CA2404624C - Improved luminescence characteristics detector - Google Patents
Improved luminescence characteristics detector Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2404624C CA2404624C CA2404624A CA2404624A CA2404624C CA 2404624 C CA2404624 C CA 2404624C CA 2404624 A CA2404624 A CA 2404624A CA 2404624 A CA2404624 A CA 2404624A CA 2404624 C CA2404624 C CA 2404624C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- intensity
- light source
- time interval
- luminescence
- excitation light
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- 238000004020 luminiscence type Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 60
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 41
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 claims abstract description 17
- 230000005284 excitation Effects 0.000 claims description 58
- 230000005855 radiation Effects 0.000 claims description 25
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 claims description 11
- 239000000976 ink Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 229920003023 plastic Polymers 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000036962 time dependent Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 15
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 abstract description 3
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 239000003550 marker Substances 0.000 abstract 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 16
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 12
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000003384 imaging method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000000891 luminescent agent Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000002310 reflectometry Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229910052691 Erbium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 229910052775 Thulium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 229910052769 Ytterbium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000011888 foil Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000000504 luminescence detection Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229920003229 poly(methyl methacrylate) Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000004926 polymethyl methacrylate Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000000630 rising effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229910052710 silicon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000010703 silicon Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000003595 spectral effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- OAICVXFJPJFONN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Phosphorus Chemical compound [P] OAICVXFJPJFONN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- UYAHIZSMUZPPFV-UHFFFAOYSA-N erbium Chemical compound [Er] UYAHIZSMUZPPFV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001093 holography Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005286 illumination Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001629 suppression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001360 synchronised effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- FRNOGLGSGLTDKL-UHFFFAOYSA-N thulium atom Chemical compound [Tm] FRNOGLGSGLTDKL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N21/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
- G01N21/62—Systems in which the material investigated is excited whereby it emits light or causes a change in wavelength of the incident light
- G01N21/63—Systems in which the material investigated is excited whereby it emits light or causes a change in wavelength of the incident light optically excited
- G01N21/64—Fluorescence; Phosphorescence
- G01N21/6408—Fluorescence; Phosphorescence with measurement of decay time, time resolved fluorescence
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07D—HANDLING OF COINS OR VALUABLE PAPERS, e.g. TESTING, SORTING BY DENOMINATIONS, COUNTING, DISPENSING, CHANGING OR DEPOSITING
- G07D7/00—Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency
- G07D7/06—Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency using wave or particle radiation
- G07D7/12—Visible light, infrared or ultraviolet radiation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07D—HANDLING OF COINS OR VALUABLE PAPERS, e.g. TESTING, SORTING BY DENOMINATIONS, COUNTING, DISPENSING, CHANGING OR DEPOSITING
- G07D7/00—Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency
- G07D7/06—Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency using wave or particle radiation
- G07D7/12—Visible light, infrared or ultraviolet radiation
- G07D7/1205—Testing spectral properties
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Toxicology (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
- Spectroscopy & Molecular Physics (AREA)
- Investigating, Analyzing Materials By Fluorescence Or Luminescence (AREA)
- Investigating Or Analysing Materials By The Use Of Chemical Reactions (AREA)
- Inspection Of Paper Currency And Valuable Securities (AREA)
- Credit Cards Or The Like (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses an improved method and a device implementing said method for the authentication of security documents or articles carrying luminescent marker compounds which show a time-deferred emission characteristic. The method allows a rapid extraction of characteristic luminescence parameters, such as emission intensity and time constants. The method is not sensitive to perturbations by ambient light and reduces the optical filtering requirements.
Description
Improved lumiaesceace characteristics detector Field o~ iaventioa The invention is in the field of security documents and articles. It concerns a method of determining the authenticity of such documents or articles.~In particular, it concerns security documents or articles carrying a luminescent feature, and a device for the quantitative measurement of the luminescence emission intensity and characteristics of said luminescent feature.
Background of the inveatioa Luminescent compounds are well known security elements for the protection of banknotes, valued papers and other security articles. Such compounds may be incorporated into the security article's substrate, printed onto security articles via an ink, or affixed to security articles in the form of a security thread, a foil or a label carrying them.
The detection of luminescent security elements is well known' in the art and described in a large number of patents. US 5,918,960 describes a counterfeit banknote detecting apparatus, based on a UV lamp to excite the luminescence, and two photocells, to measure the luminescence intensity versus the background radiation intensity. A particular problem in luminescence detection is the discrimination of the weak luminescence signal from the often much stronger background signals, which are due to environmental light. The use of modulated excitation and synchronous detection has been proposed as a possibility to overcome this difficulty.
US 5,608,225 describes an improved fluorescent detecting apparatus and a method using a modulated excitation source, a photocell, and a phase detector, for,the suppression of background signals. US 4,275,299, US 5,548,106, US 5.,418,855 and US 5,574,790 describe further detection equipment based on modulated excitation. US 3,656,835 teaches the joint use of a constant UV-excitation source and a modulated magnetic field, to produce and detect modulated emission from magnetic triplet states of the luminescent. US 5,315,993 and US 5,331,140 propose luminescence decay monitoring using a multiplexing of more than one modulation frequency of the excitation source, e.g. for the reading of invisible fluorescent barcodes. US 5,548,124 and US
5,757,013 propose the measurement of luminescence decay times through the generation of a modulation product of the excitation signal and the back-received luminescent response signal.
The modulation-based luminescence detection systems of the prior art are quite rugged against environment light influences which do not have the same modulation frequency and phase as the detector's own light source. They are, on the other hand, very sensitive to their own modulation frequency. Some of the modulated excitation light is noteworthy back-scattered at the sample surface and leaks through the optical filter system into the detector's photocell. No optical filter system has noteworthy a 1000 rejection of the off-band light components.
This residual excitation light, which has exactly the same frequency as the luminescence response, adds thus to the detected signal intensity. In the case of a weak luminescence signal, said background signal impedes a proper determination of~
the luminescence signal intensity.
This is the more disturbing as the background signal depends on the reflectivity of the substrate, which may vary independently of the luminescence signal intensity. In. the case of banknote authentication, the substrate reflectivity depends noteworthy on external factors such as dirtiness and wear, which makes it difficult to check the banknote fore genuineness if no distinction can be made between the merely reflected background signal and the true luminescence emission signal.
The present invention discloses a method and an equipment which overcome the shortcomings of the prior art.
In particular it discloses a method and an equipment which allow to discriminate between the reflected excitation signal and the luminescence emission signal, and to determine selectively the strength of the luminescence emission.
The present invention allows furthermore for a quantitative determination of luminescence intensity, independent of background reflectivity.
It allows further to derive absolute or comparative luminescence intensities, and to exploit these for coding and identification purposes.
Background of the inveatioa Luminescent compounds are well known security elements for the protection of banknotes, valued papers and other security articles. Such compounds may be incorporated into the security article's substrate, printed onto security articles via an ink, or affixed to security articles in the form of a security thread, a foil or a label carrying them.
The detection of luminescent security elements is well known' in the art and described in a large number of patents. US 5,918,960 describes a counterfeit banknote detecting apparatus, based on a UV lamp to excite the luminescence, and two photocells, to measure the luminescence intensity versus the background radiation intensity. A particular problem in luminescence detection is the discrimination of the weak luminescence signal from the often much stronger background signals, which are due to environmental light. The use of modulated excitation and synchronous detection has been proposed as a possibility to overcome this difficulty.
US 5,608,225 describes an improved fluorescent detecting apparatus and a method using a modulated excitation source, a photocell, and a phase detector, for,the suppression of background signals. US 4,275,299, US 5,548,106, US 5.,418,855 and US 5,574,790 describe further detection equipment based on modulated excitation. US 3,656,835 teaches the joint use of a constant UV-excitation source and a modulated magnetic field, to produce and detect modulated emission from magnetic triplet states of the luminescent. US 5,315,993 and US 5,331,140 propose luminescence decay monitoring using a multiplexing of more than one modulation frequency of the excitation source, e.g. for the reading of invisible fluorescent barcodes. US 5,548,124 and US
5,757,013 propose the measurement of luminescence decay times through the generation of a modulation product of the excitation signal and the back-received luminescent response signal.
The modulation-based luminescence detection systems of the prior art are quite rugged against environment light influences which do not have the same modulation frequency and phase as the detector's own light source. They are, on the other hand, very sensitive to their own modulation frequency. Some of the modulated excitation light is noteworthy back-scattered at the sample surface and leaks through the optical filter system into the detector's photocell. No optical filter system has noteworthy a 1000 rejection of the off-band light components.
This residual excitation light, which has exactly the same frequency as the luminescence response, adds thus to the detected signal intensity. In the case of a weak luminescence signal, said background signal impedes a proper determination of~
the luminescence signal intensity.
This is the more disturbing as the background signal depends on the reflectivity of the substrate, which may vary independently of the luminescence signal intensity. In. the case of banknote authentication, the substrate reflectivity depends noteworthy on external factors such as dirtiness and wear, which makes it difficult to check the banknote fore genuineness if no distinction can be made between the merely reflected background signal and the true luminescence emission signal.
The present invention discloses a method and an equipment which overcome the shortcomings of the prior art.
In particular it discloses a method and an equipment which allow to discriminate between the reflected excitation signal and the luminescence emission signal, and to determine selectively the strength of the luminescence emission.
The present invention allows furthermore for a quantitative determination of luminescence intensity, independent of background reflectivity.
It allows further to derive absolute or comparative luminescence intensities, and to exploit these for coding and identification purposes.
Summary of the invention The present invention discloses a method which allows for the determination of luminescence intensities, free of contributions from ambient light and from back-scattered excitation radiation.
It relies on the use of at least one luminescent compound showing a time-deferred emission characteristics, i.e. having a time-dependent build-up of the luminescence emission after the excitation light source has been switched on, and still emitting a decaying luminescence signal after the excitation light source has been switched off. A typical emission response of such a luminescent as a function of time is shown in Figure 1: a) shows the intensity versus time of a pulsed excitation radiation of wavelength ~,1; b) shows the intensity versus time of the detected response from the luminescent. Said detected response comprises at least three components: (1) back-scattered radiation of wavelength ~,1 leaking through the optical filter system, (2) luminescence radiation of wavelength~~,2 emitted during excitation, and (3) luminescence radiation of wavelength ~,2 emitted after excitation.
The existence of back-scattered radiation (1) at the detector makes it difficult to obtain accurate absolute measurements for the real emitted luminescence intensity, such as reflected by its "rise part" (2) and its "decay part" (3). This is particularly true in the case of weak luminescence and high excitation intensity, e.g. in the case where an up-converting phosphor must be detected.
The method according to the present invention, which overcomes this problem, is examplified in connection with Figure 2. The excitation light source is periodically switched on and off, as shown in Figure 1. A measured value for the net luminescence intensity can be obtained for both, the "rise." and the "decay"
parts by using the following method:
The "rise",interval (A) between the switching-on and the' .
switching-off of the excitation light source may be subdivided into at least two time intervals which are preferably equal. The detector signal is integrated during said time intervals to achieve values for each interval. Then the difference between the first and the second signal is calculated. Due to the fact that the time intervals are equal, the leakage contribution (1) of back-scattered excitation radiation is subtracted out, together with the otherwise present background radiation (ambient light). The remaining signal intensity is exclusively due to the luminescence emission.
In the example of Figure 2, the "rise interval" (A) may, for example, be entirely subdivided into two equal time intervals (t1, t2). The integrated signal intensity during time interval t1 is subtracted from the integrated signal intensity during time interval t2. Contributions from back-scattering, background radiation and other light influences causing an error are collectively called back-scattering contributions 1. By subtracting intensity values a net signal value is achieved which is representative of the luminescence intensity only.
Alternatively, the "rise interval" (A) may be partially subdivided into two equal time intervals (t5, t6), said time intervals being shorter than the former time intervals (t1, t2) and located near the beginning and near the end of the "rise interval" (A). The integrated signal intensity during time interval t5 is subtracted from the integrated signal intensity . during time interval t6. Contributions from back-scattering (1) and background radiation cancel out, to leave a net signal value, representative of the luminescence intensity only. This alternative solution is particularly suitable if several luminescent materials, having very different characteristic "rise" time constants, must be analyzed using one and the same detection equipment.
Similarly, the "decay" interval (D) following the switching-off of the excitation light source may be subdivided into at least two, preferably equal time intervals. The detector signal is integrated during said time intervals, and at least one difference signal between a later and an earlier, equal, time interval is formed. Due to the fact that the time intervals are equal, the otherwise present background radiation (ambient light) is subtracted out. The remaining signal is exclusively due to the presence of the luminescence emission.
In the example of Figure 2, the "decay interval" (D) may be entirely subdivided into two equal time intervals (t3, t4). The integrated signal intensity during time interval t3 is subtracted from the integrated signal intensity during time interval t4. Contributions from background radiation cancel out, to leave a net signal value, representative of the sole luminescence intensity.
Alternatively, the "decay interval" (D) may be partially subdivided into two equal time intervals (t7, t8), said time intervals being shorter than the former time intervals (t3, t4) and located near the beginning and near the end of the "decay . interval" (D). The integrated signal intensity during time interval t7 is subtracted from the integrated signal intensity during time interval t8. Contributions from background radiation cancel out, to leave a net signal value, representative of the sole luminescence intensity. This alternative solution is particularly suitable if several luminescent materials, having very different characteristic "decay" time constants, must be analyzed using one and the same equipment.
The method of the present invention relies thus on the use of luminescents which show a time-deferred emission characteristics, and which allows, through a suitable subdivision of the "rise" and "decay" signal observation intervals and the formation of corresponding integrated signal difference values, for an internal compensation of both, ambient background radiation as well as the detector's own back-scattered excitation radiation. This allows for a quantitative assessment even of weak luminescence intensities.
Based on the present teaching, the skilled in the art can easily derive and implement other variants of the disclosed method, in particular such which rely on more than two time intervals for the extraction of luminescence characteristics, and such which rely on observation time intervals of unequal size.
The present invention discloses as well detection equipment which is suitable for the determination of luminescence intensities and other luminescence characteristics, free of contributions from ambient light and from back-scattered excitation radiation. Said equipment relies on the implementation of the method of the invention, in conjunction with at least one luminescent compound showing a time-deferred emission characteristics.
Figure 2b explains in more detail how the two values of two time intervals, e.g. t5 and t6, may be subtracted from each other:
During t5 and t6 the intensity values la and 1b which are resulting from back-scattering and other errors are measured. As the time t5 and t6 is equal, the value of 1a and 1b is equal.
The total intensity value during t5 comprises the values la and 2a. The total value during t6 comprises 1b and 2b. However, as the intensity value 2a which results from emission of the luminescent material is rather low during the initial phase of illumination, and the value 2b is rather high at the end of the emission cycle, the resulting value of deducting (2b - 1b) minus (1a + 2a) is very close to the value of 2b. By taking small samples t5 at the beginning of an irradiation cycle and,another sample t6 at the end of the irradiation cycle, it is possible to achieve resulting signals, which correspond to a high degree to the intensity of the emitted luminescents. Of course, one could decide to increase the length of one of the sampling periods.
If, for example, t6 should be twice as long as t5, exact values will be achieved by dividing the intensity value measured during t6 by the factor 2 to compensate for the longer period of time.
Figure 3 gives a schematic layout of the functional blocks of said detecting equipment, implementing said. method of the invention. Said detection equipment comprises at least one laser-diode or light-emitting-diode as a light light source (LD
/ LED) for the excitation of a luminescent marking (M) on a sample under test (S). Said detection equipment comprises further at least one microprocessor (~.P) with memory (Mem) and at least one analog-to-digital converter (A/D), and at least one detecting channel. Said detecting channel comprises a photodiode (PD), followed by a transimpedance amplifier (T), a high-pass electronic filter (HP), a low-pass electronic filter (LP) and a first signal amplifier (Al). The output of the signal amplifier A1 is fed into a switching unit, comprising a positive branch composed of a non-inverting amplifier of unit gain (+1) and a switching unit (S+), and a negative branch composed of an . inverting amplifier of unit gain (-1) and a switching unit (S-).
The combined signal of both switching units (S+, S-) is fed into an integrator (I), which is followed by a second signal amplifier (A2). The output of amplifier A2 is finally fed into the A/D converter of the microprocessor (~P).
The detecting equipment comprises at least one, preferably, however, two or more detecting channels, to allow for a relative comparison of luminescence signal intensities originating from a deliberate mixture of different luminescents in a marking.
Additional optical or electronic elements may be present in the detecting equipment or in its individual detecting channels, such as focussing or light-collecting lenses, optical filters, electronic filters, etc.. Some of the functional blocks indicated in Figure 3 may also be merged together into a same electronic circuit unit.
Said excitation light source (LD / LED) and said switching units (S+, S-) are controlled by said microprocessor (~,P) and enable the detecting unit to perform arbitrary and application-specific sampling cycles through a corresponding programming of said microprocessor.
The microprocessor (~.P) is noteworthy programmed to perform the following operations:
1. repeatedly switch on and off the excitation light source (LD
/ LED) for determined intervals of time, 2. switch on and off the positive and negative switching units (S+, S-) according to a pre-established sampling scheme, 3. read the detected signal values in digitized form for at least some of the present channels by means of the ~.P's A/D
converter, 4. perform mathematical treatments and absolute or relative comparisons with reference values on the signal values read in step 3, 5. put out the result of step 4 in terms of an authenticity or non-authenticity indication for the sample under test.
Said detecting equipment may furthermore be used either as a stand-alone unit, operating in an autonomous way using pre-stored reference values to determine the authenticity of a sample under test, or, alternatively, in connection a central, secured data server via an information transfer link. Said central server contains the authenticity-reference values and may perform some of the operations of the microprocessor (~.P), in particular the ones indicated in steps 4 and 5 above.
The present invention discloses as well a security system, comprising mixtures of luminescent compounds, capable of being identified using said detecting equipment and method. Said mixtures, of luminescent compounds may be incorporated in inks and printed onto security documents or articles, or may be molded into plastic or laminated between sheets, for the production of foils, security threads, credit, identity or access cards, and the like. Said security system may noteworthy be employed for protecting banknotes, valued documents, official documents, cards, transportation tickets, as well as branded goods of all kind.
It must also be noted that the method and the equipment according to the present invention allow for a considerable reduction of the optical filtering requirements. If the detection of luminescence response is carried out during the "decay" intervals, where no excitation signal is present, one must not particularly protect the photodiode from the influence of the excitation light. A simple 45° beam-splitter of the rugate-filter type may suffice to isolate the emitted luminescence wavelength. Such filters are advantageous, as they can be mass-produced by Lippmann-holography and related techniques.
In particular cases, one might even envisage to work without any optical filtering, and to rely exclusively on the wavelength discrimination which is already realized through the choice of an appropriate excitation source and an appropriate photodiode, in conjunction with an analysis of the luminescent's decay characteristics, using the method and the device of the invention. In this context it is interesting to note that most ZEDS can also be exploited as wavelength-selective, although somewhat less efficient, photodiodes. This is particularly useful when working with up-converting phosphors, in order to reduce the photodetector's sensitivity to the intense longer-s wavelength light of the excitation source. As there are plenty of different uncolored" LED's on the market, covering the whole spectral range from the near UV, over the visible down into the IR, there are .just as many spectrally. selective potential photodiodes available to whom would need them.
Exemplary embodiment The invention is further illustrated by the drawings and by an exemplary embodiment.
Figure 1 shows a typical time evolution of the excitation signal and of the detected luminescence response of a luminescent compound used in the present invention: a) intensity versus time of the excitation signal of wavelength ~.1; b) intensity versus time of the detected response signal. The detected response signal comprises: (1) back-scattered radiation of wavelength ~,1 leaking through the optical filter system, (2) luminescent radiation of wavelength ~,2 emitted during excitation, and (3) luminescent radiation of wavelength ~,2 emitted after excitation.
Figure 2 illustrates the principle of the detection method according to the present invention Figure 3 shows a block circuit diagram of detecting equipment according to the invention, implementing the method of the invention Figure 4 shows schematic lay-outs of the optical part of an exemplary embodiment of the invention, comprising an excitation IR-LED and two detection channels:
a) a version using non-imaging optics; b) a version using imaging optics Figure 5 shows the circuit scheme of an electronic embodiment of one detecting channel according to the present invention Figure 6 example of timing diagrams for the excitation signal (E) and the control signals (P1, P2) of the switching units.
A security system and a corresponding detecting device, implementing the method of the invention were realized as follows. The luminescent compounds were chosen to be up-convertirig Y20zS: Er, Yb and YzO~S; Tm, Yb phosphors. Such materials are excitable by intense infrared radiation in the 900 to 980 nm wavelength range. Through a two-photon excitation process, they emit luminescence radiation at shorter wavelength, in the green, 550 nm region for the erbium doped material, and in the near infrared, 800 nm region for the thulium doped material. The characteristic time constants of the corresponding luminescent emission intensity growth and decay are of the order of 50 to 500 ~s; they depend noteworthy on the exact nature of the luminescent materials.
The detecting device was constructed according to Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5. The excitation source is a commercially available GaAlAs IR-LED of the type used for remote control applications. The chosen device, OPE5594S, emits.an optical power of 120 mW j steradian at a half angle of +/- 10°. The peak emission was at 940 nm wavelength, with a spectral half width of 45 nm.
. Figure 4a shows a schematic lay-out of the optical system of the detecting device. The light of said IR-LED is fed via a 45°
dielectric beam splitter (BS1) into a conical nozzle (N) of polymethyl-methacrylate (PMMA), and concentrated onto a luminescent marking (M) on the sample under test (S). Said conical nozzle (N) noteworthy acts as a non-imaging optical concentrator (acceptance angle transformer), accepting low-intensity near-parallel-ray light at its wide end and delivering high-intensity, but strongly diverging light at is narrow end.
In the opposite sense, it collects a concentrated spot of widely diverging luminescence at its tip and delivers it as a diluted, near parallel beam at its wide end. Beam splitter BS1 is of the long-pass type, having a 45° cut-off wavelength at 900 nm.
The marking (M) contains said two up-converting phosphors in a pre-determined ratio, and emits said two shorter-wavelength luminescent radiation at 550 nm and at 800 nm when excited at high intensity with light of said 900 to 980 nm emitting IR-LED.
Said emitted radiation is collected under wide acceptance angle by the conical nozzle (N), ~~parallelized~~ and deflected at the first 45° beam splatter BSI. A second 45° dielectric beam splatter (BS2) of the long-pass type, having a 45° cut-off . wavelength of 700 nm, separates the 550 nm and the 800 nm components of the emitted luminescence response. The 800 nm component is fed via an otional 800 nm band pass filter (F1) into a silicon.photodiode (PD1);.the 550 nm component is fed via an optional 500 nm band pass filter (F2) into a GaAsP photodiode (PD2) .
An alternative lay-out of the optical system is shown in Figure 4b. The substantially parallel-beam light of the narrow-angle emitting IR-LED is sent through two dichroitic 45° beam splatters (BS1, BS2) and concentrated by a focussing lens (L) onto a luminescent marking (M) of a sample under test (S). The marking M is hereby disposed in the focal plane of lens L. The luminescence emitted by the marking M in response to the 900 to 980 nm excitation light is collected by lens L and sent back as a parallel-ray light beam onto a first 45° beam splatter (BS1).
This beam splatter is of the 45° rugate-filter type and reflects a first narrow wavelength band around 800 nm towards a first photodiode (PD1). The remainder of the light beam falls onto a second 45° beam splatter (BS2). This beam splatter is of the 45°
rugate-filter type, too, and reflects a second narrow wavelength band around 550 nm towards a second photodiode (PD2). Optical filters (F1, F2), to cut down the intensity of the back-reflected IR-light of the excitation source, may be optionally inserted in front of the photodiodes (PD1, PD2).
Figure 5 shows an embodiment of the electronic part of one detection channel of the detecting device. It relies on a microprocessor of;the PIC 16F877 type. The microprocessor is common to all detection channels of the detecting device. The . detector electronics relies on inexpensive electronic components; i.e. the low-noise operational amplifiers may be of the NE 5532 type (2 units per casing), and the switching units may be of the 4066 type (4 units per casing).
The photodiode, which may be of the silicon, GaAsP, or any other type, is exploited in photovoltaic mode and delivers its signal to a balanced transimpedance amplifier stage (IC1:A). Said transimpedance amplifier stage is followed by a second amplifier stage (IC1:B), which delivers its output, through capacitance coupling, to the positive and the negative switching units (IC3:A, IC3:B). For the positive unit (IC3:A), the output signal of IC1:B is directly used; for the negative unit (IC3:B), the output signal of IC1:B is first fed through an analog-inverter stage (IC2:B). The combined output of the switching units (IC3:A, IC3:B) is fed into an integrator stage (IC2:A) and the integrated signal goes to the analog-to-digital converter (A/D) of the PIC processor. The control signals (P1, P2) for the switching units (IC3:A, IC3:B) are generated by the PIC
processor. .
Based on the foregoing teaching, it is easy for the skilled in the art to conceive further embodiments of the detecting device which, in particular, may have more than one excitation light source, or more than two detecting channels.
The operation frequency of the device of our exemplary embodiment was chosen to be 1 kHz, with equal lengths of the excitation-on and the excitation-off time intervals. This is, however, not a necessary condition; one may equally chose other . on/off ratios.
Figure 6 illustrates an example of useful timing diagrams for the excitation signal (E) and the control signals (P1, P2) of the switching units. Figure 6a shows the square-wave excitation signal (E) and the luminescence response (R). Figure 6b shows an example of sampling the "rising" part of the luminescence response (R) using the switching units' control signals (P1;
P2). Figure 6c shows an example of sampling the "decay" part of the luminescence response (R). Figure 6d shows an alternative example of sampling the "rising" part of the luminescence response (R) .
The method and the device of the invention allow noteworthy, through a combination of suitable different sampling schemes, to extract information about both, the luminescence intensity and the characteristic time constants of the "rise" and the "decay"
part of the luminescence response (R).
It relies on the use of at least one luminescent compound showing a time-deferred emission characteristics, i.e. having a time-dependent build-up of the luminescence emission after the excitation light source has been switched on, and still emitting a decaying luminescence signal after the excitation light source has been switched off. A typical emission response of such a luminescent as a function of time is shown in Figure 1: a) shows the intensity versus time of a pulsed excitation radiation of wavelength ~,1; b) shows the intensity versus time of the detected response from the luminescent. Said detected response comprises at least three components: (1) back-scattered radiation of wavelength ~,1 leaking through the optical filter system, (2) luminescence radiation of wavelength~~,2 emitted during excitation, and (3) luminescence radiation of wavelength ~,2 emitted after excitation.
The existence of back-scattered radiation (1) at the detector makes it difficult to obtain accurate absolute measurements for the real emitted luminescence intensity, such as reflected by its "rise part" (2) and its "decay part" (3). This is particularly true in the case of weak luminescence and high excitation intensity, e.g. in the case where an up-converting phosphor must be detected.
The method according to the present invention, which overcomes this problem, is examplified in connection with Figure 2. The excitation light source is periodically switched on and off, as shown in Figure 1. A measured value for the net luminescence intensity can be obtained for both, the "rise." and the "decay"
parts by using the following method:
The "rise",interval (A) between the switching-on and the' .
switching-off of the excitation light source may be subdivided into at least two time intervals which are preferably equal. The detector signal is integrated during said time intervals to achieve values for each interval. Then the difference between the first and the second signal is calculated. Due to the fact that the time intervals are equal, the leakage contribution (1) of back-scattered excitation radiation is subtracted out, together with the otherwise present background radiation (ambient light). The remaining signal intensity is exclusively due to the luminescence emission.
In the example of Figure 2, the "rise interval" (A) may, for example, be entirely subdivided into two equal time intervals (t1, t2). The integrated signal intensity during time interval t1 is subtracted from the integrated signal intensity during time interval t2. Contributions from back-scattering, background radiation and other light influences causing an error are collectively called back-scattering contributions 1. By subtracting intensity values a net signal value is achieved which is representative of the luminescence intensity only.
Alternatively, the "rise interval" (A) may be partially subdivided into two equal time intervals (t5, t6), said time intervals being shorter than the former time intervals (t1, t2) and located near the beginning and near the end of the "rise interval" (A). The integrated signal intensity during time interval t5 is subtracted from the integrated signal intensity . during time interval t6. Contributions from back-scattering (1) and background radiation cancel out, to leave a net signal value, representative of the luminescence intensity only. This alternative solution is particularly suitable if several luminescent materials, having very different characteristic "rise" time constants, must be analyzed using one and the same detection equipment.
Similarly, the "decay" interval (D) following the switching-off of the excitation light source may be subdivided into at least two, preferably equal time intervals. The detector signal is integrated during said time intervals, and at least one difference signal between a later and an earlier, equal, time interval is formed. Due to the fact that the time intervals are equal, the otherwise present background radiation (ambient light) is subtracted out. The remaining signal is exclusively due to the presence of the luminescence emission.
In the example of Figure 2, the "decay interval" (D) may be entirely subdivided into two equal time intervals (t3, t4). The integrated signal intensity during time interval t3 is subtracted from the integrated signal intensity during time interval t4. Contributions from background radiation cancel out, to leave a net signal value, representative of the sole luminescence intensity.
Alternatively, the "decay interval" (D) may be partially subdivided into two equal time intervals (t7, t8), said time intervals being shorter than the former time intervals (t3, t4) and located near the beginning and near the end of the "decay . interval" (D). The integrated signal intensity during time interval t7 is subtracted from the integrated signal intensity during time interval t8. Contributions from background radiation cancel out, to leave a net signal value, representative of the sole luminescence intensity. This alternative solution is particularly suitable if several luminescent materials, having very different characteristic "decay" time constants, must be analyzed using one and the same equipment.
The method of the present invention relies thus on the use of luminescents which show a time-deferred emission characteristics, and which allows, through a suitable subdivision of the "rise" and "decay" signal observation intervals and the formation of corresponding integrated signal difference values, for an internal compensation of both, ambient background radiation as well as the detector's own back-scattered excitation radiation. This allows for a quantitative assessment even of weak luminescence intensities.
Based on the present teaching, the skilled in the art can easily derive and implement other variants of the disclosed method, in particular such which rely on more than two time intervals for the extraction of luminescence characteristics, and such which rely on observation time intervals of unequal size.
The present invention discloses as well detection equipment which is suitable for the determination of luminescence intensities and other luminescence characteristics, free of contributions from ambient light and from back-scattered excitation radiation. Said equipment relies on the implementation of the method of the invention, in conjunction with at least one luminescent compound showing a time-deferred emission characteristics.
Figure 2b explains in more detail how the two values of two time intervals, e.g. t5 and t6, may be subtracted from each other:
During t5 and t6 the intensity values la and 1b which are resulting from back-scattering and other errors are measured. As the time t5 and t6 is equal, the value of 1a and 1b is equal.
The total intensity value during t5 comprises the values la and 2a. The total value during t6 comprises 1b and 2b. However, as the intensity value 2a which results from emission of the luminescent material is rather low during the initial phase of illumination, and the value 2b is rather high at the end of the emission cycle, the resulting value of deducting (2b - 1b) minus (1a + 2a) is very close to the value of 2b. By taking small samples t5 at the beginning of an irradiation cycle and,another sample t6 at the end of the irradiation cycle, it is possible to achieve resulting signals, which correspond to a high degree to the intensity of the emitted luminescents. Of course, one could decide to increase the length of one of the sampling periods.
If, for example, t6 should be twice as long as t5, exact values will be achieved by dividing the intensity value measured during t6 by the factor 2 to compensate for the longer period of time.
Figure 3 gives a schematic layout of the functional blocks of said detecting equipment, implementing said. method of the invention. Said detection equipment comprises at least one laser-diode or light-emitting-diode as a light light source (LD
/ LED) for the excitation of a luminescent marking (M) on a sample under test (S). Said detection equipment comprises further at least one microprocessor (~.P) with memory (Mem) and at least one analog-to-digital converter (A/D), and at least one detecting channel. Said detecting channel comprises a photodiode (PD), followed by a transimpedance amplifier (T), a high-pass electronic filter (HP), a low-pass electronic filter (LP) and a first signal amplifier (Al). The output of the signal amplifier A1 is fed into a switching unit, comprising a positive branch composed of a non-inverting amplifier of unit gain (+1) and a switching unit (S+), and a negative branch composed of an . inverting amplifier of unit gain (-1) and a switching unit (S-).
The combined signal of both switching units (S+, S-) is fed into an integrator (I), which is followed by a second signal amplifier (A2). The output of amplifier A2 is finally fed into the A/D converter of the microprocessor (~P).
The detecting equipment comprises at least one, preferably, however, two or more detecting channels, to allow for a relative comparison of luminescence signal intensities originating from a deliberate mixture of different luminescents in a marking.
Additional optical or electronic elements may be present in the detecting equipment or in its individual detecting channels, such as focussing or light-collecting lenses, optical filters, electronic filters, etc.. Some of the functional blocks indicated in Figure 3 may also be merged together into a same electronic circuit unit.
Said excitation light source (LD / LED) and said switching units (S+, S-) are controlled by said microprocessor (~,P) and enable the detecting unit to perform arbitrary and application-specific sampling cycles through a corresponding programming of said microprocessor.
The microprocessor (~.P) is noteworthy programmed to perform the following operations:
1. repeatedly switch on and off the excitation light source (LD
/ LED) for determined intervals of time, 2. switch on and off the positive and negative switching units (S+, S-) according to a pre-established sampling scheme, 3. read the detected signal values in digitized form for at least some of the present channels by means of the ~.P's A/D
converter, 4. perform mathematical treatments and absolute or relative comparisons with reference values on the signal values read in step 3, 5. put out the result of step 4 in terms of an authenticity or non-authenticity indication for the sample under test.
Said detecting equipment may furthermore be used either as a stand-alone unit, operating in an autonomous way using pre-stored reference values to determine the authenticity of a sample under test, or, alternatively, in connection a central, secured data server via an information transfer link. Said central server contains the authenticity-reference values and may perform some of the operations of the microprocessor (~.P), in particular the ones indicated in steps 4 and 5 above.
The present invention discloses as well a security system, comprising mixtures of luminescent compounds, capable of being identified using said detecting equipment and method. Said mixtures, of luminescent compounds may be incorporated in inks and printed onto security documents or articles, or may be molded into plastic or laminated between sheets, for the production of foils, security threads, credit, identity or access cards, and the like. Said security system may noteworthy be employed for protecting banknotes, valued documents, official documents, cards, transportation tickets, as well as branded goods of all kind.
It must also be noted that the method and the equipment according to the present invention allow for a considerable reduction of the optical filtering requirements. If the detection of luminescence response is carried out during the "decay" intervals, where no excitation signal is present, one must not particularly protect the photodiode from the influence of the excitation light. A simple 45° beam-splitter of the rugate-filter type may suffice to isolate the emitted luminescence wavelength. Such filters are advantageous, as they can be mass-produced by Lippmann-holography and related techniques.
In particular cases, one might even envisage to work without any optical filtering, and to rely exclusively on the wavelength discrimination which is already realized through the choice of an appropriate excitation source and an appropriate photodiode, in conjunction with an analysis of the luminescent's decay characteristics, using the method and the device of the invention. In this context it is interesting to note that most ZEDS can also be exploited as wavelength-selective, although somewhat less efficient, photodiodes. This is particularly useful when working with up-converting phosphors, in order to reduce the photodetector's sensitivity to the intense longer-s wavelength light of the excitation source. As there are plenty of different uncolored" LED's on the market, covering the whole spectral range from the near UV, over the visible down into the IR, there are .just as many spectrally. selective potential photodiodes available to whom would need them.
Exemplary embodiment The invention is further illustrated by the drawings and by an exemplary embodiment.
Figure 1 shows a typical time evolution of the excitation signal and of the detected luminescence response of a luminescent compound used in the present invention: a) intensity versus time of the excitation signal of wavelength ~.1; b) intensity versus time of the detected response signal. The detected response signal comprises: (1) back-scattered radiation of wavelength ~,1 leaking through the optical filter system, (2) luminescent radiation of wavelength ~,2 emitted during excitation, and (3) luminescent radiation of wavelength ~,2 emitted after excitation.
Figure 2 illustrates the principle of the detection method according to the present invention Figure 3 shows a block circuit diagram of detecting equipment according to the invention, implementing the method of the invention Figure 4 shows schematic lay-outs of the optical part of an exemplary embodiment of the invention, comprising an excitation IR-LED and two detection channels:
a) a version using non-imaging optics; b) a version using imaging optics Figure 5 shows the circuit scheme of an electronic embodiment of one detecting channel according to the present invention Figure 6 example of timing diagrams for the excitation signal (E) and the control signals (P1, P2) of the switching units.
A security system and a corresponding detecting device, implementing the method of the invention were realized as follows. The luminescent compounds were chosen to be up-convertirig Y20zS: Er, Yb and YzO~S; Tm, Yb phosphors. Such materials are excitable by intense infrared radiation in the 900 to 980 nm wavelength range. Through a two-photon excitation process, they emit luminescence radiation at shorter wavelength, in the green, 550 nm region for the erbium doped material, and in the near infrared, 800 nm region for the thulium doped material. The characteristic time constants of the corresponding luminescent emission intensity growth and decay are of the order of 50 to 500 ~s; they depend noteworthy on the exact nature of the luminescent materials.
The detecting device was constructed according to Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5. The excitation source is a commercially available GaAlAs IR-LED of the type used for remote control applications. The chosen device, OPE5594S, emits.an optical power of 120 mW j steradian at a half angle of +/- 10°. The peak emission was at 940 nm wavelength, with a spectral half width of 45 nm.
. Figure 4a shows a schematic lay-out of the optical system of the detecting device. The light of said IR-LED is fed via a 45°
dielectric beam splitter (BS1) into a conical nozzle (N) of polymethyl-methacrylate (PMMA), and concentrated onto a luminescent marking (M) on the sample under test (S). Said conical nozzle (N) noteworthy acts as a non-imaging optical concentrator (acceptance angle transformer), accepting low-intensity near-parallel-ray light at its wide end and delivering high-intensity, but strongly diverging light at is narrow end.
In the opposite sense, it collects a concentrated spot of widely diverging luminescence at its tip and delivers it as a diluted, near parallel beam at its wide end. Beam splitter BS1 is of the long-pass type, having a 45° cut-off wavelength at 900 nm.
The marking (M) contains said two up-converting phosphors in a pre-determined ratio, and emits said two shorter-wavelength luminescent radiation at 550 nm and at 800 nm when excited at high intensity with light of said 900 to 980 nm emitting IR-LED.
Said emitted radiation is collected under wide acceptance angle by the conical nozzle (N), ~~parallelized~~ and deflected at the first 45° beam splatter BSI. A second 45° dielectric beam splatter (BS2) of the long-pass type, having a 45° cut-off . wavelength of 700 nm, separates the 550 nm and the 800 nm components of the emitted luminescence response. The 800 nm component is fed via an otional 800 nm band pass filter (F1) into a silicon.photodiode (PD1);.the 550 nm component is fed via an optional 500 nm band pass filter (F2) into a GaAsP photodiode (PD2) .
An alternative lay-out of the optical system is shown in Figure 4b. The substantially parallel-beam light of the narrow-angle emitting IR-LED is sent through two dichroitic 45° beam splatters (BS1, BS2) and concentrated by a focussing lens (L) onto a luminescent marking (M) of a sample under test (S). The marking M is hereby disposed in the focal plane of lens L. The luminescence emitted by the marking M in response to the 900 to 980 nm excitation light is collected by lens L and sent back as a parallel-ray light beam onto a first 45° beam splatter (BS1).
This beam splatter is of the 45° rugate-filter type and reflects a first narrow wavelength band around 800 nm towards a first photodiode (PD1). The remainder of the light beam falls onto a second 45° beam splatter (BS2). This beam splatter is of the 45°
rugate-filter type, too, and reflects a second narrow wavelength band around 550 nm towards a second photodiode (PD2). Optical filters (F1, F2), to cut down the intensity of the back-reflected IR-light of the excitation source, may be optionally inserted in front of the photodiodes (PD1, PD2).
Figure 5 shows an embodiment of the electronic part of one detection channel of the detecting device. It relies on a microprocessor of;the PIC 16F877 type. The microprocessor is common to all detection channels of the detecting device. The . detector electronics relies on inexpensive electronic components; i.e. the low-noise operational amplifiers may be of the NE 5532 type (2 units per casing), and the switching units may be of the 4066 type (4 units per casing).
The photodiode, which may be of the silicon, GaAsP, or any other type, is exploited in photovoltaic mode and delivers its signal to a balanced transimpedance amplifier stage (IC1:A). Said transimpedance amplifier stage is followed by a second amplifier stage (IC1:B), which delivers its output, through capacitance coupling, to the positive and the negative switching units (IC3:A, IC3:B). For the positive unit (IC3:A), the output signal of IC1:B is directly used; for the negative unit (IC3:B), the output signal of IC1:B is first fed through an analog-inverter stage (IC2:B). The combined output of the switching units (IC3:A, IC3:B) is fed into an integrator stage (IC2:A) and the integrated signal goes to the analog-to-digital converter (A/D) of the PIC processor. The control signals (P1, P2) for the switching units (IC3:A, IC3:B) are generated by the PIC
processor. .
Based on the foregoing teaching, it is easy for the skilled in the art to conceive further embodiments of the detecting device which, in particular, may have more than one excitation light source, or more than two detecting channels.
The operation frequency of the device of our exemplary embodiment was chosen to be 1 kHz, with equal lengths of the excitation-on and the excitation-off time intervals. This is, however, not a necessary condition; one may equally chose other . on/off ratios.
Figure 6 illustrates an example of useful timing diagrams for the excitation signal (E) and the control signals (P1, P2) of the switching units. Figure 6a shows the square-wave excitation signal (E) and the luminescence response (R). Figure 6b shows an example of sampling the "rising" part of the luminescence response (R) using the switching units' control signals (P1;
P2). Figure 6c shows an example of sampling the "decay" part of the luminescence response (R). Figure 6d shows an alternative example of sampling the "rising" part of the luminescence response (R) .
The method and the device of the invention allow noteworthy, through a combination of suitable different sampling schemes, to extract information about both, the luminescence intensity and the characteristic time constants of the "rise" and the "decay"
part of the luminescence response (R).
Claims (24)
1. A method for authenticating a security marking comprising a luminescent compound, said luminescent compound being excitable by an excitation light source and having a time-dependent build-up of luminescence after the excitation light source has been switched on and still emitting a decaying luminescence signal after the excitation light source has been switched off, the method comprising the steps of:
exposing the marking to radiation from an excitation light source which is periodically switched on and off;
and measuring an intensity of luminescence emission;
wherein during or after exposure to the excitation light source light-intensity values are measured during equal intervals of time which are selected such that, after subtracting an intensity value collected during one time interval from an intensity value collected during another time interval, a net value resulting of the subtraction is representative for light emitted from the luminescent material;
further comparing the net value with stored reference values; and determining the authenticity or non-authenticity of the security marking based on a result of said comparison.
exposing the marking to radiation from an excitation light source which is periodically switched on and off;
and measuring an intensity of luminescence emission;
wherein during or after exposure to the excitation light source light-intensity values are measured during equal intervals of time which are selected such that, after subtracting an intensity value collected during one time interval from an intensity value collected during another time interval, a net value resulting of the subtraction is representative for light emitted from the luminescent material;
further comparing the net value with stored reference values; and determining the authenticity or non-authenticity of the security marking based on a result of said comparison.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein one of the time intervals is selected during an initial phase of the excitation of the luminescent material to reduce a proportion of light intensity resulting from emission of the luminescent material compared to measured light intensity caused by back-scattering light, stray light or other light which does not result from emission.
3. The method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein a second time interval is selected during a phase in which the intensity resulting from emission of the luminescent material has risen to its maximum.
4. The method according to claim 2 or 3, wherein a duration of one time interval is shorter than 25% of the emission period.
5. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the marking comprises one or more luminescent compounds which emit light at two different wavelengths and intensity values are sampled for light emitted at said wavelengths.
6. The method according to claim 5, wherein the intensity values of said different wavelengths are compared.
7. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein light intensity is sampled during exposure of the marking to irradiation.
8. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein light intensity is sampled after exposure of the marking to irradiation.
9. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein the light intensity values during the intervals of time are integrated.
10. A method for marking and authenticating of security documents or articles, said method relying on the use of at least one luminescent compound, said luminescent compound being part of said security document or article and being excitable by an excitation light source and showing a build-up in time of the luminescence emission intensity after the excitation light source has been switched on, and a decay in time of luminescent emission intensity after the excitation light source has been switched off, said method comprising the steps of:
switching said excitation light source on during a first time interval and switching off during a second time interval, and measuring at least two luminescence intensity values for at least one luminescence wavelength at least during two subsequent equal time intervals inside either the first time interval or the second time interval or both, and subtracting at least two of said measured luminescence intensity values from each other to obtain net luminescence intensity values, which are compared to reference values, as an authenticity criterion.
switching said excitation light source on during a first time interval and switching off during a second time interval, and measuring at least two luminescence intensity values for at least one luminescence wavelength at least during two subsequent equal time intervals inside either the first time interval or the second time interval or both, and subtracting at least two of said measured luminescence intensity values from each other to obtain net luminescence intensity values, which are compared to reference values, as an authenticity criterion.
11. The method according to claim 10, wherein the two subsequent equal time intervals are comprised within the first time interval.
12. The method according to claim 11, wherein the two subsequent equal time intervals are half of the first time interval
13. The method according to claim 10, wherein the two subsequent equal time intervals are comprised within the second time interval.
14. The method according to claim 13, wherein the two subsequent equal time intervals are half of the second time interval.
15. The method according to any one of claims 10 to 14, wherein said excitation light source is repeatedly switched on and off, and wherein said luminescence intensity values are repeatedly measured and subtracted, to obtain integrated net intensity values, which are compared to reference values, as an authenticity criterion.
16. A device for authentication of security documents or articles, said documents or articles carrying at least one luminescent compound, said luminescent compound being excitable by an excitation light source and showing a build-up in time of luminescence emission intensity after the excitation light source has been switched on, and a decay in time of the luminescence emission intensity after the excitation light source has been switched off, said device comprising:
at least one excitation light source;
at least one photodetector channel; and at least one microprocessor;
wherein said excitation light source is switched on during a first time interval and switched off during a second time interval under control of said microprocessor;
and said photodetector channel comprises at least one photodetector, producing an analog output signal when illuminated by a light source, and at least one signal sampling unit, capable of sampling and integrating, under control of said microprocessor, non-inverted and inverted portions, respectively, of said photodetector output signal during equal time intervals, producing at least one net output signal, and said microprocessor digitizes and stores said at least one net output signal, and said microprocessor comprises said at least one net output signal with at least one stored reference value, to derive an authenticity signal.
at least one excitation light source;
at least one photodetector channel; and at least one microprocessor;
wherein said excitation light source is switched on during a first time interval and switched off during a second time interval under control of said microprocessor;
and said photodetector channel comprises at least one photodetector, producing an analog output signal when illuminated by a light source, and at least one signal sampling unit, capable of sampling and integrating, under control of said microprocessor, non-inverted and inverted portions, respectively, of said photodetector output signal during equal time intervals, producing at least one net output signal, and said microprocessor digitizes and stores said at least one net output signal, and said microprocessor comprises said at least one net output signal with at least one stored reference value, to derive an authenticity signal.
17. The device according to claim 16, wherein the equal time intervals are comprised within the first time interval.
18. The device according to claim 17, wherein the equal time intervals are half of the first time interval.
19. The device according to claim 16, wherein the equal time intervals are comprised within the second time interval.
20. The device according to claim 19, wherein the equal time intervals are half of the second time interval.
21. The device according to any one of claims 16 to 20, wherein said excitation light source is repeatedly switched on and off, and wherein said signal sampling unit is repeatedly sampling and integrating said photodetector output signal, obtaining at least one integrated net output signal.
22. The device according to any one of claims 16 to 21, wherein said stored reference value is an internally stored reference value.
23. The device according to any one of claims 16 to 22, wherein said at least one net output signal or said at least one integrated net output signal is transmitted via a communication link to a remote server, to be compared with the at least one stored reference value, to derive and send back the authenticity signal.
24. A security system comprising a number of luminescent compounds having time-deferred emission characteristics and preferably different emission wavelengths, to be incorporated at different ratios into inks or plastic materials for the production of security documents or articles, and a device according to any one of claims 20 to 23, preferably having a corresponding number of detecting channels, for determining the authenticity of said security documents or articles.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP01105020A EP1237128B1 (en) | 2001-03-01 | 2001-03-01 | Improved luminescence characteristics detector |
| EP01105020.0 | 2001-03-01 | ||
| PCT/EP2002/000811 WO2002071347A1 (en) | 2001-03-01 | 2002-01-26 | Improved luminescence characteristics detector |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2404624A1 CA2404624A1 (en) | 2002-09-12 |
| CA2404624C true CA2404624C (en) | 2011-05-24 |
Family
ID=8176639
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA2404624A Expired - Lifetime CA2404624C (en) | 2001-03-01 | 2002-01-26 | Improved luminescence characteristics detector |
Country Status (23)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US7030371B2 (en) |
| EP (1) | EP1237128B1 (en) |
| JP (1) | JP4048121B2 (en) |
| KR (1) | KR100867394B1 (en) |
| CN (1) | CN1282135C (en) |
| AU (1) | AU2002250857B2 (en) |
| BR (1) | BR0204341B1 (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2404624C (en) |
| CY (1) | CY1115049T1 (en) |
| CZ (1) | CZ20023268A3 (en) |
| DK (1) | DK1237128T3 (en) |
| EA (1) | EA004580B1 (en) |
| ES (1) | ES2392395T3 (en) |
| HK (1) | HK1059671A1 (en) |
| HU (1) | HU225922B1 (en) |
| MX (1) | MXPA02010319A (en) |
| NO (1) | NO335437B1 (en) |
| NZ (1) | NZ521775A (en) |
| PL (1) | PL214986B1 (en) |
| PT (1) | PT1237128E (en) |
| UA (1) | UA74821C2 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2002071347A1 (en) |
| ZA (1) | ZA200209707B (en) |
Families Citing this family (53)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AU759974B2 (en) | 1998-05-16 | 2003-05-01 | Applied Biosystems, Llc | Instrument for monitoring polymerase chain reaction of DNA |
| US6818437B1 (en) | 1998-05-16 | 2004-11-16 | Applera Corporation | Instrument for monitoring polymerase chain reaction of DNA |
| US7498164B2 (en) * | 1998-05-16 | 2009-03-03 | Applied Biosystems, Llc | Instrument for monitoring nucleic acid sequence amplification reaction |
| GB2404013B (en) | 2003-07-17 | 2006-05-31 | Isis Innovation | Apparatus for and method of measuring fluorescence lifetime |
| DE10346688A1 (en) * | 2003-10-08 | 2005-05-04 | Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh | value document |
| FR2864666A1 (en) * | 2003-12-24 | 2005-07-01 | Dgtec | Photo-luminescent compound`s optics identification method for e.g. banknote, involves maintaining two sets of light intensities emitted at different instants by compound in ranges of emission spectrum |
| DE102004016249A1 (en) * | 2004-04-02 | 2005-10-20 | Chromeon Gmbh | Luminescence optical methods for the authentication of products |
| DE102004021397A1 (en) * | 2004-04-30 | 2005-11-24 | Bundesdruckerei Gmbh | Apparatus and method for checking the authenticity of a provided with a security feature security or value document that is applied to a support |
| GB0522974D0 (en) * | 2005-11-10 | 2005-12-21 | Sherwood Technology Ltd | Hand-held laser device |
| DE102005055682A1 (en) * | 2005-11-22 | 2007-05-24 | Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh | Banknote `s authenticity testing device for e.g. banknote processing machine, has control device analyzing sensor arrangement data, where design and operation of arrangement and device enables complicated interference at marking substance |
| US20070145293A1 (en) * | 2005-12-27 | 2007-06-28 | Ncr Corporation | Secure tag validation |
| DE102006047851A1 (en) * | 2006-10-10 | 2008-04-17 | Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh | Authenticity feature in the form of luminescent substances |
| KR100974670B1 (en) * | 2008-03-05 | 2010-08-06 | 장익환 | Circumstance harmony and clearing is superior the lusterless board that making method |
| US8360323B2 (en) * | 2008-07-31 | 2013-01-29 | Eastman Kodak Company | Security label laminate and method of labeling |
| US8822954B2 (en) | 2008-10-23 | 2014-09-02 | Intematix Corporation | Phosphor based authentication system |
| US8265346B2 (en) | 2008-11-25 | 2012-09-11 | De La Rue North America Inc. | Determining document fitness using sequenced illumination |
| US8780206B2 (en) * | 2008-11-25 | 2014-07-15 | De La Rue North America Inc. | Sequenced illumination |
| US8749767B2 (en) | 2009-09-02 | 2014-06-10 | De La Rue North America Inc. | Systems and methods for detecting tape on a document |
| US8194237B2 (en) | 2009-10-15 | 2012-06-05 | Authentix, Inc. | Document sensor |
| US8263948B2 (en) * | 2009-11-23 | 2012-09-11 | Honeywell International Inc. | Authentication apparatus for moving value documents |
| US8328102B2 (en) * | 2009-12-21 | 2012-12-11 | Honeywell International Inc. | Method and authentication apparatus for authenticating value documents |
| DE102010007566A1 (en) | 2010-02-10 | 2011-08-11 | Tailorlux GmbH, 48565 | Luminescent safety element for product protection |
| EP2550523A4 (en) * | 2010-03-25 | 2018-01-24 | Mocon, Inc. | Luminescence lifetime based analyte sensing instruments and calibration technique |
| DE102010014912A1 (en) * | 2010-04-14 | 2011-10-20 | Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh | Sensor for checking value documents |
| US8742369B2 (en) * | 2010-11-01 | 2014-06-03 | Honeywell International Inc. | Value documents and other articles having taggants that exhibit delayed maximum intensity emissions, and methods and apparatus for their authentication |
| DE102010051087A1 (en) * | 2010-11-12 | 2012-05-16 | Beb Industrie-Elektronik Ag | Method and device for checking the authenticity of banknotes with security windows |
| US8487272B2 (en) | 2010-12-14 | 2013-07-16 | Authentix, Inc. | Fluorescence emissions detector |
| CN103597522B (en) * | 2011-06-06 | 2016-10-05 | 锡克拜控股有限公司 | In-line decay-time scanner |
| US9239262B2 (en) * | 2011-07-15 | 2016-01-19 | Honeywell International Inc. | Methods and apparatus for authenticating articles with luminescent phosphor compounds |
| KR101288549B1 (en) * | 2011-11-09 | 2013-07-22 | 한국조폐공사 | security module reading apparatus using phosphorescence and fluorescence, and method for reading security module |
| JP5842586B2 (en) * | 2011-12-14 | 2016-01-13 | 凸版印刷株式会社 | Authenticity verifier and authenticity verification method |
| US8759794B2 (en) * | 2012-07-20 | 2014-06-24 | Honeywell International Inc. | Articles, methods of validating the same, and validation systems employing decay constant modulation |
| US9053596B2 (en) | 2012-07-31 | 2015-06-09 | De La Rue North America Inc. | Systems and methods for spectral authentication of a feature of a document |
| DE102012113008A1 (en) * | 2012-12-21 | 2014-06-26 | Hamilton Bonaduz Ag | Apparatus and method for measuring a periodic signal |
| DE102012025263A1 (en) | 2012-12-21 | 2014-06-26 | Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh | Sensor and method for checking value documents |
| JP6037889B2 (en) * | 2013-02-25 | 2016-12-07 | オリンパス株式会社 | Scanning observation device |
| CN104077697B (en) | 2013-03-29 | 2021-12-07 | 优品保有限公司 | System and method for mobile on-site item authentication |
| US9823198B2 (en) * | 2013-09-14 | 2017-11-21 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Method and apparatus for non-contact measurement of internal quantum efficiency in light emitting diode structures |
| US20150198531A1 (en) * | 2014-01-15 | 2015-07-16 | Vitaly Talyansky | Long Range Product Authenticator |
| US10650630B2 (en) * | 2014-10-31 | 2020-05-12 | Honeywell International Inc. | Authentication systems, authentication devices, and methods for authenticating a value article |
| CN105874513A (en) * | 2014-12-10 | 2016-08-17 | 韩国必特泊有限公司 | Mobile apparatus for detecting counterfeit bills, and method and system for detecting counterfeit bills by means of the mobile apparatus |
| JP6474633B2 (en) * | 2015-02-18 | 2019-02-27 | グローリー株式会社 | Fluorescence phosphorescence detection apparatus, fluorescence phosphorescence detection method, and paper sheet processing apparatus |
| US10139342B2 (en) * | 2015-08-04 | 2018-11-27 | Spectra Systems Corporation | Photoluminescent authentication devices, systems, and methods |
| US20170039794A1 (en) * | 2015-08-04 | 2017-02-09 | Spectra Systems Corp. | Photoluminescent authentication devices, systems, and methods |
| US10140494B1 (en) | 2015-08-04 | 2018-11-27 | Spectra Systems Corporation | Photoluminescent authentication devices, systems, and methods |
| TWI742100B (en) * | 2016-07-06 | 2021-10-11 | 瑞士商西克帕控股有限公司 | Method for authenticating a security marking utilizing long afterglow emission, and security marking comprising one or more afterglow compound |
| DE102017130027A1 (en) * | 2017-12-14 | 2019-06-19 | KM Innopat GmbH | Method for producing a security marker substance and method for authentication and authentication of an object and authentication system |
| DE102018109141A1 (en) | 2018-04-17 | 2019-10-17 | Bundesdruckerei Gmbh | Smartphone-verifiable, fluorescent-based security feature and device for verification Smartcard-verifiable, fluorescent-based security feature and arrangement for verification |
| US11320308B2 (en) * | 2018-07-17 | 2022-05-03 | The Trustees Of Princeton University | System and method for shaping incoherent light for control of chemical kinetics |
| JP7185439B2 (en) | 2018-08-01 | 2022-12-07 | 株式会社ヴィーネックス | Optical line sensor unit |
| KR102008934B1 (en) * | 2018-11-26 | 2019-08-08 | 한국조폐공사 | Plastic product comprising photoluminescent material and method for determining authenticity of the same |
| WO2021064336A1 (en) * | 2019-10-04 | 2021-04-08 | Spinnaker International Limited | Detector, security container, and method for processing recovered items |
| DE102020212199A1 (en) * | 2020-09-28 | 2022-03-31 | Pepperl+Fuchs Se | Method and device for detecting a graphic representation generated on a background |
Family Cites Families (19)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US3656835A (en) | 1969-08-26 | 1972-04-18 | Du Pont | Modulation by a magnetic field of electromagnetic radiation produced by the decay of triplet states |
| CH622369A5 (en) | 1978-04-18 | 1981-03-31 | Radioelectrique Comp Ind | |
| GB2097916B (en) * | 1981-05-05 | 1984-10-24 | Perkin Elmer Ltd | Correcting signals in flash spectrofluorimetry |
| US5043585A (en) * | 1990-01-03 | 1991-08-27 | Degussa Aktiengesellschaft | Method and apparatus for measurement of the fluorescence relaxation period of a fluorescent substance |
| US5315993A (en) | 1990-02-16 | 1994-05-31 | The Boc Group, Inc. | Luminescence monitoring with modulation frequency multiplexing |
| US5331140A (en) * | 1992-04-02 | 1994-07-19 | Xerox Corporation | Code reading systems |
| JP2896288B2 (en) * | 1993-05-24 | 1999-05-31 | 株式会社マイクロパック | Banknote identification method |
| US5574790A (en) | 1993-09-27 | 1996-11-12 | Angstrom Technologies, Inc. | Fluorescence authentication reader with coaxial optics |
| US5418855A (en) | 1993-09-27 | 1995-05-23 | Angstrom Technologies, Inc. | Authentication system and method |
| US5918960A (en) | 1994-01-04 | 1999-07-06 | Mars Incorporated | Detection of counterfeit objects, for instance counterfeit banknotes |
| JPH07302300A (en) * | 1994-03-08 | 1995-11-14 | Hitachi Maxell Ltd | Method and device for detecting mark |
| GB2287533B (en) | 1994-03-08 | 1998-09-16 | Hitachi Maxell | Fluorescent detecting apparatus and method |
| EP0700980B1 (en) * | 1994-03-17 | 1999-11-17 | Hitachi Maxell, Ltd. | PHOSPHOR, PHOSPHOR COMPOSITION and FLUORESCENT MARK CARRIER |
| JP3651616B2 (en) * | 1994-03-17 | 2005-05-25 | 日立マクセル株式会社 | Mark detection method and apparatus |
| CA2190362A1 (en) | 1994-05-27 | 1995-12-07 | Gert L. Duveneck | Process for detecting evanescently excited luminescence |
| US5548106A (en) | 1994-08-30 | 1996-08-20 | Angstrom Technologies, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for authenticating data storage articles |
| JP3364333B2 (en) * | 1994-09-19 | 2003-01-08 | 浜松ホトニクス株式会社 | Attenuation characteristic measuring device |
| US5757013A (en) * | 1995-12-06 | 1998-05-26 | American Research Corporation Of Virginia | Fluorescence decay measurement by calculation of inner product |
| DE10105273A1 (en) * | 2001-02-02 | 2002-08-14 | Deutsche Post Ag | Method for checking a franking applied to a mail item and device for carrying out the method |
-
2001
- 2001-03-01 DK DK01105020.0T patent/DK1237128T3/en active
- 2001-03-01 EP EP01105020A patent/EP1237128B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2001-03-01 ES ES01105020T patent/ES2392395T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2001-03-01 PT PT01105020T patent/PT1237128E/en unknown
-
2002
- 2002-01-26 HU HU0301637A patent/HU225922B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2002-01-26 NZ NZ521775A patent/NZ521775A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2002-01-26 CN CNB028004884A patent/CN1282135C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-01-26 EA EA200201047A patent/EA004580B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2002-01-26 KR KR1020027013959A patent/KR100867394B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2002-01-26 CZ CZ20023268A patent/CZ20023268A3/en unknown
- 2002-01-26 PL PL356743A patent/PL214986B1/en unknown
- 2002-01-26 JP JP2002570192A patent/JP4048121B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-01-26 US US10/240,737 patent/US7030371B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-01-26 WO PCT/EP2002/000811 patent/WO2002071347A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2002-01-26 BR BRPI0204341-6A patent/BR0204341B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2002-01-26 UA UA2002107883A patent/UA74821C2/en unknown
- 2002-01-26 AU AU2002250857A patent/AU2002250857B2/en not_active Ceased
- 2002-01-26 CA CA2404624A patent/CA2404624C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-01-26 MX MXPA02010319A patent/MXPA02010319A/en active IP Right Grant
- 2002-10-28 NO NO20025174A patent/NO335437B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2002-11-29 ZA ZA200209707A patent/ZA200209707B/en unknown
-
2004
- 2004-04-13 HK HK04102572A patent/HK1059671A1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
-
2012
- 2012-10-19 CY CY20121100987T patent/CY1115049T1/en unknown
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| EP1237128A1 (en) | 2002-09-04 |
| NO335437B1 (en) | 2014-12-15 |
| HUP0301637A2 (en) | 2003-09-29 |
| WO2002071347A1 (en) | 2002-09-12 |
| JP2004519056A (en) | 2004-06-24 |
| BR0204341A (en) | 2003-04-08 |
| CZ20023268A3 (en) | 2004-01-14 |
| PL356743A1 (en) | 2004-06-28 |
| NO20025174D0 (en) | 2002-10-28 |
| KR100867394B1 (en) | 2008-11-06 |
| US20040061048A1 (en) | 2004-04-01 |
| HU225922B1 (en) | 2008-01-28 |
| EA200201047A1 (en) | 2003-02-27 |
| CN1282135C (en) | 2006-10-25 |
| ZA200209707B (en) | 2003-08-25 |
| UA74821C2 (en) | 2006-02-15 |
| PL214986B1 (en) | 2013-10-31 |
| NO20025174L (en) | 2002-10-28 |
| JP4048121B2 (en) | 2008-02-13 |
| BR0204341B1 (en) | 2014-06-03 |
| PT1237128E (en) | 2012-10-30 |
| MXPA02010319A (en) | 2004-09-06 |
| EA004580B1 (en) | 2004-06-24 |
| CA2404624A1 (en) | 2002-09-12 |
| US7030371B2 (en) | 2006-04-18 |
| NZ521775A (en) | 2005-11-25 |
| EP1237128B1 (en) | 2012-08-01 |
| KR20020093925A (en) | 2002-12-16 |
| CN1457475A (en) | 2003-11-19 |
| ES2392395T3 (en) | 2012-12-10 |
| HK1059671A1 (en) | 2004-07-09 |
| DK1237128T3 (en) | 2012-10-29 |
| AU2002250857B2 (en) | 2007-06-14 |
| CY1115049T1 (en) | 2016-12-14 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA2404624C (en) | Improved luminescence characteristics detector | |
| US6918482B2 (en) | Device and method for verifying the authenticity of banknotes | |
| US4908516A (en) | Apparatus and process for checking the authenticity of an article having a magnetic storage information means | |
| US7067824B2 (en) | Method, device and security system, all for authenticating a marking | |
| EP1849138B1 (en) | Improvements relating to banknote validation | |
| US20070023521A1 (en) | Apparatus and method for security tag detection | |
| US10650630B2 (en) | Authentication systems, authentication devices, and methods for authenticating a value article | |
| AU2001265909A1 (en) | Method, device and security system, all for authenticating marking | |
| EP1043681A1 (en) | Method and device for exciting a luminescent material | |
| US6777704B2 (en) | Apparatus and method for examining documents | |
| JP2002109598A (en) | Bill differentiating device |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEER | Examination request | ||
| MKEX | Expiry |
Effective date: 20220126 |
|
| MKEX | Expiry |
Effective date: 20220126 |