Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20020177220 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 09/825,749
Publication dateNov 28, 2002
Filing dateApr 4, 2001
Priority dateApr 4, 2001
Also published asCA2440370A1, DE60138966D1, EP1373578A1, EP1373578A4, EP1373578B1, US6472199, WO2002081755A1
Publication number09825749, 825749, US 2002/0177220 A1, US 2002/177220 A1, US 20020177220 A1, US 20020177220A1, US 2002177220 A1, US 2002177220A1, US-A1-20020177220, US-A1-2002177220, US2002/0177220A1, US2002/177220A1, US20020177220 A1, US20020177220A1, US2002177220 A1, US2002177220A1
InventorsAlan Monken
Original AssigneeMonken Alan R.
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Method of cleaning dairy pipelines using enzyme pretreatment
US 20020177220 A1
Abstract
Improved, non-chlorinated systems and methods for removing soils from hard surfaces are provided wherein such surfaces are initially contacted with a first aqueous use dispersion including a protease enzyme, followed by contact the surface with a second aqueous acidic use dispersion. The enzyme dispersion preferably includes a polyol such as propylene glycol and in use is heated to a temperature up to about 120° C. The acid dispersion may include a surfactant and is also used in a heated condition. The two-component systems of the invention can be used for CIP treatment of dairy or other equipment in lieu chlorinated cleaning agents.
Images(5)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(52)
I claim:
1. A method of removing soils from a surface comprising the steps of:
initially contacting said surface with a first aqueous use dispersion including a protease enzyme; and
thereafter contacting said surface with a second aqueous use dispersion including an acid and a surfactant.
2. The method of claim 1, said initial contacting step being carried out for a period of from about 2-15 minutes.
3. The method of claim 2, said period being from about 5-10 minutes.
4. The method of claim 1, said first dispersion also containing a lipase enzyme.
5. The method of claim 1, said first dispersion also including a polyol.
6. The method of claim 5, said polyol selected from the group consisting of an alkylene glycol, glycerine, sorbitol, mannitol and mixtures thereof.
7. The method of claim 5, said polyol being present at a level of from about 0-0.01% by weight.
8. The method of claim 1, said protease enzyme being present at a level of from about 0.002-0.5% by weight.
9. The method of claim 1, said acid being selected from the group consisting of phosphoric, sulfuric, hydrochloric, lactic, octanoic, citric, hydroxyacetic, sulfamic, decanoic, propionic, nonanoic acids and mixtures thereof.
10. The method of claim 9, said acid being present at a level of from about 0.0005-0.0375% by weight.
11. The method of claim 1, said second contacting step being carried out for a period of from about 2-15 minutes.
12. The method of claim 1, said first aqueous use dispersion including a surfactant.
13. A method of removing soils from a surface comprising the steps of:
initially contacting said surface with a first aqueous use dispersion including a protease enzyme; and
thereafter contacting said surface with a second aqueous use dispersion including an acid selected from the group consisting of phosphoric, sulfuric, lactic, octanoic, hydrochloric, citric, hydroxyacetic, sulfamic, decanoic, propionic, nonanoic acids and mixtures thereof.
14. The method of claim 13, said initial contacting step being carried out for a period of from about 2-15 minutes.
15. The method of claim 14, said period being from about 5-10 minutes.
16. The method of claim 13, said first dispersion also containing a lipase enzyme.
17. The method of claim 13, said first dispersion also including a polyol.
18. The method of claim 17, said polyol selected from the group consisting of an alkylene glycol, glycerine, sorbitol, mannitol and mixtures thereof.
19. The method of claim 17, said polyol being present at a level of from about 0-0.01% by weight.
20. The method of claim 13, said protease enzyme being present at a level of from about 0.002-0.5% by weight.
21. The method of claim 13, said acid being present at a level of from about 0.0005-0.0375% by weight.
22. The method of claim 13, said second contacting step being carried out for a period of from about 2-15 minutes.
23. A system for removing soils from a surface, said system comprising:
a first aqueous use dispersion including a protease enzyme; and
a second aqueous use dispersion including an acid and a surfactant.
24. The system of claim 23, said first dispersion also containing a lipase enzyme.
25. The system of claim 23, said first dispersion also including a polyol.
26. The system of claim 25, said polyol selected from the group consisting of an alkylene glycol, glycerine, sorbitol, mannitol and mixtures thereof.
27. The system of claim 26, said polyol being present at a level of from about 0-0.01% by weight.
28. The system of claim 23, said protease enzyme being present at a level of from about 0.002-0.5% by weight.
29. The system of claim 23, said acid being selected from the group consisting of phosphoric, sulfuric, hydrochloric, citric, lactic, octanoic, hydroxyacetic, sulfamic, decanoic, propionic, nonanoic acids and mixtures thereof.
30. The system of claim 29, said acid being present at a level of from about 0.0005-0.0375% by weight.
31. The system of claim 23, said first aqueous use dispersion including a surfactant.
32. A system for removing soils from a surface, said system comprising:
a first aqueous use dispersion including a protease enzyme; and
a second aqueous use dispersion including an acid selected from the group consisting of phosphoric, sulfuric, lactic, octanoic, hydrochloric, citric, hydroxyacetic, sulfamic, decanoic, propionic, nonanoic acids and mixtures thereof.
33. The system of claim 32, said first dispersion also containing a lipase enzyme.
34. The system of claim 32, said first dispersion also including a polyol.
35. The system of claim 34, said polyol selected from the group consisting of an alkylene glycol, glycerine, sorbitol, mannitol and mixtures thereof.
36. The system of claim 35, said polyol being present at a level of from about 0-0.01% by weight.
37. The system of claim 32, said protease enzyme being present at a level of from about 0.002-0.5% by weight.
38. The system of claim 32, said acid being present at a level of from about 0.0005-0.0375% by weight.
39. A system for removing soils from a surface, said system comprising:
a first aqueous dilutable concentrate dispersion including a protease enzyme; and
a second aqueous dilutable concentrate dispersion including an acid and a surfactant.
40. The system of claim 39, said first dispersion also containing a lipase enzyme.
41. The system of claim 39, said first dispersion also including a polyol.
42. The system of claim 41, said polyol selected from the group consisting of an alkylene glycol, glycerine, sorbitol, mannitol and mixtures thereof.
43. The system of claim 41, said polyol being present at a level of from about 5-20% by weight.
44. The system of claim 39, said protease enzyme being present at a level of from about 4-100% by weight.
45. The system of claim 39, said acid being selected from the group consisting of phosphoric, sulfuric, hydrochloric, citric, lactic, octanoic, hydroxyacetic, sulfamic, decanoic, propionic, nonanoic acids and mixtures thereof.
46. The system of claim 45, said acid being present at a level of from about 1-75% by weight.
47. A system for removing soils from a surface, said system comprising:
a first aqueous dilutable concentrate dispersion including a protease enzyme; and
a second aqueous dilutable concentrate dispersion including an acid selected from the group consisting of phosphoric, sulfuric, hydrochloric, citric, hydroxy-acetic, sulfamic, decanoic, propionic, nonanoic acids and mixtures thereof.
48. The system of claim 47, said first dispersion also containing a lipase enzyme.
49. The system of claim 47, said first dispersion also including a polyol.
50. The system of claim 49, said polyol selected from the group consisting of an alkylene glycol, glycerine, sorbitol, mannitol and mixtures thereof.
51. The system of claim 47, said polyol being present at a level of from about 0-20% by weight.
52. The system of claim 47, said acid being present at a level of from about 1-75% by weight.
Description
    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • [0001]
    1. Field of the Invention
  • [0002]
    The present invention is broadly concerned with improved, two-component systems and methods for removing proteinaceous soils from surfaces, including an enzymatic prewash and an acidic secondary wash. More particularly, the invention is concerned with such systems and methods which are especially suited for clean-in-place (CIP) treatment of dairy equipment subject to milk-borne contamination, wherein the initial prewash includes a protease enzyme, preferably in combination with a polyol, whereas the secondary acid wash includes an acid, advantageously combined with a surfactant.
  • [0003]
    2. Description of the Prior Art
  • [0004]
    During dairy processing of milk, heat sterilization is performed in order to prevent microbial contamination. However, this inevitably causes deposition of milk-borne proteinaceous materials onto the surfaces of the dairy equipment. Such proteinaceous soils are extremely tenacious and are difficult to remove without a combination of a strong oxidizer combined with high levels of alkalinity for fat removal. The most common oxidizers in use today are chlorine-based materials. However, chlorine oxidizers present environmental problems, and there is an ongoing effort to find substitute, non-chlorinated cleaning agents which match or exceed the cleaning power of the chlorinated materials while avoiding the adverse environmental impact thereof.
  • [0005]
    Most dairies employ the CIP method, involving flushing of contaminated equipment surfaces with cleaning solution(s). For example, in conventional practice, the equipment is rinsed with lukewarm (110-120° F.) water followed by a hot was using a chlorinated agent at 160-175° C. The last step is commonly a cold acidic rinse using a phosphoric acid-based wash. The necessary tanks, pumps and control hardware for CIP processes are thus presently in place in the dairies. It is therefore highly desirable that any new cleaning system or method be usable in a CIP context without the need for any significant modifications of the in-place equipment.
  • [0006]
    A number of researchers have examined the utility of enzyme treatments as primary cleaning products, see e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,212,761, 5,858,117, 4,243,543, 5,510,052, 5,783,542, 5,489,531, 6,071,356 and 5,861,366. However, these references do not deal with commercial methods and systems where an enzymatic treatment is followed by an acid wash.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • [0007]
    The present invention overcomes the problems outlined above and provides cleaning methods and systems especially designed for the removal of proteinaceous soils from surfaces. The invention finds particular utility in the CIP treatment of dairy equipment in lieu of conventional chlorinated cleansers. Broadly speaking the method of invention involves initially contacting soiled surfaces with a first aqueous use dispersion including a protease enzyme and preferably (but not necessarily) a polyol therein. After such initial treatment, the surface is thereafter contacted with a second aqueous use dispersion including an acid such as phosphoric acid; the second use dispersion preferably includes a surfactant therein.
  • [0008]
    The initial and second contacting steps are advantageously carried out for a period of from about 2-15 minutes, more preferably from about 5-10 minutes. Normally, both of the use dispersions are heated to a level above ambient, although this is not essential. In practice, both of the dispersions are simply circulated for contact with soiled surfaces; for example, in CIP cleaning, the use dispersions are circulated in a manner essentially identical with the conventional practice.
  • [0009]
    Dispersions in accordance with the invention (as used herein, “dispersions” refers to any type of aqueous mixture, be it a true solution, a colloid, an emulsion or a dispersion) are typically provided in the form of concentrates which can be diluted on-site at the time of use. Moreover, the enzyme prewash and acid wash components are preferably provided to the consumer as a system designed to operate in tandem for the most efficient cleaning.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
  • [0010]
    The following example sets forth preferred enzyme prewash/acid wash systems and treatments in accordance with the invention. It is to be understood, however, that this example is provided by way of illustration and nothing therein should be taken as a limitation upon the overall scope of the invention.
  • EXAMPLE
  • [0011]
    In this series of tests, dual phase enzyme prewash/acid wash trials were conducted using a commercially available enzyme formulation with different acids. In these tests, the following apparatus was employed: three 1 L beaker, stirring bars, 50 or 100 ml graduated cylinder, hot plate/stirrer, analytical balance weighing to the nearest 0.1 mg, laboratory oven thermostatted to 100-110° C., laboratory oven thermostatted to 40° C., 304 SS or glass panels measuring 3″×6″0.037″, having a ¼″ hole in one end.
  • [0012]
    The reagents used were xylene, isopropanol, one 12 oz. can evaporated milk, AOAC synthetic hard water (25 grains/gal. hardness), and analytical water. One enzyme formulation contained 20% by weight Purafect 4000L protease enzyme (Genecor, Inc.), 10% by weight propylene glycol USP, and 70% by weight low conductivity water. Other enzymes formulations used were experimental enzymes A, B and C made up of (where all percentages are by weight): A-Esperase 8.0L, 10%, Lipase 100L, 10%, propylene glycol, 10%, water, 70%; B-Savinase 16.0L, 12%, Lipase 100L, 6%, propylene glycol, 10%, water, 72%; and C-Savinase 16.01L, 5%, Lipase 100L, 10%, propylene glycol, 10%, water, 75%. All of the commercial protease enzyme products (Esperase, Lipase, Savinase) are available from Novo Nordisk of Krogshøjvej, Denmark. The acids used were commercially available preparations, namely (1) containing 22.67% by weight 75% phosphoric acid, 0.4% by weight Ampholac YJH40 surfactant (sodium alkylimino dipropionate, CAS #94441-92-6 sold by Berol Nobel), 6.25% by weight 96% sulfuric acid and 70.68% by weight water; (2) containing 24.0% by weight 75% phosphoric acid, 0.5% by weight Ampholac YJH40 surfactant, 10% by weight 96% sulfuric acid and 65.5% by weight water; (3) an acid sanitizer sold by West Agro, Inc; and Unipred, a phosphoric acid-based acid cleaner commercialized by Aurhusegnens. In addition, control tests were carried out using a two-part commercially available alkaline chlorinated cleanser at recommended use levels.
  • [0013]
    The test panels are first cleaned by wiping with xylene, then with isopropanol, followed by drying in an oven (100-110° C. for 10-15 minutes) to insure complete evaporation of the solvent. The panels were suspended in the oven by attaching a rigid wire hanger to the panel hole, so that no contact is made with the oven or other items within the oven. The dried panels were then removed from the oven and allowed to cool a minimum of 20 minutes. The panels were then carefully handled so as to eliminate contact with soil sources, and the initial weight of each panel was recorded to the nearest 0.1 mg.
  • [0014]
    The evaporated milk was then emptied into the 1 L beaker along with an equivalent volume of analytical water, and the mixture was stirred to insure homogeneity. Up to three panels are placed in the milk by setting the end without the hole on the bottom of the beaker and propping the other end of the panel against the side of the beaker. Approximately ¾ of the panel should be immersed in the milk. The panels are allowed to sit in the milk for 15 minutes. After the set period, the panels were removed from the milk and drained in air for 5 minutes. Each panel side is then rinsed with 50 ml of 25 grains AOAC synthetic hard water previously heated to 90-100 ° F. Care is taken to pour the rinse water over each side of the panel so as to contact all of the soiled areas with rinsed water. The rinse water is allowed to drain off each panel and then the panels are then hung in the 40 ° C. oven to dry the panels. The panels are then removed from the oven and allowed to cool for at least 15 minutes. After cooling, the panels are weighed and each weight is recorded to the nearest 0.1 mg. The soil deposition, rinsing, drying and weighing cycle is carried out a total of five times for each panel, or until the soil weight falls within the range of 10-15 mg.
  • [0015]
    The soiled panels were then cleaned using the enzyme prewash/acid wash process of the invention. For this purpose, a 1 L beaker was used for each of the prewash and acid wash. Specifically, for the prewash, 800 ml 25 grain AOAC synthetic hard water was placed in the beaker along with a specified percent by volume of the enzyme boost was added. Similarly, for the acid wash, 800 ml of the synthetic hard water was placed in the other beaker along with a specified percent by volume of the acid product. Both the prewash and acid wash solutions were heated using the hot plate to a temperature of 40° C., unless otherwise specified.
  • [0016]
    Each test panel was first immersed in the enzyme prewash for a period of 8 minutes with agitation via a stir bar. After the prewash period, each panel was removed from the prewash and immediately immersed in the acid wash, without intermediate rinsing. The panel remained in the acid wash during stirring with a stir bar for an additional 8 minute period.
  • [0017]
    Next, each panel is removed from the acid wash solution, and is rinsed in tap water for about 5 seconds. The panel is then suspended within the 40° C. oven for a period of about 15 minutes to dryness. The panel is removed from the oven, cooled in air for about 30 minutes and then reweighed. The weight of the panel after the enzyme prewash/acid wash cycle was then compared with the soiled weight thereof to determine the percent soil removed. Each of the enzyme and acid test solutions were tested in triplicate and the results were averaged.
  • [0018]
    In certain cases as a comparison, the soiled panels were treated only with an acid treatment, in the manner set forth above. As a further comparison, other panels were treated only with the above-identified two-part alkaline chlorinated cleanser.
  • [0019]
    The following table sets forth the results of these trials.
    TABLE 1
    Cleaning
    Prewash Final Wash Efficiency
    0.05% enzyme formulation 0.5 #1 84.2%
    0.05% enzyme formulation 0.15 #3 89.9%
    0.05% enzyme formulation 0.5 #2 80.0%
    0.5 #1 64.1%
    0.05% enzyme formulation 0.5 Unipred 92.9%
    0.05% enzyme formulation 0.5 #2 102.8% 
    0.3 Unipred 83.7%
    0.5 Unipred 71.9%
    0.05% enzyme formulation 0.5 #2 74.2%
    Two-part chlorinated alka- 94.1%
    line cleanser
    0.05% Enzyme A 0.5 #2 74.6%
    0.05% Enzyme B 0.5 #2 65.5%
    0.05% Enzyme C 0.5 #2 70.5%
    Two-part chlorinated alka- 81.7%
    line cleanser
  • [0020]
    As illustrated by this data, use of the enzyme prewash in combination with the acid wash gives better cleaning results, as compared with the acid only treatment.
  • [0021]
    The acid cleaning systems and methods of the invention are not limited to the preferred embodiments described in this example. For example, a variety of other commercially available enzymes can be employed, such as Alcalase 2.5 L, DX, Esperase 8.0 L, Savinase 16.0 L Type EX (all available from Novo Nordisk). In like manner, a wide variety of polyols can be used, e.g., alkylene glycol (such as propylene, hexylene or ethylene glycol), glycerine, sorbitol, mannitol and mixtures thereof.
  • [0022]
    In the case of the acid washes, suitable acids and presently preferred ranges of use in the dilutable concentrates (% by weight) include phosphoric (15-20%), sulfuric (8-12%), hydrochloric (5-12%), lactic (2-15%), octanoic (3-5%), citric (1-10%), hydroxyacetic (2-15%), sulfamic (3-75%), decanoic (3-5%), propionic (10-12%), nonanoic (3-5%) acids and mixtures thereof, with phosphoric, sulfuric and hydrochloric acids being preferred. Preferred surfactants are low-foaming acid soluble, although other types may be employed. Exemplary surfactants include sodium alkylimino dipropionate, alcohol ethoxylate, disodium octyl iminodipropionate, octyl iminodipropionate, deceth-4-phosphate, sodium alkyl ether sulfate, alkoxylated alcohols, and mixtures thereof.
  • [0023]
    The following table sets forth approximate broad and preferred ranges for the ingredients included in the concentrates and use dilutions of both the enzyme prewash and acid wash dispersions.
    TABLE 2
    Ingredient Broad Range Preferred Range
    Enzyme Prewash Dispersions
    Dilutable Concentrates
    Protease enzyme  4-100%  8-30%
    Polyol  0-20%  8-12%
    Water q.s. q.s.
    Surfactant 0-5% 1-3%
    Use Dilutions
    Protease Enzyme 0.002-0.5%  0.004-0.015%
    Polyol  0-0.01% 0.004-0.006%
    Water q.s. q.s.
    Surfactant    0-0.0025 0.0005-0.0015 
    Acid Wash Dispersions
    Dilutable Concentrates
    Ingredient Broad Range Preferred Range
    Acid  1-75%  3-30%
    Surfactant 0-2% 0.3-1%  
    Water q.s. q.s.
    pH 0.5-3   1-2
    Use Dilutions
    Acid 0.0005-0.0375% 0.0015-0.015% 
    Surfactant    0-0.001% 0.00015-0.0005% 
    Water q.s. q.s.
    pH 1-4 2-4
  • [0024]
    During cleaning operations, both the initial enzyme prewash use dispersion and the second acid use dispersion should be used in a manner so as to insure contact between each of the use dispersions and the soiled surfaces for a period of from about 1- 15 minutes, and more preferably from about 5-10 minutes. Both the enzyme prewash use dispersion and the acid use dispersion are preferably used at a temperature of from about ambient to 120° C., and more preferably from about 30-60° C.
  • [0025]
    In actual practice, the two primary steps involving the enzyme prewash and acid wash can be varied to include other steps. For example, where chlorinated cleansers are usable, a chlorine treatment can be employed between the prewash and acid washes of the invention. Furthermore, a cold water rinse may be utilized after the acid wash treatment of the invention.
  • [0026]
    Although the invention finds particular utility for CIP treatment of dairy equipment, it is not so limited. To give but a few examples, the systems and methods hereof can be used to clean a broad array of equipment such as heat exchangers, tanks, pipes, centrifuges, evaporators, filters, extruders, coders, coolers, sieves, hydrocyclones, ultra-, hyper-, micro- and nanofiltration units.
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US7887641Jul 14, 2005Feb 15, 2011Ecolab Usa Inc.Neutral or alkaline medium chain peroxycarboxylic acid compositions and methods employing them
US8114222Oct 25, 2005Feb 14, 2012Ecolab Usa Inc.Method for cleaning industrial equipment with pre-treatment
US8398781Aug 27, 2004Mar 19, 2013Ecolab Usa Inc.Methods for cleaning industrial equipment with pre-treatment
US20060042665 *Oct 25, 2005Mar 2, 2006Ecolab Inc.Method for cleaning industrial equipment with pre-treatment
US20060046945 *Aug 27, 2004Mar 2, 2006Ecolab, Inc.Methods for cleaning industrial equipment with pre-treatment
US20080105279 *Oct 31, 2007May 8, 2008Ecolab Inc.Methods for cleaning industrial equipment with pre-treatment
US20080105280 *Oct 31, 2007May 8, 2008Ecolab Inc.Methods for cleaning industrial equipment with pre-treatment
US20080105282 *Oct 31, 2007May 8, 2008Ecolab Inc.Methods for cleaning industrial equipment with pre-treatment
US20080121250 *Oct 31, 2007May 29, 2008Ecolab Inc.Methods for cleaning industrial equipment with pre-treatment
US20090288683 *May 21, 2008Nov 26, 2009Ecolab Inc.Alkaline peroxygen food soil cleaner
US20100236581 *Apr 23, 2010Sep 23, 2010Ecolab Usa Inc.Methods for cleaning industrial equipment with pre-treatment
WO2007050291A1 *Oct 11, 2006May 3, 2007Ecolab Inc.Methods for cleaning industrial equipment with pre-treatment
WO2009130597A2 *Mar 25, 2009Oct 29, 2009Johnsondiversey, Inc.Deodorizing agent composition for cip and method for deodorizing using same
WO2009130597A3 *Mar 25, 2009Jun 17, 2010Diversey, Inc.Deodorizing agent composition for cip and method for deodorizing using same
Classifications
U.S. Classification435/264
International ClassificationC11D3/02, B08B3/08, C12N9/20, C11D3/20, C11D3/04, C11D3/386, C12S9/00, C11D11/00, C12N9/50
Cooperative ClassificationC11D3/2075, C11D3/38618, C11D3/042, C11D11/0064, C11D11/0041
European ClassificationC11D3/04A, C11D3/20E, C11D11/00B2D6, C11D3/386B, C11D11/00B8
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Apr 4, 2001ASAssignment
Owner name: WEST ARGO, INC., MISSOURI
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MONKEN, ALAN R.;REEL/FRAME:011733/0181
Effective date: 20010306
May 17, 2006REMIMaintenance fee reminder mailed
Oct 30, 2006REINReinstatement after maintenance fee payment confirmed
Dec 4, 2006PRDPPatent reinstated due to the acceptance of a late maintenance fee
Effective date: 20061205
Dec 5, 2006FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 4
Dec 5, 2006SULPSurcharge for late payment
Dec 26, 2006FPExpired due to failure to pay maintenance fee
Effective date: 20061029
Apr 21, 2010FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 8
Mar 24, 2014FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 12