Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20030113249 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 10/214,211
Publication dateJun 19, 2003
Filing dateAug 7, 2002
Priority dateDec 18, 2001
Also published asUS6813882, US20020178716, US20030113242
Publication number10214211, 214211, US 2003/0113249 A1, US 2003/113249 A1, US 20030113249 A1, US 20030113249A1, US 2003113249 A1, US 2003113249A1, US-A1-20030113249, US-A1-2003113249, US2003/0113249A1, US2003/113249A1, US20030113249 A1, US20030113249A1, US2003113249 A1, US2003113249A1
InventorsJeffrey Hepburn, Robert Hammerle
Original AssigneeHepburn Jeffrey Scott, Hammerle Robert Henry
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
System and method for removing SOx and particulate matter from an emission control device
US 20030113249 A1
Abstract
A system and method for removing SOx and particulate matter from an emission control device receiving exhaust gases from an engine is provided. The method includes adding a reductant to the exhaust gases to increase a temperature of the emission control device above a threshold temperature. The method further includes ceasing adding the reductant to the exhaust gases to remove particulate matter from the device. The method further includes adding additional reductant to the exhaust gases to remove SOx from the device.
Images(8)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(20)
We claim:
1. A method for removing SOx and particulate matter from an emission control device receiving exhaust gases from an engine, the method comprising:
adding a reductant to said exhaust gases to increase a temperature of said emission control device above a threshold temperature;
ceasing adding said reductant to said exhaust gases to remove particulate matter from said device; and
adding additional reductant to said exhaust gases to remove SOx from said device.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein said step of adding a reductant to said exhaust gases to increase a temperature of said emission control creates a mixture lean of stoichiometry.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein said step of ceasing adding said reductant to remove particulate matter from said device creates a mixture lean of stoichiometry that combusts said particulate matter in said device.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein said step of adding additional reductant to said exhaust gases to remove SOx from said device creates a mixture rich of stoichiometry that removes SOx from said device.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein said temperature of said emission control device is maintained above said threshold temperature during said step of ceasing adding said reductant to said exhaust gases.
6. The method of claim 1 wherein said temperature of said emission control device is maintained above said threshold temperature during said step of adding said additional reductant to said exhaust gases.
7. The method of claim 1 further including indicating when SOx and particulate matter need to be removed from said device.
8. The method of claim 1 wherein said method alternates between said steps of (i) ceasing adding said reductant to said exhaust gases to remove particulate matter from said device; and (ii) adding additional reductant to said exhaust gases to remove SOx from said device.
9. The method of claim 8 wherein each iteration of said step of ceasing adding said reductant to said exhaust gases is performed for a time interval based on said temperature of said exhaust gases.
10. The method of claim 8 wherein each iteration of said step of adding additional reductant to said exhaust gases is performed for a time interval based on said temperature of said exhaust gases.
11. The method of claim 1 wherein said emission control device is coupled proximate and downstream of an oxidation catalyst, wherein said step of adding a reductant to said exhaust gases to increase a temperature of said emission control device includes:
adding said reductant to said exhaust gases flowing into said oxidation catalyst to create an exothermic reaction in said catalyst to increase said temperature of said emission control device.
12. A method for removing SOx and particulate matter from an emission control device receiving exhaust gases from an engine, the method comprising:
iteratively supplying a reductant to said exhaust to remove SOx from the device and then ceasing the supply of reductant to said exhaust gases to remove particulate matter from said device.
13. The method of claim 12 wherein a temperature of said emission control device is maintained above a threshold temperature.
14. A system for removing SOx and particulate matter from an emission control device receiving exhaust gases from an engine, the method comprising:
a reductant valve selectively supplying reductant to said exhaust gases responsive to a first signal;
a throttle valve controlling flow of said exhaust gases to said device responsive to a second signal; and
a controller operably connected to said reductant valve and said throttle valve, said controller generating said first and second signals, said controller configured to add said reductant to said exhaust gases to increase a temperature of said emission control device above a threshold temperature, said controller further configured to cease adding said reductant to said exhaust gases to remove particulate matter from said device, said controller further configured to add additional reductant to said exhaust gases to remove SOx from said device.
15. The system of claim 14 wherein said controller is further configured to indicate when said SOx and particulate matter need to be removed from said device.
16. The system of claim 14 further including a temperature sensor generating a third signal indicative of a temperature of said exhaust gases, said third signal being received by said controller.
17. The system of claim 14 further including an oxidation catalyst being coupled adjacent and upstream of said device.
18. An article of manufacture, comprising:
a computer storage medium having a computer program encoded therein for removing SOx and particulate matter from an emission control device receiving exhaust gases from an engine, the computer storage medium comprising:
code for adding a reductant to said exhaust gases to increase a temperature of said emission control device above a threshold temperature;
code for ceasing adding said reductant to said exhaust gases to remove particulate matter from said device; and
code for adding additional reductant to said exhaust gases to remove SOx from said device.
19. The article of manufacture of claim 18 wherein said computer storage medium further includes:
code for indicating when SOx and particulate matter need to be removed from said device.
20. The article of manufacture of claim 18 wherein said computer storage medium alternates between executing said code for ceasing adding said reductant to said exhaust gases to remove particulate matter from said device, and said code for adding said reductant to said exhaust gases to remove SOx from said device.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

[0001] The present invention relates to a system and method for removing SOx and particulate matter from an emission control device coupled to an engine.

DESCRIPTION OF THE RELATED ART

[0002] A known engine control system for purging SOx and particulate matter from a combined particulate filter and NOx trap is disclosed in Japanese Patent 06-272541A. In particular, the control system operates the engine lean while adding reductant to exhaust gases to increase a temperature of the exhaust gases. The increased temperature is used to oxidize particulate matter stored in the combined filter and trap. This process is called particulate filter regeneration. Thereafter, the control system adds more reductant to purge sulphur-oxides (SOx) from the combined filter and trap.

[0003] The known control system, however, has a significant drawback. In particular, the control system supplies reductant/fuel to exhaust gases during the purging of particulate matter. As a result, the fuel economy of the engine is decreased. Further, the additional reductant may result in increased hydrocarbon emissions during regeneration of the particulate filter.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[0004] The foregoing problems and disadvantages are overcome by a system and method for removing particulate matter and SOx from an emission control device in accordance with the present invention.

[0005] The inventive method is utilized with an emission control device receiving exhaust gases from an engine. The method includes adding a reductant to the exhaust gases to increase a temperature of the emission control device above a threshold temperature. The method further includes ceasing adding the reductant to the exhaust gases to remove particulate matter from the device. The method further includes adding additional reductant to the exhaust gases to remove SOx from the device.

[0006] A system for removing particulate matter and SOx from an emission control device is also provided. The system includes a reductant valve selectively supplying reductant to the exhaust gases responsive to a first signal. The system further includes a throttle valve controlling flow of the exhaust gases to the device responsive to a second signal. The system further includes a controller operably connected to the reductant valve and the throttle valve. The controller generates the first and second signals. The controller is configured to add the reductant to the exhaust gases to increase a temperature of the emission control device above a threshold temperature. The controller is further configured to cease adding the reductant to the exhaust gases to remove particulate matter from the device. The controller is further configured to add additional reductant to the exhaust gases to remove SOx from the device.

[0007] The present system and method provides a substantial advantage over known systems and methods. In particular, the inventive method ceases delivery of reductant during particulate filter regeneration and then subsequently supplies reductant to remove SOx in the combined filter and trap. The process of supplying reductant and then stopping the supply of reductant may be iteratively performed to remove SOx and particulate matter, respectively. Thus, the inventors herein have recognized that an exothermic reaction generated during NOx or SOx removal can be utilized to maintain a desired temperature of exhaust gases for subsequent oxidation of particulate matter—without adding additional reductant during the oxidation process. Thus, the present system and method provides for increased fuel economy and lower hydrocarbon emissions—as compared to known systems that deliver reductant during both the particulate matter oxidation and the SOx reduction from an emission control device.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0008]FIG. 1 is a plan view of an exhaust system coupled to an engine.

[0009]FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a dual NOx trap and particulate filter of the exhaust system of FIG. 1.

[0010]FIGS. 3A, 3B are flowcharts of a method for monitoring and removing stored NOx from the exhaust system of FIG. 1.

[0011]FIGS. 4A, 4B, 4C are flowcharts for monitoring and removing particulate matter and sulfur oxides (SOx) stored in the exhaust filters of FIG. 1.

[0012]FIGS. 5A and 5B are schematics of signals illustrating the operation of the flowchart of FIG. 4B for removing particulate matter from an exhaust filter.

[0013]FIGS. 6A and 6B are schematics of signals illustrating the operation of the flowchart of FIG. 4C for removing particulate matter and SOx from an exhaust filter.

DESCRIPTION OF AN EMBODIMENT

[0014] Referring now to FIG. 1, an exhaust system 10 is illustrated in operational relationship with an internal combustion engine 12 such as a diesel engine for a vehicle such as an automotive vehicle (not shown). The engine 12 has an exhaust manifold 14 to direct the exhaust gases from engine 12 to exhaust system 10. The exhaust manifold 14 is divided into two exhaust intake conduits 16, 18. The exhaust intake conduits 16, 18 direct exhaust gases through two integrated NOx trap/particulate filters 19, 20. The outputs of the filters 19, 20 are directed through two exhaust output conduits 21, 22 to a muffler or tail pipe 23. The amount of exhaust gases flowing to filters 19, 20 is controlled by control valves 24, 25, respectively. Conventional oxidation catalysts 26, 27 are located upstream and proximate filters 19, 20, respectively.

[0015] The oxidation catalysts 26, 27 serve several functions. First, catalysts 26, 27 are utilized to accurately control temperatures in filters 19, 20, respectively. Fuel injected into the exhaust gases upstream of catalysts 26, 27 can be used to create exothermic reactions in catalysts 26, 27 to provide exhaust gases at desired temperatures to filters 19, 20, respectively. Thus, temperature spikes produced by the injected fuel only occur within catalysts 26, 27 instead of filters 19, 20—thereby protecting filters 19, 20 from degrading due to excess temperatures. Further, controlled exothermic reactions in catalysts 26, 27 allow filters 19, 20 to be maintained within desired temperature ranges and air-fuel ranges for optimally removing NOx, SOx, and particulate matter. It should be understood, however, that an oxidation catalyst as taught by this specification can be used to control a temperature of any proximate downstream emission control device such as a NOx absorber, a catalytic converter, and a particulate filter, for example. Second, catalysts 26, 27 begin burning the fuel injected into the exhaust gases and rapidly vaporize the remaining fuel before the mixture of fuel and exhaust gases reach filters 19, 20, respectively. The vaporized fuel more effectively reduces NOx within filters 19, 20 as compared to injecting liquid fuel directly into filters 19, 20.

[0016] A reducing agent supply tank 28 and associated fuel nozzles 29, 30 enable precise quantities of reductant, such as diesel fuel, to be injected into the exhaust path intake conduits 16, 18. In the case of a diesel engine, the reductant is preferably the diesel fuel supply in the vehicle fuel tank. It should be understood, however, that other reductants such as gasoline for example could be used as the injected reductant.

[0017] In addition, temperature sensors 31, 32 generate feedback signals to the engine control module (ECM) 34. The signals are indicative of temperatures of exhaust gases exiting catalysts 26, 27, respectively—obtained from exothermic reactions in oxidation catalysts 26, 27. The ECM 34, in turn, controls the flow of exhaust gases through exhaust system 10 as well as the regeneration process of filters 19, 20. Logic control of system 10 is carried out in ECM 34 by way of a central processing unit (CPU) 36 such as a microprocessor 36 and an associated memory 38.

[0018] Referring to FIGS. 1 and 2, each of the exhaust filters 19, 20 may include a filter substrate 40 extending along a longitudinal axis. The filter substrate 40 has a plurality of walls 42 extending longitudinally and forming a plurality of alternating first and second channels 44 and 46. The walls 42 may be made of a ceramic material such as ceramic cordierire. The ceramic material is porous and has a pore size of approximately 60 microns. The walls 42 have a thickness of 10 to 20 mils. The walls 42 are configured to provide 50 to 200 channels per square inch. Channels 44, 46 have a generally rectangular cross-section, although it should be appreciated that the cross-sectional area of the channels 44, 46 is dictated by flow and filtering requirements.

[0019] Each of channels 44, 46 have an inlet end 48 and an outlet end 50. The first channels 44 have a blocking member 52 to close the outlet end 50 and the second channels 46 have a blocking member 52 to close inlet end 48. The blocking member 52 is made of ceramic material such as ceramic cordierite. Second channels 46 also have a NOx absorbent wash coat 54 extending from the outlet end 50 along the walls 42 toward the inlet end 48. The wash coat 54 is a NOx absorbent applied by conventional procedures. The NOx absorbent may be (i) a precious metal such as Pt—Rh and an alkali metal such as potassium or lithium, or (ii) alkaline earth metals such as barium or strontium or (iii) lanthanides such as cerium—dispersed into an alumina support deposited onto walls 42 of second channels 46.

[0020] It should be appreciated that alternate channels 44, 46 are blocked to force all of the exhaust gas flow through walls 42 having wash coat 54 thereby filtering the exhaust gas particulate matter and absorbing the NOx. Exhaust gases from engine 12 enter through the inlet openings 48, pass through porous walls 42 of the substrate 40, and exit through the second channels 46 at open outlets 50. Since the particulate matter is too large to pass through the pores within substrate wall 42, it deposits onto surface 55 of the open channels 44. The NOx, HC, and CO pass readily through the substrate wall 42. NOx is stored as a nitrate complex while HC and CO are oxidized over the platinum within NOx trap wash coat 54.

[0021] Referring to FIGS. 1 and 2, under the control of ECM 34, all of the exhaust gases flowing from engine 12 may be directed, for example, to first exhaust intake conduit 16 and corresponding catalyst 26 and filter 19 by controlling valves 24, 25. In this example, control valve 24 is completely open and control valve 25 is completely closed. In this manner, all of the exhaust gases from engine 12 will flow through exhaust intake conduit 16, through oxidation catalyst 26, filter 19, exhaust output conduit 21, and exit tail pipe 23. When a mixture of exhaust gases and fuel are rich of stoichiometry, the majority of the CO and HC in the exhaust gases are oxidized in oxidation catalyst 26, and the remaining CO and HC is oxidized over the platinum contained within the NOx trap-particulate filter 19.

[0022] When the quantity of absorbed NOx in filter 19 approaches the absorption capacity of the NOx trap wash coat 54 of filter 19, the NOx regeneration routine for this filter is initiated. At such time, control valve 25 is actuated to a fully opened position, and control valve 24 is set to a partially opened position to restrict the flow of exhaust gases through intake conduit 16. Diesel fuel from the supply 28 is injected by nozzle or valve 29 into intake conduit 16 and is carried toward filter 19 by the restricted exhaust flow in conduit 16. Fuel is injected such that the fuel quantity exceeds the stoichiometric amount required to completely react and consume all of the oxygen contained within the exhaust gases flowing through conduit 16. In other words, the mixture of exhaust gases and fuel is rich of stoichiometry. Catalytic combustion of the injected fuel occurs in oxidation catalyst 26. Excess fuel is carried downstream into filter 19 and reacts with the absorbed NOx, thereby regenerating NOx trap wash coat 54 within filter 19.

[0023] During the NOx trap wash coat regeneration process, a substantial exothermic temperature rise occurs within oxidation catalyst 26 when catalyst 26 is oxidizing a rich mixture of exhaust gases and fuel. By locating the catalyst 26 upstream of NOx trap-particulate filter 19, relatively large temperature spikes caused by an exothermic energy release occur primarily in catalyst 26. Thus, a temperature of exhaust gases exiting catalyst 26 are maintained at a relatively uniform desired temperature which prevents thermal damage to filter 19. Because filter 19 is proximate catalyst 26, the temperature of filter 19 corresponds to the temperature of exhaust gases exiting catalyst 26.

[0024] Further, locating catalyst 26 adjacent and upstream of filter 19 allow for high molecular weight hydrocarbons within the diesel fuel to be cracked and partially oxidized by catalyst 26 (producing shorter chained hydrocarbons and CO/H2) before entering filter 19. The shorter chained hydrocarbons vaporize at lower temperatures than non-oxidized hydrocarbons allowing for more effective NOx regeneration of filter 19.

[0025] When regeneration of NOx trap wash coat of filter 19 is complete, the diesel fuel injection is discontinued, and the control valve 24 is closed. At such time, all of the exhaust gases created by engine 12 will be flowing through exhaust intake conduit 18, oxidation catalyst 27, filter 20, output conduit 22, and tail pipe 23. When the NOx trap wash coat 54 of filter 20 becomes saturated, the above process is repeated for filter 20.

[0026] At the same time the level of absorbed NOx is being monitored in filters 19, 20, the amount of accumulated particulate matter and accumulated SOx (within NOx trap wash coat 54) is monitored as well. The removal of particulate matter and desulfation processes can be accomplished in a single step. For example, when the accumulation of particulate matter and the buildup of SOx within the NOx trap wash coat of filter 19 exceeds a predetermined level, control valve 25 is fully opened and the control valve 24 is set to a partially opened position. Diesel fuel from the supply 28 is introduced through the nozzle or valve 29 into intake conduit 16 and carried towards filter 19 by the restricted exhaust flow. The rate of diesel fuel injection is set to obtain a rich air-fuel ratio needed to remove the absorbed SOx. The time interval for the fuel injection and the time interval between subsequent injections are determined to provide the exothermic temperature rise required to desorb SOx from the NOx trap and to initiate oxidation of the particulate matter or soot in filter 19. The temperature sensor 31 provides a feedback control signal to ECM 34 to provide the fuel metering and timing control. Once the temperature of the filter 19 is maintained above a threshold temperature for removing SOx and particulate matter, fuel is delivered at periodic intervals to the exhaust gases. Thus, the exhaust gases are alternated between rich of stoichiometry and lean of stoichiometry. During delivery of rich exhaust gases, the SOx is removed from filter 19. During delivery of lean exhaust gases, particulate matter is removed from filter 19.

[0027] Referring to FIGS. 3A, 3B, 4A-4C, the method executed by ECM 34 to control the exhaust gas purification system 10 will now be described. FIGS. 3A and 3B describe a preferred control arrangement for monitoring NOx absorption in filters 19, 20 and regeneration of the same. As shown in FIG. 3A, the primary NOx control scheme begins with a series of initializations. In these logic control diagrams, the parallel filter arrangement as shown in FIG. 1 is considered to have two sides or paths. Thus, logic variables ending in the numeral “1” refer to the exhaust path containing filter 19 and logic variables ending in the numeral “2” refer to the exhaust path containing filter 20.

[0028] At step 60, the regeneration flags REGNFLG1 and RGENFLG2 for filters 19, 20, respectively are initialized to zero—indicating that particulate matter (PM) removal and desulfation (SOx regeneration) is not taking place.

[0029] At step 62, the values CUMNO1 and CUMNO2 corresponding to the cumulative NOx stored in filters 19, 20, respectively, are initialized to zero.

[0030] At step 64, the NOx regeneration counter DNOXCNT and the maximum value of the NOx regeneration counter are initialized to zero.

[0031] At step 66, the status of control valves 24, 25 are initialized. In this example, the control valve 24 is fully opened (VFLG1=1) and valve 25 is completely closed (VFLG2=0). The flags VFLG1 and VFLG2 indicate a partially open position when equal to the value of two. After initializing the foregoing variables, all of the exhaust gases will be flowing through filter 19.

[0032] At block 68, the mass of feed gas NOx (MNOX) generated by engine 12 is estimated as a function of the engine speed and load 70. The value MNOX can be readily determined from lookup tables indexed by engine speed and load created during engine mapping.

[0033] Because VFLG1 is initially equal to “1”, the method advances from step 72 to step 74. At step 74, the value MNOX is added to the cumulative NOx (CUMNO1) absorbed by filter 19 through which the exhaust gases are flowing.

[0034] At step 76, the value RGENFLG2 indicating whether particulate matter and SOx regeneration is occurring for filter 20 is checked. If regeneration and particulate matter burn-off is not occurring in filter 20, then the method advances to step 78. Otherwise, the method returns to step 68.

[0035] At step 78, a determination is made as to whether the total mass of absorbed NOx (CUMNO1) is greater than or equal to a predetermined maximum value (CUMNO_MAX) for filter 19. If the value of step 78 equals “No”, the NOx regeneration program (DNOX2) for the filter 20 is executed. Otherwise, the steps 80, 82, 84, 86 are performed.

[0036] At step 80, control valve 24 is partially closed. At step 82, the duration of the NOx regeneration (DNOXCNT_MAX) for filter 19 is set as a function of the total NOx absorbed. Next at step 84, the regeneration timer DNOXCNT is reset. Finally, at step 86, control valve 25 is fully opened.

[0037] Referring to FIG. 3B, the DNOX2 routine for removing NOx from filter 20 will now be described. Before entering the DNOX2 routine, control valve 24 will be fully open and control valve 25 will be partially open.

[0038] At step 94, a determination is made as to whether the regeneration counter DNOXCNT is greater than or equal to the count DNOXCNT_MAX. The value of the maximum count DNOXCNT_MAX corresponds to the amount of time required to remove the stored NOx in filter 20 (FIG. 3A, step 92). If the value of step 94 equals “Yes”, the method if exited at step 110. Otherwise, the method advances to step 95. At step 95, a partially open position of valve 25 is determined. As shown, the position of valve 25 is determined from exhaust flow rate 97 and exhaust oxygen concentration 100. The exhaust flow rate 97 is determined as a function of engine speed 96. The exhaust oxygen concentration 100 is determined as a function of engine load 99. After step 95, the method advances to step 98.

[0039] At step 98, the amount of fuel flow F2 that is injected by injector 30 is determined. The fuel flow amount is calculated based on the exhaust flow rate 97 and the exhaust oxygen concentration 100.

[0040] At step 101, a determination is made as to whether the temperature T1 of oxidation catalyst 32 is greater than a threshold temperature T_THRESHOLD for optimal removal of NOx. The temperature T_THRESHOLD may be 270° C. for example. If the value of step 101 equals “Yes”, the method advances to step 102 which determines whether the temperature is greater than a maximum temperature T_MAX. The value of T_MAX may be 400° C. for example. If the value of step 102 equals “Yes”, the opened position V2 of valve 25 is reduced using the following equation:

V2=V2−ΔV

[0041] where ΔV is a predetermined adjustment amount of valve 25 that is empirically determined. After step 103, the method returns to step 98 to recalculate the fuel flow F2 based on the new position of valve 25.

[0042] Referring again to step 101, if the temperature T1 is less than threshold temperature T_THRESHOLD for optimal removal of NOx, the method advances to step 104.

[0043] At step 104, the fuel flow F2 is increased based on the following equation:

F2=F2+ΔF

[0044] where ΔF is a predetermined fueling adjustment amount for valve 30 that is empirically determined. The step 104 increases the amount of fuel combusted in oxidation catalyst 27 to thereby increase the temperature of catalyst 27 and filter 20.

[0045] Next at step 105, the counter DNOXCNT is incremented using the following equation:

DNOXCNT=DNOXCNT+DT

[0046] where DT corresponds to the time interval that has elapsed since the value DNOXCNT was previously incremented in this execution of the DNOX2 routine.

[0047] Next at step 106, a determination is made as to whether DNOXCNT is greater than or equal to maximum count DNOXCNT_MAX. If the value of step 106 equals “No”, the method is exited at step 110. Otherwise, the method advances to step 107.

[0048] At step 107, the fuel flow F2 is set equal to zero thereby stopping the fuel flow from valve 30.

[0049] Next at step 108, the throttle valve 25 is closed and the flag VFLG2 is set equal to zero.

[0050] Next at step 109, the cumulative stored NOx value CUMNO2 is set equal to zero. Thereafter, the method is exited at step 110.

[0051] Although not shown, the DNOX1 regeneration routine for filter 19 is performed in a similar manner as described in routine DNOX2, except that valves 24, 29 are controlled instead of valves 25, 30, respectively. The DNOX1 regeneration routine for filter 19 is called from step 91 of FIG. 3A.

[0052] Referring to FIGS. 4A, 4B, 4C, the routines for removing particulate matter and SOx from filter 19 will now be described. The variables ending in the numeral “1” refer to the exhaust path communicating with filter 19 and variables ending in the numeral “2” refer to the exhaust path communicating with filter 20.

[0053] Referring to FIG. 4A, the Main Particulate Matter and SOXREG Routine is illustrated. At step 200, the regeneration flags are REGNFLG1 and REGNFLG2 are initialized to zero.

[0054] At step 202, the accumulated particulate matter counts CUMPM1 and CUMPM2 for filters 19, 20, respectively are initialized to zero.

[0055] At step 204, the accumulated sulfur counts CUMSOX1 and CUMSOX2 for filters 19, 20, respectively, are initialized to zero. At step 206, the first valve 24 is opened (VFLG1=1) and the second valve 25 is closed (VFLG2=0).

[0056] At step 208, the mass of particulate matter flowing through the first path is determined as a function of the engine speed/load 210.

[0057] Next at step 212, the mass of sulfur flowing through filter 19 is estimated as a function of the engine fuel flow 214. Since all of the exhaust is flowing through the first path 16, these estimated values will be attributed to filter 19 at steps 218 and 220. If either the accumulated total particulate matter in filter 19 as governed by decision step 222, or the total sulfur absorbed by filter 19 as dictated by decision step 224 exceeds a predetermined maximum, the PMREG1 routine is executed to regenerate filter 19.

[0058] Before proceeding with a detailed discussion of the PMREG1 routine for removing particulate matter from filter 19, a general overview of the methodology will be explained. Referring to FIG. 5A, the lambda value (λ) corresponding to an exhaust gas-fuel ratio or an air-fuel ratio of exhaust gases flowing into oxidation catalyst 26 over time is illustrated. As shown, prior to time T1, lambda (λ) is lean of stoichiometry. Between times T1-T2, lambda (λ) is reduced to a more rich value. Lambda (λ) may be made more rich by (i) throttling valve 24 to reduce the amount of exhaust gases flowing into catalyst 26 and (ii) injecting reductant, such as diesel fuel, via valve 29 into the exhaust gases flowing into catalyst 26. Referring to FIG. 5B, during the injection of fuel during time interval T1-T2, the fuel is completely combusted in catalyst 26 increasing the temperature of exhaust gases entering filter 19. At time T2, the temperature T1 of catalyst 26 increases above a temperature TCRIT. The temperature TCRIT corresponds to a temperature above which particulate matter and SOx can be removed from filter 19. For example, TCRIT may be greater than or equal to 600° C. As illustrated, the lean mixture of exhaust gases burns off the particulate matter in filter 19 over the time period DPMTIME_MAX.

[0059] Referring to FIG. 4B, the PMREG1 routine for removing particulate matter from filter 19 is illustrated. The PMREG1 routine is called by step 226 of FIG. 4A.

[0060] At step 230, the regeneration flag RGENFLG1 is initialized to a value of one indicating regeneration has commenced.

[0061] Next at step 232, the first valve 24 is partially opened (VFLG1=2) and the second valve 25 is opened fully (VFLG2=1).

[0062] Next at step 234, the particulate matter burn-off time DPMTIME is initialized and the SOx regeneration time DSOXTIME is initialized. The value DPMTIME corresponds to an amount of time that particulate matter has been burned off of filter 19. The value DSOXTIME corresponds to an amount of time that SOx has been removed from filter 19.

[0063] Next at step 236, a determination is made as to whether the cumulative amount of stored SOx value CUMSOX1 is greater than or equal to the value CUMSOX1_MAX. If the value of step 236 equals “Yes”, the method advances to step 238 that initializes the values DPMCNT and DSOXCNT. Thereafter, the routine SOXREG1-PMREG1 is executed to purge both SOx and particulate matter from filter 19. Alternately, if the value of step 236 equals “No”, only particulate matter regeneration is required and the method advances to step 240.

[0064] Next at step 240, the partially open position V1 for valve 24 is determined as a function of the exhaust flow rate 242 and exhaust concentration 246. The exhaust flow rate 242 is determined from engine speed 244. The exhaust concentration 246 is determined based on engine load 248.

[0065] Next at step 250, the fuel flow rate F1 that is delivered by valve 29 into the exhaust gases upstream of oxidation catalyst 26 is determined based on exhaust flow rate 242 and exhaust oxygen concentration 246. The injected fuel results in catalytic combustion over oxidation catalyst 26 in the first exhaust path and a corresponding exothermic reaction. The reaction is allowed to continue until the temperature reaches a threshold temperature TCRIT where sustained oxidation of particulate matter on in filter 19 is achieved. The mixture of exhaust gases and fuel entering oxidation catalyst 26 may be lean of stoichiometry. Alternately, when a faster temperature increase is desired in oxidation catalyst, the mixture may initially be rich of stoichiometry until a temperature above TCRIT is achieved.

[0066] At step 252, a determination is made as to whether temperature T1 downstream of oxidation catalyst 26 is greater than temperature TCRIT. If the value of step 252 equals “No”, the method re-executes steps 240 and 250 to increase the temperature T1. Otherwise, the method advances to step 254.

[0067] At step 254, fuel flow through valve 29 is shut off. In other words, no further reductant is provided to oxidation catalyst 26 once sustained oxidation of the soot has been achieved in filter 19.

[0068] Next at step 256, the counter DPMTIME is incremented utilizing the following equation:

DPMTIME=DPMTIME+DT

[0069] where DT corresponds to the amount of elapsed time since the value DPMTIME was last incremented during this execution of the PMREG1 routine.

[0070] Next at step 258, a determination is made as to whether the value DPMTIME is greater than or equal to a maximum allowable time DPMTIME_MAX for removing the particulate matter. If the value of step 258 equals “No”, the method advances back to step 240 for continued oxidation of particulate matter in filter 19. Otherwise, the method advances to step 260 which sets the total particulate matter value CUMPM1 equal to zero. Further, the flag RGENFLG1 is set equal to zero. Thereafter at step 262, the routine is exited and the method returns to the MAIN PM and SOXREG program.

[0071] Before proceeding with a detailed discussion of the SOXREG1-PMREG1 routine for removing particulate matter and SOx from filter 19, a general overview of the methodology will be explained. Referring to FIG. 6A, the lambda value (λ) corresponding to an exhaust gas-fuel ratio of exhaust gases flowing into oxidation catalyst 26 over time is illustrated. As shown, lambda (λ) is alternated between being lean of stoichiometry and rich of stoichiometry. Particulate matter is removed from filter 19 when lambda (λ) is lean of stoichiometry. SOx is removed from filter 19 when lambda (λ) is rich of stoichiometry.

[0072] During each time period DSOXCNT_PRD, lambda (λ) is maintained rich of stoichiometry. A portion of the rich mixture is combusted on oxidation catalyst 26 to increase the temperature of the catalyst 26. Further, as illustrated in FIG. 6B, the temperature T1 of catalyst 26 is maintained above the temperature TCRIT. A remaining non-combusted portion of the rich mixture removes SOx stored in filter 19. During each time period DPMCNT_PRD, lambda (λ) is maintained lean of stoichiometry. The lean mixture (containing excess oxygen by definition) burns off particulate matter stored in filter 19.

[0073] Referring to FIG. 4C, the routine SOXREG1-PMREG1 for removing SOx and particulate matter from filter 19 is illustrated.

[0074] At step 264, the partially open position V1 for valve 24 is determined as a function of the exhaust flow rate 242 and exhaust oxygen concentration 246.

[0075] Next at step 266, the fuel flow rate F1 delivered into the exhaust gases upstream of catalyst 26 is determined based on exhaust flow rate 242 and exhaust oxygen concentration 246.

[0076] Next at step 268, the intermediate period (DSOXCNT_PRD) for removing SOx, and the intermediate period (DPMCNT_PRD) for removing particulate matter is determined. It should be noted that the sum of the DSOXCNT_PRD values corresponds to the De-SOx regeneration period DSOX_TIME_MAX. Similarly, the sum of the DPMCNT_PRD values correspond to the total particulate matter regeneration period DPMTIME_MAX. The values DSOXCNT_PRD and DPMCNT_PRD may be obtained from a table stored in memory 38 indexed by exhaust flow rate 242, exhaust oxygen concentration 246, and fueling rate F1.

[0077] As shown in FIG. 6A, the periods DSOXCNT_PRD and DPMCNT_PRD are utilized to create fuel injection pulses to obtain the fuel flow rate F1 (and a desired lambda value). The fuel injection pulses create a mixture of exhaust gases and fuel that alternate between being rich of stoichiometry and lean of stoichiometry. When the mixture is rich of stoichiometry, a portion of the fuel is burned in oxidation catalyst 26 increasing the temperature of filter 19. The remaining un-combusted fuel decomposes stored SOx within the NOx trap wash coat of filter 19.

[0078] Next at step 270, a determination is made as to whether temperature T1 of oxidation catalyst 26 is greater than temperature TCRIT. If the value of step 270 equals “No”, the method re-executes steps 264 and 266 to increase the temperature T1. Otherwise, the method advances to step 272.

[0079] At step 272, the time DSOXCNT is incremented utilizing the following equation:

DSOXCNT=DSOXCNT+DT

[0080] where DT corresponds to the elapsed time since the value DSOXCNT was last incremented in this execution of the SOXREG1-PMREG1 routine.

[0081] Next at step 274, a determination is made as to whether the value DSOXCNT is greater than or equal to the value DSOXCNT_PRD. If the value of step 274 equals “No”, the method returns to step 264 for continued delivery of reductant to filter 19 to remove SOx from filter 19. Otherwise, the method advances to step 276.

[0082] At step 276, the value DSOXTIME is incremented using the following equation:

DSOXTIME=DSOXTIME+DSOXCNT PRD

[0083] Next at step 278, the fuel flow rate F1 is set equal to zero to create a lean mixture of exhaust gases for removing particulate matter from filter 19.

[0084] Next at step 280, the valve DPMCNT is incremented using the following equation:

DPMCNT=DPMCNT+DT

[0085] where DT corresponds to the amount of elapsed time since the value DPMCNT was last incremented in this execution of the SOXREG1-PMREG1 routine.

[0086] At step 282, a determination is made as to whether DPMCNT is greater than or equal to regeneration period DPMCNT_PRD. If the value of step 282 equals “Yes”, the method returns to step 280 for continued removal of particulate matter from filter 19. Otherwise, the method advances to step 284.

[0087] At step 284, the total measured regeneration time DPMTIME is incremented using the following equation:

DPMTIME=DPMTIME+DPMCNT PRD

[0088] Next at step 286, a determination is made as to whether the measured SOx regeneration time DSOXTIME is greater than or equal to the value DSOXTIME_MAX. If the value of step 286 equals “Yes”, the method advances to step 288 explained below. Otherwise, the method returns to step 264 described above.

[0089] At step 288, a determination is made as to whether the measured particulate matter removal time DPMTIME is greater than or equal to value DPMTIME_MAX. If the value of step 288 equals “No”, the method returns to steps 278 for continued removal of particulate matter from filter 19. Otherwise, the method advances to step 290.

[0090] At step 290, the values CUMSOX1, CUMPM, REGNFLG1 are all set to zero. Thereafter, the routine is exited at step 292.

[0091] The present system and method provides a substantial advantage over systems and methods. In particular, the inventors herein have recognized that an exothermic reaction generated during NOx or SOx removal can be utilized to maintain a desired temperature of exhaust gases for subsequent oxidation of particulate matter—without adding additional reductant during the oxidation process. Thus, the present system and method provides for increased fuel economy as compared to known systems that deliver reductant during both the particulate matter oxidation and the SOx reduction from the combined filter and trap.

Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US7410585 *Mar 15, 2005Aug 12, 2008Honeywell International Inc.Passing a fuel through a fuel filter capable of removing sulfur containing compounds, storing the removed sulfur containing compounds, releasing a portion of the stored sulfur containing compounds, and sending the portion through the engine and into an emission control device
US7434387Jul 26, 2006Oct 14, 2008Eaton CorporationIntegrated DPF-reformer
US7610751Jul 21, 2006Nov 3, 2009Eaton CorporationFuel injection before turbocharger
US7614214Jul 26, 2006Nov 10, 2009Eaton CorporationGasification of soot trapped in a particulate filter under reducing conditions
US7621121 *Jul 21, 2006Nov 24, 2009Ford Global Technologies, LlcMethod and arrangement for purifying exhaust gas in an internal combustion engine
US7631493 *Dec 23, 2005Dec 15, 2009Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.Exhaust gas purification control of diesel engine
US7650746Sep 20, 2006Jan 26, 2010Eaton CorporationHybrid catalyst system for exhaust emissions reduction
US7704383Oct 16, 2008Apr 27, 2010Honeywell Interational Inc.Portable fuel desulfurization unit
US7785548Jul 22, 2008Aug 31, 2010Honeywell International Inc.Apparatus and method for storing and releasing sulfur containing aromatic compounds from a fuel stream of an internal combustion engine
US7918082Nov 24, 2004Apr 5, 2011Institut Francais Du PetroleMethod and device intended for desulfation of a nitric oxide trap and regeneration of a particle filter
US8209960Dec 7, 2009Jul 3, 2012International Engine Intellectual Property Company, LlcSystem and method for coupled DPF regeneration and LNT DeNOx
US8341945Jul 1, 2009Jan 1, 2013GM Global Technology Operations LLCElectrically heated particulate filter
US8443590Jul 2, 2009May 21, 2013GM Global Technology Operations LLCReduced volume electrically heated particulate filter
US8475574Aug 5, 2009Jul 2, 2013GM Global Technology Operations LLCElectric heater and control system and method for electrically heated particulate filters
US8479496Jul 2, 2009Jul 9, 2013GM Global Technology Operations LLCSelective catalytic reduction system using electrically heated catalyst
US8484956 *Feb 8, 2011Jul 16, 2013Woodward, Inc.Diesel particulate filter regeneration control using a wide band oxygen sensor
US8511069Aug 12, 2009Aug 20, 2013GM Global Technology Operations LLCSystems and methods for layered regeneration of a particulate matter filter
US8584445 *Feb 4, 2009Nov 19, 2013GM Global Technology Operations LLCMethod and system for controlling an electrically heated particulate filter
US20110197567 *Feb 8, 2011Aug 18, 2011Woodward Governor CompanyDiesel Particulate Filter Regeneration Control Using A Wide Band Oxygen Sensor
DE10261877B4 *Dec 20, 2002Apr 14, 2011Volkswagen AgVerfahren zum Betreiben einer Brennkraftmaschine mit Partikelfilter
DE102006017300B4 *Apr 12, 2006Mar 17, 2011Continental Automotive GmbhVerfahren zur Regeneration von zumindest einer oxidierend arbeitenden Abgasreinigungseinrichtung und zumindest einer reduzierend arbeitenden Abgasreinigungseinrichtung sowie Vorrichtung zum Durchführen des Verfahrens
EP1533490A1 *Nov 12, 2004May 25, 2005Institut Francais Du PetroleMehod and apparatus for the desulphurisation of a NOx storage catalyst and the regeneration of a particulate filter
Classifications
U.S. Classification423/242.1, 422/172, 422/110, 422/171, 422/177
International ClassificationF01N13/04, F01N13/02, F01N9/00, B01D53/94, F01N3/20, F01N3/035, F01N3/023, F01N3/08
Cooperative ClassificationY02T10/24, B01D53/9431, F01N3/0821, F01N2560/07, F01N2510/06, F01N3/0842, Y02T10/47, F01N2570/14, F01N3/035, F01N3/085, F01N9/00, F01N3/0231, F01N2610/146, F01N3/0814, F01N3/0878, B01D53/9495, F01N2570/04, F01N2610/03, F01N2560/06, F01N3/0885, F01N13/009, F01N13/011
European ClassificationF01N3/08B6F, F01N3/08B6D, F01N3/08B2, F01N9/00, B01D53/94Y, F01N3/08B10B, F01N3/023B, B01D53/94F2D, F01N3/08B4, F01N3/035, F01N3/08B10A
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Apr 22, 2003ASAssignment
Owner name: FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, MICHIGAN
Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:013987/0838
Effective date: 20030301
Owner name: FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,MICHIGAN
Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;US-ASSIGNMENT DATABASE UPDATED:20100420;REEL/FRAME:13987/838
Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:13987/838
Aug 7, 2002ASAssignment
Owner name: FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., MICHIGAN
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:FORD MOTOR COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:013190/0648
Effective date: 20020806
Owner name: FORD MOTOR COMPANY, MICHIGAN
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HEPBURN, JEFFREY S.;HAMMERLE, ROBERT H.;REEL/FRAME:013190/0641;SIGNING DATES FROM 20020717 TO 20020802