EP1195033B1 - Equalization with dc-offset compensation - Google Patents

Equalization with dc-offset compensation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1195033B1
EP1195033B1 EP00947884A EP00947884A EP1195033B1 EP 1195033 B1 EP1195033 B1 EP 1195033B1 EP 00947884 A EP00947884 A EP 00947884A EP 00947884 A EP00947884 A EP 00947884A EP 1195033 B1 EP1195033 B1 EP 1195033B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
offset
radio signal
initial estimate
channel
estimate
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP00947884A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1195033A2 (en
Inventor
Bengt Lindoff
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson AB
Original Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson AB
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson AB filed Critical Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson AB
Publication of EP1195033A2 publication Critical patent/EP1195033A2/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1195033B1 publication Critical patent/EP1195033B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L25/00Baseband systems
    • H04L25/02Details ; arrangements for supplying electrical power along data transmission lines
    • H04L25/06Dc level restoring means; Bias distortion correction ; Decision circuits providing symbol by symbol detection
    • H04L25/061Dc level restoring means; Bias distortion correction ; Decision circuits providing symbol by symbol detection providing hard decisions only; arrangements for tracking or suppressing unwanted low frequency components, e.g. removal of dc offset
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L25/00Baseband systems
    • H04L25/02Details ; arrangements for supplying electrical power along data transmission lines
    • H04L25/0202Channel estimation
    • H04L25/0212Channel estimation of impulse response
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L25/00Baseband systems
    • H04L25/02Details ; arrangements for supplying electrical power along data transmission lines
    • H04L25/0202Channel estimation
    • H04L25/0224Channel estimation using sounding signals
    • H04L25/0228Channel estimation using sounding signals with direct estimation from sounding signals
    • H04L25/023Channel estimation using sounding signals with direct estimation from sounding signals with extension to other symbols
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L25/00Baseband systems
    • H04L25/02Details ; arrangements for supplying electrical power along data transmission lines
    • H04L25/0202Channel estimation
    • H04L25/024Channel estimation channel estimation algorithms
    • H04L25/025Channel estimation channel estimation algorithms using least-mean-square [LMS] method

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Power Engineering (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Cable Transmission Systems, Equalization Of Radio And Reduction Of Echo (AREA)
  • Dc Digital Transmission (AREA)
  • Digital Transmission Methods That Use Modulated Carrier Waves (AREA)
  • Amplifiers (AREA)
  • Networks Using Active Elements (AREA)

Abstract

A radio signal that has been received from a channel is equalized by estimating the channel, generating an initial estimate of a DC-offset that has been introduced into the radio signal, and estimating a variance of the initial estimate of the DC-offset. The channel estimate, the initial estimate of the DC-offset and the estimated variance are then used to determine a most likely symbol represented by the radio signal. The initial estimate of the DC-offset that has been introduced into the radio signal may be determined from a training sequence portion of the received signal and a reference training sequence signal. For example, a least squares technique may be used to generate the DC-offset as well as the channel estimate and the variance of the initial estimate of the DC-offset. In an equalizer section, the DC-offset and variance values are taken into consideration when the most likely symbol represented by the radio signal is decided.

Description

    BACKGROUND
  • The present invention relates to radio communication technology, and more particularly to apparatuses and techniques for compensating for DC-offsets and low frequency distortion introduced in a radio receiver.
  • Modern telecommunications systems, such as cellular telecommunications systems, rely on digital technology for the representation and transmission of information, such as audio information. Any of a number of modulation techniques are used to impose the digital information onto a radio frequency signal, which is then transmitted from a sender's antenna, and which is received by a receiver's antenna. Ideally, the receiver would merely perform a reverse of the modulation process to recover the digital information from the received signal.
  • In practice, however, the transmitted signal is often distorted by the channel (i.e., the air interface) between the transmitter's antenna and the receiver's antenna. For example, a main ray of a transmitted signal may take a direct route between the transmitting and receiving antennas, but other rays may take indirect routes, such as reflecting off of various objects (e.g, buildings, mountains) in the environment prior to being received by the receiver's antenna. This effect is often called multipath propagation" of the signal. These indirect paths can take longer for the signal to traverse than the direct path. Consequently, signals representing the same information may arrive at the receiver at different times. The various paths between the transmitter and the receiver subject the signal to varying amounts of attenuation, so they are not all received at the same signal strength. Nonetheless, they are typically received at sufficiently high power levels to cause an effect wherein, at any moment, a received signal includes a present signal (representing a present piece of desired information) plus one or more delayed components from previously transmitted signals (each representing an earlier piece of information). This type of signal distortion is often called Inter-Symbol Interference (ISI).
  • To counteract ISI, a receiver typically employs an equalizer, which demodulates the signal in a way that utilizes a model of the channel (also referred to as an "estimate" of the channel). The channel estimate is typically generated from another component in the receiver, called a channel estimator. A channel estimator relies on a received signal including a portion, often called a "training sequence", that contains a predefined sequence of 1's and 0's known to have been transmitted by the transmitter. By comparing an actually received training sequence portion of a signal with an expected training sequence, the channel estimator is able to construct a model of the channel that can be used by the equalizer when it attempts to demodulate a portion of the received signal that includes unknown information.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a conventional channel estimator and channel equalizer for use in a burst transmission system such as, for example, the Global System for Mobile communication (GSM) system. A received radio signal is down-converted to a baseband signal 101 by circuitry in a radio receiver (not shown). The baseband signal 101, which has a predefined burst length, is supplied to a memory 103, where it is stored. A synchronization unit 105 identifies that portion of the stored received signal that corresponds to the training sequence, and supplies these samples to a channel estimator 107. The channel estimator 107 computes the K:th order channel filter taps {hi }, (i=0,K) from the received signal while referring to a reference training sequence signal 102. The number of channel taps, K, is application specific, and will generally be specified based on the maximum expected delay spread for the received radio signal. The channel filter taps are then supplied to an equalizer 109, which may for example, be a Viterbi equalizer having MK states, where M is the number of possible symbols. The equalizer 109 then uses the channel estimate to demodulate those portions of the received baseband signal (as supplied by the memory 103) that correspond to unknown information. The output of the equalizer 109 are the decided symbols 111.
  • The conventional channel estimator 107 and equalizer 109 as described above assume that the baseband signal 101 does not contain a DC-offset or low frequency distortion. "Low frequency" in this context is defined as a signal whose rate of change is slow compared to the dynamics of the radio channel and the rate of the transmitted information (e.g., the low frequency distortion is relatively constant over the span of two transmitted symbols). However, many types of radio receivers, especially homodyne receivers, introduce DC-offsets. These arise from, for example, component mismatch in the receiver in-phase (I) and quadrature phase (Q) paths; the signal from the local oscillator leaking into the antenna and becoming downconverted to DC or slowly varying DC in the mixers; or a large near-channel interfering signal leaking into the local oscillator and self-downconverting to a varying DC offset. The presence of DC-offsets and low frequency distortion in the signal supplied to the conventional equalizer 109 results in degraded performance, as measured by the accuracy with which the received signal is decoded.
  • The International PCT Application having Publication No. WO 98 25351 A, published on June 11, 1998, suggests a method for estimating an impulse response in a digital radio system, in which the signals to be transmitted comprise bursts formed of symbols, the bursts comprising a known training sequence, the method comprising sampling from a received signal, measuring of a DC-offset in the samples and correlating the signal with the known training sequence.
  • An IEEE paper by D.L. Lyon, "Elimination of DC Offset by MMSE Adaptive Equalizers," IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 24, No. 9, September 1976 (1976-09) pages 1049-1052, XP 000758814, New York, US ISSN:0090 6778, discusses using minimum mean-squared error (MMSE) equalizers to correct DC offset. The paper discloses quantitative results giving residual MSE as a function of offset magnitude, equalizer length, and signal energy,
  • The German patent document DE 196 06 102 A1, published on August 21, 1997, suggests a method for compensating for a DC-offset in an equalizer by introducing a DC-tap in the channel model. However, this method cannot take care of low frequency distortion because it assumes a pure DC component, that is, the DC-tap is constant daring the entire burst.
  • Thus, there is a need for a channel estimator and equalizer that explicitly take into account both the DC-offset and the low frequency distortion introduced in the radio receiver.
  • SUMMARY
  • The foregoing and other objects are achieved in methods and apparatuses for equalising a radio signal that has been received from a channel. In accordance with an aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of equalising a radio signal that has been received from a channel, comprising the steps of: generating a channel estimate; generating an initial estimate of a DC-offset that has been introduced into the radio signal; estimating a variance of the initial estimate of the DC-offset; generating a model of DC-offset variations based on the initial estimate of the DC-offset and the estimated variance; determining a plurality of possible DC-offset values based on the model of the DC-offset variations; and determining a most likely symbol represented by the radio signal based on a one of the DC-offset values minimising an equalisation metric and the channel estimate.
  • The operation of generating the initial estimate of the DC-offset that has been introduced into the radio signal may comprise using a training sequence portion of the received signal and a reference training sequence signal to generate the initial estimate of a DC-offset that has been introduced into the radio signal.
  • The operations of estimating the channel, generating the initial estimate of the DC-offset and estimating the variance of the initial estimate of the DC-offset may be performed by using a Least Squares technique to determine the channel estimate, the initial estimate of the DC-offset and the variance of the initial estimate of the DC-offset from a training sequence portion of the received signal and a reference training sequence signal.
  • The operation of using the channel estimate, the initial estimate of the DC-offset and the estimated variance to determine the most likely symbol represented by the radio signal may comprise for each possible transition from a state i to a state j in a decoding trellis, determining a plurality of first metric values in correspondence with the plurality of possible DC-offset values; determining which one of the plurality of possible DC-offset values corresponds to a best one of the plurality of first metric values, and selecting said one of the plurality of possible DC-offset values as an optimal DC-offset value; using the optimal DC-offset value to determine an accumulated metric associated with the transition from state i to state j; finding a lowest accumulated metric associated with a best path through the decoding trellis to state j; and determining the most likely symbol represented by the radio signal based on the lowest accumulated metric associated with the best path through the decoding trellis to state j.
  • The operation of using the channel estimate, the initial estimate of the DC-offset and the estimated variance to determine the most likely symbol represented by the radio signal may comprise determining a plurality of possible DC-offset values based on a model of DC-offset variation; and using a delayed decision feedback sequence estimation technique to determine the most likely symbol represented by the radio signal, wherein the delayed decision feedback sequence estimation technique determines a metric that is based on the plurality of possible DC-offset values.
  • In accordance with another aspect of the invention, there is provided an equaliser for equalising a radio signal that has been received from a channel, comprising: a channel estimator, means for generating an initial estimate of a DC-offset that has been introduced into the radio signal; means for estimating a variance of the initial estimate of the DC-offset; means for generating a model of DC-offset variations based on the initial estimate of the DC-offset and the estimated variance; means for determining a plurality of possible DC-offset values based on the model of the DC-offset variations; and means for determining a most likely symbol represented by the radio signal based on a one of the DC-offset values minimising an equalisation metric and the channel estimate.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The objects and advantages of the invention will be understood by reading the following detailed description in conjunction with the drawings in which:
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a conventional channel estimator and channel equaliser for use in a burst transmission system;
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an exemplary embodiment of an apparatus for equalising a received signal in accordance with the invention;
  • FIGS. 3a-3b show decoding trellis state transitions in accordance with conventional techniques;
  • FIG. 4 is a flowchart depicting steps performed by an exemplary embodiment of an equaliser in accordance with an aspect of the invention; and
  • FIGS. 5a-5c show exemplary decoding trellis state transitions in accordance with one aspect of the invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • The various features of the invention will now be described with respect to the figures, in which like parts are identified with the same reference characters.
  • In accordance with the invention, a channel estimator and equalizer are provided that estimate and compensate for DC-offsets and low frequency distortion introduced in the radio receiver. By explicitly using the channel estimator and equalizer to take care of the DC-offsets and low frequency distortion generated in the radio receiver, the bit error rate is significantly lower than bit error rates associated with conventional equalization methods. This is especially the case for moderate to high signal to noise (or carrier to interference) ratios. Further, the complexity of the inventive techniques are only marginally increased compared to conventional equalization methods.
  • An exemplary embodiment of the invention is depicted in FIG. 2. The various boxes represent functions that could be implemented in any of a number of different ways, including but not limited to hard-wired logic, and one or more programmable processors executing suitable program instructions stored in a memory device.
  • Referring now to FIG. 2, a baseband signal,
    Figure 00070001
    , t = 1,2,...,N (where N is a predefined burst length) is supplied as an input, where:
    Figure 00070002
    yt = desired signal; and
    mt = unknown low frequency distortion introduced in the radio receiver.
    The baseband signal, , is supplied to a memory 201, where it is stored. A synchronization unit 203 identifies that portion of the stored received signal that corresponds to the training sequence, and supplies these samples to a channel estimator 205. A reference training sequence signal 202 is also supplied to the channel estimator 205. The channel estimator 205 estimates the radio channel and also generates an initial estimate of the low frequency distortion (including DC-offset), based on the reference training sequence signal 202 and the received training sequence samples. For example, assume that the channel can be modeled by a K:th order FIR filter. The complete model of the radio channel and the offset introduced in the radio receiver can then be written as y t =h 0 dt +...+hKdt - K +mt where is the predicted value of , di is the unknown transmitted symbol at time i, and h 0,...,hK are the radio channel taps. The channel estimator 205 generates estimates of the radio channel taps, designated h and 0,...,h andK , along with an initial estimate, m and, of the DC offset, m 0 , this initial estimate being an estimate of the mean value of mt . The channel estimator 205 may, for example, use the well-known Least Squares method to generate these estimates.
  • In addition to the estimate of the channel taps and the initial estimate of the low frequency distortion, the channel estimator also determines the variance of the offset estimate, σ 2 / m and , using well-known techniques. These three estimates (i.e., h andi , m and, and σ 2 / m and) are then supplied to a control unit 207. The control unit 207 determines a suitable model for the offset variation, based on the supplied parameters m and and σ 2 / m and. For example, the offset variations can be modeled by an integrator model given by:
    Figure 00090001
  • As can be seen from Eq. (1), values for α i are generated as a function of m and and σ 2 / m and. That is, given the mean value of the DC-offset and the variance, estimates of the low and high values can be determined. The complete set of values for αi is then formed from these extreme values and a set of values falling in between.
  • Alternative forms of the offset variation model may be used as well. For example, one might use the more general model: m t = a 1 m t -1+a 2 m t -2+···+aW m t - W t (with W being a predetermined integer). It will be observed that this model reduces to that given by Eq. ( 1) when W=1 and a 1=1.
  • The estimated channel taps, h andt , together with the DC-offset model information are fed to an equalizer 209. In accordance with one aspect of the invention, operation of the equalizer 209 includes steps that compensate for both the DC-offset and the low frequency distortion introduced into the received signal by the radio. Nonetheless, the equalizer 209 may fundamentally operate in accordance with any of a number of known equalization techniques, such as those used by Maximum Likelihood Sequence Estimation (MLSE) Viterbi equalizers, or Delayed Decision-Feedback Sequence Estimators (DFSE).
  • The number of states in the equalizer 209 having DC-offset and low frequency distortion compensation is the same as in a conventional equalizer. For example, for a full MLSE, the number of states is MK , where M is the number of possible symbols, and K is the channel filter length. Each state in the equalizer 209 includes a memory that, at time t, contains the best estimate of mt for that state.
  • The equalizer 209 differs from a conventional equalizer in that the number of transitions between any two states i and j is L for the equalizer 209 instead of just one for a conventional equalizer. FIGS. 3a-3b show decoding trellis state transitions in accordance with conventional techniques. In FIG. 3a, the M states at time t-1 are shown along with their corresponding accumulated metrics, Q(1, t-1)...Q(M, t-1). For each of the illustrated states at time t-1, there is only a single way of transitioning to State j (at time t). The object, then, is to determine which of these M possible transitions results in a lowest accumulated metric at time t. This is illustrated in FIG. 3b by showing that the transition from State k at time t-1 to State j at time t resulted in a lowest accumulated metric, Q(j, t). It can also be seen from the figure that the data symbol corresponding to this transition is dt=sk.
  • In contrast to the prior art approach, the inventive equalizer 209 has a number of transitions from each of the M states to State j in correspondence with the number of possible transitions defined by the DC-offset variation model (given, for example, by Eq. (1)).
  • An exemplary equalizer 209 will now be described in greater detail with reference to the flowchart of FIG. 4. The exemplary equalizer algorithm follows the idea of a standard Viterbi equalizer, but includes a number of modifications to the conventional approach in order to account for DC-offset and low frequency distortion.
  • At step 401, the DC-Offset variation model within the equalizer 209 is initialized. This means setting initial values for m and 0 and Δ0. In the exemplary embodiment, these values are supplicd to the equalizer 209 by the control unit 207. It will be recalled that these values are generated in accordance with Eq. (1). At step 402, an initial value for t is set, and at step 403 an initial value for j is set. Then, at step 404, an initial value for i is set. These parameters (i, j and t) are used as indices in subsequent steps. The index i will vary to cover all states with possible transitions to state j.
  • At step 405, a value for Δ t that yields the best transition (i.e., the transition with the lowest metric) between state i and state j, is computed in accordance with:
    Figure 00110001
    where y and i,j / tcorresponds to the predicted output given state i and transition from state i to state j. More particularly,
    Figure 00110002
    where d i,j / t-l refers to those symbols corresponding to state i transitioning from state i to j.
  • At step 407, the accumulated metric, B(i,j,t), for this best transition is saved as follows:
    Figure 00110003
    where Q(i,t-1) is the accumulated metric at time t - 1 for state i. For an initial value, Q(i,0)=0.
  • At step 409, another value for the index i is selected, and the loop comprising steps 405, 407 and 409 is repeated until all possible values of i have been used.
  • Next, at step 411, the lowest accumulated metric for state j is found according to:
    Figure 00120001
  • Then, at step 413, a value for m and opt / j,t is determined in accordance with:
    Figure 00120002
    Here, k represents the state that results in the best transition (i.e., the transition resulting in the lowest accumulated metric) to State j at time t.
  • At step 415, another value for the index j is selected and the loops comprising steps 404, 405, 407, 409, 411, 413 and 415 are repeated until all possible values of j have been used.
  • Then, at step 417, another value for the index t is selected, and the loops comprising steps 403, 404, 405, 407, 409, 411, 413, 415 and 417 are repeated until all possible values of t have been used.
  • Finally, at step 419, the path through the trellis having the lowest accumulated metric is found. This path identifies the maximum likelihood (ML) estimate of the transmitted symbol sequence, which is then output from the equalizer 209.
  • To further illustrate the inventive techniques, FIGS. 5a-5c show exemplary decoding trellis state transitions in accordance with the invention. In FIG. 5a, the transitions from an exemplary State i at time t-1 to a State j at time t are shown. It can be seen that it is desired to determine, for State j, an optimal value for m and opt / j,t in addition to an accumulated metric Q(j, t). Because there are L possible values of DC offset increments (represented by Δ t ), L candidates for m and opt / j,t are generated. Note that the same symbol, dt=si, is associated with each of these L possible transitions.
  • Having determined the L candidates of DC offset increment values, that candidate is selected which minimizes the metric shown in block 405 of FIG. 4. This optimal DC offset increment value is designated Δ optt-l , for the transition from State i to State j.
  • As illustrated in FIG. 5b, optimal DC offset increment values are determined for each of the M possible state transitions to State j at time t.
  • Once these are determined, the transition resulting in the lowest accumulated metric can then be found. This is illustrated in FIG. 5c for an exemplary best transition from State k at time t-1 to State j at time t.
  • The invention has been described with reference to a particular embodiment. However, it will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art that it is possible to embody the invention in specific forms other than those of the preferred embodiment described above. The preferred embodiment is merely illustrative and should not be considered restrictive in any way. The scope of the invention is given by the appended claims, rather than the preceding description, and all variations and equivalents which fall within the range of the claims are intended to be embraced therein.

Claims (10)

  1. A method of equalising a radio signal that has been received from a channel, comprising the steps of:
    generating a channel estimate (205);
    generating an initial estimate of a DC-offset (205) that has been introduced into the radio signal;
    estimating a variance of the initial estimate of the DC-offset (205);
    generating a model of DC-offset variations based on the initial estimate of the DC-offset and the estimated variance (207);
    determining a plurality of possible DC-offset values based on the model of the DC-offset variations; and
    determining a most likely symbol represented by the radio signal based on one of the DC-offset values minimising an equalisation metric and the channel estimate (209).
  2. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of generating the initial estimate of the DC-offset that has been introduced into the radio signal comprises the step of using a training sequence portion of the received signal and a reference training sequence signal (202) to generate the initial estimate of a DC-offset that has been introduced into the radio signal.
  3. The method of claim 1, wherein the steps of generating the channel estimate, generating the initial estimate of the DC-offset (205) and estimating the variance of the initial estimate of the DC-offset (205) are performed by using a Least Squares technique to determine the channel estimate, the initial estimate of the DC-offset and the variance of the initial estimate of the DC-offset from a training sequence portion of the received signal and a reference training sequence signal (202).
  4. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of determining a most likely symbol represented by the radio signal using the model of the DC-offset variations and the channel estimate (209) comprises the steps of:
    for each possible transition from a state i to a state j in a decoding trellis, determining a plurality of first metric values in correspondence with the plurality of possible DC-offset values;
    determining which one of the plurality of possible DC-offset values corresponds to a best one of the plurality of first metric values, and selecting said one of the plurality of possible DC-offset values as an optimal DC-offset value;
    using the optimal DC-offset value to determine an accumulated metric associated with the transition from state i to state j;
    finding a lowest accumulated metric associated with a best path through the decoding trellis to state j; and
    determining the most likely symbol represented by the radio signal based on the lowest accumulated metric associated with the best path through the decoding trellis to state j.
  5. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of determining a most likely symbol represented by the radio signal using the model of the DC-offset variations and the channel estimate comprises the steps of:
    using a delayed decision feedback sequence estimation technique to determine the most likely symbol represented by the radio signal, wherein the delayed decision feedback sequence estimation technique determines a metric that is based on the plurality of possible DC-offset values.
  6. An equaliser for equalising a radio signal that has been received from a channel, comprising:
    a channel estimator (205);
    means for generating an initial estimate of a DC-offset (205) that has been introduced into the radio signal;
    means for estimating a variance of the initial estimate of the DC-offset (205);
    means for generating a model of DC-offset variations based on the initial estimate of the DC-offset and the estimated variance (207);
    means for determining a plurality of possible DC-offset values based on the model of the DC-offset variations; and
    means for determining a most likely symbol represented by the radio signal based on one of the DC-offset values minimising an equalisation metric and the channel estimate (209).
  7. The equaliser of claim 6, wherein the means for generating the initial estimate of the DC-offset that has been introduced into the radio signal comprises means for using a training sequence portion of the received signal and a reference training sequence signal (202) for generating the initial estimate of a DC-offset that has been introduced into the radio signal.
  8. The equaliser of claim 6, wherein the channel estimator (205), the means for generating the initial estimate of the DC-offset (205) and the means for estimating the variance of the initial estimate of the DC-offset (205) include a unit for using a Least Squares technique to determine the channel estimate, the initial estimate of the DC-offset and the variance of the initial estimate of the DC-offset from a training sequence portion of the received signal and a reference training sequence signal.
  9. The equaliser of claim 6, wherein the means for determining the most likely symbol represented by the radio signal using the model of the DC-offset variations and the channel estimate (209) comprises:
    means for determining, for each possible transition from a state i to a state j in a decoding trellis, a plurality of first metric values in correspondence with the plurality of possible DC-offset values;
    means for determining which one of the plurality of possible DC-offset values corresponds to a best one of the plurality of first metric values, and selecting said one of the plurality of possible DC-offset values as an optimal DC-offset value;
    means for using the optimal DC-offset value to determine an accumulated metric associated with the transition from state i to state j;
    means for finding a lowest accumulated metric associated with a best path through the decoding trellis to state j; and
    means for determining the most likely symbol represented by the radio signal based on the lowest accumulated metric associated with the best path through the decoding trellis to state j.
  10. The equaliser of claim 6, wherein the means for determining a most likely symbol represented by the radio signal using the model of the DC-offset variations and the channel estimate comprises:
    a delayed decision feedback sequence estimator for determining the most likely symbol represented by the radio signal, wherein the delayed decision feedback sequence estimator is adapted to determine a metric that is based on the plurality of possible DC-offset values.
EP00947884A 1999-07-02 2000-06-27 Equalization with dc-offset compensation Expired - Lifetime EP1195033B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/347,230 US6449320B1 (en) 1999-07-02 1999-07-02 Equalization with DC-offset compensation
US347230 1999-07-02
PCT/EP2000/005979 WO2001003396A2 (en) 1999-07-02 2000-06-27 Equalization with dc-offset compensation

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1195033A2 EP1195033A2 (en) 2002-04-10
EP1195033B1 true EP1195033B1 (en) 2004-10-06

Family

ID=23362863

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP00947884A Expired - Lifetime EP1195033B1 (en) 1999-07-02 2000-06-27 Equalization with dc-offset compensation

Country Status (9)

Country Link
US (1) US6449320B1 (en)
EP (1) EP1195033B1 (en)
JP (1) JP4579472B2 (en)
CN (1) CN1433619A (en)
AT (1) ATE279063T1 (en)
AU (1) AU6152600A (en)
DE (1) DE60014649D1 (en)
MY (1) MY125128A (en)
WO (1) WO2001003396A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (45)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
MY133723A (en) 1999-09-17 2007-11-30 Ericsson Telefon Ab L M "apparatus and method for substantially eliminating a near-channel interfering amplitude modulated signal"
AU1158300A (en) * 1999-10-27 2001-05-08 Nokia Corporation Dc offset correction in a mobile communication system
US6628706B1 (en) * 1999-12-06 2003-09-30 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Method and apparatus for transforming a channel estimate
US6847690B1 (en) * 2000-11-22 2005-01-25 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Determinant-based synchronization techniques and systems
US6977977B1 (en) 2001-02-20 2005-12-20 Comsys Communication & Signal Processing Ltd. Compensation of I/Q gain mismatch in a communications receiver
US6901121B1 (en) 2001-02-20 2005-05-31 Comsys Communication & Signal Processing Ltd. Compensation of DC offset impairment in a communications receiver
US7099409B2 (en) * 2002-02-13 2006-08-29 Broadcom Corporation Channel estimation and/or equalization using repeated adaptation
EP1337083A1 (en) * 2002-02-13 2003-08-20 Agere Systems Limited DC offset and channel impulse response estimation
KR100452619B1 (en) * 2002-05-15 2004-10-13 한국과학기술원 Estimation and compensaion method of I/Q mismatch and DC offset
US7190740B2 (en) 2002-08-19 2007-03-13 Siemens Communications, Inc. Arrangement for dynamic DC offset compensation
WO2004047388A1 (en) 2002-11-20 2004-06-03 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Method and corresponding arrangement for dc offset compensation using channel estimation
DE10303475B3 (en) * 2003-01-29 2004-10-07 Infineon Technologies Ag Maximum likelihood estimation of the channel coefficients and the DC offset in a digital baseband signal of a radio receiver using the SAGE algorithm
US20040268190A1 (en) * 2003-05-19 2004-12-30 International Business Machines Corporation Adjusting parameters of a serial link
US7349495B2 (en) * 2003-09-25 2008-03-25 Intel Corporation Soft bits normalization apparatus, method, and system
US7295605B2 (en) * 2004-02-20 2007-11-13 Fujitsu Limited Adaptive equalizer with DC offset compensation
GB0419487D0 (en) * 2004-09-02 2004-10-06 Ttp Communications Ltd DC estimation in received signals
US7555040B2 (en) * 2004-11-05 2009-06-30 Interdigital Technology Corporation Method and apparatus for generating equalizer filter tap coefficients
US7978788B2 (en) * 2005-07-01 2011-07-12 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Method and arrangement for estimating DC offset
US7974366B2 (en) * 2006-02-21 2011-07-05 Marvell World Trade Ltd. Low-latency baseline-wander compensation systems and methods
US7675983B2 (en) * 2006-04-14 2010-03-09 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. Mitigation of DC distortion in OFDM receivers
KR20070114557A (en) * 2006-05-29 2007-12-04 삼성전자주식회사 Semiconductor memory devices having fuses and methods of forming the same
US7804921B2 (en) 2006-05-30 2010-09-28 Fujitsu Limited System and method for decoupling multiple control loops
US7817757B2 (en) * 2006-05-30 2010-10-19 Fujitsu Limited System and method for independently adjusting multiple offset compensations applied to a signal
US7848470B2 (en) * 2006-05-30 2010-12-07 Fujitsu Limited System and method for asymmetrically adjusting compensation applied to a signal
US7804894B2 (en) 2006-05-30 2010-09-28 Fujitsu Limited System and method for the adjustment of compensation applied to a signal using filter patterns
US7839958B2 (en) 2006-05-30 2010-11-23 Fujitsu Limited System and method for the adjustment of compensation applied to a signal
US7787534B2 (en) * 2006-05-30 2010-08-31 Fujitsu Limited System and method for adjusting offset compensation applied to a signal
US7760798B2 (en) * 2006-05-30 2010-07-20 Fujitsu Limited System and method for adjusting compensation applied to a signal
US7817712B2 (en) * 2006-05-30 2010-10-19 Fujitsu Limited System and method for independently adjusting multiple compensations applied to a signal
US7839955B2 (en) * 2006-05-30 2010-11-23 Fujitsu Limited System and method for the non-linear adjustment of compensation applied to a signal
US7801208B2 (en) * 2006-05-30 2010-09-21 Fujitsu Limited System and method for adjusting compensation applied to a signal using filter patterns
US7764757B2 (en) * 2006-05-30 2010-07-27 Fujitsu Limited System and method for the adjustment of offset compensation applied to a signal
KR100813399B1 (en) * 2006-11-29 2008-03-12 주식회사 케이티 Apparatus for i/q mismatch compensation in zero-if receiver and thereof method
CN101227441B (en) * 2007-01-17 2010-10-27 智原科技股份有限公司 Baseline wander compensation circuit and method thereof
US7622987B1 (en) 2007-01-25 2009-11-24 Pmc-Sierra, Inc. Pattern-based DC offset correction
US8537883B1 (en) * 2007-02-02 2013-09-17 Marvell International Ltd. Detector for low frequency offset distortion
US8201066B1 (en) 2008-03-28 2012-06-12 Western Digital Technologies, Inc. Disk drive comprising a trellis detector having a read signal whitener in the ACS circuit
US8055234B2 (en) * 2008-06-27 2011-11-08 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Methods and apparatus for suppressing strong-signal interference in low-IF receivers
US8855580B2 (en) * 2008-06-27 2014-10-07 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Methods and apparatus for reducing own-transmitter interference in low-IF and zero-IF receivers
US7995973B2 (en) * 2008-12-19 2011-08-09 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Own transmitter interference tolerant transceiver and receiving methods
US8090320B2 (en) * 2008-12-19 2012-01-03 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Strong signal tolerant OFDM receiver and receiving methods
KR100996535B1 (en) 2009-05-11 2010-11-24 성균관대학교산학협력단 Inter-cell interference mitigation method using spatial covariance matrix estimation for multi input and multi output antenna ofdm system, and receiving apparatus using the same
KR102012686B1 (en) 2012-12-13 2019-08-21 삼성전자주식회사 Apparatus and method for detecting bit sequence robustly of a change of dc offset in a ook receiver
JP6150245B2 (en) 2013-03-07 2017-06-21 インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレーションInternational Business Machines Corporation Transmission device, reception device, communication system, circuit device, communication method, and program
CN112737610B (en) * 2020-12-29 2023-07-07 芯翼信息科技(上海)有限公司 DC offset estimation and calibration method and device

Family Cites Families (25)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2538963B2 (en) 1987-12-26 1996-10-02 株式会社東芝 Waveform equalizer
GB2215567B (en) 1988-03-05 1992-11-18 Plessey Co Plc Improvements in or relating to equalisers
US5241702A (en) * 1990-09-06 1993-08-31 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson D.c. offset compensation in a radio receiver
JP3169646B2 (en) 1991-09-25 2001-05-28 日本電気株式会社 Cross polarization interference compensator
JPH05316391A (en) * 1992-05-14 1993-11-26 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Waveform equalizer
GB9211712D0 (en) 1992-06-03 1992-07-15 Fujitsu Microelectronics Ltd Gm digital receive processing
GB2267629B (en) * 1992-06-03 1995-10-25 Fujitsu Ltd Signal error reduction in receiving apparatus
DE4236546C1 (en) 1992-10-29 1994-05-05 Hagenuk Telecom Gmbh Homodyne receiver and direct conversion method
US5319679A (en) * 1992-12-09 1994-06-07 Datum Systems Method and apparatus for recovering data from a radio signal
GB2274759B (en) * 1993-02-02 1996-11-13 Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd Correction of D.C offset in received and demodulated radio signals
US5396517A (en) 1993-03-04 1995-03-07 Adtran Transversal filter useable in echo canceler, decision feedback equalizer applications for minimizing non-linear distortion in signals conveyed over full duplex two-wire communication link
US5648987A (en) 1994-03-24 1997-07-15 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Rapid-update adaptive channel-equalization filtering for digital radio receivers, such as HDTV receivers
US5724653A (en) * 1994-12-20 1998-03-03 Lucent Technologies Inc. Radio receiver with DC offset correction circuit
JP2806825B2 (en) 1995-05-29 1998-09-30 福島日本電気株式会社 Demodulator
FI100017B (en) * 1995-08-29 1997-08-15 Nokia Telecommunications Oy Procedure for estimating the quality of a connection and receiving e
US5572547A (en) 1995-10-04 1996-11-05 Zenith Electronics Corporation System for controlling the operating mode of an adaptive equalizer
US5748681A (en) * 1995-10-27 1998-05-05 Lucent Technologies Inc Offset correction for a homodyne radio
KR0165507B1 (en) * 1996-01-09 1999-03-20 김광호 Equalizing method and equalizer using standard signal
DE19606102C2 (en) 1996-02-19 1998-09-03 Siemens Ag Method for compensating the DC voltage interference component of received signals and receiving device or radio station configured in this way
FI962140A (en) * 1996-05-21 1997-11-22 Nokia Telecommunications Oy Method for estimating impulse response and receiver
FI101919B (en) 1996-11-21 1998-09-15 Nokia Telecommunications Oy Method for calculating impulse response and receiver
US6269131B1 (en) * 1998-05-28 2001-07-31 Glenayre Electronics, Inc. Physical channel estimator
KR100268449B1 (en) * 1998-06-25 2000-10-16 윤종용 System with improved base band-analog circuit
US6504884B1 (en) * 1999-05-12 2003-01-07 Analog Devices, Inc. Method for correcting DC offsets in a receiver
US6370205B1 (en) * 1999-07-02 2002-04-09 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Method and apparatus for performing DC-offset compensation in a radio receiver

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
MY125128A (en) 2006-07-31
WO2001003396A3 (en) 2001-09-07
AU6152600A (en) 2001-01-22
JP2003503961A (en) 2003-01-28
WO2001003396A2 (en) 2001-01-11
ATE279063T1 (en) 2004-10-15
EP1195033A2 (en) 2002-04-10
US6449320B1 (en) 2002-09-10
CN1433619A (en) 2003-07-30
DE60014649D1 (en) 2004-11-11
JP4579472B2 (en) 2010-11-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1195033B1 (en) Equalization with dc-offset compensation
AU657287B2 (en) Apparatus and method for equalizing a corrupted signal in a receiver
KR0144806B1 (en) Method and apparatus of adaptive maximum likelihood sequence estimation using a variable convergence step size
EP1135908B1 (en) Adaptive channel characterization using decoded symbols
KR20090125118A (en) Adaptive equalizer for communication channels
JP2001522197A (en) Composite equalization and detection method for multi-user signals
WO2002032067A1 (en) Method for automatic frequency control
EP2131544B1 (en) Receiver architecture
EP2131543B1 (en) Receiver architecture
US7526022B2 (en) Low complexity equalizer
EP1067709A1 (en) Adaptive equalizer and adaptive equalizing method
KR100626103B1 (en) Receiver for a digital transmission system
EP1080566B1 (en) Apparatus and method for variable delay channel tracking
US6084929A (en) Method and apparatus for channel tracking
KR100984405B1 (en) Method and corresponding arrangement for dc offset compensation using channel estimation
GB2375272A (en) A frequency estimator
EP1099328B1 (en) Channel impulse response estimation using received signal variance
US6853681B1 (en) Using different channel models for different training sequences
US20020115412A1 (en) Method and device for channel estimation, in particular for a cellular mobile telephone
EP1949625B1 (en) Iteractive frequency correction using training sequence and data bits
EP1466455B1 (en) Frequency error estimation
EP1128618A2 (en) Method for tracking a time-variant channel impulse response

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20020128

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20030905

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20041006

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20041006

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20041006

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20041006

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20041006

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20041006

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20041006

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20041006

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 60014649

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20041111

Kind code of ref document: P

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20050106

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20050106

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20050106

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20050108

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20050117

LTIE Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension

Effective date: 20041006

NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Payment date: 20050603

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20050617

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Payment date: 20050621

Year of fee payment: 6

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20050627

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Payment date: 20050629

Year of fee payment: 6

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20050707

EN Fr: translation not filed
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20060627

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20060630

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20050306

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20060627

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20180627

Year of fee payment: 19

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20190627

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190627