CA2708564C - Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site - Google Patents
Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2708564C CA2708564C CA2708564A CA2708564A CA2708564C CA 2708564 C CA2708564 C CA 2708564C CA 2708564 A CA2708564 A CA 2708564A CA 2708564 A CA2708564 A CA 2708564A CA 2708564 C CA2708564 C CA 2708564C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- api
- servers
- online commerce
- access
- commerce site
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/06—Buying, selling or leasing transactions
- G06Q30/0601—Electronic shopping [e-shopping]
- G06Q30/0613—Third-party assisted
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F15/00—Digital computers in general; Data processing equipment in general
- G06F15/16—Combinations of two or more digital computers each having at least an arithmetic unit, a program unit and a register, e.g. for a simultaneous processing of several programs
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/06—Buying, selling or leasing transactions
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L47/00—Traffic control in data switching networks
- H04L47/70—Admission control; Resource allocation
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/01—Protocols
- H04L67/02—Protocols based on web technology, e.g. hypertext transfer protocol [HTTP]
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/01—Protocols
- H04L67/10—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
- H04L67/1001—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network for accessing one among a plurality of replicated servers
- H04L67/1004—Server selection for load balancing
- H04L67/1008—Server selection for load balancing based on parameters of servers, e.g. available memory or workload
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/01—Protocols
- H04L67/10—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
- H04L67/1001—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network for accessing one among a plurality of replicated servers
- H04L67/1004—Server selection for load balancing
- H04L67/1014—Server selection for load balancing based on the content of a request
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/14—Session management
- H04L67/142—Managing session states for stateless protocols; Signalling session states; State transitions; Keeping-state mechanisms
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/50—Network services
- H04L67/53—Network services using third party service providers
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/50—Network services
- H04L67/56—Provisioning of proxy services
- H04L67/563—Data redirection of data network streams
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L9/00—Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols
- H04L9/40—Network security protocols
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/01—Protocols
- H04L67/10—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
- H04L67/1001—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network for accessing one among a plurality of replicated servers
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/01—Protocols
- H04L67/10—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
- H04L67/1001—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network for accessing one among a plurality of replicated servers
- H04L67/10015—Access to distributed or replicated servers, e.g. using brokers
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/01—Protocols
- H04L67/10—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
- H04L67/1001—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network for accessing one among a plurality of replicated servers
- H04L67/1004—Server selection for load balancing
- H04L67/1023—Server selection for load balancing based on a hash applied to IP addresses or costs
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L69/00—Network arrangements, protocols or services independent of the application payload and not provided for in the other groups of this subclass
- H04L69/30—Definitions, standards or architectural aspects of layered protocol stacks
- H04L69/32—Architecture of open systems interconnection [OSI] 7-layer type protocol stacks, e.g. the interfaces between the data link level and the physical level
- H04L69/322—Intralayer communication protocols among peer entities or protocol data unit [PDU] definitions
- H04L69/329—Intralayer communication protocols among peer entities or protocol data unit [PDU] definitions in the application layer [OSI layer 7]
Abstract
Providing prioritization of user online access to an online commerce site. Third party applications using API function calls to access an online commerce site are restricted to specific services by an access rule. An access rule defines which API server on the online commerce site a specific third party application may access when using a specific API function call. In this way, the operator of the online commerce site may prioritize server access per service level agreements based on a specific third party application and API function call.
Description
PRIORITIZATION OF THIRD PARTY ACCESS TO AN ONLINE COMMERCE SITE
This application is a divisional application of Canadian Patent Application No. 2,469,655, filed December 13, 2002.
BACKGROUND OF THE IIWENI'ION
Field of the Invention [00011 The invention relates to the field of network computing. More specifically, the invention relates to the prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site.
B3ckttround of the Invention
This application is a divisional application of Canadian Patent Application No. 2,469,655, filed December 13, 2002.
BACKGROUND OF THE IIWENI'ION
Field of the Invention [00011 The invention relates to the field of network computing. More specifically, the invention relates to the prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site.
B3ckttround of the Invention
[0002] The online commerce marketplace allows users to buy and sell goods and services (e.g., via an online auction web site) to geographically dispersed consumers.
Typically, a user employs automated processes to buy or sell their own products on the online commerce site. By partnering with an established online commerce site, a user (e.g., a merchant) bypasses the cost of building an online commerce infrastructure from scratch, thereby reaching the online market quickly and accessing a large number of good and services in addition to a large number of buyers and sellers.
Typically, a user employs automated processes to buy or sell their own products on the online commerce site. By partnering with an established online commerce site, a user (e.g., a merchant) bypasses the cost of building an online commerce infrastructure from scratch, thereby reaching the online market quickly and accessing a large number of good and services in addition to a large number of buyers and sellers.
[0003] Permitting uncontrolled access to the online commerce site has some drawbacks, such as the drain on system resources due to the increased processing performed on the online commerce site- For example, a third party may utilize an automated program to extract information such as product listings and pricing information, from the online commerce site at various unpredictable times. The automated program may place a heavy load on the online commerce site that causes substantial response time delays to all users of the online commerce site, These response time delays may eventually frustrate the consumers of the site, causing them to cease using the online commerce site and seek another electronic commerce site from which to conduct business.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0004] Providing prioritization of user online access to an online commerce site. Third party applications using API function calls to access an online commerce site are restricted to specific services by an access rule. An access rule defines which API server on the online commerce site a specific third party application may access when using a specific API
function call. In this way, the operator of the online commerce site may prioritize server access per service level agreements based on a specific third party application and API function call.
BM F DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
function call. In this way, the operator of the online commerce site may prioritize server access per service level agreements based on a specific third party application and API function call.
BM F DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0005] The invention may best be understood by referring to the following description and accompanying drawings that are used to illustrate embodiments of the invention. In the drawings:
[0006] Figure 1 illustrates an online commerce system according to one embodiment.
[0007] Figure 2 is a flow diagram illustrating access rule processing on an online commerce site according to one embodiment.
100081 Figure 3 is a flow diagram illustrating a process of using access rules on a third party application server according to one embodiment.
[00091 Figure 4 illustrates a flow diagram of one embodiment of using access rules and rate usage limits on an online commerce server.
(00101 Figure 5 depicts an exemplary computer system suitable for practicing the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0011] In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. However, it is understood that the invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known circuits, structures and techniques have not been shown in detail in order not to obscure the invention.
[00121 Prioritization of user online access to an online commerce site is described.
According to one embodiment, an online commerce merchant configures an access rule to prioritize third party online access. An access rule defines how a third party may access the online commerce site. For example, a user may be limited, with an access rule, to a specific service on a specific server on the online commerce site, thereby, providing predictability to the operator of an online commerce site as to user accesses the online commerce site. In this way, the operator of an online commerce site may negotiate a service level agreement to provide access to specific servers with predetermined service levels as will be further described below.
[0013] Figure 1 illustrates an online co=coerce 100 system according to one embodiment. A
third party server area 102, a network area 104, and online commerce site 106, partitions the online commerce system 100.
[00141 The third party server area 102 includes third party application servers 110 and 115.
The online commerce area 106 includes Application Program Interface (API) servers 140, 142, and 144, and data storage devices 150, 152, 154, and 156. Any of the API
servers 140, 142, and 144 may access any of the data storage devices 150, 152, 154, and 156. The network area 104 includes a network 130 (e.g., the internet). The network 130 provides connectis-ity between any of the third party application servers 110 and 115 in the third party server area 102 and any of the API servers 140, 142, and 144 of the online commerce site 106. Access by the third party application servers 110, 115 may be prioritized based on a service level agreement, across the multiple API servers 140, 142, 144, as will be further described below.
[00151 Generally, third party developers create applications on the third party application servers I 10 and 115 to access information and services available in the online conanerce site 106 in a client/server type environment. For example, where the online commerce site 106 operates as an online auction site, the, online auction site may store pricing and product information in the data storage devices 150, 152, 154, and 156. The application hosted by the third party application server 110, 115 may use a I TML form or CGI program using the standard XML
(eXtensible Markup Language) data format, and may be written in C++, Pert, Pascal, or any other programming language capable of issuing data requests via the network 100 (e.g., the Internet). In one embodiment, each third party application hosted by the third party application servers 110, 115 uses APIs (application programming interfaces) to access the services provided by the online commerce site 106. Its general, APIs are standard programming interfaces (i.e., contracts) that define the input and output of function calls published by the online commerce site 106 to third party software programmers to automate access to services on the online commerce site 106 efficiently via application programs (e.g., to create an application to conduct auctions, and to manage auction and user information).
[0016] In one embodiment, a third party application must obtain access rule(s) before accessing the services on the online commerce site 106. For example, an access rule may include a URL (uniform resource locator) that addresses the API server 140, 142, or 144, with which the third party application 110 and 115 is to connect (or communicate) when accessing the services of the online commerce site 106. In this way, the URL directs a specific user to a specific API
server on the online commerce site 106 per the service level agreement The access rule may also be configured to direct a specific user to a specific API server having a different service level based on the specific APT function call to be used, For example, the third party application server 110 may be directed (via a URL stored in an access rule) to connect to API server 140 when servicing a "Getltenz" API function call to retrieve information describing an item offered for sale via the online commerce site 106.
[0017) The access rule(s) are configured on the online commerce site 106. For example, an administrator of the online commerce site 106 may configure access rules stored in the data storage device 150 via the administrator portal 160. In one embodiment, each rule has a record in a database table that corresponds to one API function call type.
Specifically, the table includes a field for a Rule ID, an APPPID, a CallName, and a UR.L for each API function call. The Rule ID field stores an identifier for a specific rule. The App -P field stores the identifier of the third party application. The CailNarne field stores the name of an API
function call. The URL
field stores the URL that the third party application should use when utilizing the API function call associated with the CallName. In this way, the administrator configures each access rule per the service level agreement to an API function used by a specific third party application to connect (via a given URL) to a specific API server. The access rule may also include rate usage information that limits third party application access as will be further described below.
[00181 In one embodiment, the access rule(s) are resident on the third party application server before the third party application accesses the services of the online commerce site 106. The third party application may request the access rule(s) from the online commerce site 106 using an API function call as will be further described below.
(0019) It should be appreciated that in this way, the online commerce merchant may prioritize access of third party application servers 110 and 115 to API servers 140, 142, 144 on the online commerce site 106. For example, the online commerce merchant may negotiate to provide a premium service level (e.g., guarantee faster response time) to third party application server 110 and provide a standard service level to the third party application server 115. The API server 142 may be designated as a premium server (for example, because a minimum number of third party applications have access to the API server 142, the API server 142 has additional resources and services available, among other examples), while the API server 144 may be designated as a standard server. Therefore, an access rule associated with an application on the third party application server 110 defines connectivity to the API server 142 for the premium service requests and an access rule associated with an application on the third party application server 115 defines connectivity to the API server 144 for the standard server requests.
(0020) A third party application may schedule the request for access rule(s) on a periodic basis (e.g_, nightly). In this way, the third party application may receive any access rule updates performed by the administrator after analyzing the usage pattern of all third party applications.
Continuing the example, if it is determined that the response time provided by the premium service on the API server 142 is not acceptable, then an administrator may modify the appropriate access rule to redirect the third party application server 110 to connect to a premium service on the API server 144 instead of cormecting to API server 142 as previously defined.
[00211 Figure 2 is a flow diagram illustrating access rule processing on the online commerce site 106 according to one embodiment.
100221 At block 210, the API server 140 receives a request for an access rule from a third party application. As stated above, the request may originate from an AN
function call. In one embodiment, the fimetion call request is passed from a third party application to the online commerce server 106 via a URL request string. By using a URL request string, through the }IT"I'P transport protocol, to make the API function call the API function is rendered-platform independent. Therefore, the third party application may be on any Internet capable machine including Microsoft Windows, Unix, Linux, or Macintosh computer, among others.
[00231 At decision block 220, the API server 140 determines whether the request is a valid.
In one embodiment, the request includes an application identifier, a developer identifier, and a session certificate- The application identifier identifies the third party application that transmitted the request. In one embodiment, a session certificate is a string of characters unique to a third party application. The session certificate string for the third party application is passed along with the developer identifier and the application identifier for each API function call type and is used by the API server 140, 142, and 144 to validate the request.
[0024) At block 225, the request is not validated and a descriptive message of the error result is returned back to the requesting third party application.
[0025] At block 230, if the third party application request is validated, the access rule(s) for the predefined service levels for the identified third party application are returned to the requesting third party application. For example, the API server 140 may access an access rules database table on the data storage device 150 for all the access rules associated with the application identifier of the request. Each access rule to be returned to the requesting third party application includes a CalIName and a URL that the third party application should use when malting a API function call associated with the CallName, as will be further desc abed. In this way, the third party application will be directed to the API server 140, 142, 144 providing the appropriate service level.
[0026) Figure 3 is a flow diagram illustrating a process of using access rules on a third party application server according to one embodiment. At block 310, the third party application makes a request for access rules to an API server. The request may be made to a predefined API
Server or to any of the API Servers on the online commerce site 106.
10027] At block 320, the third parry application receives the appropriate access rules. Upon receiving an access rule, the third party application saves the access rule in a data store such as a storage device, a memory, and a database, for example.
[002$[ At block 330, the. third party application intends to perform an API
function call to the online commerce site 106. Examples of API functions for an online auction site include: an Addltem function (sends a request to the online commerce site to put an item up for auction), a Getltem function (used to query the online commerce site and retrieve the information for one auction item); a GetSellerList function (queries the online commerce site and retrieves a list of the items a specific user/merchant is selling); a GetSearchResults (searches for items on the online commerce site); among other examples. Further examples of APIs to access an online auction site are described in U.S. patent application Publication No.
2003/0093326 entitled "Method and Apparatus to Facilitate a Transaction within a Network-Based Auction Facility", Assigned to eBay, Inc.
[00291 At block 340, the URL from the access rule associated with intended API
function call is obtained. The URL is retrieved from the access rule in the data store having a CallName associated to the intended API function call. Again, the URL may direct the user to the API
server servicing the negotiated service level.
(00301 At block 350, upon obtaining the appropriate URL, the third party application applies the intended APT function call to the appropriate API server on the online commerce site 106.
[00311 Figure 4 illustrates a flow diagram of one embodiment of using access rules and rate usage limits on an online commerce site. At block 410, an API server 140-144 receives a request to access the services on the online commerce site 106. As stated above, the request may for example be an API function call for a list of seller items (e.g., GetSellerltemList API function).
[0032] At decision block 420, a validation is performed on the request. If the request is validated, control passes to block 425. If the request is not validated, control passes to block 430.
The application identifier, developer identifier, or session certificate, or any combination thereof, included in an API function call header, may be used to validate the request based on the associated (or matching) access rule stored on the online commerce site 106.
100331 Validation may also include determining whether the requesting API
function call is to the appropriate API server. The third party application may connect to API
server to which it has been assigned in the access rule. Continuing the example, if the access rule for the third party application server 115 defines the GetltemList API function to be made to API
server 142 (via the URL stored in the access rule associated with the GetiternList API
function), then a validating API server will validate that a request is made to the appropriate API server 142.
[00341 At block 425, the request is not validated and it descriptive message is returned back to the requesting third party application.
[0035[ At block 430, the appropriate API server determines whether the third party application has exceeded a predefined maximum rate usage level. For example, the administrator may limit the third party application to perform a certain number of transactions per unit of time (e.g., 80,000 searches per day). If the third party application has exceeded the maximum rate usage, control passes to block 460. If the third party application has not exceeded the maximum rate usage, control passes to block 440. In this way, block 430 operates like a circuit breaker to limit third party access if it exceeds the agreed-upon transaction limits.
[0036] In another embodiment, block 430 may deteimnne whether the third party application has exceeded other predefined maximum rate usage levels, such as, the maximum number of calls within a predefined time frame (e.g., per day, per hour), the maximum number of simultaneous calls, whether the call is during a predefined time of day, among other examples.
[00371 At block 440, the third party application has not exceeded the maximum rate usage level, therefore, the API function call is performed, and if necessary, a usage rate counter increased. Continuing the example, the number of transaction results performed may be added to the maximum rate usage counter for the specific third party application. The maximum rate usage counter value may be stored in memory of the API server or in one of the databases 150, 152, 154, and 156.
[0038) At block 445, the API server returns the transaction results up to the maximum rate usage level. Therefore, if the third party application reaches the maximum rate usage upon performing the requested transaction, only those transactions that are below the maximum rate usage level are transmitted to the third party application. Control then passes to block 445.
[0039] At block 460, the third party application has exceeded the maximurn rate usage and a descriptive message is returned back to the requesting third party application.
[0040) One embodiment of an API server suitable for managing access rules is illustrated in Figure 5. The computer system 540 includes a processor 550, memory 555 and input/output capability 560 coupled to a system bus 565. The memory 555 is configured to store instructions which, when executed by the processor 550, perform the methods described herein. The memory 555 may also store access rules. Input/output 560 provides for the delivery and display of software to a device and allows for the modification of the access rules thereof Input/output 560 also encompasses various types of machine-readable media, including any type of storage device (e.g., preference database 240) that is accessible by the processor 550. The description of Figure is intended to provide an overview of computer hardware and other operating components suitable for implementing the invention, but is not intended to limit the applicable environments.
It will be appreciated that the computer system 540 is one example of many possible computer systems, which have different architectures. A typical computer system will usually include at least a processor, memory, and a bus coupling the memory to the processor. One of skill in the art will immediately appreciate that the invention can be practiced with other computer system configurations, including multiprocessor systems, minicomputers, mainframe computers, and the like. The invention can also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a comumunications network. It will be appreciated that more or fewer processes may be incorporated into the method illustrated in Figures 2 and 3 without departing from the scope of the invention and that no particular order is implied by the arrangement of blocks shown and described herein. It further will be appreciated that the method described in conjunction with Figures 2 and 3 may be embodied in machine-executable insavetions, e.g. software. The instructions can be used to cause a general-purpose or special-purpose processor that is programmed with the instructions to perform the operations described. Alternatively, the operations might be performed by specific hardware components that contain hardwired logic for performing the operations, or by any combination of programmed computer components and custom hardware components. The method may be provided as a computer program product that may include a machine-readable medium having stored thereon instructions, which may be used to program a computer (or other electronic devices) to perform the method. For the purposes of this specification, the terms "machine-readable medium" shall be taken to include any medium that is capable of storing or encoding a sequence of instructions for execution by the machine and that cause the machine to perform any one of the methodologies of the present invention. The term "machine-readable medium" shall accordingly be taken to include, but not be limited to, solid-state memories, optical and magnetic
100081 Figure 3 is a flow diagram illustrating a process of using access rules on a third party application server according to one embodiment.
[00091 Figure 4 illustrates a flow diagram of one embodiment of using access rules and rate usage limits on an online commerce server.
(00101 Figure 5 depicts an exemplary computer system suitable for practicing the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0011] In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. However, it is understood that the invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known circuits, structures and techniques have not been shown in detail in order not to obscure the invention.
[00121 Prioritization of user online access to an online commerce site is described.
According to one embodiment, an online commerce merchant configures an access rule to prioritize third party online access. An access rule defines how a third party may access the online commerce site. For example, a user may be limited, with an access rule, to a specific service on a specific server on the online commerce site, thereby, providing predictability to the operator of an online commerce site as to user accesses the online commerce site. In this way, the operator of an online commerce site may negotiate a service level agreement to provide access to specific servers with predetermined service levels as will be further described below.
[0013] Figure 1 illustrates an online co=coerce 100 system according to one embodiment. A
third party server area 102, a network area 104, and online commerce site 106, partitions the online commerce system 100.
[00141 The third party server area 102 includes third party application servers 110 and 115.
The online commerce area 106 includes Application Program Interface (API) servers 140, 142, and 144, and data storage devices 150, 152, 154, and 156. Any of the API
servers 140, 142, and 144 may access any of the data storage devices 150, 152, 154, and 156. The network area 104 includes a network 130 (e.g., the internet). The network 130 provides connectis-ity between any of the third party application servers 110 and 115 in the third party server area 102 and any of the API servers 140, 142, and 144 of the online commerce site 106. Access by the third party application servers 110, 115 may be prioritized based on a service level agreement, across the multiple API servers 140, 142, 144, as will be further described below.
[00151 Generally, third party developers create applications on the third party application servers I 10 and 115 to access information and services available in the online conanerce site 106 in a client/server type environment. For example, where the online commerce site 106 operates as an online auction site, the, online auction site may store pricing and product information in the data storage devices 150, 152, 154, and 156. The application hosted by the third party application server 110, 115 may use a I TML form or CGI program using the standard XML
(eXtensible Markup Language) data format, and may be written in C++, Pert, Pascal, or any other programming language capable of issuing data requests via the network 100 (e.g., the Internet). In one embodiment, each third party application hosted by the third party application servers 110, 115 uses APIs (application programming interfaces) to access the services provided by the online commerce site 106. Its general, APIs are standard programming interfaces (i.e., contracts) that define the input and output of function calls published by the online commerce site 106 to third party software programmers to automate access to services on the online commerce site 106 efficiently via application programs (e.g., to create an application to conduct auctions, and to manage auction and user information).
[0016] In one embodiment, a third party application must obtain access rule(s) before accessing the services on the online commerce site 106. For example, an access rule may include a URL (uniform resource locator) that addresses the API server 140, 142, or 144, with which the third party application 110 and 115 is to connect (or communicate) when accessing the services of the online commerce site 106. In this way, the URL directs a specific user to a specific API
server on the online commerce site 106 per the service level agreement The access rule may also be configured to direct a specific user to a specific API server having a different service level based on the specific APT function call to be used, For example, the third party application server 110 may be directed (via a URL stored in an access rule) to connect to API server 140 when servicing a "Getltenz" API function call to retrieve information describing an item offered for sale via the online commerce site 106.
[0017) The access rule(s) are configured on the online commerce site 106. For example, an administrator of the online commerce site 106 may configure access rules stored in the data storage device 150 via the administrator portal 160. In one embodiment, each rule has a record in a database table that corresponds to one API function call type.
Specifically, the table includes a field for a Rule ID, an APPPID, a CallName, and a UR.L for each API function call. The Rule ID field stores an identifier for a specific rule. The App -P field stores the identifier of the third party application. The CailNarne field stores the name of an API
function call. The URL
field stores the URL that the third party application should use when utilizing the API function call associated with the CallName. In this way, the administrator configures each access rule per the service level agreement to an API function used by a specific third party application to connect (via a given URL) to a specific API server. The access rule may also include rate usage information that limits third party application access as will be further described below.
[00181 In one embodiment, the access rule(s) are resident on the third party application server before the third party application accesses the services of the online commerce site 106. The third party application may request the access rule(s) from the online commerce site 106 using an API function call as will be further described below.
(0019) It should be appreciated that in this way, the online commerce merchant may prioritize access of third party application servers 110 and 115 to API servers 140, 142, 144 on the online commerce site 106. For example, the online commerce merchant may negotiate to provide a premium service level (e.g., guarantee faster response time) to third party application server 110 and provide a standard service level to the third party application server 115. The API server 142 may be designated as a premium server (for example, because a minimum number of third party applications have access to the API server 142, the API server 142 has additional resources and services available, among other examples), while the API server 144 may be designated as a standard server. Therefore, an access rule associated with an application on the third party application server 110 defines connectivity to the API server 142 for the premium service requests and an access rule associated with an application on the third party application server 115 defines connectivity to the API server 144 for the standard server requests.
(0020) A third party application may schedule the request for access rule(s) on a periodic basis (e.g_, nightly). In this way, the third party application may receive any access rule updates performed by the administrator after analyzing the usage pattern of all third party applications.
Continuing the example, if it is determined that the response time provided by the premium service on the API server 142 is not acceptable, then an administrator may modify the appropriate access rule to redirect the third party application server 110 to connect to a premium service on the API server 144 instead of cormecting to API server 142 as previously defined.
[00211 Figure 2 is a flow diagram illustrating access rule processing on the online commerce site 106 according to one embodiment.
100221 At block 210, the API server 140 receives a request for an access rule from a third party application. As stated above, the request may originate from an AN
function call. In one embodiment, the fimetion call request is passed from a third party application to the online commerce server 106 via a URL request string. By using a URL request string, through the }IT"I'P transport protocol, to make the API function call the API function is rendered-platform independent. Therefore, the third party application may be on any Internet capable machine including Microsoft Windows, Unix, Linux, or Macintosh computer, among others.
[00231 At decision block 220, the API server 140 determines whether the request is a valid.
In one embodiment, the request includes an application identifier, a developer identifier, and a session certificate- The application identifier identifies the third party application that transmitted the request. In one embodiment, a session certificate is a string of characters unique to a third party application. The session certificate string for the third party application is passed along with the developer identifier and the application identifier for each API function call type and is used by the API server 140, 142, and 144 to validate the request.
[0024) At block 225, the request is not validated and a descriptive message of the error result is returned back to the requesting third party application.
[0025] At block 230, if the third party application request is validated, the access rule(s) for the predefined service levels for the identified third party application are returned to the requesting third party application. For example, the API server 140 may access an access rules database table on the data storage device 150 for all the access rules associated with the application identifier of the request. Each access rule to be returned to the requesting third party application includes a CalIName and a URL that the third party application should use when malting a API function call associated with the CallName, as will be further desc abed. In this way, the third party application will be directed to the API server 140, 142, 144 providing the appropriate service level.
[0026) Figure 3 is a flow diagram illustrating a process of using access rules on a third party application server according to one embodiment. At block 310, the third party application makes a request for access rules to an API server. The request may be made to a predefined API
Server or to any of the API Servers on the online commerce site 106.
10027] At block 320, the third parry application receives the appropriate access rules. Upon receiving an access rule, the third party application saves the access rule in a data store such as a storage device, a memory, and a database, for example.
[002$[ At block 330, the. third party application intends to perform an API
function call to the online commerce site 106. Examples of API functions for an online auction site include: an Addltem function (sends a request to the online commerce site to put an item up for auction), a Getltem function (used to query the online commerce site and retrieve the information for one auction item); a GetSellerList function (queries the online commerce site and retrieves a list of the items a specific user/merchant is selling); a GetSearchResults (searches for items on the online commerce site); among other examples. Further examples of APIs to access an online auction site are described in U.S. patent application Publication No.
2003/0093326 entitled "Method and Apparatus to Facilitate a Transaction within a Network-Based Auction Facility", Assigned to eBay, Inc.
[00291 At block 340, the URL from the access rule associated with intended API
function call is obtained. The URL is retrieved from the access rule in the data store having a CallName associated to the intended API function call. Again, the URL may direct the user to the API
server servicing the negotiated service level.
(00301 At block 350, upon obtaining the appropriate URL, the third party application applies the intended APT function call to the appropriate API server on the online commerce site 106.
[00311 Figure 4 illustrates a flow diagram of one embodiment of using access rules and rate usage limits on an online commerce site. At block 410, an API server 140-144 receives a request to access the services on the online commerce site 106. As stated above, the request may for example be an API function call for a list of seller items (e.g., GetSellerltemList API function).
[0032] At decision block 420, a validation is performed on the request. If the request is validated, control passes to block 425. If the request is not validated, control passes to block 430.
The application identifier, developer identifier, or session certificate, or any combination thereof, included in an API function call header, may be used to validate the request based on the associated (or matching) access rule stored on the online commerce site 106.
100331 Validation may also include determining whether the requesting API
function call is to the appropriate API server. The third party application may connect to API
server to which it has been assigned in the access rule. Continuing the example, if the access rule for the third party application server 115 defines the GetltemList API function to be made to API
server 142 (via the URL stored in the access rule associated with the GetiternList API
function), then a validating API server will validate that a request is made to the appropriate API server 142.
[00341 At block 425, the request is not validated and it descriptive message is returned back to the requesting third party application.
[0035[ At block 430, the appropriate API server determines whether the third party application has exceeded a predefined maximum rate usage level. For example, the administrator may limit the third party application to perform a certain number of transactions per unit of time (e.g., 80,000 searches per day). If the third party application has exceeded the maximum rate usage, control passes to block 460. If the third party application has not exceeded the maximum rate usage, control passes to block 440. In this way, block 430 operates like a circuit breaker to limit third party access if it exceeds the agreed-upon transaction limits.
[0036] In another embodiment, block 430 may deteimnne whether the third party application has exceeded other predefined maximum rate usage levels, such as, the maximum number of calls within a predefined time frame (e.g., per day, per hour), the maximum number of simultaneous calls, whether the call is during a predefined time of day, among other examples.
[00371 At block 440, the third party application has not exceeded the maximum rate usage level, therefore, the API function call is performed, and if necessary, a usage rate counter increased. Continuing the example, the number of transaction results performed may be added to the maximum rate usage counter for the specific third party application. The maximum rate usage counter value may be stored in memory of the API server or in one of the databases 150, 152, 154, and 156.
[0038) At block 445, the API server returns the transaction results up to the maximum rate usage level. Therefore, if the third party application reaches the maximum rate usage upon performing the requested transaction, only those transactions that are below the maximum rate usage level are transmitted to the third party application. Control then passes to block 445.
[0039] At block 460, the third party application has exceeded the maximurn rate usage and a descriptive message is returned back to the requesting third party application.
[0040) One embodiment of an API server suitable for managing access rules is illustrated in Figure 5. The computer system 540 includes a processor 550, memory 555 and input/output capability 560 coupled to a system bus 565. The memory 555 is configured to store instructions which, when executed by the processor 550, perform the methods described herein. The memory 555 may also store access rules. Input/output 560 provides for the delivery and display of software to a device and allows for the modification of the access rules thereof Input/output 560 also encompasses various types of machine-readable media, including any type of storage device (e.g., preference database 240) that is accessible by the processor 550. The description of Figure is intended to provide an overview of computer hardware and other operating components suitable for implementing the invention, but is not intended to limit the applicable environments.
It will be appreciated that the computer system 540 is one example of many possible computer systems, which have different architectures. A typical computer system will usually include at least a processor, memory, and a bus coupling the memory to the processor. One of skill in the art will immediately appreciate that the invention can be practiced with other computer system configurations, including multiprocessor systems, minicomputers, mainframe computers, and the like. The invention can also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a comumunications network. It will be appreciated that more or fewer processes may be incorporated into the method illustrated in Figures 2 and 3 without departing from the scope of the invention and that no particular order is implied by the arrangement of blocks shown and described herein. It further will be appreciated that the method described in conjunction with Figures 2 and 3 may be embodied in machine-executable insavetions, e.g. software. The instructions can be used to cause a general-purpose or special-purpose processor that is programmed with the instructions to perform the operations described. Alternatively, the operations might be performed by specific hardware components that contain hardwired logic for performing the operations, or by any combination of programmed computer components and custom hardware components. The method may be provided as a computer program product that may include a machine-readable medium having stored thereon instructions, which may be used to program a computer (or other electronic devices) to perform the method. For the purposes of this specification, the terms "machine-readable medium" shall be taken to include any medium that is capable of storing or encoding a sequence of instructions for execution by the machine and that cause the machine to perform any one of the methodologies of the present invention. The term "machine-readable medium" shall accordingly be taken to include, but not be limited to, solid-state memories, optical and magnetic
8 disks, and a carrier wave that encodes a data signal. Furthermore, it is common in the art to speak of software, in one form or another (e.g., program, procedure, process, application, module, logic...), as taking an action or causing a result. Such expressions are merely a shorthand way of saying that execution of the software by a computer causes the processor of the computer to perform an action or a produce a result.
[0041] It should be appreciated that by providing third party applications access rules to determine which API server to access, the online commerce merchant may prioritize and control the manner in which the third party applications access the online commerce site 106. The online commerce site 106 may prioritize access by class of customer or service being accessed when needed to achieve any necessary service level. In this way, premium services may be provided to specific third party applications thereby guaranteeing availability of services on the premium site, among other advantages.
(0042] In addition, only those third party applications and API function calls that have the appropriate access rule may access the API server, thereby preventing other parties from sharing services by using a specific URL assigned to another third party application.
Also, since a single third party application may access different API servers based on the specific API function call, the invention also prevents the third party user from arbitrary selecting any one of the API
servers.
[0043) Although the exemplary embodiment of described herein details how an online auction merchant prioritizes third party application requests from API
function calls with access rules, it should be understood that the invention is not linuted to prioritizing third party application's access to an online auction site. Alternatively, an access rule may be used to prioritize access to alternative online commerce environments and to alternative services provided by an online commerce facility.
[0044] Although the invention describes how a third party application connects to an API
server, in alternative embodiments, the third party application connects to an API server pool (e.g., multiple API servers) that are controlled by a resonate load balancer and respond to the same URL. Load balancing network topologies are well know in the an and have not been described in detail in order not to obscure the invention.
[0045) It is also understood that access rules may be delivered to a third party application server via means other than the API function described. In alternative embodiincnts, the access rules may be transferred to the third party application server by other well-known file transfer
[0041] It should be appreciated that by providing third party applications access rules to determine which API server to access, the online commerce merchant may prioritize and control the manner in which the third party applications access the online commerce site 106. The online commerce site 106 may prioritize access by class of customer or service being accessed when needed to achieve any necessary service level. In this way, premium services may be provided to specific third party applications thereby guaranteeing availability of services on the premium site, among other advantages.
(0042] In addition, only those third party applications and API function calls that have the appropriate access rule may access the API server, thereby preventing other parties from sharing services by using a specific URL assigned to another third party application.
Also, since a single third party application may access different API servers based on the specific API function call, the invention also prevents the third party user from arbitrary selecting any one of the API
servers.
[0043) Although the exemplary embodiment of described herein details how an online auction merchant prioritizes third party application requests from API
function calls with access rules, it should be understood that the invention is not linuted to prioritizing third party application's access to an online auction site. Alternatively, an access rule may be used to prioritize access to alternative online commerce environments and to alternative services provided by an online commerce facility.
[0044] Although the invention describes how a third party application connects to an API
server, in alternative embodiments, the third party application connects to an API server pool (e.g., multiple API servers) that are controlled by a resonate load balancer and respond to the same URL. Load balancing network topologies are well know in the an and have not been described in detail in order not to obscure the invention.
[0045) It is also understood that access rules may be delivered to a third party application server via means other than the API function described. In alternative embodiincnts, the access rules may be transferred to the third party application server by other well-known file transfer
9 mechanisms within the scope of the invention. In addition, in some embodiments the access rules are preemptively not transferred to the third party application server but the third party application server searches access rules on the online commerce site before performing a specific API function to determine which API server to connect when accessing the online commerce site 106.
[0046) While the invention has been described in terms of several embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention is not limited to the embodiments described. The method and apparatus of the invention can be practiced with modification and alteration within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. The description is thus to be regarded as illustrative instead of limiting on the invention.
lU
[0046) While the invention has been described in terms of several embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention is not limited to the embodiments described. The method and apparatus of the invention can be practiced with modification and alteration within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. The description is thus to be regarded as illustrative instead of limiting on the invention.
lU
Claims (21)
1. A method comprising:
providing a plurality of servers to provide access to services of an online commerce site, the plurality of servers including application programming interface (API) servers for servicing API calls received from a user computer;
responsive to a request received from a user computer via an API call, determining an identity of the user computer;
identifying a first server of the plurality of servers to which to direct the user computer for service by the online commerce site based on the API call; and transmitting an identifier for the first server to the user computer so as to enable the user computer to direct a request for service to the first server of the plurality of servers via an API call.
providing a plurality of servers to provide access to services of an online commerce site, the plurality of servers including application programming interface (API) servers for servicing API calls received from a user computer;
responsive to a request received from a user computer via an API call, determining an identity of the user computer;
identifying a first server of the plurality of servers to which to direct the user computer for service by the online commerce site based on the API call; and transmitting an identifier for the first server to the user computer so as to enable the user computer to direct a request for service to the first server of the plurality of servers via an API call.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the online commerce site is a network-based auction site.
3. The method of claim 1, including transmitting an access rule to the user computer.
4. The method of claim 1, including searching a database table for a record containing an identity of the user computer.
5. The method of claim 1, including transmitting a URL to the user computer.
6. A method comprising:
providing a plurality of servers to provide access to services of an online commerce site, the plurality of servers including application programming interface (API) servers for servicing API calls received from a client;
receiving a request from the client via an API call at the online commerce site for an access rule;
identifying a first API server of the plurality of servers to which to direct the client for service by the online commerce site based on the API call; and replying to the request with the access rule, the access rule being to direct the client to the first API server upon performing an API function call.
providing a plurality of servers to provide access to services of an online commerce site, the plurality of servers including application programming interface (API) servers for servicing API calls received from a client;
receiving a request from the client via an API call at the online commerce site for an access rule;
identifying a first API server of the plurality of servers to which to direct the client for service by the online commerce site based on the API call; and replying to the request with the access rule, the access rule being to direct the client to the first API server upon performing an API function call.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein the API function call is to perform a function to facilitate the online commerce.
8. The method of claim 6, wherein the API function call is to retrieve information regarding items that are available for transaction via the online commerce site.
9. The method of claim 6, wherein the access rule includes a URL that addresses the first API server.
10. The method of claim 6, wherein the request includes an application ID to identify the access rule being returned.
11. The method of claim 6, wherein the request includes a developer ID to identify the access rule being returned.
12. The method of claim 6, wherein the request includes a session certificate in order to validate the client making the request.
13. The method of claim 6, further including:
responsive to receiving the request from the client, searching a database table for a record containing the access rule to reply to the client.
responsive to receiving the request from the client, searching a database table for a record containing the access rule to reply to the client.
14. A method comprising:
providing a plurality of servers to provide access to services of an online commerce site, the plurality of servers including application programming interface (API) servers for servicing API calls received from a client;
receiving a request to access a service on a one of the plurality of servers via an API call, the request including an identifier of the client; and validating the request based on an access rule stored on the one of the plurality of servers associated with the identifier.
providing a plurality of servers to provide access to services of an online commerce site, the plurality of servers including application programming interface (API) servers for servicing API calls received from a client;
receiving a request to access a service on a one of the plurality of servers via an API call, the request including an identifier of the client; and validating the request based on an access rule stored on the one of the plurality of servers associated with the identifier.
15. The method of claim 14, wherein the validating includes validating the request based on whether a URL in the access rule is associated with the one of the plurality of servers.
16. The method of claim 14, wherein the identifier is one of. an application identifier, a developer identifier, and a session certificate.
17. The method of claim 14, further including providing the access to the service.
18. The method of claim 14, wherein the one of the plurality of servers is an online auction server.
19. The method of claim 14, further including determining if the client has exceeded a maximum rate usage level.
20. A system, including:
a network; and a plurality of servers to provide access to services of an online commerce site, the plurality of servers including application programming interface (API) servers for servicing API calls received from a user computer, responsive to a request received from a user computer via an API call, determining an identity of the user computer, identifying a first server of the plurality of servers to which to direct the user computer for service by the online commerce site based on the API call, and transmitting an identifier for the first server to the user computer so as to enable the user computer to direct a request for service to the first server of the plurality of servers via an API call.
a network; and a plurality of servers to provide access to services of an online commerce site, the plurality of servers including application programming interface (API) servers for servicing API calls received from a user computer, responsive to a request received from a user computer via an API call, determining an identity of the user computer, identifying a first server of the plurality of servers to which to direct the user computer for service by the online commerce site based on the API call, and transmitting an identifier for the first server to the user computer so as to enable the user computer to direct a request for service to the first server of the plurality of servers via an API call.
21. The system of claim 20, wherein the online commerce site is a network-based auction site.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CA2824037A CA2824037C (en) | 2001-12-18 | 2002-12-13 | Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/025,267 US7305469B2 (en) | 2001-12-18 | 2001-12-18 | Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site |
US10/025,267 | 2001-12-18 | ||
CA2469655A CA2469655C (en) | 2001-12-18 | 2002-12-13 | Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA2469655A Division CA2469655C (en) | 2001-12-18 | 2002-12-13 | Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA2824037A Division CA2824037C (en) | 2001-12-18 | 2002-12-13 | Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2708564A1 CA2708564A1 (en) | 2003-06-26 |
CA2708564C true CA2708564C (en) | 2013-10-22 |
Family
ID=21825026
Family Applications (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA2708564A Expired - Lifetime CA2708564C (en) | 2001-12-18 | 2002-12-13 | Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site |
CA2824037A Expired - Lifetime CA2824037C (en) | 2001-12-18 | 2002-12-13 | Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site |
CA2469655A Expired - Lifetime CA2469655C (en) | 2001-12-18 | 2002-12-13 | Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site |
Family Applications After (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA2824037A Expired - Lifetime CA2824037C (en) | 2001-12-18 | 2002-12-13 | Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site |
CA2469655A Expired - Lifetime CA2469655C (en) | 2001-12-18 | 2002-12-13 | Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (9) | US7305469B2 (en) |
EP (2) | EP2618540A3 (en) |
KR (1) | KR20040063956A (en) |
CN (3) | CN101261712A (en) |
AU (1) | AU2002357254B2 (en) |
CA (3) | CA2708564C (en) |
WO (1) | WO2003052615A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (47)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8332275B2 (en) * | 2001-10-31 | 2012-12-11 | Ebay Inc. | Method and apparatus to facilitate a transaction within a network-based facility |
US7305469B2 (en) | 2001-12-18 | 2007-12-04 | Ebay Inc. | Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site |
US7383556B1 (en) * | 2002-02-08 | 2008-06-03 | Mcafee, Inc. | Extractor system, method and computer program product for managing network access on a per-application basis |
US7558834B2 (en) * | 2003-12-29 | 2009-07-07 | Ebay Inc. | Method and system to process issue data pertaining to a system |
US20050246187A1 (en) * | 2004-04-30 | 2005-11-03 | Reed Maltzman | System and method to facilitate differentiated levels of service in a network-based marketplace |
US8442883B2 (en) * | 2004-06-30 | 2013-05-14 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Relationship management in an auction environment |
KR101122474B1 (en) * | 2005-05-20 | 2012-02-29 | 에스케이 텔레콤주식회사 | Method and System for user differentiated Data Network Service |
US7747721B2 (en) | 2005-06-03 | 2010-06-29 | Sbc Knowledge Ventures, L.P. | Method and apparatus for managing broadband residential gateway |
US20070083378A1 (en) * | 2005-10-11 | 2007-04-12 | Microsoft Corporation | Secure application programming interface |
US20230319159A1 (en) * | 2005-10-31 | 2023-10-05 | Treber Rebert | Queue processor for document servers |
WO2007069951A1 (en) * | 2005-12-15 | 2007-06-21 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | A method and apparatus for load distribution in multiprocessor servers |
US8954355B2 (en) | 2006-01-26 | 2015-02-10 | Psi Systems, Inc. | Integrated postage and shipping label system |
US9037542B2 (en) * | 2006-05-03 | 2015-05-19 | Oracle International Corporation | Reducing programming complexity in client applications when interfacing with database servers operating with different programming interfaces |
US8180685B2 (en) * | 2006-09-05 | 2012-05-15 | Ip Investments Holding Llc | Methods and systems for electronic commerce facility client-based presentation offer management |
US8930555B2 (en) * | 2007-03-08 | 2015-01-06 | Microsoft Corporation | Extending functionality of web-based applications |
US20080281720A1 (en) * | 2007-05-07 | 2008-11-13 | Events. Org | Method and apparatus of interactive bidding |
JP4907603B2 (en) * | 2007-06-27 | 2012-04-04 | ヒューレット−パッカード デベロップメント カンパニー エル.ピー. | Access control system and access control method |
US20090248729A1 (en) * | 2008-03-25 | 2009-10-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Online application platform and user communities |
US9015322B2 (en) * | 2008-12-30 | 2015-04-21 | Avaya Inc. | Access to resources in a virtual environment |
US20110047055A1 (en) * | 2009-08-24 | 2011-02-24 | Maximillian Funk | Dynamic Computer-Based Information Management System |
CN102281311B (en) * | 2010-06-10 | 2014-06-04 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Method, system and device for implementing network service based on open application programming interface |
US8775618B2 (en) | 2010-08-02 | 2014-07-08 | Ebay Inc. | Application platform with flexible permissioning |
US9256900B2 (en) * | 2010-11-15 | 2016-02-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Managing service demand load relative to infrastructure capacity in a networked computing environment |
US8677308B2 (en) * | 2011-01-07 | 2014-03-18 | Mastercard International Incorporated | Method and system for generating an API request message |
US8671385B2 (en) | 2011-01-07 | 2014-03-11 | Mastercard International Incorporated | Methods and systems for throttling calls to a service application through an open API |
US8707276B2 (en) * | 2011-01-07 | 2014-04-22 | Mastercard International Incorporated | Method and system for managing programmed applications in an open API environment |
US9083534B2 (en) | 2011-01-07 | 2015-07-14 | Mastercard International Incorporated | Method and system for propagating a client identity |
US9032204B2 (en) | 2011-01-07 | 2015-05-12 | Mastercard International Incorporated | Methods and systems for providing a signed digital certificate in real time |
US9160745B1 (en) * | 2011-05-19 | 2015-10-13 | Krux Digital, Inc. | Data counter measures |
US9635028B2 (en) * | 2011-08-31 | 2017-04-25 | Facebook, Inc. | Proxy authentication |
KR101171717B1 (en) | 2011-12-28 | 2012-09-13 | (주)네오위즈게임즈 | Method and server of preventing automatic program for item auction site of on-line game |
US11023960B1 (en) | 2012-03-30 | 2021-06-01 | David Frederick | System and method for e-commerce accessibility |
US10311506B1 (en) | 2012-03-30 | 2019-06-04 | David Frederick | System and method for e-commerce accessibility |
US9430784B1 (en) | 2012-03-30 | 2016-08-30 | David Frederick | System for E-commerce accessibility |
CN102866909B (en) * | 2012-08-27 | 2018-02-27 | 北京奇虎科技有限公司 | A kind of system and method for the resource lock for controlling docking port resource to access |
US20140096037A1 (en) * | 2012-09-28 | 2014-04-03 | Interactive Memories, Inc. | Methods for Dynamic Prioritization of Graphical Digital Assets for Presentation in an Electronic Interface |
US11669584B2 (en) | 2013-02-10 | 2023-06-06 | Wix.Com Ltd. | System and method for third party application activity data collection |
US8990839B2 (en) * | 2013-04-22 | 2015-03-24 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Controlling runtime access to application programming interfaces |
EA036433B1 (en) * | 2013-12-04 | 2020-11-10 | Викс.Ком Лтд. | System and method for third party application activity data collection |
US10050935B2 (en) | 2014-07-09 | 2018-08-14 | Shape Security, Inc. | Using individualized APIs to block automated attacks on native apps and/or purposely exposed APIs with forced user interaction |
US9729506B2 (en) | 2014-08-22 | 2017-08-08 | Shape Security, Inc. | Application programming interface wall |
US10664890B2 (en) * | 2015-07-20 | 2020-05-26 | Adp, Llc | Method and system for locating a service provider |
CN106897586B (en) * | 2016-08-04 | 2020-01-14 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Application Programming Interface (API) authority management method and device |
US20180352042A1 (en) * | 2017-06-04 | 2018-12-06 | Apple Inc. | Providing Device Information to Third Party Without Identifying the Device |
CN110290167A (en) * | 2019-05-07 | 2019-09-27 | 上海望海大数据信息有限公司 | A kind of sea and land integration managing and control system |
US11258768B2 (en) * | 2020-07-03 | 2022-02-22 | Bank Of America Corporation | Optimization of the isolation and disabling of unauthorized applications by detection of false positives |
US11425100B2 (en) | 2020-07-16 | 2022-08-23 | Bank Of America Corporation | Optimization of redundant usage patterns based on historical data and security constraints |
Family Cites Families (144)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3581072A (en) * | 1968-03-28 | 1971-05-25 | Frederick Nymeyer | Auction market computation system |
US3573747A (en) * | 1969-02-24 | 1971-04-06 | Institutional Networks Corp | Instinet communication system for effectuating the sale or exchange of fungible properties between subscribers |
US4412287A (en) * | 1975-05-29 | 1983-10-25 | Braddock Iii Walter D | Automated stock exchange |
US4903201A (en) * | 1983-11-03 | 1990-02-20 | World Energy Exchange Corporation | Automated futures trading exchange |
US4677552A (en) * | 1984-10-05 | 1987-06-30 | Sibley Jr H C | International commodity trade exchange |
US4674044A (en) * | 1985-01-30 | 1987-06-16 | Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. | Automated securities trading system |
JPH0743748B2 (en) * | 1986-02-17 | 1995-05-15 | 株式会社オークネット | Information transmission processing method of auction information transmission processing system |
US4864516A (en) | 1986-03-10 | 1989-09-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for implementing an on-line presentation in an information processing system |
US4799156A (en) * | 1986-10-01 | 1989-01-17 | Strategic Processing Corporation | Interactive market management system |
US4823265A (en) * | 1987-05-11 | 1989-04-18 | Nelson George E | Renewable option accounting and marketing system |
US5168446A (en) | 1989-05-23 | 1992-12-01 | Telerate Systems Incorporated | System for conducting and processing spot commodity transactions |
US5077665A (en) * | 1989-05-25 | 1991-12-31 | Reuters Limited | Distributed matching system |
US5136501A (en) | 1989-05-26 | 1992-08-04 | Reuters Limited | Anonymous matching system |
US5101353A (en) * | 1989-05-31 | 1992-03-31 | Lattice Investments, Inc. | Automated system for providing liquidity to securities markets |
MC2199A1 (en) | 1990-02-16 | 1992-10-05 | I V P Informations Ventes Publ | AUCTION PROCESSING METHOD AND SYSTEM |
US5297031A (en) | 1990-03-06 | 1994-03-22 | Chicago Board Of Trade | Method and apparatus for order management by market brokers |
US5205200A (en) | 1990-07-26 | 1993-04-27 | Wright John J | Hydraulic booster device for linear actuator |
US5063507A (en) * | 1990-09-14 | 1991-11-05 | Plains Cotton Cooperative Association | Goods database employing electronic title or documentary-type title |
US5243515A (en) | 1990-10-30 | 1993-09-07 | Lee Wayne M | Secure teleprocessing bidding system |
US5258908A (en) | 1990-11-02 | 1993-11-02 | Foreign Exchange Transaction Services, Inc. | Detection and prevention of duplicate trading transactions over a communications network |
US5305200A (en) | 1990-11-02 | 1994-04-19 | Foreign Exchange Transaction Services, Inc. | Financial exchange system having automated recovery/rollback of unacknowledged orders |
US5280422A (en) | 1990-11-05 | 1994-01-18 | Watlow/Winona, Inc. | Method and apparatus for calibrating and controlling multiple heaters |
GB9027249D0 (en) | 1990-12-17 | 1991-02-06 | Reuters Ltd | Offer matching system |
US5297032A (en) | 1991-02-01 | 1994-03-22 | Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated | Securities trading workstation |
GB9103907D0 (en) | 1991-02-25 | 1991-04-10 | Beaumont Maxin International L | Interactive transaction processing system |
CA2059078C (en) | 1991-02-27 | 1995-10-03 | Alexander G. Fraser | Mediation of transactions by a communications system |
EP0528084B1 (en) | 1991-08-15 | 1999-05-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for processing data representing stored images |
US5426281A (en) | 1991-08-22 | 1995-06-20 | Abecassis; Max | Transaction protection system |
US5375055A (en) | 1992-02-03 | 1994-12-20 | Foreign Exchange Transaction Services, Inc. | Credit management for electronic brokerage system |
US5325297A (en) | 1992-06-25 | 1994-06-28 | System Of Multiple-Colored Images For Internationally Listed Estates, Inc. | Computer implemented method and system for storing and retrieving textual data and compressed image data |
US5598557A (en) | 1992-09-22 | 1997-01-28 | Caere Corporation | Apparatus and method for retrieving and grouping images representing text files based on the relevance of key words extracted from a selected file to the text files |
CA2100134C (en) | 1992-09-29 | 1999-06-22 | Raymond Otto Colbert | Secure credit/debit card authorization |
US5794219A (en) | 1996-02-20 | 1998-08-11 | Health Hero Network, Inc. | Method of conducting an on-line auction with bid pooling |
JPH09501517A (en) | 1993-02-08 | 1997-02-10 | アクション・テクノロジーズ・インコーポレーテッド | Method and apparatus for managing business processes |
NL9300266A (en) | 1993-02-10 | 1994-09-01 | Theodoor Hubertus Maria Joseph | Automated selling system |
JPH0728689A (en) | 1993-07-09 | 1995-01-31 | Hitachi Ltd | Information processor |
US5377258A (en) | 1993-08-30 | 1994-12-27 | National Medical Research Council | Method and apparatus for an automated and interactive behavioral guidance system |
JPH0764893A (en) * | 1993-08-31 | 1995-03-10 | Canon Inc | Network system |
US5394324A (en) | 1993-12-08 | 1995-02-28 | Xerox Corporation | Auction-based control system for energy resource management in a building |
CA2179523A1 (en) | 1993-12-23 | 1995-06-29 | David A. Boulton | Method and apparatus for implementing user feedback |
US5694546A (en) | 1994-05-31 | 1997-12-02 | Reisman; Richard R. | System for automatic unattended electronic information transport between a server and a client by a vendor provided transport software with a manifest list |
US5717989A (en) | 1994-10-13 | 1998-02-10 | Full Service Trade System Ltd. | Full service trade system |
US5715314A (en) | 1994-10-24 | 1998-02-03 | Open Market, Inc. | Network sales system |
JPH08161412A (en) | 1994-12-07 | 1996-06-21 | Oak Net:Kk | Auction information transmitting and processing system |
US5647389A (en) * | 1995-02-02 | 1997-07-15 | Parker & Harper Companies, Inc. | Indexable latching handle assembly for quarter-turn rotary valves |
US5890140A (en) | 1995-02-22 | 1999-03-30 | Citibank, N.A. | System for communicating with an electronic delivery system that integrates global financial services |
US5553145A (en) | 1995-03-21 | 1996-09-03 | Micali; Silvia | Simultaneous electronic transactions with visible trusted parties |
US7937312B1 (en) * | 1995-04-26 | 2011-05-03 | Ebay Inc. | Facilitating electronic commerce transactions through binding offers |
US5845265A (en) | 1995-04-26 | 1998-12-01 | Mercexchange, L.L.C. | Consignment nodes |
US5845266A (en) | 1995-12-12 | 1998-12-01 | Optimark Technologies, Inc. | Crossing network utilizing satisfaction density profile with price discovery features |
US5689652A (en) | 1995-04-27 | 1997-11-18 | Optimark Technologies, Inc. | Crossing network utilizing optimal mutual satisfaction density profile |
US5640569A (en) | 1995-04-28 | 1997-06-17 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Diverse goods arbitration system and method for allocating resources in a distributed computer system |
US5657389A (en) | 1995-05-08 | 1997-08-12 | Image Data, Llc | Positive identification system and method |
DE69633166T2 (en) * | 1995-05-26 | 2005-08-18 | National Semiconductor Corp., Santa Clara | INTEGRATED CIRCUIT WITH MULTIPLE FUNCTIONS AND THE COMMON USE OF SEVERAL INTERNAL SIGNAL BUSS TO DISTRIBUTE THE CONTROL OF BUS ACCESS AND ARBITRATION |
US5664115A (en) | 1995-06-07 | 1997-09-02 | Fraser; Richard | Interactive computer system to match buyers and sellers of real estate, businesses and other property using the internet |
US5706457A (en) | 1995-06-07 | 1998-01-06 | Hughes Electronics | Image display and archiving system and method |
US5956509A (en) | 1995-08-18 | 1999-09-21 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for performing remote requests with an on-line service network |
US5826244A (en) | 1995-08-23 | 1998-10-20 | Xerox Corporation | Method and system for providing a document service over a computer network using an automated brokered auction |
EP0850518A4 (en) | 1995-09-11 | 1999-11-24 | Motorola Inc | Device, router, method and system for providing a hybrid multiple access protocol for users with multiple priorities |
US5873069A (en) | 1995-10-13 | 1999-02-16 | American Tv & Appliance Of Madison, Inc. | System and method for automatic updating and display of retail prices |
US5715402A (en) | 1995-11-09 | 1998-02-03 | Spot Metals Online | Method and system for matching sellers and buyers of spot metals |
US5771291A (en) | 1995-12-11 | 1998-06-23 | Newton; Farrell | User identification and authentication system using ultra long identification keys and ultra large databases of identification keys for secure remote terminal access to a host computer |
US5884056A (en) | 1995-12-28 | 1999-03-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for video browsing on the world wide web |
US5905975A (en) | 1996-01-04 | 1999-05-18 | Ausubel; Lawrence M. | Computer implemented methods and apparatus for auctions |
US6055518A (en) | 1996-02-01 | 2000-04-25 | At&T Corporation | Secure auction systems |
US5926794A (en) | 1996-03-06 | 1999-07-20 | Alza Corporation | Visual rating system and method |
US5774664A (en) * | 1996-03-08 | 1998-06-30 | Actv, Inc. | Enhanced video programming system and method for incorporating and displaying retrieved integrated internet information segments |
US5850442A (en) | 1996-03-26 | 1998-12-15 | Entegrity Solutions Corporation | Secure world wide electronic commerce over an open network |
US6243691B1 (en) * | 1996-03-29 | 2001-06-05 | Onsale, Inc. | Method and system for processing and transmitting electronic auction information |
US5835896A (en) | 1996-03-29 | 1998-11-10 | Onsale, Inc. | Method and system for processing and transmitting electronic auction information |
ATE207638T1 (en) | 1996-03-29 | 2001-11-15 | Egghead Com Inc | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROCESSING AND TRANSMITTING ELECTRONIC AUCTION INFORMATION |
US5799285A (en) | 1996-06-07 | 1998-08-25 | Klingman; Edwin E. | Secure system for electronic selling |
US6154777A (en) * | 1996-07-01 | 2000-11-28 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | System for context-dependent name resolution |
US5890138A (en) | 1996-08-26 | 1999-03-30 | Bid.Com International Inc. | Computer auction system |
US6047264A (en) * | 1996-08-08 | 2000-04-04 | Onsale, Inc. | Method for supplying automatic status updates using electronic mail |
JP3407561B2 (en) | 1996-09-04 | 2003-05-19 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Auction apparatus and method |
US5790790A (en) * | 1996-10-24 | 1998-08-04 | Tumbleweed Software Corporation | Electronic document delivery system in which notification of said electronic document is sent to a recipient thereof |
US6119137A (en) * | 1997-01-30 | 2000-09-12 | Tumbleweed Communications Corp. | Distributed dynamic document conversion server |
US6192407B1 (en) * | 1996-10-24 | 2001-02-20 | Tumbleweed Communications Corp. | Private, trackable URLs for directed document delivery |
US5905974A (en) | 1996-12-13 | 1999-05-18 | Cantor Fitzgerald Securities | Automated auction protocol processor |
US6035402A (en) | 1996-12-20 | 2000-03-07 | Gte Cybertrust Solutions Incorporated | Virtual certificate authority |
US5924072A (en) | 1997-01-06 | 1999-07-13 | Electronic Data Systems Corporation | Knowledge management system and method |
US6104815A (en) | 1997-01-10 | 2000-08-15 | Silicon Gaming, Inc. | Method and apparatus using geographical position and universal time determination means to provide authenticated, secure, on-line communication between remote gaming locations |
US5872848A (en) | 1997-02-18 | 1999-02-16 | Arcanvs | Method and apparatus for witnessed authentication of electronic documents |
US5922074A (en) * | 1997-02-28 | 1999-07-13 | Xcert Software, Inc. | Method of and apparatus for providing secure distributed directory services and public key infrastructure |
JP3357812B2 (en) | 1997-03-18 | 2002-12-16 | 株式会社東芝 | Mutual credit server device and distributed mutual credit system |
US5803500A (en) | 1997-03-27 | 1998-09-08 | Mossberg; Bjoern E. F. | Method and kit for conducting an auction |
US6061448A (en) * | 1997-04-01 | 2000-05-09 | Tumbleweed Communications Corp. | Method and system for dynamic server document encryption |
US6047322A (en) * | 1997-05-27 | 2000-04-04 | Ukiah Software, Inc. | Method and apparatus for quality of service management |
US6021438A (en) * | 1997-06-18 | 2000-02-01 | Wyatt River Software, Inc. | License management system using daemons and aliasing |
US6236997B1 (en) * | 1997-06-23 | 2001-05-22 | Oracle Corporation | Apparatus and method for accessing foreign databases in a heterogeneous database system |
US6223292B1 (en) * | 1997-07-15 | 2001-04-24 | Microsoft Corporation | Authorization systems, methods, and computer program products |
US5974412A (en) | 1997-09-24 | 1999-10-26 | Sapient Health Network | Intelligent query system for automatically indexing information in a database and automatically categorizing users |
US5991739A (en) | 1997-11-24 | 1999-11-23 | Food.Com | Internet online order method and apparatus |
US6415269B1 (en) | 1998-05-29 | 2002-07-02 | Bidcatcher, L.P. | Interactive remote auction bidding system |
US6035288A (en) | 1998-06-29 | 2000-03-07 | Cendant Publishing, Inc. | Interactive computer-implemented system and method for negotiating sale of goods and/or services |
US6738815B1 (en) * | 1998-07-01 | 2004-05-18 | Telcordia Technologies, Inc. | Systems and methods for utilizing a communications network for providing mobile users access to legacy systems |
US6182142B1 (en) | 1998-07-10 | 2001-01-30 | Encommerce, Inc. | Distributed access management of information resources |
US6453353B1 (en) * | 1998-07-10 | 2002-09-17 | Entrust, Inc. | Role-based navigation of information resources |
US6189033B1 (en) * | 1998-07-16 | 2001-02-13 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Method and system for providing performance guarantees for a data service system of a data access network system |
US6285989B1 (en) * | 1998-08-07 | 2001-09-04 | Ariba, Inc. | Universal on-line trading market design and deployment system |
US6058417A (en) | 1998-10-23 | 2000-05-02 | Ebay Inc. | Information presentation and management in an online trading environment |
US6760775B1 (en) * | 1999-03-05 | 2004-07-06 | At&T Corp. | System, method and apparatus for network service load and reliability management |
US8375127B1 (en) * | 1999-03-31 | 2013-02-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for using virtual URLs for load balancing |
US6186886B1 (en) * | 1999-04-14 | 2001-02-13 | Midwest Research Institute | Vehicle cabin cooling system for capturing and exhausting heated boundary layer air from inner surfaces of solar heated windows |
US6968390B1 (en) * | 1999-04-15 | 2005-11-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for enabling a network function in a context of one or all server names in a multiple server name environment |
US6609112B1 (en) * | 1999-05-20 | 2003-08-19 | Dovebid, Inc. | System and method for providing proxy-based online Dutch auction services |
AU5756900A (en) | 1999-06-21 | 2001-01-09 | Ebay Inc. | Defining and uploading multiple transaction descriptions from a client to a transaction facility |
US6178408B1 (en) * | 1999-07-14 | 2001-01-23 | Recot, Inc. | Method of redeeming collectible points |
US7100195B1 (en) * | 1999-07-30 | 2006-08-29 | Accenture Llp | Managing user information on an e-commerce system |
AU6795100A (en) * | 1999-08-21 | 2001-03-19 | Webever, Inc. | Method for content delivery over the internet |
US6615253B1 (en) * | 1999-08-31 | 2003-09-02 | Accenture Llp | Efficient server side data retrieval for execution of client side applications |
US7020697B1 (en) * | 1999-10-01 | 2006-03-28 | Accenture Llp | Architectures for netcentric computing systems |
WO2001035243A1 (en) * | 1999-11-08 | 2001-05-17 | Megaxess, Inc. | QUALITY OF SERVICE (QoS) NEGOTIATION PROCEDURE FOR MULTI-TRANSPORT PROTOCOL ACCESS FOR SUPPORTING MULTI-MEDIA APPLICATIONS WITH QoS ASSURANCE |
JP3546787B2 (en) * | 1999-12-16 | 2004-07-28 | インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレーション | Access control system, access control method, and storage medium |
AU2659301A (en) | 2000-01-10 | 2001-07-24 | Skulogix Inc. | Method and system for facilitating fulfillment of electronic commercial transactions |
US20010044787A1 (en) * | 2000-01-13 | 2001-11-22 | Gil Shwartz | Secure private agent for electronic transactions |
US6823424B2 (en) * | 2000-01-26 | 2004-11-23 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Rebuild bus utilization |
KR20000036643A (en) | 2000-03-24 | 2000-07-05 | 이동훈 | Information providing and electronic commerce dealing apparatus by using monitor system comprising a plurality of information terminals and the method thereof |
WO2001075549A2 (en) * | 2000-03-30 | 2001-10-11 | Cygent, Inc. | System and method for establishing electronic business systems for supporting communications services commerce |
US6820082B1 (en) * | 2000-04-03 | 2004-11-16 | Allegis Corporation | Rule based database security system and method |
KR20010095998A (en) | 2000-04-14 | 2001-11-07 | 강상훈 | apparatus having matching agent and method for implementing marketing policy |
US6976090B2 (en) * | 2000-04-20 | 2005-12-13 | Actona Technologies Ltd. | Differentiated content and application delivery via internet |
US6973493B1 (en) * | 2000-05-09 | 2005-12-06 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Mechanism and apparatus for security of newly spawned repository spaces in a distributed computing environment |
US7243356B1 (en) * | 2000-05-09 | 2007-07-10 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Remote method invocation with secure messaging in a distributed computing environment |
US20010051980A1 (en) * | 2000-06-01 | 2001-12-13 | Raciborski Nathan F. | Preloading content objects on content exchanges |
US6947977B1 (en) * | 2000-06-09 | 2005-09-20 | Metadigm Llc | Scalable transaction system for a network environment |
JP3790661B2 (en) * | 2000-09-08 | 2006-06-28 | インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレーション | Access control system |
JP3885483B2 (en) * | 2000-10-30 | 2007-02-21 | 富士通株式会社 | Service execution method and apparatus |
WO2002044892A2 (en) * | 2000-11-28 | 2002-06-06 | 4Thpass Inc. | Method and system for maintaining and distributing wireless applications |
US20020069279A1 (en) * | 2000-12-29 | 2002-06-06 | Romero Francisco J. | Apparatus and method for routing a transaction based on a requested level of service |
US7421489B2 (en) * | 2000-12-29 | 2008-09-02 | Nortel Network Limited | Network protocols for distributing functions within a network |
US7185364B2 (en) | 2001-03-21 | 2007-02-27 | Oracle International Corporation | Access system interface |
US20040205243A1 (en) * | 2001-03-09 | 2004-10-14 | Hans Hurvig | System and a method for managing digital identities |
US7461369B2 (en) * | 2001-03-30 | 2008-12-02 | Bmc Software, Inc. | Java application response time analyzer |
KR20010079045A (en) | 2001-06-08 | 2001-08-22 | 김동홍 | Electronic commerce method based on P2P working wire and wireless together |
US7487233B2 (en) * | 2001-12-05 | 2009-02-03 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Device access based on centralized authentication |
US7305469B2 (en) | 2001-12-18 | 2007-12-04 | Ebay Inc. | Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site |
EP1590720A4 (en) | 2003-01-24 | 2006-10-25 | Auctiondrop Inc | Method and apparatus for a selling service |
EP1625480A4 (en) | 2003-05-22 | 2008-02-27 | Pershing Investments Llc | Activity-driven, customer profitability calculation system |
US7814142B2 (en) * | 2003-08-27 | 2010-10-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | User interface service for a services oriented architecture in a data integration platform |
US7774350B2 (en) | 2004-02-26 | 2010-08-10 | Ebay Inc. | System and method to provide and display enhanced feedback in an online transaction processing environment |
US20050246187A1 (en) | 2004-04-30 | 2005-11-03 | Reed Maltzman | System and method to facilitate differentiated levels of service in a network-based marketplace |
US8413229B2 (en) * | 2006-08-21 | 2013-04-02 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Method and appliance for authenticating, by an appliance, a client to access a virtual private network connection, based on an attribute of a client-side certificate |
-
2001
- 2001-12-18 US US10/025,267 patent/US7305469B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2002
- 2002-12-13 EP EP20130163818 patent/EP2618540A3/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2002-12-13 WO PCT/US2002/040146 patent/WO2003052615A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2002-12-13 CA CA2708564A patent/CA2708564C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-12-13 CN CNA2007103016143A patent/CN101261712A/en active Pending
- 2002-12-13 KR KR10-2004-7009430A patent/KR20040063956A/en active Search and Examination
- 2002-12-13 EP EP02805161A patent/EP1456765A4/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2002-12-13 CA CA2824037A patent/CA2824037C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-12-13 AU AU2002357254A patent/AU2002357254B2/en not_active Ceased
- 2002-12-13 CA CA2469655A patent/CA2469655C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-12-13 CN CNB028255135A patent/CN100428213C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2002-12-13 CN CNA2007103016139A patent/CN101261711A/en active Pending
-
2007
- 2007-10-25 US US11/924,362 patent/US8108518B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2011
- 2011-11-30 US US13/307,625 patent/US8239533B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2012
- 2012-08-03 US US13/566,919 patent/US8793375B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2014
- 2014-03-31 US US14/231,601 patent/US9679323B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2014-03-31 US US14/231,234 patent/US8918505B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2014-03-31 US US14/231,359 patent/US9508094B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2014-03-31 US US14/231,268 patent/US9626705B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2014-03-31 US US14/231,569 patent/US9589289B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA2708564C (en) | Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site | |
US7552081B2 (en) | User rating system for online auctions | |
US6064981A (en) | Method for online display and negotiation of cargo rates | |
US20030004859A1 (en) | Method and system for facilitating secure transactions | |
KR100417458B1 (en) | Computer system for data management and method of operation thereof | |
US7295989B2 (en) | Method and system for providing direct and indirect sales channels for goods or services from a single point of purchase | |
US20020032716A1 (en) | Method of distributing a spare time of CPU and system for performing the method | |
JP4492914B2 (en) | Transaction management method and program | |
CN111639279A (en) | Graphic code generation method, target page loading method and device | |
US20020091612A1 (en) | Method, system, and business method for providing a marketplace for computing capacity in a network | |
KR20220061756A (en) | Apparatus for providing real estate information and method thereof | |
KR20230044635A (en) | Electronic product follow-up management method using application |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
EEER | Examination request | ||
MKEX | Expiry |
Effective date: 20221213 |