CA2312061A1 - Method and system for enforcing a communication security policy - Google Patents
Method and system for enforcing a communication security policy Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2312061A1 CA2312061A1 CA002312061A CA2312061A CA2312061A1 CA 2312061 A1 CA2312061 A1 CA 2312061A1 CA 002312061 A CA002312061 A CA 002312061A CA 2312061 A CA2312061 A CA 2312061A CA 2312061 A1 CA2312061 A1 CA 2312061A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- workstation
- security agent
- data packet
- gateway
- security
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L12/00—Data switching networks
- H04L12/02—Details
- H04L12/22—Arrangements for preventing the taking of data from a data transmission channel without authorisation
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
- H04L63/10—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for controlling access to devices or network resources
- H04L63/102—Entity profiles
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
- G06F21/50—Monitoring users, programs or devices to maintain the integrity of platforms, e.g. of processors, firmware or operating systems
- G06F21/51—Monitoring users, programs or devices to maintain the integrity of platforms, e.g. of processors, firmware or operating systems at application loading time, e.g. accepting, rejecting, starting or inhibiting executable software based on integrity or source reliability
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
- G06F21/50—Monitoring users, programs or devices to maintain the integrity of platforms, e.g. of processors, firmware or operating systems
- G06F21/55—Detecting local intrusion or implementing counter-measures
- G06F21/554—Detecting local intrusion or implementing counter-measures involving event detection and direct action
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
- H04L63/16—Implementing security features at a particular protocol layer
- H04L63/168—Implementing security features at a particular protocol layer above the transport layer
Abstract
A method for enforcing a security policy for selectively preventing the downloading and execution of undesired Executable Objects in an individual workstation, comprising the steps of: (1) providing a security agent suitable to be installed in an individual workstation, said security agent being provided with means for introducing at least one marker in one or more data packets transmitted by a workstation to a server through a gateway, said at least one marker indicating that a security agent is installed in the transmitting workstation; (2) providing means in or coupled to the gateway for analyzing the first one or more data packet(s) received from a transmitting workstation initiating communication to a remote server, to determine whether said first one or more data packet(s) comprise at least one marker indicating that a suitable security agent is installed in the transmitting workstation;
(3) if at least one marker indicating that a suitable security agent is installed in the transmitting workstation is detected in said in said first one or more data packet(s), deleting said marker(s) from said first one or more data packet(s), and allowing said data packet(s) to be transmitted to their destination; and (4) if no marker indicating that a suitable security agent is installed in the transmitting workstation is detected in said first one or more data packet(s), preventing any data packet(s) received from the server to which the workstation is connected from being transmitted to the workstation.
(3) if at least one marker indicating that a suitable security agent is installed in the transmitting workstation is detected in said in said first one or more data packet(s), deleting said marker(s) from said first one or more data packet(s), and allowing said data packet(s) to be transmitted to their destination; and (4) if no marker indicating that a suitable security agent is installed in the transmitting workstation is detected in said first one or more data packet(s), preventing any data packet(s) received from the server to which the workstation is connected from being transmitted to the workstation.
Description
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ENFORCING A COMMUNICATION
SECURITY POLICY
Field of the Invention The present invention relates to the security management of computer networks. More particularly, the invention relates to methods and systems for preventing the downloading and execution of undesirable Executable Objects in a workstation of a computer network.
Back~~round of the Invention The Internet has developed very much both in respect of its contents and of the technology employed, since it began a few years ago. In the early days of the Internet, web sites included text only, and after a while graphics was introduced. As the Internet developed, many compressed standards, such as pictures, voice and video files, were developed and with them programs used to play them (called "players"). Initially, such files were downloaded to the user's workstation only upon his request, and extracted only by the appropriate player, and after a specific order from the user.
When, in the natural course of the development of the World Wide Web the search for a way to show nicer, interactive and animated Web Pages began, Sun Microsystems Inc. developed Java - a language that allows the webmaster to write a program, a list of commands - Network Executables -that will be downloaded to the user workstation without his knowledge, and executed by his browser at his workstation. The executables are used, e.g., to provide photographic animation and other graphics on the screen of the web surfer. Such executables have ways of approaching the user workstation's resources, which lead to a great security problem. Although some levels of security were defined in the Java language, it was very soon that a huge security hole was found in the language.
Since Java was developed, Microsoft developed ActiveX, which is another Network Executable format, also downloaded into the workstation.
ActiveX has also security problems of the same kind.
The Internet has been flooded with "Network Executables" which may be downloaded -- deliberately or without the knowledge of the users -- into workstations within organizations. These codes generally contain harmless functions. Although usually safe, they may not meet the required security policy of the organization.
Once executed, codes may jam the network, cause considerable irreversible damage to the local database, workstations and servers, or result in unauthorized retrieval of information from the servers/workstations. Such elements may appear on Java applets, ActiveX
components, DLLs and other object codes, and their use is increasing at an unparalleled pace. The majority of these small programs are downloaded 4s3~wvo~97 , , , into the organization unsolicited and uncontrolled. The enterprise has no way of knowing about their existence or execution and there is no system in place for early detection and prevention of the codes from being executed. Some of these problems are discussed in the article "Screening for applets", by Sharon Machlis, COMPUTERWORD, vol. 31, no. 6, 10 February 1997, USA, pp. 51-52.
The security problem was solved partially by the browser manufactures which allow the user to disable the use of executables. Of course this is not a reasonable solution, since all the electronic commerce and advertising are based on the use of executables. The security problem is much more serious once such an executable can approach the enterprise servers, databases and other workstations. However, so far the art has failed to provide comprehensive solutions which are safe and quick enough to be practically useful. Systems such as "Firewall" or "Finjan", distributed for use by Internet users, provide only partial solutions and, furthermore, are difficult to install and to update.
Another solution that has been suggested in EP 776 112, includes the provision of a source and destination verifiier associated with an incoming packet object, to verify its source and destination.
AN~~D~D S4EET
.. .. .. . .. .. . . .
46331W0~197 . . . . . . . ..
.
... ...
... ... ... .. ..
.
-3 bis-In two copending patent applications of the same applicants hereof, IL
120420, filed March 10, 1997, and IL 121815, filed September 22, 1997, there are described methods and means for preventing undesirable Executable Objects from ixifiltrating the LAN/WAN in which we work and, ultimately, our workstation and server. However, while the systems described in the aforementioned two Israeli patent applications are safe and convenient to use, they present a drawback when very large organizations are ANIEtdDED SHEET
SECURITY POLICY
Field of the Invention The present invention relates to the security management of computer networks. More particularly, the invention relates to methods and systems for preventing the downloading and execution of undesirable Executable Objects in a workstation of a computer network.
Back~~round of the Invention The Internet has developed very much both in respect of its contents and of the technology employed, since it began a few years ago. In the early days of the Internet, web sites included text only, and after a while graphics was introduced. As the Internet developed, many compressed standards, such as pictures, voice and video files, were developed and with them programs used to play them (called "players"). Initially, such files were downloaded to the user's workstation only upon his request, and extracted only by the appropriate player, and after a specific order from the user.
When, in the natural course of the development of the World Wide Web the search for a way to show nicer, interactive and animated Web Pages began, Sun Microsystems Inc. developed Java - a language that allows the webmaster to write a program, a list of commands - Network Executables -that will be downloaded to the user workstation without his knowledge, and executed by his browser at his workstation. The executables are used, e.g., to provide photographic animation and other graphics on the screen of the web surfer. Such executables have ways of approaching the user workstation's resources, which lead to a great security problem. Although some levels of security were defined in the Java language, it was very soon that a huge security hole was found in the language.
Since Java was developed, Microsoft developed ActiveX, which is another Network Executable format, also downloaded into the workstation.
ActiveX has also security problems of the same kind.
The Internet has been flooded with "Network Executables" which may be downloaded -- deliberately or without the knowledge of the users -- into workstations within organizations. These codes generally contain harmless functions. Although usually safe, they may not meet the required security policy of the organization.
Once executed, codes may jam the network, cause considerable irreversible damage to the local database, workstations and servers, or result in unauthorized retrieval of information from the servers/workstations. Such elements may appear on Java applets, ActiveX
components, DLLs and other object codes, and their use is increasing at an unparalleled pace. The majority of these small programs are downloaded 4s3~wvo~97 , , , into the organization unsolicited and uncontrolled. The enterprise has no way of knowing about their existence or execution and there is no system in place for early detection and prevention of the codes from being executed. Some of these problems are discussed in the article "Screening for applets", by Sharon Machlis, COMPUTERWORD, vol. 31, no. 6, 10 February 1997, USA, pp. 51-52.
The security problem was solved partially by the browser manufactures which allow the user to disable the use of executables. Of course this is not a reasonable solution, since all the electronic commerce and advertising are based on the use of executables. The security problem is much more serious once such an executable can approach the enterprise servers, databases and other workstations. However, so far the art has failed to provide comprehensive solutions which are safe and quick enough to be practically useful. Systems such as "Firewall" or "Finjan", distributed for use by Internet users, provide only partial solutions and, furthermore, are difficult to install and to update.
Another solution that has been suggested in EP 776 112, includes the provision of a source and destination verifiier associated with an incoming packet object, to verify its source and destination.
AN~~D~D S4EET
.. .. .. . .. .. . . .
46331W0~197 . . . . . . . ..
.
... ...
... ... ... .. ..
.
-3 bis-In two copending patent applications of the same applicants hereof, IL
120420, filed March 10, 1997, and IL 121815, filed September 22, 1997, there are described methods and means for preventing undesirable Executable Objects from ixifiltrating the LAN/WAN in which we work and, ultimately, our workstation and server. However, while the systems described in the aforementioned two Israeli patent applications are safe and convenient to use, they present a drawback when very large organizations are ANIEtdDED SHEET
concerned, inasmuch as they require that each individual user {or workstation) be controlled to ensure that it operates according to the desired security policy or, in other words, that he has installed in the workstation appropriate security data, or they require that control of the security policy be carried out centrally at the gateway level, rather than at the workstation level. Thus, in large organizations where new users are constantly added, policing the maintenance of the security policy requires constant management efforts, if the security agent is to be installed on the individual workstations. As will be appreciated, installing the security agent on the individual workstation provides many advantages, particularly where speed of operation and cost of central equipment is concerned, and where a centralized security enforcement is needed.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an object of the present invention to provide a method and means for enforcing the security policy of an organization on each and every member of the organization, thereby selectively preventing the downloading and execution of undesired Executable Objects in a computer, which obviates the need for the continuous central management and monitoring of the activities of the individuals within the organization, and which permits to effect a part of the security policy enforcement process on the individual workstations of the organization.
It is another object of the invention to provide such a system which is easy to install and which can be quickly and easily updated.
It is a further object of the invention to provide such a method which can be used with a large number of gateways, LAN's and workstations.
It is yet another object of the invention to provide such a security management system which is independent of the physical infrastructure and network layout.
Also encompassed by the invention is a computer system which utilizes the method of the invention.
The invention is directed to a method for enforcing a security policy for selectively preventing the downloading and execution of undesired Executable Objects in an individual workstation, comprising the steps of-.
(1) providing a security agent suitable to be installed in an individual workstation, said security agent being provided with means for introducing at least one marker in one or more data packet transmitted by a workstation to a server through a gateway, said at least one marker indicating that a security agent is installed in the transmitting workstation;
(2) providing means in or coupled to the gateway for analyzing the first one or more data packets) received from a transmitting workstation initiating communication to a remote server, to determine whether said first one or more data packets) comprise at least one marker indicating that a suitable security agent is installed in the transmitting workstation;
(3) If at least one marker indicating that a suitable security agent is installed in the transmitting workstation is detected in said first one or more data packet(s), deleting said markers) from said first one or more data packet(s), and allowing said data packets) to be transmitted to their destination; and (4) If no marker indicating that a suitable security agent is installed in the transmitting workstation is detected in said first one or more data packet(s), preventing any data packets) received from the server to which the workstation is connected from being transmitted to the workstation.
Details of the security policies, their distribution to various gateways within the organization, and the analysis of received data, are described in detail in said copending Israeli patent applications of the same applicant herein, the description of which is incorporated herein by reference, and are therefore not discussed herein in detail, for the sake of brevity.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the method further comprises the step of obliging the workstation which has transmitted data packets) which do not contain a marker indicating that a suitable security agent is installed therein, to install a suitable security agent. In this way, the security policy is enforced in real time. Furthermore, as will be further discussed below, if the security agent installed is outdated, and the marking information received at the gateway shows this fact, installation of an updated security agent, or an updating of the security policy information, can also be forced on the user. Such installation (which, as used herein, also includes updating of outdated security policy data) can either be carried out automatically by the system, or interactively, in cooperation with the user of the workstation.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, when installation of a security agent is needed, a packet containing an HTML PAGE
comprising installation information for the security agent is returned to the workstation by the gateway or by means coupled to it, such as in a form of an E-MAIL and ale attachment. .
Furthermore, according to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the identity of the workstation and/or of the user is compared with the security level to be allocated to it/him, and the suitable security agent and/or security policy data to be installed in the workstation are selected.
_g_ The invention also encompasses a system for enforcing a security policy for selectively preventing the downloading and execution of undesired Executable Objects in an individual workstation, comprising:
A. A security agent suitable to be installed in an individual workstation, said security agent being provided with means for introducing at least one marker in one or more data packet transmitted by a workstation to a server through a gateway, said at least one marker indicating that a security agent is installed in the transmitting workstation;
B. Gateway means for controlling the communication traffic of a plurality of workstations with the Internet or an intranet;
C. Detection means provided in, or coupled to said gateway for analyzing the first one or more data packets) received from a transmitting workstation initiating communication to a remote server, to determine whether said first one or more data packets) comprise at least one marker indicating that a suitable security agent is installed in the transmitting workstation;
D. Means for deleting said markers) from said first one or more data packet(s), and for allowing said data packets) to be transmitted to their destination, if at least one marker indicating that a suitable security agent is installed in the transmitting workstation is detected by said detection means in said first one or more data packet(s); and E. Means for preventing any data packets) received from the server to which the workstation is connected from being transmitted to the workstation if no marker indicating that a suitable security agent is installed in the transmitting workstation is detected by said detection means in said first one or more data packet(s).
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the system further comprises means for allowing or forcing the installation of a suitable security agent on a workstation. Such means may comprise means for obliging the workstation which has transmitted data packets) which do not contain a marker indicating that a suitable security agent is installed therein, to install a suitable security agent, which may be means for automatically installing the security agent on the workstation, or means for carrying out the installation interactively in cooperation with the user of the workstation.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention there are provided means for returning to the workstation a packet containing an HTML
PAGE comprising installation information for the security agent. Thus, according to this particular embodiment of the invention the workstation is connected through a link provided to it by the gateway, to a distant server which guides it in the installation procedure, and which provides the required information and software. In a preferred embodiment of the invention the installation is effected after comparing the identity of the workstation and/or of the user with the security level to be allocated to it/him, and selection of the suitable security agent and security policy data to be installed in the workstation.
Other advantages and objects of the invention will become apparent as the description proceeds.
Brief Description of the Drawings Fig. 1 is a schematic representation of a security policy enforcement process, according to a preferred embodiment of the invention; and Fig. 2 further illustrates the various elements of a system according to one preferred embodiment of the invention, and the relationship between them.
Detailed Description of Preferred Embodiments The method of the invention operates together with the system of IL
120420 for selectively preventing the downloading and execution of undesired Executable Objects in a computer which, briefly, operates according to the following steps:
(a) providing one or more Control Centers, each connected to one or more gateways located between a LAN and an external computer communication network;
(b) providing means coupled to each of said gateways, to detect Executable Objects reaching said gateway, to analyze the header of each of said Executable Objects, and to determine the resources of the computer that the Executable Object needs to utilize;
(c) providing means coupled to each of said gateways, to store a user's Security Policy representing the resources, or combination of resources, that the user allows or does not allow an Executable Object to utilize within its LAN, wherein the Security Policy is received from and/or stored in each of said one or more Control Centers;
(d) when an Executable Object is detected at the gateway:
1. analyzing the header of said Executable Object;
2. determining the resources of the computer that the Executable Object needs to utilize;
3. comparing the resources of the computer that the Executable Object needs to utilize with the Security Policy and;
(i) if the resources of the computer that the Executable Object needs to utilize are included in the list of the resources allowed for use by the Security Policy, allowing the Executable Object to pass through the gateway and to reach the computer which has initiated its downloading; and (ii) if the resources of the computer that the Executable Object needs to utilize are included in the list of the resources prohibited for use by the Security Policy, preventing the Executable Object from passing through the gateway, thereby preventing it from reaching the computer which has initiated its downloading.
A Control Center (CC) may be a central control unit, e.g., a PC or other computer, which is connected to a plurality of gateways, and which updates the memory means containing relevant date, e.g., the Security Policy. As will be understood from the description to follow, once the CC is updated, e.g., by the addition of an additional limitation to the Security Policy, all gateways are updated at once. The use of the CC to control the operation of the security elements of the gateways obviates the need (which exists in prior art systems) to update each gateway every time that a change in policy is made.
A LAN (Local Area Network) may be (but is not limited to), e.g., a network of computers located in an office or building. The LAN is typically connected to outside communications networks, such as the World Wide Web, or to more limited LANs, e.g., of a client or supplier, through one or more gateways. The larger the organization, the larger the number of gateways employed, in order to keep communications at a reasonable speed.
Generally speaking, a LAN can also be made of a plurality of smaller LANs, located geographically nearby or far apart, but even if small LANs are found within the same organization, the security requirements may vary from one department to the other, and it may be necessary to keep high security levels, including preventing Executables from migrating from one department to the other, even within the same organization.
The means coupled to each of said gateways, to detect Executable Objects reaching said gateway, to analyze the header of each of said Executable Objects, and to determine the resources of the computer that the Executable Object needs to utilize may be of many different types.
Typically, the executable object is "trapped" and analyzed at the gateway by listening on the communication line to the communication protocols, such as the TCP/IP, NETBUI, IPX/SPX, or others, as well as to the object transfer protocols, such as SMTP, HTTP, FTP, NMTP, IMAP, etc. Hooking into the communication line and extracting the contents of the header of the executable object are steps which are understood by the skilled person, and which can be effected by means of conventional programming, and they are therefore not described herein in detail, for the sake of brevity.
Once the header of the Executable Object (EO) has been analyzed, comparing the resources of the computer that the EO needs to utilize with the Security Policy can be easily done, e.g., by comparing them with a look-up table provided to the gateway by the CC, which represents the Security Policy. Comparison can also be carried out against the data stored in the CC, and in such a case specific memory means and comparing means may not be necessary in the gateway. However, speed and performance considerations will often dictate that such operations be carried out at the gateway itself.
The gateway must be installed in each Internet server within the organization. It comprises a small real time database which contains all the relevant operational information for the gateway. The gateway "listens" to the data being transferred between the enterprise and the Internet. It knows when an object is coming into the LAN, it analyzes it and compares it with the Security Policy to decide what action is to be taken.
According to a preferred embodiment of IL 120420, as stated, if the resources of the computer that the Executable Object needs to utilize are included in the list of the resources allowed for use by the Security Policy, no steps are taken by the system to prevent the Executable Object from passing through the gateway and reaching the computer which has initiated its downloading. However, if the resources of the computer that the Executable Object needs to utilize are included in the list of the resources prohibited for use by the Security Policy, steps will be taken to prevent the Executable Object from passing through the gateway. Such steps may include, e.g., re-routing the executable to a destination outside the gateway, canceling or garbling part of it, so as to make it inoperative, etc.
The method is not limited to any specific EO. Illustrative examples of EO's include, inter alia, Java Applets, Active-X, OCX, Win32 Executables, DLLs, or the like executable objects. However, as will be apparent to the skilled person, EO's are constantly developed, and the actual nature of the EO is not of critical importance.
Many other features and advantages of the system are described in detail in the specification of IL 120420 which, as stated, is incorporated herein by reference.
According to the present invention there is provided the process according to which the user is obliged to install a security agent according to the security policy of the organization, whenever he attempts to connect to a server via the gateway. The gateway maybe any of a plurality of gateways existing in the organization.
The system operates as follows: whenever a user attempts to connect to a server, in order to access a target server on the Internet or in an intranet, a "connect process" is effected in which a first packet a is sent from the station to the target server, which packet does not contain data.
According to the present invention private information is introduced into said first packet, which private information is termed hereinafter "Marking Information", which marking information indicates that an agent is present on the workstation that is attempting to connect. In other words, whenever the communication process is started by the user, if a security agent is present on the workstation, said security agent will modify the first packet so as to introduce marking information indicative of the fact that the agent is installed on the workstation. If no security agent is installed on the workstation, the first packet sent by the workstation during the connect process will be empty, or at least will not comprise any marking information indicative of the presence of a suitable security agent on the workstation. By means of the marking information the gateway, which is responsible for carrying out the security policy of the organization, will be alerted of the fact that a workstation on which no security agent has been installed is attempting to connect to a server outside of the Organization, or outside a segment of the Organization for which enforcement of the security policy is required.
This process is further illustrated in Fig. 1. In the figure, the operation of the gateway is schematically illustrated. The gateway, which receives all incoming and outgoing data packets, receives a first packet sent by a given workstation, and analyzes it. The gateway checks whether the first packet contains marking data, as defined above. If suitable marking data are found by the gateway, the gateway removes the marking data from the packet before allowing it to pass to its destination, so as not to interfere with any analysis made on the packet at the receiving end. The gateway then allows the workstation to connect to its destination.
If a gateway cannot detect marking data in the first packet, it does not allow the workstation to connect to its destination and, in place of connecting it to its desired destination, it returns to the workstation a link to a distant server, which server contains the required software for performing a forced installation of a security agent on the specific workstation. Forced installation of a software, such as the security agent, can be effected in a variety of ways, which are apparent to the skilled person, and which are therefore not describe herein in detail, for the sake of brevity. Such installation maybe carried out using programs written in the Java language, in any other suitable way, or even interactively with the user, by advising him that he will not be allowed to connect through the gateway unless he performs specific required operations which will lead to the installation of the desired security agent on his workstation.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the connection of the user to the server which will perform the installation of the security agent on the user's workstation, or from which the user will carry out the installation following instructions given to him, is effected by allowing the empty packet sent by the user to the gateway (viz., the first packet which does not contain marking information) to reach the destination server, and, when a response packet is received from the destination server, addressed to the user, the gateway replaces it with a packet which contains an a HTTP PAGE, which contains the information for the installation of the security agent.
Of course, additional procedures can be used in order to obtain the same result. For instance, a less convenient, more primitive - but still effective, procedure comprises analyzing the first packet at the gateway, as explained above, and then returning to the user or to the security administrator just a notification that his workstation is not allowed to connect through the gateway, because no security agent is installed thereon. Such notification may include information as to where, or from whom, the software needed for installing the security agent may be obtained. While this is a less convenient, more lengthy and time-consuming procedure, as it will be apparent to the skilled person, it is nonetheless as effective as any other more advanced installation procedure, for the purposes of maintaining security, and observing the security policy of the organization.
According to another preferred embodiment of invention, an analysis of the identity of the workstation and/or of the user is also effected by the gateway and/or by the distant server, to determine the security policy that applies to him. This is important in organizations which apply differentiated security policies, e.g., where different departments, or different individuals or levels within a departments, are assigned different security policies. Such a step is of course not necessary if the entire organization employs a uniform security policy.
Looking now at Fig. 2, three security levels of a system according to a preferred embodiment of the invention are illustrated. Box "A" is the management applications block, which contains the Control Center which controls all security operations of the system. The Control Center is connected to management modules, such as the Policy Manager, which contains data on the security policy of the system for the various gateways, users, etc., or the Audit Viewer, which permits an operator to view the operation of the system in real time, or any other utility which it may be desired to operate at the Control Center level (schematically indicated in the figure as the ". . ." box.
WO 99/29082 PC'T/IL98/00084 The Control Center is connected on the one hand to the Distribution Server, and on the other hand to one or more gateways (one gateway only being shown in the figure, for the sake of simplicity), The Distribution Server, which belongs to the management application block, is connected to the Control Center via TCP/IP (or packet level) connections, and has the function of providing operating information and data for the security agent operating at the workstation level. The Agent (box C) is logically connected, as said, on the one hand to the Distribution Server, and on the other hand to the gateway, which is provided with Gateway Level security applications (block B), which take care of the security operations which are carried out at the gateway itself, as explained above.
All the above description of preferred embodiments has been provided for the sake of illustration, and is not intended to limit the invention in any way, except as defined by the claims. Many modifications may be effected in the invention. For instance, many different markings can be provided to indicate that a security agent is installed on a given workstation, different types of analyses can be carried out by or at the gateway, or by different agents coupled to the gateway, and many different means and methods for effecting the installation of the security agent in a workstation can be provided, all without exceeding the scope of the invention.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an object of the present invention to provide a method and means for enforcing the security policy of an organization on each and every member of the organization, thereby selectively preventing the downloading and execution of undesired Executable Objects in a computer, which obviates the need for the continuous central management and monitoring of the activities of the individuals within the organization, and which permits to effect a part of the security policy enforcement process on the individual workstations of the organization.
It is another object of the invention to provide such a system which is easy to install and which can be quickly and easily updated.
It is a further object of the invention to provide such a method which can be used with a large number of gateways, LAN's and workstations.
It is yet another object of the invention to provide such a security management system which is independent of the physical infrastructure and network layout.
Also encompassed by the invention is a computer system which utilizes the method of the invention.
The invention is directed to a method for enforcing a security policy for selectively preventing the downloading and execution of undesired Executable Objects in an individual workstation, comprising the steps of-.
(1) providing a security agent suitable to be installed in an individual workstation, said security agent being provided with means for introducing at least one marker in one or more data packet transmitted by a workstation to a server through a gateway, said at least one marker indicating that a security agent is installed in the transmitting workstation;
(2) providing means in or coupled to the gateway for analyzing the first one or more data packets) received from a transmitting workstation initiating communication to a remote server, to determine whether said first one or more data packets) comprise at least one marker indicating that a suitable security agent is installed in the transmitting workstation;
(3) If at least one marker indicating that a suitable security agent is installed in the transmitting workstation is detected in said first one or more data packet(s), deleting said markers) from said first one or more data packet(s), and allowing said data packets) to be transmitted to their destination; and (4) If no marker indicating that a suitable security agent is installed in the transmitting workstation is detected in said first one or more data packet(s), preventing any data packets) received from the server to which the workstation is connected from being transmitted to the workstation.
Details of the security policies, their distribution to various gateways within the organization, and the analysis of received data, are described in detail in said copending Israeli patent applications of the same applicant herein, the description of which is incorporated herein by reference, and are therefore not discussed herein in detail, for the sake of brevity.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the method further comprises the step of obliging the workstation which has transmitted data packets) which do not contain a marker indicating that a suitable security agent is installed therein, to install a suitable security agent. In this way, the security policy is enforced in real time. Furthermore, as will be further discussed below, if the security agent installed is outdated, and the marking information received at the gateway shows this fact, installation of an updated security agent, or an updating of the security policy information, can also be forced on the user. Such installation (which, as used herein, also includes updating of outdated security policy data) can either be carried out automatically by the system, or interactively, in cooperation with the user of the workstation.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, when installation of a security agent is needed, a packet containing an HTML PAGE
comprising installation information for the security agent is returned to the workstation by the gateway or by means coupled to it, such as in a form of an E-MAIL and ale attachment. .
Furthermore, according to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the identity of the workstation and/or of the user is compared with the security level to be allocated to it/him, and the suitable security agent and/or security policy data to be installed in the workstation are selected.
_g_ The invention also encompasses a system for enforcing a security policy for selectively preventing the downloading and execution of undesired Executable Objects in an individual workstation, comprising:
A. A security agent suitable to be installed in an individual workstation, said security agent being provided with means for introducing at least one marker in one or more data packet transmitted by a workstation to a server through a gateway, said at least one marker indicating that a security agent is installed in the transmitting workstation;
B. Gateway means for controlling the communication traffic of a plurality of workstations with the Internet or an intranet;
C. Detection means provided in, or coupled to said gateway for analyzing the first one or more data packets) received from a transmitting workstation initiating communication to a remote server, to determine whether said first one or more data packets) comprise at least one marker indicating that a suitable security agent is installed in the transmitting workstation;
D. Means for deleting said markers) from said first one or more data packet(s), and for allowing said data packets) to be transmitted to their destination, if at least one marker indicating that a suitable security agent is installed in the transmitting workstation is detected by said detection means in said first one or more data packet(s); and E. Means for preventing any data packets) received from the server to which the workstation is connected from being transmitted to the workstation if no marker indicating that a suitable security agent is installed in the transmitting workstation is detected by said detection means in said first one or more data packet(s).
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the system further comprises means for allowing or forcing the installation of a suitable security agent on a workstation. Such means may comprise means for obliging the workstation which has transmitted data packets) which do not contain a marker indicating that a suitable security agent is installed therein, to install a suitable security agent, which may be means for automatically installing the security agent on the workstation, or means for carrying out the installation interactively in cooperation with the user of the workstation.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention there are provided means for returning to the workstation a packet containing an HTML
PAGE comprising installation information for the security agent. Thus, according to this particular embodiment of the invention the workstation is connected through a link provided to it by the gateway, to a distant server which guides it in the installation procedure, and which provides the required information and software. In a preferred embodiment of the invention the installation is effected after comparing the identity of the workstation and/or of the user with the security level to be allocated to it/him, and selection of the suitable security agent and security policy data to be installed in the workstation.
Other advantages and objects of the invention will become apparent as the description proceeds.
Brief Description of the Drawings Fig. 1 is a schematic representation of a security policy enforcement process, according to a preferred embodiment of the invention; and Fig. 2 further illustrates the various elements of a system according to one preferred embodiment of the invention, and the relationship between them.
Detailed Description of Preferred Embodiments The method of the invention operates together with the system of IL
120420 for selectively preventing the downloading and execution of undesired Executable Objects in a computer which, briefly, operates according to the following steps:
(a) providing one or more Control Centers, each connected to one or more gateways located between a LAN and an external computer communication network;
(b) providing means coupled to each of said gateways, to detect Executable Objects reaching said gateway, to analyze the header of each of said Executable Objects, and to determine the resources of the computer that the Executable Object needs to utilize;
(c) providing means coupled to each of said gateways, to store a user's Security Policy representing the resources, or combination of resources, that the user allows or does not allow an Executable Object to utilize within its LAN, wherein the Security Policy is received from and/or stored in each of said one or more Control Centers;
(d) when an Executable Object is detected at the gateway:
1. analyzing the header of said Executable Object;
2. determining the resources of the computer that the Executable Object needs to utilize;
3. comparing the resources of the computer that the Executable Object needs to utilize with the Security Policy and;
(i) if the resources of the computer that the Executable Object needs to utilize are included in the list of the resources allowed for use by the Security Policy, allowing the Executable Object to pass through the gateway and to reach the computer which has initiated its downloading; and (ii) if the resources of the computer that the Executable Object needs to utilize are included in the list of the resources prohibited for use by the Security Policy, preventing the Executable Object from passing through the gateway, thereby preventing it from reaching the computer which has initiated its downloading.
A Control Center (CC) may be a central control unit, e.g., a PC or other computer, which is connected to a plurality of gateways, and which updates the memory means containing relevant date, e.g., the Security Policy. As will be understood from the description to follow, once the CC is updated, e.g., by the addition of an additional limitation to the Security Policy, all gateways are updated at once. The use of the CC to control the operation of the security elements of the gateways obviates the need (which exists in prior art systems) to update each gateway every time that a change in policy is made.
A LAN (Local Area Network) may be (but is not limited to), e.g., a network of computers located in an office or building. The LAN is typically connected to outside communications networks, such as the World Wide Web, or to more limited LANs, e.g., of a client or supplier, through one or more gateways. The larger the organization, the larger the number of gateways employed, in order to keep communications at a reasonable speed.
Generally speaking, a LAN can also be made of a plurality of smaller LANs, located geographically nearby or far apart, but even if small LANs are found within the same organization, the security requirements may vary from one department to the other, and it may be necessary to keep high security levels, including preventing Executables from migrating from one department to the other, even within the same organization.
The means coupled to each of said gateways, to detect Executable Objects reaching said gateway, to analyze the header of each of said Executable Objects, and to determine the resources of the computer that the Executable Object needs to utilize may be of many different types.
Typically, the executable object is "trapped" and analyzed at the gateway by listening on the communication line to the communication protocols, such as the TCP/IP, NETBUI, IPX/SPX, or others, as well as to the object transfer protocols, such as SMTP, HTTP, FTP, NMTP, IMAP, etc. Hooking into the communication line and extracting the contents of the header of the executable object are steps which are understood by the skilled person, and which can be effected by means of conventional programming, and they are therefore not described herein in detail, for the sake of brevity.
Once the header of the Executable Object (EO) has been analyzed, comparing the resources of the computer that the EO needs to utilize with the Security Policy can be easily done, e.g., by comparing them with a look-up table provided to the gateway by the CC, which represents the Security Policy. Comparison can also be carried out against the data stored in the CC, and in such a case specific memory means and comparing means may not be necessary in the gateway. However, speed and performance considerations will often dictate that such operations be carried out at the gateway itself.
The gateway must be installed in each Internet server within the organization. It comprises a small real time database which contains all the relevant operational information for the gateway. The gateway "listens" to the data being transferred between the enterprise and the Internet. It knows when an object is coming into the LAN, it analyzes it and compares it with the Security Policy to decide what action is to be taken.
According to a preferred embodiment of IL 120420, as stated, if the resources of the computer that the Executable Object needs to utilize are included in the list of the resources allowed for use by the Security Policy, no steps are taken by the system to prevent the Executable Object from passing through the gateway and reaching the computer which has initiated its downloading. However, if the resources of the computer that the Executable Object needs to utilize are included in the list of the resources prohibited for use by the Security Policy, steps will be taken to prevent the Executable Object from passing through the gateway. Such steps may include, e.g., re-routing the executable to a destination outside the gateway, canceling or garbling part of it, so as to make it inoperative, etc.
The method is not limited to any specific EO. Illustrative examples of EO's include, inter alia, Java Applets, Active-X, OCX, Win32 Executables, DLLs, or the like executable objects. However, as will be apparent to the skilled person, EO's are constantly developed, and the actual nature of the EO is not of critical importance.
Many other features and advantages of the system are described in detail in the specification of IL 120420 which, as stated, is incorporated herein by reference.
According to the present invention there is provided the process according to which the user is obliged to install a security agent according to the security policy of the organization, whenever he attempts to connect to a server via the gateway. The gateway maybe any of a plurality of gateways existing in the organization.
The system operates as follows: whenever a user attempts to connect to a server, in order to access a target server on the Internet or in an intranet, a "connect process" is effected in which a first packet a is sent from the station to the target server, which packet does not contain data.
According to the present invention private information is introduced into said first packet, which private information is termed hereinafter "Marking Information", which marking information indicates that an agent is present on the workstation that is attempting to connect. In other words, whenever the communication process is started by the user, if a security agent is present on the workstation, said security agent will modify the first packet so as to introduce marking information indicative of the fact that the agent is installed on the workstation. If no security agent is installed on the workstation, the first packet sent by the workstation during the connect process will be empty, or at least will not comprise any marking information indicative of the presence of a suitable security agent on the workstation. By means of the marking information the gateway, which is responsible for carrying out the security policy of the organization, will be alerted of the fact that a workstation on which no security agent has been installed is attempting to connect to a server outside of the Organization, or outside a segment of the Organization for which enforcement of the security policy is required.
This process is further illustrated in Fig. 1. In the figure, the operation of the gateway is schematically illustrated. The gateway, which receives all incoming and outgoing data packets, receives a first packet sent by a given workstation, and analyzes it. The gateway checks whether the first packet contains marking data, as defined above. If suitable marking data are found by the gateway, the gateway removes the marking data from the packet before allowing it to pass to its destination, so as not to interfere with any analysis made on the packet at the receiving end. The gateway then allows the workstation to connect to its destination.
If a gateway cannot detect marking data in the first packet, it does not allow the workstation to connect to its destination and, in place of connecting it to its desired destination, it returns to the workstation a link to a distant server, which server contains the required software for performing a forced installation of a security agent on the specific workstation. Forced installation of a software, such as the security agent, can be effected in a variety of ways, which are apparent to the skilled person, and which are therefore not describe herein in detail, for the sake of brevity. Such installation maybe carried out using programs written in the Java language, in any other suitable way, or even interactively with the user, by advising him that he will not be allowed to connect through the gateway unless he performs specific required operations which will lead to the installation of the desired security agent on his workstation.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the connection of the user to the server which will perform the installation of the security agent on the user's workstation, or from which the user will carry out the installation following instructions given to him, is effected by allowing the empty packet sent by the user to the gateway (viz., the first packet which does not contain marking information) to reach the destination server, and, when a response packet is received from the destination server, addressed to the user, the gateway replaces it with a packet which contains an a HTTP PAGE, which contains the information for the installation of the security agent.
Of course, additional procedures can be used in order to obtain the same result. For instance, a less convenient, more primitive - but still effective, procedure comprises analyzing the first packet at the gateway, as explained above, and then returning to the user or to the security administrator just a notification that his workstation is not allowed to connect through the gateway, because no security agent is installed thereon. Such notification may include information as to where, or from whom, the software needed for installing the security agent may be obtained. While this is a less convenient, more lengthy and time-consuming procedure, as it will be apparent to the skilled person, it is nonetheless as effective as any other more advanced installation procedure, for the purposes of maintaining security, and observing the security policy of the organization.
According to another preferred embodiment of invention, an analysis of the identity of the workstation and/or of the user is also effected by the gateway and/or by the distant server, to determine the security policy that applies to him. This is important in organizations which apply differentiated security policies, e.g., where different departments, or different individuals or levels within a departments, are assigned different security policies. Such a step is of course not necessary if the entire organization employs a uniform security policy.
Looking now at Fig. 2, three security levels of a system according to a preferred embodiment of the invention are illustrated. Box "A" is the management applications block, which contains the Control Center which controls all security operations of the system. The Control Center is connected to management modules, such as the Policy Manager, which contains data on the security policy of the system for the various gateways, users, etc., or the Audit Viewer, which permits an operator to view the operation of the system in real time, or any other utility which it may be desired to operate at the Control Center level (schematically indicated in the figure as the ". . ." box.
WO 99/29082 PC'T/IL98/00084 The Control Center is connected on the one hand to the Distribution Server, and on the other hand to one or more gateways (one gateway only being shown in the figure, for the sake of simplicity), The Distribution Server, which belongs to the management application block, is connected to the Control Center via TCP/IP (or packet level) connections, and has the function of providing operating information and data for the security agent operating at the workstation level. The Agent (box C) is logically connected, as said, on the one hand to the Distribution Server, and on the other hand to the gateway, which is provided with Gateway Level security applications (block B), which take care of the security operations which are carried out at the gateway itself, as explained above.
All the above description of preferred embodiments has been provided for the sake of illustration, and is not intended to limit the invention in any way, except as defined by the claims. Many modifications may be effected in the invention. For instance, many different markings can be provided to indicate that a security agent is installed on a given workstation, different types of analyses can be carried out by or at the gateway, or by different agents coupled to the gateway, and many different means and methods for effecting the installation of the security agent in a workstation can be provided, all without exceeding the scope of the invention.
Claims (14)
1. A method for enforcing a security policy for selectively preventing the downloading and execution of undesired Executable Objects in an individual workstation, comprising the steps of:
(1) providing a security agent suitable to be installed in an individual workstation, said security agent being provided with means for introducing at least one marker in one or more data packet transmitted by a workstation to a server through a gateway, said at least one marker indicating that a security agent is installed in the transmitting workstation;
(2) providing means in or coupled to the gateway for analyzing the first one or more data packet(s) received from a transmitting workstation initiating communication to a remote server, to determine whether said first one or more data packet(s) comprise at least one marker indicating that a suitable security agent is installed in the transmitting workstation;
(3) If at least one marker indicating that a suitable security agent is installed in the transmitting workstation is detected in said first one or more data packet(s), deleting said marker(s) from said first one or more data packet(s), and allowing said data packet(s) to be transmitted to their destination; and (4) If no marker indicating that a suitable security agent is installed in the transmitting workstation is detected in said first one or more data packet(s), preventing any data packet(s) received from the server to which the workstation is connected from being transmitted to the workstation.
(1) providing a security agent suitable to be installed in an individual workstation, said security agent being provided with means for introducing at least one marker in one or more data packet transmitted by a workstation to a server through a gateway, said at least one marker indicating that a security agent is installed in the transmitting workstation;
(2) providing means in or coupled to the gateway for analyzing the first one or more data packet(s) received from a transmitting workstation initiating communication to a remote server, to determine whether said first one or more data packet(s) comprise at least one marker indicating that a suitable security agent is installed in the transmitting workstation;
(3) If at least one marker indicating that a suitable security agent is installed in the transmitting workstation is detected in said first one or more data packet(s), deleting said marker(s) from said first one or more data packet(s), and allowing said data packet(s) to be transmitted to their destination; and (4) If no marker indicating that a suitable security agent is installed in the transmitting workstation is detected in said first one or more data packet(s), preventing any data packet(s) received from the server to which the workstation is connected from being transmitted to the workstation.
2. A method according to claim 1, further comprising the step of obliging the workstation which has transmitted data packets) which do not contain a marker indicating that a suitable security agent is installed therein, to install a suitable security agent.
3. A method according to claim 2, wherein installation is carried out automatically by the system.
4. A method according to claim 2, wherein the installation is carried out interactively in cooperation with the user of the workstation.
5. A method according to claim 2 or 3, wherein a packet is returned to the workstation by the gateway or by means coupled to it, containing an HTML PAGE comprising installation information for the security agent.
6. A method according to any one of claims 2 to 5, further comprising comparing the identity of the workstation and/or of the user with the security level to be allocated to it/him, and selecting the suitable security agent and security policy data to be installed in the workstation.
7. A system for enforcing a security policy for selectively preventing the downloading and execution of undesired Executable Objects in an individual workstation, comprising:
A. A security agent suitable to be installed in an individual workstation, said security agent being provided with means for introducing at least one marker in one or more data packet transmitted by a workstation to a server through a gateway, said at least one marker indicating that a security agent is installed in the transmitting workstation;
B. Gateway means for controlling the communication traffic of a plurality of workstations with the Internet or an intranet;
C. Detection means provided in, or coupled to said gateway for analyzing the first one or more data packet(s) received from a transmitting workstation initiating communication to a remote server, to determine whether said first one or more data packet(s) comprise at least one marker indicating that a suitable security agent is installed in the transmitting workstation;
D. Means for deleting said marker(s) from said first one or more data packet(s), and for allowing said data packet(s) to be transmitted to their destination, if at least one marker indicating that a suitable security agent is installed in the transmitting workstation is detected by said detection means in said first one or more data packet(s); and E. Means for preventing any data packet(s) received from the server to which the workstation is connected from being transmitted to the workstation if no marker indicating that a suitable security agent is installed in the transmitting workstation is detected by said detection means in said first one or more data packet(s).
A. A security agent suitable to be installed in an individual workstation, said security agent being provided with means for introducing at least one marker in one or more data packet transmitted by a workstation to a server through a gateway, said at least one marker indicating that a security agent is installed in the transmitting workstation;
B. Gateway means for controlling the communication traffic of a plurality of workstations with the Internet or an intranet;
C. Detection means provided in, or coupled to said gateway for analyzing the first one or more data packet(s) received from a transmitting workstation initiating communication to a remote server, to determine whether said first one or more data packet(s) comprise at least one marker indicating that a suitable security agent is installed in the transmitting workstation;
D. Means for deleting said marker(s) from said first one or more data packet(s), and for allowing said data packet(s) to be transmitted to their destination, if at least one marker indicating that a suitable security agent is installed in the transmitting workstation is detected by said detection means in said first one or more data packet(s); and E. Means for preventing any data packet(s) received from the server to which the workstation is connected from being transmitted to the workstation if no marker indicating that a suitable security agent is installed in the transmitting workstation is detected by said detection means in said first one or more data packet(s).
8. A system according to claim 7, further comprising means for allowing or forcing the installation of a suitable security agent on a workstation.
9. A system according to claim 8, further comprising means for obliging the workstation which has transmitted data packet(s) which do not contain a marker indicating that a suitable security agent is installed therein, to install a suitable security agent.
10. A system according to claim 8, comprising means for automatically installing the security agent on the workstation.
11. A system according to claim 8, comprising means for carrying out the installation interactively in cooperation with the user of the workstation.
12. A system according to claim 7 or 8, comprising means for returning to the workstation a packet containing an HTML PAGE comprising installation information for the security agent.
13. A system according to any one of claims 8 to 12, further comprising means for comparing the identity of the workstation and/or of the user with the security level to be allocated to it/him, and for selecting the suitable security agent and security policy data to be installed in the workstation.
14. A method for enforcing a security policy for selectively preventing the downloading and execution of undesired Executable Objects in an individual workstation, substantially as described and illustrated.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
IL12231497A IL122314A (en) | 1997-11-27 | 1997-11-27 | Method and system for enforcing a communication security policy |
IL122314 | 1997-11-27 | ||
PCT/IL1998/000084 WO1999029082A1 (en) | 1997-11-27 | 1998-02-23 | Method and system for enforcing a communication security policy |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2312061A1 true CA2312061A1 (en) | 1999-06-10 |
Family
ID=11070898
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA002312061A Abandoned CA2312061A1 (en) | 1997-11-27 | 1998-02-23 | Method and system for enforcing a communication security policy |
Country Status (13)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (3) | US6098173A (en) |
EP (1) | EP1034646B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2001525585A (en) |
KR (1) | KR20010024658A (en) |
CN (1) | CN1119003C (en) |
AT (1) | ATE268967T1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU757668B2 (en) |
BR (1) | BR9815066A (en) |
CA (1) | CA2312061A1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE69824444T2 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2223121T3 (en) |
IL (2) | IL122314A (en) |
WO (1) | WO1999029082A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (104)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
IL120420A (en) | 1997-03-10 | 1999-12-31 | Security 7 Software Ltd | Method and system for preventing the downloading and execution of executable objects |
US6317868B1 (en) * | 1997-10-24 | 2001-11-13 | University Of Washington | Process for transparently enforcing protection domains and access control as well as auditing operations in software components |
IL122314A (en) * | 1997-11-27 | 2001-03-19 | Security 7 Software Ltd | Method and system for enforcing a communication security policy |
US7673323B1 (en) | 1998-10-28 | 2010-03-02 | Bea Systems, Inc. | System and method for maintaining security in a distributed computer network |
US6158010A (en) | 1998-10-28 | 2000-12-05 | Crosslogix, Inc. | System and method for maintaining security in a distributed computer network |
US7181486B1 (en) | 1998-12-07 | 2007-02-20 | Network Ice Corporation | Method and apparatus for remote installation of network drivers and software |
WO2000034867A1 (en) | 1998-12-09 | 2000-06-15 | Network Ice Corporation | A method and apparatus for providing network and computer system security |
JP2000347866A (en) * | 1999-06-04 | 2000-12-15 | Nec Corp | Decentralized system and unit and method for access control, and recording medium where program for access control is recorded |
US7346929B1 (en) | 1999-07-29 | 2008-03-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for auditing network security |
US8006243B2 (en) | 1999-12-07 | 2011-08-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for remote installation of network drivers and software |
US6405319B1 (en) * | 2000-01-27 | 2002-06-11 | Buildpoint Corporation | Verification system for information transfers over a computer network |
AU2001262958A1 (en) | 2000-04-28 | 2001-11-12 | Internet Security Systems, Inc. | Method and system for managing computer security information |
US7921459B2 (en) | 2000-04-28 | 2011-04-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for managing security events on a network |
US6907531B1 (en) | 2000-06-30 | 2005-06-14 | Internet Security Systems, Inc. | Method and system for identifying, fixing, and updating security vulnerabilities |
US7093239B1 (en) * | 2000-07-14 | 2006-08-15 | Internet Security Systems, Inc. | Computer immune system and method for detecting unwanted code in a computer system |
US7051069B2 (en) * | 2000-09-28 | 2006-05-23 | Bea Systems, Inc. | System for managing logical process flow in an online environment |
US9027121B2 (en) | 2000-10-10 | 2015-05-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for creating a record for one or more computer security incidents |
KR100609263B1 (en) * | 2001-01-17 | 2006-08-04 | 콘텐트가드 홀딩즈 인코포레이티드 | System and method for digital rights management using a standard rendering engine |
US20020147803A1 (en) | 2001-01-31 | 2002-10-10 | Dodd Timothy David | Method and system for calculating risk in association with a security audit of a computer network |
EP1233333A1 (en) * | 2001-02-19 | 2002-08-21 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Process for executing a downloadable service receiving restrictive access rights to al least one profile file |
US20030041050A1 (en) * | 2001-04-16 | 2003-02-27 | Greg Smith | System and method for web-based marketing and campaign management |
US7499948B2 (en) | 2001-04-16 | 2009-03-03 | Bea Systems, Inc. | System and method for web-based personalization and ecommerce management |
US7562388B2 (en) * | 2001-05-31 | 2009-07-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for implementing security devices in a network |
US7392546B2 (en) | 2001-06-11 | 2008-06-24 | Bea Systems, Inc. | System and method for server security and entitlement processing |
US7657419B2 (en) | 2001-06-19 | 2010-02-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Analytical virtual machine |
US20040107360A1 (en) * | 2002-12-02 | 2004-06-03 | Zone Labs, Inc. | System and Methodology for Policy Enforcement |
US7546629B2 (en) * | 2002-03-06 | 2009-06-09 | Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. | System and methodology for security policy arbitration |
US7590684B2 (en) * | 2001-07-06 | 2009-09-15 | Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. | System providing methodology for access control with cooperative enforcement |
KR20030016733A (en) * | 2001-08-21 | 2003-03-03 | 아르파(주) | Method of protecting dynamic service in the telecommunication system |
KR100430611B1 (en) * | 2001-08-21 | 2004-05-10 | 와이더덴닷컴 주식회사 | A securing method for communication protocol |
US7367014B2 (en) * | 2001-10-24 | 2008-04-29 | Bea Systems, Inc. | System and method for XML data representation of portlets |
US20030126464A1 (en) * | 2001-12-04 | 2003-07-03 | Mcdaniel Patrick D. | Method and system for determining and enforcing security policy in a communication session |
US7350226B2 (en) * | 2001-12-13 | 2008-03-25 | Bea Systems, Inc. | System and method for analyzing security policies in a distributed computer network |
WO2003058451A1 (en) | 2002-01-04 | 2003-07-17 | Internet Security Systems, Inc. | System and method for the managed security control of processes on a computer system |
KR100432236B1 (en) * | 2002-01-28 | 2004-05-22 | 김미희주 | Objected oriented information security system providing integrated control and management functions |
AU2003239326A1 (en) | 2002-05-01 | 2003-11-17 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Enterprise application platform |
US7725560B2 (en) | 2002-05-01 | 2010-05-25 | Bea Systems Inc. | Web service-enabled portlet wizard |
US20040010598A1 (en) * | 2002-05-01 | 2004-01-15 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Portal setup wizard |
JP4786116B2 (en) * | 2002-09-06 | 2011-10-05 | ソニー株式会社 | Information processing apparatus and method, and program |
US6850943B2 (en) * | 2002-10-18 | 2005-02-01 | Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. | Security system and methodology for providing indirect access control |
KR100484488B1 (en) * | 2002-10-31 | 2005-04-20 | 한국전자통신연구원 | A method and system for the security service in the internet service provider network including distributed network resources |
KR20040038168A (en) * | 2002-10-31 | 2004-05-08 | 한국전자통신연구원 | The method and system of internet security service by using packet marking |
US7913303B1 (en) | 2003-01-21 | 2011-03-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for dynamically protecting a computer system from attack |
US6917975B2 (en) * | 2003-02-14 | 2005-07-12 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Method for role and resource policy management |
US7653930B2 (en) | 2003-02-14 | 2010-01-26 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Method for role and resource policy management optimization |
US7591000B2 (en) | 2003-02-14 | 2009-09-15 | Oracle International Corporation | System and method for hierarchical role-based entitlements |
US20040167871A1 (en) * | 2003-02-20 | 2004-08-26 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Content mining for virtual content repositories |
US7562298B2 (en) | 2003-02-20 | 2009-07-14 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Virtual content repository browser |
US20040167880A1 (en) * | 2003-02-20 | 2004-08-26 | Bea Systems, Inc. | System and method for searching a virtual repository content |
US7293286B2 (en) | 2003-02-20 | 2007-11-06 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Federated management of content repositories |
US7840614B2 (en) | 2003-02-20 | 2010-11-23 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Virtual content repository application program interface |
US7483904B2 (en) * | 2003-02-20 | 2009-01-27 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Virtual repository content model |
US7415478B2 (en) | 2003-02-20 | 2008-08-19 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Virtual repository complex content model |
US20040230557A1 (en) * | 2003-02-28 | 2004-11-18 | Bales Christopher E. | Systems and methods for context-sensitive editing |
US20040230917A1 (en) * | 2003-02-28 | 2004-11-18 | Bales Christopher E. | Systems and methods for navigating a graphical hierarchy |
US7810036B2 (en) | 2003-02-28 | 2010-10-05 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for personalizing a portal |
US8136155B2 (en) * | 2003-04-01 | 2012-03-13 | Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. | Security system with methodology for interprocess communication control |
KR100479345B1 (en) * | 2003-05-06 | 2005-03-31 | 한국전자통신연구원 | Method and apparatus for network security and management |
US7788726B2 (en) * | 2003-07-02 | 2010-08-31 | Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. | System and methodology providing information lockbox |
US20050097352A1 (en) * | 2003-10-10 | 2005-05-05 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Embeddable security service module |
US20050262362A1 (en) * | 2003-10-10 | 2005-11-24 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Distributed security system policies |
US20050097353A1 (en) * | 2003-10-10 | 2005-05-05 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Policy analysis tool |
US20050102535A1 (en) | 2003-10-10 | 2005-05-12 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Distributed security system with security service providers |
US7644432B2 (en) | 2003-10-10 | 2010-01-05 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Policy inheritance through nested groups |
US7657938B2 (en) | 2003-10-28 | 2010-02-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for protecting computer networks by altering unwanted network data traffic |
US20050188295A1 (en) * | 2004-02-25 | 2005-08-25 | Loren Konkus | Systems and methods for an extensible administration tool |
US7774601B2 (en) | 2004-04-06 | 2010-08-10 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Method for delegated administration |
US7236990B2 (en) * | 2004-04-13 | 2007-06-26 | Bea Systems, Inc. | System and method for information lifecycle workflow integration |
US7475091B2 (en) * | 2004-04-13 | 2009-01-06 | Bea Systems, Inc. | System and method for viewing a virtual content repository |
US7236975B2 (en) * | 2004-04-13 | 2007-06-26 | Bea Systems, Inc. | System and method for controlling access to anode in a virtual content repository that integrates a plurality of content repositories |
US7236989B2 (en) | 2004-04-13 | 2007-06-26 | Bea Systems, Inc. | System and method for providing lifecycles for custom content in a virtual content repository |
US20050228816A1 (en) * | 2004-04-13 | 2005-10-13 | Bea Systems, Inc. | System and method for content type versions |
US7240076B2 (en) * | 2004-04-13 | 2007-07-03 | Bea Systems, Inc. | System and method for providing a lifecycle for information in a virtual content repository |
US20050240714A1 (en) * | 2004-04-13 | 2005-10-27 | Bea Systems, Inc. | System and method for virtual content repository deployment |
US20050228784A1 (en) * | 2004-04-13 | 2005-10-13 | Bea Systems, Inc. | System and method for batch operations in a virtual content repository |
US7580953B2 (en) * | 2004-04-13 | 2009-08-25 | Bea Systems, Inc. | System and method for schema lifecycles in a virtual content repository that integrates a plurality of content repositories |
US7246138B2 (en) * | 2004-04-13 | 2007-07-17 | Bea Systems, Inc. | System and method for content lifecycles in a virtual content repository that integrates a plurality of content repositories |
US7540013B2 (en) * | 2004-06-07 | 2009-05-26 | Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. | System and methodology for protecting new computers by applying a preconfigured security update policy |
FR2872983A1 (en) * | 2004-07-09 | 2006-01-13 | Thomson Licensing Sa | FIREWALL PROTECTION SYSTEM FOR A COMMUNITY OF APPLIANCES, APPARATUS PARTICIPATING IN THE SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR UPDATING FIREWALL RULES WITHIN THE SYSTEM |
US20060059551A1 (en) * | 2004-09-13 | 2006-03-16 | Utstarcom Inc. | Dynamic firewall capabilities for wireless access gateways |
US20060203815A1 (en) * | 2005-03-10 | 2006-09-14 | Alain Couillard | Compliance verification and OSI layer 2 connection of device using said compliance verification |
US7752205B2 (en) * | 2005-09-26 | 2010-07-06 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Method and system for interacting with a virtual content repository |
US7483893B2 (en) | 2005-09-26 | 2009-01-27 | Bae Systems, Inc. | System and method for lightweight loading for managing content |
US7953734B2 (en) | 2005-09-26 | 2011-05-31 | Oracle International Corporation | System and method for providing SPI extensions for content management system |
US7917537B2 (en) | 2005-09-26 | 2011-03-29 | Oracle International Corporation | System and method for providing link property types for content management |
US7818344B2 (en) | 2005-09-26 | 2010-10-19 | Bea Systems, Inc. | System and method for providing nested types for content management |
US7581004B2 (en) * | 2006-02-15 | 2009-08-25 | Gabriel Jakobson | System and method for alerting on open file-share sessions on a user's electronic device |
US7725922B2 (en) * | 2006-03-21 | 2010-05-25 | Novell, Inc. | System and method for using sandboxes in a managed shell |
US7743414B2 (en) * | 2006-05-26 | 2010-06-22 | Novell, Inc. | System and method for executing a permissions recorder analyzer |
US7805707B2 (en) * | 2006-07-21 | 2010-09-28 | Novell, Inc. | System and method for preparing runtime checks |
US7739735B2 (en) * | 2006-07-26 | 2010-06-15 | Novell, Inc. | System and method for dynamic optimizations using security assertions |
US7856654B2 (en) * | 2006-08-11 | 2010-12-21 | Novell, Inc. | System and method for network permissions evaluation |
US7823186B2 (en) * | 2006-08-24 | 2010-10-26 | Novell, Inc. | System and method for applying security policies on multiple assembly caches |
US8984579B2 (en) * | 2006-09-19 | 2015-03-17 | The Innovation Science Fund I, LLC | Evaluation systems and methods for coordinating software agents |
US8627402B2 (en) * | 2006-09-19 | 2014-01-07 | The Invention Science Fund I, Llc | Evaluation systems and methods for coordinating software agents |
US8607336B2 (en) * | 2006-09-19 | 2013-12-10 | The Invention Science Fund I, Llc | Evaluation systems and methods for coordinating software agents |
US8601530B2 (en) * | 2006-09-19 | 2013-12-03 | The Invention Science Fund I, Llc | Evaluation systems and methods for coordinating software agents |
US7730478B2 (en) * | 2006-10-04 | 2010-06-01 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Method and system for allowing access to developed applications via a multi-tenant on-demand database service |
US8463852B2 (en) | 2006-10-06 | 2013-06-11 | Oracle International Corporation | Groupware portlets for integrating a portal with groupware systems |
US8195939B2 (en) | 2007-01-12 | 2012-06-05 | Sap Ag | Systems and methods for protecting sensitive data |
US8887249B1 (en) * | 2008-05-28 | 2014-11-11 | Zscaler, Inc. | Protecting against denial of service attacks using guard tables |
US8302189B2 (en) * | 2009-11-30 | 2012-10-30 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Methods, devices, systems, and computer program products for edge driven communications network security monitoring |
EP2656577B1 (en) * | 2010-12-23 | 2019-02-27 | Koninklijke KPN N.V. | Method, computer-readable medium, gateway device, and network system for configuring a device in a local area network |
US9560078B2 (en) * | 2015-02-04 | 2017-01-31 | Intel Corporation | Technologies for scalable security architecture of virtualized networks |
Family Cites Families (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5699513A (en) * | 1995-03-31 | 1997-12-16 | Motorola, Inc. | Method for secure network access via message intercept |
US5757914A (en) * | 1995-10-26 | 1998-05-26 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | System and method for protecting use of dynamically linked executable modules |
US5680461A (en) * | 1995-10-26 | 1997-10-21 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Secure network protocol system and method |
US5692047A (en) * | 1995-12-08 | 1997-11-25 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | System and method for executing verifiable programs with facility for using non-verifiable programs from trusted sources |
US5928323A (en) * | 1996-05-30 | 1999-07-27 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Apparatus and method for dynamically generating information with server-side software objects |
US5903732A (en) * | 1996-07-03 | 1999-05-11 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Trusted gateway agent for web server programs |
IL120420A (en) * | 1997-03-10 | 1999-12-31 | Security 7 Software Ltd | Method and system for preventing the downloading and execution of executable objects |
US6282581B1 (en) * | 1997-03-27 | 2001-08-28 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Mechanism for resource allocation and for dispatching incoming calls in a distributed object environment |
US5974549A (en) * | 1997-03-27 | 1999-10-26 | Soliton Ltd. | Security monitor |
US5940590A (en) * | 1997-05-31 | 1999-08-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for securing computer-executable program code using task gates |
US5983348A (en) * | 1997-09-10 | 1999-11-09 | Trend Micro Incorporated | Computer network malicious code scanner |
US6317868B1 (en) * | 1997-10-24 | 2001-11-13 | University Of Washington | Process for transparently enforcing protection domains and access control as well as auditing operations in software components |
IL122314A (en) * | 1997-11-27 | 2001-03-19 | Security 7 Software Ltd | Method and system for enforcing a communication security policy |
EP1119813A1 (en) * | 1998-09-28 | 2001-08-01 | Argus Systems Group, Inc. | Trusted compartmentalized computer operating system |
US6219706B1 (en) * | 1998-10-16 | 2001-04-17 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Access control for networks |
US6405319B1 (en) * | 2000-01-27 | 2002-06-11 | Buildpoint Corporation | Verification system for information transfers over a computer network |
US20030126464A1 (en) * | 2001-12-04 | 2003-07-03 | Mcdaniel Patrick D. | Method and system for determining and enforcing security policy in a communication session |
-
1997
- 1997-11-27 IL IL12231497A patent/IL122314A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
-
1998
- 1998-02-23 DE DE69824444T patent/DE69824444T2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-02-23 CA CA002312061A patent/CA2312061A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 1998-02-23 CN CN98811601A patent/CN1119003C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1998-02-23 ES ES98904352T patent/ES2223121T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-02-23 AT AT98904352T patent/ATE268967T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1998-02-23 BR BR9815066-9A patent/BR9815066A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1998-02-23 AU AU62277/98A patent/AU757668B2/en not_active Ceased
- 1998-02-23 KR KR1020007005470A patent/KR20010024658A/en active IP Right Grant
- 1998-02-23 WO PCT/IL1998/000084 patent/WO1999029082A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1998-02-23 EP EP98904352A patent/EP1034646B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-02-23 JP JP2000523788A patent/JP2001525585A/en active Pending
- 1998-11-03 US US09/184,871 patent/US6098173A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2000
- 2000-07-26 US US09/625,927 patent/US6553498B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2000-12-07 IL IL14016100A patent/IL140161A0/en unknown
-
2003
- 2003-03-14 US US10/388,727 patent/US7305703B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP1034646A1 (en) | 2000-09-13 |
AU6227798A (en) | 1999-06-16 |
KR20010024658A (en) | 2001-03-26 |
US6098173A (en) | 2000-08-01 |
AU757668B2 (en) | 2003-02-27 |
IL122314A (en) | 2001-03-19 |
EP1034646B1 (en) | 2004-06-09 |
BR9815066A (en) | 2000-10-03 |
IL140161A0 (en) | 2002-02-10 |
CN1280733A (en) | 2001-01-17 |
DE69824444T2 (en) | 2005-06-23 |
ES2223121T3 (en) | 2005-02-16 |
US7305703B2 (en) | 2007-12-04 |
ATE268967T1 (en) | 2004-06-15 |
JP2001525585A (en) | 2001-12-11 |
US6553498B1 (en) | 2003-04-22 |
DE69824444D1 (en) | 2004-07-15 |
CN1119003C (en) | 2003-08-20 |
US20030177355A1 (en) | 2003-09-18 |
WO1999029082A1 (en) | 1999-06-10 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1034646B1 (en) | Method and system for enforcing a communication security policy | |
EP0966821B1 (en) | Method and system for preventing downloading and execution of executable objects | |
EP1018254B1 (en) | Method and system for the identification and the suppression of executable objects | |
CA2138058C (en) | Method for controlling computer network security | |
US7882229B2 (en) | Security checking program for communication between networks | |
US8990696B2 (en) | Geographical vulnerability mitgation response mapping system | |
KR100439177B1 (en) | Method for representing, storing and editing network security policy | |
US20120159626A1 (en) | Geographical intrusion response prioritization mapping system | |
EP1121792B1 (en) | Method and system for the prevention of undesirable activities of executable objects | |
US20090158386A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for checking firewall policy | |
IL140161A (en) | Method and system for enforcing a communication security policy |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
EEER | Examination request | ||
FZDE | Discontinued |