CA2305297C - Control system for a phacoemulsification handpiece - Google Patents
Control system for a phacoemulsification handpiece Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2305297C CA2305297C CA002305297A CA2305297A CA2305297C CA 2305297 C CA2305297 C CA 2305297C CA 002305297 A CA002305297 A CA 002305297A CA 2305297 A CA2305297 A CA 2305297A CA 2305297 C CA2305297 C CA 2305297C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- frequency
- admittance
- handpiece
- series resonance
- less
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 31
- 238000001356 surgical procedure Methods 0.000 claims description 20
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 abstract description 47
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 8
- 239000013078 crystal Substances 0.000 description 6
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 3
- FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium chloride Chemical compound [Na+].[Cl-] FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 2
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002238 attenuated effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000003973 irrigation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002262 irrigation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000002159 anterior chamber Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000004087 cornea Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001934 delay Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001804 emulsifying effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004146 energy storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011010 flushing procedure Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011065 in-situ storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000010355 oscillation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010223 real-time analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000003786 sclera Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000011780 sodium chloride Substances 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
- A61F9/00—Methods or devices for treatment of the eyes; Devices for putting-in contact lenses; Devices to correct squinting; Apparatus to guide the blind; Protective devices for the eyes, carried on the body or in the hand
- A61F9/007—Methods or devices for eye surgery
- A61F9/00736—Instruments for removal of intra-ocular material or intra-ocular injection, e.g. cataract instruments
- A61F9/00745—Instruments for removal of intra-ocular material or intra-ocular injection, e.g. cataract instruments using mechanical vibrations, e.g. ultrasonic
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B06—GENERATING OR TRANSMITTING MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS IN GENERAL
- B06B—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR GENERATING OR TRANSMITTING MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS OF INFRASONIC, SONIC, OR ULTRASONIC FREQUENCY, e.g. FOR PERFORMING MECHANICAL WORK IN GENERAL
- B06B1/00—Methods or apparatus for generating mechanical vibrations of infrasonic, sonic, or ultrasonic frequency
- B06B1/02—Methods or apparatus for generating mechanical vibrations of infrasonic, sonic, or ultrasonic frequency making use of electrical energy
- B06B1/0207—Driving circuits
- B06B1/0223—Driving circuits for generating signals continuous in time
- B06B1/0238—Driving circuits for generating signals continuous in time of a single frequency, e.g. a sine-wave
- B06B1/0246—Driving circuits for generating signals continuous in time of a single frequency, e.g. a sine-wave with a feedback signal
- B06B1/0253—Driving circuits for generating signals continuous in time of a single frequency, e.g. a sine-wave with a feedback signal taken directly from the generator circuit
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B2017/00017—Electrical control of surgical instruments
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B2017/00681—Aspects not otherwise provided for
- A61B2017/00725—Calibration or performance testing
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B06—GENERATING OR TRANSMITTING MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS IN GENERAL
- B06B—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR GENERATING OR TRANSMITTING MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS OF INFRASONIC, SONIC, OR ULTRASONIC FREQUENCY, e.g. FOR PERFORMING MECHANICAL WORK IN GENERAL
- B06B2201/00—Indexing scheme associated with B06B1/0207 for details covered by B06B1/0207 but not provided for in any of its subgroups
- B06B2201/40—Indexing scheme associated with B06B1/0207 for details covered by B06B1/0207 but not provided for in any of its subgroups with testing, calibrating, safety devices, built-in protection, construction details
Abstract
A system and method for tuning and controlling ultrasonic handpieces by varying the frequency of the drive signal that is fed to the handpiece by a discrete dither increment. A digital signal processor may be used to measure the response of the handpiece to the varying drive signal and compare these responses to determine the probable value of the actual series resonance. The output of the digital signal processor is used to generate control parameters embodied within an appropriate control signal, which is fed to the source of the drive signal in order to alter aspects of the drive signal.
Description
w0 99/18901 _ PCT/US98/07279 CONTROL SYSTEM FOR
A PHACOEMULSIFICATION HANDPIECE
This invention relates to a dithered control system and method for an ultrasonic device and more particularly for an ophthalmic phacoemulsification handpiece.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
A typical ultrasonic surgical device suitable for ophthalmic procedures consists of an ultrasonically driven handpiece, an attached hollow cutting tip, an irrigating sleeve and an electronic control console. The handpiece assembly is attached to the control console by an electric cable and flexible tubings. Through the electric cable, the console varies the power level transmitted by the handpiece to the attached cutting tip, and the flexible tubings supply in;~gation fluid to and draw aspiration fluid from the eye through the handpiece assembly.
The operative part of the handpiece is a centrally located, hollow resonating bar or horn directly attached to a set of piezoelectric crystals. The crystals supply the required ultrasonic vibration needed to drive both the horn and the attached cutting tip during phacoemulsification and are controlled by the console. The crystal/horn assembly is suspended within the hollow body or shell of the handpiece at its nodal points by relatively inflexible mountings. The handpiece body terminates in a reduced diameter portion or nosecone at the body's distal end. The nosecone is externally threaded to accept the irrigation sleeve. Likewise, the horn bore is internally threaded at its distal end to receive the external threads of the cutting tip. The irrigation sleeve also has an internally threaded bore that is screwed onto the external threads of the nosecone. The cutting tip is adjusted so that the tip projects only a predetermined amount past the open end of the irrigating sleeve.
Ultrasonic handpieces and cutting tips are more fully described in U.S. Pat.
Nos. 3,589,363;
4,223,676; 4,246,902; 4,493,694; 4,.'i 15,583; 4,589,415; 4,609,368;
4,869,715; and 4,922,902.
When used to :perform phacoemulsification, the ends of the cutting tip and irrigating sleeve are inserted into a small incision of predetermined width in the cornea, sclera, or other location in the e;ye tissue in order to gain access to the anterior chamber of the eye.
The cutting tip is ultrasonically vibrt~ted along its longzfiidinal axis within the irrigating sleeve by the crystal-driven ultrasonic horn, thereby emulsifying upon contact the selected tissue in situ. The hollow bore of the cutting tip conununicates with the bore in the horn that in ttun communicates with the aspiration line from the handpiece to the console. A
reduced pressure or vacuum sotu ce in the console draws or aspirates the emulsified tissue from the eye through the open end of the cutting tip, the bore of the cutting tip, the horn bore, and the aspiration line and into a collection device. The aspiration of emulsified tissue is sided by a saline flushing solution or irrigant that is injected into the surgical site through the small annular gap between the inside surface of the in~igating sleeve and the outside surface of the cutting tip.
The horn assembly, including both piezoelectric and high endtuance limit inert materials, used in ultrasonic handpie~es must be carefully tuned for proper operation. As used herein, "tuning" refers to the process of finding and tracking the resonant frequencies of the handpiece operating under loaded or unloaded conditions. Operating the handpiece at a resonant frequency takes advantage of the crystal's energy storage capabilities, which occurs most efficiently at resonance. With proper timing, the handpiece will store mechanical energy v~ihile operating unloaded and release this energy into the material being cut when loaded. As a consequence., for short periods of time, large amounts of energy can VI~O 99/18901 _ PCT/US98/07279 be directed into the material by the handpiece itself and not by the power source for the handpiece. This allows the power source to be designed to provide only the steady state power requirement of the transducer and not the loaded transients which can be many times higher.
Conventional tuning and control systems determine the series and parallel resonant frequencies under a controlled loading condition, often in saline solution, before the handpiece is subjected to loads encountered during surgery. The handpiece is excited over a range of frequencies, one frequency at a time. The response of the handpiece to each frequency, measured as the admittance (the ratio of the drive current to the drive voltage), is recorded. A typical admittance versus frequency relationship of a typical handpiece in this relatively lightly loaded pre-surgery condition is illustrated in FIG. 1. The maximum recorded admittance (YS) corresponds to the series resonance (fs) and the minimum admittance (Yp) corresponds to the parallel resonance (fp). Driving the handpiece with a power signal at the series resonance results in the most efficient conversion of electrical to mechanical energy because the electrical series resonance occurs at the same frequency as the mechanical resonance.
However, when the handpiece is mechanically loaded, as during surgery, the shape and position of the admittance versus frequency curve changes and thus the characteristic series and parallel resonant frequencies change. Curve "A" in FIG. 2 represents the characteristic admittance versus frequency curve shown in FIG. 1 for a lightly loaded handpiece. Curve "B" represents, for example, the admittance v. frequency curve when the same handpiece is mechanically loaded. As can be seen, curve "B" has shifted right (fs.B >
fS,A) and the maximum admittance of curve "B" is lower than the maximum admittance of curve "A," and the minimum admittance of curve "E3" is higher than the minimum admittance of curve "A." Certain mechanical loading conditions can siso shift curve "A"
toward lower frequencies (to the Ieft).
Curve "C" z~ep~~esents the adzruttance v. frequency curve for the same handpieee when the temperature of the crystal within ttte handpiece has increased somewhat over mom temperature. Curve "C" has shifted generally upward and leftward (i.e., higher admittance and lower fi~uency values) relative to curve "A." If the power signal were delivered to the handpiece at the originally determined series resonance, for example, the efficiency of the power signal drops off dramatically. Thus, subjecting the handpieee to loading without adjusting the frequency of the power signal reduces the efficiency and predictability of the power signal.
One approach to tuning a handpiece in real time during surgery employs using a power signal at a frequency that is the average of the series and parallel resonant frequencies in the relatively unloaded pre-surgery condition and adjusts the frequency of the power signal so that a constant admittance is maintained. This type of system is more fully described in U.S. Patent No. 5,431,664 ("the '664 patent"), Briefly, systems of this type tune the handpiece based on a constant admittance value (Ya), which is d,erermined as the average of the maximum and minimum admittances by the equation Yo = ~Ys 2 Y°) . (Some commercially available constant-admittance control systems fix Yo at a point other than the average, for example, Yp = 0.3YS +
0.7Yp.) As the handpiece is loaded under many types of conditions, the admittance v, frequency curve shifts along the frequency axis. Such a shift is shown, for example, by curve "A" and curve "B" in FIG. 2, with curve "B" representing a possible response of a handpiece to mass reactive Loading. The control system described in the '664 patent adjusts the fiequency of the drive signal to maintain the admittance at Y~.
While this type of tuning and control system is effective over a relatively broad range of loading conditions, the handpiece is never operated at the series resonance and thus some e~ciency is lost: Moreover, shifts in the admittance versus fi~eqnency curves along the admittance axis, such as those shown by curve "C" in FIG. 2, may redder this type of colt-admittance Col system ineffective: The t<ming admittance (Y~ is not found on any portion of curve "C," which may descn'be the response of a mechanically loaded and heated handpiece. Control systems that adjust the drive frequency to coincide with the series resonance typically use phase locked Loop circuits with very narrow tuning ranges.
Another Ch to tuning and controlling an ultrasonic handpiece relies on the use of a broad-band, substantially constant-amplitude calibration signal to determine the response of the-handpiece to real time mechanical loading: such a system is des~d in Canadian Patent Application Serial Number 2,271,304 filed internationally September 9, 1997. Briefly, a broad-band calibration signal is fed to an ultrasonic handpiece, and the response of the handpiece is determined by a fast fourier transform digital signal analyzer. Aspects of the drive signal and perhaps the calibration signal are altered based on the response of the handpiece. This broad-band approach generates detailed information about the shape of the admittance versus frequency response curve for a particular handpiece. However, such detailed information may not be required in order to effectuate tuning and control of the handpiece.
VKO 99/18901 _ PCT/US98/07279 Thus, a need continues to exist for a method and control system capable of tuning an ultrasonic handpiece to its series resonance when the handpiece is subjected to widely varying load conditions.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention improves upon prior art methods of tuning and controlling ultrasonic devices by automatically tuning the handpiece before a surgical procedure and exciting the handpiece with a dithered drive signal during surgery. Before being subjected to loads during surgery, the handpiece is excited with a series of single-frequency signals over a tuning range of frequencies broad enough to encompass all expected values of the series and parallel resonances. The incremental difference between each successive single-frequency signal is small enough to result in sufficient resolution of the handpiece response. This incremental difference is significantly less than the expected difference between the series resonance and the parallel resonance of the handpiece (or the bandwidth of the handpiece). For example, a difference of about 10 Hz would be sufficient for a typical handpiece with a bandwidth of a few hundred hertz.
The response of the handpiece is measured by a digital signal processor ("DSP") as the admittance corresponding to each of these tuning frequencies. The DSP
records the series of admittance values at all the tuning frequencies in order to determine the admittance versus frequency relationship for the handpiece over the entire tuning frequency range. The series resonance corresponds to the frequency at which maximum admittance occurs and the parallel resonance corresponds to the frequency at which minimum admittance occurs. Alternatively, the frequency response of each handpiece may be determined using a fast fourier transform analysis, as described for example in the '257 application.
In a first embodiment of the invention, at time to and after the tuning procedure is performed, the drive signal has a frequency, fo, equal to the series resonance fs. The response of the handpiece at to, measured as the admittance (Yo), is recorded.
At time t,, f, equals fo plus a dither increment, 8. The response of the handpiece, Y,, is measured and compared to the previous response, Yo. The next frequency and all later frequencies of the drive signal, f2~, are determined according to the following equation:
f"+~ = f" + 8[sign(f" - f".~)(sign(Y" - Y"-t)], where n>_2and sign(x) = 1 if x z 0, else sign(x) _ -1.
The accuracy with which this embodiment of the invention can track the series resonance is largely determined by how often the frequency is changed by 8.
The more often the frequency is changed, the smaller b may be and the more closely f"
will correspond to the actual value of the series resonance. Instead of varying the frequency by a constant amount (8) at each time increment, a proportional-integral-differential control algorithm may be used to determine, not only f"+,, but also the corresponding drive voltage, V"+,, and the dither increment. As a fail safe mechanism, the system can check ~f"+,-fol to determine if that difference is greater than a predetermined threshold.
While the value of this threshold varies depending upon the types of loading conditions to which the handpiece is exposed, typical values for the threshold are about 1 to 10 times the bandwidth of the handpiece as measured in an unloaded condition. If ~f"+,-fol is greater than this threshold, the control system would assume that the control logic had failed and it would reinitiate the pre-surgery tuning procedure in order to determine accurately the _7_ VYO 99/18901 _ PCT/US98/07279 actual series resonance. The system would then reset fo = f$ and restart the frequency control routine.
In a second embodiment of the invention, after the pre-surgery tuning procedure is performed, the drive signal that is fed to the handpiece is dithered to alternate among a power signal at a first frequency (the series resonance as determined during the tuning procedure) and at least two calibration components at calibration frequencies that differ from the first frequency by S or multiples of b. Because b is very small in comparison to the difference between the series and parallel resonances, the calibration components are almost as effective in driving the handpiece as the power signal (and perhaps even more effective under some circumstances). The dither increment, 8, used in this embodiment may or not be equal to the dither increment used in the first embodiment of the invention discussed above. The calibration frequencies include at least one frequency which is less than the first frequency and at least one frequency which is greater than the first frequency. Essentially, a scaled-down version of the pre-surgery tuning procedure is repeatedly performed at frequencies immediately surrounding the last known value of the series resonance.
The admittance of the handpiece at each discrete frequency (the first frequency and each of the calibration frequencies) is measured and the set of responses is analyzed to determine the probable new value of the series resonance. Once the new series resonance is determined, an appropriate control signal is generated to alter the first frequency so that it corresponds to the series resonance. The number of calibration components, the dither increment, the amplitude of the calibration components, and the _g_ order in which the drive signal sweeps through the calibration components and power signal may be varied to optimize the effectiveness of the control system.
It is accordingly an object of the present invention to provide a control system and method that performs real-time analysis of the frequency response of a mechanically loaded ultrasonic handpiece in order to estimate at least the series resonance of the handpiece and to adjust continuously at least the frequency of a power signal fed to the handpiece.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a tuning system that quickly and accurately measures the response of an ultrasonic handpiece to a range of frequencies broad enough to encompass all potential values of the series and parallel resonances in order to determine the characteristic admittance versus frequency response of the handpiece.
Other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent with reference to the drawings and the following description of the drawings and claims.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a graph of admittance versus frequency for a typical ultrasonic handpiece in the vicinity of the series and parallel resonances with a typical control admittance identified for a constant-admittance control system.
FIG. 2 a graph of admittance versus frequency illustrating the way in which the response of a typical ultrasonic handpiece may shift when the handpiece is subjected to mechanical and thermal loading.
FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a preferred embodiment of a system and method for tuning and controlling an ultrasonic handpiece during a surgical procedure according to the present invention with accompanying graphical representations of electrical signals generated by each component.
FIG. 4 is a block diagram of an alternate embodiment of a system and method for tuning and controlling an ultrasonic handpiece during a surgical procedure according to the present invention with accompanying graphical representations of electrical signals generated by each component.
FIGS. Sa-Si is a series of graphs of the portion of the admittance versus frequency response curves in the vicinity of the series resonance on which the admittance responses corresponding to two calibration frequencies and the power frequency are marked to illustrate one type of logic which may be used by the control system shown in FIG. 4 to estimate the series resonance of a mechanically loaded handpiece.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Before a surgical procedure is started, the system and method according to the present invention is used to tune the ultrasonic handpiece as described above.
Specifically, a voltage-controlled oscillator ("VCO") drives the handpiece with a series of single-frequency signals at a substantially constant amplitude, and a DSP
measures the response of the handpiece to each single-frequency signal. The range of frequencies through which the VCO sweeps (the tuning frequency range) may be defined as any portion of a spectrum from 25 kHz to 80 kHz, which is the operating spectrum for typical existing ultrasonic handpieces currently used in eye surgery. A range of approximately 100 Hz to 10,000 Hz is suitable as the tuning frequency range and that about 4,000 Hz is VKO 99/18901 _ PCT/US98/07279 preferable. Such values of the tuning frequency range are broad enough to encompass virtually all potential values of fs and fp. Other tuning frequency ranges may be more appropriate for other ultrasonic applications, and the overall operation of the systems and methods described in this document would be equally useful for tuning and control of handpieces used in those applications.
When used to control the handpiece during a surgical procedure, the system and method of the present invention generally employs a VCO combined with an amplifier as a source to generate the signal that drives an ultrasonic handpiece ("the drive signal").
The frequency of the drive signal is altered by a dither increment from the last known estimate of the series resonance ("the power frequency"). Some embodiments of the present invention dither the drive signal above and below the power frequency and others dither the power signal in only one direction (above or below the power frequency) based on the response of the handpiece to earlier dithered drive signals. For at least some systems according to the present invention, the VCO is programmable and thus easily adjustable by varying certain input information fed to the VCO. A digital signal processor ("DSP") may be used to measure the response of the handpiece to each component of the drive signal (those at the power frequency and those at the dithered frequencies) and compare those responses to determine the probable value of the actual series resonance. The output of the DSP is used to generate control parameters embodied within an appropriate control signal, which is fed to the VCO in order to alter aspects of the drive signal.
FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating a preferred embodiment of a system according to the present invention for tuning and controlling an ultrasonic handpiece 70.
WO 99/18901 _ PCTNS98/07279 The system illustrated in FIG. 3 determines whether the series resonance is likely increasing or decreasing and adjusts the frequency of power signal 6S to follow the change in the series resonance. The system illustrated in FIG. 3 accomplishes this result by examining the response (response signals 7Sa and 7Sb) of handpiece 70 (measured as S admittances Y"_, and Y") at the previous (f"_,) and current (f") frequencies of the power signals 6Sa and 6Sb respectively. The difference between f"_, and f" is the dither increment, 8, which may be a constant value or may vary depending on the response of handpiece 70.
In the embodiment shown in FIG. 3, the combination of VCO SO and amplifier 60 generates drive signal 6S, which is a variable signal that changes incrementally from drive signal 6Sa to 6Sb at frequencies f"_, and f" respectively. Each of drive signals 6Sa and 6Sb is preferably of approximately equal amplitude but may have unequal amplitude depending on whether the drive signal 6S is controlled using a constant current or a constant admittance control system. The frequency f"_, corresponds approximately to the 1 S last known estimate of series resonance fs. In the example shown in FIG.
3, frequency f"
is greater than f"_, by dither increment 8, but under appropriate circumstance f" could be less than f".,, The frequencies of response signals 7Sa and 7Sb correspond to the frequencies of drive signals 6Sa and 6Sb. In the example shown in FIG. 3, the amplitude of response signal 7Sa is less than the amplitude of response signal 7Sb. Drive signal 6Sa and response signal 7Sa are fed synchronously to DSP 80. DSP 80 divides the current of response signal 7Sa by the voltage of drive signal 6Sa (after perhaps each is attenuated to protect the input section of DSP 80) to determine the admittance Y"_, at its corresponding frequency fn_, and this admittance value is stored. Similarly, DSP 80 determines the admittance Y" at f" by dividing the current of response signal 75b by the voltage of drive signal 65b. The points (Yn_,, f"_, ) and (Y~, f") lie along admittance curve 77, which is a representation of the admittance versus frequency relationship that may be exhibited by handpiece 70. The peak of admittance curve 77 defines the actual value of the series resonance fS'.
For example, the actual series resonance fs' shown in FIG. 3 is greater than either fM, or f". Under these conditions, the control logic programmed into DSP 80 would determine that f"+, should be increased by the dither increment and send an appropriate control signal 85 to VCO 50 in order to effectuate this increase. However, admittance curve 77 as shown in FIG. 4 is only one possible scenario that may be encountered. The logic implemented by DSP 80, which responds appropriately to any shift in the admittance v. frequency curve, is defined by the following equation:
f"+, = f~ + 8[sign{f" - f~-,){sign(Y" - Yn-,)J, where n~2and sign{x) = 1 if x >_ 0, else sign(x) _ -1.
Of course, the control system according to this embodiment of the invention may also calculate f"+, based on more than the last two points along admittance curve 77. In theory, the more data used to determine f"+,, the more closely f~+, will track fs'. One skilled in the art will recognize that depending upon the nature of the external loading and how fast the data are obtained, it may be beneficial to analyze more than the last two data points. The accuracy with which the control system shown in FIG. 3 can track series resonance is largely determined by how often the control system can poll and update the power frequency. The dither increment is a function of the rate of change of the series WO 99/18901 _ PCT/US98/07279 resonance and the duty cycle, P~~,, of the control system (the duty cycle is the inverse of the frequency with which the control system polls and updates the power frequency). The equation defining the dither increment is: 8 >_ ( d~ ) P~~.~ . For example, when the series resonance could change as much as 600 Hz in 100 ms and the duty cycle of the control system is 1 ms, then the dither increment should be at least 6 Hz. The resulting error f~ in tracking the actual series resonance is approximately related to the dither increment as follows: f~ 28. To reduce the magnitude of f~, 8 should be small compared to the bandwidth of the handpiece, preferably about 0.1 (fp fs) _> 8 ? 0.001 (fp fs), and more preferably about 0.01 (fP fs). Thus, the duty cycle, P~u,, should be as short as possible. In the example discussed immediately above in which P~V, is 1 ms, the 6 Hz dither increment, which is about 1/SOth of a typical handpiece bandwidth of 300 Hz (0.02 times the typical bandwidth), would result in control of the handpiece sufficient to keep the power frequency within a range near the series resonance of approximately ~4%
of the bandwidth. If, however, P~~n is 10 ms, then b would equal 60 Hz and the power frequency would fall within a range near the series resonance of about ~40% of the bandwidth.
Thus, the shorter P~w, the more accurately the control system can track series resonance.
A shorter duty cycle would also allow the use of a handpiece with a narrower bandwidth, which is typically more efficient at converting electrical into mechanical energy.
The control system shown in FIG. 3 may also vary the voltage of drive signal depending upon the admittance of handpiece 30. A corresponding decrease in admittance generally indicates a reduction in the efficiency of the handpiece (a reduction in the power factor) and a decrease in the stroke of handpiece 30. Such stroke reductions can occur, for example, due to mechanical loading of handpiece 30 or slow frequency compensation WO 99/18901 _ PCTNS98/07279 of drive signal 65 (which results in a greater average difference between the frequency of the drive signal and the series resonance). To maintain the cutting ability of handpiece 30 (which is directly related to its stroke), the power delivered to handpiece 30 is increased by increasing the voltage of drive signal 65. Thus, as admittance decreases, the voltage of drive signal 6S is increased.
One possible manner in which the voltage of drive signal 65 may be controlled is to implement logic within DSP 80 to maintain the current, I, of drive signal 65 constant.
In such a system I = (Y)(V), where Y is the measured admittance of handpiece (determined by DSP 80 dividing the current of signal 75 by the voltage of drive signal 65) and V is the voltage of drive signal 65. Under load conditions that cause Y to decrease, I
would also decrease absent an adjustment to V. In order to maintain current, I, of drive signal 65 constant, the voltage of drive signal 65 is increased. Conventional PID control logic can be applied within DSP 80 to perform all calculations and make adjustments to V
in order to keep I constant. Such PID control logic would compensate for any delay in the response of handpiece 70 that would cause the current of signal 75 to change after the voltage of drive signal 65.
The control system shown in FIG. 3 may also vary the dither increment, depending upon the last change in the admittance, ~Y" - Y"_,I. In general, the greater the change in the admittance, the greater the dither increment (i.e., 8 x ~Y~ - Y"_~I). A
small initial value for 8 will generally reveal the direction in which the series resonance is shifting. After this initial direction is determined, 8 may be increased in order to enable faster compensation for later frequency shifts. However, if the nature of the shifts in series resonance is such that several arbitrary shifts in series resonance occur, then a constant, w0 99/18901 _ PCT/US98/07279 relatively small, value for S, would be more useful. If S is varied, those variations b and changes to the voltage of drive signal 65 may be implemented using, for example, well known PID control logic. It is possible to "customize" system response to a certain handpiece type or surgical technique. For example, if the handpiece is loaded only occasionally such that the series resonance shifts downward approximately 200-300 Hz, the control system may assume that any load sensed requires a shift in series resonance of about 200-300 Hz, with closed-loop control of the loaded handpiece as described above after the initial shift.
Under some circumstances, the control system shown in FIG. 3 may fail to track the series resonance closely enough. A correction routine prevents such a failure from unacceptably compromising the effectiveness of handpiece 30. If ~f"+,-foI were ever found to be greater than a predetermined threshold, then the control system would assume that the control logic had failed. Upon discovering such a failure, the control system would reinitiate the pre-surgery tuning procedure in order to determine accurately the actual 1 S series resonance. The system would then reset fo to fs and restart the frequency control routine.
FIG. 4 is a block diagram that illustrates a second embodiment of a system according to the present invention for tuning and controlling an ultrasonic handpiece.
The operation of the system and performance of the method illustrated in FIG.
4 results in the determination of the characteristic response of handpiece 30 at a set of discrete frequencies (e.g., f3 and f, ) relatively near and including the power frequency, f2 (which approximates the last known value of the series resonance fs). In the embodiment shown in FIG. 4, the combination of VCO 10 and amplifier 20 generates drive signal 25, which is a variable signal that sweeps through drive signals 25a, 25b, and 25c in succession at frequencies f,, f2, and f3 respectively. Each of drive signals 25a, 25b, and 25c are preferably of approximately equal amplitude. The frequency fz corresponds approximately to the last known value of series resonance fs, frequency f, is less than fz, and f3 is a frequency greater than f2. Preferably, f, and f3 differ from fz by a dither increment (8), and the preferred dither increment is defined as about 0.1 (fP
fs) ~ 8 >_ 0.001 (fP fs), and more preferably about 0.01 (fp fs).
Because drive signal 25 sweeps through drive signals 25a, 25b, and 25c, the frequency of response signal 35 of handpiece 30 also varies as shown by response signals 35a, 35b, and 35c. In the example shown in FIG. 4, the amplitude of response signal 35a is less than the amplitude of response signal 35b, which is in turn less than the amplitude of response signal 35c. Drive signals 25a, 25b, and 25c and response signals 35a, 35b, and 35c are fed synchronously to DSP 40 (after perhaps each is attenuated to protect the input section of DSP 40). DSP 40 divides the current of response signals 35a, 35b, and 35c by the voltage of drive signals 25a, 25b, and 25c respectively in order to determine admittance values Y,, YZ, and Y3 at their corresponding frequencies f,, f2, and f3. The points (Y,, f,); (Y2, f2); and (Y3, f3) lie along admittance curve 37, which is a representation of the admittance versus frequency relationship that may be exhibited by handpiece 30. The peak of admittance curve 37 defines the actual value of the series resonance f$'.
The actual series resonance fs' shown in FIG. 4 is, for example, greater than either of the calibration frequencies (f, and f3) and the power frequency (f2). Under these conditions, the control logic programmed into DSP 40 would determine a new drive _ 17-frequency to be f2 + 8 (i.e., f3) or, for example, fz plus a different increment based on the original shape of the admittance curve. DSP 40 then generates and sends an appropriate control signal 45 to VCO 10 in order to alter the frequency of drive signal 65. The calibration frequencies f, and f3 would also be increased so that they continue to differ :-from f2 by the dither increment 8. However, admittance curve 37 as shown in FIG. 4 is only one possible scenario that may be encountered.
FIGS. Sa-Si are qualitative representations of all possible admittance versus frequency curves that may be encountered by the control system shown in FIG.
4.
FIGS. Sa-Sd represent the cases in which f2 must be increased to approximate fs'. The greatest adjustment to fz is required for the situation represented in FIG. Sa and progressively less adjustment to f2 is required in FIGS. Sb, Sc, and Sd. FIG.
Se represents the case in which f2 requires no adjustment. FIGS. Sf Si represent cases in which f2 must be decreased to approximate fs' with progressively more adjustment to f2 required in FIGS. Sf, Sg, Sh, and Si. Of course, a system according to the present invention may employ more than two calibration components with an accompanying change in control logic. The table below summarizes the logic applied by DSP 40 (using two calibration components, drive signals 25a and 25c, along with drive signal 25b) in order to adjust fz so that it corresponds approximately to fs':
Condition Action Y,<Y2<Y3 or Y,<YZ=Y3 or Y,<Y3<Y2 Increase f2 Y,=Y3<YZ Maintain f2 at current value Y3<YZ<Y,or Y3<Y,<Y2 or Y3<Y,=Y2 Decrease f2 wo ~ns9oi - rc~rms9sio~z~9 The amount by which f, is adiusted is determined by comparing the slope of each line defined by adjacent points on the admittance curve 37. For example, the first and second derivatives of curve 37 (i.e., of the function Y(f)) may be approximated in a control system using a constant dither increment, d, using the three points (Y,, f, p, --s (Y,, f2): and (Y3. f3) as follovl~s:
d_3'' r_; - Yz and d, ~, ~ ( ~= + ~~," 23;, where S = I. -I. = Im 1.
df 2~ ~f - d -The first and second derivatives of Y(f) in a system in which b varies are approximated according to the following equations:
clH j 3; - ): _ t= - }i _ ;
_d~ -_ t~ - l, and clr-' - I~ .f, -.I. f: -.r~ / I .f: -.I~
dl .I; - f.
The system described above employs the minimum number of data points, three, needed to approximate first and second derivatives of Y(f). Increasing the number of calibration frequencies would. of course, increase the number of data points available for determining accurately the first and second derivatives of Y( t) thus enabling a better estimate of the actual series resonance. However, the time delays inherent in the process of gathering and analyzing more than three data points reduces the accuracy of the analysis because individual data points might reflect the location of a point on curve 37 after curve 37 has already shifted. The optimum number of data points for best determining the shape of curve 37 depends on the time delay between power signal 25b and calibration signals ''Sa and ?Sc and the time delay caused by DSP ~0 analyzing the ''0 data points along the admittance curve 37. The longer either time delay, the lower the optimum number of data points (with a minimum of three data points). As similarly VItO 99/18901 _ PCT/US98/07279 discussed above in connection with DSP 80 of the control system shown in FIG.
3, DSP
40 of the control system shown in FIG. 4 may implement logic to alter the dither increment or the drive signal voltage or both depending upon the shape and amplitude of admittance curve 37.
DSP 40 or DSP 80 may be a mufti-purpose, programmable processor of which commercial examples are available. For example, Stanford Research Systems at Reamwood Avenue, Sunnyvale, California 94089, currently sells two fast fourier transform (FFT) DSP's, the Model SR760 and Model SR770 having a single input channel. Stanford Research markets a two-channel, FFT Signal Analyzer suitable for use as DSP 40 or DSP 80, the Model SR780. All these Stanford Research DSP's have real-time bandwidths of at least 100 kHz and dynamic range of 90 dB and have fully programmable center frequency, bandwidth, analysis routines, and output. All three DSP's may be programmed by using the interface supplied (a series of menu-driven options shown on an integral display) or by using a separate computer able to output commands over a standard RS-232 or GPIB interface. The dual-input capability of the SR780 allows it to be programmed to perform mathematical comparisons between two input signals.
After DSP 40 or DSP 80 estimates the value of fs', it may also be programmed to apply proportional-integral-differential ("PID") logic in order to generate control parameters embodied within control signal 45. The use of PID logic is the best way to prevent over-compensation of the drive frequency and to reduce the potential that unstable oscillations in drive frequency are caused by the control system shown in FIGS. 3 and 4. Moreover, well known control logic other than PID logic may also be WO 99/18901 _ PCTNS98/07279 used to adjust drive frequency for changes in fs' depending upon the demands placed on the control system by the types of loading conditions likely encountered by an ultrasonic handpiece. For example, the system may require only the use of proportional or proportional-integral control. The nature of PID and other control logic is well known and thus not described further in this document.
Because the use of software implemented PID logic (within DSP 40 or DSP 80) may result in an unacceptable delay in the control systems shown in FIGS. 3 and 4, a special purpose, digital PID controller may be inserted in the control system at the output of DSP 40 or DSP 80. Such a digital PID controller would perform PID logic on the output of DSP 40 or DSP 80 and generate control signal 45 or 85 respectively.
Such a PID controller may be any one of a number of commercially available integrated circuits or discrete components arranged in any one of many widely known configurations.
Whether control signal 45 or 85 is generated directly by a DSP or through a suitable digital PID controller, VCO 10 or VCO 50 preferably uses control signs! 45 or 85 to adjust f, so that it corresponds approximately to the newly discovered fs' under load. The entire cycle is repeated continuously to maintain f, at approximately the actual series resonance of the handpiece.
The Stanford Research SR780 also contains a programmable source that is sufficiently flexible to generate.drive signal components 25a, 25b, and 25c or 65a and 65b. Thus, the SR780 is capable of being programmed to provide drive signal 25 or 65, measure response signals 35a, 35b, 35c 75a, or 75b, determine admittance curve 37 or 77 and the value of fs', and generate control signal 45 or 85 in order to alter drive signal 25 or 65 {and hence drive signals 25a, 25b, and 25c or drive signals 65a and 65b) to compensate for a mechanical and/or thermal load encountered by a handpiece in use.
While certain embodiments of the present invention have been described above, these descriptions are given for purposes of illustration and explanation.
Variations, changes, modifications and departures from the systems and methods disclosed above may be adopted without departure from the scope or spirit of the present invention which, in sum, employs a source to generate a drive signal which is dithered, either in one direction based on a trend established by past values of frequency and admittance or in both directions to determine the response of the handpiece at frequencies immediately surrounding the last known value of the series resonance, as a means of compensating for changes in the operating characteristics of the handpiece while in use.
A PHACOEMULSIFICATION HANDPIECE
This invention relates to a dithered control system and method for an ultrasonic device and more particularly for an ophthalmic phacoemulsification handpiece.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
A typical ultrasonic surgical device suitable for ophthalmic procedures consists of an ultrasonically driven handpiece, an attached hollow cutting tip, an irrigating sleeve and an electronic control console. The handpiece assembly is attached to the control console by an electric cable and flexible tubings. Through the electric cable, the console varies the power level transmitted by the handpiece to the attached cutting tip, and the flexible tubings supply in;~gation fluid to and draw aspiration fluid from the eye through the handpiece assembly.
The operative part of the handpiece is a centrally located, hollow resonating bar or horn directly attached to a set of piezoelectric crystals. The crystals supply the required ultrasonic vibration needed to drive both the horn and the attached cutting tip during phacoemulsification and are controlled by the console. The crystal/horn assembly is suspended within the hollow body or shell of the handpiece at its nodal points by relatively inflexible mountings. The handpiece body terminates in a reduced diameter portion or nosecone at the body's distal end. The nosecone is externally threaded to accept the irrigation sleeve. Likewise, the horn bore is internally threaded at its distal end to receive the external threads of the cutting tip. The irrigation sleeve also has an internally threaded bore that is screwed onto the external threads of the nosecone. The cutting tip is adjusted so that the tip projects only a predetermined amount past the open end of the irrigating sleeve.
Ultrasonic handpieces and cutting tips are more fully described in U.S. Pat.
Nos. 3,589,363;
4,223,676; 4,246,902; 4,493,694; 4,.'i 15,583; 4,589,415; 4,609,368;
4,869,715; and 4,922,902.
When used to :perform phacoemulsification, the ends of the cutting tip and irrigating sleeve are inserted into a small incision of predetermined width in the cornea, sclera, or other location in the e;ye tissue in order to gain access to the anterior chamber of the eye.
The cutting tip is ultrasonically vibrt~ted along its longzfiidinal axis within the irrigating sleeve by the crystal-driven ultrasonic horn, thereby emulsifying upon contact the selected tissue in situ. The hollow bore of the cutting tip conununicates with the bore in the horn that in ttun communicates with the aspiration line from the handpiece to the console. A
reduced pressure or vacuum sotu ce in the console draws or aspirates the emulsified tissue from the eye through the open end of the cutting tip, the bore of the cutting tip, the horn bore, and the aspiration line and into a collection device. The aspiration of emulsified tissue is sided by a saline flushing solution or irrigant that is injected into the surgical site through the small annular gap between the inside surface of the in~igating sleeve and the outside surface of the cutting tip.
The horn assembly, including both piezoelectric and high endtuance limit inert materials, used in ultrasonic handpie~es must be carefully tuned for proper operation. As used herein, "tuning" refers to the process of finding and tracking the resonant frequencies of the handpiece operating under loaded or unloaded conditions. Operating the handpiece at a resonant frequency takes advantage of the crystal's energy storage capabilities, which occurs most efficiently at resonance. With proper timing, the handpiece will store mechanical energy v~ihile operating unloaded and release this energy into the material being cut when loaded. As a consequence., for short periods of time, large amounts of energy can VI~O 99/18901 _ PCT/US98/07279 be directed into the material by the handpiece itself and not by the power source for the handpiece. This allows the power source to be designed to provide only the steady state power requirement of the transducer and not the loaded transients which can be many times higher.
Conventional tuning and control systems determine the series and parallel resonant frequencies under a controlled loading condition, often in saline solution, before the handpiece is subjected to loads encountered during surgery. The handpiece is excited over a range of frequencies, one frequency at a time. The response of the handpiece to each frequency, measured as the admittance (the ratio of the drive current to the drive voltage), is recorded. A typical admittance versus frequency relationship of a typical handpiece in this relatively lightly loaded pre-surgery condition is illustrated in FIG. 1. The maximum recorded admittance (YS) corresponds to the series resonance (fs) and the minimum admittance (Yp) corresponds to the parallel resonance (fp). Driving the handpiece with a power signal at the series resonance results in the most efficient conversion of electrical to mechanical energy because the electrical series resonance occurs at the same frequency as the mechanical resonance.
However, when the handpiece is mechanically loaded, as during surgery, the shape and position of the admittance versus frequency curve changes and thus the characteristic series and parallel resonant frequencies change. Curve "A" in FIG. 2 represents the characteristic admittance versus frequency curve shown in FIG. 1 for a lightly loaded handpiece. Curve "B" represents, for example, the admittance v. frequency curve when the same handpiece is mechanically loaded. As can be seen, curve "B" has shifted right (fs.B >
fS,A) and the maximum admittance of curve "B" is lower than the maximum admittance of curve "A," and the minimum admittance of curve "E3" is higher than the minimum admittance of curve "A." Certain mechanical loading conditions can siso shift curve "A"
toward lower frequencies (to the Ieft).
Curve "C" z~ep~~esents the adzruttance v. frequency curve for the same handpieee when the temperature of the crystal within ttte handpiece has increased somewhat over mom temperature. Curve "C" has shifted generally upward and leftward (i.e., higher admittance and lower fi~uency values) relative to curve "A." If the power signal were delivered to the handpiece at the originally determined series resonance, for example, the efficiency of the power signal drops off dramatically. Thus, subjecting the handpieee to loading without adjusting the frequency of the power signal reduces the efficiency and predictability of the power signal.
One approach to tuning a handpiece in real time during surgery employs using a power signal at a frequency that is the average of the series and parallel resonant frequencies in the relatively unloaded pre-surgery condition and adjusts the frequency of the power signal so that a constant admittance is maintained. This type of system is more fully described in U.S. Patent No. 5,431,664 ("the '664 patent"), Briefly, systems of this type tune the handpiece based on a constant admittance value (Ya), which is d,erermined as the average of the maximum and minimum admittances by the equation Yo = ~Ys 2 Y°) . (Some commercially available constant-admittance control systems fix Yo at a point other than the average, for example, Yp = 0.3YS +
0.7Yp.) As the handpiece is loaded under many types of conditions, the admittance v, frequency curve shifts along the frequency axis. Such a shift is shown, for example, by curve "A" and curve "B" in FIG. 2, with curve "B" representing a possible response of a handpiece to mass reactive Loading. The control system described in the '664 patent adjusts the fiequency of the drive signal to maintain the admittance at Y~.
While this type of tuning and control system is effective over a relatively broad range of loading conditions, the handpiece is never operated at the series resonance and thus some e~ciency is lost: Moreover, shifts in the admittance versus fi~eqnency curves along the admittance axis, such as those shown by curve "C" in FIG. 2, may redder this type of colt-admittance Col system ineffective: The t<ming admittance (Y~ is not found on any portion of curve "C," which may descn'be the response of a mechanically loaded and heated handpiece. Control systems that adjust the drive frequency to coincide with the series resonance typically use phase locked Loop circuits with very narrow tuning ranges.
Another Ch to tuning and controlling an ultrasonic handpiece relies on the use of a broad-band, substantially constant-amplitude calibration signal to determine the response of the-handpiece to real time mechanical loading: such a system is des~d in Canadian Patent Application Serial Number 2,271,304 filed internationally September 9, 1997. Briefly, a broad-band calibration signal is fed to an ultrasonic handpiece, and the response of the handpiece is determined by a fast fourier transform digital signal analyzer. Aspects of the drive signal and perhaps the calibration signal are altered based on the response of the handpiece. This broad-band approach generates detailed information about the shape of the admittance versus frequency response curve for a particular handpiece. However, such detailed information may not be required in order to effectuate tuning and control of the handpiece.
VKO 99/18901 _ PCT/US98/07279 Thus, a need continues to exist for a method and control system capable of tuning an ultrasonic handpiece to its series resonance when the handpiece is subjected to widely varying load conditions.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention improves upon prior art methods of tuning and controlling ultrasonic devices by automatically tuning the handpiece before a surgical procedure and exciting the handpiece with a dithered drive signal during surgery. Before being subjected to loads during surgery, the handpiece is excited with a series of single-frequency signals over a tuning range of frequencies broad enough to encompass all expected values of the series and parallel resonances. The incremental difference between each successive single-frequency signal is small enough to result in sufficient resolution of the handpiece response. This incremental difference is significantly less than the expected difference between the series resonance and the parallel resonance of the handpiece (or the bandwidth of the handpiece). For example, a difference of about 10 Hz would be sufficient for a typical handpiece with a bandwidth of a few hundred hertz.
The response of the handpiece is measured by a digital signal processor ("DSP") as the admittance corresponding to each of these tuning frequencies. The DSP
records the series of admittance values at all the tuning frequencies in order to determine the admittance versus frequency relationship for the handpiece over the entire tuning frequency range. The series resonance corresponds to the frequency at which maximum admittance occurs and the parallel resonance corresponds to the frequency at which minimum admittance occurs. Alternatively, the frequency response of each handpiece may be determined using a fast fourier transform analysis, as described for example in the '257 application.
In a first embodiment of the invention, at time to and after the tuning procedure is performed, the drive signal has a frequency, fo, equal to the series resonance fs. The response of the handpiece at to, measured as the admittance (Yo), is recorded.
At time t,, f, equals fo plus a dither increment, 8. The response of the handpiece, Y,, is measured and compared to the previous response, Yo. The next frequency and all later frequencies of the drive signal, f2~, are determined according to the following equation:
f"+~ = f" + 8[sign(f" - f".~)(sign(Y" - Y"-t)], where n>_2and sign(x) = 1 if x z 0, else sign(x) _ -1.
The accuracy with which this embodiment of the invention can track the series resonance is largely determined by how often the frequency is changed by 8.
The more often the frequency is changed, the smaller b may be and the more closely f"
will correspond to the actual value of the series resonance. Instead of varying the frequency by a constant amount (8) at each time increment, a proportional-integral-differential control algorithm may be used to determine, not only f"+,, but also the corresponding drive voltage, V"+,, and the dither increment. As a fail safe mechanism, the system can check ~f"+,-fol to determine if that difference is greater than a predetermined threshold.
While the value of this threshold varies depending upon the types of loading conditions to which the handpiece is exposed, typical values for the threshold are about 1 to 10 times the bandwidth of the handpiece as measured in an unloaded condition. If ~f"+,-fol is greater than this threshold, the control system would assume that the control logic had failed and it would reinitiate the pre-surgery tuning procedure in order to determine accurately the _7_ VYO 99/18901 _ PCT/US98/07279 actual series resonance. The system would then reset fo = f$ and restart the frequency control routine.
In a second embodiment of the invention, after the pre-surgery tuning procedure is performed, the drive signal that is fed to the handpiece is dithered to alternate among a power signal at a first frequency (the series resonance as determined during the tuning procedure) and at least two calibration components at calibration frequencies that differ from the first frequency by S or multiples of b. Because b is very small in comparison to the difference between the series and parallel resonances, the calibration components are almost as effective in driving the handpiece as the power signal (and perhaps even more effective under some circumstances). The dither increment, 8, used in this embodiment may or not be equal to the dither increment used in the first embodiment of the invention discussed above. The calibration frequencies include at least one frequency which is less than the first frequency and at least one frequency which is greater than the first frequency. Essentially, a scaled-down version of the pre-surgery tuning procedure is repeatedly performed at frequencies immediately surrounding the last known value of the series resonance.
The admittance of the handpiece at each discrete frequency (the first frequency and each of the calibration frequencies) is measured and the set of responses is analyzed to determine the probable new value of the series resonance. Once the new series resonance is determined, an appropriate control signal is generated to alter the first frequency so that it corresponds to the series resonance. The number of calibration components, the dither increment, the amplitude of the calibration components, and the _g_ order in which the drive signal sweeps through the calibration components and power signal may be varied to optimize the effectiveness of the control system.
It is accordingly an object of the present invention to provide a control system and method that performs real-time analysis of the frequency response of a mechanically loaded ultrasonic handpiece in order to estimate at least the series resonance of the handpiece and to adjust continuously at least the frequency of a power signal fed to the handpiece.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a tuning system that quickly and accurately measures the response of an ultrasonic handpiece to a range of frequencies broad enough to encompass all potential values of the series and parallel resonances in order to determine the characteristic admittance versus frequency response of the handpiece.
Other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent with reference to the drawings and the following description of the drawings and claims.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a graph of admittance versus frequency for a typical ultrasonic handpiece in the vicinity of the series and parallel resonances with a typical control admittance identified for a constant-admittance control system.
FIG. 2 a graph of admittance versus frequency illustrating the way in which the response of a typical ultrasonic handpiece may shift when the handpiece is subjected to mechanical and thermal loading.
FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a preferred embodiment of a system and method for tuning and controlling an ultrasonic handpiece during a surgical procedure according to the present invention with accompanying graphical representations of electrical signals generated by each component.
FIG. 4 is a block diagram of an alternate embodiment of a system and method for tuning and controlling an ultrasonic handpiece during a surgical procedure according to the present invention with accompanying graphical representations of electrical signals generated by each component.
FIGS. Sa-Si is a series of graphs of the portion of the admittance versus frequency response curves in the vicinity of the series resonance on which the admittance responses corresponding to two calibration frequencies and the power frequency are marked to illustrate one type of logic which may be used by the control system shown in FIG. 4 to estimate the series resonance of a mechanically loaded handpiece.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Before a surgical procedure is started, the system and method according to the present invention is used to tune the ultrasonic handpiece as described above.
Specifically, a voltage-controlled oscillator ("VCO") drives the handpiece with a series of single-frequency signals at a substantially constant amplitude, and a DSP
measures the response of the handpiece to each single-frequency signal. The range of frequencies through which the VCO sweeps (the tuning frequency range) may be defined as any portion of a spectrum from 25 kHz to 80 kHz, which is the operating spectrum for typical existing ultrasonic handpieces currently used in eye surgery. A range of approximately 100 Hz to 10,000 Hz is suitable as the tuning frequency range and that about 4,000 Hz is VKO 99/18901 _ PCT/US98/07279 preferable. Such values of the tuning frequency range are broad enough to encompass virtually all potential values of fs and fp. Other tuning frequency ranges may be more appropriate for other ultrasonic applications, and the overall operation of the systems and methods described in this document would be equally useful for tuning and control of handpieces used in those applications.
When used to control the handpiece during a surgical procedure, the system and method of the present invention generally employs a VCO combined with an amplifier as a source to generate the signal that drives an ultrasonic handpiece ("the drive signal").
The frequency of the drive signal is altered by a dither increment from the last known estimate of the series resonance ("the power frequency"). Some embodiments of the present invention dither the drive signal above and below the power frequency and others dither the power signal in only one direction (above or below the power frequency) based on the response of the handpiece to earlier dithered drive signals. For at least some systems according to the present invention, the VCO is programmable and thus easily adjustable by varying certain input information fed to the VCO. A digital signal processor ("DSP") may be used to measure the response of the handpiece to each component of the drive signal (those at the power frequency and those at the dithered frequencies) and compare those responses to determine the probable value of the actual series resonance. The output of the DSP is used to generate control parameters embodied within an appropriate control signal, which is fed to the VCO in order to alter aspects of the drive signal.
FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating a preferred embodiment of a system according to the present invention for tuning and controlling an ultrasonic handpiece 70.
WO 99/18901 _ PCTNS98/07279 The system illustrated in FIG. 3 determines whether the series resonance is likely increasing or decreasing and adjusts the frequency of power signal 6S to follow the change in the series resonance. The system illustrated in FIG. 3 accomplishes this result by examining the response (response signals 7Sa and 7Sb) of handpiece 70 (measured as S admittances Y"_, and Y") at the previous (f"_,) and current (f") frequencies of the power signals 6Sa and 6Sb respectively. The difference between f"_, and f" is the dither increment, 8, which may be a constant value or may vary depending on the response of handpiece 70.
In the embodiment shown in FIG. 3, the combination of VCO SO and amplifier 60 generates drive signal 6S, which is a variable signal that changes incrementally from drive signal 6Sa to 6Sb at frequencies f"_, and f" respectively. Each of drive signals 6Sa and 6Sb is preferably of approximately equal amplitude but may have unequal amplitude depending on whether the drive signal 6S is controlled using a constant current or a constant admittance control system. The frequency f"_, corresponds approximately to the 1 S last known estimate of series resonance fs. In the example shown in FIG.
3, frequency f"
is greater than f"_, by dither increment 8, but under appropriate circumstance f" could be less than f".,, The frequencies of response signals 7Sa and 7Sb correspond to the frequencies of drive signals 6Sa and 6Sb. In the example shown in FIG. 3, the amplitude of response signal 7Sa is less than the amplitude of response signal 7Sb. Drive signal 6Sa and response signal 7Sa are fed synchronously to DSP 80. DSP 80 divides the current of response signal 7Sa by the voltage of drive signal 6Sa (after perhaps each is attenuated to protect the input section of DSP 80) to determine the admittance Y"_, at its corresponding frequency fn_, and this admittance value is stored. Similarly, DSP 80 determines the admittance Y" at f" by dividing the current of response signal 75b by the voltage of drive signal 65b. The points (Yn_,, f"_, ) and (Y~, f") lie along admittance curve 77, which is a representation of the admittance versus frequency relationship that may be exhibited by handpiece 70. The peak of admittance curve 77 defines the actual value of the series resonance fS'.
For example, the actual series resonance fs' shown in FIG. 3 is greater than either fM, or f". Under these conditions, the control logic programmed into DSP 80 would determine that f"+, should be increased by the dither increment and send an appropriate control signal 85 to VCO 50 in order to effectuate this increase. However, admittance curve 77 as shown in FIG. 4 is only one possible scenario that may be encountered. The logic implemented by DSP 80, which responds appropriately to any shift in the admittance v. frequency curve, is defined by the following equation:
f"+, = f~ + 8[sign{f" - f~-,){sign(Y" - Yn-,)J, where n~2and sign{x) = 1 if x >_ 0, else sign(x) _ -1.
Of course, the control system according to this embodiment of the invention may also calculate f"+, based on more than the last two points along admittance curve 77. In theory, the more data used to determine f"+,, the more closely f~+, will track fs'. One skilled in the art will recognize that depending upon the nature of the external loading and how fast the data are obtained, it may be beneficial to analyze more than the last two data points. The accuracy with which the control system shown in FIG. 3 can track series resonance is largely determined by how often the control system can poll and update the power frequency. The dither increment is a function of the rate of change of the series WO 99/18901 _ PCT/US98/07279 resonance and the duty cycle, P~~,, of the control system (the duty cycle is the inverse of the frequency with which the control system polls and updates the power frequency). The equation defining the dither increment is: 8 >_ ( d~ ) P~~.~ . For example, when the series resonance could change as much as 600 Hz in 100 ms and the duty cycle of the control system is 1 ms, then the dither increment should be at least 6 Hz. The resulting error f~ in tracking the actual series resonance is approximately related to the dither increment as follows: f~ 28. To reduce the magnitude of f~, 8 should be small compared to the bandwidth of the handpiece, preferably about 0.1 (fp fs) _> 8 ? 0.001 (fp fs), and more preferably about 0.01 (fP fs). Thus, the duty cycle, P~u,, should be as short as possible. In the example discussed immediately above in which P~V, is 1 ms, the 6 Hz dither increment, which is about 1/SOth of a typical handpiece bandwidth of 300 Hz (0.02 times the typical bandwidth), would result in control of the handpiece sufficient to keep the power frequency within a range near the series resonance of approximately ~4%
of the bandwidth. If, however, P~~n is 10 ms, then b would equal 60 Hz and the power frequency would fall within a range near the series resonance of about ~40% of the bandwidth.
Thus, the shorter P~w, the more accurately the control system can track series resonance.
A shorter duty cycle would also allow the use of a handpiece with a narrower bandwidth, which is typically more efficient at converting electrical into mechanical energy.
The control system shown in FIG. 3 may also vary the voltage of drive signal depending upon the admittance of handpiece 30. A corresponding decrease in admittance generally indicates a reduction in the efficiency of the handpiece (a reduction in the power factor) and a decrease in the stroke of handpiece 30. Such stroke reductions can occur, for example, due to mechanical loading of handpiece 30 or slow frequency compensation WO 99/18901 _ PCTNS98/07279 of drive signal 65 (which results in a greater average difference between the frequency of the drive signal and the series resonance). To maintain the cutting ability of handpiece 30 (which is directly related to its stroke), the power delivered to handpiece 30 is increased by increasing the voltage of drive signal 65. Thus, as admittance decreases, the voltage of drive signal 6S is increased.
One possible manner in which the voltage of drive signal 65 may be controlled is to implement logic within DSP 80 to maintain the current, I, of drive signal 65 constant.
In such a system I = (Y)(V), where Y is the measured admittance of handpiece (determined by DSP 80 dividing the current of signal 75 by the voltage of drive signal 65) and V is the voltage of drive signal 65. Under load conditions that cause Y to decrease, I
would also decrease absent an adjustment to V. In order to maintain current, I, of drive signal 65 constant, the voltage of drive signal 65 is increased. Conventional PID control logic can be applied within DSP 80 to perform all calculations and make adjustments to V
in order to keep I constant. Such PID control logic would compensate for any delay in the response of handpiece 70 that would cause the current of signal 75 to change after the voltage of drive signal 65.
The control system shown in FIG. 3 may also vary the dither increment, depending upon the last change in the admittance, ~Y" - Y"_,I. In general, the greater the change in the admittance, the greater the dither increment (i.e., 8 x ~Y~ - Y"_~I). A
small initial value for 8 will generally reveal the direction in which the series resonance is shifting. After this initial direction is determined, 8 may be increased in order to enable faster compensation for later frequency shifts. However, if the nature of the shifts in series resonance is such that several arbitrary shifts in series resonance occur, then a constant, w0 99/18901 _ PCT/US98/07279 relatively small, value for S, would be more useful. If S is varied, those variations b and changes to the voltage of drive signal 65 may be implemented using, for example, well known PID control logic. It is possible to "customize" system response to a certain handpiece type or surgical technique. For example, if the handpiece is loaded only occasionally such that the series resonance shifts downward approximately 200-300 Hz, the control system may assume that any load sensed requires a shift in series resonance of about 200-300 Hz, with closed-loop control of the loaded handpiece as described above after the initial shift.
Under some circumstances, the control system shown in FIG. 3 may fail to track the series resonance closely enough. A correction routine prevents such a failure from unacceptably compromising the effectiveness of handpiece 30. If ~f"+,-foI were ever found to be greater than a predetermined threshold, then the control system would assume that the control logic had failed. Upon discovering such a failure, the control system would reinitiate the pre-surgery tuning procedure in order to determine accurately the actual 1 S series resonance. The system would then reset fo to fs and restart the frequency control routine.
FIG. 4 is a block diagram that illustrates a second embodiment of a system according to the present invention for tuning and controlling an ultrasonic handpiece.
The operation of the system and performance of the method illustrated in FIG.
4 results in the determination of the characteristic response of handpiece 30 at a set of discrete frequencies (e.g., f3 and f, ) relatively near and including the power frequency, f2 (which approximates the last known value of the series resonance fs). In the embodiment shown in FIG. 4, the combination of VCO 10 and amplifier 20 generates drive signal 25, which is a variable signal that sweeps through drive signals 25a, 25b, and 25c in succession at frequencies f,, f2, and f3 respectively. Each of drive signals 25a, 25b, and 25c are preferably of approximately equal amplitude. The frequency fz corresponds approximately to the last known value of series resonance fs, frequency f, is less than fz, and f3 is a frequency greater than f2. Preferably, f, and f3 differ from fz by a dither increment (8), and the preferred dither increment is defined as about 0.1 (fP
fs) ~ 8 >_ 0.001 (fP fs), and more preferably about 0.01 (fp fs).
Because drive signal 25 sweeps through drive signals 25a, 25b, and 25c, the frequency of response signal 35 of handpiece 30 also varies as shown by response signals 35a, 35b, and 35c. In the example shown in FIG. 4, the amplitude of response signal 35a is less than the amplitude of response signal 35b, which is in turn less than the amplitude of response signal 35c. Drive signals 25a, 25b, and 25c and response signals 35a, 35b, and 35c are fed synchronously to DSP 40 (after perhaps each is attenuated to protect the input section of DSP 40). DSP 40 divides the current of response signals 35a, 35b, and 35c by the voltage of drive signals 25a, 25b, and 25c respectively in order to determine admittance values Y,, YZ, and Y3 at their corresponding frequencies f,, f2, and f3. The points (Y,, f,); (Y2, f2); and (Y3, f3) lie along admittance curve 37, which is a representation of the admittance versus frequency relationship that may be exhibited by handpiece 30. The peak of admittance curve 37 defines the actual value of the series resonance f$'.
The actual series resonance fs' shown in FIG. 4 is, for example, greater than either of the calibration frequencies (f, and f3) and the power frequency (f2). Under these conditions, the control logic programmed into DSP 40 would determine a new drive _ 17-frequency to be f2 + 8 (i.e., f3) or, for example, fz plus a different increment based on the original shape of the admittance curve. DSP 40 then generates and sends an appropriate control signal 45 to VCO 10 in order to alter the frequency of drive signal 65. The calibration frequencies f, and f3 would also be increased so that they continue to differ :-from f2 by the dither increment 8. However, admittance curve 37 as shown in FIG. 4 is only one possible scenario that may be encountered.
FIGS. Sa-Si are qualitative representations of all possible admittance versus frequency curves that may be encountered by the control system shown in FIG.
4.
FIGS. Sa-Sd represent the cases in which f2 must be increased to approximate fs'. The greatest adjustment to fz is required for the situation represented in FIG. Sa and progressively less adjustment to f2 is required in FIGS. Sb, Sc, and Sd. FIG.
Se represents the case in which f2 requires no adjustment. FIGS. Sf Si represent cases in which f2 must be decreased to approximate fs' with progressively more adjustment to f2 required in FIGS. Sf, Sg, Sh, and Si. Of course, a system according to the present invention may employ more than two calibration components with an accompanying change in control logic. The table below summarizes the logic applied by DSP 40 (using two calibration components, drive signals 25a and 25c, along with drive signal 25b) in order to adjust fz so that it corresponds approximately to fs':
Condition Action Y,<Y2<Y3 or Y,<YZ=Y3 or Y,<Y3<Y2 Increase f2 Y,=Y3<YZ Maintain f2 at current value Y3<YZ<Y,or Y3<Y,<Y2 or Y3<Y,=Y2 Decrease f2 wo ~ns9oi - rc~rms9sio~z~9 The amount by which f, is adiusted is determined by comparing the slope of each line defined by adjacent points on the admittance curve 37. For example, the first and second derivatives of curve 37 (i.e., of the function Y(f)) may be approximated in a control system using a constant dither increment, d, using the three points (Y,, f, p, --s (Y,, f2): and (Y3. f3) as follovl~s:
d_3'' r_; - Yz and d, ~, ~ ( ~= + ~~," 23;, where S = I. -I. = Im 1.
df 2~ ~f - d -The first and second derivatives of Y(f) in a system in which b varies are approximated according to the following equations:
clH j 3; - ): _ t= - }i _ ;
_d~ -_ t~ - l, and clr-' - I~ .f, -.I. f: -.r~ / I .f: -.I~
dl .I; - f.
The system described above employs the minimum number of data points, three, needed to approximate first and second derivatives of Y(f). Increasing the number of calibration frequencies would. of course, increase the number of data points available for determining accurately the first and second derivatives of Y( t) thus enabling a better estimate of the actual series resonance. However, the time delays inherent in the process of gathering and analyzing more than three data points reduces the accuracy of the analysis because individual data points might reflect the location of a point on curve 37 after curve 37 has already shifted. The optimum number of data points for best determining the shape of curve 37 depends on the time delay between power signal 25b and calibration signals ''Sa and ?Sc and the time delay caused by DSP ~0 analyzing the ''0 data points along the admittance curve 37. The longer either time delay, the lower the optimum number of data points (with a minimum of three data points). As similarly VItO 99/18901 _ PCT/US98/07279 discussed above in connection with DSP 80 of the control system shown in FIG.
3, DSP
40 of the control system shown in FIG. 4 may implement logic to alter the dither increment or the drive signal voltage or both depending upon the shape and amplitude of admittance curve 37.
DSP 40 or DSP 80 may be a mufti-purpose, programmable processor of which commercial examples are available. For example, Stanford Research Systems at Reamwood Avenue, Sunnyvale, California 94089, currently sells two fast fourier transform (FFT) DSP's, the Model SR760 and Model SR770 having a single input channel. Stanford Research markets a two-channel, FFT Signal Analyzer suitable for use as DSP 40 or DSP 80, the Model SR780. All these Stanford Research DSP's have real-time bandwidths of at least 100 kHz and dynamic range of 90 dB and have fully programmable center frequency, bandwidth, analysis routines, and output. All three DSP's may be programmed by using the interface supplied (a series of menu-driven options shown on an integral display) or by using a separate computer able to output commands over a standard RS-232 or GPIB interface. The dual-input capability of the SR780 allows it to be programmed to perform mathematical comparisons between two input signals.
After DSP 40 or DSP 80 estimates the value of fs', it may also be programmed to apply proportional-integral-differential ("PID") logic in order to generate control parameters embodied within control signal 45. The use of PID logic is the best way to prevent over-compensation of the drive frequency and to reduce the potential that unstable oscillations in drive frequency are caused by the control system shown in FIGS. 3 and 4. Moreover, well known control logic other than PID logic may also be WO 99/18901 _ PCTNS98/07279 used to adjust drive frequency for changes in fs' depending upon the demands placed on the control system by the types of loading conditions likely encountered by an ultrasonic handpiece. For example, the system may require only the use of proportional or proportional-integral control. The nature of PID and other control logic is well known and thus not described further in this document.
Because the use of software implemented PID logic (within DSP 40 or DSP 80) may result in an unacceptable delay in the control systems shown in FIGS. 3 and 4, a special purpose, digital PID controller may be inserted in the control system at the output of DSP 40 or DSP 80. Such a digital PID controller would perform PID logic on the output of DSP 40 or DSP 80 and generate control signal 45 or 85 respectively.
Such a PID controller may be any one of a number of commercially available integrated circuits or discrete components arranged in any one of many widely known configurations.
Whether control signal 45 or 85 is generated directly by a DSP or through a suitable digital PID controller, VCO 10 or VCO 50 preferably uses control signs! 45 or 85 to adjust f, so that it corresponds approximately to the newly discovered fs' under load. The entire cycle is repeated continuously to maintain f, at approximately the actual series resonance of the handpiece.
The Stanford Research SR780 also contains a programmable source that is sufficiently flexible to generate.drive signal components 25a, 25b, and 25c or 65a and 65b. Thus, the SR780 is capable of being programmed to provide drive signal 25 or 65, measure response signals 35a, 35b, 35c 75a, or 75b, determine admittance curve 37 or 77 and the value of fs', and generate control signal 45 or 85 in order to alter drive signal 25 or 65 {and hence drive signals 25a, 25b, and 25c or drive signals 65a and 65b) to compensate for a mechanical and/or thermal load encountered by a handpiece in use.
While certain embodiments of the present invention have been described above, these descriptions are given for purposes of illustration and explanation.
Variations, changes, modifications and departures from the systems and methods disclosed above may be adopted without departure from the scope or spirit of the present invention which, in sum, employs a source to generate a drive signal which is dithered, either in one direction based on a trend established by past values of frequency and admittance or in both directions to determine the response of the handpiece at frequencies immediately surrounding the last known value of the series resonance, as a means of compensating for changes in the operating characteristics of the handpiece while in use.
Claims (10)
1. A method of controlling an ultrasonic handpiece having a variable series resonance frequency, comprising the steps of:
a. generating a drive signal having, i. a first signal at a first frequency substantially equal to a known current value of a series resonance frequency.
ii. a second signal at a second frequency greater than the first frequency and iii. a third signal at a third frequency less than the first frequency;
b. exciting the handpiece with the drive signal;
c. measuring a first admittance at the first frequency, a second admittance at the second frequency, and a third admittance at the third frequency;
d. predicting a future series resonance frequency based on the relative values of the first admittance. the second admittance and the third admittance: and e. changing the first frequency so that it corresponds to the future series resonance frequency.
a. generating a drive signal having, i. a first signal at a first frequency substantially equal to a known current value of a series resonance frequency.
ii. a second signal at a second frequency greater than the first frequency and iii. a third signal at a third frequency less than the first frequency;
b. exciting the handpiece with the drive signal;
c. measuring a first admittance at the first frequency, a second admittance at the second frequency, and a third admittance at the third frequency;
d. predicting a future series resonance frequency based on the relative values of the first admittance. the second admittance and the third admittance: and e. changing the first frequency so that it corresponds to the future series resonance frequency.
2. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of calculating a dithering increment equal to the absolute value of the difference between the second frequency and the first frequency.
3. The method of claim 1. in wherein the step of changing the first frequency so that it corresponds to the future series resonance frequency further comprises:
a. reducing the first frequency if:
i. the third admittance is less than the first admittance and the first admittance is less than or equal to the second admittance or ii. the third admittance is less than the second admittance and the second admittance is less than the first admittance;
b. maintaining the first frequency substantially constant if the third admittance substantially equals the second admittance and the third and second admittances are less than the first admittance: and c. increasing the first frequency if:
i. the second admittance is less than the third admittance and the third admittance is less than or equal to the first admittance or ii. the second admittance is less than the first admittance and the first admittance is less than the third admittance.
a. reducing the first frequency if:
i. the third admittance is less than the first admittance and the first admittance is less than or equal to the second admittance or ii. the third admittance is less than the second admittance and the second admittance is less than the first admittance;
b. maintaining the first frequency substantially constant if the third admittance substantially equals the second admittance and the third and second admittances are less than the first admittance: and c. increasing the first frequency if:
i. the second admittance is less than the third admittance and the third admittance is less than or equal to the first admittance or ii. the second admittance is less than the first admittance and the first admittance is less than the third admittance.
4. The method of claim 3, in which each of the reducing and increasing steps further comprises determining a dithering increment by which the first frequency is reduced or increased, respectively.
5. The method of claim 4. in which the dithering increment is between approximately 0.001 and 0.1 times the difference between an initial value of a series resonance frequency and an initial value of a parallel resonance frequency of the handpiece.
6. The method of claim 5. in which the dithering increment is approximately 0.01 times the difference between the initial value of the series resonance and the initial value of the parallel resonance of the handpiece.
7. The method of claim 4, further comprising the step of adjusting the dithering increment.
8. A method of controlling during a surgical procedure an ultrasonic phacoemulsification handpiece having a characteristic unloaded series resonance frequency.
comprising the steps of:
a. generating a first drive signal at a first frequency substantially equal to the unloaded series resonance frequency of the handpiece;
b. exciting the handpiece with the first drive signal;
c. measuring a first admittance at the first frequency;
d. determining a second frequency that differs from the first frequency by a dithering increment;
e. generating a second drive signal at the second frequency:
f. exciting the handpiece with the second drive signal;
g. measuring a second admittance at the second frequency; and h. predicting a future series resonance frequency at a third frequency based on a comparison of the first admittance to the second admittance and the first frequency to the second frequency.
comprising the steps of:
a. generating a first drive signal at a first frequency substantially equal to the unloaded series resonance frequency of the handpiece;
b. exciting the handpiece with the first drive signal;
c. measuring a first admittance at the first frequency;
d. determining a second frequency that differs from the first frequency by a dithering increment;
e. generating a second drive signal at the second frequency:
f. exciting the handpiece with the second drive signal;
g. measuring a second admittance at the second frequency; and h. predicting a future series resonance frequency at a third frequency based on a comparison of the first admittance to the second admittance and the first frequency to the second frequency.
9. The method of claim 8, further comprising the steps of:
a. setting the first frequency equal to the second frequency and the first admittance equal to the second admittance:
b. setting the second frequency equal to the third frequency; and c. repeating steps e-h until the surgical procedure is completed.
a. setting the first frequency equal to the second frequency and the first admittance equal to the second admittance:
b. setting the second frequency equal to the third frequency; and c. repeating steps e-h until the surgical procedure is completed.
10. The method of claim 9, in which the determining step further comprises:
i. setting the third frequency to a value greater than the second frequency if:
A. the second admittance is less than the first admittance and the first second frequency is less than the second frequency or B. the second frequency is greater than or equal to the first frequency and the second admittance is greater than or equal to the first admittance: or ii. setting the third frequency to a value less than the second frequency if:
A. the second admittance is less than the first admittance and the first frequency is greater than or equal to the second frequency or B. the second admittance is greater than or equal to the first admittance and the second frequency is less than the first frequency.
i. setting the third frequency to a value greater than the second frequency if:
A. the second admittance is less than the first admittance and the first second frequency is less than the second frequency or B. the second frequency is greater than or equal to the first frequency and the second admittance is greater than or equal to the first admittance: or ii. setting the third frequency to a value less than the second frequency if:
A. the second admittance is less than the first admittance and the first frequency is greater than or equal to the second frequency or B. the second admittance is greater than or equal to the first admittance and the second frequency is less than the first frequency.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US08/950,162 US5938677A (en) | 1997-10-15 | 1997-10-15 | Control system for a phacoemulsification handpiece |
| US08/950,162 | 1997-10-15 | ||
| PCT/US1998/007279 WO1999018901A1 (en) | 1997-10-15 | 1998-04-07 | Control system for a phacoemulsification handpiece |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2305297A1 CA2305297A1 (en) | 1999-04-22 |
| CA2305297C true CA2305297C (en) | 2005-02-15 |
Family
ID=25490043
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002305297A Expired - Lifetime CA2305297C (en) | 1997-10-15 | 1998-04-07 | Control system for a phacoemulsification handpiece |
Country Status (11)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US5938677A (en) |
| EP (1) | EP1027021B1 (en) |
| JP (1) | JP3805980B2 (en) |
| AT (1) | ATE282384T1 (en) |
| AU (1) | AU727779B2 (en) |
| BR (1) | BR9814865B1 (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2305297C (en) |
| DE (1) | DE69827659T2 (en) |
| ES (1) | ES2231981T3 (en) |
| PT (1) | PT1027021E (en) |
| WO (1) | WO1999018901A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (47)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US6780165B2 (en) * | 1997-01-22 | 2004-08-24 | Advanced Medical Optics | Micro-burst ultrasonic power delivery |
| US7169123B2 (en) | 1997-01-22 | 2007-01-30 | Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. | Control of pulse duty cycle based upon footswitch displacement |
| US6027515A (en) * | 1999-03-02 | 2000-02-22 | Sound Surgical Technologies Llc | Pulsed ultrasonic device and method |
| US6726698B2 (en) * | 1999-03-02 | 2004-04-27 | Sound Surgical Technologies Llc | Pulsed ultrasonic device and method |
| US6662127B2 (en) * | 2000-10-20 | 2003-12-09 | Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. | Method for detecting presence of a blade in an ultrasonic system |
| AU2007240154B2 (en) * | 2001-12-21 | 2010-08-12 | Sound Surgical Technologies, Llc | Pulsed ultrasonic device and method |
| US6900673B2 (en) * | 2002-06-04 | 2005-05-31 | Coltene/Whaledent, Inc. | Microcontroller unit |
| US20030222535A1 (en) | 2002-06-04 | 2003-12-04 | Igory Gofman | Ultrasonic driver |
| US7077820B1 (en) * | 2002-10-21 | 2006-07-18 | Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. | Enhanced microburst ultrasonic power delivery system and method |
| US7316664B2 (en) | 2002-10-21 | 2008-01-08 | Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. | Modulated pulsed ultrasonic power delivery system and method |
| EP2604235A1 (en) * | 2003-03-12 | 2013-06-19 | Abbott Medical Optics Inc. | System and method for pulsed ultrasonic power delivery employing cavitation effects |
| US7157830B2 (en) * | 2003-04-02 | 2007-01-02 | Piezomotor Uppsala Ab | Near-resonance wide-range operating electromechanical motor |
| US20050188743A1 (en) * | 2004-02-26 | 2005-09-01 | H. P. Intellectual Corp. | Automatic ultrasonic frequency calibration scheme |
| US7645255B2 (en) * | 2004-03-22 | 2010-01-12 | Alcon, Inc. | Method of controlling a surgical system based on irrigation flow |
| US7625388B2 (en) | 2004-03-22 | 2009-12-01 | Alcon, Inc. | Method of controlling a surgical system based on a load on the cutting tip of a handpiece |
| US7811255B2 (en) * | 2004-03-22 | 2010-10-12 | Alcon, Inc. | Method of controlling a surgical system based on a rate of change of an operating parameter |
| US7614878B2 (en) * | 2005-05-18 | 2009-11-10 | Pcg, Inc. | System and method for dynamic control of ultrasonic magnetostrictive dental scaler |
| WO2006128307A1 (en) * | 2005-06-03 | 2006-12-07 | Jocelyn Perron | Multi-level external window shutter |
| DE102006008517B4 (en) * | 2006-02-22 | 2008-10-09 | Sirona Dental Systems Gmbh | Method for operating a dental ultrasound device and dental ultrasound device |
| DE102006020417B4 (en) * | 2006-04-26 | 2008-10-02 | Herrmann Ultraschalltechnik Gmbh & Co. Kg | Device for processing workpieces by means of ultrasound |
| US7708734B2 (en) * | 2006-06-30 | 2010-05-04 | Alcon, Inc. | Method for dynamically adjusting operation of a surgical handpiece |
| US7640119B2 (en) * | 2006-06-30 | 2009-12-29 | Alcon, Inc. | System for dynamically adjusting operation of a surgical handpiece |
| US7391277B2 (en) * | 2006-07-20 | 2008-06-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Interleaved voltage controlled oscillator |
| US7785336B2 (en) | 2006-08-01 | 2010-08-31 | Abbott Medical Optics Inc. | Vacuum sense control for phaco pulse shaping |
| US8025672B2 (en) * | 2006-08-29 | 2011-09-27 | Misonix, Incorporated | Ultrasonic wound treatment method and apparatus |
| US8424362B2 (en) * | 2006-11-09 | 2013-04-23 | Abbott Medical Optics Inc. | Methods and apparatus for calibrating a vacuum component of a phacoemulsification system |
| US20080116767A1 (en) * | 2006-11-16 | 2008-05-22 | Shan-Yi Yu | Piezoelectric generation system and generation method thereof |
| DE102007031168B3 (en) * | 2007-07-04 | 2009-01-02 | Sirona Dental Systems Gmbh | Method for operating a dental ultrasound device and dental ultrasound device |
| US7877222B2 (en) * | 2007-07-20 | 2011-01-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | Structure for a phase locked loop with adjustable voltage based on temperature |
| US7493229B2 (en) * | 2007-07-20 | 2009-02-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Adjusting voltage for a phase locked loop based on temperature |
| JP5301936B2 (en) * | 2008-09-30 | 2013-09-25 | 株式会社ニデック | Ultrasonic surgical device |
| US8623040B2 (en) | 2009-07-01 | 2014-01-07 | Alcon Research, Ltd. | Phacoemulsification hook tip |
| US9018887B2 (en) | 2010-04-01 | 2015-04-28 | Westdale Holdings, Inc. | Ultrasonic system controls, tool recognition means and feedback methods |
| US10258505B2 (en) | 2010-09-17 | 2019-04-16 | Alcon Research, Ltd. | Balanced phacoemulsification tip |
| US9980741B2 (en) * | 2011-06-13 | 2018-05-29 | P Tech, Llc | Methods and systems for controlling an ultrasonic handpiece based on tuning signals |
| US8414605B2 (en) | 2011-07-08 | 2013-04-09 | Alcon Research, Ltd. | Vacuum level control of power for phacoemulsification hand piece |
| US9050627B2 (en) | 2011-09-02 | 2015-06-09 | Abbott Medical Optics Inc. | Systems and methods for ultrasonic power measurement and control of phacoemulsification systems |
| US11191669B2 (en) | 2012-03-26 | 2021-12-07 | Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. | Tapered structure in a phacoemulsification device for node placement |
| US11197778B2 (en) | 2012-03-26 | 2021-12-14 | Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. | Tapered structure in a phacoemulsification device for node placement |
| JP6240170B2 (en) | 2012-05-15 | 2017-11-29 | アイノビア，インコーポレイティド | Ejector device and method, driver and circuit thereof |
| US10624785B2 (en) | 2016-01-30 | 2020-04-21 | Carl Zeiss Meditec Cataract Technology Inc. | Devices and methods for ocular surgery |
| CN110799155B (en) | 2017-05-04 | 2022-03-22 | 卡尔蔡司白内障医疗技术公司 | Device and method for ophthalmic surgery |
| KR20210018340A (en) | 2018-06-05 | 2021-02-17 | 칼 짜이스 메디텍 캐터랙트 테크놀로지 인크. | Ophthalmic microsurgery tools, systems and methods of use |
| WO2020160434A1 (en) | 2019-02-01 | 2020-08-06 | Carl Zeiss Meditec Cataract Technology Inc. | Ophthalmic cutting instruments having integrated aspiration pump |
| EP3968912A1 (en) | 2019-05-17 | 2022-03-23 | Carl Zeiss Meditec Cataract Technology Inc. | Ophthalmic cutting instruments having integrated aspiration pump |
| CA3142864A1 (en) | 2019-06-07 | 2020-12-10 | Carl Zeiss Meditec Cataract Technology Inc. | Multi-stage trigger for ophthalmology cutting tool |
| US11877953B2 (en) | 2019-12-26 | 2024-01-23 | Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. | Phacoemulsification apparatus |
Family Cites Families (39)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NL145136C (en) * | 1967-07-25 | 1900-01-01 | ||
| US3964487A (en) * | 1974-12-09 | 1976-06-22 | The Birtcher Corporation | Uncomplicated load-adapting electrosurgical cutting generator |
| US4126137A (en) * | 1977-01-21 | 1978-11-21 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Electrosurgical unit |
| US4180074A (en) * | 1977-03-15 | 1979-12-25 | Fibra-Sonics, Inc. | Device and method for applying precise irrigation, aspiration, medication, ultrasonic power and dwell time to biotissue for surgery and treatment |
| US4223676A (en) * | 1977-12-19 | 1980-09-23 | Cavitron Corporation | Ultrasonic aspirator |
| US4246902A (en) | 1978-03-10 | 1981-01-27 | Miguel Martinez | Surgical cutting instrument |
| US4428748A (en) * | 1980-04-09 | 1984-01-31 | Peyman Gholam A | Combined ultrasonic emulsifier and mechanical cutter for surgery |
| US4493694A (en) | 1980-10-17 | 1985-01-15 | Cooper Lasersonics, Inc. | Surgical pre-aspirator |
| JPS5836684A (en) * | 1981-08-28 | 1983-03-03 | 有限会社大岳製作所 | Ultrasonic oscillation method and micro-computer built-in ultrasonic oscillator |
| US4535759A (en) * | 1982-09-30 | 1985-08-20 | Cabot Medical Corporation | Ultrasonic medical instrument |
| US4515583A (en) | 1983-10-17 | 1985-05-07 | Coopervision, Inc. | Operative elliptical probe for ultrasonic surgical instrument and method of its use |
| DE3401735C1 (en) * | 1984-01-19 | 1985-05-02 | Herbert 7909 Bollingen Gässler | Device for operating a piezoelectric ultrasonic transducer |
| US4609368A (en) | 1984-08-22 | 1986-09-02 | Dotson Robert S Jun | Pneumatic ultrasonic surgical handpiece |
| US4589415A (en) | 1984-08-31 | 1986-05-20 | Haaga John R | Method and system for fragmenting kidney stones |
| US4642581A (en) * | 1985-06-21 | 1987-02-10 | Sono-Tek Corporation | Ultrasonic transducer drive circuit |
| US4639690A (en) * | 1985-07-05 | 1987-01-27 | Litton Systems, Inc. | Tunable, dielectric-resonator-stabilized oscillator and method of tuning same |
| US4922902A (en) | 1986-05-19 | 1990-05-08 | Valleylab, Inc. | Method for removing cellular material with endoscopic ultrasonic aspirator |
| US4933843A (en) * | 1986-11-06 | 1990-06-12 | Storz Instrument Company | Control system for ophthalmic surgical instruments |
| US5001649A (en) * | 1987-04-06 | 1991-03-19 | Alcon Laboratories, Inc. | Linear power control for ultrasonic probe with tuned reactance |
| US4808948A (en) * | 1987-09-28 | 1989-02-28 | Kulicke And Soffa Indusries, Inc. | Automatic tuning system for ultrasonic generators |
| US4966131A (en) * | 1988-02-09 | 1990-10-30 | Mettler Electronics Corp. | Ultrasound power generating system with sampled-data frequency control |
| US4869715A (en) | 1988-04-21 | 1989-09-26 | Sherburne Fred S | Ultrasonic cone and method of construction |
| US5045054A (en) * | 1990-02-06 | 1991-09-03 | Advanced Osseous Technologies Inc. | Apparatus for implantation and extraction of osteal prostheses |
| US5139509A (en) * | 1989-08-25 | 1992-08-18 | Site Microsurgical Systems, Inc. | Phacoemulsification system with handpiece simulator |
| US4973876A (en) * | 1989-09-20 | 1990-11-27 | Branson Ultrasonics Corporation | Ultrasonic power supply |
| EP0424686A1 (en) * | 1989-10-27 | 1991-05-02 | Storz Instrument Company | Control system for ophthalmic surgical instruments |
| EP0424685B1 (en) * | 1989-10-27 | 1995-05-10 | Storz Instrument Company | Method for driving an ultrasonic transducer |
| US5112300A (en) * | 1990-04-03 | 1992-05-12 | Alcon Surgical, Inc. | Method and apparatus for controlling ultrasonic fragmentation of body tissue |
| US5160317A (en) * | 1991-01-03 | 1992-11-03 | Costin John A | Computer controlled smart phacoemulsification method and apparatus |
| US5279547A (en) * | 1991-01-03 | 1994-01-18 | Alcon Surgical Inc. | Computer controlled smart phacoemulsification method and apparatus |
| US5370602A (en) * | 1992-09-04 | 1994-12-06 | American Cyanamid Company | Phacoemulsification probe circuit with pulse width Modulating drive |
| US5331951A (en) * | 1992-09-04 | 1994-07-26 | American Cyanamid Company | Phacoemulsification probe drive circuit |
| US5388569A (en) * | 1992-09-04 | 1995-02-14 | American Cyanamid Co | Phacoemulsification probe circuit with switch drive |
| FR2699765B1 (en) * | 1992-12-22 | 1995-01-20 | Cepe | Method for frequency adjustment of a piezoelectric device and equipment for implementing the method. |
| US5536272A (en) * | 1993-03-26 | 1996-07-16 | Orthosonics Ltd. | Method for removal of osteal prostheses |
| US5431664A (en) * | 1994-04-28 | 1995-07-11 | Alcon Laboratories, Inc. | Method of tuning ultrasonic devices |
| US5635619A (en) * | 1994-07-12 | 1997-06-03 | Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. | Apparatus and method for driving an ultrasonic transducer |
| US5808396A (en) * | 1996-12-18 | 1998-09-15 | Alcon Laboratories, Inc. | System and method for tuning and controlling an ultrasonic handpiece |
| US5852794A (en) * | 1997-01-22 | 1998-12-22 | Allergan | Multiple frequency unambiguous phase detector for phacoemulsification system |
-
1997
- 1997-10-15 US US08/950,162 patent/US5938677A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1998
- 1998-04-07 JP JP2000515542A patent/JP3805980B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-04-07 EP EP98918104A patent/EP1027021B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-04-07 PT PT98918104T patent/PT1027021E/en unknown
- 1998-04-07 CA CA002305297A patent/CA2305297C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-04-07 ES ES98918104T patent/ES2231981T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-04-07 DE DE69827659T patent/DE69827659T2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-04-07 WO PCT/US1998/007279 patent/WO1999018901A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1998-04-07 AT AT98918104T patent/ATE282384T1/en active
- 1998-04-07 AU AU71093/98A patent/AU727779B2/en not_active Expired
- 1998-04-07 BR BRPI9814865-6A patent/BR9814865B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| DE69827659D1 (en) | 2004-12-23 |
| AU7109398A (en) | 1999-05-03 |
| WO1999018901A1 (en) | 1999-04-22 |
| EP1027021A1 (en) | 2000-08-16 |
| JP2001519228A (en) | 2001-10-23 |
| DE69827659T2 (en) | 2005-12-08 |
| PT1027021E (en) | 2005-03-31 |
| US5938677A (en) | 1999-08-17 |
| ES2231981T3 (en) | 2005-05-16 |
| EP1027021B1 (en) | 2004-11-17 |
| JP3805980B2 (en) | 2006-08-09 |
| BR9814865B1 (en) | 2010-11-30 |
| ATE282384T1 (en) | 2004-12-15 |
| CA2305297A1 (en) | 1999-04-22 |
| BR9814865A (en) | 2000-10-03 |
| AU727779B2 (en) | 2000-12-21 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA2305297C (en) | Control system for a phacoemulsification handpiece | |
| CA2271304C (en) | System and method for tuning and controlling an ultrasonic handpiece | |
| US7485106B2 (en) | Micro-burst ultrasonic power delivery | |
| EP1834614B1 (en) | Rapid pulse phaco power for burn free surgery | |
| US7614878B2 (en) | System and method for dynamic control of ultrasonic magnetostrictive dental scaler | |
| US6028387A (en) | Ultrasonic handpiece tuning and controlling device | |
| US20150216726A1 (en) | System and method for pulsed ultrasonic power delivery employing cavitation effects | |
| EP1670402A1 (en) | Control of pulse duty cycle based upon footswitch displacement | |
| US6394974B1 (en) | Power mode phaco | |
| AU2002237780B2 (en) | Rapid pulse phaco power for burn free surgery | |
| AU2007202082B2 (en) | Rapid pulse phaco power for burn free surgery |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEER | Examination request | ||
| MKEX | Expiry |
Effective date: 20180409 |