CA2229967A1 - Arrangement of contact pairs for compensation of near-end crosstalk - Google Patents
Arrangement of contact pairs for compensation of near-end crosstalk Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2229967A1 CA2229967A1 CA002229967A CA2229967A CA2229967A1 CA 2229967 A1 CA2229967 A1 CA 2229967A1 CA 002229967 A CA002229967 A CA 002229967A CA 2229967 A CA2229967 A CA 2229967A CA 2229967 A1 CA2229967 A1 CA 2229967A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- contact
- contacts
- pairs
- region
- pair
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01R—ELECTRICALLY-CONDUCTIVE CONNECTIONS; STRUCTURAL ASSOCIATIONS OF A PLURALITY OF MUTUALLY-INSULATED ELECTRICAL CONNECTING ELEMENTS; COUPLING DEVICES; CURRENT COLLECTORS
- H01R13/00—Details of coupling devices of the kinds covered by groups H01R12/70 or H01R24/00 - H01R33/00
- H01R13/646—Details of coupling devices of the kinds covered by groups H01R12/70 or H01R24/00 - H01R33/00 specially adapted for high-frequency, e.g. structures providing an impedance match or phase match
- H01R13/6461—Means for preventing cross-talk
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B3/00—Line transmission systems
- H04B3/02—Details
- H04B3/32—Reducing cross-talk, e.g. by compensating
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S439/00—Electrical connectors
- Y10S439/941—Crosstalk suppression
Abstract
At least two contact pairs are arranged so as to compensate for near-end crosstalk. One or both contacts of each contact pair are angled away one or more times from a contact region, so as to pass through a compensation region before extending away in parallel. In the compensation region, a separation distance between a contact of one contact pair and the contacts of the other contact pairs is such that crosstalk is produced which is in antiphase with that in the contact region.
Description
ARRANGEMENT OF CONTACT PAIRS FOR
COMPENSATION OF NEAR-END CROSSTALK
The invention relates to an arrangement of contact pairs for compensation of near-end crosstalk.
On account of magnetic and electrical coupling between two contact pairs, one contact pair induces a current in neighbouring contact pairs,or influences electrical charges, thereby producing crosstalk. In order to avoidnear-end crosstalk, the contact pairs can be arranged very far away from one another or a shield can be arranged between the contact pairs. However, if it is necessary to arrange the contact pairs structurally very close together, the measures described above cannot be implemented and the near-end crosstalk must be compensated for.
A known method for reducing near-end crosstalk in plugs is compensation downstream of the plug contacts. This is done by deliberate additional coupling which, however, in contrast to the coupling in the contact region, constitutes a component in antiphase and consequently reduces the overall crosstalk. For this purpose, a pair of leads is deliberately transposed downstream of the plug contact, with the result that an additional coupling in antiphase is effected downstream of the crossover point. Alternatively, as disclosed in European Patent Publication EP 0525703, the compensation can be effected by additional discreet capacitors downstream of the plug contact.
The disadvantage of this compensation method is that the contact length and the distance between the centre of the contact and the compensation location impose a physical limit for high frequencies on the scope of the compensation, with the result that this type of compensation has only limited applicability for relatively high transmission rates.
The invention is therefore based on the technical problem of providing an arrangement of contact pairs in which compensation of near-end crosstalk is ensured even at relatively high transmission rates. A further technical problem of the invention is to provide an arrangement of contact pairswhich is also compatible with the plug connectors used hitherto.
The solving of the technical problem results from the angling away of one or both contacts of a contact pair once or more than once from a contact 5 region, such that the contacts then run parallel once more and the distance between the contacts of different contact pairs is such that crosstalk which is in antiphase with the crosstalk in the contact region is produced. This crosstalk is just mutually compensating in the ideal case; adequate crosstalk attenuation is then achieved even at high transmission frequencies. As a result, the 10 compensation is integrated directly into the contact, without the individual contacts crossing over physically, by which means the limit on the compensation action is shifted to higher frequencies. The physical configuration of the contacts in the compensation region depends sharply on the method in which the contacts of the individual contact pairs are designed in relation to one 15 another in the contact region, for example, beside one another or nested.
However, what is common is that, given a displacement of the contact pairs in relation to one another, there is always a position in which complete decoupling, and beyond the decoupled position, crosstalk in antiphase occurs. As a result of the bending away of the contacts, the contacts are brought precisely into this 20 position.
The invention is an arrangement of at least two contact pairs, wherein one or both contacts in each contact pair are angled away one or more times from a contact region so as to pass through a compensation region before extending away in parallel, a separation distance in the compensation region 25 between a contact of one contact pair and the contacts of the other contact pairs being such that crosstalk is produced which is in antiphase with that in the contact region.
The contacts of a contact pair may be arranged symmetrically beside one another in the contact region, and the separation distance in the 30 compensation region between contacts of different contact pairs may be smaller than the separation distance between the contacts of a contact pair. The contacts of a contact pair may be arranged so as to be nested in one another symmetrically in the contact region, and planes each of which extends between the contacts of a respective contact pair may have an inclusive angle of less than 90~.
The contacts of each pair may extend in opposite directions from the contact region, and then angle away in the same direction. In the contact region, the contacts of each contact pair may be equidirectional and parallel, or may be parallel and extend in mutually opposite directions.
The contacts in the foregoing embodiments may be at least partially flat. Following an equidirectional extension, the contacts may each angle away toward the associated contact of the respective contact pair, with the result that a reduced distance between the contacts produces crosstalk which is in phase with the contact region. In order to limit the compensation region, the contacts may extend in a decoupled position with respect to one another, or a shield may be arranged between the contact pairs.
The arrangement may be for the socket of a plug connection having four contact pairs, two contact pairs being first and second inner contact pairs and two other contact pairs being first and second outer contact pairs, the first inner contact pair being nested within the second inner contact pair, wherein the associated contacts of each inner contact pair are arranged to be parallel and extend in mutually opposite directions in the contact region, and following the contact region, to extend in loops relative to one another. The contacts of the first one of the outer contact pairs may be arranged to be continuously parallel to one another, one contact of the first outer contact pair extending in the contact region parallel and in the opposite direction to an adjacent contact of the inner contact pairs. The contacts of the second one of the outer contact pairs may be arranged so as to be continuously parallel to oneanother, one contact of the second outer contact pair extending in the contact region parallel and in the opposite direction to an adjacent contact of the inner contact pairs. The two outer contact pairs may be arranged, in a connection region, on a magnetic field line of the inner contact pairs.
In the foregoing arrangements of contact pairs of a plug for a socket, the contacts may extend in parallel over the contact region, and the contacts of one contact pair may then angle away twice in such a way that the contact pairs are located so as to be virtually decoupled from each other. The decoupling from one another may be by means of a sheet metal shield arranged between the contact pairs. The contacts of the first outer contact pair may extend continuously parallel to one another, one contact of the first outer contact pair being arranged to extend, in the contact region, parallel and in the opposite direction to an adjacent contact of the inner contact pairs. The contacts of thesecond outer contact pair may extend parallel and in the opposite direction to one another in the contact region, and then extend in the form of a compensation loop, an outer contact of the second outer contact pair extending equidirectional to the most proximate contact of the inner contact pairs in the contact region and extending parallel to the most proximate contact of the innercontact pairs in the compensation loop. A sheet metal shield may be arranged in a connection region, the second inner contact pair being arranged on one side of the shield and the remaining contact pairs being arranged on the other side of the shield, each of the remaining contact pairs being arranged on an equipotential surface of the other remaining contact pairs.
If the contacts of a contact pair are arranged parallel and beside one another in the contact region, then the antiphase cross-torque is produced precisely when the distance between the contacts of different contact pairs is smaller than the distance between the contacts of one contact pair, whereas in the case of symmetrically-nested contact pairs this occurs when the planes covered by the contacts of one contact pair have an inclusive angle ~ of less than 90~ (the decoupled position is just at 90~).
At least partially flattening the contacts increases the capacitance between the contacts, thereby increasing the compensation, since this has the same effect as enlarging the area of a capacitor plate. In a further preferred embodiment, a respective contact of a contact pair, following the equidirectional extension, is rotated or angled away again toward its associated contact until -the smaller distance again produces crosstalk which is in phase with the crosstalk in the contact region. In the case of this embodiment, the crosstalk in antiphase is then selected precisely such that it is equal to the sum of the crosstalk in the contact region and the additional crosstalk, the in-phase 5 crosstalk additionally produced preferably being selected to have exactly the same magnitude as the crosstalk in the contact region. In order to limit the compensation region in the direction of a connecting cable with which contact is to be made, it is possible either to extend the contacts in a decoupled position or arrange a shield between the contact pairs.
The invention is explained below using a preferred exemplary embodiment. In the figures:
Figure 1 is a perspective illustration of two contact pairs with compensation in antiphase;
Figure 2 is a further arrangement of two contact pairs with compensation in antiphase in a perspective illustration;
Figure 3 is a still further arrangement of two contact pairs with compensation in antiphase in a perspective illustration;
Figure 4 is a yet further arrangement of two contact pairs with compensation in antiphase in a perspective illustration;
Figure 5 is a perspective illustration of two contact pairs with compensation in antiphase and in-phase compensation;
Figure 6 illustrates the pin allocation of a RJ-45 plug connector (prior art);
Figure 7a shows two nested contact pairs with crosstalk;
Figure 7b shows an arrangement for compensating the crosstalk in the arrangement of Figure 7a;
Figure 8 is a schematic illustration of the coupling relationships of an arrangement having four contact pairs with partial nesting;
Figure 9 shows an arrangement of two nested contact pairs in a socket for high transmission frequencies, with simultaneous compatibility with plugs according to the prior art;
Figure 10 shows an arrangement of the two nested contact pairs in a plug for high transmission frequencies;
Figure 11 shows an arrangement of a contact of a contact pair, with contacts Iying together in relation to an adjacent contact of a contact pair with nested contacts;
Figure 12 shows an arrangement of three contact pairs in a socket for high transmission frequencies, two contact pairs being nested within one another;
Figure 13 shows an arrangement of three contact pairs in a plug for high transmission frequencies, two contact pairs being nested within one another;
Figure 14 shows an arrangement of a contact of a contact pair, with contacts Iying together in relation to an adjacent contact of a contact pair having nested contacts;
Figure 15 shows a contact arrangement of four contact pairs in a socket for high transmission frequencies and with complete compatibility with known RJ-45 plugs;
Figure 16 shows a contact arrangement of four contact pairs in a plug for a socket according to Figure 15;
Figure 17 shows an arrangement of the four contact pairs in the connection region of the socket according to Figure 15; and, Figure 18 shows an arrangement of three contact pairs, arranged underneath a sheet metal shield, in the connection of a plug according to Figure16.
Figure 1 shows a perspective illustration of an arrangement of two contact pairs, 1, 2 and 3, 4, which are each designed with a contact region 5 for making contact with a mating element. If the contact pairs 1, 2 and 3, 4 are arranged in a plug, then the mating element would be a socket, for example.
In this case, the two respective contacts 1, 2 and 3, 4 belonging to a contact pair 1, 2; 3, 4 are first of all extended in opposite directions following on from the contact region 5 and are then turned in the same direction again. As a result, the distance between the contacts 1, 3 and 2, 4 is smaller than the distance between the contacts 1 and 2, and 3 and 4, as a result of which the crosstalk in this region has an opposite polarity to the crosstalk in the contact region 5, where the contact pair 1, 2 induces current in the contact pair 3, 4 or influences charges. Consequently, as a result of the crosstalk in antiphase, thenear-end crosstalk in the contact region 5 is deliberately compensated for aloneor together with possible crosstalk in the mating element. This compensation can be enhanced by a flattened design of the contacts 1, 2, 3, 4, since the capacitance between the respective contacts 1, 3 and 2, 4 is proportionally 10 increased by the enlargement of the areas respectively opposite one another in the case of the contacts 1, 3 and 2, 4. In order to achieve complete compensation, the degree of crosstalk in antiphase must correspond exactly to the near-end crosstalk in the contact region 5. For this reason, it is possible for the compensation region in the direction of a possible connecting cable to be 15 limited by means of a shield between the contact pairs 1, 2; 3, 4. Alternatively, the contacts 1, 2, 3, 4 can be extended in a decoupled position.
Figure 2 illustrates an alternative arrangement having two contact pairs 1, 2; 3, 4, in which the contacts 1, 3 are firstly angled away from the contact region 5 by 90~ to their associated contacts 2, 4 and, following this, 20 angled away once more through 90~, specifically such that the contacts 1, 3 are arranged always parallel to one another, and all the contacts 1, 2, 3, 4 are arranged parallel to one another in the compensation region. In the compensation region, the distance between the contacts 1 and 3, and 2 and 4 is then smaller than between the contacts 1, 2 and 3, 4 of an associated contact25 pair 1, 2; 3, 4. In order to terminate the compensation region, the contacts 1, 3 are then angled away once more twice, so that the contacts 1, 2, 3, 4 are subsequently mutually arranged to correspond to the contact region 5 or are extended as explained above, for example in a decoupled position.
Illustrated in Figure 3 is a further alternative embodiment, in which 30 the contacts 1, 3 are led back once more in loops. Illustrated in Figure 4 is an embodiment which represents a combination of the embodiments according to Figures 1 and 3.
Illustrated in Figure 5 is an arrangement of contact pairs 1, 2; 3, 4 in which compensation both in antiphase and in phase of the crosstalk in the contact region 5 is effected. The antiphase compensation is in this case achieved by means of an appropriate contact design according to Figure 1, the contacts 1, 2, 3, 4 being of angled-away design in this exemplary embodiment.
Following this first compensation region 6 the contacts 2, 4 are then angled away once more and extended toward their associated contacts 1, 3. Following 10 this, the contacts 2, 4 are angled away once more, so that all the contacts 1, 2, 3, 4 run parallel to one another. This results in the contact pairs 1, 2; 3, 4 in each case inducing currents or influencing charges in the other contact pair 3, 4; 1, 2. This crosstalk produced is once more in phase with the crosstalk in thecontact region 5. The region where the contacts 1, 2, 3, 4 are led in parallel 15 thus defines a second compensation region 7, which in turn partially cancels the effect of the compensation region 6. The basic idea in this case is firstly initially to overcompensate the crosstalk present and then to compensate for the overcompensation, which leads to more intensive attenuation of crosstalk, with the result that the arrangement can be operated at still higher frequencies. The20 crosstalk in the compensation region 7 is preferably selected to be exactly as large as the crosstalk in the contact region 5. In order to limit the compensation region 7, the contact pair 3, 4 is designed to be angled away once more twice, with the result that the two contact pairs 1, 2 and 3, 4 are led in parallel in a decoupled position to corresponding connecting cables.
The preceding embodiments according to Figures 1 to 5 are in principle suitable for multiple plug connections. However, in order to achieve compatibility with already existing plug connections, in particular with respect to the mechanical dimensions and the pin allocation, additional measures are necessary. To this end, the pin allocation for a RJ-45 plug are illustrated, for30 example, in Figure 6. The RJ-45 plug is the most widespread plug connector for symmetrical data cables, in which in Category 5, with an appropriate socket, crosstalk attenuation of > 40 dB between all four conductor pairs can be achieved at 100 MHz transmission frequency. As can be seen from Figure 6, the associated contacts of a contact pair are not always located directly besideone another, but rather the two central contact pairs 13, 16 and 14, 15 are 5 nested, which results in particularly severe crosstalk.
The nested arrangement of contact pairs 13, 16; 14, 15 with an excitation voltage UG on the outer contact pair 13, 16 and an influenced crosstalk voltage Us on the inner contact pair 14, 15 is illustrated in Figure 7a.
Because of the low distances between the contacts 13 and 14, and 15 and 16, 10 the crosstalk voltage has the same sign as the excitation voltage Us. In accordance with the considerations above, it is possible to find a position for the contacts 14 and 16 in which complete decoupling is achieved between the contact pairs 13, 16; 14, 15, namely when the two planes covered by the contact pairs 13, 16; 14, 15 are at right angles to one another. If the contacts15 14, 16 are displaced further, then the crosstalk voltage Us changes its sign, which can be utilized for the previously described compensation, and is illustrated in Figure 7b. However, in the case of a RJ-45 plug connector, there is a mixed relationship, that is to say the contacts of a contact pair partly lie beside one another and are partly nested in one another. It is therefore 20 necessary to provide a contact arrangement in which all four contact pairs are decoupled from one another at the same time. In the case of four contact pairs there are six couplings between the contact pairs, the intensity of these couplings being shown by the thickness of the line in Figure 8.
In the following text, the design of a plug connection compatible 25 with known RJ-45 plug connections will be gradually explained. As a first step, the crosstalk is reduced as far as possible in general by means of structural changes, in that the contacts in the socket run in parallel only in the contact region towards the plug and in the region of necessary guides. Furthermore, the large contact surfaces in the plug are replaced by small contacts. As a 30 result of the partially nested arrangement of the contact pairs, however, it is not possible for a desired crosstalk attenuation of 50 dB at 300 MHz to be achieved for all combinations, with the result that the previously described compensationmeasures have to be applied. In addition to the identical pin allocation and thesame geometrical dimensions, compatibility is also to be understood as upward compatibility of the socket according to the invention with a RJ-45 plug according to the prior art, that is to say the socket, in combination with the known plug, must satisfy Category 5 (crosstalk attenuation > 40 dB at 100 MHz transmission frequency). For this reason appropriately large compensation between the contact pairs 13, 16; 14, 15 in the socket is necessary, in order that the high crosstalk values of the plug can be compensated for in accordance 10 with the prior art. This compensation is greater than would be necessary for a RF plug according to the invention. By contrast, however, the compensation should be as small as possible in order to achieve the highest possible transmission frequencies given the combination of RF plug and RF socket.
These mutually opposing requirements require a compromise, in that the 15 compensation is selected to be smaller than would be necessary for the crosstalk of the Category 5 plug. This is also possible since only 40 dB at 100 MHz transmission frequency are necessary for Category 5, and exact compensation is not necessary.
One possible arrangement of the contact pairs 13, 16; 14, 15 for 20 the socket is illustrated in Figure 9, which is essentially based on the principle according to Figure 3. Following the compensation region, the respectively associated contacts 13, 16 and 14, 15 are led together. The very large distance still produces only very low crosstalk and can be included at the same time in the compensation when designing the socket. The arrangement comprises 25 compensation loops which are alternately rotated to the right and to the left.
Each individual contact 13-16 is, as before, a two-dimensional arrangement.
Since the compensation is virtually integrated into the contact region, the compensation is physically very close to the location of the crosstalk and results in a high limiting frequency.
In the contact region of the RF plug associated with the socket, the contacts 13-16 are located in parallel, as in the socket, and there amplify the crosstalk which has already been generated in the contact region of the socket.
Plug and socket are then matched to one another and produce a maximum of crosstalk attenuation if the crosstalk of plug and socket is equal in terms of magnitude to the compensation which is generated in the socket by the 5 compensation loops. Because of the relatively high required compensation in the socket, the crosstalk in the RF plug must be artificially increased. To thisend, the contacts 13-16, as illustrated in Figure 10, are extended in parallel. In order to limit the crosstalk in the plug precisely, following the compensation region a shield is provided between the two contact pairs 13, 16; 14, 15, which 10 are arranged very close alongside one another, said shield reaching as far as the region of the cable connection.
As the next step, consideration must be given to how the contact pair 11, 12 is to be arranged in the socket and plug. What is particularly critical is the crosstalk between the closely adjacent contracts 12 and 13. Deliberate compensation between the contact pairs 11, 12 and 13, 16 by means of a further suitable compensation loop of the two contacts 11, 12 is not possible, since this compensation loop would also result in undesired coupling with the compensation loop of the contacts 14,15. For this reason, the two contacts 12 and 13, as can be seen in Figure 11, are designed to be parallel but in mutually20 opposite directions in the contact region, that is to say the signal currents flow in opposite directions from the contact region, by which means magnetic coupling is largely suppressed. The remaining electrical coupling is low, such that crosstalk attenuations > 50 dB at 300 MHz can be achieved. Since no compensation loop is needed, the contact 11 is led parallel to the contact 12, 25 so that the provisional contact arrangement for the socket according to Figure 12 results. Following the contact region, the contact pair 11, 12 is extended ina decoupled position with respect to the contact pairs 13, 16; 14, 15. This achieves good decoupling with respect to the contact pair 13, 16. The shape of the contact 12 with respect to contact 14 is unfavourable, since these are 30 once more arranged in the same direction as one another, the crosstalk attenuation still being suffficient good, however, on account of the distance having been doubled.
The arrangement of the contact pair 11, 12 in the plug is illustrated in Figure 13. In order to keep the crosstalk on the adjacent contacts 13-16 as 5 low as possible, the two contacts 11, 12 are led downward in the opposite direction to the former.
For the arrangement of the contact pair 17, 18 it is in particular the crosstalk between the contacts 17 and 16 that is critical. Corresponding on the embodiments relating to the contact pair 11, 12, a compensation loop in the 10 socket also fails here, since this would result in undesired crosstalk in thecontact pair 14, 15. Therefore, according to Figure 14, compensation is initially omitted and, in order to avoid the magnetic induction, contact 17 is designed tobe in the opposite direction and parallel to contact 16 in the contact region.
Since compensation has been omitted, the contact 18 runs parallel 15 with contact 17, so that the contact arrangement illustrated in Figure 15 results for the socket. Following the contact region, the contact pair 17, 18 is extended in a position decoupled from the other contact pairs. Since the compensation loops of the contact pairs 13, 16 and 14, 15 produce lateral fields, the two contacts 17, 18 are electrically and magnetically influenced in this region. If the 20 contacts are not identical, this has the same effect as small compensation loops and produces corresponding crosstalk.
The complete contact pair arrangement for the plug is illustrated in Figure 16. In this case, the contact 17 is once more designed in the oppositedirection to contact 16, in order to achieve good decoupling. Since 25 measurements have shown that adequate crosstalk attenuation between the contact pairs 17, 18 and 13, 16 is not achieved in the socket, appropriate compensation in the plug is necessary. For this reason, contact 18 runs in the same direction as contact 16 and a little parallel.
In order that the results achieved with respect to the decoupling 30 and compensation of the contacts are maintained, the extension of the contacts toward the connection region must be extended in an appropriately decoupled manner. To this end, there is also, on the one hand, the possibility of using sheet metal shields or, on the other hand, guiding the contacts in a decoupled position. Because of the different contact arrangement between socket and plug, there are also different pre-conditions for searching for a decoupled 5 position.
One possible arrangement of the contacts 11-18 in the connection region of the socket is illustrated in Figure 17. Because of the large distance between the contact pairs 13, 16 and 14, 15, their crosstalk is low and negligible given a suitable design of the compensation. The two outer contact pairs 11, 12 and 17, 18 are arranged on a magnetic field line of the inner contact pairs 13, 16 and 14, 15, which result in complete decoupling. According to a specific calculation, for a contact spacing a, b=2.915a and c=2.78a result for the required decoupling.
In the case of the plug, a sheet metal shield is arranged toward the 15 connection region, the contact pair 13, 16 being arranged above and the remaining three other contact pairs below the sheet metal shield. In order to ensure decoupling between the contact pairs underneath the sheet metal shield, the contacts of one contact pair are arranged offset with respect to one another, with the result that the contact pairs are located on equivalent equipotential lines 20 of the other contact pairs, which is illustrated in Figure 18.
COMPENSATION OF NEAR-END CROSSTALK
The invention relates to an arrangement of contact pairs for compensation of near-end crosstalk.
On account of magnetic and electrical coupling between two contact pairs, one contact pair induces a current in neighbouring contact pairs,or influences electrical charges, thereby producing crosstalk. In order to avoidnear-end crosstalk, the contact pairs can be arranged very far away from one another or a shield can be arranged between the contact pairs. However, if it is necessary to arrange the contact pairs structurally very close together, the measures described above cannot be implemented and the near-end crosstalk must be compensated for.
A known method for reducing near-end crosstalk in plugs is compensation downstream of the plug contacts. This is done by deliberate additional coupling which, however, in contrast to the coupling in the contact region, constitutes a component in antiphase and consequently reduces the overall crosstalk. For this purpose, a pair of leads is deliberately transposed downstream of the plug contact, with the result that an additional coupling in antiphase is effected downstream of the crossover point. Alternatively, as disclosed in European Patent Publication EP 0525703, the compensation can be effected by additional discreet capacitors downstream of the plug contact.
The disadvantage of this compensation method is that the contact length and the distance between the centre of the contact and the compensation location impose a physical limit for high frequencies on the scope of the compensation, with the result that this type of compensation has only limited applicability for relatively high transmission rates.
The invention is therefore based on the technical problem of providing an arrangement of contact pairs in which compensation of near-end crosstalk is ensured even at relatively high transmission rates. A further technical problem of the invention is to provide an arrangement of contact pairswhich is also compatible with the plug connectors used hitherto.
The solving of the technical problem results from the angling away of one or both contacts of a contact pair once or more than once from a contact 5 region, such that the contacts then run parallel once more and the distance between the contacts of different contact pairs is such that crosstalk which is in antiphase with the crosstalk in the contact region is produced. This crosstalk is just mutually compensating in the ideal case; adequate crosstalk attenuation is then achieved even at high transmission frequencies. As a result, the 10 compensation is integrated directly into the contact, without the individual contacts crossing over physically, by which means the limit on the compensation action is shifted to higher frequencies. The physical configuration of the contacts in the compensation region depends sharply on the method in which the contacts of the individual contact pairs are designed in relation to one 15 another in the contact region, for example, beside one another or nested.
However, what is common is that, given a displacement of the contact pairs in relation to one another, there is always a position in which complete decoupling, and beyond the decoupled position, crosstalk in antiphase occurs. As a result of the bending away of the contacts, the contacts are brought precisely into this 20 position.
The invention is an arrangement of at least two contact pairs, wherein one or both contacts in each contact pair are angled away one or more times from a contact region so as to pass through a compensation region before extending away in parallel, a separation distance in the compensation region 25 between a contact of one contact pair and the contacts of the other contact pairs being such that crosstalk is produced which is in antiphase with that in the contact region.
The contacts of a contact pair may be arranged symmetrically beside one another in the contact region, and the separation distance in the 30 compensation region between contacts of different contact pairs may be smaller than the separation distance between the contacts of a contact pair. The contacts of a contact pair may be arranged so as to be nested in one another symmetrically in the contact region, and planes each of which extends between the contacts of a respective contact pair may have an inclusive angle of less than 90~.
The contacts of each pair may extend in opposite directions from the contact region, and then angle away in the same direction. In the contact region, the contacts of each contact pair may be equidirectional and parallel, or may be parallel and extend in mutually opposite directions.
The contacts in the foregoing embodiments may be at least partially flat. Following an equidirectional extension, the contacts may each angle away toward the associated contact of the respective contact pair, with the result that a reduced distance between the contacts produces crosstalk which is in phase with the contact region. In order to limit the compensation region, the contacts may extend in a decoupled position with respect to one another, or a shield may be arranged between the contact pairs.
The arrangement may be for the socket of a plug connection having four contact pairs, two contact pairs being first and second inner contact pairs and two other contact pairs being first and second outer contact pairs, the first inner contact pair being nested within the second inner contact pair, wherein the associated contacts of each inner contact pair are arranged to be parallel and extend in mutually opposite directions in the contact region, and following the contact region, to extend in loops relative to one another. The contacts of the first one of the outer contact pairs may be arranged to be continuously parallel to one another, one contact of the first outer contact pair extending in the contact region parallel and in the opposite direction to an adjacent contact of the inner contact pairs. The contacts of the second one of the outer contact pairs may be arranged so as to be continuously parallel to oneanother, one contact of the second outer contact pair extending in the contact region parallel and in the opposite direction to an adjacent contact of the inner contact pairs. The two outer contact pairs may be arranged, in a connection region, on a magnetic field line of the inner contact pairs.
In the foregoing arrangements of contact pairs of a plug for a socket, the contacts may extend in parallel over the contact region, and the contacts of one contact pair may then angle away twice in such a way that the contact pairs are located so as to be virtually decoupled from each other. The decoupling from one another may be by means of a sheet metal shield arranged between the contact pairs. The contacts of the first outer contact pair may extend continuously parallel to one another, one contact of the first outer contact pair being arranged to extend, in the contact region, parallel and in the opposite direction to an adjacent contact of the inner contact pairs. The contacts of thesecond outer contact pair may extend parallel and in the opposite direction to one another in the contact region, and then extend in the form of a compensation loop, an outer contact of the second outer contact pair extending equidirectional to the most proximate contact of the inner contact pairs in the contact region and extending parallel to the most proximate contact of the innercontact pairs in the compensation loop. A sheet metal shield may be arranged in a connection region, the second inner contact pair being arranged on one side of the shield and the remaining contact pairs being arranged on the other side of the shield, each of the remaining contact pairs being arranged on an equipotential surface of the other remaining contact pairs.
If the contacts of a contact pair are arranged parallel and beside one another in the contact region, then the antiphase cross-torque is produced precisely when the distance between the contacts of different contact pairs is smaller than the distance between the contacts of one contact pair, whereas in the case of symmetrically-nested contact pairs this occurs when the planes covered by the contacts of one contact pair have an inclusive angle ~ of less than 90~ (the decoupled position is just at 90~).
At least partially flattening the contacts increases the capacitance between the contacts, thereby increasing the compensation, since this has the same effect as enlarging the area of a capacitor plate. In a further preferred embodiment, a respective contact of a contact pair, following the equidirectional extension, is rotated or angled away again toward its associated contact until -the smaller distance again produces crosstalk which is in phase with the crosstalk in the contact region. In the case of this embodiment, the crosstalk in antiphase is then selected precisely such that it is equal to the sum of the crosstalk in the contact region and the additional crosstalk, the in-phase 5 crosstalk additionally produced preferably being selected to have exactly the same magnitude as the crosstalk in the contact region. In order to limit the compensation region in the direction of a connecting cable with which contact is to be made, it is possible either to extend the contacts in a decoupled position or arrange a shield between the contact pairs.
The invention is explained below using a preferred exemplary embodiment. In the figures:
Figure 1 is a perspective illustration of two contact pairs with compensation in antiphase;
Figure 2 is a further arrangement of two contact pairs with compensation in antiphase in a perspective illustration;
Figure 3 is a still further arrangement of two contact pairs with compensation in antiphase in a perspective illustration;
Figure 4 is a yet further arrangement of two contact pairs with compensation in antiphase in a perspective illustration;
Figure 5 is a perspective illustration of two contact pairs with compensation in antiphase and in-phase compensation;
Figure 6 illustrates the pin allocation of a RJ-45 plug connector (prior art);
Figure 7a shows two nested contact pairs with crosstalk;
Figure 7b shows an arrangement for compensating the crosstalk in the arrangement of Figure 7a;
Figure 8 is a schematic illustration of the coupling relationships of an arrangement having four contact pairs with partial nesting;
Figure 9 shows an arrangement of two nested contact pairs in a socket for high transmission frequencies, with simultaneous compatibility with plugs according to the prior art;
Figure 10 shows an arrangement of the two nested contact pairs in a plug for high transmission frequencies;
Figure 11 shows an arrangement of a contact of a contact pair, with contacts Iying together in relation to an adjacent contact of a contact pair with nested contacts;
Figure 12 shows an arrangement of three contact pairs in a socket for high transmission frequencies, two contact pairs being nested within one another;
Figure 13 shows an arrangement of three contact pairs in a plug for high transmission frequencies, two contact pairs being nested within one another;
Figure 14 shows an arrangement of a contact of a contact pair, with contacts Iying together in relation to an adjacent contact of a contact pair having nested contacts;
Figure 15 shows a contact arrangement of four contact pairs in a socket for high transmission frequencies and with complete compatibility with known RJ-45 plugs;
Figure 16 shows a contact arrangement of four contact pairs in a plug for a socket according to Figure 15;
Figure 17 shows an arrangement of the four contact pairs in the connection region of the socket according to Figure 15; and, Figure 18 shows an arrangement of three contact pairs, arranged underneath a sheet metal shield, in the connection of a plug according to Figure16.
Figure 1 shows a perspective illustration of an arrangement of two contact pairs, 1, 2 and 3, 4, which are each designed with a contact region 5 for making contact with a mating element. If the contact pairs 1, 2 and 3, 4 are arranged in a plug, then the mating element would be a socket, for example.
In this case, the two respective contacts 1, 2 and 3, 4 belonging to a contact pair 1, 2; 3, 4 are first of all extended in opposite directions following on from the contact region 5 and are then turned in the same direction again. As a result, the distance between the contacts 1, 3 and 2, 4 is smaller than the distance between the contacts 1 and 2, and 3 and 4, as a result of which the crosstalk in this region has an opposite polarity to the crosstalk in the contact region 5, where the contact pair 1, 2 induces current in the contact pair 3, 4 or influences charges. Consequently, as a result of the crosstalk in antiphase, thenear-end crosstalk in the contact region 5 is deliberately compensated for aloneor together with possible crosstalk in the mating element. This compensation can be enhanced by a flattened design of the contacts 1, 2, 3, 4, since the capacitance between the respective contacts 1, 3 and 2, 4 is proportionally 10 increased by the enlargement of the areas respectively opposite one another in the case of the contacts 1, 3 and 2, 4. In order to achieve complete compensation, the degree of crosstalk in antiphase must correspond exactly to the near-end crosstalk in the contact region 5. For this reason, it is possible for the compensation region in the direction of a possible connecting cable to be 15 limited by means of a shield between the contact pairs 1, 2; 3, 4. Alternatively, the contacts 1, 2, 3, 4 can be extended in a decoupled position.
Figure 2 illustrates an alternative arrangement having two contact pairs 1, 2; 3, 4, in which the contacts 1, 3 are firstly angled away from the contact region 5 by 90~ to their associated contacts 2, 4 and, following this, 20 angled away once more through 90~, specifically such that the contacts 1, 3 are arranged always parallel to one another, and all the contacts 1, 2, 3, 4 are arranged parallel to one another in the compensation region. In the compensation region, the distance between the contacts 1 and 3, and 2 and 4 is then smaller than between the contacts 1, 2 and 3, 4 of an associated contact25 pair 1, 2; 3, 4. In order to terminate the compensation region, the contacts 1, 3 are then angled away once more twice, so that the contacts 1, 2, 3, 4 are subsequently mutually arranged to correspond to the contact region 5 or are extended as explained above, for example in a decoupled position.
Illustrated in Figure 3 is a further alternative embodiment, in which 30 the contacts 1, 3 are led back once more in loops. Illustrated in Figure 4 is an embodiment which represents a combination of the embodiments according to Figures 1 and 3.
Illustrated in Figure 5 is an arrangement of contact pairs 1, 2; 3, 4 in which compensation both in antiphase and in phase of the crosstalk in the contact region 5 is effected. The antiphase compensation is in this case achieved by means of an appropriate contact design according to Figure 1, the contacts 1, 2, 3, 4 being of angled-away design in this exemplary embodiment.
Following this first compensation region 6 the contacts 2, 4 are then angled away once more and extended toward their associated contacts 1, 3. Following 10 this, the contacts 2, 4 are angled away once more, so that all the contacts 1, 2, 3, 4 run parallel to one another. This results in the contact pairs 1, 2; 3, 4 in each case inducing currents or influencing charges in the other contact pair 3, 4; 1, 2. This crosstalk produced is once more in phase with the crosstalk in thecontact region 5. The region where the contacts 1, 2, 3, 4 are led in parallel 15 thus defines a second compensation region 7, which in turn partially cancels the effect of the compensation region 6. The basic idea in this case is firstly initially to overcompensate the crosstalk present and then to compensate for the overcompensation, which leads to more intensive attenuation of crosstalk, with the result that the arrangement can be operated at still higher frequencies. The20 crosstalk in the compensation region 7 is preferably selected to be exactly as large as the crosstalk in the contact region 5. In order to limit the compensation region 7, the contact pair 3, 4 is designed to be angled away once more twice, with the result that the two contact pairs 1, 2 and 3, 4 are led in parallel in a decoupled position to corresponding connecting cables.
The preceding embodiments according to Figures 1 to 5 are in principle suitable for multiple plug connections. However, in order to achieve compatibility with already existing plug connections, in particular with respect to the mechanical dimensions and the pin allocation, additional measures are necessary. To this end, the pin allocation for a RJ-45 plug are illustrated, for30 example, in Figure 6. The RJ-45 plug is the most widespread plug connector for symmetrical data cables, in which in Category 5, with an appropriate socket, crosstalk attenuation of > 40 dB between all four conductor pairs can be achieved at 100 MHz transmission frequency. As can be seen from Figure 6, the associated contacts of a contact pair are not always located directly besideone another, but rather the two central contact pairs 13, 16 and 14, 15 are 5 nested, which results in particularly severe crosstalk.
The nested arrangement of contact pairs 13, 16; 14, 15 with an excitation voltage UG on the outer contact pair 13, 16 and an influenced crosstalk voltage Us on the inner contact pair 14, 15 is illustrated in Figure 7a.
Because of the low distances between the contacts 13 and 14, and 15 and 16, 10 the crosstalk voltage has the same sign as the excitation voltage Us. In accordance with the considerations above, it is possible to find a position for the contacts 14 and 16 in which complete decoupling is achieved between the contact pairs 13, 16; 14, 15, namely when the two planes covered by the contact pairs 13, 16; 14, 15 are at right angles to one another. If the contacts15 14, 16 are displaced further, then the crosstalk voltage Us changes its sign, which can be utilized for the previously described compensation, and is illustrated in Figure 7b. However, in the case of a RJ-45 plug connector, there is a mixed relationship, that is to say the contacts of a contact pair partly lie beside one another and are partly nested in one another. It is therefore 20 necessary to provide a contact arrangement in which all four contact pairs are decoupled from one another at the same time. In the case of four contact pairs there are six couplings between the contact pairs, the intensity of these couplings being shown by the thickness of the line in Figure 8.
In the following text, the design of a plug connection compatible 25 with known RJ-45 plug connections will be gradually explained. As a first step, the crosstalk is reduced as far as possible in general by means of structural changes, in that the contacts in the socket run in parallel only in the contact region towards the plug and in the region of necessary guides. Furthermore, the large contact surfaces in the plug are replaced by small contacts. As a 30 result of the partially nested arrangement of the contact pairs, however, it is not possible for a desired crosstalk attenuation of 50 dB at 300 MHz to be achieved for all combinations, with the result that the previously described compensationmeasures have to be applied. In addition to the identical pin allocation and thesame geometrical dimensions, compatibility is also to be understood as upward compatibility of the socket according to the invention with a RJ-45 plug according to the prior art, that is to say the socket, in combination with the known plug, must satisfy Category 5 (crosstalk attenuation > 40 dB at 100 MHz transmission frequency). For this reason appropriately large compensation between the contact pairs 13, 16; 14, 15 in the socket is necessary, in order that the high crosstalk values of the plug can be compensated for in accordance 10 with the prior art. This compensation is greater than would be necessary for a RF plug according to the invention. By contrast, however, the compensation should be as small as possible in order to achieve the highest possible transmission frequencies given the combination of RF plug and RF socket.
These mutually opposing requirements require a compromise, in that the 15 compensation is selected to be smaller than would be necessary for the crosstalk of the Category 5 plug. This is also possible since only 40 dB at 100 MHz transmission frequency are necessary for Category 5, and exact compensation is not necessary.
One possible arrangement of the contact pairs 13, 16; 14, 15 for 20 the socket is illustrated in Figure 9, which is essentially based on the principle according to Figure 3. Following the compensation region, the respectively associated contacts 13, 16 and 14, 15 are led together. The very large distance still produces only very low crosstalk and can be included at the same time in the compensation when designing the socket. The arrangement comprises 25 compensation loops which are alternately rotated to the right and to the left.
Each individual contact 13-16 is, as before, a two-dimensional arrangement.
Since the compensation is virtually integrated into the contact region, the compensation is physically very close to the location of the crosstalk and results in a high limiting frequency.
In the contact region of the RF plug associated with the socket, the contacts 13-16 are located in parallel, as in the socket, and there amplify the crosstalk which has already been generated in the contact region of the socket.
Plug and socket are then matched to one another and produce a maximum of crosstalk attenuation if the crosstalk of plug and socket is equal in terms of magnitude to the compensation which is generated in the socket by the 5 compensation loops. Because of the relatively high required compensation in the socket, the crosstalk in the RF plug must be artificially increased. To thisend, the contacts 13-16, as illustrated in Figure 10, are extended in parallel. In order to limit the crosstalk in the plug precisely, following the compensation region a shield is provided between the two contact pairs 13, 16; 14, 15, which 10 are arranged very close alongside one another, said shield reaching as far as the region of the cable connection.
As the next step, consideration must be given to how the contact pair 11, 12 is to be arranged in the socket and plug. What is particularly critical is the crosstalk between the closely adjacent contracts 12 and 13. Deliberate compensation between the contact pairs 11, 12 and 13, 16 by means of a further suitable compensation loop of the two contacts 11, 12 is not possible, since this compensation loop would also result in undesired coupling with the compensation loop of the contacts 14,15. For this reason, the two contacts 12 and 13, as can be seen in Figure 11, are designed to be parallel but in mutually20 opposite directions in the contact region, that is to say the signal currents flow in opposite directions from the contact region, by which means magnetic coupling is largely suppressed. The remaining electrical coupling is low, such that crosstalk attenuations > 50 dB at 300 MHz can be achieved. Since no compensation loop is needed, the contact 11 is led parallel to the contact 12, 25 so that the provisional contact arrangement for the socket according to Figure 12 results. Following the contact region, the contact pair 11, 12 is extended ina decoupled position with respect to the contact pairs 13, 16; 14, 15. This achieves good decoupling with respect to the contact pair 13, 16. The shape of the contact 12 with respect to contact 14 is unfavourable, since these are 30 once more arranged in the same direction as one another, the crosstalk attenuation still being suffficient good, however, on account of the distance having been doubled.
The arrangement of the contact pair 11, 12 in the plug is illustrated in Figure 13. In order to keep the crosstalk on the adjacent contacts 13-16 as 5 low as possible, the two contacts 11, 12 are led downward in the opposite direction to the former.
For the arrangement of the contact pair 17, 18 it is in particular the crosstalk between the contacts 17 and 16 that is critical. Corresponding on the embodiments relating to the contact pair 11, 12, a compensation loop in the 10 socket also fails here, since this would result in undesired crosstalk in thecontact pair 14, 15. Therefore, according to Figure 14, compensation is initially omitted and, in order to avoid the magnetic induction, contact 17 is designed tobe in the opposite direction and parallel to contact 16 in the contact region.
Since compensation has been omitted, the contact 18 runs parallel 15 with contact 17, so that the contact arrangement illustrated in Figure 15 results for the socket. Following the contact region, the contact pair 17, 18 is extended in a position decoupled from the other contact pairs. Since the compensation loops of the contact pairs 13, 16 and 14, 15 produce lateral fields, the two contacts 17, 18 are electrically and magnetically influenced in this region. If the 20 contacts are not identical, this has the same effect as small compensation loops and produces corresponding crosstalk.
The complete contact pair arrangement for the plug is illustrated in Figure 16. In this case, the contact 17 is once more designed in the oppositedirection to contact 16, in order to achieve good decoupling. Since 25 measurements have shown that adequate crosstalk attenuation between the contact pairs 17, 18 and 13, 16 is not achieved in the socket, appropriate compensation in the plug is necessary. For this reason, contact 18 runs in the same direction as contact 16 and a little parallel.
In order that the results achieved with respect to the decoupling 30 and compensation of the contacts are maintained, the extension of the contacts toward the connection region must be extended in an appropriately decoupled manner. To this end, there is also, on the one hand, the possibility of using sheet metal shields or, on the other hand, guiding the contacts in a decoupled position. Because of the different contact arrangement between socket and plug, there are also different pre-conditions for searching for a decoupled 5 position.
One possible arrangement of the contacts 11-18 in the connection region of the socket is illustrated in Figure 17. Because of the large distance between the contact pairs 13, 16 and 14, 15, their crosstalk is low and negligible given a suitable design of the compensation. The two outer contact pairs 11, 12 and 17, 18 are arranged on a magnetic field line of the inner contact pairs 13, 16 and 14, 15, which result in complete decoupling. According to a specific calculation, for a contact spacing a, b=2.915a and c=2.78a result for the required decoupling.
In the case of the plug, a sheet metal shield is arranged toward the 15 connection region, the contact pair 13, 16 being arranged above and the remaining three other contact pairs below the sheet metal shield. In order to ensure decoupling between the contact pairs underneath the sheet metal shield, the contacts of one contact pair are arranged offset with respect to one another, with the result that the contact pairs are located on equivalent equipotential lines 20 of the other contact pairs, which is illustrated in Figure 18.
Claims (19)
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. An arrangement of at least two contact pairs, wherein one or both contacts in each contact pair are angled away one or more times from a contact region so as to pass through a compensation region before extending away in parallel, a separation distance in the compensation region between a contact of one contact pair and the contacts of the other contact pairs being such that crosstalk is produced which is in antiphase with that in the contact region.
2. An arrangement according to claim 1, wherein the contacts of a contact pair are arranged symmetrically beside one another in the contact region, and wherein the separation distance in the compensation region between contacts of different contact pairs is smaller than the separation distance between the contacts of a contact pair.
3. An arrangement according to claim 1, wherein the contacts of a contact pair are arranged so as to be nested in one another symmetrically in the contact region, and wherein planes each of which extends between the contacts of a respective contact pair have an inclusive angle of less than 90°.
4. An arrangement according to one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the contacts of each contact pair extend in opposite directions from the contactregion, and then angle away in the same direction.
5. An arrangement according to one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the contacts of each contact pair are equidirectional and parallel in the contact region.
6. An arrangement according to one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the contacts of each contact pair are parallel and extend in mutually opposite directions in the contact region.
7. An arrangement according to one of claims 1 to 6, wherein the contacts are at least partially flat.
8. An arrangement according to one of claims 1 to 7, wherein the contacts, following an equidirectional extension, each angle away toward theassociated contact of the respective contact pair, with the result that a reduced distance between the contacts produces crosstalk which is in phase with the contact region.
9. An arrangement according to one of claims 1 to 8, wherein, in order to limit the compensation region, the contacts are extended in a decoupled position with respect to one another.
10. An arrangement according to one of claims 1 to 8, wherein, in order to limit the compensation region, a shield is arranged between the contact pairs.
11. An arrangement according to one of claims 1 to 10, wherein the arrangement is for the socket of a plug connection having four contact pairs, two contact pairs being first and second inner contact pairs and two other contact pairs being first and second outer contact pairs, the first inner contact pair being nested within the second inner contact pair, wherein the associated contacts of each inner contact pair are arranged to be parallel and extend in mutually opposite directions in the contact region, and following the contact region, to extend in loops relative to one another.
12. An arrangement according to claim 11, wherein the contacts of the first one of the outer contact pairs are arranged to be continuously parallel to one another, one contact of the first outer contact pair extending in the contact region parallel and in the opposite direction to an adjacent contactof the inner contact pairs.
13. An arrangement according to claim 12, wherein the contacts of the second one of the outer contact pairs are arranged so as to be continuously parallel to one another, one contact of the second outer contact pair extending in the contact region parallel and in the opposite direction to an adjacent contact of the inner contact pairs.
14. An arrangement according to claim 13, wherein the two outer contact pairs are arranged, in a connection region, on a magnetic field line of the inner contact pairs.
15. An arrangement of contact pairs of a plug for a socket according to one of claims 11 to 14, wherein the contacts extend in parallel over the contact region, and wherein the contacts of one contact pair are then angledaway twice in such a way that the contact pairs are located so as to be virtually decoupled from each other.
16. An arrangement of contact pairs of a plug for a socket according to one of claims 11 to 14, wherein the contacts extend in parallel over the contact region, and wherein the contacts of one contact pair are then angledaway twice and decoupled from one another by means of a sheet metal shield arranged between the contact pairs.
17. An arrangement according to claim 15 or 16, wherein the contacts of the first outer contact pair extend continuously parallel to one another, one contact of the first outer contact pair being arranged to extend, in the contact region, parallel and in the opposite direction to an adjacent contact of the inner contact pairs.
18. An arrangement according to claim 17, wherein the contacts of the second outer contact pair extend parallel and in the opposite direction to one another in the contact region, and then extend in the form of a compensation loop, an outer contact of the second outer contact pair extending equidirectional to the most proximate contact of the inner contact pairs in the contact region and extending parallel to the most proximate contact of the innercontact pairs in the compensation loop.
19. An arrangement according to claim 18, wherein a sheet metal shield is arranged in a connection region, the second inner contact pair being arranged on one side of the shield and the remaining contact pairs being arranged on the other side of the shield, each of the remaining contact pairs being arranged on an equipotential surface of the other remaining contact pairs.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| DE19708798.1 | 1997-03-05 | ||
| DE19708798A DE19708798A1 (en) | 1997-03-05 | 1997-03-05 | Arrangement of contact pairs to compensate for the near crosstalk |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2229967A1 true CA2229967A1 (en) | 1998-09-05 |
Family
ID=7822207
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002229967A Abandoned CA2229967A1 (en) | 1997-03-05 | 1998-02-18 | Arrangement of contact pairs for compensation of near-end crosstalk |
Country Status (22)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US6017247A (en) |
| EP (1) | EP0869587A3 (en) |
| JP (1) | JPH10255916A (en) |
| KR (1) | KR19980079916A (en) |
| AR (1) | AR011927A1 (en) |
| AU (1) | AU5388498A (en) |
| BG (1) | BG102269A (en) |
| BR (1) | BR9800825A (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2229967A1 (en) |
| CZ (1) | CZ62298A3 (en) |
| DE (1) | DE19708798A1 (en) |
| HR (1) | HRP980113A2 (en) |
| HU (1) | HUP9800453A2 (en) |
| ID (1) | ID20254A (en) |
| IL (1) | IL123269A0 (en) |
| NO (1) | NO980930L (en) |
| NZ (1) | NZ329742A (en) |
| PL (1) | PL325141A1 (en) |
| SG (1) | SG63812A1 (en) |
| SK (1) | SK28698A3 (en) |
| TR (1) | TR199800389A3 (en) |
| YU (1) | YU8998A (en) |
Families Citing this family (45)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE19803075C2 (en) * | 1998-01-28 | 1999-12-09 | Krone Ag | Carrier body for an electrical contact arrangement |
| DE19822630C1 (en) * | 1998-05-20 | 2000-09-07 | Krone Gmbh | Arrangement of contact pairs to compensate for the near crosstalk for an electrical connector |
| US6579127B2 (en) * | 1998-06-02 | 2003-06-17 | Stewart Connector Systems, Inc. | High frequency electrical connector assembly such as a multi-port multi-level connector assembly |
| CN1136633C (en) * | 1998-06-02 | 2004-01-28 | 斯图尔脱联接体系股份有限公司 | High frequency electrical connector assembly such as multi-port multi-level connector assembly |
| US6165023A (en) * | 1999-10-28 | 2000-12-26 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Capacitive crosstalk compensation arrangement for a communication connector |
| TW427572U (en) * | 1999-12-17 | 2001-03-21 | Hon Hai Prec Ind Co Ltd | Electrical connector |
| US6290524B1 (en) * | 2000-07-12 | 2001-09-18 | Molex Incorporated | System for varying capacitive coupling between electrical terminals |
| US6331126B1 (en) | 2000-09-07 | 2001-12-18 | Sentinel Holding, Inc. | High speed modular jack |
| US6433272B1 (en) | 2000-09-19 | 2002-08-13 | Storage Technology Corporation | Crosstalk reduction in constrained wiring assemblies |
| US20030190845A1 (en) * | 2001-10-10 | 2003-10-09 | Superior Modular Products Incorporated | Electrical connector having a contact array which provides inductive cross talk compensation |
| US6796847B2 (en) | 2002-10-21 | 2004-09-28 | Hubbell Incorporated | Electrical connector for telecommunications applications |
| CN100396165C (en) * | 2003-11-08 | 2008-06-18 | 鸿富锦精密工业（深圳）有限公司 | Differential wire assembling method for eliminating high speed board interferes |
| US7182649B2 (en) * | 2003-12-22 | 2007-02-27 | Panduit Corp. | Inductive and capacitive coupling balancing electrical connector |
| US7252554B2 (en) * | 2004-03-12 | 2007-08-07 | Panduit Corp. | Methods and apparatus for reducing crosstalk in electrical connectors |
| US7179131B2 (en) | 2004-02-12 | 2007-02-20 | Panduit Corp. | Methods and apparatus for reducing crosstalk in electrical connectors |
| US7153168B2 (en) * | 2004-04-06 | 2006-12-26 | Panduit Corp. | Electrical connector with improved crosstalk compensation |
| JP4777984B2 (en) * | 2004-07-13 | 2011-09-21 | パンドウィット・コーポレーション | Communication connector with flexible printed circuit board |
| US7326089B2 (en) * | 2004-12-07 | 2008-02-05 | Commscope, Inc. Of North Carolina | Communications jack with printed wiring board having self-coupling conductors |
| US7168993B2 (en) * | 2004-12-06 | 2007-01-30 | Commscope Solutions Properties Llc | Communications connector with floating wiring board for imparting crosstalk compensation between conductors |
| US7264516B2 (en) * | 2004-12-06 | 2007-09-04 | Commscope, Inc. | Communications jack with printed wiring board having paired coupling conductors |
| US7186149B2 (en) * | 2004-12-06 | 2007-03-06 | Commscope Solutions Properties, Llc | Communications connector for imparting enhanced crosstalk compensation between conductors |
| US7166000B2 (en) * | 2004-12-07 | 2007-01-23 | Commscope Solutions Properties, Llc | Communications connector with leadframe contact wires that compensate differential to common mode crosstalk |
| US7220149B2 (en) * | 2004-12-07 | 2007-05-22 | Commscope Solutions Properties, Llc | Communication plug with balanced wiring to reduce differential to common mode crosstalk |
| US7186148B2 (en) * | 2004-12-07 | 2007-03-06 | Commscope Solutions Properties, Llc | Communications connector for imparting crosstalk compensation between conductors |
| US7204722B2 (en) * | 2004-12-07 | 2007-04-17 | Commscope Solutions Properties, Llc | Communications jack with compensation for differential to differential and differential to common mode crosstalk |
| US7320624B2 (en) * | 2004-12-16 | 2008-01-22 | Commscope, Inc. Of North Carolina | Communications jacks with compensation for differential to differential and differential to common mode crosstalk |
| US7201618B2 (en) * | 2005-01-28 | 2007-04-10 | Commscope Solutions Properties, Llc | Controlled mode conversion connector for reduced alien crosstalk |
| US7314393B2 (en) | 2005-05-27 | 2008-01-01 | Commscope, Inc. Of North Carolina | Communications connectors with floating wiring board for imparting crosstalk compensation between conductors |
| US7255573B2 (en) * | 2005-12-30 | 2007-08-14 | Intel Corporation | Data signal interconnection with reduced crosstalk |
| EP1987569A1 (en) * | 2006-02-13 | 2008-11-05 | Panduit Corp. | Connector with crosstalk compensation |
| AU2007201113B2 (en) * | 2007-03-14 | 2011-09-08 | Tyco Electronics Services Gmbh | Electrical Connector |
| AU2007201106B9 (en) * | 2007-03-14 | 2011-06-02 | Tyco Electronics Services Gmbh | Electrical Connector |
| AU2007201107B2 (en) | 2007-03-14 | 2011-06-23 | Tyco Electronics Services Gmbh | Electrical Connector |
| AU2007201114B2 (en) * | 2007-03-14 | 2011-04-07 | Tyco Electronics Services Gmbh | Electrical Connector |
| AU2007201108B2 (en) * | 2007-03-14 | 2012-02-09 | Tyco Electronics Services Gmbh | Electrical Connector |
| AU2007201102B2 (en) * | 2007-03-14 | 2010-11-04 | Tyco Electronics Services Gmbh | Electrical Connector |
| AU2007201109B2 (en) * | 2007-03-14 | 2010-11-04 | Tyco Electronics Services Gmbh | Electrical Connector |
| AU2007201105B2 (en) | 2007-03-14 | 2011-08-04 | Tyco Electronics Services Gmbh | Electrical Connector |
| US7874878B2 (en) | 2007-03-20 | 2011-01-25 | Panduit Corp. | Plug/jack system having PCB with lattice network |
| CA2733598A1 (en) * | 2008-08-13 | 2010-02-18 | Panduit Corp. | Communications connector with multi-stage compensation |
| CA2734133C (en) * | 2008-08-20 | 2016-01-05 | Panduit Corp. | High-speed connector with multi-stage compensation |
| US7850492B1 (en) * | 2009-11-03 | 2010-12-14 | Panduit Corp. | Communication connector with improved crosstalk compensation |
| DE102010014294A1 (en) * | 2010-04-08 | 2011-10-13 | Phoenix Contact Gmbh & Co. Kg | Contact field for connectors |
| US8961239B2 (en) | 2012-09-07 | 2015-02-24 | Commscope, Inc. Of North Carolina | Communication jack having a plurality of contacts mounted on a flexible printed circuit board |
| EP3387715B1 (en) | 2015-12-08 | 2021-05-12 | Panduit Corp. | Rj45 shuttered jacks and related communication systems |
Family Cites Families (11)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP0525703B1 (en) * | 1991-08-01 | 1995-11-29 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Connector for local networks |
| US5299956B1 (en) * | 1992-03-23 | 1995-10-24 | Superior Modular Prod Inc | Low cross talk electrical connector system |
| GB2270422B (en) * | 1992-09-04 | 1996-04-17 | Pressac Ltd | Method and apparatus for cross talk cancellation |
| SG46385A1 (en) * | 1992-11-16 | 1998-02-20 | Krone Ag | Electrical plug connector |
| EP0601829B1 (en) * | 1992-12-07 | 2001-10-24 | Mod-Tap W Corporation | Electrical connectors |
| TW218060B (en) * | 1992-12-23 | 1993-12-21 | Panduit Corp | Communication connector with capacitor label |
| GB2282712B (en) * | 1993-08-31 | 1997-09-10 | At & T Corp | Electrical connectors for minimizing cross-talk |
| GB2271678B (en) * | 1993-12-03 | 1994-10-12 | Itt Ind Ltd | Electrical connector |
| US5639266A (en) * | 1994-01-11 | 1997-06-17 | Stewart Connector Systems, Inc. | High frequency electrical connector |
| EP0674364B1 (en) * | 1994-03-26 | 1999-11-24 | Molex Incorporated | Modular jack type connector |
| EP0692884B1 (en) * | 1994-07-14 | 2002-03-20 | Molex Incorporated | Modular connector with reduced crosstalk |
-
1997
- 1997-03-05 DE DE19708798A patent/DE19708798A1/en not_active Withdrawn
-
1998
- 1998-02-11 IL IL12326998A patent/IL123269A0/en unknown
- 1998-02-11 NZ NZ329742A patent/NZ329742A/en unknown
- 1998-02-12 SG SG1998000318A patent/SG63812A1/en unknown
- 1998-02-12 AU AU53884/98A patent/AU5388498A/en not_active Abandoned
- 1998-02-17 EP EP98102652A patent/EP0869587A3/en not_active Withdrawn
- 1998-02-18 CA CA002229967A patent/CA2229967A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 1998-02-24 BG BG102269A patent/BG102269A/en unknown
- 1998-03-02 CZ CZ98622A patent/CZ62298A3/en unknown
- 1998-03-03 HU HU9800453A patent/HUP9800453A2/en unknown
- 1998-03-04 SK SK286-98A patent/SK28698A3/en unknown
- 1998-03-04 NO NO980930A patent/NO980930L/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1998-03-04 AR ARP980100957A patent/AR011927A1/en unknown
- 1998-03-04 BR BR9800825-0A patent/BR9800825A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1998-03-04 US US09/034,973 patent/US6017247A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-03-04 ID IDP980318A patent/ID20254A/en unknown
- 1998-03-04 PL PL98325141A patent/PL325141A1/en unknown
- 1998-03-04 HR HR19708/798.1A patent/HRP980113A2/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1998-03-05 YU YU8998A patent/YU8998A/en unknown
- 1998-03-05 KR KR1019980007217A patent/KR19980079916A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1998-03-05 JP JP10053618A patent/JPH10255916A/en active Pending
- 1998-03-05 TR TR1998/00389A patent/TR199800389A3/en unknown
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| DE19708798A1 (en) | 1998-09-24 |
| ID20254A (en) | 1998-11-12 |
| NO980930L (en) | 1998-09-07 |
| BG102269A (en) | 1998-12-30 |
| HUP9800453A2 (en) | 1998-10-28 |
| AR011927A1 (en) | 2000-09-13 |
| EP0869587A3 (en) | 1999-04-14 |
| AU5388498A (en) | 1998-09-10 |
| TR199800389A2 (en) | 1998-09-21 |
| SK28698A3 (en) | 1999-10-08 |
| MX9801563A (en) | 1998-12-31 |
| EP0869587A2 (en) | 1998-10-07 |
| BR9800825A (en) | 1999-09-21 |
| JPH10255916A (en) | 1998-09-25 |
| KR19980079916A (en) | 1998-11-25 |
| US6017247A (en) | 2000-01-25 |
| HRP980113A2 (en) | 1998-12-31 |
| HU9800453D0 (en) | 1998-04-28 |
| NZ329742A (en) | 1999-07-29 |
| CZ62298A3 (en) | 1998-09-16 |
| TR199800389A3 (en) | 1998-09-21 |
| NO980930D0 (en) | 1998-03-04 |
| YU8998A (en) | 2001-07-10 |
| PL325141A1 (en) | 1998-09-14 |
| IL123269A0 (en) | 1998-09-24 |
| SG63812A1 (en) | 1999-03-30 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US6017247A (en) | Arrangement of contact pairs for compensation of near-end crosstalk | |
| AU746885B2 (en) | Contact pair arrangement for an electric plug-and-socket connection in order to compensate near-end crosstalk | |
| US7201618B2 (en) | Controlled mode conversion connector for reduced alien crosstalk | |
| US6443777B1 (en) | Inductive crosstalk compensation in a communication connector | |
| JP3177348B2 (en) | Circuit assembly with crosstalk reduction function in communication connector | |
| US5547405A (en) | Crosstalk suppressing connector | |
| US6520808B2 (en) | Anti-crosstalk connector | |
| EP0858684B1 (en) | Reduced cross talk electrical connector | |
| US9680259B2 (en) | Electrical jack with a plurality of parallel and overlapping capacitive plates | |
| EP0856919B1 (en) | Low crosstalk noise connector for telecommunication systems | |
| US8002571B2 (en) | Electrical connector with a plurality of capacitive plates | |
| US8313338B2 (en) | Electrical connector | |
| US8007311B2 (en) | Electrical connector | |
| US8075347B2 (en) | Electrical connector | |
| EP0880202B1 (en) | Low-crosstalk electrical connector grouping like conductors together | |
| US8133069B2 (en) | Electrical connector | |
| US7381097B2 (en) | Communications connectors with parasitic and/or inductive coupling elements for reducing crosstalk and related methods | |
| JPH11185886A (en) | Electric connector | |
| GB2380334A (en) | Communication connector having crosstalk compensating means | |
| US6816025B2 (en) | Cross talk compensation circuit | |
| MXPA98001563A (en) | Disposition of couples of contacts for the compensation of the diafonia to short distance | |
| SK162697A3 (en) | Contact-pairs assembly of double lines and of multi-conductor cable-lines for cross-talk reduction | |
| AU752830B2 (en) | Low-crosstalk electrical connector grouping like conductors together |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| FZDE | Discontinued | ||
| FZDE | Discontinued |
Effective date: 20010219 |