|Publication number||US20010020029 A1|
|Application number||US 09/548,838|
|Publication date||Sep 6, 2001|
|Filing date||Apr 13, 2000|
|Priority date||May 4, 1998|
|Also published as||US6294548|
|Publication number||09548838, 548838, US 2001/0020029 A1, US 2001/020029 A1, US 20010020029 A1, US 20010020029A1, US 2001020029 A1, US 2001020029A1, US-A1-20010020029, US-A1-2001020029, US2001/0020029A1, US2001/020029A1, US20010020029 A1, US20010020029A1, US2001020029 A1, US2001020029A1|
|Original Assignee||Smithkline Beecham P.L.C.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Referenced by (8), Classifications (14), Legal Events (6)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
 This invention relates to improved formulations of endo-N-(9-methyl-9-azabicyclo[3.3.1. ]non-3-yl)-1-methyl-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride. The compound is represented by Structure I:
 The formulations of this invention are useful as anti-emetics, particularly in the treatment of cytotoxic agent induced emesis.
 Endo-N-(9-methyl-9-azabicyclo[3.3.1.]non-3-yl)- 1-methyl-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride is a compound which is disclosed and claimed, along with pharmaceutically acceptable salts, hydrates and solvates thereof, as being useful as an anti-emetic, particularly in the treatment of cytotoxic agent induced emesis, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,886,808, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference. Endo-N-(9-methyl-9-azabicyclo[3.3.1.]non-3-yl)-1-methyl-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride can be prepared by methods such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,886,808. Endo-N-(9-methyl-9-azabicyclo[3.3.1.]non-3-yl)-1-methyl-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride is commercially available under the trade name Kytril and is also known by the generically as granisetron hydrochloride.
 As indicated in the Physicians' Desk ReferenceŽ, 1997 edition, published by Medical Economics Company, Inc. at Montvale, N.J., an injectable dosage form of endo-N-(9-methyl-9-azabicyclo[3.3.1.]non-3-yl)-1-methyl-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride is commercially available in a 1 ml single use vial containing an aqueous solution comprising 1.12 mg of granisetron hydrochloride equivalent to granisetron 1 mg. The recommended dosage for granisetron hydrochloride is 10 mcg/kg infused intravenously over 5 minutes, beginning within 30 minutes before initiation of chemotherapy.
 All publications, including but not limited to patents and patent applications, cited in this specification are herein incorporated by reference as though fully set forth.
 The prior 1 mg/ml single dose vial has proved undesirable in a number of ways. The recommended dose is 10 mcg/kg of body weight. Thus, the 1 ml vial is not ideal for patients weighing greater than 100 kg as a portion of a second vial will have to be utilized and the remaining medication discarded. Further, product wastage will occur when administering to lighter patients who do not require the full 1 ml dose. Numerous advantages would be realized if a suitable multidose vial comprising endo-N-(9-methyl-9-azabicyclo[3.3.1. ]non-3-yl)-1-methyl-1H-indazole-indazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride could be prepared. The advantages of a multidose vial of endo-N-(9-methyl-9-azabicyclo[3.3.1. ]non-3-yl)- 1-methyl-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride include: making weight-based dosing more efficient thereby minimizing wasted product, conserving resources, containing costs, making better use of storage space and more cost effective to produce and transport.
 Numerous difficulties were encountered in preparing multidose aqueous formulations of endo-N-(9-methyl-9-azabicyclo[3.3.1. ]non-3-yl)-1-methyl-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride. Included in the difficulties encountered is the need for and the selection of an antimicrobial preservative. Further, the multidose formulation experienced a shift in pH during the sterilization process. The pH of the solution was stabilized by the addition of a buffer. The previous single dose vial did not contain an antimicrobial preservative or a buffer.
 The difficulties encountered in preparing multidose aqueous formulations of endo-N-(9-methyl-9-azabicyclo [3.3.1. ]non-3-yl)- 1-methyl-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride were over come and suitable multidose formulations prepared based on the Experimental data presented below.
 All of the pharmaceutical excipients utilized herein are known and are commercially available. Before carrying out the Examples of the invention described herein, the test solutions were placed into glass vials and autoclaved for about 15 to 60 minutes at about 121° C. to provide sterile solutions.
 The following examples further illustrate the present invention. The examples are not intended to limit the scope of the invention as defined hereinabove and as claimed below.
 Selection of a Buffer
 Endo-N-(9-methyl-9-azabicyclo [3.3.1] non-3-yl)-1-methyl-1H-indazole-3 -carboxamide hydrochloride is stable in solution over the pH range 2 to 7. In preparing multidose formulations for stability testing it was noted that a pH shift effect occasionally occurred. In order to stabilize the pH, a citrate buffer was added to control the pH of the solution to a target pH of 6 with limits of 5 to 7.
 Selection of Preservatives for Evaluation
 In order to select appropriate preservative systems for evaluation, a list of antimicrobial agents suitable for parenteral use were reviewed. The ideal preservative for the multidose vial formulation would meet the following criteria:
 Stable and active over the pH range 5 to 7
 Non-reactive with components of the container/closure system
 Effective against a wide range of microorganisms
 Stable during steam sterilization
 Acceptability with the FDA
 Widely used in products commercially available in the US
 From a review of the literature, the following preservative systems were selected as possible preservatives for evaluation:
 Meta-cresol (about 0.25%)
 Benzyl alcohol (about 1.0%)
 Methyl paraben (about 0.18%)
 Propyl paraben (about 0.02%)
 Methyl paraben (about 0.18%)+propyl paraben (about 0.02%)
 In selecting these preservatives as potential candidates for the multidose formulations, it was noted that meta-cresol showed good efficacy against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, yeasts and molds over the pH range 5-7. Benzyl alcohol is commercially available and showed moderate efficacy against all four types of organism over the pH range 5 to 7. The parabens showed similar efficacy to benzyl alcohol. The concentrations selected correspond to levels typically used in commercially available parenteral products.
 Stabilility of Preservatives During Autoclaving
 The five preservative systems were assessed for stability to the autoclave process. Placebo solutions were prepared at pH6, filled into 2 ml glass vials and autoclaved for 15 and 60 minutes at 121° C. A cycle time of 60 minutes was selected to mimic the most extreme conditions to which a vial on the outside of a full autoclave load could be subjected to. Solutions were prepared at pH6 since this was the target pH of the multidose dose formulation. The early experiments were performed using 2 ml flint glass vials and West #1816 Teflon faced, bromobutyl rubber stopper.
 The results in Table 1 show the meta-cresol and benzyl alcohol contents as a percentage of their initial values. Both benzyl alcohol and meta-cresol showed good stability with no change in preservative content after 60 minutes, hence they were selected for further evaluation.
 Table 2 shows the results of the parabens systems. External standards of the parabens could not be prepared due to their poor aqueous solubility. The results were therefore determined by are normalization, whereby peak areas are expressed as a percentage of the total peak area of the chromatograph. The results indicate that all three parabens systems are unstable to autoclaving.
 The preservative content of each solution decreased and an unknown peak on the HPLC chromatograph increased. The unknown peak was hypothesized to be the hydrolysis product, 40 hydroxy benzoic acid. Based on these results the parabens were rejected as possible preservatives.
TABLE 1 Stability of Preservative Systems t Autoclave: Meta-Cresol and Benzyl Alcohol Meta-Cresol Benzyl Alcohol (0.25%) (1.0%) Initial content 2.6 mg/mL 10.0 mg/mL Content after 15 mins 100 100 (% of initial) Contents after 60 mins 100 100 (% of initial)
TABLE 2 Stability of Preservative Systems to Autoclave: Parabens Methyl- Methyl Parabens + Parabens Propyl Parabens Propyl Parabens (0.25%) (0.02%) (0.18% + 0.02%) Initial content 99.8% 99.4% (0.6%)* 88.0% + 11.7% (0.2%)* (0.3%)* Content at 15 mins 96.3% 98.4% (1.6%)* 85.7% + 11.5% (3.7%)* (2.9%)* Content at 60 mins 93.5% 97.2% (2.7%)* 83.0% + 11.0% (6.5%)* (6.0%)*
 NOTE: The results are expressed as percentage of total peak area determined by area normalisation.
 Area percent for the unknown peak
 Compatibility of endo-N-(9-methyl-9-azabicyclo[3.3.1. ]non-3-yl)-1-methyl-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride with Preservatives
 The compatibility of endo-N-(9-methyl-9-azabicyclo[3.3.1. ]non-3-yl)-1-methyl-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride with both benzyl alcohol and meta-cresol was investigated. Table 3 shows granisetron content, degradation products and preservative content for each formulation after 1 months' storage. Samples stored at 30° C. and 40° C. were compared to control samples retained at 5° C.
 The benzyl alcohol formulation showed good stability at all storage conditions. No difference was seen in endo-N-(9-methyl-9-azabicyclo[3.3.1. ]non-3-yl)-1-methyl-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride content, degradation products or benzyl alcohol content in comparison to the 5° C. controls.
 The meta-cresol formulation showed no difference in endo-N-(9-methyl-9-azabicyclo[3.3.1.]non-3-yl)- 1-methyl-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride content or meta-cresol content. However, samples at all three conditions contained 0.9% of a major degradation product, exceeding the product specification limit of 0.7%.
 To investigate this phenomenon further, the stability during autoclaving experiment was repeated on samples of the meta-cresol formulation. Results for this experiment are presented in Table 4. The degradation product content increased from 0.05% before autoclaving to 0.53% at 15 minutes then 0.93% at 60 minutes. The results confirm that endo-N-(9-methyl-9-azabicyclo[3.3.1. ]non-3-yl)-1-methyl-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride is incompatible with meta-cresol, which causes degradation of endo-N-(9-methyl-9-azabicyclo[3.3.1. ]non-3-yl)- 1-methyl-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride the autoclave cycle. Meta-cresol was therefore rejected as a possible preservative.
 Benzyl alcohol was selected as the most appropriate preservative system.
TABLE 3 Compatibility of endo-N-(9-methyl-9-azabicyclo[3.3.1.]non-3-yl)-1-methyl-1H- indazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride with Preservatives Storage Perservative degradation degradation degradation Condition Content Granisetron product 1 product 2 product 3 Meta-Cresol 5° C. 2.46 mg/ml 0.98 mg/ml 0.05% 0.24% 0.87% 30° C. 2.45 mg/ml 0.98 mg/ml 0.05% 0.24% 0.87% 40° C. 2.45 mg/ml 0.98 mg/ml 0.06% 0.24% 0.88% Benzyl Alcohol 5° C. 10.1 mg/ml 0.98 mg/ml 0.05% 0.25% 0.11% 30° C. 10.1 mg/ml 0.98 mg/ml 0.05% 0.25% 0.11% 40° C. 9.8 mg/ml 0.96 mg/ml 0.05% 0.24% 0.11%
TABLE 4 Stability of Meta-Cresol Formulation to Autoclaving Autoclave Meta-Cresol degradation degradation degradation Cycle Content Granisetron product 1 product 2 product 3 before 2.46 mg/ml 0.98 mg/ml 0.02% 0.19% 0.05% autoclaving 15 mins 2.40 mg/ml .96 mg/ml 0.05% 0.25% 0.53% 60 mins 2.40 mg/ml 0.96 mg/ml 0.05% 0.28% 0.93%
 Preservative Efficacy Testing
 The target pH of the multidose vial is 6 and limits of 5 to 7. The literature suggests that efficacy of benzyl alcohol decreases with increasing pH above pH5. Efficacy of the preservative was therefore assessed over the lower pH range 4 to 6. Vials prepared at pH4, 5 and 6 were tested for preservative efficacy according to the USP XXII 1990—“Antimicrobial Preservative Effectiveness.”
 For bacteria, the acceptance criteria require that the number of organisms per mL is reduced by a factor of not less than 103 in 14 days and there is no increase thereafter. All three batches met these criteria for P aeruginosa, S. aureus and E. coli.
 For yeasts and molds, the acceptance criterion requires that the number of organisms does not increase throughout the 28 day test period. All three batches met this criterion for C. albicans and A. niger.
 In summary, vials prepared at pH4, 5 and 6 all pass the USP test for preservative efficacy.
 Accelerated Stability Testing
 Accelerated stability testing was performed to assess the compatibility of the final formulation with the commercial packaging components and to provide an indication of the stability of the product. Vials were placed on store in both upright and inverted positions to assess compatibility with the stoppers.
 Results of the stability testing are provided in Table 5. The benzyl alcohol content remained unchanged from initial in both upright and inverted vials at all conditions. No loss of endo-N-(9-methyl-9-azabicyclo[3.3.1. ]non-3-yl)-1-methyl-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride or increase in degradation productions were observed. The results confirm that the formulation is compatible with the packaging components and indicate good product stability.
TABLE 5 Compatibility of Selected Formulation with Packaging Components Benzyl degradation degradation degradation Storage Alcohol Granisetron product 1 product 2 product 3 condition (mg/mL) (mg/mL) (% w/w) (% w/w) (% w/w) Initial 10.1 0.99 0.06 0.23 0.07 5° C. upr 10.0 0.99 0.05 0.21 0.05 5° C. inv 9.9 0.98 0.05 0.21 0.05 30° C. upr 10.0 0.99 0.04 0.21 0.05 30° C. inv 10.1 0.98 0.05 0.21 0.05 40° C. upr 10.0 0.99 0.05 0.21 0.05 40° C. inv 10.0 0.99 0.05 0.21 0.05
 Stability and Preservative Efficacy During Use
 The experiment was conducted using endo-N-(9-methyl-9-azabicyclo[3.3.1. ]non-3-yl)-1-methyl-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride 4.48mg/4mL vials containing 4 x 1.12 mg/1 mL doses of endo-N-(9-methyl-9-azabicyclo[3.3.1. ]non-3-yl)-1-methyl-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride. Antimicrobial preservative efficacy testing on the full vials showed that 1% w/w benzyl alcohol was efficacious at the time of manufacture. However, with each successive removal of a dose, the vial contents are potentially contaminated and the headspace in the vial is increased. In order to determine the duration of stability (or use-by date from opening) the following was employed.
 Three 1 mL aliquots were withdrawn from the vials in immediate succession then the vials containing the residual solution were stored for 35 days. This procedure tested the worst case scenario wherein the vial contents are subjected to the highest potential microbial challenge and exposed to the largest headspace. After 35 days the vials were test indicated no change in benzyl alcohol content or endo-N-(9-methyl-9-azabicyclo[3.3.1. ]non-3-yl)-1-methyl-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride content. The solution was found to be chemically stable throughout the testing period.
 Results of USP Antimicrobial Preservative Efficacy test found that, for bacteria, the number of organisms recovered per mL was reduced by a factor of greater than 103 within 14 days of the challenge and there was no increase thereafter. For molds and yeast there was no increase in the number of organisms throughout the testing period. The partially used vials therefore passed the USP Antimicrobial Preservative Efficacy test. This experiment demonstrated that the solution remained stable and preserved for a period of at least 35 days.
 While the preferred embodiments of the invention are illustrated by the above, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the precise instructions herein disclosed and that the right to all modifications coming within the scope of the following claims is reserved.
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7947724||Jul 21, 2005||May 24, 2011||Helsinn Healthcare S.A.||Liquid pharmaceutical formulations of palonosetron|
|US7947725||Mar 24, 2006||May 24, 2011||Helsinn Healthcare S.A.||Liquid pharmaceutical formulations of palonosetron|
|US7960424||Mar 24, 2006||Jun 14, 2011||Helsinn Healthcare S.A.||Liquid pharmaceutical formulations of palonosetron|
|US8518981||Apr 14, 2011||Aug 27, 2013||Helsinn Healthcare Sa||Liquid pharmaceutical formulations of palonosetron|
|US8598218||May 23, 2013||Dec 3, 2013||Helsinn Healthcare Sa||Liquid pharmaceutical formulations of palonosetron|
|US8598219||May 23, 2013||Dec 3, 2013||Helsinn Healthcare Sa||Liquid pharmaceutical formulations of palonosetron|
|US8729094||May 24, 2013||May 20, 2014||Helsinn Healthcare Sa||Liquid pharmaceutical formulations of palonosetron|
|US9066980||May 24, 2013||Jun 30, 2015||Helsinn Healthcare Sa||Liquid pharmaceutical formulations of palonosetron|
|International Classification||A61K31/46, A61K9/00, A61K47/10, A61K47/12|
|Cooperative Classification||Y10S514/872, A61K47/12, A61K31/46, A61K9/0019, A61K47/10|
|European Classification||A61K47/10, A61K47/12, A61K9/00M5, A61K31/46|
|Feb 2, 2001||AS||Assignment|
|Aug 6, 2002||CC||Certificate of correction|
|Feb 23, 2005||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Apr 6, 2009||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Sep 25, 2009||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|Nov 17, 2009||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 20090925