Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20040123164 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 10/326,222
Publication dateJun 24, 2004
Filing dateDec 21, 2002
Priority dateDec 21, 2002
Also published asCN1685583A, CN100452610C, EP1576710A1, US7000125, WO2004062061A1
Publication number10326222, 326222, US 2004/0123164 A1, US 2004/123164 A1, US 20040123164 A1, US 20040123164A1, US 2004123164 A1, US 2004123164A1, US-A1-20040123164, US-A1-2004123164, US2004/0123164A1, US2004/123164A1, US20040123164 A1, US20040123164A1, US2004123164 A1, US2004123164A1
InventorsAlain Chapuis, Mikhail Guz
Original AssigneePower-One Limited
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Method and system for controlling and monitoring an array of point-of-load regulators
US 20040123164 A1
Abstract
A power control system comprises a plurality of POL regulators, at least one serial data bus operatively connecting the plurality of POL regulators, and a system controller connected to the serial data bus and adapted to send and receive digital data to and from the plurality of POL regulators. The serial data bus further comprises a first data bus carrying programming and control information between the system controller and the plurality of POL regulators. The serial data bus may also include a second data bus carrying fault management information between the system controller and the plurality of POL regulators. The power control may also include a front-end regulator providing an intermediate voltage to the plurality of POL regulators on an intermediate voltage bus.
Images(4)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(22)
What is claimed is:
1. A power control system comprising:
a plurality of point-of-load (POL) regulators;
at least one serial data bus operatively connecting said plurality of POL regulators; and
a system controller connected to said at least one serial data bus and adapted to send and receive digital data to and from said plurality of POL regulators.
2. The power control system of claim 1, wherein said at least one serial data bus further comprises a first data bus carrying programming, control and monitoring information between said system controller and said plurality of POL regulators.
3. The power control system of claim 1, wherein said at least one serial data bus further comprises a second data bus carrying fault management information between said system controller and said plurality of POL regulators.
4. The power control system of claim 1, further comprising a front-end regulator providing an intermediate voltage to said plurality of POL regulators on an intermediate voltage bus.
5. The power control system of claim 4, wherein said front-end regulator is combined with said system controller in a single device.
6. The power control system of claim 1, wherein said system controller further comprises a user interface adapted to communicate at least one of monitoring and control information with a user.
7. The power control system of claim 1, wherein each of said plurality of POL regulators further comprise an intradevice interface adapted to communicate interaction information with at least one other one of said plurality of POL regulators.
8. The power control system of claim 7, wherein said interaction information further comprises current sharing information for a parallel operation between ones of said plurality of POL regulators.
9. The power control system of claim 4, wherein said plurality of POL regulators each further comprise a power conversion circuit adapted to transform said intermediate voltage to a desired output voltage.
10. The power control system of claim 1, wherein said plurality of POL regulators each further comprise a serial interface adapted to communicate with said at least one serial data bus.
11. The power control system of claim 10, wherein said plurality of POL regulators each further comprise a hardwired interface permitting programming in the absence of data received from said system controller via said serial interface.
12. The power control system of claim 11, wherein said hardwired interface further comprises an input enabling connection of at least one external resistor thereto to define an output voltage of a corresponding one of said plurality of POL regulators.
13. The power control system of claim 11, wherein said hardwired interface further comprises an address interface adapted to receive a unique identification address for each said POL regulator.
14. The power control system of claim 11, wherein said hardwired interface further comprises a VID interface adapted to receive VID codes.
15. The power control system of claim 1, wherein said plurality of POL regulators each further comprises a memory containing default configuration settings to revert to in the absence of data received from said system controller.
16. A method of controlling a plurality of point-of-load (POL) regulators, comprising:
receiving programming parameters; and
transmitting serially over a common data bus operably connected to said plurality of POL regulators digital programming data based on said programming parameters.
17. The method of claim 16, wherein said receiving step further comprises receiving programming parameters from a user.
18. The method of claim 16, wherein said receiving step further comprises receiving programming parameters from a local memory.
19. The method of claim 16, wherein said receiving step further comprises receiving programming parameters from an external memory.
20. The method of claim 16, further comprising receiving fault information of said plurality of POL regulators over a second data bus operably connected to said plurality of POL regulators.
21. The method of claim 20, taking common corrective action with respect to all of said plurality of POL regulators in response to a fault of at least one of said POL regulators.
22. The method of claim 17, further comprising storing said received programming parameters in a non-volatile memory.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0001] 1. Field of the Invention

[0002] The present invention relates to power control systems, or more particularly, to a method and system to control and monitor an array of point-of-load regulators.

[0003] 2. Description of Related Art

[0004] With the increasing complexity of electronic systems, it is common for an electronic system to require power provided at several different discrete voltage and current levels. For example, electronic systems may include discrete circuits that require voltages such as 3 v, 5 v, 9 v, etc. Further, many of these circuits require a relatively low voltage (e.g., 1 v), but with relatively high current (e.g., 100 A). It is undesirable to deliver relatively high current at low voltages over a relatively long distance through an electronic device for a number of reasons. First, the relatively long physical run of low voltage, high current lines consumes significant circuit board area and congests the routing of signal lines on the circuit board. Second, the impedance of the lines carrying the high current tends to dissipate a lot of power and complicate load regulation. Third, it is difficult to tailor the voltage/current characteristics to accommodate changes in load requirements.

[0005] In order to satisfy these power requirements, it is known to distribute an intermediate bus voltage throughout the electronic system, and include an individual point-of-load (“POL”) regulator, i.e., DC/DC converter, at the point of power consumption within the electronic system. Particularly, a POL regulator would be included with each respective electronic circuit to convert the intermediate bus voltage to the level required by the electronic circuit. An electronic system may include multiple POL regulators to convert the intermediate bus voltage into each of the multiple voltage levels. Ideally, the POL regulator would be physically located adjacent to the corresponding electronic circuit so as to minimize the length of the low voltage, high current lines through the electronic system. The intermediate bus voltage can be delivered to the multiple POL regulators using low current lines that minimize loss.

[0006] With this distributed approach, there is a need to coordinate the control and monitoring of the POL regulators of the power system. The POL regulators generally operate in conjunction with a power supply controller that activates, programs, and monitors the individual POL regulators. It is known in the art for the controller to use a multi-connection parallel bus to activate and program each POL regulator. For example, the parallel bus may communicate an enable/disable bit for turning each POL regulator on and off, and voltage identification (VID) code bits for programming the output voltage set-point of the POL regulators. The controller may further use additional connections to monitor the voltage/current that is delivered by each POL regulator so as to detect fault conditions of the POL regulators. A drawback with such a control system is that it adds complexity and size to the overall electronic system.

[0007] Thus, it would be advantageous to have a system and method for controlling and monitoring POL regulators within a distributed power system.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[0008] The present invention provides a system and method for controlling and monitoring POL regulators within a distributed power system.

[0009] In an embodiment of the invention, the power control system comprises a plurality of POL regulators, at least one serial data bus operatively connecting the plurality of POL regulators, and a system controller connected to the serial data bus and adapted to send and receive digital data to and from the plurality of POL regulators. The serial data bus further comprises a first data bus carrying programming, control and monitoring information between the system controller and the plurality of POL regulators. The serial data bus may also include a second data bus carrying fault management information between the system controller and the plurality of POL regulators. The power control may also include a front-end regulator providing an intermediate voltage to the plurality of POL regulators on an intermediate voltage bus.

[0010] The POL control system enables four different modes of operation. In the first operational mode, the POL regulators function independently in the absence of a system controller and without interaction with other POL regulators. In the second operational mode, the POL regulators interoperate for the purpose of current sharing or interleaving in the absence of a system controller. In the third operational mode, the POL regulators operate as an array in which the behavior of each POL regulator and the array as a whole are coordinated by a system controller. Lastly, the fourth operational mode includes both central control using the system controller and local control over certain functionality. This way, the POL regulators operate as an array coordinated by a system controller and also interoperate with each other to perform functions such as current sharing.

[0011] A more complete understanding of the method and system for controlling and monitoring a plurality of POL regulators will be afforded to those skilled in the art, as well as a realization of additional advantages and objects thereof, by a consideration of the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment. Reference will be made to the appended sheets of drawings, which will first be described briefly.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0012]FIG. 1 depicts a prior art distributed power delivery system;

[0013]FIG. 2 depicts a prior art POL control system using a parallel control bus;

[0014]FIG. 3 depicts an exemplary POL control system constructed in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;

[0015]FIG. 4 depicts an exemplary POL regulator of the POL control system; and

[0016]FIG. 5 depicts an exemplary system controller of the POL control system.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

[0017] The present invention provides a system and method for controlling and monitoring POL regulators within a distributed power system. In the detailed description that follows, like element numerals are used to describe like elements illustrated in one or more figures.

[0018] Referring first to FIG. 1, a prior art distributed power delivery system is shown. The prior art distributed power deliver system includes an AC/DC converter 12 that converts the available AC power into a primary DC power source, e.g., 48 volts. The primary DC power source is connected to a primary power bus that distributes DC power to plural electronic systems, such as printed circuit board 14. The bus may be further coupled to a battery 18 providing a back-up power source for the electronic systems connected to the primary power bus. When the AC/DC converter 12 is delivering DC power into the primary power bus, the battery 18 is maintained in a fully charged state. In the event of loss of AC power or fault with the AC/DC converter 12, the battery 18 will continue to deliver DC power to the primary power bus for a limited period of time defined by the capacity of the battery 18.

[0019] The printed circuit board 14 may further include a DC/DC converter that reduces the primary bus voltage to an intermediate voltage level, such as 5 or 12 volts. The intermediate voltage is then distributed over an intermediate power bus provided to plural circuits on the printed circuit board 14. Each circuit has an associated point-of-load (“POL”) regulator located closely thereby, such as POLs 22, 24, and 26. Each POL regulator converts the intermediate bus voltage to a low voltage, high current level demanded by the electronic circuit, such as 1.8 volts, 2.5 volts, and 3.3 volts provided by POLs 22, 24, and 26, respectively. It should be appreciated that the voltage levels described herein are entirely exemplary, and that other voltage levels could be selected to suit the particular needs of electronic circuits on the printed circuit board 14. By locating the POLs 22, 24, 26 close to their corresponding electronic circuits, the length of the low voltage, high current lines on the printed circuit board 14 are minimized. Moreover, the intermediate power bus can be adapted to carry relatively low current, thereby minimizing power loss due to the line impedance. But, this distributed power delivery system does not provide a way to monitor and control the performance of the POLs 22, 24, 26.

[0020]FIG. 2 illustrates a prior art DC/DC converter control system having a power supply controller 32 and a plurality of DC/DC converters 34, 36, 38, and 42. The DC/DC converters 34, 36, 38, and 42 are each connected to a power bus (as described above with respect to FIG. 1), which provides an input voltage. The DC/DC converters 34, 36, 38, and 42 each provide a low voltage, high current output that passes through respective sensing resistors 46, 52, 56, and 62 and respective switches 48, 54, 58, and 64. The controller 32 provides control signals to the DC/DC converters 34, 36, 38, and 42 via a plurality of six-bit parallel buses that each carry an enable/disable bit and five VID code bits. The VID code bits program the DC/DC converters for a desired output voltage/current level. The controller 32 also monitors the performance of the DC/DC converters 34, 36, 38, and 42 using the sensing resistors 46, 52, 56, and 62. Particularly, the controller 32 monitors the output voltage of each DC/DC converter by detecting the voltage at the output side of the sensing resistor, and monitors the output current through the sensing resistor by detecting the voltage across the sensing resistor. The voltage and current sensing for each DC/DC converter requires two separate lines, so eight separate lines are needed to sense the voltage and current condition of the exemplary four-converter system. Moreover, the controller 32 has a switch enable line connected to the gate terminals of switches 48, 54, 58, and 64, by which the controller 32 can shut off the output from any of the DC/DC controllers 34, 36, 38, and 42.

[0021] In an exemplary operation, the controller 32 provides control parameters (e.g., output voltage set-point) to the DC/DC converter 34 via the VID code portion of the six-bit parallel bus. The controller 32 then activates the DC/DC converter 34 via the enable/disable portion of the six-bit parallel bus. Once activated, the DC/DC converter 34 converts the power bus voltage (e.g., 48 volts) into a selected output voltage. The controller 32 then verifies that the output voltage is the desired voltage by measuring the voltage via the voltage monitoring line. If the output voltage is within an acceptable range, it is provided to the load (not shown) by activating the switch 48 via the switch enable line. The controller 32 can then continuously monitor the output voltage and the output current produced by the DC/DC converter 34 by measuring the output voltage via the voltage monitoring line and measuring the voltage drop across the sensing resistor (i.e., the voltage differential between the current monitoring line and the voltage monitoring line). If the controller 32 detects a fault condition of the DC/DC converter 34 (e.g., output voltage drops below a specific threshold), the controller 32 can disable and reset the DC/DC converter. The controller 32 communicates with the other DC/DC converters 36, 38, and 42 in the same manner.

[0022] A disadvantage with the control system of FIG. 2 is that it adds complexity and size to the overall electronic system by using a six-bit parallel bus to control each DC/DC converter and a separate three-line output connection to monitor the performance of each DC/DC converter. In other words, the controller 32 utilizes thirty-six separate connections in order to communicate with four DC/DC converters 34, 36, 38, and 42. As the complexity and power requirements of electronic systems increase, the number of connections to the controller will also increase in a linear manner.

[0023] Referring now to FIG. 3, a POL control system 100 is shown in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Specifically, the POL control system 100 includes a system controller 102, a front-end regulator 104, and a plurality of POL regulators 106, 108, 110, 112, and 114 arranged in an array. The POL regulators depicted herein include, but are not limited to, point-of-load regulators, power-on-load regulators, DC/DC converters, voltage regulators, and all other programmable voltage or current regulating devices generally known to those skilled in the art. An intra-device interface is provided between individual ones of the POL regulators to control specific interactions, such as current share or paralleling, e.g., current share interface (CS1) provided between POL0 106 and POL1 108, and CS2 provided between POL4 112 and POLn 114. In the exemplary configuration shown in FIG. 3, POL0 106 and POL1 108 operate in parallel mode to produce output voltage VO1 with increased current capability, POL2 110 produces output voltage VO2, and POL4 112 and POLn 114 operate in parallel mode to produce output voltage VO3, though it should be appreciate that other combinations and other numbers of POL regulators could be advantageously utilized.

[0024] The front-end regulator 104 provides an intermediate voltage to the plurality of POL regulators over an intermediate voltage bus, and may simply comprise another POL regulator. The system controller 102 and front-end regulator 104 may be integrated together in a single unit, or may be provided as separate devices. Alternatively, the front-end regulator 104 may provide a plurality of intermediate voltages to the POL regulators over a plurality of intermediate voltage buses. The system controller 102 may draw its power from the intermediate voltage bus.

[0025] The system controller 102 communicates with the plurality of POL regulators by writing and/or reading digital data (either synchronously or asynchronous) via a uni-directional or bi-directional serial bus, illustrated in FIG. 3 as the synch/data bus. The synch/data bus may comprise a two-wire serial bus (e.g., I2C) that allows data to be transmitted asynchronously or a single-wire serial bus that allows data to be transmitted synchronously (i.e., synchronized to a clock signal). In order to address any specific POL in the array, each POL is identified with a unique address, which may be hardwired into the POL or set by other methods. The system controller 102 also communicates with the plurality of POL regulators for fault management over a second uni-directional or bi-directional serial bus, illustrated in FIG. 3 as the OK/fault bus. By grouping plural POL regulators together by connecting them to a common OK/fault bus allows the POL regulators have the same behavior in the case of a fault condition. Also, the system controller 102 communicates with a user system via a user interface bus for programming, setting, and monitoring of the POL control system 10. Lastly, the system controller 102 communicates with the front-end regulator 104 over a separate line to disable operation of the front-end regulator.

[0026] An exemplary POL regulator 106 of the POL control system 10 is illustrated in greater detail in FIG. 4. The other POL regulators of FIG. 3 have substantially identical configuration. The POL regulator 106 includes a power conversion circuit 142, a serial interface 144, a POL controller 146, default configuration memory 148, and hardwired settings interface 150. The power conversion circuit 142 transforms an input voltage (Vi) to the desired output voltage (VO) according to settings received through the serial interface 144, the hardwired settings 150 or default settings. The power conversion circuit 142 may also include monitoring sensors for output voltage, current, temperature and other parameters that are used for local control and also communicated back to the system controller through the serial interface 144. The power conversion circuit 142 may also generate a Power Good (PG) output signal for stand-alone applications in order to provide a simplified monitoring function. The serial interface 144 receives and sends commands and messages to the system controller 102 via the synch/data and OK/fault serial buses. The default configuration memory 148 stores the default configuration for the POL regulator 106 in cases where no programming signals are received through the serial interface 144 or hardwired settings interface 150. The default configuration is selected such that the POL regulator 106 will operate in a “safe” condition in the absence of programming signals.

[0027] The hardwired settings interface 150 communicates with external connections to program the POL regulator without using the serial interface 144. The hardwired settings interface 150 may include as inputs the address setting (Addr) of the POL to alter or set some of the settings as a function of the address (i.e., the identifier or the POL), e.g., phase displacement, enable/disable bit (En), trim, and VID code bits. Further, the address identifies the POL regulator during communication operations through the serial interface 144. The trim input allows the connection of one or more external resistors to define an output voltage level for the POL regulator. Similarly, the VID code bits can be used to program the POL regulator for a desired output voltage/current level. The enable/disable bit allows the POL regulator to be turned on/off by toggling a digital high/low signal.

[0028] The POL controller 146 receives and prioritizes the settings of the POL regulator. If no settings information is received via either the hardwired settings interface 150 or the serial interface 144, the POL controller 146 accesses the parameters stored in the default configuration memory 148. Alternatively, if settings information is received via the hardwired settings interface 150, then the POL controller 146 will apply those parameters. Thus, the default settings apply to all of the parameters that cannot be or are not set through hard wiring. The settings received by the hardwired settings interface 150 can be overwritten by information received via the serial interface 144. The POL regulator can therefore operate in a stand-alone mode, a fully programmable mode, or a combination thereof. This programming flexibility enables a plurality of different power applications to be satisfied with a single generic POL regulator, thereby reducing the cost and simplifying the manufacture of POL regulators.

[0029] An exemplary system controller 102 of the POL control system 100 is illustrated in FIG. 5. The system controller 102 includes a user interface 122, a POL interface 124, a controller 126, and a memory 128. The user interface 122 sends and receives messages to/from the user via the user interface bus. The user interface bus may be provided by a serial or parallel bidirectional interface using standard interface protocols, e.g., an I2C interface. User information such as monitoring values or new system settings would be transmitted through the user interface 122. The POL interface 124 transforms data to/from the POL regulators via the synch/data and OK/fault serial buses. The POL interface 124 communicates over the synch/data serial bus to transmit setting data and receive monitoring data, and communicates over the OK/fault serial bus to receive interrupt signals indicating a fault condition in at least one of the connected POL regulators. The memory 128 comprises a non-volatile memory storage device used to store the system set-up parameters (e.g., output voltage, current limitation set-point, timing data, etc.) for the POL regulators connected to the system controller 102. Optionally, a secondary, external memory 132 may also be connected to the user interface 122 to provide increased memory capacity for monitoring data or setting data.

[0030] The controller 126 is operably connected to the user interface 122, the POL interface 124, and the memory 128. The controller 126 has an external port for communication a disable signal (FE DIS) to the front-end regulator 104. At start-up of the POL control system 100, the controller 126 reads from the internal memory 128 (and/or the external memory 132) the system settings and programs the POL regulators accordingly via the POL interface 124. Each of the POL regulators is then set up and started in a prescribed manner based on the system programming. During normal operation, the controller 126 decodes and executes any command or message coming from the user or the POL regulators. The controller 126 monitors the performance of the POL regulators and reports this information back to the user through the user interface 122. The POL regulators may also be programmed by the user through the controller 126 to execute specific, autonomous reactions to faults, such as over current or over voltage conditions. Alternatively, the POL regulators may be programmed to only report fault conditions to the system controller 102, which will then determine the appropriate corrective action in accordance with predefined settings, e.g., shut down the front-end regulator via the FE DIS control line.

[0031] A monitoring block 130 may optionally be provided to monitor the state of one or more voltage or current levels of other power systems not operably connected to the controller 102 via the synch/data or OK/fault buses. The monitoring block 130 may provide this information to the controller 126 for reporting to the user through the user interface in the same manner as other information concerning the POL control system 10. This way, the POL control system 10 can provide some backward compatibility with power systems that are already present in an electronic system.

[0032] The POL control system 10 enables four different modes of operation. In the first operational mode, the POL regulators function independently in the absence of a system controller and without interaction with other POL regulators. The POL regulators each include local feedback and control systems to regulate their own performance as well as control interfaces to enable local programming. The POL regulators further include default settings in which they can revert to in the absence of local programming or data from the system controller. In other words, each of the POL regulators can operate as a standalone device without the need for a system controller or interactions with another POL regulator.

[0033] In the second operational mode, the POL regulators interoperate for the purpose of current sharing or interleaving in the absence of a system controller. The POL regulators communicate with each other over the current share interface. The synch/data line may be used to communicate synchronization information to permit phase interleaving of the POL regulators, in which the phase is programmed locally by entering an address through hardwired connections.

[0034] In the third operational mode, the POL regulators operate as an array in which the behavior of each POL regulator and the array as a whole are coordinated by a system controller. The system controller programs the operation of each of the POL regulators over the synch/data serial bus, and thereby overrides the predetermined settings of the POL regulators. The synch/data serial bus is further used to communicate synchronization information to permit synchronization and interleaving of the POL regulators. This operational mode would not include interdevice communications over the current share interface.

[0035] Lastly, the fourth operational mode includes both central control using the system controller and local control over certain functionality. This way, the POL regulators operate as an array coordinated by a system controller and also interoperate with each other to perform functions such as current sharing.

[0036] It should be appreciated that the POL control system of the present invention provides certain advantages over prior art distributed power distribution systems. The present POL control system requires much less complexity or “glue” components (e.g., mediating devices) in order to provide communication and control of a plurality of POL regulators, thereby reducing the amount of circuit board space for the POL control system and number of control lines needed for communication, control and monitoring. The POL control system is easily scalable by adding POL regulators to the array in order to support additional power requirements, without increasing the overhead requirements.

[0037] Having thus described a preferred embodiment of a method and system to control and monitor an array of DC/DC power converters, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that certain advantages of the system have been achieved. It should also be appreciated that various modifications, adaptations, and alternative embodiments thereof may be made within the scope and spirit of the present invention. The invention is further defined by the following claims.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US73347 *Jan 14, 1868 of same place
US105227 *Jul 12, 1870 Improvement in raspberry and strawberry fruit sirup
US122429 *Jan 2, 1872 Improvement in propelling canal-boats
US142513 *Apr 21, 1873Sep 2, 1873 Improvement m draft-tubes for soda-fountains
US201761 *Feb 2, 1878Mar 26, 1878 Improvement in motors
US462627 *Aug 31, 1891Nov 3, 1891 Calendar
US3660672 *Feb 25, 1971May 2, 1972Pioneer Magnetics IncPower supply dual output
US4194147 *Dec 5, 1977Mar 18, 1980Burr-Brown Research CorporationParallel connected switching regulator system
US4538101 *Jun 3, 1983Aug 27, 1985Nippon Chemi-Con CorporationPower supply device
US5053920 *Oct 9, 1990Oct 1, 1991Digital Equipment CorporationIntegrated power conversion
US5073848 *Nov 21, 1990Dec 17, 1991General Electric CompanyPower distribution system
US5377090 *Jan 19, 1993Dec 27, 1994Martin Marietta CorporationPulsed power converter with multiple output voltages
US5481140 *Mar 4, 1993Jan 2, 1996Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki KaishaDemand control apparatus and power distribution control system
US5892933 *Mar 31, 1997Apr 6, 1999Compaq Computer Corp.Digital bus
US5946495 *Apr 8, 1997Aug 31, 1999Compaq Computer Corp.Data communication circuit for controlling data communication between redundant power supplies and peripheral devices
US5990669 *Dec 15, 1997Nov 23, 1999Dell Usa, L.P.Voltage supply regulation using master/slave timer circuit modulation
US6191566 *Aug 26, 1999Feb 20, 2001Lucent Technologies Inc.Board mountable power supply module with multi-function control pin
US6211579 *Sep 29, 1999Apr 3, 2001Lucent Technologies, Inc.Multiple output converter having a low power dissipation cross regulation compensation circuit
US6262900 *May 21, 1999Jul 17, 2001Muuntolaite OyModular power supply system with control command verification
US6385024 *Mar 7, 2000May 7, 2002Ss8 Networks, Inc.System and method for monitoring current consumption from current share components
US6421259 *Dec 28, 2000Jul 16, 2002International Business Machines CorporationModular DC distribution system for providing flexible power conversion scalability within a power backplane between an AC source and low voltage DC outputs
US6429630 *Jan 29, 2001Aug 6, 2002Primarion, Inc.Apparatus for providing regulated power to an integrated circuit
US20040090219 *Nov 12, 2002May 13, 2004Power-One LimitedSystem and method for controlling a point-of-load regulator
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US6949916 *Nov 12, 2002Sep 27, 2005Power-One LimitedSystem and method for controlling a point-of-load regulator
US7023190Feb 12, 2004Apr 4, 2006Power-One, Inc.ADC transfer function providing improved dynamic regulation in a switched mode power supply
US7049798 *Nov 13, 2002May 23, 2006Power-One, Inc.System and method for communicating with a voltage regulator
US7057379Jul 21, 2005Jun 6, 2006Power-One, Inc.System and method for providing digital pulse width modulation
US7080265Mar 14, 2003Jul 18, 2006Power-One, Inc.Voltage set point control scheme
US7141956Mar 18, 2005Nov 28, 2006Power-One, Inc.Digital output voltage regulation circuit having first control loop for high speed and second control loop for high accuracy
US7190291Jan 5, 2005Mar 13, 2007Artesyn Technologies, Inc.Programmable error amplifier for sensing voltage error in the feedback path of digitially programmable voltage sources
US7409315Jun 21, 2005Aug 5, 2008Broadcom CorporationOn-board performance monitor and power control system
US7420292Apr 13, 2006Sep 2, 2008Eaton CorporationVehicle bus control system
US7509507Jun 21, 2005Mar 24, 2009Broadcom CorporationMulti-regulator power supply chip with common control bus
US7558902 *Sep 29, 2006Jul 7, 2009Silicon Laboratories Inc.Bus to MCU bridge
US7581122Jun 21, 2005Aug 25, 2009Broadcom CorporationPower supply integrated circuit with feedback control
US7646382Oct 31, 2007Jan 12, 2010Power-One, Inc.Digital power manager for controlling and monitoring an array of point-of-load regulators
US7653757 *Aug 5, 2005Jan 26, 2010Zilker Labs, Inc.Method for using a multi-master multi-slave bus for power management
US7673157Nov 10, 2006Mar 2, 2010Power-One, Inc.Method and system for controlling a mixed array of point-of-load regulators through a bus translator
US7685320 *May 17, 2006Mar 23, 2010Zilker Labs, Inc.Autonomous sequencing and fault spreading
US7710092Oct 22, 2007May 4, 2010Power-One, Inc.Self tracking ADC for digital power supply control systems
US7730332Apr 17, 2006Jun 1, 2010Zilker Labs, Inc.Method and apparatus for improved DC power deliver, management and configuration
US7737961Apr 4, 2007Jun 15, 2010Power-One, Inc.Method and system for controlling and monitoring an array of point-of-load regulators
US7743266Jul 23, 2007Jun 22, 2010Power-One, Inc.Method and system for optimizing filter compensation coefficients for a digital power control system
US7782029Nov 28, 2007Aug 24, 2010Power-One, Inc.Method and system for controlling and monitoring an array of point-of-load regulators
US7793005 *Jun 21, 2006Sep 7, 2010Zilker Labs, Inc.Power management system using a multi-master multi-slave bus and multi-function point-of-load regulators
US7834613May 5, 2008Nov 16, 2010Power-One, Inc.Isolated current to voltage, voltage to voltage converter
US7836322Oct 30, 2007Nov 16, 2010Power-One, Inc.System for controlling an array of point-of-load regulators and auxiliary devices
US7840379Aug 4, 2008Nov 23, 2010Broadcom CorporationOn-board performance monitor and power control system
US7863769Jul 23, 2008Jan 4, 2011Eaton CorporationVehicle bus control system
US7882372Apr 4, 2007Feb 1, 2011Power-One, Inc.Method and system for controlling and monitoring an array of point-of-load regulators
US7908402 *Aug 26, 2010Mar 15, 2011Zilker Labs, Inc.Integrated multi-function point-of-load regulator circuit
US8108181Nov 19, 2010Jan 31, 2012Broadcom CorporationOn-board performance monitor and power control system
US8120203Jul 19, 2009Feb 21, 2012Intersil Americas Inc.Intelligent management of current sharing group
US8120205Jul 19, 2009Feb 21, 2012Zilker Labs, Inc.Adding and dropping phases in current sharing
US8145921Mar 10, 2009Mar 27, 2012Broadcom CorporationMulti-regulator power supply chip with common control bus
US8181045Mar 15, 2010May 15, 2012Broadcom CorporationPower control bus
US8230151 *Apr 11, 2005Jul 24, 2012Linear Technology CorporationConfigurable data port for I2C or single-wire broadcast interface
US8237423Jul 19, 2009Aug 7, 2012Intersil Americas Inc.Active droop current sharing
US8239597Jul 17, 2009Aug 7, 2012Intersil Americas Inc.Device-to-device communication bus for distributed power management
US8261103 *Oct 28, 2009Sep 4, 2012Dell Products L.P.Systems and methods for controlling power delivery to system components
US8452897 *Apr 17, 2006May 28, 2013Zilker Labs, Inc.Method for using a multi-master multi-slave bus for power management
US8487477Jul 19, 2009Jul 16, 2013Intersil Americas Inc.Method to properly ramp current sharing
US8638081Jun 19, 2012Jan 28, 2014Intersil Americas Inc.Active droop current sharing
US8868935Aug 18, 2009Oct 21, 2014Broadcom CorporationPower supply integrated circuit with feedback control
US20040090219 *Nov 12, 2002May 13, 2004Power-One LimitedSystem and method for controlling a point-of-load regulator
US20040093533 *Nov 13, 2002May 13, 2004Power-One LimitedSystem and method for communicating with a voltage regulator
US20040123167 *Dec 23, 2002Jun 24, 2004Power -One LimitedSystem and method for interleaving point-of-load regulators
US20040179382 *Mar 14, 2003Sep 16, 2004Power-One LimitedVoltage set point control scheme
US20040196014 *Feb 12, 2004Oct 7, 2004Power-One LimitedADC transfer function providing improved dynamic regulation in a switched mode power supply
US20040246754 *Jul 12, 2004Dec 9, 2004Alain ChapuisMethod and system for communicating filter compensation coefficients for a digital power control system
US20050180065 *Jul 13, 2004Aug 18, 2005Alain ChapuisSystem and method for managing fault in a power system
US20050200344 *Apr 27, 2005Sep 15, 2005Alain ChapuisSystem and method for controlling a point-of-load regulator
US20050285575 *Jun 21, 2005Dec 29, 2005Kim Neil YPower supply integrated circuit with feedback control
US20050286709 *Jun 23, 2005Dec 29, 2005Steve HortonCustomer service marketing
US20050289373 *Jun 24, 2005Dec 29, 2005Power-One, Inc.Method and system for controlling and monitoring an array of point-of-load regulators
US20050289378 *Jun 21, 2005Dec 29, 2005Pieter VorenkampOn-board power supply monitor and power control system
US20050289489 *Jun 21, 2005Dec 29, 2005Kim Neil YOn-board performance monitor and power control system
US20070082610 *Oct 12, 2006Apr 12, 2007Kesse HoDynamic current sharing in Ka/Ku LNB design
US20110099395 *Apr 28, 2011Dell Products L.P.Integrated System Power Controller
US20120297104 *Nov 22, 2012General ElectricControlled intermediate bus architecture optimization
US20140241018 *Feb 26, 2013Aug 28, 2014Champion Microelectronic CorporationSystem and method for limiting output current in a switching power supply
CN100451884CJun 29, 2005Jan 14, 2009美国博通公司Power supply integrated circuit with feedback control
CN100501610CJun 28, 2005Jun 17, 2009美国博通公司Multi-regulator power supply circuit with common control bus and its control method
CN101124619BJun 30, 2005Nov 13, 2013大动力公司Digital power manager for controlling and monitoring an array of point-of-load regulators
EP1612908A1 *Jun 24, 2005Jan 4, 2006Broadcom CorporationMulti-regulator power supply chip with common control bus
EP1612909A1Jun 24, 2005Jan 4, 2006Broadcom CorporationPower supply integrated circuit with feedback control
EP1612910A1Jun 24, 2005Jan 4, 2006Broadcom CorporationOn-board power supply monitor and power control system
EP1612911A1Jun 24, 2005Jan 4, 2006Broadcom CorporationOn-board performance monitor and power control system
EP1769382A2 *Jun 30, 2005Apr 4, 2007Power-One, Inc.Digital power manager for controlling and monitoring an array of point-of-load regulators
EP1899789A2 *Apr 7, 2006Mar 19, 2008Power-One, Inc.Method and system for controlling and monitoring an array of point-of-load regulators
EP1899789A4 *Apr 7, 2006Jan 27, 2010Power One IncMethod and system for controlling and monitoring an array of point-of-load regulators
EP1984801A2 *Jan 24, 2007Oct 29, 2008Power-One, Inc.Method and system for controlling an array of point-of-load regulators and auxiliary devices
WO2007119150A1 *Apr 13, 2007Oct 25, 2007Eaton CorpVehicle power bus control system and method of controlling a plurality of devices coupled to an electrical power bus
Classifications
U.S. Classification713/300
International ClassificationH02J13/00, H02J1/08, H02J1/10
Cooperative ClassificationH02J13/0003, H02J2001/008, H02J1/102, H02J1/08, H02M2001/008, Y02E60/74, Y04S10/30
European ClassificationH02J13/00E, H02J1/08
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Dec 21, 2002ASAssignment
Owner name: POWER-ONE LIMITED, CAYMAN ISLANDS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:CHAPUIS, ALAIN;GUZ, MIKHAIL;REEL/FRAME:013618/0330;SIGNING DATES FROM 20021212 TO 20021218
Sep 12, 2005ASAssignment
Owner name: POWER-ONE, INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:POWER-ONE LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:016768/0399
Effective date: 20050829
Oct 31, 2005ASAssignment
Owner name: POWER-ONE, INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:POWER-ONE LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:017212/0054
Effective date: 20050829
Mar 7, 2008ASAssignment
Owner name: PWER BRIDGE, LLC,ALASKA
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:POWER-ONE, INC.;REEL/FRAME:020617/0177
Effective date: 20080306
Mar 20, 2008ASAssignment
Owner name: PWER BRIDGE, LLC,ARKANSAS
Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE ADDR;ASSIGNOR:POWER-ONE, INC.;REEL/FRAME:020741/0403
Effective date: 20080306
Owner name: PWER BRIDGE, LLC, ARKANSAS
Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE ADDR;ASSIGNOR:POWER-ONE, INC.;REEL/FRAME:020741/0403
Effective date: 20080306
Jul 17, 2008ASAssignment
Owner name: POWER-ONE, INC.,CALIFORNIA
Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:PWER BRIDGE, LLC;REEL/FRAME:021253/0024
Effective date: 20080617
Owner name: THE BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY, N.A.,CALIFORNI
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:POWER-ONE, INC.;REEL/FRAME:021253/0076
Effective date: 20080617
Jun 22, 2009FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 4
Mar 26, 2011ASAssignment
Owner name: POWER-ONE, INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A. (AS SUCCESSOR TO THE BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY, N.A.);REEL/FRAME:026026/0794
Effective date: 20110317
Jun 7, 2011ASAssignment
Owner name: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., WASHINGTON
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:POWER-ONE, INC.;REEL/FRAME:026401/0098
Effective date: 20110329
Feb 26, 2013FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 8
May 5, 2014ASAssignment
Owner name: POWER-ONE, INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:032826/0684
Effective date: 20130722
Jun 25, 2014ASAssignment
Owner name: PAI CAPITAL LLC, CALIFORNIA
Free format text: NUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT;ASSIGNOR:POWER-ONE, INC.;REEL/FRAME:033227/0968
Effective date: 20140604