Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS1636033 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateJul 19, 1927
Filing dateMar 10, 1926
Priority dateMar 10, 1926
Publication numberUS 1636033 A, US 1636033A, US-A-1636033, US1636033 A, US1636033A
InventorsAgnew Francis E
Original AssigneeMinerva A Brotherton
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Centrifugal impact pulverizer
US 1636033 A
Abstract  available in
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

July 19, 1927.

F. E. AGNEW CENTRIFUGAL IMPACT PULVERIZER Filed March 10. 1926 2 Sheets-Sheet 1 7 F. E. AGNEW CENTRIFUGAL IMPACT PULVERIZER V 2 Sheets-Sheet 2 Filed March 10. 1926 Patented July 19, 1927.





Lpplloaflonflled March 10, 1926. Serial No. 98,600.

My invention is an impact grinder or pulverizer operated by centrifugalforce and grindin and pu'lverizing materialbeing treated iy their impact wlth a breaker surface.

An object of my invention is to utilize a centrifugal machine to throw the material to be ground or pulverzed radially outward by centrifugal action at hi h velocities,

1 whereby the impactof the individual particles of the material under treatment causes its shattering and pulverizing or grinds to small sizes.

Another object of my invention is to reduce the air cushion between the impellers and breaker rings so that the velocity of the finer particles will not be retarded and that they will strike the breaker rings with sufficient force to shatter such small particles and therefore grind or pulverize to smaller s zes. I

An object of my invention is to make use of the fact that the momentum and therefore the kinetic energy of a moving body-is proportional to the mass multi lied b. the square of thevelocity. There ore as give the particles being ground a bi h velocity, I materially increase the impact orce which causes thefsh'attering of said "particle's. However as the material becomes finer ound the mass of each individual particle ecomes ,inuch smaller "and therefore the cushion of air through which it is necessary to drive the' particles at high velocity, has a as material effect on reducing such velocity and therefore reducing the impact force to shatter and thus grind the very. small particles.

My centrifugal grinder may thus be made of use in successfully pulverizingsuch materials as magnesite, limestone, spar, silica, kaolin, gypsum, graphite, diatomaceous earth, cement-clinker, mica, coal, coke, etc., and it may also be utilized to replace stamp mills, bal'l or roller mills or the like in pulverizing ores containing gold. silver, copper, lead, zinc, or the like, in which 1t is required to reduce the particlesto sizes passing throu meshes of from say 20. to 350 to the inst The above are mere illustrations of some of the "materials successfully treated by m pulverizer.

For centri ga'l grinding and pulverizing I utilize a vertical type of machine having a vertical shaft centered in' a cylindrical shell with a hopper at the top and a discharge spout at the bottom.- A series of impeller discs are mounted on the shaft, each having impeller blades extending upwardly therefrom and being radially positioned; these impeller blades forcibly throwing the material outward against a breaker ring socured to the shell. There is an annular space between the impeller discs. and the breaker rings sufiicient to allow the broken particles of material to ass downwardly; these materials being guided by secondary hoppers to the central portion of the impeller disc'next below. I may utilize a considerable number of impeller discs su erimposed, but find a stack of three sufliclent for ordinary purposes.

Another feature of my invention is in the mounting for the vertical shaftwith a drive pulley at the lower end and anti-friction elements supporting the shaft and forming a substantially dust proof bearing.

A further object and feature of my invention is positioning the impeller blades at different distances from the breaker rings and forming the internal structure of the grinder so that the curr'ent of air tends to car the small particles into contact with the breaker rings instead of retarding such particles. Y

My invention will be more readily under stood from the following'desci'iption and drawings, in which; v

Figure 1 is a vertical section through my centrifugal impact grinder. v

Fi 2 is a horizontal section of Fig. 1 on 90 the line 2-2, in the direction of the arrows, I indicating the adjustment of the impeller blades.

Fi 3 is an enlarged section ofFig. 2, on the line 33, indicating the manner of adjusting the impeller blades.

Fig. 4 is a perspective detail of one of the wearing elements of the impeller blades.

My centrifugal impact grinder as illustrated herein is to a certain extent similar to that of my centrifugal impact pulverizer filed under Serial No. 74,291 and hence neednot be minutely described in detail. However, it may be stated that a substantial base 1 is suitably supported on a rigid foundation which should not be subject to vibration; this base carrying a sectional shell 2 having a lower flange 3. The shell is shown with a lower section 4, intermediate sections 5 and a top section 6 with a cap 7 11 secured thereto; each of these sections having flanges 8. A journal housing 9 is suitably mounted on a transverse plate 10 extending between the lower end of the lower shell section 2, or formed integral therewith. This housing has a combined thrust and lateral anti-friction ball bearings 11. These bearings support the vertical shaft 12 which is suitably secured to the inner bearing ele-' 19 leading to one of the grooves so formed.

The upper end of the shaft has an antifriction bearing 20 mounted in an upper journal housing 21 which is preferably formed integral with'the cap 7 this prefer ably being made as a casting. A hopper 22 fits inside of the cap and a cover plate 23 extends over the top of the journal, protecting it from the material being ground. A passage 24 is formed between the hopper and the cover plate to allow downward passage of the materials being ground.

The shell and the various sections thereof have a sectional liner 25 formed cylindrical with seconda hoppers 26 preferably cast integral t erewith. Breaker rings 27, preferably of corrugated material of very hard nature, are situated on the inner face of the liners and are in the same horizontal plane as the impeller discs 28.

In the illustration shown, three impeller discs are illustrated super-imposed, each having a sleeve 29 fitting on the central portion 30 of the vertical shaft and being rigidly securedthereto to be-rotated by the shaft.

The impeller blades are constructed sub-1 stantially as follows, being illustrated par ticularly in Figs. 1, 2 and 3.

Blade supports 31 extend upwardly from 1 the upper surface of the impeller discs and are preferably formed integral therewith, the whole being formed as a casting. Im-

eller wearing blades 2 are illustrated as having a slot 33 extendlngtherethrou h, of

sufiicient length to allow the wearing lades 1 to move in and out radially, according to the adjustment required. The outer end of the slot- 34: is illustrated as being vertical and the inner edge 35 bevelled to engage with the wedges. 36 between the said bevelled edge and the vertical edge 37 of the blade supports. The wedges have screw threaded sockets 38 engaging threaded screws '39 which extend through the impeller discs and are adjustable by nuts and lock nuts 40.

It will be understood that the wearing tain fine pulverizin blades form' a fairly tight fit on the lateral sides of the blade supports 31 and merely have adjustments radially thereof, this adjustment being obtained by the wedges 36. As the force exerted when the machine is under operation is centrifugal, the wearing blades are maintained in their proper position and it is not necessary to have wedges on opposite edges of the blade supports; however, such could be utilized if desired. It will be understood that -the wearing blades are subjected to considerable attrition the opening 24, being guided by the upper secondary hopper 26 discharging downwardlythrough the open end 41 'on to the central portion 43 of the upper impeller disc. This disc may have fixed impeller blades or adjustable blades asabove described. However, as the materials at the first disc are rather large size, the adjustable features of the impeller blades are more or-les's unnecessary, but'it is desirableto have removable wearing blades. The centrifugal force throws'the particles outwardly against the upper breaker ring 27 at high velocity and causes the particles to crumble, passing downwardly through the annular space 44 between the impeller discs and the breaker ring. The material then passes through the next secondary hopper therebelow and is operated on by the impeller disc in the next Stage and so on to the lowermost impeller 1sc. In-the illustration given it is presumed that the lowermost disc is the one pulverizi-ng material to the finest size in which the air cushion between the disc and the breaker ring is suchas to have a material effect on rugations as the upper rings and it is necessary to adjust the impeller blades radially to and from the breaker ring in order to obor to substitute different impeller discs with fixed impeller blades thereon. i

It will benoted that the air in my impact centrifugal pulverizer is subjected to centrifugal action in the same manner in which the particles are. However, when the material is coarse the current of air does not have a great effect on the velocity of the particles. In the lowermost or. finest pul'verizing portion of the machine the air is thrown downwardly as indicated by the arrow. 45 at the discharge end of the hopper and thrown outlib) wardly as indicated by the arrow 46 in a radial direction. The moving current of air may be regarded as being struck by the impeller blades just as much as the fine particles are struck thereby, being thrown as indicated by the arrow 47 in a radial direction against the breakerirings.

There may be a more or less dead air space 48 or a swirling annular back air space at the upper junction of the secondary hopper and its liner 25. However, the general tendency of the air is to be thrown with the articles being pulverized against the breaker ring and thence pass downwardly asindicatedby the arrow 49 into the discharge chamber 50, from whence it passes out withthe pulverized material through the spout 51. I

In utilizing my centrifugal grinder and ulverizer it is preferable to aim at grinding the material to a certain degree of coarseness which is measured by passing the material through screens as discharged from the spout. The materiaLwh'ich is of suficient fineness passes through the screens and the portion which is not suficiently fine is retzrined and passed through the machine again. This procedure prevents grinding too fine when it is not desired to have extremely fine grinding. However, this degree of grindin is regulated by positioning the impeller blades at varying distances from the breaker ring, the closer the blades being to the ring the finer the grinding within said elements, as the fine particles under treat ment do not have to be thrown such great distances through a layer of air, which although traveling with the particles acts to a certain extent as a cushion. It is to be understood however, that the impeller blades and impeller discs are always at such a distance from the breaker rings that there is no contact therebetween and particles bein treated are not subject to contact with hot the breaker rings and the impeller discs or impeller blades at the same time.

From the above description it will be seen that for fine grinding it is necessary to reduce the distance through which the very fine particles are thrown. As they are retarded by any relative body of air, they are required to transverse, whereas larger particles are not so influenced by the layer of air and travel faster than the small particles. Therefore in the upper part of my machine, although the im act of the large particles on the breaker rings breaks these not only into verized material, this pulverized material in the action of the succeeding breaker rings and impellers, is not thrown with the same force as the larger particles incorporated therewith against such rings. :5 tends smaller particles but into pulto a uniform ulverizing or grinding. However, in the ater stages-of the pulverizing or grinding it is desired that the product be as uniform as possible and as it is desirable that the particles be of more or less uniform size the adjustment of the distance of the impeller blades in relation to the breaker rings or the substitution of different breaker rings with a different spacing from the breaker rings, has a material effect on the fineness of the grinding or pulverizing.

It is also desirable that the impeller blades and the direction of the air currents be such that in the fine grinding the air travels 'withthe particles being ground or pulverized and therefore functions to'carry these particles instead of retarding them.

It will hence be seen that l have developed not only a machine for fine grinding or pulverizing, but also a method of grinding by utilizingcentrifugal force. The general construction of my machine and its manner of operation may therefore be considerably changed in general structure and specific details to suit different types of grinding and pulverizing required. Such changes will be within the spirit of my invention as set forth in the drawings, description and claims.

Having described my invention, what I claim is:

1. In a centrifugal pulverizer, a stationary cylindrical breaker ring, a vertical shaft centrally positioned therein, a horizontal impeller disc mounted thereon, blades attached to the upper surface of the impeller disc adjacent its periphery, said blades havin vertical block supports with wearing bla es surrounding said supports, wedges between'the ends of the supports and the surrounding wearing blades, and screws extending through the impeller disc and engaging t e wedges to. adjust the position of the wedges and hence the wearing blades radially.

2; In acentrifugal pulverizer, a vertical shell, :1 vertical shaft extending thereimpeller through, a journal housing at the lower end of the shell, a journal in said housing, said oil duct leading to said grooves an flanges,

and means to rotate said shaft.

lin testlmony whereof-ll have signed my me to this specification.


Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2501622 *Sep 7, 1944Mar 21, 1950Smith Franklin SPlural stage miller with rotary impactors and rotary screens
US2592231 *Jan 7, 1949Apr 8, 1952Allstott James OFeed preparation device
US2631504 *Jul 7, 1948Mar 17, 1953ArpinRotary refiner
US2651470 *May 26, 1949Sep 8, 1953Safety Car Heating & LightingMethod for milling wheat
US2700511 *Jun 6, 1952Jan 25, 1955Denovan John JOre fiberizing machine
US2700512 *Jun 6, 1952Jan 25, 1955Denovan John JVertical axis rotary beater mill for treatment of fibrous materials
US2780417 *Apr 1, 1954Feb 5, 1957Harris Holbert LMeans for treating bank gravel
US2906465 *Jun 10, 1957Sep 29, 1959South Western Minerals CorpOre treatment
US2917248 *Mar 20, 1957Dec 15, 1959Kohlenscheidungs GmbhPulverizing system
US2992783 *Feb 3, 1959Jul 18, 1961Simplicity Eng CoCrusher apparatus and methods of crushing aggregates
US3058679 *Apr 4, 1958Oct 16, 1962Adams Engineering CompanyImpact crusher
US3160354 *Feb 5, 1964Dec 8, 1964Leroy Burkett AlbertComminution device
US3189287 *Mar 2, 1964Jun 15, 1965Byberg Jonas JFeed grinder
US3414202 *Mar 14, 1966Dec 3, 1968Walter GreschMixing apparatus
US3456888 *May 20, 1964Jul 22, 1969British Titan ProductsMilling apparatus and process
US3782643 *May 17, 1972Jan 1, 1974Carborundum CoApparatus for conditioning a granular material
US3845905 *Mar 5, 1973Nov 5, 1974Haslberger JMethod and device for preparing gravel
US3987970 *Jun 16, 1975Oct 26, 1976Burkett Albert LCentrifugal mill
US4087052 *Jan 27, 1977May 2, 1978Ilok Power Co., Inc.Vertical impact mill for the reduction of four micron finest powder
US4151794 *May 24, 1978May 1, 1979Burkett Albert LApparatus for treating organic materials
US4699326 *Dec 5, 1985Oct 13, 1987Cedarapids, Inc.Vertical shaft impact crusher with split tub
US4886216 *Mar 8, 1988Dec 12, 1989Goble Ralph WMill for pulverizing rock and other material
US5732894 *Nov 9, 1995Mar 31, 1998Sheahan; Richard T.Micronization apparatus and method
US5947396 *Jan 8, 1998Sep 7, 1999Pierce; Melvin E.Collider
US5988537 *May 21, 1998Nov 23, 1999Forest Products Development Laboratories, Inc. L.L.C.Apparatus and method for controlled impact comminution of wood
US6135370 *Apr 12, 1999Oct 24, 2000C. A. Arnold & Associates, Inc.Apparatus and methods for pulverizing materials into small particles
US6227473Apr 12, 1999May 8, 2001C. A. Arnold & Associates, Inc.Apparatus and methods for pulverizing materials into small particles
US6325306Oct 22, 1998Dec 4, 2001Material Recovery Of North America, Inc.Variable size reduction apparatus and process
US6605146Jul 16, 2002Aug 12, 2003Ameritech Holding CorporationSystems and methods for producing and using fine particle materials
US6726133Aug 31, 2001Apr 27, 2004Pulsewave LlcProcess for micronizing materials
US6991189Mar 5, 2004Jan 31, 2006Pulsewave LlcProcess for micronizing materials
US8399599Aug 14, 2008Mar 19, 2013Erema Engineering Recycling Maschinen Und Anlagen Gesellschaft M.B.H.Method and apparatus for processing of plastic material
US8835594Feb 26, 2013Sep 16, 2014Erema Engineering Recycling Maschinen Und Anlagen Gesellschaft M.B.HMethod and apparatus for processing of plastic material
US8844847 *Apr 27, 2012Sep 30, 2014Advanced Grinding Technologies Pty LtdProcessing apparatus and methods
US8888029 *May 29, 2012Nov 18, 2014Mcd Technology LimitedMilling apparatus
US20040169096 *Mar 5, 2004Sep 2, 2004Hahn William E.Process for micronizing materials
US20080230641 *Mar 18, 2008Sep 25, 2008Dynacorp Engineering Inc.Staged cascade mill
US20100001110 *Jan 7, 2010Imperial Technologies, Inc.Material breaker
US20110017852 *Jan 27, 2011Dynacorp Engineering Inc.Staged cascade mill
US20130081302 *Apr 4, 2013Advanced Grinding Technologies Pty LtdProcessing apparatus and methods
US20130099033 *May 29, 2012Apr 25, 2013MCD Technology Limited.Milling apparatus
DE202011102435U1Jun 28, 2011Aug 25, 2011Hosokawa Alpine AgMahlsteine
EP2286973A3 *Aug 14, 2008Jun 13, 2012EREMA Engineering Recycling Maschinen und Anlagen Gesellschaft m.b.H.Method and device for treating plastic material
WO2009021260A1 *Aug 14, 2008Feb 19, 2009Erema Engineering Recycling Maschinen Und Anlagen Gesellschaft M.B.H.Method and apparatus for the processing of plastic material
U.S. Classification241/188.1, 241/154, 241/191, 241/275
International ClassificationB02C13/00, B02C13/14
Cooperative ClassificationB02C13/14
European ClassificationB02C13/14