CA2210270C - Railway crossing collision avoidance system - Google Patents
Railway crossing collision avoidance system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2210270C CA2210270C CA002210270A CA2210270A CA2210270C CA 2210270 C CA2210270 C CA 2210270C CA 002210270 A CA002210270 A CA 002210270A CA 2210270 A CA2210270 A CA 2210270A CA 2210270 C CA2210270 C CA 2210270C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- railroad crossing
- vehicle
- railroad
- crossing
- rail vehicle
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L29/00—Safety means for rail/road crossing traffic
- B61L29/24—Means for warning road traffic that a gate is closed or closing, or that rail traffic is approaching, e.g. for visible or audible warning
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L2205/00—Communication or navigation systems for railway traffic
- B61L2205/04—Satellite based navigation systems, e.g. GPS
Abstract
With the vehicle anti-collision system of the present invention, road vehicles in the vicinity of a railway crossing are alerted as a train approaches the crossing. A signalling device operating in conjunction with a GPS receiver located in the train emits a signal to a receiver located at the railway crossing to provide an indication of the rail vehicle's location with respect to the railway crossing. The signal is sent continuously at predetermined intervals to provide the railway crossing with sufficient data to estimate the velocity and time of arrival of the train or railway vehicle at the crossing. The railway crossing processes the information and transmits an alarm signal to approaching road vehicles as the rail vehicle approaches the crossing. The signal emitted by the crossing is received at the road vehicle which provides various levels of alarms depending on how close the rail vehicle is to the crossing. The communications between the railroad vehicle and the crossing monitor are preferably by satellite link. A sensor is also preferably provided at the crossing to detect an object on the crossing when the rail vehicle is approaching.
Description
RAILWAY CROSSING COLLISION AVOIDANCE SYSTEM
Field of the Invention This invention relates to anti-collision systems and more particularly to railway crossing collision avoidance systems.
Background of the Invention Railway crossings are inherently unsafe due to weather conditions, lack of attention by vehicle operators crossing the tracks and the fallibility of railway crossing signalling devices. Various systems have heretofore been designed to minimize problems associated with detecting an oncoming train approaching a railway crossing. Such systems are described in United States Patents 3,929,307; 4,120,471 and 4,723,737.
Although each of these systems improves the reliability of detecting oncoming trains at railway crossings, studies have shown that motor vehicle operators will nevertheless try to beat the train at the railway crossing, or will simply be unaware of the flashing signal at the crossing.
In some cases, railway crossings and road traffic signals present vehicle operators with information which can place the vehicle in a dangerous location with respect to the railway crossing. For example, railway crossings are often located near traffic lights at an intersection. In most cases, the traffic signals and the railway crossing signals operate independently. Although traffic and road planners make an effort to place traffic signals at a safe distance from railway crossings, this is not always possible. Unfortunately, accidents have occurred at such location, wherein either a bus or a truck overhangs the railway crossing while stopped at a red light. This may also occur when traffic is backed-up at the traffic light and the last vehicle does not completely clear the railway crossing.
In some situations, two or more tracks may cross a highway with insufficient spacing between the tracks for a bus or truck to clear both tracks.
Whether accidents are caused by the inattention of the drivers, undesirable weather conditions or inadequate traffic planning, a railway crossing collision avoidance system is required which will reduce the likelihood of a railway crossing accident. Accordingly a need exists for a railway crossing collision avoidance system which can overcome the problems associated with the aforementioned prior art.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a collision avoidance system for railway crossings in which a receiver located at the railway crossing is used to receive information from an oncoming railway vehicle which is indicative of the railway vehicle's velocity and time of arrival at the crossing.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a collision avoidance system for railway crossings in which the railway crossing is provided with a processor which makes use of the information received from the railway vehicle to establish an alarm condition as an oncoming railway vehicle approaches the railway crossing.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a collision avoidance system for railway crossings in which a transmitter located at the railway crossing emits an alarm signal directed to approaching road vehicles, which is indicative of how close the rail vehicle is to the crossing.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a collision avoidance system for railway crossings in which the alarm signal emitted by the railway crossing provides the operator of the vehicle with various levels of alarms depending on how close the rail vehicle is to the crossing.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a collision avoidance system for railway crossings in which the location of crossings can either be pre-stored on the rail vehicle's processor or transmitted from each crossing as the rail vehicle approaches each crossing.
Field of the Invention This invention relates to anti-collision systems and more particularly to railway crossing collision avoidance systems.
Background of the Invention Railway crossings are inherently unsafe due to weather conditions, lack of attention by vehicle operators crossing the tracks and the fallibility of railway crossing signalling devices. Various systems have heretofore been designed to minimize problems associated with detecting an oncoming train approaching a railway crossing. Such systems are described in United States Patents 3,929,307; 4,120,471 and 4,723,737.
Although each of these systems improves the reliability of detecting oncoming trains at railway crossings, studies have shown that motor vehicle operators will nevertheless try to beat the train at the railway crossing, or will simply be unaware of the flashing signal at the crossing.
In some cases, railway crossings and road traffic signals present vehicle operators with information which can place the vehicle in a dangerous location with respect to the railway crossing. For example, railway crossings are often located near traffic lights at an intersection. In most cases, the traffic signals and the railway crossing signals operate independently. Although traffic and road planners make an effort to place traffic signals at a safe distance from railway crossings, this is not always possible. Unfortunately, accidents have occurred at such location, wherein either a bus or a truck overhangs the railway crossing while stopped at a red light. This may also occur when traffic is backed-up at the traffic light and the last vehicle does not completely clear the railway crossing.
In some situations, two or more tracks may cross a highway with insufficient spacing between the tracks for a bus or truck to clear both tracks.
Whether accidents are caused by the inattention of the drivers, undesirable weather conditions or inadequate traffic planning, a railway crossing collision avoidance system is required which will reduce the likelihood of a railway crossing accident. Accordingly a need exists for a railway crossing collision avoidance system which can overcome the problems associated with the aforementioned prior art.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a collision avoidance system for railway crossings in which a receiver located at the railway crossing is used to receive information from an oncoming railway vehicle which is indicative of the railway vehicle's velocity and time of arrival at the crossing.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a collision avoidance system for railway crossings in which the railway crossing is provided with a processor which makes use of the information received from the railway vehicle to establish an alarm condition as an oncoming railway vehicle approaches the railway crossing.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a collision avoidance system for railway crossings in which a transmitter located at the railway crossing emits an alarm signal directed to approaching road vehicles, which is indicative of how close the rail vehicle is to the crossing.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a collision avoidance system for railway crossings in which the alarm signal emitted by the railway crossing provides the operator of the vehicle with various levels of alarms depending on how close the rail vehicle is to the crossing.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a collision avoidance system for railway crossings in which the location of crossings can either be pre-stored on the rail vehicle's processor or transmitted from each crossing as the rail vehicle approaches each crossing.
Summary of the Invention With the system of the present invention, road vehicles in the vicinity of a railway crossing are informed of a train approaching the crossing. In a first embodiment of the invention, a signalling device located in the train emits a signal to a receiver located at the railway crossing to provide an indication of the rail vehicle's location with respect to the railway crossing. The signal is sent continuously at predetermined intervals to provide the railway crossing with sufficient data to estimate the velocity and time of arrival of the train or railway vehicle at the crossing. The railway crossing processes the information and transmits an alarm signal to approaching road vehicles if a potential collision is detected. The signal emitted by the crossing is received at the road vehicle which provides various levels of alarms depending on how close the rail vehicle is to the crossing.
In another embodiment of the invention, the train or railway vehicle derives a velocity and time of arrival of the train at an oncoming crossing. An alarm signal is emitted from a transmitter on the train so as to be received by approaching road vehicles. The location coordinates of the oncoming railway crossing from which the velocity and time of arrival of the train can be derived, is either pre-stored at a train's onboard processor or each railway crossing transmits its location coordinates to oncoming trains.
According to an aspect of the present invention, there is provided a railroad crossing collision avoidance system for alerting a road vehicle approaching a railroad crossing of an oncoming rail vehicle, comprising:
tracking means on the rail vehicle to determine the rail vehicle's position with respect to the railroad crossing;
transmitter means responsive to the tracking means for transmitting tracking data over a satellite communications link, the tracking data being indicative of the location of the rail vehicle with respect to the railroad crossing;
first receiver means comprised of a satellite communications receiver at the railroad crossing for receiving the transmitted tracking data over the satellite communications link from the rail vehicle;
processor means at the railroad crossing for calculating the velocity and arrival time of the rail vehicle in response to the tracking data; and transmitter means at the railroad crossing responsive to the processor means for transmitting an alarm signal to an approaching road vehicle, the alarm signal being indicative of the velocity and time of arrival of a rail vehicle at the railroad crossing.
In another embodiment of the invention, the train or railway vehicle derives a velocity and time of arrival of the train at an oncoming crossing. An alarm signal is emitted from a transmitter on the train so as to be received by approaching road vehicles. The location coordinates of the oncoming railway crossing from which the velocity and time of arrival of the train can be derived, is either pre-stored at a train's onboard processor or each railway crossing transmits its location coordinates to oncoming trains.
According to an aspect of the present invention, there is provided a railroad crossing collision avoidance system for alerting a road vehicle approaching a railroad crossing of an oncoming rail vehicle, comprising:
tracking means on the rail vehicle to determine the rail vehicle's position with respect to the railroad crossing;
transmitter means responsive to the tracking means for transmitting tracking data over a satellite communications link, the tracking data being indicative of the location of the rail vehicle with respect to the railroad crossing;
first receiver means comprised of a satellite communications receiver at the railroad crossing for receiving the transmitted tracking data over the satellite communications link from the rail vehicle;
processor means at the railroad crossing for calculating the velocity and arrival time of the rail vehicle in response to the tracking data; and transmitter means at the railroad crossing responsive to the processor means for transmitting an alarm signal to an approaching road vehicle, the alarm signal being indicative of the velocity and time of arrival of a rail vehicle at the railroad crossing.
According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a railroad crossing collision avoidance system for alerting a road vehicle approaching a railroad crossing of an oncoming rail vehicle, comprising:
tracking means on the rail vehicle to determine the rail vehicle's position with respect to the railroad crossing;
receiver means on said rail vehicle for receiving data indicative.of the position of a railroad crossing which is being approached by the rail vehicle;
processor means on the rail vehicle for calculating the velocity of the rail vehicle and arrival time at the railroad crossing that it is approaching by sequentially calculating a differential position of the railroad vehicle with respect to the railroad crossing that it is approaching in response to the receipt of the data indicative of the position of the railroad crossing;
first transmitter means responsive to the processor means for transmitting an alarm signal to an approaching road vehicle, the alarm signal being indicative of the velocity and time of arrival of the rail vehicle at the railroad crossing.
tracking means on the rail vehicle to determine the rail vehicle's position with respect to the railroad crossing;
receiver means on said rail vehicle for receiving data indicative.of the position of a railroad crossing which is being approached by the rail vehicle;
processor means on the rail vehicle for calculating the velocity of the rail vehicle and arrival time at the railroad crossing that it is approaching by sequentially calculating a differential position of the railroad vehicle with respect to the railroad crossing that it is approaching in response to the receipt of the data indicative of the position of the railroad crossing;
first transmitter means responsive to the processor means for transmitting an alarm signal to an approaching road vehicle, the alarm signal being indicative of the velocity and time of arrival of the rail vehicle at the railroad crossing.
Brief Description of the Drawings Fig. 1 is a diagram illustrating the railway crossing collision avoidance system of the present invention;
Fig. 2 is a block diagram of the rail vehicle positioning systems;
Fig. 3a is a block diagram of the railway crossing monitor;
Fig. 3b is a block diagram of the road vehicle receiver;
Fig. 4 is a diagram illustrating the railway crossing collision avoidance system in accordance with a fourth embodiment of the invention;
Fig. 5 is a block diagram of the rail vehicle positioning system in accordance with the fourth embodiment of the invention; and Fig. 6 is a block diagram of the railway crossing monitor in accordance with the fourth embodiment of the invention.
Description of the Preferred Embodiment Referring now to Fig. 1, we have shown a diagram illustrating the main components forming part of the railway crossing collision avoidance system of the present invention. Although in a preferred embodiment, the collision avoidance system is described in relation to the prevention of collisions between a train and a vehicle approaching the railway crossing, it should be noted that the system is also applicable to any 'rail-road' crossing wherein a risk of collision between a rail and road vehicle exists. For example, at locations where public transit rail vehicles cross highways and roads.
In Fig. 1, we have shown a rail vehicle 10, such as a train, approaching a railway crossing which is also being approached by a road vehicle 11. A signalling device 12 located at the front end of the train 10 emits a signal to a crossing monitor 13 located at the railway crossing. The signalling device 12 is comprised of a Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver adapted to acquire a locator signal emitted from a geostationary satellite.
Today's commercial GPS receivers offer very good positioning accuracy which can provide the absolute position of a train relative to a railway crossing which is in a fixed position.
The signalling device 12 is also comprised of a signal transmitter 14 which transmits a signal to the railway crossing monitor 13. This signal is transmitted continuously as the train travels along the track. The signal will contain information or coordinates indicative of the location of the train with respect to the data received from the geostationary satellite. At the railroad crossing monitor 13, a determination of the distance can instantaneously be derived since the railway crossing is at a known fixed location. Another GPS receiver (not shown) can be provided at the crossing monitor 13 to determine the location of the crossing. The latitude and longitude of the crossing can of course be programmed in advanced either at the train's onboard processor or can be transmitted to oncoming trains for use in estimating the train's distance from the crossing. Similarly, as the signal is received from the signalling device 12, the velocity of the train can also be determined .
Depending on the speed of the train, the arrival time of the train at the crossing can be estimated. If the train slows down, the arrival time is increased whereas if the train speeds up, the arrival time is decreased. From this information, an alarm condition can be derived at the railroad crossing monitor 13. The alarm condition will vary according to the time of arrival of the train as well as its velocity. Thus, various alarm levels can be provided according to the location and speed of an incoming train.
Once the monitor 13 processes the information received from the train 10, a transmitter (not shown) located at the monitor 13 will emit an alarm signal to any oncoming road vehicle, such as road vehicle 11. The type of alarm signal can vary according to the warning level required.. Thus, if the train is at a fair distance from the railroad crossing or is slowly approaching the crossing, an alarm with a lower warning level will be transmitted to oncoming vehicles. On the other hand, if the train is approaching at a high speed, an alarm with a higher warning level will be transmitted.
An alarm signal receiver 15 located at vehicle 11 will trigger an audio and visual alarm to let the vehicle operator know that an oncoming train is approaching the railway crossing. A low level alarm signal would, for example, light up a yellow or amber LED and a corresponding chirp would be emitted from receiver 15. If the train 10 is arriving at a high speed and is located near the crossing, a high level alarm signal would be transmitted to the receiver 15. This high level alarm would trigger red LEDs and a higher pitch or louder chirp would be emitted to alert the road vehicle operator of a potential collision at the railway crossing.
The operation of the railway crossing anti-collision system is preferably independent of existing railroad crossing signals. In addition to the time of arrival of the train at the crossing, the time to clear the crossing is also an important factor since the time to clear the crossing will vary according to the number of wagons comprising the train as well as the velocity of the train.
For very long trains, a second GPS receiver 16 is provided at the last wagon. This additional GPS receiver enables the system to determine when the alarm condition should change in accordance with the time to clear the crossing. In addition, it also assists in preventing accidents caused when trains are put in reverse once they have passed the crossing.
The train's distance from the crossing is estimated by using the train's GPS value minus the crossing's position multiplied by a topology factor. The train's velocity is calculated according to the time taken between two readings of the train's position. The arrival time of the train at the crossing can therefore be derived from the train distance and train velocity.
Once the alarm is emitted at receiver 15 of vehicle 11, the receiver can be reset by the vehicle operator so as to provide feedback to ensure that the signal was recognized.
By calculating the train's velocity and distance from the crossing, the anti-collision system of the present invention can be used to determine or discern the difference between an idle train, an approaching train, and a departing train.
Fig. 2 is a block diagram of the signalling device 12 located onboard the train as shown in Fig. 1. As indicated previously, the train is equipped with a first GPS
receiver 20 located at the front of the train. A GPS
antenna 21 can be disposed anywhere near the GPS receiver as long as it is capable of providing an adequate signal to the receiver. A second GPS receiver 22 can be provided at the end of the train for reporting the train's position on a continuous basis at predetermined intervals. GPS Receivers placed at either end of the train and coupled to a processor/controller 23 provide the global absolute position of both ends of the train.
In one embodiment of the present invention, processor/controller 23 acquires the GPS information from receivers 20 and 22 and will calculate the velocity of the train. Optionally, the processor/controller 23 can compare the calculated velocity with input from the train's instruments 24. The velocity calculated by the processor/controller 23 and the velocity obtained from the train's instruments 24 will differ due to track geometry.
That is, the train's instruments will indicate the velocity of the train over the track, whereas the processor/controller 23 will derive a velocity based on the time taken by the train to cover the distance between two points. The information calculated at the processor/controller 23 is then formatted for transmission via a transmitter 25. The transmitter 25 will code and transmit the data over antenna 26 to monitors located at the railroad crossings. The transmitter in the train will transmit the signal at a relatively wide angle to any crossing monitor located within its range. Each transmitter is equipped with RF transmitters that operate on different sideband frequencies to eliminate potential interference with other trains in the vicinity. The range of the signal from the transmitter 25 will take into effect the minimum time to clear the track which is calculated from the maximum velocity of the approaching train. A value of, say, five minutes can be provided. The coded signal from transmitter 25 contains the absolute position of the train (both ends) based on the received GPS readings. The transmitter 25 transmits the signal continuously with a new position update at intervals of at least every 30 seconds.
The message is continuously repeated to eliminate signal loss due to terrain or other signal loss conditions. The RF
transmission from the transmitter 25 is at a high enough frequency to prevent interference from weather conditions, track bends or angles of approach to the crossing. Using the GPS signal, the train's position is available to an accuracy of approximately 30 meters. If the train is stalled or halted, the signal containing the same position measurements will be repeated continuously. Trains backing up will have a negative velocity measurement. The position of the train's last wagon will be known based on the signal relayed from the second GPS receiver 22.
In a second embodiment, the data captured by the GPS receivers 20 and 22 are coded and transmitted by transmitter 25 to the crossing monitor located at the railroad crossings. In this embodiment, the railroad crossing monitor determines the position and velocity of the train from the transmitted data. Thus, depending on which embodiment is considered to be more suitable, calculation of the velocity of the train can either be completed at the processor controller 23 onboard the train as described above or at the monitor 13 located at the railroad crossing.
In a further embodiment, the train or railway vehicle derives a velocity and time of arrival of the train at an oncoming crossing. An alarm signal is emitted from a transmitter on the train so as to be received by approaching road vehicles. The location coordinates of the oncoming railway crossing from which the velocity and time of arrival of the train can be derived, is either pre-stored at a train's onboard processor or each railway crossing transmits its location coordinates to oncoming trains.
A block diagram of the monitor 13 located at the railroad crossing is shown in Fig. 3a. The RF signal received from the oncoming train is first scanned by an RF
receiver/scanner 30 to determine the proper carrier frequency of the incoming signal. The processor/-controller 31 will, as described in the first or second embodiment described above, calculate the train's position and velocity based on the data received from the GPS
receivers located on the train. The position of the crossing can either be obtained from another GPS receiver (not shown) located at the crossing or entered in the processor/controller 31. Based on this information, the processor/controller 31 will determine whether an alarm condition exists. If an alarm condition exists, a determination of what level of alarm to be transmitted to road vehicles is then determined. Once the alarm condition level is determined, an RF transmitter 32 is used to code and transmit an alarm signal via antenna 33 to approaching road vehicles. A secondary back-up power source can be provided in the event of a power failure. The alarm signal transmitted at antenna 33 contains a time stamp which provides information for future reference should a crossing incident occur.
Referring now to Fig. 3b, we have shown a block diagram of a low-cost receiver for use in a road vehicle in conjunction with the anti-collision alarm system of the present invention. The road vehicle receiver basically consists of a receiving antenna 35 connected to an RF
receiver 36. The incoming signal is processed by processor 37 to determine the level of alarm being received.
The alarm indicator 38 may comprise an audible alarm which is activated as soon as the alarm condition is received, regardless of its level. It may also include one or more visual indicators such as a flashing lights or LEDs which may be of different colours according to the level of alarm being transmitted from the railroad crossing monitor 13. A
feedback or reset key 39 can be provided in order to provide feedback to the system that the vehicle operator has recognized the signal. The vehicle receiver may optionally store a time stamp transmitted at the railroad crossing to provide an indication of the timing information of the crossing signal. The timing information would, for example, contain the time at which the operator provided an acknowledgement as well as the time the train arrived at the crossing. A memory (not shown) may be provided to store a number of crossing events such as the level of alarm received by the vehicle receiver.
In addition to determining the alarm level based on the velocity and time of arrival of the train at the crossing, the railroad crossing monitor 13 can also be provided with a sensor 34 to modify the alarm level according to the weather condition existing at the crossing as the train approaches. For example, in weather conditions which make the arrival of a train or the crossing signals difficult to see by the operator of an approaching vehicle.
This could occur if the immediate vicinity of the crossing is experiencing fog conditions, heavy snowfall or other difficult weather conditions. A higher alarm condition could be triggered by the railroad crossing monitor, if those conditions should occur. The audible or visual alarm signal would enable the operator of the vehicle to be alerted sooner especially when road conditions can affect the time necessary for the operator to slow down before the crossing. In addition, the risk of a collision at crossings located near traffic signals would be significantly reduced since the operator of the vehicle would receive an indication of an incoming train, well in advance of the crossing.
Fig. 4 is a diagram illustrating the railway crossing collision avoidance system in accordance with a fourth embodiment of the invention. In accordance with the fourth embodiment, the crossing monitor 13 located at the railroad crossing is also equipped with a GPS receiver 40 adapted to acquire a locator signal emitted from a geostationary satellite. While the possibility of locating a GPS receiver at the crossing monitor 13 was mentioned above, the importance of a GPS receiver in this location was not explained. Normal GPS readings are inherently inaccurate due to the random error introduced into the worldwide GPS system by the United States military. These inaccuracies being random can compromise the accuracy of the calculations performed by the crossing monitor and/or the train or railway vehicle. The inaccuracy when using a single monitor can be as much as 30 meters, which could be especially significant when slow moving trains are being monitored. The addition of the GPS 40 permits differential position calculations which can reduce errors to 1-2 meters.
Such accuracy is particularly significant when the position of slow moving trains are being determined since the velocity and arrival times can be calculated more accurately, especially in the vicinity of the crossing.
Fig. 2 is a block diagram of the rail vehicle positioning systems;
Fig. 3a is a block diagram of the railway crossing monitor;
Fig. 3b is a block diagram of the road vehicle receiver;
Fig. 4 is a diagram illustrating the railway crossing collision avoidance system in accordance with a fourth embodiment of the invention;
Fig. 5 is a block diagram of the rail vehicle positioning system in accordance with the fourth embodiment of the invention; and Fig. 6 is a block diagram of the railway crossing monitor in accordance with the fourth embodiment of the invention.
Description of the Preferred Embodiment Referring now to Fig. 1, we have shown a diagram illustrating the main components forming part of the railway crossing collision avoidance system of the present invention. Although in a preferred embodiment, the collision avoidance system is described in relation to the prevention of collisions between a train and a vehicle approaching the railway crossing, it should be noted that the system is also applicable to any 'rail-road' crossing wherein a risk of collision between a rail and road vehicle exists. For example, at locations where public transit rail vehicles cross highways and roads.
In Fig. 1, we have shown a rail vehicle 10, such as a train, approaching a railway crossing which is also being approached by a road vehicle 11. A signalling device 12 located at the front end of the train 10 emits a signal to a crossing monitor 13 located at the railway crossing. The signalling device 12 is comprised of a Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver adapted to acquire a locator signal emitted from a geostationary satellite.
Today's commercial GPS receivers offer very good positioning accuracy which can provide the absolute position of a train relative to a railway crossing which is in a fixed position.
The signalling device 12 is also comprised of a signal transmitter 14 which transmits a signal to the railway crossing monitor 13. This signal is transmitted continuously as the train travels along the track. The signal will contain information or coordinates indicative of the location of the train with respect to the data received from the geostationary satellite. At the railroad crossing monitor 13, a determination of the distance can instantaneously be derived since the railway crossing is at a known fixed location. Another GPS receiver (not shown) can be provided at the crossing monitor 13 to determine the location of the crossing. The latitude and longitude of the crossing can of course be programmed in advanced either at the train's onboard processor or can be transmitted to oncoming trains for use in estimating the train's distance from the crossing. Similarly, as the signal is received from the signalling device 12, the velocity of the train can also be determined .
Depending on the speed of the train, the arrival time of the train at the crossing can be estimated. If the train slows down, the arrival time is increased whereas if the train speeds up, the arrival time is decreased. From this information, an alarm condition can be derived at the railroad crossing monitor 13. The alarm condition will vary according to the time of arrival of the train as well as its velocity. Thus, various alarm levels can be provided according to the location and speed of an incoming train.
Once the monitor 13 processes the information received from the train 10, a transmitter (not shown) located at the monitor 13 will emit an alarm signal to any oncoming road vehicle, such as road vehicle 11. The type of alarm signal can vary according to the warning level required.. Thus, if the train is at a fair distance from the railroad crossing or is slowly approaching the crossing, an alarm with a lower warning level will be transmitted to oncoming vehicles. On the other hand, if the train is approaching at a high speed, an alarm with a higher warning level will be transmitted.
An alarm signal receiver 15 located at vehicle 11 will trigger an audio and visual alarm to let the vehicle operator know that an oncoming train is approaching the railway crossing. A low level alarm signal would, for example, light up a yellow or amber LED and a corresponding chirp would be emitted from receiver 15. If the train 10 is arriving at a high speed and is located near the crossing, a high level alarm signal would be transmitted to the receiver 15. This high level alarm would trigger red LEDs and a higher pitch or louder chirp would be emitted to alert the road vehicle operator of a potential collision at the railway crossing.
The operation of the railway crossing anti-collision system is preferably independent of existing railroad crossing signals. In addition to the time of arrival of the train at the crossing, the time to clear the crossing is also an important factor since the time to clear the crossing will vary according to the number of wagons comprising the train as well as the velocity of the train.
For very long trains, a second GPS receiver 16 is provided at the last wagon. This additional GPS receiver enables the system to determine when the alarm condition should change in accordance with the time to clear the crossing. In addition, it also assists in preventing accidents caused when trains are put in reverse once they have passed the crossing.
The train's distance from the crossing is estimated by using the train's GPS value minus the crossing's position multiplied by a topology factor. The train's velocity is calculated according to the time taken between two readings of the train's position. The arrival time of the train at the crossing can therefore be derived from the train distance and train velocity.
Once the alarm is emitted at receiver 15 of vehicle 11, the receiver can be reset by the vehicle operator so as to provide feedback to ensure that the signal was recognized.
By calculating the train's velocity and distance from the crossing, the anti-collision system of the present invention can be used to determine or discern the difference between an idle train, an approaching train, and a departing train.
Fig. 2 is a block diagram of the signalling device 12 located onboard the train as shown in Fig. 1. As indicated previously, the train is equipped with a first GPS
receiver 20 located at the front of the train. A GPS
antenna 21 can be disposed anywhere near the GPS receiver as long as it is capable of providing an adequate signal to the receiver. A second GPS receiver 22 can be provided at the end of the train for reporting the train's position on a continuous basis at predetermined intervals. GPS Receivers placed at either end of the train and coupled to a processor/controller 23 provide the global absolute position of both ends of the train.
In one embodiment of the present invention, processor/controller 23 acquires the GPS information from receivers 20 and 22 and will calculate the velocity of the train. Optionally, the processor/controller 23 can compare the calculated velocity with input from the train's instruments 24. The velocity calculated by the processor/controller 23 and the velocity obtained from the train's instruments 24 will differ due to track geometry.
That is, the train's instruments will indicate the velocity of the train over the track, whereas the processor/controller 23 will derive a velocity based on the time taken by the train to cover the distance between two points. The information calculated at the processor/controller 23 is then formatted for transmission via a transmitter 25. The transmitter 25 will code and transmit the data over antenna 26 to monitors located at the railroad crossings. The transmitter in the train will transmit the signal at a relatively wide angle to any crossing monitor located within its range. Each transmitter is equipped with RF transmitters that operate on different sideband frequencies to eliminate potential interference with other trains in the vicinity. The range of the signal from the transmitter 25 will take into effect the minimum time to clear the track which is calculated from the maximum velocity of the approaching train. A value of, say, five minutes can be provided. The coded signal from transmitter 25 contains the absolute position of the train (both ends) based on the received GPS readings. The transmitter 25 transmits the signal continuously with a new position update at intervals of at least every 30 seconds.
The message is continuously repeated to eliminate signal loss due to terrain or other signal loss conditions. The RF
transmission from the transmitter 25 is at a high enough frequency to prevent interference from weather conditions, track bends or angles of approach to the crossing. Using the GPS signal, the train's position is available to an accuracy of approximately 30 meters. If the train is stalled or halted, the signal containing the same position measurements will be repeated continuously. Trains backing up will have a negative velocity measurement. The position of the train's last wagon will be known based on the signal relayed from the second GPS receiver 22.
In a second embodiment, the data captured by the GPS receivers 20 and 22 are coded and transmitted by transmitter 25 to the crossing monitor located at the railroad crossings. In this embodiment, the railroad crossing monitor determines the position and velocity of the train from the transmitted data. Thus, depending on which embodiment is considered to be more suitable, calculation of the velocity of the train can either be completed at the processor controller 23 onboard the train as described above or at the monitor 13 located at the railroad crossing.
In a further embodiment, the train or railway vehicle derives a velocity and time of arrival of the train at an oncoming crossing. An alarm signal is emitted from a transmitter on the train so as to be received by approaching road vehicles. The location coordinates of the oncoming railway crossing from which the velocity and time of arrival of the train can be derived, is either pre-stored at a train's onboard processor or each railway crossing transmits its location coordinates to oncoming trains.
A block diagram of the monitor 13 located at the railroad crossing is shown in Fig. 3a. The RF signal received from the oncoming train is first scanned by an RF
receiver/scanner 30 to determine the proper carrier frequency of the incoming signal. The processor/-controller 31 will, as described in the first or second embodiment described above, calculate the train's position and velocity based on the data received from the GPS
receivers located on the train. The position of the crossing can either be obtained from another GPS receiver (not shown) located at the crossing or entered in the processor/controller 31. Based on this information, the processor/controller 31 will determine whether an alarm condition exists. If an alarm condition exists, a determination of what level of alarm to be transmitted to road vehicles is then determined. Once the alarm condition level is determined, an RF transmitter 32 is used to code and transmit an alarm signal via antenna 33 to approaching road vehicles. A secondary back-up power source can be provided in the event of a power failure. The alarm signal transmitted at antenna 33 contains a time stamp which provides information for future reference should a crossing incident occur.
Referring now to Fig. 3b, we have shown a block diagram of a low-cost receiver for use in a road vehicle in conjunction with the anti-collision alarm system of the present invention. The road vehicle receiver basically consists of a receiving antenna 35 connected to an RF
receiver 36. The incoming signal is processed by processor 37 to determine the level of alarm being received.
The alarm indicator 38 may comprise an audible alarm which is activated as soon as the alarm condition is received, regardless of its level. It may also include one or more visual indicators such as a flashing lights or LEDs which may be of different colours according to the level of alarm being transmitted from the railroad crossing monitor 13. A
feedback or reset key 39 can be provided in order to provide feedback to the system that the vehicle operator has recognized the signal. The vehicle receiver may optionally store a time stamp transmitted at the railroad crossing to provide an indication of the timing information of the crossing signal. The timing information would, for example, contain the time at which the operator provided an acknowledgement as well as the time the train arrived at the crossing. A memory (not shown) may be provided to store a number of crossing events such as the level of alarm received by the vehicle receiver.
In addition to determining the alarm level based on the velocity and time of arrival of the train at the crossing, the railroad crossing monitor 13 can also be provided with a sensor 34 to modify the alarm level according to the weather condition existing at the crossing as the train approaches. For example, in weather conditions which make the arrival of a train or the crossing signals difficult to see by the operator of an approaching vehicle.
This could occur if the immediate vicinity of the crossing is experiencing fog conditions, heavy snowfall or other difficult weather conditions. A higher alarm condition could be triggered by the railroad crossing monitor, if those conditions should occur. The audible or visual alarm signal would enable the operator of the vehicle to be alerted sooner especially when road conditions can affect the time necessary for the operator to slow down before the crossing. In addition, the risk of a collision at crossings located near traffic signals would be significantly reduced since the operator of the vehicle would receive an indication of an incoming train, well in advance of the crossing.
Fig. 4 is a diagram illustrating the railway crossing collision avoidance system in accordance with a fourth embodiment of the invention. In accordance with the fourth embodiment, the crossing monitor 13 located at the railroad crossing is also equipped with a GPS receiver 40 adapted to acquire a locator signal emitted from a geostationary satellite. While the possibility of locating a GPS receiver at the crossing monitor 13 was mentioned above, the importance of a GPS receiver in this location was not explained. Normal GPS readings are inherently inaccurate due to the random error introduced into the worldwide GPS system by the United States military. These inaccuracies being random can compromise the accuracy of the calculations performed by the crossing monitor and/or the train or railway vehicle. The inaccuracy when using a single monitor can be as much as 30 meters, which could be especially significant when slow moving trains are being monitored. The addition of the GPS 40 permits differential position calculations which can reduce errors to 1-2 meters.
Such accuracy is particularly significant when the position of slow moving trains are being determined since the velocity and arrival times can be calculated more accurately, especially in the vicinity of the crossing.
A second additional feature of the invention in accordance with the fourth embodiment of the invention is the addition of satellite communications between the crossing monitor 13 and the train 10. Communications between the train 10 and the crossing monitor 13 are critical in the successful implementation of the system in accordance with the invention. Satellite communications are generally more reliable than atmospheric communications and are normally uninterrupted and substantially interference free. It is therefore preferred that both the train 10 and the crossing monitor 13 be provided with an antenna such as a satellite dish 42 for communications with a telecommunications satellite 44. The antennas 42 should be capable of receiving signals from and transmitting signals to the communications satellite 44 to permit two-way communications between the train 10 and the crossing monitor 13.
It is also preferable that the railway crossing be monitored by at least one detector 46 positioned to detect the presence of an object on the crossing, especially when a train 10 is approaching the crossing. The detector(s) 46 may be infrared motion detectors or range radar detectors focused to detect the presence of an object on the tracks in the area of the intersection. Signals from the detectors 46 are input to the crossing monitor 13 as will be explained below in more detail.
It is also preferable that the railway crossing be monitored by at least one detector 46 positioned to detect the presence of an object on the crossing, especially when a train 10 is approaching the crossing. The detector(s) 46 may be infrared motion detectors or range radar detectors focused to detect the presence of an object on the tracks in the area of the intersection. Signals from the detectors 46 are input to the crossing monitor 13 as will be explained below in more detail.
Fig. 5 is a block diagram of the signalling device 12 located on the train 10 shown in Fig. 1. As described above, the train is equipped with a first GPS
receiver 20 located at the front of the train. A GPS
antenna 21 is disposed anywhere near the GPS receiver as long as it is capable of providing an adequate signal to the receiver. The second GPS receiver 22 may be located at the end of the train. The GPS receivers 20, 22 are coupled to the processor/controller 23 to provide the global absolute position of both ends of the train. A second GPS monitor 40 is located at the crossing monitor 13 (Fig. 4) to provide data for differential position calculations. As explained above, the global position of the train may be computed by either the processor 23 aboard the train 10 or by the processor 31 located at the crossing monitor 13 (see Figs. 3a, 6) . In either case, the data exchanged by the train 10 and the crossing monitor 13 is preferably communicated by a satellite link through transmitter/receiver antennas 42. It is also preferable that both the train 10 and the crossing monitor 13 are provided with back-up broadband RF receiver/transmitters to ensure that communications between the train 10 and the crossing monitor 13 are not interrupted if the communications link provided by the satellite 44 (Fig. 4) is interrupted for any reason. The transmitter receiver 48 (Fig. 5) is therefore preferably provided with a port for the satellite communications antenna 42 as well as a port for the RF transmitters which are adapted to operate on different sideband frequencies to eliminate potential interference with other trains in the vicinity.
Fig. 6 is a block diagram of the crossing monitor 13 in accordance with the fourth embodiment of the invention. This crossing monitor is identical to the crossing monitor described above in relation to Fig. 3a with the exception that it is provided with a transmitter/receiver 50 preferably having a first communications port for input/output to the satellite communications antenna 42 as well as a port for transmitting RF sideband frequencies as described above. The processor 31 also accepts input from the crossing sensors 46 as described above. Although the crossing sensor(s) 46 preferably continually monitor the presence of objects on the crossing, signals from the crossing sensor(s) 46 are preferably ignored except at times when the crossing monitor 13 detects that a train 10 will enter the crossing within a predetermined time period. If an object is detected on the crossing during the predetermined time period, the processor 31 located in the crossing monitor 13 communicates a warning to the processor 23 located in the train 10 that the crossing is obstructed. The train 10 may be programmed to provide a visual and/or auditory warning to the operator of the train and may also be programmed to apply the train's brakes if circumstances warrant. The algorithm for controlling the train 10 on detection of an object in the crossing by the crossing sensors 46 is preferably dependent on the speed of the train, the location of the train in relation to the crossing, and the length of the train since the length of the train determines the distance in which it can be brought to a halt. If the crossing sensors cease to detect an object on the crossing after a warning signal has been communicated to the train 10 by the crossing monitor 13, a subsequent message is relayed by the crossing monitor 13 to the train 10 advising the train 10 that the crossing is clear so that the processor 23 can take remedial action to reverse any collision avoidance measures which were implemented to avoid the object detected on the crossing. The processor 23 on train 10 preferably provides the operator of the train with an "all clear"
signal when the subsequent message is received.
The low-cost receiver for use in the road vehicle in conjunction with the anti-collision alarm system in accordance with the fourth embodiment of the invention is the same as described above with reference to Fig. 3b. It should be noted, however, that the road vehicle receiver which consists of a receiving antenna 35 connected to an RF
receiver 36 (see Fig. 3b) is preferably a low-cost receiver based on a 900 Mhz phone transmitter which is acceptable for use in this application. Such receivers are relatively inexpensive and could be easily implemented to provide an inexpensive vehicle-based warning system in accordance with the invention.
Preferably, the vehicle receiver should be installed in all school and public transit buses.
Similarly, low-cost receivers could be installed on all road vehicles either during manufacture or by after-market equipment suppliers. Receivers could also be incorporated as part of standard AM/FM radios installed in road vehicles.
The alarm receiver would be such as to operate independently of the car radio.
receiver 20 located at the front of the train. A GPS
antenna 21 is disposed anywhere near the GPS receiver as long as it is capable of providing an adequate signal to the receiver. The second GPS receiver 22 may be located at the end of the train. The GPS receivers 20, 22 are coupled to the processor/controller 23 to provide the global absolute position of both ends of the train. A second GPS monitor 40 is located at the crossing monitor 13 (Fig. 4) to provide data for differential position calculations. As explained above, the global position of the train may be computed by either the processor 23 aboard the train 10 or by the processor 31 located at the crossing monitor 13 (see Figs. 3a, 6) . In either case, the data exchanged by the train 10 and the crossing monitor 13 is preferably communicated by a satellite link through transmitter/receiver antennas 42. It is also preferable that both the train 10 and the crossing monitor 13 are provided with back-up broadband RF receiver/transmitters to ensure that communications between the train 10 and the crossing monitor 13 are not interrupted if the communications link provided by the satellite 44 (Fig. 4) is interrupted for any reason. The transmitter receiver 48 (Fig. 5) is therefore preferably provided with a port for the satellite communications antenna 42 as well as a port for the RF transmitters which are adapted to operate on different sideband frequencies to eliminate potential interference with other trains in the vicinity.
Fig. 6 is a block diagram of the crossing monitor 13 in accordance with the fourth embodiment of the invention. This crossing monitor is identical to the crossing monitor described above in relation to Fig. 3a with the exception that it is provided with a transmitter/receiver 50 preferably having a first communications port for input/output to the satellite communications antenna 42 as well as a port for transmitting RF sideband frequencies as described above. The processor 31 also accepts input from the crossing sensors 46 as described above. Although the crossing sensor(s) 46 preferably continually monitor the presence of objects on the crossing, signals from the crossing sensor(s) 46 are preferably ignored except at times when the crossing monitor 13 detects that a train 10 will enter the crossing within a predetermined time period. If an object is detected on the crossing during the predetermined time period, the processor 31 located in the crossing monitor 13 communicates a warning to the processor 23 located in the train 10 that the crossing is obstructed. The train 10 may be programmed to provide a visual and/or auditory warning to the operator of the train and may also be programmed to apply the train's brakes if circumstances warrant. The algorithm for controlling the train 10 on detection of an object in the crossing by the crossing sensors 46 is preferably dependent on the speed of the train, the location of the train in relation to the crossing, and the length of the train since the length of the train determines the distance in which it can be brought to a halt. If the crossing sensors cease to detect an object on the crossing after a warning signal has been communicated to the train 10 by the crossing monitor 13, a subsequent message is relayed by the crossing monitor 13 to the train 10 advising the train 10 that the crossing is clear so that the processor 23 can take remedial action to reverse any collision avoidance measures which were implemented to avoid the object detected on the crossing. The processor 23 on train 10 preferably provides the operator of the train with an "all clear"
signal when the subsequent message is received.
The low-cost receiver for use in the road vehicle in conjunction with the anti-collision alarm system in accordance with the fourth embodiment of the invention is the same as described above with reference to Fig. 3b. It should be noted, however, that the road vehicle receiver which consists of a receiving antenna 35 connected to an RF
receiver 36 (see Fig. 3b) is preferably a low-cost receiver based on a 900 Mhz phone transmitter which is acceptable for use in this application. Such receivers are relatively inexpensive and could be easily implemented to provide an inexpensive vehicle-based warning system in accordance with the invention.
Preferably, the vehicle receiver should be installed in all school and public transit buses.
Similarly, low-cost receivers could be installed on all road vehicles either during manufacture or by after-market equipment suppliers. Receivers could also be incorporated as part of standard AM/FM radios installed in road vehicles.
The alarm receiver would be such as to operate independently of the car radio.
Claims (48)
1. A railroad crossing collision avoidance system for alerting a road vehicle approaching a railroad crossing of an oncoming rail vehicle, comprising:
tracking means on said rail vehicle to determine said rail vehicle's position with respect to said railroad crossing;
transmitter means responsive to said tracking means for transmitting tracking data at a unique radio frequency carrier, said tracking data being indicative of the location of said rail vehicle from said railroad crossing;
first receiver means comprised of a multi-frequency scanner at said railroad crossing for receiving said transmitted tracking data from one or more of said rail vehicles;
processor means at said railroad crossing for calculating the velocity and arrival time of said rail vehicle in response to said tracking data; and transmitter means at said railroad crossing responsive to said processor means for transmitting an alarm signal to an approaching road vehicle, said alarm signal being indicative of the velocity and time of arrival of a rail vehicle at said railroad crossing.
tracking means on said rail vehicle to determine said rail vehicle's position with respect to said railroad crossing;
transmitter means responsive to said tracking means for transmitting tracking data at a unique radio frequency carrier, said tracking data being indicative of the location of said rail vehicle from said railroad crossing;
first receiver means comprised of a multi-frequency scanner at said railroad crossing for receiving said transmitted tracking data from one or more of said rail vehicles;
processor means at said railroad crossing for calculating the velocity and arrival time of said rail vehicle in response to said tracking data; and transmitter means at said railroad crossing responsive to said processor means for transmitting an alarm signal to an approaching road vehicle, said alarm signal being indicative of the velocity and time of arrival of a rail vehicle at said railroad crossing.
2. A system as defined in claim 1, wherein said tracking means comprises a global positioning system (GPS) receiver.
3. A system as defined in claim 2, wherein said rail vehicle comprises a multi-wagon train with a GPS receiver located at each end of said multi-wagon train .
4. A system as defined in claim 3, wherein said tracking data is transmitted continuously at periodic intervals to said first receiver means.
5. A system as defined in claim 4, wherein said tracking data is further comprised of a time stamp.
6. A system as defined in claim 1, further comprising a second receiver means at said road vehicle for receiving said alarm signal in order to alert an operator of said road vehicle of a potential collision with a rail vehicle, at said railroad crossing.
7. A system as defined in claim 6, wherein said second receiver means is comprised of an audio and video signalling device responsive to said alarm signal.
8. A system as defined in claim 7, wherein said second receiver means is further comprised of a reset key to reset said audio and video signalling device.
9. A system as defined in claim 8, wherein said second receiver means is comprised of a memory for storing information on said alarm signal received at said second receiver means.
10. A railroad crossing collision avoidance system for alerting a road vehicle approaching a railroad crossing of an oncoming rail vehicle, comprising:
tracking means on said rail vehicle to derive tracking data indicative of said rail vehicle's position with respect to said railroad crossing;
storing means on said rail vehicle for storing locations of railroad crossings along a railway line travelled by said rail vehicle;
processor means on said rail vehicle for calculating the velocity of said rail vehicle and arrival time at said railroad crossing, in response to said tracking data; and first transmitter means responsive to said processor means for transmitting an alarm signal to an approaching road vehicle, said alarm signal being indicative of the velocity and time of arrival of a rail vehicle at said railroad crossing; and second transmitter means at said railroad crossings for transmitting its location to each oncoming rail vehicle, as said rail vehicle travels along said railway line.
tracking means on said rail vehicle to derive tracking data indicative of said rail vehicle's position with respect to said railroad crossing;
storing means on said rail vehicle for storing locations of railroad crossings along a railway line travelled by said rail vehicle;
processor means on said rail vehicle for calculating the velocity of said rail vehicle and arrival time at said railroad crossing, in response to said tracking data; and first transmitter means responsive to said processor means for transmitting an alarm signal to an approaching road vehicle, said alarm signal being indicative of the velocity and time of arrival of a rail vehicle at said railroad crossing; and second transmitter means at said railroad crossings for transmitting its location to each oncoming rail vehicle, as said rail vehicle travels along said railway line.
11. A system as defined in claim 10, wherein said tracking means comprises a global positioning system (GPS) receiver.
12. A system as defined in claim 11, wherein said rail vehicle comprises a multi-wagon train with a GPS receiver located at each end of said multi-wagon train .
13. A system as defined in claim 12, wherein said first transmitter means is located at each railway crossing so as to transmit an alarm signal to said approaching road vehicles in response to the velocity and time of arrival data received from said rail vehicle.
14. A system as defined in claim 13, wherein said velocity and time of arrival data is transmitted continuously at periodic railway crossings from an approaching rail vehicle.
15. A system as defined in claim 14, wherein velocity and time of arrival data is transmitted from each rail vehicle on a unique radio frequency carrier.
16. A system as defined in claim 15, wherein each railway crossing is further provided with a multi-frequency scanner to receive velocity and time of arrival data from different rail vehicles.
17. A system as defined in claim 10, further comprising second receiver means at said road vehicle for receiving said alarm signal in order to alert an operator of said road vehicle of a potential collision with a rail vehicle, at said railroad crossing.
18. A system as defined in claim 17, wherein said second receiver means is comprised of an audio and video signalling device responsive to said alarm signal.
19. A railroad crossing collision avoidance system for alerting a road vehicle approaching a railroad crossing of an oncoming rail vehicle, comprising:
tracking means on the rail vehicle to determine the rail vehicle's position with respect to the railroad crossing;
transmitter means responsive to the tracking means for transmitting tracking data over a satellite communications link, the tracking data being indicative of the location of the rail vehicle with respect to the railroad crossing;
first receiver means comprised of a satellite communications receiver at the railroad crossing for receiving the transmitted tracking data over the satellite communications link from the rail vehicle;
processor means at the railroad crossing for calculating the velocity and arrival time of the rail vehicle in response to the tracking data; and transmitter means at the railroad crossing responsive to the processor means for transmitting an alarm signal to an approaching road vehicle, the alarm signal being indicative of the velocity and time of arrival of a rail vehicle at the railroad crossing.
tracking means on the rail vehicle to determine the rail vehicle's position with respect to the railroad crossing;
transmitter means responsive to the tracking means for transmitting tracking data over a satellite communications link, the tracking data being indicative of the location of the rail vehicle with respect to the railroad crossing;
first receiver means comprised of a satellite communications receiver at the railroad crossing for receiving the transmitted tracking data over the satellite communications link from the rail vehicle;
processor means at the railroad crossing for calculating the velocity and arrival time of the rail vehicle in response to the tracking data; and transmitter means at the railroad crossing responsive to the processor means for transmitting an alarm signal to an approaching road vehicle, the alarm signal being indicative of the velocity and time of arrival of a rail vehicle at the railroad crossing.
20. A railroad crossing collision avoidance system as claimed in claim 19 wherein the tracking data is transmitted continuously at periodic intervals over the satellite communications channel when the rail vehicle is approaching the railroad crossing.
21. A railroad crossing collision avoidance system as claimed in claim 20 wherein the tracking data includes a time stamp.
22. A railroad crossing collision avoidance system as claimed in claim 19 wherein the tracking means is a global positioning system (GPS) receiver.
23. A railroad crossing collision avoidance system as claimed in claim 22 wherein a second GPS receiver is located at the railroad crossing, the second GPS receiver providing tracking data to permit a differential calculation of the velocity and arrival time of the rail vehicle using the tracking data from the railroad vehicle and the tracking data from the railroad crossing.
24. A railroad crossing collision avoidance system as claimed in claim 19 wherein the system further includes at least one sensor located at the railroad crossing for detecting a presence of an object on the railroad crossing when a railroad vehicle is approaching the railroad crossing.
25. A railroad crossing collision avoidance system as claimed in claim 24 wherein the processor means at the railroad crossing transmits a warning message over the satellite communications link to the railroad vehicle if the presence of an object is detected on the railroad crossing when the railroad vehicle is approaching the railroad crossing.
26. A railroad crossing collision avoidance system as claimed in claim 25 wherein a processor in the railroad vehicle emits a warning signal to an operator of the rail vehicle when the warning message is received.
27. A railroad crossing collision avoidance system as claimed in claim 26 wherein the processor in the railroad vehicle automatically brakes the railroad vehicle on receipt of the warning message.
28. A railroad crossing collision avoidance system as claimed in claim 25 wherein the processor means at the railroad crossing transmits another message over the satellite communications link to indicate to the railroad vehicle that the railroad crossing is clear of objects if an object is no longer detected on the railroad crossing before the railroad vehicle enters the railroad crossing.
29. A railroad crossing collision avoidance system as claimed in claim 28 wherein the processor in the railroad vehicle takes remedial action to restore the railroad vehicle to normal operation on receipt of the message indicating that the railroad crossing is clear of objects.
30. A railroad crossing collision avoidance system as claimed in claim 28 wherein the processor in the railroad vehicle displays an all clear signal to the operator of the rail vehicle when the other message is transmitted over the satellite communications link to indicate that the railroad crossing is clear of objects.
31. A railroad crossing collision avoidance system as claimed in claim 24 wherein the at least one sensor is an infrared motion detector.
32. A railroad crossing collision avoidance system as claimed in claim 24 wherein the at least one sensor is a range radar detector.
33. A railroad crossing collision avoidance system as claimed in claim 19 wherein the transmitter means at the railroad crossing responsive to the processor means for transmitting an alarm signal to an approaching road vehicle transmits at a frequency of 900 Mhz.
34. A railroad crossing collision avoidance system as claimed in claim 33 wherein the road vehicle is equipped with a 900 Mhz receiver for receiving the alarm signal.
35. A railroad crossing collision avoidance system for alerting a road vehicle approaching a railroad crossing of an oncoming rail vehicle, comprising:
tracking means on the rail vehicle to determine the rail vehicle's position with respect to the railroad crossing;
receiver means on said rail vehicle for receiving data indicative of the position of a railroad crossing which is being approached by the rail vehicle;
processor means on the rail vehicle for calculating the velocity of the rail vehicle and arrival time at the railroad crossing that it is approaching by sequentially calculating a differential position of the railroad vehicle with respect to the railroad crossing that it is approaching in response to the receipt of the data indicative of the position of the railroad crossing;
first transmitter means responsive to the processor means for transmitting an alarm signal to an approaching road vehicle, the alarm signal being indicative of the velocity and time of arrival of the rail vehicle at the railroad crossing.
tracking means on the rail vehicle to determine the rail vehicle's position with respect to the railroad crossing;
receiver means on said rail vehicle for receiving data indicative of the position of a railroad crossing which is being approached by the rail vehicle;
processor means on the rail vehicle for calculating the velocity of the rail vehicle and arrival time at the railroad crossing that it is approaching by sequentially calculating a differential position of the railroad vehicle with respect to the railroad crossing that it is approaching in response to the receipt of the data indicative of the position of the railroad crossing;
first transmitter means responsive to the processor means for transmitting an alarm signal to an approaching road vehicle, the alarm signal being indicative of the velocity and time of arrival of the rail vehicle at the railroad crossing.
36. A railroad crossing collision avoidance system as claimed in claim 35 wherein the receiver means on the rail vehicle is a satellite communications antenna for receiving data transmitted over a satellite communications link from the railroad crossing that it is approaching.
37. A railroad crossing collision avoidance system as claimed in claim 35 wherein the tracking means on the rail vehicle comprises a first GPS receiver and the data indicative of the position of the railroad crossing is generated from an output of a second GPS receiver located at the railroad crossing.
38. A railroad crossing collision avoidance system as claimed in claim 35 wherein the system further includes at least one sensor located at the railroad crossing for detecting a presence of an object on the railroad crossing when the railroad vehicle is approaching the railroad crossing.
39. A railroad crossing collision avoidance system as claimed in claim 38 wherein a processor means at the railroad crossing transmits a warning message over the satellite communications link to the railroad vehicle if the presence of an object is detected on the railroad crossing when the railroad vehicle is approaching the railroad crossing.
40. A railroad crossing collision avoidance system as claimed in claim 39 wherein the processor in the railroad vehicle emits a warning signal to an operator of the rail vehicle when the warning message is received.
41. A railroad crossing collision avoidance system as claimed in claim 40 wherein the processor in the railroad vehicle automatically brakes the railroad vehicle on receipt of the warning message.
42. A railroad crossing collision avoidance system as claimed in claim 39 wherein the processor means at the railroad crossing transmits another message over the satellite communications link to indicate to the railroad vehicle that the railroad crossing is clear of objects if an object is no longer detected on the railroad crossing before the railroad vehicle enters the railroad crossing.
43. A railroad crossing collision avoidance system as claimed in claim 42 wherein the processor in the railroad vehicle takes remedial action to restore the railroad vehicle to normal operation on receipt of the message indicating that the railroad crossing is clear of objects.
44. A railroad crossing collision avoidance system as claimed in claim 43 wherein the processor in the railroad vehicle displays an all clear signal to the operator of the rail vehicle when the other message is transmitted over the satellite communications link to indicate that the railroad crossing is clear of objects.
45. A railroad crossing collision avoidance system as claimed in claim 38 wherein the at least one sensor is an infrared motion detector.
46. A railroad crossing collision avoidance system as claimed in claim 38 wherein the at least one sensor is a range radar detector.
47. A railroad crossing collision avoidance system as claimed in claim 35 wherein the transmitter means on the railroad crossing responsive to the processor means for transmitting an alarm signal to an approaching road vehicle transmits at a frequency of 900 Mhz.
48. A railroad crossing collision avoidance system as claimed in claim 47 wherein the road vehicle is equipped with a 900 Mhz receiver for receiving the alarm signal.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US08/679,902 | 1996-07-15 | ||
US08/679,902 US5699986A (en) | 1996-07-15 | 1996-07-15 | Railway crossing collision avoidance system |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2210270A1 CA2210270A1 (en) | 1998-01-15 |
CA2210270C true CA2210270C (en) | 2002-03-26 |
Family
ID=24728860
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA002185052A Abandoned CA2185052A1 (en) | 1996-07-15 | 1996-09-09 | Railway crossing collision avoidance system |
CA002210270A Expired - Lifetime CA2210270C (en) | 1996-07-15 | 1997-07-14 | Railway crossing collision avoidance system |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA002185052A Abandoned CA2185052A1 (en) | 1996-07-15 | 1996-09-09 | Railway crossing collision avoidance system |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US5699986A (en) |
CA (2) | CA2185052A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN103481920A (en) * | 2012-06-12 | 2014-01-01 | 成都众山科技有限公司 | Mine railway crossing monitoring system |
Families Citing this family (133)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5739768A (en) * | 1995-08-22 | 1998-04-14 | Dynamic Vehicle Safety Systems, Ltd. | Train proximity detector |
US5699986A (en) * | 1996-07-15 | 1997-12-23 | Alternative Safety Technologies | Railway crossing collision avoidance system |
US5978718A (en) * | 1997-07-22 | 1999-11-02 | Westinghouse Air Brake Company | Rail vision system |
EP1004035A4 (en) * | 1997-08-18 | 2002-10-23 | Dynamic Vehicle Safety Systems | Collision avoidance using gps device and train proximity detector |
US6081769A (en) * | 1998-02-23 | 2000-06-27 | Wabtec Corporation | Method and apparatus for determining the overall length of a train |
US6232887B1 (en) | 1998-04-29 | 2001-05-15 | Joseph E. Carson | Warning systems |
US6323785B1 (en) * | 1998-05-20 | 2001-11-27 | Larry Nickell | Automatic railroad alarm system |
US6179252B1 (en) * | 1998-07-17 | 2001-01-30 | The Texas A&M University System | Intelligent rail crossing control system and train tracking system |
DE19843232A1 (en) * | 1998-09-10 | 2000-03-16 | Siemens Ag | Procedure for switching on level crossings |
US6064319A (en) * | 1998-10-22 | 2000-05-16 | Matta; David M. | Method and system for regulating switching of a traffic light |
US6980894B1 (en) * | 1999-04-14 | 2005-12-27 | San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit | Method of managing interference during delay recovery on a train system |
US6212825B1 (en) | 1999-06-29 | 2001-04-10 | Sentinel Innovative Technologies Incorporated | Safety crossing gate |
US6232889B1 (en) * | 1999-08-05 | 2001-05-15 | Peter Apitz | System and method for signal light preemption and vehicle tracking |
US7164892B2 (en) * | 1999-08-25 | 2007-01-16 | Derome George E | Dual-mode transmitter for railroad crossings |
US6339382B1 (en) * | 1999-12-08 | 2002-01-15 | Donald A. Arbinger | Emergency vehicle alert system |
US6267332B1 (en) | 2000-01-07 | 2001-07-31 | Robert E. Almblad | Railroad safety system |
JP2004502992A (en) * | 2000-02-28 | 2004-01-29 | ベリディアン エンジニアリング, インコーポレイテッド | System and method for avoiding accidents at intersections |
JP3854775B2 (en) * | 2000-03-24 | 2006-12-06 | パイオニア株式会社 | Mobile body system and mobile body management system |
US6416021B2 (en) | 2000-05-30 | 2002-07-09 | George Jefferson Greene, Jr. | Locomotive whistle controlled railroad grade crossing warning system |
US6340139B1 (en) | 2000-06-01 | 2002-01-22 | Labarge, Inc. | Highway grade crossing vehicle violation detector |
KR100335906B1 (en) | 2000-06-08 | 2002-05-08 | 이계안 | System for controlling speed according to traffic signal of vehicle |
US6758147B2 (en) * | 2000-07-27 | 2004-07-06 | The Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Co. | Ballast discharge system |
WO2002064414A2 (en) * | 2001-01-23 | 2002-08-22 | Alstom Signaling, Inc. | Method and apparatus for uniform time warning of railroad trains |
US6618993B2 (en) * | 2001-03-19 | 2003-09-16 | Thomas J. Burke | Railroad grade crossing assembly |
US7769544B2 (en) * | 2001-05-07 | 2010-08-03 | Ansaldo Sts Usa, Inc. | Autonomous vehicle railroad crossing warning system |
WO2003013935A1 (en) * | 2001-08-06 | 2003-02-20 | Hermanus Adriaan Bernard | Train integrity |
US6836221B1 (en) * | 2001-09-11 | 2004-12-28 | Mathews E. Boddie | Railroad advance warning system |
US6619593B1 (en) * | 2001-11-13 | 2003-09-16 | Timothy Allen Callahan | Train noise elimination system |
US6848657B2 (en) * | 2002-01-17 | 2005-02-01 | The Creative Train Company, Llc | Dynamic self-teaching train track layout learning and control system |
US7095861B2 (en) * | 2002-02-22 | 2006-08-22 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Audible signaling device with determinate directional radiation |
US7053797B2 (en) * | 2002-03-07 | 2006-05-30 | Taylor Lance G | Intelligent selectively-targeted communications systems and methods for aircraft |
US7069122B1 (en) * | 2002-03-08 | 2006-06-27 | Control Chief Corporation | Remote locomotive control |
US6701228B2 (en) | 2002-05-31 | 2004-03-02 | Quantum Engineering, Inc. | Method and system for compensating for wheel wear on a train |
US7283897B2 (en) * | 2002-05-31 | 2007-10-16 | Quantum Engineering, Inc. | Method and system for compensating for wheel wear on a train |
US6970774B2 (en) * | 2002-05-31 | 2005-11-29 | Quantum Engineering, Inc. | Method and system for compensating for wheel wear on a train |
US10308265B2 (en) | 2006-03-20 | 2019-06-04 | Ge Global Sourcing Llc | Vehicle control system and method |
US9733625B2 (en) | 2006-03-20 | 2017-08-15 | General Electric Company | Trip optimization system and method for a train |
US10569792B2 (en) | 2006-03-20 | 2020-02-25 | General Electric Company | Vehicle control system and method |
US6609049B1 (en) | 2002-07-01 | 2003-08-19 | Quantum Engineering, Inc. | Method and system for automatically activating a warning device on a train |
US6865454B2 (en) * | 2002-07-02 | 2005-03-08 | Quantum Engineering Inc. | Train control system and method of controlling a train or trains |
US20080136632A1 (en) * | 2002-08-23 | 2008-06-12 | Moreno Pieralli | Microwave detection system and method for detecting intrusion to an off-limits zone |
US6933858B2 (en) * | 2002-08-23 | 2005-08-23 | General Electric Company | System and method for detecting obstacles within the area of a railroad grade crossing using a phase modulated microwave signal |
US7295111B2 (en) * | 2002-08-23 | 2007-11-13 | General Electric Company | Microwave detection system and method for detecting intrusion to an off-limits zone |
JP3881297B2 (en) * | 2002-09-20 | 2007-02-14 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Railroad crossing control system |
US6845953B2 (en) * | 2002-10-10 | 2005-01-25 | Quantum Engineering, Inc. | Method and system for checking track integrity |
US6996461B2 (en) * | 2002-10-10 | 2006-02-07 | Quantum Engineering, Inc. | Method and system for ensuring that a train does not pass an improperly configured device |
US20040254728A1 (en) * | 2002-10-25 | 2004-12-16 | Poropat George Vladimir | Collision warning system and method |
US6957131B2 (en) | 2002-11-21 | 2005-10-18 | Quantum Engineering, Inc. | Positive signal comparator and method |
US6863246B2 (en) | 2002-12-31 | 2005-03-08 | Quantum Engineering, Inc. | Method and system for automated fault reporting |
US9950722B2 (en) | 2003-01-06 | 2018-04-24 | General Electric Company | System and method for vehicle control |
US7099774B2 (en) * | 2003-01-21 | 2006-08-29 | Byron King | GPS based vehicle warning and location system |
WO2004066240A2 (en) | 2003-01-21 | 2004-08-05 | Byron King | Gps based vehicle warning and location system and method |
US6853888B2 (en) | 2003-03-21 | 2005-02-08 | Quantum Engineering Inc. | Lifting restrictive signaling in a block |
US7398140B2 (en) * | 2003-05-14 | 2008-07-08 | Wabtec Holding Corporation | Operator warning system and method for improving locomotive operator vigilance |
US6915191B2 (en) | 2003-05-19 | 2005-07-05 | Quantum Engineering, Inc. | Method and system for detecting when an end of train has passed a point |
US7096096B2 (en) * | 2003-07-02 | 2006-08-22 | Quantum Engineering Inc. | Method and system for automatically locating end of train devices |
US6903658B2 (en) * | 2003-09-29 | 2005-06-07 | Quantum Engineering, Inc. | Method and system for ensuring that a train operator remains alert during operation of the train |
US7196636B2 (en) * | 2004-02-24 | 2007-03-27 | Graham Kevin M | Railroad crossing warning system |
KR100638679B1 (en) * | 2004-07-28 | 2006-10-25 | 한국철도기술연구원 | System for controlling on time crossing in the train using the radio communication |
US7142982B2 (en) | 2004-09-13 | 2006-11-28 | Quantum Engineering, Inc. | System and method for determining relative differential positioning system measurement solutions |
US7722134B2 (en) * | 2004-10-12 | 2010-05-25 | Invensys Rail Corporation | Failsafe electronic braking system for trains |
WO2006079165A1 (en) * | 2005-01-25 | 2006-08-03 | Alert Systems Pty Ltd | Proximity warning system |
US7439876B2 (en) * | 2005-08-02 | 2008-10-21 | General Electric Company | Microwave detection system and method |
US7575201B2 (en) * | 2005-08-18 | 2009-08-18 | General Electric Company | System and method for detecting a change or an obstruction to a railway track |
DE102006003679A1 (en) * | 2006-01-24 | 2007-08-09 | Thyssenkrupp Transrapid Gmbh | Device for generating position signals for track-bound vehicles, in particular magnetic levitation vehicles |
US9828010B2 (en) | 2006-03-20 | 2017-11-28 | General Electric Company | System, method and computer software code for determining a mission plan for a powered system using signal aspect information |
US8630757B2 (en) * | 2006-03-20 | 2014-01-14 | General Electric Company | System and method for optimizing parameters of multiple rail vehicles operating over multiple intersecting railroad networks |
WO2007134430A1 (en) * | 2006-05-09 | 2007-11-29 | Sensotech Inc. | Presence detection system for path crossing |
US20080099633A1 (en) * | 2006-10-31 | 2008-05-01 | Quantum Engineering, Inc. | Method and apparatus for sounding horn on a train |
US20080169939A1 (en) * | 2007-01-11 | 2008-07-17 | Dickens Charles E | Early warning control system for vehicular crossing safety |
FI7610U1 (en) * | 2007-01-22 | 2007-08-09 | Jet Tekno Oy | Warning system for level crossings |
US7772996B2 (en) | 2007-05-25 | 2010-08-10 | Spot Devices, Inc. | Alert and warning system and method |
US9043138B2 (en) * | 2007-09-07 | 2015-05-26 | Green Driver, Inc. | System and method for automated updating of map information |
US20110037618A1 (en) * | 2009-08-11 | 2011-02-17 | Ginsberg Matthew L | Driver Safety System Using Machine Learning |
US20110037619A1 (en) * | 2009-08-11 | 2011-02-17 | On Time Systems, Inc. | Traffic Routing Using Intelligent Traffic Signals, GPS and Mobile Data Devices |
US10083607B2 (en) | 2007-09-07 | 2018-09-25 | Green Driver, Inc. | Driver safety enhancement using intelligent traffic signals and GPS |
US9852624B2 (en) | 2007-09-07 | 2017-12-26 | Connected Signals, Inc. | Network security system with application for driver safety system |
DE102007052546A1 (en) | 2007-10-29 | 2009-04-30 | Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. | Method for monitoring danger area of railway construction, particularly danger area lying between two road sections of level crossing, involves capturing danger area pictures of danger area |
ATE512858T1 (en) * | 2008-01-10 | 2011-07-15 | Eldor Comm Technologies Ltd | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING RELIABLE COLLISION HAZARD DETECTION |
WO2009100292A1 (en) * | 2008-02-08 | 2009-08-13 | General Electric Company | Railway sensor communication system and method |
US8175764B2 (en) * | 2008-02-22 | 2012-05-08 | Wabtec Holding Corp. | System and method for identifying a condition of an upcoming feature in a track network |
WO2010012040A1 (en) * | 2008-07-31 | 2010-02-04 | Rich Electric Co. (Australasia) | A system and method for providing an alert |
DE102008062766B4 (en) * | 2008-12-18 | 2014-01-09 | Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. | Traffic influencing method |
US20100213321A1 (en) * | 2009-02-24 | 2010-08-26 | Quantum Engineering, Inc. | Method and systems for end of train force reporting |
US9834237B2 (en) | 2012-11-21 | 2017-12-05 | General Electric Company | Route examining system and method |
AU2009201730A1 (en) * | 2009-05-01 | 2010-11-18 | Latter, Patrick J | GPS control of level crossing |
AU2010251883A1 (en) * | 2009-05-29 | 2012-01-19 | United Group Rail Services Limited | Railroad warning system |
US8509970B2 (en) | 2009-06-30 | 2013-08-13 | Invensys Rail Corporation | Vital speed profile to control a train moving along a track |
WO2011009134A2 (en) * | 2009-07-17 | 2011-01-20 | Invensys Rail Corporation | Track circuit communications |
US10198942B2 (en) | 2009-08-11 | 2019-02-05 | Connected Signals, Inc. | Traffic routing display system with multiple signal lookahead |
TR200906687A1 (en) | 2009-08-31 | 2011-03-21 | Teknoray Teknoloji̇k Ray Si̇nyali̇zasyon Si̇stemleri̇ Bi̇lgi̇sayar Elektroni̇k Telekomüni̇kasyon Yazilim Ve İnşaat Li̇mi̇ted Şi̇rketi̇ | A level crossing system. |
US8500071B2 (en) * | 2009-10-27 | 2013-08-06 | Invensys Rail Corporation | Method and apparatus for bi-directional downstream adjacent crossing signaling |
US9254781B2 (en) * | 2010-02-02 | 2016-02-09 | Craig David Applebaum | Emergency vehicle warning device and system |
US8660215B2 (en) * | 2010-03-16 | 2014-02-25 | Siemens Rail Automation Corporation | Decoding algorithm for frequency shift key communications |
US8297558B2 (en) * | 2010-03-17 | 2012-10-30 | Safetran Systems Corporation | Crossing predictor with authorized track speed input |
GB2478932A (en) * | 2010-03-24 | 2011-09-28 | Legaro Ltd | Warning device for alerting a train operator to a potentially hazardous situation |
US20130200223A1 (en) * | 2010-04-05 | 2013-08-08 | Cohda Wireless Pty. Ltd. | Crossing safety system |
WO2012000011A1 (en) * | 2010-06-30 | 2012-01-05 | Nfa Innovations Pty Ltd | A system and method for remote mode switching of transport infrastructure |
US8596587B2 (en) * | 2011-05-09 | 2013-12-03 | Bystep, Llc | Systems and methods for redundant vehicle detection at highway-rail grade crossings |
CN102431579A (en) * | 2011-10-17 | 2012-05-02 | 济南三鼎电气有限责任公司 | Intelligent monitoring management system for railway crossing |
JP5452569B2 (en) * | 2011-11-07 | 2014-03-26 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Train position determination device and train position determination method |
CN102879134A (en) * | 2012-06-11 | 2013-01-16 | 西南交通大学 | Wireless detection device for train wheel-rail contact force |
KR101274549B1 (en) * | 2012-10-05 | 2013-06-13 | 주식회사 미르메이트 | Image providing apparatus for curved road |
US9193367B2 (en) * | 2012-10-09 | 2015-11-24 | The Island Radar Company | Crossing proximity and train-on-approach notification system |
US9702715B2 (en) | 2012-10-17 | 2017-07-11 | General Electric Company | Distributed energy management system and method for a vehicle system |
US9090271B2 (en) | 2012-10-24 | 2015-07-28 | Progress Rail Services Corporation | System and method for characterizing dragging equipment |
US9090270B2 (en) * | 2012-10-24 | 2015-07-28 | Progress Rail Services Corporation | Speed sensitive dragging equipment detector |
US9669851B2 (en) | 2012-11-21 | 2017-06-06 | General Electric Company | Route examination system and method |
US9682716B2 (en) | 2012-11-21 | 2017-06-20 | General Electric Company | Route examining system and method |
US9227642B2 (en) * | 2013-03-18 | 2016-01-05 | Todd M. Huntimer | Train detection systems and methods |
US9569969B2 (en) | 2014-04-17 | 2017-02-14 | Raytheon Company | Track collision avoidance control system |
CN104008655B (en) * | 2014-05-30 | 2016-08-17 | 南车南京浦镇车辆有限公司 | Tramcar grade crossing signal method for controlling priority based on centralization differential GPS location |
DE102014219321A1 (en) * | 2014-09-24 | 2016-03-24 | Continental Teves Ag & Co. Ohg | Zugwarnvorrichtung |
US9476990B2 (en) * | 2014-12-18 | 2016-10-25 | Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. | Tracking of occluded navigation satellite signals |
US9630635B2 (en) * | 2015-03-03 | 2017-04-25 | Siemens Canada Limited | Train direction and route detection via wireless sensors |
JP6588799B2 (en) * | 2015-10-27 | 2019-10-09 | 西日本旅客鉄道株式会社 | Wireless train control system |
US11468766B2 (en) * | 2020-01-03 | 2022-10-11 | Xorail, Inc. | Obstruction detection system |
US9802630B2 (en) * | 2016-03-17 | 2017-10-31 | Frank J. Bartolotti | Vehicle safety railroad crossing system |
FR3049718B1 (en) * | 2016-04-05 | 2020-12-11 | Alstom Transp Tech | WIRING KIT BURIED ALONG A RAILWAY OF A RAILWAY INFRASTRUCTURE FOR TRAMWAY TRAFFIC |
CN106080670B (en) * | 2016-08-20 | 2018-08-14 | 徐州翔和高科电气有限公司 | A kind of mine locomotive transporting vehicle-mounted navigation terminal and navigation control method |
WO2019055032A1 (en) * | 2017-09-15 | 2019-03-21 | Bartolotti Frank J | Vehicle safety railroad crossing system |
CH714184A1 (en) * | 2017-09-21 | 2019-03-29 | Marte Gerhard | Method of ensuring that a track block of a railway track is free of the last unit of a train. |
CN110304096B (en) * | 2018-01-10 | 2020-05-01 | 西华大学 | Tramcar and automobile anti-collision active protection device |
US10950130B2 (en) | 2018-03-19 | 2021-03-16 | Derq Inc. | Early warning and collision avoidance |
US11021180B2 (en) * | 2018-04-06 | 2021-06-01 | Siemens Mobility, Inc. | Railway road crossing warning system with sensing system electrically-decoupled from railroad track |
US10946881B2 (en) * | 2018-05-07 | 2021-03-16 | Siemens Mobility, Inc. | Automated testing and reporting of timely activation of crossing warning equipment based on data originated from a real-time train tracking system |
DE102018009486B3 (en) * | 2018-12-03 | 2020-04-16 | Daimler Ag | Method and system for warning a motor vehicle of a collision with a rail vehicle |
US11254337B2 (en) * | 2018-12-13 | 2022-02-22 | Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation | Determining location of a rail vehicle based on a radio frequency signal |
CN114586082A (en) | 2019-08-29 | 2022-06-03 | 德尔克股份有限公司 | Enhanced on-board equipment |
DE102019216770A1 (en) * | 2019-10-30 | 2021-05-06 | Siemens Mobility GmbH | Warning procedure and processing facility for a level crossing system |
US10974748B1 (en) * | 2019-12-23 | 2021-04-13 | Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation | Vehicle advisory system |
CN111141537A (en) * | 2020-02-26 | 2020-05-12 | 中车青岛四方机车车辆股份有限公司 | Safety monitoring method for durability test of wheel shaft |
CN115042840B (en) * | 2022-07-04 | 2023-03-14 | 陕西理工大学 | Traffic warning device of rail transit equipment industry |
Family Cites Families (15)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3777139A (en) * | 1970-12-03 | 1973-12-04 | R Peel | Motion sensor system |
US3929307A (en) * | 1973-04-09 | 1975-12-30 | Erico Rail Prod Co | Railway signal system with speed determined movement detector |
US4120471A (en) * | 1977-06-21 | 1978-10-17 | General Signal Corporation | Highway crossing system with improved ring sustain feature |
US4491290A (en) * | 1979-06-22 | 1985-01-01 | Douglas Robert D | Train defect detecting and enunciating system |
FR2572043B1 (en) * | 1984-10-18 | 1987-02-13 | Matra Transport | METHOD OF DEVICE FOR TRANSMITTING DATA BETWEEN VEHICLES MOVING ON A TRACK |
US4711418A (en) * | 1986-04-08 | 1987-12-08 | General Signal Corporation | Radio based railway signaling and traffic control system |
US4942395A (en) * | 1987-08-24 | 1990-07-17 | Ferrari John S | Railroad grade crossing motorist warning system |
JPH0260881A (en) * | 1988-08-26 | 1990-03-01 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | Obstacle detector for railway crossing |
US5070320A (en) * | 1989-06-12 | 1991-12-03 | Ralph Ramono | Alarm system |
US5429329A (en) * | 1994-01-31 | 1995-07-04 | Wallace; Charles C. | Robotic railroad accident prevention vehicle and associated system elements |
US5554982A (en) * | 1994-08-01 | 1996-09-10 | Hughes Aircraft Co. | Wireless train proximity alert system |
US5620155A (en) * | 1995-03-23 | 1997-04-15 | Michalek; Jan K. | Railway train signalling system for remotely operating warning devices at crossings and for receiving warning device operational information |
US5678789A (en) * | 1995-12-05 | 1997-10-21 | Pipich; Robert B. | Model railroad car position indicator |
US5680120A (en) * | 1996-07-12 | 1997-10-21 | Aspen Systems Inc. | Transportation safety apparatus and method |
US5699986A (en) * | 1996-07-15 | 1997-12-23 | Alternative Safety Technologies | Railway crossing collision avoidance system |
-
1996
- 1996-07-15 US US08/679,902 patent/US5699986A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1996-09-09 CA CA002185052A patent/CA2185052A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
1997
- 1997-07-14 US US08/891,809 patent/US5890682A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1997-07-14 CA CA002210270A patent/CA2210270C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN103481920A (en) * | 2012-06-12 | 2014-01-01 | 成都众山科技有限公司 | Mine railway crossing monitoring system |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US5699986A (en) | 1997-12-23 |
CA2210270A1 (en) | 1998-01-15 |
CA2185052A1 (en) | 1998-01-16 |
US5890682A (en) | 1999-04-06 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA2210270C (en) | Railway crossing collision avoidance system | |
US5554982A (en) | Wireless train proximity alert system | |
US20230192164A1 (en) | Rail Vehicle Signal Enforcement and Separation Control | |
US8635013B2 (en) | Cooperative geolocation based on inter-vehicular communication | |
US6081769A (en) | Method and apparatus for determining the overall length of a train | |
CA2273399C (en) | Apparatus and method for detecting railroad locomotive turns by monitoring truck orientation | |
US5620155A (en) | Railway train signalling system for remotely operating warning devices at crossings and for receiving warning device operational information | |
US6340139B1 (en) | Highway grade crossing vehicle violation detector | |
US10370015B2 (en) | Train traffic situation display system | |
US10816986B2 (en) | Systems for vehicle collision avoidance | |
US20080275618A1 (en) | Slow or stopped vehicle ahead advisor with digital map integration | |
AU3391799A (en) | Method and apparatus for controlling trains by determining direction taken by a train through a railroad switch | |
US20210373575A1 (en) | Vehicle control system and method | |
US20230022877A1 (en) | Method and monitoring system for determining a position of a rail vehicle | |
CA2281604C (en) | Method and system for proximity detection and location determination | |
CN113879365A (en) | Comprehensive early warning protection system combining STP system and satellite positioning and application method | |
CA3128759A1 (en) | Prevention of collision between trains | |
KR101128978B1 (en) | Intelligence System for Accident Prevention at Railway Level Crossing and Train Brake Method | |
JP3022759B2 (en) | Railroad crossing monitoring system | |
JPH0245264A (en) | System for monitoring situation in running way | |
JPH07257377A (en) | Train collision prevention aid system, and device for front and rear trains constituting it | |
CA3169906A1 (en) | Vehicle control system and method | |
JP2003285740A (en) | Accident preventing device for maintenance vehicle | |
CN116279667A (en) | Train and safety protection system and method thereof | |
MXPA99005340A (en) | Apparatus and method for detecting the direction of a railway locomotive when monitoring the orientation of carreti |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
EEER | Examination request | ||
MKEX | Expiry |
Effective date: 20170714 |