Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS1604097 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateOct 19, 1926
Filing dateFeb 16, 1926
Priority dateFeb 16, 1926
Publication numberUS 1604097 A, US 1604097A, US-A-1604097, US1604097 A, US1604097A
InventorsHewlett James Monroe
Original AssigneeStockade Building System Inc
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Wall structure
US 1604097 A
Abstract  available in
Images(1)
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

Oct. 19, 1926.

J. M. HEWLETT WALL STRUCTURE Filed Feb. 1.6. 1926 INVENTOR M55/Wav@ ATTORNEYS Patented Oct. 19, 1926. I,

UNITED STATES i PATENT OFFICE.

JAMES MONROE HEWLETT, 0F LAWRENCE, NEW YORK, ASSIGNOB T0 BTOCKADE BUILDING SYSTEM, INC., A GOBPOBATIONOF NEW YORK.

WALL STRUCTURE.

Application led February 18, 1886. Serial No. 88,52%.-

In my earlier Patent No. 1,450,724 dated April 3, 1923, I described a wall structure in which I use somewhat massive blocks solidly formed of fibrous material and plaster. The blocks are held together by concrete columns that are formed by pouring concrete into openings formed in the blocks. The blocks of the type described in my earlier patent will give some strength to the wall owing to `their solidity. p

I have found that I can build a wall which is actually stronger than the wall shown in my earlier patent if instead of using solidly formed blocks such as those previously described, I use blocks of an open iibrousnature which are full of air holes. When the blocks are made solid (except for the openings in which the concrete is to be poured) the plaster material used as a binder for the excclsior or other fibrous material will tend to withdraw moisture from the newly poured concrete and thereby dry the concrete out so rapidly that it will not set propy erly. On the other hand, if an open li rous block is used, there will be no capillary action to absorb the moisture from the wet columns and the columns will stay moist for a relatively long time, so that the full strength of the concrete is obtained. It is a known fact that concrete continues to ain strength for a period of .at least sixty ays, provided it is kept in proper moist condition. v

In order that the'wall may be built evenly, it is highly essential that the blocks which I use be of a 'uniform definite size and so formed that they will not expand oreontract appreciably with changes in their moisture content. A block made u simply by baling fibrous material will swel appre- `ciably between the bales, if it becomes wet,

and will not serve the purpose. v v

I lind that blocks that are highly efficient for use in constructions of the type referred to can be made from fibrous material of either animal, vegetable or mineral origin by combining such fibrous material in the roper manner with one of the common p aster ingredients. However, in making up the blocks, the procedure is very di'erent from that which would be followed in making up a solid block such as is described in my earlier patent where the semi-liquid plaster solution is loaded with the maximum amount of excelsior which it will carry 4and then poured or tamped into a mold.

In making the block of the present invention, the fibrous material such as excelsior,

baasse orthe like is mixed with the binder (w ich may be a lime plaster or preferably magnesite cement) in such a way that the fibres are lightly coated with the laster, but are not compacted into a solid) mass.

During the mixing the fibres should be so handled that they will be kept iutfed up and not permitted to become matted. The mixing should be continued until the fibres appear to bealmost dry with just enough moisture left in the surface coating so that be had if four or ve of the finished blocks were piled one on top of the. other. After the large block has been set, and ,been taken from its mold, it can be readily sawed or cut into blocks of the desired thickness. A. block made in this way is of definite size, is very light and open, and while it has no appreciable strength to resist crushing strains, it has ample strength for handling and shipping and will not swell appreciably Aif it should become wet by exposure to the elements. Also the coating treatment which has been given to the individual fibres renders them highly lire-resistant. The block will have very little tendency to absorb moisture and wil .have a surface appearance so rough that it will interlock with a plaster coating on its exterior and also will interlock verystrongly with concrete poured in the registering openings.

In the accompan ing drawings, I show a way in which my b ock may be used, though these drawings also include certain'detailed inventions made by others. In the illustration, Fig. 1 is a perspectivevview of a portion fof a wall built according to my invention,

lol

YThis is illustrated in Fig. 4. 'In

view of a portion of wall in the course of construction; Fig. 3 is a section on line 3-r3 of Fig. 2; Fig. 4 is a section detail on line 4-4 of Fig.'3, and Fig. 5 is a perspective view on a reduced scale of one block.

The blocks designated by the letter B as shown in Fig. 5 are preferably made 16 inches long, 4 inches thick and 8 inches wide, or of the size equal tothat of eight ordinary bricks. In the block B are two openings 6 which are spaced in the exact centers of the respective halves of the block. The opening 6 may for example be 4 inches in diameter.

In buildin a wall, the blocks B are laid dry without t e use of plaster or cement, and as is usual, the joints are broken in every course. If the blocks are `laid properly in line, this will cause the opening 6 to form vertical passages extending the height of the wall. These passages are to receive concrete to form the stockade-like Vertical weight supporting columns 7.

In order that the concrete may be properl packed into these openings, the wall should be built up progressively, that is, concrete should be poured after a relatively small number of courses are laid. In Figs. 2, 8 and 4, I show a systemo reinforcin rods particularly adapted for use'in buil 'ng a wall progressively in this manner. The rods designated by the numeral 8 are of -a U-shape with relative] long legs. Here they are illustrated as having legs 4slightly shorter than the combined thickness of four courses; in other words, the legs are about 15 inches long. A similareii'ect could 4be had if the legs were about 11 inches long. At thetip of each leg a small point is bent outward. The member joining the two legs is iiat and of a length slightly less than the diameter of the hole 6. If the blocks B are 16 inches long and the holes 6 are made 4 inches in diameter, the distance between any two adjacent holes 6 will be 4 inches. The reinforcing rods 8 are inserted after the rst four courses are laidand thereafter after each three courses are laid, so that they overlap for one course. At each course Where relnforcing rods are inserted, I prefer to putin one reinforcing rod 8 with the legs extending down into adjacent opening 6.

Since the bar which connects these legs is slightly shorter than the distance between the openings, the legs will be. spread apart towards the center of the column when the member 8 is pushed down into place. At the same time, other members 8 are put in with the legs pointing upward and the tips springing out against the sides of the o enings. uilding the wall, four courses are laid, a set of reinforcing rods 8 is then put in place and con- .crete poured in to the height of about three courses, or somewhat less. Three additional courses are then llaid and` another setof re- Vinforcing rods is put in place, and concrete is once more poured up to ai point slightly less than one course from the top.

Since the blocks B have no strength to resist Acompression strains, it is necessary that the cement columns 7 be connected 'together at the top in order to distribute the load beween these columns. In Fig. 1, I show one manner in which this can be done. This involves the use of a special form of block B which is formed with a groove in its upper face which will serve as a mold for a key-shaped concrete Stringer 10. Y Extending down from this groove are openings of the same diameter as the openings 6 and so positioned that they will register with the opening 6 in the blocks B. These openings are now shown in the drawings but at the right hand side of Fig. 1 the shape of the concrete formed byy filling these openings is illustrated. Tie-rods 8 can be put in place through the circular openings formed in blocks B and longitudinal tie-rods 1l can be laid in the groove formed in the blocks B". I prefer to unite the columns 7 with a Stringer 10, at each story in height to which the wall goes, as this will give a support for the joists l2. A similar Stringer will serve as a lintel over all openings, windows, doors, etc., as well as joiningv adjacentcolumns.

The wall may be finished by applying a coat of stucco or brick veneer or in any manner desired. 'Ihe rough surface of the blocks B and B will make an excellent -base for the application of stucco andno lath is needed. Also since these blocks contain no capillaries there will be no tendency for moisture to work in through the wall from the outside, and the inside wall can be plastered direct to the blocks without the use of furring strips and lath.

Since the blocks will not withdraw any moisture from the concrete structurev for which they `serve as permanent molds, this concrete structure will continue to lgain inv ferent ways an that the blocks may be made of diierent materials without departing from the spirit of my invention.

WhatIclaim is:

1. In a wall made up of blocks and a stockade-like concrete structure formed within the same, a substantially non-absorbent block of loosely assembled iibrous material held together by a .binding agent which extends throughout the block but does not fill the interstices between the fibres.

2, A block of the type used in building systems in which a Wall is formed of blocks and a stockade-like concrete structure is formed within the blocks, which block is substantially non-absorbent and formed of loosely assembled fibrous material held together by a binding agent which does not till the interstices between the fibres but which substantially coats the fibres and renders them lire-resistant.

3. In a Wall structure comprising a plurality of courses of blocks with registering openings through the courses adapted to act as molds for a stockade-like concrete Weight carrying structure, compacted substantially non-absorbent material so assembled that the blocks remain of substantially constant size under varying atmospheric conditions, and are adapted to serve as a substantially damp-proof wall filling between the concrete elements of the finished structure and are adapted to serve as molds for the concrete which will maintain the concrete in a moist condition for a relatively long time after it is poured, so that it may attain its maximum strength.

JAMES MONROE HEWLETr.

blocks formed of loosely.

Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2805567 *Nov 2, 1949Sep 10, 1957Durisol A G Fur LeichtbaustoffHollow block wall construction
US5177924 *Apr 16, 1992Jan 12, 1993Stefan KakukLightweight building component
US5350451 *Aug 10, 1992Sep 27, 1994Patterson Eric WBuilding material made from waste paper and method for producing the same
US5398472 *Feb 19, 1993Mar 21, 1995The Shandel GroupFiber-bale composite structural system and method
US5937588 *Oct 30, 1996Aug 17, 1999Gard; MarvinBale with integral load-bearing structural supports
US5974747 *Sep 29, 1998Nov 2, 1999Chamisa Associates, LlcStraw bale building incorporating a light weight reinforced structure ND method of fabricating same
US6061986 *Sep 3, 1998May 16, 2000Canada; LarryReinforced stucco panel and straw insulator wall assembly
US6951080 *May 10, 2002Oct 4, 2005Oryzatech Inc.Culm blocks
US7073306Mar 12, 2004Jul 11, 2006Harry Edward HagamanMethod of building
US7707784Aug 7, 2008May 4, 2010Oryzatech, Inc.Method for forming a culm block
US8414816Mar 16, 2010Apr 9, 2013Orzatech, Inc.Culm block and method for forming the same
US8448410Sep 19, 2008May 28, 2013Oryzatech, Inc.Building block, building block mold, and method for forming building block
WO1994019551A1 *Feb 17, 1994Sep 1, 1994Shandel GroupFiber-bale composite structural system and method
Classifications
U.S. Classification52/432, 52/DIG.900
International ClassificationE04C1/40
Cooperative ClassificationY10S52/09, E04C1/40
European ClassificationE04C1/40