Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20030135552 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 10/043,207
Publication dateJul 17, 2003
Filing dateJan 14, 2002
Priority dateJan 14, 2002
Also published asUS8909710, US20060010202, US20090187625, US20150095401
Publication number043207, 10043207, US 2003/0135552 A1, US 2003/135552 A1, US 20030135552 A1, US 20030135552A1, US 2003135552 A1, US 2003135552A1, US-A1-20030135552, US-A1-2003135552, US2003/0135552A1, US2003/135552A1, US20030135552 A1, US20030135552A1, US2003135552 A1, US2003135552A1
InventorsMichael blackstock, Andrew Watkins, Henk Spaay, Mathieu George, Nicholas Sawadsky
Original AssigneeBlackstock Michael A., Watkins Andrew D., Henk Spaay, George Mathieu P., Sawadsky Nicholas J.
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Method for discovering and discriminating devices on local collaborative networks to facilitate collaboration among users
US 20030135552 A1
Abstract
A method for identifying participants of a collaborative network is disclosed. The participants communicate over a larger electronic network wherein not all members may be participating in the collaborative session. The method begins by determining a unique session identifier for only the participants of the collaborative network. Next, a message having the session identifier is sent to all members of the network by an inquiring participant of the collaborative network. Only participants that have the session identifier respond to the inquiring participant. Finally, communication is established between the participants that responded to the message and the inquiring participant. In this regard, a collaborative network is formed including the inquiring participant.
Images(7)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(19)
1. A method for identifying participants of a collaborative network from all members of a computing network, the method comprising the steps of:
a) determining a unique session identifier for the participants of the collaborative network;
b) transmitting, by an inquiring participant, a message having the session identifier to all members of the computing network;
c) responding by participants having the session identifier to the transmitted message sent by the inquiring participant; and
d) establishing communication between the participants that responded to the message and the inquiring participant such that the collaborative network is formed including the inquiring participant.
2. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of creating a participant list with the inquiring participant.
3. The method of claim 2 wherein the participant list includes all of the participants of the collaborative network with the same session identifier.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein the participants are computing devices.
5. The method of claim 4 wherein the computing devices are selected from the group consisting of PDA's, computers, and wireless devices.
6. The method of claim 1 wherein the collaborative network is capable of transmitting and receiving messages to and from computing devices.
7. The method of claim 6 wherein the collaborative network is a wired or wireless network.
8. The method of claim 1 wherein step (b) comprises transmitting a UDP datagram containing the session identifier to all members of the network.
9. The method of claim 8 wherein the datagram is a broadcast or multicast datagram.
10. The method of claim 1 further comprising the steps of:
e) transmitting by each participant of the collaborative network a stay alive message; and
f) removing a participant if the stay alive message is not received for a prescribed period of time.
11. A method of identifying participants of a collaborative session communicating with an electronic network, the method comprising the steps of:
a) establishing a session identifier for the collaborative session;
b) transmitting the session identifier to all members of the electronic network; and
c) finding participants of the electronic network having the same session identifier in order to identify members of the collaborative network.
12. A system for identifying members of a collaborative network, the system comprising:
at least two computing devices in electronic communication with one another;
a unique session identifier for distinguishing members of the collaborative network; and
an identification message having the unique session identifier that is sent between the two computing devices such that if the session identifier is the same between the two devices then the devices are members of the collaborative network.
13. The system of claim 12 wherein the electronic devices are in a wireless or wired network.
14. The system of claim 12 further comprising a participant list created on the computing devices in order to store members of the collaborative network.
15. The system of claim 12 wherein the computing devices are selected from the group consisting of PDA's, computers, and wireless devices.
16. The system of claim 12 wherein the at least two computing devices comprises a plurality of computing devices configured in an electronic network.
17. The system of claim 1 wherein the identification message is a UDP datagram.
18. The system of claim 17 wherein the UDP datagram is a broadcast or multicast message.
19. The system of claim 1 further comprising a stay alive message transmitted between the electronic devices and operative to inform if a device has left the collaborative network.
Description
    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • [0001]
    The present invention generally relates to identifying members of a collaborative network and more particularly to a method of identifying members in a peer-to-peer network without the use of a central server.
  • [0002]
    In a peer-to-peer network or system, users would like to collaborate using their computing devices in a public or private collaboration session without the use of a server. Collaboration may involve the transfer of files, sending messages, or other forms of data between two or more computing devices of the network. During collaboration, the computing devices share a physical network with other devices who the users may wish to selectively include or exclude from their sessions.
  • [0003]
    Typically, a network has a central designated server that can identify users and the current network addresses or device identifiers of their devices which are currently logged-in as well as the session identifiers which are used to distinguish specific collaboration sessions. A collaboration session may correspond to an active group of collaboration participants or a team of participants in a virtual room/physical location for collaboration. When the user logs in, the central server can provide the user's computing device a list of network addresses for the other devices who share the same session identifier and exclude those who are not in the desired session.
  • [0004]
    Without a central server, it is extremely difficult to maintain an accurate accounting of the participants in the collaborative session. The computing device of the user does not have access to a central list which can be used to identify participants. There is no central mechanism for the addition and removal of participants. Accordingly, the computing device of the user will not be able to quickly and easily contact all members of the collaborative session because they are not identifiable to the user.
  • [0005]
    The Jini architecture provides an infrastructure for defining, advertising and finding services on a network where services are defined by Java interfaces or classes. Advertisement is done using a lookup service, which is a place for services to advertise their presence on a network. Generally devices use Jini protocols to find lookup servers, then query found lookup servers using Jini to find services which may exist on other network devices. Accordingly, the lookup service may not exist on the same device as the services advertised, nor does the Jini itself provide information that can be used for collaboration.
  • [0006]
    Another type of location protocol is UPnP which is similar to the Jini protocol. UpnP uses multicast messaging to request the existence of services. Only those servers that can provide a requested service or that know of servers who can provide such a service respond. The individual collaborative services do not respond. Accordingly, in order to utilize the UpnP service, a server must be present on the network.
  • [0007]
    U.S. Pat. No. 6,069,896 entitled “Capability Addressable Network And Method Therefor” describes the connection protocol for members in a peer-to-peer network. The '896 patent addresses the problems associated with trying to connect and authenticate other peers on a peer-to-peer network. However, the '896 patent does not disclose how to identify and locate other peers when collaboration between peers is necessary. Furthermore, the connection protocol described by the '896 patent is extremely bandwidth intensive such that it would not be suitable for the identification of collaborative devices on a peer-to-peer network.
  • [0008]
    Similarly, U.S. Pat. No. 6,282,183 entitled “Method For Authorizing Couplings Between Devices In A Capability Addressable Network” discloses the methods and protocols for authorizing coupling between devices in a capability-addressable network. However, the '183 patent does not disclose how peers can be quickly and easily identified on the network. In fact, the '183 patent discloses how a device accesses network services.
  • [0009]
    The present invention addresses the above-mentioned deficiencies in identification of users in a peer-to-peer network by providing a method in which a user can identify the network addresses of other users without the use of a central server. Accordingly, the present invention allows collaboration between computing devices where the network address (such as an IP address) and devices used by a user are not known in advance and may change.
  • BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • [0010]
    In accordance with the present invention, there is provided a method for identifying participants of a collaborative network. The participants communicate over a larger electronic network wherein not all members may be participating in the collaborative session. The method begins by determining a unique session identifier for only the participants of the collaborative network. Next, a message having the session identifier is sent to all members of the network by an inquiring participant of the collaborative network. Only participants that have the session identifier respond to the inquiring participant. Finally, communication is established between the participants that responded to the message and the inquiring participant. In this regard, a collaborative network is formed including the inquiring participant and excluding others on the larger network.
  • [0011]
    The method of identifying participants further includes the step of creating a participant list of the members of the collaborative network which can be stored by the participants. The participant list includes all of the participants of the collaborative network which have the same session identifier.
  • [0012]
    The participants can be computing devices such as PDA's, computers or other electronic devices. In this regard, the collaborative network is an electronic network that is capable of transmitting and receiving messages to and from computing devices. Typically, the collaborative network is a wired or wireless network. The message having the session identifier is a UDP datagram containing the session identifier. The UDP datagram may be a broadcast or multicast datagram.
  • [0013]
    In accordance with the present invention, there is provided a system for identifying members of a collaborative network. The system comprises at least two computing devices in electronic communication with one another. Furthermore, the system includes a unique session identifier for distinguishing members of the collaborative network from other members of the network. The system further includes an identification message having the unique session identifier. The identification message is sent between at least two computing devices such that if the session identifier is identical between the two devices, then the devices are members of the collaborative network. Of course, it will be realized that multiple devices may be in electronic communication with one another such that only those devices which have the unique session identifier are members of the collaborative network.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0014]
    These, as well as other features of the present invention will become more apparent upon reference to the drawings wherein:
  • [0015]
    [0015]FIG. 1 is a diagram depicting computing devices on a network for collaboration.
  • [0016]
    [0016]FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating how the computing devices shown in FIG. 1 are identified in a collaborative session.
  • [0017]
    [0017]FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating how a computing device is removed From a collaborative session.
  • [0018]
    [0018]FIG. 4 is a flow chart illustrating another method of how a computing device is identified in a collaborative session.
  • [0019]
    [0019]FIG. 5 is a diagram depicting computing devices on a personal area network for collaboration.
  • [0020]
    [0020]FIG. 6 is a diagram depicting computing devices utilizing access points in a network for a collaborative session.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • [0021]
    Referring now to the drawings wherein the showings are for purposes of illustrating a preferred embodiment of the present invention only, and not for purposes of limiting the same, FIG. 1 illustrates computing devices A, B, C, D, and E in a peer-to-peer network. The computing devices may be PDA's, PC's, wireless telephones, or any other type of electronic device that can be in a network. The network may be wired (i.e, LAN or Ethernet) or wireless network (i.e., Bluetooth, 802.11b). The present invention is independent of the type of the computing device or the type of network.
  • [0022]
    Each of the computing devices A, B, C, D, and E has a respective network identification number. For instance, computing device A has a network identification number of 001. The network identification number is a unique identifier to the network. Furthermore, each computing device may also have an associated network address. The address may be an IP address or other type of network specific address. In some instances the network identification number and the network address may be the same unique identifier for the computing device.
  • [0023]
    Referring to FIG. 1, it is possible to see that computing device A is in direct network communication with devices B and D. Similarly, computing device C is in communication with devices B and E. It is possible for computing device A to indirectly communicate with computing device C by utilizing the connection with computing device B. Accordingly, it is possible for computing devices A and C to collaboratively share information by utilizing their connectivity with device B.
  • [0024]
    Referring to FIG. 2, a method of identifying computing devices in a collaborative network according to the present invention is shown. The method begins by the device accessing and logging into the network via commonly known techniques. Next, the device that has just accessed the network will send out a broadcast or multicast datagram containing the network identification of the device, as well as a session identifier, to all potential participant devices on the network. If an appropriate receiving device is a member of the same session, then the device will recognize the session identifier and respond with the identification of the computing device and the network address of the device. However, if a computing device is not a member of the group, the computing device will not respond. Finally, the inquiring device would generate or populate a list of devices that are in the same session as the device so that collaboration can occur.
  • [0025]
    Using FIG. 1, an example of how the devices communicate will now be described. For example, assume that devices A, B, and C wish to collaborate but want to exclude devices D and E on the network. All of the devices (i.e, A, B, C, D, and E) are on the same network and can communicate with each other using broadcast or multicast messages and directed packets. As previously discussed, any type of wired or wireless network can be used.
  • [0026]
    The user's of devices A, B, and C agree on the ID of their session by choosing a name which can be turned into a unique session ID using any type of algorithm. Alternatively, the session ID can be the name itself. For instance, the session ID may be the name of the company, a department or group, the name of a location, or the purpose of the collaboration session. The agreement for the session ID can occur before or after the computing devices are logged onto the network. For instance, the users of the devices can decide on the unique session ID by other means of communication such as telephone, email, or face to face discussion. However, the user's of devices D and E are not told and do not know the name of the session ID.
  • [0027]
    Once the user of device A has logged into the network, the user will enter the name of the session ID into computing device A. If the name of the session is not the session ID, then computing device A will use the appropriate algorithm to derive the session identifier. Once the session ID has been established, then device A will send a broadcast message containing the appropriate session identifier to every device on the network (i.e., devices B, C, D, and E). The other devices receive the broadcast message (i.e., packet) and examine it. At this point none of the other user's of the devices on the network have entered the appropriate session ID. Accordingly, because none of the other devices recognize the session ID, none of the devices respond. By using the session ID in the broadcast message, bandwidth is saved and scalability is increased. The session ID in the query considerably reduces the number of responses and traffic because authentication begins immediately once a response is received by a collaborating device of the same session.
  • [0028]
    Next, the user of device B enters the name of the session on device B which derives the corresponding session ID. Once the session ID has been entered, device B sends a broadcast message to the other devices on the network (i.e., devices A, C, D, and E). Device A recognizes the session ID and responds with the device ID and/or network address. Of course, devices C, D, and E do not recognize the session ID and do not respond to device A. Then, device A populates a collaboration session device/user list with the ID and/or network address of device B. Similarly, device B populates its collaboration session device/user list with the ID and/or network address of device A. As such, device A and device B can collaborate over the network without intrusion by the other devices.
  • [0029]
    If the user of device C wishes to join the collaboration session, then the user will enter the appropriate session name into device C which derives the corresponding session ID. Once entered, device C will send a broadcast message to all of the devices. Devices A, B, D and E will receive the packet and only devices A and B will recognize the session ID and respond with the device and/or network address. Accordingly, device A and device B populate their respective device lists with the information from device C. Similarly, device C populates its device list with the information from devices A and B in order to form a collaborative network between devices A, B, and C, while still excluding devices D and E.
  • [0030]
    Referring to FIG. 3, several mechanisms are illustrated for a computing device leaving the collaborative session. In the first instance a computing device can leave the network gracefully inasmuch as it doesn't crash. The device leaving the network will send a message to all of the devices connected to the network using either a connection oriented protocol or a datagram. The message will declare that the device is leaving the network and that the remote peer is offline. Once the message has been sent, each of the devices that are members of the session can appropriately update their device lists by removing the device that left the network.
  • [0031]
    On the other hand, sometimes the network connection may be terminated abruptly such as when the network connection is physically broken, the exit datagram is lost, or the remote peer goes out of range on a wireless network. Accordingly, it is not possible to send or receive a message indicating that the device has left the session.
  • [0032]
    In order to account for this type of event, each device should be equipped to periodically send a “still alive” message to each connected device. For example, each device in the network could send a message every ten seconds to the other devices indicating that the device is still on the network. The “still alive” message could be a connectionless datagram or a message sent using a connection protocol between the devices.
  • [0033]
    If a device does not detect or receive a “still alive” message from another device of the network for more than twice a determined interval, then the device is declared offline and the connection is torn down. Furthermore, the device declared offline is removed from the device list. For example, referring to FIG. 1, if device A does not receive a “still alive” message for more than two intervals of the message being sent (i.e., 20 seconds), then device A will declare device B offline and remove device B from the device list.
  • [0034]
    Referring to FIG. 4, another method of identifying members of a collaborative network is shown. In this instance, the session identifier is not included in the broadcast or multicast datagram. The device will first log into the network. Next, the initiating device will transmit a broadcast or multicast datagram that does not include the session identifier. Every device that is active on the network will then respond to the datagram. Next, the initiating device will connect to every responding device using a connection oriented protocol such as TCP to exchange messages relating to which session a device is a member. The connection can then be dropped or maintained as necessary. For instance, all of the devices which have the same session identifier as the initiating device will have their connection maintained. If the connection is maintained, all future messages regarding session changes, exiting the network, or “keep alive” messages can then be sent using a reliable connection oriented protocol. This method can be further extended to support multiple networks or IP subnets by forwarding the multicast or broadcast packets to receivers in another network/subnet which can then multicast or broadcast the packets.
  • [0035]
    Furthermore, the above-mentioned process can be combined with an authentication protocol to ensure that the device is actually a member of the session. An additional protocol can then be used between peers to ensure that peers recognize each other. A password or shared key could be used for authentication. Alternatively, public key cryptography could be used where each device contains the keys of all possible collaborators and is used to authenticate other users. Once the device has been verified to be a member of the session, then the device can connect to other devices in the same session with a protocol like TCP in a peer-to-peer manner for collaboration.
  • [0036]
    Another instance of identification can occur when a network does not exist between devices, but the devices can communicate over some other type of connection. Accordingly, a connection could be set up initially between the devices to determine if session identifiers match. For example, a “client” device connects to a “server” device using some variant of a radio inquiry/response. The “client” then asks the “server” for the collaboration session ID to which the “server” will respond. If the session ID matches, the “client” remains connected and authenticates the session ID in order to collaborate with the “server”. This could be implemented with devices communicating over a Bluetooth network.
  • [0037]
    Referring to FIG. 5, the identification method of the present invention can be utilized with a Personal Area Network (PAN). For example, a PAN network consists of a central master device A and slave devices B, C, D, and E connected in a star shaped topology. The master device A is responsible for forwarding unicast, multicast, and broadcast packets as required by the PAN. A device in the PAN, can respond on behalf of other devices such that each device is either designated as a master or slave device. A master is first created on the PAN with no other devices connected to it, and devices are designated as slaves as they join the PAN.
  • [0038]
    For the identification of devices according to the present invention, after a slave device connects to the PAN, the slave device sends an inquiry message in a broadcast or multicast datagram containing the session identifier and the user identifier to all potential participant devices in the network. The master device receives the broadcast datagram and, as will be further explained below, does not need to forward the datagram thereby saving bandwidth. The master will save the session ID and network address from the inquiry for future use. Next, the master will retrieve previously saved network address/session information from previous requests. In this regard, the master will contain network/session information about all of the slave devices. The master will reply to the inquiry (i.e., broadcast or multicast datagram) with a list of the network ID's that match the session ID requested. The slave will use this information to begin a collaborative session with the devices that have matching session ID's. In order to save bandwidth in the network, the master will save and respond to all inquiry requests from the slave devices. In this manner, slaves who disconnect can then inform only the master who can then delete the network ID/session information from its list and notify the other connected slave devices.
  • [0039]
    The technique of the present invention can also be used to identify other devices in the same local area for collaboration without the need of a server. Referring to FIG. 6, computing devices A, B, and C can access network 20 through access point X. Similarly, computing devices D and E access network 20 through access point Y. Each of the devices stores the access point identifier (i.e., X or Y) after it connects. As the devices move, they store the ID's of the closest access point.
  • [0040]
    In order to identify participants near a desired device, the inquiring device sends a broadcast or multicast message containing the access point identifier instead of session ID information. Only those devices which have the same access point identifier will respond thereby identifying those devices which are nearby. For instance, referring to FIG. 6, if device A sends out an inquiry, only devices B and C will respond. This technique is useful for identifying participants that are in range of a wireless network. Additionally, instead of using access point identifiers, physical “beacon” identifiers can be used.
  • [0041]
    In addition to the foregoing, it is also contemplated that the above-mentioned method could be used with a designated responder for a session. When a computing device transmits a session identifier request to a designated responder, the responder would reply with information about all of the other devices with the same session ID. Accordingly, the other devices would not need to respond thereby reducing bandwidth usage.
  • [0042]
    Furthermore, to reduce bandwidth, when a device joined or rejoined a network it could attempt to connect to a previous member of the team first. If found, the device could ask the found member for the information about other collaborative devices. If the previous member is not in the session, then the device would utilize the broadcast/multicast messaging as previously described above.
  • [0043]
    Additional modifications and improvements of the present invention may also be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art. Thus, the particular combination of parts described and illustrated herein is intended to represent only certain embodiments of the present invention, and is not intended to serve as limitations of alternative devices within the spirit and scope of the invention.
Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US5392400 *Jul 2, 1992Feb 21, 1995International Business Machines CorporationCollaborative computing system using pseudo server process to allow input from different server processes individually and sequence number map for maintaining received data sequence
US5493692 *Dec 3, 1993Feb 20, 1996Xerox CorporationSelective delivery of electronic messages in a multiple computer system based on context and environment of a user
US5737601 *Jan 16, 1997Apr 7, 1998Oracle CorporationMethod and apparatus for peer-to-peer data replication including handling exceptional occurrences
US5764982 *Aug 11, 1994Jun 9, 1998International Business Machines CorporationPeer-to-peer communication interface
US5790935 *Jan 30, 1996Aug 4, 1998Hughes Aircraft CompanyVirtual on-demand digital information delivery system and method
US5854893 *Jun 10, 1996Dec 29, 1998Collaboration Properties, Inc.System for teleconferencing in which collaboration types and participants by names or icons are selected by a participant of the teleconference
US5867799 *Apr 4, 1996Feb 2, 1999Lang; Andrew K.Information system and method for filtering a massive flow of information entities to meet user information classification needs
US5890152 *Sep 9, 1996Mar 30, 1999Seymour Alvin RapaportPersonal feedback browser for obtaining media files
US5894556 *Mar 20, 1997Apr 13, 1999Mpath Interactive, Inc.Network match maker matching requesters based on communication attribute between the requesters
US5909183 *Dec 26, 1996Jun 1, 1999Motorola, Inc.Interactive appliance remote controller, system and method
US5918014 *Dec 26, 1996Jun 29, 1999Athenium, L.L.C.Automated collaborative filtering in world wide web advertising
US6018738 *Jan 22, 1998Jan 25, 2000Microsft CorporationMethods and apparatus for matching entities and for predicting an attribute of an entity based on an attribute frequency value
US6029171 *Feb 10, 1997Feb 22, 2000Actioneer, Inc.Method and apparatus for group action processing between users of a collaboration system
US6029191 *Mar 31, 1998Feb 22, 2000Nec CorporationApplication sharing system which can dynamically change an operating condition of an application program of each terminal from a sole-mode to a share-mode and vice versa
US6058106 *Oct 20, 1997May 2, 2000Motorola, Inc.Network protocol method, access point device and peripheral devices for providing for an efficient centrally coordinated peer-to-peer wireless communications network
US6061794 *Sep 30, 1997May 9, 2000Compaq Computer Corp.System and method for performing secure device communications in a peer-to-peer bus architecture
US6069896 *Oct 15, 1996May 30, 2000Motorola, Inc.Capability addressable network and method therefor
US6078948 *Feb 3, 1998Jun 20, 2000Syracuse UniversityPlatform-independent collaboration backbone and framework for forming virtual communities having virtual rooms with collaborative sessions
US6108699 *Jun 27, 1997Aug 22, 2000Sun Microsystems, Inc.System and method for modifying membership in a clustered distributed computer system and updating system configuration
US6114970 *Jan 9, 1997Sep 5, 2000Motorola, Inc.Method of assigning a device identification
US6128647 *Apr 4, 1997Oct 3, 2000Haury; Harry R.Self configuring peer to peer inter process messaging system
US6144964 *Jan 22, 1998Nov 7, 2000Microsoft CorporationMethods and apparatus for tuning a match between entities having attributes
US6148328 *Jan 29, 1998Nov 14, 2000International Business Machines Corp.Method and system for signaling presence of users in a networked environment
US6167432 *Feb 29, 1996Dec 26, 2000Webex Communications, Inc.,Method for creating peer-to-peer connections over an interconnected network to facilitate conferencing among users
US6185613 *Feb 24, 1998Feb 6, 2001Netvision, Inc.System and method for global event notification and delivery in a distributed computing environment
US6185618 *Oct 30, 1998Feb 6, 2001International Business Machines Corp.Method and apparatus for supporting dependent logical units in advanced peer-to-peer networks with branch extenders
US6192394 *Jul 14, 1998Feb 20, 2001Compaq Computer CorporationInter-program synchronous communications using a collaboration software system
US6195091 *Dec 10, 1997Feb 27, 2001Netscape Communications CorporationApparatus for collaborative computing
US6202094 *Nov 7, 1997Mar 13, 2001International Business Machines CorporationAdding links simultaneously to a multilink bundle using bandwidth allocation protocol
US6212549 *Oct 1, 1998Apr 3, 2001Nexprise, Inc.Trackpoint-based computer-implemented systems and methods for facilitating collaborative project development and communication
US6237025 *Dec 19, 1997May 22, 2001Collaboration Properties, Inc.Multimedia collaboration system
US6237026 *Dec 31, 1997May 22, 2001Intel CorporationMethod and apparatus for automatic enrollment of a computer to a conference network or the like
US6256663 *Jan 22, 1999Jul 3, 2001Greenfield Online, Inc.System and method for conducting focus groups using remotely loaded participants over a computer network
US6259701 *Sep 11, 1997Jul 10, 2001At&T Corp.Method and system for a unicast endpoint client to access a multicast internet protocol (IP) session
US6269099 *Jul 1, 1998Jul 31, 20013Com CorporationProtocol and method for peer network device discovery
US6282183 *Jun 25, 1998Aug 28, 2001Motorola, Inc.Method for authorizing couplings between devices in a capability addressable network
US6295550 *Oct 23, 1996Sep 25, 2001Ncr CorporationSession creation mechanism for collaborative network navigation
US6295588 *Jan 14, 1999Sep 25, 2001Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Memory access controller that converts memory access requests into memory access commands
US6308175 *Nov 19, 1998Oct 23, 2001Lycos, Inc.Integrated collaborative/content-based filter structure employing selectively shared, content-based profile data to evaluate information entities in a massive information network
US6314420 *Dec 3, 1998Nov 6, 2001Lycos, Inc.Collaborative/adaptive search engine
US6314448 *Jun 4, 1998Nov 6, 2001International Business Machines CorporationMethod and system for inter-applet communication in a computer network
US6334141 *Feb 2, 1999Dec 25, 2001International Business Machines CorporationDistributed server for real-time collaboration
US6336134 *Dec 30, 1999Jan 1, 2002International Business Machines CorporationDynamic clients, dynamic partitions, locking, and migration capability for distributed server for real-time collaboration
US6345264 *Jan 22, 1998Feb 5, 2002Microsoft CorporationMethods and apparatus, using expansion attributes having default, values, for matching entities and predicting an attribute of an entity
US6351762 *Jun 7, 1996Feb 26, 2002Collaboration Properties, Inc.Method and system for log-in-based video and multimedia calls
US6358813 *Nov 15, 2000Mar 19, 2002International Business Machines CorporationMethod for increasing the capacitance of a semiconductor capacitors
US6370562 *Jan 19, 2001Apr 9, 2002Nexprise Inc.Trackpoint-based computer-implemented systems and methods for facilitating collaborative project development and communication
US20010001268 *Dec 19, 2000May 17, 2001Opuswave Networks, Inc.Wireless local loop system supporting voice/IP
US20010002902 *Jan 29, 2001Jun 7, 2001Hamdi Rabah S.Multipoint digital simultaneous voice and data system
US20010017843 *Feb 27, 2001Aug 30, 2001Nec CorporationData transfer system capable of avoiding double reception os same data
US20010025329 *May 11, 2001Sep 27, 2001Micron Technology, Inc. A Delaware CorporationMethod and system for managing communications among computer devices
US20010027479 *Mar 26, 2001Oct 4, 2001Backweb Technologies, Ltd.Distributed client-based data caching system
US20020086665 *Nov 7, 2001Jul 4, 2002Mark MaggentiCommunication device for entering and exiting a net within a group communication network
US20020173319 *May 17, 2001Nov 21, 2002Comverse Network Systems, Ltd.SMS conference
US20020196789 *Nov 16, 2001Dec 26, 2002Charles PattonCombining multi-hop and multicast wireless networking in classroom-like settings
US20030131141 *Nov 18, 2002Jul 10, 2003Corbis CorporationMethod and system for property notification
US20030226013 *Jun 28, 2002Dec 4, 2003Sri InternationalMethods and apparatus for scalable distributed management of wireless virtual private networks
US20040125121 *Dec 30, 2002Jul 1, 2004The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior UniversityMethods and apparatus for interactive map-based analysis of digital video content
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US7424613 *Sep 30, 2004Sep 9, 2008Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Method of constructing domain based on public key and implementing the domain through universal plug and play (UPnP)
US7487158 *Feb 1, 2005Feb 3, 2009International Business Machines CorporationMethod for the establishment and maintenance of collaborative communication associations based on multiple contextual criteria
US7643491 *Dec 16, 2005Jan 5, 2010Microsoft CorporationScheduling connections between peers in a peer-to-peer file sharing environment
US7890583 *Oct 9, 2008Feb 15, 2011International Business Machines CorporationEstablishment and maintenance of collaborative communication associations based on multiple contextual criteria
US7953837 *Jun 13, 2008May 31, 2011International Business Machines CorporationPersistent group membership in a distributing computing system
US7966368 *May 2, 2003Jun 21, 2011Microsoft CorporationCommunicating messages over transient connections in a peer-to-peer network
US8041800 *Nov 8, 2005Oct 18, 2011International Business Machines CorporationAutomatic orchestration of dynamic multiple party, multiple media communications
US8693482 *Jan 3, 2007Apr 8, 2014Alcatel LucentApparatus, and associated method, for facilitating multi-media service in an ethernet network
US9485796 *Mar 28, 2014Nov 1, 2016Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.Content publishing method and user equipment
US20040221043 *May 2, 2003Nov 4, 2004Microsoft CorporationCommunicating messages over transient connections in a peer-to-peer network
US20050086514 *Sep 30, 2004Apr 21, 2005Samsung Electronics Co., LtdMethod of constructing domain based on public key and implementing the domain through universal plug and play (UPnP)
US20050114642 *Nov 26, 2003May 26, 2005Brett Watson-LukeSystem and method for managing OSS component configuration
US20060106804 *Oct 28, 2004May 18, 2006Nokia CorporationElectronic equipment and method for carrying out communication with electronic equipment
US20060173936 *Feb 1, 2005Aug 3, 2006International Business Machines CorporationEstablishment and maintenance of collaborative communication associations based on multiple contextual criteria
US20060193265 *Feb 25, 2005Aug 31, 2006Microsoft CorporationPeer-to-peer name resolution protocol with lightweight traffic
US20070106795 *Nov 8, 2005May 10, 2007Gilfix Michael AAutomatic orchestration of dynamic multiple party, multiple media communications
US20070206610 *Dec 16, 2005Sep 6, 2007Microsoft CorporationScheduling Connections Between Peers in a Peer-to-Peer File Sharing Environment
US20080159304 *Jan 3, 2007Jul 3, 2008Alcatel LucentApparatus, and Associated Method, for Facilitating Multi-Media Service in an Ethernet Network
US20080307095 *Jun 13, 2008Dec 11, 2008International Business Machines Corp.Persistent group membership in a distributing computing system
US20090037534 *Oct 9, 2008Feb 5, 2009Castro Paul CEstablishment and Maintenance of Collaborative Communication Associations Based on Multiple Contextual Criteria
US20140211696 *Mar 28, 2014Jul 31, 2014Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.Content Publishing Method and User Equipment
CN102209063A *Mar 29, 2010Oct 5, 2011华为技术有限公司Realization method of blank conversation, blank conversation server and terminal
WO2016057214A1 *Sep 22, 2015Apr 14, 2016Qualcomm IncorporatedLeveraging peer-to-peer discovery messages for group activity notification
Classifications
U.S. Classification709/205, 709/203
International ClassificationH04L12/56, H04L12/28, G06F15/16
Cooperative ClassificationH04L67/1068, H04L67/16, H04L12/1818, H04L12/18, H04W40/246, H04L67/104, H04L67/1053, H04L67/14, H04L67/146
European ClassificationH04L12/18D1, H04L29/08N9P, H04L29/08N13, H04L29/08N13J, H04L29/08N9P1A5
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Jan 14, 2002ASAssignment
Owner name: COLLIGO NETWORKS, INC., CANADA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BLACKSTOCK, MICHAEL A.;WATKINS, ANDREW D.;SPAAY, HENK;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:012474/0713
Effective date: 20020108