EP1050847A2 - Image Processing System using image demosaicing - Google Patents

Image Processing System using image demosaicing Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1050847A2
EP1050847A2 EP00303594A EP00303594A EP1050847A2 EP 1050847 A2 EP1050847 A2 EP 1050847A2 EP 00303594 A EP00303594 A EP 00303594A EP 00303594 A EP00303594 A EP 00303594A EP 1050847 A2 EP1050847 A2 EP 1050847A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
image
dimensional array
vectors
location
pixel
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP00303594A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1050847A3 (en
Inventor
Yacow Hel-Or
Daniel Keren
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
HP Inc
Original Assignee
Hewlett Packard Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hewlett Packard Co filed Critical Hewlett Packard Co
Publication of EP1050847A2 publication Critical patent/EP1050847A2/en
Publication of EP1050847A3 publication Critical patent/EP1050847A3/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T3/00Geometric image transformation in the plane of the image
    • G06T3/40Scaling the whole image or part thereof
    • G06T3/4015Demosaicing, e.g. colour filter array [CFA], Bayer pattern
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01LSEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
    • H01L27/00Devices consisting of a plurality of semiconductor or other solid-state components formed in or on a common substrate
    • H01L27/14Devices consisting of a plurality of semiconductor or other solid-state components formed in or on a common substrate including semiconductor components sensitive to infrared radiation, light, electromagnetic radiation of shorter wavelength or corpuscular radiation and specially adapted either for the conversion of the energy of such radiation into electrical energy or for the control of electrical energy by such radiation
    • H01L27/144Devices controlled by radiation
    • H01L27/146Imager structures
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N23/00Cameras or camera modules comprising electronic image sensors; Control thereof
    • H04N23/80Camera processing pipelines; Components thereof
    • H04N23/84Camera processing pipelines; Components thereof for processing colour signals
    • H04N23/843Demosaicing, e.g. interpolating colour pixel values
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N25/00Circuitry of solid-state image sensors [SSIS]; Control thereof
    • H04N25/10Circuitry of solid-state image sensors [SSIS]; Control thereof for transforming different wavelengths into image signals
    • H04N25/11Arrangement of colour filter arrays [CFA]; Filter mosaics
    • H04N25/13Arrangement of colour filter arrays [CFA]; Filter mosaics characterised by the spectral characteristics of the filter elements
    • H04N25/134Arrangement of colour filter arrays [CFA]; Filter mosaics characterised by the spectral characteristics of the filter elements based on three different wavelength filter elements

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method of operating a data processing system and to a method of interpolating an image for use, for example in digital cameras and similar devices, for converting data from a camera sensor to a color image.
  • a digital color image usually consists of an array of pixel values representing the intensity of the image at each point on a regular grid. Typically, three colors are used to generate the image. At each point on the grid the intensity of each of these colors is specified, thereby specifying both the intensity and color of the image at that grid point.
  • the present invention seeks to provide improved image processing.
  • the preferred embodiment can provide an improved image processing method for converting data from a pixel array having non-overlapping sensors to a fully sampled digital image.
  • the preferred embodiment provides a method of operating a data processing system to generate a full color image from a partially sampled version of the image.
  • the full color image concludes a first two-dimensional array of vectors.
  • Each vector in the first two-dimensional array includes first, second, and third intensity values.
  • Each intensity value represents the intensity of a pixel in the full color image in a corresponding spectral band at a location in the full color image determined by the location of the vector in the first two-dimensional array.
  • the method generates the first two-dimensional array from a two-dimensional array of scalars, each scalar corresponding to one of the vectors in the first two-dimensional array.
  • the scalar determines one of the first, second, or third intensity values at a corresponding location in the two-dimensional array of vectors.
  • the scalars are typically the measured pixel values from a sensor array in a digital camera or the like.
  • the preferred method determines the remaining ones of the first, second, and third intensity values. The method starts by assigning a value to each one of the components of the vectors in the first two-dimensional array of vectors that is not determined by one of the scalars. A luminance image and first and second chrominance images are then generated from the first two-dimensional array of vectors.
  • Each pixel in the luminance image is determined by the intensity of light from a corresponding pixel in the first two-dimensional array, and each pixel in the first and second chrominance images representing the color of the pixel in the first two-dimensional array.
  • the first and second chrominance images are filtered with an isotropic low-pass spatial filter to generate first and second filtered chrominance images.
  • the two-dimensional array of vectors is then regenerated from the luminance image and the first and second filtered chrominance images.
  • the decomposition, filtering, and regenerating steps are iterated to provide the final full-color image. At each iteration, the components of the two-dimensional array of vectors that were actually measured are reset to their measured values.
  • the luminance image is also filtered.
  • the filtering of the luminance image utilizes a low-pass spatial filter having an anisotropy that varies with location in the luminance image.
  • the regeneration step is then performed with the filtered luminance image.
  • the filtering of the luminance image is performed by first decomposing the luminance image into a plurality of component images, each component image representing information in the luminance image at different levels of scale. Each component image is then filtered with a low-pass spatial filter having an anisotropy that varies with location in the component image. The filtered component images are then recombined to generate the filtered luminance image.
  • Figure 1 illustrates the demosaicing problem as applied to a typical image taken with an image sensor having a repeating 2x2 pattern.
  • Figure 2 is a flow chart of a preferred method for filling in the missing pixel values in an image having a single color band.
  • Figure 3 is a flow chart of the preferred embodiment of demosaicing method.
  • the preferred method, disclosed herein, may be applied to any color-sampling device; however, to simplify the following discussion, the method will be explained in terms of an image sensor having a sensor pattern that is constructed by repeating a kernel of sensing elements.
  • one common image sensor array is based on the Bayer pattern which is generated by repeating a 2x2 sensor array kernel having two green sensors, one red sensor, and one blue sensor. This pattern is shown in Figure 1 at 10. The kernel is shown at 12.
  • the method converts the data from such an array into an augmented array shown at 10' in which each pixel has intensity values representing each of three colors.
  • the missing colors at each location are determined from the nearby sensor values for that color.
  • the missing colors are shown in a smaller typeface in the figure.
  • the individual sensor locations are assigned an address of the form ( n,m ), where n is the row number and m is the column number in which the sensor is located.
  • the missing pixel values can be initially set by interpolating the nearest four known pixels around the pixel in question.
  • the specific method for providing the starting estimate is not critical; hence, any convenient method may be utilized.
  • the pixels are processed one at a time as follows.
  • the direction and amplitude of maximum descent in the image at the pixel being processed is determined.
  • the simplest algorithm for making this determination utilizes a weighted sum of the differences in pixel intensity between the pixel being processed and its neighbors; however, more complex methods may be utilized. If there is an edge at the pixel in question, the edge will be perpendicular to the direction of maximum descent. The amplitude of the maximum descent determines whether an edge passes through this pixel.
  • a 2D vector is defined for each pixel; its direction provides the edge orientation and its length the edge strength. This vector is referred to as "the dominant orientation vector" in the following discussion.
  • the pixel in question is interpolated by computing a weighted sum of values of neighboring pixels.
  • the weights of this sum are determined by the dominant orientation vector associated with this pixel. If the length of the dominant orientation vector is high, only pixel values along the dominant orientation are summed. If the length of the dominant orientation is low or zero (i.e.,no edge) neighboring pixel values from all adjacent pixels are summed.
  • the pixels corresponding to the measured pixels are reset to the measured values. The process is then repeated until the difference in the successive images is below some predetermined error value.
  • the number of points that are used in determining the direction of maximum descent and in smoothing the image ideally depend on the scale of the objects in the image. For example, if the distance over which points are selected for the smoothing operation is too small, then insufficient smoothing will occur and the resultant image will have artifacts near the edges. If the distance is too large, structural details in the objects will be blurred.
  • the simplified procedure described above does not measure the scale of the objects in the image, and hence, cannot provide an optimal distance, which, in general, will change with the point being processed. Therefore, it is preferable to apply the above process in a multi-scale manner but a single scale procedure as described above is also possible.
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a preferred method for filling in the missing pixel values in an image having a single color band.
  • the original image is first interpolated to provide starting values for the missing pixels as shown at 22.
  • the scale of the objects in the image is taken into consideration by first decomposing the image into a number of "component" images that represent the image at various levels of scale as shown at 23.
  • the smoothing operation described above is then applied to each of the component images as shown at 24.
  • the component images are then recombined to recover a new image as shown at 25.
  • the pixels of the new image at the locations at which intensity values were actually measured are then reset to the measured values as shown at 26.
  • the process is then iterated as shown at 27 until the difference in successive recovered images is below some predetermined error value.
  • the preferred method for decomposing the image into a plurality of component images containing details of differing scale is to generate a Laplacian pyramid.
  • the decomposition of an image using this approach is well known in the image processing arts, and hence, will not be discussed in detail here.
  • the reader is referred to P.J. Burt and E.H. Adelson, "The laplacian pyramid as a compact image code", IEEE Trans. Communications, 31 (4):532-540, 1983 for a detailed discussion of the method.
  • a sequence of images is obtained from the original image as follows.
  • the original image is first blurred by applying a Guassian blurring operator to the image.
  • the blurred image is then subtracted from the original image to form a component image having details at the highest spatial frequencies, i.e., the smallest scale.
  • the blurred image is then down-sampled, and the process repeated to generate a component image at the next larger scale by repeating the above-described process with the down-sampled image in place of the original image.
  • the various component images can be combined to regenerate the original image.
  • the smoothing operation is applied separately at each level in the pyramid. For each pixel in a component image, a direction is defined as described above. The pixel being processed is then replaced by the result of smoothing the neighboring pixels along that direction.
  • the component images are recombined to generate a new image.
  • the pixel values at the locations at which the original image was actually measured are then reset to the measured values and the process repeated until a predetermined degree of convergence has been obtained.
  • the preferred method for defining the preferred orientation for the smoothing operator is steerable filters.
  • the use of such filters to determine the local orientation of the image is well known in the image processing arts, and hence, will not be discussed in detail here.
  • the reader is referred to W.T. Freedman E.H. Adelson, "Steerable filters for early vision, image analysis, and wavelet decomposition", in International Conf. on Computer Vision, 1990, pp. 406-415.
  • a set of filters can be defined that measure the "directional energy" in the image in a predetermined direction. By combining the output of the filters, the direction having the maximum energy can be determined. The maximum energy determines the "dominant orientation" vector whose length and orientation are determined according to the maximum energy value and its direction.
  • the interpolated value I(i,j) for pixel (i,j) is obtained computing a weighted sum of pixels I(k,l) in a local neighborhood, N(i,j), of pixel (i,j).
  • the weights of the sum are determined by the dominant orientation D(i,j). Pixels whose direction from (i,j) are parallel to D(i,j) are weighted higher than pixels perpendicular to D(i,j). In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, where the sum is over all pixels (k,l) in N(i,j).
  • W(k,l) (1+ D ( i,j ) ⁇ V ( i,j,k,l )) where D ⁇ V is an inner product and V(i,j,k,l) is defined as the unit vector pointing from (i,j) towards (k,l).
  • the above-described embodiments operate on a single color band.
  • the demosaicing of a color image can be performed by applying the directional smoothing described above to each color band (red, green, and blue) separately.
  • each color band red, green, and blue
  • such an approach leads to color artifacts, particularly at the edges of objects, due to mis-registration in the color bands.
  • the color artifacts can be reduced by performing the smoothing computation in the YIQ rather than the RGB representation of the image.
  • the Y component represents the luminance (intensity) of the image and the I and Q components represent the chrominance.
  • the luminance-chrominance representation is an uncorrelated color representation, and hence, each color band can be treated separately.
  • the human visual system is more sensitive to high spatial frequencies in the luminance band (Y) than in the chrominance bands (IQ). In fact, in the chrominance bands, the human visual system is only sensitive to low spatial frequencies.
  • the YIQ representation can be computed from the RGB representation via a simple linear transformation:
  • edges, lines, and textures are composed of high frequencies, their appearance is influenced mainly by the luminance component. Accordingly, an isotropic smoothing can be provided in the chrominance bands while utilizing a directional smoothing in the luminance band.
  • the isotropic smoothing substantially reduces the color artifacts while the directional smoothing preserves high frequency structures such as edges.
  • the isotropic smoothing is provided by smoothing I and Q bands by convolution with a Gaussian kernel. The same kernel used to generate the Laplacian pyramid may be utilized here.
  • the preferred embodiment of the present invention for demosaicing a color image includes two pathways as shown in Figure 3 which is a block diagram of the preferred embodiment of demosaicing method.
  • the original image is first interpolated to provide starting values for the missing pixel intensities as shown at 31.
  • the image is then separated into a luminance band, Y, and two chrominance bands, I and Q as shown at 38.
  • the luminance band is directionally smoothed using the method described above or any directional smoothing known in the literature.
  • the chrominance bands are isotropically smoothed by a convolution with a Gaussian kernel as shown at 38.
  • the resulting values are then transformed back into the RGB representation as shown at 39.
  • the pixel values at those locations that were actually measured in each band are then reset to their original values as shown at 36.
  • the process is then iterated until the resulting images converge as shown at 37.
  • the use of the isotropic smoothing in the chrominance bands together with any interpolation method in the luminance band provides an improvement over current demosaicing algorithms with respect to the suppression of color artifacts at edges while preserving edge detail.
  • the directional smoothing techniques discussed above provide improved performance in the luminance band, and hence, the preferred embodiment of the present invention utilizes both techniques.
  • RGB to YIQ transformation and the smoothing operations are both linear operations. Accordingly, an equivalent algorithm can be generated that operates on the RGB image. Such an algorithm would eliminate the need to transform from RGB to YIQ and visa versa at each iteration, and hence, impose a reduced computational load on the computing platform on which the method of the present invention is practiced.
  • the method is preferably practiced on a general purpose computer.
  • it will be obvious to those skilled in the art from the preceding discussion that it can be advantageously practiced on computational platforms having special purpose hardware for reducing the computational load imposed by linear transformations.

Abstract

A method for operating a data processing system to generate a full color image from a partially sampled version of the image. The full color image includes a first two-dimensional array of vectors having components representing the intensity of a pixel in the full color image in a corresponding spectral band at a location determined by the location of the vector in the first two-dimensional array. The method generates the first two-dimensional array from a two-dimensional array of scalars. Each scalar determines one of the first, second, or third intensity values at a corresponding location in the two-dimensional array of vectors. The method determines the remaining ones of the first, second, and third intensity values. The method starts by assigning a value to each one of the components of the vectors in the first two-dimensional array of vectors that is not determined by one of the scalars. A luminance image and first and second chrominance images are then generated from the first two-dimensional array of vectors. The chrominance images are filtered with an isotropic low-pass spatial filter to generate filtered chrominance images. The two-dimensional array of vectors is then regenerated from the luminance image and the first and second filtered chrominance images. The scalars that are originally given by the sensors are reset in the regenerated two-dimensional array of vectors. The decomposition, filtering, resetting, and regenerating steps are iterated to provide the final full-color image. In the preferred embodiment, the luminance image is also filtered. However, the filtering of the luminance image utilizes a low-pass spatial filter having an anisotropy that varies with location in the luminance image.

Description

  • The present invention relates to a method of operating a data processing system and to a method of interpolating an image for use, for example in digital cameras and similar devices, for converting data from a camera sensor to a color image.
  • A digital color image usually consists of an array of pixel values representing the intensity of the image at each point on a regular grid. Typically, three colors are used to generate the image. At each point on the grid the intensity of each of these colors is specified, thereby specifying both the intensity and color of the image at that grid point.
  • Conventional color photography records the relevant image data by utilizing three overlapping color sensing layers having sensitivities in different regions of the spectrum (usually red, green, and blue). Digital cameras and scanners, in contrast, typically utilize one array of sensors in a single "layer".
  • When only one sensor array is used to detect color images, only one color may be detected at any given sensor location. As a result, these sensors do not produce a color image in the traditional sense, but rather a collection of individual color samples, which depend upon the assignment of color filters to individual sensors. This assignment is referred to as the color filter array (CFA) or the color mosaic pattern. To produce a true color image, with a full set of color samples (usually red, green and blue) at each sampling location, a substantial amount of computation is required to estimate the missing information, since only a single color was originally sensed at each location in the array. This operation is typically referred to as "demosaicing".
  • To generate the missing information, information from neighboring pixels in the image sensor must be used. In addition, some assumption must be utilized about the structure of the underlying image, since there are an infinite number of possible images that could have generated the measured color values. Typically, it is assumed that the underlying image is smooth, and an interpolation algorithm is then utilized to compute the missing color values from the neighboring measured color values.
  • While most images of interest to human observers are mainly smooth, the smoothness assumption is not satisfied along edges of objects and in textured regions of the image. In these regions, images generated by interpolation using the smoothness assumption show a loss of resolution. In addition, algorithms that treat the red sensors as being independent from the green sensors, and so on, typically generate color artifacts in the reconstructed images. The artifacts are incorporated in the chrominance part of the image and are due to mis-registration of the chrominance components. These artifacts express themselves as streaks of false colors in the restored image, and are especially apparent around boundaries between different objects in the image and in textured areas.
  • The present invention seeks to provide improved image processing.
  • According to an aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of operating a data processing system as specified in claim 1.
  • According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of interpolating an image as specified in claim 6.
  • The preferred embodiment can provide an improved image processing method for converting data from a pixel array having non-overlapping sensors to a fully sampled digital image.
  • It is also possible with the preferred embodiment not to generate the color artifacts discussed above and/or which can have improved resolution around boundaries between objects and in textured areas.
  • The preferred embodiment provides a method of operating a data processing system to generate a full color image from a partially sampled version of the image. The full color image concludes a first two-dimensional array of vectors. Each vector in the first two-dimensional array includes first, second, and third intensity values. Each intensity value represents the intensity of a pixel in the full color image in a corresponding spectral band at a location in the full color image determined by the location of the vector in the first two-dimensional array. The method generates the first two-dimensional array from a two-dimensional array of scalars, each scalar corresponding to one of the vectors in the first two-dimensional array. The scalar determines one of the first, second, or third intensity values at a corresponding location in the two-dimensional array of vectors. The scalars are typically the measured pixel values from a sensor array in a digital camera or the like. The preferred method determines the remaining ones of the first, second, and third intensity values. The method starts by assigning a value to each one of the components of the vectors in the first two-dimensional array of vectors that is not determined by one of the scalars. A luminance image and first and second chrominance images are then generated from the first two-dimensional array of vectors. Each pixel in the luminance image is determined by the intensity of light from a corresponding pixel in the first two-dimensional array, and each pixel in the first and second chrominance images representing the color of the pixel in the first two-dimensional array. The first and second chrominance images are filtered with an isotropic low-pass spatial filter to generate first and second filtered chrominance images. The two-dimensional array of vectors is then regenerated from the luminance image and the first and second filtered chrominance images. The decomposition, filtering, and regenerating steps are iterated to provide the final full-color image. At each iteration, the components of the two-dimensional array of vectors that were actually measured are reset to their measured values. In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the luminance image is also filtered. However, the filtering of the luminance image utilizes a low-pass spatial filter having an anisotropy that varies with location in the luminance image. The regeneration step is then performed with the filtered luminance image. In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the filtering of the luminance image is performed by first decomposing the luminance image into a plurality of component images, each component image representing information in the luminance image at different levels of scale. Each component image is then filtered with a low-pass spatial filter having an anisotropy that varies with location in the component image. The filtered component images are then recombined to generate the filtered luminance image.
  • An embodiment of the present invention is described below, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
  • Figure 1 illustrates the demosaicing problem as applied to a typical image taken with an image sensor having a repeating 2x2 pattern.
  • Figure 2 is a flow chart of a preferred method for filling in the missing pixel values in an image having a single color band.
  • Figure 3 is a flow chart of the preferred embodiment of demosaicing method.
  • The preferred method, disclosed herein, may be applied to any color-sampling device; however, to simplify the following discussion, the method will be explained in terms of an image sensor having a sensor pattern that is constructed by repeating a kernel of sensing elements. For example, one common image sensor array is based on the Bayer pattern which is generated by repeating a 2x2 sensor array kernel having two green sensors, one red sensor, and one blue sensor. This pattern is shown in Figure 1 at 10. The kernel is shown at 12.
  • The method converts the data from such an array into an augmented array shown at 10' in which each pixel has intensity values representing each of three colors. The missing colors at each location are determined from the nearby sensor values for that color. The missing colors are shown in a smaller typeface in the figure. The individual sensor locations are assigned an address of the form (n,m), where n is the row number and m is the column number in which the sensor is located.
  • There are an infinite number of patterns 10' that satisfy the constraint that the measured values are as shown in 10. Hence, some additional constraints must be applied in generating the sensor values. The method assumes that the image is smooth except in the regions dominated by edges or texture. Consider an image having an object therein with a sharp edge. The object is assumed to be smooth near the edge. That is, if one moves through the pixels in a direction parallel to the edge, the sequence of intensity values changes smoothly. In contrast, if one moves through the pixel values in a direction perpendicular to the edge, the sequence of intensity values changes abruptly at the edge.
  • As stated above, there are two main problems in the reconstructed image: The color artifacts along the edges and loss of resolution due to edge smoothing. The manner in which the preferred method deals with the loss of resolution due to edge smoothing will be explained first. Consider a mono-chromatic image having missing pixel values in which the missing pixel intensities are to be computed. This problem is essentially the same as the problem of computing the missing color pixels for one color without considering the pixel values from the other color sensors. The method assumes that the measured pixel values are not to be changed. In addition, the image is assumed to be piecewise smooth with sharp edges.
  • This simplified version operates as follows. First, a guess is provided for each of the missing pixels. For example, the missing pixel values can be initially set by interpolating the nearest four known pixels around the pixel in question. The specific method for providing the starting estimate is not critical; hence, any convenient method may be utilized.
  • Next, the pixels are processed one at a time as follows. First, the direction and amplitude of maximum descent in the image at the pixel being processed is determined. The simplest algorithm for making this determination utilizes a weighted sum of the differences in pixel intensity between the pixel being processed and its neighbors; however, more complex methods may be utilized. If there is an edge at the pixel in question, the edge will be perpendicular to the direction of maximum descent. The amplitude of the maximum descent determines whether an edge passes through this pixel. Hence, a 2D vector is defined for each pixel; its direction provides the edge orientation and its length the edge strength. This vector is referred to as "the dominant orientation vector" in the following discussion. The pixel in question is interpolated by computing a weighted sum of values of neighboring pixels. The weights of this sum are determined by the dominant orientation vector associated with this pixel. If the length of the dominant orientation vector is high, only pixel values along the dominant orientation are summed. If the length of the dominant orientation is low or zero (i.e.,no edge) neighboring pixel values from all adjacent pixels are summed.
  • After all of the image points have been processed, the pixels corresponding to the measured pixels are reset to the measured values. The process is then repeated until the difference in the successive images is below some predetermined error value.
  • The number of points that are used in determining the direction of maximum descent and in smoothing the image ideally depend on the scale of the objects in the image. For example, if the distance over which points are selected for the smoothing operation is too small, then insufficient smoothing will occur and the resultant image will have artifacts near the edges. If the distance is too large, structural details in the objects will be blurred. The simplified procedure described above does not measure the scale of the objects in the image, and hence, cannot provide an optimal distance, which, in general, will change with the point being processed. Therefore, it is preferable to apply the above process in a multi-scale manner but a single scale procedure as described above is also possible.
  • Refer now to Figure 2 which is a block diagram of a preferred method for filling in the missing pixel values in an image having a single color band. The original image is first interpolated to provide starting values for the missing pixels as shown at 22. In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the scale of the objects in the image is taken into consideration by first decomposing the image into a number of "component" images that represent the image at various levels of scale as shown at 23. The smoothing operation described above is then applied to each of the component images as shown at 24. The component images are then recombined to recover a new image as shown at 25. The pixels of the new image at the locations at which intensity values were actually measured are then reset to the measured values as shown at 26. The process is then iterated as shown at 27 until the difference in successive recovered images is below some predetermined error value.
  • The preferred method for decomposing the image into a plurality of component images containing details of differing scale is to generate a Laplacian pyramid. The decomposition of an image using this approach is well known in the image processing arts, and hence, will not be discussed in detail here. The reader is referred to P.J. Burt and E.H. Adelson, "The laplacian pyramid as a compact image code", IEEE Trans. Communications, 31(4):532-540, 1983 for a detailed discussion of the method. For the purposes of this discussion, it is sufficient to note that a sequence of images is obtained from the original image as follows. The original image is first blurred by applying a Guassian blurring operator to the image. The blurred image is then subtracted from the original image to form a component image having details at the highest spatial frequencies, i.e., the smallest scale. The blurred image is then down-sampled, and the process repeated to generate a component image at the next larger scale by repeating the above-described process with the down-sampled image in place of the original image. The various component images can be combined to regenerate the original image.
  • The smoothing operation is applied separately at each level in the pyramid. For each pixel in a component image, a direction is defined as described above. The pixel being processed is then replaced by the result of smoothing the neighboring pixels along that direction.
  • After all of the component images have been smoothed, the component images are recombined to generate a new image. The pixel values at the locations at which the original image was actually measured are then reset to the measured values and the process repeated until a predetermined degree of convergence has been obtained.
  • The preferred method for defining the preferred orientation for the smoothing operator is steerable filters. The use of such filters to determine the local orientation of the image is well known in the image processing arts, and hence, will not be discussed in detail here. The reader is referred to W.T. Freedman E.H. Adelson, "Steerable filters for early vision, image analysis, and wavelet decomposition", in International Conf. on Computer Vision, 1990, pp. 406-415. For the purposes of this discussion, it is sufficient to note that a set of filters can be defined that measure the "directional energy" in the image in a predetermined direction. By combining the output of the filters, the direction having the maximum energy can be determined. The maximum energy determines the "dominant orientation" vector whose length and orientation are determined according to the maximum energy value and its direction.
  • Denote the dominant orientation for pixel (i,j) by the vector D(i,j ). The interpolated value I(i,j) for pixel (i,j) is obtained computing a weighted sum of pixels I(k,l) in a local neighborhood, N(i,j), of pixel (i,j). The weights of the sum are determined by the dominant orientation D(i,j). Pixels whose direction from (i,j) are parallel to D(i,j) are weighted higher than pixels perpendicular to D(i,j). In the preferred embodiment of the present invention,
    Figure 00080001
    where the sum is over all pixels (k,l) in N(i,j). Here, the weights, W(k,l), are defined by: W(k,l)=(1+D(i,jV(i,j,k,l)) where D·V is an inner product and V(i,j,k,l) is defined as the unit vector pointing from (i,j) towards (k,l).
  • The above-described embodiments operate on a single color band. In principle, the demosaicing of a color image can be performed by applying the directional smoothing described above to each color band (red, green, and blue) separately. However, such an approach leads to color artifacts, particularly at the edges of objects, due to mis-registration in the color bands.
  • The color artifacts can be reduced by performing the smoothing computation in the YIQ rather than the RGB representation of the image. In the YIQ representation the Y component represents the luminance (intensity) of the image and the I and Q components represent the chrominance. The luminance-chrominance representation is an uncorrelated color representation, and hence, each color band can be treated separately. Further, the human visual system is more sensitive to high spatial frequencies in the luminance band (Y) than in the chrominance bands (IQ). In fact, in the chrominance bands, the human visual system is only sensitive to low spatial frequencies.
  • The YIQ representation can be computed from the RGB representation via a simple linear transformation:
    Figure 00090001
  • Since edges, lines, and textures are composed of high frequencies, their appearance is influenced mainly by the luminance component. Accordingly, an isotropic smoothing can be provided in the chrominance bands while utilizing a directional smoothing in the luminance band. The isotropic smoothing substantially reduces the color artifacts while the directional smoothing preserves high frequency structures such as edges. In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the isotropic smoothing is provided by smoothing I and Q bands by convolution with a Gaussian kernel. The same kernel used to generate the Laplacian pyramid may be utilized here.
  • Accordingly, the preferred embodiment of the present invention for demosaicing a color image includes two pathways as shown in Figure 3 which is a block diagram of the preferred embodiment of demosaicing method. The original image is first interpolated to provide starting values for the missing pixel intensities as shown at 31. The image is then separated into a luminance band, Y, and two chrominance bands, I and Q as shown at 38. The luminance band is directionally smoothed using the method described above or any directional smoothing known in the literature. The chrominance bands are isotropically smoothed by a convolution with a Gaussian kernel as shown at 38. The resulting values are then transformed back into the RGB representation as shown at 39. The pixel values at those locations that were actually measured in each band are then reset to their original values as shown at 36. The process is then iterated until the resulting images converge as shown at 37.
  • It should be noted that the use of the isotropic smoothing in the chrominance bands together with any interpolation method in the luminance band provides an improvement over current demosaicing algorithms with respect to the suppression of color artifacts at edges while preserving edge detail. The directional smoothing techniques discussed above provide improved performance in the luminance band, and hence, the preferred embodiment of the present invention utilizes both techniques.
  • It should be noted that the RGB to YIQ transformation and the smoothing operations are both linear operations. Accordingly, an equivalent algorithm can be generated that operates on the RGB image. Such an algorithm would eliminate the need to transform from RGB to YIQ and visa versa at each iteration, and hence, impose a reduced computational load on the computing platform on which the method of the present invention is practiced.
  • The method is preferably practiced on a general purpose computer. However, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art from the preceding discussion that it can be advantageously practiced on computational platforms having special purpose hardware for reducing the computational load imposed by linear transformations.
  • The skilled person will readily appreciate that this disclosure encompasses an image processing system having apparatus components operable to carry out each of the described method steps. The structure of such apparatus components will be immediately apparent to the skilled person from the teachings herein.
  • The disclosures in United States patent application No. 09/303,772, from which this application claims priority, and in the abstract accompanying this application are incorporated herein by reference.

Claims (9)

  1. A method of operating a data processing system to generate a full color image comprising a first two-dimensional array of vectors, each vector in said first two-dimensional array comprising first, second, and third intensity values, each intensity value representing the intensity of a pixel in said full color image in a corresponding spectral band at a location in said full color image determined by the location of said vector in said first two-dimensional array, said method generating said first two-dimensional array of vectors from a two-dimensional array of scalars, each scalar in said two-dimensional array of scalars corresponding to one of said vectors in said first two-dimensional array of vectors, said scalar determining one of said first, second, or third intensity values at a corresponding location in said two-dimensional array of vectors, said method determining the remaining ones of said first, second, and third intensity values, said method comprising the steps of:
    (a) assigning a value to each one of said components of said vectors in said first two-dimensional array of vectors that is not determined by one of said scalars;
    (b) generating a luminance image and first and second chrominance images from said first two-dimensional array of vectors, each pixel in said luminance image being determined by the intensity of light from a corresponding pixel in said first two-dimensional array and each pixel in said first and second chrominance images representing the color of said pixel in said first two-dimensional array;
    (c) filtering said first and second chrominance images with a isotropic low-pass spatial filter to generate first and second filtered chrominance images;
    (d) generating a second two-dimensional array of vectors from said luminance image and said first and second filtered chrominance images, each vector in said second two-dimensional array comprising first, second, and third intensity values, each intensity value representing the intensity of a pixel in said full color image in a corresponding spectral band at a location in said full color image determined by the location of said vector in said first two-dimensional array;
    (e) setting a component of each vector in said second two-dimensional array to said scalar value in said two-dimensional array of scalars;
    (f) replacing said first two-dimensional array of vectors by said second two-dimensional array of vectors; and
    (g) repeating steps (b)-(f).
  2. A method as in Claim 1, comprising the step of filtering said luminance image with a low-pass spatial filter, said filter having an anisotropy that varies with location in said luminance image, said filtering being applied prior to generating said second two-dimensional array of vectors.
  3. A method as in Claim 2, wherein said step of filtering said luminance image comprises the steps of:
    decomposing said luminance image into a plurality of component images, each component image representing information in said luminance image at different levels of scale;
    applying a low-pass spatial filter to each of said component images, said low-pass filter having an anisotropy that varies with location in said component image; and
    combining said filtered component images to regenerate a new luminance image, said new luminance image replacing said luminance image in steps (d)-(f).
  4. A method as in Claim 3, wherein said step of decomposing said luminance image comprises generating a Laplacian pyramid from said luminance image.
  5. A method as in Claim 2, wherein anisotrophy of said filter is determined by the gradient of said luminance image at said location in said luminance image.
  6. A method of interpolating an image comprising a two-dimensional array of pixel values, each pixel value representing an intensity value for said image at a corresponding point in said image, said image including one or more unknown pixel values and a plurality of measured pixel values having known values; said method comprising the steps of:
    (a) assigning a value to each of said unknown pixel values;
    (b) filtering said image with a low-pass filter having an anisotropy that varies with position in said image;
    (c) resetting each measured pixel value to said known value; and
    (d) repeating steps (a)-(c).
  7. A method as in Claim 6 wherein said step of filtering said image comprises:
    decomposing said image into a plurality of component images, each component image representing information in said image at different levels of scale;
    applying a low-pass spatial filter to each of said component images, said low-pass filter having an anisotropy that varies with location in said component image; and
    combining said filtered component images to regenerate a new image, said new image replacing said image in steps (c)-(d).
  8. A method as in Claim 7, wherein said step of decomposing said image comprises generating a Laplacian pyramid from said image.
  9. A method as in Claim 7, wherein anisotrophy of said filter is determined by the gradient of said image at said location in said image.
EP00303594A 1999-04-30 2000-04-28 Image Processing System using image demosaicing Withdrawn EP1050847A3 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US303772 1999-04-30
US09/303,772 US6404918B1 (en) 1999-04-30 1999-04-30 Image demosaicing method utilizing directional smoothing

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1050847A2 true EP1050847A2 (en) 2000-11-08
EP1050847A3 EP1050847A3 (en) 2001-11-07

Family

ID=23173620

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP00303594A Withdrawn EP1050847A3 (en) 1999-04-30 2000-04-28 Image Processing System using image demosaicing

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (2) US6404918B1 (en)
EP (1) EP1050847A3 (en)
JP (1) JP3663112B2 (en)
KR (1) KR20010020797A (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1308888A1 (en) * 2001-11-06 2003-05-07 STMicroelectronics S.r.l. A method of processing digital images
WO2005067305A1 (en) * 2003-12-22 2005-07-21 Hewlett-Packard Development Company L.P. Method of processing a digital image
EP1580982A2 (en) * 2004-02-24 2005-09-28 OmniVision Technologies, Inc. Image data processing in color spaces
US7231084B2 (en) 2002-09-27 2007-06-12 Motorola, Inc. Color data image acquistion and processing
CN107409146A (en) * 2015-03-20 2017-11-28 英特尔公司 Sensing data visualization device and method
EP3364369A1 (en) * 2017-02-17 2018-08-22 Snell Advanced Media Limited Decoding a bayer-mask or like coded image

Families Citing this family (51)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6404918B1 (en) * 1999-04-30 2002-06-11 Hewlett-Packard Company Image demosaicing method utilizing directional smoothing
JP4077120B2 (en) * 1999-07-01 2008-04-16 富士フイルム株式会社 Solid-state imaging device and signal processing method
JP4162111B2 (en) * 1999-07-27 2008-10-08 富士フイルム株式会社 Image processing method and apparatus, and recording medium
US6625305B1 (en) * 1999-08-16 2003-09-23 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Image demosaicing method
JP4134456B2 (en) * 1999-09-17 2008-08-20 富士ゼロックス株式会社 Multicolor image forming apparatus
US6809765B1 (en) * 1999-10-05 2004-10-26 Sony Corporation Demosaicing for digital imaging device using perceptually uniform color space
AUPQ377899A0 (en) * 1999-10-29 1999-11-25 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Phase three kernel selection
GB9925902D0 (en) * 1999-11-03 1999-12-29 Vlsi Vision Ltd Colour image restoration with anti-alias
US7146055B2 (en) * 2000-05-05 2006-12-05 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Image processing decompression apparatus and method of using same different scaling algorithms simultaneously
US6741753B1 (en) * 2000-09-05 2004-05-25 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Method and system of local color correction using background liminance masking
US7474337B1 (en) * 2000-10-24 2009-01-06 Sony Corporation Method and apparatus to provide edge enhancements as part of a demosaicing process
US6917381B2 (en) * 2000-11-30 2005-07-12 Intel Corporation Color filter array and color interpolation algorithm
US6816197B2 (en) * 2001-03-21 2004-11-09 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Bilateral filtering in a demosaicing process
EP1246472A1 (en) * 2001-03-27 2002-10-02 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Image pickup apparatus and method for correcting images taken by the apparatus
US6819801B2 (en) * 2001-06-19 2004-11-16 Agilent Technologies, Inc. System and method for processing demosaiced images to reduce color aliasing artifacts
US6989862B2 (en) * 2001-08-23 2006-01-24 Agilent Technologies, Inc. System and method for concurrently demosaicing and resizing raw data images
US7088392B2 (en) * 2001-08-27 2006-08-08 Ramakrishna Kakarala Digital image system and method for implementing an adaptive demosaicing method
WO2003041834A1 (en) * 2001-11-13 2003-05-22 Metanomics Gmbh & Co. Kgaa Method for the extraction of components made from organic material
US20040008269A1 (en) * 2001-11-30 2004-01-15 Assaf Zomet System and method for providing multi-sensor super-resolution
US7158685B2 (en) * 2002-06-28 2007-01-02 Microsoft Corporation Demosaicing graphical content
US7257276B2 (en) * 2003-06-19 2007-08-14 Primax Electronics Ltd. Digital image interpolation method
JP4305071B2 (en) 2003-06-30 2009-07-29 株式会社ニコン Signal correction method
US7430334B2 (en) * 2003-07-31 2008-09-30 Hewlett Packard Development Company, L.P. Digital imaging systems, articles of manufacture, and digital image processing methods
US7269295B2 (en) * 2003-07-31 2007-09-11 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Digital image processing methods, digital image devices, and articles of manufacture
US7916940B2 (en) * 2004-01-31 2011-03-29 Hewlett-Packard Development Company Processing of mosaic digital images
WO2006079997A2 (en) * 2005-01-31 2006-08-03 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Pyramidal decomposition for multi-resolution image filtering
US7522782B2 (en) 2005-04-06 2009-04-21 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Digital image denoising
TWI272016B (en) * 2005-08-09 2007-01-21 Sunplus Technology Co Ltd Method and system for eliminating color noises generated from interpolation
US7783121B1 (en) 2005-11-29 2010-08-24 Adobe Systems Incorporated Method and apparatus for applying a filter to an image with a large range of pixel values
US8098964B2 (en) * 2006-02-06 2012-01-17 Microsoft Corp. Raw image processing
EP2003612A4 (en) 2006-03-31 2010-10-13 Nikon Corp Image processing method
US7609307B2 (en) * 2006-09-13 2009-10-27 National Chiao Tung University Heterogeneity-projection hard-decision interpolation method for color reproduction
US8213710B2 (en) * 2006-11-28 2012-07-03 Youliza, Gehts B.V. Limited Liability Company Apparatus and method for shift invariant differential (SID) image data interpolation in non-fully populated shift invariant matrix
US8040558B2 (en) 2006-11-29 2011-10-18 Youliza, Gehts B.V. Limited Liability Company Apparatus and method for shift invariant differential (SID) image data interpolation in fully populated shift invariant matrix
JP4894594B2 (en) * 2007-04-05 2012-03-14 ソニー株式会社 Image processing device
CN101796542A (en) * 2007-07-05 2010-08-04 西门子工业公司 Arrangement and method for procesing image data
JP5029274B2 (en) * 2007-10-10 2012-09-19 株式会社ニコン Imaging device
US8270713B2 (en) * 2007-10-16 2012-09-18 Aptina Imaging Corporation Method and apparatus providing hardware-efficient demosaicing of image data
JP5369526B2 (en) * 2008-07-28 2013-12-18 株式会社日立製作所 Image signal processing device, display device, recording / playback device, and image signal processing method
EP2164268A1 (en) * 2008-09-15 2010-03-17 Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (PUBL) Image processing for aberration correction
US8068145B1 (en) * 2008-10-02 2011-11-29 Pixim Inc. Method, systems, and computer program product for demosaicing images
RU2382407C1 (en) * 2008-11-21 2010-02-20 Корпорация "САМСУНГ ЭЛЕКТРОНИКС Ко., Лтд." Face detection method and system
US8035698B2 (en) * 2009-01-21 2011-10-11 Seiko Epson Corporation Joint automatic demosaicking and white balancing
KR101335127B1 (en) * 2009-08-10 2013-12-03 삼성전자주식회사 Edge adaptive interpolation and noise filtering method, computer-readable recording medium and portable terminal
US8515167B2 (en) * 2009-08-31 2013-08-20 Peking University High dynamic range image mapping with empirical mode decomposition
KR101725044B1 (en) * 2010-05-27 2017-04-11 삼성전자주식회사 Imaging display apparatus
JP5888940B2 (en) * 2011-11-11 2016-03-22 オリンパス株式会社 IMAGING DEVICE, IMAGING DEVICE CONTROL METHOD, AND PROGRAM
US8687913B2 (en) * 2012-07-17 2014-04-01 Adobe Systems Incorporated Methods and apparatus for image deblurring and sharpening using local patch self-similarity
US20150022869A1 (en) * 2013-07-17 2015-01-22 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Demosaicing rgbz sensor
WO2018119787A1 (en) * 2016-12-28 2018-07-05 华为技术有限公司 Demosaicing method and device
CN113222864B (en) * 2021-06-09 2022-09-27 广州计量检测技术研究院 Image edge denoising method, device and equipment based on amplitude limiting filtering

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5398066A (en) * 1993-07-27 1995-03-14 Sri International Method and apparatus for compression and decompression of digital color images

Family Cites Families (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5065229A (en) * 1989-07-24 1991-11-12 Eastman Kodak Company Compression method and apparatus for single-sensor color imaging systems
KR0146260B1 (en) * 1993-06-16 1998-09-15 모리시타 요이찌 Solid state image pick-up apparatus
US5373322A (en) 1993-06-30 1994-12-13 Eastman Kodak Company Apparatus and method for adaptively interpolating a full color image utilizing chrominance gradients
US5382976A (en) * 1993-06-30 1995-01-17 Eastman Kodak Company Apparatus and method for adaptively interpolating a full color image utilizing luminance gradients
US5506619A (en) * 1995-03-17 1996-04-09 Eastman Kodak Company Adaptive color plan interpolation in single sensor color electronic camera
US5875040A (en) * 1995-12-04 1999-02-23 Eastman Kodak Company Gradient based method for providing values for unknown pixels in a digital image
US5652621A (en) * 1996-02-23 1997-07-29 Eastman Kodak Company Adaptive color plane interpolation in single sensor color electronic camera
US5631703A (en) * 1996-05-29 1997-05-20 Eastman Kodak Company Particular pattern of pixels for a color filter array which is used to derive luminance and chrominance values
US6091851A (en) * 1997-11-03 2000-07-18 Intel Corporation Efficient algorithm for color recovery from 8-bit to 24-bit color pixels
US6130960A (en) * 1997-11-03 2000-10-10 Intel Corporation Block-matching algorithm for color interpolation
US6229578B1 (en) * 1997-12-08 2001-05-08 Intel Corporation Edge-detection based noise removal algorithm
US5990950A (en) * 1998-02-11 1999-11-23 Iterated Systems, Inc. Method and system for color filter array multifactor interpolation
US6236433B1 (en) * 1998-09-29 2001-05-22 Intel Corporation Scaling algorithm for efficient color representation/recovery in video
US6195467B1 (en) * 1999-03-25 2001-02-27 Image Processing Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for sharpening a grayscale image
US6404918B1 (en) * 1999-04-30 2002-06-11 Hewlett-Packard Company Image demosaicing method utilizing directional smoothing

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5398066A (en) * 1993-07-27 1995-03-14 Sri International Method and apparatus for compression and decompression of digital color images

Cited By (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1308888A1 (en) * 2001-11-06 2003-05-07 STMicroelectronics S.r.l. A method of processing digital images
US7231084B2 (en) 2002-09-27 2007-06-12 Motorola, Inc. Color data image acquistion and processing
WO2005067305A1 (en) * 2003-12-22 2005-07-21 Hewlett-Packard Development Company L.P. Method of processing a digital image
US7440016B2 (en) 2003-12-22 2008-10-21 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Method of processing a digital image
EP1580982A2 (en) * 2004-02-24 2005-09-28 OmniVision Technologies, Inc. Image data processing in color spaces
EP1580982A3 (en) * 2004-02-24 2008-04-16 OmniVision Technologies, Inc. Image data processing in color spaces
CN107409146A (en) * 2015-03-20 2017-11-28 英特尔公司 Sensing data visualization device and method
CN107409146B (en) * 2015-03-20 2022-10-28 英特尔公司 Sensor data visualization apparatus and method
EP3364369A1 (en) * 2017-02-17 2018-08-22 Snell Advanced Media Limited Decoding a bayer-mask or like coded image
EP3547249A1 (en) * 2017-02-17 2019-10-02 Snell Advanced Media Limited Decoding a bayer-mask or like coded image
US10614550B2 (en) 2017-02-17 2020-04-07 Snell Advanced Media Limited Decoding a bayer-mask or like coded image
US10909658B2 (en) 2017-02-17 2021-02-02 Grass Valley Limited Decoding a Bayer-mask or like coded image

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2000341707A (en) 2000-12-08
US20020122586A1 (en) 2002-09-05
US6404918B1 (en) 2002-06-11
KR20010020797A (en) 2001-03-15
JP3663112B2 (en) 2005-06-22
EP1050847A3 (en) 2001-11-07
US6618503B2 (en) 2003-09-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6404918B1 (en) Image demosaicing method utilizing directional smoothing
EP1038159B1 (en) A new edge-detection based noise removal algorithm
EP1371015B1 (en) Bilateral filtering in a demosaicing process
JP4352371B2 (en) Digital image processing method implementing adaptive mosaic reduction method
EP2130175B1 (en) Edge mapping incorporating panchromatic pixels
EP2130176B1 (en) Edge mapping using panchromatic pixels
US7305123B2 (en) Color interpolation method of an image acquired by a digital sensor by directional filtering
Gunturk et al. Demosaicking: color filter array interpolation
US7486844B2 (en) Color interpolation apparatus and color interpolation method utilizing edge indicators adjusted by stochastic adjustment factors to reconstruct missing colors for image pixels
US5901242A (en) Method and apparatus for decoding spatiochromatically multiplexed color images using predetermined coefficients
US7916940B2 (en) Processing of mosaic digital images
US6625305B1 (en) Image demosaicing method
US7133553B2 (en) Correlation-based color mosaic interpolation adjustment using luminance gradients
US9336570B2 (en) Demosaicking system and method for color array based multi-spectral sensors
JPH08287255A (en) Image feature extraction device and image processor for skin pattern image
US20030197796A1 (en) Image demosaicing and enhancement system
US7791648B2 (en) Method and system for de-mosaicing artifact removal, and computer program product therefor
CN110430403A (en) A kind of image processing method and device
US7430334B2 (en) Digital imaging systems, articles of manufacture, and digital image processing methods
US7269295B2 (en) Digital image processing methods, digital image devices, and articles of manufacture
Kapah et al. Demosaicking using artificial neural networks
US7133569B1 (en) Aliasing artifact attenuation system
Gevrekci et al. POCS-based restoration of Bayer-sampled image sequences
Asiq et al. Efficient colour filter array demosaicking with prior error reduction
Jain et al. Study of PCA-Based Adaptive Denoising of CFA Images for Single-Sensor Digital Cameras

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): DE FR GB

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, A DELAWARE CORPORATION

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Free format text: 7G 06T 5/00 A, 7G 06T 3/40 B

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20020506

AKX Designation fees paid

Free format text: DE FR GB

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20060321