Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20010036497 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 09/800,974
Publication dateNov 1, 2001
Filing dateMar 8, 2001
Priority dateSep 8, 1999
Also published asCA2317799A1, US6399131
Publication number09800974, 800974, US 2001/0036497 A1, US 2001/036497 A1, US 20010036497 A1, US 20010036497A1, US 2001036497 A1, US 2001036497A1, US-A1-20010036497, US-A1-2001036497, US2001/0036497A1, US2001/036497A1, US20010036497 A1, US20010036497A1, US2001036497 A1, US2001036497A1
InventorsBary Zeller, Joanne Langdon, Gregory Wiseman, Evan Turek
Original AssigneeZeller Bary Lyn, Langdon Joanne Marie, Wiseman Gregory Aaron, Turek Evan Joel
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Soluble coffee having intensified flavor and color and method of making same from a coffee extract
US 20010036497 A1
Abstract
A method of intensifying the flavor of coffee extract is disclosed in which coffee extract is heated at a temperature and for a time sufficient to intensify the flavor of the coffee. The heated coffee extract is cooled and preferably dried to produce a soluble coffee product having intensified flavor. The flavor intensity of soluble coffee can be increased without deleteriously altering coffee flavor.
Images(7)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(20)
What is claimed is:
1. A method of intensifying the flavor and color of coffee extract comprising:
selecting a temperature and time for optimizing flavor and color of a soluble coffee extract;
heating said soluble coffee extract at said temperature and said time without increasing coffee solids content of said extract to intensify the flavor and color of the coffee extract without producing sedimentation; and
cooling the heated coffee extract.
2. The method of
claim 1
wherein the coffee extract contains 5 to 70% coffee solids.
3. The method of
claim 2
wherein the extract contains 30 to 60% coffee solids.
4. The method of
claim 1
wherein the temperature is from 110° C. to 170° C. and the time is from about 15 seconds to about 30 minutes.
5. The method of
claim 4
wherein the temperature is from 130° C. to 160° C. and the time is from 2 to 6 minutes.
6. The method of
claim 5
wherein the time is from 3 to 5 minutes.
7. The method according to
claim 1
wherein said heating is effected while passing said coffee extract through a plug flow reactor.
8. The method of
claim 1
additionally comprising drying the cooled, flavor intensified coffee extract.
9. The method of
claim 8
wherein the drying is spray-drying.
10. A method according to
claim 1
wherein the flavor of the coffee extract is intensified by at least 5%.
11. A method according to
claim 10
wherein the flavor of the coffee extract is intensified at least 10%.
12. A method according to
claim 10
wherein the flavor of the coffee extract is intensified at least 15%.
13. A method of intensifying the flavor and color of coffee extract comprising:
selecting a temperature and time for optimizing flavor and color of a soluble coffee extract;
heating said soluble coffee extract which is substantially free of ground coffee at said temperature and said time to intensify the flavor and color of the coffee extract without producing sedimentation; and
cooling the heated coffee extract.
14. The method of
claim 13
wherein the coffee extract contains 5 to 70% coffee solids.
15. The method of
claim 13
wherein the temperature is from 110° C. to 170° C. and the time is from about 15 seconds to about 30 minutes.
16. The method of
claim 15
wherein the temperature is from 130° C. to 160° C. and the time is from 2 to 6 minutes.
17. The method according to
claim 13
wherein said heating is effected while passing said coffee extract through a plug flow reactor.
18. The method of
claim 13
additionally comprising drying the cooled, flavor intensified coffee extract.
19. A method according to
claim 18
wherein the flavor of the coffee extract is intensified by at least 5%.
20. A method according to
claim 19
wherein the flavor of the coffee extract is intensified at least 15%.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

[0001] The present invention relates to a soluble coffee product having intensified flavor and color and to methods of heat treating a coffee extract to intensify the flavor and color for use in soluble coffee products without deleteriously altering the flavor of the coffee.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0002] Soluble coffee products, often referred to as “instant coffee”, are prepared from aqueous extracts of roasted and ground coffee. The products are generally in the form of spray-dried or freeze-dried particulate solids.

[0003] The process of making soluble coffee causes loss of coffee aroma and flavor relative to the roasted and ground coffee from which the soluble coffee was prepared. Various methods have been developed to increase the aroma and yield of soluble coffee. For example, coffee aroma recovered during coffee grinding is often added to soluble coffee products. It is also known that the yield of conventional soluble coffee (e.g., spray-dried powder having a moisture content of about 2-3% by weight) can be increased by heating instant coffee at a temperature sufficiently high to melt the coffee and to cause pyrolysis of carbohydrates resulting in generation of carbon dioxide. This method is described in International Patent Application No. PCT/US93/10405 published May 26, 1994 as No. WO 94/10852 (hereinafter WO '852). Generation of carbon dioxide in the melt causes the melt to foam. The foam is then solidified by cooling and comminuted to form a foamed particulate soluble coffee product.

[0004] The heating process causes significant weight loss, on the order of about 7-10% by weight in addition to loss of water. It is reported in WO '852 that the weight of the foamed product needed to prepare a serving of coffee beverage is reduced by 30-50% relative to the amount of conventional soluble coffee products, such as spray dried coffee powder, required to prepare a serving of the same size. However, quality of the beverage is not reported.

[0005] The method of WO-852 potentially has several drawbacks. It involves a significant number of new unit operations which must be added to an instant coffee manufacturing process. These would include coffee powder handling, coffee powder heating such as by extrusion, coffee melt handling, melt cooling, solidified melt grinding and coffee powder sizing. Potentially, heating of dried coffee extract powder could produce flavor consistency problems especially if the coffee melt in the extruder is not completely and continuously wiped from the walls and screws producing burning of some of the coffee.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[0006] The invention is directed to a method of providing a soluble coffee having intensified flavor and color in which a coffee extract is heated at a temperature and for a time selected to optimize the flavor and color of the coffee extract. The extract is then cooled and may be dried to form a soluble coffee powder which may be sold as is as an instant coffee, combined with traditional soluble coffee, incorporated into a liquid coffee product or combined with sugar, creamer, flavors, etc. to form a soluble coffee product. Alternatively, the intensified extract may be directly incorporated into a ready to drink or concentrated liquid coffee product without undergoing a drying step.

[0007] The present invention may easily be incorporated into a standard instant coffee manufacturing process. Coffee extract which has exited the percolators is collected and/or first concentrated or evaporated and then preferably treated in a single piece of equipment, typically a plug flow reactor, which will heat the extract under pressure to effect flavor and color intensification and subsequently cool the intensified extract.

DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

[0008] The coffee extract utilized as the starting material in the present invention is substantially free of roast and ground coffee particles and may be derived from any bean type such as Robusta or Arabica, decaffeinated or caffeine-containing and should contain within the range of 5-70% soluble coffee solids, preferably 30-60%. The extract may be prepared by conventional percolation methods. Such conventional methods are, for example, described in U.S. Pat. No. 2,915,403 which is herein incorporated by reference. Typically, a countercurrent extraction method is utilized wherein water is passed through a packed bed of unextracted roast and ground coffee at a temperature of from about 80° C. to 120° C. in a percolation train of two to six percolators. The extract is recovered from the least spent percolation column and any roast and ground coffee fines are removed by centrifugation. The separation produces a coffee extract which is substantially free of roast and ground coffee particles. The extract yield is typically over 50%.

[0009] In general, heating the coffee extract to a temperature below about 100° C. is insufficient to significantly intensify coffee flavor and color, while heating the coffee extract to a temperature above about 170° C. will cause sedimentation in the coffee extract, which results in a loss of color yield and flavor quality. The time sufficient to significantly increase flavor and/or color intensity is dependent on the coffee extract temperature, with longer time being required at lower temperature and less time required at high temperature. The temperatures necessary to intensify the flavor and color of the coffee extract will typically range from 110° C. to 170° C. for a treatment time ranging from about 15 seconds to about 30 minutes. In order to achieve the required temperature, the coffee extract must be heated under elevated pressure of 6 to 100 psig. The extract is heated without increasing the coffee solids content of the extract. Preferably, the coffee solids content remains constant.

[0010] The extent of flavor intensity increase is calculated by dividing the additional amount of coffee which would be required to prepare a coffee beverage of a desired flavor intensity using the same instant coffee that was employed to make the heat treated product by the amount of coffee required to prepare a coffee beverage of the same flavor intensity and color using the instant coffee after heat treatment in accordance with the present invention. For example, if dissolving 1.955 grams of untreated instant coffee has the same flavor and color intensity as 1.700 grams of treated coffee, the extent of flavor intensity has been increased by (1.955−1.700)/1.700=15%. The extent of flavor intensity is preferably increased by at least 5% and more preferably by at least 10% and most preferably 15%.

[0011] In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention, concentrated coffee extract, i.e., at about 30-60% coffee solids, is heated at a temperature and for a time sufficient to intensify the flavor of the coffee extract. The use of a more concentrated extract as the starting material has economic benefit. The extract is then dried, typically by spray-drying or freeze-drying to form a soluble coffee. Particle size may be adjusted by conventional agglomeration techniques. Particle size is preferably the same as that of conventional soluble coffee, generally not more than 5000 μm. Average particle size is preferably within the range of 250-3000 μm.

[0012] In general, heating the coffee extract should not exceed a temperature of 170° C. as this tends to result in the formation of sediment. If undesirable sedimentation occurs, the extract and resultant soluble coffee loses both flavor and color and results in negative consumer preference. Heating of the coffee extract may be effected in any manner which allows the extract to be heated up to a temperature of less than 170° C., typically from 110° C. to 170° C. It is preferred to carry out the heating step continuously and not exceed 160° C. In a preferred method, the coffee extract is heated using a plug flow reactor. A plug flow reactor is preferred over a batch reactor as the plug flow reactor allows the coffee extract to be heated and cooled fairly rapidly. The time needed to achieve the desired flavor and color intensity varies with temperature such that residence time in the reactor decreases with increasing temperature.

[0013] The intensification of flavor and color is preferably achieved at reaction temperatures of 130-160° C. for a residence time of 2 to 6 minutes, preferably 3-5 minutes. Moreover, intensification occurs without an increase in soluble solids in the extract, and preferably while maintaining a constant content of soluble solids in the coffee extract. (All temperatures herein refer to the temperature of the coffee extract and residence time refers to the time in the reactor at the maximum desired temperature.) In a plug flow reactor, target processing temperature to achieve intensification is generally reached within 5 minutes, assuming the coffee extract enters the plug flow reactor at a temperature of about 5 to 10° C. In the experiments conducted, described in Example 1, the highest level of intensification without deleterious impact on product quality was achieved by heating the coffee extract at 155° C. for 5.4 minutes which achieved a flavor intensity increase of greater than 20%.

[0014] After heating, the coffee extract is cooled to a suitable temperature for drying, typically about 60° to 80° C. The extract is then dried by any conventional means to produce soluble coffee.

[0015] The resultant soluble coffee is useful by itself as an instant coffee and may also be used in combination with other ingredients, in the same manner as conventional instant coffee, in formulating other soluble coffee-containing food products. It is preferred to use the soluble coffee to prepare dry mix, sweetened, instant coffee products which contain instant coffee, particulate sweetener, and optional ingredients such as flavors, whiteners, and the like.

[0016] The amount of soluble coffee, prepared in accordance with the method of the invention, in such sweetened compositions is generally about 2-30% by weight and preferably about 5-20% by weight, based on the weight of the composition.

[0017] Suitable sweeteners for the sweetened products include natural and artificial sweeteners. Suitable natural sweeteners include sugars such as sucrose, dextrose, maltose, fructose, lactose, and the like, or a combination thereof in an amount of about 20-80% by weight, preferably about 35-65% by weight, based on the weight of the sweetened coffee product.

[0018] Artificial sweeteners, such as saccharin, aspartame, acesulfame-K and the like, or mixtures thereof are used in an amount equivalent to 20-80% by weight sucrose. Artificial sweeteners are normally combined with a bulking agent such as maltodextrin, employed in an amount such that the volume of the combined bulking agent and artificial sweetener is approximately the same as the volume of sucrose which provides the same sweetness.

[0019] The sweetened product preferably contains a whitener component. Suitable particulate dry mix whiteners include both non-dairy and dairy creamers. The whitener component of the sweetened composition is suitably about 20 to 60% by weight, and preferably about 25 to 50% by weight, based on the weight of the sweetened product.

[0020] The sweetened coffee product may be of the instant cappuccino type which foams when reconstituted in hot water. Foaming can be caused by employing a low density (i.e., gas-injected) particulate whitener or by including a chemical carbonation system, or both. Chemical carbonation may be effected by employing a food grade acid such as citric acid or gluconodeltalactone with a carbonate such as potassium or sodium bicarbonate.

[0021] A wide variety of flavors, such as vanilla, hazelnut, mocha, and the like, may be employed in the sweetened coffee product. Various other ingredients may be employed such as foam stabilizing agents, coloring agents, thickeners, etc.

EXAMPLE 1

[0022] Experiments were conducted using concentrated aqueous decaffeinated coffee extract at a concentration of about 55% and a temperature of 5 to 10° C. The extract was substantially free of roast and ground coffee particles and prepared using a conventional percolation method as described above. A plug flow reactor comprised of four shell sections in the following configuration:

Shell # Action
1 Preheating
2 Heating
3 Holding
4 Cooling or Holding

[0023] was used for heating and cooling of the samples. Each shell section had a product volume of 14.6 liters. Target temperature was achieved within 2-6 minutes for all experimental conditions. Two different methods of cooling the product were utilized. The product was either cooled in the 4th shell using cooling water on the jacket or the product was flashed to atmospheric pressure to cool to approximately 100° C. The goal of flash cooling the product was to achieve additional residence time at elevated temperature. Since the back pressure valve was situated between the 3rd and 4th shell of the reactor, the temperature of the product in the 4th shell was limited to 100° C. when flash cooling was utilized. Experiments were conducted at 130, 145, 150, 155, 160, and 180° C.

[0024] Samples from each experiment were placed in a sealed plastic pail and held up to 3 hours before spray-drying. The concentrations of the extracts after treatment were still 55% or lower. The samples were not mixed to suspend the solids which settled out prior to spray-drying. The amount of sediment on the bottom of the pail was qualitatively observed to increase with increasing intensity (time and temperature) of experimental conditions. This loss of solids due to sedimentation resulted in a decrease in yield and flavor impact of the dried instant coffee. All samples were spray-dried on an APV Anhydro compact spray dryer using a spinning nozzle. The capacity was rated at 10-20 lb./hour of dry product. Air inlet temperature at the spray dryer was 240° C.

[0025] After observing overnight sedimentation in the samples from the first day of experimentation, samples from day 2 and day 3 were collected into test tubes and analyzed after sedimentation. A batch of unprocessed extract was spray-dried each day for use as a control for evaluation of that day's experiments. Runs 1-5 were conducted on Day 1 and were compared with the Day 1 control; Runs 6-10 were conducted on Day 2 and were compared with the Date 2 control; and Runs 11-15 were conducted on Day 3 and were compared with the Day 3 control. The data is shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1
Ranking of
Intensity of
Process Residence
Conditions Time at
(1 = low Reaction Reaction
15 = most Temp. Temp. Cooling Extract
Run # severe) (C.) (minutes) Method pH
Day 1 NA NA NA 4.92
Control
 1 1 130 2.9 4th shell 5.00
 2 8 160 3.0 4th shell 4.94
 3 15 180 3.3 4th shell 4.70
 4 12 180 1.5 4th shell 4.71
 5 14 180 2.4 4th shell 4.81
Day 2 NA NA NA 5.05
Control
 6 3 130 4.8 4th shell 5.01
 7 4 145 5.0 4th shell 4.91
 8 10 160 5.5 4th shell 4.78
 9 2 130 4.3 flash 5.12
10 5 145 5.2 flash 4.99
Day 3 NA NA NA 5.12
Control
11 9 160 5.2 flash 4.98
12 13 180 1.9 flash 4.81
13 6 150 5.0 4th shell 4.92
14 7 155 5.4 4th shell 4.93
15 11 170 0.25 4th shell 4.94

[0026] Flavor of the coffee products of the Example was evaluated on a blind basis by between 3 to 5 members of an external panel trained in sensory analysis. Black samples were tasted at 1% solids. Control sweetened, flavored coffee products with creamer (SFC) was tasted using the following recipe: 1.0 g coffee and 13.2 g base (containing sugar, creamer and flavor) in 210 ml water. The variant (20% reduced coffee) was tasted at the following recipe: 0.8 g coffee and 13.4 g base in 210 ml water. Results are reported in Table 2.

TABLE 2
Ranking
of
Intensity
of Resi- Taste
Process dence Obser-
conditions Time at Taste vations
(1 = Reac- Obser- (SFV - all
lowest Re- tion vations variants
15 = action Temp. General (black - all at 20%
most Run Temp. (min- Obser- at 1% reduction
severe) # (C.) utes) vations solids) in coffee)
Day no weak Good
1 sediment body, flavor
Con- in the bland, low balance
trol overnight cereal and
settled low
sample caramel
Day no weak Good
2 sediment body, flavor
Con- in the bland, low balance
trol overnight cereal and
settled low
sample caramel
Day no weak Good
3 sediment body, flavor
Con- in the bland, low balance
trol overnight cereal and
settled low
sample caramel
1 1 130 2.9 powder slightly
color inten-
darker sified, no
than sourness
control
2 9 130 4.3 slight increased sl. lighter
sediment intensity color and
on the vs. v. sl. weak
bottom of control; on coffee
sample not sour flavor
bucket vs. control
3 6 130 4.8 no increased whiter
sediment intensity than
on the vs. control; sl.
bottom of control; weak
the sample similar coffee
bucket intensity flavor to
but sour control
vs. least
intense
conditions
(intensity
level 1)
run #1
4 7 145 5.0 powder increased similar
color intensity color to
lighter vs. control; v.
than control; similar
control similar to coffee
v. sl. run #6 flavor and
sediment total
on the sweet/
bottom of flavor to
the sample control
bucket
5 10  145 5.2 slight increased v. sl.
sediment intensity darker
on the but not color and
bottom of sour vs. similar
the sample control coffee
bucket impact but
missing
full body
impact vs.
control
6 13  150 5.0 powder Stronger equiv.
color is flavor and color and
lighter sl. more coffee
than sour vs. flavor to
control control control
7 14  155 5.4 powder Stronger v. sl.
color is flavor and darker
lighter sl. more color and
than sour than v. sl.
control control increased
coffee
impact vs.
control
8 2 160 3.0 powder more v. sl.
color intense lighter
darker flavor color; v.
than sl. sweeter
control and less
small coffee
amount of body vs.
sediment control
on over-
night
settled
sample
9 11  160 5.2 no darker cup darker
sediment color and color vs.
on the intensified control;
bottom of flavor vs. coffee
the bucket control impact is
similar to
control but
not as
sweet;
coffee
flavor is
not as full
bodied
10 8 160 5.5 small Increased darker
amount of intensity color than
sediment vs. control;
on the control; darker
bottom of similar flavor and
the sample sour to sl.
bucket control; increased
coffee
flavor to
control
11 15  170 0.25 moderate some darker
level of undis- color and
sediment solved more
in the particles coffee
sample which impact vs.
bucket sediment control;
powder out; coffee
color is stronger impact is
similar flavor and not as full
to control less sour bodied;
than presence
control of
sediment
at the
bottom of
the cup
was
observed
12 4 180 1.5 moderate some darker
level of undis- color and
sediment solved more
on the particles coffee
bottom of which impact vs.
the sample sediment control;
bucket out; coffee
stronger impact is
than not as full
control; bodied;
no/slight presence
sour; full of
bodied sediment
flavor at the
bottom of
the cup
was
observed
13 12  180 1.9 unaccept- sl. darker much
able level cup color darker vs.
of and control;
sediment intensified coffee
in sample flavor vs. impact is
bucket control; same as
powder there are control but
color is large not as
lighter amounts sweet;
color vs. of undis- coffee
control solved flavor is
particles not as full
which bodied;
sediment presence
out of
sediment
at the
bottom of
the cup
was
observed
14 5 180 2.4 unaccept- some v. sl.
able level undis- darker
of solved color than
sediment particles control; sl.
in sample which more
bucket sediment coffee
out; impact
stronger than
than control;
control; presence
no/slight of
sour; full sediment
bodied at the
flavor bottom of
the cup
was
observed
15 3 180 3.3 unaccept- Intensified v. sl.
able level but no full darker
of bodied; color than
sediment sour; some control; sl.
in sample undis- more
bucket solved coffee
particles impact
which than
sediment control;
out presence
of
sediment
at the
bottom of
the cup
was
observed

[0027] As can be seen by the results, if temperatures reach 180° C., the extract pH is lowered significantly resulting in undesirable sourness.

EXAMPLE 2

[0028] This example demonstrates the ability to intensify coffee flavor and color of 25% solids coffee extract at 120° C. It also demonstrates the utilization of treated coffee extract without spray-drying. Use of liquid treated coffee extract is applicable to ready-to-drink coffee beverages.

[0029] Spray-dried instant coffee powder was reconstituted to 25% solids concentration with 65° C. tap water. The instant coffee powder which was used was derived from a typical roasted coffee extraction process. The resulting coffee extract was recirculated in an Armfield FT74 ultra high temperature heat exchanger. The extract was heated in the tubular heat exchanger to a target reaction temperature of 120° C. The extract was held at the reaction temperature for a total of approximately 32 minutes. The processed coffee extract was allowed to cool to 22° C. and held in a sealed glass jar.

[0030] Organoleptic evaluation of the processed instant coffee extract was done after reconstituting a sample with 1500 ml of 180° F. water in a beaker. It was found that a 0.71% solids solution of the processed extract achieved a beverage of similar coffee strength compared to a 0.85% solids solution of untreated coffee extract.

[0031] The 0.71% solution of the processed coffee extract and the 0.85% solution of the unprocessed extract were evaluated on a blind basis by six members of an external panel trained in quantitative descriptive analysis. The results demonstrate that the 0.71% solution of processed coffee extract had a similar flavor profile as the 0.85% solids solution of untreated coffee extract. This represents a 20.5% increase in flavor intensity for the processed sample.

Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US7401545Nov 9, 2004Jul 22, 2008Nestec S.A.Method and apparatus for optimizing variable liquid temperatures
Classifications
U.S. Classification426/434, 426/595, 426/596
International ClassificationA23F5/28, A23F5/26, A23F5/40, A23F5/46, A23F5/24
Cooperative ClassificationA23F5/46, A23F5/40, A23F5/243, A23F5/28
European ClassificationA23F5/40, A23F5/24B, A23F5/28, A23F5/46
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Feb 3, 2014ASAssignment
Owner name: INTERCONTINENTAL GREAT BRANDS LLC, NEW JERSEY
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:KRAFT FOODS GLOBAL BRANDS LLC;REEL/FRAME:032152/0215
Effective date: 20130515
Dec 4, 2013FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 12
Feb 29, 2012ASAssignment
Owner name: KRAFT FOODS GLOBAL BRANDS LLC, ILLINOIS
Effective date: 20080801
Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:KRAFT FOODS HOLDINGS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:027781/0290
Dec 4, 2009FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 8
Dec 5, 2005FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 4