Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20030070808 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 10/153,144
Publication dateApr 17, 2003
Filing dateMay 21, 2002
Priority dateOct 15, 2001
Also published asCA2407102A1
Publication number10153144, 153144, US 2003/0070808 A1, US 2003/070808 A1, US 20030070808 A1, US 20030070808A1, US 2003070808 A1, US 2003070808A1, US-A1-20030070808, US-A1-2003070808, US2003/0070808A1, US2003/070808A1, US20030070808 A1, US20030070808A1, US2003070808 A1, US2003070808A1
InventorsJoe Allison
Original AssigneeConoco Inc.
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Use of syngas for the upgrading of heavy crude at the wellhead
US 20030070808 A1
Abstract
The present system may be used to hydroprocess heavy crude oil at the wellhead, effectively lowering the viscosity and removing contaminants such as sulfur, nitrogen and metal contents. The hydrogen source for hydroprocessing is the separated hydrogen product from the methane produced from a syngas plant.
Images(3)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(26)
What is claimed is:
1. A method for upgrading heavy crude oils at the wellhead comprising:
producing syngas in a syngas-producing process;
separating the syngas into H2 and CO streams; and
injecting the H2 stream into a hydroprocessing operation located at the wellhead.
2. The method according to claim 1 wherein the syngas-producing operation is of a type selected from the group consisting of CPOX (catalytic partial oxidation), ATR (autothermal reforming), and steam reforming processes.
3. The method according to claim 2 wherein the syngas-producing process is CPOX.
4. The method according to claim 3 wherein a methane-containing gas and oxygen-containing gas feed is supplied to the CPOX process.
5. The method according to claim 4 wherein the methane-containing gas is associated gas co-produced from the oil well.
6. The method according to claim 4 wherein the methane-containing gas is supplied via pipeline from other sources.
7. The method according to claim 1 wherein a hydrogen separation process separates the syngas into H2 and CO streams and optionally co-existing nitrogen streams.
8. The method according to claim 7 wherein the hydrogen separation process employs membrane separation technology.
9. The method according to claim 1 wherein the hydroprocessing operation is of a type selected from the group consisting of hydrogenation, hydrocracking, hydrodenitrogenation, hydrodemetalization, and hydrodesulfurization processes.
10. The method according to claim 9 wherein the hydroprocessing operation is hydrodesulfurization.
11. A method for upgrading heavy crude oils at the wellhead comprising:
producing syngas in a syngas-producing process;
separating the syngas into H2 and CO streams;
running the CO stream in the presence of a water feed through a water gas shift process to produce a water gas shift product comprising CO2 and additional H2;
separating the water gas shift product into H2 and CO2 streams; and
injecting the H2 streams into a hydroprocessing process located at the wellhead.
12. The method according to claim 11 wherein the syngas-producing process is of a type selected from the group consisting of CPOX (catalytic partial oxidation), ATR (autothermal reforming), and steam reforming processes.
13. The method according to claim 12 wherein the syngas-producing process is CPOX.
14. The method according to claim 13 wherein a methane-containing gas and oxygen-containing gas feed is supplied to the CPOX process.
15. The process according to claim 14 wherein the methane-containing gas is associated gas co-produced from the oil well.
16. The process according to claim 14 wherein the methane-containing gas is supplied via pipeline from other sources.
17. The method according to claim 11 wherein a hydrogen separation process separates the syngas into H2 and CO streams and optionally co-existing nitrogen streams.
18. The method according to claim 17 wherein the hydrogen separation process employs membrane separation technology.
19. The method according to claim 11 wherein the hydroprocessing process is of a type selected from the group consisting of hydrogenation, hydrocracking, hydrodenitrogenation, hydrodemetalization, and hydrodesulfurization processes.
20. The method according to claim 19 wherein the hydroprocessing process comprises a hydrodesulfurization process.
21. The method according to claim 11 further comprising feeding the product CO2 into a carbon dioxide compressor.
22. The method according to claim 21 wherein the compressed CO2 is injected into the formation via injection wells to facilitate movement of the crude oil to the producing wellhead.
23. A method for upgrading heavy crude oils at the wellhead comprising:
producing syngas in a syngas-producing process running at CPOX favorable conditions with a methane-containing gas and oxygen-containing gas feed;
separating the syngas into H2 and CO streams; and
injecting the H2 stream into a hydroprocessing process located at the wellhead.
24. A method for upgrading heavy crude oils at the wellhead comprising:
producing syngas in a syngas-producing process running at CPOX favorable conditions with a methane-containing gas and oxygen-containing gas feed;
separating the syngas into H2 and CO streams;
running the CO stream in the presence of a water feed through a water gas shift process to produce a water gas shift product comprising CO2 and additional H2;
separating the water gas shift product into H2 and CO2 streams; and
injecting the H2 streams into a hydroprocessing process located at the wellhead.
25. A system for upgrading heavy crude oils at the wellhead comprising:
providing a syngas-producing process running at CPOX favorable conditions with a methane-containing gas and oxygen-containing gas feed to produce syngas;
providing a hydrogen separation process, wherein the syngas is separated into H2 and CO streams; and
providing a hydroprocessing process located at the wellhead, wherein the H2 stream is injected.
26. A system for upgrading heavy crude oils at the wellhead comprising:
providing a syngas-producing process running at CPOX favorable conditions with a methane-containing gas and oxygen-containing gas feed to produce syngas;
providing a first hydrogen separation process, wherein the syngas is separated into H2 and CO streams;
providing a water gas shift process with a water feed and a recycle means for running the CO stream to the water gas shift process, wherein the water gas shift process produces a water gas shift product comprising additional H2 and CO2;
providing a second hydrogen separation process, wherein the water gas shift product is separated into additional H2 and CO2 streams; and
providing a hydroprocessing process located at the wellhead, wherein the H2 streams are injected.
Description
    TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • [0001]
    The present invention relates to a process for the preparation of synthesis gas, i.e., a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen, from natural gas. More particularly, this invention relates to a method for maximizing the hydrogen production in syngas. Still more particularly, the present invention relates to upgrading crude oil at the wellhead to utilize co-produced natural gas and increase the ease of transportation of the crude by reducing the viscosity and sulfur, nitrogen, and other contaminants.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • [0002]
    Large quantities of methane, the main component of natural gas, are available in many areas of the world, and natural gas is predicted to outlast oil reserves by a significant margin. However, most natural gas is situated in areas that are geographically remote from population and industrial centers. The costs of compression, transportation, and storage make its use economically unattractive. To improve the economics of natural gas use, much research has focused on the use of methane as a starting material for the production of higher hydrocarbons and hydrocarbon liquids, which are more easily transported and thus more economical. The conversion of methane to hydrocarbons is typically carried out in two steps. In the first step, methane is converted into a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen (i.e., synthesis gas or syngas). In a second step, the syngas is converted into hydrocarbons.
  • [0003]
    This first step, the preparation of synthesis gas from natural gas, is well known in the art and usually referred to as syngas conversion. The amount of hydrogen and carbon in syngas depends on the process technology, feedstock, and the operating conditions used in its manufacture. Synthesis gas can be made from a wide variety of feedstocks including natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), oil, coal and petroleum coke. Processes for converting these materials to syngas are steam methane reforming, CO2 reforming, auto thermal reforming and partial oxidation or gasification using either air or pure oxygen.
  • [0004]
    The ratio of hydrogen to carbon monoxide can range as low as 0.6 with CO2 reforming of natural gas or partial oxidation of petroleum coke to as high as 6.5 with steam methane reforming. When hydrogen is the desired product, the reforming reaction can be followed by the well-known water gas shift reaction (WGS) shown in Equation 1.
  • CO+H2OCO2+H2  (1)
  • [0005]
    The WGS essentially converts all the carbon monoxide in the raw syngas to carbon dioxide, thereby maximizing the quantity of hydrogen produced. The shift reaction can likewise be avoided and the quantity of carbon monoxide maximized by selecting a feedstock with a higher carbon to hydrogen ratio or recycling carbon dioxide through the process. Although carbon monoxide can be maximized, hydrogen cannot be eliminated and is an inevitable by-product of the process.
  • [0006]
    Current industrial use of methane as a chemical feedstock proceeds by the initial conversion of methane to carbon monoxide and hydrogen by either steam reforming, which is the most widespread process, or by dry reforming. Steam reforming currently is the major process used commercially for the conversion of methane to synthesis gas, proceeding according to Equation 2.
  • CH4+H2OCO+3H2  (2)
  • [0007]
    Although steam reforming has been practiced for over five decades, efforts to improve the energy efficiency and reduce the capital investment required for this technology continue.
  • [0008]
    The catalytic partial oxidation (CPOX) of hydrocarbons, e.g., natural gas or methane to syngas is also a process known in the art. While currently limited as an industrial process, partial oxidation has recently attracted much attention due to significant inherent advantages, such as the fact that significant heat is released during the process, in contrast to steam reforming processes.
  • [0009]
    In catalytic partial oxidation, natural gas is mixed with air, oxygen-enriched air, or oxygen, and introduced to a catalyst at elevated temperature and pressure. The partial oxidation of methane yields a syngas mixture with a H2:CO ratio of 2:1, as shown in Equation 3.
  • CH4+1/2O2 CO+2H2  (3)
  • [0010]
    This ratio is more useful than the H2:CO ratio from steam reforming for the downstream conversion of the syngas to chemicals such as methanol and to fuels. The partial oxidation is also exothermic, while the steam reforming reaction is strongly endothermic. Furthermore, oxidation reactions are typically much faster than reforming reactions. This allows the use of much smaller reactors for catalytic partial oxidation processes. The syngas in turn may be converted to hydrocarbon products, for example, fuels boiling in the middle distillate range, such as kerosene and diesel fuel, and hydrocarbon waxes by processes such as the Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis.
  • [0011]
    The selectivities of catalytic partial oxidation to the desired products, carbon monoxide and hydrogen, are controlled by several factors, but one of the most important of these factors is the choice of catalyst composition. Typically, catalyst compositions have included precious metals and/or rare earths. The large volumes of expensive catalysts needed by prior art catalytic partial oxidation processes have placed these processes generally outside the limits of economic justification.
  • [0012]
    For successful operation at commercial scale, the catalytic partial oxidation process must be able to achieve a high conversion of the methane feedstock at high gas hourly space velocities, and the selectivity of the process to the desired products of carbon monoxide and hydrogen must be high. Such high conversion and selectivity must be achieved without detrimental effects to the catalyst, such as the formation of carbon deposits (“coke”) on the catalyst, which severely reduces catalyst performance.
  • [0013]
    Accordingly, the economic evaluation for selection of a syngas process depends upon the required hydrogen to carbon monoxide molar ratio, availability and cost of hydrocarbon feedstocks and catalysts, availability and cost of oxygen and carbon dioxide, the cost of utilities and credits available for export steam and sale of excess hydrogen or carbon monoxide coproduct. This analysis is complex and highly site dependent. Typically, petrochemical applications of syngas require a ratio of hydrogen to carbon monoxide of either 1:1 or 2:1. Commercial processes for syngas yield much higher ratios; therefore, separation technology, by-product credits and production techniques that can adjust the hydrogen to carbon monoxide ratio are important aspects of syngas production.
  • [0014]
    Presently, heavy crude oil presents processing problems in refineries due to high viscosities, sulfur, nitrogen, and metal contents. Because of environmental requirements, steps are often taken at the refinery to upgrade these crude oils by reducing their viscosity and contaminants. Treatment strategies range from blending lighter crudes with heavier crudes to hydroprocessing. These strategies, though effective, are expensive because they require additional intermediates, such as hydrogen, to be produced. Therefore, there exists a need for a method of upgrading heavy crude oil with an already existing hydrogen source.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • [0015]
    The present invention relates to hydrotreating at the wellhead, using hydrogen produced from methane through the syngas process. As defined herein, the term “hydrotreating” is intended to be synonymous with the term “hydroprocessing,” which involves the reaction of hydrocarbons at operating conditions with hydrogen, usually in the presence of a catalyst. Included within the processes intended to be encompassed by the term “hydroprocessing” are hydrocracking, aromatic hydrogenation, ring-opening, and hydrorefining, or hydrodesulfurization, hydrodenitrification, and hydrodemetalation. As will be recognized, one common attribute of these processes, and the reactions being effected therein, is that they are all “hydrogen-consuming,” and are, therefore, exothermic in nature. Although hydroprocessing may be applied to any hydrocarbon feedstock, it is particularly applicable, though less easily applicable, to heavier feedstocks such as residua, vacuum and atmospheric gas oils, coal and shale liquids, etc., since these feedstocks typically contain higher concentrations of less easily removed contaminants.
  • [0016]
    Additionally, the term “catalytic partial oxidation”, or CPOX, when used in the context of the present syngas production methods, in addition to its usual meaning, can also refer to a net catalytic partial oxidation process, in which hydrocarbons (comprising mainly methane) and oxygen-containing gases (i.e. oxygen, oxygen-enriched air, air) are supplied as reactants and the resulting product stream is predominantly the partial oxidation products CO and H2, rather than the complete oxidation products CO2 and H2O. For example, the preferred catalysts serve in the short contact time process of the invention, which is described in more detail below, to yield a product gas mixture containing H2 and CO in a molar ratio of approximately 2:1. Although the primary reaction mechanism of the process is partial oxidation, other oxidation reactions may also occur in the reactor to a lesser or minor extent. As shown in Equation (2), the partial oxidation of methane yields H2 and CO in a molar ratio of 2:1.
  • [0017]
    As explained above, syngas technology can be shifted to produce larger amounts of hydrogen by varying the H2:CO ratio and additionally converting the remaining CO to CO2 and additional H2 using the water gas shift reaction. Utilization of the hydrogen from methane allows for a use of an otherwise wasted resource. Additionally, the produced CO2 from the water gas shift reaction can be injected into the formation as a CO2 flood.
  • [0018]
    In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a method for upgrading heavy crude oils at the wellhead includes producing syngas in a syngas-producing process, separating the syngas into H2 and CO streams, and injecting the H2 stream into a hydroprocessing operation located at the wellhead. A hydroprocessing operation located at the wellhead is preferably within 100 miles of the wellhead, more preferably within 10 miles of the wellhead, and most preferably within a mile of the wellhead.
  • [0019]
    In an alternate embodiment of the present invention, a method for upgrading heavy crude oils at the wellhead includes producing syngas in a syngas-producing process, separating the syngas into H2 and CO streams, running the CO stream in the presence of a water feed through a water gas shift process to produce a water gas shift product of CO2 and additional H2, separating the water gas shift product into H2 and CO2 streams, and injecting the H2 streams into a hydroprocessing process located at the wellhead.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0020]
    For a more detailed understanding of the present invention, reference is now made to the accompanying figures, FIG. 1 and FIG. 2, which are schematic illustrations of first and second systems, respectively, constructed in accordance with the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • [0021]
    Because of the shrinking world supply of oils, oil processors are faced with the necessity of utilizing heavy feedstocks that are highly contaminated with sulfur, nitrogen and metal contents. In the processing of these feedstocks, it is very desirable to remove as much of the contaminants as early in the refining of these feedstocks as possible, so that downstream catalysts do not suffer build-up and consequent reduced activity. Removing contaminants also makes a higher quality final product that is less corrosive and less polluting when combusted.
  • [0022]
    Referring now to FIG. 1, one embodiment of the present system 100 preferably includes a syngas plant 10, a hydrogen separation unit 20, and a hydroprocessing plant 30. Methane and oxygen-containing gas stream 11 is fed into syngas plant 10 and reacts with a suitable catalyst to form a stream of hydrogen and carbon monoxide 12. Hydrogen and carbon monoxide stream 12 is fed into hydrogen separation unit 20, where it is separated into carbon monoxide export stream 13 and hydrogen stream 14. Hydrogen stream 14 is injected into hydroprocessing plant 30, located at the wellhead.
  • [0023]
    Referring now to FIG. 2, an alternate embodiment of the present system 200 preferably includes a syngas plant 10, a first hydrogen separation unit 20, a water gas shift reactor 40, a second hydrogen separation unit 50, and a hydroprocessing plant 30. In some embodiments, system 200 further includes a carbon dioxide compressor 60. Methane and oxygen stream 11 is fed into syngas plant 10 and reacts with a suitable catalyst to form a stream of hydrogen and carbon monoxide 12. Hydrogen and carbon monoxide stream 12 is fed into first hydrogen separation unit 20, where it is separated into carbon monoxide stream 13 and hydrogen stream 14. Carbon monoxide stream 13 may either exit system 200 as export steam 13 b or comprise carbon monoxide feed stream 13 a for water gas shift reactor 40. In the latter embodiment, carbon monoxide stream 13 a is recycled into water gas shift reactor with water feed 21 under water gas shift favorable conditions to produce hydrogen and carbon dioxide stream 22. Hydrogen and carbon dioxide stream 22 is fed into second hydrogen separation unit 50, where it is separated into carbon dioxide stream 23 and hydrogen stream 24. Hydrogen streams 14 and 24 are injected into hydroprocessing plant 30, located at the wellhead. Carbon dioxide stream 23 may either exit system 200 as export steam 23 b or comprise carbon dioxide feed stream 23 a for carbon dioxide compressor 60. The compressed CO2 may then be injected into the wellhead to further upgrade the heavy oil.
  • [0024]
    In some embodiments, system 200 may include a syngas plant 10, a hydrogen separation unit 20, a water gas shift reactor 40, and a hydroprocessing plant 30. In these embodiments, the hydrogen separation unit separates both the hydrogen-carbon monoxide and the hydrogen-carbon dioxide streams into a hydrogen stream and a carbon monoxide-carbon dioxide stream. A carbon dioxide removal process such as membrane separation or an amine system may be utilized to separate the carbon monoxide from the carbon dioxide.
  • [0025]
    In some embodiments, the methane from the methane and oxygen-containing stream is associated gas. Associated gas is herein defined as gas co-produced from the same oil field or same wellhead being treated. In other embodiments, the methane from the methane and oxygen-containing stream is supplied via pipeline from other sources.
  • [0026]
    Process of Producing Syngas
  • [0027]
    A feed stream comprising a hydrocarbon feedstock and an oxygen-containing gas is contacted with a suitable syngas catalysts in a reaction zone maintained at partial oxidation-promoting conditions of temperature, pressure and flowrate, effective to produce an effluent stream comprising carbon monoxide and hydrogen. Preferably a millisecond contact time reactor is employed. The hydrocarbon feedstock may be any gaseous hydrocarbon having a low boiling point, such as methane, natural gas, associated gas, or other sources of light hydrocarbons having from 1 to 5 carbon atoms. The hydrocarbon feedstock may be a gas arising from naturally occurring reserves of methane which contain carbon dioxide. Preferably, the feed comprises at least 50% by volume methane, more preferably at least 75% by volume, and most preferably at least 80% by volume methane.
  • [0028]
    The hydrocarbon feedstock is in the gaseous phase when contacting the catalyst. The hydrocarbon feedstock is contacted with the catalyst as a mixture with an oxygen-containing gas, preferably pure oxygen. The oxygen-containing gas may also comprise steam and/or CO2 in addition to oxygen. Alternatively, the hydrocarbon feedstock is contacted with the catalyst as a mixture with a gas comprising steam and/or CO2.
  • [0029]
    Preferably, the methane-containing feed and the oxygen-containing gas are mixed in such amounts to give a carbon (i.e., carbon in methane) to oxygen (i.e., atomic oxygen) ratio from about 1.25:1 to about 3.3:1, more preferably, from about 1.3:1 to about 2.2:1, and most preferably from about 1.5:1 to about 2.2:1, especially the stoichiometric ratio of 2:1.
  • [0030]
    The process is operated at atmospheric or superatmospheric pressures, the latter being preferred. The pressures may be from about 100 kPa to about 12,500 kPa, preferably from about 130 kPa to about 10,000 kPa.
  • [0031]
    The process is preferably operated at catalyst temperatures of from about 600 C. to about 1,200 C., preferably from about 700 C. to about 1,100 C. The hydrocarbon feedstock and the oxygen-containing gas are preferably pre-heated before contact with the catalyst.
  • [0032]
    It will be understood that the selection of a catalyst or catalyst system requires many technical and economic considerations. The process of selecting a precious metal catalyst can be broken down into components. Key catalyst properties include high activity, high selectivity, high recycle capability and filterability. Catalyst performance is determined mainly by the precious metal component. A metal is chosen based both on its ability to complete the desired reaction and its inability to complete an unwanted reaction. Typical catalysts used in CPOX include metals from Group 6B, 7B, & 8B of the periodic table associated with promoters from Groups 1B through 8B, Groups 1A through 5A, and metals from the Lanthanide group.
  • [0033]
    Generally, catalysts are supported on a carrier material or support. The catalyst support may be any of a variety of materials that a catalytically active material is coated on. The catalyst support preferably allows for a high degree of metal dispersion. The choice of support is largely determined by the nature of the reaction system. The support catalyst is preferably stable under reaction and regeneration conditions. Further, it preferably does not adversely react with solvent, reactants, or reaction products.
  • [0034]
    Suitable supports include activated carbon, alumina, silica, silica-alumina, silicon carbide, carbon black, TiO2, ZrO2, CaCO3, and BaSO4, or stabilized forms of the aforementioned materials. Preferably, the catalytically active material is supported on either zirconia, stabilized zirconia, or alumina.
  • [0035]
    It will be understood that alternative choices of support may be made without departing from the preferred embodiments of the present invention by one of ordinary skill in the art. A support preferably favorably influences any of the catalyst activity, selectivity, recycling, refining, material handling reproducibility and the like. Properties of a support include surface area, pore volume, pore size, distribution, particle size, attrition resistance, acidity, basicity, impurity levels, and the ability to promote metal-support interactions. Metal dispersion increases with surface support area. Support porosity influences metal dispersion and distribution, metal sintering resistance, and intraparticle diffusion of reactants, products and poisons. Smaller support particle size increases catalytic activity but decreases filterability. The support preferably has desirable mechanical properties, attrition resistance and hardness. For example, an attrition resistant support allows for multiple catalyst recycling and rapid filtration. Further, support impurities preferably are inert. Alternatively, the support may contain promoters that enhance catalyst selectivity.
  • [0036]
    The catalysts used may be prepared by any of the methods known to those skilled in the art. By way of illustration and not limitation, such methods include impregnating the catalytically active compounds or precursors onto a support, extruding one or more catalytically active compounds or precursors together with support material to prepare catalyst extrudates, and/or precipitating the catalytically active compounds or precursors onto a support. Accordingly, supported catalysts may be used in the form of powders, particles, pellets, monoliths, honeycombs, packed beds, foams, and aerogels.
  • [0037]
    The hydrocarbon feedstock and the oxygen-containing gas may be passed over the catalyst at any of a variety of space velocities. Space velocities for the process (weight hourly space velocity), stated as normal liters of gas per kilogram of catalyst per hour, are from about 20,000 to about 100,000,000 NL/kg/h, preferably from about 50,000 to about 50,000,000 NL/kg/h. It is preferred that the residence time on the catalyst is about 10 milliseconds or less. Although, for ease in comparing with other syngas production systems, space velocities at standard conditions have been used to describe the present invention, it is well recognized in the art that residence time is the inverse of space velocity and that the disclosure of high space velocities equates to low residence times on the catalyst. Under these operating conditions a flow rate of reactant gases is preferably maintained sufficient to ensure a residence time of no more than 10 milliseconds with respect to each portion of reactant gas in contact with the catalyst. The product gas mixture emerging from the reactor is harvested and directly routed into hydrogen separation unit.
  • [0038]
    Process of Separating Hydrogen from Syngas/WGS Product
  • [0039]
    A preferred method for hydrogen separation employs pressure swing adsorption. At a high partial pressure, solid molecular sieves can absorb a greater quantity of certain gaseous components than others and absorb some compounds more strongly than others. For example, hydrogen is adsorbed less strongly than carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide, and the strength of adsorption of carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide increases with increasing molecular weight. As a result, at elevated pressures, hydrocarbons and other impurities are absorbed from a hydrogen-rich stream and most of the hydrogen passes through the system, leaving the impurities behind. Very high purity hydrogen can be produced this way. The hydrogen-rich stream can then be piped to a hydroprocessing unit. When the pressure on the system is reduced, the impurities adsorbed at high pressure are released from the solid adsorbent and purged.
  • [0040]
    Process of Upgrading Heavy Oil
  • [0041]
    In some embodiments of the present invention, hydrodesulfurization is the preferred process for removing undesirable compounds. In hydrodesulfurization, oil is combined with high-purity hydrogen, vaporized, and then passed over a catalyst such as tungsten, nickel, or a mixture of cobalt and molybdenum oxides supported on a carrier material such as alumina. Hydrodesulfurization is performed according to methods known to one of ordinary skill in the art. A general description of major considerations involved in performing hydrodesulfurization, and more generally hydrorefining, is given by W. S. Bland and R. L. Davidson, Petroleum Processing Handbook, Chapter 3 (1967). Operating temperatures are usually between 260 C. and 425 C. (500 F. and 800 F.) at pressures of 14 to 70 kilograms per square centimeter (200 to 1,000 pounds per square inch). Operating conditions are set to facilitate the desired level of sulfur removal without promoting any change to the other properties of the oil.
  • [0042]
    The sulfur in the oil is converted to hydrogen sulfide, which is removed from the circulating hydrogen stream by absorption in a solution such as diethanolamine. The solution can then be heated to remove the sulfide and reused. The hydrogen sulfide recovered is useful for manufacturing elemental sulfur of high purity.
  • [0043]
    Hydrodenitrification, a common process for removing nitrogen compounds and hydrodemetalation, a common process for removing metal contents, generally follow the same requirements as hydrodesulfurization.
  • [0044]
    CO2 Flooding
  • [0045]
    According to some embodiments of the present invention, the CO product stream is fed into a water gas shift plant in the presence of water and operated at water gas shift favorable conditions. After the CO product has gone through the WGS, there will be CO2 remaining. This CO2 can be used to additionally upgrade the heavy oil; it is known to inject carbon dioxide, either alone or in conjunction with natural gas, either at high pressure or containing sufficient petroleum gases in the vapor phase to perform tertiary oil recovery. The carbon dioxide can greatly improve tertiary recovery, but the effort is not economical unless very large quantities of carbon dioxide are available at a reasonable price. Conventionally, most of the successful projects of this type depend on tapping and transporting (by pipeline) carbon dioxide from underground reservoirs. However, because CO2 is a biproduct of our desired method to maximize hydrogen content, the cost is essentially the cost of separation of the hydrogen from the CO2.
  • [0046]
    While the preferred embodiments of the invention have been shown and described, modifications thereof can be made by one skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and teachings of the invention. The embodiments described herein are exemplary only, and are not intended to be limiting. For example, while CPOX is preferably employed to produce syngas, any syngas-producing technology such as autothermal reforming (ATR) and steam reforming could be utilized. Many variations and modifications of the invention disclosed herein are possible and are within the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of protection is not limited by the description set out above, but is only limited by the claims which follow, that scope including all equivalents of the subject matter of the claims. The disclosures of all patents, patent applications, and publications cited herein are incorporated by reference.
Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3228467 *Apr 30, 1963Jan 11, 1966Texaco IncProcess for recovering hydrocarbons from an underground formation
US3905892 *Aug 15, 1973Sep 16, 1975Cities Service Res & Dev CoProcess for reduction of high sulfur residue
US4141417 *Sep 9, 1977Feb 27, 1979Institute Of Gas TechnologyEnhanced oil recovery
US4160479 *Apr 24, 1978Jul 10, 1979Richardson Reginald DHeavy oil recovery process
US4183405 *Oct 2, 1978Jan 15, 1980Magnie Robert LEnhanced recoveries of petroleum and hydrogen from underground reservoirs
US4706751 *Jan 31, 1986Nov 17, 1987S-Cal Research Corp.Heavy oil recovery process
US5883138 *Apr 25, 1997Mar 16, 1999Exxon Research And Engineering CompanyRapid injection catalytic partial oxidation process and apparatus for producing synthesis gas (law 562)
US5935489 *Apr 25, 1997Aug 10, 1999Exxon Research And Engineering Co.Distributed injection process and apparatus for producing synthesis gas
US6016868 *Jun 24, 1998Jan 25, 2000World Energy Systems, IncorporatedProduction of synthetic crude oil from heavy hydrocarbons recovered by in situ hydrovisbreaking
US6103773 *Jan 27, 1998Aug 15, 2000Exxon Research And Engineering CoGas conversion using hydrogen produced from syngas for removing sulfur from gas well hydrocarbon liquids
US6147126 *Feb 10, 1998Nov 14, 2000Exxon Research And Engineering CompanyGas conversion using hydrogen from syngas gas and hydroconversion tail gas
US6479557 *Feb 14, 2000Nov 12, 2002Shell Oil CompanyProcess for the preparation of hydrocarbons from carbon monoxide and hydrogen
US20020053432 *Apr 24, 2001May 9, 2002Berchenko Ilya EmilIn situ thermal processing of a hydrocarbon containing formation using repeating triangular patterns of heat sources
USRE38170 *Mar 28, 2002Jul 1, 2003Exxonmobil Research And Engineering CompanyGas conversion using synthesis gas produced hydrogen for catalyst rejuvenation and hydrocarbon conversion
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US7648625Dec 16, 2004Jan 19, 2010Shell Oil CompanySystems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US7654330 *May 19, 2007Feb 2, 2010Pioneer Energy, Inc.Apparatus, methods, and systems for extracting petroleum using a portable coal reformer
US7674368Dec 16, 2004Mar 9, 2010Shell Oil CompanySystems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US7674370Dec 16, 2004Mar 9, 2010Shell Oil CompanySystems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US7678264Apr 7, 2006Mar 16, 2010Shell Oil CompanySystems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US7736490Dec 16, 2004Jun 15, 2010Shell Oil CompanySystems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US7745369Jun 22, 2006Jun 29, 2010Shell Oil CompanyMethod and catalyst for producing a crude product with minimal hydrogen uptake
US7749374Oct 3, 2007Jul 6, 2010Shell Oil CompanyMethods for producing a crude product
US7763160Dec 16, 2004Jul 27, 2010Shell Oil CompanySystems and methods of producing a crude product
US7780844Dec 16, 2004Aug 24, 2010Shell Oil CompanySystems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US7807046Dec 16, 2004Oct 5, 2010Shell Oil CompanySystems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US7810565 *Jun 30, 2008Oct 12, 2010Pioneer Energy, Inc.Systems for extracting fluids from the earth's subsurface and for generating electricity without greenhouse gas emissions
US7811445Dec 16, 2004Oct 12, 2010Shell Oil CompanySystems and methods of producing a crude product
US7828958Dec 16, 2004Nov 9, 2010Shell Oil CompanySystems and methods of producing a crude product
US7837863Dec 16, 2004Nov 23, 2010Shell Oil CompanySystems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US7854833May 12, 2008Dec 21, 2010Shell Oil CompanySystems and methods of producing a crude product
US7879223Dec 16, 2004Feb 1, 2011Shell Oil CompanySystems and methods of producing a crude product
US7918992Apr 7, 2006Apr 5, 2011Shell Oil CompanySystems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US7955499Mar 25, 2009Jun 7, 2011Shell Oil CompanySystems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US7959796Dec 16, 2004Jun 14, 2011Shell Oil CompanySystems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US7959797Jan 27, 2009Jun 14, 2011Shell Oil CompanySystems and methods of producing a crude product
US7972498Oct 19, 2006Jul 5, 2011Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc.Resid processing for steam cracker feed and catalytic cracking
US8025791Dec 16, 2004Sep 27, 2011Shell Oil CompanySystems and methods of producing a crude product
US8025794Dec 16, 2004Sep 27, 2011Shell Oil CompanySystems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US8047007May 3, 2011Nov 1, 2011Pioneer Energy Inc.Methods for generating electricity from carbonaceous material with substantially no carbon dioxide emissions
US8070936Jan 27, 2009Dec 6, 2011Shell Oil CompanySystems and methods of producing a crude product
US8070937Dec 16, 2004Dec 6, 2011Shell Oil CompanySystems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US8163166May 12, 2008Apr 24, 2012Shell Oil CompanySystems and methods of producing a crude product
US8241489Dec 16, 2004Aug 14, 2012Shell Oil CompanySystems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US8268164May 12, 2008Sep 18, 2012Shell Oil CompanySystems and methods of producing a crude product
US8286901Feb 27, 2009Oct 16, 2012Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Coal compositions for catalytic gasification
US8297542Feb 27, 2009Oct 30, 2012Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Coal compositions for catalytic gasification
US8306665May 7, 2007Nov 6, 2012Plasco Energy Group Inc.Control system for the conversion of carbonaceous feedstock into gas
US8328890Sep 18, 2009Dec 11, 2012Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Processes for gasification of a carbonaceous feedstock
US8349039Feb 27, 2009Jan 8, 2013Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Carbonaceous fines recycle
US8361428Feb 27, 2009Jan 29, 2013Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Reduced carbon footprint steam generation processes
US8366795Feb 27, 2009Feb 5, 2013Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Catalytic gasification particulate compositions
US8372169May 7, 2007Feb 12, 2013Plasco Energy Group Inc.Low temperature gasification facility with a horizontally oriented gasifier
US8394254Apr 14, 2011Mar 12, 2013Shell Oil CompanyCrude product composition
US8435315May 7, 2007May 7, 2013Plasco Energy Group Inc.Horizontally-oriented gasifier with lateral transfer system
US8450536Jul 17, 2009May 28, 2013Pioneer Energy, Inc.Methods of higher alcohol synthesis
US8475551May 7, 2007Jul 2, 2013Plasco Energy Group Inc.Gas reformulating system using plasma torch heat
US8475651Mar 25, 2009Jul 2, 2013Shell Oil CompanySystems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US8479833Oct 18, 2010Jul 9, 2013Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Integrated enhanced oil recovery process
US8479834Oct 18, 2010Jul 9, 2013Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Integrated enhanced oil recovery process
US8481450Mar 9, 2011Jul 9, 2013Shell Oil CompanyCatalysts for producing a crude product
US8502007Sep 18, 2009Aug 6, 2013Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Char methanation catalyst and its use in gasification processes
US8506794Dec 16, 2004Aug 13, 2013Shell Oil CompanySystems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US8557878Apr 26, 2011Oct 15, 2013Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Hydromethanation of a carbonaceous feedstock with vanadium recovery
US8602095Feb 20, 2009Dec 10, 2013Pioneer Energy, Inc.Apparatus and method for extracting petroleum from underground sites using reformed gases
US8608938Apr 14, 2011Dec 17, 2013Shell Oil CompanyCrude product composition
US8608946Dec 16, 2004Dec 17, 2013Shell Oil CompanySystems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US8613851Apr 14, 2011Dec 24, 2013Shell Oil CompanyCrude product composition
US8616294Aug 25, 2010Dec 31, 2013Pioneer Energy, Inc.Systems and methods for generating in-situ carbon dioxide driver gas for use in enhanced oil recovery
US8636895Oct 19, 2006Jan 28, 2014Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc.Hydrocarbon resid processing and visbreaking steam cracker feed
US8647402Sep 18, 2009Feb 11, 2014Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Processes for gasification of a carbonaceous feedstock
US8648121Feb 22, 2012Feb 11, 2014Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Hydromethanation of a carbonaceous feedstock with nickel recovery
US8652222Feb 27, 2009Feb 18, 2014Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Biomass compositions for catalytic gasification
US8652696Mar 3, 2011Feb 18, 2014Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Integrated hydromethanation fuel cell power generation
US8653149May 26, 2011Feb 18, 2014Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Conversion of liquid heavy hydrocarbon feedstocks to gaseous products
US8663453Apr 14, 2011Mar 4, 2014Shell Oil CompanyCrude product composition
US8669013Feb 21, 2011Mar 11, 2014Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Integrated hydromethanation fuel cell power generation
US8696888Oct 17, 2006Apr 15, 2014Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc.Hydrocarbon resid processing
US8728182May 12, 2010May 20, 2014Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Processes for hydromethanation of a carbonaceous feedstock
US8728183May 12, 2010May 20, 2014Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Processes for hydromethanation of a carbonaceous feedstock
US8733459Dec 16, 2010May 27, 2014Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Integrated enhanced oil recovery process
US8734547Dec 29, 2009May 27, 2014Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Processes for preparing a catalyzed carbonaceous particulate
US8734548Dec 29, 2009May 27, 2014Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Processes for preparing a catalyzed coal particulate
US8748687Aug 17, 2011Jun 10, 2014Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Hydromethanation of a carbonaceous feedstock
US8770284Apr 19, 2013Jul 8, 2014Exxonmobil Upstream Research CompanySystems and methods of detecting an intersection between a wellbore and a subterranean structure that includes a marker material
US8784743Dec 20, 2013Jul 22, 2014Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc.Hydrocarbon resid processing and visbreaking steam cracker feed
US8785699Apr 19, 2013Jul 22, 2014Pioneer Energy, Inc.Methods of higher alcohol synthesis
US8863839Nov 15, 2010Oct 21, 2014Exxonmobil Upstream Research CompanyEnhanced convection for in situ pyrolysis of organic-rich rock formations
US8875789Aug 8, 2011Nov 4, 2014Exxonmobil Upstream Research CompanyProcess for producing hydrocarbon fluids combining in situ heating, a power plant and a gas plant
US9012524Oct 3, 2012Apr 21, 2015Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Hydromethanation of a carbonaceous feedstock
US9034058Sep 27, 2013May 19, 2015Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Agglomerated particulate low-rank coal feedstock and uses thereof
US9034061Sep 27, 2013May 19, 2015Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Agglomerated particulate low-rank coal feedstock and uses thereof
US9080441Oct 26, 2012Jul 14, 2015Exxonmobil Upstream Research CompanyMultiple electrical connections to optimize heating for in situ pyrolysis
US9109172Dec 19, 2012Aug 18, 2015Plasco Energy Group Inc.Low temperature gasification facility with a horizontally oriented gasifier
US9127221May 31, 2012Sep 8, 2015Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Hydromethanation of a carbonaceous feedstock
US9234149Mar 4, 2015Jan 12, 2016Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Steam generating slurry gasifier for the catalytic gasification of a carbonaceous feedstock
US9273260Sep 27, 2013Mar 1, 2016Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Agglomerated particulate low-rank coal feedstock and uses thereof
US9328920Sep 27, 2013May 3, 2016Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Use of contaminated low-rank coal for combustion
US9347302Nov 12, 2013May 24, 2016Exxonmobil Upstream Research CompanyResistive heater for in situ formation heating
US9353322Oct 28, 2011May 31, 2016Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Hydromethanation of a carbonaceous feedstock
US9394772Sep 17, 2014Jul 19, 2016Exxonmobil Upstream Research CompanySystems and methods for in situ resistive heating of organic matter in a subterranean formation
US9512699Jul 30, 2014Dec 6, 2016Exxonmobil Upstream Research CompanySystems and methods for regulating an in situ pyrolysis process
US20040104147 *Sep 8, 2003Jun 3, 2004Wen Michael Y.Heavy oil upgrade method and apparatus
US20050133406 *Dec 16, 2004Jun 23, 2005Wellington Scott L.Systems and methods of producing a crude product
US20050133414 *Dec 16, 2004Jun 23, 2005Bhan Opinder K.Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US20050133415 *Dec 16, 2004Jun 23, 2005Bhan Opinder K.Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US20050133416 *Dec 16, 2004Jun 23, 2005Bhan Opinder K.Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US20050133417 *Dec 16, 2004Jun 23, 2005Bhan Opinder K.Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US20050135997 *Dec 16, 2004Jun 23, 2005Wellington Scott L.Systems and methods of producing a crude product
US20050139512 *Dec 16, 2004Jun 30, 2005Wellington Scott L.Systems and methods of producing a crude product
US20050139518 *Dec 16, 2004Jun 30, 2005Bhan Opinder K.Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US20050139519 *Dec 16, 2004Jun 30, 2005Bhan Opinder K.Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US20050139520 *Dec 16, 2004Jun 30, 2005Bhan Opinder K.Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US20050139521 *Dec 16, 2004Jun 30, 2005Bhan Opinder K.Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US20050145536 *Dec 16, 2004Jul 7, 2005Wellington Scott L.Systems and methods of producing a crude product
US20050145537 *Dec 16, 2004Jul 7, 2005Wellington Scott L.Systems and methods of producing a crude product
US20050145543 *Dec 16, 2004Jul 7, 2005Bhan Opinder K.Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US20050150818 *Dec 16, 2004Jul 14, 2005Bhan Opinder K.Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US20050155906 *Dec 16, 2004Jul 21, 2005Wellington Scott L.Systems and methods of producing a crude product
US20050155908 *Dec 16, 2004Jul 21, 2005Bhan Opinder K.Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US20050167320 *Dec 16, 2004Aug 4, 2005Bhan Opinder K.Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US20050167321 *Dec 16, 2004Aug 4, 2005Wellington Scott L.Systems and methods of producing a crude product
US20050167322 *Dec 16, 2004Aug 4, 2005Wellington Scott L.Systems and methods of producing a crude product
US20050167323 *Dec 16, 2004Aug 4, 2005Wellington Scott L.Systems and methods of producing a crude product
US20050167324 *Dec 16, 2004Aug 4, 2005Bhan Opinder K.Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US20050167325 *Dec 16, 2004Aug 4, 2005Bhan Opinder K.Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US20050167326 *Dec 16, 2004Aug 4, 2005Bhan Opinder K.Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US20050167327 *Dec 16, 2004Aug 4, 2005Bhan Opinder K.Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US20050167328 *Dec 16, 2004Aug 4, 2005Bhan Opinder K.Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US20050167329 *Dec 16, 2004Aug 4, 2005Bhan Opinder K.Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US20050167330 *Dec 16, 2004Aug 4, 2005Bhan Opinder K.Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US20050170952 *Dec 16, 2004Aug 4, 2005Wellington Scott L.Systems and methods of producing a crude product
US20050173298 *Dec 16, 2004Aug 11, 2005Wellington Scott L.Systems and methods of producing a crude product
US20050173301 *Dec 16, 2004Aug 11, 2005Bhan Opinder K.Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US20060006556 *Jun 27, 2005Jan 12, 2006Chen Hung YGas supply device by gasifying burnable liquid
US20060231456 *Apr 7, 2006Oct 19, 2006Bhan Opinder KSystems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US20060231457 *Apr 7, 2006Oct 19, 2006Bhan Opinder KSystems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US20060234877 *Apr 7, 2006Oct 19, 2006Bhan Opinder KSystems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US20060249430 *Apr 6, 2006Nov 9, 2006Mesters Carolus Matthias A MProcess for reducing the total acid number (TAN) of a liquid hydrocarbonaceous feedstock
US20060289340 *Jun 22, 2006Dec 28, 2006Brownscombe Thomas FMethods for producing a total product in the presence of sulfur
US20070000808 *Jun 22, 2006Jan 4, 2007Bhan Opinder KMethod and catalyst for producing a crude product having selected properties
US20070000810 *Jun 22, 2006Jan 4, 2007Bhan Opinder KMethod for producing a crude product with reduced tan
US20070000811 *Jun 22, 2006Jan 4, 2007Bhan Opinder KMethod and catalyst for producing a crude product with minimal hydrogen uptake
US20070012595 *Jun 22, 2006Jan 18, 2007Brownscombe Thomas FMethods for producing a total product in the presence of sulfur
US20070090019 *Oct 19, 2006Apr 26, 2007Keusenkothen Paul FHydrocarbon resid processing and visbreaking steam cracker feed
US20070090020 *Oct 19, 2006Apr 26, 2007Buchanan John SResid processing for steam cracker feed and catalytic cracking
US20070266633 *May 7, 2007Nov 22, 2007Andreas TsangarisGas Reformulating System Using Plasma Torch Heat
US20070266634 *May 7, 2007Nov 22, 2007Andreas TsangarisHorizontally-Oriented Gasifier with Lateral Transfer System
US20070295645 *Jun 20, 2007Dec 27, 2007Brownscombe Thomas FMethods for producing a crude product from selected feed
US20070295646 *Jun 20, 2007Dec 27, 2007Bhan Opinder KMethod for producing a crude product with a long-life catalyst
US20070295647 *Jun 20, 2007Dec 27, 2007Brownscombe Thomas FMethods for producing a total product with selective hydrocarbon production
US20080083650 *Oct 3, 2007Apr 10, 2008Bhan Opinder KMethods for producing a crude product
US20080083655 *Oct 3, 2007Apr 10, 2008Bhan Opinder KMethods of producing a crude product
US20080085225 *Oct 3, 2007Apr 10, 2008Bhan Opinder KSystems for treating a hydrocarbon feed
US20080087575 *Oct 3, 2007Apr 17, 2008Bhan Opinder KSystems and methods for producing a crude product and compositions thereof
US20080087578 *Oct 3, 2007Apr 17, 2008Bhan Opinder KMethods for producing a crude product and compositions thereof
US20080147241 *May 7, 2007Jun 19, 2008Placso Energy Group Inc.Control System for the Conversion of Carbonaceous Feedstock into Gas
US20080210594 *May 12, 2008Sep 4, 2008Scott Lee WellingtonSystems and methods of producing a crude product
US20080245700 *May 12, 2008Oct 9, 2008Scott Lee WellingtonSystems and methods of producing a crude product
US20080245702 *May 12, 2008Oct 9, 2008Scott Lee WellingtonSystems and methods of producing a crude product
US20080272027 *Jul 9, 2008Nov 6, 2008Scott Lee WellingtonSystems and methods of producing a crude product
US20080272029 *Jul 9, 2008Nov 6, 2008Scott Lee WellingtonSystems and methods of producing a crude product
US20080283249 *May 19, 2007Nov 20, 2008Zubrin Robert MApparatus, methods, and systems for extracting petroleum using a portable coal reformer
US20090014170 *Jun 30, 2008Jan 15, 2009Zubrin Robert MSystems for extracting fluids from the earth's subsurface and for generating electricity without greenhouse gas emissions
US20090020456 *May 12, 2008Jan 22, 2009Andreas TsangarisSystem comprising the gasification of fossil fuels to process unconventional oil sources
US20090057197 *Oct 3, 2007Mar 5, 2009Opinder Kishan BhanMethods for producing a crude product
US20090134060 *Jan 27, 2009May 28, 2009Scott Lee WellingtonSystems and methods of producing a crude product
US20090178953 *Mar 25, 2009Jul 16, 2009Opinder Kishan BhanSystems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US20090188836 *Oct 3, 2007Jul 30, 2009Opinder Kishan BhanMethods for producing a crude product
US20090206005 *Mar 25, 2009Aug 20, 2009Opinder Kishan BhanSystems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US20090217586 *Feb 27, 2009Sep 3, 2009Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Coal Compositions for Catalytic Gasification
US20090217587 *Feb 27, 2009Sep 3, 2009Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Biomass Compositions for Catalytic Gasification
US20090217589 *Feb 27, 2009Sep 3, 2009Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Carbonaceous Fines Recycle
US20090217590 *Feb 27, 2009Sep 3, 2009Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Coal Compositions for Catalytic Gasification
US20090229815 *Feb 20, 2009Sep 17, 2009Pioneer Energy, Inc.Apparatus and Method for Extracting Petroleum from Underground Sites Using Reformed Gases
US20090236093 *Feb 20, 2009Sep 24, 2009Pioneer Energy, Inc.Apparatus and Method for Extracting Petroleum from Underground Sites Using Reformed Gases
US20090288987 *Jul 30, 2009Nov 26, 2009Opinder Kishan BhanSystems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US20100071262 *Sep 18, 2009Mar 25, 2010Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Processes for Gasification of a Carbonaceous Feedstock
US20100076235 *Sep 18, 2009Mar 25, 2010Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Processes for Gasification of a Carbonaceous Feedstock
US20100088951 *Jul 17, 2009Apr 15, 2010Pioneer AstronauticsNovel Methods of Higher Alcohol Synthesis
US20100121125 *Sep 18, 2009May 13, 2010Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Char Methanation Catalyst and its Use in Gasification Processes
US20100168494 *Dec 29, 2009Jul 1, 2010Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Processes for Preparing a Catalyzed Coal Particulate
US20100168495 *Dec 29, 2009Jul 1, 2010Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Processes for Preparing a Catalyzed Carbonaceous Particulate
US20100287835 *May 12, 2010Nov 18, 2010Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Processes for Hydromethanation of a Carbonaceous Feedstock
US20100287836 *May 12, 2010Nov 18, 2010Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Processes for Hydromethanation of a Carbonaceous Feedstock
US20100314136 *Aug 25, 2010Dec 16, 2010Zubrin Robert MSystems and methods for generating in-situ carbon dioxide driver gas for use in enhanced oil recovery
US20110062012 *Sep 15, 2010Mar 17, 2011Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Processes for hydromethanation of a carbonaceous feedstock
US20110062722 *Sep 15, 2010Mar 17, 2011Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Integrated hydromethanation combined cycle process
US20110064648 *Sep 15, 2010Mar 17, 2011Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Two-mode process for hydrogen production
US20110088896 *Oct 18, 2010Apr 21, 2011Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Integrated enhanced oil recovery process
US20110088897 *Oct 18, 2010Apr 21, 2011Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Integrated enhanced oil recovery process
US20110146978 *Dec 16, 2010Jun 23, 2011Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Integrated enhanced oil recovery process
US20110160044 *Mar 9, 2011Jun 30, 2011Opinder Kishan BhanCatalysts for producing a crude product
US20110186479 *Apr 14, 2011Aug 4, 2011Scott Lee WellingtonCrude product composition
US20110192762 *Apr 14, 2011Aug 11, 2011Scott Lee WellingtonCrude product composition
US20110192763 *Apr 14, 2011Aug 11, 2011Scott Lee WellingtonCrude product composition
US20110203292 *May 3, 2011Aug 25, 2011Pioneer Energy Inc.Methods for generating electricity from carbonaceous material with substantially no carbon dioxide emissions
US20110207002 *Feb 21, 2011Aug 25, 2011Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Integrated Hydromethanation Fuel Cell Power Generation
US20110210043 *Apr 14, 2011Sep 1, 2011Scott Lee WellingtonCrude product composition
WO2007077138A1 *Dec 21, 2006Jul 12, 2007Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V.Enhanced oil recovery process and a process for the sequestration of carbon dioxide
WO2011084580A3 *Dec 16, 2010Jan 12, 2012Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Integrated enhanced oil recovery process
Classifications
U.S. Classification166/265, 166/90.1
International ClassificationC10G49/00, E21B43/16
Cooperative ClassificationE21B43/164, C10G49/007, Y02P90/70
European ClassificationE21B43/16E, C10G49/00H
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Jul 22, 2002ASAssignment
Owner name: CONOCO INC., TEXAS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ALLISON, JOE D.;REEL/FRAME:013136/0514
Effective date: 20020610