Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20040137997 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 10/706,226
Publication dateJul 15, 2004
Filing dateNov 12, 2003
Priority dateDec 3, 2002
Publication number10706226, 706226, US 2004/0137997 A1, US 2004/137997 A1, US 20040137997 A1, US 20040137997A1, US 2004137997 A1, US 2004137997A1, US-A1-20040137997, US-A1-2004137997, US2004/0137997A1, US2004/137997A1, US20040137997 A1, US20040137997A1, US2004137997 A1, US2004137997A1
InventorsJohn Rohrer
Original AssigneeRohrer Technologies, Inc.
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Focused beam emitting golf ball like device for putter aim testing and training
US 20040137997 A1
A laser or other focused beam is mounted in a device with the appearance from above of a golf ball which device can either rest on the ground in contact with a putterface or be attached to a putterhead or other clubhead such that the focused beam is at a 90 degree angle to the putterface. After the device user is satisfied that the club is properly aimed or aligned at a target, the laser beam is activated via a wired foot, or finger, or wireless switch such that the actual aim can be compared on a visible or blind screen behind the target with the intended target. The device can be used with any putter for putter training, putter club fitting, and putter aim testing and selection.
Previous page
Next page
What is claimed is:
1. A device with the appearance of a golf ball, or similarly sized white or light colored circle or disc, when viewed from above with a stable mounting or integral base underneath with an embedded focused beam of light or other energy source which device can be placed attached or unattached in front of the face of a golf putter or other club such that the focused beam is at right angles to such clubface for purposes of determining the actual orientation, aim, or alignment of such clubface relative to an intended target when such light source is activated.
2. The device of claim 1 where the focused beam is a laser or other visible light source.
3. The device of claim 1 where the focused beam is an infrared or other non-visible source.
4. The device of claim 1 where the focused beam is a radio frequency or electro-magnetic source.
5. The device of claim 1 where the mounting-base is set on the ground or a floor unattached to the clubhead and in flush contact with a clubface such that the focused beam is at a normal angle to such clubface.
6. The device in claim 1 where the mounting base is rigidly or flexibly attachable to a putterhead, or clubhead face, or sole via pressure sensitive adhesives, suction cups, straps, mechanical clips or other means such that the focused beam is at a normal angle to such clubface.
7. The device of claim 1 provided with interchangeable bases per claim 5 and claim 6.
8. The device of claim 1 having a mechanical means in the mounting base such as mating curved groves and ridges, slotted holes or the like for adjusting the height of the focused beam relative to the ground or a floor while maintaining the beam at right angles to the clubface or the mounting base member contacting said clubface.
9. The device of claim 1 having the mounting base of claim 6 with a flexible hinge, tape strip, or other suitable means allowing the focus beam of the device to maintain its height or attitude relative to the floor or ground when the user moves the club shaft fore or aft.
10. The device of claim 1 with mounting base where the device with mounting base and/or the floor activation button is weighted above 50 grams to prevent movement of either while the user is aligning the clubhead.
11. The device of claim 1 with the mounting base where the device with mounting base and/or floor activation button has a soft flat elastomer bottom with multiple small projections or feet to firmly grasp both flat hard slippery floor surfaces and textured grass or carpeted surfaces without unintended movement during use.
12. The device of claim 1 where activation of the beam is via a foot push button or switch connected to the device via wires.
13. The device of claim 1 where activation of the beam is via a finger operated push button or switch detachably connected to the club grip or upper club shaft in such position as to not disturb the users normal grasp of the club, such push, button or switch connected to the focused beam device via wires.
14. The device of claim 1 where activation of the focus beam is via a button or switch on the device or its mounting base, or club attachment means activated by a forward, downward or upward movement of the putterhead relative to the base or device by the user.
15. The device of claim 1 wirelessly connected to a focus beam activation button or switch.
16. The device of claim 1 where the battery or other energy source is located remotely from the device.
17. The device of claim 1 with a vertically oriented optional user shielded backs top screen which can be placed behind the intended target and approximately normal to its focused beam to show and/or sense such focused beam and its position relative to an intended target on or in front of such screen.
18. The device of claim 1 with backstop screen of claim 17 with multiple photo or RF/EM/IR sensitive sensors connected to a dedicated or computer display showing actual clubhead orientations when the focused beam is activated relative to the intended target.
  • [0001]
    Numerous laser and other optical alignment devices have been proposed for putters and other golf clubs. Almost all such devices have one or more light sources, either in the clubhead, attached to the clubhead, generally above it and above ball height, or attached to the putter shaft or hosel near the clubhead. None of the above have gained wide popularity as putter training devices because they are cumbersome or inaccurate to set up and use, and present a substantially different optical picture than the golfer will see on the course during actual play. If a single centered laser is embedded into a putterface, it cannot be aimed or aligned at a target with a golf ball in front of it (ball blocks light) resulting in an unrealistic alignment picture. Numerous putterheads with two lasers (toe and heal) have been proposed allowing ball placement in between to overcome this problem. The two laser beams are offset left and right of the target requiring compensation for the actual target. These putters do not conform to the United States Golf Association (USGA) Rules of Golf and, therefore, the golfer must use another putter during actual play.
  • [0002]
    Other designs attach a single laser above the clubface high enough to shoot over a golf ball. This creates an optical picture substantially different than the user's usual on-course putter. Many others have proposed shaft or hosel mounted laser alignment devices with a single focused beam or numerous dots along the target line. These devices are difficult and time e consuming to line up accurately. Set up is range sensitive. For example, if aligned properly for 20 feet, they must be realigned if practice is desired at 10 feet.
  • [0003]
    All of the above devices are extremely shaft angle sensitive. The beam hits the ground in front of the target or goes skyward above any target backstop if the user moves the puttershaft more than a few degrees from true vertical. Few, if any, of the devices have user remote activation of the light source. If the light is turned on before the user aims, he uses the light, not his own skills, to aim or align to the target. Nothing is learned. None accommodate “blind testing” where the user does not learn of his aim test results until several aims are completed, and therefore can't cheat by using one aim test result to “adjust” or improve the next one.
  • [0004]
    Putterhead or shaft mounted lasers, and other light or mirror based putters, are illegal for actual play under USGA rules. You must therefore play actual rounds without the above devices creating a different aim picture. The shaft and putterhead detachable mounted lasers are difficult to mount and align making them impractical for comparing alternative putters (to see which ones you aim best) or testing alternative putting setups and stances.
  • [0005]
    The present invention describes an inexpensive, easy to use laser or other focused beam based aim training or testing device which can be used with any putter (or other club) without time consuming or cumbersome setup and adjustment. It is either unattached or flexibly attached to the putterhead. It can be used with or without an optional recording backstop screen and can have a user activated remote switch, for either “blind testing” (where you don't see and, therefore, cannot adjust from your prior aim and “shot”), or full view testing. Unlike others, it is not shaft angle or loft sensitive. The device presents a realistic visual picture of any putter with a ball centered in front of it. Golfers can easily use the device themselves in a golf shop or home to find the putter they can consistently “aim” the best or to find the stance and setup-putting their optical aim on the target line.
  • [0006]
    There are numerous examples of single or duel lasers or lights embedded into putterheads including U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,458,038; 5,980,393; 5,810,674; 5,593,354; 5,482,283; 5,169,150; 5,165,691; and possibly others. These putters are non-conforming to the USGA Rules of Golf and, therefore, cannot be used in normal play, requiring a different putter for play vs. practice. The single central embedded clubhead laser or light can't be used with a ball in front creating an unnatural unrealistic optical picture. The twin lasers are offset from the ball target line requiring compensation. They can't be used to test the aim or alignment of any other putters. They are extremely loft and lie sensitive where a slight shifting of the user's hand position shoots the beam in wayward directions, hitting the floor before the target or shooting over it. They lack remote user activation buttons which a user can engage only after one feels his aim and alignment are correct. If the laser remains on during aiming, the user is tempted to “cheat” using the laser beam not the putterhead to aim. No user vision shielded backstop screens are described which are necessary for “blind tests.”
  • [0007]
    Numerous other examples describe lasers, mirrors, or focused beams permanently or removably attached to the top of putterheads. These allow more realistic use of a golf ball in front of the putterface and do not require aim compensation like twin laser putterheads, but the laser mount, or mirror, or light source presents an unrealistic optical picture for aiming vs. putters used in actual play. Like all devices rigidly affixed to putterheads or shafts, they are loft and lie sensitive, and they lack user remote activation buttons allowing users to “cheat” by using the beam to aim rather than learn their true-aiming tendencies. They also lack-user shielded backstop screens for “blind testing.” Those with removable lasers can be USGA legal, but realignment of the lasers once removed is time consuming, inaccurate and cumbersome. Examples of putterhead attached devices include U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,383,087; 6,371,864 B1; 6,095,930; 5,725,439; 5,709,609, 5,611,739; 5,464,221; 5,388,832; 5,330,188; 5,213,331; and 5,193,812.
  • [0008]
    Perhaps the most popular type of laser-putter systems involve putter shaft attached devices. Some are-attached low, at or near the club Hosel and throw a single beam, either offset 4″ to 12″ from the target line, or aimed from a different angle making tedious readjustment and calibration necessary every time the target to putter distance is changed. Other higher shaft mounts project multi-dots along the putterhead target tine (again after tedious adjustment). Still others bounce the shaft mounted lasers off 45 degree angle oriented mirrors mounted on top of the putterhead destroying-any realistic looking siting pictures. All of the above are loft and lie sensitive, lack user shielded backstop screens and lack user operated remote activation (except U.S. Pat. No. 5,472,204). Shaft mount examples include U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,238,298 B1, 6,149,537, 5,725,440, 5,494,290 and 5,207,429.
  • [0009]
    Prior art discloses only two putter alignment devices which lie on the ground unattached to a putter like the present, invention. U.S. Pat. No. 5,452,897 describes a laser device which is laid on the ground (by user or assistant) against the putterface after the user has attained his aim and removed the golf ball. This is cumbersome and time consuming with a very high likelihood that the aim will be lost before the procedure is done, especially if the user attempts this unassisted. Both the device and its use differ substantially from the subject invention. The other U.S. Pat. No. 4,997,189 to Pelz, requires accurate mounting of a mirror on the putter toe at precisely a 90 degree angle from the face and exact, alignment of a light source/sensor box (with top display) parallel to the putter-target line. If the user moves the putter toward or away from the sensor box, the alignment is off. Neither device describes user remote activation buttons or user shielded recordable backstop screens. U.S. Pat. No. 6,458,038 B1 does describe a photo-sensitive screen with remote display, but uses a single non-user shielded backstop and putterhead embedded light source with all the limitations of same previously described.
  • [0010]
    [0010]FIG. 1 is a plan view of the present invention in intimate contact with a typical putterhead. The focused beam emitting device, a small laser in this embodiment, is embedded in a sphere having the size and appearance of a golf ball, which is attached to a base sitting stably on the ground. Two alternative focused beam activation means are shown.
  • [0011]
    [0011]FIG. 2 is a sectional elevation view of the same embodiment of present invention again in intimate contact with a putterhead. An attitude adjustment means for the focused beam is shown as are two activation means.
  • [0012]
    [0012]FIG. 3 is an elevation view of the present invention showing the typical location of a golfer's eye above a typical putter in conjunction with a user blind recordable backstop screen of the present invention placed behind the target aim point (typically the center of a golf cup or white floor disc of cup size). The focused beam impacts the screen to show or record the golfers actual aim vs. his intended aim (at the center of the cup or aim target).
  • [0013]
    [0013]FIG. 4 is a sectional elevation of an alternative embodiment of the present invention where the laser ball device is preferably flexibly attached with pressure sensitive tape or the like to the sole of a typical putter such that the focused beam is normal to the putterface when viewed from above. Attitude adjustment and activation means are also shown.
  • [0014]
    The present invention utilizes a focused beam device of visible or non-visible light or other energy to determine or improve a golfer's ability to aim or align any putter, or other club, accurately at a specific target. Because the device has the size, shape, and appearance of a golf ball, when viewed by a golfer from above, and can be used with any putter, it has the identical optical appearance of an actual ball being addressed and aimed by a golfer with a putter (or other club).
  • [0015]
    The present invention also incorporates one ore more remote user activated beam activation means and an optional user blind recordable backstop screen placed behind the intended aim target (typically the center of a golf cup or similarly sized flat white disc on the ground). This allows the user to aim, shoot, and record several alignments without using the visible focused beam to improve aim (i.e., cheat), again exactly simulating actual playing conditions where such visible aiming beams are not permitted under the Rules of Golf.
  • [0016]
    The present invention is, therefore, useful in determining or improving a golfer's aiming accuracy with a specific putter or club (i.e., the relative dispersion of multiple shots at a target), as well as, average alignment error (i.e., the location of the shot grouping center relative to the intended target point). Aiming accuracy (shot dispersion) is primarily influenced by the optical appearance of specific putterheads when viewed (aimed) by a golfer from above with a ball in place. At a range of 20 feet, a typical golfer might have an aim dispersion of 12 inches with one putter and less than half that with another better optically suited to him. The same golfer might have an alignment error of 3 left with one putter, stance or setup and 0 with another putter, stance or setup.
  • [0017]
    The subject invention, therefore allows a golfer to select the best putter, stance, and setup to optimize both aim accuracy and alignment. It also allows improvement through practice aiming not possible by actually stroking a ball which introduces swing errors and green errors (breaking slopes and grass grain moving a ball off line). The subject invention represents a major improvement over the current art of golf laser or light aiming devices because:
  • [0018]
    1. It is the only device presenting an optically realistic picture of the user's actual playing putter (unencumbered by any shaft or clubhead mounted light sources) addressing a golf ball.
  • [0019]
    2. Since the focused beam is in the ball which stays flat on the ground and not rigidly attached to the club or shaft, it is not loft or Iie sensitive, with the beam hitting the ground in front of the clubhead if the player moves his hands forward, and skyward if he moves his hands rearward.
  • [0020]
    3. The device can be used with all USGA legal clubs (which cannot have focused light sources) without cumbersome, time consuming, inaccurate light source or mirror attachment to the clubhead or clubshaft and adjustment.
  • [0021]
    4. It can be used with its optional backstop screen to blind test aim a putter such that the user cannot “cheat” by using the visible light beam from one aim test to improve the next.
  • [0022]
    5. It incorporates users activatable beam activation means (wireless or wired floor, grip mounted or remote button) keeping the beam off until the user feels he has achieved correct aim.
  • [0023]
    The preferred embodiments are more fully described in'the drawings. FIG. 1 is a plan or overhead view of a typical putter 10 with shaft 11 and face 12 in sliding contact with the rear face 9 of the subject invention, which contains a base 5 preferably either of transparent or translucent plastic or painted green to take it out of optical view. The base is of sufficient size, weight, and bottom flatness to sit firmly on a putting green, carpet, or smooth floor without significant tipping or canting fore and aft or side to side. A focus beam holder 1 is attached to, or an integral part of, the base 5 and has the appearance of a golf ball when viewed from above. A focused beam emitting source 2, such as a small laser is embedded into the holder 1 facing forward toward the target 28 with aim point 26 and at a 90 degree angle from the base rear face 9 in contact with a putter 10 (or other club). The source emits a focused energy beam 3 such as visible or non-visible (IR or UV) light or an electromagnetic beam (RF). The beam source 2 contains an energy source 4 such as batteries or alternatively such energy source 4 can be remote from the beam source 2 such as near the floor or club shaft-activation means 7 or push button or pressure switch connected by wires 6. The energy source 4 can also be in the holder 1 or base 5. Alternative activation means include a pressure contact switch 8 on the rear face of the base 5 which activates when contacted by the face 12 of a club 10 or a wireless remote activation switch (not shown).
  • [0024]
    [0024]FIG. 2 is a sectional elevation of the embodiment shown and described in FIG. 1. The base 5 has an optional weighing means 14 to provide stability against unintended movements and an adjustment screw or other means 15 to adjust the angle or attitude of the beam 3 relative to the ground or floor. Also shown is an elastomer-bottom surface 16 to prevent slippage on smooth surfaces with multiple small feet or spikes 17 to hold position in grass or carpet pile., An optional mating groove or circular keyway 18 between the beam holder 1 and base or base weight (5 or 14), oriented on the target line allows attitude adjustment of the beam 3 without disturbing its 90 degree orientation with the base rear putter contacting surface 9.
  • [0025]
    [0025]FIG. 3 shows a golfer's eye above a putter shaft 11 with optional shaft or grip mounted beam activation means 27 or floor, button 7 with the beam 3 shooting over the target point (the center 26 of a golf hole 28) before passing through a transparent or translucent backstop screen 22 and contacting either removable manual marked or light sensitive recording paper 23, or a photo, or other energy sensitive electronic sensor screen (also 23). If the electronic sensor screen is, used, it can be wire or wirelessly connected to a display screen 27 showing the dispersion and alignment of one or more aim attempts 25 vs. the intended target 26. A top shield 20 can be used to prevent the golfer from seeing above line 29, the light beam location of his prior aim attempts and using it to “adjust” subsequent attempts. “Blind” putter aim tests and training are therefore possible. The top shield 20 can be adjusted up or down via adjustable legs 21. The user's eye to target line is shown as 19.
  • [0026]
    [0026]FIG. 4 is a sectional elevation of an alternative embodiment of the present invention which can use the same or smaller base 30, with rear face 31 under the golf ball shaped holder 1 with beam source 2 and optional attitude adjustment means 15 and 18 as previously described. A plastic sheet, or film, or tape strip 32 attaches the base 5 or 30 of FIG. 2 or FIG. 4, respectively, to the bottom of a putter 10 or other club via pressure sensitive adhesive 34, or similar means, such that the rear of the base (9 in FIG. 2 or 3 in FIG. 4) is in contact with the putterface 12. Part 33, or all of the sheet, or film, or tape strip 32 can act as a flexible hinge such that the putter's loft can be changed by the user (by moving this hands fore or aft relative the putterhead) without changing the attitude of the beam 3 which could otherwise either strike the ground in front of the target (28 in FIG. 3) or shoot over the backstop screen (22 and 23 in FIG. 3). Also shown is an alternative activation switch 35 which can be activated by pressing the putter or club downward.
  • [0027]
    In another preferred embodiment (not shown), a white or light colored circle or disc, approximately the diameter of a golf ball and located in a substantially horizontal plane on the device, replaces the golf ball shaped device of the present invention.
  • [0028]
    Other embodiments incorporating the principles of the invention described herein are also a part of the present invention.
Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3191939 *Aug 27, 1962Jun 29, 1965Hooper Frederick GSwing indicator attachment for golf clubs including spaced electric light bulbs
US4108441 *Feb 3, 1977Aug 22, 1978Tredway Sr Wynn BGolf swing training apparatus and method
US4251077 *Mar 14, 1979Feb 17, 1981Preceptor Golf Ltd.Target alignment system for use with a golf club
US4997189 *Feb 28, 1990Mar 5, 1991Perkins Sonnie JPutting teaching and learning apparatus and method
US5165691 *Oct 23, 1991Nov 24, 1992Cook Jon CLaser golf club putter assembly
US5169150 *Oct 7, 1991Dec 8, 1992Tindale John CPutting stroke correcting device
US5193812 *Apr 15, 1992Mar 16, 1993Hendricksen Mark WGolf club with laser alignment system
US5213331 *Apr 30, 1992May 25, 1993Frank AvanziniGolf training putter
US5330188 *Nov 21, 1991Jul 19, 1994Reimers Eric WPutter alignment system
US5374063 *Apr 21, 1993Dec 20, 1994The Zelar Corp.Golf apparatus
US5388832 *May 18, 1994Feb 14, 1995Hsu; Kuo H.Practice-type golf putter
US5452897 *Dec 16, 1992Sep 26, 1995Sceptre Golf CompanyLaser aided putter alignment system
US5464221 *Sep 12, 1994Nov 7, 1995Carney; William P.Golf club putter with laser aiming system
US5472204 *Jul 5, 1994Dec 5, 1995Philip C. McGaheyPutter having an optically-based aiming system
US5482283 *May 8, 1995Jan 9, 1996Wall; David A.Golf club
US5593354 *Feb 16, 1996Jan 14, 1997Falossi; AldoGolf club including light emitting positioning system
US5611739 *Oct 16, 1995Mar 18, 1997Carney; William P.Golf club putter with laser aiming system
US5692966 *Nov 14, 1996Dec 2, 1997Wash; Stephen G.Golf putting training device
US5709609 *Dec 14, 1995Jan 20, 1998Carney; William P.Training apparatus for golfers
US5725439 *Jan 19, 1996Mar 10, 1998Halsey; Keith D.Golf club alignment device
US5810674 *Dec 9, 1996Sep 22, 1998Falossi; AldoLight emitting positioning system
US5980393 *Jan 30, 1998Nov 9, 1999Laser Precision Products LlcGolf club with laser system
US6117020 *Jan 28, 1999Sep 12, 2000Kurr Golf Technology, Inc.Laser aim determination system for use in creating a custom made putter
US6149537 *Nov 23, 1998Nov 21, 2000Intelligent Machines CorporationMethods for training golf putting skills
US6238298 *Aug 6, 1999May 29, 2001David ChenAiming device for golf putter
US6364785 *Jul 7, 2000Apr 2, 2002I-Ming ChenGolf training device
US6371864 *May 23, 2000Apr 16, 2002John M. NorwoodAlignment device for golf putting practices
US6383078 *Mar 17, 2000May 7, 2002Elottery, Inc.On-line lottery game system
US6458038 *Sep 4, 2001Oct 1, 2002Teh-Cheng LinGolf putting indication device
US6579191 *Nov 13, 2001Jun 17, 2003Todd E. HamblyLaser putter device
US6872150 *Dec 16, 2003Mar 29, 2005Dan A. WelchPutting practice kit and method
US20040005934 *May 9, 2003Jan 8, 2004Battaglia Patrick W.Golf swing training system
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US6872150 *Dec 16, 2003Mar 29, 2005Dan A. WelchPutting practice kit and method
US6926629 *Nov 3, 2003Aug 9, 2005Martin L. DehenAttachment for blade of hockey stick
US7410432Aug 3, 2006Aug 12, 2008Martin L DehenHockey stick
US7850536Jan 29, 2010Dec 14, 2010Novatron Holdings CorporationPutter trainer
US20040097306 *Nov 3, 2003May 20, 2004Dehen Martin L.Attachment for blade of hockey stick
US20040132539 *Dec 16, 2003Jul 8, 2004Welch Dan A.Putting practice kit and method
US20050245334 *Jun 30, 2005Nov 3, 2005Dehen Martin LAttachment for blade of hockey stick
US20060040757 *Aug 18, 2004Feb 23, 2006Rosselli Matteo JBody attached golf aim alignment device and method for use
US20060270497 *Aug 3, 2006Nov 30, 2006Dehen Martin LHockey stick
US20060281579 *Aug 23, 2006Dec 14, 2006Marnocha Benedict FGolf club and practice arrangement
WO2006034543A1 *Sep 27, 2005Apr 6, 2006D & B Wholesale Pty LtdPutting practice device
WO2008024126A1 *Nov 20, 2006Feb 28, 2008Lpi, LlcGolf club and practice arrangement
U.S. Classification473/220, 473/236, 473/221
International ClassificationA63B69/36
Cooperative ClassificationA63B69/3685, A63B69/3614
European ClassificationA63B69/36P2