US 20020154724 A1 Abstract A control system, and a control method, of a nuclear power plant capable of easily executing automatic output regulation by an automatic power regulator system even when a maximum linear heat generation rate and a minimum critical power ratio are determined in a short cycle by using brief calculation. While a core monitoring system does not calculate a maximum linear heat generation rate and a minimum critical power ratio, they are determined by utilizing the maximum linear heat generation rate and the minimum critical power ratio calculated by the core monitoring system as well as plant data, and the maximum linear heat generation rate and the minimum critical power ratio so determined are compared with thermal limit values set in advance for them. The automatic power regulator system holds a control signal when at least one of the maximum linear heat generation rate and the minimum critical power ratio exceeds the thermal limit values.
Claims(13) 1. A control system of a nuclear power plant comprising:
a core monitoring system for determining a maximum linear heat generation rate and a minimum critical power ratio in a certain time interval; an automatic thermal limit monitor for determining said maximum linear heat generation rate and said minimum critical power ratio by utilizing said maximum linear heat generation rate and said minimum critical power ratio determined by said core monitoring system when calculation of said maximum linear heat generation rate and said minimum critical power ratio by said core monitoring system is not effected, comparing said maximum linear heat generation rate and said minimum critical power ratio so determined with thermal limit values set in advance for them, respectively, and outputting an operation hold instruction when at least one of said maximum linear heat generation rate and said minimum critical power ratio exceeds said thermal limit values; and an automatic power regulator system for outputting control signals to a re-circulation flow control system for controlling a re-circulation flow rate of a reactor and to a control rod control system for controlling the positions of control rods, and holding said control signals when said automatic thermal limit monitor outputs said operation hold instruction. 2. A control system of a nuclear power plant according to 3. A control system of a nuclear power plant according to 4. A control system of a nuclear power plant according to 5. A control system of a nuclear power plant according to 6. A control system of a nuclear power plant according to 7. A control system of a nuclear power plant according to 8. A control system of a nuclear power plant according to 9. A control system of a nuclear power plant according to 10. A method of controlling a nuclear power plant comprising the steps of:
determining a maximum linear heat generation rate and a minimum critical power ratio by a core monitoring system; determining a maximum linear heat generation rate and a minimum critical power ratio by utilizing said maximum linear heat generation rate and said minimum critical power ratio determined by said core monitoring system and plant data when the calculation of said maximum linear heat generation rate and said minimum critical power ratio is not effected by said core monitoring system; comparing said maximum linear heat generation rate and said minimum critical power ratio so determined with thermal limit values set in advance for them, respectively; and holding a control signal outputted from an automatic power regulator system to a re-circulation flow control system and to a control rod control system when at least one of said maximum linear heat generation rate and said minimum critical power ratio exceeds said thermal limit values. 11. A method of controlling a nuclear power plant according to determining said maximum linear heat generation rate and said minimum critical power ratio by said core monitoring system under the state where said control signal outputted from said automatic power regulator system is held; comparing said maximum linear heat generation rate and said minimum critical power ratio so determined with said thermal limit values; and stopping holding of said control signal in said automatic power regulator system when said maximum linear heat generation rate and said minimum critical power ratio are below said thermal limit values. 12. A method of controlling a nuclear power plant according to determining said maximum linear heat generation rate and said minimum critical power ratio by said core monitoring system under the state where said control signal outputted from said automatic power regulator system is held; comparing said maximum linear heat generation rate and said minimum critical power ratio so determined with said thermal limit values; and stopping the output of said control signal in said automatic output regulator system when at least one of said maximum linear heat generation rate and said minimum critical power ratio exceeds said thermal limit values. 13. A program for use in a control method of a nuclear power plant, comprising:
a process portion for determining a maximum linear heat generation rate and a minimum critical power ratio by a core monitoring system; a process portion for determining a maximum linear heat generation rate and a minimum critical power ratio by utilizing said maximum linear heat generation rate and said minimum critical power ratio determined by said core monitoring system and plant data when the calculation of said maximum linear heat generation rate and said minimum critical power ratio by said core monitoring system is not effected; a process portion for comparing said maximum linear heat generation rate and said minimum critical power ratio so determined with thermal limit values set in advance for them, respectively; and a process portion for holding a control signal outputted from an automatic power regulator system to a re-circulation flow control system and to a control rod control system when at least one of said maximum linear heat generation rate and said minimum critical power ratio exceeds said thermal limit values. Description [0001] Thermal limit values of fuel loaded into the core of a boiling water nuclear power plant include two thermal limit values, that is, the thermal limit values for a maximum linear heat generation rate and a minimum critical power ratio. The linear heat generation rate represents an output per unit length of a fuel rod in a fuel assembly and the critical power ratio represents a ratio of a fuel assembly output (critical output), when boiling transition takes place, to an actual fuel assembly output. Both can be calculated with high accuracy by using the calculation result of a three-dimensional power distribution inside the core by a core monitoring system. Generally, the core monitoring system is activated by operators in a one-hour cycle or on an on-demand basis. The operators monitor whether or not the maximum linear heat generation rate and the minimum critical power ratio exceed the respective thermal limit values on the basis of the calculation result by the core monitoring system, judge whether or not the control rod operation and the core flow rate operation should be continued, and control the reactor output. [0002] Recently, needs have been increasing for the use of an automatic power regulator system so as to save power involved in the reactor operation and for high-speed activation to improve economy. When the high-speed operation is executed by using the automatic power regulator system, an automatic thermal limit monitor for monitoring the thermal limit values in a short cycle is necessary as back-up means for the operators. An example of the conventional automatic thermal limit monitors is described in JP-A-51-67898. This reference describes a method of monitoring the thermal limit values by the steps of calculating an output distribution in a prescribed area inside a core by a one-dimensional neutron diffusion model, comparing and collating the one-dimensional neutron diffusion result with an indication value of a local power range monitor and executing a corrected one-dimensional calculation which adds a correction to the boundary condition. Whether or not the maximum linear heat generation rate and the minimum critical power ratio satisfy the respective thermal limit values is judged by such an automatic thermal limit monitor, and when they are judged as exceeding the thermal limit values, an automatic operation exclusion instruction is outputted to the automatic power regulator system. Incidentally, the term “automatic operation exclusion” means the stop of the operation of the automatic power regulator system, and the automatic power regulator system must be activated once again to re-start the automatic operation. [0003] According to the prior art technology described above, the maximum linear heat generation rate and the minimum critical power ratio can be calculated in a shorter cycle (about 10 seconds) than the calculation cycle (generally, one hour) of the core monitoring system for executing a three-dimensional power distribution calculation. To improve reliability, however, duplexing and further reduction of the cycle (to one second or below) are necessary in the monitoring operation of the thermal limit values by the automatic power regulator system. Because the processes for this purpose are complicated and troublesome, duplexing and further reduction of the cycle have not yet been achieved by this prior art technology. [0004] To further shorten the calculation cycle of the maximum linear heat generation rate and the minimum critical power ratio, therefore, it may be possible to employ an automatic thermal limit monitor which calculates the maximum linear heat generation rate and the minimum critical power ratio in the following way while the core monitoring system is executing its calculation. In other words, it may be possible to correct the maximum linear heat generation rate and the minimum critical power ratio as the calculation result of the core monitoring system by utilizing the values of the plant data (for example, the output of a local power range monitor) at the time when calculation is made by the core monitoring system and the plant data at the present moment and thus to briefly calculate the maximum linear heat generation rate and the minimum critical power ratio at the present moment. [0005] When such an automatic thermal limit monitor is employed, duplexing for improving reliability can be achieved easily because the process is simple, and the cycle can be shortened, as well. Nonetheless, this method involves the problem that calculation accuracy of the maximum linear heat generation rate and the minimum critical power ratio is low. For this reason, the calculation error increases as the time passes from the calculation by the core monitoring system. In other words, calculation accuracy gradually gets deteriorated from immediately after the calculation by the core monitoring system, the calculation error reaches the maximum immediately before the next calculation by the core monitoring system and is again improved immediately after the next calculation by the core monitoring system. [0006] Let's assume hereby the case where the automatic thermal limit monitor is used to judge whether or not the maximum linear heat generation rate and the minimum critical power ratio satisfy the thermal limit values, and the automatic operation exclusion instruction is outputted to the automatic power regulator system when they exceed the thermal limit values. Because calculation accuracy of the brief calculation of the maximum linear heat generation rate and the minimum critical power ratio by the automatic thermal limit monitor is low as described above, the maximum linear heat generation rate and the minimum critical power ratio exceed the respective thermal limit values in many cases under such a core condition where the maximum linear heat generation rate and the minimum critical power ratio exist in the proximity of the thermal limit values. In order to briefly calculate the maximum linear heat generation rate and the minimum critical power ratio, the automatic thermal limit monitor is designed in such a fashion that the calculation result becomes rather conservative. Therefore, the possibility that the maximum linear heat generation rate and the minimum critical power ratio exceed the thermal limit values is high when the core condition is in the proximity of the thermal limit values, or when the control rod operation quantity is great during the period in which the core monitoring system executes the calculation. [0007] The automatic power regulator system is stopped when the maximum linear heat generation rate and the minimum critical power ratio exceed the thermal limit values. However, because calculation accuracy of the maximum linear heat generation rate and the minimum critical power ratio by the automatic thermal limit monitor is low as described above, they are judged in many cases as exceeding the thermal limit values although they do not actually exceed the thermal limit values. In such cases, the automatic power regulator system must be repeatedly stopped and re-activated. Re-activation of the automatic power regulator system is very complicated and troublesome to practice because the links with other systems such as the control rod control system, the re-circulation flow control systems, etc., must be established once again. Consequently, it is difficult by the method described above to virtually use the automatic power regulator system. [0008] It is an object of the present invention to provide a control system of a nuclear power plant, and a control method therefor, capable of easily executing automatic power regulation by an automatic power regulator system even when a maximum linear heat generation rate and a minimum critical power ratio are determined in a short cycle by a brief calculation. [0009] To accomplish the object described above, the present invention provides a control system of a nuclear power plant which comprises a core monitoring system for determining a maximum linear heat generation rate and a minimum critical power ratio in a certain time interval; an automatic thermal limit monitor for determining a maximum linear heat generation rate and a minimum critical power ratio by utilizing the maximum linear heat generation rate and the minimum critical power ratio determined by the core monitoring system and plant data when the core monitoring system does not execute the calculation of the maximum linear heat generation rate and the minimum critical power ratio, comparing the maximum linear heat generation rate and the minimum critical power ratio so determined with thermal limit values set in advance for them, and outputting an operation hold instruction when at least one of the maximum linear heat generation rate and the minimum critical power ratio exceeds the thermal limit values; and an automatic power regulator system for outputting control signals to a re-circulation flow control system for controlling the re-circulation flow rate in a reactor and to a control rod control system for controlling the positions of control rods in the reactor, and holding the control signals when the operation hold instruction is outputted from the automatic thermal limit monitor. [0010] The automatic power control system holds the control signals to the control rod control system and to the re-circulation flow control system when at least one of the maximum linear heat generation rate and the minimum critical power ratio determined by the automatic thermal limit monitor exceeds the thermal limit value. Therefore, when the actual maximum linear heat generation rate and the actual minimum critical power ratio are below the thermal limit values, the automatic power regulator system need not be re-activated, and the control of the control rods and the re-circulation flow rate can be started again smoothly. Even when the maximum linear heat generation rate and the minimum critical power ratio are determined in a short cycle by the brief calculation, therefore, automatic power regulation can be easily carried out by the automatic power regulator system. The present invention is effective for the continuation of the automatic operation particularly when the core condition exists in the proximity of the thermal limit values. [0011] When the automatic power regulator system holds the control signal when it receives the operation hold instruction from the automatic thermal limit monitor, the present invention compares the maximum linear heat generation rate and the minimum critical power ratio determined by the core monitoring system with the thermal limit values, and stops the holding operation of the control signal by the automatic power regulator system when the maximum linear heat generation rate and the minimum critical power ratio are below the thermal limit values. [0012] Because holding of the control signal by the automatic power regulator system is stopped when the maximum linear heat generation rate and the minimum critical power ratio that are determined highly accurately by the core monitoring system are below the thermal limit values, the automatic output regulating operation can be continued when the actual maximum linear heat generation rate and the actual minimum critical power ratio are below the set values. [0013] When the automatic power regulator system holds the control signal as it receives the operation hold instruction from the automatic thermal limit monitor, the maximum linear heat generation rate and the minimum critical power ratio that are determined by the core monitoring system are compared with the thermal limit values, and when at least one of the maximum linear heat generation rate and the minimum critical power ratio exceeds the thermal limit values, the output of the control signal by the automatic power regulator system is stopped. [0014] Because the output of the control signal by the automatic power regulator system is stopped when at least one of the maximum linear heat generation rate and the minimum critical power ratio that are determined highly accurately by the core monitoring system exceeds the thermal limit values, the automatic power regulating operation can be stopped when the actual maximum linear heat generation rate and the actual minimum critical power ratio exceed the thermal limit values. [0015]FIG. 1 is a structural view of a control system of a nuclear power plant according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention; [0016]FIG. 2 is a schematic view showing an LPRM that is utilized for calculating an LPRM mean value when a maximum linear heat generation rate is calculated by an automatic thermal limit monitor; [0017]FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing a process in the automatic thermal limit monitor; [0018]FIG. 4 is a schematic view showing the LPRM that is utilized for calculating the LPRM mean value when a minimum critical power ratio is calculated by the automatic thermal limit monitor; [0019]FIG. 5 is a graph showing an example of the change, with time, of the maximum linear heat generation rate calculated by a core monitoring system and the maximum linear heat generation rate calculated by the automatic thermal limit monitor; and [0020]FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing a process in an automatic power regulator system. [0021] A preferred embodiment of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. [0022]FIG. 1 shows a control system of a nuclear power plant according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention. A core [0023] The LPRMs [0024] Referring to FIG. 1, the core monitoring system [0025] The automatic thermal limit monitor [0026] Next, the calculation method of the maximum linear heat generation rate and the minimum critical power ratio at the step [0027] Here, the LPRM mean values ALPRM (K, M) and CLPRM (K, M) are the mean of the four LPRM indication values of each level of the height A, B, C and D in the LPRM axial direction as shown in FIG. 2. [0028] When the minimum critical power ratio is calculated, the minimum critical power ratio inside each area comprising the sixteen fuel bundles is calculated, and the minimum critical power ratio of the core is the smallest value among the minimum critical power ratios ACPR(M) calculated for each area. The minimum critical power ratio inside the area M is calculated by correcting the minimum critical output ratio CCPR(M) of the area M, that is calculated by the core monitoring system, by the mean value ALPRM(M) of the present LPRM of the area M and the LPRM mean value CLPRM(M) at the time of calculation of the area M by the core monitoring system, and by executing also the correction AC(M) in accordance with the change of the control rod position from the start of the calculation of the core monitoring system as well as the change in the core flow rate. The calculation formula of the minimum critical power ratio by the automatic thermal limit monitor is represented by the following expression (2): [0029] Here, the LPRM mean values ALPRM(M) and CLPRM(M) are the mean values of twelve LPRMs other than the LPRM of the A level as shown in FIG. 4. [0030]FIG. 5 shows an example of the changes, with time, of the maximum linear heat generation rate calculated by the core monitoring system [0031] As shown in FIG. 5, the automatic thermal limit monitor [0032] When the maximum linear heat generation rate reaches the thermal limit value as indicated by the point A in the drawing, the automatic thermal limit monitor [0033] As described above, the operation hold instruction, the operation hold release instruction and the automatic operation exclusion instruction outputted from the automatic thermal limit monitor [0034]FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing the processing content of the automatic power regulator system [0035] At the step [0036] When the flow proceeds from the step [0037] After the hold state is released at the step [0038] The control rod control system [0039] In the embodiment described above, when at least one of the maximum linear heat generation rate and the minimum critical power ratio determined by the brief calculation exceeds the thermal limit value, the control signal is held while the link of the automatic power regulator system [0040] If the maximum linear heat generation rate and the minimum critical power ratio that are determined accurately by the core monitoring system [0041] Furthermore, if at least one of the maximum linear heat generation rate and the minimum critical power ratio that are accurately determined by the core monitoring system [0042] To quickly stop the control of the control rod and the core flow rate when exclusion of the automatic operation is required, the automatic thermal limit monitor [0043] When the LPRM [0044] In this embodiment, the calculation of the maximum linear heat generation rate and the minimum critical power ratio in the core monitoring system Referenced by
Classifications
Legal Events
Rotate |