US 20010035756 A1 Abstract A battery's impedance is measured by a technique that normally uses a current divider network which is connected to the battery. The circuit used according to this technique has a current generator producing a regulated current signal and has one or more sensing impedances which are normally positioned electrically parallel, or in some alternate embodiments in series, with the battery. A DC-blocking capacitor prevents the battery voltage from draining into the one or more sensing impedances. A magnetic field sensor or comparable device measures the magnitude and/or phase of current passing through the sensing impedances. Substitution of a number of calibrated impedances into the circuit in place of the battery permits an initial mathematical computation of the battery's impedance utilizing this technique. Thereafter battery impedances can be computed with the current without using calibrated impendances.
Claims(17) 1. An apparatus for measuring impedance in an electrochemical cell comprising:
a current generator for producing an input current signal I _{i }along a current signal path in a current divider network; said current divider network having at least a sensing current path and a battery current path, said sensing and battery current paths being in parallel to each other, each of said sensing and battery current paths also being in series with said current signal path, said current signal, sensing, and battery paths interconnecting with each other at a current dividing connector and at a current converging connector; said sensing current path having a measurable sensing impedance Z _{s }located along said sensing current path, a connector-wire impedance Z_{1 }between said current dividing connector and said sensing impedance Z_{s}, and a connector-wire impedance Z_{3 }between said sensing impedance Z_{s }and said current converging connector, wherein a portion I_{s }of current signal I_{i }flows through said sensing current path; said battery current path having a battery impedance Z _{b }located along said battery current path, a connector-wire impedance Z_{2 }between said current dividing connector and said battery impedance Z_{b}, and a connector-wire-capacitor impedance Z_{4 }between said battery impedance Z_{b }and said current converging connector, wherein a portion I_{b }of current signal I_{i }flows through said battery path; a DC-blocking capacitor in series with said battery impedance Z _{b }and located along said battery current path to prevent said battery from discharging current through said sensing impedance Z_{s}: said sensing current path also having a magnetic field sensor with a coupling attached thereto for measuring the magnitude and phase of I _{s}, thereby permitting mathematical determination of the value of Z_{b}. 2. The apparatus for measuring impedance in an electrochemical cell of claim 1 _{s }is a magnetoresistive sensor magnetically coupled to the sensing current path. 3. The apparatus for measuring impedance in an electrochemical cell of claim 1 _{s }is a Hall effect sensor magnetically coupled to the sensing current path. 4. The apparatus for measuring impedance in an electrochemical cell of claim 1 _{s }is a magnetic resistive sensor magnetically coupled to the sen sing current path;
said apparatus being further configured to experimentally determine Z
_{b }by measuring the variable I_{s }when at least two different calibrated impedances Z_{cal1 }through Z_{calN }are substituted for Z_{b }into the circuit of said apparatus. 5. The apparatus for measuring impedance in an electrochemical cell of claim 1 _{b }from the measurement of the variable I_{s }when at least two different calibrated impedances Z_{cal1 }through Z_{calN }are substituted into said current divider network of said apparatus. 6. An apparatus for measuring impedance in an electrochemical cell comprising:
a current generator for producing an input current signal I _{i }along a current signal path in a current divider network; said current divider network having a sensing current path and a battery current path, said sensing and battery current paths being in parallel to each other, each of said sensing and battery current paths also being in series with said current signal path, said current signal, sensing, and battery paths interconnecting with each other at a current dividing connector and at a current converging connector; said sensing current path having a measurable sensing impedance Z _{s }located along said sensing current path, a connector-wire impedance Z_{1 }between said current dividing connector and said sensing impedance Z_{s}, and a connector-wire impedance Z_{3 }between said sensing impedance Z_{s }and said current converging connector, wherein a portion I_{s }of current signal I_{i }flows through said sensing current path; said battery current path having a battery impedance Z _{b }located along said battery current path, a connector-wire impedance Z_{2 }between said current dividing connector and said battery impedance Z_{b}, and a connector-wire impedance Z_{4 }between said battery impedance Z_{b }and said current converging connector, wherein a portion I_{b }of current signal I_{i }flows through said battery path; a DC-blocking capacitor in series with said battery impedance Z _{b }and located along said battery current path to prevent said battery from discharging current through said sensing impedance Z_{s}: said sensing current path also having a magnetic field sensor attached with a coupling thereto for measuring the magnitude and phase of I _{s }and for determining the value of Z_{b }using the equationZ _{b} =I′(Z _{s} +Z _{1} +Z _{3})+(Z _{2} +Z _{4})where so that: 7. The apparatus for measuring impedance in an electrochemical cell of claim 6 _{L }located along said battery current path in electrical parallel to said battery impedance Z_{b}, said load impedance Z_{L }also being located between said connector-wire impedance Z_{2 }and said connector-wire impedance Z_{4 }for permitting online measurements of Z_{b}, Z_{L }being much larger than Z_{s }and Z_{b}. 8. The apparatus for measuring impedance in an electrochemical cell of claim 6 _{s }includes a magnetic core having a magnetic core path and an air gap that dissects said core path, said sensing impedance Z_{s }thereby representing a single turn winding on said magnetic core, and a magnetic field sensor being positioned in said air gap, the magnetic flux density to which said magnetic field sensor is exposed is given by the equation where B
_{gap }is the magnetic flux density of the air gap, l_{gap }is the effective gap length, l_{core }is the effective core flux path length, μ_{core }is the core permeability factor, and μ_{o }is the permeability of free space. 9. The apparatus for measuring impedance in an electrochemical cell of claim 6 _{b }by measuring the variable I_{s }when at least two different calibrated impedances Z_{cal1 }and Z_{cal2 }are substituted for Z_{b }using the equationZ _{b} =I 40 (Z _{s} +Z _{1} +Z _{3})+(Z _{2} +Z _{4})wherein
Z _{x} ≡I′Z _{3} +Z _{1} +Z _{3 }and Z_{y} ≡Z _{2} +Z _{4} so that
Z
_{b} =I′Z
_{x+} Z
_{y} resulting in an I
_{s }value of I_{1}, when Z_{call }is substituted for Z_{b }and resulting in an I_{s }value of I _{2 }when Z_{cal2 }is substituted for Z_{b }so that making the value of Z
_{b }solvable by substitution into the equationZ
_{b} =I′Z
_{x} +Z
_{y} 10. The apparatus for measuring impedance in an electrochemical cell of claim 6 _{b }by measuring the variable I_{s }when multiple calibrated impedances Z_{cal1 }through Z_{calN }are substituted for Z_{b }using the equationZ _{b} =I′(Z _{s} +Z _{1} +Z _{3})+(Z _{2+} Z _{4})wherein
Z _{x} Z _{s} +Z _{1} +Z _{3 }and Z _{y} ≡Z _{2+} Z _{4} so that
Z
_{b} =I′Z
_{x} +Z
_{y} resulting in an I
_{s }value of I_{1 }when Z_{cal1 }is substituted for Z_{b }and resulting in an I_{s }value of I_{N }when Z_{calN }is substituted for Z_{b }so thatZ _{cal1=} I _{1} Z _{x} +Z _{y},and so that
Z _{calN=} I _{N} Z _{x} +Z _{y},making the value of Z
_{x }through Z_{N }solvable and thereby making the value of Z_{b }solvable by substitution into the equationZ _{b} =I′Z _{x} +Z _{y}.11. A method for measuring impedance in an electrochemical cell comprising:
producing an input current signal I _{i }with a current generator along a current signal path in a current divider network; establishing a sensing current path and a battery current path along said current divider network so that said sensing current and battery current paths are electrically parallel to each other and so that said parallel sensing current and battery current paths are in series with said current generator; locating a measurable sensing impedance Z _{s }along said sensing current path, locating a connector-wire impedance Z_{1 }between said current signal path and said sensing impedance Z_{s }so that a portion of current signal I_{i }flows from said current signal path through said connector-wire impedance Z_{1 }to said sensing impedance Z_{s}, and locating a connector-wire impedance Z_{3 }between said sensing impedance Z_{s }and said current signal path so that current flows from said sensing impedance Z_{s }through said connector-wire impedance Z_{3 }to said current signal path; locating a battery impedance Z _{b }along said battery current path, locating a connector-wire impedance Z_{2 }between said current signal path and said battery impedance Z_{b }so that a portion of current signal I_{i }flows from said current signal path through said connector-wire impedance Z_{2 }to said battery impedance Z_{b}, and locating a connector-wire impedance Z_{4 }between said battery impedance Z_{b }and said current signal path so that current flows from said battery impedance Z_{b }through said connector-wire impedance Z_{4 }to said current signal path; and locating a DC-blocking capacitor in series with said battery impedance Z _{b }and located along said battery current path to prevent said battery from discharging current through said sensing impedance Z_{s}; instrumentally measuring the magnitude and phase of I _{s }with a magnetic field sensor and determining the value of Z_{b }using the equationZ _{b} =I′(Z _{s} +Z _{1} +Z _{3})+(Z _{2} +Z _{4}) where so that 12. The method for measuring impedance in an electrochemical cell of claim 11 _{s }is a Hall effect sensor magnetically coupled to the sensing current path. 13. The apparatus for measuring impedance in an electrochemical cell of claim 11 _{s }is a magnetoresistive sensor magnetically coupled to the sensing current path. 14. The method for measuring impedance in an electrochemical cell of claim 11 _{b }is experimentally determined by measuring the variable I_{s }when two different calibrated impedances Z_{cal1 }and Z_{cal2 }are substituted for Z_{b }using the equationZ _{b} =I′(Z _{s} +Z _{1} +Z _{3})+(Z _{2} +Z _{4})wherein
Z _{x} ≡I′Z _{3} +Z _{1} +Z _{3 }and Z_{y} ≡Z _{2+} Z _{4} so that
Z _{b} =I′Z _{x} +Z _{y},resulting in an I
_{s }value of I_{1 }when Z_{cal1 }is substituted for Z_{b }and resulting in an I_{s }value of I_{2 }when Z_{cal2 }is substituted for Z_{b }so that and then the value of Z
_{b }is solved for by substituting Z_{x }and Z_{y }into the equationZ _{b} =I′Z _{x} +Z _{y}.15. The method of measuring impedance in an electrochemical cell of claim 11 _{s }is accomplished using a magnetic field sensor having a magnetic core that has a magnetic core path and an air gap that dissects said core path, said sensing impedance Z_{s }thereby representing a single turn winding on said magnetic core, a magnetic field sensor being positioned in said air gap, the magnetic flux density to which said magnetic field sensor is exposed is given by the equation where B
_{gap }is the magnetic flux density of the air gap, l_{gap }is the effective gap length, l_{core }is the effective core flux path length, μ_{core }is the core permeability factor, and μ_{o }is the permeability of free space. 16. The method for measuring impedance in an electrochemical cell of claim 11 establishing a load impedance Z
_{L }located along said battery current path in electrical parallel to said battery impedance Z_{b}, said load impedance Z_{L }also being located between said connector-wire impedance Z_{2 }and said connector-wire impedance Z_{4}; and AC-choking said load impedance Z
_{L }for permitting online measurements of Z_{b}, Z_{L }being much larger than Z_{s }and Z_{b}. 17. An apparatus for measuring impedance in an electrochemical cell comprising:
a voltage generator for producing an input current signal I _{b }that flows along a current signal path through a battery having a battery impedance Z_{b}, said battery being located along said current signal path; said current signal path having a measurable sensing impedance Z _{s }located along said current signal path in series with said battery impedance Z_{b}; a DC-blocking capacitor in series with said battery impedance Z _{b }located along said current signal path in series with said battery impedance Z_{b }and interpositioned along said path between said battery impedance Z_{b }and said sensing impedance Z_{s }to prevent said battery from discharging through said sensing impedance Z_{s}, said sensing impedance Z _{s }having a sensing current I_{s}, a known source voltage V_{i}, and a magnetic field sensor with a coupling attached thereto for measuring the magnitude and phase of the sensing current I_{s }using the relation making said battery impedance Z _{b }determinable by the relation Description [0001] This invention relates to techniques for measuring impedance in electrochemical cells. More particularly, the invention is directed to apparatuses and methods used for taking internal impedance measurements of electrochemical batteries and cells with improved sensitivity and noise/electromagnetic immunity as compared to currently existing methods. [0002] Electrochemical batteries and cells have very low internal impedance. This is true in different types of cells, including those based on either lead acid or nickel cadmium chemistries for which impedances can be on the order of milliohms (mΩ). For this reason, an effective method for measuring impedance must be highly sensitive to small impedance values while being immune to noise and electromagnetic circuit interference. Prior methods of impedance measuring normally utilize one of five different types of electrical circuits: (1) bridge circuits; (2) voltage dividers; (3) 4-wire connections; (4) short circuits; and (5) time constant circuits. However, each of these methods is limited by the inherent characteristics of the particular circuit type used in performing the impedance measurement. [0003] Bridge circuits are commonly used to sense impedance changes in batteries. Such a bridge circuit [0004] under the condition that V (Z [0005] For example, one way of using this circuit is to make one of the impedance elements [0006] An automated system for handling such a procedure is complex and difficult to implement. This circuit is typically used by picking nominal values of the three known impedance elements [0007] Another limitation of bridge circuits relates to the fact that since internal impedance is very low for most cell types, voltage drops across the battery will also be very low. Fixing the values of all but one impedance element [0008] Such a condition would place a high gain requirement on any sensing amplification equipment connected at the output of the bridge circuit. For example, the input impedance of such an amplifier would be the impedance of the bridge circuit [0009] Since bridge circuits do not easily permit impedance sensing without adjustment of the known impedance elements [0010] A second commonly used technique for impedance measuring uses a voltage divider circuit, which is typically preferred over bridge circuits when adjustment of impedance is not required. A voltage divider circuit [0011] Voltage divider circuits used to measure battery impedance are limited by the same disadvantages as bridge circuits. Like bridge circuits, voltage measurements are taken in the millivolt signal level since batteries have very low impedance. Thus, voltage divider circuits, like bridge circuits, are susceptible to electrical field noise and have limited sensitivity. [0012] A third technique utilizes a circuit known as a 4-wire or “Kelvin” connection. This is among the most frequently used techniques for measuring battery impedance and has been described in numerous patents and other references. The general configuration of a 4-wire connection [0013] Most of the problems associated with bridge circuits and voltage dividers also apply to 4-wire connections. In fact, U.S. Pat. No. 5,821,757 to Alvarez et al. specifically addresses the problem of reducing electromagnetic interference (EMI) that adversely affects the 4-wire connection described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,281,920 to Warst with the addition of twisted, shielded-paired wires. Other attempts to reduce system noise have included the incorporation of ground isolation, the selection of driving frequencies away from known sources of electric field noise, and the combined techniques of windowing and averaging. [0014] The fact that there is a need for each of these attempted remedies demonstrates the inherent limitations of this type of circuit. In such a system, larger output signals require a larger input current signal. For example, output signals on the order of tens of millivolts require input signals on the order of tens of amperes. However, sensitivity tends to be inversely related to the impedance of a battery. Since larger cell sizes ultimately lead to progressively smaller internal impedances, then for progressively larger cells, output voltages produced using the 4-wire technique tend to be smaller for the same input current. It follows that this technique is generally inadequate for using in a broad range of cell sizes. [0015] Another technique used to measure battery impedance is the short circuit configuration. This configuration is less common than others described above and has been used in applications where internal impedance magnitudes have been on the order of hundreds to thousands of ohms, such as in lithium iodine batteries used in pacemakers and related devices. A simplified illustration of a short circuit [0016] Although this technique is useful for calculating impedance in small, lithium iodine batteries, other larger battery types, including larger lithium iodine and most lead acid batteries, pose a serious explosion hazard when similarly short circuited. This technique is also limited in that it can only be used to get a bulk number to represent the battery's internal impedance, which eliminates all phase and frequency related information. [0017] One additional technique that is commonly used to measure battery impedance is the time-constant method. As demonstrated in the example circuit in FIG. 5, this method is based on the concept of an RC time response of a battery [0018] This method has been incorporated into lithium iodine cells used in medical devices such as pacemakers. It includes switching a battery into a circuit with a parallel capacitor and then measuring the time response to determine the time constant, τ=RC. [0019] As with other techniques, the battery's internal impedance is assumed to be a resistive element and the resulting measurement is reduced to a bulk number. No information about phase or frequency contributions is measured or determined. The technique is also limited in that there is a necessary tradeoff between capacitor size and processing speed of the detection circuit. A larger capacitor requires a larger amount of energy to be drawn from the battery, while the smaller the capacitors, the less time there is for the detection circuit to determine the time constant, affecting the sensitivity of the circuit. This relative dependence on the capacitor's size ultimately affects the circuit's sensitivity. [0020] Most prior art methods of measuring internal impedance in batteries rely heavily on taking voltage measurements. Due to the very low impedance magnitudes involved, output signals are normally expected in the range of millivolts. This means that in order for most prior art methods to be operable, high gain amplifiers having a combination of low voltage signals and low input impedances to the amplifier must be used, implying a high level of susceptibility to noise and EMI. The related apparatus sensitivities of most prior art methods are also related to the impedance of the measured battery. As battery cells become progressively larger, internal impedance becomes smaller. Voltage measurements in turn become progressively smaller, thereby reducing the sensitivity of the measuring circuit. Although increasing input current can improve the output signal, such a step can be prohibitive since a magnification from amperes to tens of amperes may be required to achieve the desired effect. [0021] Frequent measurements at high current levels not only impose a higher power requirement on the circuit, but also subject the battery to higher levels of energy. Such conditions can potentially contribute to heating and eventual disruptions in normal cell reactions. As confirmed by the number of past efforts to improve existing impedance measurement techniques, a new technique for measuring impedance is needed that is less sensitive to noise and EMI effects. Such a technique should also be less dependent on direct voltage measurements that are taken across the subject battery, while remaining usable for a variety of battery sizes and configurations. [0022] In accordance with this invention, battery impedance Z [0023] Once the value of I [0024] where
[0025] so that:
[0026] where the values of Z [0027] so that
[0028] resulting in an I [0029] and so that [0030] with the final step in this example being the simple determination of the value of Z [0031] While the illustrative embodiment of this invention utilizes two calibrated impedances Z [0032] Thus, the invention does not reside in any one of the features of the impedance measuring apparatus and method which is disclosed above and in the Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments and claimed below. Rather, this invention is distinguished from the prior art by its particular combination of features disclosed. Important features of this invention have been disclosed in the Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments of this invention which are shown and described below, to illustrate the best mode contemplated to date of carrying out this invention. [0033] Those skilled in the art will realize that this invention is capable of embodiments which are different from those shown, and the details of the structure of the impedance measuring apparatuses and the details of the disclosed impedance measuring methods can be changed in various manners without departing from the scope of this invention. Accordingly, the drawings and description are to be regarded as illustrative in nature and are not to restrict the scope of this invention. Thus, the claims are to be regarded as including such equivalent apparatuses and methods as do not depart from the spirit and scope of this invention. [0034] For a more complete understanding and appreciation of this invention and many of its advantages, reference will be made to the following, detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein: [0035]FIG. 1 depicts a typical bridge circuit configuration of the type commonly used in one impedance measuring technique of the prior art; [0036]FIG. 2 depicts a typical voltage divider configuration of the type commonly used in an additional impedance measuring technique of the prior art; [0037]FIG. 3 represents a basic 4-wire configuration of the type used in the prior art; [0038]FIG. 4 depicts a typical a short circuit configuration used in the prior art; [0039]FIG. 5 is a prior art time constant configuration circuit; [0040]FIG. 6 is a general form of a proposed circuit which is according to the principles of this invention; [0041]FIG. 7 is a general form of a proposed circuit with connector, wire, and capacitor impedance values denoted before and after both the sensing impedance and the battery impedances; [0042]FIG. 8 represents a magnetic interface for sensing current I [0043]FIG. 9 is an alternative series embodiment of a proposed circuit according to the principles of this invention; [0044]FIG. 10 is an electrical schematic of a prototype circuit implementing the invention concept; and [0045]FIG. 11 is a graphical representation of impedance of a nickel cadmium battery during discharge. [0046] Referring to the drawings, identical reference numbers and letters designate the same or corresponding parts throughout the several figures shown in the drawings. [0047] The proposed technique for making impedance measurements deals directly with the limitations of prior art measuring techniques. As noted in the Background above, most previous impedance measurement techniques rely on voltage measurements made across the battery and/or sensing impedance. These measurements are in the order of millivolts, driven at amps of current through milliohms of impedance. Thus, it is very difficult to measure such current levels by merely measuring the voltage across a sensing impedance Z [0048]FIG. 6 depicts a general form of a circuit which may be used to calculate a battery's impedance according to the proposed technique. The circuit has the general construction of a current divider network. C represents the capacitance of a DC-blocking capacitor [0049] where C is the capacitor's capacitance value and f [0050] Z [0051] To determine the battery impedance, Z
[0052] and
[0053] Neither the battery voltage V
[0054] then
[0055] When battery sizes become very large, cell internal impedance becomes very small, so that impedance contributions from connectors and wires cannot be ignored. Thus, the circuit must be remodeled to include these additional impedance elements. Each of these particular elements is included in FIG. 7, with the load being omitted. In this particular embodiment of the circuit, the impedance resulting from capacitance C of DC-blocking capacitor
[0056] which can be written as [0057] The definitions [0058] allow for the relation
[0059] Further, the definition
[0060] allows for the relation [0061] For this equation, I′ is known and measured. However, Z [0062] As an example of this technique, the values of Z
[0063] Solving for Z [0064] Once Z
[0065] can be used to later determine Z [0066] It will be appreciated that, while the impedance determination of this example is made using two impedance values, it is also possible to use more than two calibration values, and this possibility is fully contemplated to be within the scope of the invention. For example, given the relation [0067] in which Z
[0068] which, depending on the range of the calibration impedances, can be solved linearly, piecewise-linearly, or nonlinearly for Z [0069] It should be noted that, unlike the prior art techniques discussed above, the voltage drops across Z [0070] Detection of I [0071] Z [0072] This equation assumes the cross sectional area of the air gap is the same as the core. B [0073] The choice of magnetic field sensor [0074] Advantages of the invention over previous impedance measuring techniques include greater sensitivity and greater immunity to noise and EMI. In the proposed circuit, sensitivity is controlled mainly by the selection of the sensing impedance and the gap size of the core [0075] For prior art methods of measuring battery impedance, such as the 4-wire circuit, the voltage drop across the battery will become progressively smaller as cell sizes increase. This results in the circuit becoming increasingly less sensitive as the magnitude of each measurement falls. It follows that the change in sensitivity is dependent on the internal impedance of the battery being monitored. Since the technique proposed by this invention measures only current with proper selection of a sensing impedance, sensitivity becomes independent of the measured internal impedance. Thus, given the proper selection of the sensing impedance, circuit sensitivity using the technique of this invention will be approximately the same in both large and small capacity cells. In addition, the overall measurement sensitivity of the disclosed technique is superior to that of previous measurement techniques. When, by way of example, an AMR sensor is used in conjunction with the technique of this invention, sensitivity has been shown experimentally to improve 26 times over the level of a prior art 4-wire circuit. Reducing the core air gap size may further increase sensitivity of this technique. [0076] A further advantage of the invention relates to inherent noise and EMI limitations of previous techniques, such as the 4-wire circuit. In such previous techniques, sensing amplifiers are required to amplify signals in the range of millivolts from a low impedance source, the battery, or sensing impedance. Such amplification typically requires the use of transistor amplifiers, such devices being highly susceptible to electric field noise sources when the input source impedance is low. [0077] In the proposed circuit configuration, sufficiently high current, typically in the range of milliamps or greater, is sensed by the magnetic interface [0078] It will be further appreciated that alternate forms of the disclosed circuit may be implemented with the proposed technique and are contemplated to be within the scope of this invention. One such alternate form of the proposed circuit is depicted in FIG. 9 and can be a voltage driven circuit having a voltage source
[0079] and by noting that the sensing current I [0080] It would then follow that [0081] and
[0082] Thus, implementation of this circuit embodiment requires knowledge of the source voltage V [0083]FIG. 10 is a schematic illustration of an example prototype circuit [0084] The circuit section [0085] The circuit section of the bottom dashed box [0086]FIG. 11 is a sample plot of the impedance measured for a D-size, 4.3-Ahr nickel cadmium cell during discharge. Each point in the plot represents the cell impedance Z [0087] Those skilled in the art will recognize that the various features of this invention described above can be used in various combinations with other elements without departing from the scope of the invention. Thus, the appended claims are intended to be interpreted to cover such equivalent impedance measuring techniques that do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention. Referenced by
Classifications
Legal Events
Rotate |