Publication number | US20030191704 A1 |

Publication type | Application |

Application number | US 10/118,812 |

Publication date | Oct 9, 2003 |

Filing date | Apr 9, 2002 |

Priority date | Apr 9, 2002 |

Publication number | 10118812, 118812, US 2003/0191704 A1, US 2003/191704 A1, US 20030191704 A1, US 20030191704A1, US 2003191704 A1, US 2003191704A1, US-A1-20030191704, US-A1-2003191704, US2003/0191704A1, US2003/191704A1, US20030191704 A1, US20030191704A1, US2003191704 A1, US2003191704A1 |

Inventors | Silviu Alb |

Original Assignee | Alb Silviu Iulian |

Export Citation | BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan |

Patent Citations (9), Referenced by (12), Classifications (4) | |

External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet | |

US 20030191704 A1

Abstract

A portfolio optimization method for maximizing long-term cumulative return is provided. The method consists in selecting the portfolio with the highest probability-weighted geometric mean of payoffs. It can be mathematically proven that maximizing the geometric mean is the investing strategy that, over the long term, will outperform any other strategy in terms of cumulative return.

Claims(3)

Description

- [0001][0001]
6003018 December 1999 Michaud et al. 705/36 - [0002]“The Relative Value Theory”, Silviu I. Alb, June 2001, http://netec.mcc.ac.uk/WoPEc/data/Papers/wpawuwpfi0106003.html “The Utility of Wealth”, Harry Markowitz, 1959, Journal of Political Economy 60 “Security prices, Risk, and Maximal Gains from Diversification”, John Lintner, 1965, Journal of Finance 20
- [0003]The invention relates generally to the field of financial advisory services (U.S. Class 705/36). Investors appear to be primarily concerned with maximizing expected return, intended as the probability-weighted arithmetic mean of returns, for a given level of risk, usually defined in terms of variance of returns. According to the classical paradigm due to Markowitz, a so-called “mean-variance efficient” portfolio can be derived using mathematical algorithms known in the art. One deficiency of such portfolio optimization is the instability of solutions.
- [0004]While the goal of maximizing the mean-variance ratio is popular among portfolio managers, and has received much attention in the art, little attention, if any, was given to the goal of maximizing long-term cumulative returns. The popularity of such goal is expected to significantly increase in the future.
- [0005]The invention consists in optimizing a portfolio by maximizing the probability-weighted geometric mean of payoffs.
- [0006]An investors expectations concerning the evolution of a set of available assets can be modeled using a set of scenarios, each having its own probability. Within any given scenario, the present value (payoff) of any portfolio can be computed by discounting the combined cash flows of the assets in the portfolio. The investor can further compute the probability-weighted geometric mean of payoffs for the portfolio across all scenarios. The optimization method claimed consists in selecting the portfolio with the highest probability-weighted geometric mean of payoffs.
- [0007]An alternate embodiment of the invention consists in using portfolio market values (after a predetermined period of time) instead of portfolio present values. All other aspects of the optimization process remain unchanged.
- [0008]The described optimization process leads to stable solutions and ensures the maximization of long-term cumulative returns.
- [0009]Investors are confronted with the problem of selecting the optimal portfolio from a set of available assets. Given such set, an investor will use judgement and experience to define his expectations concerning the possible future evolutions of the set. The investor can describe such expectations using a large set of possible scenarios, each having an associated probability.
- [0010]For any given scenario, the present value of any portfolio can be calculated by discounting the portfolio's stream of cash flows for the considered scenario, using a unique discount rate representing time value of money. We will refer to such present values as portfolio payoffs. Every scenario determines the payoff for any given portfolio.
- [0011]
- [0012]where,
- [0013]S is the number of possible scenarios
- [0014]i consecutively identifies each of the S scenarios
- [0015]M is the probability-weighted geometric mean of payoffs
- [0016]P
_{i }is the portfolio payoff corresponding to scenario i - [0017]p
_{i }is the probability associated with scenario i - [0018]The portfolio optimization method claimed consists in selecting, among all portfolios available to the investor, the one with the highest probability-weighted geometric mean of payoffs. Finding such portfolio is a maximization problem that can be solved using mathematical and numerical techniques known to persons skilled in the art. Such techniques include without being limited to: randomly selecting portfolios and keeping the one with the highest mean; orderly scanning the portfolio space for the highest mean; moving from an initial portfolio along the gradient of the mean; or setting the partial derivatives of the mean equal to zero and solving the resulting equation. All such techniques are within the scope of the present invention.
- [0019]In order to make the invention more readily understandable the following simple example is provided. A risk free asset R
_{f }and a risky asset R are considered. Two scenarios are possible: S_{1 }with probability 0.6, and S_{2 }with probability 0.4. Under scenario S_{1 }the risky asset R will generate a stream of cash flows so that a present value (payoff) of $1.3 will be returned for every $1 invested. Under scenario S_{2 }the risky asset will return a present value (payoff) of $0.65 for every $1 invested. Obviously, in both scenarios the risk free asset R_{f }will return a present value (payoff) of $1 for every $1 invested. The total capital available to the investor is $10 so he could, for instance, invest $2 in the risky asset and $8 in the risk free asset. Under scenario S_{1 }the payoff of such portfolio would be $10.6 (equal to 1.3 times $2 plus 1 times $8). Similarly, under scenario S_{2 }the payoff of such portfolio would be $9.3 (equal to 0.65 times $2 plus 1 times $8). The probability-weighted geometric mean of payoffs for the considered portfolio would be approximately $10.06 ($10.6 raised to the power of 0.6, times $9.3 raised to the power of 0.4). Using mathematical and numerical techniques one can find that the optimal portfolio results from investing $3.80952381 in the risky asset, and the remaining $6.19047619 in the risk free asset. - [0020]The set of scenarios and associated probabilities used to model expectations can be construed by determining the possible payoffs for each individual asset (and related probabilities), assuming the assets are non-correlated, and deriving the set of scenarios by extracting all possible combinations of asset payoffs. For instance, when asset R
_{1 }has two possible payoffs P1_{1 }and P1_{2 }(with probabilities p1_{1 }and p1_{2}), asset R_{2 }has two possible payoffs P2_{1 }and P2_{2 }(with probabilities p2_{1 }and p2_{2}), and R_{1 }and R_{2 }are non-correlated, expectations can be modeled by deriving four scenarios: - [0021]Under scenario 1, R
_{1}'s payoff is P1_{1}, and R_{2}'s payoff is P2_{1}, the scenario's probability being p1_{1 }times p2_{1}; - [0022]Under scenario 2, R
_{1}'s payoff is P1_{1}, and R_{2}'s payoff is P2_{2}, the scenario's probability being p1_{1 }times p2_{2}; - [0023]Under scenario 3, R
_{1}'s payoff is P1_{2}, and R_{2}'s payoff is P2_{1}, the scenario's probability being p1_{2 }times p2_{1}; - [0024]Under scenario 4, R
_{1}'s payoff is P1_{2}, and R_{2}'s payoff is P2_{2}, the scenario's probability being p1_{2 }times p2_{2}. - [0025]Such technique represents a particular case, not an alternative, of the general technique described above. Such particular case is mentioned because of its simplicity and likely future popularity.
- [0026]In an alternative embodiment, investor expectations are modeled by a set of scenarios aimed at describing not present values of portfolio future cash flows but portfolio market values after a predetermined period of time. In such embodiment portfolio payoffs would represent portfolio market values, not portfolio present values. Other than the significance of payoffs the alternative embodiment is basically identical with the one previously described.
- [0027]In an alternative embodiment, the disclosed methods for portfolio optimization may be implemented in whole or in part as a computer program product for use with a computer system. Such program may be distributed on any removable memory device, preloaded on a computer system, or distributed over a network (e.g., the Internet or World Wide Web). The invention may be implemented as entirely software, entirely hardware, or a combination of the two.
- [0028]The described embodiments of the invention are intended to be merely exemplary and numerous variations and modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art. All such variations and modifications are within the scope of the present invention.

Patent Citations

Cited Patent | Filing date | Publication date | Applicant | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|

US5126936 * | Sep 1, 1989 | Jun 30, 1992 | Champion Securities | Goal-directed financial asset management system |

US5132899 * | Oct 16, 1989 | Jul 21, 1992 | Fox Philip J | Stock and cash portfolio development system |

US5729700 * | Feb 24, 1995 | Mar 17, 1998 | Meyer Melnikoff | Methods and apparatus for facilitating execution of asset trades based on nonnegative investment risk, using overlapping time periods |

US5761442 * | Aug 31, 1994 | Jun 2, 1998 | Advanced Investment Technology, Inc. | Predictive neural network means and method for selecting a portfolio of securities wherein each network has been trained using data relating to a corresponding security |

US5799217 * | Jan 8, 1997 | Aug 25, 1998 | Nikon Corporation | Battery check device for a camera |

US5819238 * | Dec 13, 1996 | Oct 6, 1998 | Enhanced Investment Technologies, Inc. | Apparatus and accompanying methods for automatically modifying a financial portfolio through dynamic re-weighting based on a non-constant function of current capitalization weights |

US6021397 * | Dec 2, 1997 | Feb 1, 2000 | Financial Engines, Inc. | Financial advisory system |

US6078904 * | Mar 16, 1998 | Jun 20, 2000 | Saddle Peak Systems | Risk direct asset allocation and risk resolved CAPM for optimally allocating investment assets in an investment portfolio |

US6687681 * | May 28, 1999 | Feb 3, 2004 | Marshall & Ilsley Corporation | Method and apparatus for tax efficient investment management |

Referenced by

Citing Patent | Filing date | Publication date | Applicant | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|

US7502756 * | Jun 15, 2006 | Mar 10, 2009 | Unnikrishna Sreedharan Pillai | Matched filter approach to portfolio optimization |

US8131620 | Feb 18, 2005 | Mar 6, 2012 | Wisdomtree Investments, Inc. | Financial instrument selection and weighting system and method |

US8374937 | Nov 16, 2009 | Feb 12, 2013 | Research Affiliates, Llc | Non-capitalization weighted indexing system, method and computer program product |

US8374939 | Apr 1, 2010 | Feb 12, 2013 | Research Affiliates, Llc | System, method and computer program product for selecting and weighting a subset of a universe to create an accounting data based index and portfolio of financial objects |

US8374951 | Sep 7, 2009 | Feb 12, 2013 | Research Affiliates, Llc | System, method, and computer program product for managing a virtual portfolio of financial objects |

US8380604 | Jun 19, 2010 | Feb 19, 2013 | Research Affiliates, Llc | System, method and computer program product for using a non-price accounting data based index to determine financial objects to purchase or to sell |

US8694402 | Aug 23, 2012 | Apr 8, 2014 | Research Affiliates, Llc | Using accounting data based indexing to create a low volatility portfolio of financial objects |

US20070288397 * | Jun 12, 2006 | Dec 13, 2007 | Nec Europe Ltd. | Methodology for robust portfolio evaluation and optimization taking account of estimation errors |

US20070294191 * | Jun 15, 2006 | Dec 20, 2007 | Unnikrishna Sreedharan Pillai | Matched filter approach to portfolio optimization |

US20090132433 * | Jan 20, 2009 | May 21, 2009 | Unnikrishna Sreedharan Pillai | Matched filter approach to portfolio optimization |

USRE44098 | Aug 8, 2012 | Mar 19, 2013 | Research Affiliates, Llc | Using accounting data based indexing to create a portfolio of assets |

USRE44362 | Aug 17, 2012 | Jul 9, 2013 | Research Affiliates, Llc | Using accounting data based indexing to create a portfolio of financial objects |

Classifications

U.S. Classification | 705/36.00R |

International Classification | G06Q40/06 |

Cooperative Classification | G06Q40/06 |

European Classification | G06Q40/06 |

Rotate