the invention is not limited to conllllullications satellites over the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans. Secondly, to simplify the drawings, only one channel in each beam is shown. For example, beam 27 (Australia), in addition to the channel CO~ g information 37, would generally also contain additional other channels arriving at the 2nt~nn~ array 35 of satellite 36 . Similarly, each of the other regions (28 to 30 and 31 to 34) would support more than the one channel shown per beam.
Figure 5 shows the system of Figure 4 embodying the invention. In the invention, at least one channel in each of the incoming beams is divided into ~ul)chal~l~els. Use may be made of (SAW) technology as described in the Ito et al patent. In addition, the user may choose to employ partial subchannelization as described in our copending application supra. The actual method of subchannelizing is not critical and any suitable method taught in the prior art could be used. On board the satellite, the processor acts to hllell,ealll switch information at the subchannel level, as taught in the prior art. The output (hllel~alellite linking) beam 40, which includes channel 39' and its contents, is treated by the on-board cil~;uilly as any standard output beam. However, the int~s~tellite beam's frequency may differ, for ._ convenience or security or some other reason, from the frequency of the standard up- or down-link frequencies .
Using the system described, it is now possible for two or more regions to make use of a single channel in the hllel~ llite link. The first (or "a") subchannel (shown at 37) from Australia transmits to Europe (shown at 44), as described with respect to Figure 4. However, because of the ability to hllell,ealll switch at the ~ul)chdmlel level, it is possible to connect the second (or "b") subchannel (45) from another region (North-East Asia) being served by satellite 36 to another region (in this case North America) being served by satellite 42, the infommation apl)ealillg in the respective second subchannel as shown at 48. Similarly, the third (or "c") subchannel (36) from India may be ll~nslllilled to Northern South America (appearing at 49) and the fourth (or "d") subchannel (47) from Hawaii may be ll~n~ ed to Southem South America (a~ealillg at 50). The ideal situation is shown where the hllel~atellite link 40 (which is assumed to have four subchannels) is fully utilized and all four items of inrollllation from the respective regions 27 to 30 are shown in the inlelsal~llite link channel 39'.
In the case described, it should be noted that both satellites 36 and 42 must have subchannel-h~n-llin~
capability. In satellite 36 incoming channels are subchannelized, the subch~nnel~ are interbeam switched and finally combined for the hllel ~alellite link feed. In like manner, satellite 42 treats the hllel~lellite link as it does any other incoming beam and ~lrOlllls the action of subchannelizing, interbeam switching and combining with other ~ul)chal~llels to form new channels for the down links to Earth.
As taught in the prior art, by applvpliate switching arr~ngement~ on board the satellites, it is possible to place the satellite 42 in broadcast mode. As an example, Figure 6 shows an arrangement whereby hlrollllation (37) from the Australian up-link may be distributed to all the regions served by satellite 42 as shown at 44 in each region served by satellite 42. It may be noted that this does not impede the relay of single--l~stin~tion, i.e. non-bro~(lc~t infommation (46 to 47) by the other three regions being served by satellite 36 to selected regions in the footprints of satellite 42 (shown as 48 to 50). By extension, a limiting case is the possibility for each region served by satellite 36 to broadcast to all regions served by satellite 42, within the limits of satellite transponder, switching and power-h~n-lling capacity.
It is also possible to make some limited use of the invention where only one of the satellites is using a capability to subchannelize and hllelbealll switch. This may be a case when it is decided not to use on-board switching capability or if the satellite is not capable of ~I roll.ling subchannel operations. Figure 7 shows the case where one channel's colll~llls (two subchannels are placed on the beam from Australia) ., are transmitted over the intersatellite link 40 to satellite 42. In satellite 42 the incoming in~ alellite link is ~ul~channelized and hllell~ea~ll switched to deliver the contents to two down-link beams (in this case Europe at 44 and Northem South America 51 respectively are suggested). It should be apl,arelll to a skilled person that if satellite 36 has subchannel-h~n-lling capabilities and satellite 42 does not, then ~u~cha~ els from two separate sources, e.g. Australia and India, could be combined in satellite 36 for intersatellite ll~nsrel and onward tr~n~mi~sion to a single telle~llial destination, e.g. Europe.
It should be recognized that, for clarity, only part of the satellite communications system has been shown. Both satellites 36 and 42 would normally be part of a regional system. Figure 8 describes this:
however, not all beams are shown. For example, satellite 36 is shown to be receiving two beams (53 and 55) from the Earth (62). Also shown is the illlel~alellite beam 40 tr~n~mitted to satellite 42.
However, satellite 36 also ll~lls~,lil~ beams (52 and 54) to the Earth. In addition, satellite 36 receives col"~"unications signals from satellite 42 over the retum hlle,~alellite link (40'). To complete the system, satellite 42, in addition to transmitting several beams (shown as 56 and 59) to the Earth, would receive beams (57 and 58) from le"e~l~ial sources as well as the intersatellite beam 40 received from satellite 36. In keeping with the foregoing description of a typical FDM satellite system, the beams to and from satellites 36 and 42 would nommally include several channels (e.g. eight) and each channel would consist of several subchannels (e.g. four). As described above, the intersatellite link 40 would be supplemented by a complementary link 40' providing tr~n~mi~sions in the reverse direction i.e. from satellite 42 to satellite 36.
Finally, the system shown could easily be extended to fomm part of a matrix or constellation of satellites, where direct illl~l~alellite links could be ~ 1 by one satellite with more than one other s~tellite.
In Figure 8, satellite 42 is shown as being directly linked with another satellite shown at 45 via intersatellite links 47 (forward direction) and 47' (return direction). Similar to satellites 36 and 42, satellite 45 has down-links (60 and 62) and up-links (61 and 63). This application ofthe invention would be particularly useful where geostationary satellites are arranged to provide near-global conl,llu"ications coverage or in the situation where the satellites are not geostationary, but are part of, for example, a constellation of satellites in low-earth or medium-earth orbit.
What has been described is a bent-pipe communications satellite system. In general, at least part of the information contained in M incoming beams to a first satellite may be combined together and re"ed by i"le,~atellite link to a second satellite. The second satellite can separate the information out and place the separated information on N outgoing beams. M and N are natural numbers. One limiting case, M=l and N=2, is a broadcast configuration described with respect to Figure 6 in which ..
satellite 36 does not need subchannelizing capability but satellite 42 does subchannelize the signals. In this limiting case, only one up-link is participating and only two down-links are making use of the broadcast facility.
Another limiting case is where M=2 and N=l. In this case two incoming subchannels are combined in s~tellite 36 and are directed to a single destination by satellite 42. In this case, satellite 42 would not need subchannelizing capability to handle the signals.
Claims (8)
1. A satellite communications system utilizing bent-pipe architecture including:
a first communications satellite having means to receive M electromagnetic radiation beams from each of M information sources;
a second communications satellite having means to transmit N electromagnetic radiation beams to each of N information destinations;
where M and N are natural numbers and the sum of M and N is equal to or greater than 3;
means in said first satellite to transmit an in intersatellite electromagnetic radiation beam to said second satellite;
means in said second satellite to receive the intersatellite electromagnetic radiation beam from said first satellite;
said intersatellite beam including at least one intersatellite communication channel comprising a plurality of intersatellite subchannels;
each of said M electromagnetic radiation beams including one or more incoming communication channels, at least one of said incoming communication channels in each of said M beams being divisible into a plurality of incoming subchannels;
each of said N electromagnetic radiation beams including one or more outgoing communication channels, at least one of said outgoing communication channels in each of said N beams being comprised of a plurality of outgoing subchannels;
means including interbeam switching means to place the information contents of a plurality of incoming subchannels into respective ones of said plurality of intersatellite subchannels and to place the information contents of said plurality of intersatellite subchannels into respective outgoing subchannels of said N outgoing channels;
whereby information contained in incoming subchannels associated with said M beams received from said M information sources served by said first communications satellite is interbeam-switched and transmitted in outgoing subchannels associated with said N beams transmitted to said N information destinations served by said second satellite.
a first communications satellite having means to receive M electromagnetic radiation beams from each of M information sources;
a second communications satellite having means to transmit N electromagnetic radiation beams to each of N information destinations;
where M and N are natural numbers and the sum of M and N is equal to or greater than 3;
means in said first satellite to transmit an in intersatellite electromagnetic radiation beam to said second satellite;
means in said second satellite to receive the intersatellite electromagnetic radiation beam from said first satellite;
said intersatellite beam including at least one intersatellite communication channel comprising a plurality of intersatellite subchannels;
each of said M electromagnetic radiation beams including one or more incoming communication channels, at least one of said incoming communication channels in each of said M beams being divisible into a plurality of incoming subchannels;
each of said N electromagnetic radiation beams including one or more outgoing communication channels, at least one of said outgoing communication channels in each of said N beams being comprised of a plurality of outgoing subchannels;
means including interbeam switching means to place the information contents of a plurality of incoming subchannels into respective ones of said plurality of intersatellite subchannels and to place the information contents of said plurality of intersatellite subchannels into respective outgoing subchannels of said N outgoing channels;
whereby information contained in incoming subchannels associated with said M beams received from said M information sources served by said first communications satellite is interbeam-switched and transmitted in outgoing subchannels associated with said N beams transmitted to said N information destinations served by said second satellite.
2. The communications system of claim 1 wherein M equals 1 and N equals 2 and said second satellite contains means to interbeam switch subchannels.
3. The communications system of claim 1 wherein M equals 2 and N equals 1 and said first satellite contains means to interbeam switch subchannels.
4. An intersatellite communications system utilizing bent-pipe architecture including:
means in a first communications satellite to receive a first incoming beam containing a first incoming channel from a first information source and a second incoming beam containing a second incoming channel from a second information source, said first incoming channel containing a first plurality of incoming subchannels and said second incoming channel containing a second plurality of incoming subchannels, one of said first plurality of incoming subchannels containing first communications information and one of said second plurality of incoming subchannels containing second communications information;
means in said first satellite to combine said subchannels containing said first and second communication information respectively and to place said combined subchannels in a single channel in an electromagnetic beam carrier;
means to transmit the said carrier to a second communications satellite;
means in said second satellite to receive said carrier and to separate the combined subchannels in said single channel in said carrier;
and means in said second communications satellite to transmit a first outgoing beam containing a first outgoing channel to a first information destination and a second outgoing beam containing a second outgoing channel to a second information destination, said first outgoing channel containing a first plurality of outgoing subchannels and said second outgoing channel containing a second plurality of outgoing subchannels;
means in said second communications satellite to place said first communications information contained in one of said separated subchannels in one of said first plurality of outgoing subchannels;
and means in said second communication satellite to place said second communications information contained in the other of said separated subchannels in one of said second plurality of outgoing subchannels.
means in a first communications satellite to receive a first incoming beam containing a first incoming channel from a first information source and a second incoming beam containing a second incoming channel from a second information source, said first incoming channel containing a first plurality of incoming subchannels and said second incoming channel containing a second plurality of incoming subchannels, one of said first plurality of incoming subchannels containing first communications information and one of said second plurality of incoming subchannels containing second communications information;
means in said first satellite to combine said subchannels containing said first and second communication information respectively and to place said combined subchannels in a single channel in an electromagnetic beam carrier;
means to transmit the said carrier to a second communications satellite;
means in said second satellite to receive said carrier and to separate the combined subchannels in said single channel in said carrier;
and means in said second communications satellite to transmit a first outgoing beam containing a first outgoing channel to a first information destination and a second outgoing beam containing a second outgoing channel to a second information destination, said first outgoing channel containing a first plurality of outgoing subchannels and said second outgoing channel containing a second plurality of outgoing subchannels;
means in said second communications satellite to place said first communications information contained in one of said separated subchannels in one of said first plurality of outgoing subchannels;
and means in said second communication satellite to place said second communications information contained in the other of said separated subchannels in one of said second plurality of outgoing subchannels.
5. The system of claim 4 in which said first and second incoming beams are microwave-frequency radio beams from respective terrestrial information sources.
6. The system of claim 4 in which said first incoming beam is an microwave-frequency radio beam from a terrestrial source and said second incoming beam is an electromagnetic beam from a third satellite.
7. The system of claim 6 in which said electromagnetic beam is a microwave-frequency radio beam.
8. The system of claim 6 in which said electromagnetic beam is an optical-wavelength carrier beam.
Priority Applications (5)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002165875A CA2165875C (en) | 1995-12-21 | 1995-12-21 | Intersatellite communications systems |
| US08/715,065 US5825325A (en) | 1995-12-21 | 1996-09-17 | Intersatellite communications systems |
| DE69627284T DE69627284T2 (en) | 1995-12-21 | 1996-12-10 | Intersatellite communication arrangement with subchannel switching and bent pipe architecture |
| EP19960119806 EP0780998B1 (en) | 1995-12-21 | 1996-12-10 | Intersatellite communication system with switching at subchannel level using bent-pipe architecture |
| NO965313A NO965313L (en) | 1995-12-21 | 1996-12-12 | Inter Satellite |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002165875A CA2165875C (en) | 1995-12-21 | 1995-12-21 | Intersatellite communications systems |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2165875A1 CA2165875A1 (en) | 1997-06-22 |
| CA2165875C true CA2165875C (en) | 2001-03-13 |
Family
ID=4157214
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002165875A Expired - Fee Related CA2165875C (en) | 1995-12-21 | 1995-12-21 | Intersatellite communications systems |
Country Status (2)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US5825325A (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2165875C (en) |
Families Citing this family (36)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US6708029B2 (en) | 1997-06-02 | 2004-03-16 | Hughes Electronics Corporation | Broadband communication system for mobile users in a satellite-based network |
| US6125261A (en) * | 1997-06-02 | 2000-09-26 | Hughes Electronics Corporation | Method and system for communicating high rate data in a satellite-based communications network |
| US6032041A (en) * | 1997-06-02 | 2000-02-29 | Hughes Electronics Corporation | Method and system for providing wideband communications to mobile users in a satellite-based network |
| US6175719B1 (en) * | 1997-06-25 | 2001-01-16 | Hughes Electronics Corporation | Multi-spot-beam satellite system with broadcast and surge capacity capability |
| US6282179B1 (en) * | 1997-10-17 | 2001-08-28 | At&T Corp. | Method and system for reducing multipath fading in bent-pipe satellite communications systems |
| WO1999043104A1 (en) * | 1998-02-18 | 1999-08-26 | Viasat, Inc. | Method for improving inter-beam capacity switching for multiple spot beam satellite systems |
| FR2777721B1 (en) * | 1998-04-16 | 2000-12-15 | Alsthom Cge Alkatel | COMMUNICATION METHOD BETWEEN LAND STATIONS USING SATELLITE CONSTELLATION |
| US7027769B1 (en) | 2000-03-31 | 2006-04-11 | The Directv Group, Inc. | GEO stationary communications system with minimal delay |
| EP1148661A3 (en) * | 2000-04-21 | 2003-10-29 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Geostationary satellite system with satellite clusters having intra-cluster local area networks and inter-cluster wide area network |
| US7058140B2 (en) * | 2000-06-16 | 2006-06-06 | Smart Kevin J | Sliding-window multi-carrier frequency division multiplexing system |
| US6829479B1 (en) * | 2000-07-14 | 2004-12-07 | The Directv Group. Inc. | Fixed wireless back haul for mobile communications using stratospheric platforms |
| US6859652B2 (en) | 2000-08-02 | 2005-02-22 | Mobile Satellite Ventures, Lp | Integrated or autonomous system and method of satellite-terrestrial frequency reuse using signal attenuation and/or blockage, dynamic assignment of frequencies and/or hysteresis |
| US6895217B1 (en) | 2000-08-21 | 2005-05-17 | The Directv Group, Inc. | Stratospheric-based communication system for mobile users having adaptive interference rejection |
| US6868269B1 (en) | 2000-08-28 | 2005-03-15 | The Directv Group, Inc. | Integrating coverage areas of multiple transponder platforms |
| US7792488B2 (en) | 2000-12-04 | 2010-09-07 | Atc Technologies, Llc | Systems and methods for transmitting electromagnetic energy over a wireless channel having sufficiently weak measured signal strength |
| US7019882B1 (en) | 2002-03-21 | 2006-03-28 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Generation of M-ary digital signaling constellations directly at lightwave frequencies |
| US7177592B2 (en) * | 2003-05-30 | 2007-02-13 | The Boeing Company | Wireless communication system with split spot beam payload |
| KR100579127B1 (en) * | 2003-11-19 | 2006-05-12 | 한국전자통신연구원 | Satellite transponder switch control apparatus and method for multibeam communication |
| JP2007517466A (en) * | 2003-12-29 | 2007-06-28 | ピアザト・エルエルシー | Inter-satellite cross-link communication system, apparatus, method, and computer program product |
| US7738837B2 (en) * | 2005-02-22 | 2010-06-15 | Atc Technologies, Llc | Satellites using inter-satellite links to create indirect feeder link paths |
| EP2645597B2 (en) * | 2006-09-26 | 2024-03-06 | ViaSat, Inc. | Improved spot beam satellite systems |
| US20090295628A1 (en) * | 2006-09-26 | 2009-12-03 | Viasat, Inc. | Satellite System Optimization |
| US8538323B2 (en) * | 2006-09-26 | 2013-09-17 | Viasat, Inc. | Satellite architecture |
| EP2074712B1 (en) * | 2006-10-03 | 2012-04-11 | ViaSat, Inc. | Web/bulk transfer preallocation of upstream resources in a satellite communication system |
| EP2084831A2 (en) * | 2006-10-03 | 2009-08-05 | ViaSat, Inc. | Large packet concatenation in satellite communication system |
| EP2092663A2 (en) * | 2006-10-03 | 2009-08-26 | ViaSat, Inc. | Upfront delayed concatenation in satellite communication system |
| WO2008060759A2 (en) * | 2006-10-03 | 2008-05-22 | Viasat, Inc. | Map-trigger dump of packets in satellite communication system |
| US7869759B2 (en) * | 2006-12-14 | 2011-01-11 | Viasat, Inc. | Satellite communication system and method with asymmetric feeder and service frequency bands |
| US20100059294A1 (en) * | 2008-09-08 | 2010-03-11 | Apple Inc. | Bandwidth enhancement for a touch sensor panel |
| FR2952451B1 (en) * | 2009-11-10 | 2011-12-23 | Thales Sa | DYNAMIC MANAGEMENT OF THE FREQUENCY ROUTING CAPABILITY OF A TRANSPARENT DIGITAL PROCESSOR |
| FR2954634B1 (en) * | 2009-12-18 | 2012-02-24 | Thales Sa | SYSTEM FOR TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING MULTI-SPOTS OF A SATELLITE AND SATELLITE COMPRISING SUCH A SYSTEM |
| US9749037B2 (en) * | 2013-04-18 | 2017-08-29 | Mitsubishi Electric Corporation | Demultiplexing apparatus, multiplexing apparatus, and relay apparatus |
| US9991944B2 (en) * | 2015-01-15 | 2018-06-05 | Hughes Network Systems, Llc | High altitude platform with multibeam coverage for aero-based terminals |
| SG10201912685SA (en) * | 2015-07-31 | 2020-02-27 | Viasat Inc | Flexible capacity satellite constellation |
| EP3361651A1 (en) * | 2017-02-10 | 2018-08-15 | Airbus Defence and Space Limited | Ultra-low latency telecommunications system |
| CN112968725B (en) * | 2019-12-13 | 2022-05-13 | 清华大学 | Satellite link switching method and device |
Family Cites Families (38)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE1943735A1 (en) * | 1969-08-28 | 1971-03-11 | Licentia Gmbh | Directional radio system |
| US4029902A (en) * | 1975-10-22 | 1977-06-14 | Hughes Aircraft Company | Contiguous channel multiplexer |
| CA1084183A (en) * | 1976-09-21 | 1980-08-19 | William R. Holme | Branched path, path routing arrangement and systems |
| US4144495A (en) * | 1977-02-23 | 1979-03-13 | Communications Satellite Corporation | Satellite switching system |
| US4228401A (en) * | 1977-12-22 | 1980-10-14 | Communications Satellite Corporation | Communication satellite transponder interconnection utilizing variable bandpass filter |
| US4381562A (en) * | 1980-05-01 | 1983-04-26 | Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated | Broadcast type satellite communication systems |
| IT1130545B (en) * | 1980-12-03 | 1986-06-18 | Cselt Centro Studi Lab Telecom | PROCEDURE AND SYSTEM FOR ACCESS TO A SATELLITE FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS WITH COMMUNICATION ON BOARD |
| US4425639A (en) * | 1981-01-12 | 1984-01-10 | Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated | Satellite communications system with frequency channelized beams |
| US4456988A (en) * | 1981-01-29 | 1984-06-26 | Kokusai Denshin Denwa Kabushiki Kaisha | Satellite repeater |
| GB8300747D0 (en) * | 1983-01-12 | 1983-02-16 | British Aerospace | Co-operative satellites |
| US4491947A (en) * | 1983-05-31 | 1985-01-01 | At&T Bell Laboratories | Technique for dynamic scheduling of integrated circuit- and packet-switching in a multi-beam SS/TDMA system |
| US5303286A (en) * | 1991-03-29 | 1994-04-12 | Space Systems/Loral, Inc. | Wireless telephone/satellite roaming system |
| JPS61148926A (en) * | 1984-12-24 | 1986-07-07 | Kokusai Denshin Denwa Co Ltd <Kdd> | Communication satellite repeater |
| US4813036A (en) * | 1985-11-27 | 1989-03-14 | National Exchange, Inc. | Fully interconnected spot beam satellite communication system |
| US4858229A (en) * | 1986-08-14 | 1989-08-15 | Hughes Aircraft Company | Filter interconnection matrix |
| US4858225A (en) * | 1987-11-05 | 1989-08-15 | International Telecommunications Satellite | Variable bandwidth variable center-frequency multibeam satellite-switched router |
| US5408515A (en) * | 1988-04-29 | 1995-04-18 | Mobile Telecommunication Technologies | Ground-to-air telephone calling system and related method for directing a call to a particular passenger |
| US4868886A (en) * | 1988-06-14 | 1989-09-19 | Communication Satellite Corporation | Combined global/spot beam configuration for satellite communications |
| GB8819501D0 (en) * | 1988-08-17 | 1988-09-21 | British Aerospace | Spacecraft payload |
| JP2802833B2 (en) * | 1989-11-03 | 1998-09-24 | モトローラ・インコーポレーテッド | Global communication systems, receivers and methods of operating them |
| US5129095A (en) * | 1989-11-03 | 1992-07-07 | Motorola, Inc. | Global communication system receiver and method for operating the same |
| US5274840A (en) * | 1989-11-06 | 1993-12-28 | Motorola, Inc. | Satellite communication system |
| US5068813A (en) * | 1989-11-07 | 1991-11-26 | Mts Systems Corporation | Phased digital filtering in multichannel environment |
| US5239670A (en) * | 1989-11-30 | 1993-08-24 | Motorola, Inc. | Satellite based global paging system |
| US5327572A (en) * | 1990-03-06 | 1994-07-05 | Motorola, Inc. | Networked satellite and terrestrial cellular radiotelephone systems |
| US5233609A (en) * | 1990-08-27 | 1993-08-03 | Gte Government Systems | Multichannel multiplexer with frequency discrimination characteristics |
| CA2061090A1 (en) * | 1991-03-11 | 1992-09-12 | Richard A. Miska | Personal mobile communication system with call bridging |
| BR9102145A (en) * | 1991-05-20 | 1993-01-05 | Elebra Telecon Ltda | CELLULAR PHONE SYSTEM WITH ENLARGED CELL |
| US5274627A (en) * | 1991-07-10 | 1993-12-28 | International Telecommunications Satellite Organization | Non-regenerative multibeam satellite communications system with FDMA access and SSTDM connectivity |
| US5355512A (en) * | 1992-03-12 | 1994-10-11 | General Electric Co. | Uplink null intrusion rejection for satellite communications systems |
| US5249181A (en) * | 1992-03-25 | 1993-09-28 | Motorola, Inc. | Call processing using logical channel assignments |
| US5343512A (en) * | 1992-03-27 | 1994-08-30 | Motorola, Inc. | Call setup method for use with a network having mobile end users |
| US5361399A (en) * | 1992-06-02 | 1994-11-01 | Pagemart, Inc. | Adaptive communication system for transmitting between base stations and portable transceivers via different data rate communication links |
| FR2694855B1 (en) * | 1992-08-14 | 1994-09-30 | Alcatel Espace | Transparent switching device, in particular for the space domain, payload architectures using such a device, and methods of implementing the device and the architectures. |
| US5396643A (en) * | 1992-08-24 | 1995-03-07 | Motorola, Inc. | Geographic-area selective low-earth satellite-based paging broadcast system and method |
| US5394560A (en) * | 1992-09-30 | 1995-02-28 | Motorola, Inc. | Nationwide satellite message delivery system |
| US5483664A (en) * | 1993-07-26 | 1996-01-09 | Motorola, Inc. | Cellular communications with scheduled handoffs |
| US5499237A (en) * | 1995-03-23 | 1996-03-12 | Motorola, Inc. | Waste canceling packet routing system and method |
-
1995
- 1995-12-21 CA CA002165875A patent/CA2165875C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
1996
- 1996-09-17 US US08/715,065 patent/US5825325A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CA2165875A1 (en) | 1997-06-22 |
| US5825325A (en) | 1998-10-20 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA2165875C (en) | Intersatellite communications systems | |
| US6704543B1 (en) | Multi-beam satellite communications system | |
| US6704544B1 (en) | Multi-spot-beam satellite system with broadcast and surge capacity capability | |
| EP0887951B1 (en) | Method and system for communicating high rate data in a satellite-based communications network | |
| AU597126B2 (en) | Satellite communications system for mobile users | |
| US6067453A (en) | Satellite-based direct access telecommunications systems | |
| US20020132578A1 (en) | Interactive fixed and mobile satellite network | |
| CA2157209C (en) | Repeaters for multibeam satellites | |
| US6636734B1 (en) | Dual receive ground terminal for use in communication systems utilizing multiple satellites | |
| US7180873B1 (en) | Spread spectrum code division destination access (SS-CDDA) for satellite communication system with distributed gateways | |
| JPH0439249B2 (en) | ||
| EP0780998B1 (en) | Intersatellite communication system with switching at subchannel level using bent-pipe architecture | |
| US20030134594A1 (en) | Downlink switching mechanism for a satellite | |
| Mahle et al. | Satellite Scenarios and Technology for the 1990's | |
| EP1168673B1 (en) | Beam laydown for hopped satellite downlink with adaptable duty cycle | |
| EP1353454A2 (en) | Multi-beam satellite communications system | |
| US7835733B1 (en) | Satellite telecommunication system | |
| EP0760561B9 (en) | Repeaters for multibeam satellites with channels divided in subchannels and interbeam switching | |
| Campanella et al. | Satellite communications systems and technology, circa 2000 | |
| Kawai et al. | ETS-VI multibeam satellite communications systems | |
| Takeuchi et al. | Experimental advanced mobile satellite communications system in MM-wave and Ka-band using Japan's COMETS | |
| Hughes et al. | Satellite systems in a VSAT environment | |
| Miracapillo et al. | The L-band Land Mobile Payload (LLM) aboard ARTEMIS | |
| ASSAL et al. | Hardware development for future commercial communications satellites | |
| Uyttendaele | Satellite news gathering: An overview |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEER | Examination request | ||
| MKLA | Lapsed |