CA2392675C - Database system and method - Google Patents
Database system and method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2392675C CA2392675C CA2392675A CA2392675A CA2392675C CA 2392675 C CA2392675 C CA 2392675C CA 2392675 A CA2392675 A CA 2392675A CA 2392675 A CA2392675 A CA 2392675A CA 2392675 C CA2392675 C CA 2392675C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- transformation
- data
- transformation object
- objects
- source
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
- G06F16/25—Integrating or interfacing systems involving database management systems
- G06F16/254—Extract, transform and load [ETL] procedures, e.g. ETL data flows in data warehouses
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
- G06F16/25—Integrating or interfacing systems involving database management systems
- G06F16/258—Data format conversion from or to a database
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S707/00—Data processing: database and file management or data structures
- Y10S707/99941—Database schema or data structure
- Y10S707/99942—Manipulating data structure, e.g. compression, compaction, compilation
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S707/00—Data processing: database and file management or data structures
- Y10S707/99941—Database schema or data structure
- Y10S707/99944—Object-oriented database structure
Abstract
A transformation description language (TDL) for specifying how data is to be manipulated in a data warehousing application. The TDL is comprised of a source for storing raw data, one or more transformation objects for processing the raw data according to predefined instructions, and a target for storing the processed data. A mapping is used for directing the data flow between the I/O ports corresponding to the source, the plurality of transformation objects, and the target. The mapping specifies the connectivity between the source, transformation, and target objects as well as the order of these connections. There are a number of different transformations which can be performed to manipulate the data. Some such transformations include: an aggregator transformation, an expression transformation, a filter transformation, a lookup transformation, a query transformation, a sequence transformation, a stored procedure transformation, and an update strategy transformation.
Description
DATABASE SYSTEM AND METHOD
FIELD
The present disclosure relates to database systems. More particularly, the present disclosure pertains to an apparatus and method for transforming data in data warehousing applications.
BACKGROUND
Due to the increased amounts of data being stored and processed today, operational databases are constructed, categorized, and formatted in a manner conducive for maximum throughput, access time, and storage capacity. Unfortunately, the raw data found in these operational databases often exist as rows and columns of numbers and code which appears bewildering and incomprehensible to business analysts and decision makers.
Furthermore; the scope and vastness of the raw data stored in modern databases renders it harder to analyze. Hence, applications were developed in an effort to help interpret, analyze, and compile the data so that it may be readily and easily understood by a business analyst. This is accomplished by mapping, sorting, and summarizing the raw data before it is presented for display. Thereby, individuals can now interpret the data and make key decisions based thereon.
FIELD
The present disclosure relates to database systems. More particularly, the present disclosure pertains to an apparatus and method for transforming data in data warehousing applications.
BACKGROUND
Due to the increased amounts of data being stored and processed today, operational databases are constructed, categorized, and formatted in a manner conducive for maximum throughput, access time, and storage capacity. Unfortunately, the raw data found in these operational databases often exist as rows and columns of numbers and code which appears bewildering and incomprehensible to business analysts and decision makers.
Furthermore; the scope and vastness of the raw data stored in modern databases renders it harder to analyze. Hence, applications were developed in an effort to help interpret, analyze, and compile the data so that it may be readily and easily understood by a business analyst. This is accomplished by mapping, sorting, and summarizing the raw data before it is presented for display. Thereby, individuals can now interpret the data and make key decisions based thereon.
Extracting raw data from one or more operational databases and transforming it into useful information is the function of data "warehouses"
and data "marts." In data warehouses and data marts, the data is structured to satisfy decision support roles rather than operational needs. Before the data is loaded into the data warehouse or data mart, the corresponding source data from an operational database is filtered to remove extraneous and erroneous records; cryptic and conflicting codes are resolved; raw data is translated into something more meaningful; and summary data that is useful for decision support, trend analysis or other end-user needs is pre-calculated.
In the end, the data warehouse is comprised of an analytical database containing data useful for decision support. A data mart is similar to a data warehouse, except that it contains a subset of corporate data for a single aspect of business, such as finance, sales, inventory, or human resources.
With data warehouses and data marts, useful information is retained at the disposal of the decision makers.
One major difficulty associated with implementing data warehouses and data marts relates to that of data transformation. A data transformation basically includes a sequence of operations that transform a set of input data into a set of output data. As a simple example, the total sum of revenues of all of the divisions of a company minus its operating costs and losses will result in the profit for that company. In this example, revenue for each division, company operating costs, and company losses are input data and the company profit is the output data, while the transformation is basically comprised of simple arithmetic operations. This example could become much more complex for a large company that offers numerous products and services in various regions and international markets. In such a case, the transformation is no longer a simple arithmetic formula, but becomes a complex network of data transformations (e.g., SQL-Structured Query Language expressions, arithmetic operations, and procedural functions) that define the process for how the input data from various sources flow into the desired results in one or more target databases.
Presently, the existing approaches for handling transformations for data warehousing applications can be classified into three categories: using procedural programming languages (e.g., C, C++, and COBOL); using SQL
expressions; or a combination of these two. Any of these three approaches, however, is primarily focused on capturing the low-level algorithmic behavior of transformations and does not by any means facilitate the definition and exchange of transformation metadata (i.e., data that describes how data is defined, organized, or processed). Furthermore, this was usually performed by a highly specialized software engineer who would design custom programs tailored to specific applications. Such programmers are relatively scarce and are in high demand. As such, even a simple task can be quite expensive. More complex data transformations are extremely costly to implement and time-consuming as well, especially given that most data transformations involve voluminous amounts of data that are viewed and interpreted differently by various analysts and decision-makers. In today's highly competitive marketplace, it is often crucial that the most recent information be made available to key individuals so that they can render informed decisions as promptly as possible.
Moreover, software vendors in the data warehousing domain often offer specialized tools for defining and storing transformation information in their products. Such tools are still geared towards algorithmic behavior of transformations and usually provide graphical user interfaces to facilitate the use of procedural languages and/or SQL for that purpose. Bur more significantly, the format in which such transformation information is represented and saved is system-specific and low-level such that exchanging this information with other similar software becomes extremely difficult and error-prone. Hence, data transformation software might work properly for one database, but might be incompatible with another database which contains critical data. Presently, the only high-level protocol used for describing and exchanging transformation information between different data warehousing software is limited to the definition of field-level transformations with SQL statements that include logical, arithmetic, and string operations.
Thus, there exists a strong need in the data warehousing industry for some formal mechanism for exchanging metadata as well as the need for a computer-parsable language that could concisely describe various characteristics of complex data transformation networks. The present invention offers a solution with the conception and creation of a Transformation Definition Language (TDL).
SUMMARY
The present disclosure pertains to a transformation description language (TDL) used for specifying.ow data is to be manipulated in a data warehousing application. The TDL is comprised of one or more sources for storing raw data, one or more transformation objects for processing the raw data according to predefined instructions, and one or more targets for storing the processed data. A mapping is used for directing the data flow between the I/O ports corresponding to the sources, the plurality of transformation objects, and the targets. The mapping specifies the connectivity between the sources, transformation, and target objects as well as the order of these connections. There are a number of different transformations which can be performed to manipulate the data. Some such transformations include: an aggregator transformation, an expression transformation, a filter transformation, a lookup transformation, a query transformation, a sequence transformation, a stored procedure transformation, and an update strategy transformation.
According to an aspect of the present invention there is provided a computer implemented method for transferring data having a first format from a first system to a second system having a second format, comprising the steps of:
identifying a set of source data having the first format stored on the first system;
storing a set of transformation objects including an aggregator transformation object, an expression transformation object, a filter transformation object, a lookup transformation object, a query transformation object, and a sequence transformation object which transform data according to the metadata corresponding to a particular 5a transformation object, wherein different transformation objects perform different, unique functions;
mapping data from the first system to one or more of the transformation objects;
transforming the data having the first format to the second format through at least one of the transformation objects; and exporting transformed data having the second format to the second system.
According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided a computer implemented method, comprising the steps of:
specifying at least one source system containing source data;
storing metadata corresponding to a plurality of transformation objects including an aggregator transformation object, an expression transformation object, a filter transformation object, a lookup transformation object, a query transformation object, and a sequence transformation object which transform data according to the metadata corresponding to a particular transformation object, wherein different transformation objects perform different, unique functions;
specifying a target system for storing transformed data;
selecting at least one of the transformation objects;
mapping data from the source system to a first selected transformation object;
transforming the data according to the metadata corresponding to the first selected transformation object;
mapping the transformed data from the first selected transformation object to the target system.
5b According to a further aspect of the present invention there is provided a transformation description language (TDL) for specifying how data is to be manipulated in a. data warehousing application, the TDL
comprising:
a source for storing raw data.;
a set of transformation objects for processing the raw data the set of transformation objects including an aggregator transformation object, an expression transformation object, a filter transformation object, a lookup transformation object, a query transformation object, and a sequence transformation object which transform data according to the metadata corresponding to a particular transformation object, wherein the transformation objects have corresponding metadata which defines how data is to be transformed and wherein different transformation objects perform different, unique functions; and a target for storing the processed data.
According to a further aspect of the present invention there is provided a computer system for transferring data having a first format from a first system to a second system having a second format, the system configured to:
identify a set of source data having the first format stored on the first system;
store a set of transformation objects including an aggregator transformation object, an expression transformation object, a filter transformation object, a lookup transformation object, a query transformation object, and a sequence transformation object which transform data according to metadata corresponding to a particular 5c transformation object, wherein different transformation objects perform different, unique functions;
map data from the first system to one or more of the transformation objects;
transform the data having the first format to the second format through at least one of the transformation objects; and export transformed data having the second format to the second system.
According to a further aspect of the present invention there is provided a computer system configured to:
specify at least one source system containing source data;
store metadata corresponding to a plurality of transformation objects including an aggregator transformation object, an expression transformation object, a filter transformation object, a lookup transformation object, a query transformation object, and a sequence transformation object which transform data according to the metadata corresponding to a particular transformation object, wherein different transformation objects perform different, unique functions;
specify a target system for storing transformed data;
select at least one of the transformation objects;
map data from the source system to a first selected transformation object;
transform the data according to the metadata corresponding to the first selected transformation object; and map the transformed data from the first selected transformation object to the target system.
and data "marts." In data warehouses and data marts, the data is structured to satisfy decision support roles rather than operational needs. Before the data is loaded into the data warehouse or data mart, the corresponding source data from an operational database is filtered to remove extraneous and erroneous records; cryptic and conflicting codes are resolved; raw data is translated into something more meaningful; and summary data that is useful for decision support, trend analysis or other end-user needs is pre-calculated.
In the end, the data warehouse is comprised of an analytical database containing data useful for decision support. A data mart is similar to a data warehouse, except that it contains a subset of corporate data for a single aspect of business, such as finance, sales, inventory, or human resources.
With data warehouses and data marts, useful information is retained at the disposal of the decision makers.
One major difficulty associated with implementing data warehouses and data marts relates to that of data transformation. A data transformation basically includes a sequence of operations that transform a set of input data into a set of output data. As a simple example, the total sum of revenues of all of the divisions of a company minus its operating costs and losses will result in the profit for that company. In this example, revenue for each division, company operating costs, and company losses are input data and the company profit is the output data, while the transformation is basically comprised of simple arithmetic operations. This example could become much more complex for a large company that offers numerous products and services in various regions and international markets. In such a case, the transformation is no longer a simple arithmetic formula, but becomes a complex network of data transformations (e.g., SQL-Structured Query Language expressions, arithmetic operations, and procedural functions) that define the process for how the input data from various sources flow into the desired results in one or more target databases.
Presently, the existing approaches for handling transformations for data warehousing applications can be classified into three categories: using procedural programming languages (e.g., C, C++, and COBOL); using SQL
expressions; or a combination of these two. Any of these three approaches, however, is primarily focused on capturing the low-level algorithmic behavior of transformations and does not by any means facilitate the definition and exchange of transformation metadata (i.e., data that describes how data is defined, organized, or processed). Furthermore, this was usually performed by a highly specialized software engineer who would design custom programs tailored to specific applications. Such programmers are relatively scarce and are in high demand. As such, even a simple task can be quite expensive. More complex data transformations are extremely costly to implement and time-consuming as well, especially given that most data transformations involve voluminous amounts of data that are viewed and interpreted differently by various analysts and decision-makers. In today's highly competitive marketplace, it is often crucial that the most recent information be made available to key individuals so that they can render informed decisions as promptly as possible.
Moreover, software vendors in the data warehousing domain often offer specialized tools for defining and storing transformation information in their products. Such tools are still geared towards algorithmic behavior of transformations and usually provide graphical user interfaces to facilitate the use of procedural languages and/or SQL for that purpose. Bur more significantly, the format in which such transformation information is represented and saved is system-specific and low-level such that exchanging this information with other similar software becomes extremely difficult and error-prone. Hence, data transformation software might work properly for one database, but might be incompatible with another database which contains critical data. Presently, the only high-level protocol used for describing and exchanging transformation information between different data warehousing software is limited to the definition of field-level transformations with SQL statements that include logical, arithmetic, and string operations.
Thus, there exists a strong need in the data warehousing industry for some formal mechanism for exchanging metadata as well as the need for a computer-parsable language that could concisely describe various characteristics of complex data transformation networks. The present invention offers a solution with the conception and creation of a Transformation Definition Language (TDL).
SUMMARY
The present disclosure pertains to a transformation description language (TDL) used for specifying.ow data is to be manipulated in a data warehousing application. The TDL is comprised of one or more sources for storing raw data, one or more transformation objects for processing the raw data according to predefined instructions, and one or more targets for storing the processed data. A mapping is used for directing the data flow between the I/O ports corresponding to the sources, the plurality of transformation objects, and the targets. The mapping specifies the connectivity between the sources, transformation, and target objects as well as the order of these connections. There are a number of different transformations which can be performed to manipulate the data. Some such transformations include: an aggregator transformation, an expression transformation, a filter transformation, a lookup transformation, a query transformation, a sequence transformation, a stored procedure transformation, and an update strategy transformation.
According to an aspect of the present invention there is provided a computer implemented method for transferring data having a first format from a first system to a second system having a second format, comprising the steps of:
identifying a set of source data having the first format stored on the first system;
storing a set of transformation objects including an aggregator transformation object, an expression transformation object, a filter transformation object, a lookup transformation object, a query transformation object, and a sequence transformation object which transform data according to the metadata corresponding to a particular 5a transformation object, wherein different transformation objects perform different, unique functions;
mapping data from the first system to one or more of the transformation objects;
transforming the data having the first format to the second format through at least one of the transformation objects; and exporting transformed data having the second format to the second system.
According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided a computer implemented method, comprising the steps of:
specifying at least one source system containing source data;
storing metadata corresponding to a plurality of transformation objects including an aggregator transformation object, an expression transformation object, a filter transformation object, a lookup transformation object, a query transformation object, and a sequence transformation object which transform data according to the metadata corresponding to a particular transformation object, wherein different transformation objects perform different, unique functions;
specifying a target system for storing transformed data;
selecting at least one of the transformation objects;
mapping data from the source system to a first selected transformation object;
transforming the data according to the metadata corresponding to the first selected transformation object;
mapping the transformed data from the first selected transformation object to the target system.
5b According to a further aspect of the present invention there is provided a transformation description language (TDL) for specifying how data is to be manipulated in a. data warehousing application, the TDL
comprising:
a source for storing raw data.;
a set of transformation objects for processing the raw data the set of transformation objects including an aggregator transformation object, an expression transformation object, a filter transformation object, a lookup transformation object, a query transformation object, and a sequence transformation object which transform data according to the metadata corresponding to a particular transformation object, wherein the transformation objects have corresponding metadata which defines how data is to be transformed and wherein different transformation objects perform different, unique functions; and a target for storing the processed data.
According to a further aspect of the present invention there is provided a computer system for transferring data having a first format from a first system to a second system having a second format, the system configured to:
identify a set of source data having the first format stored on the first system;
store a set of transformation objects including an aggregator transformation object, an expression transformation object, a filter transformation object, a lookup transformation object, a query transformation object, and a sequence transformation object which transform data according to metadata corresponding to a particular 5c transformation object, wherein different transformation objects perform different, unique functions;
map data from the first system to one or more of the transformation objects;
transform the data having the first format to the second format through at least one of the transformation objects; and export transformed data having the second format to the second system.
According to a further aspect of the present invention there is provided a computer system configured to:
specify at least one source system containing source data;
store metadata corresponding to a plurality of transformation objects including an aggregator transformation object, an expression transformation object, a filter transformation object, a lookup transformation object, a query transformation object, and a sequence transformation object which transform data according to the metadata corresponding to a particular transformation object, wherein different transformation objects perform different, unique functions;
specify a target system for storing transformed data;
select at least one of the transformation objects;
map data from the source system to a first selected transformation object;
transform the data according to the metadata corresponding to the first selected transformation object; and map the transformed data from the first selected transformation object to the target system.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The operation of this invention can be best visualized by reference to the following drawings described below.
Figure 1 is a block diagram of a client/server system upon which the present invention may be practiced.
Figure 2 shows the data flow of the change data capture process and the extract, transform, and load process used to create data warehouses.
Figure 3A shows the most basic transformation function structure.
Figure 3B shows that more than one transformation object can be coupled in series to achieve higher level transformations and functionality.
Figure 3C shows that multiple transformation objects can be coupled in parallel.
Figure 3D shows that multiple sources can be used to supply original data to the transformation process.
Figure 3E shows that multiple targets can be used to store manipulated data after the transformation process has completed.
The operation of this invention can be best visualized by reference to the following drawings described below.
Figure 1 is a block diagram of a client/server system upon which the present invention may be practiced.
Figure 2 shows the data flow of the change data capture process and the extract, transform, and load process used to create data warehouses.
Figure 3A shows the most basic transformation function structure.
Figure 3B shows that more than one transformation object can be coupled in series to achieve higher level transformations and functionality.
Figure 3C shows that multiple transformation objects can be coupled in parallel.
Figure 3D shows that multiple sources can be used to supply original data to the transformation process.
Figure 3E shows that multiple targets can be used to store manipulated data after the transformation process has completed.
Figure 4 shows a more complex transformation process having multiple sources, transformation objects, and targets.
Figure 5 is a flowchart describing the steps for performing the transformation description language (TDL) process of the present invention.
Figure 6 shows an exemplary graphical illustration of data flow in a mapping with source, target, and transformation objects.
Figure 7A shows a metadata model for the components of a mapping using the -UML notation.
Figure 7B depicts a UML notation for the components of Figure 7A.
Figure 8 illustrates an exemplary computer system upon which the present invention may be implemented or practiced.
Figure 9 is a block diagram showing an exemplary application having an embedded data transformation engine as contemplated by the present invention.
Figure 10 is a block diagram showing how one embodiment of the present invention can be used to transfer data from one system to another system having a different format.
Figure 5 is a flowchart describing the steps for performing the transformation description language (TDL) process of the present invention.
Figure 6 shows an exemplary graphical illustration of data flow in a mapping with source, target, and transformation objects.
Figure 7A shows a metadata model for the components of a mapping using the -UML notation.
Figure 7B depicts a UML notation for the components of Figure 7A.
Figure 8 illustrates an exemplary computer system upon which the present invention may be implemented or practiced.
Figure 9 is a block diagram showing an exemplary application having an embedded data transformation engine as contemplated by the present invention.
Figure 10 is a block diagram showing how one embodiment of the present invention can be used to transfer data from one system to another system having a different format.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
An apparatus and method for transforming data in data warehousing applications is described. In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It will be obvious, however, to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form in order to avoid obscuring the present invention. Furthermore, the use of the term data mart hereinafter includes data warehousing and other related database structures and organizations.
Figure 1 is a block diagram of a client/server system upon which the present invention may be practiced. The system may incorporate a number of clients 101-103 (e.g., personal computers, workstations, portable computers, minicomputers, terminals, etc.), upon which various client processes are used to perform desired tasks (e.g., inventory, payroll, billing, finances, etc.).
The data relating to these various tasks can be entered, updated, and retrieved by any one of the clients 101-103 through one or more servers 107. Server 107 is comprised of a computer running a shared database management system (DBMS). A DBMS is a piece of software that manages access to a database.
Basically, a database is a collection of related files containing data. The data is stored in one or more operational databases (DB) 104- 106 (e.g., any of the conventional relational database management systems from Oracle, Informix, Sybase, Microsoft, etc.) residing within one or more high capacity mass storage devices (e.g., hard disk drives, optical drives, tape drives, etc.) A
DBMS "mounts" a particular database in order to access tables of information contained within the files associated with that database. Thereby, data stored in the form of tables in a relational database residing in the databases 104-are accessible to any of the clients 101-103 via server 107. Different servers running different instances of a DBMS, can simultaneously access the same database. It would be appreciated by those with ordinary skill in the art that the present invention may be practiced in any number of different hardware configurations.
A client 101 is used to create a repository 103, which is used to keep track of session information as well as mapping information relating to how data is to be mapped and transformed from sources of the operational databases 102 to target tables of data marts or data warehouses 106. The target databases of data marts 106 are synchronized with changes made to the operational databases 102.
Figure 2 shows the data flow of the change data capture process 201 and the extract, transform, and load process 202 used to create data warehouses 203-205. Raw data are stored in source tables residing within one or more source operational databases 104-106. Anytime a new entry is entered or an old entry is updated, the changes are captured and staged by the change data capture process 201. The extraction, transformation, and loading process 202 then makes the appropriate transformations and propagates the changes to the appropriate target tables of data warehouses 203-205. A repository 206 is used to store the requisite session and mapping information used by the extracting, transformation, and loading process 202;
repository 206 also contains information regarding what data should be 5 captured from the source tables of the operational databases 201-202.
In the currently preferred embodiment of the present invention, a transformation description language (TDL) process is created for completely describing the data definitions, manipulations, and other types of 10 transformations in the data warehousing domain. The syntax and semantics of TDL are similar to the Data Definition Language (DDL) and Structured Query Language (SQL) in order to provide some degree of familiarity and simplicity for users. Yet, TDL is general and extensible enough to define commonly used transformations and their combinations. Basically, TDL
consists of five primary constructs: source, target, transformation, port, and mapping. The various functions and relationships between these five constructssare shown in Figures 3A-E.
Figure 3A shows the most basic transformation function structure of a single source 301 coupled to one transformation object 302 which is coupled to a single target 303. The source 301 contains original, untransformed data.
The entire data set or a specific partial data set is output on port 311. The source output ports 311 are mapped to the input ports 312 of transformation object 302. Transformation object 302 takes this data and manipulates. it to some predefined rules or behavior and then outputs the transformed data to its output ports 313. The output ports 313 are then mapped to the input ports 314 of target 303. Target 303 stores the transformed data. Basically then, a mapping represents a network of sources, targets, transformations and specifies their relationships (e.g., inputs, outputs, and interconnections).
The mapping in Figures 3A-E is depicted by the arrows. For example, the arrow pointing from port 311 to port 312 indicates that data flows from source 301 to transformation object 302. Ports provide the means for transferring data between sources, targets, and transformation objects. The flow of data in a mapping starts from a source and ends in a target, with one or more intermediary transformation objects to manipulate the data throughout this path.
Figure 3B shows that more than one transformation object can be coupled in series to achieve higher level transformations and functionality. A
user specifies the second transformation object 304 and its specific behavior.
The second transformation object 304 may be inserted into a pre-existing or new transformation data flow by mapping its input ports 315 to the output ports 313 of a previous transformation object 302 and mapping its output ports 316 to the input ports 314 of target 303. Any number of transformation objects can thusly be chained together in a serial fashion.
Figure 3C shows that multiple transformation objects can be coupled in parallel. A second transformation object 304 can be coupled in parallel to a pre-existing transformation-object 302. This is accomplished by the user specifying the second transformation object 304 and its behavior. The second transformation object 304 may be inserted into a pre-existing or new transformation data flow by mapping its input ports 315 to the output ports 311 of source 301 and mapping its output ports 316 to the input ports 314 of target 303. Any number of transformation objects can thusly be chained together in a parallel fashion.
Figure 3D shows that multiple sources can be used to supply original data to the transformation process. For example, a second source 305, as specified by a user, can be incorporated by mapping its output port 317 to the input port 312 of a transformation object 302.
Figure 3E shows that multiple targets can be used to store manipulated data after the transformation process has completed. For example, a second target 306, as specified by a user, can be incorporated by mapping its input ports 318 to the output ports 313 of a transformation object 302.
Figure 4 shows a more complex transformation process having multiple sources, transformation objects, and targets. It can be seen that there can be multiple sources 401-402, however, there must be at least one source.
The same source can supply data to different transformation objects. For example, source 402 supplies data to transformation objects 403 and 404. The same set or a different set of data may be supplied to the transformation objects 403 and 404. Conversely, a transformation object may accept input data from more than one source (e.g., transformation object 403 receives input from sources 401 and 402). Similarly, a transformation object may output its transformed data to subsequent multiple transformation objects. For example, transformation object 403 outputs its transformed data to transformation objects 405 and 406. Conversely, a single transformation object can receive transformed data from several different upstream transformation objects (e.g., transformation object 406 receives as inputs, transformed data from transformation objects 403 and 404). A transformation object may output its transformed data to several different targets. For example, transformation object 405 can output its transformed data to both target 407 as well as target 408. In short, the present invention offers great versatility such that virtually any combination of source, transformation, and targets can be linked together in order to achieve the desired overall transformation process, provided, however, that there is at least one source, one transformation, and one target.
The TDL language offers a set of transformation "templates" that represent the most commonly used transformations for data warehousing applications. However, TDL can be easily extended to accommodate other transformations. Each transformation template in turn has a declaration part (e.g., what data to use) and a behavior part (e.g., how data is used). The ports, as well as any attributes (with optional default values), of a transformation are defined in its declaration part while the algorithms and expressions for manipulating the data are specified in its behavior part. The description of a mapping consists of sources, targets, and instances of transformation templates that have specific associated ports and attribute ' values. The order in which the transformations are defined in a mapping, in turn, dictates the flow of data between the starting sources, and the ending targets. Furthermore, TDL is designed such that a computer-based parser can be developed to effectively verify the validity of a mapping and its constituents from a syntactic as well as some well-defined semantics pertaining to data warehousing transformation rules.
Figure 5 is a flowchart describing the steps for performing the transformation description language (TDL) process of the present invention.
Initially, a source table having a field containing raw data required in order to calculate the final desired output is specified, step 501. A determination is made in step 502 as to whether any additional source tables are required in order to access the requisite raw data. If additional source tables are required, step 501 is repeated to specify those tables. After all the source tables have been specified, a determination as to the number and types of transformations to be performed is then made in step 503. The transformation behavior of each of the transformations is then specified, step 504. The transformation behavior describes how the data being input to a particular transformation object is to be manipulated or otherwise modified.
Next, one or more targets is specified in step 505, whereupon the final outputs are stored in these target tables. In step 506, the inputs and/or outputs are defined for each of the source, transformation, and target objects.
A source object only has output ports; a transformation object has input and output ports; and a target object only has input ports. In the last step 507, each input port is connected to an output port, thus linking the various objects in a mapping to specify the data flow.
Figure 6 shows an exemplary graphical illustration of data flow in a mapping with source, target, and transformation objects. Two source objects 601 and 602; three transformation objects 603-605; and one target object 606 5 are shown. Source object 601 contains and outputs data relating to a store identification (store), a particular month of interest (month), a specific product of interest (product), the cost of the product (cost), the price that the product is sold (price), and the number of units of that product were sold during that particular month (unitssold). The data from sr_prodsale source 10 object 601 is input to an ag_prodprof aggregator transformation object 603.
The aggregator transformation object 603 calculates the profit for the product by taking the sum of the units sold multiplied by the difference between the price and cost. It outputs the store identification (store), the month (month), and the profit for that product for that month (prodprof). This data is fed as 15 inputs to the jn strfinance joiner transformation object 604. Also input to the jn strfinance transformation object 604 are data from the sr storeexp source object 602. The sr_storeexp source object 602 contains and outputs data relating to the store identification (store), particular month of interest (month), region of interest (region), and expenses for that region (expense).
The jn_strfinance joiner transformation object 604 then performs a relational join operation to these seven inputs and outputs the store of interest (store), the month of interest (month), the profit for that product for that region (prodprof), and the expenses for that region (expense). This data is input to the ag_totprof aggregator transformation object 605. It is the function of the ag_totprof aggregator transformation object 605 to calculate the regional profit (regprof) by taking the sum of the differences between the product profit (prodprof) minus the expense (expense). Lastly, the month of interest (month), the region of interest (region) and the profits for that region during that month (regprof) generated by the ag_totprof aggregator transformation object 605 is stored in the tg_profits source object 606.
The following is the TDL specification of the example described above and in reference to Figure 6.
CREATE Source sr prodsale (store VARCHAR(50) OUT, month VARCHAR(10) OUT, product VARCHAR(50) OUT, cost MONEY OUT, price MONEY OUT, unitssold INTEGER OUT) (};
CREATE Source sr storeexp (store VARCHAR(50) OUT, month VARCHAR(10) OUT, region VARCHAR (25) OUT, expense MONEY OUT) (};
CREATE Aggregator ag_,profprof (store VARCHAR(50) INOUT, month VARCHAR(10) INOUT, product VARCHAR(50) IN, cost MONEY IN, price MONEY IN, unitssold INTEGER IN) prodprof MONEY OUT, Cachedir "S:\dw\system" ATTR) {
prodprof = SUM(unitssold*(price-cost));
GROUP (store, month);
CREATE Join jn_strfinance (store VARCHAR(50) INOUT, month VARCHAR(10) INOUT, prodprof MONEY INOUT, storel VARCHAR(50) IN, monthl VARCHAR(10) IN, region VARCHAR (25) INOUT, expense MONEY INOUT) {
storel = store;
monthl = month;
};
CREATE Aggregator ag_storeprof (store VARCHAR(50) IN, month VARCHAR(10) INOUT, prodprof MONEY IN, region VARCHAR (25) INOUT, expense MONEY IN, regprof MONEY OUT) {
regprof = SUM(prodprof-expense);
GROUP (region, month);
CREATE Mapping mp_regionalprofit 0 {
sr prodsale.exec 0;
sr_storeexp.exec 0;
ag_prodprof.exec (sr prodsale.store, sr prodsale.month, sr prodsale.product, sr prodsale.cost, sr prodsale.price, sr prodsale.unitssold);
jn_strfinance.exec (ag_prodprof.store, ag_prodprof.month, ag_prodprof.prodprof, ar storeexp.store, sr storeexp.month, sr storeexp.region, sr storeexp.expense);
ag_totprof.exec (jn strfinance.store, jn_strfinance.month, jn_strfinance.prodprof, jn_strfinance.region, jn_strfinance.expense);
tg_profits.exec (ag_totprof.month, ag_totprof.region, ag_totprof.regprof);
};
An apparatus and method for transforming data in data warehousing applications is described. In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It will be obvious, however, to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form in order to avoid obscuring the present invention. Furthermore, the use of the term data mart hereinafter includes data warehousing and other related database structures and organizations.
Figure 1 is a block diagram of a client/server system upon which the present invention may be practiced. The system may incorporate a number of clients 101-103 (e.g., personal computers, workstations, portable computers, minicomputers, terminals, etc.), upon which various client processes are used to perform desired tasks (e.g., inventory, payroll, billing, finances, etc.).
The data relating to these various tasks can be entered, updated, and retrieved by any one of the clients 101-103 through one or more servers 107. Server 107 is comprised of a computer running a shared database management system (DBMS). A DBMS is a piece of software that manages access to a database.
Basically, a database is a collection of related files containing data. The data is stored in one or more operational databases (DB) 104- 106 (e.g., any of the conventional relational database management systems from Oracle, Informix, Sybase, Microsoft, etc.) residing within one or more high capacity mass storage devices (e.g., hard disk drives, optical drives, tape drives, etc.) A
DBMS "mounts" a particular database in order to access tables of information contained within the files associated with that database. Thereby, data stored in the form of tables in a relational database residing in the databases 104-are accessible to any of the clients 101-103 via server 107. Different servers running different instances of a DBMS, can simultaneously access the same database. It would be appreciated by those with ordinary skill in the art that the present invention may be practiced in any number of different hardware configurations.
A client 101 is used to create a repository 103, which is used to keep track of session information as well as mapping information relating to how data is to be mapped and transformed from sources of the operational databases 102 to target tables of data marts or data warehouses 106. The target databases of data marts 106 are synchronized with changes made to the operational databases 102.
Figure 2 shows the data flow of the change data capture process 201 and the extract, transform, and load process 202 used to create data warehouses 203-205. Raw data are stored in source tables residing within one or more source operational databases 104-106. Anytime a new entry is entered or an old entry is updated, the changes are captured and staged by the change data capture process 201. The extraction, transformation, and loading process 202 then makes the appropriate transformations and propagates the changes to the appropriate target tables of data warehouses 203-205. A repository 206 is used to store the requisite session and mapping information used by the extracting, transformation, and loading process 202;
repository 206 also contains information regarding what data should be 5 captured from the source tables of the operational databases 201-202.
In the currently preferred embodiment of the present invention, a transformation description language (TDL) process is created for completely describing the data definitions, manipulations, and other types of 10 transformations in the data warehousing domain. The syntax and semantics of TDL are similar to the Data Definition Language (DDL) and Structured Query Language (SQL) in order to provide some degree of familiarity and simplicity for users. Yet, TDL is general and extensible enough to define commonly used transformations and their combinations. Basically, TDL
consists of five primary constructs: source, target, transformation, port, and mapping. The various functions and relationships between these five constructssare shown in Figures 3A-E.
Figure 3A shows the most basic transformation function structure of a single source 301 coupled to one transformation object 302 which is coupled to a single target 303. The source 301 contains original, untransformed data.
The entire data set or a specific partial data set is output on port 311. The source output ports 311 are mapped to the input ports 312 of transformation object 302. Transformation object 302 takes this data and manipulates. it to some predefined rules or behavior and then outputs the transformed data to its output ports 313. The output ports 313 are then mapped to the input ports 314 of target 303. Target 303 stores the transformed data. Basically then, a mapping represents a network of sources, targets, transformations and specifies their relationships (e.g., inputs, outputs, and interconnections).
The mapping in Figures 3A-E is depicted by the arrows. For example, the arrow pointing from port 311 to port 312 indicates that data flows from source 301 to transformation object 302. Ports provide the means for transferring data between sources, targets, and transformation objects. The flow of data in a mapping starts from a source and ends in a target, with one or more intermediary transformation objects to manipulate the data throughout this path.
Figure 3B shows that more than one transformation object can be coupled in series to achieve higher level transformations and functionality. A
user specifies the second transformation object 304 and its specific behavior.
The second transformation object 304 may be inserted into a pre-existing or new transformation data flow by mapping its input ports 315 to the output ports 313 of a previous transformation object 302 and mapping its output ports 316 to the input ports 314 of target 303. Any number of transformation objects can thusly be chained together in a serial fashion.
Figure 3C shows that multiple transformation objects can be coupled in parallel. A second transformation object 304 can be coupled in parallel to a pre-existing transformation-object 302. This is accomplished by the user specifying the second transformation object 304 and its behavior. The second transformation object 304 may be inserted into a pre-existing or new transformation data flow by mapping its input ports 315 to the output ports 311 of source 301 and mapping its output ports 316 to the input ports 314 of target 303. Any number of transformation objects can thusly be chained together in a parallel fashion.
Figure 3D shows that multiple sources can be used to supply original data to the transformation process. For example, a second source 305, as specified by a user, can be incorporated by mapping its output port 317 to the input port 312 of a transformation object 302.
Figure 3E shows that multiple targets can be used to store manipulated data after the transformation process has completed. For example, a second target 306, as specified by a user, can be incorporated by mapping its input ports 318 to the output ports 313 of a transformation object 302.
Figure 4 shows a more complex transformation process having multiple sources, transformation objects, and targets. It can be seen that there can be multiple sources 401-402, however, there must be at least one source.
The same source can supply data to different transformation objects. For example, source 402 supplies data to transformation objects 403 and 404. The same set or a different set of data may be supplied to the transformation objects 403 and 404. Conversely, a transformation object may accept input data from more than one source (e.g., transformation object 403 receives input from sources 401 and 402). Similarly, a transformation object may output its transformed data to subsequent multiple transformation objects. For example, transformation object 403 outputs its transformed data to transformation objects 405 and 406. Conversely, a single transformation object can receive transformed data from several different upstream transformation objects (e.g., transformation object 406 receives as inputs, transformed data from transformation objects 403 and 404). A transformation object may output its transformed data to several different targets. For example, transformation object 405 can output its transformed data to both target 407 as well as target 408. In short, the present invention offers great versatility such that virtually any combination of source, transformation, and targets can be linked together in order to achieve the desired overall transformation process, provided, however, that there is at least one source, one transformation, and one target.
The TDL language offers a set of transformation "templates" that represent the most commonly used transformations for data warehousing applications. However, TDL can be easily extended to accommodate other transformations. Each transformation template in turn has a declaration part (e.g., what data to use) and a behavior part (e.g., how data is used). The ports, as well as any attributes (with optional default values), of a transformation are defined in its declaration part while the algorithms and expressions for manipulating the data are specified in its behavior part. The description of a mapping consists of sources, targets, and instances of transformation templates that have specific associated ports and attribute ' values. The order in which the transformations are defined in a mapping, in turn, dictates the flow of data between the starting sources, and the ending targets. Furthermore, TDL is designed such that a computer-based parser can be developed to effectively verify the validity of a mapping and its constituents from a syntactic as well as some well-defined semantics pertaining to data warehousing transformation rules.
Figure 5 is a flowchart describing the steps for performing the transformation description language (TDL) process of the present invention.
Initially, a source table having a field containing raw data required in order to calculate the final desired output is specified, step 501. A determination is made in step 502 as to whether any additional source tables are required in order to access the requisite raw data. If additional source tables are required, step 501 is repeated to specify those tables. After all the source tables have been specified, a determination as to the number and types of transformations to be performed is then made in step 503. The transformation behavior of each of the transformations is then specified, step 504. The transformation behavior describes how the data being input to a particular transformation object is to be manipulated or otherwise modified.
Next, one or more targets is specified in step 505, whereupon the final outputs are stored in these target tables. In step 506, the inputs and/or outputs are defined for each of the source, transformation, and target objects.
A source object only has output ports; a transformation object has input and output ports; and a target object only has input ports. In the last step 507, each input port is connected to an output port, thus linking the various objects in a mapping to specify the data flow.
Figure 6 shows an exemplary graphical illustration of data flow in a mapping with source, target, and transformation objects. Two source objects 601 and 602; three transformation objects 603-605; and one target object 606 5 are shown. Source object 601 contains and outputs data relating to a store identification (store), a particular month of interest (month), a specific product of interest (product), the cost of the product (cost), the price that the product is sold (price), and the number of units of that product were sold during that particular month (unitssold). The data from sr_prodsale source 10 object 601 is input to an ag_prodprof aggregator transformation object 603.
The aggregator transformation object 603 calculates the profit for the product by taking the sum of the units sold multiplied by the difference between the price and cost. It outputs the store identification (store), the month (month), and the profit for that product for that month (prodprof). This data is fed as 15 inputs to the jn strfinance joiner transformation object 604. Also input to the jn strfinance transformation object 604 are data from the sr storeexp source object 602. The sr_storeexp source object 602 contains and outputs data relating to the store identification (store), particular month of interest (month), region of interest (region), and expenses for that region (expense).
The jn_strfinance joiner transformation object 604 then performs a relational join operation to these seven inputs and outputs the store of interest (store), the month of interest (month), the profit for that product for that region (prodprof), and the expenses for that region (expense). This data is input to the ag_totprof aggregator transformation object 605. It is the function of the ag_totprof aggregator transformation object 605 to calculate the regional profit (regprof) by taking the sum of the differences between the product profit (prodprof) minus the expense (expense). Lastly, the month of interest (month), the region of interest (region) and the profits for that region during that month (regprof) generated by the ag_totprof aggregator transformation object 605 is stored in the tg_profits source object 606.
The following is the TDL specification of the example described above and in reference to Figure 6.
CREATE Source sr prodsale (store VARCHAR(50) OUT, month VARCHAR(10) OUT, product VARCHAR(50) OUT, cost MONEY OUT, price MONEY OUT, unitssold INTEGER OUT) (};
CREATE Source sr storeexp (store VARCHAR(50) OUT, month VARCHAR(10) OUT, region VARCHAR (25) OUT, expense MONEY OUT) (};
CREATE Aggregator ag_,profprof (store VARCHAR(50) INOUT, month VARCHAR(10) INOUT, product VARCHAR(50) IN, cost MONEY IN, price MONEY IN, unitssold INTEGER IN) prodprof MONEY OUT, Cachedir "S:\dw\system" ATTR) {
prodprof = SUM(unitssold*(price-cost));
GROUP (store, month);
CREATE Join jn_strfinance (store VARCHAR(50) INOUT, month VARCHAR(10) INOUT, prodprof MONEY INOUT, storel VARCHAR(50) IN, monthl VARCHAR(10) IN, region VARCHAR (25) INOUT, expense MONEY INOUT) {
storel = store;
monthl = month;
};
CREATE Aggregator ag_storeprof (store VARCHAR(50) IN, month VARCHAR(10) INOUT, prodprof MONEY IN, region VARCHAR (25) INOUT, expense MONEY IN, regprof MONEY OUT) {
regprof = SUM(prodprof-expense);
GROUP (region, month);
CREATE Mapping mp_regionalprofit 0 {
sr prodsale.exec 0;
sr_storeexp.exec 0;
ag_prodprof.exec (sr prodsale.store, sr prodsale.month, sr prodsale.product, sr prodsale.cost, sr prodsale.price, sr prodsale.unitssold);
jn_strfinance.exec (ag_prodprof.store, ag_prodprof.month, ag_prodprof.prodprof, ar storeexp.store, sr storeexp.month, sr storeexp.region, sr storeexp.expense);
ag_totprof.exec (jn strfinance.store, jn_strfinance.month, jn_strfinance.prodprof, jn_strfinance.region, jn_strfinance.expense);
tg_profits.exec (ag_totprof.month, ag_totprof.region, ag_totprof.regprof);
};
Figure 7A shows a model for the components of a mapping. The following sections provide a detailed description as well as a specification and an example of using that specification for the fundamental concepts used in TDL. Specification of each object type has two parts: the first part has the declaration for the ports and attributes of the object, and the second part has the definition of the behavior of the object. Source and target objects do not have any behavior. The standard BNF syntax is used for specification of TDL, however for better readability, language keywords are in bold-face with their first letter capitalized while all pre-defined types and constants are in all capital letters. A variable naming convention, by means of a set of standard prefixes, is also used for quickly identifying the object type associated with a specific variable. For example, the source objects could have sr as a prefix while the aggregator objects could use the ag_ prefix.
Figure 7B depicts a UML notation for the components of Figure 7A.
Basically, a box (e.g., Class Name 750) indicates the abstraction for a concept, such as source, target, etc. A line with a diamond at one end (e.g., the line connecting boxes 751 and 752) indicates an aggregation relationship. A line with an arrow at one end (e.g., the line connecting boxes 753 and 754) indicates a specialization and/or generalization. A simple line (e.g., the line connecting boxes 755 and 756) indicates a general association. Each of the components relating to TDL is now described in detail below.
Figure 7B depicts a UML notation for the components of Figure 7A.
Basically, a box (e.g., Class Name 750) indicates the abstraction for a concept, such as source, target, etc. A line with a diamond at one end (e.g., the line connecting boxes 751 and 752) indicates an aggregation relationship. A line with an arrow at one end (e.g., the line connecting boxes 753 and 754) indicates a specialization and/or generalization. A simple line (e.g., the line connecting boxes 755 and 756) indicates a general association. Each of the components relating to TDL is now described in detail below.
Port A port is analogous to a column of a table and provides the primary means of parameterized dataflow between various objects in a mapping. A
port must have a name, data type it holds, and its data flow type (i.e., in, out, or in/out). The port may also haveprecision and scale values for further specifying its data types. A port must always be defined within the definition of a source, target, or transformation object; thus it would be meaningless to have a stand-alone definition of a port. With reference back to Figure 7A, the Transformation Field 712 corresponds to a port for a transformation object. It may be an input, or output, or an input/output. A ColumnExpression 716 specifies the expression (often defined in SQL) that is used for manipulating the data in the Transformation Field 712. The Dependency 713 captures the dependencies between the source, target, and transformation ports (e.g., the arrows). A TargetField 714 corresponds to the input port of a target table. A
SourceField 715 corresponds to the output port of a source.
Specification <port def> ::= <port tiame> <data_type def> <port type>
<port name> ::= <string>
<port_type> ::= (IN I OUT I INOUT}
<data_type_def> ::_ <data_type> [(<precision>[,<scale>])]
<precision>.::= <integer>
<scale> ::= <integer>
Example Please see examples below.
Source The source object 701 provides purely output information at the 5 beginning of a data-flow pipeline of a mapping, and thus it only has port definitions of type OUT.
Specification CREATE Source <source name>
<ports>
10 <ports> ::= <port def>, ...
Example CREATE Source sr lineltem( id INTEGER OUT, 15 name VARCHAR(20) OUT, price MONEY OUT, discount MONEY OUT) Ta Target objects 702 are the final receivers of information at the end of a 20 data-flow pipeline for a mapping. All ports of a target object must be of type IN.
port must have a name, data type it holds, and its data flow type (i.e., in, out, or in/out). The port may also haveprecision and scale values for further specifying its data types. A port must always be defined within the definition of a source, target, or transformation object; thus it would be meaningless to have a stand-alone definition of a port. With reference back to Figure 7A, the Transformation Field 712 corresponds to a port for a transformation object. It may be an input, or output, or an input/output. A ColumnExpression 716 specifies the expression (often defined in SQL) that is used for manipulating the data in the Transformation Field 712. The Dependency 713 captures the dependencies between the source, target, and transformation ports (e.g., the arrows). A TargetField 714 corresponds to the input port of a target table. A
SourceField 715 corresponds to the output port of a source.
Specification <port def> ::= <port tiame> <data_type def> <port type>
<port name> ::= <string>
<port_type> ::= (IN I OUT I INOUT}
<data_type_def> ::_ <data_type> [(<precision>[,<scale>])]
<precision>.::= <integer>
<scale> ::= <integer>
Example Please see examples below.
Source The source object 701 provides purely output information at the 5 beginning of a data-flow pipeline of a mapping, and thus it only has port definitions of type OUT.
Specification CREATE Source <source name>
<ports>
10 <ports> ::= <port def>, ...
Example CREATE Source sr lineltem( id INTEGER OUT, 15 name VARCHAR(20) OUT, price MONEY OUT, discount MONEY OUT) Ta Target objects 702 are the final receivers of information at the end of a 20 data-flow pipeline for a mapping. All ports of a target object must be of type IN.
Specification CREATE Target <target_name>
<ports>
<ports> ::= <port def>, ...
) Example CREATE Target tg_storeSum( store id INTEGER IN, store-name VARCHAR(20) IN, num_orders INTEGER IN, avg_sales MONEY IN, total-sales MONEY IN) Transformation Objects As explained above, a number of Transformations 718 are used to transform incoming data according to some predefined behavior or rule.
There are a number of different types of transformations possible (e.g., Aggregator 703, Filter 705, Lookup 706, Query 707, etc.). Other different types of transformations can be added. Existing transformation types can be modified or even deleted. Furthermore, a transformation object can be programmed to perform specific functions, depending on its corresponding application. For example, the Aggregator transformation object 703 can be used to perform a summation between two variables in one application.
<ports>
<ports> ::= <port def>, ...
) Example CREATE Target tg_storeSum( store id INTEGER IN, store-name VARCHAR(20) IN, num_orders INTEGER IN, avg_sales MONEY IN, total-sales MONEY IN) Transformation Objects As explained above, a number of Transformations 718 are used to transform incoming data according to some predefined behavior or rule.
There are a number of different types of transformations possible (e.g., Aggregator 703, Filter 705, Lookup 706, Query 707, etc.). Other different types of transformations can be added. Existing transformation types can be modified or even deleted. Furthermore, a transformation object can be programmed to perform specific functions, depending on its corresponding application. For example, the Aggregator transformation object 703 can be used to perform a summation between two variables in one application.
However, a different application can apply the Aggregator transformation object 703 to perform a summation of four variables. Each Transformation 718 is comprised of an Attribute 719 which defines the characteristics of a transformation specified in its declaration part. This could be covered by either the TableExpression 704 or Property 717. The expressions associated with TableExpression 704 are those expression (often in SQL) that may be used at the table level and not at the port level. Property 717 contains the various characteristics of a transformation, such as a cache directory, etc.
Aggregator Transformation An aggregator transformation object 703 allows one to perform aggregation functions over one or many of its output or input/output ports.
In addition to the port definitions of an aggregator, it also has a Cachedir attribute for its cache directory location. A default value for this attribute may be optionally specified in the declaration part or later when the aggregator is instantiated. The behavior of the aggregation object is specified in the body of its specification, and one can also optionally specify a set of ports in the Group statement for any group-by behavior. However, the SQL
rules for using port names in a group-by statement must be observed.
Specification CREATE Aggregator <aggregator name>
<ports>, <ports> ::_ <port_def>, ...
Cachedir [<string>] ATTR) \{
<aggregation_behavior> ; ...
<aggregation_behavior> <port name> = <aggregate_exp>
<aggregate_exp> {<port_name> I <aggregate_func> (aggregator exp)}
[Group (<port_names>)]
<port names> ::= <port name>, ...
\};
Example CREATE Aggregator ag_salesStats store id INTEGER INOUT, quantity INTEGER INOUT, price MONEY IN, discount MONEY IN, avg_sales MONEY OUT, total-sales MONEY OUT, Cachedir STRING ATTR) {
avg_sales = AVG(quantity*price-discount);
total-sales = SUM(quantity*price-discount);
GROUP(store_id);
};
Aggregator Transformation An aggregator transformation object 703 allows one to perform aggregation functions over one or many of its output or input/output ports.
In addition to the port definitions of an aggregator, it also has a Cachedir attribute for its cache directory location. A default value for this attribute may be optionally specified in the declaration part or later when the aggregator is instantiated. The behavior of the aggregation object is specified in the body of its specification, and one can also optionally specify a set of ports in the Group statement for any group-by behavior. However, the SQL
rules for using port names in a group-by statement must be observed.
Specification CREATE Aggregator <aggregator name>
<ports>, <ports> ::_ <port_def>, ...
Cachedir [<string>] ATTR) \{
<aggregation_behavior> ; ...
<aggregation_behavior> <port name> = <aggregate_exp>
<aggregate_exp> {<port_name> I <aggregate_func> (aggregator exp)}
[Group (<port_names>)]
<port names> ::= <port name>, ...
\};
Example CREATE Aggregator ag_salesStats store id INTEGER INOUT, quantity INTEGER INOUT, price MONEY IN, discount MONEY IN, avg_sales MONEY OUT, total-sales MONEY OUT, Cachedir STRING ATTR) {
avg_sales = AVG(quantity*price-discount);
total-sales = SUM(quantity*price-discount);
GROUP(store_id);
};
Expression Transformation The Expression transformation allows the user to associate an expression statement with any of its output or input/output ports. The expression in turn may contain functions that are applied to input or input/output ports.
Specification CREATE Expression <expression_name>
<ports>
<ports> ::= <port def>, ...
) \{
<expression_binding> ; ...
<expression_binding> ::_ <port name> _ <expression exp>
<expression_exp> ::_ {<port name> I <general_func> (<expression_exp>) 1 <constant>}
\}
Example CREATE Expression xp_salesRating( quantity INTEGER IN, price MONEY IN, discount MONEY IN, store rating VARCHAR(10) OUT) {
store-rating = llF(SUM(quantity*price-discount)>= 100000, 'EXCELLENT', IIF(SUM(quantity*price-discount)< 5000,'POOR'; FAIR'));
Filter Transformation 5 The filter transformation object 705 applies an expression to all of its ports and outputs all of the ports if the result of the evaluation is TRUE (a non-zero value), otherwise nothing is output. The expression may be a combination of constants and functions applied to the ports.
Specification 10 CREATE Filter <filter name>
<ports>
<ports> ::= <port def>, ...
\{
15 Filterexpr (<filter exp>);
<filter exp> ::= {<port name> I <general_func> (<filter exp>) I
<constant>) \}
Example 20 CREATE Filter fl_storeFilter( store-id INTEGER INOUT, store-name VARCHAR(20) INOUT, store_yr opened INTEGER INOUT, store-sales MONEY INOUT) Filterexpr (IIF(store sales >= 100000 AND store_yr_opened > 1980));
}
Lookup Transformation The lookup transformation object 706 provides the capability to translate one or a combination of ports into other ports based on some predefined fields that are specified in a relational table in the target database.
The fields of this lookup table must be specified as lookup ports in the lookup transformation, in addition to a lookup expression and several other parameters.
Specification CREATE Lookup <lookup_name>
<ports>, <ports> ::= <port def>, ...
Lkpfields (<fields>), <fields> ::= <field_def>, ...
<field_def> ::= <field_name> <datatype>
<field_name> ::= <string>
Lkptable [<table_name>] ATTR, [Lkpcaching [<boolean>J ATTR,J
Multimatch [{FIRST I LAST I ERROR I ALL}] ATTR, Dblocation [<string>] ATTR, Sourcetype [{DB I FILE)] ATTR, [Recache [<boolean>] ATTRJ
Lkpoverride <sql_exp>, Lkpcond <lookup_expr>, <lookup_expr> ::= {<lookup_subexpr> I <lookup_expr> AND
<lookup_subexpr>}
<lookup_subexpr> ::= <port_name> <logical op> <port_name>
<logical_op> ::=I= I < I > I <> I <= I >= }
\}
Example CREATE Lookup Ik customerLookup old_cust_id INTEGER IN, cust id INTEGER OUT, oust name VARCHAR(25) INOUT, address VARCHAR(20) OUT, city VARCHAR(15) OUT, state VARCHAR(2) OUT, zip VARCHAR(10) OUT, old_custid INTEGER) IN, Lkpfields (lkp_custid INTEGER, custid INTEGER, oust name VARCHAR(25), address VARCHAR(20), city VARCHAR(15), state VARCHAR(2), zip VARCHAR(l0) ) {
Lkpcond ("OLD_CUST ID = LKP_CUST ID");
};
lk_customerLookup ("CUSTADDLKP", TRUE, FIRST, "s:\dw\targcust", DB) Query Transformation The query transformation object 707 allows one to tailor the input data for a mapping from one or more source objects using SQL expressions. Given the fields of one or more source tables as the input ports of this transformation, the user may either provide a complete SQL query to override the default behavior of the transformation, or specify the join (Select) and filter (Where) parameters of the SQL expression that is created by the system.
Specification CREATE Query <query_name>
<ports>
<ports> ::= <port_def>, ...
\{
[Sqlquery (<sgl_exp>);]
[Userdefjoin (<sgl_exp>);]
[Sourcefilter (<sgl_exp>)]
\}
Example CREATE Query gr_storeQuery( store-id INTEGER INOUT, store_type CHAR IN, store--name VARCHAR(20) INOUT, store address VARCHAR(35) INOUT) {
Sourcefilter ("store_type }
Sequence Transformation The sequence transformation object 708 is used for creating unique keys for records as they are processed in a mapping. Each instance of a sequence transformation is created with an initial value, which is used at the start of an execution, an increment value to compute the values of subsequent indexes, and an end value. Default values will be used if any of these parameters-are omitted. This transformation has two predefined output ports, curval and nextval, that contain the current value and the next value of the sequence index, respectively. If the curval-is used, all the rows processed will get the same value corresponding to the curval setting at the time of processing; and when the nextval is used, the row for each row is incremented from the curval by the given increment setting. If the Cycle keyword is specified, the sequence numbers will be reused once a cycle has been completed and Reset allows one to reset the value of the index being used to the starting value. The Cache keyword is provided to allow creating blocks of sequence indexes that could be used by one or more other objects.
Specification CREATE Sequence <sequence_name>
5 curval INTEGER OUT, nextval INTEGER OUT, [Startvalue [<integer>] ATTR,]
[Increment [<integer>] ATTR,]
[Endval [<integer>] ATTR,]
10 [Cycle [<boolean>J ATTR,J
[Cache [<boolean>] ATTR,J
[Reset [<boolean>J ATTR]
Example 15 CREATE Sequence sq_incrBy5Sequence ( curval INTEGER OUT, nextval INTEGER OUT) (};
sq_incrBy5Sequence (2, 5, 92, TRUE);
20 Stored-Procedure Transformation The stored-procedure transformation object 709 allows one to execute a parameterized function either in a pipeline mode or stand-alone within the expression, lookup, or user-defined transformations. Furthermore, the stored procedure may return one or more values through its output ports, however, no input/output ports may be used (i.e., the procedure parameters are only passed in by value). Procedures that may have a unique return value may also be specified having their return value represented in a specialized return port. For procedures that are processed on a row-basis, the name of the procedure is specified by the Procname statement. The Targetconn will be used for the location of the database in which the procedures will be executed. In addition to the parameterized procedures discussed, pre- and post-processing functions can be executed before and after the row-by-row transformations are processed. The name of such a function is specified by the Calltext statement and its type is defined one of the four types TARGPRE, TARGPOST, SRCPRE, and SRCPOST. NORMAL is used for the row-by-row type procedures.
Specification CREATE Storedproc <storedproc name>
<ports>
<ports> ::= <port def>, ...
Procname [<string>] ATTR, Targetconn [<string>] ATTR, Calltype [{TARGPRE I TARGPOST I NORMAL I SRCPRE I SRCPOST)J
ATTR, [Calltext [<string>] ATTR]
Example CREATE Storedproc sp_prodDistrProc prodcateg VARCHAR(10) IN, price Port MONEY IN, salesregion VARCHAR(15) IN, numprodsold INTEGER IN, futuresales MONEY OUT) {};
sp_prodDistrProc ("forecastSales", "S:\dw\sales", NORMAL);
Update Strategy Transformation With the update strategy transformation object 710, one can specify how each individual row, after it is processed by a mapping, will be used to update the target database tables. The various updating options are insert, delete, update, and override. An expression specified by the user is evaluated for each row to determine the update strategy for that row. This expression returns 0 for insert, 1 for update, 2 for delete, and 3 for reject.
Specification CREATE UpdateStrategy <update_name>
<ports>
<ports> ::_ <port_def>, ...
\{
Updateexpr <update_exp>;
<update_exp> ::= {<port_name> I <general_func> (<update_exp>) I
<constant>}
\);
Example CREATE UpdateStrategy us_customerUpdate acct id NUMERIC(10) INOUT, name VARCHAR(25) INOUT, address VARCHAR(40) INOUT, last_activity DATE IN, account status CHAR INOUT) Updateexpr (IIF(DATE_DIFF(last_activity, SYSDATE,'MM')>12, 2,1));
A mapping 711 is a composition of various source, transformation, and target objects that are linked in a directed, acyclic graph. As shown in Figure 4, the source and target objects are the starting and ending nodes of the graph, respectively, while the transformation objects provide the intermediate nodes. The description of a mapping presently contains the connectivity data for ports of connected objects. The order that the objects are connected is important since it dictates the data flow in the pipeline from sources to targets. Once a mapping is instantiated, each object in that mapping is included by means of its Exec method.
Functions and Data Types The functions and data types that are used by TDL is described. The majority of these functions and data types are used in a standard SQL
environment, however, additional specific elements are also provided.
Specification <general_func> ::= (<char func> I <conversion_func> I <date_func> I
<group_func> I
<numeric_func> I <scientific_func> I <special_func>) <char func> ::= {ASCII (<char var>) I
CHR (<num_var) I
CONCAT (<char var> <char_var>) I
INITCAP (<char_var>) I
INSTR (<char var>, <char var>, [<int_var>, [<int_var>]]) I
LENGTH (<expr var>) I LOWER (<expr var>) I
LPAD (<expr var>, <num_var>, [<char_var>]) I
LTRIM (<expr var>, [<expr_var>}) I
RPAD (<char var>, <num_var>, [<char var>]) I
RTRIM (<char var>, [<char_var>]) I
SUBSTR (<char var>, <num_var>, [<num_var>]) I
UPPER (<char var>) }
<conversion_func> ::_ (TO CHAR ((<num_var> I date_var, [<char var>]}) I
TO_DATE (<char var>, [<char var>]) I
WO 01/37135 PCT[US00/30781 TO-NUMBER (<var-char>)]
<date_func> ::_ {ADD_TO_DATE (<date_var>, <char_var>, <int_var>) I
DATE-COMPARE (<date_var>, <date_var>) I
5 DATE_DIFF (<date_var>, <date_var>, <char var>) I
GET-DATE-PART (<date_var>, <char_var>) I
LAST DAY (<expr var>) I
SER DATE_PART (<date_var>, <char_var>, <int var>) }
10 <group_func> ::= {AVG (<num val>, [<expr_val>]) I
COUNT (<expr_var>, [<expr val>]) I
MAX (<expr var>, [<expr var>]), MEDIAN (<num var>, [<expr_var>]) I
MIN (<expr var>, [<expr var>]), 15 PERCENTILE (<num_var>, <num_var>, [<expr var>]) I
STDDEV (<num var>, [<expr_var>]) I
SUM (<num_var>, [<expr var>]) I
VARIANCE (<num_var>, [<expr var>]) }
20 <numeric func> ::=JABS (<num var>) I
CE1L (<num_var>) I
CLIME (<num_var>, [<expr var>J) I
EXP (<num_var>) I
ABS (<num_var>) I
Specification CREATE Expression <expression_name>
<ports>
<ports> ::= <port def>, ...
) \{
<expression_binding> ; ...
<expression_binding> ::_ <port name> _ <expression exp>
<expression_exp> ::_ {<port name> I <general_func> (<expression_exp>) 1 <constant>}
\}
Example CREATE Expression xp_salesRating( quantity INTEGER IN, price MONEY IN, discount MONEY IN, store rating VARCHAR(10) OUT) {
store-rating = llF(SUM(quantity*price-discount)>= 100000, 'EXCELLENT', IIF(SUM(quantity*price-discount)< 5000,'POOR'; FAIR'));
Filter Transformation 5 The filter transformation object 705 applies an expression to all of its ports and outputs all of the ports if the result of the evaluation is TRUE (a non-zero value), otherwise nothing is output. The expression may be a combination of constants and functions applied to the ports.
Specification 10 CREATE Filter <filter name>
<ports>
<ports> ::= <port def>, ...
\{
15 Filterexpr (<filter exp>);
<filter exp> ::= {<port name> I <general_func> (<filter exp>) I
<constant>) \}
Example 20 CREATE Filter fl_storeFilter( store-id INTEGER INOUT, store-name VARCHAR(20) INOUT, store_yr opened INTEGER INOUT, store-sales MONEY INOUT) Filterexpr (IIF(store sales >= 100000 AND store_yr_opened > 1980));
}
Lookup Transformation The lookup transformation object 706 provides the capability to translate one or a combination of ports into other ports based on some predefined fields that are specified in a relational table in the target database.
The fields of this lookup table must be specified as lookup ports in the lookup transformation, in addition to a lookup expression and several other parameters.
Specification CREATE Lookup <lookup_name>
<ports>, <ports> ::= <port def>, ...
Lkpfields (<fields>), <fields> ::= <field_def>, ...
<field_def> ::= <field_name> <datatype>
<field_name> ::= <string>
Lkptable [<table_name>] ATTR, [Lkpcaching [<boolean>J ATTR,J
Multimatch [{FIRST I LAST I ERROR I ALL}] ATTR, Dblocation [<string>] ATTR, Sourcetype [{DB I FILE)] ATTR, [Recache [<boolean>] ATTRJ
Lkpoverride <sql_exp>, Lkpcond <lookup_expr>, <lookup_expr> ::= {<lookup_subexpr> I <lookup_expr> AND
<lookup_subexpr>}
<lookup_subexpr> ::= <port_name> <logical op> <port_name>
<logical_op> ::=I= I < I > I <> I <= I >= }
\}
Example CREATE Lookup Ik customerLookup old_cust_id INTEGER IN, cust id INTEGER OUT, oust name VARCHAR(25) INOUT, address VARCHAR(20) OUT, city VARCHAR(15) OUT, state VARCHAR(2) OUT, zip VARCHAR(10) OUT, old_custid INTEGER) IN, Lkpfields (lkp_custid INTEGER, custid INTEGER, oust name VARCHAR(25), address VARCHAR(20), city VARCHAR(15), state VARCHAR(2), zip VARCHAR(l0) ) {
Lkpcond ("OLD_CUST ID = LKP_CUST ID");
};
lk_customerLookup ("CUSTADDLKP", TRUE, FIRST, "s:\dw\targcust", DB) Query Transformation The query transformation object 707 allows one to tailor the input data for a mapping from one or more source objects using SQL expressions. Given the fields of one or more source tables as the input ports of this transformation, the user may either provide a complete SQL query to override the default behavior of the transformation, or specify the join (Select) and filter (Where) parameters of the SQL expression that is created by the system.
Specification CREATE Query <query_name>
<ports>
<ports> ::= <port_def>, ...
\{
[Sqlquery (<sgl_exp>);]
[Userdefjoin (<sgl_exp>);]
[Sourcefilter (<sgl_exp>)]
\}
Example CREATE Query gr_storeQuery( store-id INTEGER INOUT, store_type CHAR IN, store--name VARCHAR(20) INOUT, store address VARCHAR(35) INOUT) {
Sourcefilter ("store_type }
Sequence Transformation The sequence transformation object 708 is used for creating unique keys for records as they are processed in a mapping. Each instance of a sequence transformation is created with an initial value, which is used at the start of an execution, an increment value to compute the values of subsequent indexes, and an end value. Default values will be used if any of these parameters-are omitted. This transformation has two predefined output ports, curval and nextval, that contain the current value and the next value of the sequence index, respectively. If the curval-is used, all the rows processed will get the same value corresponding to the curval setting at the time of processing; and when the nextval is used, the row for each row is incremented from the curval by the given increment setting. If the Cycle keyword is specified, the sequence numbers will be reused once a cycle has been completed and Reset allows one to reset the value of the index being used to the starting value. The Cache keyword is provided to allow creating blocks of sequence indexes that could be used by one or more other objects.
Specification CREATE Sequence <sequence_name>
5 curval INTEGER OUT, nextval INTEGER OUT, [Startvalue [<integer>] ATTR,]
[Increment [<integer>] ATTR,]
[Endval [<integer>] ATTR,]
10 [Cycle [<boolean>J ATTR,J
[Cache [<boolean>] ATTR,J
[Reset [<boolean>J ATTR]
Example 15 CREATE Sequence sq_incrBy5Sequence ( curval INTEGER OUT, nextval INTEGER OUT) (};
sq_incrBy5Sequence (2, 5, 92, TRUE);
20 Stored-Procedure Transformation The stored-procedure transformation object 709 allows one to execute a parameterized function either in a pipeline mode or stand-alone within the expression, lookup, or user-defined transformations. Furthermore, the stored procedure may return one or more values through its output ports, however, no input/output ports may be used (i.e., the procedure parameters are only passed in by value). Procedures that may have a unique return value may also be specified having their return value represented in a specialized return port. For procedures that are processed on a row-basis, the name of the procedure is specified by the Procname statement. The Targetconn will be used for the location of the database in which the procedures will be executed. In addition to the parameterized procedures discussed, pre- and post-processing functions can be executed before and after the row-by-row transformations are processed. The name of such a function is specified by the Calltext statement and its type is defined one of the four types TARGPRE, TARGPOST, SRCPRE, and SRCPOST. NORMAL is used for the row-by-row type procedures.
Specification CREATE Storedproc <storedproc name>
<ports>
<ports> ::= <port def>, ...
Procname [<string>] ATTR, Targetconn [<string>] ATTR, Calltype [{TARGPRE I TARGPOST I NORMAL I SRCPRE I SRCPOST)J
ATTR, [Calltext [<string>] ATTR]
Example CREATE Storedproc sp_prodDistrProc prodcateg VARCHAR(10) IN, price Port MONEY IN, salesregion VARCHAR(15) IN, numprodsold INTEGER IN, futuresales MONEY OUT) {};
sp_prodDistrProc ("forecastSales", "S:\dw\sales", NORMAL);
Update Strategy Transformation With the update strategy transformation object 710, one can specify how each individual row, after it is processed by a mapping, will be used to update the target database tables. The various updating options are insert, delete, update, and override. An expression specified by the user is evaluated for each row to determine the update strategy for that row. This expression returns 0 for insert, 1 for update, 2 for delete, and 3 for reject.
Specification CREATE UpdateStrategy <update_name>
<ports>
<ports> ::_ <port_def>, ...
\{
Updateexpr <update_exp>;
<update_exp> ::= {<port_name> I <general_func> (<update_exp>) I
<constant>}
\);
Example CREATE UpdateStrategy us_customerUpdate acct id NUMERIC(10) INOUT, name VARCHAR(25) INOUT, address VARCHAR(40) INOUT, last_activity DATE IN, account status CHAR INOUT) Updateexpr (IIF(DATE_DIFF(last_activity, SYSDATE,'MM')>12, 2,1));
A mapping 711 is a composition of various source, transformation, and target objects that are linked in a directed, acyclic graph. As shown in Figure 4, the source and target objects are the starting and ending nodes of the graph, respectively, while the transformation objects provide the intermediate nodes. The description of a mapping presently contains the connectivity data for ports of connected objects. The order that the objects are connected is important since it dictates the data flow in the pipeline from sources to targets. Once a mapping is instantiated, each object in that mapping is included by means of its Exec method.
Functions and Data Types The functions and data types that are used by TDL is described. The majority of these functions and data types are used in a standard SQL
environment, however, additional specific elements are also provided.
Specification <general_func> ::= (<char func> I <conversion_func> I <date_func> I
<group_func> I
<numeric_func> I <scientific_func> I <special_func>) <char func> ::= {ASCII (<char var>) I
CHR (<num_var) I
CONCAT (<char var> <char_var>) I
INITCAP (<char_var>) I
INSTR (<char var>, <char var>, [<int_var>, [<int_var>]]) I
LENGTH (<expr var>) I LOWER (<expr var>) I
LPAD (<expr var>, <num_var>, [<char_var>]) I
LTRIM (<expr var>, [<expr_var>}) I
RPAD (<char var>, <num_var>, [<char var>]) I
RTRIM (<char var>, [<char_var>]) I
SUBSTR (<char var>, <num_var>, [<num_var>]) I
UPPER (<char var>) }
<conversion_func> ::_ (TO CHAR ((<num_var> I date_var, [<char var>]}) I
TO_DATE (<char var>, [<char var>]) I
WO 01/37135 PCT[US00/30781 TO-NUMBER (<var-char>)]
<date_func> ::_ {ADD_TO_DATE (<date_var>, <char_var>, <int_var>) I
DATE-COMPARE (<date_var>, <date_var>) I
5 DATE_DIFF (<date_var>, <date_var>, <char var>) I
GET-DATE-PART (<date_var>, <char_var>) I
LAST DAY (<expr var>) I
SER DATE_PART (<date_var>, <char_var>, <int var>) }
10 <group_func> ::= {AVG (<num val>, [<expr_val>]) I
COUNT (<expr_var>, [<expr val>]) I
MAX (<expr var>, [<expr var>]), MEDIAN (<num var>, [<expr_var>]) I
MIN (<expr var>, [<expr var>]), 15 PERCENTILE (<num_var>, <num_var>, [<expr var>]) I
STDDEV (<num var>, [<expr_var>]) I
SUM (<num_var>, [<expr var>]) I
VARIANCE (<num_var>, [<expr var>]) }
20 <numeric func> ::=JABS (<num var>) I
CE1L (<num_var>) I
CLIME (<num_var>, [<expr var>J) I
EXP (<num_var>) I
ABS (<num_var>) I
25 FLOOR (<num_var>) I
ISNULL (<expr_var>) I
LN (<expr var>) I
LOG (<expr_var>, <expr_var>) MOD (<num var>, <num_var>) I
MOVINGAVG (<num_var>, <int var>, [<expr_var>]) I
MOVINGSUM (<num_var>, <int var>, [<expr var>]) I
POWER (<num_var>, <num_var>) I
ROUND ((<num_var> I <date var>), (<num_var> I
<format var>)) I
SIGN (<num_var>) I
SQRT (<num var>) I
TRUNC (<num_var>, [<num_var>) ) <scientific func> ::= (COS (<num_var>) I
COSH (<num_var>) I
SIN (<num_var>) I
SINH (<num_var>) I
TAN (<num_var>) I
TANH (<num_var>)) <special_func> ::= (DECODE (<expr var>, <expr var>, <expr var>, [<expr_var>]) I
IIF (<expr var>, <expr_var>, [<expr_var>]) I
LOOKUP (<expr_var>, <expr var>, <expr var>) PIVOT (<any_var>, <bool_var>) I
TOP (<num_var>, <int var>, <int var>) ) <data_type> ::_ { BINARY I BIT I CHAR I DATE I DECIMAL I DOUBLE I
FLOAT
SMALLINT I TEXT I TIMESTAMP I TINYINT I VARCHAR) <constant> ::= {<posinteger> I <integer> I <real> I <char> I <string>
I <boolean>}
Figure 8 illustrates an exemplary computer system 800 upon which the present invention may be implemented or practiced. It is appreciated that the computer system 800 of Figure 8 is exemplary only and that the present invention can operate within a number of different computer systems.
Computer system 800 of Figure 8 includes an address/data bus 801 for conveying digital information between the various components, a central processor unit (CPU) 802 for processing the digital information and instructions, a main memory 804 comprised of random access memory (RAM) for storing the digital information and instructions, a read only memory (ROM) 811 for storing information and instructions of a more permanent nature. In addition, computer system 800 may also include a data storage device 807 (e.g., a magnetic, optical, floppy, or tape drive) for storing vast amounts of data, and an I/O interface 808 for interfacing with peripheral devices (e.g., computer network, modem, etc.). It should be noted that the client program for performing TDL can be stored either in main memory 804, data storage device 807, or in an external storage device. Devices which may be coupled to computer system 800 include a display device 821 for displaying information to a computer user, an alphanumeric input device 822 (e.g., a keyboard), and a cursor control device 823 (e.g., mouse, trackball, light pen, etc.) for inputting data and selections.
Hence, an apparatus and method for transforming data in data warehousing applications has been disclosed. Furthermore, a functional specification for the Transformation Description Language (TDL) has been described in detail. The primary objective for creating TDL is to provide a text-based representation of the definitions of various source, transformation, and target objects used in data warehousing applications. Such textual descriptions can in turn be used for verification of the mappings created through a graphical user interface. A parser can also be potentially developed for TDL so that components of a mappings described in this language can be brought into other systems. Thus, TDL could potentially become a standard for exchanging transformation metadata across various programs. Furthermore, TDL could potentially be extended to capture the complete behavior of a mapping (i.e., the internal dependencies and the data flow across the acyclic, directed graph structure of the mapping). In a sense, TDL may be extended to become a complete transformation programming language to be used on top of the transformation engine to offer a truly software component which in turn could be embedded in various data warehousing systems.
In an alternative embodiment, the present invention can be readily encapsulated within an application. The present invention can be extended to cover any analytical application. Furthermore, the present invention can be extended to any application which uses data mart or data warehousing technology whereby data is being aggregated, consolidated or otherwise transformed. Some exemplary applications within which the present invention may be practiced include, but are not limited to: balance scorecard applications, enterprise applications, performance measurement applications, marketing tools, profiling applications, data mining applications, segmentation applications, filtering tools, etc.). Figure 9 is a block diagram showing an exemplary application having an embedded data transformation engine as contemplated by the present invention. Source data is stored upon in one or more source systems 901-903 (e.g., source tables). The relevant source data is extracted from one of the source systems 901-903 by the data transformation engine 904. In the currently preferred embodiment, data transformation engine 904 performs the transformations described above in reference to the transformation description language. The transformed data is then presented by the analytical application 905 for display to the user.
Typically, the analytical application has one or more graphical user interfaces which enables a user to request and obtain desired information. The resulting transformed data can also be stored in one or more data marts or data warehouses 906-907. An example of an analytical application 905 might be customer profiling used for marketing purposes. A luxury car dealership can use a profiling application to analyze the source systems of a credit card company in order to determine those potential customers who live within a certain geographical location, meet a certain income level, fly first class, eat out at upscale restaurants, etc. Complex algorithms and even neural networks can be used to analyze the transformed data obtained from the data transformation engine. The results are then stored within one or more data 5 marts for subsequent retrieval. It should be noted that the source systems 901-903 and/or the data transformation engine 904 can be part of the application 905. Furthermore, data marts/warehouses 906-907 are optional, or they can reside outside of the analytical application 905.
10 In another embodiment of the present invention, the transformation engine can be used to facilitate the transfer of data from one system to another system. Often, data from one system is required to be copied over onto a different system such that both system now have access to that valuable data. Unfortunately, in many instances, the two systems can have 15 conflicting formats, structures, or configurations due to hardware, software, or vendor differences. As such, it may be a rather difficult task trying to reconcile the different formats. The present invention can be, used to transform data, not only for analytical purposes, but also to transform the data to provide compatibility, formatting, and interfacing solutions. In other 20 words, the data is transformed to provide data integration amongst. two or more systems. Although the purpose has now changed, the process for accomplishing the data integration relies on the same steps of mapping, transforming, and then exporting of the data. Figure 10 is a block diagram showing how one embodiment of the present invention can be used to 25 transfer data from one system to another system having a different format.
Source data is stored in one or more source systems 1001-1002. The relevant source data is extracted from the appropriate-source system by the data transformation engine 1003. In the currently preferred embodiment, the TDL
as described above is used to accomplish the transformation. The source data is transformed such that its format is now compatible with that of the target system, such as target system 1004 and/or target system 1005. The target system can be a database, data mart, or data warehouse.
In yet another embodiment, the present invention covers the case whereby rather than having a physically separate database, the database is embedded within the application itself or otherwise accessible by the application. Thereby, the application now acts as the source system. An example might be a pre-packaged financial system. The user interacts with one or more graphical user interfaces rather than directly with a database.
However, a database resides either inside, underneath, or remote to the application.
The foregoing descriptions of specific embodiments of the present invention have been presented for purposes of illustration and description.
They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed, and obviously many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the Claims appended hereto and their equivalents.
ISNULL (<expr_var>) I
LN (<expr var>) I
LOG (<expr_var>, <expr_var>) MOD (<num var>, <num_var>) I
MOVINGAVG (<num_var>, <int var>, [<expr_var>]) I
MOVINGSUM (<num_var>, <int var>, [<expr var>]) I
POWER (<num_var>, <num_var>) I
ROUND ((<num_var> I <date var>), (<num_var> I
<format var>)) I
SIGN (<num_var>) I
SQRT (<num var>) I
TRUNC (<num_var>, [<num_var>) ) <scientific func> ::= (COS (<num_var>) I
COSH (<num_var>) I
SIN (<num_var>) I
SINH (<num_var>) I
TAN (<num_var>) I
TANH (<num_var>)) <special_func> ::= (DECODE (<expr var>, <expr var>, <expr var>, [<expr_var>]) I
IIF (<expr var>, <expr_var>, [<expr_var>]) I
LOOKUP (<expr_var>, <expr var>, <expr var>) PIVOT (<any_var>, <bool_var>) I
TOP (<num_var>, <int var>, <int var>) ) <data_type> ::_ { BINARY I BIT I CHAR I DATE I DECIMAL I DOUBLE I
FLOAT
SMALLINT I TEXT I TIMESTAMP I TINYINT I VARCHAR) <constant> ::= {<posinteger> I <integer> I <real> I <char> I <string>
I <boolean>}
Figure 8 illustrates an exemplary computer system 800 upon which the present invention may be implemented or practiced. It is appreciated that the computer system 800 of Figure 8 is exemplary only and that the present invention can operate within a number of different computer systems.
Computer system 800 of Figure 8 includes an address/data bus 801 for conveying digital information between the various components, a central processor unit (CPU) 802 for processing the digital information and instructions, a main memory 804 comprised of random access memory (RAM) for storing the digital information and instructions, a read only memory (ROM) 811 for storing information and instructions of a more permanent nature. In addition, computer system 800 may also include a data storage device 807 (e.g., a magnetic, optical, floppy, or tape drive) for storing vast amounts of data, and an I/O interface 808 for interfacing with peripheral devices (e.g., computer network, modem, etc.). It should be noted that the client program for performing TDL can be stored either in main memory 804, data storage device 807, or in an external storage device. Devices which may be coupled to computer system 800 include a display device 821 for displaying information to a computer user, an alphanumeric input device 822 (e.g., a keyboard), and a cursor control device 823 (e.g., mouse, trackball, light pen, etc.) for inputting data and selections.
Hence, an apparatus and method for transforming data in data warehousing applications has been disclosed. Furthermore, a functional specification for the Transformation Description Language (TDL) has been described in detail. The primary objective for creating TDL is to provide a text-based representation of the definitions of various source, transformation, and target objects used in data warehousing applications. Such textual descriptions can in turn be used for verification of the mappings created through a graphical user interface. A parser can also be potentially developed for TDL so that components of a mappings described in this language can be brought into other systems. Thus, TDL could potentially become a standard for exchanging transformation metadata across various programs. Furthermore, TDL could potentially be extended to capture the complete behavior of a mapping (i.e., the internal dependencies and the data flow across the acyclic, directed graph structure of the mapping). In a sense, TDL may be extended to become a complete transformation programming language to be used on top of the transformation engine to offer a truly software component which in turn could be embedded in various data warehousing systems.
In an alternative embodiment, the present invention can be readily encapsulated within an application. The present invention can be extended to cover any analytical application. Furthermore, the present invention can be extended to any application which uses data mart or data warehousing technology whereby data is being aggregated, consolidated or otherwise transformed. Some exemplary applications within which the present invention may be practiced include, but are not limited to: balance scorecard applications, enterprise applications, performance measurement applications, marketing tools, profiling applications, data mining applications, segmentation applications, filtering tools, etc.). Figure 9 is a block diagram showing an exemplary application having an embedded data transformation engine as contemplated by the present invention. Source data is stored upon in one or more source systems 901-903 (e.g., source tables). The relevant source data is extracted from one of the source systems 901-903 by the data transformation engine 904. In the currently preferred embodiment, data transformation engine 904 performs the transformations described above in reference to the transformation description language. The transformed data is then presented by the analytical application 905 for display to the user.
Typically, the analytical application has one or more graphical user interfaces which enables a user to request and obtain desired information. The resulting transformed data can also be stored in one or more data marts or data warehouses 906-907. An example of an analytical application 905 might be customer profiling used for marketing purposes. A luxury car dealership can use a profiling application to analyze the source systems of a credit card company in order to determine those potential customers who live within a certain geographical location, meet a certain income level, fly first class, eat out at upscale restaurants, etc. Complex algorithms and even neural networks can be used to analyze the transformed data obtained from the data transformation engine. The results are then stored within one or more data 5 marts for subsequent retrieval. It should be noted that the source systems 901-903 and/or the data transformation engine 904 can be part of the application 905. Furthermore, data marts/warehouses 906-907 are optional, or they can reside outside of the analytical application 905.
10 In another embodiment of the present invention, the transformation engine can be used to facilitate the transfer of data from one system to another system. Often, data from one system is required to be copied over onto a different system such that both system now have access to that valuable data. Unfortunately, in many instances, the two systems can have 15 conflicting formats, structures, or configurations due to hardware, software, or vendor differences. As such, it may be a rather difficult task trying to reconcile the different formats. The present invention can be, used to transform data, not only for analytical purposes, but also to transform the data to provide compatibility, formatting, and interfacing solutions. In other 20 words, the data is transformed to provide data integration amongst. two or more systems. Although the purpose has now changed, the process for accomplishing the data integration relies on the same steps of mapping, transforming, and then exporting of the data. Figure 10 is a block diagram showing how one embodiment of the present invention can be used to 25 transfer data from one system to another system having a different format.
Source data is stored in one or more source systems 1001-1002. The relevant source data is extracted from the appropriate-source system by the data transformation engine 1003. In the currently preferred embodiment, the TDL
as described above is used to accomplish the transformation. The source data is transformed such that its format is now compatible with that of the target system, such as target system 1004 and/or target system 1005. The target system can be a database, data mart, or data warehouse.
In yet another embodiment, the present invention covers the case whereby rather than having a physically separate database, the database is embedded within the application itself or otherwise accessible by the application. Thereby, the application now acts as the source system. An example might be a pre-packaged financial system. The user interacts with one or more graphical user interfaces rather than directly with a database.
However, a database resides either inside, underneath, or remote to the application.
The foregoing descriptions of specific embodiments of the present invention have been presented for purposes of illustration and description.
They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed, and obviously many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the Claims appended hereto and their equivalents.
Claims (14)
1. A computer implemented method for transferring data having a first format from a first system to a second system having a second format, comprising the steps of:
identifying a set of source data having the first format stored on the first system;
storing a set of transformation objects including an aggregator transformation object, an expression transformation object, a filter transformation object, a lookup transformation object, a query transformation object, and a sequence transformation object which transform data according to metadata corresponding to a particular transformation object, wherein different transformation objects perform different, unique functions;
mapping data from the first system to one or more of the transformation objects;
transforming the data having the first format to the second format through at least one of the transformation objects; and exporting transformed data having the second format to the second system.
identifying a set of source data having the first format stored on the first system;
storing a set of transformation objects including an aggregator transformation object, an expression transformation object, a filter transformation object, a lookup transformation object, a query transformation object, and a sequence transformation object which transform data according to metadata corresponding to a particular transformation object, wherein different transformation objects perform different, unique functions;
mapping data from the first system to one or more of the transformation objects;
transforming the data having the first format to the second format through at least one of the transformation objects; and exporting transformed data having the second format to the second system.
2. A computer implemented method, comprising the steps of:
specifying at least one source system containing source data;
storing metadata corresponding to a plurality of transformation objects including an aggregator transformation object, an expression transformation object, a filter transformation object, a lookup transformation object, a query transformation object, and a sequence transformation object which transform data according to the metadata corresponding to a particular transformation object, wherein different transformation objects perform different, unique functions;
specifying a target system for storing transformed data;
selecting at least one of the transformation objects;
mapping data from the source system to a first selected transformation object;
transforming the data according to the metadata corresponding to the first selected transformation object;
mapping the transformed data from the first selected transformation object to the target system.
specifying at least one source system containing source data;
storing metadata corresponding to a plurality of transformation objects including an aggregator transformation object, an expression transformation object, a filter transformation object, a lookup transformation object, a query transformation object, and a sequence transformation object which transform data according to the metadata corresponding to a particular transformation object, wherein different transformation objects perform different, unique functions;
specifying a target system for storing transformed data;
selecting at least one of the transformation objects;
mapping data from the source system to a first selected transformation object;
transforming the data according to the metadata corresponding to the first selected transformation object;
mapping the transformed data from the first selected transformation object to the target system.
3. The computer implemented method of claim 2, wherein the method is for analyzing data in an application.
4. The computer implemented method of claim 3, wherein the application comprises a balance score card application.
5. The computer implemented method of claim 3, wherein the application comprises an enterprise performance measurement application.
6. The computer implemented method of claim 3, wherein the application comprises a marketing application.
7. The computer implemented method of claim 3, wherein the application comprises a profiling application.
8. The computer implemented method of claim 3, wherein the application comprises a segmentation application.
9. The computer implemented method of claim 3, wherein the application comprises a data mining application.
10. The computer implemented method of claim 3, wherein the application includes an embedded data mart.
11. The computer implemented method of claim 2, wherein the source system comprises an application.
12. The computer implemented method of claim 11, wherein the application includes a database embedded within the application.
13. A computer system for transferring data having a first format from a first system to a second system having a second format, the system configured to:
identify a set of source data having the first format stored on the first system;
store a set of transformation objects including an aggregator transformation object, an expression transformation object, a filter transformation object, a lookup transformation object, a query transformation object, and a sequence transformation object which transform data according to metadata corresponding to a particular transformation object, wherein different transformation objects perform different, unique functions;
map data from the first system to one or more of the transformation objects;
transform the data having the first format to the second format through at least one of the transformation objects; and export transformed data having the second format to the second system.
identify a set of source data having the first format stored on the first system;
store a set of transformation objects including an aggregator transformation object, an expression transformation object, a filter transformation object, a lookup transformation object, a query transformation object, and a sequence transformation object which transform data according to metadata corresponding to a particular transformation object, wherein different transformation objects perform different, unique functions;
map data from the first system to one or more of the transformation objects;
transform the data having the first format to the second format through at least one of the transformation objects; and export transformed data having the second format to the second system.
14. A computer system configured to:
specify at least one source system containing source data;
store metadata corresponding to a plurality of transformation objects including an aggregator transformation object, an expression transformation object, a filter transformation object, a lookup transformation object, a query transformation object, and a sequence transformation object which transform data according to the metadata corresponding to a particular transformation object, wherein different transformation objects perform different, unique functions;
specify a target system for storing transformed data;
select at least one of the transformation objects;
map data from the source system to a first selected transformation object;
transform the data according to the metadata corresponding to the first selected transformation object; and map the transformed data from the first selected transformation object to the target system.
specify at least one source system containing source data;
store metadata corresponding to a plurality of transformation objects including an aggregator transformation object, an expression transformation object, a filter transformation object, a lookup transformation object, a query transformation object, and a sequence transformation object which transform data according to the metadata corresponding to a particular transformation object, wherein different transformation objects perform different, unique functions;
specify a target system for storing transformed data;
select at least one of the transformation objects;
map data from the source system to a first selected transformation object;
transform the data according to the metadata corresponding to the first selected transformation object; and map the transformed data from the first selected transformation object to the target system.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US09/442,060 US6339775B1 (en) | 1997-11-07 | 1999-11-16 | Apparatus and method for performing data transformations in data warehousing |
| US09/442,060 | 1999-11-16 | ||
| PCT/US2000/030781 WO2001037135A2 (en) | 1999-11-16 | 2000-11-08 | System and method for managing a database |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2392675A1 CA2392675A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 |
| CA2392675C true CA2392675C (en) | 2012-08-14 |
Family
ID=23755376
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA2392675A Expired - Fee Related CA2392675C (en) | 1999-11-16 | 2000-11-08 | Database system and method |
Country Status (3)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US6339775B1 (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2392675C (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2001037135A2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (167)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GB2343763B (en) * | 1998-09-04 | 2003-05-21 | Shell Services Internat Ltd | Data processing system |
| US6507945B1 (en) * | 1999-05-05 | 2003-01-14 | Symyx Technologies, Inc. | Synthesizing combinatorial libraries of materials |
| US6408292B1 (en) | 1999-08-04 | 2002-06-18 | Hyperroll, Israel, Ltd. | Method of and system for managing multi-dimensional databases using modular-arithmetic based address data mapping processes on integer-encoded business dimensions |
| US6385604B1 (en) * | 1999-08-04 | 2002-05-07 | Hyperroll, Israel Limited | Relational database management system having integrated non-relational multi-dimensional data store of aggregated data elements |
| US6668253B1 (en) * | 1999-09-08 | 2003-12-23 | Reynolds & Reynolds Holdings, Inc. | Enterprise information management system and methods |
| US20020029207A1 (en) * | 2000-02-28 | 2002-03-07 | Hyperroll, Inc. | Data aggregation server for managing a multi-dimensional database and database management system having data aggregation server integrated therein |
| US6567816B1 (en) * | 2000-03-07 | 2003-05-20 | Paramesh Sampatrai Desai | Method, system, and program for extracting data from database records using dynamic code |
| JP4713707B2 (en) * | 2000-03-28 | 2011-06-29 | 日産自動車株式会社 | Data display system |
| EP1277138B1 (en) * | 2000-04-04 | 2018-10-17 | Red Hat, Inc. | A system and method for accessing data in disparate information sources |
| AU2001261227A1 (en) * | 2000-05-05 | 2001-11-20 | Raytheon Company | Method and system for accessing data in a database warehouse |
| US6957234B1 (en) * | 2000-05-26 | 2005-10-18 | I2 Technologies Us, Inc. | System and method for retrieving data from a database using a data management system |
| US7117215B1 (en) | 2001-06-07 | 2006-10-03 | Informatica Corporation | Method and apparatus for transporting data for data warehousing applications that incorporates analytic data interface |
| US7043457B1 (en) | 2000-06-28 | 2006-05-09 | Probuild, Inc. | System and method for managing and evaluating network commodities purchasing |
| US7313588B1 (en) | 2000-07-13 | 2007-12-25 | Biap Systems, Inc. | Locally executing software agent for retrieving remote content and method for creation and use of the agent |
| US7613790B2 (en) * | 2000-07-13 | 2009-11-03 | Biap Systems, Inc. | Apparatus for and method of executing customized interactive computing services in a broadband network environment |
| US7152058B2 (en) * | 2000-07-13 | 2006-12-19 | Biap Systems, Inc. | Apparatus for and method of selectively retrieving information and enabling its subsequent display |
| US20030097363A1 (en) * | 2000-07-17 | 2003-05-22 | Dorsey Paul R. | Method and computer system for storage of data structure business rules using UML class diagrams |
| US6895471B1 (en) * | 2000-08-22 | 2005-05-17 | Informatica Corporation | Method and apparatus for synchronizing cache with target tables in a data warehousing system |
| US20030083898A1 (en) * | 2000-12-22 | 2003-05-01 | Wick Corey W. | System and method for monitoring intellectual capital |
| US6792431B2 (en) | 2001-05-07 | 2004-09-14 | Anadarko Petroleum Corporation | Method, system, and product for data integration through a dynamic common model |
| US7020662B2 (en) * | 2001-05-29 | 2006-03-28 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and system for determining a directory entry's class of service based on the value of a specifier in the entry |
| US7380239B1 (en) | 2001-05-31 | 2008-05-27 | Oracle International Corporation | Method and mechanism for diagnosing computer applications using traces |
| US7376937B1 (en) | 2001-05-31 | 2008-05-20 | Oracle International Corporation | Method and mechanism for using a meta-language to define and analyze traces |
| US7162643B1 (en) | 2001-06-15 | 2007-01-09 | Informatica Corporation | Method and system for providing transfer of analytic application data over a network |
| US6789096B2 (en) * | 2001-06-25 | 2004-09-07 | Informatica Corporation | Real time sessions in an analytic application |
| US6915286B2 (en) * | 2001-07-03 | 2005-07-05 | Fairfax County School Board | System and method for an education decision support library |
| WO2003005624A2 (en) * | 2001-07-05 | 2003-01-16 | Computer Associates International, Inc. | System and method for transforming business process policy data |
| US7720842B2 (en) | 2001-07-16 | 2010-05-18 | Informatica Corporation | Value-chained queries in analytic applications |
| US7065588B2 (en) * | 2001-08-10 | 2006-06-20 | Chaavi, Inc. | Method and system for data transformation in a heterogeneous computer system |
| US6836777B2 (en) * | 2001-11-15 | 2004-12-28 | Ncr Corporation | System and method for constructing generic analytical database applications |
| WO2003058427A1 (en) * | 2001-12-28 | 2003-07-17 | Jeffrey James Jonas | Real time data warehousing |
| US7343585B1 (en) * | 2002-01-30 | 2008-03-11 | Oracle International Corporation | Operator approach for generic dataflow designs |
| US7069263B1 (en) * | 2002-02-19 | 2006-06-27 | Oracle International Corporation | Automatic trend analysis data capture |
| US6820077B2 (en) | 2002-02-22 | 2004-11-16 | Informatica Corporation | Method and system for navigating a large amount of data |
| EP1349080A1 (en) * | 2002-03-26 | 2003-10-01 | Deutsche Thomson-Brandt Gmbh | Methods and apparatus for using metadata from different sources |
| EP1499255B1 (en) * | 2002-04-19 | 2015-07-22 | Syneron Medical Ltd. | Handheld transdermal drug delivery and analyte extraction |
| US7089261B2 (en) * | 2002-07-25 | 2006-08-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Programmable use of data extracted from common presentation files |
| US7200588B1 (en) * | 2002-07-29 | 2007-04-03 | Oracle International Corporation | Method and mechanism for analyzing trace data using a database management system |
| US7165190B1 (en) | 2002-07-29 | 2007-01-16 | Oracle International Corporation | Method and mechanism for managing traces within a computer system |
| US7512954B2 (en) * | 2002-07-29 | 2009-03-31 | Oracle International Corporation | Method and mechanism for debugging a series of related events within a computer system |
| US20040054545A1 (en) * | 2002-09-13 | 2004-03-18 | Electronic Data Systems Corporation | System and method for managing innovation capabilities of an organization |
| US20060005126A1 (en) * | 2002-10-07 | 2006-01-05 | Shaul Shapiro | Method for manipulation of objects within electronic graphic documents |
| CN1757188A (en) * | 2002-11-06 | 2006-04-05 | 国际商业机器公司 | Confidential data sharing and anonymous entity resolution |
| US8620937B2 (en) * | 2002-12-27 | 2013-12-31 | International Business Machines Corporation | Real time data warehousing |
| WO2004061668A1 (en) | 2002-12-31 | 2004-07-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Authorized anonymous authentication |
| US6804589B2 (en) * | 2003-01-14 | 2004-10-12 | Honeywell International, Inc. | System and method for efficiently capturing and reporting maintenance, repair, and overhaul data |
| US7200602B2 (en) * | 2003-02-07 | 2007-04-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Data set comparison and net change processing |
| US20040167979A1 (en) * | 2003-02-20 | 2004-08-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automatic configuration of metric components in a service level management system |
| US7146474B2 (en) * | 2003-03-12 | 2006-12-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | System, method and computer program product to automatically select target volumes for a fast copy to optimize performance and availability |
| EP1631908A4 (en) * | 2003-03-24 | 2012-01-25 | Ibm | Secure coordinate identification method, system and program |
| US20050138081A1 (en) * | 2003-05-14 | 2005-06-23 | Alshab Melanie A. | Method and system for reducing information latency in a business enterprise |
| US20040230463A1 (en) * | 2003-05-15 | 2004-11-18 | Results Based Scorecards Inc. | Performance management by results-based scorecarding |
| EP1625510A4 (en) * | 2003-05-17 | 2008-03-12 | Microsoft Corp | Mechanism for applying transorms to multi-part files |
| CA2429910A1 (en) * | 2003-05-27 | 2004-11-27 | Cognos Incorporated | System and method of query transformation |
| US7089266B2 (en) | 2003-06-02 | 2006-08-08 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Jr. University | Computer systems and methods for the query and visualization of multidimensional databases |
| US7596573B2 (en) * | 2003-06-11 | 2009-09-29 | Oracle International Corporation | System and method for automatic data mapping |
| US20050027550A1 (en) * | 2003-08-01 | 2005-02-03 | Electronic Data Systems Corporation | Process and method for lifecycle digital maturity assessment |
| US7873684B2 (en) | 2003-08-14 | 2011-01-18 | Oracle International Corporation | Automatic and dynamic provisioning of databases |
| US7426520B2 (en) | 2003-09-10 | 2008-09-16 | Exeros, Inc. | Method and apparatus for semantic discovery and mapping between data sources |
| US7756907B2 (en) * | 2003-09-16 | 2010-07-13 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Jr. University | Computer systems and methods for visualizing data |
| US7269701B2 (en) * | 2003-10-10 | 2007-09-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Self-configuration of source-to-target mapping |
| US7421458B1 (en) | 2003-10-16 | 2008-09-02 | Informatica Corporation | Querying, versioning, and dynamic deployment of database objects |
| US7254590B2 (en) * | 2003-12-03 | 2007-08-07 | Informatica Corporation | Set-oriented real-time data processing based on transaction boundaries |
| US20050154696A1 (en) * | 2004-01-12 | 2005-07-14 | Hitachi Global Storage Technologies | Pipeline architecture for data summarization |
| US7529764B2 (en) * | 2004-01-12 | 2009-05-05 | Hitachi Global Storage Technologies Netherlands B.V. | GUI for data pipeline |
| KR101167827B1 (en) | 2004-01-16 | 2012-07-26 | 힐크레스트 래보래토리스, 인크. | Metadata brokering server and methods |
| US8311974B2 (en) * | 2004-02-20 | 2012-11-13 | Oracle International Corporation | Modularized extraction, transformation, and loading for a database |
| US7367011B2 (en) * | 2004-04-13 | 2008-04-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system and program product for developing a data model in a data mining system |
| US20050235252A1 (en) * | 2004-04-20 | 2005-10-20 | Electronic Data Systems Corporation | System and method for reporting innovation data |
| US7448047B2 (en) * | 2004-04-29 | 2008-11-04 | Sybase, Inc. | Database system with methodology for providing stored procedures as web services |
| US8554806B2 (en) * | 2004-05-14 | 2013-10-08 | Oracle International Corporation | Cross platform transportable tablespaces |
| US20060129893A1 (en) * | 2004-11-30 | 2006-06-15 | Smith Alan R | Apparatus, system, and method for criteria driven summarization of trace entry data |
| US7424646B2 (en) * | 2004-11-30 | 2008-09-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Imposing a logical structure on an unstructured trace record for trace analysis |
| US7800613B2 (en) * | 2004-12-02 | 2010-09-21 | Tableau Software, Inc. | Computer systems and methods for visualizing data with generation of marks |
| US20060242261A1 (en) * | 2005-04-21 | 2006-10-26 | Piot Jon C | System and method for information technology assessment |
| US8418132B2 (en) * | 2005-04-29 | 2013-04-09 | Microsoft Corporation | Application description language |
| US8132148B2 (en) | 2005-04-29 | 2012-03-06 | Microsoft Corporation | XML application framework |
| US8799857B2 (en) * | 2005-04-29 | 2014-08-05 | Microsoft Corporation | XML application framework |
| US7581225B2 (en) * | 2005-04-29 | 2009-08-25 | Microsoft Corporation | Multithreading with concurrency domains |
| US8275793B2 (en) | 2005-04-29 | 2012-09-25 | Microsoft Corporation | Transaction transforms |
| US20060253466A1 (en) * | 2005-05-05 | 2006-11-09 | Upton Francis R Iv | Data Mapping Editor Graphical User Interface |
| US7840610B2 (en) * | 2005-05-11 | 2010-11-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Apparatus, system, and method for map definition generation |
| US20060271582A1 (en) * | 2005-05-25 | 2006-11-30 | Caterpillar Inc. | System and method for analyzing raw data files |
| US7877350B2 (en) * | 2005-06-27 | 2011-01-25 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Managing metadata for graph-based computations |
| US7702686B2 (en) * | 2005-07-29 | 2010-04-20 | Microsoft Corporation | Retrieving and persisting objects from/to relational databases |
| US20070028222A1 (en) * | 2005-07-29 | 2007-02-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Free/outer variable capture |
| US20070044083A1 (en) * | 2005-07-29 | 2007-02-22 | Microsoft Corporation | Lambda expressions |
| US20070027905A1 (en) * | 2005-07-29 | 2007-02-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Intelligent SQL generation for persistent object retrieval |
| US7631011B2 (en) * | 2005-07-29 | 2009-12-08 | Microsoft Corporation | Code generation patterns |
| US7685567B2 (en) * | 2005-07-29 | 2010-03-23 | Microsoft Corporation | Architecture that extends types using extension methods |
| US20070027849A1 (en) * | 2005-07-29 | 2007-02-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Integrating query-related operators in a programming language |
| US8099674B2 (en) | 2005-09-09 | 2012-01-17 | Tableau Software Llc | Computer systems and methods for automatically viewing multidimensional databases |
| US7676478B2 (en) * | 2006-01-10 | 2010-03-09 | Sas Institute Inc. | Data warehousing systems and methods having reusable user transforms |
| US7999809B2 (en) * | 2006-04-19 | 2011-08-16 | Tableau Software, Inc. | Computer systems and methods for automatic generation of models for a dataset |
| US20070271229A1 (en) * | 2006-05-17 | 2007-11-22 | Jauder Ho | System and method for data searching among multiple enterprise applications |
| CN103729330B (en) | 2006-08-10 | 2017-04-19 | 起元科技有限公司 | Distributing services in graph-based computations |
| US8204831B2 (en) * | 2006-11-13 | 2012-06-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Post-anonymous fuzzy comparisons without the use of pre-anonymization variants |
| US8909599B2 (en) * | 2006-11-16 | 2014-12-09 | Oracle International Corporation | Efficient migration of binary XML across databases |
| US20080140696A1 (en) * | 2006-12-07 | 2008-06-12 | Pantheon Systems, Inc. | System and method for analyzing data sources to generate metadata |
| US20080235041A1 (en) * | 2007-03-21 | 2008-09-25 | Cashdollar Jeffrey J | Enterprise data management |
| US10387440B2 (en) | 2007-03-29 | 2019-08-20 | Jda Software Group, Inc. | Generic data staging and loading using enhanced metadata and associated method |
| US20090043690A1 (en) * | 2007-08-06 | 2009-02-12 | Maclellan Paul | System and method for validating indirect financing transactions |
| US20080243661A1 (en) * | 2007-03-30 | 2008-10-02 | Bussone Ryan Joseph | System and method of acquiring instant credit |
| US7860904B2 (en) * | 2007-04-24 | 2010-12-28 | Microsoft Corporation | Standalone execution of incomplete data flows |
| US7860905B2 (en) * | 2007-04-24 | 2010-12-28 | Microsoft Corporation | Systems and methods for modularizing data flows |
| WO2008134627A2 (en) | 2007-04-27 | 2008-11-06 | Boomi, Inc. | System and method for automated on-demand creation of a customized software application |
| US8799856B2 (en) * | 2007-06-12 | 2014-08-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for automatically declaring variables |
| US8060868B2 (en) * | 2007-06-21 | 2011-11-15 | Microsoft Corporation | Fully capturing outer variables as data objects |
| US8401987B2 (en) * | 2007-07-17 | 2013-03-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Managing validation models and rules to apply to data sets |
| WO2009015342A1 (en) * | 2007-07-26 | 2009-01-29 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Transactional graph-based computation with error handling |
| US8626622B2 (en) * | 2007-12-14 | 2014-01-07 | Routeone Llc | System and methods for electronic signature capture in e-contracting transactions |
| US20090193043A1 (en) * | 2008-01-29 | 2009-07-30 | Inventec Corporation | Method and system for transforming database and compressible database structure |
| US20090271765A1 (en) * | 2008-04-29 | 2009-10-29 | Microsoft Corporation | Consumer and producer specific semantics of shared object protocols |
| US20090282042A1 (en) * | 2008-05-12 | 2009-11-12 | Expressor Software | Method and system for managing the development of data integration projects to facilitate project development and analysis thereof |
| US8271430B2 (en) * | 2008-06-02 | 2012-09-18 | The Boeing Company | Methods and systems for metadata driven data capture for a temporal data warehouse |
| US9720971B2 (en) * | 2008-06-30 | 2017-08-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Discovering transformations applied to a source table to generate a target table |
| WO2010093879A1 (en) | 2009-02-13 | 2010-08-19 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Managing task execution |
| US8606366B2 (en) | 2009-02-18 | 2013-12-10 | Syneron Medical Ltd. | Skin treatment apparatus for personal use and method for using same |
| US9563866B2 (en) * | 2009-04-06 | 2017-02-07 | Accenture Global Services Limited | Estimating a computing job complexity |
| JP5471086B2 (en) * | 2009-07-02 | 2014-04-16 | 富士通株式会社 | Information integration apparatus, information integration method, and information integration program |
| JP5375413B2 (en) * | 2009-07-30 | 2013-12-25 | 富士通株式会社 | Data conversion apparatus, data conversion method, and data conversion program |
| US8667329B2 (en) * | 2009-09-25 | 2014-03-04 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Processing transactions in graph-based applications |
| US8739118B2 (en) | 2010-04-08 | 2014-05-27 | Microsoft Corporation | Pragmatic mapping specification, compilation and validation |
| US8266181B2 (en) | 2010-05-27 | 2012-09-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Key-break and record-loop processing in parallel data transformation |
| WO2011159759A1 (en) | 2010-06-15 | 2011-12-22 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Dynamically loading graph-based computations |
| US20120005151A1 (en) * | 2010-07-01 | 2012-01-05 | Vineetha Vasudevan | Methods and systems of content development for a data warehouse |
| JP5601066B2 (en) | 2010-07-23 | 2014-10-08 | 富士通株式会社 | Information integration program, apparatus and method |
| JP5100820B2 (en) * | 2010-11-25 | 2012-12-19 | 株式会社東芝 | Query expression conversion apparatus, method and program |
| CN102479219B (en) * | 2010-11-30 | 2015-02-25 | 香港理工大学 | Interactive searching processing method |
| US9710282B2 (en) | 2011-12-21 | 2017-07-18 | Dell Products, Lp | System to automate development of system integration application programs and method therefor |
| US8943076B2 (en) | 2012-02-06 | 2015-01-27 | Dell Products, Lp | System to automate mapping of variables between business process applications and method therefor |
| US8954376B2 (en) * | 2012-03-08 | 2015-02-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | Detecting transcoding tables in extract-transform-load processes |
| US8583626B2 (en) | 2012-03-08 | 2013-11-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method to detect reference data tables in ETL processes |
| US8805716B2 (en) | 2012-03-19 | 2014-08-12 | Dell Products, Lp | Dashboard system and method for identifying and monitoring process errors and throughput of integration software |
| US8930303B2 (en) | 2012-03-30 | 2015-01-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Discovering pivot type relationships between database objects |
| US8782103B2 (en) | 2012-04-13 | 2014-07-15 | Dell Products, Lp | Monitoring system for optimizing integrated business processes to work flow |
| US9158782B2 (en) | 2012-04-30 | 2015-10-13 | Dell Products, Lp | Cloud based master data management system with configuration advisor and method therefore |
| US9606995B2 (en) | 2012-04-30 | 2017-03-28 | Dell Products, Lp | Cloud based master data management system with remote data store and method therefor |
| US9015106B2 (en) | 2012-04-30 | 2015-04-21 | Dell Products, Lp | Cloud based master data management system and method therefor |
| US8589207B1 (en) | 2012-05-15 | 2013-11-19 | Dell Products, Lp | System and method for determining and visually predicting at-risk integrated processes based on age and activity |
| US9069898B2 (en) | 2012-05-31 | 2015-06-30 | Dell Products, Lp | System for providing regression testing of an integrated process development system and method therefor |
| US9092244B2 (en) | 2012-06-07 | 2015-07-28 | Dell Products, Lp | System for developing custom data transformations for system integration application programs |
| US10108521B2 (en) | 2012-11-16 | 2018-10-23 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Dynamic component performance monitoring |
| US9507682B2 (en) | 2012-11-16 | 2016-11-29 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Dynamic graph performance monitoring |
| US9274926B2 (en) | 2013-01-03 | 2016-03-01 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Configurable testing of computer programs |
| US9928283B2 (en) | 2013-04-15 | 2018-03-27 | Validus Solutions, Inc. | Tracing data through a transformation process using tracer codes |
| CN104239343B (en) * | 2013-06-20 | 2018-04-27 | 腾讯科技（深圳）有限公司 | A kind of user inputs the treating method and apparatus of information |
| US9183074B2 (en) | 2013-06-21 | 2015-11-10 | Dell Products, Lp | Integration process management console with error resolution interface |
| JP6626823B2 (en) | 2013-12-05 | 2019-12-25 | アビニシオ テクノロジー エルエルシー | Management of interface for data flow graph composed of subgraphs |
| GB2524074A (en) | 2014-03-14 | 2015-09-16 | Ibm | Processing data sets in a big data repository |
| US9424318B2 (en) | 2014-04-01 | 2016-08-23 | Tableau Software, Inc. | Systems and methods for ranking data visualizations |
| US20150278214A1 (en) | 2014-04-01 | 2015-10-01 | Tableau Software, Inc. | Systems and Methods for Ranking Data Visualizations Using Different Data Fields |
| US9613102B2 (en) | 2014-04-01 | 2017-04-04 | Tableau Software, Inc. | Systems and methods for ranking data visualizations |
| US9684699B2 (en) * | 2014-12-03 | 2017-06-20 | Sas Institute Inc. | System to convert semantic layer metadata to support database conversion |
| US20160292243A1 (en) * | 2015-03-31 | 2016-10-06 | RIMES Technologies Corporation | Data Management System |
| US10083215B2 (en) * | 2015-04-06 | 2018-09-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | Model-based design for transforming data |
| US20170010758A1 (en) * | 2015-07-08 | 2017-01-12 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Actuator module for building application |
| US10657134B2 (en) | 2015-08-05 | 2020-05-19 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Selecting queries for execution on a stream of real-time data |
| US20170083594A1 (en) * | 2015-09-22 | 2017-03-23 | Microsoft Technology Licesnsing, LLC | Application autorouting framework |
| JP6584672B2 (en) | 2015-12-21 | 2019-10-02 | アビニシオ テクノロジー エルエルシー | Subgraph interface generation |
| US10498858B2 (en) | 2016-12-14 | 2019-12-03 | Dell Products, Lp | System and method for automated on-demand creation of and execution of a customized data integration software application |
| US10896297B1 (en) | 2017-12-13 | 2021-01-19 | Tableau Software, Inc. | Identifying intent in visual analytical conversations |
| US10764253B2 (en) | 2018-06-28 | 2020-09-01 | Bank Of America Corporation | System for using metadata to identify and extract specific upstream data, provisioning data batches, and providing dynamic downstream data access |
| US11055489B2 (en) | 2018-10-08 | 2021-07-06 | Tableau Software, Inc. | Determining levels of detail for data visualizations using natural language constructs |
| US11314817B1 (en) | 2019-04-01 | 2022-04-26 | Tableau Software, LLC | Methods and systems for inferring intent and utilizing context for natural language expressions to modify data visualizations in a data visualization interface |
| US11042558B1 (en) | 2019-09-06 | 2021-06-22 | Tableau Software, Inc. | Determining ranges for vague modifiers in natural language commands |
| US11194831B2 (en) | 2019-12-16 | 2021-12-07 | Informatica Llc | Systems, apparatus, and methods for data integration optimization |
Family Cites Families (15)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5794229A (en) * | 1993-04-16 | 1998-08-11 | Sybase, Inc. | Database system with methodology for storing a database table by vertically partitioning all columns of the table |
| US5794228A (en) * | 1993-04-16 | 1998-08-11 | Sybase, Inc. | Database system with buffer manager providing per page native data compression and decompression |
| US5708828A (en) * | 1995-05-25 | 1998-01-13 | Reliant Data Systems | System for converting data from input data environment using first format to output data environment using second format by executing the associations between their fields |
| US5721903A (en) * | 1995-10-12 | 1998-02-24 | Ncr Corporation | System and method for generating reports from a computer database |
| US5870746A (en) * | 1995-10-12 | 1999-02-09 | Ncr Corporation | System and method for segmenting a database based upon data attributes |
| US5692181A (en) * | 1995-10-12 | 1997-11-25 | Ncr Corporation | System and method for generating reports from a computer database |
| US5832496A (en) * | 1995-10-12 | 1998-11-03 | Ncr Corporation | System and method for performing intelligent analysis of a computer database |
| US5706495A (en) * | 1996-05-07 | 1998-01-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Encoded-vector indices for decision support and warehousing |
| US5870747A (en) * | 1996-07-09 | 1999-02-09 | Informix Software, Inc. | Generalized key indexes |
| US5781911A (en) * | 1996-09-10 | 1998-07-14 | D2K, Incorporated | Integrated system and method of data warehousing and delivery |
| US5826258A (en) * | 1996-10-02 | 1998-10-20 | Junglee Corporation | Method and apparatus for structuring the querying and interpretation of semistructured information |
| US5848415A (en) * | 1996-12-18 | 1998-12-08 | Unisys Corporation | Selective multiple protocol transport and dynamic format conversion in a multi-user network |
| US5842213A (en) * | 1997-01-28 | 1998-11-24 | Odom; Paul S. | Method for modeling, storing, and transferring data in neutral form |
| US5873102A (en) * | 1997-04-29 | 1999-02-16 | Oracle Corporation | Pluggable tablespaces on a transportable medium |
| US5794246A (en) * | 1997-04-30 | 1998-08-11 | Informatica Corporation | Method for incremental aggregation of dynamically increasing database data sets |
-
1999
- 1999-11-16 US US09/442,060 patent/US6339775B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2000
- 2000-11-08 CA CA2392675A patent/CA2392675C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2000-11-08 WO PCT/US2000/030781 patent/WO2001037135A2/en active Application Filing
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| WO2001037135A3 (en) | 2003-12-04 |
| WO2001037135A2 (en) | 2001-05-25 |
| CA2392675A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 |
| US6339775B1 (en) | 2002-01-15 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA2392675C (en) | Database system and method | |
| US6014670A (en) | Apparatus and method for performing data transformations in data warehousing | |
| US6161103A (en) | Method and apparatus for creating aggregates for use in a datamart | |
| US6212524B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for creating and populating a datamart | |
| US6189004B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for creating a datamart and for creating a query structure for the datamart | |
| US7117215B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for transporting data for data warehousing applications that incorporates analytic data interface | |
| US7739224B1 (en) | Method and system for creating a well-formed database using semantic definitions | |
| US7146376B2 (en) | Data abstraction model driven physical layout | |
| US6820135B1 (en) | Modeless event-driven data transformation | |
| AU780565B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for selecting aggregate levels and cross product levels for a data warehouse | |
| US6374252B1 (en) | Modeling of object-oriented database structures, translation to relational database structures, and dynamic searches thereon | |
| US8010905B2 (en) | Open model ingestion for master data management | |
| Srivastava et al. | Warehouse creation-a potential roadblock to data warehousing | |
| US20060064428A1 (en) | Methods and apparatus for mapping a hierarchical data structure to a flat data structure for use in generating a report | |
| WO1997033241A1 (en) | System and apparatus for loading and retrieving information | |
| US7461076B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for creating a well-formed database system using a computer | |
| Matthews et al. | MySQL and Java developer's guide | |
| Bai et al. | Introduction to databases | |
| CA2414230C (en) | Computer method and device for transporting data | |
| Hobbs et al. | Rdb: a comprehensive guide | |
| Powell | Oracle High Performance Tuning for 9i and 10g | |
| Thanuja et al. | Database Management Systems: An Introduction | |
| Vavouras et al. | A metadata-driven approach for data warehouse refreshment | |
| Jain | Database Management Systems | |
| Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Database Design Fundamentals |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEER | Examination request | ||
| MKLA | Lapsed |
Effective date: 20191108 |