|Publication number||US20040259449 A1|
|Application number||US 10/489,057|
|Publication date||Dec 23, 2004|
|Filing date||Aug 29, 2002|
|Priority date||Sep 10, 2001|
|Also published as||CA2459901A1, CN1304686C, CN1553980A, DE10144307A1, DE50208019D1, EP1432869A1, EP1432869B1, WO2003023136A1|
|Publication number||10489057, 489057, PCT/2002/9624, PCT/EP/2/009624, PCT/EP/2/09624, PCT/EP/2002/009624, PCT/EP/2002/09624, PCT/EP2/009624, PCT/EP2/09624, PCT/EP2002/009624, PCT/EP2002/09624, PCT/EP2002009624, PCT/EP200209624, PCT/EP2009624, PCT/EP209624, US 2004/0259449 A1, US 2004/259449 A1, US 20040259449 A1, US 20040259449A1, US 2004259449 A1, US 2004259449A1, US-A1-20040259449, US-A1-2004259449, US2004/0259449A1, US2004/259449A1, US20040259449 A1, US20040259449A1, US2004259449 A1, US2004259449A1|
|Inventors||Thierry Onder de Linden, Jurgen Budenbender|
|Original Assignee||Onder De Linden Thierry, Jurgen Budenbender|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (8), Referenced by (6), Classifications (16), Legal Events (1)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
 The present invention relates to backing fabrics for papermaking machine felt with improved properties, preferably improved wear resistance and in particular improved dimensional stability during paper manufacture.
 Processes for the production of monofilaments from thermoplastic polymers are in principle known (c.f. Handbuch der Kunststofftechnik II, C. Hanser Verlag, Munich 1986, pp. 295-319).
 Paper production on modern papermaking machines involving sheet forming (forming part), mechanical dewatering (pressing part) and thermal dewatering (drying part), smoothing and rolling is known from Lehrbuch der Papier- und Kartonerzeugung (VEB Fachbuchverlag 1987, p. 190 ff).
 Fabrics employed in the forming part consist predominantly of polyester monofilaments. In order to improve the abrasion resistance monofilaments of polyamides together with polyester monofilaments in an alternating pick-and-shot arrangement on the machine side are also used.
 In the pressing part the basic fabrics for the pressing felt or wet pressing felt are produced almost exclusively from polyamide fibres and polyamide monofilaments, preferably from pure polyamide-6 but also from polyamide-66. A nonwoven layer of polyamide fibres is needled onto the base fabrics consisting of polyamide monofilaments in a second processing stage and this layer is thereby mechanically anchored in the said base fabric.
 Dry screens on the other hand normally consist of polyester monofilaments that are largely stabilised by means of suitable products, for example Stabaxol (a commercial product available from Rheinchemie, Mannheim), against hydrolytic decomposition.
 The commercially available press felts made from polyamide-6 monofilaments have on account of their high abrasion resistance, compressibility and very good recovery of the felts after passing through the press nip major advantages compared to press felts of other materials, e.g. polypropylene, polyester, wool or other types of polyamide (e.g. PA 6.10, PA 6.12).
 A significant disadvantage of these press felts is however the lack of dimensional stability in the event of machine downtimes. The materials polyamide-6 and polyamide-66 absorb up to 10 wt. % of water in a wet environment. The length and thickness of the monofilaments changes with the absorption of water. In particular the change in length means that in the event of malfunctions or downtimes of the papermaking machine due to other causes the felts have a different weight and fabric density in the wet zones than in the dry zones. After dealing with the malfunctions and starting up the papermaking machine again no high-quality paper can be produced with these felts until the felts have re-established the same water content and the same density and width over the whole area.
 Furthermore the change in width often means that the full working width of the papermaking machine cannot be utilised since the felts extend beyond the maximum width of the machine and are damaged at their edges.
 There has therefore been no lack of attempts to improve the dimensional stability of press felts in wet/dry cycles.
 One possibility is to use other fabric constructions.
 The use of other materials in the warp of the fabrics is widespread, for example the replacement of polyamide-6 or polyamide-66 monofilaments by filaments which absorb substantially less moisture under high ambient moisture conditions and in which the dimensions of the fabrics consequently change only slightly. Monofilaments of polyamide 6.10 and polyamide 6.12 have proved suitable.
 A disadvantage of these fabrics and of the felt produced therefrom is however the significantly reduced wear resistance when used in papermaking machines compared to fabrics of polyamide-6 monofilaments and felts produced therefrom.
 It has now surprisingly been found that the disadvantages of the lack of wear resistance can be avoided and can be replaced by the advantages of a good dimensional stability if the warp of the basic fabric consists of combination twisted yarns that contain monofilaments of polyamide-6 as well as also monofilaments of polyamide 6.10 or polyamide 6.12.
 The object of the invention is achieved if in the production of the backing fabric there are used combination twisted yarns with 1 to 20 monofilaments of polyamide-6 and 20 to 1 monofilaments of polyamide 6.10, polyamide 6.12, polyamide 11 or polyamide 12 in the warp instead of twisted yarns of polyamide-6 monofilaments.
 Moreover, the fabrics produced in this way also have a significantly improved economic utility since the raw materials polyamide-6 and polyamide-66 are industrially more readily available and can be re-used in many recycling systems after economic utilisation.
 A particular advantage of the process according to the invention is that twisted yarns of an even number of the materials used as well as also an odd number of these materials can be twisted with one another. In this way specific, calculable dimensional changes of the twisted yarns or fabrics produced therefrom can be established and the economic utility can optionally also be improved.
 The following examples demonstrate the advantages according to the invention of the combination twisted yarns, without restricting the possibilities of these combinations.
Monofilament Commercial Product Diameter Polyamide 6 X 201 0.20 mm Polyamide 6.10 ATF 2311 0.20 mm Polyamide 6.12 ATF 23 0.20 mm
 Manufacturer: Bayer Faser GmbH
 Pre-Twisted Yarns
 Pre-twisted yarns of construction 0.20 mm×2 were produced on an Allma Saurer AZB-T type yarn twisting machine at 304 revolutions/metre
 Experimental part V 1: X 201/X 201, 0.20 mm×2, S 304 revolutions/metre
 Experimental part V 2: X 201/ATF 2311, 0.20 mm×2, S 304 revolutions/metre
 Experimental part V 3: ATF 2311, 0.20 mm×2, S 304 revolutions/metre
 Experimental part V 4: ATF 2300 0.20 mm×2, S 304 revolutions/metre
 Pre-twisted yarns of polyamide 6, experimental part V 1, were processed on an Allma Saurer AZB-T type yarn twisting machine to form a balanced annular twisted yarn of construction 0.2 mm×2×2 with S 304/Z 260 revolutions.
 The twisted yarn was then fixed tension-free in a heating cabinet for 5 minutes at 160° C. and cut into pieces of length 1.00 m. The exact length and the weight of the sample pieces was determined. Following this the samples were then stored tension-free for 24 hours in a water bath at 20° C., removed from the water, dried, and the change in length as well as the weight were determined.
 The twisted yarn was then dried for 24 hours at 80° C. in a circulating air drying cabinet and the change in length and weight loss were again determined. This cycle was repeated three times. The changes in length between the wet/dry cycles are summarised in Table 1.
 The abrasion resistance of the twisted yarns was determined by an abrasion test developed in-house. For this, the monofilaments and twisted yarns are drawn cyclically under a defined load over a grinding roller until they break. The number of grinding cycles is a measure of the abrasion resistance.
 Pre-twisted yarns of polyamide 6.10 (ATF 2311), experimental part V 3, 0.20 mm were processed into an annular twisted yarn as described in comparison example 1. The change in length after wet/dry alternating cycles as well as the abrasion resistance were also determined as described in comparison example 1. The results are summarised in Table 1.
 Pre-twisted yarn V 1 and pre-twisted yarn V 2 were processed into an annular twisted yarn as described in comparison example 1. The annular twisted yarn had a proportion of PA 6.10 of 25%. The change in length after wet/dry alternating cycles as well as the abrasion resistance was also determined as described in comparison example 1. The results are summarised in Table 1.
 Pre-twisted yarn V 1 and pre-twisted yarn V 3 were processed into an annular twisted yarn as described in comparison example 1. The annular twisted yarn had a proportion of PA 6.10 of 50%. The change in length after wet/dry alternating cycles as well as the abrasion resistance was also determined as described in comparison example 1. The results are summarised in Table 1.
 Pre-twisted yarn V 2 and pre-twisted yarn V 2 were processed into an annular twisted yarn as described in comparison example 1. The annular twisted yarn had a proportion of PA 6.10 of 50%. The change in length after wet/dry alternating cycles as well as the abrasion resistance was also determined as described in comparison example 1. The results are summarised in Table 1.
 Pre-twisted yarn V 3 and pre-twisted yarn V 2 were processed into an annular twisted yarn as described in comparison example 1. The annular twisted yarn had a proportion of PA 6.10 of 75%. The change in length after wet/dry alternating cycles as well as the abrasion resistance was also determined as described in comparison example 1. The results are summarised in Table 1.
 Pre-twisted yarn V 4 and pre-twisted yarn V 1 were processed into an annular twisted yarn as described in comparison example 1. The annular twisted yarn had a proportion of PA 6.12 of 50%. The change in length after wet/dry alternating cycles as well as the abrasion resistance was also determined as described in comparison example 1. The results are summarised in Table 1.
TABLE 1 Abrasion Propn. Propn. Water Water Behaviour PA 6 PA 6.10 Absorption 1) Elongation 1) min-max % % % % Cycles Comp. Ex. 1 100 0 6.8 3.0 260-350 Comp. Ex. 2 0 100 2.8 1.2 220-290 Example 1 75 25 6.0 2.7 260-320 Example 2 50 50 5.2 2.0 250-295 Example 3 50 50 4.9 1.9 255-305 Example 4 25 75 3.8 1.6 225-290 Propn. PA 6.12 Example 5 50 50 5.1 2.1 245-300
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4564985 *||Oct 7, 1982||Jan 21, 1986||Nippon Felt Co., Ltd.||Felt for paper manufacture and method for producing the same|
|US4874660 *||Apr 14, 1988||Oct 17, 1989||Albany Research (Uk) Limited||Paper machine felts|
|US4891040 *||Jul 20, 1988||Jan 2, 1990||Mitsuboshi Belting Ltd.||Woven fabric belt|
|US5164251 *||Nov 28, 1990||Nov 17, 1992||Albany International Corp.||Paper machine felts|
|US5194121 *||Nov 29, 1989||Mar 16, 1993||Nippon Felt Co. Ltd.||Needled felt for papermaking use|
|US5244543 *||Jan 14, 1992||Sep 14, 1993||Asten Group, Inc.||Belt filter press fabric|
|US5783501 *||Oct 10, 1994||Jul 21, 1998||Ems-Inventa Ag||Paper machine felts|
|US6175996 *||Jul 22, 1999||Jan 23, 2001||Weavexx Corporation||Method of forming a papermakers' felt|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7344074 *||Apr 8, 2002||Mar 18, 2008||Nokia Corporation||Mobile terminal featuring smart card interrupt|
|US8289159||Apr 24, 2007||Oct 16, 2012||Qualcomm Incorporated||Wireless localization apparatus and method|
|US8406794||Apr 25, 2007||Mar 26, 2013||Qualcomm Incorporated||Methods and apparatuses of initiating communication in wireless networks|
|US8600373||Apr 26, 2007||Dec 3, 2013||Qualcomm Incorporated||Dynamic distribution of device functionality and resource management|
|US8644396||Apr 17, 2007||Feb 4, 2014||Qualcomm Incorporated||Waveform encoding for wireless applications|
|US8654868||Apr 17, 2007||Feb 18, 2014||Qualcomm Incorporated||Offloaded processing for wireless applications|
|International Classification||D03D15/00, D21F7/08, D03D7/00|
|Cooperative Classification||Y02W30/62, Y10T442/30, D21F7/08, B29B17/00, D10B2211/02, D03D7/00, D10B2331/02, B29L2031/7092, B29K2277/00, D10B2331/04|
|European Classification||D21F7/08, D03D7/00|
|Aug 16, 2004||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: BAYER FRASER GMBH, GERMANY
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ONDER DE LINDEN, THIERRY;BUDENBENDER, JURGEN;REEL/FRAME:015062/0308;SIGNING DATES FROM 20040224 TO 20040322