Publication number | US20010040920 A1 |

Publication type | Application |

Application number | US 08/997,491 |

Publication date | Nov 15, 2001 |

Filing date | Dec 23, 1997 |

Priority date | Dec 23, 1996 |

Also published as | US6320902 |

Publication number | 08997491, 997491, US 2001/0040920 A1, US 2001/040920 A1, US 20010040920 A1, US 20010040920A1, US 2001040920 A1, US 2001040920A1, US-A1-20010040920, US-A1-2001040920, US2001/0040920A1, US2001/040920A1, US20010040920 A1, US20010040920A1, US2001040920 A1, US2001040920A1 |

Inventors | Mohammed Nafie, Song Wu |

Original Assignee | Mohammed Nafie, Song Wu |

Export Citation | BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan |

Referenced by (5), Classifications (10), Legal Events (4) | |

External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet | |

US 20010040920 A1

Abstract

An equalization technique for an ADSL data communications system is disclosed. The effective channel overall response is made a window of length I equal to the length of the cyclic prefix. The response energy output of filtering is monitored against a preset threshold value to adaptively position the window.

Claims(1)

Description

- [0001]This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e)(1) of provisional U.S. Ser. No. 60/034,341 filed Dec. 23, 1996, entitled “Time Domain Equalizer for ADSL,” the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.
- [0002]This invention relates to digital subscriber loop telecommunications systems and, in particular, to channel equalizers for the same.
- [0003]The current ADSL standard is based on discrete multi-tone signalling (DMT) protocol, wherein each frame is comprised of the IFFT of a number of samples. In ADSL channels, and at such high data rates, it is computationally expensive to fully equalize the channel. Hence, only partial equalization is implemented to constrain the overall effective channel length to a certain number of samples, say v. Then the last v samples of each frame are used as a prefix to the frame, so that in effect the time domain data is cyclically convolved with the effective overall channel response, composed of the physical channel and the equalizer. FIG. 1 shows the overall situation.
- [0004]The current equalization technique relies on frequency domain lms (least mean square) is computationally expensive, is nonlinear, and its steady state error is high.
- [0005]The invention provides an equalization technique that relies on time domain lms, has lower computational complexity and has lower steady state error.
- [0006]Embodiments of the invention have been chosen for purposes of illustration and description and are described with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
- [0007][0007]FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing the DMT signalling system.
- [0008][0008]FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing a prepared equalizer implementation.
- [0009][0009]FIG. 3 shows the system response after application of the equalizer of FIG. 2.
- [0010][0010]FIGS. 4 and 5 illustrate the convergence of both equalization methods.
- [0011]General and additional details concerning digital subscriber loop modem telecommunications are given in copending patent application Ser. No. 08/667,267, filed Jun. 20, 1996, entitled “Multi-Mode Digital Modem,” the entirety of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
- [0012]If the channel response is assumed to be given by h and the equalizer by w, then the overall response will be given by b=h*w. The objective is to make this effective channel overall response of length equal to the length of the cyclic prefix, I, sent as an overhead on each DMT frame. In other words, since achieving this exactly would probably be impractical computationally—or even theoretically impossible—with a finite length equalizer, what is wanted is to have a window with size I with most of the energy of b inside this window, or to decrease any energy outside that window. Now, from the training sequence a pretty good estimate of h can be obtained. This can then be convolved with the equalizer to get an estimate of b.
- [0013]Therefore, if it can be known beforehand where the best place is to position the maximum energy window over the overall length of b, the lms algorithm can be applied with the input being h and the error signal being the components of b outside the window. One may choose to position the window to coincide with the position of the maximum energy window over h but this doesn't always work. Another method would be to run the lms algorithm several times for several window positions. This might require a large amount of computation. So, instead of that the value of b that is output from filtering h with w can be monitored, and when this value exceeds a certain preset threshold, the window applied. Thus, this window will change its position adaptively with the adapted w, and better performance should be expected.
- [0014]The method can be summarized as follows:
- [0015]1. Perform FFT on the received training data to get Y.
- [0016]2. To get an estimate of the frequency response of the channel, divide Y by the training sequence X. Perform an IFFT to get an estimate of h. Averaging a large number of frames will give a good estimate of the true h.
- [0017]3. Start with any initial estimate of w.
- [0018]a. Filter h using w.
- [0019]b. Update w using the lms algorithm, with the error equal to the output of the filter, and the input equal to h . The equation is thus, w=w+2*˜*b(n)*h, where h is the vector composed of the components of h currently in the equalizer. While doing so, monitor the output of this filtering process.
- [0020]c. When the output exceeds a preset threshold, assume the lms error equal to zero for a number for outputs equal to 1.
- [0021]d. Continue filtering and updating for the whole length of h.
- [0022]e. Repeat the above steps until the lms converges.
- [0023][0023]FIG. 1 illustrates an implementation of such a procedure.
- [0024]Although this technique converges faster and offers performance which is better than frequency domain lms, it can be made to converge even faster. This is achieved by sticking an all 1's filter before the w filter and then using time domain Ims with the error equal to the output when not in the window, and the input is the output of the all 1's filter.
- [0025][0025]FIG. 3 shows the results of applying the previous two techniques to a channel.
- [0026][0026]FIGS. 4 and 5 show the convergence of both methods.
- [0027]Those skilled in the art to which the invention relates will appreciate that various substitutions and modifications may be made to the foregoing embodiments, without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the claims.

Referenced by

Citing Patent | Filing date | Publication date | Applicant | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|

US7173976 * | Sep 21, 2005 | Feb 6, 2007 | At&T Corp. | Frequency-domain method for joint equalization and decoding of space-time block codes |

US7379508 * | Jul 18, 2006 | May 27, 2008 | At&T Corp. | Frequency-domain method for joint equalization and decoding of space-time block codes |

US8102928 * | Sep 25, 2008 | Jan 24, 2012 | Tellabs Operations, Inc. | Spectrally constrained impulse shortening filter for a discrete multi-tone receiver |

US8315299 | Mar 7, 2011 | Nov 20, 2012 | Tellabs Operations, Inc. | Time-domain equalization for discrete multi-tone systems |

US9014250 | Dec 28, 2012 | Apr 21, 2015 | Tellabs Operations, Inc. | Filter for impulse response shortening with additional spectral constraints for multicarrier transmission |

Classifications

U.S. Classification | 375/229, 375/222 |

International Classification | H04L25/02, H04L25/03 |

Cooperative Classification | H04L25/0212, H04L2025/03414, H04L25/03159, H04L2025/03522 |

European Classification | H04L25/02C3, H04L25/03B3 |

Legal Events

Date | Code | Event | Description |
---|---|---|---|

Sep 14, 1998 | AS | Assignment | Owner name: TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED, TEXAS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:NAFIE, MOHAMMED;WU, SONG;REEL/FRAME:009457/0239;SIGNING DATES FROM 19980207 TO 19980213 |

Mar 29, 2005 | FPAY | Fee payment | Year of fee payment: 4 |

Mar 26, 2009 | FPAY | Fee payment | Year of fee payment: 8 |

Mar 18, 2013 | FPAY | Fee payment | Year of fee payment: 12 |

Rotate