CA2265795C - Therapeutic agent with quantitative consumption marker and method of monitoring therapeutic agent consumption - Google Patents
Therapeutic agent with quantitative consumption marker and method of monitoring therapeutic agent consumption Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2265795C CA2265795C CA002265795A CA2265795A CA2265795C CA 2265795 C CA2265795 C CA 2265795C CA 002265795 A CA002265795 A CA 002265795A CA 2265795 A CA2265795 A CA 2265795A CA 2265795 C CA2265795 C CA 2265795C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- urine
- compliance
- marker
- concentration
- patient
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 123
- 239000003550 marker Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 107
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 65
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 23
- 229940124597 therapeutic agent Drugs 0.000 title description 10
- 229940079593 drug Drugs 0.000 claims abstract description 110
- 229940049706 benzodiazepine Drugs 0.000 claims abstract description 18
- 210000002700 urine Anatomy 0.000 claims description 202
- 230000005484 gravity Effects 0.000 claims description 65
- 239000002207 metabolite Substances 0.000 claims description 44
- AAOVKJBEBIDNHE-UHFFFAOYSA-N diazepam Chemical group N=1CC(=O)N(C)C2=CC=C(Cl)C=C2C=1C1=CC=CC=C1 AAOVKJBEBIDNHE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 24
- 229960003529 diazepam Drugs 0.000 claims description 23
- SVUOLADPCWQTTE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 1h-1,2-benzodiazepine Chemical compound N1N=CC=CC2=CC=CC=C12 SVUOLADPCWQTTE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 13
- 230000037396 body weight Effects 0.000 claims description 9
- 230000037406 food intake Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- VREFGVBLTWBCJP-UHFFFAOYSA-N alprazolam Chemical group C12=CC(Cl)=CC=C2N2C(C)=NN=C2CN=C1C1=CC=CC=C1 VREFGVBLTWBCJP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 5
- 229940125717 barbiturate Drugs 0.000 claims description 5
- 150000001557 benzodiazepines Chemical class 0.000 claims description 5
- 229960004538 alprazolam Drugs 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000002378 acidificating effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- HNYOPLTXPVRDBG-UHFFFAOYSA-N barbituric acid Chemical compound O=C1CC(=O)NC(=O)N1 HNYOPLTXPVRDBG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims 4
- 239000013543 active substance Substances 0.000 claims 2
- DDBREPKUVSBGFI-UHFFFAOYSA-N phenobarbital Chemical group C=1C=CC=CC=1C1(CC)C(=O)NC(=O)NC1=O DDBREPKUVSBGFI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims 2
- 229960002695 phenobarbital Drugs 0.000 claims 2
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 abstract description 15
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 abstract description 4
- -1 acids benzodiazepines Chemical class 0.000 abstract description 2
- 239000002547 new drug Substances 0.000 abstract description 2
- DDRJAANPRJIHGJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N creatinine Chemical compound CN1CC(=O)NC1=N DDRJAANPRJIHGJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 40
- 229960001797 methadone Drugs 0.000 description 23
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 23
- USSIQXCVUWKGNF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 6-(dimethylamino)-4,4-diphenylheptan-3-one Chemical compound C=1C=CC=CC=1C(CC(C)N(C)C)(C(=O)CC)C1=CC=CC=C1 USSIQXCVUWKGNF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 22
- 229940109239 creatinine Drugs 0.000 description 20
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 18
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 16
- 238000002483 medication Methods 0.000 description 14
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 13
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 12
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 12
- WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-GASJEMHNSA-N Glucose Natural products OC[C@H]1OC(O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-GASJEMHNSA-N 0.000 description 8
- 239000008103 glucose Substances 0.000 description 8
- 239000006187 pill Substances 0.000 description 8
- 208000019901 Anxiety disease Diseases 0.000 description 7
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 description 7
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 description 7
- AUNGANRZJHBGPY-SCRDCRAPSA-N Riboflavin Chemical compound OC[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)CN1C=2C=C(C)C(C)=CC=2N=C2C1=NC(=O)NC2=O AUNGANRZJHBGPY-SCRDCRAPSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 230000036506 anxiety Effects 0.000 description 6
- 210000004369 blood Anatomy 0.000 description 6
- 239000008280 blood Substances 0.000 description 6
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000009472 formulation Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000002485 urinary effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 4
- 230000029142 excretion Effects 0.000 description 4
- 210000003734 kidney Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 4
- 229940005483 opioid analgesics Drugs 0.000 description 4
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000001225 therapeutic effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- CKRJGDYKYQUNIM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 3-fluoro-2,2-dimethylpropanoic acid Chemical compound FCC(C)(C)C(O)=O CKRJGDYKYQUNIM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- AUNGANRZJHBGPY-UHFFFAOYSA-N D-Lyxoflavin Natural products OCC(O)C(O)C(O)CN1C=2C=C(C)C(C)=CC=2N=C2C1=NC(=O)NC2=O AUNGANRZJHBGPY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 150000007513 acids Chemical class 0.000 description 3
- 239000012141 concentrate Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 235000013305 food Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000005556 hormone Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229940088597 hormone Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 230000003907 kidney function Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000000902 placebo Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229940068196 placebo Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 229960002477 riboflavin Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 235000019192 riboflavin Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 239000002151 riboflavin Substances 0.000 description 3
- 210000002966 serum Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 208000024891 symptom Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 239000011800 void material Substances 0.000 description 3
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 description 2
- 208000007271 Substance Withdrawal Syndrome Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 238000007792 addition Methods 0.000 description 2
- 210000001124 body fluid Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000007877 drug screening Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000975 dye Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000024924 glomerular filtration Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000036541 health Effects 0.000 description 2
- 208000006454 hepatitis Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 231100000283 hepatitis Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 239000002117 illicit drug Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229940126585 therapeutic drug Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 102000009027 Albumins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010088751 Albumins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 239000004475 Arginine Substances 0.000 description 1
- FYEHYMARPSSOBO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Aurin Chemical compound C1=CC(O)=CC=C1C(C=1C=CC(O)=CC=1)=C1C=CC(=O)C=C1 FYEHYMARPSSOBO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 206010012335 Dependence Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000031886 HIV Infections Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000037357 HIV infectious disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 206010021118 Hypotonia Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 206010029164 Nephrotic syndrome Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 206010033296 Overdoses Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 206010040047 Sepsis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000032023 Signs and Symptoms Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 206010044565 Tremor Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000002159 abnormal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012443 analytical study Methods 0.000 description 1
- 208000004793 anterograde amnesia Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000001773 anti-convulsant effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000001961 anticonvulsive agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229960003965 antiepileptics Drugs 0.000 description 1
- ODKSFYDXXFIFQN-UHFFFAOYSA-N arginine Natural products OC(=O)C(N)CCCNC(N)=N ODKSFYDXXFIFQN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 235000013361 beverage Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007844 bleaching agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000010836 blood and blood product Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000036772 blood pressure Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940125691 blood product Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002775 capsule Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000007963 capsule composition Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000007795 chemical reaction product Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004587 chromatography analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229940121657 clinical drug Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000009535 clinical urine test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012468 concentrated sample Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009223 counseling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009260 cross reactivity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001627 detrimental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 206010012601 diabetes mellitus Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000003745 diagnosis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000037213 diet Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000005911 diet Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 231100000673 dose–response relationship Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 229940000406 drug candidate Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000002359 drug metabolite Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003777 experimental drug Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000003608 fece Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000000796 flavoring agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000019634 flavors Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004817 gas chromatography Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000001035 gastrointestinal tract Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 208000037870 generalized anxiety Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000004128 high performance liquid chromatography Methods 0.000 description 1
- 208000033519 human immunodeficiency virus infectious disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000000147 hypnotic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003018 immunoassay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 208000015181 infectious disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 239000004615 ingredient Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002673 intoxicating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 231100000566 intoxication Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000035987 intoxication Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001990 intravenous administration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 208000017169 kidney disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000012417 linear regression Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000004185 liver Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000004060 metabolic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229960005189 methadone hydrochloride Drugs 0.000 description 1
- FJQXCDYVZAHXNS-UHFFFAOYSA-N methadone hydrochloride Chemical compound Cl.C=1C=CC=CC=1C(CC(C)N(C)C)(C(=O)CC)C1=CC=CC=C1 FJQXCDYVZAHXNS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000036640 muscle relaxation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010606 normalization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000015097 nutrients Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000003204 osmotic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000144 pharmacologic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001766 physiological effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000010287 polarization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035935 pregnancy Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008707 rearrangement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000005227 renal system Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000003252 repetitive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000003839 salts Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004799 sedative–hypnotic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000020341 sensory perception of pain Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002904 solvent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009987 spinning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010972 statistical evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001502 supplementing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 208000011580 syndromic disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000002560 therapeutic procedure Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000005239 tubule Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 229940072690 valium Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000021419 vinegar Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000000052 vinegar Substances 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
- G01N33/48—Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
- G01N33/483—Physical analysis of biological material
- G01N33/487—Physical analysis of biological material of liquid biological material
- G01N33/493—Physical analysis of biological material of liquid biological material urine
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
- G01N33/48—Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
- G01N33/50—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
- G01N33/94—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving narcotics or drugs or pharmaceuticals, neurotransmitters or associated receptors
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
- G01N33/48—Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
- G01N33/50—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
- G01N33/94—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving narcotics or drugs or pharmaceuticals, neurotransmitters or associated receptors
- G01N33/948—Sedatives, e.g. cannabinoids, barbiturates
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S436/00—Chemistry: analytical and immunological testing
- Y10S436/807—Apparatus included in process claim, e.g. physical support structures
- Y10S436/808—Automated or kit
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S436/00—Chemistry: analytical and immunological testing
- Y10S436/901—Drugs of abuse, e.g. narcotics, amphetamine
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T436/00—Chemistry: analytical and immunological testing
- Y10T436/17—Nitrogen containing
- Y10T436/173845—Amine and quaternary ammonium
Abstract
Quantitative compliance markers and associated methods for monitoring patien t compliance with medication prescriptions associated with compliance markers have been found to eliminate the need for specific quantitative relationships for each new drug tested. Such compliance markers and methods for monitoring patient compliance utilize pharmacologically inert substances, namely the weak acids benzodiazepines, or non-metabolizable substances in association with an underlying drug at a measurable dosage, so as to correlate compliance marker concentration with underlying medication concentration to determine amount of actual medication ingested.
Description
101520253035W0 98l12557CA 02265795 l999-03- 16PCT/U S97/ 16416THERAPEUTIC AGENT WITH QUANTITATIVE CONSUMPTION MARKERAND METHOD OF MONITORING THERAPEUTIC AGENT CONSUMPTIONTECHNI CAL FI ELDThe present invention relates generally to monitoringpatient compliance with medication prescriptions. Moreparticularly, the invention relates to compositions andpatient compliance usingmethods for monitoringquantitative compliance markers in association withprescribed medications.BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTIONIn the fields of human and animal medicine, psychiatryand animal husbandry, insuring that the patient or animalingests the proper amount of medicine, hormone or nutrientto produce a desired effect is a commonly encounteredproblem. For example, human research has demonstrated thatpatients typically ingest only half the amount ofmedications prescribed by their physicians. Thus, patientsplaced on prescribed medication treatment programs areoften monitored. Both subjective and objective methods areused to identify bothersome symptoms and to implementduring the course of treatment.necessary changesMonitoring generally continues for as long as treatment is101520253035CA 02265795 l999-03- 16WO 98/12557 PCT/US97/16416-2-provided. For example, the Hamilton Anxiety Scale can beused to quantify the amount of anxiety remaining astreatment proceeds for an anxietyârelated condition. Ifthe level of residual anxiety decreases significantly, sayfrom the proper prescription of a benzodiazepine drug, likediazepam, then the physician and patient can be assuredthat treatment is efficacious and should be continued.Preferably both quantitative and analytical methodsshould be used to monitor the patient on a repetitive basisto insure that the patient is indeed ingesting theprescribed amounts of medication. Currently, the mostcommon method of monitoring patients for medicationcompliance is clinical observation which involvesindividual counseling and close personal supervision byphysicians. Physicians observe physiological signs andsymptoms such as intoxication, drug withdrawal typicallyoccurring for benzodiazepines, barbiturates and opioids, orresidual signs of illness such as tremor in anxiety,sighing in depression, and nociception in pain syndromes.Physicians also listen to patient complaints regardingdegree of pain relief and evaluate psychological changesover time. This method however is time consuming,expensive and highly subjective. Needless to say, it isfraught with potential errors.Additional compliance information can be obtainedusing qualitative urine monitoring methods such as thestandard laboratory procedure called enzyme-multipliedimmunoassay (EMIT). Utilizing an arbitrary cutoff value,these methods provide the clinician with a simple positiveor negative indication of the possible presence or absenceof a parent drug or its metabolites in a patientâs urine.The parent drug is the prescribed medication itself and themetabolites are those chemical derivatives of themedication which naturally occur upon the patient's bodymetabolizing the medication. These tests do not provide101520253035CA 02265795 l999-03- 16W0 98/12557 PCT/US97/16416-.3-information concerning the time or amount of last drug useor whether or not the prescribed dose of medication wasingested properly, diverted or supplemented. This type oftesting fails to provide any indication as to the actualquantity of drug ingested.Physicians utilizing only clinical evaluation andqualitative urine drug screening test results may developproblems in their treatment methods. Such is often thecase in treating patients who have become biochemicallydependent upon opioids either through prescription orillegal use. Opioid addicts experience great difficultyeliminating their dependency upon such drugs and typicallyenter into extended rehabilitative treatment programs whichutilize prescribed methadone dosages to eliminate opioiddependency. For example, physicians must effectivelyassess the condition of patients on methadone maintenanceprograms in order to adjust dosages and monitor compliance.If a patient is continually testing positive for opioids orcomplains of continuing subjective opioid withdrawalsymptoms, a physician may conclude that the currentlyprescribed dose of methadone is not sufficient to curb thebody's desire for opioids and may increase the prescribeddosage. This highly subjective monitoring method canresult in over-medication with patients being given moremethadone than they require, creating an unnecessaryreliance on methadone. Alternately, physicians sometimesconclude, erroneously, that a patientâs methadone dose issufficient to prevent opioid withdrawal and drug cravingsand deny the patient a further increase sufficient to stopillicit opioid use. Such action can expose the patient tofurther intravenous drug use and the associated negativesocial and medical consequences which can follow such asHIV, hepatitis, and blood poisoning.Similar problems with treatment may arise for patientsprescribed diazepam for longstanding generalized anxiety.101520253035CA 02265795 l999-03- 16W0 98/ 12557 PCT/U S97] 16416-4-Patients may not show improvement in their condition eventhough this therapy is known to be highly efficient. Thismedication is a member of the sedative-hypnotic family ofbenzodiazepines which have been clinically shown to causesedation, hypnosis, decreased anxiety, muscle relaxation,anterograde amnesia and anticonvulsant activity. Apatient, for example, may insist that he or she isingesting the medication as prescribed, and yet claim nosignificant improvement in symptomology. The physiciansuspects that the patient is not ingesting the medicationproperly and perhaps is selling it, and orders aqualitative urine drug screen to verify compliance. Thescreen is reported as positive at greater than 200 ng/mldrug concentration. Since some benzodiazepine is presentthe physician assumes, incorrectly, that the patient iscompliant, but will require additional medication andincreases the daily dose. In truth, the patient isdiverting the majority of his or her dose to the illicitmarket and only ingesting enough drug to test positive onthe drug screen.Patients also commonly visit multiple physicians toobtain similar medication for self-ingestion. Thesepatients desire the intoxicating effects of the medication,but are unable to obtain sufficient quantities from asingle source. Qualitative tests like the EMIT aregenerally not useful in detecting this situation since thequantitative amount of medication concentration in the bodyis not measured.Another monitoring method sometimes used, though mostoften only in research centers, is direct measurement ofparent drug concentrations or active metabolitesconcentrations of the drug in plasma. This method has beenparticularly useful to eliminate illicit opioid use ofpatients on methadone maintenance programs. It is knownfrom analytical studies using venous blood samples obtained1015202530CA 02265795 l999-03- 16WO 98/12557 PCT /US97I 16416-5-from stable patients that plasma methadone concentrationsranging from 150 - 600 ng/ml are necessary. This directmethod of testing is not very practical since it requiresthe use of time consuming, expensive, and highly technicalanalytical procedures such as high pressure liquidchromatography and gas chromatography/ mass spectrometrysince active and inactive metabolites must be quantifiedseparately. Additionally, for many patients the obtainingof plasma samples is invasive, offensive and difficult dueto inadequate venous access. Medical professionals mustalso be concerned about their own health safety in doingthis since they are exposed to blood products from patientgroups which can have a high prevalence of hepatitis andHIV infection. Therefore, such procedures are primarilyconducted in research centers and not generally utilized instandard maintenance programs.Another problem commonly encountered by pharmaceuticalcompanies occurs whenever they are comparing the clinicalefficacy of a potential, new medication versus a placebo.For example, in clinical trials new medications appear tobe two to three times as effective as a placebo, i.e.,placebo response rates can range from 20-30% while drugresponse rates range from 60-80%. One explanation for whynew medications are not more effective is that many testsubjects are not taking their prescribed doses. The endresult is that âmanyâ medications with undesirable side-effects, as formulated for the study, may appear not to beefficacious and be inappropriately dropped from researchonly because subjects are not ingesting sufficient drug toobserve the desired effects. other medications may end upbeing clinically prescribed at higher doses than necessary,increasing morbidity and mortality, because the researchersthink the subjects are taking more medication than theyactually are.1015202530CA 02265795 l999-03- 16W0 98/ 12557 PCT/US97/16416-5-Researchers have proposed several solutions to thisproblem. For instance, drug compliance in a researchsetting has been monitored by counting the residual pillsremaining following a course of treatment. In this regardthe use of a tablet container which incorporates a recorderthat records each opening of the container is described inthe scientific literature. However, the technique ofresidual pill counting is not necessarily indicative ofpill ingestion.Another method of drug compliance monitoring which isdisclosed in scientific literature involves addingsecondary substances to medication which presence can bequalitatively detected in blood work and other bodilyfluids. In this regard, some researchers have addedingredients like riboflavin to pills and looked for theingredient in the patient's serum, urine, or feces.However, testing serum necessitates additional labor andcare since it requires a blood sample to be taken.Furthermore, since ingredients like riboflavin are commonlyfound in food, beverage, and multivitamins, they arenormally also present in urine independent of anysupplemented riboflavin. The normal presence of suchingredients in the urine therefore leads to false positivereadings during testing. Additionally, no accuraterelationship has been determined between the presence ofthese markers in the urine and the amount of medicationtaken.As an alternative solution, researchers have addedrelatively harmless amounts of a second medication to pillsfor this purpose. However, the addition of this type ofingredient again only indicates that patients are takingsome pills. Depending on the half-life of these secondarymedications, researchers may only be able to tell if thepatient ingested the medication recently. Furthermore,101520253035CA 02265795 l999-03- 16W0 98/12557 PCT/U S97/ 16416-7-research with "second medication" type markers has focusedon serum testing for verification.While methods now exist for determining complianceusing quantitative urine monitoring that are useful forinsuring that patients are obtaining adequate body levelsof specific drugs, as disclosed in the applications earliercited, these methods require the development of specificanalytical methods tailored for measuring each specificdrug and its metabolites. Often these methods are notavailable in a clinically useful manner in the earlydevelopment of new drugs.While providing useful information relative to patientstatus and treatment compliance, the clinical monitoringmethods described above, i.e. clinical interviews withpatients, direct plasma drug measurement, qualitative urinedrug screening, residual tablet counting, and quantitativeurine drug screening for each drug ingested, each havedistinct drawbacks which limit their usefulness inexperiments and treatment plans. Therefore, it is seenthat a need remains for a predictable method of monitoringpatients who have been placed on potentially abusable anddangerous maintenance medications or new experimental drugsfor compliance therewith. A need remains for a method ofmonitoring drug ingestion which is not invasive to thepatient and which does not require a predeterminedmathematical relationship specific for each. drug beingmonitored. To help prevent continued medication misuse andbetter optimize patient medication dose, it would beadvantageous for patients to have a facile bodily fluid,such as urine, regularly and quantitatively monitored forthe presence of the medication. It would be furtherdesirable not to have to rely on the distinctivepharmacokinetics of each medication in such monitoring buton the pharmacokinetics of only a standard compliancemarker or a series of compliance markers. Such a101520253035CA 02265795 l999-03- 16W0 98/12557 PCT/US97/16416._8_monitoring method would help physicians both in prescribingadequate doses of medication and in monitoring patients toinsure that they were ingesting the prescribed amounts.Obtaining a fluid sample like urine would not be invasiveto the patient or a safety risk to the health careprovider.Furthermore, a need remains for a composition whichincludes an easily measurable quantitative compliancemarker and a therapeutic agent, in which the consumptioncompliance marker readily passes through the renal systemwith little or no pharmacological effect on the patient.Accordingly, it is to the provision of such improvedmethods and compositions that the present invention isprimarily directed.SUMMARY OF INVENTIONA composition and method has been developed forparticularâ use in clinical drug evaluation studies fortracking compliance of patients on prescription medications(therapeutic agents) by using compliance markers(quantitative consumption markers) in association with themedications, which consumption compliance markerconcentrations can be accurately measured in the urine.Upon a determination of the compliance markerconcentration, a correlation. is âmade to âthe amount ofactual medication ingested. only a small number ofmathematical relationships need be determined betweenmarker intake and urine output, rather than developingunique relationships for each and every drug tested.Moreover, quantitative relationships exist between theamount ingested and the amount appearing in the urine as afunction of physical parameters such as patient weight,lean bodyâ mass, age, urine pH, urine specific gravity(which may be measured by a refractometer, hydrometer orchemical methods), or other equivalent parameters related1015202530CA 02265795 l999-03- 16W0 98/ 12557 PCT/US97/16416-9..to dissolved urinary solids such as urine osmolality. Thisis especially useful in clinical trials of new, potentiallyuseful medications.It has now been discovered that pharmacologicallyinert quantities of weakly acidic medications, specificallybenzodiazepines, provide quantitative compliance markers inassociation with therapeutic agents. The measurablebenzodiazepines and their metabolites readily pass throughthe renal system into the urine making benzodiazepines andsubstances with similar properties especially suitable ascompliance markers. Preferably a pharmacologically inertquantity of a benzodiazepine, referred to as a"quantitative compliance marker," is added to each unitdose of therapeutic agent, i.e. medication, hormone ornutrient, which quantitative compliance markerconcentration can be measured in the urine. For thepurposes of this application, an inert substance shallinclude biologically inactive substances which are non-metabolizable and pharmacologically insignificant amountsof therapeutic drugs and their metabolites, which can stillbe detected in the urine of a patient.The quantitative compliance marker may be added to amedical formulation by being mixed homogeneously throughoutthe formulation or solution, or as a film or coating on atablet or capsule containing the formulation.Additionally, the marker may be introduced as particulatesin a suspension. If more than one medication has beenprescribed, a separate quantitative compliance marker maybe used in association with each medication. Preferablythe quantitative compliance markers have biological half-lives of between 24 and 48 hours so that they will appearin a urine sample long after ingestion. The quantitativecompliance markers are associated with therapeutic agentsat a predetermined proportion and preferably at a1015202530CA 02265795 l999-03- 16WO 93/12557 PCT/US97/16416sufficiently small dosage to insure the absence ofpsychotropic and physiological effects on the patient.In the method of monitoring therapeutic agentconsumption, random samples of a patient's urine may beanalyzed for the concentration of a quantitative compliancemarker associated with a therapeutic agent. Theconcentration of the quantitative compliance marker thenserves as the basis for both monitoring consumptioncompliance with the prescribed therapeutic agent dosage andto establish the proper medication dosage.In the method of monitoring therapeutic agentconsumption, if appropriate, it is first determined whetherthe urine sample is adulterated as by comparing urine pH,specific gravity, and creatinine level with that of anormal urine sample and the specific values previouslydetermined for the patient. If found to be unadulterated,and probably from the patient being monitored, the rawurine compliance marker concentration is measured alongwith the urine specific gravity or urine osmolality.Once the actual concentration of the compliance markerin the sample is determined (the raw urine compliancemarker concentration), adjustments are made to account forthe affects of variations in certain urinary parametersupon this concentration, by adjusting for the compoundingeffects of urine specific gravity. This is accomplished byaccounting for the difference between the measured specificgravity and a reference specific gravity. An adjustment isalso made to reflect a normalization to a constant patientbody weight such as 70 kg or 154 lbs. This final adjustedcompliance marker concentration is defined as thenormalized urine compliance marker concentration. In thealternative, the normalized urine compliance markerconcentration may be calculated as a function of the urineosmolality, the measured raw urine compliance marker101520253035CA 02265795 l999-03- 16WO 98/12557 PCT/US97/16416-11-concentration and the patient body weight normalized to aconstant value.The normalized urine compliance marker concentrationvalue is then used to determine whether the patient iscompliant by comparing the value of the normalizedcompliance marker concentration to an expected value, forthe purpose of determining whether there is any significantstatistical variance between the two values. By obtainingmultiple urine samples from the patient, once or twice aweek, it is possible to establish an expected baselinenormalized compliance marker concentration against which acurrent or future value can be statistically compared. Anexpected baseline compliance marker concentration for apatient is _the mean normalized compliance markerconcentration from historical values obtained from thepatient. This method of monitoring compliance is dependentupon the assumption that the patient is initially compliantin order to get the expected value. In the alternative,expected ranges of normalized compliance markerconcentrations for specific compliance marker dosages, maybe used for comparison. These ranges are based. on apatient database independent of the subject patient.A corresponding value for the actual medication doseingested is then calculated by multiplying the prescribedmedication dose with the calculated normalized urinecompliance marker concentration, and dividing the productby the expected normalized urine compliance markerconcentration.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGSFig. 1 is a graph of reverse urine creatinineexcretion factor (RUCEF) versus urine volume productionrate factor (UVPRF) showing their substantially linearrelationship.101520253035CA 02265795 l999-03- 16WO 98/12557 PCT/US97/16416-12-Fig. 2 is a graph of urine volume production ratefactor (UVPRF) versus specific gravity factor (SGF) showingtheir substantially linear relationships.Fig. :3 is a graph of urine production rate versusurine specific gravity factor (SGF) using independent dataand showing their substantially linear relationship.Fig. 44 is a graph of urine production rate versusspecific gravity ratio (1.030/urine SG).Fig. 5 is a graph of urine creatinine concentrationversus urine production rate showing the inverserelationship between urine creatinine and urine productionrate, forming a hyperbola.Fig. £5 is a graph of urine volume production ratefactor versus urine specific gravity factor, showing aslope of one and a zero intercept and demonstrating theirsubstantially linear relationship.Fig. 7 is a graph of normalized urine compliancemarker concentration versus daily compliance marker dosedemonstrating their substantially linear relationship.DETAILED DESCRIPTIONSpecifics of CompositionA specified amount of the quantitative compliancemarker benzodiazepine is added to each unit dose oftherapeutic agent, i.e. medication, hormone or nutrient,which marker can be measured in the urine. For thepurposes of this application, an inert substance includesbiologically inactive substances which are non-metabolizable, and pharmacologically'insignificant.amountsof therapeutic drugs and their metabolites, which can stillbe detected in the urine of a patient. Preferably theinert substances are not normally found in urine and arenot normally ingested as food or drink or as a medicine.Also the inert substances are preferably weak acids so thatthey are unaffected by urine pH and pass through the renal101520253035)wo és/1255;:CA 02265795 2004-02-19PCTIUS9'IIl6416-13-system without resorption. Additionally, there aremathematical relationships between weak acids with pK(dissociationm constants) values less than. 4, and theirindividual active and inactive metabolites.Benzodiazepines, such as the alprazolam Xanaainï¬nd theValimgy which aretherapeutic for treatment ofconditions, are especially suited as markers because theirdiazepam normally prescribed asagents anxiety relatedurinary excretion is not dependent upon urine pH, as areweak bases, because they are completely ionized at thetypical urine pH range of 4.5-8.5. This insures completeclearance after glomerular filtration in the kidneys, sincethesequantities byâ the renal tubules of the kidneys. Fordrugs are not absorbed or secreted in greatinstance, Valium could serve as a marker at a dosage rangeof 1â10mg a day, depending on the individual patient.Advantageously, while the benzodiazepine familyâ ofmedications are absorbed fullyâ by the digestive tract,being very lipophilic in neutralized form, they are notsignificantlyâ metabolized by the liver. Consequently,simple relationships exist between oral intake and urineoutput, as corrected for patient weight and urine specificgravity. Moreover, if the compounds are psychotropicallyand physiologically inactive at low doses, their ingestionwill not adversely affect the patient. Therefore it ispreferable that pharmacologically inert quantities of abenzodiazepine be used as a marker.A benzodiazepine quantitative compliance marker may beadded to a medical formulation by being mixed homogeneouslythroughout the formulation or as a film or coating on atablet or capsule formulation.Additionally, the marker may be mixed in in solution orintroduced as particulates in a suspension. If more thancontaining theone medication has been prescribed, a separate quantitativecompliande marker may be used in association with each1015202530CA 02265795 l999-03- 16W0 98/ 12557 PCT/U S97/ 16416_14âmedication. Preferably the markers have biological half-lives of between 24 and 48 hours so that they will appearin a urine sample long after ingestion.A general example using this type of quantitativecompliance marker, is the following:A clinical examination shows that a patient needs toingest three pills of medication a day. If 0.5 mgs of along-acting inactive metabolite of alprazolam or diazepam(having plasma half-lives greater than 24 hours) is addedto each pill as a compliance marker, each compliant patientwill have a specified and constant amount of the compliancemarker in each urine sample. The average amount measured,as normalized for urine specific gravity, and a constantpatient body weight, will be directly related to the numberof pills ingested, for instance 120 concentration unitsassuming each pill contains 40 concentration units.Persons taking only 2 pulls will have 80 concentrationunits, and persons taking only 1 pill will have 40concentration units. Having this data, a pharmaceuticalcompany can then create dose-response curves for the drugsince they will have patients taking different amounts ofdrugs due to variations in compliance.A second general example is the following:A quantitative compliance marker is used in amethadone concentrate at a constant ratio, i.e., onecompliance marker per ten methadone. Therefore the amountof methadone ingested will be proportional to the amount ofcompliance marker taken. Consequently, taking less or moremethadone than prescribed will show up as less or moremarker in the urine, thus helping to eliminate diversion ofa drug to a second individual or supplementing of apatient's drug intake from another source. In this way anumber of distinct markers may be used to monitor thecompliance of a variety of medications.101520253035CA 02265795 l999-03- 16W0 98/ 12557 PCT/US97/16416-15-Other inert substances may also serve as markers inthe following method of monitoring consumption compliancewith therapeutic agents. For example, the barbituratephenobarbital may be used as a compliance marker inconjunction with other prescribed medications, providingthe dosage of the compliance marker is low, and there is nodrug cross-reactivity with the prescribed medication orother medication that the patient is currently taking.Specifics of MethodA patient is initially prescribed a medication anddose based on several factors. These ordinarily includethe severity and duration of illness, amounts and types ofmedications previously used, current or previousphysiological and/or physical dependence upon otherprescription or illicit drugs, previous medical history,patient sex, pregnancy status, patient weight and ingestionof other therapeutic medications. Often medication dose isadjusted upwardly until a patient no longer complains ofresidual signs and symptoms of his or her psychiatricand/or medical illness, is no longer experiencingwithdrawal signs and symptoms if on a medication-replacement taper to abstinence program, or loses his orher desire to use illicit medications if a substance abuseproblem exists. Medication dose is increased per publishedand accepted standard medical protocols for each family ofpsychiatric and medical drug, usually "x" mg every fewdays. A compliance marker is associated with theprescribed medication at a preestablished ratio so that asthe patient takes his/her prescription, he/she also takesa correlative amount of the compliance marker.Testing for AdulterationIn certain circumstances it. may be appropriate tofirst test for adulteration of urine samples. Such. a101520253035CA 02265795 l999-03- 16W0 98/ 12557 PCT/US97/ 16416-16....circumstance may be appropriate in drugrehabilitation/addiction treatment settings. If this isnecessary, a supervised, spot sample of urine should befirst collected from a patient. The urine sample iscollected by simply providing the patient with a standardurine collection bottle into which he or she can urinate.Alternatively, a sample can be collected by catheterizationor withdrawn from a urine collection bag. only severalmilliliters of urine are required for analysis. With thissampling method, it is not necessary to record the volumecollected or completely void the bladder. Loss of aportion of the sample is also not detrimental as long as asufficient sample remains for analysis.Several properties of the urine are measured toevaluate whether the urine is adulterated, adulterationbeing the altering by a patient of his or her urine in aneffort to prevent detection of illicit drug use ordiversion of a drug. Adulteration typically isaccomplished by adding foreign substances to the urine suchas salt, bleach, or vinegar. Many patients attempt todilute amount of drugs in the urine sample by drinkinglarge quantities of water or by adding water to the sample.Adulteration may also occur by substituting anotherperson's urine for the patient's own urine, includinginstillation of foreign urine into the patient's bladder.In checking for adulteration, urine pH is measured, aswith the use of a pH Data Logger type meter available fromOakton, to see if it is within the normally expected pHrange of 4.5 to 8.5. Urine specific gravity is alsomeasured to see if it is within the normal range of 1.004to 1.035 units. A Digital Urinometer by Biovation may beused for this test. Creatinine, an end product of glycineand arginine metabolism excreted through the kidneys, ismeasured to evaluate renal function. The creatinine levelin human urine usually ranges from 8 to 500 mg/dl, the101520253035CA 02265795 l999-03- 16WO 98112557 PCT/US97/ 16416-17..range being affected by variables such as age, sex, diet,lifestyle and geographic location. creatinine levelsgenerally are homeostatically maintained by the body at aconstant value for each individual patient over his or herlifetime. Creatinine levels may be determined on nmnydifferent analyzers, including a TDX REA creatinine Systemavailable from Abbott Laboratories. All of these tests arehelpful in establishing normally expected ranges for eachpatient and the overall population of patients.Once pH, specific gravity, and creatinine level valuesfor the spot urine sample are obtained for a particularpatient, comparisons can be made between the sample inquestion and values previously measured (if alreadyavailable) both for the patient and for normals toascertain whether the urine sample is adulterated. If noadulteration is found, a data base is created or extendedfor the patient so that a basis of comparison exists forfuture spot urine samples. Of the three measures, urinarycreatinine level is generally the most useful indicator asto whether the spot sample is that of the patient or ofsomeone else. If it is not necessary to test foradulteration of urine samples, then random urine samplesare simply obtained from the patient to be analyzed in thefollowing manner.Measurement of Specific Gravity or osmolalityOnce a representative urine sample has been obtained,specific gravity (SG) is measured for the urine at roomtemperature, (22-23 degree C) which typically ranges from1.004 to 1.035 for normal urine. A Digital Urinometer byBiovation may be used for this test. Occasionally, urinesamples may exhibit artificially elevated specific gravityvalues. This situation occurs whenever the urine containsa significant amount of protein, such as in the nephroticsyndrome, and/or glucose, as in diabetes mellitus.101520253035CA 02265795 l999-03- 16W0 98/12557 PCT/US97/ 16416-18-Occasionally, this can also occur when urinary cleared,radiopaque dyes are used for diagnostic purposes.osmolality measurement may therefore be preferred inlieu of specific gravity measurement in order to avoidthese inflated values, since osmolality values are lessdramatically affected by the presence of glucose andprotein in the âurine, and since there is a ârecognizedrelationship in scientific literature that exists betweenurine osmolality and urine specific gravity. Furthermore,osmolality values are not sensitive to temperaturevariations as are specific gravity values.Measuring Raw Urine Compliance Marker ConcentrationThe unadulterated. sample is next analyzed for rawurine compliance marker concentration, preferably usingfluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) technology.In this regard an Abbott TDX or ADX Analyzer may beprofitably employed. other standard analytical methods mayalso be used such as chromatography or other types ofimmunoassay. The value, u, obtained is the raw urinecompliance marker concentration expressed in ng/ml. Ifappropriate, the value u includes the compliance markermetabolite concentration in the urine as well. Metabolitesare those substances which result from the body'smetabolism of the compliance marker.The raw urine compliance marker concentration, u, isnext converted to a :normalized. urine compliance markerconcentration, nu, as discussed below. A historicaldatabase is then created for these values.Calculating Normalized Urine Compliance MarkerConcentrationParameters of a patientâs urine, such as pH andspecific gravity, vary from one day to the next dependentupon the type and quantities of foods and beverages101520253035CA 02265795 l999-03- 16W0 98/ 12557 PCT/U S97/ 16416-19-ingested. Additionally, individuals metabolize endogenoussubstances, as well as medications, at different rates.Due to variations in these daily urine parameters,concentration levels for creatinine, other endogenouscompounds, and drug metabolites can vary over time. Sincemany endogenous compounds and drugs are weak acids undernormal conditions of urine pH, significant tubularresorption does not occur and renal clearance is primarilythe result of glomerular filtration. For these compounds,the major variable responsible for observed variations inurine metabolite and drug concentrations is tubularresorption or excretion of free water. The kidneysregulate urine production rates so to maintain normal bloodpressure and blood osmolality. This property of thekidneys is indicated by the urine specific gravity, aphysical variable relatingâ to urinary solids and âurinevolume production rate. A mathematical relationship hasbeen discovered to exist between urine compliance markerconcentrations and urine specific gravity, which herein isgiven by the specific gravity normalized compliance markerconcentration, nu.It is now realized that renal excretion rates (mg/dl)for drugs and urine metabolites are relatively constant forany patient during a typical day. This constancy has nowbeen experimentally verified by examining the renalexcretion rates of methadone, benzodiazepines, other drugsand creatinine and other endogenous metabolites as afunction of urine volume production rate. For example,sequential, complete and timed (1-8 hours holding periods)aliquots of urine for 12 compliant control subjects werecollected over 24 to 72 hour periods. For each urinealiquot, urine volume production rate (ml/min), specificgravity and creatinine concentration (mg/dl) (as the testedsubstance) were determined. Using this data, adimensionless, linear relationship was found to exist, that101520253035CA 02265795 l999-03- 16WO 98/12557 PCT/US97/16416-.20..is the same for all patients, between a urine volumeproduction rate factor (UVPRF) and a reverse urinecreatinine excretion factor (RUCEF). For each individual,control, urine collection period, the UVPRF is defined bythe ratio of urine volume production rate for each urinealiquot collected, v, to the urine volume production ratefor the most concentrated sample in the collection periodwith a specific gravity usually near 1.030 (ie thatspecific gravity of a normal urine sample at roomtemperature, typical of a morning void ), vâ,UVPRF = v/vâ. (1)Similarly, in this example, RUCEF factor is defined by theratio of the creatinine concentration of the mostconcentrated urine aliquot with a specific gravity usuallynear 1.030, uâ, to the creatinine concentration for eachurine aliquot collected, u,RUCEF = uâ/u. (2)This linear relationship is shown in Figure 1. The bestfit linear regression line is given by the expression,RUCEF = 0.942-UVPRF + 0.121 (3)uâ/u = 0.942-v/vâ + 0.121 (4)where statistical evaluation results in an adjusted squaredmultiple R = (L985, a standard error of the estimate =0.242, and a Fâratio = 4965.Therefore, contrary to the traditional teachings ofthose skilled in the art, urine drug and metaboliteconcentrations, u, are inversely related to the volume ofurine produced by the kidneys, v, clearly demonstrating1015202530CA 02265795 l999-03- 16W0 98/12557 PCT/US97/16416-21-that the product (u-v) is constant at any particular timepoint and urine pH.Since (u-v) at any time is a constant, steadyâstatevalue, it follows that from Equation (4) some empiricalmathematical relationship must exist between u and v suchthat given an arbitrary urine volume production rate vâ andan equivalent uâ at a reference point (a specific gravityof 1.030):{u'v}mwml= {u"V'}aLmo (5)or upon rearrangement for uâ gives,uâ = u-(v/vâ) (6)where the products given in Equation (6) are those measuredfor a spot urine sample collected with an actual specificgravity and a corrected specific gravity typical of amorning void of 1.030.Using controlled urine collections, a urine volumeproduction rate vâ of 0.44 ml/min for persons withreasonably normal renal functions at a specific gravity of1.030 was initially measured. A specific gravity factor isthen calculated by the equation (rsg - 1.000)/(msg -1.000), where rsg is the reference specific gravity, whichin this case is equal to 1.030, and where msg is themeasured specific gravity. The specific gravity factor isan adjustment of the measured specific gravity value toaccount for the difference between the measured specificgravity value and a reference specific gravity value.It has been found that a linear relationship existsbetween the urine volume production rate factor and thespecific gravity factor, (SGF) as shown in Figure 2 andgiven as follows:101520253035CA 02265795 l999-03- 16W0 98/12557 PCT/US97/16416.-22..UVPRF = v/vâ = 2.43-SGF â 1.43 (7)where the adjusted squared multiple R = 0.856, standarderror of the estimate = 0.787, F-ratio = 482.Substituting Equation (7) into Equation (6) thespecific gravity normalized creatinine concentration, nu,(since we are testing for creatinine) is then calculated byadjusting the actual urine creatinine concentration, u, forcompounding effects of urine specific gravity at 1.030:nu = uâ = u-(v/vâ) = u-UVPRF = u-[kpSGF - kg (8)wherein k.is a constant equal to 2.43 and L is a constantequal to 1.43.Using Osmolalitv Measurement In Lieu of Specific GravityMeasurement in CalculationsIt has been noted that specific mathematicalrelationships exist between the rate of urine formation(ml/min) and the concentration of creatinine in the urine.A relationship also exists between these variables andurine specific gravity. Generally, the relationshipsbetween SGF and v/vâ apply to persons with normal renalfunction. However several situations exist in which theSGF, especially when measured by refractometry orhydrometer, is not directly related to v/vâ, thus creatinginaccuracies 531 the relationships heretofore described.Such a situation occurs whenever the urine contains asignificant amount of protein and/or glucose. Occasionallythis can also occur whenever urinary cleared, radiopaquedyes are used. for diagnostic âpurposes. Each of thesecompounds can affect the refractive index or dragcoefficients for a spinning hydrometer. In situations suchas these, the presence of the abnormal components resultsin the specific gravity value being artificially elevated.101520253035CA 02265795 l999-03- 16W0 98/ 12557 PCT/U S97/ 16416For example, protein in the urine, which is mainly albumin,causes the specific gravity to increase by about 0.003units for every 1000 mg of protein/100 ml urine. Thepresence of glucose results in an increase of about 0.004units for every 1000 mg of glucose/100 ml urine. If thepresence of these influencing compounds is not considered,the specific gravity utilized in the correlation isinaccurate. This inaccuracy is readily apparent becausethe v/vâ from the calculated SGF will fall outside of theexpected range, alerting the clinician to a possibleunusual situation. It will appear that the urine specificgravity is too high for the amount of urine produced. Inthis scenario, additional urine tests can be done toquantify the amounts of protein, glucose and radiopaquedyes. Once these figures are obtained, corrections can beapplied to the calculations. For example, another urinesample can be collected after the radiopaque dye is out ofthe urine and numerical corrections to the refractometer orhydrometer specific gravity values can be made for proteinand/or glucose. The corrected specific gravity isdetermined by subtraction so as to remove the effect of theabnormal urine components. Once these corrections aremade, the normally expected relationships between SGF andv/vâ may be noted.However, in lieu of using SGF as a measure of urineconcentrating ability, specific gravity being the mass ofa unit volume of solution/mass of a unit volume of puresolvent, urine osmolality factor (hereinafter UOF) can alsobe used. osmolality is the number of osmotic particles perunit volume of pure solvent. A common relationship existsin scientific literature relating urine osmolality to urinespecific gravity. For instance, urine osmolality, measuredin mOSM, is equal to 37500(SG~1.000). Furthermore, urineosmolality is not temperature sensitive as is urinespecific gravity. The urine osmolality factor is defined101520253035CA 02265795 l999-03- 16W0 98/12557 PCT/US97/16416as the ratio of the urine osmolality at a specific gravityof a reference point, such as 1.030, to the urineosmolality equivalent at the actual urine specific gravity.Using this equation, the following figures may be generatedfor protein/glucose free urines.EXAMPLESMeasured Calculated Measured CalculatedSpecific Specific Osmolality UrineGravity Gravity OsmolalityFactor Factorsample 1 SG 1.003 SGF 10 Osm 112.5 UOF 10sample 2 SG 1.015 SGF 2 Osm 562 UOF 2sample 3 SG 1.030 SGF 1 Osm 1125 UOF 1It is therefore evident from this data that SGF andUOF values are equivalent and either one may be used in theapplication of this invention.Refinement of the Normalized Urine Compliance MarkerEquationsIndependent data was gathered from 96 patients beingfollowed in a renal disease clinic. Data available fromthese patients included 24 hour urine volumes, urinespecific gravity, urine creatinine concentration, serumcreatinine concentration, creatinine clearances measuredfrom 24 hour collections, presence of protein and glucosein urine, urine osmolality, patient sex, age, lean bodyweight, total body weight, height and diagnosis.The independent data was first plotted by urineproduction rate (ml/min) versus various mathematicalformulations of urine specific gravity as illustrated inFigs. 3 and 4. Although several methods exist for plottingspecific gravity or its equivalent, osmolality, on the x-axis, ie, SG ratio=1.030/SG, SGF or even SG, the SGF andUOF relationship are preferable.101520253035CA 02265795 l999-03- 16W0 98Il2557 PCT/US97/16416-25-As a further example for demonstrating in greaterdetail the inverse relationship between urine creatinineand urine volume production rate, urine creatinineconcentration was plotted against urine production raterevealing a hyperbola in Fig. 5.Figure 6 plots the ratio v/vâ using vâ equal to 0.58ml/min against SGF. Plotting this data gives a slope of oneand a zero intercept. Data gathered from normal subjectssupports this same conclusion.These functions differ from functions describedearlier in that vâ is now equal to 0.58 and v is now equalto SGF -vâ as compared to previous formulations where v wasequal to (2.43 - SGF-1.43) - vâ, where vâ equals 0.44. Therefined normalized equation may be expressed generally asfollows (normalized to a specific gravity of 1.030):nu = uâ = u-(v/vâ) = u-UVPRF = u-SGF (9)The equation for nu (9) may be further normalized toadjust for a standard patient body weight such as of 70 kgor 154 lbs. This normalized value for nu may be reflectedin the following equation:nu = uâ = u-(v/vâ) = u-SGF-(WGT/K) (10)where WGT is equal to patient body weight, and K is aconstant equal in this case to 154 lbs. It should be notedthat this equation may be normalized to any reference valuefor specific gravity or weight.Comparison of nu Value With Established ValuesThe normalized urine compliance marker concentrationis then compared to established values for the patient. Byobtaining multiple urine samples from a patient, once ortwice a week, it is possible to establish an expectednormalized compliance marker baseline against which a101520253035CA 02265795 l999-03- 16W0 98/12557 PCT/US97/16416-25-current or future value can be statistically compared. Theexpected normalized compliance marker baseline is the meannormalized compliance marker value from historical patientdata. This method of monitoring compliance is dependentupon the assumption that the patient is initially compliantin order to get the expected value. In the alternative,expected ranges for normalized compliance markerconcentrations from independent patient databases may beused for comparison. If any difference between calculatednu and expected nu is not explained by statisticallyacceptable deviation, then the patient is not incompliance. The actual medication dosage ingested may thenbe calculated as:(prescribed medication dose)-(calculated nu)expected nuSpecific Examples and Supporting Data Using MethodSeveral methadone patients were independentlyprescribed diazepam for anxiety disorders. These patientswere utilized to determine if it would be possible tocompound a particular "marker" chemical in a set ratio tomethadone such that one could tell how many doses ofmethadone each patient took. If the "marker" concentrationin the urine satisfied specified statistical requirementsas to the concentration level measured, then one would besure that the patient did not ingest extra doses or divertmethadone by not taking the full dose. These experimentswere designed as follows:Experiment £1 QueryDoes normalized urine concentration of compliancemarker correlate with doses of the underlying drugmethadone given to patient?101520253035CA 02265795 l999-03- 16W0 98/ 12557 PCT/U S97ll6416-27-Stages of Experiment £11. A fixed diazepam/methadone hydrochloride mixtureratio was chosen (1 mg diazepam per 15 mg methadone HCL).Methadone-marker solutions were prepared by addingsufficient diazepam liquid (10 mg/ml concentrate) tomethadone concentrate (50 mg/ml) so as to manufacture unitsamples containing either (4mg diazepam/70 mg methadone) or(8 mg diazepam/120 mg methadone) such that the final volume(including water, color and flavor) of each dose was 15 ml.2. To insure compliance with protocol for thisexperiment, three rehabilitated and compliant patients(each having been in methadone treatment for several years)were chosen for this experiment. Two patients ingestedmethadone 30 mg p.o. every 12 hours (half a bottle eachtime) and one patient ingested methadone 60 mg p.o. every12 hours (half a bottle each time). on a random basis,each patient was asked to provide an observed urine samplefor analysis prior to being given his or her daily dose.Each patient came to the office at least twice a week topick up medication, ingest half their dose and beinterviewed. Each experiment was conducted for a two monthperiod. During this period, the only sources of methadoneand diazepam available were given in the test site.3. Diazepam was measured by FPIA normalized to aurine specific gravity of 1.030 and a total body weight of154 lbs:nu concentration = (u)(SGF)(wgt/154)10152025303540CA 02265795 l999-03- 16W0 98/ 12557 PCT/US97l 16416_28_4. Results.PRESCRIBED COMPLIANCEMEDICATION MARKERMEAN NU FORCOMPLIANCE MARKERP-1 methadone 30mg diazepam 2mgp.o. q12h p.o. qlzhsoo (so 90, cv 13%)P-2 methadone 60mg diazepam 4mgp.o. q12h p.o. q12h1068 (so 233, cv 22%)P-3 methadone 30mg diazepam 2mgp.o. q12h p.o. q12h499 (so 73, cv 15%)Expected. ratio of marker P-1/marker P-3 should. be1.00; actual ratio observed was 1.00. Expected ratio ofP-2/marker Pâ1 or P-3 should be 2.00; actual ratio was2.13.Experiment £2 QueryWhat happens if a patient were to ingest extramethadone from another source also containing compliancemarker?Stages of Experiment £21. For this experiment, patient P-3 was utilized.In order to simulate a patient ingesting twice as muchmethadone (underlying drug) each day (also with compliancemarker), patient P-3 was given his standard methadone dosefor several weeks prior to and following a one week changein the amount of compliance marker (2 mg diazepam per 15 mgmethadone HCL) included in his normal 60 mg daily methadonedose so as to simulate "double dosing." Included in thefollowing chart are sequential nu diazepam urine values forthe pre-change period, simulation of "double dosing" andpost-change period.1015202530CA 02265795 l999-03- 16W0 98/12557 PCT/US97/16416._ 2 9 ..Date: marker status: nu diazepam:02-19-96 post-change 534 ng/ml02-09-96 post-change 48202-02-96 post-change 40401-31-96 post-change 59101-26-96 double marker 1163marker returned to1 mg/15 mg methadone01-22-96 double marker 59701-19-96 pre-change 450marker increased to2 mg/15 mg methadone01-16-96 pre-change 51901-03-96 pre-change 39512-29-95 pre-change 51612-26-95 pre-change 34412-22-95 pre-change 591If the patient was "double dosing" one would expect tosee (after about a week, since the average half-life of thediazepam metabolites is about 48 hours) at the end of aweek, a compliance marker concentration about twice thebaseline concentration. Expected concentration would beabout 1000 ng/ml, while concentration observed was 1163ng/ml. Therefore, if this patient had been non-compliantand getting methadone from another clinic, doctors wouldhave been able to intervene.Experiment £3 QueryWhat happens if a patient were to divert a portion oftheir daily doses?Stages of Experiment £31. For this experiment, patient P-2 was utilized.In order to simulate a patient diverting half of her dailyCA 02265795 l999-03- 16W0 98/ 12557 PCT/US97/16416-30-methadone (has takeâhomes with one clinic visit a week), aprotocol similar to experiment #2 was done exceptcompliance marker was decreased to 0.5 mg diazepam per 15mg methadone HCL.1015202530If a patient were diverting half of their take-homedoses, one would expect to see a decrease in the complianceDate: marker status: nu diazepam:02-09-96 postâchange 1019 ng/ml02-06-96 post-change 104402-02-96 post-change 107301-30-96 post-change 109801-26-96 half marker 445increase marker to1 mg/15 mg methadone01-23-96 half marker 67301-19-96 half marker 997decrease marker to0.5 mg/15 mg methadone01-16-96 pre-change 104401-12-96 pre-change 97801-09-95 pre-change 102901-05-96 pre-change 89601-02-96 pre-change 1210marker concentration of half after a week or so.indeed what happened.Experiment £4 QueryHow to establish expected values for normalized urinecompliance marker concentrations ?Based on data gathered from over 50 patients observed overa fourâyear period, expected ranges for several normalizedurine complianceestablished.For example, when diazepam is utilized asiamarkerconcentrations âhaveThis is101520253035CA 02265795 l999-03- 16W0 98/ 12557 PCT/U S97/ 16416â3 1-compliance marker, the expected normalized value for urinediazepamâlike immunoreactivity is 125 ng/ml/mgâ diazepammarker ingested. Statistical ranges for acceptable lowsand highs have been established as being between 75 to 175ng/ml/mg diazepam marker ingested. The linear correlationbetween normalized urine compliance marker concentrationand daily compliance marker dose is illustrated in Fig. 7.Using preestablished data for normalized urine compliancemarker concentration will eliminate the need to establishhistorical data bases for each individual patient.It thus is seen that methods and compositions are nowprovided for monitoring patients who have been placed onmedication maintenance programs or have been participantsin experimental drug programs. The method utilizes acompliance marker concentration from evaluation of patienturine samples by FPIA to determine normalized urinecompliance marker concentrations. Normalized urinecompliance marker concentration can then be compared to anexpected normalized urine compliance marker concentration.The actual drug dose ingested may then be calculated todetermine compliance with the prescribed medication dose.The methods and compositions are clinically practicalwithout high laboratory testing cost, the invasiveness ofwithdrawing blood, and the added exposure to medicalprofessionals of patient blood having high probability ofhepatitis and HIV infection. Furthermore, the methods andcompositions do not require multiple equations to calculatenormalized concentration values, or the consideration ofnumerous pharmacokinetics variables for each âmedicationbeing monitored.While this invention has been described in detail withparticular references to preferred embodiments thereof, itshould be understood that many modifications, additions anddeletions may be made thereto, in addition to thoseexpressly recited without departure from the spirit andCA 02265795 l999-03- 16WO 98/12557 PCT/US97/16416-32-scope of the invention as set forth in the followingclaims.
Claims (24)
1. A method of monitoring compliance of a patient who has been placed on a medication maintenance program with a prescribed medication dosage, and with the method comprising the steps of:
(a) physically associating a compliance marker with a prescribed medication dosage prior to ingestion, (b) obtaining a sample of the patient's urine, (c) measuring the concentration of the compliance marker and its metabolites in the urine and the urine specific gravity, (d) calculating a normalized urine compliance marker and its metabolite concentration as a function of the measured compliance marker and its metabolite concentration in the urine and the urine specific gravity adjusted to account for the difference between the measured urine specific gravity and a preselected reference urine specific gravity, (e) comparing the normalized urine compliance marker and its metabolite concentration with an expected normalized urine compliance marker and its metabolite concentration for the amount of compliance marker prescribed, as an indication of compliance or non-compliance.
(a) physically associating a compliance marker with a prescribed medication dosage prior to ingestion, (b) obtaining a sample of the patient's urine, (c) measuring the concentration of the compliance marker and its metabolites in the urine and the urine specific gravity, (d) calculating a normalized urine compliance marker and its metabolite concentration as a function of the measured compliance marker and its metabolite concentration in the urine and the urine specific gravity adjusted to account for the difference between the measured urine specific gravity and a preselected reference urine specific gravity, (e) comparing the normalized urine compliance marker and its metabolite concentration with an expected normalized urine compliance marker and its metabolite concentration for the amount of compliance marker prescribed, as an indication of compliance or non-compliance.
2. The method of claim 1 further including the step:
(f) calculating the amount of prescribed medication actually ingested by multiplying the prescribed medication dose with the calculated normalized urine compliance marker and its metabolite concentration, and dividing the product by the expected normalized urine compliance marker and its metabolite concentration.
(f) calculating the amount of prescribed medication actually ingested by multiplying the prescribed medication dose with the calculated normalized urine compliance marker and its metabolite concentration, and dividing the product by the expected normalized urine compliance marker and its metabolite concentration.
3. A method of monitoring compliance of a patient who has been placed on a medication maintenance program with a prescribed medication dosage and having a compliance marker physically associated with the medication at a predetermined dosage, and with the method comprising the steps of:
(a) obtaining a sample of the patient's urine, (b) measuring the concentration of the compliance marker and its metabolites in the urine and the urine specific gravity, (c) calculating a normalized urine compliance marker and its metabolite concentration as a function of the measured compliance marker and its metabolite concentration in the urine and the urine specific gravity adjusted to account for the difference between the urine measured specific gravity and a preselected reference urine specific gravity, (d) comparing the normalized urine compliance marker and its metabolite concentration with an expected normalized urine compliance marker and its metabolite concentration for the amount of compliance marker prescribed, as an indication of compliance or non-compliance.
(a) obtaining a sample of the patient's urine, (b) measuring the concentration of the compliance marker and its metabolites in the urine and the urine specific gravity, (c) calculating a normalized urine compliance marker and its metabolite concentration as a function of the measured compliance marker and its metabolite concentration in the urine and the urine specific gravity adjusted to account for the difference between the urine measured specific gravity and a preselected reference urine specific gravity, (d) comparing the normalized urine compliance marker and its metabolite concentration with an expected normalized urine compliance marker and its metabolite concentration for the amount of compliance marker prescribed, as an indication of compliance or non-compliance.
4. The method of claim 3 further including the step:
(e) calculating the amount of prescribed medication actually ingested by multiplying the prescribed medication dose with the calculated normalized urine compliance marker and its metabolite concentration, and dividing the product by the expected normalized urine compliance marker and its metabolite concentration.
(e) calculating the amount of prescribed medication actually ingested by multiplying the prescribed medication dose with the calculated normalized urine compliance marker and its metabolite concentration, and dividing the product by the expected normalized urine compliance marker and its metabolite concentration.
5. The method of claim 3 wherein step (d) the normalized urine compliance marker and its metabolite concentration is calculated in accordance with the equation nu = u.cndot.SGF.cndot.(WGT/K) where nu is the normalized urine compliance marker and its metabolite concentration, a is the measured raw urine compliance marker and its metabolite concentration, SGF is the specific gravity factor of the urine sample calculated from the equation (rsg - 1.000)/(msg - 1.000), where rsg is the preselected reference urine specific gravity, and where msg is the urine measured specific gravity, where WGT is the patient body weight and K is a constant.
6. The method of claim 3 wherein step (b) the concentration of a benzodiazepine and its metabolites are measured.
7. The method of claim 6 wherein the benzodiazepine is diazepam.
8. The method of claim 6 wherein the benzodiazepine is alprazolam.
9. The method of claim 3 wherein step (b) the concentration of a barbiturate and its metabolites are measured.
10. The method of claim 9 wherein the barbiturate is phenobarbital.
11. A method of claim 3 wherein step (b) the concentration of a weakly acidic medication and its metabolites are measured.
12. A method of monitoring compliance of a patient who has been placed on a medication maintenance program with a prescribed medication dosage and having a compliance marker physically associated with the medication at a predetermined dosage, and with the method comprising the steps of:
(a) obtaining a sample of the patient's urine, (b) measuring the concentration of the compliance marker and its metabolites in the urine and the urine osmolality, (c) calculating a normalized urine compliance marker and its metabolite concentration as a function of the measured compliance marker and its metabolite concentration in the urine and the urine osmolality, (d) comparing the normalized urine compliance marker and its metabolite concentration with an expected normalized urine compliance marker and its metabolite concentration value prescribed, as an indication of compliance or non-compliance.
(a) obtaining a sample of the patient's urine, (b) measuring the concentration of the compliance marker and its metabolites in the urine and the urine osmolality, (c) calculating a normalized urine compliance marker and its metabolite concentration as a function of the measured compliance marker and its metabolite concentration in the urine and the urine osmolality, (d) comparing the normalized urine compliance marker and its metabolite concentration with an expected normalized urine compliance marker and its metabolite concentration value prescribed, as an indication of compliance or non-compliance.
13. The method of claim 12 further including the step:
(e) calculating the amount of prescribed medication actually ingested by multiplying the prescribed medication dose with the calculated normalized urine compliance marker and its metabolite concentration, and dividing the product by the expected normalized urine compliance marker and its metabolite concentration.
(e) calculating the amount of prescribed medication actually ingested by multiplying the prescribed medication dose with the calculated normalized urine compliance marker and its metabolite concentration, and dividing the product by the expected normalized urine compliance marker and its metabolite concentration.
14. The method of claim 12 wherein step (c) the normalized urine compliance marker and its metabolite concentration is calculated in accordance with the equation nu = u.cndot.UOF.cndot.(WGT/K) where nu is the normalized urine compliance marker and its metabolite concentration, a is the measured raw urine compliance marker and its metabolite concentration, UOF is the urine osmolality factor of the urine sample defined as the ratio of the urine osmolality at a specific gravity of a reference urine sample to the urine osmolality equivalent at the actual urine specific gravity, where WGT is the patient body weight and K is a constant.
15. The method of claim 12 wherein step (b) the concentration of a benzodiazepine and its metabolites are measured.
16. The method of claim 15 wherein the benzodiazepine is diazepam.
17. The method of claim 15 wherein the benzodiazepine is alprazolam.
18. The method of claim 12 wherein step (b) the concentration of a barbiturate compliance marker and its metabolites are measured.
19. The method of claim 18 wherein the barbiturate is phenobarbital.
20. A method of claim 12 wherein step (b) the concentration of a weakly acidic medication and its metabolites are measured.
21. A method of determining patient compliance, comprising prescribing the ingestion by the patient of an active agent and a marker comprising a benzodiazepine or benzodiazepine metabolite and subsequently analyzing the patient's urine to confirm the presence of said marker and thus the ingestion of said prescribed active agent.
22. The method of claim 21, wherein said marker is pharmacologically inert.
23. The method of claim 21, wherein said marker is diazepam.
24. The method of claim 21, wherein said marker is alprazolam.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CA2526433A CA2526433C (en) | 1996-09-17 | 1997-09-17 | Therapeutic agent with quantitative consumption marker and method of monitoring therapeutic agent consumption |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US08/715,016 US5776783A (en) | 1993-11-02 | 1996-09-17 | Method of monitoring therapeutic agent consumption |
US08/715,016 | 1996-09-17 | ||
PCT/US1997/016416 WO1998012557A1 (en) | 1996-09-17 | 1997-09-17 | Therapeutic agent with quantitative consumption marker and method of monitoring therapeutic agent consumption |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA2526433A Division CA2526433C (en) | 1996-09-17 | 1997-09-17 | Therapeutic agent with quantitative consumption marker and method of monitoring therapeutic agent consumption |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2265795A1 CA2265795A1 (en) | 1998-03-26 |
CA2265795C true CA2265795C (en) | 2006-03-07 |
Family
ID=24872366
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA002265795A Expired - Fee Related CA2265795C (en) | 1996-09-17 | 1997-09-17 | Therapeutic agent with quantitative consumption marker and method of monitoring therapeutic agent consumption |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US5776783A (en) |
EP (1) | EP0944828B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2001507118A (en) |
AT (1) | ATE263371T1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2265795C (en) |
DE (1) | DE69728418D1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO1998012557A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (40)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP3063837B2 (en) * | 1997-09-26 | 2000-07-12 | 日本電気株式会社 | Urine multi-sensor |
US6087182A (en) | 1998-08-27 | 2000-07-11 | Abbott Laboratories | Reagentless analysis of biological samples |
US6136801A (en) * | 1998-12-24 | 2000-10-24 | U. D. Testing, Inc. | Therapeutic agent with quantitative consumption marker |
US7069226B1 (en) | 1999-07-07 | 2006-06-27 | Synetic, Incorporated | Prescription data processing system for determining new therapy starts |
US20020177232A1 (en) * | 2001-05-23 | 2002-11-28 | Melker Richard J. | Method and apparatus for detecting illicit substances |
US20050233459A1 (en) * | 2003-11-26 | 2005-10-20 | Melker Richard J | Marker detection method and apparatus to monitor drug compliance |
US20050037374A1 (en) * | 1999-11-08 | 2005-02-17 | Melker Richard J. | Combined nanotechnology and sensor technologies for simultaneous diagnosis and treatment |
NZ518740A (en) * | 1999-11-08 | 2004-04-30 | Univ Florida | Marker detection method and apparatus to monitor drug compliance |
US7104963B2 (en) | 2002-01-22 | 2006-09-12 | University Of Florida Research Foundation, Inc. | Method and apparatus for monitoring intravenous (IV) drug concentration using exhaled breath |
US6981947B2 (en) | 2002-01-22 | 2006-01-03 | University Of Florida Research Foundation, Inc. | Method and apparatus for monitoring respiratory gases during anesthesia |
US20030194374A1 (en) * | 2001-01-17 | 2003-10-16 | Xanodyne Pharmacal, Inc. | Compositions including a visual marker and method of use thereof |
US7062312B2 (en) * | 2001-01-17 | 2006-06-13 | Pediamed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Combination and method including a visual marker for determining compliance with a medication regimen |
WO2002069897A2 (en) * | 2001-03-02 | 2002-09-12 | Euro-Celtique, S.A. | Method and apparatus for compounding individualized dosage forms |
DE10112470B4 (en) * | 2001-03-15 | 2008-02-28 | Keller, Ruprecht, Priv.-Doz. Dr.Dr. | A method for sample identification in a mammal and kit for carrying out this method |
US7052854B2 (en) * | 2001-05-23 | 2006-05-30 | University Of Florida Research Foundation, Inc. | Application of nanotechnology and sensor technologies for ex-vivo diagnostics |
EP1393069A1 (en) * | 2001-05-24 | 2004-03-03 | The University Of Florida | Method and apparatus for detecting environmental smoke exposure |
US20070167853A1 (en) | 2002-01-22 | 2007-07-19 | Melker Richard J | System and method for monitoring health using exhaled breath |
ATE261126T1 (en) * | 2002-08-01 | 2004-03-15 | Mtm Lab Ag | PROCEDURE FOR SOLUTION-BASED DIAGNOSIS |
US20060160134A1 (en) * | 2002-10-21 | 2006-07-20 | Melker Richard J | Novel application of biosensors for diagnosis and treatment of disease |
US9233049B2 (en) * | 2002-10-31 | 2016-01-12 | Purdue Pharma L.P. | Pharmaceutical identification |
DE10253664B4 (en) * | 2002-11-18 | 2005-02-03 | Gauchel, Gisela, Dr. | diagnostic procedures |
US7585680B2 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2009-09-08 | Marshfield Medical Research And Education Foundation | Method and device for monitoring medication usage |
US20050191757A1 (en) * | 2004-01-20 | 2005-09-01 | Melker Richard J. | Method and apparatus for detecting humans and human remains |
US20060062734A1 (en) * | 2004-09-20 | 2006-03-23 | Melker Richard J | Methods and systems for preventing diversion of prescription drugs |
US8296162B1 (en) | 2005-02-01 | 2012-10-23 | Webmd Llc. | Systems, devices, and methods for providing healthcare information |
US20060257883A1 (en) * | 2005-05-10 | 2006-11-16 | Bjoraker David G | Detection and measurement of hematological parameters characterizing cellular blood components |
US20060277063A1 (en) * | 2005-06-01 | 2006-12-07 | Travis Leonardi | Preventive healthcare program with low-cost prescription drug benefit patient enrollment system and method |
US7838526B2 (en) * | 2005-08-05 | 2010-11-23 | Esther Baldinger | Method of treating neurological disorders |
CA2645041A1 (en) * | 2006-03-07 | 2007-09-13 | University Of Florida Research Foundation, Inc. | Drug adherence monitoring system |
US7914460B2 (en) * | 2006-08-15 | 2011-03-29 | University Of Florida Research Foundation, Inc. | Condensate glucose analyzer |
US8380530B2 (en) * | 2007-02-02 | 2013-02-19 | Webmd Llc. | Personalized health records with associative relationships |
US8067243B2 (en) * | 2008-09-03 | 2011-11-29 | Oregon Medical Laboratories | Methods and systems for analyzing medication levels in a sample |
CA2789377A1 (en) * | 2010-02-11 | 2011-08-18 | Harry Leider | Methods of normalizing measured drug concentrations and testing for non-compliance with a drug treatment regimen |
WO2013078403A1 (en) * | 2011-11-21 | 2013-05-30 | Daniel Saal | Verifying the source of biological samples; method, composition and kit therefor |
WO2015184084A2 (en) * | 2014-05-28 | 2015-12-03 | University Of Cincinnati | Sweat monitoring and control of drug delivery |
EP3486652B1 (en) | 2014-06-18 | 2023-07-26 | Ruma GmbH | Method for identifying of a biological sample of a mammal, composition for use in this method and kit for performance of this method |
EP3106876B1 (en) | 2015-06-19 | 2022-12-07 | F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG | Solid waste removal |
US10145855B2 (en) | 2016-05-03 | 2018-12-04 | Synapse Biosciences, LLC | Methods and dose packs for monitoring medication adherence |
EP3782096B1 (en) | 2019-07-04 | 2023-06-07 | Ruma GmbH | Location-independent intake control |
US20210215662A1 (en) * | 2020-01-15 | 2021-07-15 | MX3 Diagnostics, Inc. | Assessment of biomarker concentration in a fluid |
Family Cites Families (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2564247A (en) * | 1947-08-18 | 1951-08-14 | Richard M Carson | Method of testing urine to determine pregnancy |
US3856469A (en) * | 1973-01-02 | 1974-12-24 | Syva Corp | Interferant removal from amphetamine immunoassay |
US3901655A (en) * | 1973-12-26 | 1975-08-26 | American Cyanamid Co | Urine toxicology control |
US4104367A (en) * | 1976-10-13 | 1978-08-01 | Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. | Radioimmunoassay for methadone |
US4196185A (en) * | 1978-06-05 | 1980-04-01 | Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. | Immunoassay for phencyclidine |
JPH0698032B2 (en) * | 1987-01-23 | 1994-12-07 | 財団法人野田産業科学研究所 | Methods for measuring creatine or creatinine and reagents for these measurements |
US5137692A (en) * | 1990-12-11 | 1992-08-11 | Robert Fritz | Nitrogen test kit for physical training |
US5179027A (en) * | 1991-01-10 | 1993-01-12 | Fisher Murray M | Method employing chemical markers and kit for verifying the source and completeness of urine samples for testing for the presence of drugs of abuse |
US5547878A (en) * | 1993-11-02 | 1996-08-20 | Kell; Michael | Method of monitoring patient compliance with medications prescriptions |
-
1996
- 1996-09-17 US US08/715,016 patent/US5776783A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1997
- 1997-09-17 DE DE69728418T patent/DE69728418D1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1997-09-17 AT AT97943330T patent/ATE263371T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1997-09-17 CA CA002265795A patent/CA2265795C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1997-09-17 JP JP51482198A patent/JP2001507118A/en active Pending
- 1997-09-17 WO PCT/US1997/016416 patent/WO1998012557A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1997-09-17 EP EP97943330A patent/EP0944828B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CA2265795A1 (en) | 1998-03-26 |
EP0944828A1 (en) | 1999-09-29 |
ATE263371T1 (en) | 2004-04-15 |
EP0944828B1 (en) | 2004-03-31 |
WO1998012557A1 (en) | 1998-03-26 |
US5776783A (en) | 1998-07-07 |
EP0944828A4 (en) | 1999-09-29 |
JP2001507118A (en) | 2001-05-29 |
DE69728418D1 (en) | 2004-05-06 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA2265795C (en) | Therapeutic agent with quantitative consumption marker and method of monitoring therapeutic agent consumption | |
US5908788A (en) | Method of monitoring patient compliance with medications prescriptions | |
US5547878A (en) | Method of monitoring patient compliance with medications prescriptions | |
Matheson et al. | Sex differences in the acute effects of smoked cannabis: evidence from a human laboratory study of young adults | |
Crom et al. | Pharmacokinetics of vincristine in children and adolescents with acute lymphocytic leukemia | |
US6136801A (en) | Therapeutic agent with quantitative consumption marker | |
Galgatte et al. | Study on requirements of bioequivalence for registration of pharmaceutical products in USA, Europe and Canada | |
Guénette et al. | Measures of adherence based on self-report exhibited poor agreement with those based on pharmacy records | |
Friedman et al. | Experience in monitoring drug reactions in outpatients: the Kaiser-Permanente Drug Monitoring System | |
Gariti et al. | Detecting smoking following smoking cessation treatment | |
Leppik et al. | Compliance and variability of plasma phenytoin levels in epileptic patients | |
Herron et al. | Assessment of riboflavin as a tracer substance: comparison of a qualitative to a quantitative method of riboflavin measurement | |
Cody et al. | Impact of adulterants on RIA analysis of urine for drugs of abuse | |
WO1999002983A1 (en) | Urine adulteration test method | |
Wolff et al. | Measuring compliance in methadone maintenance patients: Use of a pharmacologic indicator to “estimate” methadone plasma levels | |
Hegde et al. | High prevalence of alcoholism in dialysis patients | |
CA2216380C (en) | Method of determining renal clearances | |
Dubbert et al. | Riboflavin as a tracer of medication compliance | |
AU736645B2 (en) | Therapeutic agent with quantitative consumption marker and method of monitoring therapeutic agent consumption | |
CA2526433C (en) | Therapeutic agent with quantitative consumption marker and method of monitoring therapeutic agent consumption | |
AU758193B2 (en) | Therepeutic agent with quantitative consumption marker | |
EP2533768B1 (en) | Methods of normalising measured oxycodone concentrations and testing for non-compliance with a treatment regimen | |
WO1996003648A1 (en) | Method of determining renal clearances | |
Martin | Understanding Clinical Laboratory Interference | |
Mollica | Monitoring compliance through analysis of drug and metabolite levels |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
EEER | Examination request | ||
MKLA | Lapsed |
Effective date: 20140917 |