Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20040153157 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 10/473,998
PCT numberPCT/EP2002/003132
Publication dateAug 5, 2004
Filing dateMar 20, 2002
Priority dateApr 5, 2001
Also published asEP1250898A1, EP1389982A1, US8303661, US20090228108, WO2002080818A1
Publication number10473998, 473998, PCT/2002/3132, PCT/EP/2/003132, PCT/EP/2/03132, PCT/EP/2002/003132, PCT/EP/2002/03132, PCT/EP2/003132, PCT/EP2/03132, PCT/EP2002/003132, PCT/EP2002/03132, PCT/EP2002003132, PCT/EP200203132, PCT/EP2003132, PCT/EP203132, US 2004/0153157 A1, US 2004/153157 A1, US 20040153157 A1, US 20040153157A1, US 2004153157 A1, US 2004153157A1, US-A1-20040153157, US-A1-2004153157, US2004/0153157A1, US2004/153157A1, US20040153157 A1, US20040153157A1, US2004153157 A1, US2004153157A1
InventorsArnold Keller
Original AssigneeArnold Keller
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
System for intervertebral disk prostheses
US 20040153157 A1
Abstract
System of intervertebral disc prostheses which includes standard prostheses and corrective prostheses. The corrective prostheses serve to compensate for a ventro-dorsal offset. They are characterized in that, on one of their cover plates (15), the surface (4′) via which it cooperates in a matching manner with the prosthesis core (3′) is offset ventrodorsally relative to the contact surface (7) by comparison with the standard prostheses.
Images(2)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(7)
1. System of intervertebral disc prostheses which includes standard prostheses and corrective prostheses, the standard prostheses in at least one size category being identical to each other and consisting of a prosthesis core (3, 3′, 23, 23′) and of at least one cover plate (1, 1′, 2, 2′, 21, 21′, 22, 22′) which has a core-matching surface (4, 4′, 24, 26) cooperating with the prosthesis core (3, 3′, 23, 23′) and a contact surface (7) intended to adjoin a vertebral body (9), characterized in that the corrective prostheses (14) have a corrective cover plate (15, 20, 29) whose core-matching surface (4′, 28, 26) is offset ventrodorsally relative to the contact surface (7) by comparison with the standard prostheses.
2. System according to claim 1, characterized in that a dorsal side is distinguishable on the corrective cover plates (15, 20, 29), and the core-matching surface (4′, 26, 28) is offset dorsally relative to the contact surface (7).
3. System according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the diameter (12′) of the core-matching surface (4′, 26, 28) of the corrective cover plates (15, 20, 29) is smaller than that of the standard cover plates.
4. System according to claim 3, characterized in that it includes a first size category with standard cover plates (1, 2, 21, 22) whose core-matching surfaces (4, 24) have a first diameter (12), and a second size category with standard cover plates (1′, 2′, 21′, 22′) whose core-matching surfaces (4′, 24′, 26) have a second diameter (12′) which is smaller than the first diameter (12), and in that the first size category includes corrective cover plates (15, 20, 29) whose core-matching surface diameters (12′) are identical to the core-matching surface diameter (12′) of the standard cover plates (1′, 2′, 21′, 22′) of the second size category.
5. System according to one of claims 1 to 4, characterized in that it includes corrective prostheses which consist of two corrective cover plates (15), arranged in opposite directions relative to each other, and of a prosthesis core (3′).
6. System according to one of claims 1 to 5, characterized in that the core-matching surfaces (4, 24, 4′, 24′) are spherical articulation surfaces.
7. System according to one of claims 4 to 6, characterized in that it includes corrective cover plates (15) whose width in the mediolateral direction (10) is equal to the width of the standard cover plates (1, 2, 21, 22) in the same size category and whose dimension in the ventrodorsal direction (11) is smaller than that of the standard cover plates (1, 2, 21, 22) in the same size category.
Description
  • [0001]
    It is known to replace damaged intervertebral discs with prostheses which consist of two cover plates, each to be connected to an adjacent vertebral body, and of a prosthesis core, said prosthesis core cooperating with one or both cover plates via complementary spherical surfaces of articulation (EP-B 298 233). The cover plates have contact surfaces by means of which they are connected to the adjacent vertebral bodies. It is desired that the centre of articulation of the prostheses be arranged in such a way that the movements permitted by the prosthesis are as far as possible identical to the natural ones and that forces can be transmitted uniformly between the vertebral bodies and the prosthesis. In known prostheses, this objective is approached by arranging the centre of articulation in a predetermined spatial relationship to the contact surfaces of the cover plates and by providing the cover plates with an edge which bears on the ventral margin of the associated vertebral body and thereby determines the relative position of the cover plate to the vertebral body (EP-B 560 140), or by using an implantation instrument which has a limit stop on the vertebral body (EP-B 333 990). This ensures an at all times identical position of the centre of articulation of the prosthesis in relation to the ventral edge of the vertebral bodies. It is also known (EP-A 955 021), in a system of intervertebral disc prostheses including several categories of different sizes, to provide corrective prostheses which belong on one side to one size category and on the other side to another size category.
  • [0002]
    By means of the abovementioned predetermined spatial relationship of the centre of articulation to the contact surfaces of the prostheses, the desired spatial relationship to the vertebral bodies is achieved only if the anatomical conditions correspond to the normal conditions assumed upon construction of the prosthesis. If, however, for example for anatomical reasons, a centre of articulation is by way of exception to have another position, the prosthesis in question or a cover plate of this prosthesis must be implanted so as to deviate from the normal spatial relationship to the vertebral body, which is difficult and risky.
  • [0003]
    Starting from the prior art last mentioned above, it is therefore an object of the invention to make the implantation of the prosthesis easier and safer for these cases. This is achieved by the features of claim 1 and preferably by the features of the subclaims.
  • [0004]
    A system of intervertebral disc prostheses is assumed which includes standard prostheses and corrective prostheses. The standard prostheses in each size category are identical to each other. A plurality of size categories are normally available, although this is not absolutely necessary. The prostheses consist of a prosthesis core and of at least one cover plate. The prosthesis core cooperates with at least one cover plate via articulation surfaces. The prosthesis core preferably has two articulation surfaces on opposite sides via which it cooperates with complementary articulation surfaces of two cover plates. However, it is also possible for one of the cover plates to cooperate in a non-articulating manner with the prosthesis core via retaining surfaces. Articulation surfaces and retaining surfaces are combined below and in the claims under the term core-matching surfaces. The cover plates have a contact surface to adjoin a vertebral body. In this connection, the invention provides for the corrective prostheses to have at least one corrective cover plate whose core-matching surface is offset ventrodorsally relative to the contact surface by comparison with the standard prostheses.
  • [0005]
    In this way, it is ensured that the centre of articulation of a prosthesis relative to the vertebral body on whose side the corrective cover plate is fitted is offset ventrodorsally compared to the standard prostheses. The offset can be in the ventral direction or the dorsal direction depending on the type and direction of insertion of the cover plate. If the contact surfaces of the corrective cover plates are of symmetrical configuration in relation to their mediolateral centre line, they can either be used with the centre offset in the ventral direction or in the dorsal direction. Since the offset in question is predominantly in the dorsal direction, an essential embodiment of the corrective rective plate according to the invention is distinguished by the fact that the centre of articulation is offset dorsally, provided that the dorsal side can be distinguished on the cover plate.
  • [0006]
    Cases arise in which the intervertebral disc prosthesis tends to be offset in an undesired manner because of considerable curvature of the spinal column or because of high ventrodorsal forces acting between the vertebrae concerned. This is true in particular of those prostheses in which the prosthesis core cooperates with both cover plates via spherical articulation surfaces. In this type of prosthesis, the cover plates are able to move slightly in translation relative to each other in an angular position of the prosthesis core under relative lateral forces. The use of the invention is particularly advantageous in this type of prosthesis because the corrective plates make it possible to arrange the centre of articulation of one cover plate so that it is displaced relative to the centre of articulation of the other cover plate, as a result of which said offset is compensated.
  • [0007]
    The diameter of the articulation surfaces can be chosen as large as possible within the limits of the cover plate in order to keep the surface pressure low. In known prostheses, the articulation surface formed on the cover surface has an only slightly smaller ventrodorsal extent than the cover plate. In these cases the offset of the articulation surface relative to the contact surface can take place only under the proviso that a smaller diameter is chosen for the articulation surface. If the radius of curvature of the articulation surface is left unchanged, the depth of the articulation surface provided in the cover plate decreases as the diameter decreases and thus its ability to transmit forces acting laterally (parallel to the plane of the cover plate). This may be acceptable in some cases, so that this embodiment of the invention is not excluded. However, an embodiment is preferred in which the diameter and the radius of curvature of the articulation surface of the corrective cover plate are chosen to complement the articulation surfaces which belong to another, smaller size category. In the smaller size category, not only is the diameter of the articulation surfaces chosen smaller, but also the radius of curvature. The depth of these smaller articulation surfaces is therefore greater than the depth of an articulation surface of the larger size category, in which only the diameter was reduced, but not the radius of curvature.
  • [0008]
    Choosing an articulation surface (or other core-matching surface) admittedly rules out using the corrective cover plate together with prosthesis parts which belong to the same size category. However, instead of this, prosthesis parts can be used which belong to the smaller size category, on whose basis the articulation surface of the corrective cover plate was chosen. The prosthesis core is preferably in all cases a standard prosthesis core. The second cover plate belonging to the prosthesis is likewise preferably a standard cover plate. However, if a particularly large offset of the two contact surfaces of the prostheses relative to each other is wanted, the second cover plate can also be a corrective cover plate, which is, however, rotated though 180° in relation to the first one so that the offset amounts of both plates are added to each other. It is only if, for some reason, the centre of articulation of the prosthesis is to be displaced ventrally or dorsally in relation to both adjacent vertebrae that corrective cover plates are used in the same orientation on both sides.
  • [0009]
    In the case of the corrective cover plates, as a result of the offset arrangement of the core-matching surface relative to the contact surface, on one side of the core-matching surface there is a distance between this and the plate edge. If this part of the surface is not needed in order to make available as large a contact surface as possible, the plate can be shortened on this side. The contact surface is then the same width in the mediolateral direction as the standard cover plates of the same size category, but its dimension in the ventrodorsal direction is smaller and can correspond to the smaller size category. This can afford advantages in terms of adjustment in cases where the vertebral bodies are wider in the mediolateral direction and narrower in the ventrodorsal direction.
  • [0010]
    The invention is explained in more detail below with reference to the drawing which depicts advantageous illustrative embodiments and in which:
  • [0011]
    [0011]FIG. 1 shows a medial section through a standard prosthesis of a first size category,
  • [0012]
    [0012]FIG. 2 shows a view of the inside of a cover plate of a standard prosthesis of the first size category,
  • [0013]
    [0013]FIG. 3 shows a medial section through a standard prosthesis of a second size category,
  • [0014]
    [0014]FIG. 4 shows a view of the inside of a cover plate of the standard prosthesis according to FIG. 3,
  • [0015]
    [0015]FIG. 5 shows a first embodiment of a corrective prosthesis in medial section,
  • [0016]
    [0016]FIG. 6 shows a view of the inside of the associated corrective cover plate,
  • [0017]
    [0017]FIG. 7 shows a second embodiment of the corrective prosthesis in medial section,
  • [0018]
    [0018]FIGS. 8, 9 show medial sections through standard prostheses of different size categories in a modified embodiment, and
  • [0019]
    [0019]FIGS. 10, 11 show two corrective prostheses for the modified embodiment.
  • [0020]
    The standard prostheses according to FIGS. 1 to 4 consist of a lower cover plate 1, an upper cover plate 2 and a prosthesis core 3. The cover plates form spherical, concave articulation surfaces 4, and the prosthesis core 3 forms two identical convex, spherical articulation surfaces 5 which lie opposite each other and which are designed to complement those of the cover plates. All dimensions of the first size category (FIGS. 1 and 2) are greater than those of the second size category (FIGS. 3 and 4). In addition to the two size categories shown, further size categories can be present within the system.
  • [0021]
    The components of the prosthesis can be made of materials which have proven suitable for endoprostheses, for example metal, ceramic, polyethylene, with the cover plates 1, 2 preferably being made of rigid material (for example metal) and the prosthesis core preferably being made of polyethylene.
  • [0022]
    The cover plates 1, 2 have a contact surface 7 which is intended for connection to the end face of a vertebral body. It can be equipped with means (not shown) for fixed connection to the bone, for example teeth. It is more extensive in the mediolateral direction, which is indicated by the line 10 in FIG. 2, than it is in the ventrodorsal direction 11. The diameter 12 of the. articulation surface 4 in the standard prostheses is as large as is permitted by the dimension of the cover plate in the direction 11. These explanations concerning FIGS. 1 and 2 apply likewise to the second size category according to FIGS. 3 and 4.
  • [0023]
    As is known, such prostheses are able to transmit from vertebra to vertebra the forces extending in the direction of the spinal column, and to a certain extent also the forces extending transverse to the latter, and at the same time they permit swivel movements. If they are implanted between vertebrae between which strong transverse forces act, or between which a substantial directional change takes place, as is often the case for example between the last lumbar vertebra and the sacrum, a displacement of the cover plates and of the vertebrae may occur. This can be compensated for by using a corrective prosthesis 14. It is constructed, for example, as is shown in FIG. 5 or FIG. 7.
  • [0024]
    According to FIG. 5, the corrective prosthesis has an upper cover plate 15 which is designed as a corrective cover plate. The external dimensions of its contact surface 7 and thus the overall surface dimensions are equal to those of the standard cover plate 2 of the first size category. The centre 16 of the articulation surface 4′ provided on its inside is displaced dorsally in relation to the centre line 10 by an amount 17. If one were to use the articulation surface 4 of the standard cover plate for this, it would assume the position 4″ indicated by the broken line in FIG. 2. As this is partially extending out beyond the edge of the standard prosthesis, the latter would have to be provided at this location with a projection or a widening, or the articulation surface would have to be shortened to correspond to the standard edge contour. Both of these options are within the scope of the invention but are not generally expedient. The embodiment according to FIG. 6 is thus preferred, in which use is made of that articulation surface 4′ of the second size category whose diameter 12′ is correspondingly smaller and can therefore be accommodated within the edge of the standard format of the corrective cover plate 15. Matching this articulation surface 4′, the corrective cover plate 15 is combined with a prosthesis core 3′ and a lower cover plate 1′ of the second size category, as is indicated in FIG. 5. If, in this corrective prosthesis, the position of the articulation centre line 16 is compared with the position of the contact surface 7 of the corrective cover plate 15, it can be seen that, unlike in the standard prosthesis, these do not coincide but instead are offset in relation to one another by the amount 17.
  • [0025]
    Instead of being connected to a standard cover plate 1′ of the second size category (FIG. 5), a corrective cover plate 15 turned through 180° can also be used as lower cover plate in the corrective prosthesis (FIG. 7). The offset 17 obtained on the lower cover plate is added to the offset 17 on the upper cover plate with the result that the corrective prosthesis according to FIG. 7 provides twice the offset of that according to FIG. 5.
  • [0026]
    As has been stated, the invention is especially suitable for the prosthesis type shown in FIGS. 1 to 7 in which the prosthesis core 3 has two articulation surfaces 5 opposite each other. However, the invention can also be used in prostheses of the prosthesis type shown in FIGS. 8 to 11. FIGS. 8 and 9 show medial sections through prostheses of different size categories. They consist of a lower cover plate 21, 21′, an upper cover plate 22, 22′ and a prosthesis core 23, 23′. The upper cover plate 22, 22′ and the top of the prosthesis core 23, 23′ are identical to those of the illustrative embodiment discussed above. They afford a possibility of articulated movement along the pair of articulation surfaces 24, 25. The underside of the prosthesis core 23 is made flat. The lower cover plate 21, 21′ and its core-matching surface 26 with edge 27 is designed solely to hold the prosthesis core 23, 23′.
  • [0027]
    According to FIG. 10, the upper cover plate 20 is designed as a corrective cover plate according to the explanations given for FIGS. 5 and 6. It belongs to the first, larger size category. It is combined with a prosthesis core 23′ and a lower cover plate 21′ of the second, smaller size category.
  • [0028]
    Instead of this, it is also possible according to FIG. 11 to use the lower cover plate 29 as corrective plate. It belongs to the first size category and is combined with a prosthesis core 23′ and an upper cover plate 22′ of the second size category. As in the examples discussed above, this therefore results in an offset 17 of the centre of articulation relative to the contact surface of the corrective cover plate.
  • [0029]
    For the sake of simplicity, the offset mentioned in the explanations has been described relative to the contact surface's centre point which, in the standard prostheses, coincides with the centre of articulation of the prosthesis. It goes without saying, however, that the offset can be determined relative to any desired point of the contact surface, in which case its relative position to the articulation centre is to be compared, on the one hand, in a standard cover plate and, on the other hand, upon use of a corrective cover plate.
  • [0030]
    As can be seen in FIG. 6, the edge strip 30 of the corrective cover plate 15 is not needed for accommodating the articulation surface 4′. If it is also not needed with respect to a desired size of the contact surface 7, it can be dispensed with. The cover plate 15 and its contact surface 7 are then delimited for example according to the broken line 31.
Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US6368350 *Mar 11, 1999Apr 9, 2002Sulzer Spine-Tech Inc.Intervertebral disc prosthesis and method
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US7273496 *Oct 14, 2003Sep 25, 2007St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc.Artificial vertebral disk replacement implant with crossbar spacer and method
US7537614 *Sep 18, 2002May 26, 2009Synthes Usa, LlcImplant comprising a two-piece joint
US7582115Sep 30, 2004Sep 1, 2009Helmut WeberIntervertebral prosthesis
US7621956Apr 20, 2004Nov 24, 2009Globus Medical, Inc.Prosthetic spinal disc replacement
US7628813Oct 20, 2003Dec 8, 2009Cervitech, Inc.Cervical intervertebral prosthesis system
US7641666Jul 30, 2004Jan 5, 2010Globus Medical, Inc.Prosthetic spinal disc replacement
US7670377Nov 5, 2004Mar 2, 2010Kyphon SarlLaterally insertable artifical vertebral disk replacement implant with curved spacer
US7691146Nov 5, 2004Apr 6, 2010Kyphon SarlMethod of laterally inserting an artificial vertebral disk replacement implant with curved spacer
US7713304Dec 28, 2005May 11, 2010Globus Medical, Inc.Transforaminal prosthetic spinal disc replacement
US7811329Mar 3, 2006Oct 12, 2010Globus MedicalTransforaminal prosthetic spinal disc replacement and methods thereof
US7828846Sep 11, 2003Nov 9, 2010Biedermann Motech GmbhSpace keeper for vertebrae or intervertebral disks
US7833246Oct 14, 2003Nov 16, 2010Kyphon SĀRLInterspinous process and sacrum implant and method
US7842088 *Jan 27, 2006Nov 30, 2010Ldr MedicalIntervertebral disc prosthesis
US7867279Jan 23, 2006Jan 11, 2011Depuy Spine, Inc.Intervertebral disc prosthesis
US7892262Mar 1, 2006Feb 22, 2011GlobusMedicalPosterior prosthetic spinal disc replacement and methods thereof
US7927374Nov 13, 2006Apr 19, 2011Synergy Disc Replacement, Inc.Artificial spinal disc
US7959678Apr 15, 2005Jun 14, 2011Zimmer GmbhIntervertebral disk implant
US7963994Sep 11, 2003Jun 21, 2011Biedermann Motech GmbhIntervertebral disk prosthesis
US8038716Sep 30, 2008Oct 18, 2011Synergy Disc Replacement, IncArtificial spinal disc
US8062369Jul 8, 2008Nov 22, 2011Cervitech, Inc.Cervical intervertebral prosthesis system
US8092540Apr 16, 2009Jan 10, 2012Synthes Usa, LlcImplant comprising a two-piece joint
US8100974Jun 30, 2005Jan 24, 2012Synergy Disc Replacement, Inc.Artificial spinal disc
US8137404Mar 28, 2006Mar 20, 2012Depuy Spine, Inc.Artificial disc replacement using posterior approach
US8167948Oct 11, 2005May 1, 2012Globus Medical, Inc.Anterior prosthetic spinal disc replacement
US8172904Sep 21, 2006May 8, 2012Synergy Disc Replacement, Inc.Artificial spinal disc
US8231677Jul 31, 2012Synergy Disc Replacement, Inc.Artificial spinal disc
US8241360Aug 14, 2012Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc.Artificial disc device
US8257439Jan 26, 2009Sep 4, 2012Ldr MedicalIntervertebral disc prosthesis
US8262731Jul 19, 2005Sep 11, 2012Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc.Artificial disc device
US8267999Apr 15, 2009Sep 18, 2012Ldr MedicalIntervertebral disc prosthesis
US8277509Dec 7, 2009Oct 2, 2012Globus Medical, Inc.Transforaminal prosthetic spinal disc apparatus
US8282641Jul 12, 2007Oct 9, 2012Depuy Spine, Inc.Methods and instrumentation for disc replacement
US8303661Nov 7, 2007Nov 6, 2012Depuy Spine, Inc.System for intervertebral disk prostheses
US8343219Jun 6, 2008Jan 1, 2013Ldr MedicalIntersomatic cage, intervertebral prosthesis, anchoring device and implantation instruments
US8388684Oct 22, 2003Mar 5, 2013Pioneer Signal Technology, Inc.Artificial disc device
US8454699Oct 27, 2008Jun 4, 2013Synergy Disc Replacement, IncSystems and methods for vertebral disc replacement
US8465546Feb 16, 2007Jun 18, 2013Ldr MedicalIntervertebral disc prosthesis insertion assemblies
US8613768Aug 20, 2010Dec 24, 2013Biedermann Technologies Gmbh & Co. KgSpace keeper for vertebrae or intervertebral disks
US8685103Jul 25, 2012Apr 1, 2014Globus Medical, Inc.Transforaminal prosthetic spinal disc apparatus
US8715352Dec 14, 2006May 6, 2014Depuy Spine, Inc.Buckling disc replacement
US8771284Sep 15, 2012Jul 8, 2014Ldr MedicalIntervertebral disc prosthesis and instrumentation for insertion of the prosthesis between the vertebrae
US8821576Apr 15, 2011Sep 2, 2014Biedermann Technologies Gmbh & Co. KgIntervertebral disk prosthesis
US8852193Nov 25, 2008Oct 7, 2014Synergy Disc Replacement, Inc.Systems and methods for vertebral disc replacement
US8858635Feb 4, 2005Oct 14, 2014Ldr MedicalIntervertebral disc prosthesis
US8894709Oct 27, 2008Nov 25, 2014Synergy Disc Replacement, Inc.Systems and methods for vertebral disc replacement
US8968407Jun 10, 2011Mar 3, 2015Zimmer GmbhIntervertebral disk implant
US8974532Aug 22, 2011Mar 10, 2015Ldr MedicalIntervertebral disc prosthesis
US8979932Nov 29, 2010Mar 17, 2015Ldr MedicalIntervertebral disc prosthesis
US9017410Oct 26, 2011Apr 28, 2015Globus Medical, Inc.Artificial discs
US9125754Sep 30, 2008Sep 8, 2015Synergy Disc Replacement, Inc.Artificial spinal disc
US9168149 *Oct 28, 2014Oct 27, 2015NaVasive, Inc.Total disc replacement system and related methods
US9173745Jun 13, 2011Nov 3, 2015Ldr MedicalInstruments and methods for removing fixation devices from intervertebral implants
US9198770Jul 31, 2013Dec 1, 2015Globus Medical, Inc.Artificial disc devices and related methods of use
US9233011May 5, 2014Jan 12, 2016Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc.Systems and apparatuses for inserting an implant in intervertebral space
US9237958Mar 4, 2008Jan 19, 2016Synergy Disc Replacement Inc.Joint prostheses
US9241807Dec 21, 2012Jan 26, 2016Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc.Systems and methods for inserting a spinal device
US20040117021 *Sep 11, 2003Jun 17, 2004Lutz BiedermannInvertebral disk prosthesis
US20040172135 *Oct 14, 2003Sep 2, 2004St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc.Artificial vertebral disk replacement implant with crossbar spacer and method
US20050004572 *Sep 11, 2003Jan 6, 2005Lutz BiedermannSpace keeper for vertebrae or intervertebral disks
US20050033437 *Oct 22, 2003Feb 10, 2005Pioneer Laboratories, Inc.Artificial disc device
US20050043800 *Apr 20, 2004Feb 24, 2005Paul David C.Prosthetic spinal disc replacement
US20050085911 *Oct 20, 2003Apr 21, 2005Cervitech, Inc.Cervical intervertebral prosthesis system
US20050256577 *Sep 18, 2002Nov 17, 2005Mathys Medizinaltechnik AgImplant comprising a two-piece joint
US20050256581 *Jul 19, 2005Nov 17, 2005Pioneer Laboratories, Inc.Artificial disc device
US20050261772 *Apr 15, 2005Nov 24, 2005Zimmer GmbhIntervertebral disk implant
US20060036325 *Oct 11, 2005Feb 16, 2006Globus Medical Inc.Anterior prosthetic spinal disc replacement
US20060069437 *Sep 30, 2004Mar 30, 2006Helmut WeberIntervertebral prosthesis
US20060223639 *Dec 15, 2005Oct 5, 2006Aruze Corp.Game chip
US20070010826 *Mar 1, 2006Jan 11, 2007Rhoda William SPosterior prosthetic spinal disc replacement and methods thereof
US20070088441 *Sep 21, 2006Apr 19, 2007Synergy Disc Replacement, Inc.Artificial Spinal Disc
US20070173936 *Jan 23, 2006Jul 26, 2007Depuy Spine, Inc.Intervertebral disc prosthesis
US20070233244 *Mar 28, 2006Oct 4, 2007Depuy Spine, Inc.Artificial Disc Replacement Using Posterior Approach
US20070233261 *Mar 28, 2006Oct 4, 2007Depuy Spine, Inc.Artificial Disc Replacement Using Posterior Approach
US20070260316 *Apr 30, 2007Nov 8, 2007Aesculap Ag & Co. KgKit for an intervertebral implant and intervertebral implant
US20080133013 *Jun 30, 2005Jun 5, 2008Synergy Disc Replacement, Inc.Artificial Spinal Disc
US20080215156 *Mar 4, 2008Sep 4, 2008Synergy Disc ReplacementJoint Prostheses
US20080269905 *Jul 8, 2008Oct 30, 2008Cervitech, Inc.Cervical intervertebral prosthesis system
US20090043392 *Sep 30, 2008Feb 12, 2009Synergy Disc Replacement, Inc.Artificial Spinal Disc
US20090043393 *Sep 30, 2008Feb 12, 2009Synergy Disc Replacement, Inc.Artificial Spinal Disc
US20090069894 *Nov 13, 2006Mar 12, 2009Synergy Disc Replacement, Inc.Artificial Spinal Disc
US20090076616 *Oct 27, 2008Mar 19, 2009Synergy DiscSystems and Methods for Vertebral Disc Replacement
US20090228108 *Nov 7, 2007Sep 10, 2009Link Spine Group, Inc.System for intervertebral disk prostheses
US20110040385 *Aug 20, 2010Feb 17, 2011Biedermann Motech GmbhSpace keeper for vertebrae or intervertebral disks
US20110082556 *Apr 7, 2011Synergy Disc Replacement, Inc.Artificial Spinal Disc
US20110137421 *Jun 9, 2011Noah HansellTransforaminal Prosthetic Spinal Disc Apparatus
US20110196498 *Aug 11, 2011Biedermann Motech GmbhIntervertebral disk prosthesis
US20110238185 *Sep 29, 2011Zimmer GmbhIntervertebral disk implant
US20150045896 *Oct 28, 2014Feb 12, 2015Nuvasive, Inc.Total disc replacement system and related methods
US20150173912 *Mar 4, 2015Jun 25, 2015Globus Medical, Inc.Six degree spine stabilization devices and methods
CN101296671BSep 23, 2006Dec 26, 2012Ldr医疗公司椎间盘假体
WO2006004848A1 *Jun 30, 2005Jan 12, 2006Synergy Disc Replacement IncArtificial spinal disc
Classifications
U.S. Classification623/17.14
International ClassificationA61F2/30, A61F2/00, A61F2/44
Cooperative ClassificationA61F2310/00179, A61F2002/443, A61F2002/30616, A61F2002/30604, A61F2002/30841, A61F2310/00017, A61F2002/30662, A61F2/4425
European ClassificationA61F2/44D2
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Apr 2, 2004ASAssignment
Owner name: LINK SPINE GROUP, INC., CONNECTICUT
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:KELLER, ARNOLD;REEL/FRAME:015276/0315
Effective date: 20040107
May 6, 2013ASAssignment
Owner name: DEPUY SPINE, LLC, MASSACHUSETTS
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:DEPUY SPINE, INC.;REEL/FRAME:030352/0673
Effective date: 20121230
Owner name: DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, LLC, MASSACHUSETTS
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:HAND INNOVATIONS LLC;REEL/FRAME:030352/0722
Effective date: 20121231
Owner name: HAND INNOVATIONS LLC, FLORIDA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:DEPUY SPINE, LLC;REEL/FRAME:030352/0709
Effective date: 20121230
Feb 24, 2015ASAssignment
Owner name: DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC., MASSACHUSETTS
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, LLC;REEL/FRAME:035074/0647
Effective date: 20141219