Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20010006616 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 08/968,463
Publication dateJul 5, 2001
Filing dateOct 2, 1997
Priority dateMar 11, 1996
Also published asCA2248076A1, CN1213316A, EP0902687A1, US5942209, US6352682, WO1997033628A1
Publication number08968463, 968463, US 2001/0006616 A1, US 2001/006616 A1, US 20010006616 A1, US 20010006616A1, US 2001006616 A1, US 2001006616A1, US-A1-20010006616, US-A1-2001006616, US2001/0006616A1, US2001/006616A1, US20010006616 A1, US20010006616A1, US2001006616 A1, US2001006616A1
InventorsD Leavitt Richard, Luis Z Avila
Original AssigneeD Leavitt Richard, Luis Z Avila
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Polymeric delivery of radionuclides and radiopharmaceuticals
US 20010006616 A1
Abstract
Locally deposited polymer depots are used as a vehicle for the immobilization and local delivery of a radionuclide or radiopharmaceutical. Radionuclides are incorporated in their elemental forms, as inorganic compounds, or are attached to a larger molecule or incorporated into the polymer, by physical or chemical methods. Ancillary structure may be employed to control the rate of release. Standard radionuclides which have been used for local radiotherapy may be used, such as radionuclides of iodine, iridium, radium, cesium, yttrium or other elements.
Images(5)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(14)
We claim:
1. A method for local radiotherapy at a site in a patient, comprising forming a polymeric depot at a site at which therapy is to be administered, wherein the depot comprises one or more radioisotopes in combination with a depot-forming biodegradable biocompatible polymeric material.
2. The method of
claim 1
, in which the depot is a hydrogel.
3. The method of
claim 1
, in which the depot is a solid polymer applied in a first fluent state and converted to a second less fluent state upon application to tissue.
4. The method of
claim 1
wherein the polymer is chemically coupled to the radioisotopes.
5. The method of
claim 1
wherein the polymer is conjugated to the radioisotopes via a chelating agent coupled to the polymer.
6. The method of
claim 1
wherein the depot comprises microspheres comprising radioisotopes.
7. The method of
claim 6
wherein the microspheres are biodegradable at a different rate than the depot.
8. A composition for local radiotherapy, comprising one or more radioisotopes in combination with a depot-forming material, wherein the depot-forming material is a biodegradable, biocompatible polymer and can be formed into a depot in vivo at a selected site.
9. The composition of
claim 8
, in which the depot is a hydrogel.
10. The composition of
claim 8
, in which the depot is a solid polymer applied in a first fluent state and converted to a second less fluent state upon application to tissue.
11. The composition of
claim 8
wherein the polymer is chemically coupled to the radioisotopes.
12. The composition of
claim 8
wherein the polymer is conjugated to the radioisotopes via a chelating agent coupled to the polymer.
13. The composition of
claim 8
wherein the depot comprises microspheres comprising radioisotopes.
14. The composition of
claim 13
wherein the microspheres are biodegradable at a different rate than the depot.
Description
    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • [0001]
    This relates to an improved method of local radiotherapy, and devices and compositions for accomplishing local radiotherapy.
  • [0002]
    Radiation has been used for cancer therapy and to control local healing in areas as diverse as preventing excessive scar formation or reducing lymphoid infiltration and proliferation. More recently, radiation has been used to inhibit restenosis following coronary artery or peripheral artery angioplasty. Interstitial radiation by use of radioactivity incorporated into intravascular stents, delivery of radiation dose by use of catheters containing radioactive sources, and external beam radiotherapy have been used.
  • [0003]
    There are disadvantages to each of these approaches. When radiation is delivered by an extracorporeal beam, the usual problems of limiting the exposure only to those tissues intended to be affected are encountered. Moreover, doses must often be subdivided, requiring more than one visit to the hospital by the patient. If radiation is to be delivered by a catheter or other temporarily-installed medical device, then the rate of delivery of radiation from the device must be high. The active source will normally require careful shielding, even if relatively “soft” radiation, such as beta rays, is used. If administered in the same operation as balloon angioplasty or cardiac bypass, extra complications of an already complex and risky procedure are magnified. Delivery of radiation on a permanently implanted device, or a biodegradable device that necessarily is eroded over a long period of time because it also provides structural support, severely limits the choice of radioisotope because of the need to limit the total delivered dose to the tissue, while simultaneously providing sufficient initial dose to achieve the required effect. Moreover, repetition of the administration, if required, is not readily achieved.
  • [0004]
    The object of this invention is to provide an improved method for localized radiotherapy for the cure or alleviation of medical conditions.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • [0005]
    Locally deposited biodegradable polymer depots are used as a vehicle for the immobilization and local delivery of a radionuclide or radiopharmaceutical. Radionuclides are incorporated in their elemental forms, as inorganic compounds, or are attached to a larger molecule or incorporated into the polymer, by physical or chemical methods. Ancillary structures may be employed to control the rate of release. The depot is preferably made of a biodegradable material which is selected to degrade at a known rate under conditions encountered at the site of application. The depot is preferably fluent, or capable of being made fluent, so that it may be deposited at a site in a conforming manner by minimally invasive means. Examples of such materials are melted polymers which re-solidify at body temperature, and polymerizable materials which are polymerized at the site of deposition. The depot optionally is provided with means for controlling the rate of release of the radioactive compound. These means may include microparticles in which the radioactive compound is incorporated.
  • [0006]
    The use of the polymeric depots provides a way of immobilizing the source of energy from a radioactive source at a remote site within the body, which can be accessible by a less invasive surgical procedure, such as by catheter or laparoscopy. The duration and total dose of radiation can be controlled by a combination of choice of the radionuclide, control of the rate of degradation of the polymer, and control of the rate of release of the radionuclide from the depot. Following polymer degradation and/or release of the radionuclide, excretion from the body in urine and stool can be favored by administering pharmaceutical agents which favor excretion. For example, in the case of iodine radionuclides, excretion can be favored by blocking thyroid uptake of radioactive iodine or iodinated compounds by systemic administration of non-radioactive iodine compounds, such as sodium iodide or Lugol's solution.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • [0007]
    The polymeric depots provide a method of delivery of a radioactive agent to a local site of disease for treatment, such as for prevention of restenosis following angioplasty. The method has advantages over other methods of local radiation delivery in all applications, because the duration and intensity of the exposure can be altered by choosing radionuclides of differing physical half-life, and the biological half-life can be controlled by accelerating or retarding the rate of release of the radionuclide from the polymeric matrix. This provides a way to control local dosage of radiation without the need for physical removal of the implanted radionuclide. Radioactivity can thus be applied at any site in the body that is accessible by a less invasive procedure or catheter, for example, to a coronary artery or a tumor arterial supply. This also allows the application of interstitial, implanted radiotherapy while minimizing the exposure of the operator to radiation that is sometimes necessary when using other currently available methods of providing local radiotherapy.
  • [0008]
    Polymers
  • [0009]
    Polymers for forming the depot must be biodegradable, i.e., must dissolve into small molecules which can be removed by normal metabolic functions and/or excretion, under the conditions found at the site of application of the depot. In one aspect, the polymers may be slowly soluble under body conditions, for example, certain poloxamers, such as Pluronic™ F-68 (a polyethylene glycol-polyethylene oxide block copolymer marketed by BASF), which gel at body temperature and slowly dissolve over several days. In another aspect, the fluidity of the polymers is altered using temperature. For example, polymers can be melted by heating or by cooling (e.g., with Pluronics™), and applied to the site, where the polymer will re-solidify. Depot formation can also be caused by other known means of coacervation, such as complexation of polymers with ions (e.g., alginate with calcium), direct coacervation of polymers (e.g., polyglutamic acid with polylysine), and exsolvation of polymers by diffusional removal of non-water solvent molecules.
  • [0010]
    Degradable linkages in the polymers include esters, orthocarbonates, anhydrides, amides and peptides, acetals, phosphazane linkages, and Schiff base adducts. Examples of groups forming suitable ester linkages include hydroxy acids, such as lactic, glycolic, hydroxybutyric, valerolactic and hydroxycaproic. Examples of anhydride-forming groups include oxalic, malonic, succinic, glutaric, adipic, suberic, azelaic sebacic, maleic, fumaric and aspartic. Examples of carbonate-forming compounds include trimethylene carbonate.
  • [0011]
    In another aspect, the polymers may be crosslinkable in situ. Crosslinking may be by any suitable chemical means. If chemically crosslinked, at least one of the polymer and the linkage formed must be biodegradable. Examples of biodegradable linkages include Schiff bases, anhydrides, disulfides, and acetals. Examples of other linkages, not necessarily biodegradable, include epoxy (oxirane) groups, urethanes, ester, ethers, amides, and sulfones. Linkages involving carbon-carbon double bonds may be formed by a variety of means, including the polymerization of ethylenically-unsaturated groups. These may include (meth)acryl, vinyl, allyl, styryl, cinnamoyl, and alkenyl groups. Such reactions can be initiated by thermal, chemical, radiative or photochemical means. It is known that most chemically crosslinkable groups and molecules will tend to crosslink in the presence of radioactive materials, and are preferably mixed with radioactive materials just before application.
  • [0012]
    In another aspect, the biodegradable polymer is dissolved in a solvent other than water (an “organic” solvent, broadly construed to include any biocompatible non-aqueous solvent) and deposited at the site, and precipitated as the organic solvent diffuses away from the site, forming a depot. The organic solvent must not cause undue damage to the tissue at the site. This will vary, depending on the tissue and on the condition to be treated. In many applications, ethanol, isopropanol, mineral oil, vegetable oil, and liquid silicones may be suitable.
  • [0013]
    The biodegradable polymer, and any solvent or adjuvant included in the composition, must further be sufficiently biocompatible for the purposes of the therapy. A biocompatible material is one which arouses little or no tissue reaction to its implantation, and where any reaction is of limited extent and duration. The extent of irritation which is tolerable, or which will be elicited, depends on the site of application. For example, many polymers are minimally irritating on the skin, or within the digestive tract, while only a few polymers are acceptable in the peritoneum. Many materials of high biocompatibllity (minimally irritating) are non-ionic and, after application, contain few reactive or potentially reactive groups. Preferred examples of such materials are poly(alkylene oxides), such as polyethylene glycols, poloxamers, meroxapols and the like.
  • [0014]
    The depot formed by local deposition of an appropriate biodegradable polymer, normally in combination with the radioactive material at the time of deposition, will be structured to release the radioactive material in a known and predictable manner during biodegradation of the depot. The combined effects of radioactive decay and of controlled release will determine the total energy deposited into the target tissue. Numerous means are known for controlling the release rate of a material from a depot. These include diffusion of the material through a solid polymer; diffusion of the material through pores in a polymer, or in a gel formed from the polymer; burst release of a material on rupture of a compartment; exposure of material to the environment due to erosion of the polymer; slow dissolution of material from a solid form which is maintained in place by the polymer; release of diffusional restrictions on a material by degradation of a solid polymer, a polymeric coating or a gel; release of a material from a degradable linkage to a polymer, or to a carrier material contained in or on a polymer; and de-binding of a reversible association between a material and a polymer, or a carrier material contained in or on a polymer. Combinations of such means may be used to obtain an optimal release profile. For example, a small radiolabelled molecule may be embedded in a degradable microsphere, from which it is slowly released by a combination of diffusion and degradation of the microspheres. The microspheres in turn are restrained at the site of therapy by a polymeric gel formed in situ, which itself provides minimal diffusion barriers and further gradually degrades. Selection of the relative degradation rates of the gel and of the microspheres will influence the total radiation dose administered to the site of therapy. As used herein, microspheres includes microparticles, microcapsules, liposomes, lipid particles, and other formulations of similar size and function.
  • [0015]
    Radioactive materials
  • [0016]
    Any radioactive material may be used. Standard radionuclides which have been used for local radiotherapy may be used, such as radionuclides of iodine, iridium, radium, cesium, yttrium or other elements.
  • [0017]
    Preferred radioisotopes are those which have a particle range in tissue which is concordant with the thickness of the layer of tissue to be treated. Information on particle ranges is readily available. For example, it is known that about 90% of the energy from a 14C (carbon-14) source will be absorbed in about the first 70 microns of tissue, and similar distances will be found for sulfur-35 and phosphorous-33, since their emitted particles are of the same kind as 14C (beta particles) and of similar energies. More energetic beta particles would have a longer range, such as those of phosphorous-32, which has a maximum range of about a centimeter and thus can be used to treat thicker tumors, or blood vessels having multi-millimeter thick medial layers. Very high energy emissions, whether of beta particles or of other forms, are generally less preferred because their emissions may exit from the body, thereby causing shielding problems.
  • [0018]
    The radioisotope must be administered in a pharmaceutically acceptable form The form must be biocompatible, as described above. The form must also be capable of remaining at the site of application for a controlled length of time, in combination with a means for control of local delivery. For example, the radioisotope could be in the form of an element, an inorganic compound, an organic compound, or attached to a larger molecule, such as a polymer. In the last case, incorporation could be into a backbone group; as a side group, preferably covalently bonded; or as a ligand, bound to a suitable binding group on the polymer. A binding group could be a non-biological binding group, such as a chelator for metal ions; or a biological group for binding, such as avidin for biotin. Likewise, the polymer could be biological, such as a protein, a polysaccharide or a nucleic acid; or it could be synthetic, such as a polyalkylene glycol or a poly(meth)acrylate.
  • [0019]
    Immobilization of Ions in a Gel
  • [0020]
    Radioactive ions can be directly immobilized in a gel. In one embodiment, they may be locally converted to a low-solubility salt form, for example by precipitation with an appropriate salt, e.g., as calcium phosphate, or as a ligand on a polymer, or as a cofactor bound to a biological molecule.
  • [0021]
    In a preferred embodiment, radioactive ions are immobilized in a gel by chelation. A chelator can be covalently immobilized in a gel. The covalently linked chelator (‘host’) in turn can immobilize the metallic ion (‘guest’).
  • [0022]
    Polymerizable macromers or small molecules can be synthesized bearing an appropriate chelator connected to the backbone. An example of a suitable molecule would be one which has one end(s) of the central backbone (e.g., a polyalkylene oxide, such as polyethylene glycol (PEG) or polypropylene oxide/polyethylene oxide (PPO/PEO)) bearing a chelator, optionally attached through a spacer group such as a hydroxyacid. The other end(s) of the PEG backbone would carry a polymerizable bond, with or without spacer groups. This requires a backbone having two or more functionalizable ends. The presence of the backbone is optional; a chelating group could be directly coupled to a reactive group, such as an acryl, allyl or vinyl group, which would participate in the formation of a gel.
  • [0023]
    An example of a chelator (‘host’) is the polyazamacrocycle cyclam 1,4,8,11-tetra azacyclo tetradecane which is know to form thermodynamically and kinetically stable complexes with Tc-99m (‘guest’), a metal ion used for medical applications.
  • [0024]
    An example of a guest is technetium-99m, a γ-emitter for clinical applications, which emits only γ-radiation, has a low radiation energy and a short half-life of only 6 hrs. Tc-99m can be used for monitoring physiological changes using scintigraphy, a highly sensitive γ-radiation-based technique used in most hospitals.
  • [0025]
    These chelator-bearing macromonomers can be delivered as solutions and ‘gelled’ in the target site using polymerizable crosslinkers (e.g., PEG with acrylate endgroups linked to the PEG by biodegradable spacers)). The degradation and other physical property of the resulting hydrogel can be tailored to desired specifications.
  • [0026]
    The significance of such a gel is that:
  • [0027]
    1. Such hydrogels can be formed in situ and can bear a γ-emitter or other medically useful isotope for various medical applications.
  • [0028]
    2. Since databases for various chelators are available from literature, it is straightforward to find an appropriate chelator to selectively immobilize a particular metal ion within a hydrogel.
  • [0029]
    3. Other possible applications of the concept include localized delivery or immobilization of medically useful nuclides, localized delivery of physiologically beneficial (and therapeutic) metal ions or other charged species.
  • [0030]
    Medical Applications
  • [0031]
    Applications of this technology include the local treatment of tumors, cancer, and other unwanted growths (e.g., atheromae, papillae); inhibition of scarring or healing to prevent excessive scar formation or keloid formation; preservation of surgically-created conduits, for example inhibition of healing over of the sclera following a filtration procedure for glaucoma; prevention of fibrosis and of capsule formation; and prevention of restenosis following angioplasty.
  • [0032]
    Methods of Application
  • [0033]
    The local depot can be placed at the site to be treated by any of several methods. For external application, a preformed depot can be applied and secured by appropriate adhesives. An external application would also require appropriate means for prevention of migration of the radioactive material. For internal applications, the depot-forming polymer, preferably in combination with the radioactive material and any required excipients, accessory materials, and drug delivery means, is typically administered in a fluent form to the site of application by a delivery device, and caused or allowed to solidify at the site. Delivery devices can include percutaneous means such as catheters, cannulae, and needles; or means applied through natural or surgically created openings or through temporary openings, such as those created by trocars, using syringes, brushes, pads, or brushes. Similar means are used to apply any stimuli required to form the depot from the fluid polymer material. For example, light may be brought to a remote site via an optical fiber, or a device similar to a laparoscope, to cause polymerization in a depot, or a chemical could be applied by means similar to those used for the depot-forming mixture.
  • [0034]
    Dose Control
  • [0035]
    The method provides three ways of controlling the total dose delivered to a site, while simultaneously controlling exposure to other areas of the body. First, the total amount of isotope can be varied. Second, the half-life of the isotope can be selected; this provides an upper limit of the applied dose. Third, the lifetime of the radioisotope in the local delivery depot can be controlled.
  • [0036]
    For example, if the radioisotope is a macromolecule, then the depot could be a gel, and the rate of release of the macromolecule from the gel can be controlled by making the gel sufficiently dense so that the macromolecule is released only as the gel degrades. Such gels are known; for example, the gels described by U.S. Pat. No. 5,410,016 to Hubbell et al. are suitable.
  • [0037]
    If the radioisotope is a small molecule, rather than a macromolecule, its rate of release can be controlled by embedding it in a solid bioerodable material, such as polylactide, polycaprolactone, a polyanhydride, or a polymerized biomaterial, such as protein. Then the small molecule is released by a combination of diffusion through the material, and erosion of the material, each of which is adjustable.
  • [0038]
    Alternatively, the rate of release of a radioisotope may be regulated by selecting the strength of interaction of the molecule with its environment. For example, if both the molecule and the depot are relatively hydrophobic, then the molecule will diffuse out of the depot relatively slowly. If it is not practical to make the depot hydrophobic, then the molecule can be included in more hydrophobic microparticles, such as polymeric microparticles, liposomes, emulsions, etc., which in turn are embedded within a hydrophilic depot.
  • [0039]
    The present invention will be further understood by reference to the following non-limiting examples.
  • EXAMPLE 1
  • [0040]
    Immobilization of a Radionuclide in an Interfacially Deposited Gel
  • [0041]
    A radionuclide (125I or 131I or other radionuclide) is deposited in an interfacial hydrogel following angioplasty, either coronary or peripheral, or intravascular stent placement, or carotid artery stent, or an arterectomy. The incorporated radionuclide is chosen to provide a total of exposure of at least 1500 cGy to the arterial wall. The delivered dose is adjusted by choosing the amount of incorporated radionuclide and is further controlled by choosing a formulation of hydrogel with a different persistence at the site of deposition. The duration of exposure at the site of deposition can be controlled by adjusting the biodegradable moieties of the hydrogel or by changing the density of crosslink of the polymer at the site.
  • EXAMPLE 2
  • [0042]
    Local Radiotherapy from a Polymer Applied Via Catherization
  • [0043]
    Local radiotherapy can be applied to any tumor which is accessible by a vascular catheter. This technique is particularly applicable to either highly vascularized tumors or tumors which have a single dominant arterial vascular supply. This would provide a method for treatment particularly applicable to renal cell carcinoma, hepatoma, sarcomas, cancers of the head and neck, and central nervous system tumors. In this example, radioactive microspheres containing yttrium-90 are incorporated in a hydrogel that is deposited in the artery supplying a tumor. The local tumor volume in the area of deposition is radiated while the microspheres are immobilized at the site of deposition. On degradation of the hydrogel, the microspheres are released and redeposited in the distal microcirculation, where they provide continued radiation treatment. The exposure at the site of an initial deposition can be regulated by controlling the rate of hydrogel degradation, either by adjusting the biodegradable moieties in the hydrogel or the density of crosslinking. The microspheres can be chosen for a longer time of degradation or elimination of greater than 320 hours, when five half-lives of the implanted yttrium-90 have expired and the vast majority of radioactive decay has occurred.
  • [0044]
    Modifications and variations will be obvious to those skilled in the art from the foregoing detailed description and are intended to come with the scope of the following claims.
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US6996433Nov 21, 2003Feb 7, 2006Senorx, Inc.Imageable biopsy site marker
US7651505Jun 17, 2002Jan 26, 2010Senorx, Inc.Plugged tip delivery for marker placement
US7792569Nov 16, 2004Sep 7, 2010Senorx, Inc.Cavity-filling biopsy site markers
US7877133May 23, 2003Jan 25, 2011Senorx, Inc.Marker or filler forming fluid
US7970454Jun 18, 2008Jun 28, 2011Senorx, Inc.Marker delivery device with releasable plug
US7983734May 23, 2003Jul 19, 2011Senorx, Inc.Fibrous marker and intracorporeal delivery thereof
US8157862Dec 10, 2010Apr 17, 2012Senorx, Inc.Tissue marking implant
US8177792Nov 18, 2009May 15, 2012Senorx, Inc.Plugged tip delivery tube for marker placement
US8219182Aug 6, 2010Jul 10, 2012Senorx, Inc.Cavity-filling biopsy site markers
US8224424Jul 13, 2009Jul 17, 2012Senorx, Inc.Tissue site markers for in vivo imaging
US8311610Jan 22, 2009Nov 13, 2012C. R. Bard, Inc.Biopsy tissue marker
US8361082Mar 1, 2011Jan 29, 2013Senorx, Inc.Marker delivery device with releasable plug
US8401622Dec 17, 2007Mar 19, 2013C. R. Bard, Inc.Biopsy marker with in situ-generated imaging properties
US8437834Sep 28, 2011May 7, 2013C. R. Bard, Inc.Breast marker
US8447386Dec 14, 2010May 21, 2013Senorx, Inc.Marker or filler forming fluid
US8486028Sep 30, 2011Jul 16, 2013Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.Tissue marking apparatus having drug-eluting tissue marker
US8498693Apr 8, 2011Jul 30, 2013Senorx, Inc.Intracorporeal marker and marker delivery device
US8579931Sep 29, 2011Nov 12, 2013Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.Apparatus for the percutaneous marking of a lesion
US8626269Jun 8, 2011Jan 7, 2014Senorx, Inc.Fibrous marker and intracorporeal delivery thereof
US8626270Jun 13, 2012Jan 7, 2014Senorx, Inc.Cavity-filling biopsy site markers
US8634899Feb 3, 2006Jan 21, 2014Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.Multi mode imaging marker
US8639315May 16, 2013Jan 28, 2014Senorx, Inc.Marker or filler forming fluid
US8668737Mar 21, 2012Mar 11, 2014Senorx, Inc.Tissue marking implant
US8670818Dec 30, 2008Mar 11, 2014C. R. Bard, Inc.Marker delivery device for tissue marker placement
US8718745May 25, 2010May 6, 2014Senorx, Inc.Tissue site markers for in vivo imaging
US8784433Apr 27, 2012Jul 22, 2014Senorx, Inc.Plugged tip delivery tube for marker placement
US8880154Jul 19, 2013Nov 4, 2014Senorx, Inc.Fibrous marker and intracorporeal delivery thereof
US8965486Dec 6, 2013Feb 24, 2015Senorx, Inc.Cavity filling biopsy site markers
US9039763Jan 28, 2014May 26, 2015Senorx, Inc.Tissue marking implant
US9042965Mar 6, 2013May 26, 2015C. R. Bard, Inc.Biopsy marker with in situ-generated imaging properties
US9044162Jan 25, 2013Jun 2, 2015Senorx, Inc.Marker delivery device with releasable plug
US9149341Nov 21, 2011Oct 6, 2015Senorx, IncDeployment of polysaccharide markers for treating a site within a patient
US9237937Feb 20, 2015Jan 19, 2016Senorx, Inc.Cavity-filling biopsy site markers
US9327061Sep 21, 2009May 3, 2016Senorx, Inc.Porous bioabsorbable implant
US9579077Dec 12, 2007Feb 28, 2017C.R. Bard, Inc.Multiple imaging mode tissue marker
US9579159Nov 5, 2013Feb 28, 2017Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.Apparatus for the percutaneous marking of a lesion
US20040101479 *Oct 10, 2003May 27, 2004Senorx, Inc.Biopsy site marker and process and apparatus for applying it
US20040116806 *Nov 21, 2003Jun 17, 2004Senorx, Inc.Biopsy site marker and process and apparatus for applying it
US20040236211 *May 23, 2003Nov 25, 2004Senorx, Inc.Marker or filler forming fluid
US20040236212 *May 23, 2003Nov 25, 2004Senorx, Inc.Fibrous marker and intracorporeal delivery thereof
US20040236213 *Jan 7, 2004Nov 25, 2004Senorx, Inc.Marker delivery device with releasable plug
US20050119562 *Oct 27, 2004Jun 2, 2005Senorx, Inc.Fibrous marker formed of synthetic polymer strands
US20050143656 *Nov 16, 2004Jun 30, 2005Senorx, Inc.Cavity-filling biopsy site markers
US20060084865 *Oct 25, 2005Apr 20, 2006Burbank Fred HImageable biopsy site marker
US20080039819 *Jul 26, 2007Feb 14, 2008Senorx, Inc.Marker formed of starch or other suitable polysaccharide
US20080058640 *Oct 30, 2007Mar 6, 2008Senoxrx, Inc.Marker formed of starch or other suitable polysaccharide
US20080254298 *May 29, 2008Oct 16, 2008Meadwestvaco CorporationMethod for treating a substrate
US20090030309 *Feb 21, 2008Jan 29, 2009Senorx, Inc.Deployment of polysaccharide markers
US20090131825 *Dec 18, 2008May 21, 2009Senorx, Inc.Imageable biopsy site marker
US20090287078 *Jun 24, 2008Nov 19, 2009Senorx, Inc.Marker or filler forming fluid
USD715442Sep 24, 2013Oct 14, 2014C. R. Bard, Inc.Tissue marker for intracorporeal site identification
USD715942Sep 24, 2013Oct 21, 2014C. R. Bard, Inc.Tissue marker for intracorporeal site identification
USD716450Sep 24, 2013Oct 28, 2014C. R. Bard, Inc.Tissue marker for intracorporeal site identification
USD716451Sep 24, 2013Oct 28, 2014C. R. Bard, Inc.Tissue marker for intracorporeal site identification
WO2017026578A1 *Oct 12, 2015Feb 16, 2017전북대학교 산학협력단Chitosan-chelate hydrogel for cancer treatment and preparing method therefor, and pharmaceutical composition and composition for embolotherapy both containing the same as active ingredient
Classifications
U.S. Classification424/1.25, 424/1.11, 424/1.29, 524/916, 424/1.33, 600/3, 600/1, 600/8, 600/7, 600/4, 252/634, 252/625
International ClassificationA61K51/12, A61K51/00, A61K51/04, A61K31/00, A61K51/06, A61K47/48, A61K9/00, A61P35/00
Cooperative ClassificationA61K51/06, A61K51/0497, A61K51/1213
European ClassificationA61K51/12D, A61K51/06, A61K51/04Z
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
May 20, 2004ASAssignment
Owner name: GENZYME CORPORATION, MASSACHUSETTS
Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:FOCAL, INC.;REEL/FRAME:014653/0416
Effective date: 20040312
Sep 21, 2005REMIMaintenance fee reminder mailed
Mar 6, 2006LAPSLapse for failure to pay maintenance fees
May 2, 2006FPExpired due to failure to pay maintenance fee
Effective date: 20060305