Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20040213342 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 10/785,499
Publication dateOct 28, 2004
Filing dateFeb 24, 2004
Priority dateJun 30, 1998
Also published asDE69939006D1, EP1038365A2, EP1038365B1, US6724844, WO2000001085A2, WO2000001085A3
Publication number10785499, 785499, US 2004/0213342 A1, US 2004/213342 A1, US 20040213342 A1, US 20040213342A1, US 2004213342 A1, US 2004213342A1, US-A1-20040213342, US-A1-2004213342, US2004/0213342A1, US2004/213342A1, US20040213342 A1, US20040213342A1, US2004213342 A1, US2004213342A1
InventorsMonisha Ghosh
Original AssigneeMonisha Ghosh
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Method and device for improving DFE performance in a trellis-coded system
US 20040213342 A1
A method and device for improving DFE performance in a trellis coded system by placing a short adaptive predictive filter after the DFE in order to whiten the error sequence at the output of the DFE.
Previous page
Next page
What is claimed is:
1-2. Cancelled.
3. A device for improving DFE performance, comprising:
an input which receives an output of a DFE;
an adaptive filter having an adaptive filter input and an adaptive filter output, the adaptive filter input coupled to the input; and
an output coupled to the adaptive filter output for supplying an output signal to a DDFSE trellis decoder, which output signal is the DFE output signal with a smaller whiter error than the error in the output of the DFE.
4. The device as claimed in claim 3, wherein the adaptive filter is adapted to receive a training sequence that adapts filter taps in the adaptive filter such that the adaptive filter acts to whiten the error in the output of the DFE.
5. The device as claimed in claim 4, wherein the adaptive filter further includes a LMS algorithm which is used to adapt the filter taps.
6. The device as claimed in claim 5, wherein the
i = 1 L g g i 2 P
adaptive filter further includes a device for comparing where gi is a filter tap and P is a power constraint imposed on the LMS algorithm to limit amplitude of the filter taps.
7. A method of improving DFE performance, comprising the steps of:
receiving an output signal from the DFE which includes k+ek;
adaptively filtering k+ek;
providing the adaptively filtered k+ek to a DDFSE.
8-11. Cancelled.

[0001] This is a Divisional of application Ser. No. 09/107,546, filed Jun. 30, 1998.


[0002] 1. Field of the Invention

[0003] The present invention is directed in general to digital signal processing, and in particular to receiver based methods and devices for improving decision feedback equalizer (“DFE”) performance in a trellis coded system.

[0004] 2. Background of the Invention

[0005] In many digital communication scenarios (e.g. telephone transmission, broadcast TV transmission, cable etc.) The transmitted signal arrives at the receiver through more than one path in addition to the direct path. This condition is called “multipath” and leads to intersymbol interference (“ISI”) in the digital symbol stream. This ISI is compensated for in the receiver through an equalizer which in many cases is a DFE as shown in FIG. 1. U.S. Pat. No. 5,572,262 shows one method of combating these multipaths.

[0006] A DFE 10 (FIG. 1) has two filter sections, a forward filter 12 and a feedback filter 16. The input to the forward filter 12 is the received data which includes the transmitted symbol sequence ak, noise nk and multipath hi. The input to the feedback filter 16 is the quantized equalizer output k. The output of both the sections are summed 18 to form the final equalizer output k which is also the input to the next stage in a trellis-coded system, the trellis decoder. While a DFE performs better than a linear equalizer in severe ISI, the performance is limited by error propagation through the feedback filter 16 of the DFE 10. Error propagation occurs in the feedback filter 16 when the quantized equalizer output k is not the same as the transmitted symbol ak. If an error is made in determining the symbol k at the output of the slicer 11, this incorrect symbol is fed back to the input of the feedback filter 16 and propagates. In many systems which employ error correction codes like trellis codes and/or Reed-Solomon codes to obtain very low error rates at moderate SNRs, the “raw” symbol error rate (SER) at the equalizer output can be extremely high. For example, in the VSB system, at threshold in white noise the SER at the equalizer output is about 0.2. The increased error propagation due to these high SERs can cause the DFE to lose a couple of dB in performance as compared to the case of no error propagation. Additionally, the error propagation causes the error sequence at the equalizer output to be correlated, since it depends on past incorrect symbol decisions. This correlation has an adverse effect on the subsequent trellis decoder which is usually designed for a white noise sequence.


[0007] Accordingly, it is an object of the invention to reduce the mean-squared-error (MSE) and correlation of the DFE output error sequence. This object is achieved by placing a short adaptive predictor filter after the DFE in order to whiten the error sequence. The ISI introduced into the data symbol stream by this filter is then compensated in the trellis decoder by the use of delayed decision feedback sequence estimation (DDFSE) as described in “Delayed decision-feedback sequence estimation,” by A. Duel-Hallen and C. Heegard, IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. COM-37, no. 5, pp. 428-436, May 1989.

[0008] The invention has applications in any trellis coded system that utilizes a DFE for equalization, especially in cases where the SER after the equalizer is high and error propagation causes problems. An example is terrestrial transmission of digital TV signals.

[0009] The invention can also be used in trellis coded systems with DFEs which are subject to colored noise interference. Again, the DFE cancels much of the interference but the adaptive predictor serves to whiten the noise further. This helps improve the trellis decoder performance.

[0010] The invention accordingly comprises the several steps and the relation of one or more of such steps with respect to each of the others, and the apparatus embodying features of construction, combinations of elements and arrangement of parts which are adapted to effect such steps, all as exemplified in the following detailed disclosure, and the scope of the invention will be indicated in the claims.


[0011] For a more complete understanding of the invention reference will be had to the following drawings:

[0012]FIG. 1 shows a standard DFE;

[0013]FIG. 2 shows a DFE in accordance with the invention; and

[0014]FIG. 3 shows a DFE in accordance with the invention during a training sequence.


[0015]FIG. 1 is a diagram of the standard decision feedback equalizer 10 (DFE). The DFE includes a forward filter 12, a slicer 14, a feedback filter 16 and a subtractor 18. Let ak be the transmitted trellis-coded symbol stream. The received signal rk r k = i = 0 L h - 1 h i a k + d h - i + n k

[0016] after multi-path distortion and added noise nk can be written as where hi, i=0 . . . Lh−1 is the multipath channel of length lh and delay dh, and nk is the additive noise which in general is neither gaussian nor white. The forward filter 12 is used to remove the pre echo or ghosts in the received signal. The slicer 14 quantizes the signal to the nearest symbol k. If an error is made in this quantization the error is passed to the feedback filter 16 and remains in the system. The output of the feedback filter 16 is subtracted from the output of the forward filter 12 to provide k. k is an estimate of the transmitted symbol ak plus, an error ek. a k = i = 0 L f - 1 f i r k + d f - i + i = 1 L b b i E ' k - d b - i

[0017] It can also be expressed as:

[0018] where fi, i=0 . . . Lf−1 are the forward equalizer taps, bi, i=1 . . . Lb are the feedback taps, df is the delay through the forward equalizer, db is the delay in the feedback equalizer and k is the constellation point closet to k. In the absence of error propagation, i.e. if k=ak, the error sequence ek at the equalizer output 20 is white. However, in most cases the error propagation causes this error sequence to be correlated, that is, the noise samples are no longer independent. The “colored” noise affects the performance of a trellis coder, because a trellis coder is optimized for performance in a channel having all white guassian noise.

[0019] In accordance with the invention, as shown in FIG. 2, an adaptive filter 22 is placed at the output of the DFE 10 but before a trellis decoder (not shown). The output of filter 22 can be y k = a k + i = 1 L g g i a k - i

[0020] expressed as

[0021] where (1, g1 , g 2, g3 . . . gLg) are the taps of the adaptive filter.

[0022] Since k=ak+ek, then the adaptive filter output can be written y k = a k + i = 1 L g g i a k + i + e k + i = 1 L g g i e k - i = a k + i = 1 L g g i a k + i + e k

[0023] as

[0024] If the filter taps are chosen so as to minimize the variance of e′k, the SNR of the sequence yk can be improved. In addition, since e′k is the prediction error sequence of the equalizer output error sequence ek, it will be white see Widrow and Stearns, “Adaptive Signal Processing,” (hereby incorporated by reference), at pages 99-116), which does not affect the performance of a trellis decoder.

[0025] Training of the Adaptive Filter

[0026] To minimize the error from the output of the DFE, or in other words to tune the adaptive filter taps g to the error ek, the adaptive filter 22 is first placed through a training sequence as shown in FIG. 3. In many applications, such as digital TV, the training sequence is part of the transmitted signal. After the equalizer 10 has converged (via blind means, without using the signal ak, or trained means which uses the signal ak) the adaptive filter 22 receives a training sequence which is the difference between the output of the DFE k and the transmitted symbol sequence ak. This difference is the error ek produced by the DFE.

−a k =e k   (5)

[0027] This error sequence ek is then input into the adaptive filter 22. The adaptive filter 22 forms an output sequence xk as shown in FIG. 3, where x k = e k + i = 1 L g g i e k - i

g (k+1)= g (k)−μx k e (k)

[0028] The filter taps gk are adapted using the LMS algorithm as follows where g= and e(k)=ek−1, ek−2, . . . ek−Lg]. This adaptation adapts the filter taps to minimize the mean squared, error ek 2, of the DFE.

[0029] Since the trellis decoder uses the taps [g1, g2, . . . gLg] in a feedback loop, error propagation can also occur hence it is also beneficial to limit the size of the taps g during adaptation, so that the trellis decoder that uses these taps does not suffer error propagation. If g is too small, however, the efficiency of the adaptive filter is reduced. Accordingly, an additional power constraint is imposed on the LMS algorithm to limit the amplitude of the taps which reduces the error propagation in the DDFSE trellis decoder (described next). A parameter P is chosen such that it is required that i = 1 L g g i 2 P

[0030] At each step of the LMS algorithm this condition is tested, and if violated, the taps are rescaled appropriately.

[0031] The Adaptive Filter and DDFSE

[0032] Once the adaptive filter 22 is appropriately trained to minimize ek, k=ak+ek is input to the adaptive filter 22. The adaptive filter 22 although it has been trained to minimize ek, it will also distort k. Equation 9 shows this distortion and y k = a k + i = 1 L g g i a k - i

[0033] represents the output of adaptive filter 22 as follows: As stated above, if the filter taps g are chosen to minimize ek, the SNR of the sequence yk can be improved. yk, however, is a distorted k and includes the ISI introduced into the data stream by the adaptive filter 22. This distortion is then compensated for in the trellis decoder by use of delayed decision feedback sequence estimation (DDFSE)as described in A. Duel-Hallen and C. Heegard, “Delayed decision-feedback Sequence Estimation,” IEEE Trans. Common., Vol. Com-37, no. 5, pp. 428-436, May 1989, hereby incorporated by reference, and as summarized below.

[0034] From the definition of yk, we see that an optimum trellis decoder which will remove the distortion of k, should minimize the k [ y k - a k - i = 1 L g g i a k - i ] 2

[0035] metric (maximum likelihood decoding):

[0036] This equation, however, requires past symbol sequences ak−i to be saved, and each tap gi in the adaptive filter therefore introduces more memory into the system which causes the number of steps of a trellis decoder to grow exponentially with the number of taps in the adaptive filter 22. Therefore an expanded trellis is necessary to accommodate the memory (ak−i) introduced by the adaptive filter 22.

[0037] A suboptimum, but computationally less intensive way of performing the trellis decoding is to instead minimize the k [ y k - a k - i = 1 L g g i E ' k - i , j ] 2

[0038] following metric:

[0039] where the sequence k−i,j, i=1, . . . Lg is the survivor symbol sequence associated with state j in the trellis. This scheme does not expand the number of states in the original trellis, but instead introduces decision-feedback in each of the trellis states. That is, since this scheme uses k−i, which is merely an estimate of, rather than the actual value ak−i, there is no memory introduced into the system. Since there is no memory, an expanded trellis is not required, i.e. the number of states in the trellis remains the same even with the additional adaptive filter 22.

[0040] There is the possibility of error propagation in this implementation and hence the precaution is taken in the LMS algorithm of limiting the amplitude of the filter taps. The optimum value of P will depend on the trellis code and application. In the United States HDTV example, simulation results indicate that a value of P=0.15 gives good performance.

[0041] It will thus be seen that the objects set forth above, among those made apparent from the preceding description, are efficiently attained and, since certain changes may be made in carrying out the above method and in the construction set forth without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, it is intended that all matter contained in the above description and shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3723911 *Sep 13, 1971Mar 27, 1973Codex CorpTraining adaptive linear filters
US5777910 *Nov 19, 1996Jul 7, 1998Thomson Multimedia S.A.Sparse equalization filter adaptive in two dimensions
US6118812 *Jan 30, 1998Sep 12, 2000Lucent Technologies Inc.Digital equalization in the presence of quantization noise
US6285709 *Oct 31, 1997Sep 4, 20013 Com CorporationError filtering in a hybrid equalizer system
US6570863 *Nov 16, 1999May 27, 2003Electronics And Telecommunications Research InstituteApparatus and method for adaptive CDMA detection based on constrained minimum mean squared error criterion
US6724844 *Jun 30, 1998Apr 20, 2004Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.Method and device for improving DFE performance in a trellis-coded system
US6934345 *Jan 17, 2001Aug 23, 2005Adtran, Inc.Apparatus, method and system for correlated noise reduction in a trellis coded environment
US20030193366 *Apr 16, 2002Oct 16, 2003Tobe BarksdaleDemodulating
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US7194029 *Oct 8, 2003Mar 20, 2007Broadcom CorporationMulti-pair gigabit ethernet transceiver having adaptive disabling or circuit elements
US7483481 *Aug 31, 2004Jan 27, 2009Adtran, Inc.System and method for adaptively updating precoder taps
US7570701Dec 4, 2007Aug 4, 2009Broadcom CorporationMulti-pair gigabit ethernet transceiver
US7733952Mar 20, 2007Jun 8, 2010Broadcom CorporationMulti-pair gigabit Ethernet transceiver having adaptive disabling of circuit elements
US7801240Nov 18, 2008Sep 21, 2010Broadcom CorporationMulti-pair gigabit ethernet transceiver
US7801241Aug 3, 2009Sep 21, 2010Broadcom CorporationMulti-pair gigabit Ethernet transceiver
US8451885Jun 8, 2010May 28, 2013Broadcom CorporationMulti-pair gigabit ethernet transceiver having adaptive disabling of circuit elements
US8787439 *Mar 13, 2012Jul 22, 2014Lsi CorporationDecision feedforward equalization
US20120002762 *Jan 5, 2012Intelleflex CorporationSingle or dual complex subcarrier downconversion
US20130243066 *Mar 13, 2012Sep 19, 2013Lsi CorporationDecision feedforward equalization
U.S. Classification375/233
International ClassificationH04L25/03, H04B7/005, H04L1/00
Cooperative ClassificationH04L2025/0349, H04L2025/03617, H04L2025/03382, H04L1/0054, H04L25/03057
European ClassificationH04L1/00B5L, H04L25/03B1A7