Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20030126202 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 10/290,171
Publication dateJul 3, 2003
Filing dateNov 8, 2002
Priority dateNov 8, 2001
Also published asUS7213065, US20070250608
Publication number10290171, 290171, US 2003/0126202 A1, US 2003/126202 A1, US 20030126202 A1, US 20030126202A1, US 2003126202 A1, US 2003126202A1, US-A1-20030126202, US-A1-2003126202, US2003/0126202A1, US2003/126202A1, US20030126202 A1, US20030126202A1, US2003126202 A1, US2003126202A1
InventorsCharles Watt
Original AssigneeWatt Charles T.
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
System and method for dynamic server allocation and provisioning
US 20030126202 A1
Abstract
A management tool that streamlines the server allocation and provisioning processes within a data center is provided. The system, method, and computer program product divide the server provisioning and allocation into two separate tasks. Provisioning a server is accomplished by generating a fully configured, bootable system image, complete with network address assignments, virtual LAN (VLAN) configuration, load balancing configuration, and the like. System images are stored in a storage repository and are accessible to more than one server. Allocation is accomplished using a switching mechanism which matches each server with an appropriate system image based upon current configuration or requirements of the data center. Thus, real-time provisioning and allocation of servers in the form of automated responses to changing conditions within the data center is possible. The ability to instantly re-provision servers, safely and securely switch under-utilized server capacity to more productive tasks, and improve server utilization is also provided.
Images(8)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(39)
What is claimed is:
1. A system for providing dynamic server allocation and provisioning within a data center, wherein the data center includes a plurality of servers connected via a communications network, the system comprising:
a storage element for storing a plurality of server images available for loading onto the plurality of servers;
a load manager capable of assigning one of the plurality of server images stored in said storage element to each of the plurality of servers;
at least one server manager, coupled to each of the plurality of servers, and capable of controlling the power of each of the plurality of servers upon receiving commands from said load manager;
a plurality of boot loaders, each residing on one of the plurality of servers and capable of receiving commands from said at least one server manager, in order to load one of the plurality of server images onto each of the plurality of servers; and
a server monitor capable of receiving a heartbeat signal and a load measurement signal periodically from each of the plurality of servers via the communications network, and reporting said heartbeat signals and said load measurement signals to said load manager;
whereby said load manager is able to allocate and provision the plurality of servers using said heartbeat signals, and according to a set of pre-determined criteria in response to said load measurement signals received from each of the plurality of servers.
2. The system of claim 1, further comprising:
a boot controller capable of exchanging messages with each of said plurality of boot loaders, said messages assisting said plurality of boot loaders in loading one the plurality of server images onto each of the plurality of servers.
3. The system of claim 2, wherein said messages exchanged between said boot controller and said plurality of boot loaders are Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) messages exchanged via the communications network.
4. The system of claim 1, further comprising:
a repository manager capable of aggregating a plurality of application software snapshots in order to form at least one server image, and storing said at least one server image on said storage element thereby making said at least one server image available for loading onto the plurality of servers.
5. The system of claim 4, wherein said plurality of application software snapshots is stored on said storage element such that a single copy of each of said plurality of application software snapshots can be shared among said plurality of server images.
6. The system of claim 4, further comprising:
a control console having a graphical user interface (GUI) for allowing a user to create said at least one server image from a subset of said plurality of application software snapshots.
7. The system of claim 1, wherein said server monitor comprises:
an emitter, residing on each of the plurality of servers, capable of generating said heartbeat signal and said load measurement signal; and
a collector, residing on said control console, capable of receiving said heartbeat signal and said load measurement signal from said emitter process via the communications network.
8. The system of claim 1, further comprising:
an infrastructure controller capable of receiving commands from said load manager to configure switch ports on network switching equipment connected to a network interface on each of the plurality of servers.
9. The system of claim 1, wherein the storage element is comprised of at least one of the following: (i) a storage area network (SAN) device; (ii) a network attached storage (NAS) device; and (iii) a distributed file system (DFS).
10. The system of claim 1, wherein each of said plurality of system images is a bootable system image and includes a root file system, a kernel, and at least one executable software application.
11. The system of claim 1, wherein each of the plurality of servers is a virtual server residing on a single physical server and said at least one server manager is capable of resizing the partitions on said single physical server upon receiving commands from said load manager.
12. A system for remotely controlling the booting of a plurality of servers connected via a communications network within a data center, the system comprising:
a plurality of server images available for loading onto the plurality of servers and stored externally to each of the plurality of servers;
a plurality of boot loaders, each corresponding to one of the plurality of servers and capable of loading one of said plurality of server images onto their respective server; and
a boot controller, located remotely from each of the plurality of servers and capable of exchanging messages with each of said plurality of boot loaders via the communications network, which directs the actions of each of said plurality of boot loaders during the loading one of the plurality of server images onto their respective server;
whereby each of the plurality of servers can assume a system image that is accessible to it via the communications network.
13. The system of claim 12, wherein said messages exchanged between said boot controller and said plurality of boot loaders are Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) messages exchanged via the communications network.
14. The system of claim 12, wherein at least one of said plurality of boot loaders resides in the flash memory of their respective server.
15. The system of claim 12, wherein at least one of said plurality of boot loaders is accessible to their respective server via said communications network.
16. The system of claim 12, wherein at least one of said plurality of boot loaders is accessible to their respective server via a serial line.
17. The system of claim 12, wherein at least one of said plurality of boot loaders is accessible to their respective server via a local storage element.
18. The system of claim 12, wherein each of said plurality of system images is a bootable system image and includes a root file system, a kernel, and at least one executable software application.
19. The system of claim 12, wherein said plurality of server images are stored in a storage element which is comprised of at least one of the following: (i) a storage area network (SAN) device; (ii) a network attached storage (NAS) device; and (iii) a distributed file system (DFS).
20. The system of claim 19, further comprising:
a repository manager capable of aggregating a plurality of application software snapshots in order to form at least one server image, and storing said at least one server image on said storage element.
21. The system of claim 20, wherein said plurality of application software snapshots is stored on said storage element such that a single copy of each of said plurality of application software snapshots can be shared among said plurality of server images.
22. The system of claim 21, further comprising:
a control console having a graphical user interface (GUI) for allowing a user to create said at least one server image from a subset of said plurality of application software snapshots.
23. The system of claim 12, wherein each of the plurality of servers is a virtual server residing on a single physical server.
24. A method for remotely managing server images for a plurality of servers connected via a communications network, the method comprising the steps of:
storing a plurality of server images on a storage element, wherein said storage element is external to the plurality of servers and accessible via the communications network;
loading a plurality of boot loaders onto each of the plurality of servers, wherein each of said plurality of boot loaders is capable of loading one of said plurality of server images onto their respective server; and
executing each of said plurality of boot loaders wherein each of said plurality of boot loaders exchanges messages with an external boot controller capable of directing the actions of each of said plurality of boot loaders during the loading of one of the plurality of server images onto their respective server;
wherein each of the plurality of servers can assume a system image that is accessible to it via the communications network.
25. The method of claim 24, wherein said storage element is comprised of at least one of the following: (i) a storage area network (SAN) device; (ii) a network attached storage (NAS) device; and (iii) a distributed file system (DFS).
26. The method of claim 24, wherein said messages exchanged between said external boot controller and said plurality of boot loaders are Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) messages exchanged via the communications network.
27. The method of claim 24, wherein at least one of said plurality of boot loaders resides in the flash memory on its respective server.
28. The method of claim 24, wherein each of said plurality of system images is a bootable system image and includes a root file system, a kernel, and at least one executable software application.
29. A method for dynamic server allocation and provisioning among a plurality of servers connected via a communications network, comprising the steps of:
storing a plurality of server images on a storage element, said plurality of server images being available for loading onto the plurality of servers;
assigning at least one of the plurality of server images stored in said storage element to at least one of the plurality of servers;
powering on said at least one of the plurality of servers and loading said at least one of said plurality of server images onto said at least one of the plurality of servers; and
receiving a heartbeat signal and a load measurement signal periodically from said at least one of the plurality of servers via the communications network;
wherein a replacement server among the plurality of servers may be allocated, powered on, and provisioned either upon the detection of said at least one of the plurality of servers failing based upon said heartbeat signal, or according to a set of pre-determined criteria based upon said load measurement signal received from said at least one of the plurality of servers.
30. The method of claim 29, wherein the step of loading said at least one of said plurality of server images onto said at least one of the plurality of servers, further comprises the steps of:
installing a boot loader onto said at least one of the plurality of servers in order to facilitate loading of said at least one of said plurality of server images onto said at least one of the plurality of servers; and
configuring the switch ports on said at least one of the plurality of servers.
31. The method of claim 29, wherein said storage element is comprised of at least one of the following: (i) a storage area network (SAN) device; (ii) a network attached storage (NAS) device; and (iii) a distributed file method (DFS).
32. The method of claim 29, wherein each of said plurality of system images is a bootable system image and includes a root file system, a kernel, and at least one executable software application.
33. The method of claim 29, further comprising the step of:
aggregating a plurality of application software snapshots in order to form at least one server image, and storing said server image on said storage element, thereby making said at least one server image available for loading onto the plurality of servers.
34. The method of claim 29, further comprising the step of:
storing said plurality of application software snapshots on said storage element thereby a single copy of each of said plurality of application software snapshots can be shared among said plurality of server images.
35. The method of claim 34, wherein said set of pre-determined criteria includes at least one of the following:
(i) a minimum number of the plurality of servers being assigned and executing said at least one server image;
(ii) a maximum number of the plurality of servers being assigned and executing said at least one server image;
(iii) a minimum average of said load measurement signals received from at least one of the plurality of servers being assigned and executing said at least one server image;
(iv) a maximum average of said load measurement signals received from the plurality of servers being assigned and executing said at least one server image;
(v) a pre-assigned priority for each of said plurality of server images;
(vi) a pre-assigned costs for each of the plurality of servers, said costs being associated with the type of hardware configuration of each of the plurality of servers;
(vii) a pre-assigned costs for each of the plurality of servers, said costs being associated with the type of software configuration of each of the plurality of servers;
(viii) a pre-assigned costs for each of said plurality of server images;
(ix) a pre-assigned costs for each of the plurality of servers, said costs being associated with each servers respective location within the communications network; and
(x) a pre-assigned costs for each of the plurality of servers, said costs being associated with each servers respective ownership.
36. A computer program product comprising a computer usable medium having control logic stored therein for causing a computer to remotely managing server images for a plurality of servers connected via a communications network, said control logic comprising:
first computer readable program code means for causing the computer to store a plurality of server images on a storage element, wherein said storage element is external to the plurality of servers and accessible via the communications network;
second computer readable program code means for causing the computer to load a plurality of boot loaders onto each of the plurality of servers, wherein each of said plurality of boot loaders is capable of loading one of said plurality of server images onto their respective server; and
third computer readable program code means for causing the computer to invoke each of said plurality of boot loaders wherein each of said plurality of boot loaders exchanges messages with an external boot controller capable of directing the actions of each of said plurality of boot loaders during the loading of one of the plurality of server images onto their respective server.
37. The computer program product of claim 36, wherein said messages exchanged between said external boot controller and said plurality of boot loaders are Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) messages exchanged via the communications network.
38. A computer program product comprising a computer usable medium having control logic stored therein for causing a computer to perform dynamic server allocation and provisioning among a plurality of servers connected via a communications network, said control logic comprising:
first computer readable program code means for causing the computer to store a plurality of server images on a storage element, said plurality of server images being available for loading onto the plurality of servers;
second computer readable program code means for causing the computer to assign at least one of the plurality of server images stored in said storage element to at least one of the plurality of servers;
third computer readable program code means for causing the computer to power on said at least one of the plurality of servers;
fourth computer readable program code means for causing the computer to load said at least one of said plurality of server images onto said at least one of the plurality of servers; and
fifth computer readable program code means for causing the computer to receive a heartbeat signal and a load measurement signal periodically from said at least one of the plurality of servers via the communications network.
39. The computer program product of claim 38, further comprising:
sixth computer readable program code means for causing the computer to aggregate a plurality of application software snapshots in order to form at least one server image, and store said server image on said storage element, thereby making said at least one server image available for loading onto the plurality of servers.
Description

[0001] This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/331,122, filed Nov. 8, 2001. The entirety of that provisional application is incorporated herein by reference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0002] 1. Field of the Invention

[0003] The present invention relates generally to computer resource management systems and methods, and more particularly to systems and methods that provide dynamic, load-based allocation and provisioning of servers within data centers.

[0004] 2. Related Art

[0005] In today's computing environment, it is common for an entity (e.g., a corporation) to operate a data center to provide a variety of applications and services for its customer end users and internal operations. Such data centers typically include a collection of servers, storage elements (i.e., any device designed and built primarily for the purpose of persistent data storage and delivery), and a communications infrastructure (i.e., a network) that provides physical connections among the data center's elements and a management layer that organizes these connections, storage elements and servers.

[0006] Each application or service to be executed within the data center often requires one or more servers provisioned with the correct operating system, middleware, application software, data and configuration information. Currently, provisioning and allocating a server are essentially one task—installing the necessary software onto the hard drive of the server and configuring it for use within the specific application and operating environment.

[0007] More specifically, the provisioning process for a traditional server involves installing and configuring software on the server's directly attached storage device or dedicated storage area network (SAN) device. This is a time consuming, mostly manual operation that can take days to complete and fully verify for a large, complex application. It is also a destructive process that requires irreversible changes to the server's disk drive such that any previous installation will be overwritten. If the new installation fails, there may be no easy way to recover the previous working system. The time, effort, expense and risk associated with provisioning servers make it infeasible to re-provision a server to meet short-term requirements. Thus, in practice, each server typically is statically allocated to a specific application.

[0008] Several commercial tools have been introduced that streamline this process when installing a large number of servers. These tools employ “push provisioning” to copy a system image over the network to the local hard drive of each server. This approach is useful in maintaining a common system image across a server pool, but does not facilitate rapid re-provisioning of servers because it consumes significant network bandwidth and is destructive of previous installations. Re-provisioning a single server can fully saturate a 100 Mbps local area network (LAN) for several minutes. Re-provisioning a pool of servers can take several hours.

[0009] As mentioned above, because of the time, effort, expense and risk associated with provisioning servers, each server in the data center typically is statically allocated to a specific application. Consequently, long-term capacity projections are used to plan server capacity in advance of need to ensure that the data center has sufficient number of servers to meet the peak capacity requirements for each application. Most of the time, however, an application does not experience peak demand and its servers run well below their capacity. This wastes power and physical (i.e., rack) space, as well as increases administrative burden.

[0010] Therefore, given the above, what is needed is a system, method, and computer program product for dynamic server allocation and provisioning. The system, method, and computer program product should divide the server provisioning and allocation into two separate tasks. Provisioning a server should be accomplished by generating a fully configured, bootable system image (root file system, kernel, applications, data, etc.), complete with network address assignments, virtual LAN (VLAN) configuration, load balancing configuration, and the like. The system images should be stored in a storage repository such that they are accessible to more than one server. The allocation process should be accomplished using a switching mechanism that can match each server with an appropriate system image based upon the current configuration or requirements of the data center. Thus, the system, method, and computer program product should be able to provide real-time provisioning and allocation of servers in the form of automated responses to changing conditions within the data center.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[0011] The present invention meets the above-identified needs by providing a system, method and computer program product for dynamic server allocation and provisioning.

[0012] In an embodiment, the present invention includes a storage element for storing server images available for loading onto servers within a data center, a load manager capable of assigning one of the server images (i.e., a root file system, kernel, and one or more applications) to each of the servers, and at least one server manager for each of the servers capable of powering it on and off upon receiving commands from the load manager. The present invention also includes boot loaders residing on the servers and capable of receiving commands from the server managers in order to load the server images onto each of the servers. Such loading, in an embodiment, involves each server accessing only those portions of the image needed at any point in time and can incrementally load additional portions of the image on an as-needed basis.

[0013] The present invention further includes a server monitor that receives periodic heartbeat and load measurement signals from each of the servers in the data center via a communications network. These signals are then reported to the load manager. This allows the load manager to allocate and provision servers upon detecting failures (i.e., lack of heartbeat signals from a particular server in the data center). This also allows the load manager to allocate and provision servers according to pre-determined criteria in response to the load measurement signals received from the servers.

[0014] In alternate embodiments, the present invention includes a boot controller capable of exchanging messages (e.g., DHCP messages) with each of the boot loaders in order to assist the boot loaders in loading server images onto each of their servers. Such assistance includes resolving which instance of a server image to load and the server's network configuration. Also included is a repository manager that manages the aggregation of application software snapshots in order to form various server images, which are then stored in a repository (i.e., any of a variety of storage elements such as a storage area network (SAN) device, a network attached storage (NAS) device or a distributed file system (DFS)) thereby making them available for loading onto the servers. A control console, having a graphical user interface (GUI), is also provided for allowing a user (i.e., a data center administrator) to create various server images and perform various other administrative, reporting and billing functions, including defining the pre-determined criteria for the load manager to implement during server provisioning and allocation.

[0015] An advantage of the present invention is that it lowers capital costs for an entity operating a data center containing multiple servers. By sharing servers across the entity's customers and applications, massive improvements in server utilization are gained. This translates directly into the need for fewer servers, fewer racks, less floor space, less supporting infrastructure, less power and less cooling. This also translates directly into multiple revenue streams per server (i.e., when a server is under-utilized, it can be switched to an alternate revenue stream).

[0016] Another advantage of the present invention is that it lowers operational costs by automating the provisioning and software management tasks. That is, a significant reduction of administrative burden associated with an entity's servers within a data center can be realized. This results in the ability to reduce administrative staff or can free existing staff for more productive activities.

[0017] Yet another advantage of the present invention is that its load monitoring and automated server allocation and provisioning features allow an entity to provide customers with guaranteed service level agreements (SLAs) that can be reliably enforced without adding additional hardware to the data center or adding additional staff to its operation.

[0018] Yet another advantage of the present invention is that its facilitates detailed accounting and reporting to allow an entity to bill customers based upon their actual server usage, to enforce variable rate pricing for peak, off-peak and overload conditions to maximize returns and helps to attract new customers to the entity's data center.

[0019] Yet another advantage of the present invention is that it reduces an entity's overall operational risk typically associated with data center operations. As a result of maintaining server images on centralized storage, the present invention vastly simplifies backup processes, making it quicker, more efficient, and more reliable. The real-time server allocation and provisioning features allow an entity to quickly rebuild a data center in the event of a disaster. An N×M fault-tolerance allows a single pool of M servers to provide full disaster backup for any number of N applications or data centers. (For example, M spare servers can provide a back up for N servers possibly executing N different applications, and where N>>M.) Application performance and server health are continuously monitored. Thus, in the event of poor application performance or a server or network failure, additional server capacity can be powered on and provisioned, rerouting the network as necessary.

[0020] Yet still another advantage of the present invention is improved infrastructure security. The provisioning system of the present invention utilizes read-only file systems that cannot be modified by data center servers. This helps prevent inadvertent or malicious corruption of the servers. Many network security issues are eliminated by automatically configuring the network infrastructure when a server is provisioned to restrict access to just those resources within the data center that the server needs to perform its function.

[0021] Further features and advantages of the invention as well as the structure and operation of various embodiments of the present invention are described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings.

DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

[0022] The features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the detailed description set forth below when taken in conjunction with the drawings in which like reference numbers indicate identical or functionally similar elements. Additionally, the left-most digit of a reference number identifies the drawing in which the reference number first appears.

[0023]FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating the integration of an embodiment of the present invention into a conventional data center.

[0024]FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating the system architecture of an embodiment of the present invention, showing connectivity among the various components.

[0025]FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a repository according to an embodiment of the present invention.

[0026] FIGS. 4A-B are block diagrams illustrating the use of clusters in one embodiment of the present invention.

[0027]FIG. 5 is a block diagram of an exemplary computer system useful for implementing the present invention.

[0028] FIGS. 6A-6B, are flowcharts illustrating an automated server allocation process according to an embodiment of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0029] I. Overview

[0030] The present invention provides a system, method and computer program product for dynamic server allocation and provisioning.

[0031] Running a data center is a complex operation that requires clean integration between a variety of management and monitoring applications and tools. Thus, in an embodiment, an entity running such a data center will utilize the management tool of the present invention to perform: (i) automated software management and provisioning (i.e., software installation, configuration, patches, upgrades, rollbacks, and full life-cycle maintenance); (ii) real-time allocation (including powering servers on/off as needed, and automatic network infrastructure reconfiguring); (iii) scheduled allocation (i.e., swapping servers back and forth between multiple applications based upon date, time-of-day, day-of-week and/or the like); (iv) server monitoring (e.g., continuous monitoring for server failures or server pool under- or over-load conditions); (v) automated, policy-based allocation (i.e., management of server pools, a cluster of resources, or the entire data center for complete “lights-out” operation); and (vi) accounting (i.e., recording detailed accounting trails of all server usage for viewing and generating reports for billing, monitoring, tracking, allocation, and resource planning).

[0032] The present invention is now described in more detail herein in terms of the above example. This is for convenience only and is not intended to limit the application of the present invention. In fact, after reading the following description, it will be apparent to one skilled in the relevant art(s) how to implement the following invention in alternative embodiments. For example, the present invention can dynamically provision and allocate any computer systems or other processing systems including servers, desktop computers, personal computers, handheld computing devices, or dedicated or special purpose systems, where these processing systems can be jointly located within a data center environment, deployed individually, or any combination thereof. Further, in alternate embodiments, the present invention can dynamically provision and allocate servers, including virtual servers that run within a partition of a server's hardware or operating system such as those offered by IBM's Logical Partitions (LPAR) and Virtual Machine (VM), Sun's Dynamic System Domains (DSD), and Hewlett-Packard's nPartition or vPartition.

[0033] The terms “user,” “entity,” “administrator,” and the plural form of these terms may be used interchangeably throughout herein to refer to those who would access, use, and/or benefit from the tool that the present invention provides for dynamic server allocation and provisioning.

[0034] Further, the term “loading” as used herein with reference to loading server images onto servers from a storage element means that a server need only access those portions of the image needed at any point in time and can incrementally load additional portions of the image on an as-needed basis. Alternately, a server may choose to pre-load the entire image into its local storage.

[0035] II. System Integration

[0036] Referring to FIG. 1, a block diagram 100 illustrating the integration of an embodiment of the present invention into an existing data center infrastructure is shown. More specifically, FIG. 1 illustrates the variety of interfaces in one embodiment of the present invention's dynamic server allocation and provisioning (“DSAP”) system 102. The interfaces are designed to provide easy, fully functional integration with other data center operations and management applications.

[0037] DSAP system 102 can be controlled using its powerful, easy-to-use management interface, command line utilities and scripts, or direct network commands. Each event that it monitors and each action that it takes can be easily extended or modified using its unique callout capability. It provides feedback and alarms to the data center's network operations center and provide custom policies and controls. The interfaces are described in more detail below.

[0038] Commands and controls 104 can be sent to DSAP system 102 using a graphical user interface (GUI), Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) commands, a Command Line Interface (CLI), or a native Remote Procedure Call (RPC) mechanism.

[0039] Third-party applications 108 can report DSAP system-related events 106, such as a server failure or a server pool overload, using DSAP system 102 CLI or RPC mechanisms. DSAP system 102 reports events using an event publishing mechanism 110. This allows a third-party application 108 to register with event publisher mechanism 110 to receive notification of interesting events, such as server failure, server pool overload, administrator login, the creation of a new virtual service for load balancing, and the like. Event handlers within event publishing mechanism 110 can tie DSAP system 102 events back to the third-party applications 108. The event handlers can also alter the flow of the core processing of DSAP system 102. This can be used for “advanced” purposes such as replacing the authentication mechanism of DSAP system 102, providing automated firewall management, replacing standard server allocation algorithms of DSAP system 102, and the like. Event publishing mechanism 110 can produce reports in Extensible Markup Language (XML) so that they can be easily integrated with existing billing and resource management tools.

[0040] DSAP system 102 provides driver application programming interfaces (APIs) for interacting with various hardware drivers 112 such as hardserver blade chassis, server power controllers, network switches, and network load balancers.

[0041] III. Overview of System Architecture

[0042] Referring to FIG. 2, a block diagram illustrating the (logical) system architecture of an embodiment of the present invention, showing connectivity among the various components, is shown. More specifically, FIG. 2 illustrates the components of DSAP system 102 and their respective connectivity to conventional data center components 220 to form a data center 200 according to an embodiment of the present invention.

[0043] The components of DSAP system 102, in an embodiment, include an infrastructure controller 202, a server monitor 204, a load manager 206, a plurality of server managers 208 a and a plurality of corresponding boot loaders 208 b, and a repository manager 210.

[0044] Conventional data center components 220 include a plurality of server pools 212 a-n, where each pool 212 contains several servers (e.g., an IBM™ or compatible computer running the Microsoft® Windows NT™ operating system, a Sun Fire™ server running the Solaris™ operating system or the like). Conventional data center components 220 also include network switching infrastructure 214, firewalls and load balancing infrastructure 216 (which are connected to external networks (e.g., the Internet) and external server clusters 230), and a centralized network storage device 218.

[0045] While one network storage device 218 is shown in FIG. 2 for ease of explanation, it will be apparent to one skilled in the relevant art(s) that in alternate embodiments data center 200 may utilize storage devices physically located on one or more computers and device 218 can be mirrored for fault tolerance.

[0046] Repository manager 210 is responsible for securely and efficiently provisioning and managing server images 217 a-n on storage devices 218 within data center 200. It allows an administrator to install software one time such that it can be shared by all servers within a server pool 212, or even by servers in different pools. The administrator can pick and choose from the installed software base to create a master server image 217. Once defined, this server image 217 can be rapidly replicated and configured using automated tools to build out images for an entire server pool 212. Full life-cycle management is provided with easy patching, upgrades, and rollbacks.

[0047] Each server manager 208 a is responsible for rebooting or powering on and off specified servers as directed by load manager 206. (Only one server manager 208 a is shown in FIG. 2 for ease of explanation herein.) Boot loader 208 b executes on the server under control. (Only one boot loader 208 b is shown in FIG. 2 for ease of explanation herein.) Boot loader 208 b directs the booting server to the correct system image 217, whether on centralized storage 218 or the particular server's local disk drive. After the server has booted to a fully operational state, server manager 208 a maintains a management connection with the server via the server's console port or a secured network connection.

[0048] Server monitor 204 continuously monitors the health, load and response time of all servers within data center 200. It detects and reports server failures to load manager 206. Server monitor 204 also calculates average server load and response times for each configured server pool 212, reporting under- and over-load conditions to load manager 206.

[0049] Load manager 206 is responsible for allocating servers and images 217 to meet the requirements of data center 200. It receives reports on server failures and load conditions for servers within a server pool 212, and makes allocation decisions based upon rules and policy settings specified by the administrator. Load manager 206 powers servers on or off as needed via the server manager 208 a. Load manager 206 re-provisions servers when needed via the repository manager 210. Load manager 206 reconfigures the network infrastructure 214 and 216 surrounding a server via infrastructure controller 202.

[0050] Load manager 206 can provide fully automated server allocation in conjunction with the other DSAP system 102 components. It also supports manual (via a control console) provisioning and allocation as well as scheduled allocation. Load manager 206 writes accounting records to a database each time a server is allocated or powered on or off. These records form the input to accounting and reporting modules which provide detailed resource tracking and billing as well as reporting on resource allocation, utilization, and efficiency.

[0051] Infrastructure controller 202 is responsible for configuring the network infrastructure 214 and 216 surrounding a server to provide secure, limited access to those resources required by the server and its applications. This includes configuring network switches and virtual LANs (VLANs) 216. The tasks of infrastructure controller 202 also include configuring load balancers 216 to add/remove servers from the affected server pools 212, configuring all switch ports connected to the server to ensure that the server and its applications have access to the network resources they need, and to prevent them from accessing any restricted resources that they are not authorized to access.

[0052] In an embodiment, infrastructure controller 202 is necessary only when the servers and applications within the data center 200 are partitioned using VLANs or hard-wired partitions. In such networks, infrastructure controller 202 serves to separate servers and their applications for reasons of security and isolates network traffic in order to improve overall throughput.

[0053] A control console (not shown in FIG. 2) provides the administrative interface by which data center personnel can create server images 217, manage the software repository, manually allocate servers and images 217, set the control parameters by which servers are automatically provisioned and allocated, and monitor the status of the data center 200. It is also provides accounting and reporting functions (and stores accounting records) to assist in customer billing and long-term resource planning. In an embodiment, the control console of DSAP system 102 also provides a Command Line Interface (CLI) as well as a Graphical User Interface (GUI) in order to accomplish the above-described functionality.

[0054] IV. Detailed System Architecture

[0055] The components of DSAP system 102 (i.e., components 202-210) shown in FIG. 2 are shown as logical (software) units in one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, as will be apparent to one skilled in the relevant art(s), it is possible to combine one or more of these components into a single component without departing from the spirit of the present invention. In an embodiment, components 202-206, 208 a, and 210) may reside on a dedicated management workstation (either the same or different than the control console). In such an embodiment, multiple management workstations can be used to provide redundancy.

[0056] The components of DSAP system 102, as well as their functionality, are now described in more detail below.

[0057] A. Repository Manager

[0058] Repository manager 210 provides a methodology and toolset for laying out server images 217 on network storage element 218 (e.g., a network attached storage (NAS)), greatly reducing the complexity and cost of administering large numbers of servers. Repository manager 210 supports full life cycle management of the server image, providing easy patches, upgrades, and rollbacks. In an alternate embodiment, repository manager 210 can also install and manage instances on a SAN as well as on a server's local attached storage.

[0059] In an embodiment of the present invention, DSAP system 102 includes a repository which is a file hierarchy spread over one or more NAS 218 devices that contains all of the working server images 217 a-n for the servers in data center 200, as well as all of the software, data, and support required to create and maintain those images.

[0060] Referring to FIG. 3, a block diagram of a repository 300 and its connection to the servers within a data center 200, according to an embodiment of the present invention, is shown. Repository manager 210 automates the building of repository 300 and virtualizes storage across multiple NAS devices 218. In an embodiment, from the perspective of the data center 200 administrator, there is just one repository 300 regardless of the number and types of storage devices 218 on which it is stored.

[0061] In an embodiment, software to be executed is installed only once, regardless of how many servers will eventually execute the software. This master installation is called a “snapshot” (FIG. 3 shows snapshots 302 a-n representing several different installed software applications for execution on various servers 308 a-n within the data center 200).

[0062] Software snapshots 302 can be combined to create a “golden master” server image 217, called a “server class” 304 (FIG. 3 shows server classes 304 a-n). Each server class 304 is a list of snapshots 302 that eventually make up the specific image 217 or “personality” of a server 308.

[0063] Server images 217 are generated in an automated manner from a server class 304. A working server image 217 is called an “instance” 306 of the server class 304. When a server 308 boots, it mounts an instance 306 as its root file system, providing it with a “personality.” Each server 308 can execute just one instance 306 at a time. Each instance 306 can be mounted by only one server 308 at a time. However, there is no limit to the number of instances 306 that can be created from a server class 304 and made available to a server pool 212.

[0064] In an embodiment, if any software within an instance 306 requires individual server licenses instead of a group or site license, the licenses are installed when the instance 306 is created. Further, simple patches and updates can be installed directly into the appropriate snapshot 302, immediately updating all server images 217 referencing the snapshot 302. To install more complex patches and updates, however, a new server class 304 that includes the original image plus the patch is first created, then the required number of instances 306 is created, and finally the servers 308 are switched to the new instances 306. In such an embodiment, because the original instances 306 are maintained intact, any necessary rollbacks can occur within seconds.

[0065] B. Boot Loader

[0066] When a traditional server powers up, it first runs a boot loader program that finds and loads its system image from its hard drive or other locally attached storage. In order for DSAP system 102 to properly function, however, it must be possible for it to dynamically alter the system image loaded by the servers in data center 200. According to the present invention, this may be accomplished in many ways.

[0067] In one embodiment, the boot loader of server 308 is replaced with a DSAP system-specific boot loader (e.g., a DSAP-specific boot loader stored in the flash memory of the server 308). In an alternate embodiment, the boot loader of server 308 is configured to load a DSAP system-specific boot loader in place of a server image. It can load the DSAP system's boot loader from the server's local storage, a floppy disk or CD-ROM, or over a communications network. In yet another embodiment, the behavior of the boot loader of server 308 can be controlled via commands issued by a serial line or other communications channel such that the boot loader is instructed to load the DSAP system's selected system image. In another embodiment, the SAN routing and volume assignment can be changed by DSAP system 102 thereby affecting the SAN's mapping of the server's SAN connection to a SAN volume. In yet another embodiment, the cabling, network connections, or routing by which a server 308 gains access to its storage can be dynamically switched by DSAP system 102.

[0068] The present invention is now described in more detail herein in terms of the above embodiment where the boot loader of each server 308 is replaced with a DSAP system-specific boot loader. This is for convenience only and is not intended to limit the application of the present invention. In fact, after reading the following description, it will be apparent to one skilled in the relevant art(s) how to implement the following invention in alternative embodiments.

[0069] The DSAP system 102 boot loader 208 b first communicates with the server's assigned server manager 208 a in order to learn the server's unique ServerID and other configuration details. In an embodiment, this communication can be via the server's serial console port, a network connection, or any other communications channel shared by the server 308 and its manager 208 a. Boot loader 208 b then identifies the system resources available on the server 308—CPU type and speed, available memory, hardware extensions, etc.—and sends this information to the DSAP system 102 boot controller as vendor-specific options in a Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) request. In an embodiment, the boot controller is a software component that resides on the control console.

[0070] Upon receiving the boot request, the DSAP system 102 boot controller uses the ServerID to resolve the proper instance 306 and network configuration for the server 308, and returns the information in a DHCP response. Prior to powering on the server 308 and starting the boot sequence, load manager 206 will have specified this information based upon the available server resources, the current load averages in the server pools 212, the images 217 currently available, and the operational requirements of data center 200. In alternate embodiments, the selected image 217 can reside on NAS 218, SAN, or a bootable partition on the local storage of server 308.

[0071] Boot loader 208 b receives the response, loads the specified image 217, mounts the specified root file system, and passes control to the operating system of the image 217.

[0072] If boot loader 208 b of a server 308 is unable to communicate with its server manager 208 a, perhaps because no communications mechanism is provided between the two at boot time, the boot loader will quickly time out and go directly to the boot controller. The boot controller will detect the missing ServerID and map the server to an ID based upon the MAC address associated with the server's network interface. This mapping will be available if the data center 200 administrator has previously registered the server and its MAC address. If no mapping is found, the boot controller will not respond to the server 308 and it will fall back to its standard behavior (i.e., the behavior it would exhibit if no DSAP system 102 was present).

[0073] If boot loader 208 b fails to receive a response from the boot controller, it will retry the process several times on all available network interfaces. If it still does not receive a response, it will fail over to the standard boot loader of the server 308 and the server 308 will boot in a standard way (i.e., as if no DSAP system 102 was present). Note that in the absence of the boot controller of DSAP system 102, all servers will boot as if DSAP system 102 were not installed within the data center 200.

[0074] In an embodiment, all DSAP system 102 components are independent of server type except for boot loader 208 b, which is a software program that is unique to the server's processor family, network interface, and console interface. Supporting a new server hardware family requires the creation of a boot loader program written specifically for that family. In an embodiment, DSAP system 102 supports at least servers based on the Intel Pentium® and Sun SPARC™ processor families.

[0075] In an embodiment, by default, DSAP system 102 boot controller will only answer DHCP requests that originate from a DSAP system 102 boot loader 208 b. Thus, it will not interfere with any other DHCP servers that are present within data center 200.

[0076] C. Server Manager

[0077] Server manager 208 a is responsible for powering a server 308 on or off upon the command of load manager 206. It works closely with the boot loader 208 b to ensure that each server 308 loads the correct image 217 when powered up, and to ensure that the server 308 shuts down gracefully before it is powered off. It also provides secure management access to each server 308 once it is up and running.

[0078] In an embodiment, server manager 208 a includes two components—an optional hardware component that has the ability to power the server on/off and to communicate with the boot loader 208 b during the power on process; and a software component that runs either on this hardware or on the DSAP system 102 control console to act upon commands from load manager 206. In such an embodiment, the software component is designed to be portable between hardware platforms, but may require custom development for certain drivers.

[0079] After a server 308 has finished booting and is fully operational, a DSAP system 102 management process is started on the server to communicate with server manager 208 a. In an embodiment, communications can occur over the server's serial console or a secure network connection. This interface is used for several functions: to provide secure access, similar to a port concentrator, to the server's console via the management LAN; to provide secure monitoring facilities via the management LAN; and to provide the interface by which server manager 208 a can gracefully shut down the server 308 prior to powering it off.

[0080] In an embodiment, a single instance of a software-only server manager 208 a can manage any number of servers 308. In an alternate embodiment, a hardware server manager 208 a can manage a fixed number of servers 308 based upon its available resources (e.g., 15 or more servers). In sum any implementation of the server manager 208 a must have access to an adequate communications channel between itself and the boot loader 208 b running on the server(s) 308 being managed.

[0081] D. Server Monitor

[0082] Server monitor 204 continuously monitors all servers 308 within data center 200 in order to alert any server failures or server pool 212 under- or over-load conditions. In an embodiment, server monitor 204 includes two processes—an emitter process and a collector process.

[0083] The emitter process executes on each server 308 to monitor the health, load, and response time of the server. The collector process, in an embodiment, executes on the control console where the emitter process reports to the collector process using two periodic signals. The first periodic signal, in an embodiment, is a short “heartbeat” interval (e.g., every second), and provides a “heartbeat signal,” the absence of which alerts the collector process to a server failure. The second periodic signal, in an embodiment, is a user-configurable longer interval (e.g., anywhere from every five seconds to every five minutes), and provides a full load update. All communications between the emitter and collector processes occur over a secured management channel provided by server manager 208 a.

[0084] When the collector process detects a missing heartbeat signal, it sends a notification to load manager 206 alerting it to a potential server failure.

[0085] From the load reports that it receives from each server 308, the collector process of server monitor 204 builds an image of the active server pools 212. It automatically detects when a server is added to or removed from a server pool 212 and adjusts its accounting appropriately. At periodic intervals it calculates the average load across each server pool 212 and forwards these values to load manager 206.

[0086] In an embodiment, to ensure that server monitor 204 is properly robust and scalable for very large server deployments, its collection system can be tiered. To ensure complete fault-tolerance and redundancy, emitter processes can be configured to report to multiple collector processes.

[0087] In an embodiment, because different applications have different concepts of “load”, the emitter process includes an API by which data center 200 administrator can tailor its load assessment for each application executing on a server 308.

[0088] E. Load Manager

[0089] Load manager 206 is key DSAP system 102 component for allocating servers 308. It receives a variety of inputs including: direct commands from the administrator via the GUI or CLI, schedules server allocation events via CLI scripts, heartbeat failure notifications from server monitor 204, server pool 212 load statistics from server monitor 204, as well as server allocation rules and policies (or criteria) configured by the data center administrator.

[0090] To allocate a server 308, load manager 206 issues commands to repository manager 210 in order to assign an instance 306 of the proper class 304 to the server 308. To power a server 308 off or on, load manager 206 issues commands to the server's server manager 208 a. To ensure that the network infrastructure is properly configured for the server's new personality, load manager 206 issues commands to the infrastructure controller 202. This includes: configuring the VLANs for the switch ports associated with the server 308, as well as adding the server 308 to the appropriate server pools 212 managed by the load balancers 216.

[0091] If properly configured, load manager 206 will automatically allocate and power on a replacement server 308 upon the detection of a failed server 308. It can also automatically allocate servers following the rules and policies established by the administrator in response to a server pool 212 under- or over-load condition. It can even preemptively shutdown servers and re-allocate them to higher priority tasks.

[0092] V. Server Provisioning Operation

[0093] Through the use of software repository 300, DSAP system 102 divides server provisioning and allocation into two separate tasks.

[0094] Referring again to FIG. 3, DSAP system 102 provisions a server 308 by generating a fully configured, bootable instance 306 of the appropriate server class 304, complete with network address assignments, VLAN configuration, load balancing configuration, etc. Provisioning n instances 306 of a server class 304 provides DSAP system 102 with the capacity to run n servers 308 of the specified class 304, provided that sufficient server resources are available. To execute those instances, however, the required n number of servers 308 must first be allocated by assigning them an instance 306. In an embodiment, DSAP system 102 supports three instance types—independent, local and dependent instances.

[0095] An independent instance 306 contains an actual physical copy of all files in the master image 217, with the configuration files updated to provide a unique personality for the server. Because it consumes a significant amount of disk space, the independent instance is rarely used for production servers. It is most commonly used to generate a base snapshot for a new server class from an existing server class definition. The independent instance is stored on centralized storage (e.g., storage 218) and can be run by any available server 308.

[0096] A local instance 306 is an independent instance that is physically stored on the local storage attached to a server 308. Because the local instance physically resides with the server, it can only be run by that server and cannot be allocated elsewhere. The maximum number of local instances supported by a server is dependent upon the server type and its available local storage. (For example, due to MS DOS partitioning restrictions, a standard Intel® Pentium processor-based server can only support four local instances 306 per local disk drive.)

[0097] A dependent instance 306 contains copies of just those files necessary to boot the server 308 and provide it with a unique personality. The remainder of the image is shared with other dependent instances by referencing the read-only snapshot 302 containing the original files. The dependent instance is stored on centralized storage (e.g., storage 218) and can be executed by any available server 308. Because the dependent instance is mostly shared on a remote, read-only file system, use of the dependent instance provides: dramatically reduced storage requirements; the volume of data that must be backed-up is reduced by a similar amount and the process simplified because the data is centrally located; greatly simplified disaster recovery; faster instance generation than other server provisioning techniques; and servers are no longer vulnerable to security holes that rely on modifying critical system files (as the critical system files are mounted on a remote, read-only file system, they cannot be modified from server 308, even when running with administrative access).

[0098] DSAP system 102 can re-provision an entire data center 200 in the time that it takes to reboot servers 308 due to its unique approach of “virtualizing” the server 308. Virtualization is defined as the process of dividing a server's software image from the hardware required to run the image. A server's software image traditionally resides on a local disk drive and includes an operating system (including the kernel image), file systems, commands, utilities, programs, and scripts to operate and administer the server, application software, system or application data, and configuration information.

[0099] In an embodiment of DSAP system 102, a server image 217 can reside on NAS 218, a SAN, a distributed file system (DFS), or any other centralized data storage element. A centrally stored image 217 is not associated with any specific server 308 and can execute on any available server. Likewise, an available server 308 can execute any ready image 217, provided that the server's hardware is compatible with the image.

[0100] Like a traditional server, DSAP system 102 also supports storing images on servers' local storage. Unlike a traditional server, however, DSAP system 102 can support multiple images 217 on local storage and can rapidly switch the server 308 back and forth between any of these local images and any shared images on centralized storage 218 based upon the current needs of data center 200. Benefits to moving system image 217 to centralized storage include: changing a server's system image requires no changes at the server and can be done while the server is on-line; re-provisioning the server is as quick and simple as rebooting the server and pointing it to a different image; the complexity of managing a server pool 212 is greatly simplified by having system images 217 centrally located; and there is no need to copy data over the network, to synchronize multiple images, or to schedule updates for offline servers; centralized images significantly reduce the cost and complexity associated with backup and disaster recovery; and storage requirements 217 for server images can be reduced.

[0101] Most parts of a server's system image are read-only and identical from one server to the next. In the traditional local-storage model, each server has to have its own copy of the entire system image on its own local drive. In DSAP system 102, servers can share a single copy of the read-only portions of images 217 stored on NAS 218 or SAN. Local images 217, however, are bound to the attached server and cannot be shared amongst available servers.

[0102] VI. Server Allocation Operation

[0103] In an embodiment of the present invention, an administrator can manually allocate one or more servers 308 using the administrative interface or CLI, via the control console, to send the proper commands to load manager 206. Using either interface this involves a simple (manual) three-step procedure: (1) shutting down the particular server 308 if it is currently in use; (2) assigning the desired instance 306 to the server 308; and (3) powering up the server 308 so that it will run with the new instance 306. In such an embodiment, the entire procedure takes as long as rebooting the server. In an embodiment, when infrastructure controller 202 is installed within the DSAP system 102 of the data center 200, network infrastructure 214 surrounding the server 308 is automatically provisioned when an instance 306 is assigned to a server 308.

[0104] In another embodiment of the present invention, an administrator can schedule allocation of one or more servers 308 by using CLI instructions in a script file executed on a pre-determined schedule from the control console.

[0105] In yet another embodiment, DSAP system 102 can be configured to automatically respond to server failures that are detected by server monitor 204. DSAP system 102 can also be configured to automatically respond to server pool under- and over-load conditions that are a reported by server monitor 204.

[0106] Load manager 206 filters the reports that it receives from server monitor 204 to remove duplicate reports, verifies the correctness of the information, and then takes appropriate action based upon the configured rules and policies configured by the administrator. Potential actions include: Ignoring the condition; Alerting the data center 200 staff via an alarm, email, pager, etc.; Provisioning and powering up a replacement for a failed server 308; Powering off a server in an under-loaded server pool 212; provisioning and powering on a server 308 to join an over-loaded server pool 212; Provisioning and powering on a replacement collector process; Provisioning and powering on a set of servers 308 to replace those taken off line by a failed server manager 208 a; and Installing itself as the primary load manager when the controlling load manager 206 fails.

[0107] In an embodiment, load manager 206 makes server allocation decisions by following the policies configured by an authorized administrator. The failure policy can be set for a specific server class 304, instance 306, server 308 or server pool 212. The supported policies, in an embodiment of the present invention, are described in Table 1 below.

TABLE 1
Policy Description
Ignore The server failure is ignored with the assumption that a
replacement will be powered on only if needed to meet the
configured load policy.
Restart N attempts are made within a specified time window to
restart the failed server. If the configurable restart
count is exceeded, load manager 206 continues with the
alternate failure policy.
Replace The failed server 308 is replaced with another server 308
executing any free instance 306 of the same server class 304.
Takeover The instance 306 associated with the failed server
308 is moved to a ready server 308, which is then
powered on to take over.

[0108] Load manager 206 allocates servers 308 and images 217 to handle under- and over-loaded server pools 212 based upon the rules specified for each service or application. These rules are specified by the DSAP system 102 administrator and, in an embodiment, include those described in Table 2 below.

TABLE 2
Rule Description
Min # of Servers The minimum number of servers to have online at any
time for the application;
Max. # of Servers The maximum number of servers to have online at
any time for the application;
Application Relative Priority The relative priority of the application relative to the other
applications in the data center 200; higher
priority applications can steal servers 308 from lower
priority applications when the data center as a whole
is overloaded.
Min. Acceptable Avg. Load The minimum acceptable average load for a server
pool 212. If the load on the pool falls below this
threshold, servers 308 will be powered off and
returned to the free pool.
Max. Acceptable Avg. Load The maximum acceptable average load for a server
pool. If the load on the pool exceeds this threshold,
servers will be allocated from the free pool,
provisioned with an appropriate system image, and
powered on so that they can join the pool.
Server Class Relative Cost The relative cost associated with using a specific
server class 304 for an application.
Server Relative Cost The relative cost associated with using a server from
a specific virtual cluster for an application

[0109] In an embodiment, in order to facilitate the management and control of automated server allocation, DSAP system 102 utilizes the concept of the “virtual cluster.” A virtual cluster is a collection of servers 308 (or server pools 212) and their respective instances 306 that are grouped together to provide one or more service or application. Load manager 206 controls the number of servers 308 actively powered on within a virtual cluster and controls the assignment of instances 306 to those servers 308 in order to meet the load requirements for each application. Applications can be constrained to specific clusters. Each cluster can have a different “cost” associated with providing the application. This gives the administrator excellent control over where servers 308 are allocated in order to provide an application.

[0110] The virtual cluster is a flexible tool for meeting diverse objectives. Referring to FIG. 4A, a block diagram shows how virtual clusters can be used to separate servers 308 and instances 306 by ownership. All of the servers 308 and instances 306 owned by Customer1 are isolated in Cluster1. All of the servers and instances owned by Customer2 are in Cluster2. Referring to FIG. 4B, a block diagram shows resources separated by function, using a single, large cluster as a backup for multiple primary clusters.

[0111] Referring to FIG. 6A, an automated server allocation process 600, according to an embodiment of the present invention is shown. As will be appreciated by one skilled in the relevant art(s), process 600, in an embodiment, can be executed in an endless loop fashion by load manager 206. In such an embodiment, process 600 begins at step 602, with control passing immediately to step 604.

[0112] In step 604, load manager 206 receives an event from server monitor 204 (in the form of a heartbeat or load management signal).

[0113] In step 606, process 600 determines the type of event received in step 604. If the event is a “server pool underload”, process 600 proceeds to step 650 to handle such an event (as shown in FIG. 6B and described in detail below). If the event is a “server pool overload”, process 600 proceeds to step 670 to handle such an event (as shown in FIG. 6B and described in detail below). If the event is a “server failure”, process 600 proceeds to step 608 to handle such an event. In step 608, load manager 206 consults the policies (i.e., the failure modes of Table 1) pre-configured for the relevant virtual cluster, server class 304, and instance 306 relevant to the event was received in step 604.

[0114] In step 610, load manager 206 determines if the failure mode was previously set by an administrator to “Ignore”. If so, process 600 returns to step 602 (i.e., the start of the execution loop) as indicated in FIG. 6A (see Table 1).

[0115] If step 610, determines that the failure mode was previously set by an administrator to “Restart”, process 600 proceeds to step 612.

[0116] In step 612, load manager 206 checks the previously-set value of N (the maximum number of attempts to restart as set by the data center 202 administrator). Step 614 then determines if this maximum N number has been exceeded. If so, step 616 changes the failure mode to the previously-set alternate failure mode (see Table 1) and returns to step 610. If not, load manager 206 sends a command to the relevant server manager 208 a to reboot the relevant server 308. Process 600 then returns to step 602 (i.e., the start of the execution loop) as indicated in FIG. 6A. If step 610, determines that the failure mode was previously set by an administrator to “Takeover”, process 600 proceeds to step 620.

[0117] In step 620, load manager 206 unassigns the instance 306 of the failed server 308. In step 622, load manager 206 locates another server 308 in the relevant cluster which is available and able (in terms of hardware configuration) to run the instance 308 unassigned in step 620. In step 624, process 600 determines if step 622 was successful. If so, step 626 assigns the previously-unassigned instance 306 to the newly-identified server 308. The new server 308 is then powered up by the relevant server manager 208 a in step 628 and process 600 then returns to step 602 (i.e., the start of the execution loop) as indicated in FIG. 6A.

[0118] If step 624 determines that step 622 was not successful, process 600 determines if there is an assigned backup cluster in step 630. If step 632 determines there is a backup cluster, process 600 returns to step 622 in order to identify an available server within the identified backup cluster. If step 632 determines there is not a backup cluster, process 600 issues an error (e.g., a message to the control console) in step 634 indicating that the “Takeover” failure policy could not be implemented.

[0119] If step 610, determines that the failure mode was previously set by an administrator to “Replace”, process 600 proceeds to step 636.

[0120] In step 636, process 600 attempts to locate an unassigned instance 308 having the same server class 304 as the failed server 308. Step 638 then determines if step 636 was successful. If so, process 600 proceeds to step 640. In step 640, the unassigned instance 306 having the same server class 304 as the failed server 308 is identified and process 600 then attempts to assign it to an able and available server 308 within the cluster via steps 622-634 as described above.

[0121] If step 638 determines that step 634 was not successful, process 600 proceeds to step 642. In step 642, process 600 determines if there is an assigned backup cluster. If step 644 determines there is a backup cluster, process 600 returns to step 636 in order to identify an available server 308 within the identified backup cluster. If step 644 determines there is not a backup cluster, process 600 issues an error (e.g., a message to the control console) in step 646 indicating that the “Replace” failure policy could not be implemented.

[0122] Returning to step 606, if the event received in step 604 is a “server pool underload”, process 600 proceeds to step 650 to handle such an event. Control then immediately passes to step 652.

[0123] Referring to FIG. 6B, in step 652, load manager 206 compiles a list of all servers 308 currently executing the under-loaded service (i.e., all servers 308 having a server class 304 containing the relevant snapshot(s) 302 that comprise the service) that caused the “server pool underload” event.

[0124] In step 654, load manager 206 calculates the costs of commanding the relevant server manager 208 to power off each server identified in step 652. This is done by load manager 206 based on a “Server Relative Cost” policy previously set by a data center 200 administrator (see Table 2) for each respective server 308.

[0125] In step 656, load manager 206 selects the lowest of the costs calculated in step 654 in order to determine if this cost is low enough (based on a pre-set criteria—threshold—specified by a data center 200 administrator) to justify expending such cost to power off the server 308 associated with this lowest cost. If step 658 determines such cost is low enough, load manager 206 commands the relevant server manager 208 a to power off such server 308 in step 660. Then, or if step 658 determines such cost is not low enough, process 600 returns to step 602 (i.e., the start of the execution loop) as indicated in FIG. 6B.

[0126] Returning to step 606, if the received event is a “server pool overload”, process 600 proceeds to step 670 to handle such an event. Control then immediately passes to step 672.

[0127] In step 672, load manager 206 compiles a list of all server classes 304 that are capable of providing the overloaded service (i.e., all server classes 304 containing the relevant snapshot(s) 302 that comprise the service).

[0128] In step 674, load manager 206 compiles a list of all available instances 308 for each server class 304 identified in step 672.

[0129] In step 676, a sub-loop of process 600 is started where for each instance 306 identified in step 674, steps 678-680 and 684-690 are performed within the cluster of the relevant instance 306.

[0130] In step 678, load manager 206 attempts to find available and able servers 308, and then identifies which has the lowest cost (based on a pre-set “Server Relative Cost” criteria specified by a data center 200 administrator) among those found.

[0131] In step 680, process 600 determines if step 678 was successful. If so, process 600 proceeds to step 684. In step 684, load manager computes the cost of powering on the identified server 308 using the identified server instance 306. This cost calculation is based upon pre-set cost criteria specified by a data center 200 administrator for each server 308, server class 304, instance 306 and cluster (see, e.g., Table 2).

[0132] In step 686, load manager 206 selects the lowest of the costs calculated in step 684 in order to determine if this cost is low enough (based on a pre-set criteria specified by a data center 200 administrator) to justify expending such cost to power on the server 308 associated with this lowest cost. If step 688 determines such cost is low enough, load manager 206 assigns the identified instance 306 to the identified server 308 and then commands the relevant server manager 208 a to power on such server 308 in step 690. Then, or if step 688 determines such cost is not low enough, process 600 returns to step 602 (i.e., the start of the execution loop) as indicated in FIG. 6B.

[0133] Returning to step 680, if step 678 was not successful, process 600 proceeds to step 682. In step 682 process 600 repeats steps 678-690 for any assigned backup cluster. (If there is no assigned backup cluster, although not shown in FIG. 6B, process 600, in an embodiment, may issue an error—e.g., a message to the control console—in step 682 indicating that the “server pool overload” event could not be handled.)

[0134] VII. Example Implementations

[0135] Generally, as will be appreciated by one skilled in the relevant art(s) after reading the description herein, the present invention (i.e., DSAP system 102 and/or any components(s) or function(s) thereof) may be implemented using hardware, software or a combination thereof and may be implemented in one or more computer systems or other processing systems. In fact, in one embodiment, the invention is directed toward one or more computer systems capable of carrying out the functionality described herein. An example of a computer system 500 is shown in FIG. 5. Computer system 500 includes one or more processors, such as processor 504. The processor 504 is connected to a communication infrastructure 506 (e.g., a communications bus, cross-over bar, or network). Various software embodiments are described in terms of this exemplary computer system. After reading this description, it will become apparent to a person skilled in the relevant art(s) how to implement the invention using other computer systems and/or architectures.

[0136] Computer system 500 can include a display interface 502 that forwards graphics, text, and other data from the communication infrastructure 506 (or from a frame buffer not shown) for display on the display unit 530.

[0137] Computer system 500 also includes a main memory 508, preferably random access memory (RAM), and may also include a secondary memory 510. The secondary memory 510 may include, for example, a hard disk drive 512 and/or a removable storage drive 514, representing a floppy disk drive, a magnetic tape drive, an optical disk drive, etc. The removable storage drive 514 reads from and/or writes to a removable storage unit 518 in a well known manner. Removable storage unit 518, represents a floppy disk, magnetic tape, optical disk, etc. which is read by and written to by removable storage drive 514. As will be appreciated, the removable storage unit 518 includes a computer usable storage medium having stored therein computer software and/or data.

[0138] In alternative embodiments, secondary memory 510 may include other similar devices for allowing computer programs or other instructions to be loaded into computer system 500. Such devices may include, for example, a removable storage unit 522 and an interface 520. Examples of such may include a program cartridge and cartridge interface (such as that found in video game devices), a removable memory chip (such as an erasable programmable read only memory (EPROM), or programmable read only memory (PROM)) and associated socket, and other removable storage units 522 and interfaces 520, which allow software and data to be transferred from the removable storage unit 522 to computer system 500.

[0139] Computer system 500 may also include a communications interface 524. Communications interface 524 allows software and data to be transferred between computer system 500 and external devices. Examples of communications interface 524 may include a modem, a network interface (such as an Ethernet card), a communications port, a Personal Computer Memory Card International Association (PCMCIA) slot and card, etc. Software and data transferred via communications interface 524 are in the form of signals 528 which maybe electronic, electromagnetic, optical or other signals capable of being received by communications interface 524. These signals 528 are provided to communications interface 524 via a communications path (e.g., channel) 526. This channel 526 carries signals 528 and may be implemented using wire or cable, fiber optics, a telephone line, a cellular link, an radio frequency (RF) link and other communications channels.

[0140] In this document, the terms “computer program medium” and “computer usable medium” are used to generally refer to media such as removable storage drive 514, a hard disk installed in hard disk drive 512, and signals 528. These computer program products provide software to computer system 500. The invention is directed to such computer program products.

[0141] Computer programs (also referred to as computer control logic) are stored in main memory 508 and/or secondary memory 510. Computer programs may also be received via communications interface 524. Such computer programs, when executed, enable the computer system 500 to perform the features of the present invention, as discussed herein. In particular, the computer programs, when executed, enable the processor 504 to perform the features of the present invention. Accordingly, such computer programs represent controllers of the computer system 500.

[0142] In an embodiment where the invention is implemented using software, the software may be stored in a computer program product and loaded into computer system 500 using removable storage drive 514, hard drive 512 or communications interface 524. The control logic (software), when executed by the processor 504, causes the processor 504 to perform the functions of the invention as described herein.

[0143] In another embodiment, the invention is implemented primarily in hardware using, for example, hardware components such as application specific integrated circuits (ASICs). Implementation of the hardware state machine so as to perform the functions described herein will be apparent to persons skilled in the relevant art(s).

[0144] In yet another embodiment, the invention is implemented using a combination of both hardware and software.

[0145] More specifically, repository 300 may consist of one or more storage devices 218 employing a variety of technologies such as Network Attached Storage (NAS), Storage Area Networks (SAN), Distributed File System (DFS), or any other technology for providing centralized storage. In an embodiment, repository 300 can simultaneously support any number of diverse storage element technologies.

[0146] Repository manager 210 may be implemented in hardware, software, or a combination thereof. In an embodiment, it manages the installation and life-cycle maintenance of software packages, the server provisioning process, the allocation of server images, and the software life-cycle management process. As will be apparent to one skilled in the relevant art(s) after reading the description herein, the specific embodiment of repository manager 210 may depend upon its implementation technology and the technology employed for repository 300.

[0147] With respect to server manager 208 a, it must be able to reboot a server 308 or otherwise cause it to reload its system image. This involves powering the server 308 off and on. In alternate embodiments, server manager 208 a achieves this control over the server 308 through any possible means, such as: via an external device that physically switches the power to the server on and off; exercising capabilities built directly into the server 308 itself; or sending commands to a management system built into or otherwise provided for the server 308.

[0148] While any server 308 is running, server manager 208 a maintains a secure communications channel with the server in order to perform management functions according to the present invention. This communication channel may be via a serial connection to the server, a network connection to the server, or any other communications channel supported by the server 308.

[0149] The purpose of the server monitor 204 is to alert load manager 206 to server failures and server pool underload and overload conditions. In alternate embodiments, this can be implemented using any reliable, real-time mechanism for gathering the information including: any mechanism for directly monitoring the servers 308 and analyzing the retrieved data; using the results of some other monitoring or management process; retrieving the information from some other infrastructure component that detects these conditions such as a TCP/IP (or other network) load balancer.

[0150] In an embodiment, load manager 206 controls all aspects of provisioning and allocating servers 308 a-n based upon the direct commands that it receives from administrators or the events and conditions that it senses across data center 200. It may be implemented using hardware, software, or a combination thereof and may be implemented in one or more computer systems or other processing systems. As described herein, load manager 206 relies upon other DSAP system 102 components to receive server status information and affect provisioning and allocation changes. Thus, its specific embodiment will depend upon the implementation of these other components.

[0151] As described herein, infrastructure controller 202 is responsible for configuring the network infrastructure surrounding a server to provide secure, limited access to those resources required by the server and its applications. An embodiment will depend upon the means used to affect configuration of the components of the network infrastructure 214-216, which includes but is not limited to: logging into such component as an administrator and issuing commands directly to such components using a serial connection; logging into such components as an administrator and issuing commands directly to such components using a secure network connection; and/or issuing machine-oriented commands directly to such component using some technology such as XML.

[0152] VIII. Conclusion

[0153] It should be understood that the figures, which highlight the functionality and other advantages of DSAP system 102, are presented for example purposes only. The architecture of the present invention is sufficiently flexible and configurable such that users may utilize system 102 in ways other than that shown in the figures.

[0154] While various embodiments of the present invention have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example and not limitation. It will be apparent to persons skilled in the relevant art(s) that various changes in form and detail can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Thus, the present invention should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with the following claims and their equivalents.

Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US7046668Jan 14, 2004May 16, 2006Pettey Christopher JMethod and apparatus for shared I/O in a load/store fabric
US7103064Jan 14, 2004Sep 5, 2006Nextio Inc.Method and apparatus for shared I/O in a load/store fabric
US7107323 *Aug 8, 2003Sep 12, 2006Hitachi, Ltd.System and method of file distribution for a computer system in which partial files are arranged according to various allocation rules
US7174413Apr 1, 2006Feb 6, 2007Nextio Inc.Switching apparatus and method for providing shared I/O within a load-store fabric
US7188209Apr 19, 2004Mar 6, 2007Nextio, Inc.Apparatus and method for sharing I/O endpoints within a load store fabric by encapsulation of domain information in transaction layer packets
US7219183Apr 19, 2004May 15, 2007Nextio, Inc.Switching apparatus and method for providing shared I/O within a load-store fabric
US7308591Dec 16, 2004Dec 11, 2007International Business Machines CorporationPower management of multi-processor servers
US7325041 *Aug 8, 2006Jan 29, 2008Hitachi, Ltd.File distribution system in which partial files are arranged according to various allocation rules associated with a plurality of file types
US7330967Dec 3, 2004Feb 12, 2008Symantec Operating CorporationSystem and method for injecting drivers and setup information into pre-created images for image-based provisioning
US7349958 *Jun 25, 2003Mar 25, 2008International Business Machines CorporationMethod for improving performance in a computer storage system by regulating resource requests from clients
US7379989 *Jul 31, 2003May 27, 2008International Business Machines CorporationMethod for dual agent processes and dual active server processes
US7383313Nov 5, 2003Jun 3, 2008Hitachi, Ltd.Apparatus and method of heartbeat mechanism using remote mirroring link for multiple storage system
US7441035 *Feb 4, 2003Oct 21, 2008Nokia CorporationReliable server pool
US7451183Mar 21, 2003Nov 11, 2008Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.Assembly and method for balancing processors in a partitioned server
US7457906Jan 14, 2004Nov 25, 2008Nextio, Inc.Method and apparatus for shared I/O in a load/store fabric
US7480720 *Jun 25, 2003Jan 20, 2009International Business Machines CorporationMethod and system for load balancing switch modules in a server system and a computer system utilizing the same
US7493416Jan 27, 2005Feb 17, 2009Nextio Inc.Fibre channel controller shareable by a plurality of operating system domains within a load-store architecture
US7502370Jan 27, 2005Mar 10, 2009Nextio Inc.Network controller for obtaining a plurality of network port identifiers in response to load-store transactions from a corresponding plurality of operating system domains within a load-store architecture
US7512717Jan 27, 2005Mar 31, 2009Nextio Inc.Fibre channel controller shareable by a plurality of operating system domains within a load-store architecture
US7515589Aug 27, 2004Apr 7, 2009International Business Machines CorporationMethod and apparatus for providing network virtualization
US7546610Jul 16, 2003Jun 9, 2009International Business Machines CorporationMethod for managing multi-tier application complexes
US7590739 *Mar 24, 2005Sep 15, 2009Akamai Technologies, Inc.Distributed on-demand computing system
US7596615Feb 22, 2006Sep 29, 2009Microsoft CorporationMulti-server automated redundant service configuration
US7617333Jan 27, 2005Nov 10, 2009Nextio Inc.Fibre channel controller shareable by a plurality of operating system domains within a load-store architecture
US7620064Sep 26, 2005Nov 17, 2009Nextio Inc.Method and apparatus for shared I/O in a load/store fabric
US7620066Sep 26, 2005Nov 17, 2009Nextio Inc.Method and apparatus for shared I/O in a load/store fabric
US7620698Dec 6, 2007Nov 17, 2009Hitachi, Ltd.File distribution system in which partial files are arranged according to various allocation rules associated with a plurality of file types
US7624445Jun 15, 2004Nov 24, 2009International Business Machines CorporationSystem for dynamic network reconfiguration and quarantine in response to threat conditions
US7653894May 4, 2005Jan 26, 2010International Business Machines CorporationMethod and apparatus for classifying and modeling operating system image for data center management
US7664909Jun 9, 2004Feb 16, 2010Nextio, Inc.Method and apparatus for a shared I/O serial ATA controller
US7680914Sep 28, 2004Mar 16, 2010Fujitsu LimitedAutonomous control apparatus, autonomous control method, and computer product
US7685269 *Dec 20, 2002Mar 23, 2010Symantec Operating CorporationService-level monitoring for storage applications
US7698483Oct 25, 2004Apr 13, 2010Nextio, Inc.Switching apparatus and method for link initialization in a shared I/O environment
US7706372Apr 19, 2006Apr 27, 2010Nextio Inc.Method and apparatus for shared I/O in a load/store fabric
US7761538Aug 30, 2006Jul 20, 2010Microsoft CorporationDynamically configuring, allocating and deploying computing systems
US7765299 *Sep 16, 2002Jul 27, 2010Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.Dynamic adaptive server provisioning for blade architectures
US7782893May 4, 2006Aug 24, 2010Nextio Inc.Method and apparatus for shared I/O in a load/store fabric
US7783907Aug 31, 2007Aug 24, 2010International Business Machines CorporationPower management of multi-processor servers
US7797288 *May 27, 2005Sep 14, 2010Brocade Communications Systems, Inc.Use of server instances and processing elements to define a server
US7809831 *Mar 31, 2008Oct 5, 2010International Business Machines CorporationMethod for provisioning resources
US7836211Mar 16, 2004Nov 16, 2010Emulex Design And Manufacturing CorporationShared input/output load-store architecture
US7853945 *Feb 22, 2006Dec 14, 2010Michael KramerIntegrated computer server imaging
US7856500Jul 11, 2008Dec 21, 2010International Business Machines CorporationMethod for placing composite applications in a federated environment
US7895295Jan 19, 2006Feb 22, 2011Sprint Communications Company L.P.Scoring data flow characteristics to assign data flows to storage systems in a data storage infrastructure for a communication network
US7899897 *Apr 1, 2008Mar 1, 2011International Business Machines CorporationSystem and program for dual agent processes and dual active server processes
US7917658May 25, 2008Mar 29, 2011Emulex Design And Manufacturing CorporationSwitching apparatus and method for link initialization in a shared I/O environment
US7925713Aug 23, 2000Apr 12, 2011Akamai Technologies, Inc.Method for operating an integrated point of presence server network
US7930397 *Aug 29, 2003Apr 19, 2011International Business Machines CorporationRemote dynamic configuration of a web server to facilitate capacity on demand
US7953074Jan 31, 2005May 31, 2011Emulex Design And Manufacturing CorporationApparatus and method for port polarity initialization in a shared I/O device
US7971089Apr 17, 2007Jun 28, 2011Fujitsu LimitedSwitching connection of a boot disk to a substitute server and moving the failed server to a server domain pool
US7979749 *Nov 15, 2006Jul 12, 2011International Business Machines CorporationMethod and infrastructure for detecting and/or servicing a failing/failed operating system instance
US7979789 *Dec 19, 2005Jul 12, 2011Microsoft CorporationSystem and method of replacing a delegate component associated with a delegate modular software component at software execution time
US8010513May 28, 2010Aug 30, 2011Brocade Communications Systems, Inc.Use of server instances and processing elements to define a server
US8028048Feb 27, 2007Sep 27, 2011International Business Machines CorporationMethod and apparatus for policy-based provisioning in a virtualized service delivery environment
US8032659Feb 3, 2005Oct 4, 2011Nextio Inc.Method and apparatus for a shared I/O network interface controller
US8055735 *Oct 15, 2008Nov 8, 2011Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.Method and system for forming a cluster of networked nodes
US8086711Dec 12, 2007Dec 27, 2011International Business Machines CorporationThreaded messaging in a computer storage system
US8102843Apr 19, 2004Jan 24, 2012Emulex Design And Manufacturing CorporationSwitching apparatus and method for providing shared I/O within a load-store fabric
US8122149 *Dec 28, 2007Feb 21, 2012Microsoft CorporationModel-based datacenter management
US8132057Aug 7, 2009Mar 6, 2012International Business Machines CorporationAutomated transition to a recovery kernel via firmware-assisted-dump flows providing automated operating system diagnosis and repair
US8145765 *Sep 11, 2009Mar 27, 2012Akamai Technologies, Inc.Distributed on-demand computing system
US8176408Sep 12, 2005May 8, 2012Microsoft CorporationModularized web provisioning
US8185624Mar 9, 2009May 22, 2012Oracle International CorporationEfficient on-demand provisioning of servers for specific software sets
US8201029Jan 31, 2008Jun 12, 2012International Business Machines CorporationMethod and apparatus for operating system event notification mechanism using file system interface
US8224941 *Apr 17, 2007Jul 17, 2012Fujitsu LimitedMethod, apparatus, and computer product for managing operation
US8239665 *Oct 31, 2007Aug 7, 2012Dell Products L.P.Methods, systems and media for configuring boot options
US8301644 *Oct 10, 2008Oct 30, 2012Electronics And Telecommunications Research InstituteApparatus and method of driving loadable device component
US8301773 *Apr 18, 2007Oct 30, 2012Fujitsu LimitedServer management program, server management method, and server management apparatus
US8316101Jun 27, 2008Nov 20, 2012Microsoft CorporationResource management system for hosting of user solutions
US8346726 *Jun 23, 2006Jan 1, 2013Peter Chi-Hsiung LiuSystem and method for virtualizing backup images
US8346884Jul 30, 2004Jan 1, 2013Nextio Inc.Method and apparatus for a shared I/O network interface controller
US8370416 *Apr 26, 2006Feb 5, 2013Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.Compatibility enforcement in clustered computing systems
US8375142Jan 13, 2012Feb 12, 2013Microsoft CorporationModel-based data center management
US8387013Apr 17, 2007Feb 26, 2013Fujitsu LimitedMethod, apparatus, and computer product for managing operation
US8438376May 24, 2006May 7, 2013Super Talent Technology, Corp.Method and system for providing a modular server on USB flash storage
US8458011Mar 24, 2010Jun 4, 2013International Business Machines CorporationDynamic pricing of a resource
US8495183Feb 25, 2011Jul 23, 2013Wyse Technology Inc.State-based provisioning of a client having a windows-based embedded image
US8510429 *Jan 19, 2006Aug 13, 2013Sprint Communications Company L.P.Inventory modeling in a data storage infrastructure for a communication network
US8543686Jul 23, 2009Sep 24, 2013University-Industry Cooperation Group Of Kyung Hee UniversityDynamic resource collaboration between network service providers
US8560818Feb 25, 2011Oct 15, 2013Wyse Technolgoy Inc.Automatic retrieval, parsing and application of configuration for a specific-purpose client having a windows-based embedded image with a write-filter
US8606886Oct 25, 2005Dec 10, 2013Novell, Inc.System for conversion between physical machines, virtual machines and machine images
US8661130 *Mar 10, 2009Feb 25, 2014Fujitsu LimitedProgram, method, and apparatus for dynamically allocating servers to target system
US8700888Feb 25, 2011Apr 15, 2014Wyse Technology L.L.C.Specific-purpose client with configuration history for self-provisioning of configuration and obviating reinstallation of embedded image
US8725997Feb 25, 2011May 13, 2014Wyse Technology L.L.C.Self-provisioning of configuration for a specific-purpose client having a windows-based embedded image with a write-filter
US8751778Feb 25, 2011Jun 10, 2014Wyse Technology L.L.C.Generating, validating and applying custom extensible markup language (XML) configuration on a client having a windows-based embedded image
US8769545 *Jun 11, 2013Jul 1, 2014Hitachi, Ltd.Server pool management method
US20070255813 *Apr 26, 2006Nov 1, 2007Hoover David JCompatibility enforcement in clustered computing systems
US20090172168 *Mar 10, 2009Jul 2, 2009Fujitsu LimitedProgram, method, and apparatus for dynamically allocating servers to target system
US20100185761 *Jan 11, 2010Jul 22, 2010Fujitsu LimitedService provider node, and computer-readable recording medium storing service provider program
US20100217786 *Oct 10, 2008Aug 26, 2010Electronics And Telecommunications Research InstituteApparatus and method of driving loadable device component
US20100313207 *Mar 15, 2010Dec 9, 2010Tadashi TanakaService provider management device, service provider management program, and service provider management method
US20110107358 *Oct 30, 2009May 5, 2011Symantec CorporationManaging remote procedure calls when a server is unavailable
US20120174089 *Mar 9, 2012Jul 5, 2012Milner Stephen DMethod and an apparatus to conduct software release
US20130198354 *Mar 13, 2012Aug 1, 2013Softlayer Technologies, Inc.System and Method for Portable and Flexible Deployment of Servers
US20130283261 *Jun 11, 2013Oct 24, 2013Hitachi, Ltd.Server pool management method
DE102004046046B4 *Sep 21, 2004Mar 4, 2010Fujitsu Ltd., KawasakiVorrichtung zum Einstellen eines Betriebsmittels
EP1758332A1 *Aug 24, 2005Feb 28, 2007Wen Jea WhanCentrally hosted monitoring system
EP1811376A1 *Oct 18, 2004Jul 25, 2007Fujitsu Ltd.Operation management program, operation management method, and operation management apparatus
EP1907935A2 *Jun 23, 2006Apr 9, 2008Syncsort IncorporatedSystem and method for virtualizing backup images
EP2021939A1 *Mar 8, 2007Feb 11, 2009Microsoft CorporationConverting machines to virtual machines
WO2006027152A1 *Aug 31, 2005Mar 16, 2006Fujitsu Siemens Computers IncMethod for provisioning a server in a computer arrangement
WO2006029715A1 *Aug 31, 2005Mar 23, 2006Fujitsu Siemens Computers IncMethod and configuration agent for provisioning an application on a server
WO2006135466A2 *Mar 24, 2006Dec 21, 2006Akamai Tech IncDistributed on-demand computing system
WO2007002398A2Jun 23, 2006Jan 4, 2007Syncsort IncSystem and method for virtualizing backup images
WO2007082943A1 *Jan 19, 2007Jul 26, 2007Finanzit GmbhMethod for designing and controlling virtual devices
WO2011010892A1 *Jul 23, 2010Jan 27, 2011University-Industry Cooperation Group Of Kyung Hee UniversityDynamic resource collaboration between network service providers
WO2012095867A2 *Jan 10, 2012Jul 19, 2012Videonetics Technology Private LimitedAn integrated intelligent server based system and method/systems adapted to facilitate fail-safe integration and /or optimized utilization of various sensory inputs
WO2012102908A1 *Jan 17, 2012Aug 2, 2012Wyse Technology Inc.Self-provisioning of configuration for a specific-purpose client having a windows-based embedded image with a write-filter
WO2012102909A1 *Jan 17, 2012Aug 2, 2012Wyse Technology Inc.Transferring configuration data from a public cloud server and applying onto a mobile client
WO2014036135A1 *Aug 28, 2013Mar 6, 2014VCE Company LLCIntegrated computing platform deployed in an existing computing environment
Classifications
U.S. Classification709/203, 707/999.01
International ClassificationH04L29/06, G06F9/50, H04L29/08
Cooperative ClassificationH04L67/1029, H04L67/1008, H04L67/1002, G06F9/4401, G06F9/505
European ClassificationH04L29/08N9A1B, H04L29/08N9A7, G06F9/44A, H04L29/08N9A, G06F9/50A6L
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
May 15, 2013ASAssignment
Effective date: 20130515
Owner name: SILICON VALLEY BANK, CALIFORNIA
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:RACEMI, INC.;REEL/FRAME:030423/0611
May 10, 2013ASAssignment
Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:GRAY GHOST VENTURES MISCELLANEOUS HOLDINGS, LLC (F/K/A PATTILLO INVESTMENTS, LLC);REEL/FRAME:030395/0985
Effective date: 20130510
Owner name: RACEMI, INC., GEORGIA
Oct 25, 2010FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 4
May 29, 2007ASAssignment
Owner name: PATTILLO INVESTMENTS, LLC, GEORGIA
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:RACEMI, INC.;REEL/FRAME:019341/0612
Effective date: 20070525
Nov 17, 2005ASAssignment
Owner name: RACEMI, INC., GEORGIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:PATTILLO, ROBERT A.;FIVE PACES VENTURES, L.P.;REEL/FRAME:016794/0879
Effective date: 20051117
Mar 15, 2004ASAssignment
Owner name: FIVE PACES VENTURES, L.P., GEORGIA
Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:RACEMI, INC.;REEL/FRAME:015077/0579
Effective date: 20040216
Owner name: PATTILLO, ROBERT A., GEORGIA
Feb 10, 2003ASAssignment
Owner name: RACEMI, INC., GEORGIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:WATT, CHARLES T.;REEL/FRAME:013744/0803
Effective date: 20030210