US20040180777A1

US20040180777A1 - Alkali resistant ceramic media

Info

Publication number: US20040180777A1
Application number: US10/810,092
Authority: US
Inventors: Xueren Cao
Original assignee: Individual
Current assignee: Individual
Priority date: 2002-04-16
Filing date: 2004-03-26
Publication date: 2004-09-16
Also published as: US6800242B2; US20030211370A1

Abstract

The present invention relates to novel ceramic media or ceramic media coatings comprising mainly magnesia, silicon dioxide, and alumina, with forsterite and spinel as the dominant crystalline phases, which show high resistance to alkali attack at high temperature. Ceramic materials having these characteristics are particularly well suited for use as heat-exchange media in regenerative thermal oxidizers (RTOs) for the wood process industry.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/372,953 filed on Apr. 16, 2002.[0001]

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to ceramic regenerative heat transfer media for use in Regenerative Thermal Oxidizers.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Conventional ceramic heat-transfer media used in RTOs typically consist of 70˜75% SiO ₂, 20˜25% Al₂O₃, 2˜5% K₂O or Na₂O, and trace amounts of Fe, Ca, and Ti. The media can be shaped like honeycombs, plates, saddles, or other forms. When ceramic media having such composition are used in an alkaline environment, reactions will occur between the surface of the media and the alkaline component.

between the surface of the media and the alkaline component.

As a result, a layer of reaction products builds up on the surface of the media, which increases in thickness over time such that the effective void fraction of the media is decreased. The reduction in void fraction eventually reaches a point at which the increased pressure drop of gas flowing through the media impairs the operating efficiency and performance of the equipment, which then has to be shut down to permit replacement of the media. This not only adds to the cost of media, but it may also result in lost production.

Alkali-resistant ceramics used in the metal finishing and glass industries contains silicon carbide, silicon nitride, alumina, zirconia, and similar materials that have to be formed under high pressure. As a result, these ceramics are quite expensive. More importantly, these ceramic compositions cannot be shaped using ordinary methods, so they often cannot be made into the same shapes as conventional ceramic media.

U.S. Pat. No. 5,731,250 to Reid et al. teaches the use of zircon-based ceramic bodies made from a composition that can be formed by conventional processes. However, zircon is expensive, and it would be useful to make heat-exchange media from a material with even better resistance to alkali attack.

As is well known, regenerative thermal oxidizers (RTO) usually consist of two or more heat-exchange canisters with one combustion chamber. Heat-transfer media are installed in the heat-exchange canisters in order to store and release heat.

In the wood process industry, the waste gas treated by RTOs often contains substantial amounts of solid particulates. Analysis by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) indicates that the residue left on the media by partial oxidation of such solid particulates consists of:

TABLE 1


Composition of char/ash residue from wood dust

Component

	C	O	Na	Mg	Al	Si	S	K	Ca

Percent	68.56	27.71	0.83	0.71	0.36	0.5	0.5	0.44	0.37

Additional analysis using Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) shows that wood ash contains large amounts of Na ₂SO₄, K₂CO₃, CaCO₃, MgO, Al₂O₃, SiO₂and other inorganic compounds. At the operating temperature of an RTO (850° C.), these components can become corrosive. The corrosive nature of these compounds can cause chemical reactions with ordinary porcelain or stoneware. These reactions can reduce the void fraction of the media and impair the performance of the RTO.

Analysis of media that had been installed in an RTO for ten months reveals that the surface layer of the media contained the same components as wood ash, indicating that the wood ash has reacted with that layer of ceramic material.

TABLE 2


Surface compostion of chemical porcelain media after 10
months in RTO

Component

	C	O	Na	Mg	Al	Si	S	K	Ca

Percent	20.34	42.88	15.12	0.7	7.57	9.59	3.17	0.33	0.7

Analysis by AES and X-ray diffraction spectroscopy shows that the surface layer consists of sodium aluminosilicate (Na ₂AlSiO₄), potassium aluminosilicate (K₂AlSiO₄), and various other compounds of potassium, calcium, aluminum, silicon and/or sulfur. These are the reaction products that cause problems with the media.

There is therefore a need for an economical alkali-resistant ceramic material that can solve the problem of chemical attack by hot alkali in RTOs.

DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides an alkali-resistant material comprising 20˜80 wt % MgO, 10˜50 wt % SiO ₂, 5˜30 wt % Al₂O₃, and 1˜10 wt % Fe₂O₃, CaO, Ka₂O and/or Na₂O, with forsterite and spinel being the dominant crystalline phases.

The MgO may be derived from oxides of magnesium or from talc. The SiO ₂and Al₂O₃may be derived from clay.

The alkali-resistant material in accordance with the present invention can be formed in the same way as conventional ceramic media. The raw materials are ground up into particles, 80% of which are smaller than 50 microns and mixed with water to form a paste which can be extruded or pressed into shape, then dried and fired at 1,250° C.˜1,450° C.

This alkali-resistant material can also be applied as a surface coating to conventional ceramic media shapes. The coated product is then fired at 1,250° C.˜1,450° C. Among the chemical reactions that may occur are the following:

Al₂O₃+MgO→MgAl₂O₄

Al₂O₃+2MgO→Mg₂Al₂O₅

2MgO+SiO₂→Mg₂SiO₄

After firing, the material has porosity less than 5% by volume, water absorption less than 5% by weight, and compressive strength greater than 2×10 ⁸N/m². Analysis by x-ray diffraction spectroscopy reveals the characteristics peaks of forsterite and spinel, indicating that these are the predominant crystalline phases. There is no evidence of any quartz phase.

The ceramic material in accordance with the present invention, when used at temperatures between 200˜1,100° C., shows high resistance to alkali attack.

EXAMPLE 1

Ceramic saddles were prepared from the alkali-resistant material in accordance with present invention. The alkali-resistant material was prepared from the following raw materials:

Alkali-Resistant Ceramic Material

			Chemical
			Composition
			of the Raw
	Raw Materials		Materials
	(weight %)		(weight %)

Roasted Magnesia	80	MgO	76.3
Ceramic Clay	14	SiO₂	13.6
Limestone	5	Al₂O₃	5.2
Water Glass	1.0	CaO	2.9
Carboxymethyl	1.5	K₂O	0.4
Cellulose
		Na₂O	1.4
		Fe₂O₃	0.2

The raw materials listed above were ground in the dry state to a particle size less than 50 microns for 80% of the particle. Water is then mixed into the ground material to make a homogeneous paste. A pressure filter was then used to remove the excess water. Once the water content was less than 23%, the mixture was formed into the shape of saddles. The shaped material was dried for two hours at 110° C., then fired at 1,350° C. in a kiln for 19 hours. [0021]
1. Accelerated Alkali Corrosion Test: [0022]

Specimens of conventional chemical porcelain saddles, zircon-based ceramic bodies (Ty-Pak™ Heat Sink Media (HSM) from Norton Chemical Process Inc., Akron, Ohio) and the alkali-resistant saddles in accordance with the present invention were buried under pure potassium carbonate (melting point 891° C.). The saddles and the K ₂CO₃were heated to 950° C. and kept at that temperature for 8 hours. This allowed molten K₂CO₃to contact the specimens on all sides. The specimens were then cooled, washed with water, and dried.

TABLE 3


Corrosion resistance of porcelain, zircon-based ceramic (Ty-
Pak ™ HSM), and alkali-resistant saddles in accordance with
the present invention after 8 hours in molten K₂CO₃

	Weight
Weight	after	Weight
before	Test	Change
Test	W₂	(%)
W₁(gm.)	(gm.)	ΔW

Porcelain	11.0625	8.1572	−26.3%
Saddles
Ty-Pak ™ HSM	4.6687	4.4869	−3.9%
Alkali	10.2478	11.0957	0.2%
Resistant
Saddles

As shown in Table 3, porcelain saddles and Ty-Pak™ HSM lost 26% and 3.9% of their original weights, respectively, due to K[0024] ₂CO₃corrosion. The weight change for alkali-resistant saddles in accordance with the present invention was only 0.2%. At high temperatures, K₂CO₃reacted with SiO₂, the main component of porcelain, to form a 1-mm layer of glassy, water-soluble K₂SiO₄. After washing with water, the porcelain saddles lost 26% of their mass. In contrast, little glaze formed on the alkali-resistant saddles in accordance with the present invention, and they lost very little mass when washed.
Physical examination revealed that the size of the porcelain saddle decreased due to corrosion. The surface of the Ty-Pak™ HSM also revealed some corrosion, and surface flaking. In contrast, the alkali-resistant saddles in accordance with the present invention showed very little change on the surface. [0025]
2. Ash Build-Up Resistance Test: [0026]

Porcelain saddles, zircon-based ceramic bodies, and alkali-resistant saddles in accordance with the present invention were buried under wood ash. The wood ash was heated to 870° C. and maintained at that temperature for 40 hours. The specimens were then washed, dried and weighed.

TABLE 4


Build-up of residue on porcelain, zircon-based
ceramic (Ty-Pak ™ HSM),
and alkali-resistant saddles in accordance with the
present invention after 40 hours in wood ash

Weight	Weight
before	after
Test	Test	Weight
W₁	W₂	Change (%)
(gm.)	(gm.)	ΔW

Porcelain	10.6687	11.1168	4.2
Saddles
Ty-Pak ™ HSM	12.1354	12.2946	1.31
Alkali	11.2245	11.2918	0.6
Resistant
Saddles

As can be seen in Table 4, the alkali-resistant saddles in accordance with the present invention saddles showed the lowest weight change, suggesting good resistance to wood ash build-up. The alkali-resistant saddles did not significantly react with alkaline components of wood ash. The surface of the alkali-resistant saddles was covered with the deposits of the low-melting-point components in wood ash, which washed off easily. In contrast, the SiO[0028] ₂in the porcelain saddles reacted with the wood ash at high temperature. The wood ash was therefore chemically bound to the porcelain saddles. With a combination of physical and chemical attachment, the overall weight of the porcelain saddles increased significantly.
3. Stress Test: [0029]
Porcelain saddles, zircon-based ceramic bodies (Ty-Pak™ HSM), and alkali-resistant saddles in accordance with th present invention were heated to 870° C. and the temperature maintained for 30 min. The saddles were then allowed cool in ambient air. This test was repeated until the saddles cracked. [0030]

TABLE 5

Thermal stress test of porcelain, zircon-based

ceramic (Ty-Pak ™ HSM), and alkali-

resistant saddles in accordance with the

present invention

Alkali

Breakage after Porcelain Resistant

cycles Saddles Ty-Pak ™ HSM Saddles

10 3% 0% 0%

20 10% 0% 0%

50 100% 0% 0%

100 0% 2%
The normal operating temperature of RTOs is 850° C. The specimens were heated to 870° C. for this test, or 20° C. higher than normal operating temperature. This test showed that alkali-resistant saddles in accordance with the present invention have good resistance to thermal stress. [0031]
4. Crushing Strength, Water Absorption, and Porosity: [0032]
The crushing strength of the material was measured by the ASTM C515 standard test method. The water absorption and porosity were measured by the ASTM C373 standard test method. The results were as follows: [0033]

TABLE 6

Properties of conventional porcelain and alkali-resistant

ceramic saddles in accordance with the present invention

Crushing

Strength of Water

Saddles (N/m²) Absorption (%) Porosity (%)

Porcelain 1,270 0.2 0.5

Saddles

Alkali 2,168 0.4 1.1

Resistant

Saddles

EXAMPLE 2

A batch of alkali-resistant saddles with slightly different composition was prepared and tested the same way as in Example 1.

Alkali-Resistant Ceramic Material

			Chemical
			Composition
			of the Raw
	Raw Material		Materials
	(weight %)		(weight %)

Light Magnesia	40	MgO	44.6
Powdered Talc	27	SiO₂	38.2
Ceramic Clay	30	Al₂O₃	10.4
Calcium Carbonate	3	CaO	1.6
Carboxymethyl	1	K₂O	1.8
Cellulose
		Na₂O	0.9
		Fe₂O₃	0.5

Test results: [0035]
Accelerated Alkali Corrosion Test: ΔW (%)=0.6% [0036]
Thermal Stress Test: Breakage after 20 cycles=0% [0037]

EXAMPLE 3

Alkali-Resistant Ceramic Material

			Chemical
			Composition
			of the Raw
	Raw Material		Materials
	(weight %)		(weight %)

Light Magnesia	22	MgO	25.4
Powdered Talc	16	SiO₂	47.2
Ceramic Clay	54	Al₂O₃	20.1
Barium Carbonate	3	BaO	1.6
Water Glass	4	CaO	2.4
Carboxymethyl	1	K₂O	1.0
Cellulose
		Na₂O	1.2
		Fe₂O₃	0.5

Test results: [0039]
Accelerated Alkali Corrosion Test: ΔW (%)=1.8% [0040]
Thermal Stress Test: Breakage after 20 cycles=2.0% [0041]

EXAMPLE 4

A mixture of 80 wt % roasted magnesia, 10 wt % ceramic clay, 9.0 wt % limestone, 1 wt % water glass, and 1 wt % carboxymethyl cellulose was ground to a particle size of less than 30 microns. This mixture was then applied as a coating onto saddles made of ordinary clay (75 wt % SiO[0042] ₂, 20 wt % Al₂O₃, 4 wt % K₂O or Na₂O, 2 wt % Fe₂O₃). The saddles were then dried at 110° C., and fired at 1,300° C. in a kiln.
Test results: [0043]
Accelerated Alkali Corrosion Test: ΔW (%)=0.8% [0044]
Thermal Stress Test: Breakage after 20 cycles=10% [0045]
From the above examples and data, it will therefore be clear that, by controlling the composition as taught in the present invention, it is possible to produce a ceramic material that is substantially resistant to attack by alkali salts within the operating environment of a RTO. [0046]

Claims

I claim:

1) An alkali-resistant material comprising:

20 to 80% by weight of MgO;

10 to 50% by weight of SiO₂;

5 to 30% by weight Al₂O₃; and

1 to 10% by weight Fe₂O₃, CaO, and alkali oxides.

2) The alkali-resistant material of claim 1 wherein the dominant crystalline phases are forsterite and spinel.

3) The alkali-resistant material of claim 1 wherein the alkali oxide is Ka₂O.

4) The alkali-resistant material of claim 1 wherein the alkali oxide is Na₂O.

5) The alkali-resistant material of claim 1 wherein the MgO is derived from oxides of magnesium.

6) The alkali-resistant material of claim 1 wherein the MgO is derived from talc.

7) The alkali-resistant material of claim 1 wherein the SiO₂is derived from clay.

8) The alkali-resistant material of claim 1 wherein the Al₂O₃is derived from clay.

9) A process for the production of an alkali-resistant ceramic body comprising the steps of:

a) grinding together a mixture comprising 0% to 50% by weight of light magnesia, 0% to 85% by weight of roasted magnesia, 10% to 60% by weight of ceramic clay, 0% to 15% by weight of limestone, 0% to 3% by weight of water glass, 0% to 3% by weight of carboxymethyl cellulose, 0% to 30% by weight of talc, and 0% to 30% by weight of calcium or barium carbonate to a particle size of less than 50 microns for 80% of the particles;

b) mixing the ground mixture with water to produce a paste containing less than 30% by weight of water;

c) shaping the paste to a desired shape;

d) drying the shaped product at a temperature greater than 100 degrees centigrade to make it suitable for firing in a kiln; and

e) firing the dried shaped product in a kiln at 1,250 to 1,450 degrees centigrade.

10) A process for coating a conventional ceramic body with an alkali-resistant ceramic coating comprising the steps of:

i) preparing an alkali resistant ceramic coating by grinding together 75% to 85% by weight of roasted magnesia, 5% to 10% by weight of ceramic clay, 0% to 15% by weight of limestone, 0% to 2% by weight of water glass, and 0.5% to 2% by weight of carboxymethyl cellulose to a particle size of less than 40 microns for 80% of the particles;

ii) mixing the ground mixture with water to produce a paste containing less than 30% by weight of water;

iii) applying a coating of the alkali resistant material paste to the surface of the conventional ceramic body;

iv) drying the coated ceramic body at a temperature greater than 100 degrees centigrade; and

v) firing the dried coated ceramic body in a kiln at 1,200 to 1,400 degrees centigrade.

11) An alkali-resistant ceramic body comprising:

20 to 80% by weight of MgO;

10 to 50% by weight of SiO₂;

5 to 30% by weight Al₂O₃; and

1 to 10% by weight Fe₂O₃, CaO, and alkali oxides.

12) The alkali-resistant ceramic body of claim 11 wherein the dominant crystalline phases are forsterite and spinel.

13) The alkali-resistant ceramic body of claim 11 wherein the alkali oxide is Ka₂O.

14) The alkali-resistant ceramic body of claim 11 wherein the alkali oxide is Na₂O.

15) The alkali-resistant ceramic body of claim 11 wherein the MgO is derived from oxides of magnesium.

16) The alkali-resistant ceramic body of claim 11 wherein the MgO is derived from talc.

17) The alkali-resistant ceramic body of claim 11 wherein the SiO₂is derived from clay.

18) The alkali-resistant ceramic body of claim 11 wherein the Al₂O₃is derived from clay.

19) The alkali-resistant ceramic body of claim 11 wherein the porosity is less than 5% by volume.

20) The alkali-resistant ceramic body of claim 11 wherein the water absorption is less than 5% by weight

21) The alkali-resistant ceramic body of claim 11 wherein the compressive strength of the ceramic material is greater than 2×10⁸Newtons per square meter.

22) The alkali-resistant ceramic body of claim 11 wherein the loss in weight of the alkali-resistant ceramic body is less than one percent when exposed to molten potassium carbonate.

23) The alkali-resistant ceramic body of claim 11 wherein the gain in weight of the alkali-resistant ceramic body is less than one percent when exposed to wood ash at greater than 800 degrees centigrade.

24) A ceramic body coated with an alkali-resistant material, the alkali resistant coating comprising:

20 to 80% by weight of MgO;

10 to 50% by weight of SiO₂;

5 to 30% by weight Al₂O₃;

and 1 to 10% by weight Fe₂O₃, CaO, and alkali oxides.

25) The ceramic body of claim 24 wherein the dominant crystalline phases of the alkali resistant coating are forsterite and spinel.

26) The ceramic body of claim 24 wherein the porosity of the alkali resistant coating is less than 5% by volume.

27) The ceramic body of claim 24 wherein the water absorption of the alkali resistant coating is less than 5% by weight.

28) The ceramic body of claim 24 wherein the alkali oxide is Ka₂O.

29) The ceramic body of claim 24 wherein the alkali oxide is Na₂O.

30) The alkali-resistant material of claim 24 wherein the MgO is derived from oxides of magnesium.

31) The alkali-resistant material of claim 24 wherein the MgO is derived from talc.

32) The alkali-resistant material of claim 24 wherein the SiO₂is derived from clay.

33) The alkali-resistant material of claim 24 wherein the Al₂O₃is derived from clay.