CA2265326C - Unique identifier bar code on stamps and apparatus and method for monitoring stamp usage with identifier bar codes - Google Patents
Unique identifier bar code on stamps and apparatus and method for monitoring stamp usage with identifier bar codes Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2265326C CA2265326C CA002265326A CA2265326A CA2265326C CA 2265326 C CA2265326 C CA 2265326C CA 002265326 A CA002265326 A CA 002265326A CA 2265326 A CA2265326 A CA 2265326A CA 2265326 C CA2265326 C CA 2265326C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- bar code
- unique identifier
- postage
- stamps
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06K—GRAPHICAL DATA READING; PRESENTATION OF DATA; RECORD CARRIERS; HANDLING RECORD CARRIERS
- G06K19/00—Record carriers for use with machines and with at least a part designed to carry digital markings
- G06K19/06—Record carriers for use with machines and with at least a part designed to carry digital markings characterised by the kind of the digital marking, e.g. shape, nature, code
- G06K19/06009—Record carriers for use with machines and with at least a part designed to carry digital markings characterised by the kind of the digital marking, e.g. shape, nature, code with optically detectable marking
- G06K19/06018—Record carriers for use with machines and with at least a part designed to carry digital markings characterised by the kind of the digital marking, e.g. shape, nature, code with optically detectable marking one-dimensional coding
- G06K19/06028—Record carriers for use with machines and with at least a part designed to carry digital markings characterised by the kind of the digital marking, e.g. shape, nature, code with optically detectable marking one-dimensional coding using bar codes
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07B—TICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
- G07B17/00—Franking apparatus
- G07B17/00185—Details internally of apparatus in a franking system, e.g. franking machine at customer or apparatus at post office
- G07B17/00435—Details specific to central, non-customer apparatus, e.g. servers at post office or vendor
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07B—TICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
- G07B17/00—Franking apparatus
- G07B17/00185—Details internally of apparatus in a franking system, e.g. franking machine at customer or apparatus at post office
- G07B17/00435—Details specific to central, non-customer apparatus, e.g. servers at post office or vendor
- G07B2017/00443—Verification of mailpieces, e.g. by checking databases
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07B—TICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
- G07B17/00—Franking apparatus
- G07B17/00459—Details relating to mailpieces in a franking system
- G07B17/00661—Sensing or measuring mailpieces
- G07B2017/00709—Scanning mailpieces
- G07B2017/00725—Reading symbols, e.g. OCR
Abstract
A postage stamp for general circulation which has a unique identifier bar code is provided which allows the prevention of various fraudulent stamp usages.
Description
Unique Identifier Bar Code on Stamps and Apparatus and Method for Monitoring Stamp Usage with Identifier Bar Codes Field of the Invention The invention relates to stamps, such as postage stamps, and also to methods, systems and machines for tracking the usage of such stamps.
Background of the Invention Stamps provide a common vehicle used in the collection of payment for the delivery of deliverable items.
For example, postage stamps are used to pay for postal delivery service of mail items. While the value of a given conventional postage stamp can easily be determined from a visual inspection, current systems for processing mail are incapable of automatically determining whether the proper amount of postage has been applied with the result that postal administrations are incapable of identifying mail pieces with short paid postage in an automated processing stream.
Additional problems with conventional stamps include the re-use of cancelled postage stamps, the use of postage stamps which have been stolen, the use of postage stamps which have been chemically washed to remove cancellation marks, and the use of postage stamps which have been fraudulently manufactured. The above mis-uses of postage stamps cost postal administrations millions of dollars annually in lost revenue.
Various proposals have been made for dealing with this problem. Colour imaging of postage stamps and the analysis of colours and patterns has been proposed for the identification of specific postage stamps and the calculation of short paid postage. This methodology is very expensive due to the requirement for a colour camera on mail processing machines. It is also unreliable due to the complexity of the individual patterns which must be recognized. Furthermore, only a limited number of patterns can be stored and accessed during real time processing.
The use of connotative inks in postage stamp manufacture and postage stamp cancellation has been investigated as a means to permanently alter the colour of a postage stamp after cancellation to eliminate the potential for washing and re-using a postage stamp. However, connotative inks are expensive and the manufacture of stamps in this manner is more difficult.
No methods have been developed for the detection and isolation of stolen postage stamps. The detection of counterfeit stamps is dependant on the visual examination of the postage stamps' paper, perforations, colour and fluorescence. Visual detection is inefficient and ineffective as only a small sample can be examined.
Metered marks are also subject to fraud. To reduce this fraud and to provide a convenient alternative to postage stamps for small office/home office mailers, the United States Postal Service has developed a methodology for PC (Personal Computer) postage. For PC postage, the United States Postal Service is investigating the use of the PDF 417 bar code for application to the exterior of envelopes by the printer of the envelopes.
A chip or on-line Internet account is debited each time the bar code indicia is printed. Unfortunately, the PDF 417 bar code has very low efficiency in terms of data content per unit area. This is despite the fact that the smallest element in the PDF 417 bar code is very small, in fact smaller than that readable by today's postal industry optical character recognition (OCR) packages included in many existing mail processing machines which have 200 dpi resolution. This means that hand-held scanners are required to read the PDF 417 bar code. Furthermore, the PDF 417 bar codes are large and are not aesthetically pleasing. The systems employed to monitor PC postage usage through these bar codes takes over a day to perform verification and as such cannot be used in real time.
At meetings of the Universal Postal Union Technical Standards Board, the United States Postal Service discussed their information-based indicia program based on the use of the PDF 417 bar code symbology as a replacement for a meter impression, and Canada Post proposed the use of Data Matrix or Aztec code symbologies for this purpose. Mechanisms for using such bar codes to verify postage or detect fraud in real time have yet to be proposed.
While it has been proposed to include unique identifiers on PC postage, there have never been postage stamps which include any sort of unique identifier.
Furthermore, there are not any existing systems capable of identifying mail pieces which are short paid, or postage stamps which have been stolen or reused.
Summary of the Invention It is an object of some embodiments of the invention to obviate or mitigate one or more of the above identified disadvantages.
According to a first broad aspect, the invention provides a postage stamp comprising a first area containing postage stamp artwork; and a second area containing an identifier bar code for the stamp.
According to a second broad aspect, the invention provides a deliverable item processing apparatus for processing a deliverable item having destination information and one or more identifier bar codes each containing a value, the apparatus comprising an image capture device for taking one or more images of the deliverable item which include at least the identifier bar codes and the destination information; a processing and control block for processing the images so as to determine the destination information and the values contained in the identifier bar codes, for accumulating a total of the values contained in the identifier bar codes applied to the deliverable item, for determining a required value for the deliverable item on the basis of the destination information, and for determining if the total is as great as the required value.
According to a third broad aspect, the invention provides a deliverable item processing apparatus for processing a deliverable item having destination information and one or more two-dimensional unique identifier bar codes each representing a unique identifier, the apparatus comprising an image capture device for taking one or more images of the deliverable item which include at least the unique identifier bar codes and the destination information;
an identification tag printer for applying a unique identification tag to each deliverable item processed by the deliverable item processing apparatus; a processing and control system for processing the images so as to determine a destination identifier from the destination information and from the unique identifier bar codes the unique identifiers, and for creating a record for each unique identifier bar code containing the unique identifier, the identification tag and the destination identifier.
According to a fourth broad aspect, the invention provides a deliverable item processing apparatus for processing a deliverable item having an identification tag, the apparatus comprising an identification tag capture device for reading the identification tag; a processing and control block for maintaining a list of identification tags on the basis of an input received from a remote source, for comparing the identification tag with the list of identification tags, and if there is a match, diverting the deliverable item for special processing.
According to a fifth broad aspect, the invention provides a method of controlling data for use by deliverable item processing apparatuses, the method comprising storing a plurality of records each having fields for an identification tag and a unique identifier; receiving from one of said deliverable item processing apparatuses a destination identifier, a received identification tag of a deliverable item which has been processed by said deliverable item processing apparatus and a received unique identifier; looking up the record containing the received unique identifier; if there is no stored identification tag in the record, adding the received identification tag to the record; if there is a stored identification tag in the record, comparing the stored identification tag to the received identification tag; if there is no record for the unique identifier, or if there is a mismatch between the stored identification tag and the received identification tag, sending the received identification tag to a destination identified by the destination identifier.
According to a sixth broad aspect, the invention provides a deliverable item processing apparatus for processing a deliverable item having one or more stamps with unique identifier bar codes each containing a unique identifier, the apparatus comprising memory for storing a list of unique identifiers for stamps which have been identified as stolen; an image capture device for taking one or more images of the deliverable item which include at least the unique identifier bar codes; a processing and control block for determining from the unique identifier bar codes in the images the unique identifiers of the stamps, and for comparing these to the stored unique identifiers, and if there is a match, diverting the deliverable item for special processing.
According to a seventh broad aspect, the present invention provides a postage stamp for general circulation comprising: a first area containing postage stamp artwork;
and a second area containing a unique identifier bar code allowing individual identification of the postage stamp.
- 6a -Brief Description of the Drawings Preferred embodiments of the invention will now be described with reference to the attached drawings in which:
Figure 1A is a schematic illustration of two postage stamps according to an embodiment of the invention;
Figure 1B is an illustration of two possible bar code symbologies for use with the postage stamps of Figure 1A;
Figure 2 is a schematic illustration of another postage stamp according to an embodiment of the invention;
Figure 3 is a block diagram of a postal service provider system;
Figure 4 is a block diagram of a mail processing apparatus according to an embodiment of the invention;
Figure 5 is a flowchart of a method used by the mail processing apparatus of Figure 4 to identify short paid postage;
Figure 6 is a flowchart of a method used by the mail processing apparatus of Figure 4 to identify stolen stamps;
Figure 7 is a block diagram of a mail processing system according to an embodiment of the invention showing details of an originating mail processing apparatus;
Figure 8 is a block diagram of the mail processing system of Figure 7 showing details of a destination mail processing apparatus;
Figure 9 is an example record in the national circulation database of Figures 7 and 8;
Figure 10 is a flowchart of a method used by the originating mail processing apparatus of Figures 7 and 8 to prevent the fraudulent use of stamps;
Figures 11A and 11B are flowcharts of methods used by the national circulation database of Figures 7 and 8 to prevent the fraudulent use of stamps;
Figures 12A and 12B are flowcharts of methods used by the destination mail processing apparatus of Figures 7 and 8 to prevent the fraudulent use of stamps;
Figure 13 is an illustration of an identification tag on the back of an envelope;
Figure 14 is a plan view of a PC postage mail piece which can be read by mail processing apparatuses according to the invention; and Figure 15 is a plan view of another PC postage mail piece which can be read by mail processing apparatuses according to the invention.
Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments According to an embodiment of the invention, an improved postage stamp is provided which includes a two-dimensional unique identifier bar code. As described in detail below, the unique identifier bar code uniquely identifies the postage stamp and permits the elimination of most or all of the fraudulent postage stamp usages outlined above. The unique identifier bar code is readable preferably by mail processing machines which use cameras for optical character recognition.
Referring firstly to Figure 1A, two schematic replicas of such improved postage stamps according to the invention are shown and are generally indicated by 20,22.
Each stamp 20,22 includes a two-dimensional bar code portion 24,26, and an artwork portion 28,30. The artwork portions 28,30 include an alphanumeric designation of the country, in this case "Canada", and of the postage value of the particular postage stamp, in this case "45".
The bar code portions 24,26 may use any existing or future bar code symbology satisfying a number of constraints.
Firstly, the bar code symbology must permit the expression of a sufficient amount of information about the postage stamp, and preferably in a reasonable amount of postage stamp real estate. In other words, the unique identifier bar codes must not be too large.
Preferably, the bar code symbology is readable with existing mail processing machines. The majority of mail processing machines in the world have cameras with a resolution of 200 dots per inch. Based on this requirement, the smallest element in the unique identifier bar code should be at least 0.3 mm in size, and more preferably, each element is at least 0.5 mm in size to ensure reliable reading.
Each two-dimensional unique identifier bar code is encoded with information that makes it a unique identifier for the postage stamp of which it forms a part. Preferably, it contains several data elements as summarized in the following table where example values for the data elements are also provided:
Data Element Bytes Example Delivery Service 2 JO
Provider Identifier Country Identifier 2 CA
Postage Stamp Value 2 0046 Postage Stamp Design # 2 0105 Date of Printing (yymm) 2 9902 Printing Company # 2 02 Serial Number 4 1054345 Data Security (encryption) 8 Binary String Total 22 To distinguish the two-dimensional unique identifier bar codes created for use by delivery service providers from other two-dimensional bar codes which may appear on a mail piece, a delivery service provider identifier data element is preferably included in the data. To provide the flexibility for use by different countries, a country identifier is added.
The postage stamp value is required to allow a determination of whether a mail piece has been short paid as described in detail below. The postage stamp value, stamp design number, date of printing, and printing company number identify manufacturing batches with serial numbers assigned within each batch to uniquely identify each postage stamp. The use of batch criteria permits fast searching of databases. Any one or a combination of these or other fields which allows a unique identification of a postage stamp will be referred to as a "unique identifier". This unique identifier might for example include all of the following fields: the postage stamp value, stamp design number, date of printing, printing company and serial number.
To accommodate the required data in an OCR readable bar code in the real estate available with the smallest size of postage stamp requires the use of a two-dimensional bar code. To guarantee a high bar code read rate with a low error rate, error correction such as Reed-Solomon coding can be incorporated in the unique identifier bar code. To minimize damage to the unique identifier bar code and maximize reading during mail processing of a black ink unique identifier bar code, it is desirable to locate the unique identifier bar code towards the bottom (as in the first example 20) or to the left-hand side (as in the second example 22) of the postage stamp.
Two known bar code symbologies with the required properties are illustrated in Figure 1B and consist of the Aztec Code symbology 27 and the Data Matrix symbology 29. The Aztec symbology is described in AIM (American Industry Manufacturers) Standard ISS (International Symbology Specification) Aztec (10/97), and the Data Matrix symbology is described in AIM Standard ISS Data Matrix (12/96 V1.01). The Data Matrix and Aztec symbologies both have a net area efficiency of approximately 50%.
Preferably the unique identifier bar code is printed in black and white or in colours with sufficient print contrast ratio for OCR reading and is printed in a separate portion of the postage stamp from the artwork. Another option is to print the two-dimensional unique identifier bar code in invisible ink (fluorescent or infrared) partially or completely overlapping the artwork of the postage stamp. This option would require the installation of an additional camera on each mail processing machine. An example of this is shown in Figure 2 where the unique identifier bar code is illustrated in white, but it is to be understood that the unique identifier bar code would be printed using invisible ink meaning the artwork would be completely visible.
While the above described embodiment has focused on postage stamps which would be sold by postal administrations, it is to be understood that any stamps including such unique identifier bar codes could be put to use by any delivery service provider.
A very general postal service provider system is shown schematically in Figure 3. The system includes a number (three shown) of mail processing plants 51,53,55 "connected to each other" through a delivery transport mechanism 52 which is illustrated by a cloud. The mail processing plants 51,53,55 are typically disparately geographically located, for example in different cities. Each processing plant 51,53,55 contains one or more originating mail processing apparatuses by which mail pieces are first processed by the system and/or one or more destination mail processing apparatuses which perform output processing on mail pieces. The details of mail processing plant 51 are shown by way of example to include three originating mail processing apparatuses 50 and three destination mail processing apparatuses 54. The delivery transport mechanism 52 is any mechanism or combination of mechanisms which provides for the physical delivery of mail pieces between the mail processing plants 51,53,55.
A mail processing apparatus according to an embodiment of the invention is depicted in block diagram form in Figure 4. While this embodiment could be used as a destination mail processing machine, it is preferably implemented as an originating mail processing apparatus for use in a system such as depicted in Figure 3 for example.
This embodiment allows the detection and extraction of short paid mail pieces. This apparatus is designed to process mail pieces which have destination information such as an address, and to which one or more of the above described novel postage stamps have been affixed. The apparatus has an input queue 60 into which mail pieces for processing are deposited. The input queue 60 feeds the mail pieces onto a mail piece conveyor 62 which is typically a series of belts designed to transport mail pieces through the mail processing apparatus to a multi-bin stacker generally indicated by 64. The multi-bin stacker 64 has a plurality of bins 64A, 64B, 64C, 64D, 64E, 64F, 64G, 64H, 641, 64J, 64K, 64L into which mail pieces can be directed by deviators 65 (12 shown). Along the length of the mail piece conveyor 62 (which need not be a straight line) various devices are placed to perform actions upon the mail pieces as they pass by. A camera 66 is provided for taking and digitizing an image of the front surface of the mail piece, the assumption being that the mail pieces have been previously faced such that the destination information and stamps are on the front surface. There is a weighing module 68 for measuring the weight of the mail pieces. There is a processing and control block generally indicated by 70 which is intended to represent most of the processing and control functionality of the mail processing machine. This may be implemented in one or a series of computer platforms with one or multiple processors. The processing and control block is connected to receive the digitized images taken by the camera 66 and the weights measured by the weighing module 68. It is also connected to control the deviators 65 forming part of the multi-bin stacker 64 so as to be able to precisely control into which bin a given mail piece is to be diverted. While the camera 66 preferably takes an image of the entire front surface of the mail piece, it (or a combination of cameras) must at least take one or more images which collectively include the destination information and the stamps.
The processing and control block 70 includes optical character recognition software for analysing digitized images received from the camera 66, and more particularly for processing the unique identifier bar code on each stamp on the mail piece, and for determining the destination information.
The processor and control block 70 also includes functionality which allows a determination of a required postage for various destinations for a given weight of a mail piece.
The steps performed by the mail processing apparatus of Figure 4 will now be described with reference to the flowchart of Figure 5. To begin, the camera 66 takes an image of the front surface of the mail piece, digitizes this and passes it to the processing and control block 70. The processing and control block 70 performs character and word recognition to identify the destination information and to find and decode the unique identifier bar code on each stamp and recover the data elements represented by the unique identifier bar code. There may be several stamps. Next, the processing and control block 70 accumulates a sum of the postage values of the postage stamps on the mail piece. The processing and control block 70 then determines a required postage based on the destination information and the weight.
Next, a comparison of the required postage with the total cumulative stamp value is made. If there is a postage shortfall, this fact is identified in real time, and the processing and control block 70 controls the stacker deviators 65 such that the mail piece is diverted to a bin which has been allocated to receive short paid mail, for example bin 64A
which is labelled "short paid". If there is sufficient postage, then normal processing of the mail piece is completed, and the mail piece is diverted to a bin for transport, for example one of bins 64G, 64H, 641, 64J, 64K, 64L.
In another embodiment of the invention, a mail processing apparatus is provided which can detect stolen stamps. Referring again to Figure 4, in this embodiment, a stolen stamps table 72 either forming part of or accessible to the processing and control block 70 is provided for storing unique identifiers of stamps which have been stolen. A
Background of the Invention Stamps provide a common vehicle used in the collection of payment for the delivery of deliverable items.
For example, postage stamps are used to pay for postal delivery service of mail items. While the value of a given conventional postage stamp can easily be determined from a visual inspection, current systems for processing mail are incapable of automatically determining whether the proper amount of postage has been applied with the result that postal administrations are incapable of identifying mail pieces with short paid postage in an automated processing stream.
Additional problems with conventional stamps include the re-use of cancelled postage stamps, the use of postage stamps which have been stolen, the use of postage stamps which have been chemically washed to remove cancellation marks, and the use of postage stamps which have been fraudulently manufactured. The above mis-uses of postage stamps cost postal administrations millions of dollars annually in lost revenue.
Various proposals have been made for dealing with this problem. Colour imaging of postage stamps and the analysis of colours and patterns has been proposed for the identification of specific postage stamps and the calculation of short paid postage. This methodology is very expensive due to the requirement for a colour camera on mail processing machines. It is also unreliable due to the complexity of the individual patterns which must be recognized. Furthermore, only a limited number of patterns can be stored and accessed during real time processing.
The use of connotative inks in postage stamp manufacture and postage stamp cancellation has been investigated as a means to permanently alter the colour of a postage stamp after cancellation to eliminate the potential for washing and re-using a postage stamp. However, connotative inks are expensive and the manufacture of stamps in this manner is more difficult.
No methods have been developed for the detection and isolation of stolen postage stamps. The detection of counterfeit stamps is dependant on the visual examination of the postage stamps' paper, perforations, colour and fluorescence. Visual detection is inefficient and ineffective as only a small sample can be examined.
Metered marks are also subject to fraud. To reduce this fraud and to provide a convenient alternative to postage stamps for small office/home office mailers, the United States Postal Service has developed a methodology for PC (Personal Computer) postage. For PC postage, the United States Postal Service is investigating the use of the PDF 417 bar code for application to the exterior of envelopes by the printer of the envelopes.
A chip or on-line Internet account is debited each time the bar code indicia is printed. Unfortunately, the PDF 417 bar code has very low efficiency in terms of data content per unit area. This is despite the fact that the smallest element in the PDF 417 bar code is very small, in fact smaller than that readable by today's postal industry optical character recognition (OCR) packages included in many existing mail processing machines which have 200 dpi resolution. This means that hand-held scanners are required to read the PDF 417 bar code. Furthermore, the PDF 417 bar codes are large and are not aesthetically pleasing. The systems employed to monitor PC postage usage through these bar codes takes over a day to perform verification and as such cannot be used in real time.
At meetings of the Universal Postal Union Technical Standards Board, the United States Postal Service discussed their information-based indicia program based on the use of the PDF 417 bar code symbology as a replacement for a meter impression, and Canada Post proposed the use of Data Matrix or Aztec code symbologies for this purpose. Mechanisms for using such bar codes to verify postage or detect fraud in real time have yet to be proposed.
While it has been proposed to include unique identifiers on PC postage, there have never been postage stamps which include any sort of unique identifier.
Furthermore, there are not any existing systems capable of identifying mail pieces which are short paid, or postage stamps which have been stolen or reused.
Summary of the Invention It is an object of some embodiments of the invention to obviate or mitigate one or more of the above identified disadvantages.
According to a first broad aspect, the invention provides a postage stamp comprising a first area containing postage stamp artwork; and a second area containing an identifier bar code for the stamp.
According to a second broad aspect, the invention provides a deliverable item processing apparatus for processing a deliverable item having destination information and one or more identifier bar codes each containing a value, the apparatus comprising an image capture device for taking one or more images of the deliverable item which include at least the identifier bar codes and the destination information; a processing and control block for processing the images so as to determine the destination information and the values contained in the identifier bar codes, for accumulating a total of the values contained in the identifier bar codes applied to the deliverable item, for determining a required value for the deliverable item on the basis of the destination information, and for determining if the total is as great as the required value.
According to a third broad aspect, the invention provides a deliverable item processing apparatus for processing a deliverable item having destination information and one or more two-dimensional unique identifier bar codes each representing a unique identifier, the apparatus comprising an image capture device for taking one or more images of the deliverable item which include at least the unique identifier bar codes and the destination information;
an identification tag printer for applying a unique identification tag to each deliverable item processed by the deliverable item processing apparatus; a processing and control system for processing the images so as to determine a destination identifier from the destination information and from the unique identifier bar codes the unique identifiers, and for creating a record for each unique identifier bar code containing the unique identifier, the identification tag and the destination identifier.
According to a fourth broad aspect, the invention provides a deliverable item processing apparatus for processing a deliverable item having an identification tag, the apparatus comprising an identification tag capture device for reading the identification tag; a processing and control block for maintaining a list of identification tags on the basis of an input received from a remote source, for comparing the identification tag with the list of identification tags, and if there is a match, diverting the deliverable item for special processing.
According to a fifth broad aspect, the invention provides a method of controlling data for use by deliverable item processing apparatuses, the method comprising storing a plurality of records each having fields for an identification tag and a unique identifier; receiving from one of said deliverable item processing apparatuses a destination identifier, a received identification tag of a deliverable item which has been processed by said deliverable item processing apparatus and a received unique identifier; looking up the record containing the received unique identifier; if there is no stored identification tag in the record, adding the received identification tag to the record; if there is a stored identification tag in the record, comparing the stored identification tag to the received identification tag; if there is no record for the unique identifier, or if there is a mismatch between the stored identification tag and the received identification tag, sending the received identification tag to a destination identified by the destination identifier.
According to a sixth broad aspect, the invention provides a deliverable item processing apparatus for processing a deliverable item having one or more stamps with unique identifier bar codes each containing a unique identifier, the apparatus comprising memory for storing a list of unique identifiers for stamps which have been identified as stolen; an image capture device for taking one or more images of the deliverable item which include at least the unique identifier bar codes; a processing and control block for determining from the unique identifier bar codes in the images the unique identifiers of the stamps, and for comparing these to the stored unique identifiers, and if there is a match, diverting the deliverable item for special processing.
According to a seventh broad aspect, the present invention provides a postage stamp for general circulation comprising: a first area containing postage stamp artwork;
and a second area containing a unique identifier bar code allowing individual identification of the postage stamp.
- 6a -Brief Description of the Drawings Preferred embodiments of the invention will now be described with reference to the attached drawings in which:
Figure 1A is a schematic illustration of two postage stamps according to an embodiment of the invention;
Figure 1B is an illustration of two possible bar code symbologies for use with the postage stamps of Figure 1A;
Figure 2 is a schematic illustration of another postage stamp according to an embodiment of the invention;
Figure 3 is a block diagram of a postal service provider system;
Figure 4 is a block diagram of a mail processing apparatus according to an embodiment of the invention;
Figure 5 is a flowchart of a method used by the mail processing apparatus of Figure 4 to identify short paid postage;
Figure 6 is a flowchart of a method used by the mail processing apparatus of Figure 4 to identify stolen stamps;
Figure 7 is a block diagram of a mail processing system according to an embodiment of the invention showing details of an originating mail processing apparatus;
Figure 8 is a block diagram of the mail processing system of Figure 7 showing details of a destination mail processing apparatus;
Figure 9 is an example record in the national circulation database of Figures 7 and 8;
Figure 10 is a flowchart of a method used by the originating mail processing apparatus of Figures 7 and 8 to prevent the fraudulent use of stamps;
Figures 11A and 11B are flowcharts of methods used by the national circulation database of Figures 7 and 8 to prevent the fraudulent use of stamps;
Figures 12A and 12B are flowcharts of methods used by the destination mail processing apparatus of Figures 7 and 8 to prevent the fraudulent use of stamps;
Figure 13 is an illustration of an identification tag on the back of an envelope;
Figure 14 is a plan view of a PC postage mail piece which can be read by mail processing apparatuses according to the invention; and Figure 15 is a plan view of another PC postage mail piece which can be read by mail processing apparatuses according to the invention.
Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments According to an embodiment of the invention, an improved postage stamp is provided which includes a two-dimensional unique identifier bar code. As described in detail below, the unique identifier bar code uniquely identifies the postage stamp and permits the elimination of most or all of the fraudulent postage stamp usages outlined above. The unique identifier bar code is readable preferably by mail processing machines which use cameras for optical character recognition.
Referring firstly to Figure 1A, two schematic replicas of such improved postage stamps according to the invention are shown and are generally indicated by 20,22.
Each stamp 20,22 includes a two-dimensional bar code portion 24,26, and an artwork portion 28,30. The artwork portions 28,30 include an alphanumeric designation of the country, in this case "Canada", and of the postage value of the particular postage stamp, in this case "45".
The bar code portions 24,26 may use any existing or future bar code symbology satisfying a number of constraints.
Firstly, the bar code symbology must permit the expression of a sufficient amount of information about the postage stamp, and preferably in a reasonable amount of postage stamp real estate. In other words, the unique identifier bar codes must not be too large.
Preferably, the bar code symbology is readable with existing mail processing machines. The majority of mail processing machines in the world have cameras with a resolution of 200 dots per inch. Based on this requirement, the smallest element in the unique identifier bar code should be at least 0.3 mm in size, and more preferably, each element is at least 0.5 mm in size to ensure reliable reading.
Each two-dimensional unique identifier bar code is encoded with information that makes it a unique identifier for the postage stamp of which it forms a part. Preferably, it contains several data elements as summarized in the following table where example values for the data elements are also provided:
Data Element Bytes Example Delivery Service 2 JO
Provider Identifier Country Identifier 2 CA
Postage Stamp Value 2 0046 Postage Stamp Design # 2 0105 Date of Printing (yymm) 2 9902 Printing Company # 2 02 Serial Number 4 1054345 Data Security (encryption) 8 Binary String Total 22 To distinguish the two-dimensional unique identifier bar codes created for use by delivery service providers from other two-dimensional bar codes which may appear on a mail piece, a delivery service provider identifier data element is preferably included in the data. To provide the flexibility for use by different countries, a country identifier is added.
The postage stamp value is required to allow a determination of whether a mail piece has been short paid as described in detail below. The postage stamp value, stamp design number, date of printing, and printing company number identify manufacturing batches with serial numbers assigned within each batch to uniquely identify each postage stamp. The use of batch criteria permits fast searching of databases. Any one or a combination of these or other fields which allows a unique identification of a postage stamp will be referred to as a "unique identifier". This unique identifier might for example include all of the following fields: the postage stamp value, stamp design number, date of printing, printing company and serial number.
To accommodate the required data in an OCR readable bar code in the real estate available with the smallest size of postage stamp requires the use of a two-dimensional bar code. To guarantee a high bar code read rate with a low error rate, error correction such as Reed-Solomon coding can be incorporated in the unique identifier bar code. To minimize damage to the unique identifier bar code and maximize reading during mail processing of a black ink unique identifier bar code, it is desirable to locate the unique identifier bar code towards the bottom (as in the first example 20) or to the left-hand side (as in the second example 22) of the postage stamp.
Two known bar code symbologies with the required properties are illustrated in Figure 1B and consist of the Aztec Code symbology 27 and the Data Matrix symbology 29. The Aztec symbology is described in AIM (American Industry Manufacturers) Standard ISS (International Symbology Specification) Aztec (10/97), and the Data Matrix symbology is described in AIM Standard ISS Data Matrix (12/96 V1.01). The Data Matrix and Aztec symbologies both have a net area efficiency of approximately 50%.
Preferably the unique identifier bar code is printed in black and white or in colours with sufficient print contrast ratio for OCR reading and is printed in a separate portion of the postage stamp from the artwork. Another option is to print the two-dimensional unique identifier bar code in invisible ink (fluorescent or infrared) partially or completely overlapping the artwork of the postage stamp. This option would require the installation of an additional camera on each mail processing machine. An example of this is shown in Figure 2 where the unique identifier bar code is illustrated in white, but it is to be understood that the unique identifier bar code would be printed using invisible ink meaning the artwork would be completely visible.
While the above described embodiment has focused on postage stamps which would be sold by postal administrations, it is to be understood that any stamps including such unique identifier bar codes could be put to use by any delivery service provider.
A very general postal service provider system is shown schematically in Figure 3. The system includes a number (three shown) of mail processing plants 51,53,55 "connected to each other" through a delivery transport mechanism 52 which is illustrated by a cloud. The mail processing plants 51,53,55 are typically disparately geographically located, for example in different cities. Each processing plant 51,53,55 contains one or more originating mail processing apparatuses by which mail pieces are first processed by the system and/or one or more destination mail processing apparatuses which perform output processing on mail pieces. The details of mail processing plant 51 are shown by way of example to include three originating mail processing apparatuses 50 and three destination mail processing apparatuses 54. The delivery transport mechanism 52 is any mechanism or combination of mechanisms which provides for the physical delivery of mail pieces between the mail processing plants 51,53,55.
A mail processing apparatus according to an embodiment of the invention is depicted in block diagram form in Figure 4. While this embodiment could be used as a destination mail processing machine, it is preferably implemented as an originating mail processing apparatus for use in a system such as depicted in Figure 3 for example.
This embodiment allows the detection and extraction of short paid mail pieces. This apparatus is designed to process mail pieces which have destination information such as an address, and to which one or more of the above described novel postage stamps have been affixed. The apparatus has an input queue 60 into which mail pieces for processing are deposited. The input queue 60 feeds the mail pieces onto a mail piece conveyor 62 which is typically a series of belts designed to transport mail pieces through the mail processing apparatus to a multi-bin stacker generally indicated by 64. The multi-bin stacker 64 has a plurality of bins 64A, 64B, 64C, 64D, 64E, 64F, 64G, 64H, 641, 64J, 64K, 64L into which mail pieces can be directed by deviators 65 (12 shown). Along the length of the mail piece conveyor 62 (which need not be a straight line) various devices are placed to perform actions upon the mail pieces as they pass by. A camera 66 is provided for taking and digitizing an image of the front surface of the mail piece, the assumption being that the mail pieces have been previously faced such that the destination information and stamps are on the front surface. There is a weighing module 68 for measuring the weight of the mail pieces. There is a processing and control block generally indicated by 70 which is intended to represent most of the processing and control functionality of the mail processing machine. This may be implemented in one or a series of computer platforms with one or multiple processors. The processing and control block is connected to receive the digitized images taken by the camera 66 and the weights measured by the weighing module 68. It is also connected to control the deviators 65 forming part of the multi-bin stacker 64 so as to be able to precisely control into which bin a given mail piece is to be diverted. While the camera 66 preferably takes an image of the entire front surface of the mail piece, it (or a combination of cameras) must at least take one or more images which collectively include the destination information and the stamps.
The processing and control block 70 includes optical character recognition software for analysing digitized images received from the camera 66, and more particularly for processing the unique identifier bar code on each stamp on the mail piece, and for determining the destination information.
The processor and control block 70 also includes functionality which allows a determination of a required postage for various destinations for a given weight of a mail piece.
The steps performed by the mail processing apparatus of Figure 4 will now be described with reference to the flowchart of Figure 5. To begin, the camera 66 takes an image of the front surface of the mail piece, digitizes this and passes it to the processing and control block 70. The processing and control block 70 performs character and word recognition to identify the destination information and to find and decode the unique identifier bar code on each stamp and recover the data elements represented by the unique identifier bar code. There may be several stamps. Next, the processing and control block 70 accumulates a sum of the postage values of the postage stamps on the mail piece. The processing and control block 70 then determines a required postage based on the destination information and the weight.
Next, a comparison of the required postage with the total cumulative stamp value is made. If there is a postage shortfall, this fact is identified in real time, and the processing and control block 70 controls the stacker deviators 65 such that the mail piece is diverted to a bin which has been allocated to receive short paid mail, for example bin 64A
which is labelled "short paid". If there is sufficient postage, then normal processing of the mail piece is completed, and the mail piece is diverted to a bin for transport, for example one of bins 64G, 64H, 641, 64J, 64K, 64L.
In another embodiment of the invention, a mail processing apparatus is provided which can detect stolen stamps. Referring again to Figure 4, in this embodiment, a stolen stamps table 72 either forming part of or accessible to the processing and control block 70 is provided for storing unique identifiers of stamps which have been stolen. A
flowchart for this embodiment is shown in Figure 6. As before, the camera 66 takes an image of the front surface of the mail piece, digitizes it and passes the image to the processing and control block 70. The processing and control block 70 performs recognition and decoding of the unique identifier bar code on each stamp on a given mail piece to recover the data elements and to determine a unique identifier for each stamp. Next, the unique identifier on each postage stamp is compared to the identifiers in the stolen stamps table 72 in real time by the processing and control block 70.
If there is a match, then the mail piece is directed to a particular bin selected for mail pieces with fraudulent stamps, for example, bin 64B which is labelled "fraudulent stamps".
Referring now to Figures 7 to 13, in another embodiment of the invention, systems and methods for preventing the fraudulent reuse of a stamp are provided.
Figure 7 is a view of a system according to the invention showing the details of an originating mail processing apparatus 50, and Figure 8 is a view of the same system showing the details of a destination mail processing apparatus 54. Although not shown, it is of course assumed that the originating mail processing apparatus 50 and the destination mail processing apparatus 54 each interface to a delivery transport mechanism (52 of Fig. 3). In this embodiment, each originating mail processing apparatus (50 of Figure 3) is equipped with a mail identification tag printer 74 capable of printing a bar code in fluorescent ink on the back of the mail piece which uniquely identifies the mail piece. Such identification tag printers are well known in the U.S. and Canadian postal systems for example. In addition, the originating mail processing apparatus is connected through a network 76 to a national circulation database 78 (more generally some sort of a "remote depository").
Preferably, the originating mail processing apparatus also has a destination identification tag reader 80, and a destination identification tag printer 82. In such apparatuses, the first time a mail piece is processed by an originating mail processing machine, the destination information is processed using optical character recognition, and a destination identifier is determined. This destination identifier might be a postal code or a zip code for example.
The destination identification tag printer 82 then prints a destination identification tag determined from the destination identifier on the mail piece in the form of a fluorescent bar code for example, and all subsequent routing of the mail piece is performed on the basis of the destination identifier and/
or the destination identification tag. This avoids the need for downstream mail processing apparatuses to reprocess the destination information. The destination identification tag reader 80 is provided to identify mail pieces which have already been processed by an originating mail processing machine. This will occur for example when a mail piece is incorrectly addressed and the incorrect receiver puts the mail piece back into the system for reprocessing. This is standard technology in mail processing and delivery and will not be discussed in further detail here. This is described simply to point out that the destination identifiers already used in the routing of mail may also be used as destination identifiers for the purposes described in detail below, although other forms of destination identifiers may be alternatively used.
The national circulation database 78 contains a table of all stamps which are in circulation. Information is stored in the national circulation database 78 in the form of records such as illustrated by way of example in Figure 9. In this example each record has four fields, namely a unique identifier field for storing the unique identifier included in the unique identifier bar code of each stamp, an identification tag field for storing a corresponding identification tag which has been applied to a given mail piece, a destination identifier field for identifying a destination mail processing plant and a date field for identifying the date that the identification tag and destination identifier were input to the database.
Referring now to Figure 8, the destination mail processing apparatus 54 is typically much simpler than the originating mail processing apparatus 50 because destination information processing has already been done. As before, the destination mail processing apparatus 54 has an input queue 80, a mail conveyor 82, a multi-bin stacker 83, with stacker bins 83A-83L under control of a processing and control block 84. In addition, there is an identification tag reader 86 for reading the identification tag of a mail piece applied by an originating mail processing apparatus 50. The processing and control block 84 has, or has access to, an identification tags list 88, the purpose of which will be described below.
Figures 10, 11 and 12 are flowcharts of the steps performed by the originating mail processing apparatus 50, the national circulation database 78 and the destination mail processing apparatus 54 respectively. Referring firstly to Figure 10, when a mail piece is processed by an originating mail processing apparatus 50, i.e. the first time it is processed by any machine, the mail identification tag printer 74 prints an identification tag which uniquely identifies the mail piece in fluorescent ink on the back of the envelope.
This might be a bar code an example of which is given in Figure 13.
Next, the camera 66 takes an image of the front surface of the mail piece and passes this to the processing and control block 70 which determines the unique identifier bar code data elements on all the stamps on the mail piece, and the destination identifier from the destination information. In particular, the unique identifiers are determined. For each stamp, a record in a log file 71 is created consisting of the unique identifier, the identification tag and the destination identifier. These records are transferred periodically to the national circulation database 78 through the network 76. This completes the normal processing of that mail piece by the originating mail processing machine.
Referring now to Figure 11A, this is a flowchart of the process by which the national circulation database 78 maintains the list of stamps which are in circulation. This simply consists of adding new records to the database for new stamps, and subsequently deleting records from the list which have been "processed" for at least a predetermined amount of time. The date field in each national circulation database record can be used to determine how long it has been since a particular stamp was initially processed by any mail processing machine. After a predetermined period has elapsed after the date entered in the record (i.e. a predetermined time has elapsed since the corresponding stamp was processed by an originating mail processing machine), the record can be deleted from the national circulation database, the assumption being that the mail piece has reached its destination by that time.
Referring next to Figure 11B, the process implemented by the national circulation database 78 each time it receives a log file record from an originating mail processing apparatus 50 consists of first looking up the record in the national circulation database for the unique identifier contained in the log file record. If the unique identifier is not in the database then it is assumed that the stamp is fraudulent. A message is sent to the mail plant identified by the destination identifier containing the identification tag contained in the log file record. This ends the processing of the record by the national circulation database 78. In the case that the unique identifier is in the database, the record in the database is checked to ascertain whether an identification tag has already been added to that stamp's record. If not then the identification tag, the destination identifier, and date are added to the record in the circulation database and the processing of that record ends. Alternatively, if the identification tag is already in the circulation database then the stored identification tag is compared to that received in the log file record. If there is a mismatch between the identification tags then once again the stamp has been fraudulently used. This is dealt with in the same manner as above, namely by sending a message containing the identification tag to the destination. As discussed below regarding the mail processing apparatus at the destination, mail pieces identified as being fraudulent can be extracted for sortation to a special stacker bin.
Referring next to Figure 12A the processing performed at the destination mail processing apparatus 54 will be described. The destination mail processing apparatus for a given mail piece will be any destination mail processing apparatus in the mail processing plant identified by the destination identifier. First, the identification tag of a mail piece being processed is read using the identification tag reader 86. The identification tag is then compared to the identification tags stored in the identification tags list 88 maintained by that destination mail processing apparatus 54 as described below. If the identification tag is in the identification tags list 88 then there has been fraudulent misuse of the stamps, and the mail piece is directed to a special bin in the multi-bin stacker 83 for example, bin 83A
labelled "fraudulent mail". In the event that the identification tag is not in the identification tags list 88 then normal processing of the mail piece is completed.
Figure 12B is a flowchart of a process concurrently implemented by the destination mail processing apparatus to maintain the identification tags list 88. This simply consists of the steps of receiving identification tags from the national circulation database 78 and storing them in the identification tags list 88, and then subsequently deleting them from the identification tags list 88 after the mail piece is processed or after a predetermined time. In the event that a given mail processing plant contains more than one destination mail processing machine, a single message may be sent to the particular mail processing plant which then either passes or otherwise makes available this information to the individual destination mail processing apparatuses.
The above described embodiments have dealt with identifying stamps which have been stolen or reused. In order to detect stamps which have been fraudulently created or manufactured, in a preferred embodiment, the identifier bar codes include some form of data security such as encryption, for example. During the processing of mail pieces, the unique identifiers for stamps are validated in real time, by an originating mail processing apparatus for example. A bar code which cannot be decrypted or validated must not be a valid bar code, and thus mail pieces having stamps with such invalid bar codes can be sorted to a special stacker bin.
In the event that a valid bar code is simply copied, it will of course contain valid data security. However, after any stamp containing the valid bar code is used, the stamp identifier of the original stamp having the valid bar code will be deleted from the national circulation database, and as such subsequently processed stamps with the same bar code will be considered to be fraudulently produced or re-used.
In another embodiment of the invention, analysis of the data in the national database can provide historic information on customer usage of purchased stamps (philatelic versus postage), assist in forecasting volumes of mail with postage paid in stamps, and assist in inventory management.
Analysis of unique identifiers and destination data can provide information on customer usage of types of stamps for international mail.
In another embodiment of the invention, the mail processing methods and systems such as those described above may be used to process deliverable items having two-dimensional unique identifier bar codes such as those described above included as part of PC postage applied to the exterior of envelopes, such as depicted in Figure 14 or applied directly on papers to be inserted in envelopes, the envelopes having windows to allow the unique identifier bar codes to be scanned without opening the envelope. An example of this is depicted in Figure 15.
Numerous modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practised otherwise than as specifically described herein.
If there is a match, then the mail piece is directed to a particular bin selected for mail pieces with fraudulent stamps, for example, bin 64B which is labelled "fraudulent stamps".
Referring now to Figures 7 to 13, in another embodiment of the invention, systems and methods for preventing the fraudulent reuse of a stamp are provided.
Figure 7 is a view of a system according to the invention showing the details of an originating mail processing apparatus 50, and Figure 8 is a view of the same system showing the details of a destination mail processing apparatus 54. Although not shown, it is of course assumed that the originating mail processing apparatus 50 and the destination mail processing apparatus 54 each interface to a delivery transport mechanism (52 of Fig. 3). In this embodiment, each originating mail processing apparatus (50 of Figure 3) is equipped with a mail identification tag printer 74 capable of printing a bar code in fluorescent ink on the back of the mail piece which uniquely identifies the mail piece. Such identification tag printers are well known in the U.S. and Canadian postal systems for example. In addition, the originating mail processing apparatus is connected through a network 76 to a national circulation database 78 (more generally some sort of a "remote depository").
Preferably, the originating mail processing apparatus also has a destination identification tag reader 80, and a destination identification tag printer 82. In such apparatuses, the first time a mail piece is processed by an originating mail processing machine, the destination information is processed using optical character recognition, and a destination identifier is determined. This destination identifier might be a postal code or a zip code for example.
The destination identification tag printer 82 then prints a destination identification tag determined from the destination identifier on the mail piece in the form of a fluorescent bar code for example, and all subsequent routing of the mail piece is performed on the basis of the destination identifier and/
or the destination identification tag. This avoids the need for downstream mail processing apparatuses to reprocess the destination information. The destination identification tag reader 80 is provided to identify mail pieces which have already been processed by an originating mail processing machine. This will occur for example when a mail piece is incorrectly addressed and the incorrect receiver puts the mail piece back into the system for reprocessing. This is standard technology in mail processing and delivery and will not be discussed in further detail here. This is described simply to point out that the destination identifiers already used in the routing of mail may also be used as destination identifiers for the purposes described in detail below, although other forms of destination identifiers may be alternatively used.
The national circulation database 78 contains a table of all stamps which are in circulation. Information is stored in the national circulation database 78 in the form of records such as illustrated by way of example in Figure 9. In this example each record has four fields, namely a unique identifier field for storing the unique identifier included in the unique identifier bar code of each stamp, an identification tag field for storing a corresponding identification tag which has been applied to a given mail piece, a destination identifier field for identifying a destination mail processing plant and a date field for identifying the date that the identification tag and destination identifier were input to the database.
Referring now to Figure 8, the destination mail processing apparatus 54 is typically much simpler than the originating mail processing apparatus 50 because destination information processing has already been done. As before, the destination mail processing apparatus 54 has an input queue 80, a mail conveyor 82, a multi-bin stacker 83, with stacker bins 83A-83L under control of a processing and control block 84. In addition, there is an identification tag reader 86 for reading the identification tag of a mail piece applied by an originating mail processing apparatus 50. The processing and control block 84 has, or has access to, an identification tags list 88, the purpose of which will be described below.
Figures 10, 11 and 12 are flowcharts of the steps performed by the originating mail processing apparatus 50, the national circulation database 78 and the destination mail processing apparatus 54 respectively. Referring firstly to Figure 10, when a mail piece is processed by an originating mail processing apparatus 50, i.e. the first time it is processed by any machine, the mail identification tag printer 74 prints an identification tag which uniquely identifies the mail piece in fluorescent ink on the back of the envelope.
This might be a bar code an example of which is given in Figure 13.
Next, the camera 66 takes an image of the front surface of the mail piece and passes this to the processing and control block 70 which determines the unique identifier bar code data elements on all the stamps on the mail piece, and the destination identifier from the destination information. In particular, the unique identifiers are determined. For each stamp, a record in a log file 71 is created consisting of the unique identifier, the identification tag and the destination identifier. These records are transferred periodically to the national circulation database 78 through the network 76. This completes the normal processing of that mail piece by the originating mail processing machine.
Referring now to Figure 11A, this is a flowchart of the process by which the national circulation database 78 maintains the list of stamps which are in circulation. This simply consists of adding new records to the database for new stamps, and subsequently deleting records from the list which have been "processed" for at least a predetermined amount of time. The date field in each national circulation database record can be used to determine how long it has been since a particular stamp was initially processed by any mail processing machine. After a predetermined period has elapsed after the date entered in the record (i.e. a predetermined time has elapsed since the corresponding stamp was processed by an originating mail processing machine), the record can be deleted from the national circulation database, the assumption being that the mail piece has reached its destination by that time.
Referring next to Figure 11B, the process implemented by the national circulation database 78 each time it receives a log file record from an originating mail processing apparatus 50 consists of first looking up the record in the national circulation database for the unique identifier contained in the log file record. If the unique identifier is not in the database then it is assumed that the stamp is fraudulent. A message is sent to the mail plant identified by the destination identifier containing the identification tag contained in the log file record. This ends the processing of the record by the national circulation database 78. In the case that the unique identifier is in the database, the record in the database is checked to ascertain whether an identification tag has already been added to that stamp's record. If not then the identification tag, the destination identifier, and date are added to the record in the circulation database and the processing of that record ends. Alternatively, if the identification tag is already in the circulation database then the stored identification tag is compared to that received in the log file record. If there is a mismatch between the identification tags then once again the stamp has been fraudulently used. This is dealt with in the same manner as above, namely by sending a message containing the identification tag to the destination. As discussed below regarding the mail processing apparatus at the destination, mail pieces identified as being fraudulent can be extracted for sortation to a special stacker bin.
Referring next to Figure 12A the processing performed at the destination mail processing apparatus 54 will be described. The destination mail processing apparatus for a given mail piece will be any destination mail processing apparatus in the mail processing plant identified by the destination identifier. First, the identification tag of a mail piece being processed is read using the identification tag reader 86. The identification tag is then compared to the identification tags stored in the identification tags list 88 maintained by that destination mail processing apparatus 54 as described below. If the identification tag is in the identification tags list 88 then there has been fraudulent misuse of the stamps, and the mail piece is directed to a special bin in the multi-bin stacker 83 for example, bin 83A
labelled "fraudulent mail". In the event that the identification tag is not in the identification tags list 88 then normal processing of the mail piece is completed.
Figure 12B is a flowchart of a process concurrently implemented by the destination mail processing apparatus to maintain the identification tags list 88. This simply consists of the steps of receiving identification tags from the national circulation database 78 and storing them in the identification tags list 88, and then subsequently deleting them from the identification tags list 88 after the mail piece is processed or after a predetermined time. In the event that a given mail processing plant contains more than one destination mail processing machine, a single message may be sent to the particular mail processing plant which then either passes or otherwise makes available this information to the individual destination mail processing apparatuses.
The above described embodiments have dealt with identifying stamps which have been stolen or reused. In order to detect stamps which have been fraudulently created or manufactured, in a preferred embodiment, the identifier bar codes include some form of data security such as encryption, for example. During the processing of mail pieces, the unique identifiers for stamps are validated in real time, by an originating mail processing apparatus for example. A bar code which cannot be decrypted or validated must not be a valid bar code, and thus mail pieces having stamps with such invalid bar codes can be sorted to a special stacker bin.
In the event that a valid bar code is simply copied, it will of course contain valid data security. However, after any stamp containing the valid bar code is used, the stamp identifier of the original stamp having the valid bar code will be deleted from the national circulation database, and as such subsequently processed stamps with the same bar code will be considered to be fraudulently produced or re-used.
In another embodiment of the invention, analysis of the data in the national database can provide historic information on customer usage of purchased stamps (philatelic versus postage), assist in forecasting volumes of mail with postage paid in stamps, and assist in inventory management.
Analysis of unique identifiers and destination data can provide information on customer usage of types of stamps for international mail.
In another embodiment of the invention, the mail processing methods and systems such as those described above may be used to process deliverable items having two-dimensional unique identifier bar codes such as those described above included as part of PC postage applied to the exterior of envelopes, such as depicted in Figure 14 or applied directly on papers to be inserted in envelopes, the envelopes having windows to allow the unique identifier bar codes to be scanned without opening the envelope. An example of this is depicted in Figure 15.
Numerous modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practised otherwise than as specifically described herein.
In the above described embodiment, a destination identifier read or derived from the destination information is used to route identification tags associated with fraudulent mail pieces to the appropriate mail processing plant or other destination. Of course, the particular information forming part of the destination information which would allow this identification would depend upon the particular addressing scheme used within a given postal administration's operations or within a given delivery service provider's operations.
In the above described embodiments, fluorescent one-dimensional bar codes were used as identification tags. Of course any identification tag structure or format which can uniquely identify mail pieces or deliverable items may be used.
In the above described embodiments, a mail processing apparatus has been described which includes a processing and control block which controls much of the operation of the machine. Of course, it is to be understood that this could be implemented on one or a plurality of processors, and these processors could form part of one or more computers of any appropriate type. The processing capability could be implemented in hardware or software as appropriate.
While the above embodiments have focused on delivery service providers which are postal administrations, it is to be understood that more generally they can be used by any delivery service providers in the delivery of deliverable items, in which case deliverable item processing apparatuses including the above described inventive features would be employed.
While in the above example, a single camera is provided for taking a single image of a front surface of a mail piece, more generally any image capture device may be provided for capturing one of more images of a deliverable item so long as the image(s) include the unique identifier bar codes and destination information.
While all of the above examples have included two-dimensional unique identifier bar codes, it is to be understood that for the short paid postage embodiment a one-dimensional bar code could be used since in this case the bar codes need not be unique. In this case, identifier bar codes are provided which need to at least identify the postage value of the stamp, but which may also include other information.
In the above described embodiments, fluorescent one-dimensional bar codes were used as identification tags. Of course any identification tag structure or format which can uniquely identify mail pieces or deliverable items may be used.
In the above described embodiments, a mail processing apparatus has been described which includes a processing and control block which controls much of the operation of the machine. Of course, it is to be understood that this could be implemented on one or a plurality of processors, and these processors could form part of one or more computers of any appropriate type. The processing capability could be implemented in hardware or software as appropriate.
While the above embodiments have focused on delivery service providers which are postal administrations, it is to be understood that more generally they can be used by any delivery service providers in the delivery of deliverable items, in which case deliverable item processing apparatuses including the above described inventive features would be employed.
While in the above example, a single camera is provided for taking a single image of a front surface of a mail piece, more generally any image capture device may be provided for capturing one of more images of a deliverable item so long as the image(s) include the unique identifier bar codes and destination information.
While all of the above examples have included two-dimensional unique identifier bar codes, it is to be understood that for the short paid postage embodiment a one-dimensional bar code could be used since in this case the bar codes need not be unique. In this case, identifier bar codes are provided which need to at least identify the postage value of the stamp, but which may also include other information.
Claims (11)
1. A postage stamp for general circulation comprising:
a first area containing postage stamp artwork; and a second area containing a unique identifier bar code allowing individual identification of the postage stamp.
a first area containing postage stamp artwork; and a second area containing a unique identifier bar code allowing individual identification of the postage stamp.
2. A postage stamp according to claim 1 wherein the unique identifier bar code is in black and white with sufficient print contrast ratio for optical character recognition reading, and does not overlap with any of the first area.
3. A postage stamp according to claim 1 wherein the unique identifier bar code is in invisible ink and overlaps partially with the first area.
4. A postage stamp according to claim 1 wherein the unique identifier bar code is in colours with sufficient print contrast ratio for optical character recognition reading, and does not overlap with any of the first area.
5. A postage stamp according to claim 1 wherein the unique identifier bar code is in invisible ink and overlaps completely with the first area.
6. A postage stamp according to any one of claims 1 to 5 wherein the unique identifier bar code contains information comprising a postage value.
7. A postage stamp according to any one of claims 1 to 5 wherein the unique identifier bar code contains information comprising a unique identifier and a postage value.
8. A postage stamp according to any one of claims 1 to 5 wherein the unique identifier bar code contains information which has data security.
9. A postage stamp according to any one of claims 1 to 8 wherein the unique identifier bar code includes error correction coding.
10. A postage stamp according to any one of claims 1 to 9 wherein a two-dimensional bar code symbology is used for the unique identifier bar code.
11. A postage stamp according to claim 10 wherein the two-dimensional bar code symbology is one of: Aztec Code symbology and Data Matrix symbology.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002595621A CA2595621C (en) | 1999-02-26 | 1999-03-15 | Unique identifier bar code on stamps and apparatus and method for monitoring stamp usage with identifier bar codes |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US09/258,665 US6415983B1 (en) | 1999-02-26 | 1999-02-26 | Unique identifier bar code on stamps and apparatus and method for monitoring stamp usage with identifier bar codes |
| US09/258,665 | 1999-02-26 |
Related Child Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002595621A Division CA2595621C (en) | 1999-02-26 | 1999-03-15 | Unique identifier bar code on stamps and apparatus and method for monitoring stamp usage with identifier bar codes |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2265326A1 CA2265326A1 (en) | 2000-08-26 |
| CA2265326C true CA2265326C (en) | 2008-04-22 |
Family
ID=22981593
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002265326A Expired - Lifetime CA2265326C (en) | 1999-02-26 | 1999-03-15 | Unique identifier bar code on stamps and apparatus and method for monitoring stamp usage with identifier bar codes |
Country Status (2)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (2) | US6415983B1 (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2265326C (en) |
Families Citing this family (150)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US6766953B1 (en) * | 1992-05-01 | 2004-07-27 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Tape indicia on clear film media |
| US6363164B1 (en) | 1996-05-13 | 2002-03-26 | Cummins-Allison Corp. | Automated document processing system using full image scanning |
| US7903863B2 (en) | 2001-09-27 | 2011-03-08 | Cummins-Allison Corp. | Currency bill tracking system |
| US20050276458A1 (en) | 2004-05-25 | 2005-12-15 | Cummins-Allison Corp. | Automated document processing system and method using image scanning |
| US8162125B1 (en) | 1996-05-29 | 2012-04-24 | Cummins-Allison Corp. | Apparatus and system for imaging currency bills and financial documents and method for using the same |
| US7187795B2 (en) | 2001-09-27 | 2007-03-06 | Cummins-Allison Corp. | Document processing system using full image scanning |
| US8204293B2 (en) | 2007-03-09 | 2012-06-19 | Cummins-Allison Corp. | Document imaging and processing system |
| US8478020B1 (en) | 1996-11-27 | 2013-07-02 | Cummins-Allison Corp. | Apparatus and system for imaging currency bills and financial documents and method for using the same |
| US7392945B1 (en) | 1998-09-11 | 2008-07-01 | Lv Partners, L.P. | Portable scanner for enabling automatic commerce transactions |
| US6823388B1 (en) | 1998-09-11 | 2004-11-23 | L.V. Parners, L.P. | Method and apparatus for accessing a remote location with an optical reader having a programmable memory system |
| US7386600B1 (en) | 1998-09-11 | 2008-06-10 | Lv Partners, L.P. | Launching a web site using a personal device |
| US6868433B1 (en) | 1998-09-11 | 2005-03-15 | L.V. Partners, L.P. | Input device having positional and scanning capabilities |
| US6843417B1 (en) * | 1998-09-11 | 2005-01-18 | L. V. Partners, L.P. | Aiming indicia for a bar code and method of use |
| US7191247B1 (en) | 1998-09-11 | 2007-03-13 | Lv Partners, Lp | Method for connecting a wireless device to a remote location on a network |
| US7440993B1 (en) | 1998-09-11 | 2008-10-21 | Lv Partners, L.P. | Method and apparatus for launching a web browser in response to scanning of product information |
| US6745234B1 (en) | 1998-09-11 | 2004-06-01 | Digital:Convergence Corporation | Method and apparatus for accessing a remote location by scanning an optical code |
| US6636896B1 (en) | 1998-09-11 | 2003-10-21 | Lv Partners, L.P. | Method and apparatus for utilizing an audibly coded signal to conduct commerce over the internet |
| NL1010616C2 (en) * | 1998-11-20 | 2000-05-23 | Ptt Post Holdings Bv | Method and devices for printing a franking mark on a document. |
| US7149726B1 (en) | 1999-06-01 | 2006-12-12 | Stamps.Com | Online value bearing item printing |
| US7831244B2 (en) * | 1999-06-30 | 2010-11-09 | Silverbrook Research Pty Ltd | Retrieving an image via a coded surface |
| US20060013630A1 (en) * | 1999-06-30 | 2006-01-19 | Silverbrook Research Pty Ltd | Printing a photograph using a mobile device |
| US7663780B2 (en) * | 1999-06-30 | 2010-02-16 | Silverbrook Research Pty Ltd | Cartridge with identifiers |
| US7490065B1 (en) | 1999-10-18 | 2009-02-10 | Stamps.Com | Cryptographic module for secure processing of value-bearing items |
| US7233929B1 (en) | 1999-10-18 | 2007-06-19 | Stamps.Com | Postal system intranet and commerce processing for on-line value bearing system |
| US7216110B1 (en) * | 1999-10-18 | 2007-05-08 | Stamps.Com | Cryptographic module for secure processing of value-bearing items |
| US6868406B1 (en) | 1999-10-18 | 2005-03-15 | Stamps.Com | Auditing method and system for an on-line value-bearing item printing system |
| US7236956B1 (en) | 1999-10-18 | 2007-06-26 | Stamps.Com | Role assignments in a cryptographic module for secure processing of value-bearing items |
| US7240037B1 (en) | 1999-10-18 | 2007-07-03 | Stamps.Com | Method and apparatus for digitally signing an advertisement area next to a value-bearing item |
| AU1966601A (en) | 1999-10-18 | 2001-04-30 | Stamps.Com | Method and apparatus for on-line value-bearing item system |
| US8701857B2 (en) | 2000-02-11 | 2014-04-22 | Cummins-Allison Corp. | System and method for processing currency bills and tickets |
| WO2001061652A2 (en) * | 2000-02-16 | 2001-08-23 | Stamps.Com | Secure on-line ticketing |
| CA2334193A1 (en) | 2000-03-23 | 2001-09-23 | Eastman Kodak Company | A method for printing and verifying limited edition stamps |
| US6810390B1 (en) * | 2000-08-28 | 2004-10-26 | Cheryl L. Picoult | System and method for verifying digital postal marks |
| US7756795B2 (en) * | 2000-12-27 | 2010-07-13 | Pitney Bowes Inc. | Mail piece verification system |
| US7707124B2 (en) * | 2000-08-28 | 2010-04-27 | Pitney Bowes Inc. | Mail piece verification system having forensic accounting capability |
| US7577618B2 (en) * | 2000-10-10 | 2009-08-18 | Stamps.Com Inc. | Generic value bearing item labels |
| US6980306B1 (en) * | 2000-11-25 | 2005-12-27 | Silverbrook Research Pty Ltd | Printer with manual collation control |
| US6671577B2 (en) | 2000-12-01 | 2003-12-30 | United States Postal Service | System and method for directly connecting an advanced facer canceler system to a delivery bar code sorter |
| JP2002240387A (en) * | 2000-12-12 | 2002-08-28 | Ricoh Co Ltd | Imaging method, imaging apparatus and image information management system |
| US7013024B2 (en) * | 2001-04-13 | 2006-03-14 | Pitney Bowes Inc. | Method for reading information that has been embedded in an image |
| US7191336B2 (en) * | 2001-04-13 | 2007-03-13 | Pitney Bowes Inc. | Method for embedding information in an image |
| US20020176114A1 (en) * | 2001-04-13 | 2002-11-28 | Pitney Bowes Incorporated | Method for utilizing a fragile watermark for enhanced security |
| US20020174148A1 (en) * | 2001-05-18 | 2002-11-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for formatting international shipping addresses |
| US7647275B2 (en) | 2001-07-05 | 2010-01-12 | Cummins-Allison Corp. | Automated payment system and method |
| US7747670B2 (en) | 2001-09-17 | 2010-06-29 | United States Postal Service | Customized item cover |
| US8944234B1 (en) | 2001-09-27 | 2015-02-03 | Cummins-Allison Corp. | Apparatus and system for imaging currency bills and financial documents and method for using the same |
| US8437530B1 (en) | 2001-09-27 | 2013-05-07 | Cummins-Allison Corp. | Apparatus and system for imaging currency bills and financial documents and method for using the same |
| US8437529B1 (en) | 2001-09-27 | 2013-05-07 | Cummins-Allison Corp. | Apparatus and system for imaging currency bills and financial documents and method for using the same |
| US8428332B1 (en) | 2001-09-27 | 2013-04-23 | Cummins-Allison Corp. | Apparatus and system for imaging currency bills and financial documents and method for using the same |
| US7873576B2 (en) * | 2002-09-25 | 2011-01-18 | Cummins-Allison Corp. | Financial document processing system |
| US8433123B1 (en) | 2001-09-27 | 2013-04-30 | Cummins-Allison Corp. | Apparatus and system for imaging currency bills and financial documents and method for using the same |
| DE10150457A1 (en) * | 2001-10-16 | 2003-04-30 | Deutsche Post Ag | Method and device for processing graphic information located on the surfaces of postal items |
| US6817517B2 (en) * | 2001-10-25 | 2004-11-16 | George Schmitt & Company, Inc. | Distribution based postage tracking system and method |
| US20030139994A1 (en) * | 2002-01-22 | 2003-07-24 | Jones John E. | Financial institution system |
| JP2003282939A (en) * | 2002-03-26 | 2003-10-03 | Oki Degital Imaging:Kk | Semiconductor light-emitting device and method of manufacturing the same |
| US6902265B2 (en) * | 2002-06-28 | 2005-06-07 | Pitney Bowes Inc. | Method for printing high information density machine-readable composite images |
| WO2004010584A2 (en) * | 2002-07-24 | 2004-01-29 | Congruence Llc. | Code for object identification |
| US7350694B2 (en) * | 2002-08-14 | 2008-04-01 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | System and method for narrowcasting item tracking |
| WO2004070620A1 (en) * | 2002-09-04 | 2004-08-19 | United States Postal Services | Digital cancellation mark |
| US8171567B1 (en) | 2002-09-04 | 2012-05-01 | Tracer Detection Technology Corp. | Authentication method and system |
| US8627939B1 (en) | 2002-09-25 | 2014-01-14 | Cummins-Allison Corp. | Apparatus and system for imaging currency bills and financial documents and method for using the same |
| JP4256136B2 (en) * | 2002-10-01 | 2009-04-22 | 株式会社小糸製作所 | Vehicle lighting |
| US20040112950A1 (en) * | 2002-12-12 | 2004-06-17 | Manduley Flavio M. | Secure stamp system |
| US7025269B2 (en) * | 2003-04-24 | 2006-04-11 | Watson Label Products Corp. | Barcodes including embedded security features and space saving interleaved text |
| US7104451B1 (en) * | 2003-07-01 | 2006-09-12 | Mccartney James I | System and method of bar code error detection in large volume mailing |
| US20050071110A1 (en) * | 2003-09-25 | 2005-03-31 | Davis Randall R. | Method for identifying objects to be used in an automatic clinical analyzer |
| US7509291B2 (en) * | 2003-10-17 | 2009-03-24 | Stamps.Com Inc. | Formatting value-bearing item indicia |
| US7818269B2 (en) * | 2003-12-08 | 2010-10-19 | Stamps.Com Inc. | Computer postage and mailing tracking labels |
| US7778939B2 (en) * | 2003-12-29 | 2010-08-17 | Stamps.Com Inc. | Outbound mail piece tracking |
| US20050170127A1 (en) * | 2004-01-30 | 2005-08-04 | Rod Whitmond | Stamp sheetlet |
| US20060088910A1 (en) * | 2004-02-13 | 2006-04-27 | Khue Vu Nguyen | RT-PCR-based cloning of the human beta-amyloid precursor protein gene and the construction of its expression plasmids |
| WO2005096202A1 (en) * | 2004-03-05 | 2005-10-13 | United States Postal Service | Retail stamp with tracking |
| US20050267848A1 (en) * | 2004-05-25 | 2005-12-01 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Methods and systems for applying additional postage to mail items |
| US7904488B2 (en) * | 2004-07-21 | 2011-03-08 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Time stamp methods for unified plant model |
| DE102004036176A1 (en) * | 2004-07-26 | 2006-04-20 | Deutsche Post Ag | Method and device for checking charges during the transport of mail via an electronic parcel compartment system |
| US8065239B1 (en) | 2004-07-27 | 2011-11-22 | Stamps.Com Inc. | Customized computer-based value-bearing item quality assurance |
| US7933845B1 (en) | 2004-07-27 | 2011-04-26 | Stamps.Com Inc. | Image-customization of computer-based value-bearing items |
| US8805745B1 (en) * | 2004-07-27 | 2014-08-12 | Stamps.Com Inc. | Printing of computer-based value-bearing items |
| US7979358B1 (en) | 2004-07-27 | 2011-07-12 | Stamps.Com Inc. | Quality assurance of image-customization of computer-based value-bearing items |
| US7243842B1 (en) | 2004-07-27 | 2007-07-17 | Stamps.Com Inc. | Computer-based value-bearing item customization security |
| US8005762B2 (en) | 2004-08-20 | 2011-08-23 | Stamps.Com Inc. | Automated handling of computer-based postage system printing errors |
| US7710598B2 (en) | 2004-08-23 | 2010-05-04 | Harrison Jr Shelton E | Polychromatic encoding system, method and device |
| US8756521B1 (en) | 2004-09-30 | 2014-06-17 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Systems and methods for automatic visualization configuration |
| US8155313B2 (en) * | 2005-02-03 | 2012-04-10 | Yottamark, Inc. | Systems and methods for employing duo codes for product authentication |
| US7614546B2 (en) * | 2005-02-03 | 2009-11-10 | Yottamark, Inc. | Method and system for deterring product counterfeiting, diversion and piracy |
| US8300806B2 (en) * | 2005-02-03 | 2012-10-30 | Yottamark, Inc. | Duo codes for product authentication |
| US8649512B2 (en) | 2005-02-03 | 2014-02-11 | Yottamark, Inc. | Duo codes for product authentication |
| US8799800B2 (en) | 2005-05-13 | 2014-08-05 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Automatic user interface generation |
| US7672737B2 (en) | 2005-05-13 | 2010-03-02 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Hierarchically structured data model for utilization in industrial automation environments |
| US7650405B2 (en) | 2005-05-13 | 2010-01-19 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Tracking and tracing across process boundaries in an industrial automation environment |
| US7809683B2 (en) * | 2005-05-13 | 2010-10-05 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Library that includes modifiable industrial automation objects |
| US7676281B2 (en) | 2005-05-13 | 2010-03-09 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Distributed database in an industrial automation environment |
| US20070023336A1 (en) * | 2005-08-01 | 2007-02-01 | Owens Kevin M | Inline filter monitoring device |
| US20070067458A1 (en) * | 2005-09-20 | 2007-03-22 | Rockwell Software, Inc. | Proxy server for integration of industrial automation data over multiple networks |
| US7881812B2 (en) * | 2005-09-29 | 2011-02-01 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Editing and configuring device |
| US7548789B2 (en) | 2005-09-29 | 2009-06-16 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Editing lifecycle and deployment of objects in an industrial automation environment |
| US7526794B2 (en) * | 2005-09-30 | 2009-04-28 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Data perspectives in controller system and production management systems |
| US8484250B2 (en) * | 2005-09-30 | 2013-07-09 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Data federation with industrial control systems |
| US8275680B2 (en) * | 2005-09-30 | 2012-09-25 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Enabling transactional mechanisms in an automated controller system |
| US7801628B2 (en) * | 2005-09-30 | 2010-09-21 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Industrial operator interfaces interacting with higher-level business workflow |
| US7660638B2 (en) | 2005-09-30 | 2010-02-09 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Business process execution engine |
| US7734590B2 (en) | 2005-09-30 | 2010-06-08 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Incremental association of metadata to production data |
| US8285651B1 (en) | 2005-12-30 | 2012-10-09 | Stamps.Com Inc. | High speed printing |
| US20070179902A1 (en) * | 2006-02-01 | 2007-08-02 | John Kenneth S | Printing apparatus system and method |
| US7823768B2 (en) * | 2006-02-02 | 2010-11-02 | Yottamark, Inc. | System and method of code generation and authentication |
| US20070251403A1 (en) * | 2006-04-27 | 2007-11-01 | St John Kenneth | Printing and curing apparatus system and method |
| US7874593B1 (en) | 2006-05-16 | 2011-01-25 | Stamps.Com Inc. | Rolls of image-customized value-bearing items and systems and methods for providing rolls of image-customized value-bearing items |
| US10839332B1 (en) | 2006-06-26 | 2020-11-17 | Stamps.Com | Image-customized labels adapted for bearing computer-based, generic, value-bearing items, and systems and methods for providing image-customized labels |
| US20080046384A1 (en) * | 2006-08-04 | 2008-02-21 | Pitney Bowes Incorporated | Postage verification apparatus and methods |
| US20080141888A1 (en) | 2006-12-18 | 2008-06-19 | Pitney Bowes Incorporated | Postage label having concealed postal indicium |
| US8505978B1 (en) | 2006-12-20 | 2013-08-13 | Stamps.Com Inc. | Systems and methods for creating and providing shape-customized, computer-based, value-bearing items |
| US8510233B1 (en) | 2006-12-27 | 2013-08-13 | Stamps.Com Inc. | Postage printer |
| US9779556B1 (en) | 2006-12-27 | 2017-10-03 | Stamps.Com Inc. | System and method for identifying and preventing on-line fraud |
| DE102007003138A1 (en) * | 2007-01-16 | 2008-07-24 | Francotyp-Postalia Gmbh | Method for controlling operating principle of thermal transfer of print head, involves supplying energy to printing element to transfer color from color transfer device to substrate for producing pixel of bar code |
| WO2008109363A1 (en) | 2007-03-02 | 2008-09-12 | United States Postal Service | System and method of identifying shipping anomalies |
| US8417017B1 (en) | 2007-03-09 | 2013-04-09 | Cummins-Allison Corp. | Apparatus and system for imaging currency bills and financial documents and method for using the same |
| US8538123B1 (en) | 2007-03-09 | 2013-09-17 | Cummins-Allison Corp. | Apparatus and system for imaging currency bills and financial documents and method for using the same |
| US8887990B2 (en) | 2007-09-07 | 2014-11-18 | Yottamark, Inc. | Attributing harvest information with unique identifiers |
| US8152063B1 (en) | 2009-05-22 | 2012-04-10 | Yottamark, Inc. | Case labeling for field-packed produce |
| US7909239B2 (en) | 2007-09-07 | 2011-03-22 | Yottamark, Inc. | Attributing harvest information with unique identifiers |
| US8210430B1 (en) | 2011-02-24 | 2012-07-03 | Yottamark, Inc. | Methods for assigning traceability information to and retrieving traceability information from a store shelf |
| US8342393B2 (en) * | 2007-09-07 | 2013-01-01 | Yottamark, Inc. | Attributing harvest information with unique identifiers |
| US8196827B1 (en) | 2009-05-22 | 2012-06-12 | Yottamark, Inc. | Case labeling for field-packed produce |
| DE102007058679A1 (en) * | 2007-11-05 | 2009-05-07 | Siemens Ag | Value document, in particular postage stamp, with security element |
| US8428773B1 (en) | 2008-02-12 | 2013-04-23 | Yottamark, Inc. | Systems and methods of associating individual packages with harvest crates |
| US10373398B1 (en) | 2008-02-13 | 2019-08-06 | Stamps.Com Inc. | Systems and methods for distributed activation of postage |
| US9978185B1 (en) | 2008-04-15 | 2018-05-22 | Stamps.Com Inc. | Systems and methods for activation of postage indicia at point of sale |
| US7941378B2 (en) * | 2008-05-16 | 2011-05-10 | Siemens Industry, Inc. | Stamp testing and monitoring |
| US8240564B2 (en) | 2008-07-11 | 2012-08-14 | Yottamark, Inc. | Mobile table for implementing clamshell-to-case association |
| US7766240B1 (en) | 2008-07-19 | 2010-08-03 | Yottamark, Inc. | Case-Level Traceability without the need for inline printing |
| US9911246B1 (en) | 2008-12-24 | 2018-03-06 | Stamps.Com Inc. | Systems and methods utilizing gravity feed for postage metering |
| US8467591B1 (en) | 2009-04-15 | 2013-06-18 | Cummins-Allison Corp. | Apparatus and system for imaging currency bills and financial documents and method for using the same |
| US8391583B1 (en) | 2009-04-15 | 2013-03-05 | Cummins-Allison Corp. | Apparatus and system for imaging currency bills and financial documents and method for using the same |
| US8929640B1 (en) | 2009-04-15 | 2015-01-06 | Cummins-Allison Corp. | Apparatus and system for imaging currency bills and financial documents and method for using the same |
| US9082234B1 (en) | 2009-07-10 | 2015-07-14 | Stamps.Com Inc. | Automatic guarantee delivery tracking and reporting for united states postal service postage refunds for paid computer-based postage |
| US20110084127A1 (en) * | 2009-10-08 | 2011-04-14 | Elliott Grant | Voice Code for Distribution Centers |
| US8484401B2 (en) | 2010-04-15 | 2013-07-09 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Systems and methods for conducting communications among components of multidomain industrial automation system |
| US8984533B2 (en) | 2010-04-15 | 2015-03-17 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Systems and methods for conducting communications among components of multidomain industrial automation system |
| US9392072B2 (en) | 2010-04-15 | 2016-07-12 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Systems and methods for conducting communications among components of multidomain industrial automation system |
| US20120076371A1 (en) * | 2010-09-23 | 2012-03-29 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Phantom Identification |
| US9914320B1 (en) | 2011-04-21 | 2018-03-13 | Stamps.Com Inc. | Secure value bearing indicia using clear media |
| US10713634B1 (en) | 2011-05-18 | 2020-07-14 | Stamps.Com Inc. | Systems and methods using mobile communication handsets for providing postage |
| US10373216B1 (en) | 2011-10-12 | 2019-08-06 | Stamps.Com Inc. | Parasitic postage indicia |
| US10846650B1 (en) | 2011-11-01 | 2020-11-24 | Stamps.Com Inc. | Perpetual value bearing shipping labels |
| US10922641B1 (en) | 2012-01-24 | 2021-02-16 | Stamps.Com Inc. | Systems and methods providing known shipper information for shipping indicia |
| GB2541863A (en) * | 2012-09-07 | 2017-03-08 | Hand Held Products Incorporated | Package source verification |
| US9141876B1 (en) | 2013-02-22 | 2015-09-22 | Cummins-Allison Corp. | Apparatus and system for processing currency bills and financial documents and method for using the same |
| US9878825B1 (en) | 2015-06-02 | 2018-01-30 | Ecoenvelopes, Llc | Reusable top flap envelope with dual opposing seal flaps |
| WO2018213179A1 (en) | 2017-05-15 | 2018-11-22 | Walmart Apollo, Llc | Cloud based authentication of objects |
| GB2578436B (en) * | 2018-10-25 | 2021-05-05 | Royal Mail Group Ltd | Stamp management method and mail processing system |
Family Cites Families (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPS59149578A (en) * | 1983-02-04 | 1984-08-27 | Toshiba Corp | Postage print surface |
| US5267754A (en) * | 1985-04-24 | 1993-12-07 | Gao Gesellschaft Fuer Automation Und Organisation Mbh | Stamp such as a postage stamp and a method for producing it |
| US5064222A (en) | 1989-11-20 | 1991-11-12 | Canada Post Corp. | Bar code applicator |
| US5420403A (en) * | 1992-05-26 | 1995-05-30 | Canada Post Corporation | Mail encoding and processing system |
| US5943432A (en) * | 1993-11-17 | 1999-08-24 | Gilmore; Jack R. | Postage due detection system |
| US5929415A (en) * | 1997-04-28 | 1999-07-27 | Pitney Bowes Inc. | Postage metering refill system that utilizes information contained in information based indicia to audit the franking process |
-
1999
- 1999-02-26 US US09/258,665 patent/US6415983B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1999-03-15 CA CA002265326A patent/CA2265326C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2000
- 2000-11-06 US US09/707,192 patent/US6398106B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CA2265326A1 (en) | 2000-08-26 |
| US6398106B1 (en) | 2002-06-04 |
| US6415983B1 (en) | 2002-07-09 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA2265326C (en) | Unique identifier bar code on stamps and apparatus and method for monitoring stamp usage with identifier bar codes | |
| EP1696391B1 (en) | System and method of postal-charge assessment | |
| CA2513999C (en) | Fraud detection mechanism adapted for inconsistent data collection | |
| CN1188799C (en) | Mail processing system with unique mailpiece authorization assigned in advance of mailpieces entering carrier service mail processing stream | |
| US7301115B2 (en) | System and method of identifying and sorting response services mail pieces in accordance with plural levels of refinement in order to enhance postal service revenue protection | |
| RU2309012C2 (en) | Method and device for processing mail items | |
| US8774455B2 (en) | Document fingerprinting | |
| US6911910B2 (en) | Method for detecting and redirecting misdirected mail | |
| EP1825440B1 (en) | Automatic verification of postal indicia products | |
| US20100163612A1 (en) | Method of Processing Mailpieces That Enables Virtual Identification of The Mailpieces to be Used With Forwarding | |
| US20070185726A1 (en) | Methods and systems for processing suspicious delivery fee payment indicia | |
| FR2890771A1 (en) | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR VALIDATION AND VERIFICATION OF POSTAL MAIL | |
| CA2238196C (en) | Method and system for automatic recognition of digital indicia images deliberately distorted to be non readable | |
| WO2006062737B1 (en) | Automatic verification of postal indicia products | |
| AU2003298069B2 (en) | Method and device for processing graphical information located on surfaces of postal articles | |
| NO324143B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for printing a postage mark on a document | |
| US11436650B1 (en) | Parasitic postage indicia | |
| CA2595621C (en) | Unique identifier bar code on stamps and apparatus and method for monitoring stamp usage with identifier bar codes | |
| US20080059219A1 (en) | Method of manufacturing and of verifying mail items, the method guaranteeing that payment has been made | |
| EP1804218A1 (en) | System and method for processsing custom postal indicia | |
| US20040059690A1 (en) | Method for franking and processing deliveries | |
| US20100133803A1 (en) | Method of processing reply cards | |
| EP1047025A2 (en) | Method and apparatus for detecting misuse of postal indica | |
| JPH1190341A (en) | Postal item processing system |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEER | Examination request | ||
| MKEX | Expiry |
Effective date: 20190315 |