Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20040254643 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 10/769,230
Publication dateDec 16, 2004
Filing dateJan 30, 2004
Priority dateNov 12, 2002
Also published asUS6685742
Publication number10769230, 769230, US 2004/0254643 A1, US 2004/254643 A1, US 20040254643 A1, US 20040254643A1, US 2004254643 A1, US 2004254643A1, US-A1-20040254643, US-A1-2004254643, US2004/0254643A1, US2004/254643A1, US20040254643 A1, US20040254643A1, US2004254643 A1, US2004254643A1
InventorsRoger Jackson
Original AssigneeJackson Roger P.
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Articulated anterior expandable spinal fusion cage system
US 20040254643 A1
Abstract
An articulated modular spinal fusion cage is implanted in the intervertebral space and adjusted in situ from an anterior access position to support adjacent vertebrae in normal curved alignment. The cage includes a first leg having a cylindrical pivot member and a second leg having a socket. The socket permits pivotal movement of the first leg with respect to the second leg to an anteriorly open, wedge-shaped orientation which may be selectively angularly adjusted. The laterally elongated socket and pivot member form a fulcrum that is positioned anteriorly from the posterior leg ends to enhance torsional stability and increase anterior preload. A driver is inserted through a bore in the socket and corresponding groove in the flange and is operable to engage a sloped interior surface of the first leg and to urge the anterior end upwardly by rotating the pivot member within the socket.
Images(3)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(1)
What is claimed and desired to be secured by Letters Patent is as follows:
1. A spinal fusion cage apparatus for implanting between adjacent vertebrae and comprising:
a) an inferior leg with an inferior support surface for supporting engagement with an inferior vertebra;
b) a superior leg with a superior support surface for supporting engagement with a superior vertebra adjacent said inferior vertebra;
c) said superior leg being pivotally connected to said inferior leg by a pivot joint having a lateral axis to form an articulated spinal fusion cage having a posterior end and an opposed anterior end;
d) a threaded driver member adjustably engaged between said inferior leg and said superior leg to position said superior leg at a selected angle relative to said inferior leg;
e) said pivot joint being inset a selected distance anteriorly from said posterior end of said cage to impart a selected spacing and relative angular relationship between said inferior and superior vertebrae;
f) said pivot joint including a knuckle positioned on said inferior leg and extending toward said superior leg, said knuckle having an elongated cylindrical socket extending laterally thereof;
g) said knuckle having a threaded bore formed therethrough and threadedly receiving said driver member;
h) said pivot joint including a cylindrical pivot member extending laterally across said superior leg, said pivot member being received in said knuckle to pivotally connect said superior leg to said inferior leg;
i) said pivot member having a notch formed therein to enable clearance by said driver member;
j) said notch in said pivot member cooperating with said driver member to prevent relative lateral displacement of said superior leg and said inferior leg;
k) said superior leg including a sloped inferior bearing surface;
l) said driver member including a head;
m) said driver member head engages said sloped inferior bearing surface to position said superior leg at a selected angle relative to said inferior leg;
n) said sloped inferior bearing surface including a groove for receiving said driver member;
o) said inferior and superior support surfaces including ports for permitting bone cells to grow therethrough and fuse said inferior and superior vertebrae;
p) said inferior and superior support surfaces each including serrations for preventing disengagement of said spinal fusion cage from said inferior and superior vertebrae; and
q) said superior leg including a stop structure for abutting engagement with said inferior leg.
Description
    CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • [0001]
    The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/292,723 entitled ARTICULATED ANTERIOR EXPANDABLE FUSION CAGE SYSTEM, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,685,742.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • [0002]
    The present invention is broadly concerned with a spinal fusion cage system. More particularly, it is directed to an articulated implant which can be installed between a pair of adjacent vertebrae and selectively expanded in situ to form a wedge with an adjustable angle of inclination for supporting and stabilizing the vertebrae in normal curved alignment in order to promote fusion of the aligned vertebrae.
  • [0003]
    The spine is a column of stacked vertebrae which are normally axially aligned along the median plane. When viewed from the front or back, the spine appears to be straight. When viewed from a lateral perspective, however, it is shown to be comprised of four distinct curves. Each vertebra is angularly displaced in the coronal plane in accordance with its position along one of the respective curves.
  • [0004]
    The structure of each vertebra includes a rounded, weight bearing anterior element, or vertebral body, which is separated from the adjacent superior and inferior vertebral bodies and cushioned by fibrocartilage pads or discs. These intervertebral discs support the adjacent vertebrae in an appropriate angular orientation within a respective spinal curve and impart flexibility to the spine so that it can flex and bend yet return to its original compound curvate configuration.
  • [0005]
    Aging, injury or disease may cause damage to the discs or to the vertebrae themselves. When this occurs, it may be necessary to surgically remove a disc and fuse the adjacent vertebral bodies into a single unit. Such surgical arthrodesis is generally accomplished by implanting a cage-like device in the intervertebral or disc space. The cages are apertured, and include a hollow interior chamber which is packed with live bone chips, one or more gene therapy products, such as bone morphogenic protein, cells that have undergone transduction to produce such a protein, or other suitable bone substitute material. Following implantation, bone from the adjacent vertebrae above and below the cage eventually grows through the apertures, fusing with the bone of the adjacent vertebral bodies and fixing the adjacent vertebrae as well as the cage in position.
  • [0006]
    Once the disc has been removed from the intervertebral space, the angular orientation of the adjacent vertebrae is established and stabilized by the three dimensional geometry of the implanted fusion cage, and the vertebrae will eventually fuse in this orientation. The lumbar curve presents a region of normal anterior convexity and posterior concavity or lordosis. There is a need for an anterior implant for use in this region which can be adjusted in situ to achieve and maintain normal lordosis of the vertebrae.
  • [0007]
    Previous attempts to achieve normal spinal curvature with fusion cages have involved trial insertion of cages of various different sizes into the intervertebral space. The cage is repeatedly removed and replaced with another unit of a slightly different size until an optimal angular incline is achieved. There is a need for a modular and articulated implant which can be installed in a first configuration, and adjusted in situ into a wedge configuration from an anterior access position.
  • [0008]
    Once installed in an intervertebral space, spinal implants are subject to compressive forces exerted by gravity and movement of the spinal column. Normal forward bending activity exerts substantially greater compressive force on the vertebrae than backward bending. Consequently, there is a need for an implant which will accept an increased anterior preload to withstand anterior compressive forces and to maintain the disc space height.
  • [0009]
    Spinal implants are also subject to twisting forces caused by unequal lateral distribution of weight on the adjacent vertebral bodies. This may occur, for example, during normal sideward bending and reaching activity. There is also a need for an implant which will provide torsional stability to resist such twisting forces. In particular, in order to withstand the greater compressive forces associated with forward bending movements, there is a need for an implant that will provide enhanced anterior torsional stability.
  • [0010]
    The apparatus of the present invention is specifically designed to provide a modular intervertebral implant which can be both installed and selectively expanded in situ from an anterior access position to form a wedge which stabilizes the adjacent vertebrae in normal curved alignment while providing lateral stability, increased anterior preload and enhanced anterior torsional stability.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • [0011]
    The present invention is directed to an articulated modular cage system for implantation in the intervertebral space and adjustment in situ from an anterior access position to support the adjacent vertebrae in a normal curved alignment while permitting fusion of the adjacent bones. The fusion cage system of the present invention includes a first leg having a pivot member, a second leg having a socket for receiving the pivot member and a driver. The socket permits movement of the first leg about an axis of pivotal rotation from a closed, parallel insertion position to an anteriorly open, wedge-shaped orientation which may be selectively adjusted to provide appropriate angular support. The socket and pivot member are laterally elongated to provide lateral support. The pivot member includes a cylindrical notch or aperture, and the socket includes a threaded bore which are aligned for receiving a driver.
  • [0012]
    The driver is operable to engage a sloped interior surface of the first leg and to urge the anterior end of the first leg apart from the anterior end of the second leg while causing the pivot member to rotate within the socket. Registry of the driver within both the bore and the aperture serves to prevent lateral displacement of the pivot member within the socket. The pivot member and socket are inset or positioned anteriorly of the posterior ends of the respective legs in order to enhance torsional stability and to optimize the anterior preload. This is achieved by decreasing a moment arm length between an effective area of engagement of the adjacent vertebrae and the location of the connection between the legs of the cage. Positioning the pivot axis anterior of the posterior ends of the legs also helps to optimize the intervertebral spacing and angular alignment of the adjacent vertebrae to avoid undesirably stressing the next vertebrae beyond the vertebrae engaged by the fusion cage.
  • [0013]
    Objects and advantages of this invention will become apparent from the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein are set forth, by way of illustration and example, certain embodiments of the invention.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0014]
    [0014]FIG. 1 is a partially exploded perspective view of an articulated expandable spinal fusion cage system in accordance with the present invention, illustrating a threaded driver.
  • [0015]
    [0015]FIG. 2 is a fragmentary side elevational view of the cage of FIG. 1 installed between adjacent vertebrae, showing a bore and interior surfaces in phantom to illustrate the path of installation of the driver.
  • [0016]
    [0016]FIG. 3 is a view similar to FIG. 2, illustrating the driver installed between the bearing surfaces of the legs and the anterior portions of adjacent vertebrae displaced to achieve lordosis.
  • [0017]
    [0017]FIG. 4 is a front elevational view taken along line 4-4 of FIG. 3 showing an anterior end of the top leg with the driver omitted.
  • [0018]
    [0018]FIG. 5 is a rear elevational view taken along line 5-5 of FIG. 3 showing a posterior end of the top leg with the driver omitted.
  • [0019]
    [0019]FIG. 6 is a bottom plan view taken along line 6-6 of FIG. 2, showing a bottom side of the top leg of the cage with the driver omitted.
  • [0020]
    [0020]FIG. 7 is a front elevational view taken along line 7-7 of FIG. 3 showing an anterior end of the bottom leg with the driver omitted.
  • [0021]
    [0021]FIG. 8 is a top plan view taken along line 8-8 of FIG. 2 showing a top side view of the bottom leg with the driver omitted.
  • [0022]
    The drawings constitute a part of this specification and include exemplary embodiments of the present invention and illustrate various objects and features thereof.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • [0023]
    As required, detailed embodiments of the present invention are disclosed herein; however, it is to be understood that the disclosed embodiments are merely exemplary of the invention, which may be embodied in various forms. Therefore, specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting, but merely as a basis for the claims and as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art to variously employ the present invention in virtually any appropriately detailed structure.
  • [0024]
    Certain terminology will be used in the following description for convenience in reference only and is not intended to be limiting. For example, the words “anterior”, “posterior”, “superior” and “inferior” and “lateral” and their derivatives will refer to the device as it may be installed in anatomical position as depicted in FIGS. 2-3.
  • [0025]
    Referring now to the drawings, an articulated anterior expandable spinal fusion cage system in accordance with the invention is generally indicated by the reference numeral 1 and is depicted in FIGS. 1-8. FIGS. 2 and 3 illustrate a partial side view of a human spine showing an intervertebral region 2, which is the functional location of implantation of the fusion cage system 1, between the vertebral bodies of selected upper and lower adjacent vertebrae 3 and 4.
  • [0026]
    Referring again to FIG. 1, the fusion cage system 1 broadly includes a fusion cage 10 and a driver 11. The cage 10 includes a first leg 12 depicted and normally installed in a superior orientation and adjustably coupled with a second, normally inferior leg 13 by a pivot joint or bearing 14 positioned posteriorly of a centerline C, passing midway between the ends. The first leg 12 has an anterior end 15, a posterior end 16 and a pair of opposed sides 20 interconnected by a central web portion 21. The sides of the cage 20 are depicted as generally planar and orthogonal to the web portion 21, although they may also be of curvate, angular or compound curvate or angular construction. The legs 12 and 13 are normally of the same width and length, but it is also foreseen that either of the legs 12 and 13 may be of somewhat broader construction in order to selectively enhance the superior or inferior bone-supporting surface area.
  • [0027]
    The first leg 12 includes an outer, bone-supporting surface 22 and an inner surface 23, best shown in FIG. 6. The web 21 is apertured by one or more ports or windows 24, which extend between the outer and inner surfaces 22 and 23.
  • [0028]
    The leg inner surface 23 includes an anterior portion 30 and a posterior portion 31. The anterior portion 30 has a linear cam or bearing surface 32 that terminates posteriorly in a first abutment surface or stop 33 that is generally orthogonal to the outer surface 22. When viewed from the side (FIGS. 1-3), the bearing surface 32 slopes downwardly at an angle as it approaches the second end 16 in the configuration of a ramp or wedge having the abutment surface 33 as its base. The posterior portion 31 extends in generally parallel relationship with the web outer surface 22 except for a dependent, generally cylindrical pivot member 34 having a pivot axis P. The pivot member 34 depends the entire width of the cage 10 between the sides 20 and includes a central notch, aperture or groove 35 (FIGS. 4-6) for receiving the driver 11.
  • [0029]
    The leg outer surface 22 includes a series of serrations or teeth 40 for engaging the surface of a respective adjacent vertebra 3 against slippage along an anterior-posterior axis within the intervertebral joint 2. The leg inner surface 23 is generally smooth. The anterior bearing surface 32 is axially grooved to form a channel 41 (FIG. 6) adapted for sliding reception of the driver 11.
  • [0030]
    The second leg 13 has an anterior first end 42, a posterior second end 43 and a pair of opposed sides 44 interconnected by a central web portion 45. The leg 13 also includes an outer, bone-supporting surface 50 and an inner surface 51, best shown in FIG. 8. The web 45 is apertured by one or more ports or windows 52, which extend between the outer and inner surfaces 50 and 51.
  • [0031]
    The leg inner surface 51 includes an anterior portion 53 and a posterior portion 54. The anterior portion 53 has a support surface 55 that extends in generally parallel relationship with the leg outer surface 50. The posterior portion 54 also extends in generally parallel relationship with the leg outer surface 50, except for an upstanding, approximately rectangular knuckle 60. The knuckle 60 is elongated laterally, so that it extends the full width of the cage 10 between the sides 44.
  • [0032]
    The knuckle 60 includes anterior, posterior, and upper or superior surfaces 61, 62 and 63 (FIG. 3). The superior surface 63 includes a laterally extending, generally cylindrical channel which serves as a socket 64 for receiving the cylindrical pivot member 34 of the first leg 12 in pivoting relationship to form the pivot bearing 14. The laterally elongated pivot member 34 and socket 64 cooperatively provide lateral support to the cage 10 against sideward bending stresses which may be brought to bear following installation.
  • [0033]
    The anterior and posterior knuckle surfaces 61 and 62 are generally orthogonal to the outer surface 50, and the anterior surface 61 serves as an abutment surface or stop for the first leg abutment surface 33. The upper knuckle surface 63 is generally parallel with the outer surface 50, except that the posterior aspect is somewhat relieved so that it does not serve as a stop when the first leg 12 pivots in the socket 64 of the second leg 13. As shown in FIGS. 7 and 8, the knuckle 60 includes a central bore 65 having flighting or threads 70 for receiving and engaging the driver 11.
  • [0034]
    Like the first leg 12, the second leg outer surface 50 includes a series of bone-engaging serrations or teeth 71 (FIG. 2). The leg inner surface 51 is generally smooth. The first and second leg anterior portions 15 and 42 cooperatively define an open-sided chamber 72 when the cage 10 is assembled as depicted in FIGS. 1-3.
  • [0035]
    The driver 11 is depicted in FIG. 1 to include a radially expanded head 73 and a shaft 74 terminating in a generally flattened driving end 75. The shaft 74 is sized and shaped for reception within channel 41, and preferably includes threads 80 for operable reception within matingly threaded bore 65, with the radially expanded driver head 73 engaging the angled bearing surface 32 of the upper leg 12. It is also foreseen that in certain applications the shaft 74 could be smooth and unthreaded. The driver head 73 is coupled with the shaft 74 by a generally frustoconical shank portion 81, and terminates in a narrow, generally cylindrical bearing surface 82. The head 73 also includes a non-round socket or receiver 83 configured for non-slip reception of a driving tool such as a wrench (not shown). While the receiver 83 is depicted as being generally hexagonal in shape, it is understood that it may be configured as a square, slot, multi-lobular or any other shape corresponding to a preselected driving tool.
  • [0036]
    The diameter of the driver head 73 and the length of the shaft 74 are sized so that the driver 11 extends posteriorly through the channel 41 of the upper leg 12 for driving registry of the shaft 74 within the groove 35 of the first leg and central bore 65 of the lower leg 13 and engagement of the driver head bearing surface 82 with the angled bearing surface 32 of the upper leg 12. In this manner, the channel 41, groove 35 and bore 65 cooperate with the shaft 74 of the driver 11 to effectively lock the legs 12 and 13 against lateral displacement.
  • [0037]
    The legs 12 and 13 and driver 11 may be constructed of a non-metallic material such as carbon fiber reinforced composite or tissue-derived polymer material, or of a strong, inert material having a modulus of elasticity such as a metal, like stainless steel or titanium alloy, or of porous tantalum or any other biocompatible material or combination of materials. It is foreseen that it may be desirable in certain applications to employ a radiolucent material such as carbon fiber reinforced composite which will not block post operative radiographic images of bridging bone growth.
  • [0038]
    It is also foreseen that the fusion cage system 1 may also include a pair of independently adjustable cages 10, installed in generally side-by-side relationship within a single intervertebral space 2, as set forth more fully in U.S. Pat. No. 6,454,807 and incorporated herein by reference.
  • [0039]
    In use, the anterior surface of a selected intervertebral region 2 of the spine of a patient is surgically exposed. The soft tissues are separated, the disc space is distracted and the disc is removed, along with any bone spurs which may be present. The disc space is distracted to a predetermined height which serves to decompress any affected nerve roots and to permit preparation of the intervertebral region 2.
  • [0040]
    The fusion cage system 1 is assembled by a surgeon or assistant by laterally aligning the cylindrical pivot member 34 of the first leg 12 with the socket 64 of the second leg 13 and sliding the pivot member 34 laterally into engagement with the socket 64 until the groove 35 is aligned with the bore 65. The driver 11 is next grasped and the threaded end 75 is introduced into the bore 65 and rotated by hand or with the use of an insertion tool until the threads 80 of the driver shaft 74 engage the threads 70 of the bore 65. Registry of the driver 11 within both the groove 35 of the first leg 12 and the bore 65 of the second leg serves to prevent any lateral movement or play of the pivot member 34 within the socket 64. The driver 11 may be rotated a few additional turns in order to secure against disengagement from the bore 65 during insertion. However, unless the intervertebral space 2 is substantially larger than the cage 10, rotation is generally stopped when the conical shank 81 engages the bearing surface 32 of the first leg 12, so that the cage 10 can be inserted in its smallest, or closed configuration.
  • [0041]
    The first and second leg anterior first ends 15 and 42 are next grasped and pressed together until the first leg abutment surface 33 comes to rest against the second leg abutment surface or stop 61 and the cage 10 is maximally compressed. The assembled fusion cage 10 presents a closed, overall rectangular configuration, with the outer surfaces 22 and 50 of the legs 12 and 13 in a generally parallel orientation, as depicted in FIGS. 1 and 2 and the driver 11 projecting slightly anteriorly from the cage 10.
  • [0042]
    The cage 10 may be press-fit directly into the distracted intervertebral region 2, or the vertebrae 3 and 4 may be predrilled to receive the cage system 1. Although an anterior approach is preferred, it is foreseen that a posterior or even lateral approach could also be employed.
  • [0043]
    The surgeon next positions a tool (not shown) in the driver head 73 and rotates the tool in a clockwise or posteriorly advancing direction to drive or pull the threaded shaft 74 further into the bore 52 and advance the head 73 in a posterior direction. Continued rotation of the driver 11 simultaneously causes the end 75 to advance posteriorly, the pivot member 34 to rotate within the socket 64, and the bearing surface 32 of the first leg 12 to ride up over the beveled shank 81 until the bearing surface 82 of the driver 11 engages the bearing surface 32 of the first leg 12. In this manner, rotational advancement of the driver 11 causes it to progressively wedge the bearing surface 32 apart from the support surface 55 of the second leg 13 until the cage 10 begins to assume a generally wedge shape when viewed from the side.
  • [0044]
    In this manner, the angle formed by the outer, bone supporting surfaces 22 and 50 of the legs 12 and 13, is determined by the displacement of the bearing surfaces 32 of the first leg 12 away from the support surface 55 of the second leg 13, which in turn is determined by the posterior advancement of the driver bearing surface 82 along the first leg bearing surface 32. The driver 11 is of a preselected size to cause displacement of the first leg 12 to form the cage 10 into an appropriate wedge shape which will support the adjacent vertebrae 3 and 4 at the proper height as well as the desired angular alignment to achieve normal curvature of the respective spinal region.
  • [0045]
    Advantageously, the laterally elongate cylindrical configuration and anteriorly inset or forward positioning of the pivot bearing 14 cooperatively formed by the pivot member 34 and socket 64, relative to the posterior ends 16 and 43 of the legs 12 and 13, enhance both the lateral and torsional stability of the cage system 1 as well as its anterior preload. The configuration of the channel 41 for receiving the driver shaft 74 and the anterior preload also cooperate to enhance torsional stability.
  • [0046]
    The surgeon next transplants a quantity of packed bone cells or a suitable bone substitute material into the chamber 72 by a lateral approach through the open area between the first and second legs 12 and 13. Alternatively, the bone cells may be introduced into the chamber 72 by a posterior approach through the bore 65 prior to installation of the driver 11 or by any combination of these methods. Bone for use in the graft may be harvested from the patient as live bone, from a bone bank or from a cadaver. Demineralized bone matrix, bone morphogenic protein or any other suitable material may also be employed.
  • [0047]
    Following implantation, the bone grows between vertebrae 3 and 4, through the windows 24 and 52 with the bone in the chamber 72 and around the cage system 1 to fuse the bodies of vertebrae 3 and 4 together.
  • [0048]
    Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the fusion cage 10 may also be assembled and installed into the intervertebral space 2 prior to insertion of the driver 11 into the bore 65. In addition, while a single exemplary driver 11 and cage 10 having a wedge-shaped first leg 12 is depicted, a variety of drivers 11 and cages 10, having variously configured bearing surfaces 32 of different shapes, each producing a different degree of displacement of the first leg 12 may be incorporated in a set to allow the surgeon to preselect a cage system 1 to achieve a desired angle of displacement and consequent positioning of the vertebrae 3, 4 relative to each other. It is foreseen that various other configurations of the pivot bearing 14 could be advantageously employed in the cage system 1.
  • [0049]
    The cage system 1 of the invention is designed to permit adjustment by rotation of the driver 11 in situ until the desired alignment between the vertebra 3 and 4 is achieved. However, if necessary, the cage system 1 may also be removed and the installation repeated using a cage 10 and driver 11 having different configurations until the desired angular alignment is achieved.
  • [0050]
    It is to be understood that while certain forms of the present invention have been illustrated and described herein, it is not to be limited to the specific forms or arrangement of parts described and shown.
Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US4013071 *Nov 11, 1975Mar 22, 1977Lior RosenbergFasteners particularly useful as orthopedic screws
US4863476 *Aug 28, 1987Sep 5, 1989Shepperd John A NSpinal implant
US5015255 *May 10, 1989May 14, 1991Spine-Tech, Inc.Spinal stabilization method
US5055104 *Nov 6, 1989Oct 8, 1991Surgical Dynamics, Inc.Surgically implanting threaded fusion cages between adjacent low-back vertebrae by an anterior approach
US5059193 *Apr 19, 1990Oct 22, 1991Spine-Tech, Inc.Expandable spinal implant and surgical method
US5258031 *Dec 14, 1992Nov 2, 1993Danek MedicalIntervertebral disk arthroplasty
US5263953 *Dec 31, 1991Nov 23, 1993Spine-Tech, Inc.Apparatus and system for fusing bone joints
US5458638 *Nov 6, 1992Oct 17, 1995Spine-Tech, Inc.Non-threaded spinal implant
US5489307 *Sep 1, 1994Feb 6, 1996Spine-Tech, Inc.Spinal stabilization surgical method
US5489308 *Sep 1, 1994Feb 6, 1996Spine-Tech, Inc.Spinal implant
US5554191 *Jan 23, 1995Sep 10, 1996BiomatIntersomatic vertebral cage
US5593409 *Feb 17, 1995Jan 14, 1997Sofamor Danek Group, Inc.Interbody spinal fusion implants
US5609636 *Jan 11, 1996Mar 11, 1997Spine-Tech, Inc.Spinal implant
US5653763 *Mar 29, 1996Aug 5, 1997Fastenetix, L.L.C.Intervertebral space shape conforming cage device
US5658337 *Apr 17, 1996Aug 19, 1997Spine-Tech, Inc.Intervertebral fusion implant
US5665122 *Jan 31, 1995Sep 9, 1997Kambin; ParvizExpandable intervertebral cage and surgical method
US5669122 *Apr 29, 1996Sep 23, 1997Salomon S.A.Tightening lever with adjustable hook
US5669909 *Mar 30, 1995Sep 23, 1997Danek Medical, Inc.Interbody fusion device and method for restoration of normal spinal anatomy
US5683391 *Jun 7, 1995Nov 4, 1997Danek Medical, Inc.Anterior spinal instrumentation and method for implantation and revision
US5693100 *Mar 15, 1996Dec 2, 1997Pisharodi; MadhavanMiddle expandable intervertebral disk implant
US5702453 *May 13, 1996Dec 30, 1997Sofamor Danek GroupAdjustable vertebral body replacement
US5776197 *Dec 11, 1996Jul 7, 1998Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Adjustable vertebral body replacement
US5776198 *Mar 10, 1997Jul 7, 1998Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Adjustable vertebral body replacement
US5782832 *Oct 1, 1996Jul 21, 1998Surgical Dynamics, Inc.Spinal fusion implant and method of insertion thereof
US5782919 *Mar 27, 1995Jul 21, 1998Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Interbody fusion device and method for restoration of normal spinal anatomy
US5797909 *Jun 7, 1995Aug 25, 1998Michelson; Gary KarlinApparatus for inserting spinal implants
US5865847 *Jul 29, 1997Feb 2, 1999Sulzer Spine-Tech Inc.Lordotic spinal implant
US5885287 *Sep 29, 1997Mar 23, 1999Spine-Tech, Inc.Self-tapping interbody bone implant
US5980522 *Nov 21, 1997Nov 9, 1999Koros; TiborExpandable spinal implants
US6080193 *Sep 15, 1998Jun 27, 2000Spinal Concepts, Inc.Adjustable height fusion device
US6102950 *Jan 19, 1999Aug 15, 2000Vaccaro; AlexIntervertebral body fusion device
US6117174 *Sep 16, 1998Sep 12, 2000Nolan; Wesley A.Spinal implant device
US6129763 *Sep 12, 1997Oct 10, 2000Chauvin; Jean-LucExpandable osteosynthesis cage
US6159244 *Jul 30, 1999Dec 12, 2000Suddaby; LoubertExpandable variable angle intervertebral fusion implant
US6159245 *Nov 9, 1999Dec 12, 2000Meriwether; Michael W.Box cage for intervertebral body fusion
US6165219 *Mar 6, 1998Dec 26, 2000Sulzer Spine-Tech Inc.Lordotic spinal implant
US6176882 *Feb 19, 1999Jan 23, 2001Biedermann Motech GmbhIntervertebral implant
US6179875 *Jun 16, 1999Jan 30, 2001Ulrich Gmbh & Co. KgImplant for fusing lumbar vertebrae and method of using same
US6183517 *Dec 16, 1998Feb 6, 2001Loubert SuddabyExpandable intervertebral fusion implant and applicator
US6193757 *Oct 29, 1998Feb 27, 2001Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Expandable intervertebral spacers
US6231609 *Feb 10, 1999May 15, 2001Hamid M. MehdizadehDisc replacement prosthesis
US6332895 *Mar 8, 2000Dec 25, 2001Loubert SuddabyExpandable intervertebral fusion implant having improved stability
US6454807 *Nov 30, 2000Sep 24, 2002Roger P. JacksonArticulated expandable spinal fusion cage system
US6610093 *Jul 28, 2000Aug 26, 2003Perumala CorporationMethod and apparatus for stabilizing adjacent vertebrae
US6658336 *May 11, 2001Dec 2, 2003General Motors CorporationMethod and system of cooperative collision mitigation
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US7204853Aug 5, 2003Apr 17, 2007Flexuspine, Inc.Artificial functional spinal unit assemblies
US7318839 *Jul 22, 2004Jan 15, 2008Ebi, L.P.Expandable spinal implant
US7465317Apr 6, 2007Dec 16, 2008Ebi, LlcExpandable spinal implant
US7556651 *Jan 7, 2005Jul 7, 2009Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Posterior spinal device and method
US7708778May 20, 2005May 4, 2010Flexuspine, Inc.Expandable articulating intervertebral implant with cam
US7744649 *Jun 25, 2007Jun 29, 2010Moore Mark RSpondylolisthesis correction apparatus and method
US7753958Feb 3, 2005Jul 13, 2010Gordon Charles RExpandable intervertebral implant
US7785351Mar 8, 2006Aug 31, 2010Flexuspine, Inc.Artificial functional spinal implant unit system and method for use
US7794480Mar 8, 2006Sep 14, 2010Flexuspine, Inc.Artificial functional spinal unit system and method for use
US7799082Mar 8, 2006Sep 21, 2010Flexuspine, Inc.Artificial functional spinal unit system and method for use
US7811326 *Jan 30, 2006Oct 12, 2010Warsaw Orthopedic Inc.Posterior joint replacement device
US7837732Nov 19, 2004Nov 23, 2010Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Intervertebral body fusion cage with keels and implantation methods
US7909869Feb 12, 2004Mar 22, 2011Flexuspine, Inc.Artificial spinal unit assemblies
US7959677Jan 19, 2007Jun 14, 2011Flexuspine, Inc.Artificial functional spinal unit system and method for use
US8034081Feb 6, 2007Oct 11, 2011CollabComl, LLCInterspinous dynamic stabilization implant and method of implanting
US8052723Mar 8, 2006Nov 8, 2011Flexuspine Inc.Dynamic posterior stabilization systems and methods of use
US8118869Mar 8, 2006Feb 21, 2012Flexuspine, Inc.Dynamic interbody device
US8118870May 20, 2005Feb 21, 2012Flexuspine, Inc.Expandable articulating intervertebral implant with spacer
US8118871May 20, 2005Feb 21, 2012Flexuspine, Inc.Expandable articulating intervertebral implant
US8123810May 20, 2005Feb 28, 2012Gordon Charles RExpandable intervertebral implant with wedged expansion member
US8147550May 20, 2005Apr 3, 2012Flexuspine, Inc.Expandable articulating intervertebral implant with limited articulation
US8157844Oct 22, 2007Apr 17, 2012Flexuspine, Inc.Dampener system for a posterior stabilization system with a variable length elongated member
US8162994Oct 22, 2007Apr 24, 2012Flexuspine, Inc.Posterior stabilization system with isolated, dual dampener systems
US8172903May 20, 2005May 8, 2012Gordon Charles RExpandable intervertebral implant with spacer
US8182514Oct 22, 2007May 22, 2012Flexuspine, Inc.Dampener system for a posterior stabilization system with a fixed length elongated member
US8187330Oct 22, 2007May 29, 2012Flexuspine, Inc.Dampener system for a posterior stabilization system with a variable length elongated member
US8211178Jun 18, 2009Jul 3, 2012Warsaw OrthopedicIntervertebral implant with a pivoting end cap
US8257439Jan 26, 2009Sep 4, 2012Ldr MedicalIntervertebral disc prosthesis
US8257440May 20, 2005Sep 4, 2012Gordon Charles RMethod of insertion of an expandable intervertebral implant
US8267939Feb 28, 2008Sep 18, 2012Stryker SpineTool for implanting expandable intervertebral implant
US8267965Oct 22, 2007Sep 18, 2012Flexuspine, Inc.Spinal stabilization systems with dynamic interbody devices
US8267999Apr 15, 2009Sep 18, 2012Ldr MedicalIntervertebral disc prosthesis
US8343219Jun 6, 2008Jan 1, 2013Ldr MedicalIntersomatic cage, intervertebral prosthesis, anchoring device and implantation instruments
US8361148Sep 8, 2008Jan 29, 2013Marc I. MalbergMethod for stabilizing spine
US8372150Aug 2, 2010Feb 12, 2013Warsaw Orthpedic, Inc.Spinal device and method
US8377098Jan 19, 2007Feb 19, 2013Flexuspine, Inc.Artificial functional spinal unit system and method for use
US8465546Feb 16, 2007Jun 18, 2013Ldr MedicalIntervertebral disc prosthesis insertion assemblies
US8486148Jan 16, 2009Jul 16, 2013Life Spine, Inc.Hinged spinal fusion cages
US8491653Oct 4, 2010Jul 23, 2013Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Intervertebral body fusion cage with keels and implantation methods
US8512408Dec 17, 2010Aug 20, 2013Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Flexiable spinal implant
US8523912Oct 22, 2007Sep 3, 2013Flexuspine, Inc.Posterior stabilization systems with shared, dual dampener systems
US8597358Jan 19, 2007Dec 3, 2013Flexuspine, Inc.Dynamic interbody devices
US8603168Mar 8, 2006Dec 10, 2013Flexuspine, Inc.Artificial functional spinal unit system and method for use
US8603170Jul 31, 2012Dec 10, 2013Stryker SpineExpandable intervertebral implant
US8647386Jul 22, 2010Feb 11, 2014Charles R. GordonExpandable intervertebral implant system and method
US8753398May 20, 2005Jun 17, 2014Charles R. GordonMethod of inserting an expandable intervertebral implant without overdistraction
US8771284Sep 15, 2012Jul 8, 2014Ldr MedicalIntervertebral disc prosthesis and instrumentation for insertion of the prosthesis between the vertebrae
US8795365Mar 24, 2008Aug 5, 2014Warsaw Orthopedic, IncExpandable devices for emplacement in body parts and methods associated therewith
US8795375Jul 23, 2009Aug 5, 2014Resspond Spinal SystemsModular nucleus pulposus prosthesis
US8801788May 20, 2013Aug 12, 2014Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Expandable medical implant
US8858635Feb 4, 2005Oct 14, 2014Ldr MedicalIntervertebral disc prosthesis
US8858636 *Apr 9, 2010Oct 14, 2014DePuy Synthes Products, LLCIntervertebral implant
US8864832Aug 16, 2007Oct 21, 2014Hh Spinal LlcPosterior total joint replacement
US8888852Jun 15, 2009Nov 18, 2014Hh Spinal LlcSpinal athroplasty device and method
US8940022Jan 19, 2007Jan 27, 2015Flexuspine, Inc.Artificial functional spinal unit system and method for use
US8940051Mar 4, 2013Jan 27, 2015Flexuspine, Inc.Interbody device insertion systems and methods
US8974532Aug 22, 2011Mar 10, 2015Ldr MedicalIntervertebral disc prosthesis
US8979932Nov 29, 2010Mar 17, 2015Ldr MedicalIntervertebral disc prosthesis
US8986384Jan 28, 2013Mar 24, 2015Resspond Spinal SystemsMethod for stabilizing spine
US9039774Feb 22, 2013May 26, 2015Ldr MedicalAnchoring device and system for an intervertebral implant, intervertebral implant and implantation instrument
US9044337Jun 29, 2012Jun 2, 2015Ldr MedicalAnchoring device and system for an intervertebral implant, intervertebral implant and implantation instrument
US9050194 *May 5, 2010Jun 9, 2015Stryker SpineExpandable spinal implant apparatus and method of use
US9066811Jan 19, 2007Jun 30, 2015Flexuspine, Inc.Artificial functional spinal unit system and method for use
US9078765Apr 3, 2012Jul 14, 2015Ldr MedicalVertebral cage device with modular fixation
US9216096Apr 23, 2015Dec 22, 2015Pinnacle Spine Group, LlcIntervertebral implants and related tools
US9301853Apr 7, 2011Apr 5, 2016DePuy Synthes Products, Inc.Holder for implantation and extraction of prosthesis
US9320610Aug 16, 2012Apr 26, 2016Stryker European Holdings I, LlcExpandable implant
US9333088Aug 28, 2014May 10, 2016DePuy Synthes Products, Inc.Intervertebral implant
US9333095Feb 4, 2008May 10, 2016Ldr MedicalIntervertebral disc prosthesis, surgical methods, and fitting tools
US9364338Mar 6, 2013Jun 14, 2016Resspond Spinal SystemsModular nucleus pulposus prosthesis
US9380932Nov 1, 2012Jul 5, 2016Pinnacle Spine Group, LlcRetractor devices for minimally invasive access to the spine
US9393130May 20, 2014Jul 19, 2016K2M, Inc.Adjustable implant and insertion tool
US9463091Jan 12, 2015Oct 11, 2016Ldr MedicalIntervertebral implant having extendable bone fixation members
US9492288Feb 20, 2014Nov 15, 2016Flexuspine, Inc.Expandable fusion device for positioning between adjacent vertebral bodies
US9517144Apr 24, 2014Dec 13, 2016Exactech, Inc.Limited profile intervertebral implant with incorporated fastening mechanism
US9526627Nov 15, 2012Dec 27, 2016Exactech, Inc.Expandable interbody device system and method
US9579124Apr 2, 2012Feb 28, 2017Flexuspine, Inc.Expandable articulating intervertebral implant with limited articulation
US9585762Oct 9, 2014Mar 7, 2017K2M, Inc.Expandable spinal interbody spacer and method of use
US9603715Apr 30, 2015Mar 28, 2017Stryker European Holdings I, LlcExpandable spinal implant apparatus and method of use
US9649203Apr 23, 2015May 16, 2017Pinnacle Spine Group, LlcMethods of post-filling an intervertebral implant
US9668876Jul 16, 2014Jun 6, 2017Spinal Elements, Inc.Expandable interbody device
US20050021144 *Jul 22, 2004Jan 27, 2005Malberg Marc I.Expandable spinal implant
US20070050031 *Aug 23, 2006Mar 1, 2007Hamid KhosrowshahiSpinal implant and implant inserter
US20070123989 *Oct 18, 2006May 31, 2007Synthes (U.S.A.)Method and instruments to treat spondylolisthesis by an anterior minimally invasive approach of the spine
US20070260314 *May 1, 2007Nov 8, 2007Ashok BiyaniTransforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage
US20070288018 *Apr 6, 2007Dec 13, 2007Ebi, L.P.Expandable spinal implant
US20080319481 *Jun 25, 2007Dec 25, 2008Moore Mark RSpondylolisthesis correction apparatus and method
US20090030458 *Sep 8, 2008Jan 29, 2009Ebi, LlcMethod for stabilizing spine
US20090182431 *Jan 16, 2009Jul 16, 2009Butler Michael SSpinal Interbody Fusion Cages Providing Variable Anterior/Posterior Profiles
US20090240335 *Mar 24, 2008Sep 24, 2009Arcenio Gregory BExpandable Devices for Emplacement in Body Parts and Methods Associated Therewith
US20090299478 *Jun 3, 2008Dec 3, 2009Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Lordotic Implant for Posterior Approach
US20100286779 *May 5, 2010Nov 11, 2010Thibodeau Lee LExpandable spinal implant apparatus and method of use
US20110029085 *Oct 23, 2009Feb 3, 2011Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Flexible spinal implant
US20110251690 *Apr 9, 2010Oct 13, 2011Roger BergerIntervertebral implant
US20150328013 *Jul 27, 2015Nov 19, 2015DePuy Synthes Products, Inc.Expandable Vertebral Body Replacement System and Method
USD626233May 4, 2009Oct 26, 2010Stryker SpineExpandable intervertebral implant
CN103356310A *Mar 28, 2012Oct 23, 2013北京爱康宜诚医疗器材股份有限公司Adjustable interbody fusion cage
WO2009092030A1 *Jan 16, 2009Jul 23, 2009Life Spine, Inc.Spinal inetrbody fusion cages providing variable anterior/posterior profieles
WO2016040125A1 *Sep 3, 2015Mar 17, 2016Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Spinal implant system and method