Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20030182018 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 10/384,915
Publication dateSep 25, 2003
Filing dateMar 6, 2003
Priority dateMar 6, 2002
Also published asUS7590544, WO2003077075A2, WO2003077075A3
Publication number10384915, 384915, US 2003/0182018 A1, US 2003/182018 A1, US 20030182018 A1, US 20030182018A1, US 2003182018 A1, US 2003182018A1, US-A1-20030182018, US-A1-2003182018, US2003/0182018A1, US2003/182018A1, US20030182018 A1, US20030182018A1, US2003182018 A1, US2003182018A1
InventorsRobert Snapp
Original AssigneeSnapp Robert F.
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Method for correcting a mailing address
US 20030182018 A1
Abstract
A method for the Postal Service to provide updated address information to its customers such as mass mailers. The method includes comparing information on old delivery point files with information on current delivery point files. The delivery point files include unique identifiers that are keyed to each delivery point. Thus a comparison of older and newer files identifies delivery points that have been changed by, for example, changes in street name or renumbering of address numbers. The comparison of files generates a file with updated delivery and address information. In modified format this updated address information can be made available to mass mailers so that mass mailers will have the most up-to-date address information for mailings.
Images(3)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(14)
What is claimed is:
1. A method of correcting an address comprising obtaining an 11 digit Delivery Point Bar Code, validating the address against a Delivery Point Validation Table to obtain the specific delivery point Key ID code and posting the changes against the specific Key ID code.
2. A method for updating an address list comprising:
receiving a current delivery point file;
comparing information on the current delivery point file with information from an older delivery point file;
creating an updated address list with information from the comparison of delivery point files.
3. The method of claim 2 further comprising the step of removing ambiguities from address information.
4. The method of claim 2 further comprising the step of adding artificial address information.
5. The method of claim 2 further comprising publishing updated address information to a customer.
6. A method for creating an updated list of information for physical mailing addresses comprising the steps of:
receiving a current delivery point file with updated address information;
comparing information on the current delivery point file with information from an older delivery point file;
generating translation records from the comparison of the current and older delivery point files;
resolving ambiguities in translation records;
adding fictional address information; and
publishing the updated address information to a customer.
7. The method of claim 6 wherein the current delivery point file includes changes to addresses for renamed streets.
8. The method of claim 6 wherein the current delivery point file includes changes to addresses for renumbered streets.
9. The method of claim 6 wherein a delivery point bar code comprises a unique mailing delivery point.
10. The method of claim 6 wherein the address information published to a customer may be processed by the customer using a ZIP+4 engine.
11. A method for a mailer to update address information on a mailing list comprising:
receiving a list of IZ4 delivery point bar codes;
comparing the delivery point bar codes with existing information in order to determine whether there are conflicting 11 digits;
determining whether there is a change in a temporary translation record; and
updating with new information where there is a change.
12. The method of claim 11 further comprising receiving a list of IZ4 delivery point bar codes from the Postal Service.
13. The method of claim 11 further comprising deleting addresses with ambiguous 11 digit delivery point bar codes.
14. The method of claim 11 further comprising retaining those addresses where there is no change in address information received from the delivery point bar codes.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

[0001] This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/362,174 filed on Mar. 6, 2002 entitled “A Method for Correcting a Mail Address.” The contents of the above application is relied upon and expressly incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

[0002] The invention was made by an agency of the United States government or under a contract with an agency of the United States government, the United States Postal Service (“USPS” or “Postal Service”), an independent establishment of the executive branch of the U.S. government.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0003] 1. Field of the Invention

[0004] This invention relates to a method of correcting a mailing address and more particularly to maintaining a correct, updated address list for mass mailing.

[0005] 2. Description of the Related Art

[0006] The Postal Service processes and delivers millions of pieces of mail each year. The efficiency of the postal system is impacted when address information on a mailpiece is not correct. The mail system works most efficiently when a mailpiece is addressed exactly correctly, and it costs the USPS more money to deliver improperly addressed mailpieces.

[0007] Likewise, certain bulk mailers or mass mailers have a strong economic interest in seeing that they have the most up to date and accurate mailing information for its intended addressees. Improperly addressed items that do not reach the intended recipient are a direct lost cost to the mailer. Mailpieces that must be redirected may lose their timeliness and thus their effectiveness for the mailer.

[0008] Delivery service providers, including mail delivery providers such as the USPS, are also faced with certain challenges presented by customers who change address. Misdirected mail that arises when a customer relocates is a source of inefficiency to the entity sending the mail. Likewise the time and resources expended by the entity handling the mail also represent lost resources. The USPS for example handles millions of mailpiece items in a calendar year, and the inefficiency and waste associated with misdirected mail carries significant costs.

[0009] In addition to typical change of address occurrences occasioned by the move of an individual addressee, postal delivery addresses themselves may change. A postal delivery address, even though established, may have changes made, for example, to the street name, the secondary information like apartment numbers, or even the ZIP code or the plus four add-on.

[0010] The intelligent ZIP+4 (IZ4) can use the Delivery Point Bar Code (DPBC) from a ZIP+4 reference product and maintain updates or changes to that record.

[0011] As is currently known, a mailer, or anyone with an address list, can run the address list through a reference database product. The current address database product assigns the correct ZIP+4 code to a physical address and standardizes the addresses. This reference product is commonly referred to as a ZIP+4 engine. The ZIP+4 engine accepts street addresses with a city and state and attempts to match them against a database that has all possible addresses within that geographical area.

[0012] However, there are limitations to the ZIP+4 engine. For example, it does not verify that the address is correct. It merely indicates that the address is within the range of addresses on that street in that city. If the street name changes or a renumbering of any kind occurs, then the ZIP+4 engine may not make a match or may make an incorrect match and the owner of the address list may have corrupted the address.

[0013] The Postal Service estimates that there is quite a significant number of address changes that do occur. On an annual basis it is estimated that 20% of all postal addresses experience a change of some kind. The change may be to the physical address such as a street name, number or ZIP code. Also included within this number are changes that do not appear on the physical address, but are nonetheless important to mass mailers. This information includes items such as drop off points, equipment, and packaging information. Mailers use all of this information to efficiently communicate with their addressees.

[0014] Thus there is a need for an improved address correction method. The improved method should allow a mailer to check information on an address list for any changes to the postal delivery address. It is desired that a correction method would identify changes to postal addresses such as renamed streets, renumbering of apartments, or ZIP code changes.

[0015] It is further desired that an improved address correction method provide updated address information on a regular and periodic basis. In this way mailers can continuously update mailing lists when sending out mailings on a periodic basis.

[0016] It is also desired that an improved address correction method be made accessible to the mailing public through software and software applications now in use by mailers. In this way mailers can use the product without significant changes to data processing operations.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[0017] The present invention overcomes deficiencies in the prior art by providing an address correction method. The method of the present invention captures address changes such as changes due to street name changes, address renumbering or apartment renumbering.

[0018] The present method relies on information that is generated by the Postal Service on a weekly basis, and therefore the updated information can be made available on a periodic and regular basis.

[0019] It is an object of the invention to provide a method of correcting an address by obtaining an 11 digit Delivery Bar Code and validating the address against a Delivery Point Validation Table to obtain the specific Key ID code and making changes to the address for that specific Key ID code.

[0020] Additional objects and advantages of the invention will be set forth in part in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by practice of the invention. The objects and advantages of the invention will be realized and attained by means of the elements and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims. It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the invention, as claimed. Thus, the present invention comprises a combination of features, steps, and advantages which enable it to overcome various deficiencies of the prior art. The various characteristics described above, as well as other features, will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the invention, and by referring to the accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0021] The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of the specification, illustrate several embodiments of the inventions and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention.

[0022]FIG. 1 depicts the flow chart for building the Intelligent Zip 4 product.

[0023]FIG. 2 depicts the flow chart for public use of the Intelligent Zip 4 process.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

[0024] Reference will now be made in detail to exemplary embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts.

[0025] The present invention builds an address product that can be provided to customers who mail articles through a postal service such as the USPS. The customers can use the address product to correct mailing addresses in their possession. The address product arises in two sets of steps. In a first set of steps, the USPS internally creates an intelligent zip+4 table (sometimes referred to as the “IZ4” table). A second set of steps involves the customer using the IZ4 table to update its own mailing list.

[0026] We first describe the steps in a preferred method of creating the IZ4 table.

[0027] As shown in FIG. 1, building of the IZ4 product depends on the Master Delivery Sequence File or Delivery Point File (DPF). The DPF file contains all the known US Postal Service delivery points. Contained within it are the parsed addresses (addresses broken down by its components), the five digit ZIP code, the four digit ZIP code add-on, the delivery point code, and a Key ID code. The combination of these elements allows for a specific identification code for each physical address. The US Postal Service generates the data that create a DPF file on a weekly basis.

[0028] The information in the DPF file is typically referred to as a flat file rather than a database. The significance is that the data in the DPF file are not linked or related to one another. However, data within a DPF file related to a delivery point is constant. Thus, although the mailing representation of the physical address may change (street name change, address renumbering) the DPF constantly tracks the delivery point.

[0029] As shown in step one IZ4 compares a copy of last week's DPF file to a copy of this week's DPF file to identify changes to the record. From the comparison records are marked as Temporary Translation records (TMP X-Recs) or Temporary Ambiguous records (TMP A-Recs). Translation records are ones where there has been a change at a delivery point and the record can “translate” the old 11 digit delivery point bar code and street indicia to the new 11 digit DPBC and new indicia information. Ambiguous records are ones where two records (11 digit DPBC's) conflict with each other and new information can't be provided.

[0030] Also shown in FIG. 1 is a step comparing recent DPF with ancient DPF. Step zero. This is a start up procedure only. Once a baseline of DPF information has been established, each new week's DPF file is compared to the information from the last week's file.

[0031] After the TMP records are created they are compared to the already existing X-recs and A-recs from previously run IZ4. Step two. This step ensures that none of the TMP X-recs conflict with any existing records. The result is a new list of New X-recs and New A-recs. This list of New X-recs and New A-recs are combined with other TMP recs that were produced from the current week's DPF file. Step three. This list indicates which delivery points were added to or deleted from the file (not just changed as in the earlier compare process). Step four. These TMP and New recs are evaluated like they were originally to ensure there is not a conflict with each other. The result is the Newer X-recs and Newer A-recs. These records are combined with U-records made from this week's DPF file, de-conflicted then finalized to make Final X-recs, Final A-recs, and Final U-recs. U in this instance represents unambiguous. Steps five, six, and seven.

[0032] The final step in the commercial product is “hiding” the real delivery points. By law the US Postal Service is prohibited from providing a set of actual address data. Thus in order to create an address list that can be shared with the public, artificial names and addresses are added to the set of actual names and addresses. The number of valid names and addresses is in the order of 150 million. To this are added 350 to 400 million false addresses. Artificial U-recs are created that fill in block faces with non-delivery points. This also prevents hackers from getting an address list of all the actual US Postal Service delivery points. The IZ4 released for public use thus includes both real and artificial address information, thereby satisfying legal requirements.

[0033] Several steps in the above process involve comparing one data file to another data file. For example, once the process is in operation there will be a weekly run to compare the last week's DPF file with the new DPF file received for this week. A software application makes the comparison between the two files. The software may be any of the known comparison programs that have as their purpose comparison of data such as address information. The function of the software is to compare two sets of data for a given delivery point (last week's and this week's); where there is a conflict between them, the software selects this week's address information (the newer information). Depending on how the data is presented or configured, the comparison software may take different configurations. In FIG. 1 the software that the USPS uses is designated in the various steps as IZ400.

[0034] The previous discussion explained how an IZ4 file is created. We now explain how a customer of the Postal Service, for example a mass mailer, uses the IZ4 file to update its own mailing information.

[0035] Use of the IZ4 is shown in FIG. 2. To use the Intelligent ZIP+4 the mailer uses a normal ZIP+4 engine to get an 11 digit DPBC and then validates the address against a Delivery Point Validation table. The delivery point validation verifies that the address is a US Postal Service delivery point. Each specific delivery point has a Key ID code assigned to that physical address. In this way when changes occur and are posted, such as a new street name is assigned or the ZIP code changes, the Key ID code won't change but all the indicia or mailing address information can be changed. IZ4 recognizes that changes have occurred and sends the mailer the new information with confidence that the mail will be delivered to the correct delivery point. When alternate forms of addressing components exist for a single physical delivery point, IZ4 returns the most preferred of the available choices. This will include, when appropriate, conversions from rural style addressing to city style addressing, preferred aliases, and proper standardized components. The mailer or owner of the address list can then make the changes in their database for future mailings.

[0036] The Intelligent Z4 has two prerequisites; the address has to have been ZIP+4 coded to obtain the 11 digit DPBC and that DPBC must have been Delivery Point Validated. Once that processing has been done, IZ4 can reprocess the list as often as once a week to keep up with changes or at a minimum of once every three months to keep current.

[0037] IZ4 is different from a ZIP+4 engine in two main aspects. The input of one is the output of the other and quickness of updates. The ZIP+4 product has as its input a street address with city and state and outputs a standardized USPS address with a 5 digit ZIP code and the 4 digit add-on and includes the delivery point code. (FIG. 2) By the nature of the policies surrounding the ZIP+4 product, it can be used up to 180 days after it was created. The IZ4 is a weekly product and can be kept much more current.

[0038] An example of the input and result differences with the ZIP+4 and the IZ4 products is shown at FIG. 2 where a known address has a change in the indicia: 123 Main Street, Collierville Tenn. is changed to 123 Elvis Presley Blvd, Collierville Tenn. An updated ZIP+4 engine product will not correct this type of change since the input information is different. The delivery point itself has not changed only the address indicia. IZ4 can track the delivery point and return the corrected 123 Elvis Presley Blvd when presented with 38017-1234-23. Likewise if any other part of the street address components change (the city name, the street number, the ZIP Code, or the Add-on), IZ4 will respond with the new information when given the old.

[0039] IZ4 responds with “Ambiguous” when there is a conflict with the 11 digit DPBC. Ambiguous happens in several ways. If the 11 digit DPBC is the default record for a high rise building with multiple delivery points, IZ4 cannot determine which delivery point is really being queried. Also If a ZIP Code or the Plus Four add-on had been deleted then is re-used for a different delivery point later, the old designation for the 11 digit DPBC and the new designation will be in conflict. The IZ4 product can be used for address list maintenance. Mailers or owners of large mailing lists spend millions of dollars in postage and fees for returned “Undeliverable As Addressed” (UAA) mail. The IZ4 product keeps their list updated with the latest correct address. Other embodiments consistent with the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of this invention disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered exemplary only, with the true scope of the invention being indicated by the following claim and equivalents.

[0040] While preferred embodiments of this invention have been shown and described, modifications thereof can be made by one skilled in the art without departing from the spirit or teaching of this invention. The embodiments described herein are exemplary only and are not limiting. Many variations and modifications of the system and apparatus are possible and are within the scope of the invention. One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the process just described may easily have steps added, taken away, or modified without departing from the principles of the present invention. Accordingly, the scope of protection is not limited to the embodiments described herein, but is only limited by the claims which follow, the scope of which shall include all equivalents of the subject matter of the claims.

Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US7617112Mar 13, 2006Nov 10, 2009Harrison Jr Shelton EPostal system, method and device
US7622692Jan 24, 2007Nov 24, 2009United States Postal ServiceMethods and systems for sorting unaddressed items
US7702919Dec 31, 2003Apr 20, 2010International Business Machines CorporationAuthorized anonymous authentication
US7739201 *Oct 22, 2004Jun 15, 2010Neopost TechnologiesMailpiece tracking
US7792683 *Nov 7, 2002Sep 7, 2010Siemens Industry, Inc.Method and system for address information distribution
US7801925 *Dec 21, 2005Sep 21, 2010United States Postal ServiceSystem and method for electronically processing address information
US7900052 *Nov 6, 2003Mar 1, 2011International Business Machines CorporationConfidential data sharing and anonymous entity resolution
US7917544Apr 5, 2010Mar 29, 2011Qas LimitedMethod and apparatus for retrieving data representing a postal address from a plurality of postal addresses
US7962757Mar 24, 2004Jun 14, 2011International Business Machines CorporationSecure coordinate identification method, system and program
US7974882 *Sep 12, 2006Jul 5, 2011Direct Resources Solutions, LLCMethod and system for creating a comprehensive undeliverable-as-addressed database for the improvement of the accuracy of marketing mailing lists
US8032530Dec 4, 2006Oct 4, 2011Deutsche Post AgMethod and device for processing relevant data for sorting postal items
US8078313Sep 30, 2004Dec 13, 2011United States Postal ServiceMethods and systems for sorting unaddressed items
US8103518 *Jan 12, 2007Jan 24, 2012United States Postal ServiceSystems and methods for new address validation
US8165909May 17, 2006Apr 24, 2012The United States Postal ServiceSystem and method for automated management of an address database
US8352746Feb 19, 2010Jan 8, 2013International Business Machines CorporationAuthorized anonymous authentication
US8452787Dec 27, 2002May 28, 2013International Business Machines CorporationReal time data warehousing
US8527086 *Jun 23, 2010Sep 3, 2013Raf Technology, Inc.Return address destination discrimination technology
US8615521Sep 8, 2005Dec 24, 2013International Business Machines CorporationReal time data warehousing
US8620937Jan 13, 2006Dec 31, 2013International Business Machines CorporationReal time data warehousing
US8774455Mar 2, 2012Jul 8, 2014Raf Technology, Inc.Document fingerprinting
US20090089070 *Oct 1, 2007Apr 2, 2009Level 3 Communications, LlcSystem and Method for Validating and Processing Customer Entered Addresses
US20100324724 *Jun 23, 2010Dec 23, 2010Raf Technology, Inc.Return address destination discrimination technology
EP1804217A1Dec 5, 2005Jul 4, 2007Deutsche Post AGMethod and device for the processing of postal mail sorting data
WO2004023711A1Jun 11, 2003Mar 18, 2004Edgar H Ii GillockMethod and system for efficiently retrieving secured data by securely pre-processing provided access information
WO2005107965A2 *Sep 30, 2004Nov 17, 2005Us Postal ServiceMethods and systems for sorting unaddressed items
WO2007065616A1 *Dec 4, 2006Jun 14, 2007Deutsche Post AgMethod and device for processing relevant data for sorting postal items
Classifications
U.S. Classification700/225
International ClassificationG06Q10/00, G07B17/00
Cooperative ClassificationG07B2017/00443, G07B2017/00451, G06Q30/018, G07B17/00435, G06Q10/08, G07B17/00024
European ClassificationG06Q10/08, G06Q30/018, G07B17/00E4, G07B17/00D1
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Feb 21, 2013FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 4
Oct 31, 2003ASAssignment
Owner name: UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SNAPP, ROBERT F.;REEL/FRAME:014648/0483
Effective date: 20030606