Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20020075019 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 09/997,501
Publication dateJun 20, 2002
Filing dateNov 19, 2001
Priority dateDec 4, 2000
Also published asDE10143173A1, DE20114544U1, US7233160, US7456646, US7495461, US7688097, US7761983, US20070200580, US20080042677, US20080042678, US20080045028, US20100251545
Publication number09997501, 997501, US 2002/0075019 A1, US 2002/075019 A1, US 20020075019 A1, US 20020075019A1, US 2002075019 A1, US 2002075019A1, US-A1-20020075019, US-A1-2002075019, US2002/0075019A1, US2002/075019A1, US20020075019 A1, US20020075019A1, US2002075019 A1, US2002075019A1
InventorsLeonard Hayden, John Martin, Mike Andrews
Original AssigneeLeonard Hayden, John Martin, Mike Andrews
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Wafer probe
US 20020075019 A1
Abstract
The present invention relates to a probe for testing of integrated circuits or other microelectronic devices.
Images(4)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(22)
1. A probe comprising:
(a) a substantially rigid support; and
(b) a plurality of contact fingers supported by and extending from said support, wherein said contact fingers are arranged as a unity assembly such that said plurality of contact fingers are maintained in a predetermined alignment when attached to said support.
2. The probe of claim 1 wherein a plurality of said contact fingers extend in a radially outward direction from said support.
3. The probe of claim 2 wherein the arrangement of said contact fingers match the geometry of a contacting pads on a device under test.
4. The probe of claim 1 wherein said support includes a resistor-capacitor network interconnected to said contact fingers.
5. The probe of claim 1 wherein said support is a planar circuit board.
6. The probe of claim 1 wherein said unitary assembly includes a tab proximate the ends of said plurality of contact fingers that maintains said contact fingers in said predetermined alignment.
7. The probe of claim 6 wherein said tab is removed prior to probing with said contact fingers.
8. The probe of claim 1 wherein said rigid support includes a respective trace for each of said contact fingers.
9. The probe of claim 8 wherein said respective traces are electrically interconnected to a connector suitable to interconnect to test equipment.
10. The probe of claim 7 wherein said removal of said tab leaves the ends of each of said plurality of contact fingers in a predetermined position.
11. The probe of claim 1 wherein said plurality of contact fingers is greater than three.
12. A method of assembling a probe comprising:
(a) providing a substantially rigid support;
(b) providing a unitary assembly including a plurality of contact fingers, such that said plurality of contact fingers are maintained in a predetermined alignment; and
(c) attaching said plurality of contact fingers to said support.
13. The method of claim 12 wherein a plurality of said contact fingers extend in a radially outward direction from said support.
14. The method of claim 13 wherein the arrangement of said contact fingers match the geometry of a contacting pads on a device under test.
15. The method of claim 12 wherein said support includes a resistorcapacitor network interconnected to said contact fingers.
16. The method of claim 12 wherein said support is a planar circuit board.
17. The method of claim 12 wherein said unitary assembly includes a tab proximate the ends of said plurality of contact fingers that maintains said contact fingers in said predetermined alignment.
18. The method of claim 17 wherein said tab is removed prior to probing with said contact fingers.
19. The method of claim 12 wherein said rigid support includes a respective trace for each of said contact fingers.
20. The method of claim 19 wherein said respective traces are electrically interconnected to a connector suitable to interconnect to test equipment.
21. The method of claim 18 wherein said removal of said tab leaves the ends of each of said plurality of contact fingers in a predetermined position.
22. The method of claim 12 wherein said plurality of contact fingers is greater than three.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0001] The present invention relates to a probe for testing of integrated circuits or other microelectronic devices.

[0002] One type of probe utilizes a spaced-apart array of slender needles to contact pads on a device under test (DUT). A signal is provided to the DUT, and the voltages and/or currents at the selected nodes are routed to measurement equipment. A problem encountered with such measurement systems, particularly at high frequencies, is that the close proximity between the needle tips creates inductance that can interfere with accurate measurements. Though this inductance can be reduced by limiting the isolated portion of the probe tips to the region immediately surrounding the DUT, practical considerations make such a design difficult.

[0003] Probe structures have been developed to compensate for the inductance at the probe tips. One such design is exemplified by Lockwood et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,697,143. Lockwood et al. disclose a ground-signal-ground arrangement of strip like conductive traces formed on the underside of an alumina substrate so as to create coplanar transmission lines. These coplanar transmission lines extend from the pads of the DUT at one end to a coaxial cable at the other end. The associated pair of ground traces on each coplanar transmission line is connected to the outer conductor of the coaxial cable and the interposed signal trace is connected to the inner conductor. Areas of wear-resistant conductive material are provided to reliably establish an electrical connection with the respective pads of the DUT. Layers of ferrite-containing microwave absorbing material are mounted about the substrate to absorb spurious microwave energy over a major portion of the length of each ground-signal-ground trace pattern. In accordance with this type of construction, a high frequency impedance (e.g., 50 ohms) can be presented at the probe tips to the device under test. Thus broadband signals of eighteen gigahertz or less can travel with little loss across the coplanar transmission lines formed by each ground-signal-ground trace pattern.

[0004] The probing system of Lockwood et al., however, is insufficient to effectively probe non-planar surfaces. Such surfaces might result, for example, if the pads of the DUT differ in height, if a loose metallic particle of minute dimension adheres electrostatically to the surface of one of the pads of the DUT so as to form a non-planar surface irregularity, or when the plane of the DUT is inadvertently tilted slightly with respect to the plane of the coplanar tips of the probing assembly. Further, proper alignment between the needles and the DUT requires careful placement of each needle, a time consuming process.

[0005] The alignment limitation between the needles was addressed by Godshalk, U.S. Pat. No. 5,506,515. Godshalk discloses a ground-signal-ground finger arrangement attached to a coaxial cable, as in Lockwood. The fingers, however, are originally formed in one piece, joined together by a carrier tab at the contact ends. Once the fingers are attached to the coaxial cable, the carrier tab is severed and the contact fingers appropriately shaped for contact with the DUT. Godshalk discloses that the relative position of each finger is held in alignment first by the carrying tab, and then by the coaxial cable. Unfortunately, Godshalk's design is limited in that the close placement of a coaxial cable to the finely spaced geometry of the DUT places a limit on the number of coaxial cables, and hence contact fingers, that may be used effectively in the probe. Further, a probe having multiple adjacent coaxial cables, each of which has different flexibilities, may lead to insufficient contact with some of the nodes on the DUT.

[0006] Another class of probes that provide clean power to circuits at low impedance are generally referred to as power bypass probes. Another configuration that has been developed to counteract the inductance at the tips of a probe assembly is a power bypass quadrant. The power bypass quadrant minimizes such inductance by providing integrated capacitors or resistor-capacitor networks within the probe.

[0007] Strid, U.S. Pat. No. 4,764,723, discloses a power bypass quadrant probe that utilizes an array of ceramic fingers coated with a thin gold or polyimide film to make contact with the DUT. The test signals are routed through a power bypass structure consisting of an RC network. Because of the small geometries near the DUT, the capacitors are located far away from the probe tip, which potentially decreases performance. In addition, the ceramic contact fingers tend to break during probing, particularly when the probe overshoots the contact pads. Further, probing pads that are not coplanar is exceedingly difficult because the ceramic contacting fingers lack flexibility.

[0008] Boll et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,373,231 disclose a probe that includes an array of blades to contact the pads of a DUT. The array of blades extend from a transmission line network traced on a circuit board. An RC network is provided on the circuit board to provide the requisite power bypass, and in some instances, flexible capacitors are located close to, or between the contact blades. Because of the limited geometries near the DUT, the capacitance of the capacitors interconnected between the blades are small, and alone are insufficient to adequately eliminate circuit inductance. Accordingly, a second bank of capacitors with larger values are located away from the probe tip where space is available. Probes utilizing flexible capacitors between the closely spaced blades of the probe have proven to be of limited mechanical durability.

[0009] What is desired, therefore, is a configurable, multi-contact probe for high frequency testing of integrated circuits or other microelectronic devices that reduces the inductance at the probe tip to levels acceptable for measurement over a wide range of frequencies. The probe should be sufficiently durable and flexible to reliably and repeatedly probe substantially non-planar devices over time. It is further desired that the probe be easily aligned with the contact points on the device to be tested and that the probe be capable of simultaneously probing a number of such contact points.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0010]FIG. 1 shows a top view of an exemplary embodiment of the probe head of the present invention.

[0011]FIG. 2 shows a bottom view, at an enlarged scale, of the probe head of FIG. 1.

[0012]FIG. 3 shows an enlarged view of the probe tips attached to a common carrying tab of the probe head of FIG. 1.

[0013]FIG. 4A shows a schematic of the electrical trace patterns of the top face of the exemplary probe head of FIG. 1 including a power bypass feature.

[0014]FIG. 4B shows a schematic of the electrical trace patterns of the bottom face of the exemplary probe head of FIG. 1 including a power bypass feature.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

[0015]FIGS. 1 and 2 illustrate an exemplary wafer probe 10. The wafer probe 10 includes an integrated tip assembly 12 mounted to a circuit board 14. The integrated tip assembly 12 comprises a plurality of contact fingers 16 extending from the circuit board 14 in a radially inward direction so as to match the compact geometry of the device under test (not shown). The distal end portion 17 of each contact finger is shaped to provide a reliable electrical connection with an associated pad on a device under test. The circuit board 14 has electrical traces that route signals from the contact fingers 16 through a resistor-capacitor (RC) network 20 to pin connectors 22. Measurement cables (not shown) may be electrically connected to the pin connectors.

[0016] The wafer probe 10 is designed to be mounted on a support through a three hole mounting frame 24 of a wafer probe station so as to be in a suitable position for probing a device under test, such as an individual component on a semiconductor wafer. In this type of application, the wafer is typically supported under vacuum pressure on the upper surface of a chuck that is part of the same probing station. Ordinarily an X-Y-Z positioning mechanism is provided, such as a micrometer knob assembly, to effect movement between the supporting member and the chuck so that the tip assembly of the wafer probe can be brought into pressing engagement with the contact pads of the device under test.

[0017] Referring to FIG. 3, the integrated tip assembly 12 is fashioned as a unitary device with the individual contact fingers 16 connected by a common carrying tab 26 at the probing end. Each individual contact finger 16 is positioned so that, after the integrated tip assembly 12 is attached the circuit board 14, the common carrying tab 26 may be severed, leaving the distal end 18 of each contact finger in the appropriate position for probing the contact pads of the device under test.

[0018] The spacing of the contact fingers 16 at their respective distal ends 18 is selected to match the geometry of the DUT pads. Use of an integrated tip assembly 12 advantageously serves to maintain this proper spacing while the contact fingers 16 are attached to their respective connections to the circuit board 14. Typically, contact fingers or needles are attached to a circuit board by being held flush to their respective traces and soldered into the appropriate position and pitch. During this process, lateral forces tend to displace the distal ends of the contact fingers, making it difficult to maintain the proper spatial relationship between the contact fingers to match that of the pads of the DUT. Use of a carrying tab 26, however, maintains the proper transverse spacing of the distal ends 18 of the contact fingers 16 by counteracting any lateral forces encountered in the attachment process.

[0019] In addition, the probe 16 described herein achieves an improved spatial transformation between the compact geometry of the microelectronic device being probed and the dispersed geometry of the testing equipment and, if provided, any power bypass circuitry. This improved spatial characteristic stands in contrast to earlier design, in which signals were routed through a coaxial cable. A coaxial cable, having simply an inner and an outer conductor, limits the number of attached contact fingers to three, arranged in a ground-signal-ground arrangement. Accordingly, any common carrying tab used to hold the contact fingers in position during their attachment to a coaxial cable also is limited to a maximum of three contact fingers.

[0020] Oftentimes, however, the DUT has more than three pads to be tested. In such a case, configuring the probe requires the use of multiple coaxial cables arranged in an adjacent relationship to each other, usually an awkward process given the limited space available near the probe tips. Use of multiple coaxial cables is also problematical in that different cables have differing flexibility, making it difficult to line up all the cables in a single plane and leading to uneven probe forces when the contact fingers are pressed to their respective pads. Moreover, the used of multiple coaxial cables and multiple carrying tabs necessitates the careful and time consuming adjustment of the relative position between the sets of contact fingers to the geometry of the pads of the DUT. In another design, the use of multiple coaxial cables and a single carrying tab necessitates the careful and time consuming adjustment of the relative position of the coaxial cables.

[0021] Use of a circuit board 14, however, addresses each of these drawbacks. Because the circuit board 14 can include separate traces for each of the contact pads of the DUT to which the probe will be engaged during testing, the common carrying tab 26 depicted in FIG. 3 may include four or more contact fingers 16, maintaining all of their respective distal ends in their proper position until each finger 16 is rigidly attached to the circuit board 14. The circuit board 14 provides a controlled and uniform flexure, assuring not only a uniform amount of overtravel when the fingers 16 make contact with the pads of the DUT, but also a mechanism by which the stress in the contact fingers 16 may be relieved by the uniform flexibility of the circuit board 14. This flexibility may even be controlled by the selection of material for the circuit board 14.

[0022]FIG. 3 shows an example of an integrated tip assembly having the common carrying tab 26 still attached. The fingers 16 are generally of rectangular cross section and are preferably composed of the same material, where the material is selected from those metals that are capable of high resiliency to enable the fingers to probe a device having associated contact surfaces that are in non-planar arrangement. In the preferred embodiment, the fingers are formed of beryllium-copper (BeCu) which has been gold plated in order to reduce resistive losses. This material is particularly suited for the probing of contact pads that are formed of gold, since BeCu is substantially harder than gold. This, in turn, results in minimal wear and a long, maintenance free period of operation of the probe.

[0023] If the pads of the device are formed of aluminum instead of gold, it is preferable to use a harder material for the fingers 16, such as tungsten. Here again, the finger material selected is substantially harder than the contact pad material in order to ensure minimal wearing of the fingers 16. If tungsten fingers are used, it is preferable that they also be gold plated to reduce resistive losses. Use of materials such as BeCu and tungsten allows repeated use of the probe while avoiding the fragility encountered through the use of the ceramic contact fingers described earlier. It should also be noted that other potential materials may be used, in addition to BeCu or tungsten. In addition, a number of other potential techniques exist to connect the contact fingers with the circuit board besides soldering, including epoxy and the like.

[0024] The contact fingers 16 are fabricated as a single, integrated unit attached to a common carrying tab 26 at the distal (tip) ends 18. The distal end 18 has a shape that provides a geometrical fanning of the contacts from the very small pitch (center-to center contact spacing) at the distal ends 18 up to the larger geometry of the traces 40 on the circuit board 14.

[0025] In accordance with one preferred assembly method, to prepare for connection of the respective contact fingers to the circuit board, solder paste is evenly applied to the exposed traces on the circuit board. The fingers are then held just above their corresponding traces, then lowered until they press against the solder paste in an appropriate position. When the solder is melted, preferably by heating elements arranged above and below the connection region a solder fillet is desirably formed between each finger and its corresponding circuit board trace.

[0026] Preferably, while heating the solder, the fingers are held at a slight downward incline relative to the distal ends so that during cooling, each finger assumes a planar relationship with the circuit board 14. During this connection process, it will be noted that the proper transverse spacing is maintained between the respective fingers by the common carrier tab since any forces that would tend to laterally displace the fingers are negated by the common carrier tab 26 that holds the contact fingers at their respective distal ends. 18 After the fingers 16 are attached to the circuit board 14, the common carrier tab 26 is severed as it is no longer needed because proper finger alignment is maintained by the circuit board 14. The fingers 16 are preferably shaped using grinding and lapping processes to create a flat contact area whose leading edge is visible when viewed from directly above.

[0027] Referring to FIG. 1 and FIGS. 4A and 4B, the circuit board electrical traces 40 provide continued geometrical fanning to even larger dimensions, ultimately leading to one or more connectors such as the set of pins shown in FIG. 1, typically of a much larger physical scale. The circuit board 14 may have a ground plane (not shown) providing reduced ground inductance and controlled impedance of the signal traces 40—usually 50 ohms for use with standard test equipment. Use of a circuit board 14 also allows for the optional use of very small dimension Surface Mount Technology (SMT) components that can be placed at an intermediate level of geometric scaling.

[0028] As shown in FIG. 1 and FIG. 2, the structure is compatible with a power bypass architecture that can be mounted on the surface of the circuit board 14. In the preferred embodiment both surfaces of the circuit board are used to provide the power bypass feature in order to utilize the additional space.

[0029] To illustrate how such a power bypass structure may be incorporated, FIGS. 1 and 2 depict a power bypass architecture spread over both surfaces of the circuit board 14. It should be noted, however, that it is entirely feasible to provide a complete power bypass structure using only one surface of the circuit board if so desired. In this illustration, the four contact fingers 50, 52, 54, 56 are arranged in an adjacent relationship, alternating between power and ground contacts. On the bottom surface of the circuit board, depicted FIG. 2, a high frequency metal-insulator-metal (MIM) capacitor is attached between the adjacent power and ground transmission lines formed by respected pairs of contact fingers.

[0030] While the MIM capacitor has very low inductive parasitics and a very high self-resonant frequency it does not have very much capacitance. This limits its ability to provide power bypass at lower frequencies. Accordingly, a relatively larger sized and valued SMT capacitor, though still of very small physically dimension, is placed further up the board where there is sufficient space. A small value SMT resistor is used in series with this capacitor to “de-Q” or spoil the parallel resonance that can occur between the MIM capacitor and the inductance of the line length running to the SMT capacitor.

[0031] Referring specifically to FIGS. 4A and 4B, the circuit board is designed to allow customization of the function, i.e. ground, signal, power, etc., of each electrical contact of the probe. Initially, each of the fingers is connected to a via to the ground plane, to an SMT component and eventually to the connector. Programming a ground contact requires simply leaving the connection to the ground intact, while for all other functions this small circuit board trace is cut away, with a sharp blade or a laser for instance. When programming a bypassed power line the connection to the SMT component is left intact while the short circuit trace to the ground is cut.

[0032] Referring again to FIG. 1, the probe design preferably includes an inclined circuit board 14 relative to the device under test. A major portion of the fingers 16 are likewise preferably aligned with the plane of the circuit board 14 with the distal ends 18 being shaped for appropriate probing of the device under test. This inclined design permits the circuit board 14 to be spaced apart from the device under test during testing, while simultaneously permitting the fingers 16 to be short, which minimizes inductance to increase performance. Otherwise, the fingers would need to be mounted in an inclined manner with respect to the circuit board, which in many cases, would require longer fingers for effective probing.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US491783 *Dec 15, 1890Feb 14, 1893 Bolster-plate
US2545258 *Mar 22, 1945Mar 13, 1951Cailloux Marcel LDevice for telecontrol of spatial movement
US2921276 *Aug 30, 1955Jan 12, 1960Cutler Hammer IncMicrowave circuits
US3429040 *Jun 18, 1965Feb 25, 1969IbmMethod of joining a component to a substrate
US3561280 *Oct 23, 1968Feb 9, 1971American Mach & FoundryThree axis strain gage control device
US3634807 *Mar 19, 1970Jan 11, 1972Siemens AgDetachable electrical contact arrangement
US3862790 *Jul 10, 1972Jan 28, 1975Plessey Handel Investment AgElectrical interconnectors and connector assemblies
US3867698 *Jan 31, 1974Feb 18, 1975Western Electric CoTest probe for integrated circuit chips
US3930809 *Jul 15, 1974Jan 6, 1976Wentworth Laboratories, Inc.Assembly fixture for fixed point probe card
US3936743 *Mar 5, 1974Feb 3, 1976Electroglas, Inc.High speed precision chuck assembly
US4001685 *Oct 11, 1974Jan 4, 1977Electroglas, Inc.Micro-circuit test probe
US4008900 *Mar 15, 1976Feb 22, 1977John FreedomIndexing chuck
US4009456 *Jan 15, 1973Feb 22, 1977General Microwave CorporationVariable microwave attenuator
US4066943 *Nov 10, 1975Jan 3, 1978Electroglas, Inc.High speed precision chuck assembly
US4074201 *Jul 26, 1976Feb 14, 1978Gte Sylvania IncorporatedSignal analyzer with noise estimation and signal to noise readout
US4184133 *Nov 28, 1977Jan 15, 1980Rockwell International CorporationAssembly of microwave integrated circuits having a structurally continuous ground plane
US4184729 *Oct 13, 1977Jan 22, 1980Bunker Ramo CorporationFlexible connector cable
US4251772 *Dec 26, 1978Feb 17, 1981Pacific Western Systems Inc.Probe head for an automatic semiconductive wafer prober
US4312117 *Nov 20, 1979Jan 26, 1982Raytheon CompanyIntegrated test and assembly device
US4641659 *Apr 19, 1982Feb 10, 1987Sepponen Raimo EMedical diagnostic microwave scanning apparatus
US4646005 *Mar 16, 1984Feb 24, 1987Motorola, Inc.Signal probe
US4727319 *Dec 24, 1985Feb 23, 1988Hughes Aircraft CompanyApparatus for on-wafer testing of electrical circuits
US4727391 *Jan 27, 1987Feb 23, 1988Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.,Sheet film package and device for loading sheet films
US4795962 *Sep 4, 1987Jan 3, 1989Hewlett-Packard CompanyFloating driver circuit and a device for measuring impedances of electrical components
US4805627 *Sep 4, 1986Feb 21, 1989Siemens AktiengesellschaftMethod and apparatus for identifying the distribution of the dielectric constants in an object
US4891584 *Mar 21, 1988Jan 2, 1990Semitest, Inc.Apparatus for making surface photovoltage measurements of a semiconductor
US4893914 *Oct 12, 1988Jan 16, 1990The Micromanipulator Company, Inc.Test station
US4894612 *Sep 23, 1988Jan 16, 1990Hypres, IncorporatedSoft probe for providing high speed on-wafer connections to a circuit
US4899126 *Jan 4, 1989Feb 6, 1990Sharp Kabushiki KaishaThick film resistor type printed circuit board
US4899998 *Nov 9, 1988Feb 13, 1990Hiroshi TeramachiRotational positioning device
US4901012 *Nov 18, 1987Feb 13, 1990Thomson Hybrides Et MicroondesCircuit for measuring the dynamic characteristics of a package for high-speed integrated circuits and a method for measuring said dynamic characteristics
US4904933 *Sep 8, 1986Feb 27, 1990Tektronix, Inc.Integrated circuit probe station
US4983910 *May 20, 1988Jan 8, 1991Stanford UniversityMillimeter-wave active probe
US4987100 *Oct 30, 1989Jan 22, 1991International Business Machines CorporationFlexible carrier for an electronic device
US4988062 *Mar 10, 1988Jan 29, 1991London Robert AApparatus, system and method for organizing and maintaining a plurality of medical catheters and the like
US4991290 *Jun 16, 1989Feb 12, 1991Microelectronics And Computer TechnologyFlexible electrical interconnect and method of making
US5089774 *Dec 24, 1990Feb 18, 1992Sharp Kabushiki KaishaApparatus and a method for checking a semiconductor
US5091692 *Dec 31, 1990Feb 25, 1992Tokyo Electron LimitedProbing test device
US5177438 *Aug 2, 1991Jan 5, 1993Motorola, Inc.Low resistance probe for semiconductor
US5180977 *Dec 2, 1991Jan 19, 1993Hoya Corporation UsaMembrane probe contact bump compliancy system
US5289117 *Dec 30, 1992Feb 22, 1994Everett Charles Technologies, Inc.Testing of integrated circuit devices on loaded printed circuit
US5383787 *Apr 27, 1993Jan 24, 1995Aptix CorporationIntegrated circuit package with direct access to internal signals
US5389885 *Jan 26, 1993Feb 14, 1995Everett Charles Technologies, Inc.Expandable diaphragm test modules and connectors
US5481196 *Nov 8, 1994Jan 2, 1996Nebraska Electronics, Inc.Process and apparatus for microwave diagnostics and therapy
US5481936 *Jun 24, 1994Jan 9, 1996Yugen Kaisha SozoanRotary drive positioning system for an indexing table
US5487999 *Nov 22, 1994Jan 30, 1996Micron Technology, Inc.Method for fabricating a penetration limited contact having a rough textured surface
US5493236 *Jun 23, 1994Feb 20, 1996Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki KaishaTest analysis apparatus and analysis method for semiconductor wafer using OBIC analysis
US5594358 *Sep 1, 1994Jan 14, 1997Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Radio frequency probe and probe card including a signal needle and grounding needle coupled to a microstrip transmission line
US5601740 *Dec 18, 1995Feb 11, 1997Formfactor, Inc.Method and apparatus for wirebonding, for severing bond wires, and for forming balls on the ends of bond wires
US5704355 *Jun 21, 1995Jan 6, 1998Bridges; Jack E.Non-invasive system for breast cancer detection
US5715819 *May 26, 1994Feb 10, 1998The Carolinas Heart InstituteMicrowave tomographic spectroscopy system and method
US5720098 *May 12, 1995Feb 24, 1998Probe TechnologyMethod for making a probe preserving a uniform stress distribution under deflection
US5864946 *Apr 15, 1997Feb 2, 1999Form Factor, Inc.Method of making contact tip structures
US5869974 *Apr 1, 1996Feb 9, 1999Micron Technology, Inc.Micromachined probe card having compliant contact members for testing semiconductor wafers
US6023103 *Jun 30, 1998Feb 8, 2000Formfactor, Inc.Chip-scale carrier for semiconductor devices including mounted spring contacts
US6029344 *Aug 12, 1998Feb 29, 2000Formfactor, Inc.Composite interconnection element for microelectronic components, and method of making same
US6031384 *Dec 22, 1997Feb 29, 2000Advantest CorporationIC testing method and apparatus
US6168974 *Feb 8, 2000Jan 2, 2001Formfactor, Inc.Process of mounting spring contacts to semiconductor devices
US6169410 *Nov 9, 1998Jan 2, 2001Anritsu CompanyWafer probe with built in RF frequency conversion module
US6172337 *Jul 8, 1999Jan 9, 2001Mattson Technology, Inc.System and method for thermal processing of a semiconductor substrate
US6174744 *Mar 29, 2000Jan 16, 2001Advantest Corp.Method of producing micro contact structure and contact probe using same
US6175228 *Oct 30, 1998Jan 16, 2001Agilent TechnologiesElectronic probe for measuring high impedance tri-state logic circuits
US6181144 *Feb 25, 1998Jan 30, 2001Micron Technology, Inc.Semiconductor probe card having resistance measuring circuitry and method fabrication
US6181149 *Sep 26, 1996Jan 30, 2001Delaware Capital Formation, Inc.Grid array package test contactor
US6181416 *Apr 14, 1999Jan 30, 2001Optometrix, Inc.Schlieren method for imaging semiconductor device properties
US6184053 *May 6, 1997Feb 6, 2001Formfactor, Inc.Method of making microelectronic spring contact elements
US6184587 *Oct 21, 1996Feb 6, 2001Formfactor, Inc.Resilient contact structures, electronic interconnection component, and method of mounting resilient contact structures to electronic components
US6191596 *May 22, 1998Feb 20, 2001Advantest CorporationMethod for detecting a contact position between an object to be measured and measuring pins
US6334247 *Jun 11, 1997Jan 1, 2002International Business Machines CorporationHigh density integrated circuit apparatus, test probe and methods of use thereof
US6339338 *Jan 18, 2000Jan 15, 2002Formfactor, Inc.Apparatus for reducing power supply noise in an integrated circuit
US6340895 *Jul 14, 1999Jan 22, 2002Aehr Test Systems, Inc.Wafer-level burn-in and test cartridge
US6509751 *Mar 17, 2000Jan 21, 2003Formfactor, Inc.Planarizer for a semiconductor contactor
US6520778 *Feb 13, 1998Feb 18, 2003Formfactor, Inc.Microelectronic contact structures, and methods of making same
US6525555 *May 16, 2000Feb 25, 2003Formfactor, Inc.Wafer-level burn-in and test
US6672875 *Dec 29, 1999Jan 6, 2004Formfactor, Inc.Spring interconnect structures
US6677744 *Apr 13, 2000Jan 13, 2004Formfactor, Inc.System for measuring signal path resistance for an integrated circuit tester interconnect structure
US6678850 *Nov 6, 2002Jan 13, 2004Formfactor, Inc.Distributed interface for parallel testing of multiple devices using a single tester channel
US6678876 *Aug 24, 2001Jan 13, 2004Formfactor, Inc.Process and apparatus for finding paths through a routing space
US6680659 *Apr 26, 2002Jan 20, 2004Formfactor, Inc.Integrated circuit interconnect system
US6685817 *Jun 9, 2000Feb 3, 2004Formfactor, Inc.Method and apparatus for controlling plating over a face of a substrate
US6686754 *Oct 31, 2002Feb 3, 2004Formfactor, Inc.Integrated circuit tester with high bandwidth probe assembly
US6690185 *Nov 19, 1998Feb 10, 2004Formfactor, Inc.Large contactor with multiple, aligned contactor units
US6836962 *Dec 29, 2000Jan 4, 2005Formfactor, Inc.Method and apparatus for shaping spring elements
US6838885 *May 15, 2003Jan 4, 2005Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd.Method of correcting measurement error and electronic component characteristic measurement apparatus
US6838893 *Jun 10, 2003Jan 4, 2005Formfactor, Inc.Probe card assembly
US6839964 *Aug 8, 2002Jan 11, 2005Formfactor, Inc.Method for manufacturing a multi-layer printed circuit board
US6845491 *Jan 29, 2003Jan 18, 2005Formfactor, Inc.Method of designing, fabricating, testing and interconnecting an IC to external circuit nodes
US6850082 *Oct 22, 2002Feb 1, 2005Casecade Microtech, Inc.Probe holder for testing of a test device
US6856150 *Apr 10, 2001Feb 15, 2005Formfactor, Inc.Probe card with coplanar daughter card
US20020005728 *Apr 15, 1999Jan 17, 2002Gordon M. BabsonMicro probe and method of fabricating same
US20020008533 *Jul 2, 2001Jan 24, 2002Ando Electric Co., LtdElectro-optic probe and magneto-optic probe
US20020009377 *Oct 2, 2001Jan 24, 2002Shafer Ronny A.Motor cover retention
US20020009378 *Jun 29, 2001Jan 24, 2002Rikuro ObaraBlower
US20020011859 *Nov 17, 1998Jan 31, 2002Kenneth R. SmithMethod for forming conductive bumps for the purpose of contrructing a fine pitch test device
US20020011863 *Sep 21, 2001Jan 31, 2002Advantest CorporationIC chip tester with heating element for preventing condensation
US20030010877 *Jul 8, 2002Jan 16, 2003Jean-Luc LandrevilleAnti-vibration and anti-tilt structure
US20030030822 *May 28, 2002Feb 13, 2003Moshe FinarovMethod and apparatus for process control in semiconductor manufacture
US20040021475 *Jun 6, 2001Feb 5, 2004Atsushi ItoWafer prober
US20050030047 *Aug 5, 2003Feb 10, 2005Vahe AdamianMethod and apparatus for measuring a device under test using an improved through-reflect-line measurement calibration
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US7786741 *Nov 21, 2005Aug 31, 2010Rosenberger Hochfrequenztechnik Gmbh & Co. KgMeasuring tip for high-frequency measurement
Classifications
U.S. Classification324/755.07
International ClassificationH01L21/66, G01R31/26, G01R1/06, G01R1/073
Cooperative ClassificationY10T29/49208, Y10T29/49121, Y10T29/49147, G01R1/07342, G01R1/06772, Y10T29/49204
European ClassificationG01R1/067H, G01R1/073B4
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Nov 19, 2001ASAssignment
Owner name: CASCADE MICROTECH, INC., OREGON
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HAYDEN, LEONARD;MARTIN, JOHN;ANDREWS, MIKE;REEL/FRAME:012340/0956
Effective date: 20011111
Dec 13, 2010FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 4
Oct 8, 2014FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 8