|Publication number||US1619183 A|
|Publication date||Mar 1, 1927|
|Filing date||May 8, 1925|
|Priority date||May 8, 1925|
|Publication number||US 1619183 A, US 1619183A, US-A-1619183, US1619183 A, US1619183A|
|Inventors||Bradner Donald B, Oglesby Nicholas E|
|Original Assignee||Bradner Donald B, Oglesby Nicholas E|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Referenced by (11), Classifications (8)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
- 1 619 183 March 1 3927' D. B. BRADNER ET AL PROCESS OF PRODUCING SMOKE CLOUDS FROM MOVING AIRCRAFT Filed May 8, 1925 fililmdner INVENTORS- and AgZ ChQZcZJ E. Qglebyby A TTORNE Y.
Patented Mar. 1, 1927.
UNITED STATES 1,619,183 PATENT OFFICE.
DONALD B. BRADNEB AND NICHOLAS E. OGLESBY, 0F EDGEWOOD, MARYLAND.
PROCESS OF PRODUCING SMOKE CLOUDS FROM MOVING AIRCRAFT.
Application filed May 8, 1925. Serial No. 28,981.
velocity and has more specific application to the sprinkling .of smoke-producing liquids from aircraft, such as aeroplanes, dirigibles, etc.
Among the objects of this invention is the provision of a process whereby smokeproducing liquids may be dropped from aircraft, wherein the liquid reacts with one or more of the constituents of the air or atmosphere and generates a smoke screen as it falls. This is an improvement over the present means of generating smoke screens wherein the smoke material is dropped to the ground in containers or else is set out on the ground, and wherein the success of the operation of producing the screen is dependent on the rise of a smoke cloud.
A further object of this invention is the provision of a process which may be employed for laying screens of smoke from aeroplanes to protect the planes from antiaircra'ft attack or to protect land fortifications, troops, or ships from enemy fire.
A still further object of this invention is the provision of a process for producing long and extensive fronts of smoke in an economic, safe and rapid manner.
Other, further and more specific objects of the invention will become readily ap-parent to persons skilled in the art from a consideration of the following description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing.
When a liquid is dropped from an elevation at rest with respect to the air it will fall to the ground in the form of stable drops. If, however, the liquid be dropped from a body moving at high velocity, the liquid will immediately upon release become broken up intoa mist and all of the liquid or a considerable portion thereof will be dispersed in the air and not reach the ground. By ejecting the liquid under pressure from an aeorplane or other moving aircraft so that the liquid leaves the plane at approximately the same velocity as the plane passes through the air but in a substantially opposite direction, the liquid will fall as if poured from an elevation at rest, and travels to the ground in substantially stable drops. The present invention makes use of this method of ejecting smoke-producing liquids from moving aircraft.
"from the tank (1) to the gauge This invention is not limited to any class of smoke-producing liquids and may also be applied to solutions of solids in liquids. The success and effectiveness of the smoke screen islargely dependent on the chemical and physical properties of the liquid'employed. We prefer to cm )loy a smoke-producing liquid such as 'liill, SnOh, oleum and chlorsulphonic acid. We may, however, use other mixtures or solutions, for example a solution of sulphur t-rioxide in chlorsulphonic acid. These smoke-producing materials are not stable in the air but react with one or more constituents of the air to form substantially stable products.
hen these smoke-producing liquids are ejected under pressure from an aeroplane or other moving aircraft so that the liquid leaves the plane at approximately the same velocity as the plane passes through the air but in a substantially opposite direction, the liquid falls in the form of relatively stable drops and reacts with the constituents of the air to form a smoke screen. The effect produced is the generation of a falling smoke curtain, which reaches the ground in the form of a long, high screen. Dependent on the height at which the plane is travelling when the liquid is released, the smoke curtain may be made tohang in the air, or may be made to rest on the ground.
Reference is to be had to the accompanying drawings wherein we have illustrated, more or less diagrammatically, =an apparatus which is suitable for carryingout our invention. Fig. 1 is a side elevation of an aeroplane equipped with the special apparatus for carrying out our invention. Fig. 2 is a detail view illustrating diagrammatically the parts of the apparatus.
The apparatus comprises a tank (1) for holding the liquid to be sprinkled. A pressure cylinder (2) containing compressed carbon dioxide or other suitable gas is connected to the tank (1) by the conduit (3) and the branching conduits l) and (5). The conduit (6) connects with the conduit (5) and terminates at the back of the aeroplane in a nozzle (7). The tank (1) is fastened to the aeroplane b the straps 01' bands (8), and the cylinder 2) and the conduits.
are held in position by any suitable means.
The tank (1) is provided with a pressure gauge (9), and when handling corrosive substances provide a trap (10) in the line (11) (9) The as an air release outlet.
. be sprinkled. In the conduit cated near the conduit (6) 1s a valve (17) gauge side of the trap (10) contains a su1table non-corroding material, such as chlorinated parafiin oils, while the other side of the trap contains mercury. The gauge (9) is positioned convenient to the operator.
Compressed gas is supplied from the cylinder (2) thru the cylinder valve (12), conduit (3), valve (13) and conduit (4) to the tank (1) containing the l1qu1d to be sprm kled. The liquid is forced from the tank (1 by the compressed gas thru the conduit (5;, valve (14), conduit (6) and the nozzle (7) at the rear of the aeroplane.
The conduit (4) is also provided with a valve (15), which serves as an emergency pressure release outlet, and when the tank (1) is being filled this valve (15) serves The conduit (5) is provided with a valve (16 near thetank (1), this valve being used 1n the ord nary filling of the tank (1) with the liquid to I I 3) and lowhieh serves in an emergency for permitting the escape of pressure should a forced landing be necessary.
The tank (1) may be filled wlth the liquid to be sprinkled in any convenient manner. For example, air is allowed to escape by opening the valve (15) and the liquid is forced into the tank (1) through the valve (16), the valve (14) being closed during the operation. When the tank (1) has been filled the valves (15) and (16) are agaln closed. a
In operating this device for sprinkling the liquid, it is advisable 'not to introduce pressure into the system until the lane has left the ground. All the valveselng closed, valve (13) is opened and then valve (12) is opened gradually. Pressure immediately builds up in the system as shown b the gauge (9). Ordinarily, it is desirable to start with an initial pressure of 225 pounds per square inch in order that the pressure he maintained at the .desired point while valve (14) is being opened and until attention can again be given to the pressure control. Valve (14) should be opened gradually in order to prevent a water hammer effect which might result in a broken connection. If decrease in pressure takes place at this point, valve (12) is again opened and manipulated so as to maintain the gauge pressure at about 170 lbs. per sq. in. This pressure will discharge approximately 300 pounds of liquid over a peripd of 20 seconds and of a distance of one half mile. After the tank has been completely discharged a rapid decrease in pressure will be noted.
1 Ordinarily, it is advisable to allow the gas,
for example carbon dioxide,
This invention is applicable to various types of aeroplanes and aircraft, and the .to be sprinkled may to exhaust itself in order to clear all the conduits and lines.
amount of liquid which may be carried varies with the carrying capacity of the particular aircraft.
Although in this specific illustration we employ compressed carbon dioxide as the source of gas pressure, it is to be understood that our invention is not limited in this respect but that other gases which do not have undesirable chemical action on the. liquid be employed, and that mechanical apparatus, for example a pump or air compressor, may be employed in lieu of the compressed carbon dioxide. Also, other smoke-producing liquids than those named herein may be employed without dcparting from the spirit of this invention.
In describing the operation of our device, a gas pressure of 175 lbs. per square in. of the liquid is given. This figure represents a value based uponthe physical and chemical constants of the liquids sprinkled, the average speed of the plane, the size of the nozzle and the resistance of the conduits and fittings. By controlling the pressure of the gas in the tank containing the liquid to be sprinkled, the velocity of ejection may be made approximately equal to the velocity of the plane through the air at any given time.
In the velocity of the wind with reference to the ground is of substantially no importance, the vital consideration being the velocity of the moving aircraft in the air which is the factor resulting in the breaking up of the drops of liquid into smaller particles. By projecting the liquid from the moving ai1'- craft with a velocity substantially equal and opposite to the velocity in the air of the moving aircraft, counter-longitudinal motion between the liquid and the air at the time of release of the liquid is prevented and the result is that the liquid falls as if poured from an elevation at rest, and travels to the ground in substantially stable drops. When the liquid is a smoke-producing material, which reacts with oneor'more constituents of "the air to form substantially stable. visible roducts, the effect produced is that of a fa ling smoke curtain.
In the following claims, wherever refer-' ence is made to the velocity of the moving body, aircraft-or airplane, it is intended to refer to the velocity in the air and not the speed relative to the ground.
The present invention is not limited to the specific details set forth in the foregoing examples which should be construed as illustrative and not by way of limitation, and
which may be eflected therein without departing from the spirit and scope of this invention, it is desired that only such limitations be imposed as are indicated in the appended claims.
practice of our invention, the actual 1n view of the numerous modifications We claim as our invention:
1. In a process of producing a smoke screen, ejecting from a moving body a liquid which reacts with a constituent of the air to produce a smoke, said body moving at a velocity sufiicient to produce a highly dispersive action upon a liquid falling therefrom and said smoke-producing liquid being ejected in a direction substantially opposite to that of the moving body and at a velocity to counteract said dispersive action.
2. In a process of producing a falling curtain of smoke, ejecting from a moving body a liquid which reacts with a constituent of the air to produce a smoke, said bod moving at a velocity sufficient to pro uce a highly dispersive action upon a liquid falling therefrom and said smoke-producing liquid being ejected in a direction substantially opposite to that of the moving body and at a velocity suiiicient to counteract substantially all of said dispersive action.
3. In a process of producing a curtain of smoke, ejecting from a moving body a liquid which reacts with a constituent of the air to produce a smoke, said body moving at a velocity sufiicient to produce a highly dispersive action upon a liquid falling therefrom and said liquid being ejected in the form of a spray, at a velocity substantially equal and in a direction substantially opposite to that of the moving body.
' 4. In a process of producing a smoke screen, ejecting from an aeroplane while flying a liquid which reacts with a. constituent of the air to produce a smoke, said liquid being ejected in a direction substantially opposite to that of the moving aeroplane and the difi'erence in velocity between the aeroplane and the liquid ejected therefrom not exceeding 20 miles per hour.
5. In a process of producing a falling curtain of smoke, ejecting from moving aircraft a liquid which reacts with a constituent of the air to produce a smoke, said aircraft moving at a velocity sutiicient to produce a highly dispersive action upon a liquid falling therefrom and said smoke-producing liquid being ejected in the form of a spray, in a direction substantially opposite to that of the moving aircraft and at a velocity suflicientto counteract the greater portion of said dispersive action.
6. In a process of producing a smoke screen, ejecting from a moving aeroplane a liquid which reacts with a constituent of the air to produce a smoke, said aeroplane moving at a velocity sufficient to produce a highly despersive action upon a liquid falling therefrom, and said smoke-producing liquid being ejected at the rear of and backward to the motion of said aeroplane and at a velocity closely approaching that of the moving aeroplane.
7. In a process of producing a smoke screen, ejecting from a moving body liquid Tic/1 said body moving at a velocity sufficient to produce a highly dispersive action upon a liquid falling therefrom and said TiCl being ejected in a direction substantially opposite to that of the moving body and at a velocity to count ract said dispersive action.
8. In a process of producing a falling curtain of smoke, ejecting from moving aircraft liquid TiCh, said aircraft moving at a velocity sufiicient to produce a highly dispersive action upon a liquid falling therefrom and said TiCl being ejected in the form of a spray, in a direction substantially opposite to that of the moving aircraft and at a velocity sufficient to counteract the greater portion of said dispersive action.
DONALD E. BRADNER. NICHOLAS E. OGLESBY.
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2504580 *||Jun 27, 1946||Apr 18, 1950||Roland Pierson||Aerial spraying apparatus|
|US2862765 *||Jan 3, 1956||Dec 2, 1958||Wing Archie L||Insecticide fog system|
|US3278141 *||Jun 3, 1964||Oct 11, 1966||Robert D Wolcott||Material diffusing apparatus for aircraft|
|US3899144 *||Jul 22, 1974||Aug 12, 1975||Us Navy||Powder contrail generation|
|US4055303 *||Feb 5, 1976||Oct 25, 1977||Golden State Helicopter, Inc.||Agrichemical spraying system|
|US5156333 *||Jun 10, 1991||Oct 20, 1992||The Boc Group Plc||Apparatus for producing fog|
|US6626375 *||Oct 19, 2000||Sep 30, 2003||Cybercore, Inc.||Method and apparatus for aerial spray marking of ground surfaces|
|US7624666 *||Dec 1, 2009||Raytheon Company||Obscuration method for reducing the infrared signature of an object|
|US9227726 *||Nov 29, 2012||Jan 5, 2016||The Boeing Company||Aircraft bird strike prevention|
|US20040069866 *||Sep 26, 2003||Apr 15, 2004||Ireland Sean P.||Method for aerial spray marking of ground surfaces|
|US20140145035 *||Nov 29, 2012||May 29, 2014||The Boeing Company||Aircraft Bird Strike Prevention|
|U.S. Classification||244/136, 516/2, 239/171, 239/2.1|
|International Classification||F41H9/00, F41H9/06|