CA2226093C - Automatic dynamic changing of agents' call handling assignments - Google Patents

Automatic dynamic changing of agents' call handling assignments Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CA2226093C
CA2226093C CA002226093A CA2226093A CA2226093C CA 2226093 C CA2226093 C CA 2226093C CA 002226093 A CA002226093 A CA 002226093A CA 2226093 A CA2226093 A CA 2226093A CA 2226093 C CA2226093 C CA 2226093C
Authority
CA
Canada
Prior art keywords
skill
agent
individual
call center
skills
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
CA002226093A
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
CA2226093A1 (en
Inventor
Alan V. Tonisson
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nokia of America Corp
Original Assignee
Lucent Technologies Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Lucent Technologies Inc filed Critical Lucent Technologies Inc
Publication of CA2226093A1 publication Critical patent/CA2226093A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CA2226093C publication Critical patent/CA2226093C/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04MTELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04M3/00Automatic or semi-automatic exchanges
    • H04M3/42Systems providing special services or facilities to subscribers
    • H04M3/50Centralised arrangements for answering calls; Centralised arrangements for recording messages for absent or busy subscribers ; Centralised arrangements for recording messages
    • H04M3/51Centralised call answering arrangements requiring operator intervention, e.g. call or contact centers for telemarketing
    • H04M3/523Centralised call answering arrangements requiring operator intervention, e.g. call or contact centers for telemarketing with call distribution or queueing
    • H04M3/5232Call distribution algorithms
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04MTELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04M3/00Automatic or semi-automatic exchanges
    • H04M3/42Systems providing special services or facilities to subscribers
    • H04M3/50Centralised arrangements for answering calls; Centralised arrangements for recording messages for absent or busy subscribers ; Centralised arrangements for recording messages
    • H04M3/51Centralised call answering arrangements requiring operator intervention, e.g. call or contact centers for telemarketing
    • H04M3/523Centralised call answering arrangements requiring operator intervention, e.g. call or contact centers for telemarketing with call distribution or queueing
    • H04M3/5232Call distribution algorithms
    • H04M3/5233Operator skill based call distribution

Abstract

An agent vector (150) monitors (402, 404) selected performance parameters of a call center (FIG. 1 ) -- such as service times, in-queue times, call volumes, call abandonment rates, benefits derived from having different agents handle calls requiring different skills, proportions of work spent by agents on handling calls requiring different skills, etc. -- and automatically adjusts (412-422) agents' call-handling assignments -- for example, by changing the skills to which an agent is assigned (logged into) or by changing the relative priorities (levels of expertise) of the agent's skills -- in order to optimize (406) a predefined objective.
The objective is a selected performance characteristic of the call center -- forexample, the total benefit (B) to the call center of individual ones of the agents (a) handling calls requiring individual agent skills (s).

Description

AUTOMATIC DYNAMIC CHANGING
OF AGENTS' CALL-HANDLING ASSIGNMENTS
Technical Field This invention relates to automatic call distribution (ACD) systems, also variously referred to as call centers or telemarketing systems.
Background of the Invention ACD systems distribute calls incoming to a call center for handling to any suitable ones of available call-handling agents according to some predefined criteria. In advanced modern-day ACD systems, suitability of an agent to handle a call is determined by matching skills that are needed to handle a particular call against the skills possessed by the agents who are available to handle that call. An illustrative such system is disclosed in U. S. Pat. no. 5,206,903.
It often happens that the call center becomes overloaded by calls, so that no suitable agents are available to handle the calls at the moment that the calls come in. The calls then back up, and are placed in call queues based upon some predefined criteria, such as the skills that are needed to handle them. There they await suitable agents becoming free and available to handle them. When the ACD system detects that an agent has become available to handle a call, the ACD system delivers to the agent the highest-priority oldest-waiting call that matches the agent's highest skill.
Generally the only condition that results in a call not being delivered to an available agent is that there are no calls waiting to be handled that require any of the available agent's skills . The available agents are then placed in agent queues based upon some predefined criteria, such as the skills which they possess. There they await the arrival of suitable calls for handling. When a call arrives, the ACD system delivers the call to the longest-waiting agent whose skills best match the call's requirements.
Call center efficiency typically requires that both calls and agents spend as little time in queues as possible.
As call volumes of calls requiring different skills change, agents may need to be reassigned to different skills (i.e., to handling calls requiring different ones of the skills possessed by the agents) to balance the call load. The task of monitoring service levels, determining which skills each agent should be logged into at any given time, and moving the agents between skills to maintain optimal staffing is complex, time-consuming, laborious, and slow. This function is normally carried out manually by the call center supervisor. Consequently, the supervisor must almost constantly monitor the performance of the call center and adjust agent assignments as call volumes change. Even then, the supervisor's reactions to changes in the call center's workload are often either delayed if properly computed or inaccurate if done reflexively, based only on experience and without computation, to avoid delay. Moreover, the call center supervisors are normally the most experienced employees and the call center's most valuable resource, whose time could be better spent on other call center work.
Summary of the Invention This invention is directed to solving these and other problems and disadvantages of the prior art. Generally according to the invention, there is provided an arrangement that monitors a call center's performance parameters --such as service times, in-queue times, call volumes, call abandonment rates, benefits derived from having different agents handle calls requiring different skills, proportions of work (e.g., time or calls handled) spent by agents on handling calls requiring different skills, etc. -- and automatically adjusts agents' call-handling assignments -- for example, by changing the skills to which an agent is assigned (logged into) or by changing the relative priorities (levels of expertise) of the agent's skills -- in order to optimize a predefined objective or objectives. The objective is a selected performance characteristic of the call center, such as the total benefit to the call center of individual ones of the agents handling calls requiring individual agent skills. The term "automatically" is used herein to mean by means of a machine (e.g., an ACD or some other processing system or computer), as opposed to manually by the call-center supervisor or some other person.
Specifically according to the invention, call center agents are automatically assigned to skills in a call center wherein individual calls requiring different skills are handled by a plurality of agents who are individually assigned to different ones of the skills, in the following manner. The present values of call center parameters that impact a predetermined performance characteristic of the call center are automatically determined. The characteristic is one which is sought to be optimized -- for example, the total benefit to the call center of individual ones of the agents handling calls requiring individual ones of the skills. The parameters include actual assignments of the plurality of call center agents to skills. The parameter of actual assignments of the plurality of call center agents to skills preferably is the parameter of actual proportions of work that individual ones of the agents spend handling calls requiring individual ones of the skills. Then an optimization function that uses the determined parameter values is automatically performed on the predetermined performance characteristic to determine optimum assignments of the plurality of call center agents to skills that optimize the predetermined performance characteristic. The optimum assignments of the plurality of call center agents to skills preferably are optimum proportions of work for individual ones of the agents to spend handling calls requiring the individual ones of the skills. The actual assignments of the plurality of call center agents to skills are then automatically adjusted to bring the actual assignments closer to the determined optimum assignments. Preferably, the adjusting involves assigning an individual agent to handle calls requiring an individual skill, in response to the optimum proportion of work for the individual agent to spend handling calls requiring the individual skill exceeding the actual proportion of work that the individual agent spent handling calls requiring the individual skill and the individual agent not being assigned to handle calls requiring the individual skill, and further preferably involves freeing ("un-assigning") the individual agent from handling calls requiring the individual skill, in response to the actual proportion of work that the individual agent spent handling calls requiring the individual skill exceeding the optimum proportion of work for the individual agent to spend handling calls requiring the individual skill and the individual agent being assigned to handle calls requiring the individual skill.
The invention advantageously frees call center supervisors from having to decide which agents to assign to which skills as call volumes change. It provides more efficient allocation of call center resources (agents) than could be reasonably achieved by manual means. It allows the call center supervisor to manage a call center simply by deciding which performance characteristic should be optimized.
The operation of the call center is then automatically adjusted to optimize the selected performance characteristic. It automates many aspects of running the call center, thereby freeing the call center supervisor to do other things, while still retaining a high degree of control for the supervisor. And it reduces the need to write complicated call vectors or individual per-agent agent vectors to control the distribution of calls.
Furthermore, the invention is very flexible and can be used to control many aspects of a call center. For example, it can be used to extract information from the optimization function for use by features like "wizards" which advise a supervisor on the best course of action to take, e.g., "Add 3 more agents skilled in Sales". This can form the basis of an expert system for call center applications. The optimization function can also be used in conjunction with predicted call volumes to allow optimum agent allocations to be calculated ahead of time and to advise a call center supervisor on when to add agents with particular skills. This facility can be used to assist in scheduling of agents.

-3a-In accordance with one aspect of the present invention there is provided an arrangement for automatically assigning call center agents to skills in a call center wherein individual calls requiring different skills are handled by a plurality of agents who are individually assigned to different ones of the skills, comprising: means for automatically determining present values of call center parameters that impact a predetermined performance characteristic of the call center, which characteristic is sought to be optimized, the parameters including a parameter indicating actual assignments of the plurality of call center agents to work handling calls requiring individual ones of the skills; means for automatically performing an optimization function, using the determined present values, on the predetermined performance characteristic to determine optimum assignments of the plurality of call center agents to skills that optimize the predetermined performance characteristic; and means for automatically adjusting the actual assignments of the plurality of call center agents to skills, to bring the actual assignments closer to the determined optimum assignments.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of automatically assigning call center agents to skills in a call center wherein individual calls requiring different skills are handled by a plurality of agents who are individually assigned to different ones of the skills, comprising the steps of: automatically determining present values of call center parameters that impact a predetermined performance characteristic of the call center, which characteristic is sought to be optimized, the parameters including a parameter indicating actual assignments of the plurality of call center agents to work handling calls requiring individual ones of the skills; automatically performing an optimization function, using the determined present values, on the predetermined performance characteristic to determined optimum assignments of the plurality of call center agents to skills that optimize the predetermined performance characteristic; and automatically adjusting the actual assignments of the plurality of call center agents to skills, to bring the actual assignments closer to the determined optimum assignments.
In accordance with yet another aspect of the present invention there is provided a computer-usable program storage device having embodied therein means for automatically assigning call center agents to skills in a call center, wherein individual calls requiring different skills are handled by a plurality of agents who are individually assigned to different ones of the skills, said means - 3b -being computer-readable program code means for causing the computer to perform the functions of: determining present values of call center parameters that impact a predetermined performance characteristic of the call center, which characteristic is sought to be optimized, the parameters including a parameter indicating actual assignments of the plurality of call center agents to work handling calls requiring individual ones of the skills; performing an optimization function, using the determined present values, on the predetermined performance characteristic to determine optimum assignments of the plurality of call center agents to skills that optimize the predetermined performance characteristic;
and adjusting the actual assignments of the plurality of call center is agents to skills, to bring the actual assignments closer to the determined optimum assignments.
These and other advantages and features of the invention will become more apparent from the following description of an illustrative embodiment of the invention taken together with the drawings.
Brief Description of the Drawing FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a call center that includes an illustrative embodiment of the invention; and FIGS. 2-4 are flow diagrams of operations performed by an agent vector of the call center of FIG. 1 upon agent log in, agent log off, and periodically to optimize the operation of the call center of FIG. 1, respectively.
Detailed Description 1. Call Center General Description FIG. 1 shows an illustrative call center. As is conventional, the call center comprises a plurality of telephone lines and/or trunks 100 selectively interconnected with a plurality of agent positions 102-104 via an ACD system 101.
Each agent position 102-104 includes a voice-and-data terminal 105 for use by a corresponding agent 106-108 in handling calls. Terminals 105 are connected to ACD system 101 by a voice-and-data transmission medium 109. Also, included in ACD system 101 is a conventional basic call management system (BCMS) and connected to ACD system 101 is a conventional call management system (CMS) that gather call records and call-center statistics for use in managing the call center and in generating call-center reports. CMS and BCMS will hereafter be referred to jointly as CMS 110.
ACD system 101 is illustratively the Lucent Technologies Definity~
private-branch exchange (PBX)-based ACD system. It is a stored-program-controlled system that conventionally includes interfaces to external communications links, a communications switching fabric, service circuits (e.g., tone generators, announcement circuits, etc.), memory for storing control programs and data, and a processor for executing the stored control programs to control the interfaces and the fabric and to provide automatic call-distribution functionality. Included among the data stored in a memory of ACD system 101 are a set of call queues 120 and a set of agent queues 130. Each call queue 121-129 corresponds to a different agent skill, as does each agent queue 131-139. Conventionally, calls are prioritized, and either are enqueued in individual ones of call queues 120 in their order of priority or are enqueued in different ones of a plurality of call queues that correspond to a skill and each one of which corresponds to a different priority. To simplify the illustrative example of the invention, system 101 is configured to assign each call to only one call queue which corresponds to the skill that the call needs the most.
Likewise, each agent's skills are typically prioritized according to his or her level of expertise in that skill, and either agents are enqueued in individual ones of agent queues 130 in their order of expertise or are enqueued in different ones of a plurality of agent -S-queues that correspond to a skill and each one of which corresponds to a different level of expertise. Included among the control programs in a memory (e.g., RAM, ROM, disk, or some other storage device) of ACD system 101 are a call vector 140, an agent vector 150, and a function for estimating in-queue waiting time (EWT) 145.
Calls incoming to the call center on lines or trunks 100 are assigned by call vector 140 to different call queues 121-129 based upon the agent skill that they require for their proper handling. EWT 145 computes estimates of how long an incoming call will have to wait in a call queue 121-129, e.g., before being handled by an agent.
Agents 106-108 who are available for handling calls are assigned by agent vector 150 to agent queues 131-139 based upon the skills which they possess.
Individual calls requiring different skills are handled by agents 106-108 who are individually assigned to different ones of the skills. Call vectoring is described in DEFINITY~ Communications System Generic 3 Call Vectoring/Expert Agent Selection (EAS) Guide, AT&T publication no. 555-230-520 (Issue 3, Nov. 1993).
Skills-based ACD is described in further detail in U. S. Patent no. 5,206,903.
An illustrative EWT function is described in U. S. Patent no. 5,506,898. An illustrative implementation of agent vectoring is described in U.S. Patent no. 5,721,770.
According to the invention, agent vector 150 is configured as follows.
As each agent 106-108 logs in at an agent position 102-104, agent vector 150 automatically assigns the agent to handling calls that require one or more of the skills of that agent, by logging the agent into the one or more of the skills. As the call volumes of calls requiring different skills (i.e., call volumes of calls in different call queues 121-129) change, the assignment is periodically recalculated and changed by agent vector 150 as required.
The assignment of an agent to skills is proportional. E.g., an agent may be 30% allocated to one skill and 70% allocated to another skill. This means that, on average, 30% of the agent's work time should require the first skill and the remaining 70% of the agent's work time should require the second skill. An agent will not be logged into a skill if that agent's optimum proportion of calls requiring that skill is determined to be either zero or below some predetermined threshold.
There are two components to a complete solution: 1 ) An optimization function which calculates the optimum proportions. The optimum proportions are calculated as the solution of a constrained linear optimization problem. This is a well-understood problem, and there are many algorithms for solving this problem.
2) A call-distribution or an agent-vectoring algorithm which distributes calls to agents in the optimum proportions.

The inputs to the linear optimization include a set of levels of priority, or expertise, in each skill for each agent. These numbers represent the "value" to the call center of the agent taking a call that requires that particular skill.
The size of the values is not important, but the relative size of the values determines the relative benefit to the call center of the agent taking a call in the skill. E.g., if agent A has a value of 30 in a skill and agent B has a value of 90 in the same skill, then it is three times more desirable for agent B to take a call in that skill than for agent A
to take the call.
Optimum operation of the call center may involve minimizing the operating cost of the call center or maximizing the level of service, or it may be defined in terms of other relevant performance characteristics of the call center. The optimization objective determines the values used as inputs to the optimization and some of the parameters of the optimization. The objective may be different for different call centers.
Once the optimum proporvons for allocation of agents to skills have been calculated, calls must be distributed to agents so that the call loads match the desired proportions. This can be achieved by storing the percentage of time spent by each agent handling calls in each skill in the last X minutes (or whatever other period of time makes sense) and distributing calls to agents in such a way as to bring the percentages closer to the ideal.
The computations performed by agent vector 150 are based on the following model of the call center of FIG. 1.
2. Modeling a Call Center 2.1 Elements of the Model The model assumes that a call center has a number of queues, and that each queue is associated with exactly one skill. When calls arrive at a call center, they are placed in queues. Each call is queued in exactly one queue at any given time. This makes sense because the solution presented here removes any need to queue a call to more than one skill at any time.
As agents become available, if there is a call available in one of the call queues corresponding to a skill that the agent is logged into, the first call is taken from one of the call queues and is passed to the agent. It is assumed that the ACD is capable of distributing calls in such a way that a fixed proportion of the agent's workload -- either time or number of calls handled -- can be allocated to each skill.
The model is restricted to only consider the life of calls coming from queues and serviced by agents. It is only concerned with the average volume of calls coming into the call center to each skill. Measures of performance such as an -7_ estimate of the time that a caller should expect to wait in a queue before the call is answered by an agent (EWT) and the length of time that the oldest call in a queue has been waiting (OCW) are related to the rate at which calls enter the call center and the rate at which calls are being serviced, and are not considered in the model.
S To model the distribution of calls to agents, individual calls are ignored.
It is assumed that calls are like water flowing through pipes and that it is desired to maximize the "value" of the flow of calls through a call center. The behavior of queues is ignored, as queues serve mainly to smooth out fluctuations in the call volume entering a call center.
The main elements of the model are skills, agents, call volumes, and measures of value.
2.2 Measuring Call Volumes If a call center has n skills numbered 1 to n, and m available agents numbered 1 to m, we define the following notation:
Let V S be the volume of calls arriving in skill s, for s = 1, ..., n.
These volumes are measured by counting the number of calls arriving in each skill in the last x minutes -- whatever time period makes sense for the call center.
Let A S be the volume of abandoned calls in skill s.
Let V S,a, be the volume of calls from skill s being handled by agent a, where s = 1, ..., n and a = 1, ..., m.
We also need to take into account the capacity of each agent to handle calls in each skill.
Let Cs,a, be the capacity of agent a to handle calls in skill s, for s = l, ..., n and a = 1, ..., m. Le., Cs,a is the (maximum, average) volume of calls that agent a can handle in skill s. These values are measurable positive call volumes.
These capacities are measured from historical data by taking the number of calls handled by each agent in each skill over a sufficiently long period and dividing them by the total time that the agent has spent handling those calls in each skill --including after-call work (ACW) time, etc. It may make sense to ignore differences between individual agents and use an average of all agents handling calls in each skill.
Let Rs,a be the proportion of time that agent a spends handling calls from skill s, for s = 1, ..., n and a = 1, ..., m.
The values Vs, Vs,a and Cs,a have units of calls per hour. The Rs,a values are dimensionless.
Note thatVS,a=Cs,axRs,a,fors=1,...,nanda=1,...,m.

_g_ By varying the proportion of time that each agent spends handling calls in each skill, the running of the call center can be optimized to maximize a given objective.
2.3 Constraints S These quantities defined so far satisfy the following relationships:
m VS= ~ VS,a+AS,fors=1,...,n.
a=1 Le., the volume of calls coming into a skill equals the sum of the total volume of calls handled by agents for that skill plus the volume of calls abandoned.
This constraint can be rewritten in terms of the proportions Rs,a as follows:
m ~ Cs,ax Rs,a=VS-AS, where s= 1, ..., n.
a=1 Rs,a>_0, wheres=1,...,nanda=1,...,m.
Le., an agent cannot spend a negative proportion of his or her time on calls from any skill.
n ~, Rs,a<-1, where a= 1, ..., m.
s=i Le., the relative proportions of time that an agent spends handling calls in each skill cannot add up to more than one.
2.4 Measuring Call Center Performance To optimize the operation of a call center, we need to assign an estimate of value to each call handled. How the value of each call is determined will be different for each call center.
The values of calls handled are, in general, different for different skills and also depend on which agent handles the call. E.g., it is of more value for an agent who is well-trained in a skill to handle calls for that skill, than one who has little or no training for the skill. To model this, we define a value for each agent taking calls in a particular skill:
Let B S.a be the benefit or value to the call center of a call from skill s being handled by agent a, for s = 1, ..., n and a = 1, ..., m.
B S,a is a per-call benefit and does not take into account how long it takes for the agent to handle the call. B S,a may be thought of as the expertise that agent a has in skill s. Note that only the relative sizes of these values are important for the purpose of optimizing the call center.
How the B S,a values are chosen depends on the call center's purpose.
They may represent (average) dollars of profit per call, or a negative value representing the cost of a call, etc. These quantities can be measured or estimated.

A better measure of an agent's performance also takes into account the volume of calls that the agent can handle in each skill:
LetLs,a=Cs,axBs,a,fors=1,...,nanda=1,...,m.
L s.a is a measure of the benefit to the call center of agent a taking calls in skill s per unit time. E.g., if L2,5 = 25 and L 3,1 = S0, then it is twice as valuable for agent 1 to spend an hour taking calls in skill 3 as it is for agent 5 to spend an hour taking calls in skill 2. Ls,a is a measure of the expertise of the agent in the particular skill.
Since Cs,a is a measurable quantity, defining Ls,a for each agent/skill pair is equivalent to defining B S,a for each agent/skill pair. Either of these sets of values may be used to define the objective function for a call center. The L
S.a values may also be chosen to be values that can be measured, such as profit in dollars per hour.
It is also convenient to define a penalty for abandoned calls:
Let P S be the penalty for an abandoned call in skill s, for s = 1, ..., n.
The overall efficiency of the call center can be measured by the quantity:
n m n B- ~ ~ Bs.aVs.a- ~, PsAs s=la=i s=1 n m n _ ~. ~, Ls.aRs.a- F, PsAs s=la=1 s=1 where B represents the total benefit to the call center of individual ones of the agents handling calls requiring individual ones of the skills.
2.5 Other Performance Measures Customers typically use a variety of metrics to measure call-center performance. These include oldest-call waiting (OCW), average speed of answer (ASA), and service level. This model does not take into account these measures because they can all be viewed as indicators of the percentage of utilization of the resources available for handling calls in the given skill. E.g., if the EWT
for sales is too high, then this indicates that there are insufficient resources allocated to sales, i.e., the estimate of call volume for sales needs to be increased.
This model does not directly take into account other measures of performance such as oldest call waiting (OCW) times, service levels, or queue lengths. These measures are all related to the ratio of the volume of calls coming into a skill and the capacity of the call center to handle calls in each skill. Queuing theory gives some relationships between these other measures of performance and volumes of calls.

2.6 Some Ideas from Queuing Theory Queuing theory is a complex subject, and the model presented here deliberately ignores the details of what is happening in queues, but it is useful to note some elementary properties of queues to see how the model can be used to control the behavior of call center queues. For queuing theory principles relevant hereto, see, e.g., see W. Stallings, Data and Computer Communications (3d ed.) Macmillan Pub. Co ( 1988), Appendix A.
Queuing theory states that the average waiting time in a first-in, first-out (FIFO) queue is approximately proportional to m 1 s , and the average number of _P
calls in a queue is proportional to b 1 PP , where m is the number of agents, p is the average fraction of time that each agent is busy, and b is the probability that all agents are busy. These values are approximate because they assume that all agents are only handling one skill. There are two important things to note here:
1. As the utilization approaches 100%, the average queue length and average waiting time approach infinity. (Assuming, of course, that no calls are abandoned and that there are infinitely many trunks and infinite queuing capacity.) 2. Full utilization of call center resources is not possible without very long queue lengths and very patient customers. (About 80-90% should be realistically achievable. As the utilization reaches 80-90%, the queue lengths and waiting times start to climb very rapidly. The exact point at which this happens depends on the details of the probability distribution of the mean time between agents becoming available, which varies between call centers and skills.) This confirms what every call center supervisor already knows: that the average waiting time and the number of calls in a queue are sensitive indicators of the utilization of the resources presently allocated to a skill.
3. Optimizing Call Center Performance Given the above, optimization of call center performance reduces to the following optimization problem:
n m n maximize B = ~ ~ LS,aRs,a- ~ PsAs subject to:
s=la=1 s=t m ~CS,aRs,a=Vs-AS, fors=1,...,n.
a=1 Rs,a>-0, fors=1,...,nanda=1,...,m.
n ~; Rs,a<-l, for a= l, ...,m.
s=1 This problem has an exact solution which can be calculated using the well-known Simplex Algorithm (See, e.g., R. Sedgewick, Algorithms, Addison Wesley (1946), Chapter 38).
The values V s represent the call volumes entering the call center in each skill.
The values C s,a are measurable values which represent the volume of calls that each agent can handle in each skill.
The values L S,a and P S are determined by the call center supervisor.
These values depend on the criteria chosen to measure the performance of the call center. If the Ls,a and PS values are chosen sensibly, the allocation of calls to agents can be done automatically. These values can even be tied to quantities that can be automatically tracked.
The values R s,a are the values to be optimized. In most call centers, not all agents will be expected to handle calls in all skills, so some of these values may be set at 0, which means they can be ignored and left out of the optimization process.
4. Adding More Flexibility The main aim here is to provide a means to automatically allocate call center resources where they are needed. It is the call center supervisor's responsibility to decide the relative priorities of the different skills. To make it easier for the supervisor to control where resources are allocated, per-skill weights W s may be added to the objective function:
n m n WsLs.aRs,a- ~, PsAs s=la=1 s=1 The intention is that the skill levels Ls,a should not need to change very often, as they represent expertise (levels of ability) of the agents in each skill. The skill weightings are intended to be changed in response to changing conditions. This gives the call center supervisor a means of adjusting the automatic control and overriding the priorities determined by the skill levels. E.g., if the level of service for the skill "complaints" is unacceptable and the supervisor is prepared to sacrifice service in other skills, he or she can increase the weighting for "complaints"
in order to make the system allocate more resources to "complaints".
5. Limitations of the Model This model does not take into account all of the complexity of real call centers. E.g., it assumes that once a call is queued, it is either answered by an agent or the caller will abandon the call. It does not take into account calls answered by voice-response units.

Another thing to note is that the optimum solution produced by this model may not be unique. E.g., if there are two agents, Dana and Fox, with the same level of skill in "Insurance Enquiries" and they are not needed for any other skills, then if the volume of calls in "Insurance Enquiries" is not high, the same optimum performance can be achieved by allocating half of the calls to Dana and half of the calls to Fox or all of the calls to Dana and none of the calls to Fox. If there is a choice, the Simplex Algorithm is likely to allocate all of the calls to one of the agents and none of the calls to the other. It does not ensure that the call loads are fairly distributed to agents. Additional constraints are needed to ensure fair distribution of calls.
This model ignores the behavior of the skill queues. It collapses all of the queues' properties into two numbers per queue: volume of calls and volume of abandoned calls. This means that the model cannot be used to directly to calculate optimum skill allocations for minimizing, for example, average speed of answer (ASA) over all queues. The only information that the model has about what is happening in each queue is the call volume and the number of abandoned calls.
Abandoned calls are a poor indicator of poor service, because it is better to deal with long wait times in a queue before the number of abandoned calls becomes too high.
It is useful to add some penalty terms to the optimization representing the cost of poor ASA. These terms should be non-linear and have not been included in order to keep the problem simple and easily solvable. Another way to tie ASA
into the model is to make the skill weights W S dependent on the queue length.
6. The Agent Vector Given the above-described model for optimizing call-center performance, agent vector 150 operates as follows.
Whenever any agent 106-108 logs in at an agent position 102-104, as indicated at step 200 of FIG. 2, agent vector 150 retrieves the agent's skills and levels of expertise from a database of system 101, at step 202, and logs the agent into each of the agent's skills at the corresponding level of expertise, at step 204, and then ends, at step 206. Similarly, whenever any agent 106-108 logs off at an agent position 102-104, as indicated at step 300 of FIG. 3, agent vector 150 logs the agent out of each skill into which the agent is logged in, at step 302, and then ends, at step 304.
Periodically, agent vector 150 is invoked to perform a benefit optimization of the call center of FIG. 1. This function of agent vector 150 is diagrammed in FIG. 4. Upon its invocation, at step 400, agent vector 150 retrieves predetermined values of optimization parameters from CMS 110, at step 402.
These are the values that are preestablished by the call center supervisor, such as the values for the measure of benefit to the call center of each agent taking calls in each skill per unit of time (Ls,a) and the penalty for an abandoned call in each skill (PS).
Agent vector 150 then uses measured data that is stored by CMS 110 to determine (measure) the present values of other optimization parameters, at step 404.
These are the values for the volume of calls arriving for each skill (V S), the volume of abandoned calls for each skill (A S ), the capacity of each agent to handle calls in each skill (Cs,a), and the actual proportion of time that each agent spends handling calls for each skill (actual Rs,a). Agent vector 150 then uses the parameter values to perfoln the benefit-optimization function on the predetermined call-center performance characteristic (e.g., maximize B) that was presented in Section 3 above, to obtain the optimum proportion of work that each agent spends handling calls for each skill (optimum Rs,a), for each agent and each skill, at step 406.
Vector 150 then compares the actual R S,a with the optimum R S,a for each agent and each skill and adjusts the agents' call-handling priorities in order to bring the actual RS,a values more in line with the optimum Rs,a values. Vector selects a first agent (a), at step 408, and a first skill (s), at step 410, and compares the actual Rs,a with the optimum Rs,a to determine if the actual proportion of work that the selected agent spends handling calls for the selected skill exceeds the optimum, at step 412. If the actual work proportion does exceed the optimum work proportion, vector 150 checks whether the selected agent is logged into the selected skill, at step 414, and if so, logs the selected agent out of the selected skill, at step 416.
Thereafter, or if it is determined at step 412 that the actual work proportion does not exceed the optimum work proportion, vector 150 determines if the optimum proportion of work that the selected agent spends handling calls for the selected skill exceeds the actual proportion of work that the selected agent spends handling calls for the selected skill, at step 418. If the optimum work proportion does exceed the actual work proportion, vector 150 checks whether the selected agent is logged into the selected skill, at step 420, and if not, logs the selected agent into the selected skill, at step 422.
Thereafter, or if it is determined at step 418 that the optimum work proportion does not exceed the actual work proportion, vector 150 checks whether it has done the optimization for each skill of the selected agent, at step 424.
If optimization has not been done for each skill of the selected agent, vector 150 selects the next skill of the selected agent, at step 426, and returns to step 412 to perform the optimization for this next skill. If and when optimization has been done for each skill of the selected agent, vector 150 checks whether it has done the optimization for each logged-in agent, at step 428, If optimization has not been done for each logged-in agent, vector 150 selects the next logged in agent, at step 430, and returns to step 410 to perform the optimization for each skill of this next agent. If and when optimization has been done for all logged in agents, vector 150 ends its operation, at step 432, until it is invoked again at step 200, 300, or 400.
Of course, various changes and modifications to the illustrative embodiment described above will be apparent to those skilled in the art. For example, the optimization of call-center performance may be drastically simplified to reassign agents among skills only in response to actual or anticipated emergency service threshold being reached.
In this simplified arrangement, agents are pre-assigned to all the skills that they have been trained to handle, but only the skills in which they are scheduled to work are given high preference (expertise) levels, meaning that under normal circumstances they only handle calls from their scheduled skills. Their other, backup, skills have low preference levels, and only come into effect when there is a service level emergency.
Each skill may have one or more emergency service level thresholds administered. Exceeding these thresholds is an indication that there is a service level emergency and that the skill requires additional staffing.
Under normal conditions, (i.e., no service level emergencies), when an agent becomes available to take a call, the ACD's normal criteria for choosing a call are used. (These criteria typically include the agent's skill preference levels or work allocation, call priorities, and the time that each call has been in queue, etc.) If the agent becomes available when one of his/her administered skills has a service level emergency, the emergency overrides all other criteria, and the agent gets a call from the skill with the emergency condition. If more than one of the agent's administered skills has a service level emergency, a number of options are available. For example, the traditional criteria, such as skill preference level, can be used to select one of the emergency skills.
At the opposite end of the spectrum, each skill may also have a low threshold administered to cater to situations where the skill has been overstaffed. In this situation, agent call handling priorities are adjusted to redirect agents away from skills with service times which are below the low threshold.
This arrangement has the ability to detect and resolve potential service problems rapidly and automatically. Enough agents are diverted to handle calls from the emergency queue, sufficient to bring the service time back within the skill's threshold, at which time call allocation returns to normal. If a predictor of future waiting times is used as the threshold criterion, potential service problems can be dealt with before any call has actually exceeded the wait time threshold.
Such changes and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and the scope of the invention and without diminishing its attendant ~ advantages. It is therefore intended that such changes and modifications be covered by the following claims.

Claims (25)

1. An arrangement for automatically assigning call center agents to skills in a call center wherein individual calls requiring different skills are handled by a plurality of agents who are individually assigned to different ones of the skills, comprising:
means for automatically determining present values of call center parameters that impact a predetermined performance characteristic of the call center, which characteristic is sought to be optimized, the parameters including a parameter indicating actual assignments of the plurality of call center agents to work handling calls requiring individual ones of the skills;
means for automatically performing an optimization function, using the determined present values, on the predetermined performance characteristic to determine optimum assignments of the plurality of call center agents to skills that optimize the predetermined performance characteristic; and means for automatically adjusting the actual assignments of the plurality of call center agents to skills, to bring the actual assignments closer to the determined optimum assignments.
2. The arrangement of claim 1 wherein:
the predetermined performance characteristic comprises a total benefit to the call center of individual ones of the agents handling calls requiring individual ones of the skills.
3. The arrangement of claim 1 wherein:
the parameter of the actual assignments of the plurality of call center agents to skills includes a parameter (R s,a) of proportions of work that individual ones of the agents (a) spend handling calls requiring individual ones of the skills (s).
4. The arrangement of claim 3 wherein:
the predetermined performance characteristic comprises a total benefit (B) to the call center of the individual ones of the agents (a) handling calls requiring the individual ones of the skills (s).
5. The arrangement of claim 4 wherein:
the call center parameters further include for each agent (a) and each skill (s), a benefit (L s,a) to the call center of said each agent (a) handling calls requiring said each skill (s) per unit of time, for each skill (s), a volume (A s) of abandoned calls requiring said each skill (s), and for each skill (s), a penalty (P s) for each abandoned call requiring said each skill (s).
6. The arrangement of claim 5 wherein performing the optimization function comprises maximizing B= ~ ~ L s,a R s,a- ~ P s A s.
7. The arrangement of claim 5 wherein:
the call center parameters further include for each agent (a) and each skill (s), a capacity (C s,a) of said each agent (a) to handle calls requiring said each skill (s), and for each skill (s), a volume (V s) of arriving calls requiring said each skill (s); and performing the optimization function comprises maximizing B= ~ ~ L s,a R s,a- ~ P s A s subject to ~ C s,a R s,a = V s-A s.
8. The arrangement of claim 5 wherein:
the call center parameters further include for each skill (s), a weight (W s) associated with said each skill (s); and performing the optimization function comprises maximizing B= ~ ~ W s L s,a R s,a- ~ P s A s.
9. The arrangement of claim 4 wherein:
the call center parameters further include for each agent (a) and each skill (s), a benefit (B s,a) to the call center of said each agent (a) handling a call requiring said each skill (s), for each agent (a) and each skill (s), a capacity (C s,a) of said each agent (a) to handle calls requiring said each skill (s), for each skill (s), a volume (A s) of abandoned calls requiring said each skill (s), and for each skill (s), a penalty (P s) for each abandoned call requiring said each skill (s).
10. The arrangement of claim 9 wherein:
performing the optimization function comprises maximizing B= ~ ~ B s,a C s,a R s,a- ~ P s A s.
11. The arrangement of claim 4 wherein:
the call center parameters further include for each agent (a) and each skill (s), a benefit (B s,a) to the call center of said each agent (a) handling a call requiring said each skill (s), for each agent (a) and each skill (s), a volume (V s,a) of calls requiring said each skill (s) handled by said each agent (a), for each skill (s), a volume (A s) of abandoned calls requiring said each skill (s), and for each skill (s), a penalty (P s) for each abandoned call requiring said each skill (s).
12. The arrangement of claim 1 wherein:
performing the optimization function comprises maximizing B= ~ ~ B s,a V s,a- ~ P s A s.
13. The arrangement of claim 4 wherein:
the call center parameters further include for each agent (a) and each skill (s), a benefit (B s,a) to the call center of said each agent (a) handling a call requiring said each skill (s), for each agent (s) and each skill (s), a capacity (C s,a) of said each agent (a) to handle calls requiring said each skill (s), for each skill (s), a volume (A s) of abandoned calls requiring said each skill (s), and for each skill (s), a penalty (P s) for each abandoned call requiring said each skill (s).
14. The arrangement of claim 13 wherein:

performing the optimization function comprises maximizing B= ~ ~ B s,a C s,a R s.a- ~ P s A s.
15. The arrangement of claim 4 wherein:
the call center parameters further include for each agent (a) and each skill (s), a benefit (B s,a) to the call center of said each agent (a) handling a call requiring said each skill (s), for each skill (s), a volume (V s) of arriving calls requiring said each skill (s), for each skill (s), a volume (A s) of abandoned calls requiring said each skill (s), and for each skill (s), a penalty (P s) for each abandoned call requiring said each skill (s).
16. The arrangement of claim 15 wherein:
performing the optimization function comprises maximizing B= ~ ~ B s,a(V s-A s)- ~ P s A s.
17. The arrangement of claim 1 wherein:
the parameter of the actual assignments of the plurality of call center agents to skills includes a parameter of actual proportions of work that individual ones of the agents spend handling calls requiring individual ones of the skills;
the optimum assignments of the plurality of call center agents to skills include optimum proportions of work for individual ones of the agents to spend handling calls requiring the individual ones of the skills; and the adjusting means comprise means for assigning an individual agent to handle calls requiring an individual skill in response to the optimum proportion of work for the individual agent to spend handling calls requiring the individual skill exceeding the actual proportion of work that the individual agent spent handling calls requiring the individual skill and the individual agent not being assigned to handle calls requiring the individual skill, and for freeing the individual agent from handling calls requiring the individual skill in response to the actual proportion of work that the individual agent spent handling calls requiring the individual skill exceeding the optimum proportion of work for the individual agent to spend handling calls requiring the individual skill and the individual agent being assigned to handle calls requiring the individual skill.
18. A method of automatically assigning call center agents to skills in a call center wherein individual calls requiring different skills are handled by a plurality of agents who are individually assigned to different ones of the skills, comprising the steps of:
automatically determining present values of call center parameters that impact a predetermined performance characteristic of the call center, which characteristic is sought to be optimized, the parameters including a parameter indicating actual assignments of the plurality of call center agents to work handling calls requiring individual ones of the skills;
automatically performing an optimization function, using the determined present values, on the predetermined performance characteristic to determined optimum assignments of the plurality of call center agents to skills that optimize the predetermined performance characteristic; and automatically adjusting the actual assignments of the plurality of call center agents to skills, to bring the actual assignments closer to the determined optimum assignments.
19. The method of claim 18 wherein:
the predetermined performance characteristic comprises a total benefit to the call center of individual ones of the agents handling calls requiring individual ones of the skills.
20. The method of claim 18 wherein:
the parameter of the actual assignments of the plurality of call center agents to skills includes a parameter of proportions of work that individual ones of the agents spend handling calls requiring individual ones of the skills;
the step of performing comprises the step of automatically determining optimum proportions of work for individual ones of the agents to spend handling calls requiring individual ones of the skills; and the step of adjusting comprises the step of bringing the actual proportions closer to the optimum proportions.
21. The method of claim 20 wherein:

the step of bringing comprises the steps of assigning an individual agent to handle calls requiring an individual skill in response to the optimum proportion for the individual agent exceeding the actual proportion for the individual agent and the individual agent not being assigned to handle calls requiring the individual skill, and freeing the individual agent from handling calls requiring the individual skill in response to the actual proportion for the individual agent exceeding the optimum proportion for the individual agent and the individual agent being assigned to handle calls requiring the individual skill.
22. A computer-usable program storage device having embodied therein means for automatically assigning call center agents to skills in a call center, wherein individual calls requiring different skills are handled by a plurality of agents who are individually assigned to different ones of the skills, said means being computer-readable program code means for causing the computer to perform the functions of:
determining present values of call center parameters that impact a predetermined performance characteristic of the call center, which characteristic is sought to be optimized, the parameters including a parameter indicating actual assignments of the plurality of call center agents to work handling calls requiring individual ones of the skills;
performing an optimization function, using the determined present values, on the predetermined performance characteristic to determine optimum assignments of the plurality of call center agents to skills that optimize the predetermined performance characteristic; and adjusting the actual assignments of the plurality of call center is agents to skills, to bring the actual assignments closer to the determined optimum assignments.
23. The device of claim 22 wherein:
the predetermined performance characteristic comprises a total benefit to the call center of individual ones of the agents handling calls requiring individual ones of the skills.
24. The device of claim 22 wherein:
the parameter of the actual assignments of the plurality of call center agents to skills includes a parameter of proportions of work that individual ones of the agents spend handling calls requiring individual ones of the skills;

the step of performing comprises the step of determining optimum proportions of work for individual ones of the agents to spend handling calls requiring individual ones of the skills; and the step of adjusting comprises the step of bringing the actual proportions closer to the optimum proportions.
25. The device of claim 24 wherein:
the step of bringing comprises the steps of assigning an individual agent to handle calls requiring an individual skill, in response to the optimum proportion for the individual agent exceeding the actual proportion for the individual agent and the individual agent not being assigned to handle calls requiring the individual skill; and freeing the individual agent from handling calls requiring the individual skill, in response to the actual proportion for the individual agent exceeding the optimum proportion for the individual agent and the individual agent being assigned to handle calls requiring the individual skill.
CA002226093A 1997-01-28 1998-01-05 Automatic dynamic changing of agents' call handling assignments Expired - Fee Related CA2226093C (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US08/790,010 US5903641A (en) 1997-01-28 1997-01-28 Automatic dynamic changing of agents' call-handling assignments
US08/790,010 1997-01-28

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CA2226093A1 CA2226093A1 (en) 1998-07-28
CA2226093C true CA2226093C (en) 2000-09-05

Family

ID=25149380

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CA002226093A Expired - Fee Related CA2226093C (en) 1997-01-28 1998-01-05 Automatic dynamic changing of agents' call handling assignments

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (1) US5903641A (en)
EP (1) EP0855826B1 (en)
JP (1) JP3366565B2 (en)
KR (1) KR19980070730A (en)
AU (1) AU731207B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2226093C (en)
DE (1) DE69701350T2 (en)

Families Citing this family (322)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6041109A (en) 1995-12-29 2000-03-21 Mci Communications Corporation Telecommunications system having separate switch intelligence and switch fabric
US5974414A (en) * 1996-07-03 1999-10-26 Open Port Technology, Inc. System and method for automated received message handling and distribution
US6188673B1 (en) * 1997-09-02 2001-02-13 Avaya Technology Corp. Using web page hit statistics to anticipate call center traffic
US6804345B1 (en) * 1997-09-18 2004-10-12 At&T Corp Virtual contact center with flexible staffing control
US6418461B1 (en) 1997-10-06 2002-07-09 Mci Communications Corporation Intelligent call switching node in an intelligent distributed network architecture
US6088441A (en) * 1997-12-17 2000-07-11 Lucent Technologies Inc. Arrangement for equalizing levels of service among skills
US6052460A (en) * 1997-12-17 2000-04-18 Lucent Technologies Inc. Arrangement for equalizing levels of service among skills
US6192122B1 (en) * 1998-02-12 2001-02-20 Avaya Technology Corp. Call center agent selection that optimizes call wait times
JP3450175B2 (en) * 1998-02-19 2003-09-22 富士通株式会社 Operator response scenario system
CN1254073C (en) * 1998-03-09 2006-04-26 西门子公司 Communications installation
US6278777B1 (en) 1998-03-12 2001-08-21 Ser Solutions, Inc. System for managing agent assignments background of the invention
US6330326B1 (en) * 1998-03-27 2001-12-11 At&T Corp. Dynamic staffing of service centers to provide substantially zero-delay service
US6173053B1 (en) * 1998-04-09 2001-01-09 Avaya Technology Corp. Optimizing call-center performance by using predictive data to distribute calls among agents
US6292550B1 (en) * 1998-06-01 2001-09-18 Avaya Technology Corp. Dynamic call vectoring
US6405159B2 (en) 1998-06-03 2002-06-11 Sbc Technology Resources, Inc. Method for categorizing, describing and modeling types of system users
US6332023B1 (en) * 1998-06-04 2001-12-18 Mci Communications Corporation Method of and system for providing services in a communications network
US6389400B1 (en) * 1998-08-20 2002-05-14 Sbc Technology Resources, Inc. System and methods for intelligent routing of customer requests using customer and agent models
US6535601B1 (en) * 1998-08-27 2003-03-18 Avaya Technology Corp. Skill-value queuing in a call center
US6272544B1 (en) * 1998-09-08 2001-08-07 Avaya Technology Corp Dynamically assigning priorities for the allocation of server resources to completing classes of work based upon achievement of server level goals
US6694482B1 (en) * 1998-09-11 2004-02-17 Sbc Technology Resources, Inc. System and methods for an architectural framework for design of an adaptive, personalized, interactive content delivery system
US6310951B1 (en) * 1998-09-25 2001-10-30 Ser Solutions, Inc. Reassignment of agents
US6130942A (en) * 1998-10-30 2000-10-10 Ericsson Inc. Skills-based automatic call distribution system
US6366666B2 (en) * 1998-12-16 2002-04-02 Avaya Technology Corp. Adjustment of call selection to achieve target values for interval-based performance metrics in a call center
US7058589B1 (en) * 1998-12-17 2006-06-06 Iex Corporation Method and system for employee work scheduling
US6925165B2 (en) * 1998-12-23 2005-08-02 Avaya Technology Corp. Call selection based on continuum skill levels in a call center
US7295669B1 (en) 1999-01-21 2007-11-13 Avaya Technology Corp. Call center telephone and data flow connection system
US7200219B1 (en) 1999-02-10 2007-04-03 Avaya Technology Corp. Dynamically allocating server resources to competing classes of work based upon achievement of service goals
US6424709B1 (en) 1999-03-22 2002-07-23 Rockwell Electronic Commerce Corp. Skill-based call routing
US7133520B1 (en) * 1999-04-27 2006-11-07 Rockwell Electronic Commerce Technologies, Llc Dynamic skill-based call routing
US7224790B1 (en) 1999-05-27 2007-05-29 Sbc Technology Resources, Inc. Method to identify and categorize customer's goals and behaviors within a customer service center environment
US7086007B1 (en) * 1999-05-27 2006-08-01 Sbc Technology Resources, Inc. Method for integrating user models to interface design
US6771760B1 (en) * 1999-09-20 2004-08-03 International Business Machines Corporation Callback imitation as incoming calls
US7035808B1 (en) * 1999-10-20 2006-04-25 Avaya Technology Corp. Arrangement for resource and work-item selection
US6766012B1 (en) 1999-10-20 2004-07-20 Concerto Software, Inc. System and method for allocating agent resources to a telephone call campaign based on agent productivity
US6775378B1 (en) 1999-10-25 2004-08-10 Concerto Software, Inc Blended agent contact center
US6594470B1 (en) 1999-10-28 2003-07-15 Nortel Networks Limited System and method for remote management of call center operations
US6832203B1 (en) * 1999-11-05 2004-12-14 Cim, Ltd. Skills based contact routing
US20040202308A1 (en) * 1999-11-16 2004-10-14 Knowlagent, Inc. Managing the selection of performance interventions in a contact center
US20040202309A1 (en) * 1999-11-16 2004-10-14 Knowlagent, Inc. Managing the rate of delivering performance interventions in a contact center
US6628777B1 (en) 1999-11-16 2003-09-30 Knowlagent, Inc. Method and system for scheduled delivery of training to call center agents
US20050175971A1 (en) * 1999-11-16 2005-08-11 Knowlagent, Inc., Alpharetta, Ga Method and system for scheduled delivery of training to call center agents
US20060233346A1 (en) * 1999-11-16 2006-10-19 Knowlagent, Inc. Method and system for prioritizing performance interventions
US6347139B1 (en) 1999-12-06 2002-02-12 Avaya Technology Corp. System for automatically routing calls to call center agents in an agent surplus condition based on agent occupancy
US6510221B1 (en) 1999-12-06 2003-01-21 Avaya Technology Corp. System for automatically routing calls to call center agents in an agent surplus condition based on delay probabilities
US6535600B1 (en) * 1999-12-06 2003-03-18 Avaya Technology Corp. System for automatically routing calls to call center agents in an agent surplus condition based on service levels
US6553114B1 (en) * 1999-12-06 2003-04-22 Avaya Technology Corp. System for automatically predicting call center agent work time in a multi-skilled agent environment
KR100508969B1 (en) * 1999-12-31 2005-08-17 주식회사 케이티 Method for spreading and accomodating exchange modules to distribute load applied to the exchange modules
WO2001054388A1 (en) 2000-01-07 2001-07-26 Ineto, Inc. Customer communication service system
US6661889B1 (en) * 2000-01-18 2003-12-09 Avaya Technology Corp. Methods and apparatus for multi-variable work assignment in a call center
CA2328335A1 (en) * 2000-01-24 2001-07-24 Avaya Technology Corp. Automated transaction distribution system and method allowing selection of agents by transaction initiators
US6724887B1 (en) 2000-01-24 2004-04-20 Verint Systems, Inc. Method and system for analyzing customer communications with a contact center
US6771764B1 (en) * 2000-01-26 2004-08-03 Rockwell Electronic Commerce Corp. Schedule based transaction routing
US6741698B1 (en) * 2000-01-27 2004-05-25 Avaya Technology Corp. Call management system using dynamic threshold adjustment
US6744879B1 (en) * 2000-02-02 2004-06-01 Rockwell Electronic Commerce Corp. Profit-based method of assigning calls in a transaction processing system
US6763104B1 (en) 2000-02-24 2004-07-13 Teltronics, Inc. Call center IVR and ACD scripting method and graphical user interface
US6603854B1 (en) 2000-02-25 2003-08-05 Teltronics, Inc. System and method for evaluating agents in call center
US6587556B1 (en) 2000-02-25 2003-07-01 Teltronics, Inc. Skills based routing method and system for call center
US7068774B1 (en) * 2000-02-25 2006-06-27 Harris Corporation Integrated acd and ivr scripting for call center tracking of calls
US6707904B1 (en) 2000-02-25 2004-03-16 Teltronics, Inc. Method and system for collecting reports for call center monitoring by supervisor
US6775377B2 (en) 2001-09-10 2004-08-10 Knowlagent, Inc. Method and system for delivery of individualized training to call center agents
US6324282B1 (en) 2000-03-02 2001-11-27 Knowlagent, Inc. Method and system for delivery of individualized training to call center agents
US6707906B1 (en) 2000-03-13 2004-03-16 Concerto Software, Inc. Outbound calling system in a contact center
US6778643B1 (en) * 2000-03-21 2004-08-17 Sbc Technology Resources, Inc. Interface and method of designing an interface
US20040006473A1 (en) 2002-07-02 2004-01-08 Sbc Technology Resources, Inc. Method and system for automated categorization of statements
US6956941B1 (en) * 2000-04-12 2005-10-18 Austin Logistics Incorporated Method and system for scheduling inbound inquiries
US7844504B1 (en) 2000-04-27 2010-11-30 Avaya Inc. Routing based on the contents of a shopping cart
US6754333B1 (en) * 2000-04-27 2004-06-22 Avaya Technology Corp. Wait time prediction arrangement for non-real-time customer contacts
US7043193B1 (en) 2000-05-09 2006-05-09 Knowlagent, Inc. Versatile resource computer-based training system
US6766011B1 (en) 2000-06-16 2004-07-20 Concerto Software, Inc. Method and apparatus for controlling a contact center
US7406515B1 (en) * 2000-06-27 2008-07-29 Aspect Communications System and method for automated and customizable agent availability and task assignment management
US7502460B2 (en) 2006-11-20 2009-03-10 Austin Logistics Incorporated Method and system for distributing outbound telephone calls
US7103173B2 (en) 2001-07-09 2006-09-05 Austin Logistics Incorporated System and method for preemptive goals based routing of contact records
US7142662B2 (en) 2000-07-11 2006-11-28 Austin Logistics Incorporated Method and system for distributing outbound telephone calls
US6778951B1 (en) 2000-08-09 2004-08-17 Concerto Software, Inc. Information retrieval method with natural language interface
US6947988B1 (en) 2000-08-11 2005-09-20 Rockwell Electronic Commerce Technologies, Llc Method and apparatus for allocating resources of a contact center
AU2001284913A1 (en) * 2000-08-14 2004-05-13 Telephony@Work, Inc. Call center administration manager with rules-based routing prioritization
US7039176B2 (en) 2000-08-14 2006-05-02 Telephony@Work Call center administration manager with rules-based routing prioritization
US6697858B1 (en) 2000-08-14 2004-02-24 Telephony@Work Call center
US8041023B1 (en) * 2000-09-29 2011-10-18 Aspect Software, Inc. System and method of using a phone to access information in a call center
WO2002030093A2 (en) * 2000-09-29 2002-04-11 Avaya Technology Corp. System for automatically predicting availability of a resource in a customer care center
US8868448B2 (en) * 2000-10-26 2014-10-21 Liveperson, Inc. Systems and methods to facilitate selling of products and services
US9819561B2 (en) 2000-10-26 2017-11-14 Liveperson, Inc. System and methods for facilitating object assignments
DE10065744B4 (en) * 2000-12-29 2006-06-01 Siemens Ag Method for operating a system for the determination of planning data for the personnel and / or resource planning of a call center
JP2002297900A (en) 2001-03-30 2002-10-11 Ibm Japan Ltd Control system for reception by businesses, user side terminal device, reception side terminal device, management server queue monitoring device, method of allocating reception side terminals, and storage medium
US8015042B2 (en) * 2001-04-02 2011-09-06 Verint Americas Inc. Methods for long-range contact center staff planning utilizing discrete event simulation
US6778660B2 (en) 2001-04-06 2004-08-17 Concerto Software, Inc. Customer interaction system
US20020159475A1 (en) * 2001-04-27 2002-10-31 Hung Francis Yun Tai Integrated internet and voice enabled call center
US6804341B1 (en) * 2001-05-02 2004-10-12 Bellsouth Intellectual Property Corp. System and method for providing no answer detail service for telephone calls that are not completed
GB2391984A (en) 2001-05-17 2004-02-18 Bay Bridge Decision Technologi System and method for generating forecasts and analysis of contact center behaviour for planning purposes
US20030055705A1 (en) * 2001-06-19 2003-03-20 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for skills-based task routing
US7110525B1 (en) * 2001-06-25 2006-09-19 Toby Heller Agent training sensitive call routing system
US20030007628A1 (en) * 2001-06-26 2003-01-09 International Business Machines Corporation Load balancing among call center agents
US7054434B2 (en) * 2001-07-09 2006-05-30 Austin Logistics Incorporated System and method for common account based routing of contact records
US7715546B2 (en) * 2001-07-09 2010-05-11 Austin Logistics Incorporated System and method for updating contact records
US7065201B2 (en) 2001-07-31 2006-06-20 Sbc Technology Resources, Inc. Telephone call processing in an interactive voice response call management system
US6856680B2 (en) 2001-09-24 2005-02-15 Rockwell Electronic Commerce Technologies, Llc Contact center autopilot algorithms
US7174010B2 (en) * 2001-11-05 2007-02-06 Knowlagent, Inc. System and method for increasing completion of training
US6870926B2 (en) * 2001-11-06 2005-03-22 Rockwell Electronic Commerce Technologies, Llc Method of optimizing call center resources based upon statistics
US6891946B2 (en) * 2002-01-25 2005-05-10 Walgreen, Co. Automated phone priorities
US7305070B2 (en) 2002-01-30 2007-12-04 At&T Labs, Inc. Sequential presentation of long instructions in an interactive voice response system
US6914975B2 (en) * 2002-02-21 2005-07-05 Sbc Properties, L.P. Interactive dialog-based training method
US7372952B1 (en) 2002-03-07 2008-05-13 Wai Wu Telephony control system with intelligent call routing
US7292689B2 (en) * 2002-03-15 2007-11-06 Intellisist, Inc. System and method for providing a message-based communications infrastructure for automated call center operation
US7336779B2 (en) * 2002-03-15 2008-02-26 Avaya Technology Corp. Topical dynamic chat
US8170197B2 (en) * 2002-03-15 2012-05-01 Intellisist, Inc. System and method for providing automated call center post-call processing
US7415417B2 (en) 2002-03-15 2008-08-19 Avaya Technology Corp. Presence awareness agent
US8068595B2 (en) 2002-03-15 2011-11-29 Intellisist, Inc. System and method for providing a multi-modal communications infrastructure for automated call center operation
US7962644B1 (en) * 2002-03-18 2011-06-14 Oracle International Corporation Systems and methods for handling a plurality of communications
US7657263B1 (en) * 2002-03-21 2010-02-02 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method and system for automatic call distribution based on customized logic relating to agent behavior
US7620169B2 (en) 2002-06-17 2009-11-17 Avaya Inc. Waiting but not ready
US7170990B2 (en) * 2002-06-18 2007-01-30 Avaya Technology Corp. Autonomous dispatcher method and apparatus
US20040081311A1 (en) * 2002-10-23 2004-04-29 Paul Thompson Method abandoned call rescue
US9818136B1 (en) 2003-02-05 2017-11-14 Steven M. Hoffberg System and method for determining contingent relevance
US7676034B1 (en) * 2003-03-07 2010-03-09 Wai Wu Method and system for matching entities in an auction
US20040193468A1 (en) * 2003-03-31 2004-09-30 Dave Mosquera System for optimizing business rule resources
DE10322634A1 (en) * 2003-05-20 2004-12-23 TOS Team für Organisation und Systeme GmbH Control method for a communication event, especially a telephone call, message transfer or data transmission, whereby communication initiator and target resource profiles are defined and used when generating a communication link
US7050566B2 (en) * 2003-06-13 2006-05-23 Assurant, Inc. Call processing system
US7158628B2 (en) * 2003-08-20 2007-01-02 Knowlagent, Inc. Method and system for selecting a preferred contact center agent based on agent proficiency and performance and contact center state
US20050047584A1 (en) * 2003-08-26 2005-03-03 Capital One Financial Corporation System and method for customized intelligent contact routing
WO2005028673A1 (en) * 2003-09-22 2005-03-31 Institut Pasteur A method for detecting nipah virus and method for providing immunoprotection against henipaviruses
US7770175B2 (en) * 2003-09-26 2010-08-03 Avaya Inc. Method and apparatus for load balancing work on a network of servers based on the probability of being serviced within a service time goal
US8094804B2 (en) 2003-09-26 2012-01-10 Avaya Inc. Method and apparatus for assessing the status of work waiting for service
US20050071241A1 (en) * 2003-09-26 2005-03-31 Flockhart Andrew D. Contact center resource allocation based on work bidding/auction
US8724796B2 (en) 2003-09-30 2014-05-13 Avaya Inc. Estimation of expected value for remaining work time for contact center agents
US6973176B1 (en) 2003-09-30 2005-12-06 Avaya Technology Corp. Method and apparatus for rotating auto reserve agents
US7184541B2 (en) * 2003-12-11 2007-02-27 General Electric Capital Corporation Method and apparatus for selecting an agent to handle a call
US7027586B2 (en) * 2003-12-18 2006-04-11 Sbc Knowledge Ventures, L.P. Intelligently routing customer communications
US7539297B2 (en) * 2003-12-19 2009-05-26 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Generation of automated recommended parameter changes based on force management system (FMS) data analysis
US20050135601A1 (en) * 2003-12-19 2005-06-23 Whitman Raymond Jr. Force management automatic call distribution and resource allocation control system
US7406171B2 (en) * 2003-12-19 2008-07-29 At&T Delaware Intellectual Property, Inc. Agent scheduler incorporating agent profiles
US7499844B2 (en) * 2003-12-19 2009-03-03 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Method and system for predicting network usage in a network having re-occurring usage variations
US7551602B2 (en) * 2003-12-19 2009-06-23 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Resource assignment in a distributed environment
US7616755B2 (en) * 2003-12-19 2009-11-10 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Efficiency report generator
US7321657B2 (en) * 2003-12-19 2008-01-22 At&T Delaware Intellectual Property, Inc. Dynamic force management system
US8472612B1 (en) 2004-01-29 2013-06-25 Avaya Inc. Call center customer queue shortcut access code
US8457300B2 (en) * 2004-02-12 2013-06-04 Avaya Inc. Instant message contact management in a contact center
US7729490B2 (en) * 2004-02-12 2010-06-01 Avaya Inc. Post-termination contact management
US7885401B1 (en) * 2004-03-29 2011-02-08 Avaya Inc. Method and apparatus to forecast the availability of a resource
US7734032B1 (en) 2004-03-31 2010-06-08 Avaya Inc. Contact center and method for tracking and acting on one and done customer contacts
US8000989B1 (en) 2004-03-31 2011-08-16 Avaya Inc. Using true value in routing work items to resources
US7158909B2 (en) * 2004-03-31 2007-01-02 Balboa Instruments, Inc. Method and system for testing spas
US7953859B1 (en) 2004-03-31 2011-05-31 Avaya Inc. Data model of participation in multi-channel and multi-party contacts
US8126133B1 (en) * 2004-04-01 2012-02-28 Liveops, Inc. Results-based routing of electronic communications
US8234141B1 (en) 2004-09-27 2012-07-31 Avaya Inc. Dynamic work assignment strategies based on multiple aspects of agent proficiency
US7949121B1 (en) 2004-09-27 2011-05-24 Avaya Inc. Method and apparatus for the simultaneous delivery of multiple contacts to an agent
US7949123B1 (en) 2004-09-28 2011-05-24 Avaya Inc. Wait time predictor for long shelf-life work
US7657021B2 (en) * 2004-09-29 2010-02-02 Avaya Inc. Method and apparatus for global call queue in a global call center
US8229101B1 (en) * 2004-09-30 2012-07-24 Virtual Hold Technology, Llc Punctuality call center metric
US20060072739A1 (en) * 2004-10-01 2006-04-06 Knowlagent Inc. Method and system for assessing and deploying personnel for roles in a contact center
US20060177803A1 (en) * 2005-02-10 2006-08-10 Envision Telephony, Inc. System and method for training distribution management
US7567653B1 (en) 2005-03-22 2009-07-28 Avaya Inc. Method by which call centers can vector inbound TTY calls automatically to TTY-enabled resources
US7817796B1 (en) 2005-04-27 2010-10-19 Avaya Inc. Coordinating work assignments for contact center agents
US20060256953A1 (en) * 2005-05-12 2006-11-16 Knowlagent, Inc. Method and system for improving workforce performance in a contact center
US8885812B2 (en) * 2005-05-17 2014-11-11 Oracle International Corporation Dynamic customer satisfaction routing
US20060265088A1 (en) * 2005-05-18 2006-11-23 Roger Warford Method and system for recording an electronic communication and extracting constituent audio data therefrom
US7995717B2 (en) 2005-05-18 2011-08-09 Mattersight Corporation Method and system for analyzing separated voice data of a telephonic communication between a customer and a contact center by applying a psychological behavioral model thereto
US8094803B2 (en) 2005-05-18 2012-01-10 Mattersight Corporation Method and system for analyzing separated voice data of a telephonic communication between a customer and a contact center by applying a psychological behavioral model thereto
US8094790B2 (en) * 2005-05-18 2012-01-10 Mattersight Corporation Method and software for training a customer service representative by analysis of a telephonic interaction between a customer and a contact center
US7511606B2 (en) * 2005-05-18 2009-03-31 Lojack Operating Company Lp Vehicle locating unit with input voltage protection
US7809127B2 (en) * 2005-05-26 2010-10-05 Avaya Inc. Method for discovering problem agent behaviors
EP1729247A1 (en) * 2005-06-01 2006-12-06 InVision Software AG Resource planning for employees
US8503663B2 (en) * 2005-06-30 2013-08-06 Interactive Intelligence, Inc. System and method for agent queue activation in a contact center
US7779042B1 (en) 2005-08-08 2010-08-17 Avaya Inc. Deferred control of surrogate key generation in a distributed processing architecture
US8583466B2 (en) 2005-08-09 2013-11-12 Oracle International Corporation System and method for routing workflow items based on workflow templates in a call center
US9432468B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2016-08-30 Liveperson, Inc. System and method for design and dynamic generation of a web page
US8738732B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2014-05-27 Liveperson, Inc. System and method for performing follow up based on user interactions
US7881450B1 (en) 2005-09-15 2011-02-01 Avaya Inc. Answer on hold notification
US8577015B2 (en) * 2005-09-16 2013-11-05 Avaya Inc. Method and apparatus for the automated delivery of notifications to contacts based on predicted work prioritization
US8116446B1 (en) 2005-10-03 2012-02-14 Avaya Inc. Agent driven work item awareness for tuning routing engine work-assignment algorithms
US8073129B1 (en) 2005-10-03 2011-12-06 Avaya Inc. Work item relation awareness for agents during routing engine driven sub-optimal work assignments
US10572879B1 (en) 2005-10-03 2020-02-25 Avaya Inc. Agent driven media-agnostic work item grouping and sharing over a consult medium
US7822587B1 (en) 2005-10-03 2010-10-26 Avaya Inc. Hybrid database architecture for both maintaining and relaxing type 2 data entity behavior
US8874477B2 (en) 2005-10-04 2014-10-28 Steven Mark Hoffberg Multifactorial optimization system and method
US8411843B1 (en) 2005-10-04 2013-04-02 Avaya Inc. Next agent available notification
US7752230B2 (en) 2005-10-06 2010-07-06 Avaya Inc. Data extensibility using external database tables
US7787609B1 (en) 2005-10-06 2010-08-31 Avaya Inc. Prioritized service delivery based on presence and availability of interruptible enterprise resources with skills
US20070140468A1 (en) * 2005-11-04 2007-06-21 Spanlink Communications, Inc. Method and system for scheduling resources in customer contact centers
US20070121897A1 (en) * 2005-11-30 2007-05-31 Balaji Patakula Methods and apparatus for dynamically adjusting resource configuration in a resource allocation system
US8238541B1 (en) 2006-01-31 2012-08-07 Avaya Inc. Intent based skill-set classification for accurate, automatic determination of agent skills
US8825507B1 (en) 2006-02-03 2014-09-02 Liveops, Inc. System and method for self-scheduling of service representatives
US8737173B2 (en) 2006-02-24 2014-05-27 Avaya Inc. Date and time dimensions for contact center reporting in arbitrary international time zones
US8494152B1 (en) 2006-02-28 2013-07-23 Allstate Insurance Company Systems and methods for automated call-handling and processing
JP4894301B2 (en) 2006-03-03 2012-03-14 富士通株式会社 Skill value calculation program and skill value calculation device
US7734783B1 (en) * 2006-03-21 2010-06-08 Verint Americas Inc. Systems and methods for determining allocations for distributed multi-site contact centers
US8442197B1 (en) 2006-03-30 2013-05-14 Avaya Inc. Telephone-based user interface for participating simultaneously in more than one teleconference
US8300798B1 (en) 2006-04-03 2012-10-30 Wai Wu Intelligent communication routing system and method
US7660407B2 (en) * 2006-06-27 2010-02-09 Verint Americas Inc. Systems and methods for scheduling contact center agents
US7936867B1 (en) 2006-08-15 2011-05-03 Avaya Inc. Multi-service request within a contact center
US8391463B1 (en) 2006-09-01 2013-03-05 Avaya Inc. Method and apparatus for identifying related contacts
US8811597B1 (en) 2006-09-07 2014-08-19 Avaya Inc. Contact center performance prediction
US8938063B1 (en) * 2006-09-07 2015-01-20 Avaya Inc. Contact center service monitoring and correcting
US8855292B1 (en) 2006-09-08 2014-10-07 Avaya Inc. Agent-enabled queue bypass to agent
US7835514B1 (en) 2006-09-18 2010-11-16 Avaya Inc. Provide a graceful transfer out of active wait treatment
US8666040B2 (en) 2006-09-22 2014-03-04 International Business Machines Corporation Analyzing Speech Application Performance
US20080120164A1 (en) * 2006-11-17 2008-05-22 Avaya Technology Llc Contact center agent work awareness algorithm
US20080144803A1 (en) * 2006-12-15 2008-06-19 Peeyush Jaiswal Dynamic agent skill balancing
US8767944B1 (en) 2007-01-03 2014-07-01 Avaya Inc. Mechanism for status and control communication over SIP using CODEC tunneling
JP5090001B2 (en) * 2007-01-29 2012-12-05 ピーアンドダブリューソリューションズ株式会社 Server, administrator terminal, system, and method for displaying operator status using seat layout
JP5368676B2 (en) * 2007-01-29 2013-12-18 ピーアンドダブリューソリューションズ株式会社 Method and computer for creating a communicator schedule
US8718262B2 (en) 2007-03-30 2014-05-06 Mattersight Corporation Method and system for automatically routing a telephonic communication base on analytic attributes associated with prior telephonic communication
US8023639B2 (en) 2007-03-30 2011-09-20 Mattersight Corporation Method and system determining the complexity of a telephonic communication received by a contact center
US7869586B2 (en) * 2007-03-30 2011-01-11 Eloyalty Corporation Method and system for aggregating and analyzing data relating to a plurality of interactions between a customer and a contact center and generating business process analytics
US7747705B1 (en) 2007-05-08 2010-06-29 Avaya Inc. Method to make a discussion forum or RSS feed a source for customer contact into a multimedia contact center that is capable of handling emails
US8688486B2 (en) * 2007-07-13 2014-04-01 International Business Machines Corporation System, method and program for setting wage for call center personnel
US8504534B1 (en) 2007-09-26 2013-08-06 Avaya Inc. Database structures and administration techniques for generalized localization of database items
US10419611B2 (en) 2007-09-28 2019-09-17 Mattersight Corporation System and methods for determining trends in electronic communications
US8560369B2 (en) * 2007-11-01 2013-10-15 Red Hat, Inc. Systems and methods for technical support based on a flock structure
US10282701B2 (en) * 2007-11-20 2019-05-07 Red Hat, Inc. Web-based technical issue assignments based on technical support groups having handled a highest number of technical requests
US8856182B2 (en) 2008-01-25 2014-10-07 Avaya Inc. Report database dependency tracing through business intelligence metadata
US9692898B1 (en) 2008-01-28 2017-06-27 Afiniti Europe Technologies Limited Techniques for benchmarking paring strategies in a contact center system
US9712676B1 (en) 2008-01-28 2017-07-18 Afiniti Europe Technologies Limited Techniques for benchmarking pairing strategies in a contact center system
US10708430B2 (en) 2008-01-28 2020-07-07 Afiniti Europe Technologies Limited Techniques for benchmarking pairing strategies in a contact center system
US9712679B2 (en) 2008-01-28 2017-07-18 Afiniti International Holdings, Ltd. Systems and methods for routing callers to an agent in a contact center
US9774740B2 (en) 2008-01-28 2017-09-26 Afiniti Europe Technologies Limited Techniques for benchmarking pairing strategies in a contact center system
US8718271B2 (en) * 2008-01-28 2014-05-06 Satmap International Holdings Limited Call routing methods and systems based on multiple variable standardized scoring
US9300802B1 (en) 2008-01-28 2016-03-29 Satmap International Holdings Limited Techniques for behavioral pairing in a contact center system
US8670548B2 (en) * 2008-01-28 2014-03-11 Satmap International Holdings Limited Jumping callers held in queue for a call center routing system
WO2009097210A1 (en) * 2008-01-28 2009-08-06 The Resource Group International, Ltd. Routing callers from a set of callers in an out of order sequence
US9654641B1 (en) 2008-01-28 2017-05-16 Afiniti International Holdings, Ltd. Systems and methods for routing callers to an agent in a contact center
US8781100B2 (en) * 2008-01-28 2014-07-15 Satmap International Holdings Limited Probability multiplier process for call center routing
US20090190745A1 (en) * 2008-01-28 2009-07-30 The Resource Group International Ltd Pooling callers for a call center routing system
US10750023B2 (en) 2008-01-28 2020-08-18 Afiniti Europe Technologies Limited Techniques for hybrid behavioral pairing in a contact center system
US8879715B2 (en) * 2012-03-26 2014-11-04 Satmap International Holdings Limited Call mapping systems and methods using variance algorithm (VA) and/or distribution compensation
US9781269B2 (en) 2008-01-28 2017-10-03 Afiniti Europe Technologies Limited Techniques for hybrid behavioral pairing in a contact center system
US8903079B2 (en) * 2008-01-28 2014-12-02 Satmap International Holdings Limited Routing callers from a set of callers based on caller data
US9787841B2 (en) 2008-01-28 2017-10-10 Afiniti Europe Technologies Limited Techniques for hybrid behavioral pairing in a contact center system
US10567586B2 (en) * 2008-11-06 2020-02-18 Afiniti Europe Technologies Limited Pooling callers for matching to agents based on pattern matching algorithms
US8824658B2 (en) 2008-11-06 2014-09-02 Satmap International Holdings Limited Selective mapping of callers in a call center routing system
US10708431B2 (en) 2008-01-28 2020-07-07 Afiniti Europe Technologies Limited Techniques for hybrid behavioral pairing in a contact center system
US8831206B1 (en) 2008-05-12 2014-09-09 Avaya Inc. Automated, data-based mechanism to detect evolution of employee skills
US8385532B1 (en) 2008-05-12 2013-02-26 Avaya Inc. Real-time detective
US8260846B2 (en) 2008-07-25 2012-09-04 Liveperson, Inc. Method and system for providing targeted content to a surfer
US8762313B2 (en) 2008-07-25 2014-06-24 Liveperson, Inc. Method and system for creating a predictive model for targeting web-page to a surfer
US20100020959A1 (en) * 2008-07-28 2010-01-28 The Resource Group International Ltd Routing callers to agents based on personality data of agents
US8805844B2 (en) 2008-08-04 2014-08-12 Liveperson, Inc. Expert search
US10375244B2 (en) * 2008-08-06 2019-08-06 Avaya Inc. Premises enabled mobile kiosk, using customers' mobile communication device
US10033869B2 (en) 2008-08-29 2018-07-24 8X8, Inc. Methods and systems for information streaming to user interface
US8781106B2 (en) * 2008-08-29 2014-07-15 Satmap International Holdings Limited Agent satisfaction data for call routing based on pattern matching algorithm
US8116237B2 (en) 2008-09-26 2012-02-14 Avaya Inc. Clearing house for publish/subscribe of status data from distributed telecommunications systems
US9892417B2 (en) 2008-10-29 2018-02-13 Liveperson, Inc. System and method for applying tracing tools for network locations
US8472611B2 (en) 2008-11-06 2013-06-25 The Resource Group International Ltd. Balancing multiple computer models in a call center routing system
US20100111288A1 (en) * 2008-11-06 2010-05-06 Afzal Hassan Time to answer selector and advisor for call routing center
USRE48412E1 (en) 2008-11-06 2021-01-26 Afiniti, Ltd. Balancing multiple computer models in a call center routing system
US8340274B2 (en) 2008-12-22 2012-12-25 Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc. System for routing interactions using bio-performance attributes of persons as dynamic input
US8175254B2 (en) * 2009-04-23 2012-05-08 Avaya Inc. Prediction of threshold exceptions based on real time operating information
US8621011B2 (en) * 2009-05-12 2013-12-31 Avaya Inc. Treatment of web feeds as work assignment in a contact center
US8964958B2 (en) 2009-05-20 2015-02-24 Avaya Inc. Grid-based contact center
US10699223B1 (en) * 2009-08-13 2020-06-30 Amazon Technologies, Inc. System and method for resource allocation across distinct processes of a materials handling facility
US8644491B2 (en) * 2009-08-21 2014-02-04 Avaya Inc. Mechanism for multisite service state description
US8385533B2 (en) 2009-09-21 2013-02-26 Avaya Inc. Bidding work assignment on conference/subscribe RTP clearing house
US8565386B2 (en) 2009-09-29 2013-10-22 Avaya Inc. Automatic configuration of soft phones that are usable in conjunction with special-purpose endpoints
US9468755B2 (en) * 2009-09-30 2016-10-18 Respicardia, Inc. Medical lead with preformed bias
US9516069B2 (en) 2009-11-17 2016-12-06 Avaya Inc. Packet headers as a trigger for automatic activation of special-purpose softphone applications
US8306212B2 (en) * 2010-02-19 2012-11-06 Avaya Inc. Time-based work assignments in automated contact distribution
EP2556449A1 (en) 2010-04-07 2013-02-13 Liveperson Inc. System and method for dynamically enabling customized web content and applications
US8724797B2 (en) 2010-08-26 2014-05-13 Satmap International Holdings Limited Estimating agent performance in a call routing center system
US8699694B2 (en) 2010-08-26 2014-04-15 Satmap International Holdings Limited Precalculated caller-agent pairs for a call center routing system
US20120101867A1 (en) * 2010-10-25 2012-04-26 Zgardovski Stanislav V System for Automatic Assignment of Agents in Inbound and Outbound Campaigns
US20120134487A1 (en) * 2010-11-29 2012-05-31 Avaya Inc. Predicted percent service level
US8918465B2 (en) 2010-12-14 2014-12-23 Liveperson, Inc. Authentication of service requests initiated from a social networking site
US9350598B2 (en) 2010-12-14 2016-05-24 Liveperson, Inc. Authentication of service requests using a communications initiation feature
US8577018B1 (en) * 2011-03-18 2013-11-05 Shoretel, Inc. Systems and methods for providing agent queues
US8837705B2 (en) * 2011-04-06 2014-09-16 Avaya Inc. Real-time probability based contact handling time
US8837711B2 (en) * 2011-04-15 2014-09-16 Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. Dynamic update of skills database
JP5911109B2 (en) * 2011-05-24 2016-04-27 日本電気株式会社 COMMUNICATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, COMMUNICATION PROCESSING METHOD, COMMUNICATION PROCESSING DEVICE, CONTROL METHOD AND CONTROL PROGRAM THEREOF
US10579947B2 (en) * 2011-07-08 2020-03-03 Avaya Inc. System and method for scheduling based on service completion objectives
US9118765B2 (en) * 2011-07-19 2015-08-25 Avaya Inc. Agent skill promotion and demotion based on contact center state
US8699696B1 (en) 2011-07-19 2014-04-15 Avaya Inc. System and method for efficiently managing large contact centers
US8918789B2 (en) 2011-10-26 2014-12-23 International Business Machines Corporation Task assignment using ranking support vector machines
US8306213B1 (en) 2011-11-22 2012-11-06 Google Inc. Skill and level assignment via concentric inlaid circles
US8943002B2 (en) 2012-02-10 2015-01-27 Liveperson, Inc. Analytics driven engagement
US8675860B2 (en) 2012-02-16 2014-03-18 Avaya Inc. Training optimizer for contact center agents
US8805941B2 (en) 2012-03-06 2014-08-12 Liveperson, Inc. Occasionally-connected computing interface
US9025757B2 (en) 2012-03-26 2015-05-05 Satmap International Holdings Limited Call mapping systems and methods using bayesian mean regression (BMR)
US9563336B2 (en) 2012-04-26 2017-02-07 Liveperson, Inc. Dynamic user interface customization
US9672196B2 (en) 2012-05-15 2017-06-06 Liveperson, Inc. Methods and systems for presenting specialized content using campaign metrics
US8792630B2 (en) 2012-09-24 2014-07-29 Satmap International Holdings Limited Use of abstracted data in pattern matching system
US9392115B2 (en) * 2012-11-19 2016-07-12 Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc. System and method for contact center activity routing based on agent preferences
US9900435B2 (en) * 2012-11-19 2018-02-20 Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc. Best match interaction set routing
US9082149B2 (en) * 2013-02-19 2015-07-14 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. System and method for providing sales assistance to a consumer wearing an augmented reality device in a physical store
US9191510B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2015-11-17 Mattersight Corporation Methods and system for analyzing multichannel electronic communication data
US9154627B2 (en) 2013-05-13 2015-10-06 Genesys Telecommunication Laboratories, Inc. Activities assignment optimization for multi-skill contact center
US20150206092A1 (en) * 2014-01-21 2015-07-23 Avaya, Inc. Identification of multi-channel connections to predict estimated wait time
US11386442B2 (en) 2014-03-31 2022-07-12 Liveperson, Inc. Online behavioral predictor
SG11201703521UA (en) * 2014-11-03 2017-05-30 Genentech Inc Methods and biomarkers for predicting efficacy and evaluation of an ox40 agonist treatment
JP6486690B2 (en) * 2015-01-07 2019-03-20 ピーアンドダブリューソリューションズ株式会社 Skill management apparatus and method, and program.
US10142908B2 (en) 2015-06-02 2018-11-27 Liveperson, Inc. Dynamic communication routing based on consistency weighting and routing rules
US20170039508A1 (en) * 2015-08-03 2017-02-09 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Systems and methods for recommendation tool
CN108369675B (en) 2015-12-01 2021-09-03 阿菲尼帝有限公司 Techniques for case distribution
US9961012B2 (en) 2015-12-21 2018-05-01 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Per-stage assignment of pipelines agents
CN113095659B (en) * 2016-04-18 2022-07-08 阿菲尼帝有限公司 Techniques for benchmarking pairing strategies in contact center systems
US10142473B1 (en) 2016-06-08 2018-11-27 Afiniti Europe Technologies Limited Techniques for benchmarking performance in a contact center system
CN116528220A (en) 2016-08-14 2023-08-01 利维帕尔森有限公司 Method and system for real-time remote control of mobile applications
US9692899B1 (en) 2016-08-30 2017-06-27 Afiniti Europe Technologies Limited Techniques for benchmarking pairing strategies in a contact center system
US9888121B1 (en) 2016-12-13 2018-02-06 Afiniti Europe Technologies Limited Techniques for behavioral pairing model evaluation in a contact center system
US9955013B1 (en) 2016-12-30 2018-04-24 Afiniti Europe Technologies Limited Techniques for L3 pairing in a contact center system
US10320984B2 (en) 2016-12-30 2019-06-11 Afiniti Europe Technologies Limited Techniques for L3 pairing in a contact center system
US10326882B2 (en) 2016-12-30 2019-06-18 Afiniti Europe Technologies Limited Techniques for workforce management in a contact center system
US10257354B2 (en) 2016-12-30 2019-04-09 Afiniti Europe Technologies Limited Techniques for L3 pairing in a contact center system
US11831808B2 (en) 2016-12-30 2023-11-28 Afiniti, Ltd. Contact center system
US10135986B1 (en) 2017-02-21 2018-11-20 Afiniti International Holdings, Ltd. Techniques for behavioral pairing model evaluation in a contact center system
US10970658B2 (en) 2017-04-05 2021-04-06 Afiniti, Ltd. Techniques for behavioral pairing in a dispatch center system
US9930180B1 (en) 2017-04-28 2018-03-27 Afiniti, Ltd. Techniques for behavioral pairing in a contact center system
US10122860B1 (en) 2017-07-10 2018-11-06 Afiniti Europe Technologies Limited Techniques for estimating expected performance in a task assignment system
US10110746B1 (en) 2017-11-08 2018-10-23 Afiniti Europe Technologies Limited Techniques for benchmarking pairing strategies in a task assignment system
US10509669B2 (en) 2017-11-08 2019-12-17 Afiniti Europe Technologies Limited Techniques for benchmarking pairing strategies in a task assignment system
US11399096B2 (en) 2017-11-29 2022-07-26 Afiniti, Ltd. Techniques for data matching in a contact center system
US10509671B2 (en) 2017-12-11 2019-12-17 Afiniti Europe Technologies Limited Techniques for behavioral pairing in a task assignment system
US10623565B2 (en) 2018-02-09 2020-04-14 Afiniti Europe Technologies Limited Techniques for behavioral pairing in a contact center system
US11250359B2 (en) 2018-05-30 2022-02-15 Afiniti, Ltd. Techniques for workforce management in a task assignment system
US10496438B1 (en) 2018-09-28 2019-12-03 Afiniti, Ltd. Techniques for adapting behavioral pairing to runtime conditions in a task assignment system
US10867263B2 (en) 2018-12-04 2020-12-15 Afiniti, Ltd. Techniques for behavioral pairing in a multistage task assignment system
US11144344B2 (en) 2019-01-17 2021-10-12 Afiniti, Ltd. Techniques for behavioral pairing in a task assignment system
US11563853B2 (en) * 2019-04-11 2023-01-24 Baptist Health South Florida, Inc. Method, system, and computer program product to accurately route a call request
US10757261B1 (en) 2019-08-12 2020-08-25 Afiniti, Ltd. Techniques for pairing contacts and agents in a contact center system
US11445062B2 (en) 2019-08-26 2022-09-13 Afiniti, Ltd. Techniques for behavioral pairing in a task assignment system
US10757262B1 (en) 2019-09-19 2020-08-25 Afiniti, Ltd. Techniques for decisioning behavioral pairing in a task assignment system
US10990913B2 (en) * 2019-09-24 2021-04-27 BigFork Technologies, LLC System and method for electronic assignment of issues based on measured and/or forecasted capacity of human resources
WO2021158436A1 (en) 2020-02-03 2021-08-12 Afiniti, Ltd. Techniques for behavioral pairing in a task assignment system
AU2021216364A1 (en) 2020-02-04 2022-09-15 Afiniti, Ltd Techniques for error handling in a task assignment system with an external pairing system
EP4100901A1 (en) 2020-02-05 2022-12-14 Afiniti, Ltd. Techniques for sharing control of assigning tasks between an external pairing system and a task assignment system with an internal pairing system
US11336772B1 (en) * 2020-02-11 2022-05-17 Noble Systems Corporation Limited derogation of contact center agent skill levels

Family Cites Families (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4885686A (en) * 1987-01-12 1989-12-05 American Telephone And Telegraph At&T Bell Laboratories Methods and apparatus for efficient resource allocation
US5031089A (en) * 1988-12-30 1991-07-09 United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator, National Aeronautics And Space Administration Dynamic resource allocation scheme for distributed heterogeneous computer systems
US5148365A (en) * 1989-08-15 1992-09-15 Dembo Ron S Scenario optimization
US5185715A (en) * 1990-03-30 1993-02-09 Hughes Aircraft Company Data processing systems and methods for linear programming
US5185780A (en) * 1990-10-12 1993-02-09 Tex Corporation Method for predicting agent requirements in a force management system
JPH05507396A (en) * 1990-11-20 1993-10-21 テロケント コミュニケーションズ コーポレーション call processing system
US5206903A (en) * 1990-12-26 1993-04-27 At&T Bell Laboratories Automatic call distribution based on matching required skills with agents skills
US5335269A (en) * 1992-03-12 1994-08-02 Rockwell International Corporation Two dimensional routing apparatus in an automatic call director-type system
US5309513A (en) * 1992-07-02 1994-05-03 Rockwell International Corporation Telephone system with ubiquitous agents
CA2147601C (en) * 1992-10-21 1998-08-25 Norman J. Donaghue, Jr. Integrated intelligent call blending
US5499291A (en) * 1993-01-14 1996-03-12 At&T Corp. Arrangement for automating call-center agent-schedule-notification and schedule-adherence functions
US5506898A (en) * 1994-07-12 1996-04-09 At&T Corp. Expected wait-time indication arrangement
US6333980B1 (en) * 1994-09-28 2001-12-25 Rockwell International Corporation Automatic call distributor and method for routing incoming telephone calls based on proficiency ratings of agents
US5594791A (en) * 1994-10-05 1997-01-14 Inventions, Inc. Method and apparatus for providing result-oriented customer service
AU4396896A (en) * 1995-01-18 1996-08-07 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Answering telephone calls
DE69636239T2 (en) * 1995-04-24 2007-05-10 International Business Machines Corp. A method and apparatus for skill-based routing in a call center
US5721770A (en) * 1996-07-02 1998-02-24 Lucent Technologies Inc. Agent vectoring programmably conditionally assigning agents to various tasks including tasks other than handling of waiting calls

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU731207B2 (en) 2001-03-29
EP0855826A2 (en) 1998-07-29
US5903641A (en) 1999-05-11
AU5215098A (en) 1998-07-30
EP0855826A3 (en) 1998-09-16
DE69701350D1 (en) 2000-04-06
DE69701350T2 (en) 2000-10-19
EP0855826B1 (en) 2000-03-01
CA2226093A1 (en) 1998-07-28
KR19980070730A (en) 1998-10-26
JPH10224478A (en) 1998-08-21
JP3366565B2 (en) 2003-01-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA2226093C (en) Automatic dynamic changing of agents&#39; call handling assignments
CA2293853C (en) Method and apparatus for determining measures of agent-related occupancy in a call center
EP1107556B1 (en) System for automatically predicting call center agent work time in a multi-skilled agent environment
JP4445121B2 (en) A system that automatically routes calls to call center agents based on agent occupancy in surplus agent situations
CA2326607C (en) System for automatically routing calls to call center agents in an agent surplus condition based on service levels
EP1107557B1 (en) System for automatically routing calls to call center agents in an agent surplus condition based on delay probabilities
EP1011256B1 (en) Adjustment of call selection to achieve target values for interval-based performance metrics in a call center
US6639982B1 (en) Method and apparatus for agent forcing and call distribution for large team call servicing
US6925165B2 (en) Call selection based on continuum skill levels in a call center
US5506898A (en) Expected wait-time indication arrangement
US6563920B1 (en) Methods and apparatus for processing of communications in a call center based on variable rest period determinations
US5982873A (en) Waiting-call selection based on objectives
US20030081757A1 (en) Contact center autopilot architecture
US7095841B2 (en) Queued task/queued resource state forecaster

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
EEER Examination request
MKLA Lapsed

Effective date: 20150105