CA2253339C - Method and system for administrating of remotely-proctored secure examination - Google Patents
Method and system for administrating of remotely-proctored secure examination Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2253339C CA2253339C CA002253339A CA2253339A CA2253339C CA 2253339 C CA2253339 C CA 2253339C CA 002253339 A CA002253339 A CA 002253339A CA 2253339 A CA2253339 A CA 2253339A CA 2253339 C CA2253339 C CA 2253339C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- data
- test
- station
- testing
- central station
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
- G09B7/00—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07C—TIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
- G07C9/00—Individual registration on entry or exit
- G07C9/30—Individual registration on entry or exit not involving the use of a pass
- G07C9/32—Individual registration on entry or exit not involving the use of a pass in combination with an identity check
- G07C9/37—Individual registration on entry or exit not involving the use of a pass in combination with an identity check using biometric data, e.g. fingerprints, iris scans or voice recognition
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S706/00—Data processing: artificial intelligence
- Y10S706/902—Application using ai with detail of the ai system
- Y10S706/927—Education or instruction
Abstract
A system for controlling the administration of remotely-proctored secure examination at a remote test station, and a method for administrating examination.
The system includes a central station (1), a registration station (2) and a remote testing station (3). The central station (1) includes storage device (13) for storing data, which include test question data and verified biometric data, and a data processor (10), operably connected to the storage device (13), for comparing test taker biometric data with stored verified biometric data. The remote test station (3) includes a data processor (30), a data storage device (31), operably connected to the data processor (30), for storing input data, a biometric measurement device (34) for inputting test taker biometric data to the data processor (30), a display (32) for displaying test question data, an input (33) for inputting test response data to the data processor (30), a recorder (35) for recording proctoring data of a testing event, and a communication link for communicating with the central station (1).
The system includes a central station (1), a registration station (2) and a remote testing station (3). The central station (1) includes storage device (13) for storing data, which include test question data and verified biometric data, and a data processor (10), operably connected to the storage device (13), for comparing test taker biometric data with stored verified biometric data. The remote test station (3) includes a data processor (30), a data storage device (31), operably connected to the data processor (30), for storing input data, a biometric measurement device (34) for inputting test taker biometric data to the data processor (30), a display (32) for displaying test question data, an input (33) for inputting test response data to the data processor (30), a recorder (35) for recording proctoring data of a testing event, and a communication link for communicating with the central station (1).
Description
METHOD AND SYS'I'EM FOR ADMINISTRATING OF REMOTELY-PROCTORED SECURE
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a system for controlling the administration of remotely-proctored, secure examinations at a remote test station, and a method for using thesystem to administer remotely-proctored, secure examinations.
In administering secure, proctored examinations such as the SAT, GRE, GMAT, MCAT, LSAT, professional qualification examinations, and other such examinations, much time and effort is spent ensuring the integrity of the examination. First, the test taker must be properly registered. It is essential that only those persons who are qualified are registered to take the examination.
Second, it is important to ensure that only persons who are registered are allowed to take the examination. The integrity of any test is damaged, of course, if tests are taken by persons other than those who are properly registered. It is also important that the test be properly proctored to ensure that cheating does not take place. Lastly, the test question information must be secure from theft, unauthorized access and alteration.
All of the above security measures require significant expense and manpower.
Ensuring the integrity of an examination becomes even more burdensome when the examination is given at a number of remote sites. It has thus long been desired to automate the above security measures to allow the efficient, cost-effective and secure administration of tests at remote locations.
Attempts have been made to achieve some of these goals in related areas of technology. United States Patent No. 4,486,180, to Riley, discloses a system for the administration of driver's tests. This patent discloses an automated booth for taking driver's test, but the system is limited to driver's tests and is not sufficiently comprehensive and secure to administer a large number of different standardized tests at a large number of remote test sites.
United States Patent Nos. 5,195,033 and 5,204,813, both to Samph et al., disclose testing systems-in which a central computer is connected to a number of assessment centers for the administration of tests. However, the systems disclosed in these patents are insufficient to ensure the verification of test takers and the security of the test question data.
United States Patent No. 4,764,120, to Griffin et al., discloses a student response system which centrally processes student response data from a number of classrooms. However, the system disclosed cannot meet the strict validation, proctoring and security requirements of most standardized tests.
United States Patent No. 5,218,528, to Wise et al., discloses an automated voting system in which voters are registered and certified, but it does not provide a system with sufficient security for test question data.
The present inventors have developed the current state of the art computer network used to deliver computerized standardizedexaminations. Years of development time and millions of testing events have proven the existing system to be a sound and robust method of testing. The current system involves a software platform which delivers an exam on local networks which are supported world-wide by a centralized master network. The master network downloads the exams to the testing centers, and picks up the completed test files after the exam has been completed by the candidate.
This current network utilizes registration centers which employ registrars who answer phone requests from candidates and manually enter in personal demographic information, test selection, and payment information.
These registrars schedule the candidate into a specific testing center location on a specific day and time.
The test centers are comprised of local networks on which the exam is delivered to the candidate. System =administrators employed at the test centers check-in the scheduled candidate, and confirm the candidates identity by verifying official forms of identification. Once this is completed, the candidate is seated at a designated testing station, where the administrator will launch the examination process. The Administrators proctor the examination event to ensure that the candidate does not use any supplementary items to cheat on the exam, and are available to respond to any problems which occur.
Despite its advantages, the current state of the art nonetheless requires significant manpower to register persons for examinations, to ensure that only registered persons take the exams, to proctor examinations, and to secure the test question data.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The described embodiments relate to a system for controlling the administration of remotely proctored, secure examinations at a remote test station. In its most basic embodiment, the system comprises (1) a central station and (2) a remote testing station.
The central station includes (a) storage means for storing data, including test question data and verified biometric data, and (b) a data processor, operably connected to the storage means, for comparing test taker biometric data with stored, verified biometric data.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a system for controlling the administration of remotely-proctored, secure examinations at a remote test station, and a method for using thesystem to administer remotely-proctored, secure examinations.
In administering secure, proctored examinations such as the SAT, GRE, GMAT, MCAT, LSAT, professional qualification examinations, and other such examinations, much time and effort is spent ensuring the integrity of the examination. First, the test taker must be properly registered. It is essential that only those persons who are qualified are registered to take the examination.
Second, it is important to ensure that only persons who are registered are allowed to take the examination. The integrity of any test is damaged, of course, if tests are taken by persons other than those who are properly registered. It is also important that the test be properly proctored to ensure that cheating does not take place. Lastly, the test question information must be secure from theft, unauthorized access and alteration.
All of the above security measures require significant expense and manpower.
Ensuring the integrity of an examination becomes even more burdensome when the examination is given at a number of remote sites. It has thus long been desired to automate the above security measures to allow the efficient, cost-effective and secure administration of tests at remote locations.
Attempts have been made to achieve some of these goals in related areas of technology. United States Patent No. 4,486,180, to Riley, discloses a system for the administration of driver's tests. This patent discloses an automated booth for taking driver's test, but the system is limited to driver's tests and is not sufficiently comprehensive and secure to administer a large number of different standardized tests at a large number of remote test sites.
United States Patent Nos. 5,195,033 and 5,204,813, both to Samph et al., disclose testing systems-in which a central computer is connected to a number of assessment centers for the administration of tests. However, the systems disclosed in these patents are insufficient to ensure the verification of test takers and the security of the test question data.
United States Patent No. 4,764,120, to Griffin et al., discloses a student response system which centrally processes student response data from a number of classrooms. However, the system disclosed cannot meet the strict validation, proctoring and security requirements of most standardized tests.
United States Patent No. 5,218,528, to Wise et al., discloses an automated voting system in which voters are registered and certified, but it does not provide a system with sufficient security for test question data.
The present inventors have developed the current state of the art computer network used to deliver computerized standardizedexaminations. Years of development time and millions of testing events have proven the existing system to be a sound and robust method of testing. The current system involves a software platform which delivers an exam on local networks which are supported world-wide by a centralized master network. The master network downloads the exams to the testing centers, and picks up the completed test files after the exam has been completed by the candidate.
This current network utilizes registration centers which employ registrars who answer phone requests from candidates and manually enter in personal demographic information, test selection, and payment information.
These registrars schedule the candidate into a specific testing center location on a specific day and time.
The test centers are comprised of local networks on which the exam is delivered to the candidate. System =administrators employed at the test centers check-in the scheduled candidate, and confirm the candidates identity by verifying official forms of identification. Once this is completed, the candidate is seated at a designated testing station, where the administrator will launch the examination process. The Administrators proctor the examination event to ensure that the candidate does not use any supplementary items to cheat on the exam, and are available to respond to any problems which occur.
Despite its advantages, the current state of the art nonetheless requires significant manpower to register persons for examinations, to ensure that only registered persons take the exams, to proctor examinations, and to secure the test question data.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The described embodiments relate to a system for controlling the administration of remotely proctored, secure examinations at a remote test station. In its most basic embodiment, the system comprises (1) a central station and (2) a remote testing station.
The central station includes (a) storage means for storing data, including test question data and verified biometric data, and (b) a data processor, operably connected to the storage means, for comparing test taker biometric data with stored, verified biometric data.
The remote test station comprises (a) a data processor, (b) a data storage means, operably connected to the data processor, for storing input data, (c) a biometric measurement device for inputting test taker biometric data to the processor, (d) display means for displaying test question data (e) an input for inputting test response data to the processor, (f) a means for recording proctoring data of a testing event, and (g) communicating means for communicating with the central station, for receiving test question data from the central processor, and communicating test taker biometric data, test response data, and proctoring data to the central station.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment, the proctoring data is audio/visual data of the testing event. The proctoring data preferably includes an audio/visual record of (a) input of test taker biometric data and (b) input of test response data. The proctoring data preferably further includes a still picture of the test taker.
In yet another embodiment, the system also has a registration station in addition to the central station and the remote testing station. The registration station comprises (a) a data processor for processing and verifying registrant data, (b) storage means for storing data sufficient to verify registrant data, and operably connected to the processor, (c) a biometric measurement device for inputting registrant biometric data; and (d) communication means for communicating verified test registration data, including verified biometric data to the ceritral station.
The registration station and the testing station can either be remote or proximate to one another. In one embodiment, the registration station and testing station can be combined in one station.
In another aspect, the invention provides a method for controlling the administration of remotely proctored, secure examinations at a remote testing station. The method comprises the steps of (a) storing verified biometric data at a central station; (b) storing test question data at the central station; (c) inputting test taker biometric data at the remote testing station to begin a testing event; (d) communicating the test taker biometric data to the central station and comparing the test taker biometric data with the verified biometric data to thereby verify the test taker data; (e) making test question data from the central station available at the remote testing station; (f) storing test answer data input in response to the test question data; (g) recording and storing audio/video proctoring data of the testing event; (h) ending the testing event; and (i) validating the testing event by reviewing the proctoring data for invalidating events. In one embodiment, the method further includes the step of assigning a unique identifier to the testing event.
In an alternative embodiment, the proctoring data is evaluated and the testing event validated during the event itself. In that way, the test-taker can walk away from the event with a validated record of the test score.
In another preferred embodiment, the testing station is a kiosk, or self-contained unit inaccessible without input of test registration data. A second communication means for permitting a test taker to communicate with the central station can be provided inside the kiosk.
In one embodiment, the remote testing station can be a kiosk installed into a public access facility, allowing a candidate complete a particular exam without any outside assistance. In a further embodiment, the candidate may register and schedule the examination in the kiosk as well. Registration and scheduling may also be performed at a separate registration site.
Registration results in the storage of verified biometric data in a central site, in order to later ensure that only properly registered persons are allowed to take any given test.
The kiosk is preferably a free standing unit which is installed into an existing building and taps into the building's HVAC, phone, and electrical systems. Hardware included in the Kiosk allows a candidate to enter registration data, personal biometric data, and then to receive test question and complete a test in a private, secure testing station. To minimize any distractions to the candidate, each testing station preferably incorporates sound isolation features. In a preferred embodiment, access to each individual testing station is electronically controlled by the automated system.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment, the proctoring data is audio/visual data of the testing event. The proctoring data preferably includes an audio/visual record of (a) input of test taker biometric data and (b) input of test response data. The proctoring data preferably further includes a still picture of the test taker.
In yet another embodiment, the system also has a registration station in addition to the central station and the remote testing station. The registration station comprises (a) a data processor for processing and verifying registrant data, (b) storage means for storing data sufficient to verify registrant data, and operably connected to the processor, (c) a biometric measurement device for inputting registrant biometric data; and (d) communication means for communicating verified test registration data, including verified biometric data to the ceritral station.
The registration station and the testing station can either be remote or proximate to one another. In one embodiment, the registration station and testing station can be combined in one station.
In another aspect, the invention provides a method for controlling the administration of remotely proctored, secure examinations at a remote testing station. The method comprises the steps of (a) storing verified biometric data at a central station; (b) storing test question data at the central station; (c) inputting test taker biometric data at the remote testing station to begin a testing event; (d) communicating the test taker biometric data to the central station and comparing the test taker biometric data with the verified biometric data to thereby verify the test taker data; (e) making test question data from the central station available at the remote testing station; (f) storing test answer data input in response to the test question data; (g) recording and storing audio/video proctoring data of the testing event; (h) ending the testing event; and (i) validating the testing event by reviewing the proctoring data for invalidating events. In one embodiment, the method further includes the step of assigning a unique identifier to the testing event.
In an alternative embodiment, the proctoring data is evaluated and the testing event validated during the event itself. In that way, the test-taker can walk away from the event with a validated record of the test score.
In another preferred embodiment, the testing station is a kiosk, or self-contained unit inaccessible without input of test registration data. A second communication means for permitting a test taker to communicate with the central station can be provided inside the kiosk.
In one embodiment, the remote testing station can be a kiosk installed into a public access facility, allowing a candidate complete a particular exam without any outside assistance. In a further embodiment, the candidate may register and schedule the examination in the kiosk as well. Registration and scheduling may also be performed at a separate registration site.
Registration results in the storage of verified biometric data in a central site, in order to later ensure that only properly registered persons are allowed to take any given test.
The kiosk is preferably a free standing unit which is installed into an existing building and taps into the building's HVAC, phone, and electrical systems. Hardware included in the Kiosk allows a candidate to enter registration data, personal biometric data, and then to receive test question and complete a test in a private, secure testing station. To minimize any distractions to the candidate, each testing station preferably incorporates sound isolation features. In a preferred embodiment, access to each individual testing station is electronically controlled by the automated system.
Each kiosk is remotely supported by a singular central station. The network utilizes state of the art telecommunication methods to remotely update and maintain the local testing networks. Technical support for the remote registration and testing stations is provided by the central station. The central station may be used to respond to any candidate problems while completing an exam. Eligibility based testing, in which only preselected candidates have the right to take a specific exam, can also be controlled from the central station.
In one embodiment, the remote testing station of the system also features a variety of security measures designed to eliminate the possibility of cheating during the testing process. First, there is a biometric data measuring device. Devices used in the embodiment include those which record a candidate's fingerprint image, retinal image, or hand geometry image, as well as voice recording and analysis devices. The embodiment also allows test scores to be validated by the central station. For example, printed score results which contain the candidate's photo image can be printed on non-alterable, non-reproducible paper, verified by an official Notary Republic. A unique, seemingly random number produced by a coding algorithm is assigned to the test response data, and proctoring data as the test is taken to validate the testing event. Verification and invalidation can be achieved either during the test, or afterwards.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 is a block diagram of the hardware of the system according to an embodiment.
Figure 2 is a flow diagram of one embodiment of the registration process according to an embodiment.
Figure 3 is a flow diagram of one embodiment of the test taking process in which the testing event is verified during the event.
Figure 4 is a flow diagram of the central site activity during registration and testing in the embodiment of Figs. 3 and 4.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Figure 1 is a block diagram showing the hardware of a system according to an embodiment for controlling the administration of remotely proctored, secure examinations at a remote test site. The central station 1 comprises a data processor 10. A display 11 is provided for allowing personnel to monitor the administration of tests at remote sites, and the functioning of the system in general. An input 12, such as a keyboard, is provided to allow control, updating and management of the system. A
storage device 13 is provided for storing data. A printer 14 is provided for those embodiments of the invention in which test results are verified after the testing event and verified test results are sent to the test taker from central station 1.
Central station 1 is connected to communicate with a registration site 2. Any appropriate data link can be used to connect the central station 1 with registration station 2. Registration site 2 includes a data processor 20, connected to a display 24 and a storage device 23. An input 25, such as a keyboard, card reader, bar code reader, etc., is provided to allow the input of registrant data, which is then compared with stored data to determine if the registrant qualifies to be registered for a particular examination. An optional credit card input 27 may be provided to allow credit payment for the registration. A printer 28 may also be provided. A
biometric measurement device 26 is provided to record biometric data such as an image of candidate's fingerprint, a retinal image, a voice print, hand geometry, or other biometric data capable of identifying an individual, including photographs or digital images.
In one embodiment, the remote testing station of the system also features a variety of security measures designed to eliminate the possibility of cheating during the testing process. First, there is a biometric data measuring device. Devices used in the embodiment include those which record a candidate's fingerprint image, retinal image, or hand geometry image, as well as voice recording and analysis devices. The embodiment also allows test scores to be validated by the central station. For example, printed score results which contain the candidate's photo image can be printed on non-alterable, non-reproducible paper, verified by an official Notary Republic. A unique, seemingly random number produced by a coding algorithm is assigned to the test response data, and proctoring data as the test is taken to validate the testing event. Verification and invalidation can be achieved either during the test, or afterwards.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 is a block diagram of the hardware of the system according to an embodiment.
Figure 2 is a flow diagram of one embodiment of the registration process according to an embodiment.
Figure 3 is a flow diagram of one embodiment of the test taking process in which the testing event is verified during the event.
Figure 4 is a flow diagram of the central site activity during registration and testing in the embodiment of Figs. 3 and 4.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Figure 1 is a block diagram showing the hardware of a system according to an embodiment for controlling the administration of remotely proctored, secure examinations at a remote test site. The central station 1 comprises a data processor 10. A display 11 is provided for allowing personnel to monitor the administration of tests at remote sites, and the functioning of the system in general. An input 12, such as a keyboard, is provided to allow control, updating and management of the system. A
storage device 13 is provided for storing data. A printer 14 is provided for those embodiments of the invention in which test results are verified after the testing event and verified test results are sent to the test taker from central station 1.
Central station 1 is connected to communicate with a registration site 2. Any appropriate data link can be used to connect the central station 1 with registration station 2. Registration site 2 includes a data processor 20, connected to a display 24 and a storage device 23. An input 25, such as a keyboard, card reader, bar code reader, etc., is provided to allow the input of registrant data, which is then compared with stored data to determine if the registrant qualifies to be registered for a particular examination. An optional credit card input 27 may be provided to allow credit payment for the registration. A printer 28 may also be provided. A
biometric measurement device 26 is provided to record biometric data such as an image of candidate's fingerprint, a retinal image, a voice print, hand geometry, or other biometric data capable of identifying an individual, including photographs or digital images.
As is discussed below, in the registration process, the verified biometric data is transferred to and stored by the central station 1 for later comparison with test taker biometric data, to verify that the test taker has been properly registered for a particular examination.
The remote test site 3 comprises a data processor 30, connected to be able to communicate with the central station 1. The communication means can be a modem and a telephone line, an ISDN connection, a satellite link, or some other appropriate data link. If the connection is broadcast or is a data link over the internet, then special encoding and decoding software would be necessary to ensure security of the data transmitted. A storage device 31 is provided for storing data required for the initiation of the testing event. A display 32 is provided for displaying test question data received from the central station 1, and an input 33, such as a touch screen, a keyboard, a pen device, or other input, etc., is provided for the input of registration data and test response data by the test taker. In an embodiment where registration data is entered by means of a registration card, a bar code reader or the like (not shown in Fig. 1) is also provided. A printer 36 may also be provided. A
biometric measuring device 34 is provided to allow the test taker to input test taker biometric data. As described below, the test taker biometric data is communicated to the central station 1 and compared with the verified biometric data stored in storage device 13 before the testing event is begun.
Lastly, the remote site 3 has a means for recording and inputting proctoring data 35. In the preferred embodiment, the proctoring data is an audio/visual record, particularly, a record of the input of test taker biometric data and the input of test response data during the testing event. In one example, a video camera is placed in one corner of a self-sufficient testing kiosk and creates an audio/visual record of the entire testing event. How the proctoring data is used to validate or invalidate a testing event is discussed below. In short, however, the proctoring data may be evaluated during the testing event, after the testing event or both during and after.
In a preferred embodiment, the remote testing site 3, is a kiosk, or free standing structure designed to be installed into existing public access buildings. The kiosk could be in the lobby of a public building in a shopping mall, or in an airport or train station. The kiosk in this embodiment taps into the host facility's electrical, phone, and HVAC systems. The registration station 2 may be remote from or proximate to the kiosk which comprises the remote testing station 3. If registration and testing are performed at the same site, input devices must be provided both for entering (1) information required for registration, including, eg., identification information, demographic information, payment information, and test selection; and (2) information for the testing event, including, eg., registration, biometric and test response data.
In the Kiosk embodiment, the structure is a free standing, light weight unit; designed to be installed into open space areas of public access facilities. It is a=semi-permanent enclosure which can be assembled in a short time, and does not require major build-out modifications to its host.facility. Electrical and phone lines are routed into the unit, as required, from the host facility's infrastructure. If necessary, the host facility can be used to fulfill any HVAC requirements of the kiosk. An ancillary HVAC supply can also be utilized if necessary. If a smaller, more controlled space is available, such as a store unit in a shopping mall, a modified unit can be installed which achieves the same level of security.
In the Kiosk, the reraote testing site 3 can comprise a single testing station or a plurality of stations. The stations would each be provided with a door which remains locked at all times, secured with an electronically controlled lock. The door will unlock only after a test taker has successfully completed registration and has checked-in using input devices external to the station.
Once the test taker has entered the testing station, the door remains locked from the outside to ensure security and privacy for the test taker. The door is not locked from the inside, allowing the candidate to leave at any time, however the lock would create a signal which would become part of the proctoring data. Any unauthorized opening of the door during the testing process can, if desired, become an invalidating event which would end or invalidate the testing event.
Preferably, the walls of the kiosk comprise a sound absorbent material to provide the test taker with a quiet, undisturbed testing event. 'White-noise' generators can be implemented if ambient noise from the host facility is a source of distraction. Speakers located in each test station, driven by a common amplifier, provide low level sound which masks any distracting noises.
The inside of the kiosk consists of a shelf on which the various required input devices and display are located. There is shelving 'provided for the test taker's personal possessions. Lighting appropriate for computerized testing is installed in each test station.
A computer such as a personal computer, including the data processor 30 and storage device 31 is preferably held in a locked compartment within the station.
In the preferred embodiment, the device 35 for recording proctoring data is a video camera used to monitor and record the testing event, is mounted in one corner of the testing station. The audio/visual recording of the session is used to document the entry of biometric data and test response data, to record any problems or abnormalities that may occur during the testing event, and to prevent the test taker from cheating.
In one embodiment, evaluation of the proctoring data can take place during the testing event. In this embodiment, the audio/visual proctoring data can be transmitted to central station 1 and displayed on display 11 so that an administrator can view the testing event, end or invalidate the event if necessary, or respond to any problems during the testing event. The audio/visual proctoring data is also preferably digitally recorded, transmitted to the central station 1 and stored for use in later validation of the testing event. The device 35 is also used to capture a still image portrait of the testing candidate. This image will be become part of the proctoring data and is stored for candidate identification or test validation purposes.
The biometric measuring device 34 is selected from a wide variety of available devices including: fingerprint recording devices that capture a digital image of candidate's fingerprint; retinal image recording devices, voice print devices, hand geometry recording devices, and others. As discussed above, the biometric measuring device 34 can be combined with a camera so that a photograph or digital image becomes part of the biometric data.
It is desirable to have one input device be a microphone or handset that can be used by the test taker to communicate with the central station 1. Two-way video communication is also desirable in certain instances.
The test question data is stored at the central station 1 for security purposes, and communicated to testing station 3 at an appropriate point in the testing process, as will be discussed below. The central station 1 also stores the verified biornetric data of the registrants to be used in test taker verification and validation of the test taker data. Test response data are transmitted to the central station 1 for storage, and, in one embodiment, for later validation of test taker data.
On-line administrators and technicians provide operational and technical support to the remote testing stations 3 from the central station 1 using whatever conmunications method (data, voice, or two way video) necessary to accooplish the task. All software upgrades and revisions to the system are performed fran the central station 1 using the connnunications lines connecting the central station 1 with the registration station 2 and remote testing station 3.
ReQistration Registration for the test will now be described with reference to the preferred embodiment shown in the flow chart of Fig. 2.
Upon arrival at the registration station 2, a registrant presents identification in step 40 which is input in step 41 into processor 20 by means of input 25. Other qualification information is then requested in step 42 and input in step 43. Depending on the type of test for which the registrant wishes to be registered, as input in step 44, either the processor 20 of the registration site, or the processor 10 of the central station determines whether the registrant is qualified in step 47. If the test is determined to be an eligibility type test at step 45, the registrant's data is coaYmunicated to the central station at step 46. If the registrant is not qualified, the registration is stopped at step 48. If the test is not an eligibility test, then the processor 20 of the registration site 2 is instructed to qualify the registrant of step 47.
If the registrant is qualified, the input of bianetric data is requested in step 49. After the input of biometric data, payment is collected in steps 50, 51 and 52. If payment is by credit, approval needs to be obtained in step 51. If payment is by cash, then cash or a check is collected in step 52. If the payrrent collection is confirnned at step 53, then a testing event is scheduled at step 54, and the bianetric, and other personal data of the registrant is sent to the central station 1 at step 55.
Steps 54 and 55 can also take place in reverse order, if desired.
The scheduling step 54 will also typically include the input of data such as the preferred tine and place at which the registrant desires to take the test. If the test is scheduled to take place directly after registration at step 56, then the registrant goes directly to step 62 of the testing event shown in Figure 3. If the test is taken at a later date, a registration card is printed, or registration number issued at step 57 and the registration completed at step 58. The registration card, or number can be used in the check-in process at the start of the testing event illustrated in Fig. 3. If payment is not collected at step 53, the registration is ended at step 48.
In an embodiment where the registration station 2 is proximate to, or integrated with the testing station 2, it is possible for testing to directly follow registration at the same site, assuming that a testing station 3 is free.
Other registration processes are envisioned as long as they result in the recordation of verified biometric data, and the communication of the verified data to the central station 1.
As should be apparent from the flow chart of Fig. 2, the registration process is entirely, or at least substantially automated.
THE TESTING EVENT
The testing event will be described with reference to the preferred embodiment of Fig. 3.
The testing process begins, upon arrival of the test taker at the remote testing station 3, with a request of the test taker to present a registration card printed during the registration process, or enter a registration number. In a preferred embodiment, the request for registration card or registration number stated on the card is made at a display outside of a kiosk in order to open the door. For this purpose, a display and a card reader are provided outside the kiosk. Otherwise, the prompt is given on display 32 of the remote testing site 3 and card information may either be entered by the registrant with input 33, or a special input, such as accord reader, may be provided for that purpose.
If the card is determined to be valid at step 61, and the test taker is verified as a valid registrant, then the recording of audio/visual proctoring data begins at step 62, and the test taker is asked to enter biometric data at step 63. For example, the test taker is asked to face the video camera for the taking of a still picture or the taker is asked to place his hand or finger in suitable recording device.
In this embodiment, if there is an invalidating event while the biometric data is being measured (step 64) then the testing event is invalidated and the test stopped. An invalidating event could be, for example, the presence of two persons in the remote testing station, or an attempt to improperly or fraudulently enter biometric data. Typically, the types of occurrences or data which would constitute invalidating events would vary depending on the particular test and level of security required. The proctoring data may include more than audio/visual data, such as a signal from an electronic door lock, etc., in which case, an invalidating event could be an unlocked or opened door signal. If there is no invalidating event, then the biometric data is communicated to central station 1 in step 65 and compared at step 66 with verified biometric data stored in the storage device 13.
If the communicated test taker biometric data matches the verified biometric data corresponding to the proper registrant (step 67), then test question data is communicated to remote test site 3. Steps 70, 71 and 73 represent the entry of test response data by the test taker in response to question data displayed in display 32. If at any point during the entry of test response data an invalidating event occurs (step 72), as determined by analysis of the proctoring data, then the testing event is stopped and/or invalidated (step 68). As disclosed above, invalidating events would include the opening of the kiosk door by the applicant, unauthorized u-se of notes or reference materials, or unauthorized communication between the test taker and someone outside the kiosk.
After all questions have been answered (step 73) the test taker is given the option of reviewing the questions (step 74), or completing the test (step 76). In step 77 a unique identifier is assigned to the testing event for use in coordinating test response data and proctoring data for the testing event. Thereafter, the test response data is communicated to the central station 1 at step 78.
A record of the testing event is then printed for the test taker at step 79. In one embodiment, because the proctoring data is used to validate the testing event during the event, a verified test result can be given to the test taker at step 79.
In another embodiment, the proctoring data is analyzed and the testing event validated after the event, in which case the test taker is given only a record of having completed the testing event at step 79, and is given a validated test result subsequent to the end of the test at step 80, such as by the printing of an Official Score Report Form.
While not specifically described here, it is also possible to have the registration take place after the testing event at the same time as or in conjunction with validation.
In a further embodiment, two way communication is provided between the test taker and the central statzon 1. This two way communication would also be recorded and stored as proctoring data. Such a communication link allows the test taker, for example, to request a pause in the testing event for a restroom break, or to communicate technical problems or questions regarding the system. In very secure tests, steps 60 through 67 may be required to be repeated after even an authorized interruption.
A tutorial can also be provided either before, or during the testing event, to allow the test taker to become familiar with the functioning of the system.
At the conclusion of the testing process, data are transmitted back to the central station 1. These data would include some or all of the following: the test response data, audio/visual proctoring data, a still picture of the test taker, and registration data. If, as described above, the testing event is validated during the event, the results are then processed and a printed record is produced.
The printed record includes some or all of the following: the test taker's personal information and qualification data, the still picture of the test taker as well as any other physical characteristics recorded, the test response data, the pass/fail status and percentage score. Whether printed at the remote station 3 or at the central station 1, the record is printed onto an Official Score Report Form which is printed on specially formulated security paper. This security paper utilizes safeguards to prevent alteration or duplication by the student. The paper bears a distinctive logo as a watermark and is printed on colored paper.
The record preferably also contains the identifier assigned to the testing event and the test data. This identifier is preferably a seemingly random number produced by a unique algorithm. The algorithm utilizes input variables which are-derived from, among other things, the registration and qualification data, the date and time of the testing event, the test taken, and the response data or score. Thus, the identifier is unique to the testing event, and can be used to authenticate a valid score report, thus preventing the test taker, or anyone else, from creating a falsified report.
In a further embodiment, where the report is generated at the central station 1, the preliminarily validated report is first mailed to the test taker.
Thereafter, in order to complete validation of the testing event and score, the candidate must have the document notarized by an Official Notary of the United States. Instructions on the document inform the notary that they must first verify that the personal data and picture on the document indeed match the actual person.
A list of acceptable forms of identification is included on the score report. Once the identity of the test taker has been confirmed, the notary places the official WO 98/40862 PCT/tJS98/04587 notarization seal on the document, taking care to overlap part of the seal onto the test taker picture.
In this embodiment, the score result must then be mailed back to the central station 1. Once the returned document has been inspected and authenticated by the central station 1, the test is deemed completely validated. The results are then relayed to the test taker, and the testing organization responsible for the test.
In order to better understand the interplay of the central station and the remote registration/testing sites the steps which may be carried out at the central station in Figures 2 and 3 are illustrated in Figure 4. Similar method steps in Figure 4 bear similar reference numerals.
Data is received from the registration site at step 46, and the central site can determine if the registrant is qualified at step 49. If necessary, the central site may stop registration at step 48. Collection of payment is verified in step 53, the test is scheduled in step 54 and the biometric data is received from the registration site at step 55.
If the central site determines that the test is taken now at step 56 then it may begin the recordation of proctoring data for the testing event at step 62. If the test is not taken directly after registration, a registration card is printed or a number issued at step 57. In cases where the test is taken at a time removed from the registration event, the central station's first step is to determine if the registration card or number entered at the test site is valid at step 61.
In embodiments where verification takes place during the testing event, the central station may then determine if there has been an invaiidating event at steps 64,72, and proceed to stop the testing event at step 68 if there has.
The central station receives, compares and verifies the biometric data in steps 65-67, and if the data matches, the test data will be communicated at step 69 to the testing station.
In another contemplated embodiment, the test data already resides in the storage device 31 of the test site 3. In this embodiment the test data residing in storage device 31 would be unlocked at step 69 under instructions from the central station 1.
In the embodiment shown in Fig. 4, the test taker is permitted to address queries to the central station at step 80 and receive answers at step 81. The central s=tation then receives the test response data at step 78, and prints a record at step 79. As discussed above, the record may also be printed at the remote test site if the test is validated during the event.
The remote test site 3 comprises a data processor 30, connected to be able to communicate with the central station 1. The communication means can be a modem and a telephone line, an ISDN connection, a satellite link, or some other appropriate data link. If the connection is broadcast or is a data link over the internet, then special encoding and decoding software would be necessary to ensure security of the data transmitted. A storage device 31 is provided for storing data required for the initiation of the testing event. A display 32 is provided for displaying test question data received from the central station 1, and an input 33, such as a touch screen, a keyboard, a pen device, or other input, etc., is provided for the input of registration data and test response data by the test taker. In an embodiment where registration data is entered by means of a registration card, a bar code reader or the like (not shown in Fig. 1) is also provided. A printer 36 may also be provided. A
biometric measuring device 34 is provided to allow the test taker to input test taker biometric data. As described below, the test taker biometric data is communicated to the central station 1 and compared with the verified biometric data stored in storage device 13 before the testing event is begun.
Lastly, the remote site 3 has a means for recording and inputting proctoring data 35. In the preferred embodiment, the proctoring data is an audio/visual record, particularly, a record of the input of test taker biometric data and the input of test response data during the testing event. In one example, a video camera is placed in one corner of a self-sufficient testing kiosk and creates an audio/visual record of the entire testing event. How the proctoring data is used to validate or invalidate a testing event is discussed below. In short, however, the proctoring data may be evaluated during the testing event, after the testing event or both during and after.
In a preferred embodiment, the remote testing site 3, is a kiosk, or free standing structure designed to be installed into existing public access buildings. The kiosk could be in the lobby of a public building in a shopping mall, or in an airport or train station. The kiosk in this embodiment taps into the host facility's electrical, phone, and HVAC systems. The registration station 2 may be remote from or proximate to the kiosk which comprises the remote testing station 3. If registration and testing are performed at the same site, input devices must be provided both for entering (1) information required for registration, including, eg., identification information, demographic information, payment information, and test selection; and (2) information for the testing event, including, eg., registration, biometric and test response data.
In the Kiosk embodiment, the structure is a free standing, light weight unit; designed to be installed into open space areas of public access facilities. It is a=semi-permanent enclosure which can be assembled in a short time, and does not require major build-out modifications to its host.facility. Electrical and phone lines are routed into the unit, as required, from the host facility's infrastructure. If necessary, the host facility can be used to fulfill any HVAC requirements of the kiosk. An ancillary HVAC supply can also be utilized if necessary. If a smaller, more controlled space is available, such as a store unit in a shopping mall, a modified unit can be installed which achieves the same level of security.
In the Kiosk, the reraote testing site 3 can comprise a single testing station or a plurality of stations. The stations would each be provided with a door which remains locked at all times, secured with an electronically controlled lock. The door will unlock only after a test taker has successfully completed registration and has checked-in using input devices external to the station.
Once the test taker has entered the testing station, the door remains locked from the outside to ensure security and privacy for the test taker. The door is not locked from the inside, allowing the candidate to leave at any time, however the lock would create a signal which would become part of the proctoring data. Any unauthorized opening of the door during the testing process can, if desired, become an invalidating event which would end or invalidate the testing event.
Preferably, the walls of the kiosk comprise a sound absorbent material to provide the test taker with a quiet, undisturbed testing event. 'White-noise' generators can be implemented if ambient noise from the host facility is a source of distraction. Speakers located in each test station, driven by a common amplifier, provide low level sound which masks any distracting noises.
The inside of the kiosk consists of a shelf on which the various required input devices and display are located. There is shelving 'provided for the test taker's personal possessions. Lighting appropriate for computerized testing is installed in each test station.
A computer such as a personal computer, including the data processor 30 and storage device 31 is preferably held in a locked compartment within the station.
In the preferred embodiment, the device 35 for recording proctoring data is a video camera used to monitor and record the testing event, is mounted in one corner of the testing station. The audio/visual recording of the session is used to document the entry of biometric data and test response data, to record any problems or abnormalities that may occur during the testing event, and to prevent the test taker from cheating.
In one embodiment, evaluation of the proctoring data can take place during the testing event. In this embodiment, the audio/visual proctoring data can be transmitted to central station 1 and displayed on display 11 so that an administrator can view the testing event, end or invalidate the event if necessary, or respond to any problems during the testing event. The audio/visual proctoring data is also preferably digitally recorded, transmitted to the central station 1 and stored for use in later validation of the testing event. The device 35 is also used to capture a still image portrait of the testing candidate. This image will be become part of the proctoring data and is stored for candidate identification or test validation purposes.
The biometric measuring device 34 is selected from a wide variety of available devices including: fingerprint recording devices that capture a digital image of candidate's fingerprint; retinal image recording devices, voice print devices, hand geometry recording devices, and others. As discussed above, the biometric measuring device 34 can be combined with a camera so that a photograph or digital image becomes part of the biometric data.
It is desirable to have one input device be a microphone or handset that can be used by the test taker to communicate with the central station 1. Two-way video communication is also desirable in certain instances.
The test question data is stored at the central station 1 for security purposes, and communicated to testing station 3 at an appropriate point in the testing process, as will be discussed below. The central station 1 also stores the verified biornetric data of the registrants to be used in test taker verification and validation of the test taker data. Test response data are transmitted to the central station 1 for storage, and, in one embodiment, for later validation of test taker data.
On-line administrators and technicians provide operational and technical support to the remote testing stations 3 from the central station 1 using whatever conmunications method (data, voice, or two way video) necessary to accooplish the task. All software upgrades and revisions to the system are performed fran the central station 1 using the connnunications lines connecting the central station 1 with the registration station 2 and remote testing station 3.
ReQistration Registration for the test will now be described with reference to the preferred embodiment shown in the flow chart of Fig. 2.
Upon arrival at the registration station 2, a registrant presents identification in step 40 which is input in step 41 into processor 20 by means of input 25. Other qualification information is then requested in step 42 and input in step 43. Depending on the type of test for which the registrant wishes to be registered, as input in step 44, either the processor 20 of the registration site, or the processor 10 of the central station determines whether the registrant is qualified in step 47. If the test is determined to be an eligibility type test at step 45, the registrant's data is coaYmunicated to the central station at step 46. If the registrant is not qualified, the registration is stopped at step 48. If the test is not an eligibility test, then the processor 20 of the registration site 2 is instructed to qualify the registrant of step 47.
If the registrant is qualified, the input of bianetric data is requested in step 49. After the input of biometric data, payment is collected in steps 50, 51 and 52. If payment is by credit, approval needs to be obtained in step 51. If payment is by cash, then cash or a check is collected in step 52. If the payrrent collection is confirnned at step 53, then a testing event is scheduled at step 54, and the bianetric, and other personal data of the registrant is sent to the central station 1 at step 55.
Steps 54 and 55 can also take place in reverse order, if desired.
The scheduling step 54 will also typically include the input of data such as the preferred tine and place at which the registrant desires to take the test. If the test is scheduled to take place directly after registration at step 56, then the registrant goes directly to step 62 of the testing event shown in Figure 3. If the test is taken at a later date, a registration card is printed, or registration number issued at step 57 and the registration completed at step 58. The registration card, or number can be used in the check-in process at the start of the testing event illustrated in Fig. 3. If payment is not collected at step 53, the registration is ended at step 48.
In an embodiment where the registration station 2 is proximate to, or integrated with the testing station 2, it is possible for testing to directly follow registration at the same site, assuming that a testing station 3 is free.
Other registration processes are envisioned as long as they result in the recordation of verified biometric data, and the communication of the verified data to the central station 1.
As should be apparent from the flow chart of Fig. 2, the registration process is entirely, or at least substantially automated.
THE TESTING EVENT
The testing event will be described with reference to the preferred embodiment of Fig. 3.
The testing process begins, upon arrival of the test taker at the remote testing station 3, with a request of the test taker to present a registration card printed during the registration process, or enter a registration number. In a preferred embodiment, the request for registration card or registration number stated on the card is made at a display outside of a kiosk in order to open the door. For this purpose, a display and a card reader are provided outside the kiosk. Otherwise, the prompt is given on display 32 of the remote testing site 3 and card information may either be entered by the registrant with input 33, or a special input, such as accord reader, may be provided for that purpose.
If the card is determined to be valid at step 61, and the test taker is verified as a valid registrant, then the recording of audio/visual proctoring data begins at step 62, and the test taker is asked to enter biometric data at step 63. For example, the test taker is asked to face the video camera for the taking of a still picture or the taker is asked to place his hand or finger in suitable recording device.
In this embodiment, if there is an invalidating event while the biometric data is being measured (step 64) then the testing event is invalidated and the test stopped. An invalidating event could be, for example, the presence of two persons in the remote testing station, or an attempt to improperly or fraudulently enter biometric data. Typically, the types of occurrences or data which would constitute invalidating events would vary depending on the particular test and level of security required. The proctoring data may include more than audio/visual data, such as a signal from an electronic door lock, etc., in which case, an invalidating event could be an unlocked or opened door signal. If there is no invalidating event, then the biometric data is communicated to central station 1 in step 65 and compared at step 66 with verified biometric data stored in the storage device 13.
If the communicated test taker biometric data matches the verified biometric data corresponding to the proper registrant (step 67), then test question data is communicated to remote test site 3. Steps 70, 71 and 73 represent the entry of test response data by the test taker in response to question data displayed in display 32. If at any point during the entry of test response data an invalidating event occurs (step 72), as determined by analysis of the proctoring data, then the testing event is stopped and/or invalidated (step 68). As disclosed above, invalidating events would include the opening of the kiosk door by the applicant, unauthorized u-se of notes or reference materials, or unauthorized communication between the test taker and someone outside the kiosk.
After all questions have been answered (step 73) the test taker is given the option of reviewing the questions (step 74), or completing the test (step 76). In step 77 a unique identifier is assigned to the testing event for use in coordinating test response data and proctoring data for the testing event. Thereafter, the test response data is communicated to the central station 1 at step 78.
A record of the testing event is then printed for the test taker at step 79. In one embodiment, because the proctoring data is used to validate the testing event during the event, a verified test result can be given to the test taker at step 79.
In another embodiment, the proctoring data is analyzed and the testing event validated after the event, in which case the test taker is given only a record of having completed the testing event at step 79, and is given a validated test result subsequent to the end of the test at step 80, such as by the printing of an Official Score Report Form.
While not specifically described here, it is also possible to have the registration take place after the testing event at the same time as or in conjunction with validation.
In a further embodiment, two way communication is provided between the test taker and the central statzon 1. This two way communication would also be recorded and stored as proctoring data. Such a communication link allows the test taker, for example, to request a pause in the testing event for a restroom break, or to communicate technical problems or questions regarding the system. In very secure tests, steps 60 through 67 may be required to be repeated after even an authorized interruption.
A tutorial can also be provided either before, or during the testing event, to allow the test taker to become familiar with the functioning of the system.
At the conclusion of the testing process, data are transmitted back to the central station 1. These data would include some or all of the following: the test response data, audio/visual proctoring data, a still picture of the test taker, and registration data. If, as described above, the testing event is validated during the event, the results are then processed and a printed record is produced.
The printed record includes some or all of the following: the test taker's personal information and qualification data, the still picture of the test taker as well as any other physical characteristics recorded, the test response data, the pass/fail status and percentage score. Whether printed at the remote station 3 or at the central station 1, the record is printed onto an Official Score Report Form which is printed on specially formulated security paper. This security paper utilizes safeguards to prevent alteration or duplication by the student. The paper bears a distinctive logo as a watermark and is printed on colored paper.
The record preferably also contains the identifier assigned to the testing event and the test data. This identifier is preferably a seemingly random number produced by a unique algorithm. The algorithm utilizes input variables which are-derived from, among other things, the registration and qualification data, the date and time of the testing event, the test taken, and the response data or score. Thus, the identifier is unique to the testing event, and can be used to authenticate a valid score report, thus preventing the test taker, or anyone else, from creating a falsified report.
In a further embodiment, where the report is generated at the central station 1, the preliminarily validated report is first mailed to the test taker.
Thereafter, in order to complete validation of the testing event and score, the candidate must have the document notarized by an Official Notary of the United States. Instructions on the document inform the notary that they must first verify that the personal data and picture on the document indeed match the actual person.
A list of acceptable forms of identification is included on the score report. Once the identity of the test taker has been confirmed, the notary places the official WO 98/40862 PCT/tJS98/04587 notarization seal on the document, taking care to overlap part of the seal onto the test taker picture.
In this embodiment, the score result must then be mailed back to the central station 1. Once the returned document has been inspected and authenticated by the central station 1, the test is deemed completely validated. The results are then relayed to the test taker, and the testing organization responsible for the test.
In order to better understand the interplay of the central station and the remote registration/testing sites the steps which may be carried out at the central station in Figures 2 and 3 are illustrated in Figure 4. Similar method steps in Figure 4 bear similar reference numerals.
Data is received from the registration site at step 46, and the central site can determine if the registrant is qualified at step 49. If necessary, the central site may stop registration at step 48. Collection of payment is verified in step 53, the test is scheduled in step 54 and the biometric data is received from the registration site at step 55.
If the central site determines that the test is taken now at step 56 then it may begin the recordation of proctoring data for the testing event at step 62. If the test is not taken directly after registration, a registration card is printed or a number issued at step 57. In cases where the test is taken at a time removed from the registration event, the central station's first step is to determine if the registration card or number entered at the test site is valid at step 61.
In embodiments where verification takes place during the testing event, the central station may then determine if there has been an invaiidating event at steps 64,72, and proceed to stop the testing event at step 68 if there has.
The central station receives, compares and verifies the biometric data in steps 65-67, and if the data matches, the test data will be communicated at step 69 to the testing station.
In another contemplated embodiment, the test data already resides in the storage device 31 of the test site 3. In this embodiment the test data residing in storage device 31 would be unlocked at step 69 under instructions from the central station 1.
In the embodiment shown in Fig. 4, the test taker is permitted to address queries to the central station at step 80 and receive answers at step 81. The central s=tation then receives the test response data at step 78, and prints a record at step 79. As discussed above, the record may also be printed at the remote test site if the test is validated during the event.
The present system has been illustrated with respect to a few preferred embodiments, but one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that deletions, additions, substitutions, and improvements can be made while remaining within the spirit and scope of the present invention. The scope of the invention is determined solely by the appended claims.
Claims (26)
What is claimed is:
1. A system for controlling the administration of remotely proctored, secure examinations at a remote test station, comprising:
(1) a central station including (a) first storage means for storing data, including test question data and verified biometric data, and (b) a first data processor, operably connected to the storage means, for comparing test taker biometric data with stored, verified biometric data; and (2) a remote test station comprising (a) a second data processor, (b) second storage means, operably connected to the second data processor, for storing input data, (c) a biometric measurement device for inputting test taker biometric data to the second data processor, (d) display means for displaying test question data (e) an input for inputting test response data to the second data processor, (f) means for recording proctoring data of a testing event, and (g) first communicating means for communicating with the central station, for receiving test question data from the central station, and for communicating test taker biometric data, test response data, and proctoring data to the central station.
(1) a central station including (a) first storage means for storing data, including test question data and verified biometric data, and (b) a first data processor, operably connected to the storage means, for comparing test taker biometric data with stored, verified biometric data; and (2) a remote test station comprising (a) a second data processor, (b) second storage means, operably connected to the second data processor, for storing input data, (c) a biometric measurement device for inputting test taker biometric data to the second data processor, (d) display means for displaying test question data (e) an input for inputting test response data to the second data processor, (f) means for recording proctoring data of a testing event, and (g) first communicating means for communicating with the central station, for receiving test question data from the central station, and for communicating test taker biometric data, test response data, and proctoring data to the central station.
2. A system according to claim 1, wherein the proctoring data is audio/visual data of the testing event.
3. A system according to claim 2, wherein the proctoring data includes an audio/visual record of (a) input of test taker biometric data and (b) input of test response data.
4. A system according to claim 2 or claim 3, wherein the proctoring data further includes a still picture of the test taker.
5. A system according to any one of claims 1 to 4, further comprising a registration station, comprising:
a) a third data processor for processing and verifying registrant data;
b) third storage means for storing data sufficient to verify registrant data, and operably connected to the processor;
c) a biometric measurement device for inputting registrant biometric data; and d) third communication means for communicating verified test registration data, including verified biometric data to the central station.
a) a third data processor for processing and verifying registrant data;
b) third storage means for storing data sufficient to verify registrant data, and operably connected to the processor;
c) a biometric measurement device for inputting registrant biometric data; and d) third communication means for communicating verified test registration data, including verified biometric data to the central station.
6. A system according to claim 5, wherein the registration station and testing station are in the same place.
7. A system according to any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein the testing station is a self-contained unit, inaccessible without input of test registration data.
8. A system according to claim 7, wherein the means for recording proctoring data includes a video camera disposed inside the unit.
9. A system according to any one of claims 1 to 8, further comprising second communication means for permitting a test taker to communicate with the central station.
10. A method for controlling the administration of remotely proctored, secure examinations at a remote testing station comprising the steps of:
a) storing verified biometric data at a central station;
b) storing test question data at the central station;
c) inputting test taker biometric data at the remote testing station to begin a testing event;
d) communicating the test taker biometric data to the central station and comparing the test taker biometric data with the verified biometric data to thereby verify the test taker data;
e) making test question data from the central station available at the remote testing station;
f) storing test response data, input in response to the test question data;
g) recording and storing audio/video proctoring data of the testing event;
h) ending the testing event; and i) validating the testing event by reviewing the proctoring data for invalidating events.
a) storing verified biometric data at a central station;
b) storing test question data at the central station;
c) inputting test taker biometric data at the remote testing station to begin a testing event;
d) communicating the test taker biometric data to the central station and comparing the test taker biometric data with the verified biometric data to thereby verify the test taker data;
e) making test question data from the central station available at the remote testing station;
f) storing test response data, input in response to the test question data;
g) recording and storing audio/video proctoring data of the testing event;
h) ending the testing event; and i) validating the testing event by reviewing the proctoring data for invalidating events.
11. A method according to claim 10, further including the step of assigning a unique identifier to the testing event.
12. A method according to claim 10 or claim 11, wherein step (e) comprises communicating the test data from the central station to the remote test station.
13. A method according to claim 10 or claim 11, wherein said step (e) comprises unlocking test data already at the remote test site.
14. A method according to any one of claims 10 to 13, wherein said step (c) further comprises inputting other registrant data.
15. A method according to any one of claims 10 to 14, wherein steps (e) to (i) are carried out only if the biometric data is verified in step (d).
16. A method according to claim 11, wherein the step (b) of storing verified biometric data further comprises the steps of qualifying a registrant for a particular test, recording biometric data, collecting payment, and transmitting the recorded biometric data to the central station.
17. A method according to claim 16, further comprising the step of issuing a registration card containing registration data.
18. A method according to claim 16 or claim 17 wherein step (c) cannot be performed until registration data is transmitted to the central station.
19. A method according to any one of claims 16 to 18, further comprising the step of printing a record of the testing event including the identifier and registration data.
20. A method for controlling the administration of remotely proctored, secure examinations at a remote testing station comprising the steps of:
a) storing verified biometric data at a central station;
b) storing test question data at the central station;
c) inputting test taker biometric data at the remote testing station to begin a testing event;
d) communicating the test taker biometric data to the central station and comparing the test taker biometric data with the verified biometric data to thereby verify the test taker data;
e) communicating test question data from the central station to the remote testing station;
f) storing test answer data input in response to the test question data;
g) recording and storing audio/video proctoring data of the testing event, assigning the identifier to the proctoring data;
h) reviewing the proctoring data during the testing event for the presence of invalidating events;
and i) ending the testing event.
a) storing verified biometric data at a central station;
b) storing test question data at the central station;
c) inputting test taker biometric data at the remote testing station to begin a testing event;
d) communicating the test taker biometric data to the central station and comparing the test taker biometric data with the verified biometric data to thereby verify the test taker data;
e) communicating test question data from the central station to the remote testing station;
f) storing test answer data input in response to the test question data;
g) recording and storing audio/video proctoring data of the testing event, assigning the identifier to the proctoring data;
h) reviewing the proctoring data during the testing event for the presence of invalidating events;
and i) ending the testing event.
21. A method according to claim 20, further comprising the step of assigning a unique identifier to the testing event.
22. A method according to claim 20 or claim 21, wherein steps (e) to (i) are carried out only if the biometric data is verified in step (d).
23. A method according to claim 21, wherein the step (a) of storing verified biometric data further comprises the steps of qualifying a registrant for a particular test, recording biometric data, collecting payment, and transmitting the recorded biometric data to the central station.
24. A method according to claim 23, further comprising the step of issuing a registration card containing registration data.
25. A method according to claim 23 or claim 24, wherein step (c) is not performed until registration data is input and transmitted to the central station.
26. A method according to any one of claims 23 to 25, further comprising the step of printing a record of the testing event including the identifier and registration data.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US08/816,039 US5915973A (en) | 1997-03-11 | 1997-03-11 | System for administration of remotely-proctored, secure examinations and methods therefor |
US08/816,039 | 1997-03-11 | ||
PCT/US1998/004587 WO1998040862A1 (en) | 1997-03-11 | 1998-03-10 | Method and system for administrating of remotely-proctored secure examination |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2253339A1 CA2253339A1 (en) | 1998-09-17 |
CA2253339C true CA2253339C (en) | 2008-10-28 |
Family
ID=25219542
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA002253339A Expired - Lifetime CA2253339C (en) | 1997-03-11 | 1998-03-10 | Method and system for administrating of remotely-proctored secure examination |
Country Status (13)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US5915973A (en) |
EP (2) | EP0910844A4 (en) |
JP (2) | JP4495786B2 (en) |
CN (1) | CN1301497C (en) |
AT (1) | ATE268042T1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU733914B2 (en) |
BR (1) | BR9805947B1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2253339C (en) |
DE (1) | DE69824192T2 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2220264T3 (en) |
HK (1) | HK1026293A1 (en) |
RU (1) | RU2216048C2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO1998040862A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (169)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US10361802B1 (en) | 1999-02-01 | 2019-07-23 | Blanding Hovenweep, Llc | Adaptive pattern recognition based control system and method |
US6208746B1 (en) * | 1997-05-09 | 2001-03-27 | Gte Service Corporation | Biometric watermarks |
US6347943B1 (en) * | 1997-10-20 | 2002-02-19 | Vuepoint Corporation | Method and system for creating an individualized course of instruction for each user |
US6154631A (en) * | 1997-11-14 | 2000-11-28 | Sony Corporation | Learning system with synchronized control of hardware and switching network |
US6148174A (en) * | 1997-11-14 | 2000-11-14 | Sony Corporation | Learning systems with patterns |
US6376251B1 (en) | 1999-02-03 | 2002-04-23 | Medtox Scientific, Inc. | On-site drug testing method |
US7656271B2 (en) * | 2002-01-09 | 2010-02-02 | I.D. Systems, Inc. | System and method for managing a remotely located asset |
WO2000070530A1 (en) * | 1999-05-19 | 2000-11-23 | I.D. Systems, Inc. | Fully automated vehicle rental system |
US7886008B2 (en) * | 1999-07-28 | 2011-02-08 | Rpost International Limited | System and method for verifying delivery and integrity of electronic messages |
US6514085B2 (en) * | 1999-07-30 | 2003-02-04 | Element K Online Llc | Methods and apparatus for computer based training relating to devices |
US20020086275A1 (en) * | 1999-07-30 | 2002-07-04 | Boney James L. | Methods and apparatus for computer training relating to devices using a resource control module |
US7953671B2 (en) * | 1999-08-31 | 2011-05-31 | American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for conducting electronic transactions |
US7505941B2 (en) * | 1999-08-31 | 2009-03-17 | American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for conducting electronic transactions using biometrics |
US7343351B1 (en) | 1999-08-31 | 2008-03-11 | American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for conducting electronic transactions |
US7889052B2 (en) | 2001-07-10 | 2011-02-15 | Xatra Fund Mx, Llc | Authorizing payment subsequent to RF transactions |
US20050175971A1 (en) * | 1999-11-16 | 2005-08-11 | Knowlagent, Inc., Alpharetta, Ga | Method and system for scheduled delivery of training to call center agents |
US7062446B1 (en) * | 1999-11-16 | 2006-06-13 | Dana Corporation | Apparatus and method for tracking and managing physical assets |
US20040202309A1 (en) * | 1999-11-16 | 2004-10-14 | Knowlagent, Inc. | Managing the rate of delivering performance interventions in a contact center |
US20020087345A1 (en) * | 1999-11-16 | 2002-07-04 | Dana Commercial Credit Corporation | System and method for tracking user certification and training |
US20040202308A1 (en) * | 1999-11-16 | 2004-10-14 | Knowlagent, Inc. | Managing the selection of performance interventions in a contact center |
US20060233346A1 (en) * | 1999-11-16 | 2006-10-19 | Knowlagent, Inc. | Method and system for prioritizing performance interventions |
US6681098B2 (en) | 2000-01-11 | 2004-01-20 | Performance Assessment Network, Inc. | Test administration system using the internet |
US6871287B1 (en) | 2000-01-21 | 2005-03-22 | John F. Ellingson | System and method for verification of identity |
GB2360106B (en) * | 2000-02-21 | 2004-09-22 | Ac Properties Bv | Ordering playable works |
US6775377B2 (en) | 2001-09-10 | 2004-08-10 | Knowlagent, Inc. | Method and system for delivery of individualized training to call center agents |
WO2001073724A1 (en) * | 2000-03-24 | 2001-10-04 | Richter David A | Computer-based instructional system with student verification feature |
US7412604B1 (en) | 2000-03-28 | 2008-08-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Using biometrics on pervasive devices for mobile identification |
US7043193B1 (en) * | 2000-05-09 | 2006-05-09 | Knowlagent, Inc. | Versatile resource computer-based training system |
JP2001344358A (en) * | 2000-06-02 | 2001-12-14 | Nippon Tokei Jimu Center:Kk | Method for conducting procedure for taking examination |
US6381444B1 (en) * | 2000-07-12 | 2002-04-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Interactive multimedia virtual classes requiring small online network bandwidth |
US6549751B1 (en) | 2000-07-25 | 2003-04-15 | Giuseppe Li Mandri | Multimedia educational system |
US6976269B1 (en) * | 2000-08-29 | 2005-12-13 | Equinix, Inc. | Internet co-location facility security system |
US7099620B2 (en) * | 2000-09-22 | 2006-08-29 | Medical Council Of Canada | Method and apparatus for administering an internet based examination to remote sites |
GB0028835D0 (en) * | 2000-11-27 | 2001-01-10 | Arenbee Media Consultants Pvt | An examination implementation method and system |
US20020078139A1 (en) * | 2000-12-18 | 2002-06-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method of administering exam content |
US6988895B1 (en) | 2001-01-12 | 2006-01-24 | Ncs Pearson, Inc. | Electronic test item display as an image with overlay controls |
US6810232B2 (en) | 2001-03-05 | 2004-10-26 | Ncs Pearson, Inc. | Test processing workflow tracking system |
US6961482B2 (en) * | 2001-03-05 | 2005-11-01 | Ncs Pearson, Inc. | System for archiving electronic images of test question responses |
US6675133B2 (en) | 2001-03-05 | 2004-01-06 | Ncs Pearsons, Inc. | Pre-data-collection applications test processing system |
US6751351B2 (en) | 2001-03-05 | 2004-06-15 | Nsc Pearson, Inc. | Test question response verification system |
US7181017B1 (en) | 2001-03-23 | 2007-02-20 | David Felsher | System and method for secure three-party communications |
US7210938B2 (en) * | 2001-05-09 | 2007-05-01 | K12.Com | System and method of virtual schooling |
WO2002095589A1 (en) * | 2001-05-17 | 2002-11-28 | Identix Incorporated | Mobile identity verification |
US7725427B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2010-05-25 | Fred Bishop | Recurrent billing maintenance with radio frequency payment devices |
US8548927B2 (en) | 2001-07-10 | 2013-10-01 | Xatra Fund Mx, Llc | Biometric registration for facilitating an RF transaction |
US7735725B1 (en) | 2001-07-10 | 2010-06-15 | Fred Bishop | Processing an RF transaction using a routing number |
US7668750B2 (en) | 2001-07-10 | 2010-02-23 | David S Bonalle | Securing RF transactions using a transactions counter |
US7249112B2 (en) | 2002-07-09 | 2007-07-24 | American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. | System and method for assigning a funding source for a radio frequency identification device |
US7360689B2 (en) | 2001-07-10 | 2008-04-22 | American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. | Method and system for proffering multiple biometrics for use with a FOB |
US20040236699A1 (en) | 2001-07-10 | 2004-11-25 | American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. | Method and system for hand geometry recognition biometrics on a fob |
US7303120B2 (en) | 2001-07-10 | 2007-12-04 | American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. | System for biometric security using a FOB |
US8294552B2 (en) | 2001-07-10 | 2012-10-23 | Xatra Fund Mx, Llc | Facial scan biometrics on a payment device |
US8284025B2 (en) | 2001-07-10 | 2012-10-09 | Xatra Fund Mx, Llc | Method and system for auditory recognition biometrics on a FOB |
US8001054B1 (en) | 2001-07-10 | 2011-08-16 | American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. | System and method for generating an unpredictable number using a seeded algorithm |
US9024719B1 (en) | 2001-07-10 | 2015-05-05 | Xatra Fund Mx, Llc | RF transaction system and method for storing user personal data |
US9454752B2 (en) | 2001-07-10 | 2016-09-27 | Chartoleaux Kg Limited Liability Company | Reload protocol at a transaction processing entity |
US7705732B2 (en) | 2001-07-10 | 2010-04-27 | Fred Bishop | Authenticating an RF transaction using a transaction counter |
US9031880B2 (en) | 2001-07-10 | 2015-05-12 | Iii Holdings 1, Llc | Systems and methods for non-traditional payment using biometric data |
US20030022138A1 (en) * | 2001-07-26 | 2003-01-30 | Aravinda Korala | Self-service kiosk trainer |
US7922494B2 (en) * | 2001-08-28 | 2011-04-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for improved administering of tests using customized user alerts |
US20030074559A1 (en) * | 2001-10-12 | 2003-04-17 | Lee Riggs | Methods and systems for receiving training through electronic data networks using remote hand held devices |
US20030073064A1 (en) * | 2001-10-12 | 2003-04-17 | Lee Riggs | Methods and systems for registering and authenticating recipients of training provided through data communications networks to remote electronic devices |
JP2005106836A (en) * | 2001-10-12 | 2005-04-21 | Ima International:Kk | Medical education system |
US7174010B2 (en) * | 2001-11-05 | 2007-02-06 | Knowlagent, Inc. | System and method for increasing completion of training |
AUPS113202A0 (en) * | 2002-03-15 | 2002-04-18 | University Of Newcastle Research Associates Limited, The | Remote examination supervision |
US20030231616A1 (en) * | 2002-06-14 | 2003-12-18 | Shervin Rashti | Method of transporting voice over internet protocol via public access internet workstations |
AU2003249211A1 (en) * | 2002-07-12 | 2004-02-02 | Checkspert, Inc. | System and method for remote supervision and authentication of user activities at communication network workstations |
US7766743B2 (en) * | 2002-08-29 | 2010-08-03 | Douglas Schoellkopf Jebb | Methods and apparatus for evaluating a user's affinity for a property |
US6805287B2 (en) | 2002-09-12 | 2004-10-19 | American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. | System and method for converting a stored value card to a credit card |
JP3930022B2 (en) * | 2002-09-27 | 2007-06-13 | 株式会社ギンガネット | Distance learning system, attendance confirmation method and attendance confirmation program |
CN101827124B (en) | 2002-11-13 | 2011-12-28 | 教育考试服务中心 | Systems and methods for testing over a distributed network |
US20040221162A1 (en) * | 2003-02-03 | 2004-11-04 | Phill Kongtcheu | Method and systems to facilitate online electronic notary, signatures and time stamping |
US9818136B1 (en) | 2003-02-05 | 2017-11-14 | Steven M. Hoffberg | System and method for determining contingent relevance |
US7478756B1 (en) * | 2003-03-04 | 2009-01-20 | Data Recognition Corporation | Method and apparatus for pen based data entry and storage |
US7308581B1 (en) | 2003-03-07 | 2007-12-11 | Traffic101.Com | Systems and methods for online identity verification |
CN100585662C (en) | 2003-06-20 | 2010-01-27 | 汤姆森普罗梅特里克公司 | System and method for computer based testing using cache and cacheable objects to expand functionality of a test driver application |
US20050282133A1 (en) * | 2004-06-18 | 2005-12-22 | Christopher Crowhurst | System and method for facilitating computer-based testing using traceable test items |
WO2004114093A2 (en) * | 2003-06-20 | 2004-12-29 | Thomson Prometric | System and method for computer based testing using cache and cacheable objects to expand functionality of a test driver application |
US20050008998A1 (en) * | 2003-07-10 | 2005-01-13 | Munger Chad B. | System and method for providing certified proctors for examinations |
US7158628B2 (en) * | 2003-08-20 | 2007-01-02 | Knowlagent, Inc. | Method and system for selecting a preferred contact center agent based on agent proficiency and performance and contact center state |
US7228484B2 (en) * | 2003-09-11 | 2007-06-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for implementing redundancy enhanced differential signal interface |
JP2005141432A (en) * | 2003-11-05 | 2005-06-02 | Kinesics Inc | Method and system for supporting recruiting employee |
US8190080B2 (en) * | 2004-02-25 | 2012-05-29 | Atellis, Inc. | Method and system for managing skills assessment |
US20050235144A1 (en) * | 2004-04-14 | 2005-10-20 | Jacobs James P | Apparatus and method for computer based examinations |
US7318550B2 (en) | 2004-07-01 | 2008-01-15 | American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. | Biometric safeguard method for use with a smartcard |
US7363504B2 (en) * | 2004-07-01 | 2008-04-22 | American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. | Method and system for keystroke scan recognition biometrics on a smartcard |
US7325724B2 (en) | 2004-07-01 | 2008-02-05 | American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. | Method for registering a biometric for use with a smartcard |
US7314164B2 (en) | 2004-07-01 | 2008-01-01 | American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. | System for biometric security using a smartcard |
US7341181B2 (en) | 2004-07-01 | 2008-03-11 | American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. | Method for biometric security using a smartcard |
US7314165B2 (en) | 2004-07-01 | 2008-01-01 | American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. | Method and system for smellprint recognition biometrics on a smartcard |
US20060016876A1 (en) * | 2004-07-01 | 2006-01-26 | American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. | Method for registering a biometric for use with a smartcard-reader system |
US20060072739A1 (en) * | 2004-10-01 | 2006-04-06 | Knowlagent Inc. | Method and system for assessing and deploying personnel for roles in a contact center |
CN101185347A (en) * | 2005-03-01 | 2008-05-21 | I.D.系统公司 | Mobile portal for rfid applications |
US20060199165A1 (en) * | 2005-03-03 | 2006-09-07 | Christopher Crowhurst | Apparatuses, methods and systems to deploy testing facilities on demand |
US20070042335A1 (en) * | 2005-05-11 | 2007-02-22 | Ctb Mcgraw-Hill | System and method for assessment or survey response collection using a remote, digitally recording user input device |
US20060256953A1 (en) * | 2005-05-12 | 2006-11-16 | Knowlagent, Inc. | Method and system for improving workforce performance in a contact center |
US20070031801A1 (en) * | 2005-06-16 | 2007-02-08 | Ctb Mcgraw Hill | Patterned response system and method |
US20070048723A1 (en) * | 2005-08-19 | 2007-03-01 | Caveon, Llc | Securely administering computerized tests over a network |
JP2006053578A (en) * | 2005-09-12 | 2006-02-23 | Nippon Tokei Jimu Center:Kk | Test implementation method |
US8874477B2 (en) | 2005-10-04 | 2014-10-28 | Steven Mark Hoffberg | Multifactorial optimization system and method |
US7513775B2 (en) * | 2005-10-05 | 2009-04-07 | Exam Innovations, Inc. | Presenting answer options to multiple-choice questions during administration of a computerized test |
EP1987505A2 (en) * | 2005-11-21 | 2008-11-05 | Software Secure, Inc. | Systems, methods and apparatus for monitoring exams |
NZ547425A (en) * | 2006-05-24 | 2008-08-29 | Shadow Consulting Ltd | Improvements in or relating to psychometric testing |
JP4911756B2 (en) * | 2006-06-12 | 2012-04-04 | 株式会社日本統計事務センター | Online testing system |
US20080059484A1 (en) * | 2006-09-06 | 2008-03-06 | K12 Inc. | Multimedia system and method for teaching in a hybrid learning environment |
US20080085501A1 (en) * | 2006-10-10 | 2008-04-10 | Philadelphia Health & Education Corporation | System and methods for interactive assessment of performance and learning |
US8435038B2 (en) * | 2006-10-17 | 2013-05-07 | Apollo Finance, Llc | Methods and systems for teaching a practical skill to learners at geographically separate locations |
US8239478B2 (en) * | 2006-12-18 | 2012-08-07 | Fourier Systems (1989) Ltd. | Computer system |
RU2336018C1 (en) * | 2007-01-09 | 2008-10-20 | Владимир Николаевич Бичигов | Carrier of biometric information |
US20080293033A1 (en) * | 2007-03-28 | 2008-11-27 | Scicchitano Anthony R | Identity management system, including multi-stage, multi-phase, multi-period and/or multi-episode procedure for identifying and/or authenticating test examination candidates and/or individuals |
JP2008268431A (en) * | 2007-04-18 | 2008-11-06 | Oki Electric Ind Co Ltd | Written examination system and written examination apparatus |
US20080285818A1 (en) * | 2007-05-17 | 2008-11-20 | Hardy Warren | Fingerprint verification system for computerized course attendance and performance testing |
US7733223B2 (en) * | 2007-08-17 | 2010-06-08 | The Invention Science Fund I, Llc | Effectively documenting irregularities in a responsive user's environment |
US8990400B2 (en) | 2007-08-17 | 2015-03-24 | The Invention Science Fund I, Llc | Facilitating communications among message recipients |
US8583267B2 (en) | 2007-08-17 | 2013-11-12 | The Invention Science Fund I, Llc | Selective invocation of playback content supplementation |
EP2026264A2 (en) | 2007-08-17 | 2009-02-18 | Searete LLC | Effectively documenting irregularities in a responsive user's environment |
US20090099898A1 (en) * | 2007-10-15 | 2009-04-16 | I.D Systems, Inc. | System and method for managing work requests for mobile assets |
US8387082B2 (en) * | 2008-03-25 | 2013-02-26 | Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. | Enhanced voice-rich input for interactive programming |
US8838015B2 (en) | 2009-08-14 | 2014-09-16 | K12 Inc. | Systems and methods for producing, delivering and managing educational material |
US8768240B2 (en) * | 2009-08-14 | 2014-07-01 | K12 Inc. | Systems and methods for producing, delivering and managing educational material |
WO2011035271A1 (en) * | 2009-09-18 | 2011-03-24 | Innovative Exams, Llc | Apparatus and system for and method of registration, admission and testing of a candidate |
US9141513B2 (en) | 2009-10-01 | 2015-09-22 | Kryterion, Inc. | Maintaining a secure computing device in a test taking environment |
US9280907B2 (en) * | 2009-10-01 | 2016-03-08 | Kryterion, Inc. | Proctored performance analysis |
US20110102142A1 (en) * | 2009-11-04 | 2011-05-05 | Widger Ian J | Webcast viewer verification methods |
US20180225982A1 (en) | 2010-01-15 | 2018-08-09 | ProctorU, INC. | System for online automated exam proctoring |
US20110177484A1 (en) * | 2010-01-15 | 2011-07-21 | ProctorU Inc. | Online proctoring process for distance-based testing |
US8417525B2 (en) * | 2010-02-09 | 2013-04-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Adaptive voice print for conversational biometric engine |
TWI409722B (en) * | 2010-03-08 | 2013-09-21 | Prime View Int Co Ltd | Examining system and method thereof |
US10672286B2 (en) | 2010-03-14 | 2020-06-02 | Kryterion, Inc. | Cloud based test environment |
US20120077177A1 (en) * | 2010-03-14 | 2012-03-29 | Kryterion, Inc. | Secure Online Testing |
WO2011115644A1 (en) * | 2010-03-14 | 2011-09-22 | Kryterion, Inc. | Systems and methods for secure, online, proctored examination |
CN102201176B (en) * | 2010-03-25 | 2013-11-06 | 元太科技工业股份有限公司 | Test system and methods thereof |
US8650805B1 (en) | 2010-05-17 | 2014-02-18 | Equinix, Inc. | Systems and methods for DMARC in a cage mesh design |
US8713130B2 (en) * | 2010-08-04 | 2014-04-29 | Kryterion, Inc. | Peered proctoring |
US9137163B2 (en) | 2010-08-04 | 2015-09-15 | Kryterion, Inc. | Optimized data stream upload |
US9953175B2 (en) * | 2010-08-16 | 2018-04-24 | Extegrity, Inc. | Systems and methods for detecting substitution of high-value electronic documents |
US20120072121A1 (en) * | 2010-09-20 | 2012-03-22 | Pulsar Informatics, Inc. | Systems and methods for quality control of computer-based tests |
US8762009B2 (en) | 2010-11-18 | 2014-06-24 | I.D. Systems, Inc. | Impact sensor calibration tool |
CN102054374A (en) * | 2010-12-28 | 2011-05-11 | 山大鲁能信息科技有限公司 | Test system based on 3G (Third Generation) network |
US20120244508A1 (en) * | 2011-03-24 | 2012-09-27 | The American Paralegal Institute, Inc. | Method for remotely proctoring tests taken by computer over the internet |
US9047464B2 (en) | 2011-04-11 | 2015-06-02 | NSS Lab Works LLC | Continuous monitoring of computer user and computer activities |
US9092605B2 (en) | 2011-04-11 | 2015-07-28 | NSS Lab Works LLC | Ongoing authentication and access control with network access device |
US8904473B2 (en) | 2011-04-11 | 2014-12-02 | NSS Lab Works LLC | Secure display system for prevention of information copying from any display screen system |
US8909127B2 (en) | 2011-09-27 | 2014-12-09 | Educational Testing Service | Computer-implemented systems and methods for carrying out non-centralized assessments |
KR20130044888A (en) * | 2011-10-25 | 2013-05-03 | 주식회사 케이티 | Method and system for providing education content using multiple terminals |
WO2014013513A1 (en) * | 2012-07-20 | 2014-01-23 | Himanshu Aggarwal | Method and system for verifying identity of a person |
CN102831500A (en) * | 2012-08-08 | 2012-12-19 | 广东兰贝斯信息科技有限公司 | Paperless examination security monitoring system and method |
US20140244717A1 (en) * | 2013-02-27 | 2014-08-28 | MXN Corporation | Eportal system and method of use thereof |
US9852275B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2017-12-26 | NSS Lab Works LLC | Security device, methods, and systems for continuous authentication |
US10008124B1 (en) | 2013-09-18 | 2018-06-26 | Beth Holst | Method and system for providing secure remote testing |
US11327302B2 (en) | 2013-09-18 | 2022-05-10 | Beth Holst | Secure capture and transfer of image and audio data |
US9754503B2 (en) * | 2014-03-24 | 2017-09-05 | Educational Testing Service | Systems and methods for automated scoring of a user's performance |
US20150339937A1 (en) * | 2014-05-22 | 2015-11-26 | Act, Inc. | Methods and systems for testing with test booklets and electronic devices |
US9875348B2 (en) | 2014-07-21 | 2018-01-23 | Green Grade Solutions Ltd. | E-learning utilizing remote proctoring and analytical metrics captured during training and testing |
US9715621B2 (en) * | 2014-12-22 | 2017-07-25 | Mcafee, Inc. | Systems and methods for real-time user verification in online education |
WO2016108212A1 (en) * | 2015-01-02 | 2016-07-07 | Aggarwal, Varun | Portable assessment and proctoring system |
US9607189B2 (en) | 2015-01-14 | 2017-03-28 | Tactilis Sdn Bhd | Smart card system comprising a card and a carrier |
US10395227B2 (en) | 2015-01-14 | 2019-08-27 | Tactilis Pte. Limited | System and method for reconciling electronic transaction records for enhanced security |
US10037528B2 (en) | 2015-01-14 | 2018-07-31 | Tactilis Sdn Bhd | Biometric device utilizing finger sequence for authentication |
CN108352044A (en) | 2015-11-24 | 2018-07-31 | 索尼公司 | Information processing unit, information processing method and program |
JP6379165B2 (en) * | 2016-10-14 | 2018-08-22 | 株式会社ベネッセコーポレーション | Information processing terminal and program |
EP3330947A1 (en) | 2016-12-01 | 2018-06-06 | Tata Consultancy Services Limited | System and method for computer based assessment distribution and printing |
EP3480801A1 (en) * | 2017-11-02 | 2019-05-08 | Tata Consultancy Services Limited | System and method for conducting a secured computer based candidate assessment |
TWI706331B (en) * | 2018-05-22 | 2020-10-01 | 義隆電子股份有限公司 | Fingerprint enrollment method and electronic device for the same |
RU2709649C2 (en) * | 2018-06-06 | 2019-12-19 | Виталий Борисович Дагиров | Remote registration system for mobile communication users |
US11205351B2 (en) * | 2018-12-04 | 2021-12-21 | Western Governors University | Dynamically controlling program flow of a testing application |
US11763692B2 (en) | 2019-06-05 | 2023-09-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Secure delivery and processing of paper-based exam questions and responses |
CN111696395A (en) * | 2020-06-30 | 2020-09-22 | 安徽文香信息技术有限公司 | Multimedia desk based on synchronous classroom |
US11605462B1 (en) * | 2021-12-30 | 2023-03-14 | Great Plain Technologies, Llc | System and methods for human identification of individuals with COVID-19 utilizing dynamic adaptive biometrics |
Family Cites Families (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4486180A (en) * | 1982-04-27 | 1984-12-04 | Riley Michael D | Testing system with test of subject matters, identification and security |
US4764120A (en) * | 1986-05-27 | 1988-08-16 | Mcdonald's Corporation | Student response system |
US4970655A (en) * | 1988-11-01 | 1990-11-13 | American Registration Systems, Inc. | Automatic fee collecting and receipt dispensing system |
US5195033A (en) * | 1990-06-08 | 1993-03-16 | Assessment Systems, Inc. | Testing system including removable storage means for transfer of test related data and means for issuing a certification upon successful completion of the test |
US5204813A (en) * | 1990-06-08 | 1993-04-20 | Assessment Systems, Inc. | Computer-controlled testing process and device for administering an examination |
US5218528A (en) * | 1990-11-06 | 1993-06-08 | Advanced Technological Systems, Inc. | Automated voting system |
US5170362A (en) * | 1991-01-15 | 1992-12-08 | Atlantic Richfield Company | Redundant system for interactively evaluating the capabilities of multiple test subjects to perform a task utilizing a computerized test system |
US5565316A (en) * | 1992-10-09 | 1996-10-15 | Educational Testing Service | System and method for computer based testing |
JPH06180546A (en) * | 1992-12-15 | 1994-06-28 | Toshiba Corp | Intellectual examination system |
US5458494A (en) * | 1993-08-23 | 1995-10-17 | Edutech Research Labs, Ltd. | Remotely operable teaching system and method therefor |
JP3776117B2 (en) * | 1993-09-30 | 2006-05-17 | エデュケーショナル・テスティング・サービス | Centralized system and method for managing computer tests |
US5601432A (en) * | 1995-01-20 | 1997-02-11 | Mastery Rehabilitation Systems, Inc. | Educational organizer |
US5947747A (en) * | 1996-05-09 | 1999-09-07 | Walker Asset Management Limited Partnership | Method and apparatus for computer-based educational testing |
WO1998009401A1 (en) * | 1996-08-27 | 1998-03-05 | Hondros John G | Audit and verification system |
-
1997
- 1997-03-11 US US08/816,039 patent/US5915973A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1998
- 1998-03-10 EP EP98909064A patent/EP0910844A4/en not_active Withdrawn
- 1998-03-10 AT AT00101866T patent/ATE268042T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1998-03-10 BR BRPI9805947-5A patent/BR9805947B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1998-03-10 RU RU98120494/28A patent/RU2216048C2/en active
- 1998-03-10 CN CNB988002698A patent/CN1301497C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-03-10 CA CA002253339A patent/CA2253339C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-03-10 DE DE69824192T patent/DE69824192T2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-03-10 ES ES00101866T patent/ES2220264T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-03-10 EP EP00101866A patent/EP1018717B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-03-10 JP JP53967498A patent/JP4495786B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-03-10 WO PCT/US1998/004587 patent/WO1998040862A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1998-03-10 AU AU66943/98A patent/AU733914B2/en not_active Expired
-
2000
- 2000-08-07 HK HK00104894A patent/HK1026293A1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
-
2009
- 2009-08-18 JP JP2009189596A patent/JP2010009055A/en active Pending
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP4495786B2 (en) | 2010-07-07 |
CN1219260A (en) | 1999-06-09 |
CN1301497C (en) | 2007-02-21 |
RU2216048C2 (en) | 2003-11-10 |
EP1018717B1 (en) | 2004-05-26 |
AU733914B2 (en) | 2001-05-31 |
DE69824192T2 (en) | 2005-06-02 |
BR9805947B1 (en) | 2011-12-13 |
JP2010009055A (en) | 2010-01-14 |
EP0910844A1 (en) | 1999-04-28 |
HK1026293A1 (en) | 2000-12-08 |
ATE268042T1 (en) | 2004-06-15 |
WO1998040862A1 (en) | 1998-09-17 |
CA2253339A1 (en) | 1998-09-17 |
DE69824192D1 (en) | 2004-07-01 |
US5915973A (en) | 1999-06-29 |
EP1018717A3 (en) | 2000-07-26 |
AU6694398A (en) | 1998-09-29 |
EP1018717A2 (en) | 2000-07-12 |
EP0910844A4 (en) | 2000-07-12 |
ES2220264T3 (en) | 2004-12-16 |
JP2001510593A (en) | 2001-07-31 |
BR9805947A (en) | 1999-08-31 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA2253339C (en) | Method and system for administrating of remotely-proctored secure examination | |
US20180131518A1 (en) | Identity Management for Computer Based Testing System | |
US5189288A (en) | Method and system for automated voting | |
US6325631B1 (en) | Remote certification of workers for multiple worksites | |
US20180211255A1 (en) | Transaction choice selection apparatus and system | |
CN110738114A (en) | student identity safety verification system for online education | |
US20100268961A1 (en) | Method and Arrangement for User Validation | |
US20050035199A1 (en) | Voter interface for electronic voting system for the visually impaired | |
KR100478157B1 (en) | System for administration of remotely-proctored, secure examinations and methods therefor | |
JPH04139576A (en) | Automatic resident card issuing system | |
WO2006075396A1 (en) | Authentication system | |
CN208014043U (en) | Guest machine based on recognition of face | |
MXPA98009405A (en) | Method and system for administrating of remotely-proctored secure examination | |
US6997383B2 (en) | Electronic voting system and method of preventing unauthorized use of ballot cards therein | |
JP3405597B2 (en) | Electronic voting system | |
US20020016847A1 (en) | Method for testing of students at a remote testing facility | |
CN211857592U (en) | Bill dynamic code inspection system | |
CN115631073A (en) | Mobile invigilating mobile phone matching key terminal | |
WO2002042963A2 (en) | A computerised administration system and method for administering the conduct of examinations such as academic examinations | |
KR20060000104A (en) | Student-watch-system linked by institute-management-system | |
JP2005208995A (en) | Attendance and absence management system | |
JP2005092293A (en) | Examination server, examination terminal, and cad examination system | |
JP2000242158A (en) | Learning system | |
CN116057601A (en) | Online learning system | |
KR20210032162A (en) | Attendance Management System Using Electronic Examination Ticket |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
EEER | Examination request | ||
MKEX | Expiry |
Effective date: 20180312 |